1. law, govt and politics
2. government

“There is nothing more powerful
than an idea whose time has
come.” – Victor Hugo
The First
Freedom
It’s here to stay.
Number 7
A
P. O. Box 385 Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Self-government begins at home
Y’all have a nice day.
Volume 17
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: First-time readers of
alternate news, especially boob tube babies, may experience
severe loss of confidence in the Establishment press and TV.
July 2015
Inviting the Zionist-controlled media¢cracy to meet a rising free South
www.firstfreedom.net
$2.00
The trap
ZOG’s puppet
Cameron
Page 7
Untold numbers of young
college students are being
conscripted into believing
in government-as-savior.
Page 9
Page 4
Colombian rebel
leader killed
More trustworthy credit
rating agencies are now
in Russia and China
Page 13
Plea bargain waivers
Page 11
Are they legal?
American Defense Party
Page 15
2016 campaign kickoff
Page 24
Bolivia slams
U. S. coups,
dictatorships
Page 12
Page 24
Are “Judeo-Christians” totally
blind, deaf and dumb?
Would-be world
rulers connive
again Page 18
Get the hardest-hitting rebel newspaper of them all by
mail anywhere in the C.S.A. or U.S. For 12 issues send
$25 to TFF, P.O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576.
Three names: Black-on-White crime In South Carolina
American
Defense
Party’s
2016
campaign
kickoff
J. B. Campbell, Chairman
South Carolina
Low theater
The gun
Page 6
Page 4
Vandals are attacking
Confederate monuments
all over the South.
didn’t do it
Page 10
Actor
Rand Paul
Page 7
Iceland
busts the
banksters
Jim Tucker (wearing hat) of
American Free Press first
exposed these Bilderberg
secret meetings years ago
It’s not “democracy” if they vote the wrong way
Page 4
Saudis need Russia, not
the other way around.
Crimea and Sevastopol
Page 13
200 Syrian refugees return from Turkey
Page 19
Page 12
Page 6
Color his
“revolutions”
blood red
Ellen Brown
Censored details of the Holocaust
Race to
oblivion
Page 3
Page 14
Page 4
It’s not democracy if they
vote the wrong way
Politics & government
Nicaraguans protest
Page 8
China’s canal plans
Cops arrest little old lady for knowing
Those who can’t have Holocaust
deniers running loose sent police
to raid Ursula Haverbeck’s house
in Vlotho, Germany.
By Jobst Lüdeking
Investigators confiscated from there a
publication, Die Stimme des Reiches, or
Voice of the Reich, a spokesman for the
prosecutor’s office said.
vlotho/verden (nw)
The local prosecutor’s office had once
before checked around to learn who was in
charge of that magazine. During its current
process extensive material was taken after
investigations in Vlotho, Verden, Kerpen,
Regensburg and Baden-Württemberg –
including the current issue of the journal.
The materials will now be examined.
86-year-old Ursula Haverbeck, having
denied the Holocaust for years in defiance
of Germany’s investigative authorities and
The Bielefeld public prosecutor’s
office has announced its charges against
“neo-Nazi figurehead Ursula Haverbeck”
for having violated Germany’s paragraph
forbidding officially-prohibited opinions.
The search of her home resulted in the
State Office of Criminal In vestigation
Lower Saxony, supported by officials from
Herford, charging also an additional three
thought criminals.
Habitual thought criminal
courts, has been sentenced in the past.
The Collegium Humanum, founded by
her husband in Vlotho, was “a neo-Nazi
training center” until shut down in 2008 by
the Interior Ministry.
EDITOR’S NOTE
Germany’s occupied media remain
silent regarding the actual programs
these peaceful “neo-Nazis” stand for,
as they may only toe the dictated line
parroting “what everybody knows.”
Read Ursula Haverbeck’s forbidden
research – from her own condemned
alternate magazine – on page16.
By Hunter Wallace
occidentaldissent.com
While absolutely nothing excuses Dylann
Roof’s evil, horrific crime in Charleston,
the Coun cil of Con ser va tive Cit i zens
“stands unshakably behind the facts on its
website” and will continue to point out the
“dangers of denying the extent of Blackon-White crime.” The extreme Left Wing
would prefer to tell a “story about race,”
which highlights angelic Black males such
as Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and
Freddie Gray.
The Far Left does not want to have a
“conversation about race,” revealing what
Black males have done to, say, the following
three White people in South Carolina in
just six months of 2011. Their lives were
also either taken or traumatized in horrific
tragedies. In spite of what some might say,
their stories are just as important to “race in
America” as the likes of Michael Brown or
Freddie Gray.
Again, the Far Left denies that White
people have legitimate grievances about
being victimized by Black-on-White crime
and believes that discussion of this subject
should be treated as taboo. Instead, the Far
Left wants the American media to promote
its chosen narrative of Black victimization,
when the facts show the reverse is true.
In ter ra cial crime is over whelm ingly
Black-on-White.
For instance, during
June 2011, 18-year-old
Carter Strange, shown
here in hospital, was
nearly beaten to death
by a group of “youths”
(as the media usually
have it when they are
Blacks). This happened
in Columbia, S. C.
Four months later in
Charleston, five-yearold Allison Griffor was
shot and killed while
sleeping alone in her
bed dur ing a home
invasion. Again, none
but the local media took
notice, but even these
dared not “profile.”
Two months later in Kershaw, still in
South Carolina, Beverly Hope Melton was
followed and chased
by a Black male who
knocked her vehicle off
the road, abducted, raped
and beat her to death
with a baseball bat,
CNN gives months
of notice to the tragic
deaths of thugs and criminals like Trayvon
Martin, Michael Brown and Freddie Gray.
Dylann Roof was “radicalized” by this
anti-White double standard: why so much
attention to Trayvon, Brown and Gray but
not to, say, Carter Strange, Allison Griffor
or Beverly Hope Melton?
Alternate media matter
Treating the value of White lives as a
radioactive subject brought Dylann Roof
to burn with a sense of injustice. The Far
Left wants to chill discussion of legitimate
issues. As the besieged police retreat from
the streets and fanatics morph into lone
wolf spree killers, oddly enough the toll
will fall primarily on Black lives.
All Lives Matter. Yet, however long the
Left honors the memory of such “martyrs”
as Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and
Freddie Gray, there will be those on the
Right who will remember Carter Strange,
Allison Griffor and Beverly Hope Melton.
2
The First Freedom
— Southern Poverty Truth Center —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
HERE’S WHAT WAS IGNORED OR MISREPORTED ELSEWHERE:
U. S. puts all its eggs in one basket: the military
“Be assured that if this new provision
[the 14th Amendment] be engrafted in
the Constitution, it will, in time, change
the entire struc ture and texture of
our government, and sweep away all
the guarantees of safety devised and
provided by our patriotic Sires of the
Revolution.” – Orville Browning
AS AMERICA’S military commanders
(those who haven’t retired early rather than
flex the ZOG’s ageing muscles nonstop)
threaten everywhere, Rothschild banking
Nations are facing deflationary pressures.
China, working with the governments of
the United Kingdom and other European
powers, has moved further to boot multiple
New World Order-controlled institutions
such as the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) and the World Bank completely out
of Asia, another sign of declining United
States financial power.
NOISE. The New York Times tells us
“Iran continued its ‘terrorist-related’
activity last year and also continued to
pro vide broad mil i tary sup port to
President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, the
State Department said June 19 in its
annual report on terrorism. The State
Department’s assessment suggests that
neither the election of President Hassan
Rouhani nor the prospect of a nuclear
accord with the U. S. and its negotiating
partners has had a moderating effect on
Iran’s foreign policy in the Middle East.”
RUSSIAN security firm Kaspersky Lab
disclosed recently that it had been hacked,
noting that the culprits, believed to be from
Israel, had penetrated its network since
sometime last year. The company allowed
those attackers seemed intent on studying
its antivirus software and finding ways
around the software on buyers’ machines,
thus avoiding detection.
A STRING of “charities” – Cancer
Fund of Amer ica, Can cer Sup port
Services, the Breast Cancer Society and
Children’s Cancer Fund of America –
have turned out to be manipulative
frauds run by a family of con artists.
The cash they raised for cancer patients
actually went to pay for their personal
luxuries instead – Disney World trips,
jet ski outings, new cars, college tuition
and luxury travel.
“BAD Iran. Bad Iran!!!”
– Official White Horse Souse
Thus (ahem) whatreallyhappened.com:
“Ever notice that when Iran supports
Syria’s government, it is terror, but when
the U. S. supports the hired mercenaries
trying to overthrow Syria’s government, it
is called ‘Nation-building’ and ‘bringing
the people Democracy!’ I am concerned
about this announcement coming as it does
on the heels of Israel’s testing radioactive
dirty bombs in the Negev.”
Getting things backwards
TRUCK convoys formed by Russia’s
Emergencies Ministry have delivered a
total of over 38,000 tons of humanitarian
aid to the Donbas region since mid-August
2014. Now Russia’s Emergencies Ministry
is preparing the 31st humanitarian aid
convoy to east Ukraine’s Donetsk and
Luhansk People’s Republics known as the
Donbas region, a ministry spokesman said
on June 24. “The convoy will deliver to the
Luhansk and Donetsk regions foodstuffs,
medicines, essential supplies and other
items re quired for the res i dents of
Donbas,” the spokesman said.
WORRIED about the strengthening
of Greece’s ties with Russia, Washington
is secretly “convincing” Germany and its
partners in the European Union to agree
with a compromise in settling Athens’
debt, The Financial Times has reported.
FACEBOOK founder and CEO Mark
Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan
announced last month that they would
donate $5 million for scholarships to 400
“undocumented” Bay Area students.
THRONGS flocked into Athens on
June 21 to call on the ruling Syriza party
to stand up to international creditors
and reject further austerity measures.
In the second mass demonstration that
week, thousands of protesters chanted
“No to the euro!” and “The people will
not be blackmailed!”
AFGHAN officials said security forces
repelled a Taliban attack on the parliament
building June 22, prompting evacuation of
lawmakers as they prepared to review the
nomination of that country’s new defense
minister. In other words, the people there
are trying to take their Nation back from its
U. S. puppet rulers.
DISPUTING China’s rising presence
in the region, the United States Pacific
Command has stationed more than
1,200 special forces troops across the
Asia-Pacific sphere along with its latest
advancements in weapons technology,
reports the Beijing-based Sina Military
Network.
The First
Freedom
I thoroughly enjoy reading your
excellent paper. In the spirit of Christ,
White survival, Nationalism and White
pride worldwide, keep up the good work!
PETER MALLEN
Kent, England
I recently received my third issue of
your publication and like it very much. I
wasn’t born in the South but sure am
glad I’m here now!
KAREN POST
Dickinson, TX
SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
NEW READERS
r $5 for 6 issues
__________________
RENEWAL
r
r
r
r
$25 for 1 year
$50 for 2 years
$75 for 3 years
$100 for 4 years
________________________________________
NAME
________________________________________
ADDRESS
________________________________________
CITY
STATE
ZIP
________________________________________
PHONE
EMAIL
________________________________________
CHURCH/SCHOOL/ORGANIZATION
CLIP AND MAIL TO THE FIRST FREEDOM
P. O. BOX 385, SILVERHILL, ALABAMA 36576
Challenging a Zionist-controlled mediacracy to tolerate the truth
Sec. of the Interior (1867)
BAN the U. S. Capitol’s monument to
Thomas Jefferson? Yes, said leftist Don
Lemon June 24 on CNN. See page 3.
Scalawag of the Month
Judy Alves
The Ft. Myers, Florida, News-Press saw
fit to publish this June 15 diatribe:
The “states’ rights” goal of the
Civil War, the ‘right’ Gen. Lee fought
for, was to enslave, beat, whip, rape,
buy and sell human beings in order
to preserve the wealthy lifestyle of
slaveholders.
Depicting Lee in military regalia
in a forum of American government
is repugnant. The fact that he was
appreciated as a gentleman is not
the message of the portrait. He is
dressed for his defense of human
trafficking. Additionally, there is no
acceptable analogy to our revolutionary slaveholding forefathers who at
worst were reluctant hypocrites in
their pronouncement of “every man
is created equal” as they fought for
freedom from colonial rule.
The Gen. Lee portrait needs to
go.
– Judy Alves, Fort Myers
Lack of Knowledge
Dear Judy Alves,
You have obviously been sadly misled
by our rewritten history. There are no facts
to support your claim that General Lee
fought “to enslave, beat, whip, rape, buy
and sell human beings in order to preserve
the wealthy lifestyle of slaveholders.” In
fact, Lee set his inherited slaves free before
the war. He was against slavery, so why
would he fight to promote it? On the other
hand, your glorious General Grant kept
slaves until after the 13th Amendment was
passed. That was the amendment that freed
the slaves, which was not passed until eight
months after the war was over. Since you
are greatly lack ing in true his tor i cal
knowledge, please allow me to enlighten
you a little. The war was not about slavery,
not because I say so, but because the U. S.
government said so…
On July 22, 1861, the U. S. Congress
passed a joint resolution stating the purpose
of the war: “Resolved…That this war is
not being prosecuted on our part in any
spirit of oppression, not for any purpose of
conquest or subjugation, nor purpose of
overthrowing or interfering with the rights
or established institutions of those States,
but to defend and maintain the supremacy
The First
Freedom
Self-government begins at home
Speech and religion were already ours
back when FDR named “four freedoms.”
But he would whip hunger, fear and oppression,
abstaining forever from Europe’s wars.
When politicians lie, the State bites off
what only individuals can chew.
It’s time we recovered
those powers not delegated.
Editor: Olaf Childress
Editorial faculty: Nancy Hitt, Christine Miller,
Donald Sullivan, Valerie Protopapas and Ingrid
Rimland Zündel.
Correspondents: Mark Anderson, Bill Ebb, Lloyd
Caperton, Chris DeHuff, Jason Gerhard, Bill Ivy,
John Kaminski, John Peeples and Carolyn Yeager.
Telephone: 251-945-5130
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.firstfreedom.net
Correspondence about subscriptions or changes of
address should be addressed to The First Freedom,
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576.
of the Constitution and all laws made in
pursuance thereof and to preserve the Union,
with all the dignity, equality and rights of
the several States unimpaired; and that as
soon as these objects are accomplished the
war ought to cease.”
General Lee was a great Christian leader
of his people who was defending his homeland from an illegal invasion by the despot
Lincoln. Lincoln’s army looted, raped,
burned, and murdered the civilians of the
South. When the Confederate soldiers
wanted to retaliate in kind, General Lee
would not allow it. – Jeff Paulk, Tulsa, OK
Seriously, now
A man sees a sign in front of a house:
“Talking Dog for Sale.” He rings the bell
and the owner tells him the dog is in the
back yard. He goes there and sees a black
mutt just sitting.
“You talk?” he asks.
“Yep,” the dog replies.
“So, what’s your story?”
The mutt looks up and answers, “Well, I
discovered this gift while pretty young and
wanted to help the government, so I told
the CIA about my speaking, and in no time
they had me jetting from one country to the
other, sitting in rooms with spies and world
leaders, since no one figured a dog could
be eavesdropping.
“I was one of their most valuable spies
eight years running. But the jetting around
really tired me out, and finally, not getting
any younger, I decided to settle down.
“So, signing up for a job at the airport to
perform undercover security work, mostly
wandering near suspicious characters and
listening in, I uncovered some incredible
dealings there and was awarded a batch of
medals.
“Had a wife, a mess of puppies, and now
I’m just retired.”
The man is dumbfounded. He goes back
in and asks the owner what he wants for the
dog.
The owner says, “Ten dollars.”
The guy gushes, “This dog is amazing!
Why on earth are you selling him so
cheap?”
The owner replies, “He’s such a liar. He
didn’t do any of that stuff.”
Periodicals postage paid at Foley, Alabama.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The First
Freedom, P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576.
SUBSCRIPTIONS: C. S. A. and U. S: For one
year (12 issues) send $25 to above address.
Domestic subscriptions: Send $25 check, money
order, (Federal Reserve Notes or one silver dollar at
own risk) for next 12 monthly issues anywhere in
C. S. A. and U. S. by bulk mail or $48 in a first class
envelope. Inmates may pay with postage stamps.
Foreign subscriptions: Canada $53, other foreign
destinations $77. Payable in U. S. dollars or other
instruments readily convertible thereto.
Self-government begins at home. Let patriotism,
in obedience to God, emancipate our imprisoned
heritage! Join this nonprofit newspaper and help
de-program the brainwashed population. Except for
copyrighted articles, anyone may reprint or quote
The First Freedom in whole or part; just give full
credit and address.
We may carefully edit submitted manuscripts to
fit space and style sheet without changing meaning;
prefer email; publish only the writer’s name, city
and State but need address and phone verification.
Signed articles by contributors do not necessarily
represent The First Freedom’s views. These are
expressed in editorials.
— First things —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
3
Thomas Jefferson on politics and government
Here is some historical wisdom
from one of our greatest Founding
Fathers. Pray for its rediscovery.
19. Separation of Powers:
Federal and State
he Federative Prin ci ple was the
mechanism introduced by the Founders
that made possible a republic spread over
a vast continent. In addition, by dividing
gov ern men tal power into co-equal,
independent responsibilities, each branch
of government might serve as a check on
the other and thus prevent either one from
undermining the safety of the public liberty.
“Our country is too large to have all its
affairs directed by a single government.
Public servants at such a distance, and
from under the eye of their constituents,
must, from the circumstance of distance, be
unable to administer and overlook all the
details necessary for the good government
of the citizens; and the same circumstance,
by rendering detection impossible to their
constituents, will invite public agents to
corruption, plunder and waste.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Gideon
Granger, 1800. ME 10:167
“While smaller governments are
better adapted to the ordinary objects
of society, larger confederations more
effectually secure independence and the
preservation of republican government.”
–Thomas Jefferson to the Rhode Island
Assembly, 1801. ME 10:262
“The extent of our country was so great,
and its former division into distinct States
so established, that we thought it better to
confederate as to for eign affairs only.
Every State retained its self-government
in domestic matters, as better qualified to
direct them to the good and satisfaction of
their citizens, than a general government
so distant from its remoter citizens and so
little familiar with the local peculiarities of
the different parts.”
–Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray,
1823. ME 15:483
“I believe the States can best govern
our home concerns, and the General
Government our foreign ones.”
–Thomas Jefferson to William
Johnson, 1823. ME 15:450
“My general plan would be, to make the
States one as to everything connected with
foreign Nations, and several as
to everything purely domestic.”
– Thomas Jefferson to Edward
Carrington, 1787. ME 6:227
“Distinct States, amalgamated
into one as to their foreign
con cerns, but sin gle and
independent as to their internal
ad min is tra tion, reg u larly
organized with a legislature
and governor resting on the
choice of the peo ple and
enlightened by a free press,
can never be so fascinated by
the arts of one man as to
sub mit vol un tarily to his
usurpation. Nor can they be
constrained to it by any force
he can possess. While that may paralyze
the single State in which it happens to be
encamped, [the] others, spread over a
country of two thousand miles diameter,
rise up on every side, ready organized
for de lib er a tion by a con sti tu tional
leg is la ture and for ac tion by their
governor, constitutionally the commander
of the militia of the State, that is to say, of
every man in it able to bear arms.”
–Thomas Jefferson to A. L. C. Destutt
de Tracy, 1811. ME 13:19
“It is hoped that by a due poise and
partition of powers between the General
and par tic u lar gov ern ments, we have
found the secret of extending the benign
bless ings of re pub li can ism over still
greater tracts of country than we possess,
and that a subdivision may be avoided for
ages, if not forever.”
–Thomas Jefferson to James
Sullivan, 1791. FE 5:369
T
PUT IT BACK
Your “representatives” – forbidden by the Southern Puberty Lechery Center, a
federal Affirmative Action Apparatchik and those new voting machines to display
such reminders in a building full of judges, lawyers and politicians – have banished
the Ten Commandments from Alabama’s Supreme Court now for
months.
142
The basis of separation
“Our cit i zens have wisely formed
themselves into one Nation as to others and
several States as among themselves. To the
United Nation belong our external and
mutual relations; to each State, severally,
the care of our persons, our property, our
reputation and religious freedom.”
–Thomas Jefferson: To Rhode Island
Assembly, 1801. ME 10:262
“The States in North America which
confederated to establish their independence of the government of Great
Brit ain, of which Vir ginia was one,
became on that acquisition, free and
in de pend ent States, and as such,
authorized to constitute governments,
each for itself, in such form as it thought
best. They entered into a compact
(which is called the Constitution of the
United States of America), by which they
agreed to unite in a single government as
to their relations with each other and
with foreign Nations, and as to certain
other articles particularly specified.
They retained at the same time each to
itself, the other rights of independent
gov ernment, comprehending mainly
their domestic interests.”
–Thomas Jefferson: Declaration and
Protest of Virginia, 1825. ME 17:442
“The radical idea of the character of the
constitution of our government, which I
have adopted as a key in cases of doubtful
construction, is, that the whole field of
government is divided into two departments,
domestic and foreign (the States in their
mutual relations being of the latter); that the
former department is reserved exclusively
to the respective States within their own
limits, and the latter assigned to a separate
set of functionaries, constituting what may
be called the foreign branch, which, instead
of a federal basis, is established as a distinct
government quoad hoc [to this ex tent],
acting as the domestic branch does on the
citizens directly and coercively; that these
departments have distinct directories,
co-ordinate, and equally independent and
supreme, each within its own sphere of
action.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Edward
Livingston, 1824. ME 16:23
“Nor is it admitted... that the people
of these States, by not investing their
federal branch with all the means of
bettering their condition, have denied to
themselves any which may effect that
purpose; since, in the distribution of these
means, they have given to that branch
those which belong to its department, and
to the States have reserved separately the
residue which belong to them separately.
And thus by the organization of the two
branches taken together, have completely
se cured the first ob ject of hu man
association, the full improvement of their
condition, and reserved to themselves all
the faculties of multiplying their own
blessings.”
–Thomas Jefferson: Declaration and
Protest of Virginia, 1825. ME 17:444
“To the State governments are reserved
all legislation and administration in affairs
which concern their own citizens only,
and to the federal government is given
whatever concerns foreigners or the citizens
of other States; these functions alone being
made fed eral. The one is the do mestic,
the other the foreign branch of the same
government; neither having control over
the other, but within its own department.
There are one or two exceptions only to
this partition of power.”
–Thomas Jefferson to John
Cartwright, 1824. ME 16:47
“I con sider the foun da tion of the
Constitution as laid on this ground:
That “all powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor
pro hib ited by it to the States, are
reserved to the States or to the people.”
[X Amendment] To take a single step
beyond the boundaries thus specifically
drawn around the powers of Congress,
is to take possession of a boundless field
of power, no longer susceptible of any
definition.”
–Thomas Jefferson: National Bank
Opinion, 1791. ME 3:146
“The States supposed that by their tenth
amendment, they had secured themselves
against constructive powers.”
–Thomas Jefferson to William
Johnson, 1823. ME 15:450
“The true theory of our Constitution
is surely the wisest and best, that the
States are independent as to everything
within them selves, and united as to
everything respecting foreign Nations.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Gideon
Granger, 1800. ME 10:168
“The best general key for the solution of
questions of power between our governments
is the fact that ‘every foreign and federal
power is given to the Federal Government,
and to the States ev ery power purely
domestic.’ I recollect but one instance of
control vested in the Federal over the State
authorities in a matter purely domestic,
which is that of me tal lic ten ders. The
Federal is, in truth, our foreign government,
which department alone is taken from the
sovereignty of the separate States.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Robert J.
Garnett, 1824. ME 16:15
“To draw around the whole Nation
the strength of the General Government
as a barrier against foreign foes; to
watch the border of every State that no
external hand may intrude or disturb
the exercise of self-government reserved
to itself; to equalize and moderate the
pub lic con tri bu tions that while the
req uisite ser vices are invited by due
re mu ner a tion, noth ing be yond this
may exist to attract the attention of our
cit i zens from the pur suits of use ful
industry, nor unjustly to burden those
who continue in those pursuits – these are
the functions of the General Government
on which you have a right to call.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Amos
Marsh, 1801. ME 10:293
“The pres er va tion of the gen eral
government in its whole constitutional
vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at
home and safety abroad, I deem [one of]
the essential principles of our government,
and consequently [one of] those which
ought to shape its administration.”
–Thomas Jefferson: 1st Inaugural
Address, 1801. ME 3:321
Separate responsibilities
“It has been so often said, as to be
generally believed, that Congress have no
power by the [Articles of] Confederation
to en force any thing; for ex am ple,
con tri bu tions of money. It was not
nec es sary to give them that power
expressly; they have it by the law of
na ture. When two par ties make a
compact, there results to each a power of
compelling the other to execute it.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Edward
Carrington, 1787. ME 6:227
“I like much the general idea of framing
a government which should go on of itself,
peace ably, with out need ing con tin ual
recurrence to the State legislatures.”
–Thomas Jefferson to James
Madison, 1787. ME 6:386
“The States should be left to do
whatever acts they can do as well as the
General Government.”
–Thomas Jefferson to John
Harvie, 1790. FE 5:214
“It is of immense consequence that the
States re tain as complete au thor ity as
pos sible over their own citizens. The
withdrawing themselves under the shelter
of a foreign jurisdiction is so subversive of
order and so pregnant of abuse, that it may
not be amiss to consider how far a law of
praemunire [a punishable offense against
gov ern ment] should be re vised and
modified, against all citizens who attempt
to carry their causes before any other than
the State courts, in cases where those other
courts have no right to their cognizance.”
–Thomas Jefferson to James
Monroe, 1797. ME 9:424
“[Regulating] the condition of the
descriptions of men composing a State...
certainly is the exclusive right of every
State, which nothing in the Constitution
has taken from them and given to the
General Government. Could Congress,
for example, say that the non-freemen of
Connecticut shall be freemen, or that
they shall not emigrate into any other
State?”
–Thomas Jefferson to John Holmes,
1820. ME 15:250
NEXT: Relation of State to Federal
Jewish Atrocities against the Palestinians
Complete history of the Jewish conquest of Palestine.
Originated as a Communist State, assassinated those
who defended Palestinian rights, used terror to drive
them from their homes, under today’s murderous
military rule. 25 photos, 56 pages, $8 PPD.
Truth at Last Books
P. O. Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
4
The First Freedom
— Media bypass operation —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Europe betrays own interests to serve those of the U. S.
By Bryan MacDonald
B
rt.com
significant.
Schmidt remains ac tive in Ger man
public life – he is the publisher of Die Zeit
– and is still a frequent television guest,
of ten cig a rette in hand, at the age of
96. He remarked last year that Russia’s
reunification with Crimea was “completely
understandable” and that U. S.-led sanctions
y slavishly following Washington’s
line on Rus sia, Eu rope’s lead ers are
essentially sticking pins into voodoo dolls
of them selves. It’s as point less as it is
ri dic u lous.
If America were hand-picking European
leaders, it’s doubtful that they
could select as subservient a
crew as now dominate the E. U.
There’s nobody comparable to
Charles de Gaulle or Willy
Brandt in sight. In fact, there’s
not even a Jacques Chirac. So
depressing is the current situation
that you’d even pine for a second
rate Thatcher impersonator. At
least there’d be a few fireworks.
In stead, we have Angela U. S. President Barack Obama and Germany’s Chancellor
Mer kel, Da vid Cameron and Angela Merkel attend a working dinner at a G7 summit at the
Francois Hollande on the hotel castle Elmau in Kruen, Germany, June 7, 2015.
front line. When the White House suggests were “nonsense.” He also warned that they
they jump, the only question they seem to were symbolic and would “affect the West
have for Washington is, “how high?” At as much as the Russians.”
present, their leaps are so impressive that
Despite the fact that Schmidt
they’d give Ukraine’s leg endary pole
vaulter Sergey Bubka a run for his money. has probably forgotten more
The last time Eu rope’s top play ers
about diplomacy than Merkel,
se riously as serted their in de pend ence
from the U. S. was in 2002 when Gerhard Hollande or Cameron will
Schroeder and Chirac campaigned against ever know, they chose to
George W. Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq. ignore his wisdom. However,
Their brave stance was com pro mised
by Britain’s Tony Blair who bent over Fillon’s eyes are wide open.
backwards to play the role of poodle to his “Europe is not independent.
American master. The Polish, who should …The U. S. is drawing us [the
have known better, also participated in the
E. U.] into a crusade against
unlawful offensive. Following the initial
barrage, other fringe European States like Rus sia, which con tra dicts
Estonia, Latvia and Albania, desperate to the interests of Europe,” he
curry favor in Washington, got involved. told the BFMTV channel.
The rather more influential Italy and Spain
Fillon didn’t restrict his criticism to
also briefly con trib uted forces be fore
swiftly withdrawing.
Since the august stand of Schroder and
Chirac, Europe’s autonomy has collapsed.
Germany is in the grip of the pro-American
The E. U. has renewed sanctions
CDU/CSU and France’s Gaullists have against the Crimea and Sevastopol
given way to Francois Hollande’s insipid until June 2016.
Socialists. Hollande has shown signs of a
By Taras Litvinenko
willingness to challenge Washington’s
sputniknews.com
diktat but seems incapable of asserting
France’s once-proud swag ger. Gal lic
he European Council has officially
hauteur has been exchanged for callow extended economic sanctions against the
diffidence.
Crimean Peninsula and city of Sevastopol
un til June 23, 2016, ac cord ing to a
Lambs replacing lions
communique published on June 19.
France’s former Prime Minister (from
The Crimea and Sevastopol, which has a
2007-12) Francois Fillon spoke last month special status within the region, became
of his despair at Paris’ new-found meekness. subjects of the Russian Federation on
Nicolas Sarkozy’s former right-hand man March 21, 2014, after more than 96 percent
claimed that the U. S. is drawing European of Crimea voters had backed the motion to
States into a “crusade” against Russia, rejoin Russia in a referendum held on
which goes against Europe’s own interests. March 16.
While Fillon is merely stating the obvious,
But the West refused to recognize results
the fact that such a recent powerbroker is of that referendum and imposed economic
speaking publicly indicates the level of sanctions against Crimea in 2014, which
included a ban on investing in its economy
and restrictive measures targeting Crimean
individuals and companies.
Russia policy; the Gaullist also laid into
American activities further afield. He
noted that Washington pursues “extremely
dangerous” policies in the Middle East that
the E. U. and European States have to
agree with. The ex-PM further accused
German intelligence of spying on France
“not in the interests of Germany but in the
interests of the United States.”
A dangerous world
As Fillon was speaking in Paris, Sergey
Ivanov – the head of Russia’s Presidential
Administration – was warning in Moscow
that the mutually ruinous sanctions game
be tween Rus sia and the E. U. is set to
continue. “As far as we know the recent G7
summit has prolonged sanctions against
the Rus sian Fed er a tion. There fore it’s
logical for Russia to prolong its countersanc tions,” Ivanov stated. Of course,
Russia was excluded from the old G8 last
year which served to deny Moscow and the
American-led West a valuable forum to
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French
President Francois Hollande and British Prime
Minister David Cameron.
discuss their differences.
What we now see is a race to the bottom.
Europe and Russia tearing themselves apart
– undermining decades of carefully built
bilateral relations – while the puppeteers in
Washington barely suffer at all. All this
current needless tension is destroying jobs
and businesses across the European Union
and the Russian Federation and is of no
benefit to either party.
Can we tell the dancer from the dance?
Meanwhile, the U. S. is the big winner. By
launching a massive propaganda campaign
accentuating a non-existent Russian threat,
they have scared eastern European States
to such an extent that they now open up
their territory to the American military
without question. At the same time, Europe’s
fringe Nations watch helplessly as their
nascent economic recoveries are stymied
by a counter-productive sanctions game
with a major market.
The big question now is whether it is
conceivable that Europe will ever again
act independently in its policy towards
Moscow. The portents look grim. Cameron,
while dis tracted by Scot land and his
country’s E. U. membership, has recently
received a new five-year mandate, giving
him plenty of space to pro mote U. S.
interests in Europe. Merkel is midway
through a four-year term and unless her
CDU party replaces her (very unlikely) or
she resigns (not implausible), the Chancellor
will probably be re-elected for a 4th term in
two years’ time.
Of course, eventually somebody will
break ranks. Most likely the French, when
Hollande is almost certainly booted out of
office in 2017. Nevertheless, that gives
Washington two more years to wreak
havoc in Europe. By then, permanent
damage will probably have been done to
the European economy and the continent’s
relations with its giant Eurasian neighbor.
At the same time, America, while pulling
the strings, will remain unharmed.
Towards the end of his life, de Gaulle
observed: “I have tried to lift France out of
the mud. But she will return to her errors
and vomiting, I cannot prevent the French
from being French.” If he were around
today, he’d surely say “Je te l’avais dit.”
Not “democracy” if they vote the wrong way
T
Anti-Russian sanctions can cost the E. U. up to $114 billion – Austrian study
“As stated by the European Council on
19 March 2015, the E. U. contin ues to
condemn the illegal annexation of Crimea
and Sevastopol by the Russian Federation
and remain committed to fully implement its
non-recognition policy,” the communique
read.
Earlier on that day, a source told RIA
Novosti that the E. U. economic and finance
ministers had approved the decision of the
European Council to extend the existing
sanctions against Crimea.
Cultural genocide unfolding in Dixie
Vandals are hitting Confederate
monuments all over the South.
By Hunter Wallace
occidentaldissent.com
Former French Prime Minister Francois Fillon
de spair in Eu rope. Older, ex pe rienced
politicians and diplomats from Henry
Kissinger to Helmut Schmidt have lashed
out at recent Western policy towards Russia
previously, but Fillon is contemporaneous
to the present kingpins. And that is very
Order extra copies of
The First
Freedom
Help your friends shed the
scales from their eyes!
See coupon at bottom of page 24
Y
ears ago, I warned
that the American Left’s
cultural genocide agenda
was no different from
ISIS or the Taliban in
its ferocity, and now
we are witnessing an
unprecedented attack on all monuments
“The principle for which we
contend is bound to reassert
it self, though it may be
at an other time and in
an other form.”
– Pres i dent Jef fer son Da vis
and symbols of Southern and Confederate
heritage.
When the Tom Wat son statue was
removed from the Georgia State Capitol in
2013, I made a point to travel to Atlanta to
stand against it. At the time, I said that I
would be back when they came for the
other monuments on the Capitol grounds.
Last August, I traveled to Ole Miss when
Confederate Drive was renamed because I
felt it was important to do so. If I had not
made other plans, I would have been in
Union Springs last month to protest the
assault on Confederate graves.
This must be what it felt like to witness
the Bolshevik Revo lution in Lenin’s
Russia or the Cultural Revolution in Mao
Zedong’s China. An ugly spectacle is
un folding across the South, as craven
Republican politicians acquiesce to radical
de mands and ven er a ble and his toric
monuments come under sustained attack
be cause of the crazed ac tions of a lone
fanatic. Not content to dump buckets of
ice on the heads, hordes of vandals who
look like extras from Mad Max: Road are
burning Confederate flags. The mobs that
burned down Baltimore and Ferguson are
gathering in our streets to plot their next
move.
Ominous
There are too many new developments to
track. Walmart, Amazon, E-Bay and Sears
are outlawing Confederate merchandise.
Mainstream conservative websites such
as Breitbart and National Review have
condemned the Confederate flag. Don’t
even bother contacting your Republican
representatives. None of those cowards
will be of any assistance to you. Let’s hope
this doesn’t escalate into violence against
the White community.
— Southern Culturalism —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
5
Let us salute the flag
On the
nobility
of motives
By Fred Reed
fredoneverything.net
A
aaagh! Enough. I keep reading that I
should Honor Our Troops. On airline
flights, I am asked to
applaud Our Young
Men in Uni form.
Why, for God’s
sake? What have
Our Troops done for
me except cause me
great embarrassment,
cost money better
spent on anything else, and kill millions
of people that I have had no interest in
killing? For this I am to thank them?
No, they don’t have noble motives. Men
join the military because they need a job,
because they want money for college or
because they are bored or want to prove
their manhood or go to exotic places and
get laid. Basic training, jump school, being
a tank gunner or doing nocturnal scuba
insertions are much more appealing to a
young man than selling fan belts at the
NAPA outlet.
Patrio tism? “Love of country” is an
after-market add-on, good for a drink or a
pat on the back at the Legion – nothing
more than an ex pres sion of the pack
instinct that makes men in all places and
times join in groups to fight other groups.
The pack instinct is why tribal warfare is
continual among primitive peoples, why
war, oth er wise in ex pli ca ble, re mains
incessant between modern countries. It is
why the gangs of young males in Chicago
mirror military hierarchy, with territory to
be expanded or defended, with leaders and
insignia (e.g. black and gold jackets for the
Latin Kings), with hand signs to signify
identity and loyalty. It is why people join
screaming mobs in political conventions,
why they become wildly emotional over
foot ball teams con sist ing largely of
convicted felons who have nothing to do
with the city.
Dr. Jekyll and Colonel Hyde
The pattern of loyalty inward to one’s
pack and hostility outward toward other
packs explains the peculiar morality of the
military (and of most other people). A
Marine colonel will be at home a good
neighbor, civic-minded, honest, cut the
grass and help old ladies across the street.
Come a war and he will mercilessly bomb
any city he is told to bomb and, after killing
he doesn’t care whom on the ground, he
will go to the officers’ club where there
will be high-fives and war stories.
We must not notice this, or the other
feral dogs will turn on us. If you say that
soldiers are morally indistinguishable from
Mafia hit-men, you will arouse outrage –
but there is no difference. A soldier who
has never heard of Vietnam or Iraq goes
when ordered to kill Vietnamese and
Iraqis, and duly kills them. Guido and
Vito, who have never heard of Hyman
Blitzschein the store-owner who is behind
on his protection payments, break Hyman’s
leg when ordered to. What is the difference?
Morality is always a very thin veneer on
top of the deeper savagery of the pack.
Militaries encourage this savagery. From
Joshua onward until very recently, armies
reg u larly put cit ies to the sword, and
generals allowed their troops to sack and
rape, rewards for good service. For those
un fa mil iar with such things, “putt ing
cities…” meant killing every living thing
within.
Nothing new
A graphic description of torture and
murder routine in the Thirty Years War
would have most readers retching. Today
this sort of thing, when exposed, is held to
be in bad taste. Only the United States
engages openly in torture (put “Abu Ghraib)
In Google images), but others do it.
Of course, much depends on who is
doing what to whom. When the Germans
bombed London, the English thought it
barbaric. Later, when they were bombing
German cities, it was a form of heroism.
The Rape of Nanjing was hideous, while
the frying of Hiroshima was not. Killing
everyone in a city of a hundred thousand
by hand would be very bad PR, but burning
them to death from above is a cause for
congratulations.
An effect of the pack in stinct is the
suppression of cognitive dissonance. If one
noticed that a woman campaigning for
sexual abstinence was pregnant with her
seventh child, that person might notice the
contradiction. Patriots, or the American
variety anyway, cannot notice that Our
Boys, and Our Girls, are committing the
routine atrocities that armies
normally commit. Call it cognitive
indifference.
Keeping things clean
American atrocities are always
Isolated Incidents. An Isolated
In ci dent is busi ness-as-usual
that is detected by the press.
Thus torture is best avoided by
restricting coverage.
It is de rigueur to speak of our
boys fighting to defend America
and our way of life, and to speak
of their sacrifices. In the Fifties TFF writer Richard Noegel traveled to Yorktown, Virginia, to
this spirit was exemplified by see the arrival from France of an exact replica of the Hermione,
Su perman jump ing out of a the French frigate that brought General the Marquis de la
Fayette to America in 1780. The ship was built entirely by hand,
window, while the voice-over using 18th-century tools and construction methods. For the full
intoned, “Truth, justice, and the story in words and pictures, go to “GASSAR” (Georgia Society,
American way,” then thought to Sons of the American Revolution”), and on the home page, click
“Articles.” On the drop-down, click “Hermione Replica.” The
be related.
ship was built exclusively with donations from the people of
Actually, soldiers are more France. She arrived at Yorktown, first stop on her American
sac ri ficed than sac ri fic ing. tour, on Friday, June 5, 2015, shown here.
Precisely how killing Afghan goatherds would want to do anyway.
pro tects the United States is not clear:
Ageless jingoism
careful students of geography have argued
that Afghanistan is somewhere else. The
Loyalty to a small band of warriors is
evidence does seem to support this.
easily transferred to an abstraction such
Today, the motives of wars are usually as country or religious faith. Witness the
disguised so as to be palatable. It has been fervor of Moslems today, or the enthusiasm
said that the British fought for empire, for Christianity of illiterate Crusaders in
the French for la gloire de la France, the the eleventh century who knew little of
Russians to steal watches from the wounded Christianity and certainly didn’t follow its
and the Amer i cans for vague moral moral precepts. Being swept up in a Cause
abstractions. Thus Washington fights to rid gives an appearance of meaning to a life
Iraq of a cruel dictator, while supporting otherwise devoid of such. The flags, the
many oth ers as cruel; fights to in still hurrahs, the rhythmic thump-thump-thump
democracy, as if anyone anywhere cared of hundreds of boots, the solidarity – these
whether Afghanistan were democratic; reinforce the pack instinct, and recruiters
and to protect the world from nonexistent and politicians know it.
WMD.
And so a coal-miner who hates the coal
Licensed gangs
company, hates suits and liberals and the
The dog-pack instinct is most intense in rich and Blacks and homosexuals and
the elite outfits, SEALs and Force Recon knows he is being exploited and doesn’t
and Special Forces, with tightly-bonded really like anybody at all except local
small groups – the focus of males – working friends, will discover unexpected loyalty
together. Powerful, free-floating hostility when the Japanese bomb Pearl.
characterizes these, and patriotism gives
And now, let’s hear a huzzah for Our
them a cover story for doing what they Boys.
SPLC teaches intolerance for real men
This Southern Nationalist police
officer was fired for refusing an
order to renounce his beliefs.
By Marcus Cicero
occidentaldissent.com
A
White Man who refuses to back
down despite pressure from all sides. We
would do well to follow the example of this
hero when the time comes.
Previously, Majority Rebellion reported
on the story of Josh Doggrell, one of two
Anniston, Alabama, police officers placed
on administrative leave, following an
SPLC hit piece on their membership within
the League of the South.
Word has now come forth that Mr.
Doggrell, a nineteen-year veteran of the
force, has been unconditionally terminated
from his position after explicitly staying true
to his pro-White, pro-South, Nationalist
beliefs.
Despite knowing of his involvement
with the League throughout the long years,
new management within the city of
Anniston felt as if the time had come to
prostrate before the altar of the United
States federal government, which seeks to
extinguish any views that differ from the
idea of a twisted, atheistic, sexually-deviant,
multicultural empire.
Doggrell is sued a statement, which
brings chills up one’s spine due to its
commitment and moral resolve.
“For years, my affiliation with the
League has intermittently come up at my
job. I have told them if ever it came to it, I
would choose the League over my job. The
previous police chiefs were supportive.
This one was not. And the new city
manager became openly hostile upon his
‘discovery’ this week.
“Friday afternoon the carrot was dangled
by internal affairs. Would I be willing to
‘flush’ the League entirely in order to save
my job? The answer was a swift no. Three
hours later, my termination was announced.
Nineteen years, my salary, my benefits and
my retirement are gone. I’m not looking
for sympathy, but I do ask for support.
“And I’ve gotten it. I am humbled and
grate ful for the prom ises of sup port,
including financial, I have received. I think
I have a good case, and I am planning to
take this to court. If anyone wishes to
donate to the legal defense, the Pay Pal
email is [email protected].
“God is still on His throne. His will I
accept. Pray His hand guides me and
protects my family. In tough times, you
find out who your friends are. I am proud
to be a Southern Nationalist and a member
of the League of the South.”
While other al leged “Na tion al ists,”
throughout mainly the internet sphere,
frequently alter their belief system, and
switch worldviews as if they were informal
party clothes, Lt. Doggrell has stood firm
since his entry to the League two decades
ago, and demonstrates to us a model for
how we should conduct ourselves in daily
life.
Information contained in the above
statement is provided in order to facilitate
some real-life activism to aid a man who
has sacrificed much for the Cause he
wholeheartedly believes in. Any sort of
financial and/or moral support to Mr.
Doggrell would go a long way during the
coming bat tles to re ceive jus tice and
compensation for his loss.
May God stand with him and his family
through this difficult time.
From the Wine Press: A Tale of War
(1913)
By Alfred Noyes
They
were cleanly
groomed. They were
not to be bought.
And their cigars
were good.
But they had pulled
so many strings
In the tinseled puppet-show of kings
That, when they talked of war, they
thought
Of sawdust, not of blood;
Not of the crimson tempest
Where the shattered city falls:
They thought, behind their varnished doors,
Of diplomats, ambassadors,
Budgets, and loans and boundary-lines,
Coercions and re-calls;
Forces and Balances of Power;
Shadows and dreams and dust;
And how to set their bond aside
And prove they lied not when they lied,
And which was weak, and which was strong,
But – never which was just.
Yet they were honest, honest men.
Justice could take no wrong.
The blind arbitrament of steel,
The mailed hand, the armored heel,
Could only prove that Justice reigned
And that her hands were strong.
For they were strong. So might is right,
And reason wins the day.
And, if at a touch on a silver bell
They plunged three Nations into hell,
The blood of peasants is not red
A hundred miles away.
6
The First Freedom
— Politrix —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Political theater: starring Rand Paul and the NSA
By Gregory Kay
E
[email protected]
veryone is all in a tizzy over Rand
Paul – over how he alone
stood up to the NSA and
his own party in order to
filibuster a renewal of the
so-called “Patriot Act,” and
single-handedly killed the
infamous spying provisions
saving all of us from their
warrantless tyranny and thus
proving himself alone among
the Republican candidates
electable material for the oval office.
Well, as the old Irish joke goes, “Ah, it
would be a grand thing, if only it were
true.” Or, to quote from the less-desirable
part of town: “You been played, sucker!”
And the play you saw was pure political
theater, nothing more.
In case you think I’m being too harsh on
poor little open-borders Rand, ask yourself
this one ques tion. What ex actly did he
accomplish? Simply this: instead of the
NSA collecting your records, the phone
company does it for those spooks.
Low theater
I repeat; under this new bill, the equally
misnamed “USA Freedom Act” (the name
alone, like “The Patriot Act” or “Operation
Iraqi Freedom,” should be enough to tell
you it’s a load of hogwash propaganda), the
NSA is spared the expense and manpower
of collecting the information itself, and
now simply has its pet “secret judges” from
“secret courts” issue more “secret orders”
telling the phone companies to provide it
for them.
Not really much difference, is there?
That’s because you just watched another
episode of the long-running soap opera
called “Political Theater,” with
Rand Paul in his first lead
role as The Loyal Opposition,
pro vid ing a safety valve to
release some of the public ire
while actually changing nothing
of substance; he can’t, even if
he wanted to, because the kind
of power that came from the
Patriot Act is something the
United States Government is
not about to give up, regardless of what
anybody says. Despite their legendary
incompetence (a good bit of it illusory, just
play acting for the public in this charade),
knowing that knowledge is power, they
understand its use and consider what they
got from the Patriot Act much too valuable
to surrender without a real fight. All of this
has little to do with security or fighting
terrorism; the Patriot Act has never stopped
a single terrorist act. Instead, its value among
our enemies – and danger to ourselves –
lies in opportunies for their gaining ever
more money and power.
For starters, even though they collect
information on everyone, the NSA could
care less about most of us, our email and
Facebook rants, except to get a general feel
of things, a finger-in-the-wind of public
opinion for government psychologists and
psy-ops people who adjust the political
screenplay accordingly, on an as-needed
basis. Our information is still valuable to
them, however, in two ways.
First, selected information of illegal (as
opposed to criminal, which in American is
not always the same) activities is funneled
to local police departments that, in turn,
make up some excuse to get a warrant or do
a “random” stop and search. This makes
cops look good, and they come to depend
on that information from the Feds; so that,
when Uncle Sam wants a favor, those who
should be at the epicenter of protecting us
from wrongful government oppression will
instead jump right in on its side.
Secondly, your personal information –
even if it is just metadata as they claim – is
of great monetary value to marketers in
corporatist America. If you don’t believe
it, look at Facebook and Google. There is
quite a bit of evidence suggesting that the
NSA either sells its data to big business or,
perhaps more likely, trades it for corporate
information wanted or when getting others
to do research for them in certain sensitive
cases which gives Uncle Sam “plausible
deniability.”
Actors guild
This is not the only way the Patriot Act
works with businesses, of course. Recent
leaks have shown that one of its primary
functions is industrial espionage, stealing
trade secrets and business information
from foreign companies and either selling
or trading that to companies and investors
here, thus assuring their continued backing
in the process.
This is a lucrative carrot for business
and law enforcement, but, of course, with
every carrot there comes also a stick.
While the Feds may not be interested in
you personally, they’re very interested in
certain others: politicians, judges, public
officials, organizational heads; and business
leaders, foreign or domestic, be they friend
or foe. These are the ones whose personal
data you can bet your bottom dollar is the
most eagerly sought and compiled by the
NSA.
The human comedy
Think about it; all of us have something
to hide. In most cases, it’s just something
potentially embarrassing; maybe you like
to surf porn or have strange tastes in sex,
maybe you drink a little too much or smoke
a little weed, or perhaps you once made a
politically-incorrect comment (à la Paula
Deen). Usually it’s not that big of a deal,
but, at the same time, you’d just as soon not
have it become public knowledge, right?
Sometimes, though, it really is a big deal,
one that involved deviant and criminal
activity, often of the worst kind. Either
way, since even ordinary embarrassment
can be the death knell for people in power
and lead to their public humiliation, loss of
jobs, and divorce for those farther down
the food chain, that information provides a
pretty strong lever to move them any way
their manipulator wants them to go.
All the world’s a stage
Did you ever wonder how Uncle Sam
gets so many people to go along with so
many wrong-headed ideas, and why so
many people suddenly decide on retiring
“to spend more time with the family”?
Easy; it’s called “blackmail.” The Feds do
it, the NSA facilitates it, and Rand Paul
puts on a dog and pony show to help fool
the sheeple into believing the problem has
been taken care of so we can go back to
sleep and not actually try dealing with it.
Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode
of Political Theater: Obamatrade.
Fast-track authority – a race to oblivion
By Ellen Brown
“L
ellenbrown.com
et the jury consider their verdict,”
the King said, for
about the twentieth
time that day.
“No, no!” said the
Queen. “Sentence first
– verdict afterwards.”
“Stuff and nonsense!” said Al ice loudly. “The idea of
having the sentence first!”
“Hold your tongue!” said the Queen,
turning purple.
“I won’t!” said Alice.
“Off with her head!” the Queen shouted
at the top of her voice.
– Lewis Carroll, Al ice’s
Adventures in Wonderland
Back to the unreal world
Fast-track authority was being sought in
the Senate last month for the Trans-Pacific
Partnership (TPP), along with the Trade in
Services Agreement (TiSA) and any other
such trade agreements coming down the
pike in the next six years. The terms of the
TPP and the TiSA are so secret that drafts
of the negotiations are to remain classified
for four years or five years, respectively,
after the deals have been passed into law.
How can laws be enforced against people
and governments who are not allowed to
know what was negotiated?
The “14th Amendment” wasn’t ratified!
It’s not the law! Get this
32-page booklet
What every
cat is
discovering
lately
into the paws of our kittens for under
50¢ per adventure. Read it and you’ll
see why we’re copy-catting the enemy’s
entreaty, “From each according to his
ability…”
10 for $10… PPD 100 for $20… PPD
50 for $15… PPD 200 for $30… PPD
Mention this ad
The First Freedom
Order them today: P. O. Box 385
Silverhill, AL 36576
The TPP, TiSA and Transatlantic Trade
and Investment Partnership (or TTIP,
which covers Europe) will collectively
encompass three-fourths of the world’s GDP;
and they ultimately seek to encompass
nearly ninety per cent of GDP. Despite
this enormous global impact, fast-track
authority would allow the President to sign
the deals before their terms have been made
public, and send implementing legislation
to Congress that cannot be amended or
fil i bus tered and is not sub ject to the
constitutional requirement of a two-thirds
treaty vote.
Huh?!
While these deals are being negotiated,
lawmakers can see their terms only under
the strictest secrecy, and can be subjected
to criminal prosecution for revealing those
terms. What we know of them comes only
through WikiLeaks. The agreements are
being treated as if they were a matter of
grave national security, yet they are not
about troop movements or military strategy.
Something else is obviously going on.
The bizarre, unconstitutional, blatantly
illegal nature of this enforced secrecy was
highlighted in a May 15th article by Jon
Rappoport, titled “What Law Says the Text
of the TPP Must Remain Secret?” He
wrote:
§ It seems like a case of mass hypnosis. . .
§ Members of Congress are scuttling
around like weasels, claiming they can’t
dis close what’s in this far-reach ing,
12-nation trade treaty.
§ They can go into a sealed room and read
a draft, but they can’t copy pages, and they
can’t tell the public what they just read.
§ Why not?
§ If there is a U. S. law forbidding
disclosure, name the law.
§ Can you re call any thing in the
Constitution that establishes secret treaties?
§ Is there a prior treaty that states the text
of all treaties can be hidden from the
people?
Israel Not A Democracy
By Norman F. Dacey, author of the best seller, “How
To Avoid Probate.” Studies Israel’s laws which make
it a Marxist dictatorship. 70 pages, $8 PPD.
Truth at Last Books
P. O. Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
To Congressmen who say they cannot
reveal what is in a treaty that will adversely
affect the lives of hundreds of millions of
people, Rappoport says:
§ Wrong. You’re lying. You can reveal
se cret text. In fact, it’s your duty.
Otherwise, you’re guilty of cooperating in
a RICO criminal conspiracy.
A corporate coup d’état
What’s going on was predicted by David
Korten in his 1995 block buster, When
Corporations Rule The World. Catherine
Austin Fitts calls it a “corporate coup
d’état.”
This cor po rate coup in cludes the
privatization and offshoring of the judicial
function delegated to the U. S. court system
in the Constitution, through Investor-State
Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions that
strengthen existing ISDS procedures.
As explained in The Economist, ISDS
gives foreign firms a special right to apply
to a se cre tive tri bu nal of highly paid
cor po rate law yers for com pen sa tion
whenever the government passes a law to
do things that hurt corporate profits – such
things as discouraging smoking, protecting
the environment or preventing a nuclear
catastrophe. Arbitrators are paid $600-700
an hour, giving them little incentive to
dismiss cases. The secretive nature of the
arbitration pro cess and the lack of any
requirement to consider precedent give wide
scope for creative judgments – the sort of
arbitrary edicts satirized by Lewis Carroll
in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.
Sentence first
To date, the highest ISDS award has
been for $2.3 billion to Occidental Oil
Company against the gov ern ment of
Ec ua dor over its ter mi na tion of an
oil-con ces sion con tract, al though the
termination was apparently legal. Under
the TPP, however, even larger and more
unpredictable judgments can be anticipated,
since the sort of “investment” it protects
includes not just “the commitment of capital
or other resources” but “the expectation of
gain or profit.” That means the rights of
corpo rations extend not merely to their
factories and other “capital” but to the
profits they expect to receive. Just the
threat of a mas sive damage award for
impairing “expected corporate profits”
could be enough to discourage prospective
legislation by lawmakers.
The Trade in Services Agreement adds
additional barriers to proposed legislation.
TiSA involves 51 countries, including
ev ery ad vanced econ omy ex cept the
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and
South Africa). The deal would liberalize
global trade in services covering close to
80% of the U. S. econ omy, in clud ing
financial services, health care, education,
engineering, telecommunications and many
more. It would restrict how governments
can manage their public laws, and it could
dis man tle and pri vat ize State-owned
enterprises, turning those services over to
the private sector. It would also block the
emerg ing trend to re turn pri vat ized
services to the public sector, by limiting or
prohibiting governments from creating or
reestablishing public utilities and other
“uncompetitive” forms of service delivery.
Time to wake up
It seems that the TPP, TTIP and TiSA are
not about the sort of “free trade” that would
free local businesses to sell abroad. They
are about freeing international corporations
from the government regulation necessary
to protect the economy, the people and the
environment. They are about preserving
pri vat ized mo nop o lies and pre venting
competition from the public sector. And
they are about moving litigation offshore
into private arbitrary tribunals – the sort of
tribunal that might have lost Alice her
head, if she had not awakened from her
bizarre dream.
American Free Press
is the weekly newspaper out of Washington, DC,
that rose from its ashes when they shut down The
Spotlight. Tired of waiting a whole month for TFF
to arrive? Subscribe to this also-truthful tabloid,
52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus
six free issues of Whole Body Health for $59.
American Free Press
16000 Trade Zone Avenue
Unit 406
Upper Marlboro, MD 20774
— Human gullibility —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
7
Trade treaties, mega-corporations, worldwide socialism
By Jon Rappoport
“T
activistpost.com
he ever-emerging popular image of
socialism: a humane government colossus
controls the means of production for the
benefit of the people; and share-the-wealth
at all levels of society comes alive. This is
political theory for children in a condition
of arrested development – for example,
college students and Hollywood actors
who long for lunch at the White House.”
(The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
I use the loaded word “socialism” in the
headline, because it’s important to understand that globalism is a form of socialism.
That may not sit well with some people,
because they believe in the socialism team
and think that team is against globalism.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
It’s about time they woke up.
Globalism was born out of the triumphs
of cutthroat capitalists such as Rockefeller
and international bankers like Rothschild
and Warburg. These men made a decision
quite natural for them: “By hook and by
crook I’ve acquired my fortune; now I
want a monopoly; I want to cut out the
competition; I want empire; therefore, I
have to control governments; I want to
make governments more powerful, so by
controlling them I control society.”
What better way to make
governments more powerful
than by forming a long-term
(criminal) collaboration with
mega-corporations, including
major banks?
Governments plus giant corporations.
Does that equal socialism?
You can quibble and say corporations
are re ally in charge and there fore this
isn’t socialism. Call it oligarchy. Call it
runaway capitalism or the corporate state.
This collaboration among governments,
mega-cor po ra tions and bank ers is the
triangle. It’s the engine of control. It
grossly limits freedom. It claims, through
propaganda, that its “government wing” is
for the people. That’s utter nonsense, of
course.
Other way around
Today’s socialists believe government is
the answer to the control of society by big
money and big greed. That’s a delusion.
The governments are on the side of big
money.
Socialists also like to say governments
are weak sis ters in the pocket of the
corporations, and therefore the governments
must become stronger. Another dangerous
fantasy.
The last time I looked at America, for
example, the government had an extensive
mili tary, a diz zy ing number of spy ing
agencies and a gigantic Justice Department
that could make arrests and put criminals
on trial. If that’s weak, what’s strong?
Who are the major money men of Wall
Street the U. S. government has thrown in
prison? Who are the mega-corporate thugs
the government has sent away for life
terms?
The government is firmly in bed with
the corporations. Committed. Purposefully.
All the trade treaties – GATT, NAFTA,
CAFTA, the TPP, etc. – are ba si cally
instruments of the government-corporate
collaboration. They strengthen corporations
and they strengthen the de facto global
Order extra copies of
The First
Freedom
Help your friends shed the
scales from their eyes!
See coupon on page 24
Let’s roll!
management system, which is government
on a far larger scale.
Securing monopoly requires controlling
governments and making them more and
more repressive in order to put populations
under control.
It makes per fect sense, if you’re a
billionaire or trillionaire sociopath.
When I say “Globalists controlling governments,” I’m talking about a partnership,
and if one partner, equipped with armies,
spies and prosecutors, surrenders to the
other partner, that’s a form of extreme
cowardice.
Just one example: the current globalist
TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) negotiation
is secret, as are the details of the treaty. But
any legislator in any of the 12 member
nations could step out of the shadows and
communicate everything he knows about
what’s in the treaty…if he wanted to.
In the U. S., a sen a tor might, at the
extreme, spend a night in jail for violating
Executive Branch regulations on classified
data.
He would also spark a much needed
Constitutional crisis, and he would become
a popular hero.
But no; so far, no U. S. Sen ator or
Congressman has dared to spill all the
beans.
Surrendered power
Of course, when government surrenders
its powers long enough (since roughly
1913 in the U. S.) and globalists/socialists
are brought into one key gov ern ment
position after another, up to and including
the Presidency, the corruption runs very,
very deep.
Does this sound like a benign State that
wants to do everything it can to help the
people?
Does this sound like “heraldic socialism”
determined to build a peaceful and fair
society?
Right now, President Obama is running
around in a panic, trying to put together
enough congressional votes to pass the
TPP. Does that sound like a man who wants
to rescue the American people from the
mega-corporations?
The so-called clas sic def i ni tion of
socialism: government controls the means
of pro duc tion. Just change that a bit:
government, in criminal collaboration with
mega-corporations, controls the means of
production.
Split hairs if you want to; but it’s a
distinction without a difference.
Tweedledee and Tweedledum
George Bush the Elder (globalist), who
briefly served as CIA di rec tor and as a
director of the Council on Foreign Relations
(Rockefeller/globalist powerhouse), ran
for a second term in the White House
against neophyte Bill Clinton (globalist).
Under ordinary circumstances, there was
no way Bush could have lost. But it was
globalist vs. globalist, a distinction without
a difference.
There are still hope-and-change people
out there who wonder how their man,
Obama, could be supporting Monsanto.
They haven’t gotten the memo yet. Obama
is a globalist, Monsanto a mega-corporation.
GMO crops? Roundup? The health dangers
of GMOs and pesticides? Irrelevant.
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, by Gary
Allen, 1971:
“…most of us believe socialism is what
the socialists want us to believe it is – a
share-the-wealth program… Here in the
reality of socialism you have a tiny
oligarchial clique at the top, usu ally
numbering no more than three percent of
the total population, controlling the total
wealth, total production and the very lives
of the other ninety-seven percent.
“…If one understands that socialism is
not a share-the-wealth program, but is in
reality a method to consolidate and control
the wealth, then the seeming paradox of
super-rich men pro mot ing so cial ism
be comes no par a dox at all. In stead it
becomes the logical, even the perfect tool
of power-seeking megalomaniacs.”
The trap
In America, untold numbers of young
college students are being conscripted into
the illu sion of gov ern ment-as-sav ior.
Matriculating on the basis of government
student loans, hav ing to go deep into
debt to pay back those loans, these young
peo ple are al ready wards of the State.
For them, the only question is: how can
they minimize the interest on the loans?
Otherwise, they see government and its
support of politically correct behavior and
speech as conditioning mechanisms leading
to “a better world.” This is Pathetic Mind
Control 101.
As part of this po litical cor rect ness,
the students are taught to rail against big
corporations, never realizing their adored
Mommy-Daddy Government is an active
partner in crime with the corporations.
“Reform government. Make government
better. Make government more responsive
to the people.” This is like hoping to stage
a con ciliatory dialogue with a T-Rex in
Jurassic Park.
Socialism – the nightmare it represents
– is the premier vehicle for those super-rich
men who have limitless political goals that
add up to population control.
The au thor of three explo sive col lections, The
Matrix Revealed, Exit from the Matrix, and Power
Outside the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a U. S.
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California.
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients,
the purpose of which is the expansion of personal
creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has
worked as an investigative reporter for thirty years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for
CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern
and other newspapers and magazines in the U. S. and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on
global politics, health, logic, and creative power to
audiences around the world.
Iceland recovers fast after jailing banksters
By Claire Bernish
A
theantimedia.org
fter Iceland suffered a heavy hit in the
2008-2009 financial crisis, which famously
resulted in convictions and jail terms for a
number of top banking executives, the IMF
now says the country has managed to
achieve economic recovery – “without
compromising its welfare model,” which
includes universal healthcare and education.
In fact, Iceland is on track to become the
first European country that suffered in the
financial meltdown to “surpass its pre-crisis
peak of economic output” – essentially
proving to the U. S. that bailing out “too
big to fail” banks wasn’t the way to go.
No sympathy for scoundrels
Iceland is beautifully, yet unfortunately,
unique in how it chose to handle the disaster.
It simply let the banks fail, which resulted
in defaults totaling $85 billion – lending
ample justification for the prosecution and
conviction of bank executives for various
fraud-related charges. The decision seemed
shocking at the time, but the gamble has
obviously paid off. Choosing a different
route, the U. S. bailed out the banks and let
executives off the hook by levying fines
that ultimately ended up being paid by the
corporations – meaning the executives
ostensibly responsible for the mess got off
scot-free.
“Why should we have a part of our
society that is not being policed or without
responsibility?” special prosecutor Olafur
Hauksson said after Iceland’s Supreme
Court upheld the convictions for three
bankers – and sentenced them to between
four and five and a half years each. “It is
dan ger ous that some one is too big to
investigate – it gives a sense there is a safe
haven.”
Hauksson, a police officer from a small
fishing village, ended up taking the role of
special prosecutor after being urged to do
so when the first announcement to fill the
position drew no applicants. The Icelandic
Parliament even aided the prosecution’s
effort by loosening secrecy laws to allow
in vestiga tion with out the hin drance of
requiring court orders.
Decisive and holding
Six of the seven convictions that ended
up in Iceland’s Supreme Court have been
upheld, and five cases were scheduled for
the top court as of February. An additional
four teen cases ap pear likely to be
prosecuted. By contrast, the animosity
Amer i cans felt to ward their larg est
financial institutions after the bailout has
grown bitter. After the banks pled guilty in
May for manipulating global currency and
interest rates, the court imposed a paltry
fine of $5.7 billion – which won’t even go
to the people most affected by the fraud.
Ice land’s suc cess ful pros e cu tions and
economic recovery remain the subject of
envy for Americans.
Shortly, however, Iceland’s economic
health will be put to the test.
Strict capital controls that were applied
when banks were circling the drain six
years ago will now be loosened, allowing
for eign in vestors – whose assets have
essentially been frozen since then – to take
their business elsewhere. To prevent a
possible repeat crisis, the finance minister
announced a 39% tax for anyone choosing
to do so. “The danger is capital flight and a
consequent fall in the value of the krona,”
explained University of Iceland economics
pro fessor Thorolfur Matthiasson. “That
would be tantamount to October 2008,
bringing back bad memories for ordinary
people and possibly making most businesses
un sus tain able due to bal ance-sheet
prob lems.”
Though many are nervous, there is still
cautionary optimism since Iceland has
certainly weathered the storm before.
8
The First Freedom
— The awakening —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
What’s it gonna take? Wake up America before it’s too late!
Latest U. S. statistical map
E
leven States now have more people
on welfare than they do employed! During
May 2015, the Senate Budget Committee
reported that in fiscal year 2014, between
food stamps, housing support, child care,
Medicaid and other benefits, the average
U. S. household below the poverty line
received $168.00 a day in government
support. What’s the problem with that
Jews and Their Lies
By Martin Luther, founder of the Lutheran Church.
Condemns Jews for undermining the Christian faith.
Says their “Talmud” (bible) preaches hatred for
Christ. 49 pages, $8 PPD. Truth at Last Books, P. O.
Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
much support?
Well, the median household in come
in America is just over $50,000,which
averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it
another way, being on welfare now pays
the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for a
40-hour week, while the average job pays
$20.00 an hour.
Furthermore:
There are actually two messages here.
The first is very interesting, but the second
is absolutely astounding, and explains a
lot. A recent “Investor’s Business Daily”
article provided very interesting statistics
from a sur vey by the United Na tions
International Health Organization…
Percentage of men and women surviving
a cancer five years after diagnosis:
U. S. 65%
England 46%
Canada 42%
Percentage of patients diagnosed with
diabetes who received treatment within six
months:
U. S. 93%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage of seniors needing a hip
replacement who received it within six
months:
U. S. 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Per cent age re ferred to a med i cal
specialist who see one within one month:
U. S. 77%
England 40%
Canada 43%
Num ber of MRI scan ners (a prime
diagnostic tool) per million people:
U. S. 71
England 14
Canada 18
Percentage of seniors 65 and over, with
low income, who say they are in “excellent
health”:
U. S. 12%
England 2%
Canada 6%
And now… for the last statistic:
Socialized Health Insurance?
U. S. NO
England YES
Canada YES
Spy agency had online “conformity” and “obedience” plans
rinf.com
included not only “suspected terrorists”
and “crim i nals” but also dip lo mats,
journalists and activists.
With never-before-seen
documents accompanied by
new reporting on June 22,
The In ter cept’s Glenn
Green wald and An drew
Fishman are offer ing a
more in-depth look than
ever into how a secretive
unit of the U. K.’s GCHQ
surveillance agency used
a host of psy cho log ical
methods and online subterfuge in order
to manipulate the behavior of individuals
and groups through the internet and other
digital forms of communication.
According to the reporting, the latest
documents, which were leaked to journalists
by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden,
demonstrate how the Joint Threat Research
Intelligence Group (JTRIG), a unit of the
signals intelligence agency Government
Communications Headquarters (GCHQ),
is involved in efforts against political
groups it considers “extremist,” Islamist
activity in schools, the drug trade, online
fraud and financial scams.
Though its existence was secret until
last year, JTRIG quickly developed a
distinctive profile in public understanding
after documents from NSA whistleblower
Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had
engaged in “dirty tricks” like deploying
sexual “honey traps” designed to discredit
targets, launching denial-of-service attacks
to shut down internet chat rooms, pushing
veiled propaganda onto social networks
and generally warping discourse online.
Digital stalking
Among the most troubling revelations
is a 42-page internal JTRIG memo that
de scribes in de tail how the elite unit
developed, maintained, and apparently
sought to ex pand its “sci en tific and
psychological research into how human
thinking and behavior can be influenced” in
order to increase its ability to “manipulate
public opinion” via online tools like email,
social media, video, discussion forums and
other platforms.
Greenwald and Fishman argue JTRIG’s
self-documented exploits are most notable
because of “extensive use of propaganda
methods and other online tactics of deceit
and manipulation” that are not only reserved
for “suspected foreign enemies” or criminals
as the agency continues to claim, but have
also been used against other groups and
in di vid u als that the agency deems
threatening or “politically radical.”
As Common Dreams reported back in
February of 2014 – when the existence of
JTRIG was first made public – the GCHQ
has used the unit to de velop and de ploy
a com plex se ries of “dirty tricks,”
“propaganda” and “false flag” operations
designed to spy on selected targets that
Jewish Atrocities against the Palestinians
Complete history of the Jewish conquest of Palestine.
Originated as a Communist State, assassinated those
who defended Palestinian rights, used terror to drive
them from their homes, under today’s murderous
military rule. 25 photos, 56 pages, $8 PPD.
Truth at Last Books
P. O. Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
Conspirators
Included in the new JTRIG memo is this
detailed look at the manipulative online
tactics developed by the group.
As shown at left, the reporting also
highlights this internal memo’s focus on
“manipulation” and how the GCHQ hoped
to foster both “conformity” and “obedience”
among those targeted.
Wanted
Thinkers
Survivors
The First Freedom is spreading “hate!” whine
those who misapprehend us survivors. It’s really
out of pity that we try so hard to de-program the
brainwashed. Order a box of 100 extra copies for
$35 or $40 on page 24 and help distribute the truth.
Yemen forces take control of Saudi bases
presstv.ir
The Yemeni army, backed by popular
committees, has seized control of a number
of Saudi military bases in the province of
Jizan, even as Riyadh keeps pounding the
impoverished Arab Nation.
According to media outlets, on June 21,
Yemeni forces managed to capture three
Saudi military sites in the area of al-Jaberi
in the southwestern region.
The Yemeni forces also set fire to two
Saudi military vehicles in the attack on
Saudi military bases.
Hired guns prove worthless
Yemen’s al-Masirah TV reported that
Saudi forces collectively abandoned their
positions and fled the area as a result of the
Yemeni attack.
Reports said earlier in the day that at
least one Saudi soldier had been killed and
five others wounded in a separate Yemeni
retaliatory attack in Jizan.
Reports over the past days have shown a
surge in border clashes between Saudi
ground forces and Yemeni fighters.
The advance by Yemeni forces comes as
Saudi Arabia continues to target Yemen
with deadly aerial attacks.
Saudi fighter jets pounded the town of
Saqayn in the northern Yemeni province of
Sa’ada in Riyadh’s latest onslaught on the
This April 13, 2015, file photo shows Saudi military vehicles patrolling three months earlier near the
border with Yemen close to the kingdom’s southwestern city of Jizan.
Arab coun try June 21. There was no
immediate report of casualties or damage.
Relentless air strikes
Saudi aircraft also bombarded a mosque
in the Yemeni capital, Sana’a, the previous
day, killing at least four people.
At least five people, including women
and children, also lost their lives in a Saudi
air strike on a residential area in Yemen’s
central province of Ma’rib.
Riyadh has been bombarding areas
across Yemen since March 26 without any
mandate of the United Nations (UN) and
with the aim of undermining the Houthi
Ansarullah movement as well as restoring
to power fugitive former president Abd
Rabbuh Mansour Hadi, who is a staunch
ally of the Al Saud regime.
Rupert Colville, spokesman for the U. N.
High Commissioner for Human Rights,
said on June 16 that in excess of 1,410
Yemeni civilians, including 210 women,
have been killed and a further 3,423 have
suffered injuries since Saudi Arabia started
its military campaign against Yemen.
Nicaraguans protest controversial canal
presstv.ir
Thousands of Nicaraguans have staged
a protest rally in a central city to voice their
anger at a government decision to give the
go-ahead to the controversial construction
of a canal through their lands.
On June 13, around 15,000 protesters,
mainly farmers whose lands lie on the
waterway’s planned route, gathered from
across the country in the central Nicaraguan
city of Juigalpa.
The demonstrators shouted “No to the
canal,” waving Nicaragua’s national flags
during the rally. Ground was broken last
De cember on the con struction site of
Nicaragua’s Interoceanic Grand Canal,
which is aimed at cutting a transportation
passageway between the Pacific Ocean
and the Caribbean. However, the digging
will not begin until 2016.
Banksters hire Dragon Lady
The Managua government has awarded
this massive, $50 billion canal project to
the Chinese firm of Hong Kong Nicaragua
Peasants march against the construction of an inter-oceanic canal in the city of Juigalpa in central
Nicaragua on June 13, 2015.
Development (HKND).
The waterway, which is scheduled for
completion in 2019, is expected to rival
the Panama Canal farther south. It crosses
Lake Nicaragua and runs through some 40
villages.
Farmers and native peoples living on the
canal’s route, however, oppose the project,
arguing that it will disrupt life along a
280-kilometer (175-mile)-long corridor.
The project is expected to displace some
30,000 people.
— The awakening —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
9
“Cookies lady” Nuland starts another jolly revolution
whatreallyhappened.com
Police brutally disperse a rally in the
capital of Armenia. Western and Ukrainian
media write that Armenia is experiencing
another “revolution of dignity.” A fifth
column is working inside the government.
The protests started after authorities had
raised tariffs on electricity, a request by the
Electric Networks of Armenia (subsidiary
of Russia’s OAO Inter RAO UES). The
State Commission for Regulation of Public
Services raised the price per kilowatt of
electricity by 6.93 drams (about 5.7 rubles,
vs. the previous 4.8 rubles, or 42 drams).
These new tariffs take effect on 1 August.
The information war against JSC Electric
Networks of Armenia reflects an assertion
that the company has accumulated a debt
worth $250 million due to inefficient and
even criminal management. It was said that
the company wanted to lay the burden of
debt onto Armenian taxpayers.
Members of the Armenian National
Congress stressed that the lion’s share of
the debt of the company expanded the
shadow budget of the country several
times the size of Armenia’s State budget.
To crown it all, it is Armenian President
Serzh Sargsyan who controls the shadow
budget, ANC claims.
Victoria Nuland brings ideas
Their statement says all of Armenia’s
problems can be solved by overthrowing
the government. “The regime will become
weak and impotent, if society consolidates
and starts fighting it,” representatives of
the Armenian National Congress said. This
looks like those revolutions in Ukraine and
other post-Soviet States, does it not?
Armenia’s Energy Minister accused the
Russian company of embezzlement. Does
the Armenian government condone theft?
“Such a government” must resign, and it
will happen, unless the President rethinks
his cabinet. Obviously, a fifth column is
conniving here. Active work was launched
soon after cookie lady Victoria Nuland
paid a visit to Yerevan. Paul Craig Roberts,
formerly with the Reagan administration,
said that Nuland had visited Armenia to
organize a coup there; Armenia would be
similar to what happened in Ukraine in
2014. The goal of funding NGOs there is to
put people in the streets and buy politicians.
Armenia would be destroyed to become a
vassal State. Afterward comes Kazakhstan,
Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. In all of these
post-Soviet countries, Washington wants
to build its army bases, Paul Craig Roberts
said.
The cookies lady
Interestingly, just a day after Nuland’s
visit, the Armenian government finally
approved the sale of all those Vorotansky
hydro-electric power plants to U. S.-based
ContourGlobal. The deal was evaluated at
$180 million.
Ukrainian general switches sides
A member of Kiev’s top brass has
defected to the Donetsk Republic,
and predicts more will follow him.
hungarianambience.com
I
ntroducing himself as Major General
Aleksandr Kolomiyets, this chief analyst
of the Ukrainian armed forces
and assistant to the Ukrainian
defense minister says morale in
the Ukraine military is low and
he has switched sides for moral
reasons. He has announced that
he is now working with the
forces of the self-proclaimed
Donetsk People’s Republic.
“I am the Ukrainian Armed
Forces Major General Aleksandr
Kolomiyets. My latest posts are
chief analyst of the Ukrainian
armed forces as assistant to the Ukrainian
defense minister,” the man said at a news
conference at the Donetsk news agency
loyal to this self-proclaimed republic.
Kolomiyets had previously spent 19 years
as the chief enlistment officer in the
Donetsk region.
“I am going to work for the good of the
Donetsk People’s Republic,” Kolomiyets
(not to be confused with oligarch Igor
Kolomoysky) announced.
The defector says he took his family out
of the Ukrainian capital because fearing
repercussions from officials.
He also claims a lot of people in the
Ukrainian military want to switch to the
military. They do not understand the orders
they are given, to kill civilians. We are
going to see that, by autumn, everything
will change.”
He added that morale is very low in the
Ukrainian army: “All the officers, generals
that understand the criminal nature of the
authorities’ actions, do not want to fight.”
Kiev responds
self-proclaimed republic’s side, including
officers. According to Kolomiyets, hundreds
have already abandoned Kiev.
“Look at who is actually fighting. Only
the volunteers from nationalist squads,”
the defector said at the news conference.
There is growing dissatisfaction with
the commanders, Kolomiyets said. “Soon,
there is go ing to be un rest within the
Mean while, the press sec re tary of
Ukraine’s General Staff told Ukrainskaya
Pravda newspaper that Kolomiyets was
discharged from the army in 2012 due to
incompetence. “He could not handle the
post of the army’s top analyst,” the paper
quoted the press secretary as maintaining.
“Besides, he traveled to Russia as a private
[individual]. Military men are supposed
to inform their commanders about such
visits, but he broke the rules.”
Kolomiyets, if it is him, is not the first
Ukrainian official to have switched sides in
the conflict that has been tearing the country
apart for over a year now. Prior defections
include the head of the Lugansk customs
office, an officer of the Ukrainian foreign
intelligence office and a member of staff of
the Ukrainian embassy in France.
ZOGistas drooling over prospects for another big one
Response Force (NRF) to 30,000 or 40,000
troops,” he said, add ing that the fi nal
decision on the number would be taken up
later in Brussels.
On June 13, the New York Times ran an
article saying that the Pentagon could store
“battle tanks, infantry fighting vehicles
and other heavy weapons for as many as
5,000 American troops in several Baltic
and Eastern European countries.”
The Pentagon will
provide weapons,
aircraft and forces
for NATO’s “rapid
response” to its own
provocative actions
in Eastern Europe.
T
rt.com
he U. S. aims to
send special operations
personnel, aircraft and
weapons for NATO’s
rapid reaction force based in Europe, says
Defense Secretary Ash Carter. Washington’s
new contribution could result in increasing
U. S. forces in Europe.
Washington will contribute intelligence
and sur veil lance ca pa bil i ties, spe cial
op er a tions forces, lo gis tics, trans port
aircraft and a range of weapons, Carter
announced June 22 in Münster, Germany,
after meeting with defense ministers from
Germany, Norway and the Netherlands.
Under the plan, those contributions are
to include precision joint fire capabilities
ranging from land-based artillery to air
support or naval firepower. However, he
did not specify the number of troops that
would be stationed or where they would
come from. Carter added that he planned to
discuss the U. S. contributions to NATO’s
rapid reaction force in Europe during his
visit to Brussels later that week.
Military/industrial complex
The new contributions could mean an
increase in U. S. forces in Europe, unnamed
defense officials told AP and Reuters.
“We do so because the United States is
deeply committed to the collective defense
of Europe,” Carter said.
NATO has been beefing up its forces in
its eastern member States to counter what
alliance commanders have repeatedly
dubbed “Russian aggression in Ukraine.”
Following a NATO summit in Wales in
September 2014, the alliance members
agreed to create a rapid 4,000-strong force
in Europe ready to be deployed within 48
hours.
“Noble,” as in Iraq, Syria, etc.
However, the initial number of troops
planned to be deployed has grown tenfold
in less than a year. On June 22, SecretaryGeneral Jens Stoltenberg announced that
the Spearhead Force might reach 40,000
troops.
“NATO defense ministers ... [will] make
a decision to further increase the strength
and capacity of the 13,000-strong NATO
This came as the Spearhead forces were
conducting their initial military exercises
codenamed “Noble Jump” in Poland. The
drills involved about 2,000 soldiers and
some 500 pieces of hardware, including
tanks, jets and helicopters.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, in
turn, announced plans to further strengthen
his coun try’s stra te gic nu clear armed
forces. On June 23 Putin stated that in 2015
Russia’s strategic forces will be getting
over forty new intercontinental ballistic
missiles (ICBMs).
“If someone threatens our territories, it
means that we will have to aim our armed
forces accordingly at the territories from
where the threat is coming. How else could
it be? It is NATO that’s approaching our
borders, not like we are moving anywhere,”
Putin said at a joint media conference with
Finland’s President Sauli Niinisto the same
evening in Moscow.
Despite the increase in NATO’s military
presence near the Russian border, Carter
stated on June 22 that the alliance is not
seeking a “cold, let alone a hot war with
Russia.”
NWO
“But make no mistake: we will defend
our allies, the rules-based international
order and the positive future it affords us
all,” he added speaking in Berlin.
Senior Colombian rebel leader killed
presstv.ir
Colombia’s military has killed a rebel
as well as illegal mining are widespread.
The rebel commander was also wanted
for the hijacking of an Avianca passenger
commander of the county’s second largest
left ist guer rilla group, the
National Liberation Army (ELN).
The Colombian government
said on June 14 that Jose Amin
Hernandez, also known as
Marquitos, was killed dur ing
combat in Segovia municipality
in the northwestern province of
Antioquia.
“The rebel known as Marquitos,
leader of the ELN’s Dario
Martinez front and a member of This picture, taken on February 27, 2000, shows members of
its National leadership, has been the National Liberation Army (ELN) of Colombia in a rural
road in Sarare, Colombia.
killed. Congratulations, armed
forces,” President Juan Manuel Santos said plane with nearly fifty people on board in
1999.
in a message posted on Twitter.
Having about 2,500 guerrillas, the ELN
The army issued a statement describing
the death of the ELN’s front leader as a is the sec ond big gest re bel group in
Colombia. It has been fighting against the
“decisive blow” to the rebel group.
Ac cord ing to the gov ern ment, government for more than 50 years and has
Hernandez was the commander of 13 ELN not entered the ongoing peace talks with
units in the provinces of Antioquia and Bogota.
The Co lombian gov ern ment and the
Bolivar, where drug and arms trafficking
coun try’s larger guer rilla group, the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
(FARC), started peace talks in 2012.
The negotiations between the two sides
in the Cuban capital, Havana, have so far
pro duced par tial agreements on several
issues, including ending the drug trafficking
that has fueled the conflict. But the two
sides have not clinched a final deal yet.
Over 200,000 people have been killed
in the Colombian conflict, which has also
up rooted more than six million since
FARC launched its activities in 1964.
Head of the Colombian delegation Humberto de
la Calle (L) and Cuban guarantor of the peace
talks Rodolfo Benitez shake hands before a press
conference at the end of the 37th cycle of the talks
between the Colombian government and FARC, at
Convention Palace in Havana, June 4, 2015.
10
The First Freedom
— Uncertainties —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Gun grabbers always grabbing for emotionalism
The President gets it wrong once
again – guns are actually saving
lives.
By Erich Pratt
gunowners.org
Just hours after the tragic shooting in a
South Carolina church, President Barack
Obama resumed his fanatical war on the
Second Amendment rights of law-abiding
gun owners.
“Now’s the time for mourning and for
healing, but let’s be clear – at some point
we as a country will have to reckon with
the fact that this type of mass violence does
not happen in other advanced countries,”
Obama said.
Really? Has the Pres ident forgotten
just some of the foreign massacres that
have taken place during his presidency –
shootings that claimed far more lives than
the nine which were tragically lost in South
Carolina? How about:
§ The attacks from earlier this year –
which began at Charlie Hebdo in Paris and
continued for 48 hours around the region –
that resulted in 17 people being murdered;
§ Or the Anders Breivik murders in
Norway in 2011 where 77 people were
murdered – 69 of them with firearms;
§ Or the Derrick Bird shootings in
Cumbria, England that left 12 people dead
in 2010.
In each of these cases, the
armed perpetrators ignored
strict gun con trol laws in
acquiring and carrying their
weapons.
One of the biggest problems with this
South Carolina church is that the potential
victims were disarmed by law.
In the Palmetto State, a concealed carry
permit holder can carry in places of worship
with permission from a church official.
Unfortunately, the pastor was an anti-gun
activist. As a State senator, the Pastor had
voted against concealed carry.
But the President completely misses all
of this. He ignores the fact that this was yet
another example where a massacre took
place in a Gun Free Zone.
“We don’t have all the facts, but we do
know that, once again, innocent people
were killed in part because someone who
wanted to in flict harm had no trou ble
getting their hands on a gun,” Obama said.
To the contrary, armed civilians have
actually prevented several mass shootings
from occurring – and some of them in
churches. Consider:
This past New Year’s Eve, a Florida
pastor prevented a possible mass shooting
at his church – and saved the lives of
several men, women and children – when
he used his firearm to incapacitate a
shooter.
Change
In the President’s home city of Chicago,
an Uber driver used his concealed firearm
this year to stop a gunman who was firing
into a crowd of people. The Assistant
State’s Attorney Barry Quinn praised the
Uber driver for “acting in self-defense and
in the defense of others.”
In March, police credited a concealed
carrier with saving several lives, including
those of children, in a Philadelphia barber
shop.
Replying in kind
And in years past, attempted massacres
were brought to a screeching halt at
churches in South Africa and Colorado,
solely because there were concealed carriers
in the service who were able to shoot back
against armed thugs.
No wonder that almost 90% of police
in America believe that the way to reduce
casualties in mass shootings is to allow
citizens to carry firearms concealed.
The President would blame an inanimate
object – the gun. But that just deflects blame
away from the real culprit: gun control
policies that leave people defenseless in
the face of evil perpetrators who are never
effectively prevented from acquiring
weap ons.
Erich Pratt is the Director of Commu ni cations
for Gun Own ers of America, a grass roots lobby
representing more than one million gun owners.
A storm of bloodshed in the 33rd degree
By Michael Hoffman
D
www.revisionisthistory.org
ylann Storm Roof was shown in the
national media with a Confederate States
of America license plate on June 18, the
day which began with the breaking news
that the U. S. Supreme Court had upheld
the ban on Confederate license plates by the
State of Texas (as far as those plates being
issued by the State itself). Coincidence?
A “Texas Masons” license plate complete
with the Square and Compass symbol, is
officially issued by the Texas department
of motor vehicles.
Matter over mind
Roof’s heinous killings occurred on the
33rd degree of north parallel latitude in
Charleston, South Carolina, headquarters
of the most powerful Masonic body in the
world, the Scottish Rite. Coincidence?
Other news media have reported that
Mr. Roof has in the past taken the
psychotropic drug Xanax. (He was facing
felony drug charges prior to the massacre
he perpetrated.) Was he drugged during his
shooting spree? The Establishment media
don’t ask, and they also don’t ask why
he was n’t tested for drugs or al co hol
being present in his system when he was
apprehended. Many other youths who
initiated massacres (Kip Kinkle and the
Col umbine High kill ers for ex ample)
were under the influence of a hypnotic
pharmaceutical drug when they committed
their crimes.
The New York Times issued a graph on
June 18 purporting to show that Black
people are the chief victims of hate crimes
in the United States, but these statistics are
cooked. It is very difficult to have Black on
White crime officially listed as a hate
crime. Such crimes are too often dismissed
as non-racial, random violence.
An inanimate object is taking some of
the blame for the murders. If Roof had
killed those nine Black peo ple with an
automobile would the media be filled with
questions concerning “How did he get the
car?” And “What can we do to keep cars
out of the hands of people like Roof?”
Certainly not. But because he killed with a
gun that piece of iron is being scapegoated.
Calls for “gun control” are simply a means
for disarming poor people and people who
do not have “connections.” Millionaires,
lawyers, judges and the “connected” will
always have gun permits, even in States
with the tightest “gun control,” or they can
afford bodyguards who will have permits.
The politically correct issues here are
racism and gun control, and the suppressed
issues are mind control pharmaceuticals
and Manchurian candidates.
Writer Michael Hoffman initially concluded this
article with, “Wish me luck: I’m giving a speech this
weekend at a ‘historically’ White church. Only, unlike
those unfortu nate unarmed Black victims of this
mur derous de gen er ate, the con grega tion I will be
ad dress ing in north Idaho will not be quite so
vul ner a ble.”
Thousands of Hondurans call for president’s resignation
Presstv.ir
Thousands of Hondurans
have taken to the streets of
the capital, Tegucigalpa, to
call on Pres i dent Juan
Orlando Hernandez to quit
over an alleged corruption
scan dal in his elec tion
cam paign.
Ac tiv ists said 30,000
people turned out on June
19 for the fourth weekly
demonstration in a row and Protesters march in the Honduran capital city of Tegucigalpa on
then marched toward the June 19, 2015, to demand the resignation of President Juan Orlando
Hon du ran pros e cu tor ’s Hernandez.
holding torches, flags and signs, with one
office.
of them reading, “If media do not speak,
Chanting “JOH out!” – referring to the we will give the details.”
president’s initials – the protesters were
“We are here because we are outraged,”
AFP quoted Rafael Alegria, an opposition
member of the National Con gress of
Honduras, as saying.
Weekly rallies kicked off on May 30 in
the wake of accusations that during the
2013 campaign, Juan Hernandez’ ruling
National Party received about $90 million
of over $300 million that had been skimmed
from the country’ public health system.
The president, denying any wrongdoing,
played down the graft scandal and pledged
to punish anyone found guilty of misusing
funds, emphasizing that investigators would
“get to the bottom of all this.”
Earlier that week, prosecutors charged
Congress Vice President Lena Gutierrez
with fraud, falsification of documents and
crimes against public health as part of a
President Juan Orlando Hernandez
probe into the corruption scandal.
Over the previous month, people had
staged similar demonstrations in several
cities across the Central American country,
demanding the resignation of the president
as well as several Honduran prosecutors for
failing to conduct a proper investigation
into the case.
Neo-cons imagine they’re winning the Great Game
The U. S., allows one official of
Russia, wishes to see his country
just cease existing.
presstv.ir
T
he head of Russia’s Security Council
has lashed out at the United States for
mobilizing the world against the so-called
“Russian threat,” saying that Washington
would like to see Russia cease to exist as a
country.
Nikolai Patrushev said on June 22 that
Washington’s policy since the start of an
armed conflict in east Ukraine has been to
put Russia on the level of an international
threat, somewhat like ISIL Takfiris and the
Ebola virus.
Russia and the West have been at odds
over the armed conflict in
Ukraine. The United States
and its al lies in Eu rope
accuse Moscow of having a
major hand in the crisis.
Russia denies the charges.
Wise to our ZOG
Patrushev said the U. S.
has committed a “political
mistake” by initiating the
crisis in Ukraine, which he
Russian President Vladimir Putin (R), accompanied
said was just a pretext to
by Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev
weaken Russia.
“They would like very much to see in Ukraine and maintaining its sovereignty
Russia cease to exist as a country,” he told and territorial integ rity, but their main
Rus sian-lan guage Kommersant daily, target is Russia.
adding that U. S. officials have no interest
“All they need is to apply pressure on
Russia and this is exactly what the U.S. is
doing,” Patrushev said, adding that such a
policy has forced the European countries to
follow suit and impose economic sanctions
on Moscow.
Lapdogs
European Union flags fly outside E. U.
headquarters in Brussels. “If it were not for
the U. S., [Europeans] would not pursue
such policies,” he said, stressing that
Washington enjoys a “massive” influence
over politicians and heads of States in
Europe.
Earlier that day, a statement said E. U.
foreign ministers had agreed at their recent
meeting in Luxembourg to extend the
Ukraine-related sanctions on Russia until
the end of January 2016.
— Change —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
11
Russia and China: Watch out Moody’s, here we come!
The Zionist NWO credit agencies
are finally getting competition.
By F. William Engdahl
journal-neo.org
O
ver the past approximate quarter
century of so-called economic globalization,
Wall Street’s ability to
be the home of the only
dom i nant “global”
rat ing agen cies to
bestow ratings on the
credit-wor thi ness of
the world has been one
of the most effective weapons of financial
warfare in the Wall Street arsenal. They rate
Nations as well as private corporations.
Now an answer to the Moody’s-Standard
& Poor’s-Fitch U. S. rating monopoly is
coming. Not from the E. U., where it is
long overdue. It is coming from Russia and
China, as so many bold and challenging
initiatives of late.
Today, despite repeated financial crises
where the New York Big Three credit
rating agencies either failed or acted with
clear political bias to rate, a virtual global
monopoly is held by Moody’s, Standard &
Poor’s and Fitch Ratings. The
“Big Three,” as they are called,
issued 98% of all credit ratings
in the United States and roughly
95% worldwide. That’s influence,
brother.
The sys tem that the most
important banks of Wall Street
developed after 1944 to make
New York the world financial
center and the dollar its reserve
cur rency had sev eral wellcon ceived fac ets to it. Af ter
1945 it was the fact that the U. S.
Federal Reserve held some 70%
of the world’s monetary gold so that the
dollar was then “as good as gold.” The
Nations of defeated Europe scrambled to
get every possible dollar to buy American
machinery and goods for postwar reconstruction. The Marshall Plan was explicitly
drafted to use U. S. taxpayer dollars to
extend loans to the recovering European
economies, almost $12 billion in the period
1948-1951 that was used to buy essential
goods like U. S. wheat and Rockefeller
American oil and to buy U. S. machine
tools, back when America was world
leader in machine tools, to reconstruct
factories and housing.
House of cards
The Dollar System that I describe in
detail in my book, Gods of Money: Wall
Street and the Death of the American
Century (Der Untergang des DollarImperiums), has been at the center of the
power of the Wall Street Money Trust
(as it once was correctly named) and the
American oligarchs ever since they created
the Bretton Woods Treaty in 1944.
Now that same dollar system is facing
an existential crisis and the power of those
same oligarchs to increase their power
through wars everywhere – wars financed
by the savings of other Nations such as
Germany, or Japan or China or Russia – is
threatened as never before. To survive they
are unleashing global financial sanctions
wars against countries like Syria, Iran,
Russia; currency wars and now a de facto
“rating war.”
After the defeat of Germany and the
Axis powers in 1945, the families who
controlled the banks of Wall Street and of
Wanted
Thinkers
Survivors
The First Freedom is spreading “hate!” whine
those who misapprehend us survivors. It’s really
out of pity that we try so hard to de-program the
brainwashed. Order a box of 100 extra copies for
$35 or $40 on page 24 and help distribute the truth.
Lower Manhattan – Chase Bank, Citibank,
or Morgan Stan ley, Lehman Broth ers,
Merrill Lynch – built a de facto empire in
which, according to the rules they imposed
on a defeated world including a bankrupt
Britain, would be based on the supremacy
of the U. S. dollar in the world.
In 1945 it was easy to get a defeated
Europe to agree to a Bretton Woods Gold
Exchange Standard in which all currencies
would be fixed to the U. S. dollar and the
dollar alone fixed to gold at $35 an ounce,
where it then remained until the system
collapsed in August 1971 when Nixon
abandoned gold-dollar convertibility. By
then Europe was booming with modern
reconstructed industry and the USA was
becoming a rustbelt. France and Germany
demanded U. S. gold bullion instead of
inflated dollars, and U. S. gold reserves
were vanishing.
After 1971, the dollar flooded the world
unfettered by gold reserve requirements
and U. S. military might during the Cold
War forced Japan, Western Europe and
others including OPEC to accept constantly
inflating paper U. S. dollars.
From 1970 until about 2000 the volume
of dollars in the world had risen some
2,900%. Because the dollar was the world
“reserve currency” needed by all for trade
in oil, goods, grains, the world was forced
to swallow a de facto mammoth inflation
after 1971.
A corrupt rating monopoly
The es tab lished New York credit
agencies would play a strategic role in this
post-1971 dollar system. During the 1970s
the U. S. Gov ernment’s Securities and
Exchange Commission, charged with
over sight of bond and stock mar kets,
issued a ruling giving the then-dominant
New York credit rating agencies – Moody’s
and Standard & Poor’s (and later Fitch
Ratings) – a de facto guaranteed monopoly
in an unregulated market, when they ruled
that only “Nationally Recognized Statistical
Rating Organizations” would be qualified
to issue appropriate ratings, i.e., only
Moody’s and S&P. Corruption was made
endemic to the U/ S. ratings game and
Washington was party to the dirty deal.
Cancerous cupidity
By the end of the 1970s, using the vast
amount of OPEC “petro-dollars” from the
two oil price shocks in 1973 and 1979,
New York international banks, using
London, began to loan to the rest of the
world to finance imports of oil and other
essentials. The New York credit rating
agencies, previously primarily rating U. S.
corporate bonds, expanded into the new
foreign debt markets as the largest and only
established rating agencies in the new
phase of dollarization and globalization of
capital markets. They set up branches in
Germany, France, Japan, Mexico, Argentina
and other emerging markets much like the
U. S. Big Five accounting firms.
During the 1980s the rating agencies
played a key role in down-rating the debt
of the Latin American debtor countries
such as Mex ico and Argen tina. Their
ratings determined if the debtor countries
could borrow or not. Financial market
insiders in London and New York openly
spoke of the “political” rating agencies
using their de facto monopoly to advance
the agenda of Wall Street and the Dollar
System behind it.
Then, in the 1990s, the New York rating
agencies played a decisive role in spreading
the “Asia Crisis” of 1997-98. With precise
timing of its downgrades they could
worsen the panic because they had been
suspiciously silent right up until the first
sign of crisis. The result was that the thenAsian “Tiger” economies of Thailand,
South Korea and Indonesia for the first
time were forced to submit to destructive
IMF conditionalities, whose ultimate result
was a massive export of capital from Asia
into the U. S. dollar bonds that created the
“Clinton” prosperity. Before the 1997-98
Asia Crisis, dollars were flooding into the
Tiger economies to invest. After it, some
$200 billion a year according to a Bank for
International Settlements estimate, flowed
in the reverse direction into U. S. Treasury
bonds, pushing U. S. interest rates way down
and feeding the dot.com stock bubble.
Fixed game
Curiously, when it came to its own back
yard, such as with rating the Texas energy
giant Enron in 2001, the largest postwar
U. S. corporate bankruptcy, the rating
agencies were strangely blind. They gave
Enron best ratings right up to the last
minute. Moody’s and friends did the same
with their ratings of “sub-prime” U. S. real
estate bonds – so-called mortgage-backed
securities in the first seven years of the new
century. They gave out the highest AAA
ratings right up to the outbreak of the panic
in March 2007. They did so even though
signs of crisis were everywhere in what
was a brazen conflict of interest, as Wall
Street mortgage bond issuers themselves,
under the bizarre rules of the U. S. rating
game, paid the raters to rate them. Rating
agencies were earning a new windfall in
prof its by rating the new as set-backed
securities and had no interest in “taking
away the punchbowl just when the party
was really getting hot.” Nor did Alan
Greenspan at the Fed for that matter.
Notably, until the present, the Big Three
U. S. rating agencies have been virtually
un reg u lated. They need not fear le gal
action for their ratings, even if politically
biased, since the U. S. Supreme Court ruled
that ratings were simply an expression of
the agencies’ informed opinions, protected
as “free speech” under the First Amendment.
Only in 2006 was even a pre tense of
legislation, the deceptively-named Credit
Rating Agencies Reform Act of 2006,
passed by Con gress and had no vis ible
effect deterring the rating agencies. The
reform was purely cosmetic to convince
the electorate that the Wall Street-owned
Congress was doing something to prevent
a repeat of the crisis.
In the Greek sovereign debt crisis, just
as E. U. governments were about to finalize
a deal to stabilize the Greek government’s
bond debt, in April 2010 Standard &
Poor’s (S&P), suddenly downgraded Greek
State debt by three full levels to “junk”
rating, which forced most pension funds
around the world to liquidate the bonds,
sending Greek interest rates to more than
10%. That rat ing act cre ated the Euro
crisis. It also saved the falling U. S. dollar,
the heart of the Wall Street-U. S. TreasuryFederal Reserve Dollar System.
E. U. rating failure
The blatant political timing of that April
2010 S&P Greek downgrade convinced
many E. U. governments of the urgent need
for a truly independent European Rating
Agency. Notable is the inability of the
E. U. to act on that and some seven years
after the outbreak of the financial crisis
of 2007-8. The E. U. has done nothing to
defend its own sovereign interests with an
independent credit rating authority. In April
2012, the attempt to devise a European
credit rating entity that, unlike the U. S.
model, would not be financed by the
governments or companies receiving the
ratings, died for lack of support and due to
subtle pressure from Washington by all
informed accounts. Washington and Wall
Street don’t easily give up such strategic
monopolies.
The raters threaten Russia
Now the U. S. is trying to use the rating
agencies to drive Putin’s Russia to the
precipice of sovereign default.
On the eve of Christmas, December 23,
2014, as most of the world was decorating
Christmas tree or buying gifts, Standard &
Poor’s, the same rater that triggered the
April 2010 Greek crisis, announced there
was “at least a fifty percent chance” that
Russia would be lowered to junk within 90
days. S&P would issue its rating at end of
January, they said. On January 12, Fitch,
the smallest of the Big Three U. S. raters,
joined S&P with the same downgrade
one notch above junk. Moody’s Investors
Service ranked Russia one step higher than
S&P and Fitch. In April, as Washington’s
U. S. Treasury financial warfare against
Russia began, S&P lowered the Russian
sovereign debt rating one level in April to
BBB-. In short, the New York rating cartel
holds a Sword of Damocles over Russia.
Junk rating would force international
pension funds and investment institutes to
dump Russian State bonds just as in the
Ruble default crisis of 1998, a crisis where
U. S. hedge fund billionaire George Soros
played a key nasty role and reportedly
made a killing.
Notably, the same Soros today is shouting
from the rooftops and in OpEd articles in
the major financial media that E. U. and
U. S. and other governments must urgently
come to the res cue of Ukraine and not
allow a default that would hurt private
Ukraine bondholders. Soros is also beating
the drums for war against Putin’s Russia.
Market rumors are that
Soros op por tu nisti cally
bought a huge amount of
cheap Ukrai nian bonds,
con fi dent that the E. U.
would come to the rescue.
They haven’t. Now the old
fox shows signs of panic. On
January 13 he went to Kiev
to meet Ukrainian billionaire
President Petro Poroshenko.
In Kiev Soros stated, “Ukraine is
struggling to protect not only itself, but
also Europe [sic!]. Thus, Europe should
help Ukraine implement reforms necessary
for the country.”
E. U. Commission President Juncker
triggered Soros’ panic on December 17
when he announced no new E. U. money to
bail out Ukraine was forthcoming for at
least the next two years. The E. U. had
other fish to fry, he said. So much for the
Febru ary 2014 E. U. rosy promises of
billions in financial support to the coup
re gime they and Wash ing ton il le gally
installed in Kiev with their hollow offer of
an E. U. Associate Member status.
Russia and China act
Unlike the politically impotent E. U.,
however, Russia today is not the Russia of
the corrupt Yeltsin era of the late 1990s.
Vladimir Putin and China’s Xi have agreed
to create their own international credit
rating agency and it plans to open for
business this year, 2015.
The Universal Credit Rating Group
(UCRG) plans to begin official independent
ratings in 2015 to challenge the Moody’s,
S&P and Fitch ratings monopoly, according
to RusRating Managing Director Aleksandr
Ovchinnikov.
The new agency will be based in Hong
Kong. Interestingly, there is a third equal
partner to Russia and China in UCRG. In
addition to China’s Dagon Credit Rating
Agency and Russia’s RusRating, the U. S.-
12
The First Freedom
— The Great Game —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
based independent Egan-Jones Ratings is
partner in the new UCRG. Each member
will hold an equal share in the venture,
with an initial investment of $9 million.
In effect, three already well-established
national independent rating agencies form
the new UCRG joint venture. It is a serious
challenge to the New York Big Three
mo nop oly.
Rarity
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, also
known as EJR, founded in 1995, is a very
interesting partner for Russia and China
raters. It is unique among U. S. nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations
(NRSROs) for being wholly investorsupported, not client-financed, eliminating
the gross conflict of interest of the Big
Three. On April 5, 2012, Egan-Jones was
the first rater to down grade the credit
ranking of the United States. In addition
Egan-Jones was also the first to downgrade
WorldCom and Enron.
The UCRG was officially created in
June 2013 and has since been finalizing
its business structure. Ovchinnikov added
that, “When the issue of creating an agency
alternative to the ‘Big Three’ was raised,
we in fact offered a project that was ready
to be launched and was supported by the
governments of Russia and China.” He
explicitly pointed to the bias of the U. S.
Big Three raters to be overly “generous” to
U. S. and E. U. clients while being biased
against developing or emerging countries
such as the BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India,
China and South Africa.
Now with an independent credit rating
agency, a $100 billion BRICS Infrastructure
Bank and strategic local currency agreements in place, Russia and China, Brics for
Brics, are establishing the architecture to
a genuine alternative to the destructive
neo-colonial IMF and World Bank and the
Jewish Atrocities against the Palestinians
Complete history of the Jewish conquest of Palestine.
Originated as a Communist State, assassinated those
who defended Palestinian rights, used terror to drive
them from their homes, under today’s murderous
military rule. 25 photos, 56 pages, $8 PPD.
Truth at Last Books
P. O. Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
tyranny of the Wall Street dollar system.
The year 2015 will indeed by interesting.
Poor Mr. Soros might have to look for
another job.
F. William Engdahl is a strategic risk consultant and
lecturer. He holds a degree in politics from Princeton
University and is a best-selling author on oil and
geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine
“New Eastern Outlook.”
Keep your money, Soros
Two
rt.com
se nior law mak ers from the
Commu nist Party cau cus have asked
Russian prosecutors to use the recently
introduced law on “undesirable” foreign
groups against George Soros’s Open
Society organization.
“The anti-Russian activities
of Soros’s foundation must
be recognized as undesirable
be fore they as sume the
destructive forms that we
could observe in Ukraine,
Georgia and other countries,”
MPs Valery Rashkin and
Sergey Obukhov said,
appealing to the Prosecutor
General.
The Communist leaders claimed that
the Open Society NGO had conducted
“per sistent anti-Russian activities for
decades” and that it happened both in
Russia and in other countries. They said
that the group was allegedly promoting
hatred against Russians in Ukraine and
also launched some “proxy subversive
operations” in the Russian Federation.
In particular, the two MPs blamed
George Soros’s NGO for the destruction of
the Russian education system, manifested
in the much-criticized system of single
State exams for schoolchildren as well as
underfinancing of schools and institutes.
The Law on Un de sir able For eign
Groups that came into force earlier last
month charges the Prosecutor General’s
Office and Foreign Ministry with the task
of creating an official list of “undesirable
foreign organizations” and outlawing their
activities in the country. The main criterion
for putting a foreign or international NGO
on the list is “a threat to the Constitutional
order and the defense capability or security
of the Russian State.”
“Judeo-Christians,” are you totally blind, deaf and dumb?
Meet the REAL Israeli Defense
Force: the U. S. Congress.
Israeli gears
By Jeffrey St. Clair
counterpunch.org
It started as a rather melancholy Friday
afternoon in the West Bank. Nothing unusual. Just another funeral for a promising
young man who died much too young.
Under the implacable shadow of the Wall
and in the rifle sights of Israeli soldiers,
more than 200 mourners walked down the
cobbled street toward the old cemetery in
the village of Beit Ummar. Some shouted
angrily at the soldiers, condemning Israel
for yet another senseless death.
The funeral was for a college student,
Jafaar Awad, who slipped into a coma and
died only two months after being released
from an Israeli prison, where his serious
illness had festered untreated for months.
Awad was only 22 when he died, as have so
many other Palestinian prisoners, from
medical neglect at the hands of Israeli
jailers.
Sadistic
As his family huddled around his grave,
the IDF launched a dozen tear gas canisters
toward the mourners, scattering the stunned
group ing. Then au to matic weap ons fire
strafed the crowd, bullets hitting more than
a dozen people, including Jafaar’s cousin
Ziad Awad. Ziad was struck in the back,
the bullet piercing his spine. He was rushed
to the Al Ahli Hospital in Hebron, where
he died of his wounds. Ziad was only 28
A few hours after Ziad’s murder at the
hands of Israeli snipers, the IDF issued a
terse statement saying that Israeli soldiers
fired on the crowd of mourn ers af ter
people where seen throwing stones.
I’m surprised the IDF even felt compelled
to issue a justification for a kind of killing
that has be come rou tine: kids were
throwing stones, skipping rocks, jumping
rope, blowing bubbles, tossing dirt on an
open grave. They had no option but to
shoot.
Tragic
The Palestinians have no redress for
these daily acts of butchery: no court to go
to judge the legitimacy of shootings, no
venue to seek compensation for medical
bills, pain and suffering or lost work days,
no avenue to find a measure of justice
for the slain. How much loss, misery and
humiliation are one people expected to
endure?
The Israeli State has never been more
vi o lent, the blood toll of Pal es tin ian
civilians never so high. In 2014, the Israeli
military and security forces killed more
than 2,300 Pal es tin ians and wounded
another 17,000. That’s the worst carnage
since 1967, when the occupation of the
West Bank and Gaza intensified in the wake
of the Six Day War. During the height of the
last Israeli rampage in Gaza last summer,
more than 500,000 Pal es tin ians were
displaced from their homes. And, according
to a recent U. N. Report titled Fractured
Lives, more than 100,000 of them remain
homeless. Detentions of Palestinians inside
Israeli prisons are also on the rise. As of the
end of February of this year, more than
6,600 Pales tin ians were be ing held in
Israeli prisons and IDF detention centers,
the most in five years. So the gears of the
killing machine grind on with impunity,
each slaughter only serving to embolden
more killing.
accounts for more than half of all U. S.
military aid worldwide, is enough to satiate
Israel’s thirst for new weaponry. Even as
Israel repeatedly sabotages U. S. policy
across the region, Obama has described the
U. S. aid package as “sacrosanct.”
In this light, the annual subornment of
Israel, which totals about a third of the
nation’s arms budget by the U. S. begins to
Sadomasochistic partnership
Who will stop them? Certainly not the
Israeli State’s principle financial investor.
For the most vigorous Israeli Defense Force,
unblinking in its vigilance, unfaltering in
its loyalty, is the U. S. Congress. There is a
savage synchronicity to an alliance between
one nation that drone strikes weddings and
another that shoots ups funerals.
Each year Congress drops a cool $3
billion on Israel. Even in chambers ruled
by fiscal tightwads the only real debate is
whether this lavish dispensation, which
look less like a subsidy to a client State
than protection money paid to a gangster
organization.
It should come as no surprise that two
of Benjamin Netanyahu’s most fer vid
American dis ciples, Ted Cruz and Tom
Cotton, both gradu ated from Harvard
Law, where they incubated in the Zionist
hothouse of Alan Dershowitz. Yet, Cruz
and Cotton aren’t outliers. Indeed, there
is scarcely a micron of daylight between
the positions of Ted Cruz and Elizabeth
Warren, the Athena (to HRC’s Medea, I
suppose) of the progressives, when it comes
to defending the scandalous behavior of
Israel. Indeed Warren, like many other
lib er als, seems to work over time to
demonstrate her unrivaled fealty to the
Jewish State.
Robots
The vaunted Israel Lobby scarcely even
needs a lobbyist anymore. These days the
new members of con gress arrived preconditioned to demonstrate their devotion
to the Israeli cause. They don’t need to be
bribed with PAC money, courted with
hookers or blackmailed with indiscrete cellphone photos. When Israel assassinates an
Iranian scientist, uses chemical weapons in
Gaza, tortures prisoners, murders a young
American peace activist, enfilades a burial
party or is caught spying on the American
president, the congress will leap in unison
to its defense – no questions asked, no
questions answered – and dispatch another
check to Tel Aviv.
In the face of the world’s lon gest
running war crime, the American capital
stands inert, an ethical void, its halls
packed with the political equivalent of
GMOs. Pass the Round-Up.
Jeffrey St. Clair is editor of CounterPunch. His new
book is Killing Trayvons: an Anthology of American
Violence (with JoAnn Wypijewski and Kevin Alexander
Gray). He can be reached at: [email protected].
“Athens does not need help from the IMF”
presstv.ir
The Greek minister of State says
his country does not need more help
from the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) and Europe would be better off
without the U. S.-based institution.
Nikos Pappas’ remarks came ahead
of a summit meeting of the European
Union to determine whether Greece
would remain in the eurozone or leave
the bloc.
Unwanted
“I am one of those who think that the
IMF should not be in Europe. I hope we
find a solution without its participation,”
Pappas, who is close to Greek Prime
Min is ter Alexis Tsipras, told the daily
Ethnos on June 21, AFP reported.
The minister added that Europe “has no
need” for the Washington-based IMF,
because its agenda shows that it “is not at
all European,” and Europe “can continue
without it and its money.”
The IMF was asked by the E. U. to
intervene and help rescue Greece at the end
of 2009, when the debt-ridden country was
no longer able to borrow on international
Greece’s Minister of State Nikos Pappas
markets.
The E. U. was supposed to provide 240
billion euro in loans to Greece in exchange
for drastic austerity measures and reforms
implemented by the Greek government.
However, E. U.’s role in saving the crisishit country was to end at the end of June
2015, while IMF was expected to continue
its involvement up until March 2016.
During the past nine months, bailout
talks between Greece and its international
lenders – the IMF, the European Central
Bank and the European Union – have been
in a position of deadlock over the payment
of the last tranche of Greece’s bailout,
which amounts to 7.2 billion euros.
The Greek government argues that
continuation of the bailout should be
aimed at helping the country’s devastated
economy without enforcement of additional
austerity measures.
“The agreement should be of a type
and timeframe so that it would re store
con fi dence,” Pappas told the Greek
news pa per, add ing, “It should n’t be
short-term which would only lead to
further uncertainty.”
Wheeler dealers
According to the terms of the bailout
deal with international lenders, Greece had
to make a 1.6-billion-euro payment to the
IMF at the end of last month, while another
6.7-billion-euro payment is due to the ECB
in July and August. Greek officials had
previously announced that their country
would not be able to make those payments.
Economic analysts have been warning
for a long time that Greece’s default on its
debt to international creditors could trigger
a cascade of events which might lead to
Athens’s exit from the eurozone, the move
known as Grexit.
— The Great Game —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
13
Russia weathers sanctions: $5.4 billion deals at St Pete
rt.com
Worth $5.4 billion, 205 contracts were
signed at annual St. Petersburg International
Economic Forum SPIEF-2015, completely
refuting the idea of Russia’s economic
isolation. This compares with 175 deals
signed at the 2014 event, worth $7.4 billion
said Anton Kobyakov, executive secretary
of this year’s SPIEF organizing committee.
This year, some 10,000 representatives
from 120 countries visited the so-called
“Russian Davos,” an “unprecedented”
interest in the event, Kobyakov stated.
About 2,000 journalists were accredited to
cover the Forum – a record for the Forum’s
19-year history, he said.
The Forum’s events were attended by
top officials coming from Greece, China,
Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Mongolia, Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain and Iraq. SPIEF was also
attended by eight former heads of State,
some 200 CEO-level executives of foreign
companies and 1,500 of their Russian
counterparts.
“The results of the forum tear to shreds
the time-worn the sis of the al leg edly
efficient, [severe] isolation of Russia from
global development processes,” Kobyakov
said.
A Russia-Greece gas deal estimated at
€2 billion to construct the Turkish Stream
pipeline across Greece was probably the
most remarkable deal struck at the forum.
The so-called “Nord Stream 2.0” gas
agreement between Gazprom, Shell, E.ON
and OMV was another major deal at the
Forum. They signed a memorandum of
intent to lay two additional gas pipelines
under the Baltic Sea, with a capacity of 55
billion cubic meters per year. It will follow
the route of Nord Stream, bringing Russian
gas to European consumers.
BP acquired a 20 percent stake in one of
Russia’s largest oil and gas fields in Eastern
Siberia, which belongs to Rosneft subsidiary
Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha (Taas).
The de posit cur rently pro duces about
20,000 barrels of oil per day. BP’s share in
the project is estimated at $750 million.
In 2014, a total of 7,590 representatives
of foreign delegations from 73 countries
attended the Forum.
Saudis to offer Putin a deal he can’t refuse?
journal-neo.org
It is reported that Saudi Arabia has sent
a delegation to Moscow for the purpose of
once again attempting to lure Russia away
from its current interests in the Middle
East, and into line behind Riyadh and its
underwriters in Washington.
Puppet State
However, vacillating in the past between
toothless threats and absurd promises of
lavish economic deals, the Saudis have
accomplished only one thing in their recent
string of diplomatic maneuvering, that is,
to tele graph im mense weak ness and
desperation ahead of their next visit.
Indeed, if on Earth there is one Nation
that needs Russia the most, it might be
Saudi Arabia. Conversely, however, if ever
there was a Nation Russia would be wise
enough never to do business with, it would
also be Saudi Ara bia. A client-State of
the British and then American empire, it
has of late allowed itself to be used as an
intermediary in an increasingly dangerous
proxy war in volv ing Syria, Iraq, Iran,
Yemen, and, to a certain extent, Lebanon,
Egypt and even Libya.
Per fidious chameleons
While un doubt edly the U. S. State
Department staff explained at length how
Washington would never allow anything to
happen to their favorite regional autocracy,
the war Riyadh started on Washington’s
behalf in Yemen is now slowly creeping
over the borders into Saudi territory, and
the weap ons and fight ers emerg ing on
that bat tle field may yet link up with
long-simmering tensions in eastern Saudi
Arabia.
To the north, Saudi Arabia has actively
contributed to the destruction of Iraq and
Syria, and, on the African continent, Saudi
Arabia has played a role in destabilizing
both Egypt and to a far greater extent
Libya. Should the tides turn in any of these
theaters of war, the temptation for those
victimized by Saudi Arabia’s meddling to
in turn help fuel chaos upon the Arabian
Peninsula will be overwhelming.
To say that Saudi Arabia is a Nation in
need of friends is an understatement, and
Riyadh might finally have realized that
Washington sees its “favorite” autocracy as
it does all other client-States, expendable.
However, so sociopolitically, economically
and geopolitically disfigured from its role
as chief regional facilitator for Washington
and Lon don’s agenda, it may have left
itself with no alternatives.
The “Deal”
Saudi Arabia has done much to destroy
its neighbors in the Middle East and North
Africa (MENA), but it also has played a
role in applying pressure on States well
beyond, some States that hold significant
in flu ence through out the re gion. This
includes Russia. In fact, Saudi Arabia’s
role in destabilizing and destroying the
MENA re gion is part of a larger
geopolitical gambit aimed at Moscow,
among others.
In the past, the Saudis have both lavished
with promises of wealth and threatened
Moscow with outright terrorism, in order
to pressure Russia to abandon its allies in
Damascus, Baghdad and Tehran.
It was reported by the London Telegraph
in its article, “Saudis offer Russia secret oil
deal if it drops Syria,” that:
Saudi Arabia has secretly offered
Russia a sweeping deal to control
the global oil market and safeguard
Russia’s gas contracts, if the Kremlin
backs away from the Assad regime
in Syria.
It also stated, in addition to the offer,
that there was as well an implicit threat:
As-Safir said Prince Bandar pledged
to safeguard Russia’s naval base in
Syria if the Assad regime is toppled,
but he also hinted at Chechen
terrorist attacks on Russia’s Winter
Olympics in Sochi if there is no
accord. “I can give you a guarantee
to pro tect the Win ter Olympics
next year. The Chechen groups that
threaten the security of the games
are controlled by us,” he allegedly
said. Prince Bandar went on to say
that Chechens operating in Syria
were a pressure tool that could be
switched on an off. “These groups
do not scare us. We use them in the
face of the Syrian regime but they
will have no role in Syria’s political
future.”
Clearly, Saudi Arabia’s lack of reliable
allies stands for good reason. Bandar’s
gloating about Riyadh’s role in creating
and controlling some of the most vicious
terrorist organizations on Earth confirms
what has been reported elsewhere across
both the alternative and even mainstream
press. It also confirms that while Washington,
Lon don and Brussels dis in ge nu ously
wring their hands about the threat of
“Islamists,” they are allied closest with the
very Nation responsible for this same threat.
Why Putin can refuse
Russia’s resurgence as a global power is
underpinned not on Saudi oil or the lack of
terrorism in the Caucasus region, but instead
underpinned by its growing relationship with
other members of the BRICS association
as well as other Nations throughout the
developing world who are quickly gaining
ground versus traditional global power
brokers.
New compact
Brazil, India, China and South Africa
have all found themselves on the receiving
end of similar pressure from Washington
and London, though arguably to a lesser
extent. Their combined economies and
populations provide a market Russia has
been incrementally transitioning to serve,
out side of the con fines and ex tor tion
imposed upon it dealing with the West.
Like wise, other Na tions
across the developing world
are increasingly aware of this
shift ing bal ance of power
and are seeking ways out of
compromises they previously
made to placate such foreign
interests as would otherwise
eviscerate their Nations like
they’ve done to Libya, Syria
and Iraq.
Additionally, despite the pressure of
sanctions and Saudi Arabia’s oil pricefixing, Russia has attempted to continue
reaching out to European Nations in the
hopes of working around derailed pipeline
deals and other disruptions intentionally
created and aimed at Moscow. Russia has
done this with varying degrees of success,
all while cultivating a policy of National
self-reliance.
The Eu ro pean Un ion it self is also
suffering under the sanctions imposed on
Russia, ironically, and many Nations have
at tempted to un der mine or circumvent
these sanctions in order to secure for
themselves the ben efits Brussels and
others would gladly forfeit on their behalf
to pursue their own agenda.
In reality, Russian President Vladimir
Putin can say “no” to Saudi Arabia’s
wheeling and dealing specifically because
it is not Russia that needs Saudi Arabia, it
is Saudi Arabia that in fact needs Russia.
Riyadh’s role as Washington’s proxy in
the Middle East and even as a means of
leverage on the greater global stage has led
it to the edge of a cliff. This is a cliff
Washington itself will inevitably fall over,
but it will not do so until its proxies have
pushed over first.
Considering these realities, it may be
time for Riyadh’s delegation to Moscow to
put aside the empty threats and equally
empty promises, and talk about a real path
forward. Riyadh’s, not Moscow’s future
may depend on it.
Morales slams U. S. coups, dictatorships
presstv.ir
as world peace when calling on the E. U. to
come up with social programs to fight
poverty.
Bolivia’s President Evo Morales has
blasted the U. S. for still relying on military
coups and dic ta tor ships to impose its
policies in the world, saying that his country
is doing much better after having cut off
Washington’s meddling.
Describing Washington’s current policy
as one of “military expansion,” the Latin
American president said on June 14 that
the U. S. continues to use tactics such as
government coups and military dictatorships
to impose its policies “in the pursuit of
geopolitical interests.”
Mo rales made these re marks in an
in ter view with RT’s Span ish-lan guage
chan nel in Brussels, wh ere he was
attend ing the E. U.-CELAC summit of
European, Latin American and Caribbean
leaders.
No Jews wanted
“Everything is well in Latin America,”
Mo rales fur ther em pha sized, add ing,
“Bolivia is showing significant economic
growth due to the fact that we have gained
political independence. The U. S. no longer
governs our country through its embassy
and doesn’t make decisions for us.”
He also slammed the U. S.-based
International Monetary Fund (IMF) for
dictating its economic policies on Nations
through its loan programs, indicating that
Bolivia no longer allows the Fund to set
economic policies for his country.
“The IMF doesn’t decide for us in the
Tired of it
Bolivian President Evo Morales
Morales has been a strong critic of
Washington’s policies, particularly with
regards to Latin American Nations.
U. S. relations with Bolivia deteriorated
further in 2013 after the grounding of a
passenger plane carrying Morales in Vienna.
While heading home on a flight from
Moscow in July of that year, several E. U.
Nations closed their airspace to his plane
on the suspicion that former contractor of
the American NSA spy agency Edward
economy sector,” he said.
Morales further called on European
Nations to rid themselves of U. S. political
domination as well as IMF’s economic
“dictates.”
“I would want to conclude
an alliance with Europe to free
ourselves together from [U. S.]
impe rial domi nance and its
neocolonial men tal ity, which
seeks hegemony,” said Morales,
urging Europe “to get rid of the
U. S. political influence” and
“economically free yourselves
from the International Monetary
Fund’s dictates.”
During the inter view with Bolivian President Evo Morales (C) is welcomed to the
E. U.-CELAC Summit in Brussels by European Commission
RT, the Bolivian president also President Jean-Claude Juncker (L) and European Council
underlined that he is “very sorry President Donald Tusk (R), June 10, 2015.
that, instead of freeing themselves from the Snowden – wanted in the U. S. on spy
shackles of the North American Empire, charges – was on board his jet.
some coun tries con tinue to live in its
Bolivia then blamed the U. S. for the
submission.”
grounding of the presidential plane, and
He went on to highlight the significance Morales threatened to shut down the U. S.
of social equality, saying it is as important embassy in La Paz.
14
The First Freedom
— 150 years of subjugation —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Censored details of the Southern Holocaust
themselves fully justified in hanging U. S.
President Abraham Lincoln and his entire
high command for violations of the laws of
war – specifically for waging war against
noncombatant civilians.
In a moment of candor, Sherman wrote
Grant: “You and I and every commander
must go through war justly chargeable with
crimes.”
Here continues the untold story
of our Southern Holocaust, truths
the court historians agree never to
mention, facts untaught in “public
education” centers.
By John Peeples
firstfreedom.net
M
ajor General W. T. Sherman and his
army eventually reached its destination at
Goldsboro, North Carolina, on 27 March
1865 after their rapine to (and from) the sea
was completed. He then met with fellow
war criminals Grant and Lincoln at City
Point on the James River, where Sherman
regaled them with his exploits, writing in
his personal memoirs later that Lincoln had
wanted to know all about those marches
and particularly enjoyed stories about the
bummers (as the looters were called) and
their foraging activities. For Sherman had
famously promised that he would “make
Georgia howl” with his March to the Sea.
(That he did, and South Carolina as well.)
After the war Sherman announced, “Now
the truth is we fought the holiest war ever
fought on God’s earth”: the same rhetoric
warmongers in Cesspool, DC, mouth today.
Other war criminals
U. S. General Phil Sheridan laid waste
the Shenandoah Valley on 24 September
1864. Further evidence that waging war on
civilians was an integral part of Lincoln’s
strategy lies in the burning of Virginia’s
Shenandoah Valley that autumn. Finally
the Confederate forces had been pushed
out of the valley by the Federal arsenal’s
overwhelming power when General Grant
ordered Sheridan to make one more trip
down the valley pillaging, plundering and
burning everything in sight: “Carry off
stock of all descriptions, and Negroes, so
as to prevent further planting.” Anything
that could not be con sumed was to be
destroyed. The land was to be devastated,
Grant ordered, so that crows flying over it
would need to pack their own lunches. “If
this war is to last an other year, we want
the Shenandoah Valley to remain a barren
waste.” The valley was to be turned into “a
desert” and its residents rendered homeless.
“General Hunter has already started the
job, having burned the Virginia Military
Institute among other things.”
Grant was careful to inform Sheridan of
the political imperative of his mission: If
his soldiers should be defeated in the
Shenandoah Valley, that bad news could
cause Lincoln to lose the November 1864
election, and the Democrat Party was then
inclined to work out a peace agreement.
(Sherman had understood this as well in
his Atlanta Campaign.) So that was to be
avoided at all costs. As Sheridan stated it,
“The defeat of my army might be followed
by the overthrow of the party in power,”
and lead to “the complete abandonment of
all coercive measures.”
Sheridan and his 35,000-man infantry
plus three divisions of cavalry (roughly
15,000 troopers) faced no military forces at
all (except for a few pockets of guerrilla
fighters), and proceeded to terrorize the
women, children and elderly of the valley
in Shermanesque fashion. Reporting from
the town of Woodstock, Virginia, Sherman
informed Grant on 6 October 1864 that his
army had “destroyed over 2,000 barns full
of flour, wheat, corn and hay along with
farming implements; over 70 mills filled
with flour and wheat; destroyed all of the
OLD SOUTH
GENERAL STORE AND PAWN SHOP
Weogufka, AL CSA 35183 (256)249-9100
$1.75 lb.
Farm Raised
“You Catch”
Catfish
Guns · Tools
Confederate
Electronics
Shirts, Caps
Jewelry
Belt Buckles
All 6 flags
Knives · Ammo · Bumper Stickers · Beverages · Tobacco
Building erected in 1853
Lloyd Caperton @ Facebook – [email protected]
Treasurer, Alabama League of the South
Cash Loans
Pawn · Buy
Sell · Trade
Part 5
Never forget!
Wanton destruction of all means for civilian survival down the Shenandoah Valley
factories of cloth; killed or driven off every
animal, even poultry that could contribute
to human sustenance. Nothing should be
left in the Shenandoah but eyes to lament
the war.”
Grant received a communique from
General Sheridan dated 11 October 1864
noting “…guerrilla parties… are becoming
very formidable… I know of no way to
exterminate them except to burn out the
whole country” (OR vol. 43 pt. II pg. 340).
He used the term exterminate rather
than the normal military parlance, defeat,
in referring to local Southern resistance.
He would burn out the whole country, but
who will feed the civilian population when
his army has destroyed all tools and seeds?
Starvation results from such a scorched
earth policy!
General Sheridan received a letter from
Sherman advising, “I am satisfied that the
present class of men who rule the South
must be killed outright rather in conquest
of territory… a great deal of it yet remains
to be done… Therefore, I shall expect you
on any and all occasions to make bloody
results” (OR vol. 45, pt. II, pg. 622).
In letters sent home Sheridan’s troops
referred to themselves as “barn burners”
and “destroyers of homes.” One soldier
wrote that he had personally burned more
than sixty private homes to the ground and
opined, “It was a hard-looking sight to see
women and children turned out of doors at
this season of the year.”
A sergeant in Sheridan’s army, William
T. Patterson, described the burn ing of
Harrisburg, Bridgewater and Dayton in
Virginia:
The work of destruction is commencing in the suburbs of the town.
…The whole country around is
wrapped in flames, the heavens are
aglow with the light thereof… such
mourning, such lamentations, such
crying and pleading for mercy, I
never saw nor never want to see
again. Some were wild, crazy, mad,
some cry for help while others
throw their arms around Yankee
soldiers necks and implore mercy.
Abraham Lincoln, “Malice toward none
…Charity for all” spokesperson, wrote a
letter to General Sheridan on 27 October
1864 declaring “…my personal admiration
and gratitude for the month’s operation in
the Shenandoah Valley” (OR vol. 43, pt. I,
pg. 62).
Genocide
Abraham Lincoln believed that might
makes right and that he could ignore the
Constitution, international law, common
standards of morality and decency as long
as he held the upper hand militatily and as
long as he could continue confusing the
public (sheeple) with legal gobbledegook
and his well-honed rhetorical talents. His
chief generals, Grant, Sherman, Sheridan
and others, followed that lead by blaming
their carefully planned war of aggression
on civilians and even God. Neither Lincoln
nor his generals ever admitted any share of
responsibility for all that bloodletting, as
they were the victors who wrote its history.
There can be no question nor doubt at all
among truthful researchers regarding the
fact of Lincoln and his top generals having
violated international law during their war
of 1861. Moreover, had the Confederate
army won, a victory putting them instead
in position to bring their opponents before
some sort of tribunal, they would’ve found
Abraham is responsible for the deaths of
over one million Americans!
The new estimate of battle deaths (both
Confederate and Union forces) is 750,000
or more; civilian deaths 250,000!
And that death figure becomes higher as
we look beyond 1865 to the war’s second
phase, for those Union forces remained in
occupation of our country until 1877. The
Confederate States of America suffered
“Reconstruction” under martial law during
a dozen years. State-created famine, inept
and corrupt practices of military officers,
poverty, a dictatorship of expropriation
and disease claimed yet further premature
deaths in the wake of Lincoln’s 1861-65
war.
A REAL holocaust
What was experienced by our Southern
fore bears re mains a
story little known and
almost never told by
“po lit i cally-cor rect”
historians. They do not
go there. Yet Dr. Allan
Nevens (1890-1971), a
researcher more worthy
of the name who does,
equates the organized Dr. Allan Nevens
devastation that was experienced all across
our South with similar prop erty losses
during the worst chapters of the two world
wars.
The Southern holocaust is a relatively
unknown story that must be told, for here
was the completely organized devastation
which involved extensive loss of life by
fire and the wanton slaughter of civilians.
Never forget, throughout the South it was a
relentless war of extermination – by fire
and sword, then at last starvation! Such is
the legacy those invaders left behind them,
recounted almost exclusively as of today in
the Official Records – yet largely hushed
up: so many facts of death and destruction.
Understanding at last the enormity of
those acts against Southern civilians, we
should ask why monuments are not raised
or museums built in sacred memory of our
250,000 forebears who died of starvation,
disease and murder brought about by the
Federal invader!
NEXT: “Reconstruction”
War between brothers or satanic invasion?
By Joseph Jones
K
firstfreedom.net
arl Marx published The Communist
Manifesto in 1848, the same year which
saw a rash of Communist revolutions in
Europe. These revolutionaries, identified
as 48ers, are not to be confused with the
gold rush 48ers. Their revolutions proving
unsuccessful, they had to, as the cliché has
it, Get out of Dodge! – Dodge representing
anywhere else; just leave, pronto.
They boarded a transport to take them to
what was once upon a time known as the
land of the free and the home of the brave,
where gaining control of the 1860 Chicago
Republican Convention. Their nominated
man got elected by a 39% plurality. 61%
were opposed but they didn’t count. His
was the political persuasion of Federalist
Alexander Hamilton, favoring a powerful
central government, the Federalists having
morphed into the Whigs and the latter then
becoming the Republican Party. Their man
was unrepresentative of the working class
as Marx had described him; he was rather a
lawyer for one of the largest corporations
in America, the Illinois Central Railroad.
After taking the oath of office, their man
appointed an editor who paid Karl Marx to
write a column in the New York Tribune.
Marx later sent a letter of congratulations
to their man upon his reelection.
Some of those revolutionary 48ers were
graduates of European military institutions
similar to West Point, all of them combat
veterans. A historian writes regarding the
invaded Confederate States of America:
“Many of our boys thought they were
fighting Hessians.”
No historian this writer has read calls
their man a Communist, but, do we or do
we not think that “Birds of a feather flock
together” expresses something akin to fact?
A recently-published historian residing
in their man’s home State, having ancestors
on both sides of that war which had greater
casualties than any of our establishment’s
others, titles him “the greatest tyrant of the
19th century.”
I’ve read four historians who state that
their man’s war was a religious war. Some
of them get denominational on the subject.
One wrote: “When all is said and done it
was hatred for the Church that caused the
French Revolution. The throne had to be
destroyed because it protected the altar.”
Their Marxist’s obsession: “When all is
said and done it was hatred for Southern
Christianity that caused Lincoln’s War to
destroy the South, as it was the Christian
altar.”
Which brings to mind another popular
saying: “The more things change, the more
they stay the same.”
A public meeting was announced to be
held at the Bath County, Virginia, Public
Library, where an out-of-State university
professor would speak on the Civil War. I
attended and, during the Q and A session,
introduced my argument that the conflict
under discussion had been a religious war.
As the meeting ended, two groups formed;
one around the speaker and another joining
this writer, myself becoming the speaker.
My opponent told his group I was wrong
because both North and South had fought
as Christians. He forgot about those wars
dividing Christians called the Reformation
and the more recent struggle these same
denominations had engaged in across the
Atlantic. Did this doctor of history think
they kissed and made up when crossing the
water?
How far was Jamestown from Plymouth
Rock? A lot farther then than it is today.
Reconstruction remains just another pound
of flesh demanded by the Communists.
— Points of law —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
15
Waivers: The question regarding their legality
By Floyd Harshman
M
firstfreedom.net
ost people find reading legalese both
dry and boring. So did I before becoming a
“guest” of the federal government over the
issue of marijuana. Seems farming is not
the proud vocation it once was. Nothing
like having one’s freedom taken away to
change his attitude about such a mundane
thing as the law.
Like the vast majority of defendants –
96 percent in the federal system and 94
percent in our fair States – I opted to take
“the deal.” That is, I pleaded out to a fixed
prison term instead of taking my case to a
jury and risking the government’s wrath.
As every defendant learns, the government
has a nasty habit of giving those citizens
who exercise their constitutional right to a
jury trial exorbitant prison sentences. And,
despite laws (federal, no less), against this
practice, the judges in our “justice” system
still routinely do exactly that. So we “plead
out,” guilty and innocent alike. This is why
America has more innocent citizens behind
bars than ever before in its history. Fear.
Fear of the government.
tests, only one of which will suffice for me
– and others – to swim free.
No judicial tyranny
Validity Test A. We have a fundamental
principle of law that says the courts shall
not enforce a bargain where one party has
unconscionably taken unfair advantage of
the necessities and distress of the other.
Confer Lonergau v Buford and Snyder v
Rosenbaum.
A plea deal amounts to a contract based
upon a bargain between parties. Knowing
defendants such as myself are in “distress”
omissions. Thus, these two entities utilize
such waivers to hide their liabilities. But,
does this legally remove that responsibility
for negligence, to say nothing of criminal
collusion? No, it does not.
It is a fundamental principle of business
law that liability waivers do not actually
remove liability. While it is a common
practice to use waivers in business – like
the movie theaters printing on the back of
each ticket “No responsibility for any lost
or stolen item inside the building or out on
the parking lot” – that does not in fact free
the company’s responsibility to provide a
an attractive “deal,” viewed analytically.
But, can the government legally enter
into such a contract as removes a citizen’s
constitutional rights? Can the government
legally deny that citizen his constitutional
rights even if the latter signs under duress
“a waiver” of those rights? Can a court, as
the obvious beneficiary of such a waiver,
ignore the conflict of interest herein and
support a government prosecutor’s move
to reduce the citizen’s constitutional rights?
No! I don’t think so! Our constitutional
rights are inviolable, and most especially
by a government calling itself legitimate.
Efficiency of the lure
My plea agreement, like 99.9 percent of
all such coercions, contained a “waiver of
appeal” clause. Basically, this prevents one
from exercising his constitutional right to
further defend himself no matter what. We
are, in effect, trading our rights to “due
process” and “petition of government for
the redress of grievances” for whatever the
government promises us. That bait varies
often, but the waivers seldom do.
Rarely does the defendant ask himself
why the government is so insistent that he
waive his constitutional rights… until it’s
too late. Only then does he realize how the
system has duped him. It’s a bit later, after
the fear they’ve instilled in us recedes, that
our rational brains kick back in. But, as I
have said, by then it’s too late.
You see, our judicial system is flawed.
There are errors in almost every case, if
you’ll just look. Errors by the prosecutor,
errors the court makes, those committed by
our own defense attorneys. Errors, errors,
errors, everywhere errors. The government
and courts know this, thus their insistence
on these waivers and why they manipulate
the defendant into accepting their offer of a
plea agreement. They don’t want anyone to
get off that hook and swim away. Well, this
fish wants off the government’s hook.
Original American justice
A fully-informed jury would decide not
only the merits of a case but the law which
resulted in the defendant’s arrest, and our
runaway government doesn’t want to see
any panel of citizens go there these days.
To get a fair jury trial, I must overcome –
that is, invalidate – the waiver I’ve signed,
which looks entirely possible since these
plea agreements fail three different validity
As it was constituted
and thus vulnerable, the prosecutor moves
in for full advantage and “unscionably”
uses that intimidating power, punishing us
with these waivers, depriving defendants
of their constitutional rights.
If it’s a true bargain, both parties must
meet as equals, especially in an adversarial
legal system. The two arguments must get
equal consideration or the system cannot
work correctly. Chief Justice Abbott wrote:
“But if one party has the power of saying to
the other, ‘That which you require shall not
be done except upon the conditions which I
choose to impose,’ no person can contend
that they stand upon anything like an equal
footing.” Morgan v Palmer
Chief Justice Cockburn was even more
blunt: “Where the one person can dictate,
and the other has no alternative but to
submit, it is coercion.” Atkinson v Denby
Defendants like myself (indigent) are
nowhere near equal to the government in
America’s legal arena. Fearful of exercising
our right to jury trial because of the court’s
practice of punishing us for doing so, we
take their “deal” and its waiver. Because
the government is using fear to gain an
advantage, this is illegal. It’s coercion – a
form of psychological coercion.
Validity Test B. A second questionable
aspect of waivers is that they’re used as
instruments of liability reduction. As I’ve
said, both government prosecutor and the
courts themselves know that many – if not
most – criminal cases contain actionable
errors which they are directly or indirectly
responsible for because of their actions and
What has evolved
safe environment for its patrons, since it is
still 100% responsible for any negligence
or criminal act on the company’s part or
that of its employees. Thus such a waiver is
invalid. Business Law 101.
Fishing without a license
It’s no different with the courts. It’s not
lawful for them to “waiver away” liability
for their actions and omissions. In fact, the
courts should be held to a higher standard
than a mere business. Courts deal in rights
and lives, not entertainment or consumer
goods. They are responsible for providing
us citizens with an impartial setting that
protects our rights and lives. The courts are
to insure that every accused is on an equal
footing with the government in order for a
fair adversarial system to function the way
it should.
In short, these waivers within the plea
agreements are invalid because one cannot
waive responsibility for his actions. If it
were otherwise, no doubt many a criminal
type would waive all guilt for his actions.
Validity Test C. The third aspect of this
controversy is by far the most important,
namely, the constitutionality of waiving an
accused’s rights along with the court’s and
government prosecutor’s responsibilities.
A “waiver of appeal” becomes a contract
between a defendant and his government
that happens to benefit the court, whereby
defendant gives up his constitutional right
to due process which precludes petitioning
the government for redress of grievances,
etc., in exchange for a prison sentence, not
Our rights are not commodities to be sold,
bought or traded.
The Constitution states that no person
can be “deprived of life, liberty or property
without due process of law.” Certainly our
rights extend to the lengthy and exhausting
appeal process implemented by Congress.
The federal government prosecutors and
courts apparently believe so, as due process
is the primary target they have focused on
removing. Obviously defendants remain
constitutionally entitled to their due process
rights even after conviction. All attempts
to remove these rights – our rights! – are
both repugnant and unconstitutional.
Illegal catch
It has been established that a statute or
rule may be held constitutionally invalid as
applied when it operates to deprive one of a
protected right. What are court rules which
allow the implementation and use of these
“waivers of appeal” that, when applied,
operate to deprive individuals of protected
rights? This makes such court rules which
allow waivers invalid and unconstitutional.
In conclusion, this practice of coercing
“waivers of appeal” is unethical because it
allows the government to take advantage
of its stronger bargaining position. It’s also
unenforceable since waivers cannot legally
reduce the government prosecutor’s – or
court’s – liability. And, finally, it’s illegal
because it removes constitutional rights
from American citizens in violation of the
laws of the land. This fish has just spit the
angler’s hook out of his mouth.
Crimean government gaining respect
This Austrian group recognizes
Crimea as Russian and wants out
of the E. U.
mid-dnr.ru
Austrian political movement Civil
Initiative Homeland and Environment has
stated again it intends to hold a referendum
for Austria`s getting out of the “dictatorial
and centralistic European Union.” Apart
from that, advocates oppose anti-Russian
sanctions and consider the Crimea`s return
to the Russian Federation to be absolutely
legal.
Yours for a donation of your choice to
help us with our outreach.
Soaring Eagles Studios and Gallery
2869 Hatcher Mountain Road
Sevierville, TN 37862
Portent
They proclaim their Austrian political
movement Civil Initiative Homeland and
Environment is determined to conduct a
referendum on that country`s withdrawal
from the Eu ro pean Union, as the Kurier
journalist Margareta Kopajnig informs us.
Members of the movement are planning
to collect one hundred thousand signatures
and, on the basis of this, introduce a bill in
the National Council of Austria. Explains
the head of Civil Initiative Homeland and
Environment Inge Rauscher, “We have no
rights in the E. U.; the whole E. U. is a tool
of confidence with dictatorial features and
centralism.
Discontent
“It’s destroying our farmers, ecology,
employment, and denying us neutrality –
all this from the European Union,” she
emphasized.
And, in Rauscher`s opinion, Crimea`s
reunion with Russia is absolutely legal
from the point of view of international law
and corresponds to the right of peoples on
self-determination. Civil Initiative is very
much opposed to sanctions against Russia.
But, as the Kurier journalist underlines
regarding social opinion poll data carried
by the Austrian community on European
policy, only 20-25% of Austrians support
withdrawing from the E. U.
It is worth noting, however, the writer
repeated, that Sevastopol and the Crimea
returned to Russia after a referendum in
which the majority of peninsula citizens
voted for a withdrawal from Ukraine and
reunion with Russia. On March 16, 2014,
96.77% of Crimean citizens and 95.6% in
Sevastopol voted for entrance into the
Russian Federation.
16
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
— The International Jew —
German television exposes Holocaust lies
A courageous woman’s historic
broadcast has shocked Germany.
endzog.wordpress.com
I
n one of the most amazing events to
oc cur in oc cu pied Ger many since the
Sec ond World War His to rian Ursula
Haverbeck made his tory in a de fi ant
interview in which she openly trashed the
very basis of the lie upon which all modern
European social democratic States have
been built. The elderly historian brought
into question the moral integrity of all
Western political parties and academic
institutions, exposing the official account of
the Second World War and the Holocaust
for the lie it was on a television station
which is the second largest in the world
after Britain’s BBC.
Millions of surprised Germans sat on
the edges of their sofas and gasped as, for
the first time in their lives, the truth about
the Second World War was brought into
their living rooms when the second largest
broadcaster in the world took the risk of
being shut down for the illegal offense
of transmitting Holocaust denial by the
criminal transnational Jewish financial
occupation regime.
Ursula Haverbeck
ARD (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der
öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten der Bundesrepublik
Deutschland – Consortium of
public broadcasters in Germany)
is a joint organization of that
country’s regional public-service
broadcasters. It was founded in
1 9 5 0 i n We s t G e r ma n y t o
represent the common interests
of the newly de cen tral ized
postwar broadcasting services –
in particular the introduction of a
joint television network.
No small platform
ARD is the world’s second largest public
broadcaster after the British Broadcasting
Corporation, with a budget of €6.3 billion
and 23,000 employees. The budget comes
primarily from the license fees every
household, every company and even every
public institution like city governments are
required to pay. For an ordinary household
the fee is currently €17.98 per month.
Households living on welfare don’t have to
pay the fee. The fees are not col lected
di rectly by the ARD, but by the Beitragsservice (formerly Gebühreneinzugszentrale
GEZ), a common organization of the ARD
member broadcasters, the second public TV
broadcaster ZDF and Deutschlandradio.
The biggest single source of Holohoax
pro paganda in mod ern times is Jewish
Hollywood. Most people’s views of the
Second World War are formed by watching
Order extra copies of
The First
Freedom
Help your friends shed the
scales from their eyes!
See coupon on page 24
their movies and the Jewish propaganda
documentaries on Jewish-owned or -run
channels such as the History Channel,
National Geographic Channel or the BBC.
Rethinking the unthinkable
Why were Jews put in camps in the first
place?
Af ter In ter na tional Jewry
declared war on Germany and
initiated international boycotts
of her products and called for
sabotage and terrorism by Jews
in Germany against the German
State, Germany’s leader hesitated
to respond. Finally after a major
act of terrorism by Jewish and
commu nist agents known as
Kristallnacht he decided to place all Jews
in camps and send them to Palestine. The
agreement between Germany and Theodor
Herzl as head of the Zionist movement for
and Talmud.
For this plan it was essential that all
major Western Nations who were pursuing
a policy of financial independence from
the Jews must be destroyed in order to
merge them into the transnational Jewish
Banking System. International Jewish agents
began a process that would turn Germany’s
demands for the territories stolen from
her after the first world war into a world
war which would ensure once and for all
Jewish world financial control.
This plan was outlined in a
Jewish book which called for
all Germans to be sterilized in
order to exterminate them.
administered offshore by Israel but one can
see in every interview with a “Holocaust
Survivor” just how wealthy and luxurious
the circumstances are in which they live.
Employment opportunity
There is a huge and lucrative “survivor”
sector for any Jew willing to lie before the
camera for large fees, and a considerable
number of Jews make vast sums of money
by traveling around to schools, writing
books, giving TV interviews etc, lying
about “how evil” the Germans were. In fact
this whole concept of the psychopathic,
murderous Nazi is entirely a creation of the
Jews who ran their wartime propaganda,
newspapers, movies and newsreels and
have con trolled the me dia, ed u cation,
Hollywood and most recently the computer
gaming industry since after the war.
Much of the money for reparations or
“Jew ish se cu rity” is in fact spent on
What is a Plutocracy?
Jews to travel to Palestine was (in order
to create the Holohoax) refused by Lord
Victor Rothschild, the British government
minister responsible for Palestine, so that
the Jews then became stuck in the camps
and became factory workers during the
war. This was the terrorist event which
caused Germany to put the Jews in camps
ready for transportation.
What was the New World Or der
pledged to the Jews?
The British government, same as the
U. S. government, had fallen under the
sway of the vast power of International
Jewish Finance. In other words men like
Churchill and Roosevelt (both of whom
were Zionists with Jewish heritage) agreed
in effect that the world would now be run
economically and socially in the interests
of Jewish finance. This was the beginning
in the West of what is
now increasingly known
as “White genocide,” a
process which had gone
on in Jewish Bolshevik
Rus sia through mass
mur der and cre ated
famines which by the
end of Jewish Bolshevik
Com mu nism in the
So viet sphere had
killed 100 million White
Christian Russians and
Slavs. However, in the
case of the West today
it takes the form of
deliberate extermination
of the White race by
using mass third world
immigration into White
Nations and White Nations alone to remove
the one people whose intelligence and
power stand in the way of world Jewish
conquest: the Jew World Order and one
world government demanded in the Torah
A Plu toc racy is ei ther an
individual Plutocratic State (as
all Western Nations are today)
or a one-world Plu to cratic
government (which these States
are be ing moved to wards)
where the people are ruled by
an elite or ruling class whose
power derives solely from their wealth.
Once the war started it
became impossible to do
anything but use the Jews as
factory workers in the huge
industrial and manufacturing
plants surrounding AuschwitzBirkenau in Po land. The
Germans did their best to
keep the inmates healthy and
busy at work, but, towards
the end of the war, the allies
de lib er ately bombed the
routes to the camps so that
little food or medicine could
reach them. In those very wet
and marshy areas of Poland
ticks spread the disease of
typhus to the inmates so that
when the al lies ar rived at
the camps, with Hollywood film crews on
standby having cinematic special effects
such as “human skin” lampshades, South
American shrunken heads and supposed
human soap, huge heaps of the bodies of
inmates including Jews were piled up away
from the housing of the healthy prisoners.
And so the planned Holohoax was all set
up.
Truth about Auschwitz
Who is really being genocided here? A
quick guide to what Auschwitz was really
about will discover how the Jews present
Auschwitz to the world.
Auschwitz-Birkenau
and other camps now
lie debunked.
Just who are these
“Holocaust Survivors”
that manage frequently
to appear on television,
at lectures and making
YouTube videos, lying
about those camps and
defaming the German
people?
Af ter the war the
Ger man gov ern ment
was forced to begin a
process of paying out
billions of dollars to
“Holocaust Survivors”
as reparations. And a
Holocaust Survivor is any Jew who can
prove having resided in Europe (even in
countries outside the Reich like Britain)
during the war. No one really knows how
the money is dis trib uted because it is
keeping the story going by, for example,
multiple daily robo-uploads of videos to
YouTube from their computer-generated
channels, or endlessly sponsored expensive
Ho lo caust events, or to fund gangs of
violent Jewish and Marxist antifa street
thugs across Europe and the United States
with names like Hope Not Hate or Unite
Against Fascism, all of whom are never
under any circumstances paid for by the
Jews themselves but by White people’s
taxes through gov ern ments and area
councils. Added to this, countless millions
are paid by every Western government to
the Jews for all sorts of reasons, tens of
millions to keep up the camps, build vast
lavish Holocaust Museums, many of whose
exhibits are either from the Jewish-run
Gulags of Bolshevist Russia or just props
from the Jewish-run antique trade or clear
photographic fakes.
As an ex ample of this ex trav agance,
British Prime Minister David Cameron, who
is a direct descendent of Moses, even as he
cut services to the poor and for mobility for
disabled children before the 2015 British
general election, granted 21 million pounds
(fifty million dollars) for the protection of
Jewish schools and synagogues – even
though they were under no greater threat
than churches and non-Jewish schools.
What is the truth about “The Final
Solution” libel?
What did Himmler refer to in his Posnan
speech, if not a policy of killing the Jews?
The quote from the October 4, 1943,
Himmler Posnan speech usually cited as
evidence that the Nazis were attempting to
— The International Jew —
exterminate the Jews is debunked af ter a
brief introduction by the world’s leading
expert on Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich
where she explains on her radio show
about Heinrich Himmler’s faked Posen
Jewish extermination speech.
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
17
Those evil, lying, Marxist, anti-White,
anti-German nuns have blasphemously
turned Auschwitz into a major place of
Catholic pilgrimage – like the genuine
shrines of Lourdes and Fatima – and
perform such fraudulent acts as burning
candles on the ovens in the crematorium
where people who died of natural causes or
disease were cremated, gathering Christian
visitors to say rosaries with them to pray
for the “victims.”
Let’s bring ’em into the light
But what of Anne Frank?
Another one debunked
Written seven years after the subject’s
death, Anne Frank, the diary of a young
girl came out: a forgery compiled by Anne
Frank’s father following WW II. In 1959 a
Swedish journal called Frida Ord revealed
that Anne Frank’s father had contacted a
Jewish novelist named Meyer Levin to
craft much of the dialogue found in this
supposed diary. French professor Robert
Faurisson also invested a great deal of time
looking into the matter, only to find that a
teenage girl could not have created such a
remarkable literary masterpiece.
Most glar ing of all is the fact that
segments of this “diary” were written in
ballpoint pen – not to mention with two
completely different styles of handwriting
– one of Levin, and the other by Anne
Frank’s father. Ballpoint pens, although
invented in 1931, were not available on the
market until after WW II ended, making it
impossible for Anne Frank to have written
her original draft using such an instrument.
Even Jews were sus pi cious of the
diary’s legitimacy because, being raised in
the Jewish faith, Miss Frank’s supposed
memoirs fail to mention Passover, special
holidays and most other Jewish religious
issues. It appeared this “Jewish” girl had
The First Freedom
little or no concern about anything Jewish
at all.” Anne died of typhus during the war
and not gassing as the Jews claim.
Evil Angels of Auschwitz
The Polish communists had long been
worried by the beautiful theater that the
Germans had built for the Jews. For some
time they just kept it closed to the public,
but nevertheless it was an inconvenience to
their narrative of the history of the camp.
When Zionist-infiltrated Rome elected a
Polish Marxist and part-Jewish pope, they
arranged with him to dispatch a group of
Vatican II Sect nuns to manage the building
– portraying this as a ghoulish way of
Christianizing the Holohoax. These nuns
will not allow anyone to enter the building
to capture images of the theater. Even
many Jews themselves, familiar as they
were with the dark side, sensed the Satanic
in these voyeuristic shroud-chasers and
objected to their presence. Before he
passed away the Polish Pope had turned all
the Polish camps into shrines to the lies of
the Holohoax.
Ten extra copies of The First Freedom
(specify which issue) are yours for $15 PPD
anywhere in C.S.A. or U.S., plus – if you
want them, ask – one sheet containing 80
of these labels in Confederate red, white
and blue.
New subscribers! Get 6
If you
issues of rebel news for
$5 to TFF, PO Box 385
de sire a
Silverhill, Ala. 36576.
few extra
labels, they’re $1 per sheet of 80, PPD.
Where to put them? Inside books, on the
literature and envelopes you pass out, any
old place that comes to mind. Let’s roll!
18
The First Freedom
— Animal farm —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Secretive, would-be world rulers connive again
At Bilderberg 2015 the overrepresentation of Jewishness was
unsurprising.
By Benjamin Garland
dailystormer.com
Bobby, a reader of Daily Stormer, took
the time to research the Jewishness of this
year’s Bilderberg event and posted his
findings in a comment on our previous
article on that subject.
I found this worthy of its own article, so
below is his comment in full, with a few
very slight editorial changes.
* * * * *
went through the 2015 Bilderberg
attendee list in detail. Here’s every member
who’s either Jewish or strongly connected
to Jews either through marriage or lifelong
work:
Achleitner, Paul M. – Most probably
German Jew. Looks extremely Jewish,
here he is attending a conference held in a
German Jewish community center:
I
individuals and groups such as “American
Crossroad” and “Restore Our Future.”
Guriev, Sergei – A Russian traitor and
a Rothschild agent, works closely with
international Jewry. Escaped Russia when
he was being investigated by the Russian
intelligence. Being anti-Putin, he strongly
criticized Putin’s crackdown on Jewish
oligarchs in Russia, and is possibly Jewish
himself.
Halberstadt, Victor – Dutch Jew.
Hampel, Erich – Austrian Jew.
Hoffman, Reid – American Jew.
Ischinger, Wolfgang – German Jew.
Jacobs, Kenneth M. – American Jew.
Hmmmmm…
Rocca, Gianfelice – Most prob ably
Ital ian Jew (looks ex tremely Jew ish,
unknown ethnicity).
Rubin, Robert E. – American Jew.
Sadjadpour, Karim – Most probably
an Iranian Jew. Is very anti-Iran, pro-Israel,
and has previously joked about a global
Jewish conspiracy.
Schmidt, Eric E. – Strong Jew ish
connections, close friend of Shimon Peres,
unknown ethnicity.
Scholten, Rudolf – Most probably an
Austrian Jew, extremely pro-Jew.
Sevelda, Karl – Most prob ably an
Austrian Jew (looks very Jewish).
Sutherland, Peter D. – Chairman of
Goldman Sachs In ter na tional, strong
Jewish con nections. As the U. N.’s
(Bilderberg) special representative for
migration, he told the E. U. that the group
should “do its best to undermine” the
“homogeneity” of its member States.
Wallenberg, Jacob – Strong Jewish
connections, his family used to “save
Jews” from the Holohoax. Alleged richest
man in Sweden.
Weber, Vin – Strong Jewish/Neo-con
connections, is a member of Neo-con
PNAC.
Wolf, Martin H. – British/Austrian Jew.
Wolfensohn, James D. – Australian Jew
with strong Rothschild connections.
Zoellick, Robert B. – German Jew, on
the board of Goldman Sachs, a Neo-con.
Monti, Mario – Un known eth nicity,
former VP of Goldman Sachs. This picture
says it all:
Some pigs more equal than
others
No comment.
Maher, Shiraz – Seems to be an Arab
guy work ing for Jews. He has worked
on destabilizing Israel’s neighbors and is
extremely anti-Iran, anti-Russia, and proJew. Pos sibly the guy re spon si ble for
reporting on the latest news on ISIS.
Mathews, Jessica T. – American Jewess,
granddaughter of Jewish banker Maurice
Wertheim and great-grand daugh ter of
Henry Morgenthau Sr.
Michel, Charles – Unknown ethnicity
but looks very Jewish. The nose doesn’t
lie:
Kenneth Jacobs is head of the International
Jewish Merchant Banking Group Lazard.
Jew or just a Jew lover? You de cide! (He
certainly does look pretty Jewy.)
Agius, Marcus – Ancestry has strong
Jewish links. Married into the Rothschild
family.
Altman, Roger C. – Most probably
Jew ish (Jew ish last name, no eth nic
information available).
Applebaum, Anne – American Jew.
Baird, Zoë – Married to a Jewish lawyer.
Bernabè, Franco – Used to work for
Rothschild investment bank, looks Jewish
himself.
Bronner, Oscar – Austrian Jew, born
in Man da tory Pal es tine af ter Hit ler’s
expulsions.
Döpfner, Mathias – Winner of 2014
ADL International Leadership Award,
clearly a Shabbos Goy.
Jäkel, Julia – Strong Jewish connections,
her husband Ulrich Wickert is recipient of
multiple Jewish awards.
Johnson, James A. – Was married to a
Jewess, on the board of Goldman Sachs,
possibly half Jewish himself.
Juppé, Alain – Most probably French
Jew. Looks ex tremely Jew ish, highly
supportive of any and all Jewish causes,
this picture should say it all:
Whatcha wearing, buddy?
Cute hat, Juppé.
Karp, Alex – American Jew.
Kepel, Gilles – Most probably French
Jew (looks Jewish, has dedicated his life to
attacking Islam).
Kerr, John – Most probably Scottish
Jew, looks very Jewish:
Munroe-Blum, Heather – Married to
Jew Len Blum.
H. R. H. Prin cess Beatrix of the
Netherlands – Her family owns a large
part of Royal Dutch Shell along with the
Queen of England and the Rothschilds.
Perle, Richard N. – American Jew.
Petraeus, David H. – Strong Jewish
connections, worked with Jews all his life,
current chairman of KKR Global Institute
owned by Jews Kravis and Kohlberg.
Reisman, Heather M. – Canadian Jew.
Out of 134 members on that list, 21 are
confirmed, well-known Jews, another
11-12 are most probably Jewish (I just
wasn’t able to find confirming information
online despite strong evidence), and finally
another 24 have strong Jewish/Rothschild
links either through marriage or business.
Rest assured the rest of the members are all
100% kosher.
We’re talking about between 20-25%
ethnic Jews. 45% either Jew or directly
connected/related to Jews. 95-100% ADL/
Bnai-Brith certified Kosher. Keep in mind
that Jews are only 2% of the population in
the West and less than 0.2% worldwide.
Many of the non-Jews are merely Shabbos
Goyim who are on the Jews’ payroll. The
Jews need experts on various issues and
from different parts of the world – they
can’t rely only on fellow Jews to do all the
grunt work.
Also worth noting is that many of the
Gentiles with no apparent connection to
Jews are mem bers of var i ous se cret
so ci et ies.
Clowns in ties and beanies
The secretive annual Bilderberg
conference looks to the future but
is stuck in the past.
Mathias has been a very good goy.
Elkann, John – Italian Jew.
Federspiel, Ulrik – His family helped
the Jews during WWII, married to a Jew.
Feldstein, Martin S. – American Jew.
Ferguson, Niall – A Neo-con, worked
with Jews all his life, and his wife is the
recipient of multiple Jewish awards.
By Charlie Skelton
Kissinger, Henry A. – German Jew.
Kleinfeld, Klaus – Potentially Jewish
or half Jewish (Jewish last name).
Kravis, Henry R. – American Jew.
Kravis, Marie-Josée – Wife of Jew
Henry Kravis, on the board of the New
York Fed, possibly Jewish herself.
Kudelski, André – Most prob ably
Polish Jew (Jewish last name, looks Jewish).
Levey, Stuart – American Jew.
Leyen, Ursula von der – Unknown
ethnicity but this picture says it all:
Two of the many pro-Jew books written by the
sickening, rabid Zionist Niall Ferguson.
Fischer, Heinz – Married to a Jew, spent
a year volunteering at a Kibbutz in Israel.
Fresco, Louise O. – Dutch Jew.
Griffin, Kenneth – Wall Street insider
with strong Jewish/Neo-con connections.
Funder and supporter of Israeli mafia boss
Rahm Emanuel and various other Neo-con
The Guardian
guardian.co.uk
Jew? Maybe. Maybe not.
At a Jew Holohoax memorial.
And the next one:
D
isturbing news has emerged that a
bullet was fired at a po lice he licop ter
during this year’s Bilderberg conference.
Who would do such a thing? It turns out
the people who would do it are the police.
The bullet was fired accidentally, admits
a government spokesperson, by a member
of Austria’s elite EKO Co bra counterterrorism squad: the rifle went off when the
officer was climbing into the helicopter.
Luckily, no one was hurt, one helicopter
slightly injured. That’s a relief, although it
begs the question: what on earth is a crack
anti-terror unit doing flying helicopter
patrols around Telfs with live ammo and
the safety off? Last time I looked we’re in
the Tyrol, not Vietnam.
It seems appropriate that the single act
of violence perpetrated towards police at
Bilderberg 2015 was the direct result of
their crazily heavy policing. In fact, the
only injury the police received the entire
time was when an officer sprained his lips
from go ing “brrrm brrrm brrrm” while
sitting in their redundant armored personnel
carrier and pretending to drive it.
The police won’t spend money on a
much-needed press accreditation center
here, but they’re happy to splash out on an
armor-plated snowplough. What a joke.
Scouting around
In the wake of the conference, at the bar
of the Interalpen-Hotel Tyrol, I chanced
upon a lingering delegate, the Portuguese
media mogul Francisco Pinto Balsemão.
In my terrible Portuguese I asked him
whether he’d had a productive conference
– uma conferência útil – and he replied in
English: “We always do.” I managed one
more question before being bustled away
by hotel staff. “Do you think next year you
might hold a press conference, like in the
old days?” Senhor Balsemão smiled, and
replied in Portuguese. “Talvez,” he said.
Perhaps.
After the conference, Barroso seemed
jubilant. His grin spoke volumes as he
sprang from his car at the airport. He
beamed and waved at the cameras, and I
thought for a moment he was going to punch
the air like at the end of The Breakfast
Club. He looked like the cat that got the
— Orwell’s 2015 —
An armored personnel carrier sits in the woods
during the Bilderberg conference.
cream, then decided the cream was boring,
and drank a bottle of champagne instead.
He seemed a charming man, but tired.
He was lingering, I suspect, because this
was his last Bilderberg as a member of the
steering committee, and he was savoring
the memories of power. In the runup to this
by extension, the merger of human and
machine intelligence. Thiel’s ticket to
immortality.
At Bilderberg this year, the executive
chair man of Google, Eric Schmidt,
brought along two of his top people to lead
a session on AI. It might seem an odd fit for
Bilderberg, but over the last few years the
big shift within the group has been towards
new media and new technology.
Artificially Intelligent
Schmidt and Thiel both sit on the
group’s steering committee, as does Craig
Mundie of Microsoft and Alex Karp, the
billionaire CEO of data analytics company
Palantir, who was Thiel’s roommate at
Stanford Law School.
Bilderberg has reached out to Silicon
Valley; it’s grap pling with AI. Look ing
forwards to the future, always with an eye
to what’s valu able. If Bilderberg is to
sur vive, and stay in flu en tial, it has to
merge with this new technology. It knows
it can’t be left behind.
And here’s where I worry for the future
of Bilderberg. Inwardly, the group seems
able to adapt to new technology, but what
about the relationship between the group
and the technology being used by the news
media? It’s not the 1950s any more: you
can’t just “have a quiet word” with half a
dozen editors and keep a story out of the
papers.
You’ve got to deal with reporters like
Dan Dicks and Luke Rudkowski, with
their instant uploads and cameras hanging
off every rucksack strap. You’ve got
bloggers and citizen journalists, activists
with Instagram accounts. News articles
José Manuel Barroso
year’s conference, the Portuguese press had
reported how Balsemão had nominated his
fellow countryman, José Manuel Barroso,
the former European commission president,
to replace him on the steering committee.
And midway through the proceedings, the
official website was changed to show the
switch in names.
Typical Bilderberg clowns
Rather less forthcoming than Barroso was
the investment banker James Wolfensohn.
When asked by reporter Dan Dicks
whether he’d had a good conference,
Wolfensohn said: “I wasn’t there… I didn’t
attend.” Which is a pretty rubbish answer
to give to the press when you’ve just
stepped out of a V12 Mercedes with a
massive “B” sticker in the front window.
Emerging from the next limo along,
with a soft whir from its cyborg limbs, the
remarkably lifelike Peter Thiel 3000 checked
its scanners for threats, then made its way
out towards its private jet.
The founder of Paypal and director of
Facebook is cur rently pour ing money
Bilderberg meets in Tyrol
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
19
The chairman of the Bilderberg Group, Henry
de Castries, head of AXA, decides whether or not
to speak to the press.
with comments sections and buttons to
share them on social media. The news just
doesn’t work the way it used to.
Thiel will tell you that, if no one else
does.
Equally anach ro nistic is the heavyhanded po lic ing: the check points, the
armored snowploughs, the harassment, the
helicopter patrols with itchy-fin gered
cops. The obstinate refusal to engage in
proper press relations. It’s just a physical
extension of Wolfensohn’s “I wasn’t there
… I didn’t attend.” A denial of reality, a
denial of change: and it’s no kind of
long-term strategy.
It’s like George Osborne keeping his
head down, dodg ing the cameras, and
half-pretending he’s not been at Bilderberg,
then eventually declaring the three days of
meetings in his transparency data with the
two words: “general discussion.”
More is required of Osborne, and more
is required of the group in general. For its
own sake as much as ours. So will the
Bilderberg group take a deep breath, move
forwards, and give us more in 2016?
In the words of Senhor Balsemão …
talvez.
Liberalitis sufferers showing improvement
And now they have decided that
free range parents letting kids play
outside alone is not neglect.
activistpost.com
P
olice and Child Protective Services in
Maryland had twice removed the Meitiv
children, 10 and 6, from their parents for
child endangerment because they played
alone at a nearby park.
The generation that grew up as latchkey
kids is today being called “free range”
parents if letting the children play outside
unattended. And they were being charged
with neglect.
But now it’s been reported that CPS has
cleared parents Danielle and Sasha Meitiv
of a second case of neglect. They were
cleared of wrongdoing in their first case
less than a month earlier.
No harm ever befell the children except
when they were kidnapped by overzealous
authorities and kept away from their loving
parents.
Sanity returns
Due to the outrage caused by this case,
the Mary land De part ment of Hu man
Re sources was forced to is sue a new
statewide policy saying “children walking
or playing outside alone is not neglect and
does not warrant the intervention unless
the children are in danger or at risk.”
More good news
Bowing to strong public pressure about
the right to buy and drink raw milk, the
New Zealand government has unveiled
new rules which permit farmers to sell this
most basic, probiotic rich and nutritious of
foods directly to consumers.
Direct farm sales there include home
deliveries of raw milk to both rural and
urban consumers, paving the way for the
return of the beloved milkman.
200 Syrian refugees return from Turkey
Peter Thiel
into anti-ageing research, as part of his
“immortality project.” He says: “I believe
if we could enable people to live forever,
we should do that. I think this is absolute.”
(Of course, he’s not the only Bilderberger
with an eye on immor tal ity. Da vid
Rockefeller, the godfather of the group,
turned 100 during this year’s conference –
it’s thought he joined the event via the
huge screen they have set up in the main
conference room. And Henry Kissinger is
92. He would have died years ago but
Death is too scared to knock on his door.)
Back in 2006, Thiel was a co-founder,
with Ray Kurzweil, of the Singularity
Summit. Kurzweil is a famous futurologist,
transhumanist and currently a director of
engineering at Google.
By “sin gu lar ity” is meant the shift
towards smarter-than-human technology:
the era of non-biological intelligence and,
T
presstv.ir
he first group of Syrian refugees has
returned from Turkey to their homes in the
bor der town of Tal Abyad, which was
recently retaken from the ISIL Takfiri
terrorists.
Risking it
Nearly 200 men, women and children
on June 17 entered Syria after passing the
Turk ish bor der post at Akcakale in
Sanliurfa Province.
The Syrian refugees said they prefer
going back home to remaining refugees in
another country.
“It’s not so good here... It’s not like
home. We want to spend our holy
Ramadan in our homeland. We have been
looking forward to it,” said Mahmoud, a
farmer, referring to the holy Muslim month
of Ramadan, which was due to begin that
week.
Fahriye, a 40-year-old housewife, also
Wanted
Thinkers
Survivors
The First Freedom is spreading “hate!” whine
those who misapprehend us survivors. It’s really
out of pity that we try so hard to de-program the
brainwashed. Order a box of 100 extra copies for
$35 or $40 on page 24 and help distribute the truth.
Kurdish YPG fighters hold their movement
flags near the Akcakale crossing gate between
Tur key and Syria at Akcakale in Sanliurfa
Province, June 15, 2015.
Syrians fleeing the war pass through a broken down border fence to enter Turkish territory, near the
Akcakale border crossing, June 14, 2015.
said she was returning home despite fears
over the U. S.-led coalition bombings and
possible ISIL attacks to once again take
over Tal Abyad.
“I’m returning, I left my husband there.
But I’m still very afraid of the bombs, how
would someone not be afraid of bombs?”
she said.
Fighters from the Kurdish People’s
Protection Units (YPG) and their allies
managed to recapture the strategic town
the pre vi ous day af ter sev eral days of
fighting against ISIL terrorists. The clashes
have forced over 23,000 people from their
homes.
The latest gains of the Kurdish forces
against ISIL came months af ter YPG
fighters succeeded in pushing the militants
from the Syrian city of Kobani.
Important victory
Tal Abyad’s recapture has dealt a major
blow to the ISIL ter ror ists, who have
used the town for illegal oil sales, and for
smuggling foreign militants and supplies
into Syria.
Retaking Tal Abyad from the terrorists
also cuts a main ISIL supply line to the
Syrian city of Raqqa, controlled by the
extremist militants.
20
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
— MLK Boulevard —
The 1898 Wilmington, North Carolina, coup d’état
By Lt. Colonel Donald Sullivan (Ret)
A
[email protected]
lso known as the massacre or the
race riot of 1898, it began
on November 10, 1898, and
continued for several days.
It is considered a turning
point in post-Reconstruction
North Carolina politics. The
event is credited with having
ushered in an era of severe
racial segregation and the
dis en fran chise ment of
African-Americans throughout the Southeastern United States. It happened when
nearly 2,000 White Dem o cratic Party
insurgents overthrew the “legitimately”
elected local government and attacked
the only Black newspaper in the State
along with persons and property in Black
neighborhoods, killing an estimated 15 to
more than 60 victims.
Change
In 1860, before the so-called Civil War,
Wilmington was majority Black. Numerous
slaves and free Blacks worked at the port,
in households as domestic servants and in
a variety of jobs as artisans and skilled
workers. After the Battle of Fort Fisher,
which the Union won in January 1865,
Wilmington was taken by Union troops in
February, after they had worked their way
through Confederate defenses up the Cape
Fear River. With its victory in the Battle
of Wilmington, the Union completed its
blockade of major Southern ports. The
Confederate General Braxton Bragg had
burned tobacco and cotton stores before
leaving the city.
With the end of the war, freedmen in
many States left plantations and rural areas
for towns and cities, not only to seek work
but to gain safety by cre at ing Black
communities without White supervision.
Tensions grew in Wilmington and other
areas because of a shortage of supplies;
Confederate currency had no value; and
the South was impoverished at the end of
the long war.
Federal constitutional amendments had
abolished slavery, and granted citizenship
and voting rights to freedmen. Adults and
children were pursuing education. Freedmen
were eager to vote, tending to sup port
the Republican Party of Lincoln that had
achieved their freedom.*
Red Shirts rise
In North Carolina, State and local races
were close, with Republicans winning most
of the offices. Their ascendancy to power
can be traced to granting the franchise to
freedmen; plus the successful formation of
a biracial coalition of freedmen, recent
Black and White migrants from the North
(carpetbaggers), White Southerners who
supported the Union and Reconstruction
(scalawags); and the fact that members of
the CSA army were denied the vote. Many
White Democrats had been embittered
since the Confederacy’s defeat, and most
veterans were armed. Insurgent veterans
joined the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), which
started in Tennessee but soon had chapters
across the South. It generated considerable
violence at elections to suppress the Black
vote, and Democrats regained control of
the State legislature in 1870. After the
KKK was sup pressed by the fed eral
government through the Force Act of
1870, new paramilitary groups arose in the
South. By 1874, chapters of Red Shirts, a
paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party,
had formed in North Carolina, helping
Wade Hampton gain election in 1874 by
suppressing the Black vote. A Republican
governor was elected in 1876, before the
end of Reconstruction and withdrawal of
federal troops from the South.
In the years that followed, Wilmington,
then the largest city in the State with 10,000
residents, had a majority-Black population
* Lt. Col. Sullivan is relying here on Wikipedia’s
slant for much of this report, but bear with him. – ed.
including numerous Black professionals
and a rising middle class. Unlike in many
other jurisdictions, Blacks in Wilmington
gained positions as members of the
police force and fire department, as
well as elected positions.
In 1871 Demo crats re gained
control of the State legislature.
After 1875, the White Democratic
campaign to reduce voting by freedmen was helped by the Red Shirts.
The group had started in Mississippi
in 1875, and chapters arose in both
the Carolinas. In the same period, some
20,000 White men in North Carolina
belonged to rifle clubs, who comprised
other para mil i tary groups. Al though
Democrats dominated State politics after
1877, both Blacks and Whites continued
to participate in politics and, in the 1890s,
the Populists appealed to many former
Democratic voters.
In the 1894 and 1896 elections, North
Carolina’s Populist Party supported fusion
candidates in an alliance with the bi-racial
Republican Party. They won enough votes
to gain control of the State government and
were known as the Fusionists. Governor
Daniel L. Russell, elected in 1896, was the
first Republican elected since 1877. The
Fusionists passed a law increasing the
franchise for both Blacks and Whites by
decreasing property requirements.
In the 1898 election, the Democratic
Party regained control at the State level,
partly due to widespread vio lence and
intimidation of Blacks by the Red Shirts,
which suppressed Black voting. They ran a
campaign of regaining White supremacy.
Be cause Wilmington was a Black
majority city, its election of city officers
was followed statewide. On November 4,
1898, the Raleigh News & Observer noted
that:
The first Red Shirt parade on horseback ever witnessed in Wilmington
elec tri fied the peo ple to day. It
cre ated en thu si asm among the
Whites and consternation among
the Ne groes. The whole town
turned out to see it. It was an
enthusiastic body of men. Otherwise
it was quiet and orderly.
Despite the Democrats’ inflammatory
rhetoric in support of White separatism
and the Red Shirt armed display, voters
elected a Fusionist government to office in
Wilmington on November 8. The mayor
and 2/3 of the al der men were White.
Democratic Party White separatists, led by
Alfred Moore Waddell who as incumbent
had lost his congressional seat to Daniel
L. Russell (now governor) in 1878, had
organized a secret committee of nine. This
committee had planned to replace the
gov ern ment if the Dem o cratic Party
candidates lost.
During the election campaign, Whites
had criticized Alexander Manly, owner
and editor of Wilmington’s Daily Record,
the State’s only Black-owned newspaper,
and wanted to close him down. Many
news pa pers state wide had pub lished
pictures and stories implying that AfricanAmerican men were sexually attacking
White women in Wilmington. Manly denied
such charges, saying the stories represented
consensual relationships and suggested
“White men [should] be more protective
of their women against sexual advances
from males of all races.” White separatists
pub li cized his words as a cat a lyst for
violence against the Black community.
The ultimatum
After the election, Whites created a
Committee of Twenty-Five, all separatists,
and pre sented their de mands to the
Committee of Colored Citizens (CCC), a
group of politicians and leaders of the
African-American community. Specifically,
the Whites wanted the CCC to promise to
evict Manly and his brother Frank, a
co-owner of the paper, from the city. They
gave the CCC a deadline of November 10,
1898, to respond. When Waddell and the
Committee had not received a response by
7:30 AM, he gathered a large group of
White businessmen and veterans at the
Wilmington Light Infantry (WLI) armory.
By 8:00 AM, Waddell led the armed group
of 1,000-1,500 men, organized in military
for ma tion, to the Daily Re cord office,
where they destroyed the equipment and
burned down the building. By this time, the
crowd had swelled to nearly 2,000 men.
Whites, too, can get testy
Manly along with many oth ers had
hidden or fled Wilmington for safety.
Waddell tried to get the group to return
to the Armory and disband, but he lost
con trol, and the armed men turned into
a mob. Whites rioted, attacking Blacks
throughout Wilmington but especially in
Brooklyn, the majority-Black neighborhood.
The small patrols were spread out over the
city and continued until nightfall. Walker
Taylor, of the Secret Nine, was authorized
by Governor Russell to command the
Wilmington Light Infantry (WLI) troops,
newly returned from the Spanish-American
War, and the federal Naval Reserves, taking
them into Brooklyn to quell the “riot.”
They intimidated both Black and White
crowds with rapid-fire weapons and killed
several Black men.
Whites drove the op pos ing po lit ical
and business leaders from the town. The
estimated number of deaths ranges from
six to 100, all Blacks. No Whites were
reported dead, although some were
wounded. Hundreds of Blacks fled the
town to take shelter in nearby swamps.
After the violence settled, more than 2,100
Blacks left Wilmington, per ma nently
leaving it a White majority city.
Waddell and his men forced the White
Republican Mayor Silas P. Wright and
other members of the city government
(both Black and White) to resign. (Their
terms would have lasted until 1899). They
installed a new city council that elected
Waddell to take over as mayor by 4:00 PM
that day. City residents’ appeals to President
William McKinley for help to recover from
the widespread destruction in Brooklyn
were met with no response.
Reconstruction II
Waddell and his team were formally
elected to city offices in March 1899. More
importantly, that year, the Democraticdom i nated State leg is la tors passed a
con sti tu tional amend ment de signed to
exclude Black voters. It required voters
to pay a poll tax and pass a liter acy test
(administered by Whites) to register to
vote, both mea sures that in prac tice
discriminated against Blacks and ignorant
Whites. When Democrats had first proposed
the measure in 1881, The New York Times
estimated that 40,000 Black men would be
disfranchised by such action in North
Carolina. Although the legislators appeared
to infringe on the Black’s voting privilege,
the U. S. Su preme Court had re cently
upheld similar measures in a challenge to
Mississippi’s 1890 constitution. Democrats
in other Southern States also worked to
reduce the Black vote with disfranchising
laws or constitutions following
Mississippi’s.
Once that was done,
Democrats passed laws imposing racial
segregation of public facilities. Essentially
they imposed mar tial law on Af ri can
Americans in North Carolina, setting an
example that had influence beyond the
State’s borders. It took another six decades
and passage of federal laws in the mid1960s for these accomplishments to be
rudely undone, not by the strength of arms
but by the unwillingness of 20th century
Whites to defend their honor and their
land. It took the “New Democratic Party”
president’s “Great Society” in the 1960s to
give African Americans their civil rights in
North Carolina and other Southern States,
with the protection of the federal military.
In 1900, a second “White supremacy”
political campaign cemented the Democrats’
domina tion in the State; they elected
Charles B. Aycock as governor. Party
agitators used photos suggesting “Negro
domination” to raise fears and tensions.
The crude strategy, plus the constitutional
amendment, had sharply reduced AfricanAmer i can vot ing, and the Demo crats
controlled the legislature and governor’s
office. The night before the election,
Waddell spoke:
“You are Anglo-Saxons. You are armed
and prepared, and you will do your duty…
Go to the polls tomorrow, and if you find
the Negro out voting, tell him to leave the
polls; and, if he refuses, kill him, shoot him
down in his tracks. We shall win tomorrow
if we have to do it with guns.”
A future for Whites
The Democratic Party won by a landslide.
Hugh MacRae was among the nine
conspirators who planned the insurrection
of 1898. He later donated land outside
Wilmington to New Hanover County for
a park, which was named for him. He
included a restriction in the deed for the
park which denied Blacks access to it to
protect it from the future ravages of a
Black populace. In the park stands a plaque
in his honor that does not mention his role
in the 1898 insurrection. A descendant of
his contributed to the 1998 centennial
commemoration and is included in its
“Founder’s Circle.” This same descendant
lifted the deeded ban on Blacks using Hugh
McRae Park. His name is Hugh McRae II,
and he is a disgrace to his grandfather. I
played in that park as a child, and my
grandchildren play there today. They know
its history well and know that I am proud of
the courage and determination shown by
our an ces tors from my home town in
November of 1898. From my vantage
point it appears life was far more peaceful
for both Blacks and Whites before the era
of the “Civil Rights Movement” than it is
now.
Few have noticed, but it only took fifty
years for the agen das of the Demo crats
and Republicans to switch sides. Most
Democratic voters didn’t even notice the
switch for 40 years or so, and Republicans
still don’t get it. Now, the Democrats have
put a “Black” man in the White House “till
death do us part.” Go figure.
Council of Conser vative Citizens
I
t has been brought to the attention of
the Council of Conservative Citizens that
Dylann Roof – the alleged perpetrator of
mass murder in Charleston last month –
credits the CofCC website for his knowledge
of Black-on-White violent crime.
This is not surprising: The CofCC is one
of perhaps three websites in the world that
accurately and honestly report Black-onWhite violent crime and, in particular, the
seemingly end less in cidents in volv ing
Black-on-White murder. The CofCC website
exists because media either “spike” such
stories, or intentionally obscure the race
of Black offenders. Indeed, at its national
convention some years ago, the Society of
Professional Journalists adopted this tactic
as a formal policy.
The CofCC is hardly responsible for the
actions of this deranged individual merely
because he gleaned accurate information
from our site. We are no more responsible
for the actions of this sad young man, than
the Olin Corporation was for manufacturing
the ammo misused by Colin Ferguson to
mur der six Whites on the Long Is land
Railroad in 1993. The CofCC does not
advocate illegal activities of any kind, and
never has. I would gladly compare our
membership’s honesty and law-abiding
nature against that of any other group.
– Earl Holt III, President, CofCC
— More profiling —
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
21
Mexico deporting more Central Americans than the U. S.
govtslaves.info
United States, the wait for court dates and
fi nal de cisions on their cases can take
several years because of a backlog of more
than 449,000 cases already pending in
immigration courts.
According to the U. S. Department of
Justice, there were about 41,920 requests
for asylum in 2014, not all from Central
Americans. About 49 percent of requests
processed that year were granted.
Mexico now deports more Central
American migrants than the United States,
a dramatic shift since the U. S. petitioned
Mexico for help a year ago with a spike
in illegal migration, espe cially among
unaccompanied minors.
Between October and April, Mexico
apprehended 92,889 Central Americans. In
the same time period, the United States
detained 70,226 “other than Mexican”
migrants, the vast majority from Guatemala,
Honduras and El Salvador.
Too few minutemen
That was a huge reversal from the same
period a year earlier, when the wave of
migrants and unaccompanied minors from
Cen tral Amer ica was build ing. From
October 2013 to April 2014, the United
States apprehended 159,103 “other than
Mexicans,” three times the 49,893 Central
Americans detained by Mexico.
The difference is Mexico’s new Southern
Border Program, an initiative that included
sending 5,000 federal police to the border
with Gua te mala and more bor der and
highway checkpoints. Raids on migrants
in creased and au thor i ties fo cused on
keeping migrants off a northbound freight
train known as “The Beast,” on which
many have suffered mutilation injuries.
Neither U. S. nor Mexican immigration
officials responded to requests for comment
on the change last month, though officials
in the past have said it is aimed at reducing
dangers facing migrants.
“Mexico is doing the dirty work, the
very dirty work, for the United States,”
said Tomas González, a Franciscan friar
who runs the “72” shelter for migrants in
Tenosique, a town in the southern Mexico
state of Tabasco.
In the past, Mexican migration officials
looked the other way as thousands rafted
across the river at the border and then
climbed onto freight trains north. In 2014,
more than 46,000 unaccompanied minors
from Central America crossed into the
United States, leading the U. S. government
to turn to the governments in Mexico and
Central America to try to stanch the flow.
Mexico has proved the more efficient in
de por ta tions, which is al ready caus ing
con cerns among hu man rights groups
about the new tactics.
Not facilitating invasion
In most cases, Mexico holds migrants
only long enough to verify their nationalities
and quickly bundles them aboard buses to
take them back to their home countries.
“The time that for eign ers re main in
immigration (detention) centers depends
only on the speed with which the authorities
of their (home) countries confirm their
nationality,” Mexico’s National Immigration
In sti tute said in an email re sponse to
questions from the Associated Press.
Maureen Meyer of the Washington
Office on Latin America think tank, which
noted the dramatic change in a report last
month, questions the speed Mexico is using.
“What we have heard continuously in
the past year is that migrants are being so
rapidly deported that even some that might
have wanted to re quest some type of
protection, or who would have been eligible
for some type of humanitarian visa because
they had been victims of crime in Mexico,
haven’t had that opportunity,” Meyer said.
By comparison, when immigrants are
caught crossing the U. S. border illegally,
the process of being sent home can take
anywhere from hours to years. Mexican
Nationals are often repatriated quickly –
sometimes the same day they are caught –
while migrants from other countries often
spend at least a few days in U. S. custody
before being flown back to their country of
origin.
Less resolved
The deportation process can take much
longer if an immigrant seeks asylum or if
the person is a child traveling alone. For
those immigrants who fight to stay in the
Mexico grants only a tiny
number of asylum requests.
The latest figures, covering
a nine-month period from
January to September 2014,
show only 1,525 people, the
majority of them Cen tral
Americans, requested asylum
or refugee status, with only
one-sixth – 247 – granted.
U. S. officials did not answer questions
regarding the amount of U. S. funding
Mexico receives for its crackdown on the
Guatemalan border, but it is making things
tougher for migrants.
“It has raised the costs of the trip, it has
raised costs for paying coyotes (smugglers)
and the (Mexican) authorities that let them
through,” said migrant activist González.
“It has spurred increases in everything bad
– corruption and impunity – everything but
human rights.”
EDITOR’S NOTE
No doubt some of this story is true.
However, “human rights” is a code
phrase in favor of every other race
encroaching upon the White man.
E. U. launches military mission to tackle migrant crisis
presstv.ir
European Union foreign
min is ters have ap proved
the launch of a military
op er a tion to stop hu man
traffick ers from bring ing
African migrants across the
Mediterranean to Europe.
Meeting in Luxembourg
on June 22, the ministers
gave their nod for the new
mission to head into its
Phase 1, which will see five Migrants sleep under a makeshift shelter on rocks near the sea in the
warships, two submarines Italian city of Ventimiglia at the Italian-French border, June 20, 2015.
and three maritime patrol aircraft carry
“I am impressed by the unanimity
out intelligence gathering operations with and speed with which we have put this
drones and helicopters in attendance.
together,” said E. U. foreign policy chief
The Eu ro pean Un ion Na val Force Federica Mogherini.
Mediterranean Sea (EU NAVFOR Med)
“As the E. U., we are determined to
aims to target people smugglers in the con trib ute to save lives, dis man tle the
Mediterranean.
net works of the smug glers of hu man
be ings and ad dress the root causes of
migration,” she said.
Some 100,000 migrants have crossed
the Mediterranean so far this year, most of
them landing in Italy, Greece and Malta.
The military mission was decided on back
in April, when up to 800 people died as
their rickety boat sank.
Too little, too late
Representative of the European Union for Foreign
Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini
EU NAVFOR Med also envisages two
follow-up phases, which require a United
Nations Security Council Resolution and
Libya’s approval. Phase 2 would see active
intervention to board and disable smuggler
vessels and arrest the traffickers, while the
third stage would extend these actions into
Libyan territorial waters and possibly
inside the country itself.
Crit ics, how ever, in sist that tak ing
military action in Libyan waters or halting
a vessel flying the country’s flag without
an in ter na tional man date would be in
violation of international law.
EDITOR’S NOTE
Stay out of Lybia; you’ve “helped”
enough there. Let Europe mind its
own business and stop trying to make
Africa happy by becoming Africans.
Endemic: the explosive temper that can’t control itself
newnation.org
HOUSTON – The suspect accused of
killing his supervisor on June 23 has been
arrested in West Texas. He surrendered to
Fort Stockton police early the next day.
Houston police had been searching for
49-year-old Rodney Jackson since the
shooting at 9051 Spikewood in northeast
Houston. The victim, 40-year-old Jason S.
Yanko, had just told Jackson he was being
laid off. Police say Jackson went to his
vehicle to get a gun and tried to walk back
into the building but Yanko stopped him at
the door. “Are you sure?” Jackson asked
Yanko before shooting him several times,
court documents said. Yanko died at the
scene. He was still hold ing Jackson’s
termination papers in his hand.
Willie Singleton, a driver for the supply
company who comes and goes into that
gated industrial area almost daily, says he
knew the manager and the accused shooter.
He opines that this is “Disheartening,
because whatever it was it wasn’t worth
that. It’s not worth it. Let it go. If you get
laid off, you get fired, move on and get you
another job.
“It may be hard but nothing is fair these
days so you go out and do what you have to
do to make a living.”
One country gets it
Even the readers of extremist
globalist news sites are supporting
Hungary’s plan to erect a fence on
the Hungarian-Serbian border.
hungarianambiance.com
T
wo thirds of the readers of globalist
news site origo.hu are now backing the
government’s plan to build a fence on the
Hungarian-Serbian border. The globalist
opposition is grieving. Years of hard work
to brainwash the Hungarian people hasn’t
paid off.
The globalist opposition isolated itself by
frantically promoting illegal immigration,
prob ably to flatter their for eign paymasters.
More than twenty thousand readers
responded to an online poll asking, “Do
you agree with the construction of the
fence?”
Forty percent of respondents agreed
with the government’s plan to build a
four-meter-high fence along the SerbianHungarian border. Twenty-five percent of
respondents would like to see even a
higher fence. Sixteen percent thought that
this decision won’t create jobs, and only
thirteen percent opposed the construction
of the fence unequivocally.
22
The First Freedom
— Decision time —
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
Has Washington gone Looney Tunes?
Just whose carrot patch do these
wabbits think they’re invading?
By F. William Engdahl
journal-neo.org
Given a series of recent speeches by
lead ing U. S. officials and actions, the
question must be frankly posed: Has
Wash ing ton gone col lec tively Looney
Tunes? Even as the governments of the
E. U. are moving to buck U. S. pressures
and ease the sanc tions, the Obama
Administration seems intent on marching
in the direction of a nuclear confrontation
with Rus sia. A s the an cient G reek
expression puts it, “Whom the gods would
de stroy they first make mad…” The
following recent developments fit that
pattern quite nicely, thank you.
On June 5, Ashton Carter, the neoconservative Obama Defense Secretary,
gave clear indications he is prepared to be
far more provocative against Russia than
his fired predecessor, Chuck Hagel. Carter
convened a special meeting in Stuttgart,
Germany, of two dozen U. S. military
leaders and U. S. Ambassadors in Europe
at the headquarters of U. S. European
Command. He told them, “We have
something that has taken a sad turn recently,
which is Russia.”
Willing accomplices
That in itself was not so notable as were
the reports that the neo-con U. S. Defense
Secretary “Ash” – which is his nickname,
appropriately enough – Carter discussed
at the Stuttgart meeting returning U. S.
short-range nuclear missiles to European
NATO countries to target Russia.
On June 7, just two days after Carter’s
Stuttgart remarks, U. K. Foreign Secretary
Philip Hammond told the press that the
U. K. might again place American nuclear
missiles on British soil because of what he
termed “heightened tensions” with Russia.
The Foreign Secretary said there were
“wor ry ing signs” about the in creased
activity of Russian forces and that the
U. K. would “consider the pros and cons of
taking U. S. intermediate-range weapons.”
The U. K. Tele graph re ported that
Ash Carter was considering unilaterally
ab ro gat ing a Cold War-era treaty with
Russia’s predecessor, the Soviet Union,
and re-deploying nuclear-capable missiles
in Europe.
Yes and no
Britain’s Foreign Secretary Hammond
went on to reveal what a psychologist
might clinically call paranoid schizophrenia.
First he sounded the war drums, declaring
boldly, “We have got to send a clear signal
to Russia that we will not allow them to
transgress our red lines.” The last NATO
politician to foolishly talk about red lines
was U. S. President Barack Obama in Syria
in 2013 and that nearly landed the U. S. in a
Middle East conflagration so dangerous
that his own generals reportedly threatened
to resign. Then, in the next breath,
Hammond the tough guy talking about
re-station ing U. S. intermediate-range
nuclear missiles on U. K. soil, blurts out,
“At the same time, we have to recognize
that the Russians do have a sense of being
surrounded and under attack and we don’t
want to make unnecessary provocations.”
Does that mean the U. K. will only make
“neces sary” prov o ca tions? In deed, the
intellectual and moral quality of western
Become a distributor
Order extra copies of
The First
Freedom
Help your friends shed the
scales from their eyes!
See coupon on page 24
Let’s roll!
NATOmic neo-cons
politicians in the last decades has become
laughable.
Neither Britain nor France, both NATO
countries with nuclear arsenals, signed the
1987 INF Treaty, something Moscow at
the time vehemently protested.
Germans accept missiles
In 1983 the German Bundestag agreed
to allow the deployment of American
Pershing II middle-range nuclear missiles
on German territory, at the same time the
Reagan Administration announced it was
initiating an anti-ballistic missile defense
sys tem, later dubbed Star Wars. Both
decisions led to a state of extreme military
tensions between the Warsaw Pact and
NATO until the USA and Soviet Union
agreed to sign the Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces Treaty in December 1987
which pro vided for destruction of all
middle range weapons on both sides.
Significantly, that was one year after
Washington and Saudi Arabia deliberately
collapsed the price of crude oil to well
below $10 a barrel, devastating the Soviet
hard cur rency dol lar bud get that was
essential to obtain technologies to counter
the U. S. Star Wars and other NATO
military threats.
Now Washington seems to be saying, to
quote the words of the great New York
Yankees baseball catcher, Yogi Berra, “It’s
déjà vu all over again.” But 2015 is not at
all the same world as 1983, and the Russian
Federation, especially in de facto alliance
with China and others, is not the bankrupt
Soviet Union of 1983.
NATO to take Kaliningrad?
It seems that the Pentagon is considering
far more mad moves than merely returning
mid-range nuclear missiles to Europe.
According to hackers who managed to
enter the system of the Lithuanian Armed
Forces, that tiny Baltic country is getting
ready to mil i tarily an nex Rus sia’s
Kaliningrad region. It reads like a fantastic
rewrite of the 1950s Peter Sellers satire
film, The Mouse that Roared, with Lithuania
cast in the role of the Duchy of Grand
Fenwick, declaring war this time, not on
the United States, but on the Rus sian
Federation.
Kaliningrad is a Russian Oblast today of
some 960,000 ethnic Russian inhabitants.
It became part of the Soviet Union in 1945,
at the Potsdam Conference, when the U. S.
and British Governments agreed to the
transfer to the Soviet Union of the city of
Koenigsberg, renamed Kaliningrad, and
the area adjacent to it.
Be cause of Wash ing ton’s east ward
expansion of NATO after the collapse of
the Warsaw Pact, Kaliningrad is situated
now between NATO members Poland and
Lithuania on the Baltic Sea. Because it is
the only Russian Baltic Sea port “ice-free”
all year round, it plays a vital strategic role
in harboring the Russian Baltic Naval Fleet
and three Russian air force bases.
When the Bush Administration gave
notice it was stationing U. S. missiles in
Poland in 2007 as part of its upgraded
Ballistic Missile Defense deployment,
tensions between Moscow and Washington
reached a break point, as Russia threatened
to station nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad,
a threat dropped in 2009 as a response to
Obama’s feint, called “reset.” For NATO,
using tiny Lithuania today as her proxy to
seize Kaliningrad would amount to a
declaration of nuclear war against Russia.
According to Lithuanian news portal
Delfi, the hacked doc u ments of the
Lithuanian Defense Ministry reveal that
ongoing NATO maneuvers in the region
would provide the cover for the surprise
attack. Right now some 2,100 soldiers
from nine NATO member States as part of
the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force
(VJTF) are taking part in military exercises
in northwestern Poland. Later this summer,
NATO’s “Allied Shield” will be also held
in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland,
involving 15,000 troops from 19 NATO
member States and three partner Nations
including Sweden.
Moscow accuses Washington of violating
the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces
Treaty by placing missile defense launchers
in Poland and Romania, capable of firing
Tomahawk thermonuclear cruise missiles
at Russian and Belarus targets.
Who violates INF?
To cover over the bra zen U. S. INF
violations, Ash Carter claims the Obama
Administration “suspects” Russia has
tested ground-launched cruise missiles
with a range that is not allowed by the INF
treaty. Testing missiles, even if true, and
Washington has produced no proof, is a
far cry from deploying nuclear-capable
missiles in Poland and Romania and to
planning the invasion by NATO of one
of Rus sia’s prime military en claves,
Kaliningrad.
Digging up an old bone
The so-called Rus sian INF Treaty
violations that are being used as a pretext
for Washington to again place intermediaterange missiles in Europe, aimed at Russian
targets, were supposedly committed by
Moscow in 2008, according to New York
Times reports. But it was only in 2013, just
prior to their launching Maidan Square
protests that led to the Washington coup
d’etat in Ukraine, did the U. S. State
Department even raise the possibility of a
violation. Then it was only in July, 2014
when, according to the New York Times,
that U. S. President Obama had written a
letter to President Putin accusing Russia of
those 2008 testing violations.
The leak of the letter at the time, July
2014, fit conveniently with the Obama
Administration demonization of Putin’s
Russia. The NATO Supreme Commander,
U. S. General Philip M. Breedlove, stated
in April 2014 that the alleged 2008 Russian
“vi o la tion” re quired a re sponse. “A
weapon capability that violates the INF,
that is introduced into the greater European
land mass, is absolutely a tool that will have
to be dealt with. It can’t go unanswered.”
Little wonder Russian analysts accuse
Washington of setting loose a propaganda
barrage, blaming Russia for violations, so
that they could jus tify re turn ing their
nuclear missiles to European NATO and
Asia where they would target both Russia
and China.
Ash plan
Mad, heated-up people in Washington,
Lon don and else where in NATO are
literally playing nuclear “chicken.” Are the
Poles, Lithuanians, Germans and British
that stupid that they cannot see the larger
consequences of the Washington NATO
game? Or are they that suicidal? After all,
it is they who would become a thermonuclear ash-heap, not the United States,
just as it has been the German and other
E. U. econo mies which have suffered
massively un der U. S.-imposed Rus sia
sanctions.
How ridiculous this all is. Roaring mad
mice streaming out of the cracks in the
august edifices of Washington and London
and Vilnius, squeaking and running about
in a mad frenzy. It’s Looney Tunes rebaked
in Washington these days. But Daffy Duck,
Porky Pig, Elmer Fudd, Tweety Bird and
Sylvester the Cat did a better job than these
guys.
The truth of the “Fourteenth Amendment”
By John W. Altman
S
firstfreedom.net
ince there is no valid article in the
U. S. Constitution known as the “14th
Amendment” – which is the basis of the
school integration decision of 1954 and a
great deal more mischief such as illegal
aliens who cross our borders to have their
babies automatically made U. S. citizens –
why isn’t it exposed in schools for the
usurpation and fraud that it is?
Indisputable fact
As David Lawrence, editor of U. S.
News & World Report, wrote over 50 years
ago: “No such amendment was ever legally
ratified by three-fourths of the States of
the Union as required by the Constitution
itself.”
What are the brief, tragic facts of the
case? In 1868, there were 37 States in the
Union. For the passage of an amendment,
the approval of 28 States was needed. From
the outset, the Congressional proceedings
dominated by Radical Republican leaders
Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner
were rife with corruption and fraud. To
begin with, Congress, which had refused
the duly-elected Southern representatives
their seats in Congress in December of
1865, did not lawfully pass the resolution
required for the amendment’s submission
to the States. In other words, the amendment
was not proposed by two-thirds of a legally
constituted Congress by reason of Article
V, which provides that “No State, without
its consent, shall be deprived of its equal
suffrage in the Senate.” But the fact that 22
Southern senators plus one from Jersey
had been unlawfully excluded from that
body made no differ ence at all to the
Radical Republicans. The mood was, as
the hate-filled Stevens declared, “We shall
treat the South as a defeated enemy.” And
that they proceeded to do.
As it turned out, when the amendment
was submitted, six States outside the South
failed to ratify (New Jersey and Ohio had
rescinded their ratifications before the final
proclamation of approval). Ten Southern
legislatures also formally rejected it.
So, instead of the 28 States needed for
ratification, the assent of only 21 States
was obtained. It had failed ratification by a
margin of seven States – 25% of the newly
“Reconstructed,” “reunited” total!
So, how did it “pass?” Knowledgable
Southerners know only too well. At the
point of the bayonet, the Southern State
governments were abolished and replaced
by military governments. Then, with the
expulsion of all who had served in the
Confederate governments or the military,
new legislatures were chosen and forced to
“ratify,” although no such right to force a
State to ratify an amendment is to be found
anywhere in the Constitution.
Again, there is no legal, valid “14th
Amendment.” So why isn’t this taught in
the schools by our great professors and
teachers of history?
Great train wreck
In his informative and interesting book,
The Politically Incorrect Guide to the
Corstitution (2007), Dr. Kevin Gutzman
writes: “The Fourteenth Amendment was
never constitutionally proposed to the States
by Congress and never constitutionally
ratified by the States, and yet today it
stands as one of the most significant parts
of the American legal system.”
Will someone please reprint the article,
“There Is No ‘Fourteenth Amendment,’”
which appeared in the September 27, 1957,
issue of U. S. News & World Report as
written by the editor, David Lawrence? It’s
easy to read and will greatly facilitate the
understanding of what is wrong with our
government today. [Maybe later. – ed.]
— Bulletin board —
SALTY SID of Silver Spring sends seven
separate sensational scandal spreadsheets
for seven dollars. Sure satisfaction! Sid’s
super-sized subscription set includes The
First Freedom, Impact, Citizens Informer,
The Nationalist Times, CofCC Newsletter,
Heritage & Destiny and bonus essays by
patriots. Send check to Sidney Secular, PO
Box 8336, Silver Spring, MD 20907-8336.
JOIN GIDEON’S ELITE, PREPARE
FOR KINGDOM SERVICE! Hear
Pastor Peter J. Peters daily on WWCR
shortwave radio. For a FREE newsletter
with com plete broad cast sched ule:
Scriptures For America, POB 766, LaPorte
CO 80535. 24 hrs daily internet streaming
@ www.scripturesforamerica.org
HERITAGE AND DESTINY is a 24 page
bimonthly patriotic magazine printed in
England. To receive a sample copy send
$5, or for a year’s subscription (6 issues)
send $45 to P. O. box 8336, Silver Spring,
MD 20907. Check out the website at
www.efp.org.uk
KENTUCKY BLOODLETTING. 2½ hour
DVD. Four “rebels” murdered in cold
blood for each invader killed by the angry
citizenry. $15 PPD in C. S. A. and U. S. Get
yours by contacting TFF roving reporter
Nancy Hitt, [email protected] .
Letters…
-
FOR ONE free pocket Constitution send a
self addressed stamped (70 cents) envelope
to:
NCCS
37777 W Juniper Rd
Malta, ID 83342
or, for 100 copies, $35 to same address.
“IN RACIST Marxist Israel,” by Jack
Bernstein. He worked there for six years in
security. His experiences prove Israel is no
democracy but a Marxist Police State. 42
pages, $8 ppd. Truth at Last Books, P. O.
Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061.
SICK AND TIRED of the anti-White
mass media? Then why not join us online?
News 4 Whites.blogspot.com
White Information Network
AMERICAN FREE PRESS. This weekly
newspaper offers an introductory rate of
16 issues for $17.76. 645 Pennsylvania
Ave SE #100, Washington, DC 20003.
DISPLAY ADVERTISING for pages 6-22:
REALITY CHECK – 217 pgs paperback.
Join history sleuth German-born author
Christine Miller as she exposes Zionist
contradictions in their own words against
themselves. Nothing is closer to fresh air
and light than Reality Check. $20 PPD in
C. S. A. and U. S. TFF, P. O. Box 385,
Silverhill, AL 36576.
www.firstfreedom.net/Adv.rates.htm
YOUR NAME in TFF makes a difference
to people you can count on, assuring those
friends you’re with them.
“What World Famous Men Said About
The Jews.” Compiled by Dr. Ed Fields.
100 quotes – from Christ to Cicero, Henry
Ford, Napoleon, Truman, Nixon, Rev.
Billy Graham, many others (our best seller).
$6 PPD. Truth at Last Books, P. O. Box
1211, Marietta, GA 30061.
CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAGS, 3x5
polyester with metal grommets, $12 each
PPD in C. S. A. and U. S., or free by request
with any first-time 12-month subscription
to The First Freedom for $25 cash, check or
m.o. to TFF, P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, AL
36576.
ORDER the 100+ page booklet
CONNECT THE DOTS
Second Edition
Help stop the Zionist NWO
$20 includes postage
DWA Trust – P. O. Box 1947
Payson, Arizona 85547
ADVERTISE on this bulletin board. Just
$10 per insertion, maximum 50 words, 10¢
each additional word. Please indicate any
capitalization or italics desired.
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
OUR CELTIC HERITAGE, by Brig. Gen.
Sir Standish G. Crauford, 16 page booklet
covers migrations from the Holy Land to
England in ancient times. Send $5 to Karl
Hand, PO Box 1281, Lockport, NY 14095.
THE INTERNATIONAL JEW, by Henry
Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company,
exposes Jews as “The World’s Foremost
Problem.” These articles first appeared in
the periodical published by the Ford Motor
Company, The Dearborn Independent. This
is the abridged single volume edition at 231
pages. $14 postal money order to Karl Hand,
P. O. Box 1281, Lockport, NY 14095.
FREE DVD catalog on global conspiracy,
legal sovereignty, reduce taxes and avoid
taxes, land patent, allodial title, etc. Over
200 listings plus discounted DVDs and
books. Call 800-770-8802, leave name and
address. ToolsForFreedom.com .
Declare a new era for the National Alliance.
After many years of mismanagement and
inattention, members are fighting back to
save Dr. Pierce’s legacy. Join Dr. Pierce’s
brother, Sanders Pierce, and the alliance’s
top street activist Michael Weaver along
with many others. To learn more about this
project and how anyone can get involved,
visit us online at: www.narrg.com .
23
David Lee’s BIBLE ERRORS REVEALED
and Related Topics. Thirty years research
seeking the Truth. Six paper back 8½ x 11
volumes $20 each PPD. Vol. I – 179 pages
including Genesis chapter one, Noah’s
flood & Khazar Empire. Check or m.o. to
SBO 66, Box 05292, Miami, FL 33102.
33-YEAR-OLD Aryan trapped in Florida
prison, spent his last FRNs hoping to find
friends among likeminded folks willing to
reach out to a fallen soldier of our cause
suffering behind the walls.
Kevin Walsh #d05549
Blackwater C. F.
5914 Jeff Ates Rd
Milton, FL 32583
“Unite with Envious Pride 1488”
THREE TRUTH TRACTS
1) “Interracial Marriage - Right or Wrong?”
Mixed race offspring have lower IQ, goes
against nature and Biblical law.
2) “Martin Luther King Holiday Should
Be Repealed.” FBI files document his
Communist ties.
3) “Kosher Food Tax Raises Food Prices.”
Every food item featuring a “K” or “U”
imprint has paid a tax to a Rabbi.
All three tracts only $1 from:
Truth at Last Books
P. O. Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
Your signed letter with phone number and address is welcome, but will be edited as necessary to fit available
space. Send to The First Freedom, P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576 or email [email protected]
FORD ARTICLES
The most valuable public service that
The First Free dom has pro vided to its
readership has been Henry Ford’s ongoing
series of installments on “The International
Jew,” effectively transmitted and illustrated.
I think that these installments should be
re-started soon as possible and published
continuously for however long this paper
remains in print.
BANCROFT W. T. HALL
Annapolis, MD
I agree with Carl Young of Memphis
that TFF should run Henry Ford’s articles
again so that new subscribers can read it
from the start. I, too, began receiving your
newspaper in the middle of that series. So it
would be cool if you did “The International
Jew” all the way through again.
AUSTIN GALLUP
Mineral Point, MO
While I agree “The International Jew”
should be repeated, it might be severely
condensed. The invalid predictions should
actually be left in, but editorialized so as to
illustrate how both Ford and Hitler badly
underestimated the Jew threat.
ERIC JONES
Florence, AL
They did indeed show too little “fear
of the Jew” and unrealistic hopes for his
salvation. But, if not the Khazars, some
other Mafia will always defile itself and
challenge our will to resist corruption.
After a pause we’ll revisit Henry Ford.
TWO WORLDVIEWS
A bright spot is that Charlestonians told
Al Sharpton to stay away. And they have
not rioted as they do above the MasonDixon line. Not sure what that means, but
the difference between “us” and “them”
could hardly be more obvious.
And of course the Governor has stabbed
the people in the back, but that was certainly
no surprise. Yet when the flag was moved
from the top of the State House dome to the
lawn, the General Assembly made it clear
to all parties that that was final. That this
“issue” would never be permitted to come
up again. So we shall see. My guess is that
flags will proliferate on private property,
visible from interstate highways. I have to
say that it does make me chuckle that
“they” simply cannot get it through their
thick skulls that we are not going to give
this up. But it “fits” when one considers
political correctness as an ersatz religion. A
cult. Hence the fanaticism; the punishment
for her esy, which is always swift and
merciless; the uselessness of facts and
reason in dealing with these fanatics.
Anyway, I say again what I said after
Charlie Hebdo: the war has officially
started. “Good Lord, deliver us.”
RICHARD NOEGEL
Augusta, GA
Orders for our battle flags are rising.
HOMELAND OBSCURITY
Mr. Anglin accuses Alex Jones of being
a conspiracy theorist [TFF June 2015] and
paints a nice picture of the U. S. military.
But, together with the U. S. government,
it’s all a gruesome and massive criminal
enterprise. A U. S. Marine Corps officer
has revealed that Operation JADE HELM
stands for Joint Assistant Deployment and
Execution, Homeland Eradication of Local
Militias, initiated by the criminal Pentagon.
I am living proof that the U. S. military can
be a gruesome criminal enterprise. Read
articles in TFF, the December 2014 issue,
pages 8 and 9, by Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan.
PARMENIO IGLESIAS
San Antonio, TX
The regulars are grunts doing their
jobs. It’s those “special forces,” proud of
their desensitized training, the jingoists,
that we must beware of. Andrew Anglin
will cover these exercises and stay alert
to what’s happening, including Waco II
where militarized cops murdered those
bikers without cause. Let’s not let Alex
Jones distract and frighten us elsewhere
with a lot of bunko.
LINCOLN’S LOONIES
Is it mysterious or right on target that
the Communist forces in the Spanish Civil
War (1936-1939) were called “the Lincoln
Brigade” who opposed the Nationalists?
Here was the warmup for WWII, Stalin’s
Lincoln Brigade vs. its early Nationalists.
JOSEPH JONES
McDowell, VA
STILL HUSHED UP
June 8 is just another day for most
Americans. However, for the survivors,
families and friends of the crew of the USS
Liberty, June 8 is another anniversary of
sorrow. On June 8, 1967, the USS Liberty,
an intelligence-gathering U. S. Navy ship,
was brutally attacked by air and naval
forces of the State of Israel, our supposed
ally.
Fol low ing sketchy news cov er age,
details of the attack were hushed up by
both governments. Israel claimed their
forces mistook the Liberty for an Egyptian
ship. Despite evidence to the contrary, the
U. S. government accepted this excuse. To
date no official investigation has ever been
launched by the U. S. Congress or the U. S.
Navy. Despite all efforts of survivors,
including myself, the U. S. government has
never fully investigated the brutal murder
of 34 Americans and the wounding of 174
more. All the survivors want is a complete
investigation of the incident and a chance
to present the truth to the American public.
The friends and families of the 34 slain
men deserve this.
KEN ECKER
Wounded Survivor, USS Liberty
111 W. Locust St. Apt. 2
Watseka, IL 60970
815 432-5137
PATHOLOGIC
The Yankees seem to love frying their
enemies either quickly or slo-mo: Sherman
burning cities down, WWI poison gas,
Churchill burning Dresden and Hamburg
down, nukes over Japan; then radiation,
napalm, agent orange in Vietnam and – for
slow roasting Iraq – depleted uranium.
SIDNEY SECULAR
Silver Spring, MD
BLACK OPPRESSION
The last fifty years have proven how
much Blacks hate America’s Caucasians
and Caucasian police, as well summarized
by Jack Kerwick [TFF June 2015].
Since the Jews brought those Blacks on
Jew-owned ships to these shores to work
Jew-owned plantations against their wills,
it’s only fair that we return them to their
homeland of Africa to be looked after by
their own people and live under African
rule.
BETTIE SKINNER
Woodford, VA
BLACK CONFUSION
Chaos, yet again, this time in Baltimore
over the death of Negro Freddie Gray, who
was a known criminal arrested 22 times.
Baltimore is like Ferguson and Detroit –
three dysfunctional cities run by Negroes.
Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings, just
another Black typically lost in a leadership
position, gave orders for the police to stand
down and “give those who wish to destroy
space to do it.” So the helpless police got
pelted with bricks, bottles and the like. She
added, “Let them loot; it’s only property,”
while inviting Al Sharpton to join the fun
which he did. Rawlings should resign or be
prosecuted.
On April 17, Negro thugs (calling them
protestors is a misnomer) swarmed into the
streets to loot and destroy. They attacked
the police, torched patrol cars, houses and
stores.
As Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn
Mosby, also Black, said, “To the people of
Baltimore and the demonstrators [rioters
and looters] across America: I heard your
call for ‘No justice, no peace.’ To the youth
of this city: I will seek justice [rioters and
loot ers] on your be half. You’re at the
fore front of this cause and, as young
people, our time is now.” Mosby should
recuse herself; she has conflicts of interest.
The U. S. Injustice Department’s Black
Attorney General Loretto Lynch announced
a wide-ranging investigation into the city
of Baltimore’s police – not Rawlings and
Mosby.
Maryland Governor Larry Hogan had in
hand credible evidence of plans by gangs
Cribs, Bloods and Black Guerrilla Family
to “take out” police. All of this proves that
Negroes cannot govern. Just look at some
37 Third World African countries. So God
help us Whites when we are the minority in
our own!
RAY DIVELY
Baden, PA
WANTED
In the mid-1960s a pocket book came
out titled None Dare Call it Treason. It had
a color photo of an Army officer on the
front cover. He may have been the author
of that book. If any of you out there have
any idea just where the book can be gotten
then please do let me know. It was at the
time when Vietnam was really heating up.
That mess was all about treason at its worst
ever.
DICK ROGERS
P.O. Box 93
Mira Loma,CA
Abebooks.com has revised editions of
John A. Stormer’s book, or perhaps one
of our readers might supply you with a
copy of the original.
WARRIORS FEW
Greetings from Minneapolis where I’m
visiting. The people here are pleasantly
good-natured Americans, apolitical except
for wanting to replace Obama. The local
news has a female primary school teacher
taking students to a porno shop as part of
their sex education. She’s not been tarred
and feathered yet, but we can hope. As I’ve
said many times, I never hear mutterings or
conversations about the demise of America
and Western civilization. I’ve just finished
a most interesting book, The Occult War,
by Dr. Harrell Rhone, full of enlightening
quotes and here’s one from 2009 Pravda:
“The proud American will go down into
his slavery ‘shout a fight, beating his chest
and proclaiming to the world how free he
really is. The world will only snicker.”
Thanks for the best fighting newspaper
in America.
MIKE BOWER
Medford, OR
RARE MODERATION
In the middle of the night on Friday,
June 19, there was a seminar/discussion
on TV from Petersburg, Russia, between
Amerikano speaking head Charlie Rose
and Russian President Putin. Well, Putin
took the sails out of that old, stinking Rose,
and the latter’s assorted implications of
“Russian aggression in Ukraine,” etc.
It was a de light to see the calm and
controlled Putin relay to the world his hope
for peaceful negotiations with countries
such as Ukraine, Syria, China and Iran;
while letting Rose know that the Syrian
people alone have the right to decide the
fate of their President Assad, not Russia or
our bully leadership. Who do we think we
are, telling the world to live in the same
manner as our violent and self-indulgent
people? Bravo for a forum which exposed
the Americano intrigues/revolutions being
forged in foreign lands on our taxpayers’
dimes! Most sheeple will not read between
the lines, but Putin was saying it even if not
blunt enough for many to understand. We
is the enemy of peace... Just look at Iraq,
Afghanistan and Libya, even Egypt.
PATRICIA HELLER
Louisville, KY
24
The First Freedom
July 2015
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
— Self-government begins at home —
American Defense Party’s 2016 campaign kickoff
By Olaf Childress
[email protected]
O
ur people are finally discussing what
they’ve seen all along, though acting until
lately as if no elephant were parked in the
room. Ordering that
thing to vacate might
hurt its feelings and
label us as uncaring
“humanists” or some
such epithet, but it’s
less terrorizing these
days thank God.
So there you have
the good news. And
now for more on this
joyful awakening. We’re getting tougher at
calling a spade a spade. Once our mounting
voices overthrow the Jewish mediacracy’s
outdated lyrics, we’ll sing truer versions of
the future. Indeed, there’s a new world
coming, and anyone with enough spunk to
join us can feel it without half trying.
Reviving the war department
Acknowledging that all things exist to a
purpose, it becomes evident why we few
keep ourselves in shape, ever ready to meet
challenges, harbingers of opportunities at
various forks along life’s road. Ignoring
options for advancing this Aryan Nation
toward increased virtue, morality, integrity
and numbers while defending its inherited
spaces, the default mode of inaction finds
many a passive, no-elephant-in-the-room
“Judeo-Christian” supporting the so-called
Neo-Conservatives – which collaboration,
whether they’ll admit it or not, is sending
young Americans to kill and die, terrifying
entire regions of the world with the ZOG’s
deceptive wars “on terror.”
When did it come to this? The existing
state of confusion didn’t begin in our own
times. Over one hundred and fifty years
ago warmongering Lincoln was locking up
dissenting editors. But the bankrollers of
his administration and later biographers
who would not write sic semper tyrannis if
they expected to get published described
“Reconstruction” in such glowing terms as
today’s “Diversity is our strength,” giving
those victors credit for having fought their
invasive war against “rebels” “to free the
slaves” so that all goyim might be “equal.”
How green was our Shenandoah Valley!
The bad news is that such chatter about
equality comes from Jewish Supremacists
whose media munchkins still shove it into
juvenile faces. Black CEOs, White boobs,
mixed-race and same-sex couplings all get
the mediacracy’s nod – whatever stupidity
today’s traffic will bear.
Good housekeeping
Beholden to Jewish campaign financing
because it “elected” them, presidents and
prime ministers in turn must name only
“God’s Chosen” imposters as directors of
the International Monetary Fund, Federal
Reserve Bank, World Bank, United States
Treasury, et cetera ad nauseam. We can
exile that elephant from our living rooms
in the reverse order by which it came, i.e.,
when taking control of the creature’s nosey
proboscis, the media, rather than wrestling
with its fiat-currency bulwark. Such a long
trunk could never have entered our domain
except for the colossus behind it. So we
grab onto its sensitive, foremost tip, which
The First Freedom
P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Alabama 36576
________________________________________
FULL NAME
________________________________________
MAIL ADDRESS
________________________________________
CITY
STATE
ZIP
________________________________________
REMARKS
ð Here’s $25 for a one-year subscription
ð $48 for same, but in 1st class envelope
ð $40 for 100 extra copies of current issue
ð $35 for 100 back issues; prefer_______
ð $20 for 22 extra copies of current issue
ð $15 for 10 extra copies of current issue
ð $_________as a patron. Keep it going!
predictably will trumpet “Anti-Semitism!”
and push the monster out; then, not letting
all that thick hide go to waste, plaster some
outdoor advertising across those expansive
ribs and backsides: “With Jews you lose!”
The masses always await instructions,
cooperating with whomever they perceive
as actually in charge. Many people don’t
particularly care for involvement, but let’s
not get too uppity discussing “the sheeple.”
That’s just the way it is. Our White Nation
comprises various worldviews, numerous
among which perceive no subterfuge in
Rodney King’s “Why can’t we all just get
along?” Each community defines its level
of investigative participation. Those who
watch and wait, the nonconfrontational,
suffer merely less satisfaction than enjoyed
by a Thomas Jefferson or Benedict Arnold
at more elevated musings. If the originally
European-stocked homelands should go
under, it’s all one.
So what we’re considering here comes
down to who commands the watchers’ and
waiters’ attentions.
Two opposed forces compete forever in
this world, and it was always so. Call them
the armies of those who contend primarily
for honor on one side and deception at the
other. See both leaderships lampooned by
that twentieth century cartoon in which
they’re trying to influence this undecided
fellow who hears a small angel on one
shoulder whispering into his ear and a little
devil at the opposite side doing likewise.
The former we may call positive and the
latter negative. Honor wants a constitution
of laws which condemns subversive acts;
deception would keep every avenue open.
Both speak of a lasting peace, knowing the
while that what they’re really debating is
whether it’s to be international bloodshed
and short, nonviolent regroupings without
letup or Jeffersonian contentions between
ideas as they apply exclusively inside each
separate community, State or Nation.
Virtue vs. venality
Unassailable honor, ever beholden to its
heritage and checked by that debt, always
seeking our advancement as a people, is
less about personal safety and thus wills us
to take necessary risks on the way toward a
virtuous future; whereas insecure venality,
equally aware of its historic place, keeps
rearching, ever covetous for more, greater
sufficiency, impossible finality – resulting
in endless wars by deception and whatever
means. Brave men die but once, cowards
many times.
While the less decisive are content with
mundane lives, active antagonists regard
each other as whetstones upon which to
sharpen their vital wits and resolutions.
Honor would call the undecided masses
at minimum away from what we may now
plainly see is a failed social experiment,
i.e., miscegenation, multiculturalism and
the equally-absurd search for gratification
exclusively in material things. Inconstancy
among the if-it-feels-good-do-it befuddled
victims of venality, prizing here-and-now
physical security above all else, somehow
never find it.
Two different worldviews
Those who don’t play that game know
how it works, but newcomers to alternate
news experience cognitive dissonance; it’s
incompatible with what turns their circles
on. They long for love instead of “racism”;
acceptance, not “homophobia,” and open
borders rather than “xenophobia,” along
with other tunes the just-following-orders
media munchkins sing to them from all
sides. Aryan Nationalists don’t mind being
noticed and “labeled,” catching that little
quiver in the so-called journalist’s voice
when he intones, “Your side lost; get over
it!” Sticks and stones may break our bones,
but such clichés tell us we’re making good
progress. Therefore let’s catalogue, that is,
profile, all these innocent White victims of
infotainment that we meet – they’re either
salvageable or hopeless – then spend our
reeducation time and effort wherever that
indicates the greatest return on investment.
New recruits must hear from the start
that we’ve no fixed program and our entire
movement is based on the love, acceptance
and vigilance which loyal members of any
successfully cohesive society pledge one
another. It’s not hate for a Nation to study
and practice what works best.
As things stand, today’s infotainment
victims get shocked by fresh deviances
from the traditional norms daily, yet insist
that each titillating new oddity rhyme with
everything the “mainstream” colossus has
heretofore supposedly authenticated. Thus
they’re turned off by White Nationalists
singing a dissonant tune.
Facing the reality
Which development, painful to recount,
is alternate news at its saddest. We’ve lost
them. Not each and every one, but far too
many of our people are hopelessly beyond
redemption.
What to do? Get down on our knees and
pray for guidance, then perform what that
wisdom dictates. So long as even a few
stalwarts make themselves seen and heard
out on the streets demonstrating, flyering,
postering, organizing, shoving literature at
the brainwashed masses, it’s just possible
that today’s challenge may become Aryan
man’s finest hour.
For surely he’s the ultimately observant,
can do specimen of humankind who sees
divine purpose – ab aspera ad astra – in all
these tumults, recognizing necessity as the
motivational mother of invention, Zionist
histrionics notwithstanding. Without that
elephant squatting in every Nation’s midst
instilling fear, daring any authority to call
its bluff until Germany’s Reichsführer and
scientists actually did, this world might’ve
waited another millennium before Jules
Verne’s submarine and Buck Rogers’ extra
terrestrial space ship became realities.
What this tells us is that false flags and
disinformation, no matter how cowardly,
are the sine qua non provocations keeping
our people wide awake to the Mossadniks’
scheming. We owe them, and vice versa, in
a contest without enduring victory, defeat
or finality. The adversaries stimulate each
other, dividing the spoils (those who labor,
pay homage without complaint and await
instructions) constantly.
Therefore, during our lifetimes let us get
busy where we’re most needed, laugh off
such silly words as “homophobe,” “racist”
and “xenophobe,” ourselves calling the
shots much more often rather than letting
some munchkin name us reactionaries, a
favorite shtik from Bolshevik Jews still on
the offensive.
Indeed, evil is a prime moving force in
the world, defending against which being
one’s duty. But action doesn’t have to wait
for the enemy to commit such a blooper as
we’ll consider here before capitalizing on
that mistake. Coach Paul “Bear” Bryant’s
Crimson Tide knew “The best defense is a
good offense.” And yet we must presently
continue on the defensive by pointing out
what absurdities the media are flinging our
way. Take, for instance, “homophobe.” It’s
a non sequitur, since homo means “man,”
whom (assuming he’s logical and honest),
we’ve no cause to fear, whereas our word
“perversophobe” were more correct. Once
we’ve forced those Zionist overlords and
their puffed-up munchkin team back a few
yards, Aryan Nationalists will have gone
on the offense and brought to the playing
field some better-understood rules.
A renewed confederation
Grabbing the elephant by its proboscis,
we concentrate all available resources on
exposing what started as the United States
War Department in 1789 and became the
Department of Defense in 1949. Our war
department must do a J. Bruce Campbell
reverse play on words, calling ourselves
the American Defense Party while openly
stating we’re out to destroy the ZOG. This
non-voting political drive is dedicated to
ending the disastrous federal system and
private central bank, having its sense of
identity, camaraderie and communications
plus a common declaration and agreement
of purpose: an organized “defense” against
aggression.
Bruce Campbell declares that “America
is a presidential dictatorship abetted by a
cowardly Congress and a corrupt Supreme
Court. It has masqueraded as a democracy
and as a republic and as a nation guided by
‘the rule of law.’ But the law is only for us,
the people, to obey and be controlled. The
lawmakers and law enforcers make and
enforce the law on the orders of our deadly
enemies…
“There are two political philosophies in
America. One philosophy is that government
is necessary and as such deserves to be
voted on and validated periodically… by
electing ‘good new people’… But, as we
all can see, with untold trillions of dollars
of government debt to the private Federal
Reserve, Communist China and others, the
government is out of control and has been
for a hundred years… All of this and much
more were made possible by a hundred
years of voting … exactly how long it’s
been since our elected representatives
voted to make the Federal Reserve Act into
‘law’…
No more ZOG
“A non-voting political party dedicated
to the shutting down of the suicidal and
catastrophic federal system would give
Americans an actual means to unlatch the
homicidal parasites from our veins and bank
accounts… The new party wouldn’t put
people in federal office because we want to
do away with the federal government and
you can’t do that as a part of government.
“The political climate in America is
ripe for radical change. The Neo-Cons
who took control of the Bush and Obama
administrations have brought only chaos
and hardship to America and mass death
and misery to the peoples of the world. The
Neo-Cons have plotted to rule the world for
decades, but once in power demonstrated
only ineptitude and failure at everything
other than destruction.
“The American Defense Party would
replace the Constitution with Articles of
Con fed er a tion – a mod ern ver sion of
the original. There would be no central
government to enforce the private central
bank, both of which would be abolished
forever. The one legitimate function of the
remaining Treasury Department… would be
to create and distribute debt-free currency
(Kennedy’s 1963 U. S. Note). That would
be one of the first principles of the party
platform…”
A positive new direction
What the world needs now is not love,
sweet love, but trustworthy media – that is,
responsible White men in control of those
physical narrows through which their own
daily tradings of ideas, services and things
must pass. And, following such reforms,
even though meddling into everybody’s
business remains none of ours, still, the
more alert non-White Nations might study
how we’re doing it and act similarly.
Today is an opportune time for grabbing
that bluffing bulwark aggressively by the
nose and – one, two, three – shove!
Indeed it’s happening, all across Europe
and hereabouts. Just when the Chosenites
thought it was safe to produce a Holohoax
movie again, nobody’s buying. In today’s
information age, neither the revisionists
nor those whose eyes we are prying open
fear their “hate laws” transparently crafted
to bluff White Nationalists out of poking
about that elephant over in the corner.
For the young European of a hundred
generations who loves his inherited space
wherever on earth that State be established
suddenly realizes the present danger and
will perform what such wisdom dictates.
We must secure the existence of our
people and a future for White children.