Current Transfer Patterns of California Community College Students Alice van Ommeren Research, Analysis and Accountability Unit California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Importance of Transfer • Approximately 55% of CSU graduates and 30% of UC graduates were community college transfers. • Transfer is the most common declared goal of first-time students enrolling in our system. • Transfer related outcomes are the most frequent outcome in Scorecard Completion Rate. • Transfer continues to be a central mission of community colleges, despite expanding goals. Objectives • Report the most recent trends in transfer and differences among student populations. • Describe the various methodologies for measuring and capturing transfer. • Update on Associate of Transfer Degrees and HBCU Transfer Degree Guarantee Project. • Discuss how transfer is being included in other systemwide initiatives. Data and Term Definitions • Volume of Transfers – Number of students transferring in a particular year. – Snapshot in time • Transfer Rates – Percentage of transfer seeking students who transfer within # years. – Cohorts of students • Transfer Prepared – Number of students with 60 CSU/UC transferrable units. – CCC metric, transfer proxy Volume of Transfer • Number of students transferring to CSU and UC is always captured based on their reports and their methodology. Volume of Transfer • Number of students transferring to CSU and UC is always captured based on their reports and their methodology. Volume of Transfer • Number of students transferring to CSU and UC is always captured based on their reports and their methodology. • CSU has been volatile since 2007-08 and UC has been more stable. Volume of Transfer • Number of students (=>12 units) transferring to In-State Private (ISP) and Out-of-State (OOS) institutions is based on a match with National Student Clearinghouse Volume of Transfer • Number of students (=>12 units) transferring to ISP and OOS is based on a match with National Student Clearinghouse Volume of Transfer • Number of students (=>12 units) transferring to ISP and OOS is based on a match with National Student Clearinghouse • Number of transfers to ISP and OOS have decreased, steady decline for ISP since 2009-10 Transfers by Destination, 2012-13 California State University University of California In-State-Private (ISP) Out-of-State (OOS) Out-of-State “Top 10” Transfer Destinations Out-of-State Institutions 2012-13 Ashford University* 824 Arizona State University 689 Kaplan University 592 University Of Maryland 533 Grand Canyon University* 488 Brigham Young University 370 Western Governors University (Utah) 288 University Of Nevada-Las Vegas 231 Liberty University (Virginia) 190 Portland State University 188 In-State Private “Top 10“ Transfer Destinations Out-of-State Institutions 2012-13 University Of Phoenix* 3,768 National University 1,585 University of Southern California 743 Devry University-California* 637 California Baptist University 532 University Of La Verne 504 Fresno Pacific University 371 Academy Of Art University* 337 California College-San Diego 269 Azusa Pacific University 250 Sector of Choice CSU % ISP % OOS % UC % African American 29.5 33.2 32.3 5.1 Asian 48.8 10.9 8.9 31.5 Filipino 48.5 25.4 14.3 11.8 Hispanic 53.5 23.7 13.2 9.5 Pacific Islander 41.7 19.9 28.6 9.8 White 44.8 19.4 23.2 12.5 Transfer Rates • Methodology developed in 2001 by CCCCO & Transfer Data Technical Workgroup (TDTW). • Published and peer reviewed by Bahr, Hom and Perry in 2005 and refined over the years. • Student educational goal is not reliable indicator of intent (change mind, exaggerate, updated) • Course taking patterns based on units and types of courses is used to establish student intent. Transfer Rates • Percentage of first-time students with at least 12 units and attempted transfer level math or English who transferred after X years (6 years) to a public or private four-year institution. Transfer Rates • Percentage of first-time students with at least 12 units and attempted transfer level math or English who transferred after X years (6 years) to a public or private four-year institution Transfer Rates • Percentage of first-time students with at least 12 units and attempted transfer level math or English who transferred after X years (6 years) to a public or private four-year institution • Cohort sizes have increased, transfer outcomes have not kept up. Transfer Pool Proxies • Transfer Prepared • Completed 60 UC/CSU transferable units • 77.0% transfer or complete • Transfer Directed • Completed Transfer Math and English • 63.5% transfer or complete • Transfer Ready • Completed Math, English, and 60 units, both • 84.5% transfer or complete h Transfer Prepared “60 units” Transfer Directed “Math/English” Transfer Ready “Both” 2003-2004 78,398 84,239 57,451 2004-2005 82,758 85,847 60,420 2005-2006 83,882 83,730 60,930 2006-2007 83,247 84,740 60,920 2007-2008 84,294 87,491 61,994 2008-2009 89,662 96,120 66,415 2009-2010 93,886 96,888 69,137 2010-2011 99,923 97,880 72,535 2011-2012 103,442 99,102 75,268 Transfer Rates 2007-08 African American 35.7 Asian 55.6 Filipino 36.5 Hispanic 30.3 Pacific Islander 35.9 White 42.3 Overall 39.6 Transfer Rates 2001-02 4-Year Rate 24.7 5-Year Rate 33.4 6-Year Rate 39.6 7-Year Rate 44.7 8-Year Rate 48.3 9-Year Rate 50.4 10-Year Rate 52.0 Transfer Velocity Project • Study by the RP Group (2010) with key findings on factor that promote transfer among CCCs. • Literature review, case studies and statistical modeling of institutional factors. • Includes strategies and approaches fro improving transfer. • http://www.rpgroup.org/css/TVP.html Transfer Velocity Project • Institutional Factors – Strong transfer culture on campus, effective use of support services. – Relationships with high schools and four-year institutions. • Student Behaviors – Course taking patterns that include Math and English – Transfer as a goal, strong academic performance – Associate degree completion as a predictor – Full-time, summer enrollment and swirlers Volume of Associate Degrees for Transfer 14,000 11,839 12,000 10,000 8,000 5,366 6,000 4,000 2,000 807 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Volume of AD-T’s by Type 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Associate in Science (A.S.-T) 72 1,742 4,938 Associate in Arts (A.A.-T) 735 3,624 6,901 807 5,366 11,839 Total Source: CCCCO Data Mart, as of 03/24/2015 LAO Report Data Recommendations • LAO - Nonpartisan fiscal and policy advisor • Report - Recommendations to the Legislature • Data - Admissions and Student Outcomes – CSU provide data on students admitted – Monitor CCC development of new tools to track students intending to transfer – CSU make available data on CSU units taken and graduation rates for AD-T transfers Historically Black Colleges and Universities • Transfer Guarantee Program with nine HCBUs starting in Fall 2015 • Guarantee of transfer for students with: – Associates Degrees of Transfer – IGETC requirements – CSU General Education – 30 CSU/UC transferable units • Includes Data Agreement HBCU Data Agreement • Student descriptives and process measures, such as course completion, term persistence and course of study. • Success of students is measured by achieved outcomes and includes degrees conferred, time to completion, and continuation to an advanced education. • Colleges provide the CCCCO with a written summary of the results of the analysis annually. Transfer and CCCCO Initiatives Student Success Scorecard Associate Degrees of Transfer System Goals Historically Black College and Universities Transfer Guarantee Project • Institutional Effectiveness • Student Equity Plans • • • • Contact Information Alice van Ommeren [email protected] Transfer Data Resources http://extranet.cccco.edu/Divisions/TechResearchI nfoSys/Research/Transfer.aspx
© Copyright 2024