EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL CABINET – 1 APRIL 2015 UPDATE REPORT - DUNSTONHILL AND NETHERTON OPENCAST COAL SITES – REVISED RESTORATION SCHEMES. Report by the Chief Governance Officer PURPOSE OF REPORT 1. The purpose of this report is to advise Cabinet of the current position in relation to proposals to secure and deliver revised restoration schemes in respect of (First) Dunstonhill Opencast site at Patna; and (Second) Netherton Opencast site at Skares; and to seek authority for the proposed course of action. BACKGROUND 2. Dunstonhill Opencast Site, Patna 3. On 4 June 2014 Cabinet considered a report entitled “Update Report Dunstonhill and Ponesk Opencast Sites Restoration Bonds” (dated 28 May 2014). The Report set out the updated position, at that time, in relation to ongoing bond negotiations between the Council and the Bond provider for those sites and advised that a cumulative offer had been made to the Council by the Bond provider, Euler Hermes, of £6 million in full and final settlement of both of those Bonds. The Report recommended, for the reasons set out in the Report, that Cabinet should accept the settlement offer. 4. Cabinet agreed to (i) note the position in respect of the restoration bonds relative to Dunstonhill and Ponesk Opencast site; (ii) agree that the revised settlement offer made by the Bond provider’s agents for the Restoration Bonds be accepted; and (iii) note that if Cabinet is minded to approve (ii) a further report would be presented to Cabinet and the Planning Committee, as appropriate, in due course, seeking authority for a proposed alternative restoration scheme for each site and the associated expenditure of each scheme; and (iv) otherwise to note the contents of that Report. 5. Since that date officers have been working with relevant stakeholders to determine the most appropriate apportionment of the Bond monies for these two sites. It is considered that an appropriate apportionment, should be an equal division of the monies to each site, namely £3m each. 6. The assessed restoration value for the Dunstonhill site was £10.241m and the assessed restoration for the Ponesk site was £13.762m. It is considered that Bond settlement monies of £3m could be used for a revised restoration scheme at the Dunstonhill Site which would provide an acceptable restoration solution for that site. The Dunstonhill site has only one other Bond available to be used towards aftercare work at the site; Dunstonhill is a standalone opencast site and not part of a larger complex and while the proposed Bond monies will not allow restoration in terms of the original consented scheme, it is considered that it will provide a revised restoration scheme which addresses the safety and environmental issues pertaining to the site and provides an acceptable level of restoration to the site. 7. Ponesk, in contrast, presents additional challenges, it is part of the larger Spireslack complex with total assessed restoration costs of £27.894m. While there are some additional Bond monies available for that complex, the Ponesk Bond monies will make up the largest part of available bond monies; the land owners, Mines Restoration Ltd (MRL), are considering alternative future uses of the site, which may in the future, offer an alternative restoration solution for the site. This includes the major void at Spireslack having been reviewed by the British Geological Survey and consideration by the land owner as a Geopark in its present state and this has been progressed by the commissioning of a feasibility study for the site. It is considered therefore that £3m would allow Dunstonhill to be restored to an acceptable level, while leaving as much bond monies as possible, to be used towards restoration at the larger Ponesk/Spireslack Complex. 8. Having assessed that £3m was the appropriate apportionment for the Dunstonhill site, officers conducted a competitive tendering exercise. The scope of the tender was to design and deliver a revised restoration scheme for Open Cast Mining Land at Dunstonhill, Patna to the value of £3m. As part of the finalisation of the restoration design specification, the land owners namely MRL, the Poll Estate and Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) were consulted and agreed on the terms of the finalised tender scheme. The tender exercise took place from 15 December 2014 until 26 January 2015. 9. A number of bids were received. A tendering panel was set up consisting of relevant stakeholders, namely senior Council Officers, the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers, namely Dalgleish Associates Ltd (DAL), members of Patna Community Council, the landowners for the Dunstonhill site and statutory bodies (SEPA and SNH). The panel met to consider bids on 4th March 2015 and this was supported by a site visit at Dunstonhill prior to the evaluation commencing. From the evaluation of the bids, the Panel concluded that the scheme promoted by Hargreaves Surface Mining Limited (HSML) was considered to be the most appropriate to deliver the design specification and re-profile the landscape while managing the environmental issues and making the site safe to future public access. The final restoration complies with the Councils Steps to Recovery theme of “Make Safe, Make Good, Make New”. 10. While HSML are the preferred bidder no contract has to date been awarded as (first) Cabinet approval is required for the associated expenditure of the scheme; and (second) Planning Committee approval is required for the proposed revised restoration scheme; should Cabinet and the Planning Committee approve these matters, then it is intended that the contract would be awarded to HSML thereafter, with the owners of the site being asked to sign the contract as party consenters. 11. Having regard to Planning Committee approval for the proposed revised restoration scheme, Cabinet are advised that the proposed statutory framework to be used to secure terms of the revised restoration scheme, would be through serving an Enforcement Notice on the owners and interested parties of the site (which would also include HSML if the tender contract is concluded with them). 12. The Enforcement Notice will set out in detail the restoration works to be undertaken; the timescales for delivery of the scheme; an activity schedule; progress plans; and associated operative conditions. DAL will also undertake the Compliance Monitoring arrangements on site on behalf of the Council and through the monthly assessment of works carried will advise the Planning Authority on the contract administration of staged payments to HSML for restoration works completed during the preceding month. The site will also be subject to a Technical Working Group and a Community Liaison Committee which will be made up from local residents directly adjacent to the site, the Community Council and ward councillors. Subject to Cabinet approval of this Report, it is intended that the Enforcement Notice will be considered by the Planning Committee on 2 April 2015. 13. The Enforcement Notice will set out in detail a revised restoration scheme for the site, which will be a variation to the restoration scheme originally approved under Planning Permission for Dunstonhill (08/0783/FL) granted on 29 March 2010. The Enforcement Notice will impose upon owners and interested parties an obligation to deliver the revised restoration of the site. 14. In agreeing the terms of revised restoration scheme officers have engaged with relevant stakeholders (including landowners, SEPA and SNH and the Community Council) and sought their views on the restoration scheme proposed. 15. Netherton Opencast Site, Skares 16. On 13 August 2014 Cabinet considered a report entitled “Update Report – Netherton Opencast Coal Site Restoration Bond” (dated 7 August 2014). The purpose of that Report was to advise Cabinet of a settlement agreement which had been concluded in respect of the Restoration Bond for the Netherton Opencast site, in accordance with the powers afforded the Chief Executive within the approved Scheme of Delegation. The Performance Bond for Netherton had been called by officers on 30 September 2013; there had thereafter been ongoing negotiations between officers and the Bond provider, ACE which culminated in a settlement proposal of £3.96m being agreed in full and final settlement of the Bond. 17. On 13 August 2014 Cabinet agreed to (i) note the action taken by the Chief Executive on the recommendation of the Chief Governance Officer, to authorise conclusion to have settlement negotiations with the Bond provider for the Netherton Site; (ii) note that the proposed revised restoration scheme for the Netherton site would be presented to the Planning Committee for consideration in early course; (iii) note that, entirely subject to any decision which may be taken by the Planning Committee under recommendation (ii) above, a further report would also be presented to Cabinet seeking authority to negotiate a contract with the current site operator for delivery of those elements of the overall restoration works to be funded by the Council from the recovered Bond monies; and (iv) otherwise, to note the contents of the Report. 18. Cabinet will recall that from the date of the liquidation of Aardvark TMC Ltd, the previous operator at the site, OCCW (Netherton) Limited had taken control of the site and coaling operations had continued, with HMSL carrying out this work, as contractors of OCCW (Netherton) Limited. 19. Cabinet will also recall that the Report to Cabinet of 13 August 2014 acknowledged that the Bond monies would be insufficient to deliver the original approved restoration scheme for Netherton; however, £3.96m would be sufficient to allow the Council, working in conjunction with HSML, to deliver a revised restoration scheme for the site, which on completion of coaling operations, would restore the whole of the Netherton Site to a suitable and acceptable level; it was also noted that the Council would ringfence the £3.96m against future expenditure on the site and make staged payments under a contract to be negotiated with HSML to carry out specified elements of the overall revised restoration programme in return for payment of the bond funds; all such staged payments would only be made when certified as due under the contract, the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers. 20. In terms of the Council’s Standing Orders relating to Contracts, paragraph 21(1), requires Cabinet authority be sought when an Executive Director/Head of Services considers that a tender should be negotiated with one person. In this regard the Chief Governance Officer considers that circumstances currently exist in relation to delivering a revised restoration scheme for the Netherton site which engages paragraph 21(1) of the Standing Orders. 21. It is considered that a tender contract should be negotiated with HSML only, for the reasons being that: HSML are currently working on the site with coaling which is due to finish in September 2015; HMSL’s workforce and machinery are currently in situ, which will provide a saving on significant mobilisation costs when delivering the revised restoration scheme; HMSL will provide a seamless transition from coaling to restoration of the site with no break in operations (where any such break could increase restoration costs); the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers have been involved in the Compliance Monitoring of current coal and restoration works and also assessing the revised restoration scheme proposed by HMSL and their associated Bill of Quantities, to assess the acceptability of the scheme and the reasonableness of the costs of works proposed; and given the outcome of the Dunstonhill tender the Council has had the opportunity to compare the rates for Netherton with those successfully tendered by HSML for Dunstonhill to ensure these compare favourably and demonstrate value for money. 22. As stated in the preceding paragraph negotiations have taken place between officers and HSML and these have been scrutinised by the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers, in order that the Council can be satisfied that the revised restoration scheme is acceptable in engineering terms and delivers value for money as a whole. 23. It is considered that the proposed revised restoration scheme negotiated with HSML offers best value to the Council and provides an expedited process to obtain restoration at the Netherton site, particularly when staff, plant and equipment are on site under the coal operations. 24. If (first) Cabinet approves the recommendation that the Chief Governance Officer can proceed to negotiate a tender with HMSL; and (second) the Planning Committee approve the terms of the Enforcement Notice, then a contract, Restoration Services Agreement, will be progressed to conclusion between the Council and HSML, with the owners of the site being asked to sign the Agreement as party consenters. 25. Having regard to Planning Committee approval being required for the proposed revised restoration scheme, Cabinet are advised that the proposed statutory framework to be used to secure terms of the revised restoration scheme works, would be through serving an Enforcement Notice on the owners and interested parties of the site (which would also include HSML as owners and contractors at the site). 26. The Enforcement Notice will set out in detail the restoration works to be undertaken; the timescales for delivery of the scheme; activity schedule; progress plans; and associated operative conditions. DAL have been undertaking the Compliance Monitoring arrangements on site on behalf of the Council and through the monthly assessment of works carried out will advise the Planning Authority on the contract administration of staged payments to HSML for restoration works completed during the preceding month. The site is also subject to both a Technical Working Group and a Community Liaison Committee and both these groups have been involved in the review of the final restoration scheme. Subject to Cabinet approval of this Report, it is intended that the Enforcement Notice will be considered by the Planning Committee on 2 April 2015. 27. The Enforcement Notice will set out in detail a revised restoration scheme for the site, which will be a variation to the restoration scheme originally approved under Planning Permission for Netherton (09/0891/PP) granted on 19 October 2010. The Enforcement Notice will impose upon owners and interested parties an obligation to deliver the revised restoration of the site. 28. In agreeing the terms of revised restoration scheme officers have engaged with relevant stakeholders (including landowners, SEPA and SNH and representatives from the Community Council and local residents) and sought their views on the restoration scheme proposed though discussion with stakeholders at the ongoing Netherton Technical Working Group and Community Liaison Group which have been held during HSML’s coaling operations at the site. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 29. A tender process had been undertaken seeking to award a contract to deliver a revised restoration scheme for the Dunstonhill Open Cast site from Bond monies to the value of £3 million. These funds currently held by the Council will be used to carry out the restoration under a contract to be formally awarded to HSML. The details of the restoration scheme will be set out in an Enforcement Notice; and all staged payments will only be made when certified as due, under the contract, by the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers. 30. Officers have been negotiating the terms of the revised restoration scheme for the Netherton Site with HSML. Subject to approval of this Report, the Netherton Bond monies to the value of £3.96m would be used to fund the delivery of the restoration under a contract to be awarded to HSML. The details of the restoration scheme will be set out in the Enforcement Notice and all staged payments will only be made when certified as due, under the contract, by the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers. LEGAL AND RISK IMPLICATIONS 31. The Council’s Standing Orders in relation to contracts (paragraph 21(1)) require Cabinet approval to be sought before tender negotiations can take place with a single contractor. 32. In concluding these contractual agreements and utilising the funds to fully restore the site to a safe and suitable and therefore acceptable level the Council will ensure that any responsibilities it may have under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in respect of Statutory Nuisance and in certain circumstances contamination issues will be fulfilled in respect of these sites to the extent that they may be applicable. COMMUNITY PLANNING 33. Restoration of the Dunstonhill and Netherton sites is compliant with the Community Plan local outcome to protect, conserve and enhance the natural environment. CONCLUSION 34. For the reasons and considerations set out within the Report it was considered appropriate to undertake a compulsory tendering process for the Dunstonhill site, and to award a contract to deliver a restoration scheme to the value of £3m; and to negotiate with HSML only, to deliver a revised restoration scheme for the Netherton site to the value of £3.96m. Relevant stakeholders for each site have been consulted about the proposed revised restoration schemes and their views considered by officers. The delivery of restoration schemes would be regulated through statutory Enforcement Notice procedure and associated contracts, with bond monies being paid out through staged payments monitored by the Council’s Independent Mining Engineers. Progress of the site restoration will be reported to the Planning Committee through the quarterly Compliance monitoring report of Environmental projects and members will have an opportunity to attend visits at these sites to view progress. RECOMMENDATIONS 35. Cabinet is asked to:i. agree the apportionment of the Dunstonhill/ Ponesk Bond monies, of £3m to each site; ii. note the competitive tendering process which has been completed to design and deliver a restoration scheme for the Dunstonhill opencast site to the value of £3m and that the preferred bidder is Hargreaves Surface Mining Limited; iii. subject to Cabinet agreement of (i) above, note that a Report on the proposed Enforcement Notice for the revised restoration scheme for Dunstonhill shall be submitted to the Planning Committee for its consideration on 2nd April 2015; iv. note that if the Planning Committee approve the recommendation in (iii) above, then the Chief Governance Officer will proceed to award the restoration contract to its preferred bidder, HMSL in accordance with the earlier competitive tender exercise; v. give approval for the Chief Governance Officer to negotiate a contract with HMSL to deliver elements of a restoration scheme to the value of £3.96m to the Netherton opencast site, in accordance with paragraph 21 (1) of the Council’s Standing Orders relating to Contracts; vi. and subject to Cabinet agreement of (v) above, note that a Report on the proposed Enforcement Notice for the revised restoration scheme for Netherton shall be submitted to the Planning Committee for its consideration on 2nd April 2015; vii. note that if the Planning Committee approve the recommendation in (vi) above, then the Chief Governance Officer will proceed to conclude a contract with HMSL in accordance with paragraph 21 (1) of the Council’s Standing Orders relating to Contracts; and viii. to otherwise note the contents of the Report. David Mitchell Chief Governance Officer 26 March 2015 LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS Nil Members requiring further information should contact David Mitchell, Chief Governance Officer, Tel No 01563 576061. IMPLEMENTATION OFFICER: David Mitchell
© Copyright 2024