FOR INSTITUTIONAL/WHOLESALE OR PROFESSIONAL CLIENT USE ONLY | NOT FOR RETAIL DISTRIBUTION GIM Solutions-GMAG – Weekly Strategy Report 6th April 2015 First quarter of 2015 in review - Economic and policy divergence has boosted USD and the geographic dispersion of equity performance - Oil prices due to stay low - Emerging markets remain on the sidelines This document is produced by the Global Strategy Team within GIM Solutions-GMAG. For further information please contact: Editor: Patrik Schöwitz [email protected] Michael Albrecht John Bilton Michael Hood Beth Li Jonathan Lowe Benjamin Mandel David Shairp Chart of the Week Our COTW shows consensus US GDP growth forecasts for the quarter and year as they evolved over the course of the first quarter. While the trajectory of downgrades for the first quarter of 2015 looks similar to that of the first quarter of 2014, the level remains higher, indicating a more sanguine outlook this time around. In both cases, there is little conviction that a weak first quarter will torpedo annual growth. We are inclined to agree that, despite the negative tenor of recent data, the US economy is poised for a year of above-trend growth. Comparing the first quarter of 2015 with that of 2014 is tempting but misleading. In both cases, the prospect of US rate hikes took root, high hopes for US growth were dashed, the S&P moved sideways, the euro area exceeded low expectations and emerging markets were sluggish. However, underlying those similarities are some stark differences. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has ostensibly committed to raising rates in or around September, quantitative easing (QE) efforts in Europe and Japan are in full throttle, the US labour market has added 1.3 million jobs since November, the US dollar has surged, and a supply glut has cut oil prices in half. These differences confirm our view of developed market recoveries gaining traction, with the US at the vanguard, and our generally positive view of risk assets. G4 monetary policy: the other shoe drops. Two major innovations in the first quarter have bolstered our conviction that monetary policy will continue to diverge across developed markets. First, the European Central Bank (ECB) entered the realm of QE with gusto. Purchasing about 60% of gross issuance of eurozone sovereign debt has had a profound effect on markets, pushing down sovereign yields—including bringing the German 10-year bond yield within spitting distance of zero—and compressing euro area credit spreads, catapulting equities, and tamping down the long end of other G4 yield curves. Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) has moved diligently, if glacially, towards lifting the fed funds rate off of zero. While futures markets remain sceptical on both the timing and pace of US policy normalisation relative to the FOMC’s communication, we expect a September rate hike to put a bookend on steady progress in the US economic recovery. All in all, the combination of two behemoths moving in opposite directions has made among the biggest splashes in financial markets of all the QE experiments thus far. The continued efficacy (read: credibility) of the ECB project and the political will to mobilise US policy rates should both continue to support duration and cause the US yield curve to flatten in the second quarter. E.T. on FX. An alien arriving on planet earth whose only communication with the world was reading FOMC and ECB governing council communiqués might have surmised that the US dollar would strengthen relative to the euro in the first quarter. It would be correct. So much was obvious to the Swiss National Bank when it dropped its Swiss franc per euro floor in January. Perhaps less obvious to the observer would be the fact that monetary policy would be such a dominant driver of global currency changes over that period. The broad (trade-weighted) dollar appreciated 5% over the first quarter compared to an 8% depreciation in the euro. Currencies that saw more muted developments in policy were flatter. The Japanese yen was up by 3%, slightly offsetting the sharp decline in the latter half of Déjà vu? Not quite. Consensus forecasts of U.S. GDP growth (percent) 3.5 2015 annual 3.0 2014 annual 2.5 Q1 2015 2.0 Q1 2014 1.5 1-Jan 31-Mar Sources: Bloomberg, daily data, as at 2 April 2015 1 FOR INSTITUTIONAL/WHOLESALE OR PROFESSIONAL CLIENT USE ONLY | NOT FOR RETAIL DISTRIBUTION GIM Solutions-GMAG Weekly Strategy Report Miscellaneous Musings Across our opportunity set, risk assets continued to perform well in the first quarter, though geographic contributions shifted. Moderate global growth and active central bank policy should continue to foster an environment that is friendly for equities in the current quarter. Moreover, in spite of the evolving stance of U.S. monetary policy, we continue to expect support for duration and flatter yield curves. F irs t F o u rt h T o ta l re tu rn s q u a rt e r q u a rt e r (U S D u n l e ss n o te d ) of 2015 of 2014 G lo b a l E q u it ie s 2.4% G lo b a l IG C re d it 2.1% 1.6% -8 . 2 % -2 7 . 7 % G S C I C o m m o d it ie s 0.5% U . S . E q u it y (S & P ) 1.0% 4.9% U K E q u it y (F TS E ) -0 . 7 % -4 . 2 % E u ro p e e x U K E q u it y 5.6% -4 . 2 % Ja p a n E q u it y (To p ix ) 10.0% 6.3% P a c ific e x -Ja p a n E q u it y 3.0% -1 . 5 % E M E q u it y (M S C I) 2.2% -4 . 4 % U . S . 5 -y r 1.7% 1.1% U . S . 3 0 -y r 5.1% 10.1% G e rm a n B u n d s (E U R ) 2.6% 3.0% E u ro p e rip h e ry b o n d s (E U R ) 5.1% 2.7% U K G ilt s (G B P ) 1.5% 5.4% U . S . IG c re d it 2.2% 1.8% U . S . h ig h y ie ld 2.5% -1 . 0 % E M Debt 2.1% -1 . 6 % U S D t ra d e w e ig h t e d 5.1% 5.3% E U R t ra d e w e ig h t e d -8 . 3 % 0.2% G B P t ra d e w e ig h t e d 2.2% 0.0% JP Y t ra d e w e ig h t e d 3.1% -6 . 0 % 2014 when the Bank of Japan (BoJ) extended its QE programme. The pound ticked up by 2%, with expectations gradually coalescing around an early 2016 rate hike. What pearls of wisdom would our alien offer for the coming quarter? It would caution that the Fed’s increasing data dependence introduces greater volatility at the short end of the yield curve and, as a result, into the value of the US dollar. But, ultimately, the view that US policy rates will outpace the anaemic fed funds futures curve implies continued support for the US dollar throughout 2015. FX on growth and earnings. US economic data largely disappointed in the first quarter as weather, unusually high personal savings rates and some payback for strength in late 2014 conspired against growth. Meanwhile, the cyclical recovery in continental Europe and the perception that political contagion from Greece will not be catastrophic have produced equally sizeable upside surprises. Innovations in FX, in turn, play an important incremental role in this story, notably in Japan where the yen’s depreciation has bolstered the cyclical upswing in exports and corporate profits. In the US, where expected 2015 S&P earnings revised down considerably since the beginning of the year, US dollar strength accounts for roughly a third of the decline. The geographic distribution of equity performance in the first quarter follows this script closely. More or less flat S&P performance contrasts sharply with stellar performance of Europe (ex UK) and Japanese equities. Crude oil finds a floor, but may test it again midyear. After declining by over 40% in the fourth quarter of 2014, crude oil prices bottomed out and have been cycling around USD 50 per barrel. While the stability was welcomed by high yield credit markets, where oil companies constitute a large share of issuance and the spread relative to investment grade credits narrowed, it may have sounded a note of caution for US. consumers that savings at the pump may in fact be more temporary than they thought. Going into mid year, several factors suggest that oil prices will remain subdued. First is the surprising fact that the halving of US shale oil rigs will merely cause output to level off. In other words, the oversupply coming from US production will stabilise, but not decline. Second, as US crude inventories approach capacity and exports struggle to keep up, prices will likely bear the brunt of the adjustment. If so, it will revive familiar concerns about the viability of marginal US energy producers and related equities and high yield credits. With any luck, though, it persuades US consumers to loosen their purse strings. Emerging markets still on the sidelines. Subdued commodity prices entrench one of many challenges faced by emerging market economies. Monetary easing gathered pace in the first quarter as countries continued to grapple with slower growth and capital outflows. China is front and centre in this narrative, having conspicuously cut its deposit rate in response to GDP growth tracking well below the official 7% target. And the fact that the renminbi is tethered to a rocket means that exports will not help meaningfully. All told, nascent monetary easing in emerging markets is still outweighed by deeper cyclical and structural challenges, supporting our underweight exposure to emerging market equities and cautious approach to emerging market debt. Benjamin Mandel All data sourced from JPMAM, Bloomberg, and Datastream, unless stated otherwise. NOT FOR RETAIL DISTRIBUTION: This communication has been prepared exclusively for Institutional/Wholesale Investors as well as Professional Clients as defined by local laws and regulation. The opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial markets expressed are those held by J.P. Morgan Asset Management at the time of going to print and are subject to change. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the recipient. Any research in this document has been obtained and may have been acted upon by J.P. Morgan Asset Management for its own purpose. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as advice or a recommendation relating to the buying or selling of investments. Furthermore, this material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and the recipient should ensure that all relevant information is obtained before making any investment. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. This communication may be issued by the following entities: in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited; in other EU jurisdictions by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l.; in Switzerland by J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA; in Hong Kong by JF Asset Management Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited; in India by JPMorgan Asset Management India Private Limited; in Singapore by JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Singapore) Pte Ltd; in Australia by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited ; in Taiwan by JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited and JPMorgan Funds (Taiwan) Limited; in Brazil by Banco J.P. Morgan S.A.; in Canada by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., and in the United States by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., JPMorgan Distribution Services Inc., and J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments, Inc. member FINRA/SIPC. ID: 4d03c02a80022663 2
© Copyright 2024