2015 APHL – ASCLS Webinar Series A Rational Approach to Emerging Pathogen Biosafety Considerations 4/16/2015 Speaker Michael Pentella, PhD, Director of the Bureau of Laboratory Sciences at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute, MA Dept. of Public Health, Boston, MA Dr. Pentella is the Bureau Director, Massachusetts Bureau of Laboratory Science. He has a Bachelor of Science degree from The Ohio State University in microbiology, a Master’s of Science Degree from Thomas Jefferson University in Clinical Microbiology, and a Doctor of Philosophy Degree from the University of South Florida in Infectious Diseases. He has over thirty years’ experience in the clinical microbiology laboratory and over twenty years’ experience in hospital infection control and epidemiology. He is certified as a specialist in microbiology through the American Society for Clinical Pathology, in infection control through the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and is certified as an American Board of Medical Microbiology Diplomate. He is a member of several national committees, for infectious diseases and preparedness, such as APHL’s Infectious Disease Committee. Objectives At the conclusion of this program, participants will be able to: Review the biosafety risk assessment process. List examples of risk assessments for emerging pathogens. Continuing Education Credit The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science (ASCLS) is approved as a provider of continuing education programs in the clinical laboratory sciences by the ASCLS P.A.C.E.® Program. Participants who successfully complete each program will be awarded 1.0 contact hours. ASCLS P.A.C.E.® is accepted by the ASCP Board of Certification and all states including Florida and California as an approved provider of continuing education. ASCLS will submit attendance to CE Broker for Florida licensees. Continuing education credits are available to individuals who successfully complete the program and evaluation by 10/16/2015. CPH-recertification credit is not available for this program. Evaluation/Printing Certificate C. Evaluation (complete first) Go to http://ascls.webedcafe.com/registration/999/5/r/Biosafety and complete the evaluation by 10/16/2015, Upon completion of the evaluation, you will be sent to a page with a unique session code and instructions on how to use CE Organizer. Print out that page. Record the session code number. You will need this number in CE Organizer to get credit for attending the session. B. Certificate a. If you have not used CE Organizer before, I suggest you take a moment to view the tutorial on the ASCLS web site at http://ceorganizer.ascls.org/. After you have used the program once or twice, you will be quite comfortable with it. If you do have questions or comments, please call 571-748-3770 or email [email protected]. b. Here is a brief summary describing how to use the ASCLS CE Organizer: 1. Go to http://ceorganizer.ascls.org/. 2. If you already have a CE Organizer account, log in with your email address and password. If you have not used CE Organizer before, scroll down the page to the Log In instructions. ASCLS members will log in using the same username and password used to enter the Members Section of the ASCLS website. ASCLS members without a username and password should click on the link to register. If you are not an ASCLS member, click the “Register Here” link to create a username and password. If you cannot remember your username or password, send an email request to [email protected]. Do not create another username and password. 3. Once logged in, click on Certificates. 4. In the list of ASCLS P.A.C.E. ® approved events, click on “APHL-ASCLS Webinar Series.” 5. On the next screen, check the box(es) of the/every webinar you attended and click “Next” at the bottom of the page. If you cannot see the checkboxes, you may need to use the scroll bar at the bottom of the page. Archived Program The archived streaming video will be available within one day after the live program. Anyone from your site can view the Web archived program and/or complete the evaluation and print the certificate for free. Registration is not necessary for the archive program. For Live or archived site registrations, the URL will be sent to the site representative who is responsible for distributing the URL. Comments, opinions, and evaluations expressed in this program do not constitute endorsement by APHL/ASCLS. The APHL/ASCLS does not authorize any program faculty to express personal opinion or evaluation as the position of APHL/ASCLS. The use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the program sponsors. © This program is copyright protected by the speaker(s), ASCLS and APHL. The material is to be used for this APHL/ASCLS program only. It is strictly forbidden to record the program or use any part of the material without permission from the author, ASCLS or APHL. Any unauthorized use of the written material or broadcasting, public performance, copying or re-recording constitutes an infringement of copyright laws. Biosafety Topics Are In the Forefront A Rational Approach to Emerging Pathogen Biosafety Considerations A step-by-step approach to assess the risk and assure preparedness. Michael Pentella, PhD, D(ABMM) [email protected] 1 2 Emerging Pathogens by Decade Objectives • Review the biosafety risk assessment (RA) process • Provide examples of risk assessments for emerging pathogens Legionella pneumophila Norwalk virus MRSA Helicobacter pylori E. Coli O157 Prions VRE Cryptosporidium Chikungunya MERS D68 Ebola ________________________________ _______________________________ HIV Campylobacter Toxic Shock Syndrome Ehrlichia West Nile virus SARS Nipah virus Novel H1N1 3 What do you do when you learn of an emerging pathogen? 4 Assemble a team of subject matter experts • Ask questions: • Potential SME’s: Infectious Disease Physician, Microbiologist, Infection Preventionist • Learn everything you can about the emerging pathogen • Monitor CDC website and listservs • Engage the facility safety committee – Is it reasonable to expect to see patients with this pathogen at your facility? – What patient populations will likely be infected? – What is the clinical setting that you may see this pathogen? – Based on the differential diagnosis, what tests may be ordered? 5 6 Treat it as an infection control problem: Chain of Infection Risk can be defined as the probability that a health effect will occur after an individual has been exposed to a specified amount of hazard. Agent Agent Susceptible Host Risk is the probability that a health event will occur after an exposure to a specified amount of hazard Reservoir Risk assessment is the process of gathering all available information on a hazardous substance and evaluating it to determine the possible risks associated with exposure. This is followed by determining the mitigation strategies necessary to provide protection. There is no one standard approach to the RA process. Portal of Exit The risk can be mitigated but never zero. Goal: Predict, Identify and Mitigate Risk Means of Spread 8 7 Step 1 Risk Assessment Goals: Balancing risk and work performance Step 1 Practices implemented to mitigate risk What should the Risk Assessment Cover? • Pre-analytical activities from the time the specimen is collected, transported, unpackaged, centrifuged, aliquoted, and moves through the lab • Analytical activities • Post-analytical activities – clean up of the lab and destruction of the specimen and lab generated materials Performance of work in a safe, accurate and efficient manner. 10 9 Step 1 Step 1 Steps to complete RA 1.a. Identify agent hazards and perform an initial risk assessment, place the findings in writing • • • • • • 1.b. Identify lab procedure hazards, place the findings in writing 1.c. Review assessment with staff and management 11 Risk Assessment Information: Know the Agent Pathogenicity Virulence Infectious dose Routes of Transmission Type of specimens needed for detection Sources for the information: BMB 5th ed., 12 Step 1 Step 1 Risk Assessment Information: Who is susceptible? Questions to ask? ‒ What are the likely specimen types you will receive and will they contain the pathogen? ‒ Who collects the specimens? ‒ Will the lab be notified of the suspect agent? ‒ How will specimens be transported? ‒ Is there a need to track who handles the specimens in case of exposure? ‒ How will specimens be handled in the lab? ‒ What disinfectant will be used? ‒ How will spills be handled? ‒ How will specimens and waste be discarded? • Who is at risk? – Direct workers? – Employees in general work vicinity? – Visitors to the lab? • Individual level Susceptibility? • Available vaccination or antibiotic prophylaxis? • Effective treatment? 13 Step 1 14 Step 1 Risk Assessment Information: Review Protocols RA - Predict and Identify Risk: Example – working with a bloodborne pathogen Procedure • Agent Concentration in specimens • Suspension Volume • Generation of Aerosols, Droplets or Droplet Nuclei • Protocol Complexity • Use of Sharps • Use of Animals Preparation of blood specimen for testing Potential Hazards Control Breakage/ Aerosolization/ Splash/ Splatter Comment -Minimize number of staff handling specimen 15 Step 1 16 Step 1 RA - Predict and Identify Risk: RA - Predict and Identify Risk: Example – working with a blood culture bottles Procedure Blood Cultures Potential Hazards Aerosolization/ Splash/Splatter/ Contact with Blood Control Example – Packaging and Shipping Specimens Comment Procedure -Use plastic bottles if available. Packaging & Shipping of Specimens Potential Hazard Control Comment Breakage and Aerosolization 1990 17 18 Step 1 Step 1 RA - Predict and Identify Risk: RA - Predict and Identify Risk: Example – Stools Specimens Example – Sputum Specimens Procedure Inoculation of Stool specimen for culture Potential Hazard Control Comment Procedure Leaking containers, external contamination of container, Splash and Splatter Inoculation of Sputum specimen for culture Potential Hazard Control Comment Leaking containers, external contamination of container, Splash and Splatter 19 Step 2: Selection of Mitigation Tools 20 Step 2 Biosafety level Tasks to select safety practices Engineering Controls PPE Lab Practices • Review the risk assessment • Determine the appropriate control for the identified risk • Write the control into the procedure manual Medical Waste 21 Step 2 Step 2 Predict, Identify, & Mitigate Risk: Lab Safety Practices Example – working with a bloodborne pathogen • Personal Protective Equipment • Disinfectant Procedure Preparation of blood specimen for testing – Daily Disinfectant BSC, Counters and Centrifuge • • • • • • 22 Capped Centrifuge tubes Splash Proof Containers Use Of UV lights Use disposable loops Allow slides to dry in BSC Spill Clean-up procedure Potential Hazards Breakage/ Aerosolization/ Splash/ Splatter Control Comment -Use PPE: fluid resistant back-closing gown, double gloves, N95 respirator and goggles, or full face shield, (eyes and mucous membranes covered). -Perform work in the BSC. -No exposed skin inside the BSC. Immediately change gloves if contamination is visible or suspected. -Bring all necessary material into the BSC before starting to work. -Do not enter and re-enter BSC once specimen processing begins. Document annual competency 23 24 Step 2 Step 2 Predict, Identify, & Mitigate Risk: Predict, Identify, & Mitigate Risk: Example – working with a blood cultures Procedure Blood Cultures Potential Hazards Control Aerosolization/ Splash/Splatter/ Contact with Blood -Once received in the laboratory, all specimens should be opened inside a BSC. -Inspect for any signs of breakage. -Wipe the outside of the bottles with hospital approved disinfectant -Place the bottles into a rigid leak proof container and carry the container to the blood culture instrument. Example – Packaging and Shipping Specimens Comment Procedure -Use plastic bottles if available. Packaging & Shipping of Specimens Potential Hazard Breakage and Aerosolization Control Comment -Specimens should be packaged and shipped without attempting to open collection tubes or aliquot specimens. -Specimens must be packaged based on the triple packaging system which consists of a tube in a sealable specimen bag with absorbent material (primary receptacle) placed in a watertight, leak-proof container (secondary receptacle). Packaging and shipping of Infectious Substances or Biological Substances should only be performed by laboratory personnel who are trained and certified to do so. 25 Step 2 26 Step 2 RA - Predict and Identify Risk: RA - Predict and Identify Risk: Example – Stools Specimens Example – Sputum Specimens Procedure Inoculation of Stool specimen for culture Potential Hazard Leaking containers, external contamination of container, Splash and Splatter Control Comment Procedure -Once received in the laboratory, all specimens should be opened inside a BSC. -Inspect for any signs of leakage. -Wipe the outside of container with hospital approved disinfectant. Inoculation of Sputum specimen for culture Potential Hazard Leaking containers, external contamination of container, Splash and Splatter Control Comment -Once received in the laboratory, all specimens should be opened inside a BSC. -Inspect for any signs of leakage. -Wipe the outside of container with hospital approved disinfectant. 27 28 Step 2 Step 3: Connect to Biosafety Competencies Predict, Identify, & Mitigate Risk: Example – ebola Procedure Potential Hazards Centrifuging Aerosolization Control -Ensure o-ring microcentrifuge tube is tightly sealed. -Use sealed head rotor inside the BSC. -Must decontaminate specimen before removing from BSC. Further Needs • Connect competencies to required skills Action – Skill Domain I: Potential hazards – Skill Domain II: Hazard controls – Skill Domain III: Administrative controls – Skill Domain IV: Emergency preparedness and response -Perform “mock” Supervisor sample to practice technique • Determine education and training needs 29 30 Step 3 Step 3 Intent of the Guidelines Competency Domains • Define essential competencies needed by laboratory personnel to work safely with biologic materials and other hazards commonly found in biologic laboratory • Reduce the risk of exposures at all levels • Provide essential base-line information for a format to develop facility specific competencies • Target audience is the laboratorian • • • • Skill Domain I: Potential hazards Skill Domain II: Hazard controls Skill Domain III: Administrative controls Skill Domain IV: Emergency preparedness and response 31 Step 3 Step 3 Competencies are Tiered to Three Professional Levels of Practitioners Field Entry Level Academia or research Technician, research Principal investigator, associate, or laboratory manager, specialist postdoctoral student, or senior or staff scientist Midlevel Principal investigator or branch or division manager Clinical setting Laboratory scientist or medical technologist Laboratory manager, chief technologist, or hospital or clinic director Chief/head scientist or medical technologist, laboratory specialist, or laboratory manager 32 Skill Domain I: Potential hazards • Focused on competencies involved with understanding the hazards. • Recognition is the first step in prevention • Subdomains: Senior level – Biologic Materials – Research animals – Chemical materials – Radiologic materials 33 34 Step 3 Skill Domain II: Hazard controls • Focuses on use of primary and secondary barriers to prevent exposure • Competencies for decontamination and management of hazardous waste • Subdomains: – – – – 35 Personal protective equipment Engineering controls-equipment (primary barriers) Engineering controls- facility (secondary barriers) Decontamination and waste control management 36 Step 3 Skill Domain III: Administrative Controls • Focuses on administrative controls to reduce the duration, frequency and severity of exposure to hazardous materials or situations • Subdomains: – – – – – Hazard communication and signage Guidelines and regulatory compliance Safety program management Occupational health – medical surveillance Risk Management 37 38 Step 3 Skill Domain IV: Emergency preparedness and response • Focuses on management of emergencies • Subdomains: – Emergencies and incident response – Exposure prevention and hazard mitigation – Emergency response –exercises and drills 39 40 Step 3 Tasks to Link to Biosafety Competencies • Review the competencies • Select the competencies from each domain that are applicable to the lab based on the risk assessment 41 42 Step 4 Step 4: Accomplish education and training Perform Safety Education & Training • Based on RA and competencies design the training that is needed. • Determine what outside training is available and what site specific training is needed. • Consider the best format for the training • Write materials and exams for in house training • Educate staff about the hazards identified in the risk assessment • Train staff on use of safety practices: Engineering controls, PPE, lab practices • Require staff to review changes to the procedures • Determine staff level of knowledge by observation and testing 44 43 Step 5 Step 5: Following up on the biosafety plans Safety Audits • Exercise the procedures • Audit the program by self audits, internal audits, external audits • Monitor staff and equipment performance • Mandate Reporting and Follow up on accidents, incidents, and near misses • Revise the plans accordingly • Discuss biosafety at regular meetings UNSAFE PRACTICES OBVIOUS: Food in work area LESS OBVIOUS: Boxes blocking air flow in BSC 45 46 Step 5 Step #6: Use a biosafety checklist YES NO Standard Resources Comments Is basic PPE provided for all personnel working in the laboratory? (basic PPE includes gloves, laboratory coats or gowns, protective eyewear or face protection, etc.) http://www.cd c.gov/HAI/pre vent/ppe_train .html Any observation made during audit Occupational Health Program • Post Exposure Management Plan • Partner with Occupational Health clinician 47 48 Step 6 Tasks to link with Occupational Health Program Step #7: Address concerns from labs not impacted • Meet with occupational health services to review the risk assessment • Review the procedure for staff access to occupational health services • Review reports from occupational health • Train staff on when to connect with occupational health • Hold a special meeting about safety and the emerging pathogen • Take every safety question/concern seriously • Communicate about the testing so that everything is transparent. 49 50 Step 7 Final thought: Will technology help us improve biosafety? Building a culture of safety? • Need a commitment from administration and lab leadership • Have regular communication about safety issues http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/29/us‐usa‐cdc‐safety‐idUSKBN0L21LL20150129 51 Comments/concerns about this program? Email [email protected] 52
© Copyright 2024