Judge Sweeney Order Regarding Sur-Reply

Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 160 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 13-465C
(Filed: June 4, 2015)
*************************************
FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC., et al.,
*
*
Plaintiffs,
*
*
v.
*
*
THE UNITED STATES,
*
*
Defendant.
*
*************************************
ORDER
On April 23, 2015, plaintiffs in the above-captioned case filed a motion to remove the
“Protected Information” designation from defendant’s March 20, 2015 provisional privilege log.
Plaintiffs’ motion is fully briefed. On June 2, 2015, the court granted defendant’s unopposed
motion to file a sur-response, to allow defendant to clarify its position regarding production of
the final privilege logs during jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs have now filed a motion to file
a sur-reply, stating that while they welcome defendant’s clarification in its sur-response, that
submission also makes some new representations. Plaintiffs seek the opportunity to respond, and
have attached their sur-reply to the motion. For good cause shown, plaintiffs’ motion is
GRANTED, and the sur-reply is deemed FILED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Margaret M. Sweeney
MARGARET M. SWEENEY
Judge