1. No category

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
IA No. 100/2015
CA No. _______/2015 in
Appeal No. 20/2011
[Under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the order dated
12.08.2011 passed by the Competition Commission of India in Case No. 19/2010]
CORAM
Hon’ble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi
Chairman
In the matter of:
Shri Amit Jain
... Appellant
Vs.
…Respondents
M/s DLF Limited
Appearances :
Shri Amit Jain, Appellant in person .
Shri Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Shri H. S.
Chandhoke, Ms. Kanika Chaudhary Nayar and Ms. Nidhi Singh
Prakash, Advocates for the respondents
ORDER
The delay in depositing the fee is condoned. The appeal may now be
registered and listed for admission hearing.
[G.S.Singhvi]
Chairman
19th May, 2015
COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
UTPE No. 113/1992
CA No. 207/1992
CORAM
Hon’ble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi
Chairman
In the matter of:
M/s Surya Scooters Private Limited
... Complainant
Vs.
M/s Greaves Cotton and Company Limited and others
Appearances :
…Respondents
Shri Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Advocate with Shri Ankit Garg,
Advocate for the Complainant.
Shri R. S. Suri, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda,
Advocate for the Respondents
ORDER
Shri Sabharwal, learned Senior Counsel says that he was asked by a
party to appear in this case only at 10 p.m. yesterday and he has difficulty in
apprising the Tribunal with the facts by referring to the relevant pages. He requests
for 2 days adjournment.
Shri Suri says that he does not have any objection.
In peculiar with the facts, the case is adjourned. To be taken up on Friday i.e.
22nd May, 2015 as the first case.
[G.S.Singhvi]
Chairman
19th May, 2015
COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
UTPE No. 113/2007
CORAM
Hon’ble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi
Chairman
In the matter of:
Radhika Lall and Others
... Complainant
Vs.
M/s Build Aids Private Limited and Others
Appearances :
…Respondents
Shri Om Prakash, Advocate for the Complainant
Shri M D Kamal, Advocate for the Respondent
ORDER
Arguments heard. Order reserved.
[G.S.Singhvi]
Chairman
19th May, 2015
COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
UTPE No. 07/2004
CA No. 24/2008
CORAM
Hon’ble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi
Chairman
In the matter of:
M/s Ajit Bhardwaj
... Complainant
Vs.
M/s DLF Universal Limited and Others
Appearances :
…Respondents
Shri K. K. Rai, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Bankey Bihari,
Advocate for the Complainant.
Shri Aditya Narain assisted by Shri Shashank Bhushan, Shri
Arnav Narain and Ms. Seema Sood, Advocates for the
Respondents
ORDER
Shri Aditya Narain states that his client has made available the
approved building plans but the same are required to be sorted out for locating the
site in question and that exercise is likely to take some time. He requests that
further hearing of the case may be adjourned by 4 weeks.
MA 15/2015
This is an application by the complainant for issue of directions to
Respondent No. 1 – Non applicant No. 1 to place on record Annexures to sale deed
dated 9.12.2013 as mentioned in para 3 of the application.
Shri Aditya Narain, learned Counsel for the respondents states that so far as
the Item No. I is concerned, the Tribunal has already issued direction for production
of the approved building plans. He further states that documents referred to at Item
Nos. II, III and IV are part of the commercial buyers’ agreement executed by the
parties and the same is available in Vol. 4 of the paper book.
In view of the statement made by Shri Aditya Narain, no order is required to
be passed on this application and the same is disposed off.
List the case on 15.7.2015.
[G.S.Singhvi]
Chairman
19th May, 2015