Rascal IRB 2.0 Launch date: May 31, 2015 Alan Teller, Associate Director Rachel Lally, Associate Director IRB 2.0 Background o Upgrade the investigator interface Address 100+ requests (IRB/researcher/other) o Obtain more complete applications – reduce returns 55% of all new protocols are returned at pre-review 66% of exempt and expedited protocols are returned at prereview New protocol average times in: 2.1 (including external reviews, e.g. PRMC, JRSC, IBC) 2 IRB 2.O Goals Obtain more complete applications Streamline review process and set up for IRB 2.1 (IRB side) Reduce turnaround time without compromising quality Directed logic driven questions with less narrative text Address researchers’ requests Page 3 Features New pages; consolidated topics Specific pages for unique research components Built-in “I don’t know” responses Information to explain questions; hover text; revised help text Options to indicate NHSR, exempt, expedited Section to identify special circumstances Funding, reliance, roles in MC trials, resources Engaged personnel signoff revised Earlier in process; PI only for renewals; attestation Page 4 Prompts and Validations Directed questions with required* responses Many more required fields Page and submit validations • Individual pages cannot be saved until the required information is provided Submit validations • Validations between pages will identify inconsistencies and/or missing items prior to submission Page 5 Stand-alone Protocols Certain questions/sections designed to allow for referral to protocols built outside of Rascal (e.g. sponsor’s protocols, grants, multi-center or externally developed protocols) The current “Study Description” is going away – All related fields are incorporated into individual pages – Accurate, detailed SD can be the stand-alone protocol • Saved by Rascal upon submission • Researcher can save if prepared but not submitted Page 6 May 31, 2015 = “Go-Live” date • Transition will occur overnight (into June 1st) • NO extended Rascal shut-down • Rascal upgrade, therefore cannot be phased • Transition will occur by protocol as events* created/submitted • One year for non-exempt studies • Two years for exempt • New fields cannot be filled out in advance • New fields will be mapped to old, wherever possible Page 7 All previously approved submissions will remain the same Page 8 First submission after May 31, 2015: ALL new fields will be required for ALL protocols, renewals, mods (submissions and resubmissions) Page 9 Events in Researchers’ Queues • Protocol/Renewal/Modification • Status: Creating, Returned, Pending • On the go live date (overnight): • existing data in fields in the current submission that do not map directly to fields in the new system will be cleared • New fields will appear and require completion before submission • Protocol/Renewal/Mod created after May 31st - new fields Applies regardless of how minor a modification may be or whether or not a renewal involves changes Page 10 Events in IRB Queues • If returned by HRPO staff or the IRB, information in non-mapped fields will be cleared upon return • New fields will appear and completion will be required before resubmission • If approved on/after May 31, without being returned • New fields not required until a Renewal/Mod created Page 11 Current Exempt Protocols • Must be updated • 5 year term (expanded from 2) • Expect that some may get different determinations Unanticipated Problems Reports and Closures • New fields not required • UPs – improved format • Closures – additional questions Page 12 Planning Most new protocols in the current system are returned at least 1 time 55% of all new protocols are returned at pre-review 66% of exempt and expedited protocols are returned at pre-review New protocol average times in: 2.1 WAIT TO CREATE & SUBMIT NEW PROTOCOLS Advantage: will not need to convert the Protocol from IRB 1.0 format if the IRB returns the Protocol prior to approval or when they create a Renewal or Modification Page 13 HRPO Suggestions New Protocols Non-exempt Protocols that have a Pending or Returned status, status date within the past 60 days = Resubmit now Non-exempt Protocols that have a Pending or Returned status, status date > 60 days = Wait until IRB 2.0 Wait to create new Protocols until after June 1, 2015 so the Protocol will be in the IRB 2.0 format Modifications Minor, straightforward, administrative, time sensitive= Submit now Complex, not time sensitive = Wait until IRB 2.0 Page 14 HRPO Suggestions Renewals Check Committee Assignment & IRB Meeting Schedule Expiration date before June 17 = submit now Expiration date after June 17 = submit in IRB 2.0 Exempt Protocols and Renewals Submit in IRB 2.0 Submitted and Approved after June 1 = 5 Year approval period Page 15 Questions? http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/irb/contactus.html [email protected] 212-305-5883 Page 16
© Copyright 2024