S A M P L E R E... THE PROVISION OF IN SERVICE ABOVE GROUND TANK

SAMPLE REPORT
THE PROVISION OF IN SERVICE ABOVE GROUND TANK
INSPECTION USING PHONON DIAGNOSTIC METHOD
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
CONTENTS
1. REPORT SUMMARY.....………………………………………………..... 3
2. TANK PHONON DIAGNOSTICS…………..…………………………… 3
2.1. Basic data of the tank…………….…………………………………… 3
2.2. Analysis of tank operation data………………………………………
7
2.3. Diagram of tank phonon diagnostic ………………………….……… 8
2.4. Developing phonon calibration – drawings of the tank……...……… 9
2.5. Phonon monitoring of tank………………………………………...… 10
2.6. Analysis of phonon diagnostics results……………………………… 11
2.7. Calculation of tank remaining life with due account of phonon
diagnostics data………………..……………………………………… 15
2.8. Diagnostic of thickness…………..…………………………………… 17
2.9. Thermal phonon diagnostic……...…………………………………… 19
2.10. Stressed state diagnostic………...…………………………………… 20
3. TANK GEOMETRY DIAGNOSTICS…………………………………… 21
3.1. Geometry diagnostics scheme………………………………………… 21
3.2. Bottom settlement evaluation…………………………………………. 21
3.3. Calculation of deviations from tank bottom plane…………………… 24
3.4. Shell plumbness evaluation……...……………………………………
26
3.5. Shell ovality evaluation………………..………………………………
27
4. TABLE OF TANK DEFECTS……………………………………………. 28
5. EVALUATION OF DEFECTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FFS
REQUIREMENTS………………………………………………...………
6. EVALUATION OF TANK REMAINING LIFE…………………………
29
30
7. CONCLUSION ON TECHNICAL STATE OF THE TANK.…………… 31
8. RECOMMENDATIONS ON FURTHER OPERATION AND
REPAIR…………………………………………………………………… 32
2
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
1. REPORT SUMMARY
The technical report on the tank contains the following:
- Diagrams and results of phonon diagnostics of the technical condition of
the tanks, defects, thicknesses, stressed state and remaining life of the
tanks;
- Tank geometry diagnostics results;
- Table of defects and their classification;
- Defect assessment in accordance with the requirements of FITNESSFOR-SERVICE (FFS);
- Evaluation of remaining life in accordance with the FFS requirements;
- Conclusion on tank technical state;
- Recommendation on further tank operation.
2. TANK PHONON DIAGNOSTICS
2.1. Basic Data of the Tank
2.1.1. The tank has been constructed according to the standard API 620, 9th
edition, Annex 2. The basic data of the tank is determined proceeding from the
analysis of the drawings, operational data and from polling the operating personnel.
On the basis of this data there have been developed tables of tank parameters
(Tables 2.1-2.6), 2D data (Fig. 2.2), 3D computer construction for further
calculations and visualization of phonon diagnostics data.
Table 2.1
TANK PREHISTORY
Number
Location
Serial number
Date of construction
Operating life
Purpose
Product
Operating mode
Breakdowns
Repairs
Previous inspections
3
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Fig. 2.1. General view of the tank
Table 2.2
NOMINAL DIMENSIONS AND TANK DATA
3
Nominal volume, m
Inner diameter (ID), mm
Outer diameter (OD), mm
Shell height, mm
Height of ring , mm
Design pressure, bar
Design temperature, °C
Corrosion allowance, mm
Specific weight
Filling level for hydrotesting, mm
Maximum filling level, mm
Normal filling level, mm
External insulation
Inner insulation
4
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Table 2.3
SHELL AND ROOF NOZZLES
Elements
Shell
Roof
Nozzle name
Designation
Temperature connection
Manhole w/davit
Manhole w/davit
Level connection
Foam chamber connection
Drain w/dip pipe to sump
Spare w/blind fl.
Pump return w/mixing jet
Liquid outlet
Liquid inlet w/diffuser
Overflow
Level connection
Center vent
Circulating vent
Circulating vent
Circulating vent
Circulating vent
Circulating vent
Circulating vent
Circulating vent
Manhole w/davit
Orientation,
degrees
T
M3
M1
L1
F
E
D
C
B
A
X
L2
W
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
V7
M2
115
315
315
170
60
100
15
90
0
225
170
0
270
315
0
45
90
180
225
135
Outside
diameter, mm
(in.)
Shell thickness,
mm
48.26(1 1/2)
609.6(24)
609.6(24)
48.261 1/2
114.3(4)
60.3(2)
141.3(6)
141.3(6)
141.3(6)
88.9(3)
141.3(6)
48.26(1 1/2)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
323.8(12)
609.6(24)
5.08
9.52
9.52
5.08
8.56
5.53
8.56
8.56
8.56
7.62
8.56
5.08
9.52
9.52
9.52
9.52
9.52
9.52
9.52
9.52
9.52
Table 2.4
MATERIALS AND THICKNESSES OF PLATES
Component
Number of plates, pcs.
Course 1
Course 2
Course 3
Course 4
Course 5
Course 6
Course 7
Course 8
Course 9
Bottom
Roof
Material
Thickness, mm
7.9
4
JIS G 3101 SS400
6.5
10
19
5.5
7.9
Table 2.5
MATERIAL DATA
Part
Material
Yield point
Y, MPa
Break point
T, MPa
Maximum allowable stresses of
courses 1 and 2/next courses S,
MPa
Efficiency factor
Shell, bottom,
roof
JIS G 3101
SS400
245
400
172/189
1
5
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Table 2.6
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF WORKING MEDIUM
No.
1
2
Medium
N-Butanol
Water
Composition, %
Specific weight
Corrosiveness
99.925
0.03
0.8
low
Roof
Shell development
Bottom
Scheme – exploded view of tank with conventional symbols
6
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
2.2. Analysis of Tank Operation Data
Legend
product level
85% from working level
average
cycles
Level, %
Working level
average
Time, days
Fig. 2.2. Histogram of tank loads and cycles
After considering the results of operating modes analysis (in accordance with
API 579-1/ASME FSS-1 2007 (FFS), Annex B1, B1.5.2, Table B1.8) it was
established, that complete cycles N
FT
= 60, and incomplete cycles (by 15 % less
than complete ones) N PO = 3. In accordance with the results of cyclic recurrence
analysis the total number of cycles amounted to N FT+ N PO = 63.
Thus, the tank operates in the cyclic mode. As for the date of this diagnosis it
has run 400 cycles and does not need calculation for material fatigue.
7
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
2.3. Diagram of Tank Phonon Diagnostics
2.3.1
The tank phonon diagnostics has been carried out using eightchannel circuit diagram of phonon sensors (PFE) forming six groups. PFE fixation
on the construction was performed by special-purpose magnetic holders. The
diagram of phonon diagnostics is presented on Fig. 2.3.
2.3.1.1.
The first group was installed in the area of the bottom and
consisted of PFE No. 1 at 0, No. 2 at 90, No. 3 at 180, No.
4 at 270.
2.3.1.1.1.
The second group was installed in the area of the roof and
consisted of PFE No. 5 at 0, No. 6 at 90, No. 7 at 180, No. 8
at 270.
2.3.1.1.2.
The third group diagnoses a quarter of the shell from
0– 90and consists of PFE No. 1 at 0, No. 4 at 90in the area
of the bottom and No. 5 at 0, No. 8 at 90in the area of the roof.
2.3.1.1.3.
The fourth group diagnoses a quarter of the shell from
90– 180and consists of PFE No. 4 at 90, No. 2 at 180in the
area of the bottom and No. 8 at 90, No. 6 at 180in the area of
the roof.
2.3.1.1.4.
The fifth group diagnoses a quarter of the shell from
180– 270and consists of PFE No. 2 at 180, No. 3 at 270in
the area of the bottom and No. 6 at 180, No. 7 at 270in the
area of the roof.
2.3.1.1.5.
The sixth group diagnoses a quarter of the shell from
270– 0and consists of PFE No. 3 at 270, No. 1 at 0in the
area of the bottom and No. 7 at 270, No. 5 at 0in the area of
the roof.
2.3.2 For phonon diagnostics there was used one system of phonon
diagnostics (SFD) “PHONON-8K”. The system has eight data registration
channels, is delivered with “FDT-8” software package for phonon diagnostics data
analysis and is of explosion-proof version. In the area of the tank there was
arranged the phonon diagnostics station equipped with a table for SFD installation,
8 cable routes of 100 m length for connection of 8 PFE, electrical cable 220 V
equipped with industrial systems for hooking up, canvas for rain protection.
8
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
phonon emission sensors
channel number
cable routes
phonon diagnostics station
Fig. 2.3. Diagram of phonon diagnostics for the tank
2.4. Developing Phonon Calibrations – Drawings of the Tank
2.4.1. Phonon calibrations–drawings are precise developments of diagnosed
tank components, including welds of plates, nozzles, manholes. Separately
calibrated are the bottom, roof, and tank shell. The shell is divided into four
sections of 90 degrees in a clockwise direction. The results of phonon calibrations
are presented on Fig. 2.4.
9
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Channel
Channel
Results of phonon calibration for tank roof R622.CLB
Results of phonon calibration for tank bottom
B-622.CLB
Channel
Channel
Results of phonon calibration for tank shell 0-90
S1-622.CLB
Results of phonon calibration for tank shell 90-180
S2-622.CLB
Channel
Channel
Results of phonon calibration for tank shell 180-270
S3-622.CLB
Results of phonon calibration for tank shell 270-0
S4-622.CLB
Fig. 2.4 Phonon calibration results
2.5. Phonon Monitoring of Tank
2.5.1. Phonon monitoring of all tank components was carried out
simultaneously in real time, by recording data on a hard disk. The results and
duration of phonon monitoring are presented in Table 2.7.
10
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Table 2.7
RESULTS AND DURATION OF PHONON MONITORING
Mode
Phonon
diagnostics
results file
1
bottom
B-622.CLB
B-622.RES
2
Shell 0-90
S1-622.CLB
S1-622.RES
3
Shell 90-180
4
Shell 180-270
S3-622.CLB
S3-622.RES
5
Shell 270-360
S4-622.CLB
S4-622.RES
6
Roof
R-622.CLB
R-622.RES
26.04.09
Duration
Phonon
diagnostics
data file
Component
Plane
Data
Phonon
calibration
file
#
11 hr 7 min
S2-622.CLB
Test262.dta
S2-622.RES
2.5.2. In the course of phonon calibration, phonon energy emission
(radiation) areas – phonon active areas (FAA) are plotted in real time by the
means of software on phonon calibrations – drawings in the places of their
origination.
Active areas of phonon emission correspond to such defects as general and
local metal loss, pitting corrosion, crack-like defects, laminations, etc. By the
location of these areas on phonon calibration – drawing it is possible to localize
spatially and fix the places of defect formation.
2.6. Analysis of Phonon Diagnostics Results
2.6.1. The results of phonon diagnostics are presented in Table 2.8. The
development of the tank with the results of phonon diagnostics is presented on Fig.
2.5.
2.6.2. The coordinates of the Defect on the tank shell are specified relative to
the nearest weld crossing. Defect coordinates for the roof and bottom are specified
relative to the center.
11
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Table 2.8
MAPS AND TABLES OF PHONON DIAGNOSTICS RESULTS
Maps of phonon diagnostics
Defect table
Map and table of phonon diagnostics results for the bottom
Defect FAA
number number
Number
of acts

FAA
energy
concentra
tion
Activity
coeff,
KFFA
FAA
hazard
level
Defect type
FAA
area
mm2

Channel
FAA
coordinates,
mm
X
Y
D9d
1
0.3
98
1.59
ND
Local metal
113205
loss
-153
117
D10d
2
0.2
184
1.93
ND
Local metal
113105
loss
376
108
D11d
3
0.6
115
1.61
ND
Local metal 113205
loss
407
196
Graph of energy
distribution in FAA
Map and table of phonon diagnostics results for the roof
FAA
Defect numbe r
number
D8k
Number
of acts

1
0.6
FAA
energy
concentra
tion

102
Activity
coeff,
KFFA
1.25
FAA
hazard
level
ND
Defect type
FAA
area
mm2
Local metal
174114
loss
FAA
coordinates,
mm
X
Y
73
31
Graph of energy
distribution in FAA
Channel
Map and table of phonon diagnostics results for the shell 0-90
FAA
Defect numbe
number
r
D4s
1
Number
of acts

0.1
Channel
12
FAA
energy
concentra
tion

64
Activity
coeff,
KFFA
FAA
hazard
level
0.77
ND
Defect type
FAA
area
mm2
FAA
coordinates,
mm
X
Local metal
235451 -2111
loss
Y
463
Graph of energy
distribution in FAA
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Maps of phonon diagnostics
Defect table
Map and table of phonon diagnostics results for the shell 90-180
FAA
Defect numbe
number
r
D5s
1
Number
of acts

0.2
FAA
energy
concentra
tion

53
Activity
coeff,
KFFA
FAA
hazard
level
0.82
ND
Defect type
Local metal
loss
FAA
coordinates,
mm
FAA
area
mm2
X
548221
Graph of energy
distribution in FAA
Y
1842 553
Channel
Map and table of phonon diagnostics results for the shell 180-270
FAA
energy
concentra
tion

Activity
coeff,
KFFA
FAA
hazard
level
1.1
312
2.98
ND
Internal
defect
2
1
99
2.74
ND
3
0.2
401
1.32
ND
FAA
Defect numbe
number
r
Number
of acts

D1s
1
D2s
D1s
Defect type
FAA
coordinates,
mm
FAA
area
mm2
X
Y
0.4
-186
0
Internal
defect
0.24
0
343
Local metal
loss
548222
-2073
588
Graph of energy
distribution in FAA
Channel
Map and table of phonon diagnostics results for the shell 270-0
Defect
number
FAA
numbe
r
Number
of acts

FAA
energy
concentr
ation

Activity
coeff,
KFFA
FAA
hazard
level
Defect type
Internal
defect
D3s
1
0.9
799
2.61
ND
D7s
2
0.5
2064
1.55
ND
Channel
13
FAA
area
mm2
0.4
Local metal
235451
loss
FAA
coordinates,
mm
X
Y
-2623
0
-2270
722
Graph of energy
distribution in FAA
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
shell development diagram
roof
shell development
course 9
course 8
course 7
course 6
course 5
course 4
course 3
course 2
course 1
LEGEND
- bottom weld number
- roof weld number
- vertical weld number
- circular weld number
- defect number
bottom
Fig. 2.7. Results of tank phonon diagnostics
14
- defect
SCALE
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Table 2.8
SUMMARY TABLE OF DEFECTS ACCORDING TO THE RESULTS OF TANK PHONON
DIAGNOSTICS
Tank
Section name
Section
element
Course 1
shell
Defect
ratio,
KFFA
Defect dimensional
specifications, mm
mm
Scaling
factor kT
coeff,
T
К FFA
X
Y
Width, c
Area m2
Dfect type
Hazard level
Length, s Depth, d
Weld
C1
D1s
2,99
0,11
3,09
-186
0
0.5
0.8
0.8
0.4*10-7 Weld defect unhazardous
Weld
L1-3
D2s
2,75
0,11
2,85
0
343
0.4
0.6
0.7
2.4*10-7 Weld defect unhazardous
Weld
C1
D3s
2,61
0,11
2,72
-2623
0
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.4*10-7 Weld defect unhazardous
Plate
P 1-5
D4s
0,77
0,11
0,88
-2151 463
620
495
0.2
0.235
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
Plate
P 1-5
D5s
0,83
0,11
0,93
-1842 553
1450
487
0.2
0.548
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
Plate
P 1-5
D6s
1,33
0,11
1,43
-2073 588
1400
518
0.3
0.548
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
Plate
P 1-5
D7s
1,55
0,11
1,66
-2270 722
609
485
0.4
0.235
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
D8k
1,26
0,11
1,36
31
539
428
0.3
0.174
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
D9d
1,59
0,11
1,70
-153 117
436
345
0.4
0.113
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
D10d
1,93
0,11
2,04
376
108
436
345
0.5
0.113
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
D11d
1,61
0,11
1,72
407
196
436
345
0.4
0.113
Local
metal loss
unhazardous
Course 5
Roof
Bottom
Plate P8-R
Plate P6-B
73
2.7. Calculation of Tank Remaining Life with Due Account of Phonon
Diagnostics Data
2.7.1. Tank remaining life with due account of the data of phonon diagnostics
is estimated for each defect and calculated according to the formula:


i
(P
n
P
)
r
(t
ФД
2
u


min h Д ) 
R y c

 T
 
ФД
T
h Д K FFA
h ФД – defect depth according to phonon diagnostics data;
T
K FFA
– defect activity coefficient, with account for equipment operating life;
T – period of service;
Pu – excess pressure in the space under the tank roof;
15
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
r – radius of tank shell course median surface (since the thickness of tank
shell is negligible in comparison to the radius, for calculation one takes tank outer
radius),
c – service factor: for the condition of product storage c=0,7 for course 1
and c=0,8 for other courses;
Ry – design material strength according to yield point;
P – hydrostatic pressure at the level of defect location;
t imin – minimal shell thickness according to diagnostics data;
2.7.2. The results of remaining life calculation are presented in Table 2.10.
Table 2.10
RESULTS OF REMAINING LIFE CALCULATION FOR TANK WITH
ACCOUNT FOR PHONON DIAGNOSTICS DATA
Coordinate,
mm
Defect
number
Activity
coefficient,
T
К FFA
X
Y
Defect
depth
z, distance from
the bottom to the
level of defect
location, m
P, hydrostatic
pressure, kgf/mm2
Remaining
life, years
D1s
2.99
-186
0
0.8
0
0.0097
11.1
D2s
2.75
0
343
0.7
1.843
0.0083
14.2
D3s
2.61
-2623
0
0.7
0
0.0097
14.9
D4s
0.77
-2151
463
0.2
7.963
0.0034
161.1
D5s
0.83
-1842
553
0.2
8.053
0.0033
152.4
D6s
1.33
-2073
588
0.3
8.088
0.0033
64.0
D7s
1.55
-2270
722
0.4
8.222
0.0032
40.0
D8k
1.26
73
31
0.3
12.869
0
45.2
D9d
1.59
-153
117
0.4
0
0.0097
47.0
D10d
1.93
376
108
0.5
0
0.0097
30.4
D11d
1.61
407
196
0.4
0
0.0097
46.4
2.7.3. According to the data of calculation the remaining life of the tank with
due account of phonon diagnostics data is 11 years.
16
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
2.8. Diagnostics of thickness
2.8.1. Thickness map according to diagnostics results
roof
cross-section
along minimal thicknesses of
the roof
shell development
cross-section
along minimal thicknesses of
the shell
course 9
course 8
course 7
course 6
course 5
course 4
course 3
course 2
course 1
thickness color
scale, mm
bottom
cross-section
along minimal thicknesses of
the bottom
Legend
- thickness, mm
- tank element minimal
thickness
Scale
Fig. 2.8. Tank thickness map
17
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
2.8.2. Corrosive wear map of the tank
roof
Maximum corrosive
wear of the roof
3,64%
shell development
Maximum
0°corrosive wear,
%
course 9
course 8
course 7
course 6
Maximum
corrosive
wear of
the shell
4,62%
course 5
course 4
course 3
course 2
course 1
bottom
Maximum corrosive
wear of the bottom
5,06%
Legend
5,0 - corrosive wear, %
7,0 - maximum corrosive wear of
tank element
Scale
Fig. 2.9. Corrosive wear map
18
corrosive wear scale
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
2.8.3. Thickness diagnostics results
Table 2.10
GENERAL METALL LOSS EVALUATION RESULTS
Tank component
tmin,
tam,
COV,
%
FCA,
mm
t am - FCA
Level 1 criteria
tam - FCA ≥ tmin
Bottom
Shell course 1
Shell course 2
Shell course 3
Shell course 4
Shell course 5
Shell course 6
Shell course 7
Shell course 8
Shell course 9
Roof
2.84
2.84
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
7.95
7.85
7.85
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.76
5.65
0.50
0.43
0.41
0.48
0.48
0.66
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.93
0.62
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
1.5875
6.36
6.27
6.27
5.07
5.07
5.06
5.07
5.07
5.07
5.18
4.06
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
The results of total corrosive wear evaluation for tank elements in accordance with
Fitness - For - Service meets the criteria of FFS Part 4 Level 1. Coefficient of variation
is less than 10% and does not exceed 0,9 %.
2.9. Thermal Phonon Diagnostics
Shell top
Liquid level
Foundation
Fig. 2.10. Tank shell temperature distribution map at the moment of performing diagnostics
Temperature
Density, %
Liquid level
Shell height, m
Liquid
Temperature, °C
Fig. 2.11. Tank shell temperature distribution
diagram
Fig. 2.12. Tank shell temperature density
distribution diagram
19
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
2.9.1. As per the Results of Thermal Phonon Diagnostics
 Operating temperature conditions of tank operation
= 27÷30 ºC
 Maximum tank shell temperature density in the area of filling
= 28 ºC
 Maximum tank shell temperature density in the remaining part of the tank
= 29,5 ºC
 Product level at the moment of performing diagnostics
= 9,9 m
2.10. Stressed state diagnostics
zone 1
weld
P1-1/P2-1
zone 2
weld
P3-1/P4-1
Fig. 2.13. Scheme of stressed state diagnostics
Table 2.11
STRESSED STATE DIAGNOSTICS RESULTS
#
Place of diagnostics
Zone 1 – Weld P1-1/P2-1
Zone 2 – Weld P3-1/P4-1
Scale
Map
of stressed state
Map
of stress
concentrators
result
Unsafe stresses not found
Unsafe stresses not found
2.10.1. Stress State Diagnostics Results
According to the results of stressed state diagnostics unsafe stresses were not
found.
20
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
3. TANK GEOMETRY DIAGNOSTICS
3.1. Geometry Diagnostics Scheme
Measurements of settlement, plumbness, ovality were carried out in the
process of tank operation. The tank was filled to the level of 80%. The scheme for
geometry diagnostics is presented on Fig. 3.14. Settlement measurements were
performed at the points H1 – H12 in 30° steps, clockwise, total of 12 points.
Measurements of plumbness, ovality were performed at the points V1 – V48, total
of 48 points.
- points of settlement measurement
- points of plumbness and ovality
measurement
- horizontal generating line and
distance from the bottom
Fig. 3.14. Geometry diagnostics scheme
3.2. Bottom Settlement Evaluation
Evaluation of bottom settlement was carried out in accordance with API Std
653, Annex B. The graph of results is presented on Fig. 3.15.
The graph of data measured along the whole perimeter of the tank is
represented by brown line, approximation curve – by blue line. Approximation
with certainty R2=0.92 was carried out using polynomial method according to the
formula y = 2,32E-15x4-1.37E-10x3+2.52E-06x2-0.01335+7028.234.
21
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
22
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
23
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Depth, mm
Maximum inclination of the bottom
LEGEND
Measured points of bottom
settlement
Optimal polynomial curve
Minimal inclination of the bottom
Tank circumference, mm (deg)
Fig. 3.15. Graph of tank bottom settlement (inclination)
The tank bottom is inclined within the limits of design requirements.
Inclination orientation from 60 (upper point) to 240 (lower point). Maximum
bottom inclination according to the results of measurements is 47 mm at 240.
3.2.1. Bottom Settlement Evaluation Results
Tank bottom settlement was not found. Sloping bottom of the tank
corresponds to the design.
3.3. Calculation of Deviations from Tank Bottom Plane
Depth, mm
On the graph of Fig. 3.16, there are found deviations from the plane of tank
bottom inclination.
Legend
deviation from bottom inclination plane
above polynomial curve
deviation from bottom inclination plane
below polynomial curve
Tank circumference, mm (deg)
Fig. 3.16. Graph of deviations from bottom plane
24
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
To determine admissibility of inclination nonuniformity one performed
calculations according to API 653 (4_EDITION), B.2.2.5.
Table 3.12
CALCULATIONS OF DEVIATIONS FROM TANK BOTTOM PLANE
#
Distance along the
perimeter,
mm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1,00
2080,26
4160,52
6240,77
8321,03
10401,29
12481,55
14561,81
16642,06
18722,32
20802,58
22882,84
24963,10
Degrees along the
perimeter,
deg
Measured
values of
inclination,
mm
Calculated
values of
inclination,
mm
0
22
21
30
6
3
60
0
0
90
2
6
120
23
17
150
32
28
180
35
37
210
41
42
240
47
42
270
39
39
300
28
33
330
36
27
360
22
21
Maximum deviation from tank bottom plane- S max
Maximum allowable deviation - S a
Deviation from
the plane
S, mm
U,
mm
-0,22
1,82
-1,16
-5,31
5,18
3,09
-2,87
-1,98
3,38
-1,17
-6,07
8,20
-0,22
-6,98
2,51
0,59
-7,32
6,29
1,93
-3,42
-2,24
4,96
0,18
-9,59
12,67
-6,98
12,67 mm
31 mm
3.3.1 Calculation Results for Deviations from the Plane
Measured maximum deviation from tank bottom plane is 12,67 mm which
is less than the allowable value of 31 mm.
3.4 Shell Plumbness Evaluation
Measurement of shell deviations from the vertical plane has been performed
on 12 vertical generating lines in 30° steps along the perimeter of tank clockwise.
The results of measurements are presented on graphs in Fig. 3.17. Maximum
allowable deviation from tank shell in the upper point is 128 mm.
Roof
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 0
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 30
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 60
25
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Roof
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
Bottom
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 90
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 120
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 150
Roof
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
Bottom
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 180
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 210
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 240
Roof
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Roof
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
point-by-point
measurements
Ideal vertical
(-) – inward tank
(+) – outward tank
Bottom
Bottom
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness, mm
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 270
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 300
Out-of-plumbness
on generating line 330
Fig. 3.17. Graphs of tank shell out-of-plumbness
26
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
3.4.1 Shell Plumbness Evaluation Results
Maximum measured tank shell deviation is 10 mm inward of the tank, 6 mm
outward of the tank and does not exceed maximum allowable value in the upper
point which is equal to 128 mm.
3.5 Shell Ovality Evaluation
Radius, mm
Measurement of shell ovality has been performed by measuring tank radii on 4
horizontal generating lines 0 m, 4290 mm, 8580 mm, 12860 mm. There have been
performed 12 measurements on each generating line in 30° steps along the tank
perimeter in a clockwise manner. The results of measurements are presented on the
graph of Fig. 3.18.
Legend
Horizontal generating line #1 – 12860 mm
Horizontal generating line #2 – 8580 mm
Horizontal generating line #3 – 4290 mm
Horizontal generating line #4 – 0 mm
Ideal generating line of tank shell
Fig. 3.18. Graph of tank ovality
According to the graph the determined total ovality with maximum diameter
(Dmax) is equal to 8000 mm in the direction 60- 240, minimal diameter (Dmin)
is equal to 7955 in the direction 150-330. The directional ovality agrees with
bottom inclination.
Table 3.13
CALCULATION OF DEVIATIONS FROM OVALITY DIAMETER 60- 240
#
of generating line
Radius
60, mm
Radius
240, mm
Mean radius,
mm
Diameter, mm
Deviation
60
Deviation
240
1
2
3
4
4010
4011
4002
4005
3990
3987
3987
3989
3988
3989
3990
3991
8000
7998
7989
7994
22
22
12
14
2
-2
-3
-2
Table 3.14
CALCULATION OF DEVIATIONS FROM OVALITY DIAMETER 150- 330
#
of generating line
Radius
60, mm
Radius
240, mm
Mean radius,
mm
Diameter, mm
Deviation
60
Deviation
240
1
2
3
4
3975
3979
3980
3982
3980
3980
3981
3984
3988
3989
3990
3991
7955
7959
7961
7966
-13
-10
-10
-9
-8
-9
-9
-7
27
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
Total ovality per radius from the side 60 is 22 mm. Maximum admissible
ovality per radius for the tank of diameter less than 12 m is Tolmax=13 мм (FFS,
Part 8, Table 8.7). Evaluation of tank ovality has been performed in accordance
with FSS, Part 8, p. 8.4.3.3, level 2.
Table 3.15
EVALUATION OF TANK OVALITY LEVEL 2
Dmax,
mm
7955
Dmin,
mm
8000
Dm,
m
m
7977
P,
MPa
0.125
t c,
mm
7.85
Sa,
MPa
160
Rorb = 0.02
m,
MPa
6.33
Hf
Cs

1.5
0.5
0.28
Ey,
MPa
210000
RSF = 1
Rb = 0.02
Rbs = -1
RSFa=0.9
Condition RSF>RSFa met. Ovality is acceptable according to retained strength condition.
3.5.1 Shell Ovality Estimation Results
Ovality is admissible for further operation and does not cause hazardous
secondary (additional) stresses, but may have an impact on operation of internal
floating roof.
4. TABLE OF TANK DEFECTS
Table 4.16
TABEL OF TANK DEFECTS ACCORDING TO PHONON DIAGNOSTICS RESULTS
28
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
4.2. Defect Analysis and Classification Results
4.2.1. According to the results of phonon diagnostics there have been detected
11 defects:
4.2.1.1. 8 defects of corrosive origin. Defects were formed in the process of
tank operation. Corrosive defects were classified according to FFS part 5 as local
metal loss.
4.2.1.2. 3 defects of welds. Defects were formed before operation. Welding
defects were classified according to FFS part 9 as crack-like defects.
5. EVALUATION OF DEFECTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FFS
REQUIREMENTS
Table 5.17
620
1450
1400
609
539
436
436
436
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.40
tmin, tc,
mm mm
LTA
tmm,
mm
Rt
s
LOSS,
mm
Lmsd,
mm
189
189
189
189
189
189
189
189
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
6.40
6.40
6.30
6.20
5.30
7.60
7.50
7.60
0.96
0.96
0.94
0.92
0.93
0.94
0.92
0.94
3.19
3.14
3.34
3.13
3.08
1.97
1.97
1.97
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
463.00
553.00
588.00
722.00
10.00
457.00
293.00
365.00
5.01
5.01
5.01
5.01
4.01
6.41
6.41
6.41
Lmsd1.8 
(Dt c
495
487
518
485
428
345
345
345
S,
MPa
tmm-FCA2

Limiting crteria
Rt0. 2
depth, d
D4s
D5s
D6s
D7s
D8s
D9d
D10d
D11d
width, c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Dimensional
characteristics, mm
length, s
No.
Defect number
EVALUATION OF LOCAL METAL LOSS LEVEL 1
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
RSF MFH
MFHr
c
TSF
0.98
0.98
0.97
0.96
0.96
0.98
0.97
0.98
13.42
13.42
13.33
13.24
12.87
12.87
12.87
12.87
4.00
9.35
9.02
3.93
3.88
2.48
2.48
2.48
1.02
1.02
1.04
1.05
1.04
1.03
1.03
1.03
12.87
12.87
12.87
12.87
12.87
12.87
12.87
12.87
Evaluation
result by level 1
meets
meets
meets
meets
meets
meets
meets
meets
Table 5.18
EVALUATION OF CRACK-LIKE DEFECTS LEVEL 1
№
Defect
number
2c
a
t
T,°C
Material
1
2
3
D1s
D2s
D3s
0,5
0,4
0,5
0,8
0,7
0,7
7,8
7,8
7,8
35
35
35
SS400
SS400
SS400
Yield
point
MYS
245,00
245,00
245,00
Tref
T-Tref+56
2csc
2c2csc
Evaluation result by
level 1
31,00
31,00
31,00
60,00
60,00
60,00
10,52
6,48
10,52
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
meets
meets
meets
5.1. Defects Evaluation Results
5.1. According to the results of defects evaluation using Fitness-For-Service
method:
5.1.1. 8 defects, classified as local metal loss, meet the criteria of FFS part 5
Level 1.
5.1.2. 3 defects, classified as crack-like defects, meet the criteria of FFS part 9
Level 1.
5.2. All 11 defects of the tank are admissible for further operation.
29
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
6. EVALUATION OF TANK REMAINING LIFE
Evaluation of remaining life for tank components with the defects of the
type “total metal loss” has been performed on the basis of FFS, Part 4, p. 4.5.
Table 6.19
EVALUATION OF REMAINING LIFE WITH DEFECTS OF TYPE GENERAL METALL LOSS
No.
Tank component
tam, mm
K
tmin, mm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Bottom
Shell course 1
Shell course 2
Shell course 3
Shell course 4
Shell course 5
Shell course 6
Shell course 7
Shell course 8
Shell course 9
Roof
7.95
7.85
7.85
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
5.65
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2.84
2.84
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
Crate,
mm/yrs
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
Rlife, yrs
92.0
150.4
481.9
373.8
373.8
74.7
373.8
373.8
373.8
373.8
70.9
Remaining
life, years
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
Evaluation of remaining life for tank components with the defects of type
local metal loss has been carried out on the basis of FFS, Part 5, p. 5.5.
Table 6.20
EVALUATION OF REMAINING LIFE WITH DEFECTS OF TYPE LOCAL METALL LOSS
#
Tank component
Bottom
Shell course 5
Shell course 5
Shell course 5
Shell course 5
Roof
Defect number
Rt
RSF
D9s
D10s
D11s
D4s
D5s
D6s
D7s
D8s
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.81
0.82
0.90
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.90
Rlife,
yrs
128.00
101.00
128.00
130.00
130.00
95.00
75.00
73.00
Remaining life,
years
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
over 20
6.1. Remaining Life of Crack-Like Defects
In accordance with FSS paragraph 9.4.2 defects No. D1s – D3s do not affect
further safe operation of the tank.
6.2. Remaining Life Evaluation Calculation Results
6.2.1. According to the results of remaining life calculation:
- in accordance with FSS tank remaining life is 20 years;
- according to the results of remaining life calculation with due account of the
data of phonon diagnostics - 11 years.
6.2.2. Remaining life of the tank of Butanol plant is 11 years.
30
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
7. CONCLUSION ON TECHNICAL STATE OF THE TANK
7.1. The tank was
built
as
per
the
standard
API
620 9th ED.
ADDENDUM 2 in August, 2000 and corresponds to the design
documentation.
7.2. The tank is operated in cyclic mode. As for the moment of diagnosis it
has run 63 cycles.
7.3. Foundation, drainage and grounding systems are in satisfactory state.
Anchors, visible part of the bottom, shell and shell elements, roof and
roof elements are in satisfactory state, except for detected damage of
protective coating, corrosion in the places of damage.
7.4. Phonon diagnostics determined 11 defects of tank elements: 3 defects of
the bottom, 7 defects of the shell, 1 defect of the roof. Out of them 8
defects are of the type of local metal loss, 3 defects of the type of
crack- like defects. Evaluation of the defects according to FFS
criteria has determined that the defects are not hazardous and do not
affect safe operation.
7.5. Corrosion rate of tank components does not exceed 0,06 mm/year.
7.6. Operating temperature of the tank is 30C and does not exceed the
design one.
7.7. Unsafe stresses and stress concentrators have not been determined.
7.8. Tank bottom settlement has not been determined. Deviation of tank
bottom from horizontal is satisfactory. Deviation of tank shell from
vertical is satisfactory. Tank ovality is satisfactory as per FFS criteria.
7.9. Calculated remaining life is 11 years.
7.10. The tank of Butanol plant fits for further service without change of
operating modes.
31
SAMPLE REPORT OF TANK
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (1035028-D)
8. RECOMMENDATIONS ON FURTHER OPERATION AND REPAIR
8.1. Remove corrosion and recover protective coating in the places of
damage on tank components in accordance with section 2.3 of the
current report.
8.2. Carry out visual inspection and diagnostics of tank geometry in 5 years
in April, 2014 in accordance with the procedures of API 653 p. 6.3,
Annex B; FFS Part 8, p. 8.4.3.3.
8.2.1. Carry out phonon diagnostics in 10 years in April, 2019 to determine
real technical state in accordance with the procedures of API 653 p. 6.4.
32