2011 Below Deck Brewing A Feasibility Study of Opening a Microbrewery Neal Bloom Decision Sciences 12/8/2011 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 Business Description .................................................................................................................... 6 Industry Description ...................................................................................................................... 7 Financial Projections ................................................................................................................... 15 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 17 Appendix A.................................................................................................................................. 19 Appendix B.................................................................................................................................. 20 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................ 22 Executive Summary Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of starting a microbrewery that serves quality and unique beers in the Los Angeles area. Business Summary Proposed name of organization “ Below Deck Brewing” Initial capacity of 2300 barrels a year Beer will be sold strictly for off-site consumption only Initial target customer is 21-39 year olds, with interest in craft beer Community involvement through brewing education and sponsored events Industry Summary The brewing industry is a $100 billion industry, craft brew only accounts for $7 billion There has been significant growth in the microbrewery/ craft brewery industry in the last 20 years, especially on the West Coast Los Angeles is far under-represented in craft breweries per city Location & Demographic Summary Multiple independent cities evaluated in Los Angeles county, avoiding Los Angeles city for ease of permit approvals: Culver City, Venice, Santa Monica, San Fernando & Malibu Projected growth of up to 13 million in Los Angeles County by 2050 Currently eight microbreweries exist in Los Angeles County Financial Summary Approach: gathered estimates from area costs (rent, taxes, etc) along with known figures from related relevant businesses to project costs and revenues Projected 1st year net profit of $14,582 Approximately 2230 barrels of beer needed to sell to cover initial setup and 1st year costs Startup funding needs to be established towards $500,000 Conclusion: A microbrewery startup is a viable option to open in Los Angeles. It would benefit from a growing and unsaturated market. Funding options will need to be figured, but it is a profitable business. Introduction “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.” ~Benjamin Franklin The culinary arts have long been an accepted art form. Spending three times a day to eat, it is little wonder why people are so interested in food. With the advent of mass media, the appeal has spread to record highs. The beverage industry shares a similar gain in prominence. Alcohol has always had a special place in society because of its mind altering effects, whether controversial or vastly popular. Wine making has become a larger and larger industry, with entire regions devoted to its production and competitions held to compare the quality. Beer has been made historically almost as long as wine, with evidence showing that the Egyptians taught the Greeks how to make beer. (HorstDornbusch, 2005) There is even an Egyptian Goddess of Beer, Tenenit. (Mark, 2011). Beer was long made in the abbeys by Franciscan Monks and still is in certain areas of Belgium. Germany has its own beer industry, with the entire country Figure 1 Goddess Tenenit receives the holy beer following the Reinheitsgebot, specific Purity Laws, since 1516, which kept all beers to use the exact same ingredients until 1987. (German Beer Institute, 2008) In America, Anheiser Busch has long been the largest beer brewer for the last hundred years. When Prohibition became law, it wiped out many small breweries that had their place as the town tavern and meeting place. At the end of Prohibition, regulation was setup that only allowed for large manufacturers of beer. This kept small new breweries from opening up until 1979 when beer making was deregulated. Since then, the beer revolution has been getting stronger and stronger in America. (Kain, 2011) The 20’s and 30’s age group has latched onto the craft beer industry which has fueled its added popularity. The idea that one brewery’s Heffeweizen concoction could Figure 2 The Rise of Craft Brewing in the U.S. taste different than another’s is still a new idea, even with the wine industry proving that point again and again. The more people care about the quality and flavor of their beer, the more craft breweries will exist. The art of making beer is not one of difficult skill. There are really only four main ingredients to beer: water, malt, hops, and yeast. What makes each beer distinct could be the kind of hops, yeast, and malt used. The water from a different region can also affect flavor. In the craft industry it is also becoming customary to add other ingredients into beer, whether fruit syrup, herbs, or the West Coast favorite, triple the typical hops. The variation leaves the taster wondering what else is out there and the tease has been set. It is with this allure that has started a grassroots industry that has spread like wildfire up and down the West Coast, with exception to Los Angeles. LA has been late to the game and has only a handful of breweries that don’t have distribution outside of the city. In a city where rush hour is a way of life, stresses of the day only compound on themselves, everyone could use a friend and a beer every once and a while. That’s what Below Deck Brewing hopes to offer; a community establishment for adults that leaves a positive impact to those around. This feasibility study will take these factors into account and shows why LA deserves its craft beer. Included in the report is a industry study, Los Angeles- specific demographic study, a break even analysis & SWOT analysis. Business Description Proposed Names “B’Lo Dek Brewery” – A conglomerate of the last names of Neal Bloom & Kasia Gondek “Below Deck Brewing” – An easier marketed name of above, with nautical theme “Below Deck Ale House” – A spin off bar from the original brewery The business name Below Deck Brewing will be used for this paper. Mission Statement Below Deck Brewing offers local jobs, fresh beer, and a positive influence on the community. Organization Description Manufacturing unique craft beer styles for off plant local consumption Industry Adult Beverages Manufacturer and Selling of Beer Target Customer Middle Class Angelinos interested in trying something new. Services What Makes Below Deck Brewing Different Most bars serve beers that have been ordered through a distributor and possibly the beers had to travel a very far distance. With a local brewery like Below Deck, the beer is made nearby and delivered with the freshest taste available. It also costs less to ship and deliver as well as create less waste. Initial Objectives Attract new customers to craft beer through new style beer tasting, beer education, community involvement and engagement. Reach out to the other Los Angeles breweries to create a city-wide community that will benefit from teaming together and marketing as a city guild. Growth by name and acknowledgements by winning awards at local beer competitions and word of mouth. Industry Description Definition The American Beer Brewing industry can be segmented into two: the large breweries and craft breweries. For the point of this project, the two sects will take on a rivalry at times, an antagonist/protagonist role, and David and Goliath at other times. The Brewer’s Association defines an American Craft Brewery as small, independent, and traditional with 6 million barrels of beer or less of annual production. According to rules of alternating production, a brewer is someone who produces beer. Production of flavored malt beverages are not considered beer regarding this definition. To be independent means to be less than 25% owned or controlled by a non-craft brewer of alcoholic beverages. Being a traditional brewer means to have at least 50% by volume in either all malt beers or in beers which use adjuncts to enhance rather than lighten flavor. Some concepts under this definition is that the hallmark of craft brewing is innovation. Interpreting historic styles with unique twists or develop brand new styles. It is typical in the craft beer industry to be highly involved in the local community through philanthropy, product donations, volunteerism, and sponsoring of events. Current Trends and Statistics Shown in Figure is the amount of breweries operating in the U.S. since the end of Prohibition, with current amount of breweries in operation the largest since the late-1800s Breweries in Operation 2,000 1933 to 2010 1,500 1,000 500 1933 1935 1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 0 TOTAL BREWERIES Figure 3 American Breweries 1933-2010 What this chart does not show is the type of each brewery, which is shown in Figure 4. 1800 1600 1400 1200 CRAFT BREWERIES 1000 LARGE BREWERIES 800 600 400 200 1933 1937 1941 1945 1949 1953 1957 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 0 Figure 4 Number of Large and Craft Breweries by Year Though the industry has had a boom since the mid-80’s, 81% of beer sold in the year 2000 was made by one of the big three breweries, Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. In 1980 there were 45 breweries in the U.S, and in 2010 there were 1693 breweries. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011) But with the large increase in breweries, total production did not follow the same trend. In 1979, total domestic production of beer in the U.S. was 183 million barrels while in 2010 total production was 194 million barrels. Accounting for the import and export (which has grown from 3% to 13% of the total consumption from 1980 to 2010) markets comes to a total U.S. consumption of 208,349,068 gallons of beer in 2010. In 2010, the overall beer industry was down 1% in sales from 2010 but craft beer sales were up 15% in the first half of 2011. The overall U.S. beer market is a $100 billion industry, while craft beer accounted for only $7.6 billion. With craft breweries though, because of distribution laws and general size of batches, it is a better estimate to look at smaller markets to understand true trends for the average brewery, though has been said, the majority of Americans live within ten miles of a craft brewer. (Shutterstock, 2010) In 2010, of the 2131 breweries with active permits, California ranked 1st in most breweries with 318. This was an increase from 2009 of 13 new breweries in the state. ( Tax and Trade Bureau, 2004 to 2010, 2010). There is also a split of different beer producers within the craft beer realm, as seen below in Figure 5 Figure 5 2009 & 2010 split of craft beer producers The different split is based on number of barrels and where they are sold. To be considered a microbrewery, the brewery makes less than 15,000 barrels a year. A brewpub is one that sells 25% or more of its beer on the premises, most of the time paired with a restaurant. Regional craft brewery makes between 15,000 and 60,000 barrels while also using 50% or more malt based beverages. A large brewery is considered large at 6 million barrels a year or more. As it is shown, large breweries did have much growth between 2009 and 2010, while regional craft, brewpub, and largely microbreweries did. At current state, microbreweries have opened up in larger cities using the city as a rally point. For example, in San Diego, there exist 36 breweries and brewpubs and collectively they call themselves the San Diego Brewers Guild. Together they put on beer festivals where attendees can try every brewery Figure 5 San Diego Beer Week and SD Brewer’s represented, meet the brewers and compare Guild thank the public for 2011 Beer Week companies. This is largely the way to introduce new beers to the customer. What has become commonplace for craft brewers is a “week” of pushing beer through the community called Beer Week. Through collaboration with “beer bars” (bars that only serve specialty craft beers) and brewers, events are put on nightly for the industry to have a more public face. The reality is beer weeks now last up to 2 weeks, sometimes longer. In San Diego, Beer Week entails only San Diego establishments, whereas Los Angeles Beer Week, while markets itself as a 14 day celebration of beer culture, though features many more San Diego breweries to allow for the LA public to meet the San Diego scene. This is reasonable as Los Angeles has only 6 microbreweries in the city with a population 3.8 million, while San Diego has 1.3 million. It would seem that there is a disparity between number of breweries in Los Angeles and a market that has proven it is hungry for craft beer. Figure 7 LA Beer Week Marketing Industry Direction The industry has proven that over the last 20 years, it can grow. It has lasted through several recessions and still appears strong today. California has maintained it rank as state with the largest amount of breweries, but prestige and leadership of the industry are not necessarily within the state. The largest beer festival in the U.S. is the Great American Beer Festival in Colorado each summer and the largest craft brewery is the Boston Beer Company out of Massachusetts. If California wants to maintain its edge, it will need breweries to come together to lead the state in the future. As the larger microbreweries continue to find prosperity, they will inherently grow larger and probably will become a larger distributing house for other beers, as is seen with Stone Brewery. Stone is one of the largest regional craft breweries of San Diego and has recently become a distributer of other national microbreweries which allows for market penetration. While a great benefit of the industry today is that there is always a new beer to try, this won’t always be the case. At some point, customers will put their flag of allegiance in the ground and drink a certain beer more consistently. This will start to weed out certain microbreweries and create the larger regional craft breweries. For a microbrewery to truly stay small and cater to the local community, it needs to find a way to be sustainable within the community. There needs to be mutual gain for the community and brewery to co-exist. The microbrewery scene would benefit in learning not just how to make profits, but how to cater to what the community needs. Industry Competitiveness Instead of making light beer like the large breweries of the 80’s, microbreweries tried a new approach to competing. Instead of trying to compete in the sales or marketing front, it boasted a freshness of local beer with a larger selection of styles of beer at lower batch sizes. (Stack, 2010) While this has proven to be a great growth area, craft beer is still only 7% of the U.S. beer market. In turn, large breweries are the largest competition. The example of this is how hard distributorship is in Los Angeles. Anheiser-Busch owns a brewery in the San Fernando Valley and therefore to get a new beer into a bar or retailer is incredibly hard. This hurts the craft brewing industry because customers don’t realize they have a choice of beer, not just light beer for the Big Three, which make up over 80% of beer production. What also makes competition is where a brewery is located. Certain cities have welcomes the small American business of craft beers and created incentives. The Federal Government lowered the per barrel excise tax for breweries producing under 60,000 barrels per year from $18 per barrel to $7 in 2005 which has also helped craft beer flourish. There is by no means saturation though, especially in Los Angeles. It turns out the main competition is wholesale distributors. The common method of delivery from brewer to customer is the three-tier system. The brewer sells to wholesaler who sells to retailer. Below Deck Brewing will try to skip the wholesaler in the first few years, by selling to local establishments. The other plan is to sell to wholesaler like Costco who also is the retailer. The microbreweries in Los Angeles are currently: Eagle Rock Brewery in Eagle Rock, Nibble Bit Tabby in Downtown Los Angeles, Golden Road Brewery in Atwater Village, Craftsman Brewery in Pasadena, El Segundo Brewery in El Segundo, Ladyface Ale Company in Agoura Hills, Hangar 24 in Redlands, Ohana Brewing Company in Downtown LA. The Orange County Breweries are: Bootlegger’s Brewery in Fullerton, Beachwood Brewery in Long Beach, Cismontane Brewery in Rancho Santa Margarita, Tustin Brewery in Tustin, The Bruery in Placentia An example of Beachwood Breweries website shows where else to find their beer. Figure 8 Beachwood Breweries beer found at other local locations Of the other locations, only one is in Los Angeles, the rest in San Diego, even though Beachwood Brewery is in Long Beach. It is this favorability that also causes competition. Location and Demographic Location of any business is an important aspect of business planning. With Below Deck Brewing, a storefront is not as important because the kind of business is more industrial and warehouse like. Needing high ceilings would be important for the brewing and holding tanks. Also easy access for supply delivery and keg mobility to be transported to parked delivery trucks would be nice to have. Industrial grade electricity, air conditioning and natural gas will be a necessity and therefore those kinds of utilities should be looked for in finding a location. There will not be anything sold in-house until a few years after start up. But it doesn’t hurt to pick an accessible, safe, and clean area. Since there is a want to have occasional brewery tours and community events at the brewery near a populated area would be ideal, especially if an additional tasting room is achieved a few years down the road as well. Figure 9 The microbreweries in Los Angeles Other advice received is that going through LA’s bureaucracy to get approvals, especially for alcohol-producing permits may be best to avoid. Independent cities thought of to look at are Culver City, Venice, Santa Monica, Malibu, and San Fernando. All areas have commercial warehouse space, though the ones near the ocean have the highest rent, which is something to consider. While the brewery itself may not need to be near high population zones, Culver City, Venice and Santa Monica are on the Westside of LA, with high tourism centers, which Malibu is also a tourist destination and therefore will have plenty of alcoholic beverage dispensing establishments to sell beer to for retail sale. San Fernando is in more of a suburban area and therefore lower rent costs. It is not terribly far to deliver to LA city locations. City Comparisons: Figure 10 Population by age and income 1 In Figure 10 is the age and income break outs for the five cities that were research for potential for Below Deck Brewing headquarters. It’s interesting how many more 25-39 year olds in Venice compared to all other cities. The young workforce relates well to the up and coming craft beer scene, which lends itself well for potential employees. Santa Monica, Venice, and Culver all had the largest group of middle class population which also lends itself to potential customers who more frequent nightlife like bars and clubs. All five cities had a manufacturing industry but San Fernando’s was a much larger percentage of employment per industry per city. Having a larger population with a manufacturing background is good for a job pool. Culver City had the second largest and Venice the third for highest percentage citizen employed in manufacturing. With these simple projections, Venice will be used from this point as 1st choice for place of manufacturing for Below Deck Brewing. Along with being near the water which ties into the name, Venice provides a young, active and engaging community that will hopefully open its arms up fully to a new business. Like other cities, Venice has experienced growth in terms of real estate value, number of businesses opened as well as payroll increase. From the year 2000-2009, median home prices rose from $410,000 to $845,000. Number of business establishments increased from 826 to 1086. The total citywide payroll also increased from $204 million to $348 million. Figure 11 City proper of Venice, CA Location Conclusion After review of many independent cities of Los Angeles, Venice appears to be a city aligned with similar needs and traits of Below Deck Brewery. The growth of the city, the vicinity to water and ample industrial property are all exceptional opportunities for the brewery. The two greatest assets of Venice are its large percent of employees in the manufacturing industries as well as young age range for interest in craft beer as well as potential employment. Financial Projections This section includes financial projections for Below Deck Brewing. It includes estimated start-up costs of equipment for production of beer, per unit cost of each barrel, first year production rates and first year estimated revenue. The majority of the costs are estimates from a range of sources and may not be complete, but are a safe range for an initial starting point. First, a visual introduction to the brewery process: Building Requirements As can be seen in Figure 12, there are a lot of large equipment involved in the direct manufacture of beer. What isn’t shown is the quantity and scale of these pieces of equipment. What is typically needed is about 4000 square feet for a brewery the size Below Deck intends to work with. (Sound Brew) Space will be leased with warehouse facilities like loading dock, ample plumbing, natural gas, commercial electricity, and sewage. In table 1 below, the estimated fixed costs are presented. What is included is $150,000 in used brewing hardware with installation, as well as other equipment for loading. These costs equal a first year fixed cost of $295,600. Figure 12 The typical commercial brewing 1 Brew Equipment and Installation Equipment Depreciation Delivery equipment (trucks, dollys, etc) Yearly Insurance Yearly Rent Legal Fees Sales and Marketing Initial Fixed Costs Total Fixed Costs at end of year $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 150,000.00 15,000.00 20,000.00 3,600.00 48,000.00 5,000.00 54,000.00 229,000.00 295,600.00 Table 1 Fixed Costs for First Year of Operation Certain assumptions should be explained. The equipment depreciation is based on straight line depreciation with an estimated life of 10 years. All fixed costs are also assumed all paid up front, except insurance and rent, which are paid monthly at a fixed rate. In table two, the unit cost is displayed, which accounts for the variable costs of brewing the beer. Cost Factor per barrel Direct Labor Malt Hops Yeast Filter Media CO2 Water Electricity Natural Gas Cleaning Chemical Sewage Charges Federal Excise tax State Excise tax Miscellaneous Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Unit Cost 33.95 17.50 2.00 0.15 0.50 0.30 0.50 2.00 0.70 1.50 1.56 7.00 6.20 0.25 In establishing a unit cost, this is per barrel. It is standard to sell the product in kegs, which is converted by 1 barrel equaling 2.067 kegs. Table 3 shows the revenue by choosing an industry standard of $100 a keg. Price per keg Kegs per barrel Revenue per unit $100 2.06666667 $206.67 Table 3 Revenue Calculation per Unit $74.11 Table 2 Variable Costs per Unit (Richardson, 2003) A base lined production schedule is displayed in Table 4, estimating brewing three days a week. This will allow for two other days of the week to be used for setup, cleanup, kegging, and delivery if the same staff is utilized for brewing and delivery, if possible with a minimal staff in the first year. Barrels Produced per Brew Session Brew Sessions per day Brew Sessions per week Barrels produced per year Table 4 First Year Production Output 15 1 3 2340 With this given output and the unit cost, it is able to establish a first year total revenue of $483,600. Using the Break Even Equation of Break Even Volume = Fixed Costs / (Revenue per Unit- Unit Cost), it is shown that the break even volume is 2230 barrels, which is 110 barrels less than the total year output. Using the Production Schedule in Table 4, Break Even Volume would occur with three weeks left before one complete year of production. Table 5 shows the total dollar amounts for the year. Total Variable cost per year with total barrel output Total Fixed Costs for the first year Total Revenue Total Net Profit (loss) $173,417.40 $ 295,600.00 $483,600 $14,583 Table 5 Total Costs and Profit for Year 1 Sensitivity Analysis Two sensitivity analyses were completed on first year estimates. One analysis assumed a 10% increase to unit cost. With this assumption, break even volume followed at 2362 barrels of the 2340 first year production, so break even just within less than a week early of 1 year of production. The second sensitivity analysis assumed a reduced revenue per keg of $90 instead of the $100. With this assumption, a break even volume was found at 2641 barrels for break even, so 300 more barrels past the years production, which would take an extra 6.67 weeks to produce. Funding Analysis With the given startup costs, variable unit costs, and break even amount, it is seen that funding will be needed for at least the first three years until the total yearend profit can sustain the next years costs (see Appendix for yearly costs and profit.) An initial amount of at least $500,000 is needed for the first year fixed and variable costs and $320,000 for subsequent years. It is not until the fourth year that the fixed and variable costs are covered from the previous year profits, therefore funding will be needed for the first three years, all assuming no change to production amount each year or changes to unit costs and fixed costs after year one. Conclusions From the total analysis put together in this report, it would seem that opening a microbrewery is a viable option as a new business opportunity. The craft beer segment of the beer brewing industry is showing 20+ years of growth and microbreweries still only account for 7% of total beer market in sales. Compared to other cities like San Diego, with 40+ breweries, and still no sign of saturation as more breweries are opening up, Los Angeles has ample potential for customer base within the city limits, let alone distributorship to other counties and regions. With an analysis of the Los Angeles area demographics, Venice was picked as a viable location to manufacturer beer for its younger than other areas average age, relatively high population of manufacturing-related jobs, and potential growth in the Los Angeles area. A look at financials revealed that producing 15 barrels a batch, 3 times a week would make 2340 barrels of beer per year or 4836 kegs. Selling a standard keg at $100 would create a break even volume of 2230 barrels, so able to break even within a year. The initial costs would be on the order of $500,000 but if the ability to obtain funding exists, so does profits early within opening the brewery. As is common saying in the brewery industry though, ‘to make a large pile of money in the beer business, start with a small pile of money.’ Appendix A SWOT Analysis Strengths Variety offered compared to major breweries of light beer Knowledge of the community for understanding of micro & nano economics and interests Management experience in construction and production at a batch scale Opportunities Proven growth in industry, even through two recessions Internet marketing and sales offer much less cost to seller and much broader exposure Ease of shipping and communication allows for world market penetration Weakness Lack of reputation compared to competition Limited financial base compared to major players Lack of clear cut channels of distribution Threats Price of products depend on commodity price fluctuations Existing competition is moving towards backward and forward vertical integration, including growing own materials on farms and getting in the distribution business Selling only initially by keg and not in glass or can only leaves about 10% of the total beer market to get into Appendix B 1st year break even analysis Total Yearly Volume by month (BBL) 0 195 390 585 780 975 1170 1365 1560 1755 1950 2145 2340 Total Cost per volume Total Revenue per volume $ 295,600.00 0 $ 310,051.45 $40,300 $ 324,502.90 $80,600 $ 338,954.35 $120,900 $ 353,405.80 $161,200 $ 367,857.25 $201,500 $ 382,308.70 $241,800 $ 396,760.15 $282,100 $ 411,211.60 $322,400 $ 425,663.05 $362,700 $ 440,114.50 $403,000 $ 454,565.95 $443,300 $ 469,017.40 $483,600 Monthly Costs and Volumes in 1st Year Production $600,000.00 $500,000.00 $400,000.00 $300,000.00 Total Cost per volume $200,000.00 Total Revenue per volume $100,000.00 0 195 390 585 780 975 1170 1365 1560 1755 1950 2145 $- Total Cost and Revenue chart for Year 1, Intersection of two lines is Break Even Point 2nd Year Production and Break Even Analysis Total Yearly Volume by month (BBL) 0 195 390 585 780 975 1170 1365 1560 1755 1950 2145 2340 Total Cost per volume Total Revenue per volume $ 145,600.00 0 $ 160,051.45 $40,300 $ 174,502.90 $80,600 $ 188,954.35 $120,900 $ 203,405.80 $161,200 $ 217,857.25 $201,500 $ 232,308.70 $241,800 $ 246,760.15 $282,100 $ 261,211.60 $322,400 $ 275,663.05 $362,700 $ 290,114.50 $403,000 $ 304,565.95 $443,300 $ 319,017.40 $483,600 Monthly Costs and Volumes in 2nd Year Production, less Initial Equipment Costs $600,000.00 $500,000.00 $400,000.00 $300,000.00 Total Cost per volume $200,000.00 Total Revenue per volume $100,000.00 0 195 390 585 780 975 1170 1365 1560 1755 1950 2145 $- Total Cost and Revenue chart for Year 2 of Production, Intersection of two lines is Break Even Point 5 Year Cash Flow Year 1 Year 2 Total Variable cost per year with total barrel output 173417.4 173417.4 Total Fixed Costs for the first year 295600 145600 Total Revenue 483600 483600 Profit from Previous Year 14582.6 Total Net Profit (loss) 14582.6 179165.2 Year 3 173417.4 145600 483600 179165.2 343747.8 Year 4 Year 5 173417.4 173417.4 145600 145600 483600 483600 343747.8 508330.4 508330.4 672913 5 Year Total Revenue, Cost, & Profit References for finding costs for break even analysis: (Wikipedia), (Love to Know), (BP Plans), (eHow), (Dennis Briggs, 2004), (Funding Universe) Bibliography (2010). Tax and Trade Bureau, 2004 to 2010. BP Plans. (n.d.). Retrieved December 06, 2011, from Brewery Business Plan: http://www.bplans.com/brewery_business_plan/financial_plan_fc.php#9.2_Break-even_Analysis Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011, September). Retrieved December 2, 2011, from Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages: www.bls.gov Dennis Briggs, C. B. (2004). Google Books. Retrieved December 05, 2011, from Brewing: Science and Practice: http://books.google.com/books?id=zV9bpyykNtMC&pg=PA660&lpg=PA660&dq=microbrewery+ fixed+costs&source=bl&ots=Fh9vAavjQ5&sig=f7Pf4RkgFBVIDb76c5_4CiaATb8&hl=en#v=onep age&q=fixed%20cost&f=false eHow. (n.d.). Retrieved December 05, 2011, from Fixed Costs of a Brewery: http://www.ehow.com/info_8484354_fixed-costs-brewery.html Funding Universe. (n.d.). Retrieved December 04, 2011, from Sample Business PlansMicrobreweries: http://www.fundinguniverse.com/sample-business-plans/?plan=Microbrewery German Beer Institute. (2008). Retrieved December 03, 2011, from http://www.germanbeerinstitute.com/beginners.html HorstDornbusch. (2005, February 28). The Beer Advocate. Retrieved November 2011, from http://beeradvocate.com/articles/629 Kain, E. D. (2011, September 16). Forbes. Retrieved December 03, 2011, from The Rise of Craft Beer in America: http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/09/16/the-rise-of-craft-beer-inamerica/ Love to Know. (n.d.). Retrieved December 04, 2011, from Start a Brewery: http://business.lovetoknow.com/wiki/Starting_a_Brewery Mark, J. J. (2011, March 02). Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 2011, from http://www.ancient.eu.com/article/223/ Richardson, R. (2003). A Business Plan For a Microbrewery. Pomona: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Shutterstock, L. (2010). Brewer's Association. Retrieved December 05, 2011, from Craft Brewer Defined: http://www.brewersassociation.org/pages/business-tools/craft-brewing-statistics/craftbrewer-defined Sound Brew. (n.d.). Retrieved December 3, 2011, from General Notes on Brewery Projects: http://www.soundbrew.com/projectnotes.html Stack, M. H. (2010, February 01). EH.Net Ecyclopedia. Retrieved December 03, 2011, from http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/stack.brewing.industry.history.us Wikipedia. (n.d.). Retrieved December 05, 2011, from Payroll Tax: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payroll_tax
© Copyright 2024