1. business and industrial
2. energy
3. nuclear power

April 2015
April 2015
Newsletter
Global Technical Training Services, Inc.
807 Bypass 123 – Suite 31
Seneca, South Carolina 29678
Special Interest
Articles:
 Jackie Pate, Administration Home Office (Seneca)
 New Job
Opportunities
864.882.3111 [email protected]
 Sid Crouch, Vice President, Technical Operations Hartsville Office
843.339.9874 [email protected]
 Pat
McHale, Technical Consulting Manager Charlotte-Area Office
704.502.8705 [email protected]
 Kaye Browder, Technical Staffing Manager
Greenville-Area Office
864.631.9325 [email protected]
 Chrissy
Mulay, Technical Staffing Specialist New York State–Area
864.506.4647 [email protected]
Individual Highlights:





Vogtle and Its New
Generation
Construction Project
Good for Georgia
pg#2
Trimble, Consultant Washington State–Area [email protected]
Job Opportunities:

Task Director (GE Mark VI) –
1yr

Engineering Instructor


ESP Instructor
Standardization of
Nuclear Design at
the Forefront for
SMR’s pg#3
Site Project Lead (GE Mark VI)
– 1yr

SRO Instructor (PWR)

System Engineering Analyst 1yr

Procedure Writers

EP Scenario Developer
Lower Electric Prices
Triggered by Spring
Thaw pg#4

Database Analyst – 1yr

Design Engineer

QA Auditor & Assessor – 1yr


Electrical Planner (Field
Coordinator) – 1yr
Construction Monitoring
Program Lead

Construction Coordinator

Electrical Discipline Engineer
(GE Mark VI) – 1yr

Ventyx Instructors

Chemistry Instructor
Engineering Supervisor (GE
Mark VI) – 1yr

Estimator – Major Projects
Document Control Specialist


Civil / Mechanical Engineer (GE
Mark VI) – 1yr

NRC Exam Writer

SAFER Maintenance
Supervisor – 8 months

Operations ILT Instructor

Performance Coordinators

ASME Engineer Specialist (98%
travel) – 9 months

Maintenance, Electrical, and
I&C Instructors
Germany’s Partial
Eclipse Could Teach
U.S. Grid Operators
a Lot! pg#4
PG&E Reports Diablo Canyon Can
Withstand a
Fukushima Event
pg#5

Did You Know?
pg#6

Renaissance Watch
pg#7

 Gerry
GTTSi Employee –
Barbara Williams
pg#8

Contact Kaye Browder @ 864-631-9325 or [email protected]
if you are interested and qualified for one of these positions.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
Page 2 of 8
April 2015
Vogtle and Its New Generation Project Good for Georgia
budget. The handwringing
over Vogtle Units 3&4 –
mostly fueled by antinuclear activists hoping to
derail the project – looks
similar to the experience
four decades ago during
the construction of the first
two reactors.
Vogtle Units 1&2
are the lowestcost source of
baseload
electrical
generation out of
all 70 Southern
Company plants
– including
natural gas- and
coal-fired
facilities.
Even after three
decades, Vogtle
is still one of the
cleanest, safest
and most reliable
big-megawatt
facilities in the
nation.
There’s no
reason to doubt
that Vogtle 3&4
will similarly
benefit Georgia,
and these
Westinghouse
AP1000 reactors
will provide a
carbon-free
energy source
representing 1/3
of Georgia’s
strategy to
comply with the
EPA’s proposed
clean-air
regulations.”
With the economic
uncertainty our nation is
facing, Augusta, GA area
stands out. Residents in
this area have one of the
nation’s largest
construction projects
going on in their own back
yard; Vogtle Units 3&4.
This new generation
nuclear construction
project near Waynesboro,
GA, has created more
than 4,200 construction
jobs. And once these two
units are completed, it will
double the plant’s
permanent work force to
1,800.
More importantly, the $14
billion project will nearly
double the plant’s output
and enable its investors,
namely Georgia Power, to
continue delivering
reliable, affordable, and
zero carbon emission
electricity to the Peach
State for decades to
come.
However, there have been
some setbacks, resulting
in schedule delays and
budget overruns; after all
no one has built a nuclear
unit in the US for over 30
years.
The project has slipped 18
months behind schedule
and nearly $2 billion over
Longtime residents surely
remember their
excitement in the mid1970s when work began
for Vogtle Units 1&2 –
then a $700 million project
– along the banks of the
Savannah River in rural
Burke County. However,
during construction came
Three Mile Island in 1979
– the accident that hurt no
one but scared everyone
and dramatically halted
construction. When
construction resumed in
the early 1980s, project
leaders were met with an
endless stream of Nuclear
Regulatory Commissionmandated change orders,
akin to a homebuilder
constructing a house to a
local building code that
changed daily.
Other utility companies
canceled nuclear projects
in the works, but Southern
Company was at the point
of no return. By the time
the units went online in
1987 and 1989, the
facility’s price tag had
grown to $8.8 billion –
nearly $17 billion in
today’s currency.
Outsiders initially declared
the world’s most modern
nuclear power plant was a
financial albatross. But
when the switch was
flipped, more than 2,400
megawatts of electricity
began pulsing through the
Peach State’s fastgrowing power grid. And
with the exception of a
scheduled, four-week
maintenance and refueling
break every 18 months, it
hasn’t stopped since.
Today, Vogtle Units 1&2
are the lowest-cost source
of baseload electrical
generation out of all 70
Southern Company plants
– including natural gasand coal-fired facilities.
Even after three decades,
Vogtle is still one of the
cleanest, safest and most
reliable big-megawatt
facilities in the nation.
Vogtle is a big part of why
the word ―brownout‖ has
never been part of the
Georgia vernacular, and
why Georgia Power’s
residential rates – which
are regulated by the state
Public Service
Commission – historically
have been below the
national average.
Units 1&2 have paid for
themselves and – with an
NRC operating license in
effect until 2047 and 2049
– they will benefit Georgia
and Southern Company
for decades to come.
There’s no reason to
doubt that Vogtle 3&4 will
similarly benefit Georgia,
and these Westinghouse
AP1000 reactors will
provide a carbon-free
energy source
representing 1/3 of
Georgia’s strategy to
comply with the EPA’s
proposed clean-air
regulations.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
Standardization of Nuclear Design at the Forefront for SMR’s
build on the successful
of previous designs and the
redundant safety systems
developed over the last 60 years.
The standardization issue is
being seriously studied by the
CORDEL Group (Cooperation in
Reactor Design Evaluation and
Licensing Working Group).
The CORDEL Group was
established by the World Nuclear
Association in 2007, and has
been working on a strategy to
harmonize international nuclear
efforts by stimulating dialogue
between the nuclear industry
(reactor vendors, operators and
utilities) and nuclear regulators
(national and international
organizations).
The United States will soon have
four new large AP1000 reactors
online that embody the strategy of
standardization in nuclear plant
design; two in Georgia (Vogtle
3&4) and two in South Carolina
(V.C. Summer 2&3). This
Westinghouse AP1000 design was
approved by the NRC is a new
generation design, sometimes
referred to as Generation III; all
AP1000’s built will be of that same
design.
categories: Generation III and III+
new versions of the traditional lightwater reactor; the new small
modular reactors (SMRs) of either
light water, molten salt, or liquid
metal; Generation IV hightemperature reactors and especially
the fast neutron reactors. All have
redundant and passive safety
systems – no meltdowns – and are
easy to protect from terrorists and
weapons-proliferating countries, say
the DOE (Department of Energy).
This standardization concept is
incorporated with the small
modular reactors (SMRs), as well.
The SMR reactors have been
around since the 1950s, in
submarines, aircraft carriers,
icebreakers and at universities. But
creating a commercially-viable
small reactor for public power has
only recently gained traction as our
nuclear fleet ages, coal declines,
hydro becomes tapped out, and we
start needing more baseload
electricity.
SMRs are less than a third the size
of traditional nuclear plants,
producing less than 300 megawatts
(MW), and many are as small as 30
MW. The idea is to have a few
standard modules that can be
mixed and matched to best fit any
situation because their small size is
better suited to more situations than
larger plants.
Nuclear reactor technology and
designs have come a long way
since 1980. There are several
designs vying to be one of the
―standard‖ ones, in all three
Whether they’re variations on the
traditional light-water reactor
(NuScale), new molten salt designs
(Terrestial Energy IMSR), aircooled, liquid metal, or advanced
fast-reactors that burn everything
from spent fuel from large reactors
to Iraqi tank armor (TerraPower;
General Atomics), these SMRs
The CORDEL Group plans to roll
out their new Strategic Plan at
th
their 5 Annual Small Modular
Reactor Summit on April 14,
2015 in Charlotte,NC. CORDEL
Group co-chair, Kristiina
Söderholm, believes, ―The
current way of licensing is a very
slow and heavy process
worldwide, and no certification or
license can be utilized from one
country to another. This makes it
difficult and very expensive to
license any nuclear power plant
in multiple countries.‖
Currently, national variations in
safety regulations present an
obstacle to internationally
standardized nuclear reactor
designs. The achievement of
harmonization of nuclear safety
standards could overcome this
obstacle, facilitating the
emergence of a global market
that offers a choice of a small
number of reactor types that are
recognized by regulators
worldwide as safe and
technologically mature.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
Page 3 of 8
April 2015
Page 4 of 8
April 2015
Lower Electric Power Prices Triggered by Spring Thaw
Less than two weeks after
the Northeast was
experiencing daily spot
power prices in excess of
$100/MWh and spot
natural gas prices in
double-figures, the daily
energy price landscape
has changed dramatically.
“New York City
had the highest
spot power price
in the nation at
only $38.84/MWh
and New England
had the highest
spot gas price at
$3.59/mmBtu.”
The National Weather
Service (NWS) cited
―unseasonably warm
temperatures‖ for much of
the country in its midMarch forecast, and the
figures posted by the
Energy Information
Administration (EIA) show
that spot power prices are
below $40/MWh in all
the markets in the
continental United States.
Also spot gas prices are
below $4/mmBtu
New York City had the
highest spot power price
in the nation at only
$38.84/MWh and New
England had the highest
spot gas price at
$3.59/mmBtu.
Officially spring begins
with the vernal equinox on
March 20, but many
nuclear power reactors
are already holding
regularly-scheduled
refueling and maintenance
outages while power
demand is low.
Figures released midMarch by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission
(NRC) indicate that 13 of
the nation’s 99 nuclear
reactors are currently at
zero generation. The
majority are offline for
scheduled refueling
outages.
In addition, the Omaha
Public Power District
(OPPD) Fort Calhoun
nuclear facility is expected
to begin its refueling
outage in April, according
to news accounts from
Nebraska.
Germany’s Partial Eclipse Could Teach the U.S. Grid Operators a Lot!
then a surge in solargenerated power that will
have to be balanced out to
avoid instability in the grid,
Germany's Fraunhofer
Institute for Solar Energy
Systems said.
“The U.S. will not
experience a solar
eclipse until August
2017 but we could
learn a lot from the
partial eclipse
Germany will
experience in late
March 2015.”
We could learn a lot from
the partial eclipse in late
March 2015.
Scientists at the Freiburgbased institute ran
simulations showing that
conventional power plants
and hydroelectricity pumpstorage facilities should be
able to cushion the impact
of the eclipse.
Experts say the
Germany’s electricity grid,
which relies increasingly
on renewable energy,
faces a crucial test on the
morning of March 20,
when the moon will pass
in front of the sun and
block up to 82 percent of
its light across Germany.
The simulations revealed
that the strain on the grid
would be greatest should
it be a sunny day when
the drop and subsequent
rebound would be
strongest. Grid operators
have likened this effect to
12 large power plants
being switched off and
then 19 being switched on
in a short space of time.
This partial eclipse will
cause a sudden drop and
If the weather is overcast,
the impact should be
minimal, but if it is a sunny
day before the partial
eclipse it will be dramatic
on the grid and its
operators.
Solar power from some
1.4 million installations
contributed almost 6
percent to Germany's
energy mix last year, but
is set to rise steadily as
Europe's biggest economy
strives to meet 80 percent
of its energy needs from
renewable sources by
2050. Germany currently
gets almost 26 percent of
its electricity from
renewables, including
solar, wind, biomass and
hydroelectric plants.
The upcoming eclipse will
help grid operators plan
for the next comparable
event in 2026, when
Germany expects to have
shuttered all its nuclear
power stations.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
In accordance with
Diablo Canyon’s
“Long Term Seismic
Program”, conducted
in cooperation with
the U.S. Geological
Service, constant
study of the local
geological features
and global seismic
events which could
affect seismic safety
at Diablo Canyon
have been applied.
Through this program
the Shoreline Fault
was discovered in
2008 and it was
determined that it too
would generate
ground motion levels
below what the plant
was retrofitted to
withstand in the
1970’s, prior to its
operation. This was
recently confirmed
again as a result of
the recently
completed advanced
seismic studies using
state of the art two
and three
dimensional imaging.
Here is the
conclusion reached
by the NRC, “there is
not now nor has there
ever been an
immediate safety
concern” with this
issue at Diablo
Canyon.
In January, our article
“Reflection on a Few Key
Facts – U.S. Nuclear
Electric Plants”
discussed how nuclear
plants were specifically
designed for seismic
concerns. Since the
2011 Fukushima Event
the NRC ordered all U.S.
nuclear plants to conduct
studies based on the
earthquake off the
eastern coast of Japan
that triggered a tsunami
and knocked out power
at the Fukushima Dai-ichi
nuclear plant, causing
three of the plant’s
reactors to melt down.
Nuclear facilities in the
Western U.S. were
required to file their
reports with the
commission in March
2015.
PG&E, owner-operator of
Diablo Canyon Nuclear
Power Plant, located
near San Luis Obispo
issued their report. In
summary this was their
finding; Diablo Canyon
could withstand the
strongest quake likely
to hit in 10,000 years
and also survive
tsunamis generated by
offshore quakes or
landslides.
This report comes just
days after federal
seismologists greatly
increased the odds of a
major earthquake —
magnitude 8 or higher —
striking California in the
next 30 years. The U.S.
Geological Survey now
says the state stands a 7
percent chance of
suffering such a quake in
the next three decades,
up from the previous
estimate of 4.7 percent.
Seismologists increased
the odds after studying
how quakes can move in
a flash across multiple
faults, increasing their
destructive power.
PG&E’s new assessment
takes that idea into
account as well, said Jearl
Strickland, director of
technical services at
Diablo Canyon.
PG&E once argued that
the faults near Diablo
Canyon were unlikely to
rupture together. For the
new study, however, the
company considered
scenarios in which quakes
started on one fault and
―stepped over‖ to others.
The closest, the Shoreline
Fault, comes within 2,000
feet of the reactors.
Another, the Hosgri, lies 3
miles offshore.
―Five years ago, you’d talk
to seismologists, and they
wouldn’t talk about stepover from one fault to
another,‖ Strickland said.
―Today, they just assume
that if faults are within 5
kilometers of each other,
you’ll see step-over.‖
power plant owners to
study how well their plants
would survive the
strongest ground shaking
likely to occur in 10,000
years. PG&E’s
calculations set that level
of shaking at .8 times the
force of gravity.
The plant is designed to
withstand ground motion
of .75g. But Diablo’s
buildings and equipment
were built with enough of
a safety margin that they
can still survive the higher
degree of shaking, said
PG&E spokesman Blair
Jones.
―What’s most important
here is that nothing
exceeds the margin of the
plant,‖ he said.
Diablo Canyon’s critics
have long questioned
PG&E’s assurances that
the plant is safe. When
construction began, in
1968, none of the four
closest faults had even
been discovered. The
Hosgri was found in 1971,
the Shoreline in 2008.
One of the regulatory
commission’s own
inspectors at the plant
argued in 2013 that Diablo
should be shut down until
PG&E proved that it could
survive earthquakes on
some of the more recently
discovered faults, an idea
the commission rejected.
If you would like to learn
more, please check out
the January 2015 article
“Reflection on a Few Key
Facts – U.S. Nuclear
Electric Plants” on page 2.
The commission,
Strickland said, asked
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
Page 5 of 8
April 2015
PG&E Reports - Diablo Canyon Can Withstand a Fukushima Event
Page 6 of 8
April 2015
Did You Know?
91.9%
That the 100 power reactors licensed to operate in the U.S.
had an average capacity factor of 91.9% in 2014; edging past
the 91.8% achieved in 2007. Best Ever!
798.4
terrawatthours
“The U.S. nuclear
industry “took
swift and
decisive action”
after the
Fukushima
disaster and will
have most of its
safety-significant
enhancements
set for
completion by
the end of next
year, said
Nuclear
Regulatory
Commission
Chairman
Stephen Burns at
the Regulatory
Information
Conference.
Additionally, the
NRC will soon
review reactor
renewal
applications that
could extend the
lives of existing
reactors over 60
years, he said. “
That 798.4 terrawatt-hours of electricity was produced from the
100 power reactors licensed to operate in the U.S. in 2014.
3
That Kansas City Power & Light will stop burning coal at three of
its coal-fired power plants. KCP&L will end the use of coal at the
96MW Lake Road 6, the 170MW Montrose 1, 164MW Montrose 2,
176MW Montrose 3, 48MW Sibley 1, and 51MW Sibley 2. Lake
Road 6 has the ability to shift to natural gas and will switch by
2016. Montrose 1 is scheduled to close at the end of 2016. The
Sibley units will shut down at the end of 2019 and Montrose 2 & 3
will close at the end of 2021. KCP&L said it was more cost
effective to shut down the smaller units to comply with the recent
EPA emission requirements instead of retrofitting them.
2016
That the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Terrestial
Energy are working in collaboration to advance development of
Terrestial Energy’s Integral Molten Salt Reactor (ISMR) concept to
the engineering blueprint state by late 2016. An early developer
of this technology, ORNL built the first Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)
and also developed the Denatured Molten Salt Reactor design,
which is the basis of Terrestial Energy’s IMSR.
20MW
That Dominion Power filed an application with Virginia to build the
state’s first large-scale solar project; 20MW solar array on 125
acres near the Remington Power Station in Fauquier County.
30 tons/day
That under an agreement with the National Energy Technology
Laboratory, Linde, LLC began pilot-scale testing of a carbon
capture technology from flue gas in Wilsonville, AL; a 1MW pilot
project expected to capture 30 tons of carbon-dioxide per day.
1/3
That Solar accounted for 1/3 of the nation’s new generating
capacity in 2014, beating out both wind energy and coal for the
second year in a row. Only natural gas constituted a greater
share of new generating capacity.
6,201 MW
$66 Billion
20
gigawatts
CCR Rule
(Coal Ash
Rule)
That newly installed solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity for 2014
reached a record 6, 201 MW, growing 30% over 2013’s totals. An
additional 767MW of concentrating solar power (CSP) came online, as well.
That the solar investment tax credit has fueled the growth in solar
power here in the U.S. Since 2006, more than 150,000 jobs have
been created and $66 billion invested.
That the U.S. now has 20 gigawatts (GW) of installed solar
capacity – enough to power 4 million U.S. homes – as long as the
sun is shining.
That the EPA issued its final ruling for the regulation of coal
combustion residuals (CCR’s); commonly referred to as the ―Coal
Ash Rule‖. The ruling has given power producers the option to
handle their coal ash using either wet, dry, or hybridized wet-dry
systems. Though the new regulations are more moderate than
some feared, they will still prove costly for the industry.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
U.S. Nuclear Renaissance
Watch Update
Construction is underway at 3 sites; Bellefonte technically listed as under construction will not
resume construction activity until after startup of Watts Bar 2. We currently have 8 sites with
“active” license applications, although Calvert Cliffs 3 will never occur due to foreign ownership;
3 sites are planning license application; and 2 sites received an ESP (Early Site Permit).
State
Plant
Utility
Reactor
Type
Alabama
Bellefonte 3&4 * ^ ##
TVA
AP-1000
Alabama
Bellefonte 1
TVA
B&W
Florida
* Levy 1&2 ## & ^
Progress Energy
AP-1000
Florida
* Turkey Point 6&7 ## ^
FP&L
AP-1000
Georgia
Vogtle 3&4 NRC COL
Southern Company
AP-1000
Idaho
Payette AP
Unistar / AEHI
TBD
Idaho
Idaho National Lab
DOE
NGNP
Louisiana
River Bend 3 #
Entergy
ESBWR
Maryland
* Calvert Cliffs 3 ## #
EDF
Areva US-EPR
Michigan
* Fermi 3 ##
DTE Energy
TBD
Mississippi
Grand Gulf 3 # $
NuStart / Entergy
ESBWR
Missouri
Callaway 2 # AP
Unistar / Ameren UE
Areva US-EPR
New Jersey
Salem $
PSEG
TBD
North Carolina
Harris 2&3 ^ #
Progress Energy
AP-1000
Pennsylvania
* Bell Bend ^
Unistar / PP&L
Areva US-EPR
South Carolina
* Lee 1&2 ^
Duke Energy
AP-1000
South Carolina
Summer 2&3 NRC COL
SCANA / Santee Cooper
AP-1000
Tennessee
Clinch River AP
TVA
mPower
Tennessee
Watts Bar 2
TVA
Westinghouse
Texas
Comanche Peak 3&4 ^ #
Luminant
MHI US-APWR
Texas
* South Texas 3&4 ## & $
NRG Energy
Toshiba ABWR
Utah
Blue Castle Project $
Blue Castle Holdings
TBD
* North Anna 3 ## $ ^
Dominion
MHI US-APWR
Virginia
# NRC reviews suspended at applicant’s request.
@ Other vendor designs being considered
# Concern over ownership by foreign entity
^ Delay expected; no scheduled target dates
## Recent Contentions for Licensing Review
#? Contention forth coming or expected
& Signed EPC Contract
Pink italics = Notice of Violation.
* License Application Active
Blue italics i= application is forthcoming.
$ Received Early Site Permit
Red italics = delay announced by Applicant
COL Construction Operation License Expected
$ Project activity decreased by Utility
NRC COL Issued by NRC
AP – License Application Planned
Under Construction
License Application Active
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.
Page 7 of 8
April 2015
GTTSi Employee – Barbara Williams
Barbara Williams joined the GTTSi
team in March 2012, as a Chemistry
Instructor at the Harris Nuclear
Plant.
HOME Office
In January 2013, Barbara
transitioned to her current
assignment at Harris, as an
Integration Instructor. In this role
Barbara, reviews the new fleet
procedures for training impacts and
needs, updates training materials
and conducts training.
Field Support / Recruiting
Jackie Pate
Phone: 864.882.3111
Fax: 864.882.1026
[email protected]
GTTSi
P. O. Box 1679
Seneca, SC 29679
Hartsville Office
Consulting / Field Support /
Recruiting
Sid Crouch
Phone: 843.339.9874
Fax: 843.339.9528
[email protected]
GTTSi
P. O. Box 307
Hartsville, SC 29550
Charlotte-Area Office
Consulting / Field Support /
Recruiting
Pat McHale
Phone: 704.502.8705
Fax: 704.875.6090
[email protected]
GTTSi
P. O. Box 2632
Huntersville, NC 28070
Greenville-Area Office
Staffing / Recruiting
Kaye Browder
Phone: 864.631.9325
Fax: 864.862.8730
Prior to GTTSi, Barbara worked at
Vermont Yankee for 23 years and
held a variety of positions there.
In her last position at Vermont Yankee Barbara was the Technical Training
Superintendent, where her duties included Entergy Fleet Engineering
Training Peer Group Lead, Supervisor of the Engineering, Chemistry,
Radiation Protection, and General Employee Training Programs. In addition,
Barbara was also a Chemistry Instructor, the Environmental Program Lead,
and a Chemistry Technician.
Barbara started her nuclear career working at the West Valley Demonstration
Project in New York, where she worked as a chemist, during
decommissioning.
She is a graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo with a
Bachelor’s Degree in Science.
Barbara remains located in Hampstead, NC with her husband Michael and their two
daughters.
Check out our newly revised website at
www.gttsi.com
[email protected]
GTTSi
P. O. Box 864
Fountain Inn, SC 29644
GTTSi
P.O. Box 1679
Seneca, South Carolina 29679
New York Office
Staffing / Recruiting
Chrissy Mulay
Phone: 864.506.4647
Fax: 716.604.1948.
[email protected]
GTTSi
P. O. Box 16522
Rochester, NY 14616
COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP
We’re on the Web!
See us at:
www.gttsi.com
SERVICES FOR NUCLEAR
AND ENERGY
Disclaimer: The views expressed in any article or advertisement appearing on this website or
newsletter do not necessarily represent those of GTTSi and GTTSi accepts no responsibility for them.