Joachim MULLER Managing Director Fulcrum3D

Resource Assessments and
Development of WPP's
- Use of Remote Sensing Technology -
introduction
 It is no longer a straightforward process deciding on the optimal
measurement strategy to minimise uncertainties in the energy assessment
for a specific project. Assessing the resulting financial benefit is just as
challenging.
 Minimising uncertainties in wind speed measurement, wind flow
modelling and ultimately energy yield calculation is essential
– maximises project debt (P90)
– maximises financial returns to the investor
 More than anything, the energy yield uncertainties are driven by the
design of the wind monitoring campaign
 A good wind monitoring campaign has the best financial return available
from any wind energy investment, paying for itself many times over
Page 2
traditional approach
 Hub height wind monitoring mast
 Multiple instruments along mast
– typically 3 – 4 anemometers at
different heights
– Typically 2-3 wind vanes
– quality of instruments varies
 Wind shear calculations to estimate
wind speeds above the mast
 Wind flow models to estimate wind
speeds at different locations on site
 Minimum 12 month campaign
Page 3
remote sensing approach
 Mobile, ground mounted remote
sensing system (sodar or lidar)
 Single unit measures the entire
height of the wind turbine
– measures wind speed, direction and
inflow angle with measurements
every 10m from 40 – 200m
– Wind speed measurements up to and
beyond blade tip
 Already 3 month campaign with
correlation against long term met
mast gives additional value
 Due to the mobility different
locations can be measured on site
Page 4
comparison of options
Traditional approach
Fulcrum3D Sodar
Accuracy
•
•
Very good in simple terrain
Affected by inflow angle in complex
terrain; met mast interference; cup
overspeeding
•
•
Very good in simple terrain
Very good in complex terrain in
combination with met-mast
(measures vertical flows also)
Availability
•
•
•
•
•
Excellent in normal operation
Initial delays due to building approvals
etc significant
Damage more likely (lightning, birds)
•
Very good in normal operation
Fast initial deployment – no building
approvals required
Minimal maintenance
Measurement
heights
•
•
Hub height only
3 or 4 measurement points
•
•
Tip height and beyond
Measures every 10m
Vertical wind speed/
inflow angle
•
Not usually measured, low accuracy
when measured
•
Measured at each height
Flexibility
•
Only one location
•
Easy deployment in many locations
Costs
•
•
Mod – High capital & installation
High removal costs
•
(depending on sensor quality and mast height)
•
Moderate capital, re-usable at many
sites
Very low for installation and removal
Well known technology
•
•
Relatively new technology
Proven via extensive validation tests
Page 5
Experience
•
flexibility of a sodar offers many benefits
 Sodars are mounted in a trailer and can be relocated on site in a matter of hours,
at minimal cost
– A single sodar could provide a typical 12 month monitoring program at >5 different
locations over its typical life span
– Sodars can also be easily used for shorter (e.g. 3 month) campaigns to test multiple
sites; confirm expected results; or test wind shear at existing masts
 In small sites in simple terrain usually only one measurement location is required
 As sites get larger, more measurements locations are required
– This is even higher in complex terrain where measurements every 1-2km (equating to 1
measurement every 6 - 10 turbines) are often recommended
 Met masts cannot be simply relocated, and are expensive to remove – usually
<20% of the initial capital can be retained at the end of the initial installation
Page 6
uncertainty benefits / impacts of Sodar
Benefit / impact of Sodar relative to Met Mast
Availability
• Slightly lower availability during the measurement period
does not materially affect uncertainty
• More data for the same costs
Monitoring period
• Sodar can offer benefits where met mast instalment is
delayed through planning approval requirements
Measurement height • Reduction in uncertainty from wind shear estimates – this
can be significant in unusual wind conditions
Multiple
measurement
locations
• Lower cost and greater flexibility of sodar allows multiple
measurement locations on a site for the same cost
• This can significantly reduce overall uncertainty, especially
in complex terrain where wind flow modelling uncertainty
often exceeds all other uncertainties
Page 7
EXAMPLE WIND FARM SITE
example wind farm site
 28 turbine site along a ridge approx.
10km long
 hill top location with difficult access –
complex terrain
 some sparse vegetation on site
 proposed turbine hub heights in
range 80 – 100m
 significant wind monitoring
requirements in order to reduce
overall yield uncertainty
Page 9
option 1: typical monitoring program
 1 x 60m mast installed in accessible
northern area
 12 months data already collected,
correlates well with long term mast
off-site
 turbines located up to 10km from the
closest met mast
 very high energy yield uncertainty
 requires at least one additional hub
height met mast to reduce
uncertainty
Page 10
option 2: additional 1x sodar
 use a single sodar to:
– carry out 3mo shear verification at
existing mast (6080m)
– measure 2 additional locations to the
south for 6mo each (“site infill”)
 all turbines now within 3km of a wind
monitoring location
 same price as purchasing 1 x new
hub height met mast
 12 - 18 months measurement
campaign
 lower uncertainty, higher value site
Page 11
option 3: additional 2x sodars
 use one or two sodars to:
– carry out 3mo shear verification at
existing mast (6080m)
– measure 4 additional locations to the
south for 6mo each (“site infill”)
 all turbines now within 1.5km of a
wind monitoring location
 1 sodar would take 18 – 30 months
and cost the same as a new hub
height met masts
 2 sodars would take 12 - 15 months
measurement campaign
 lowest uncertainty, highest value site
Page 12
THE TURKISH SITUATION
Page 13
The Turkish situation
 government advises proposed connection points for tenders
 developers secure sites and commence wind monitoring
–
–
New Electricity Market Law (6446) requires at least 12 months wind data to be captured on the site
often carried out with a single met mast in easy access area
•
•
~80% with 60m mast
~20% with 80m mast
 developers then bid into the tender process
– Significant oversupply therefore significant uncertainty
 this leads to 3 monitoring phases:
– site identificaition
– preparation for tender
– after winning a tender- confirming wind energy yields for financing
Page 14
initial site investigation
 a single sodar can assess multiple
sites using short term campaigns
 from this the preferred site near a
connection point can be chosen –
quickly, and at low cost
 early site measurements can then be
used to
– decide what resource exists
– correlate with the met mast once
installed to extend the effective
length of the met mast dataset
– confirm wind shear above the mast
and check inflow angles affecting met
mast measurements
Page 15
12 month data collection
 Together with the met-mast the sodar
is ideally suited to providing the initial
12 months wind data required for the
wind tenders
–
–
–
–
increased height range up to 200m
measurements every 10m
vertical inflow information
several locations can be measured
 with additional sodar measurements
you can get much more precise
information prior to submitting a
tender  lower risk
 if the bid is not successful, the sodar
can be relocated to another site at
low cost
Page 16
after winning a bid, a sodar offers:
 rapid increase in the number of locations
monitored on site
– no delays from weather windows;
building approvals etc
– Maximise wind data to reduce
uncertainty
 height extension of existing masts
– Low cost confirmation of the wind
shear calculations of the existing mast
– Rapidly take the effective height of a
60m mast to >150m
 significantly lower uncertainty from wind
flow modelling, the most significant
contributor to yield uncertainty in complex
terrain
Page 17
FULCRUM3D SODAR
introduction to Fulcrum3D Sodar
 specifically designed for high
performance in complex terrain
 optimised for the wind energy
industry
 compact beam sodar
 wind speed, direction and inflow
angles from 40m to >200m
 fully automated for remote
operation
 data available via Flightdeck
Page 19
extensive validation testing
 extensive validation test regime adjacent to tall met masts (up to 130m)
–
–
–
–
~25 location both simple and complex terrain, in coastal and inland sites
Elevation from below sea level to 1300m above
Average annual wind speeds 5.5 – 9.5 m/s
Average annual temperatures 10 degrees – 35 degrees
 results have been analysed by Fulcrum3D and industry experts
– Consultants including DNV-GL, Windguard, Barlovento, Parsons Brinckerhoff,
Entura, Ecofys …
– Clients including Epuron, Westwind, Trustpower, Eurus Energy …
 3-way trial shows excellent performance of Fulcrum3D Sodar compare to
another sodar-system on key metrics (within 1% of mast vs. within 2% of
mast, 0.980 vs. 0.958 on R2, increased availability at higher heights)
Page 20
conclusion
 there is not only one way to carry out measurement campaigns
 developers should go more into the detail and check the impact of all
technologies on costs and project value
 sodar, alone or in combination with met masts, offers significant
improvements in uncertainty and at low cost
 the Fulcrum3D Sodar is designed specifically for complex terrain and is
priced to suit the Turkish market
Page 21
Fulcrum3D Pty Ltd
Level 11, 75 Miller Street
North Sydney NSW 2060
AUSTRALIA
T +61 (2) 8456 7400
F +61 (2) 9922 6645
www.fulcrum3d.com
[email protected]
a better sodar design
 3x physically fixed phased arrays
eliminate site to site variations seen
with electronically-steered sodars
– beam orientation is independent of
frequency, temp., air density
– greater consistency from site to site
 adjustable beam frequency (3.5 to
7.5 kHz) allows:
– side by side operation of sodars
– avoidance of specific background
noise e.g. birds
 multi-beam sampling available
physically fixed phased arrays ensure
constant beam angles
– more data, more availability
Page 23
a better sodar design
 narrow beam angle means better
performance in complex terrain
– 9-12o from vertical compared with up
to 30o for competitors
– smaller measurement volume;
reduced flow curvature effects in
complex terrain
– greater accuracy in complex terrain
 operating range 40 to >200m
– 10m height bins (5m optional)
– arbitrary heights available to match
mast measurement heights or hub
heights
Page 24
a better sodar design
 full spectrum data retrieval
– spectrum data is sent via secure
communications to Fulcrum3D
servers for processing
 full spectrum data is permanently
stored for post processing later
– historical data can be reprocessed
when software upgrades are
released
• data continuity and consistency are
assured
• processing improvements can be
compared directly
Fulcrum3D Sodar Electronics
– 3rd party or client algorithms can be
applied to raw spectrum data
Page 32
how it works
 Sound pulse (“chirp”) sent by
sodar
 As this chirp moves up
through the atmosphere some
of the sound is scattered back
towards the sodar
 The sodar listens to this
returned signal – the time
delay from when the chirp
was sent directly relates to the
measurement height
 Wind flow causes a “doppler
shift” in the frequency
 this is used to determine the
wind speed at each height
Page 33
data management via Flightdeck
 all data can be viewed and
downloaded from one location:
– wind, solar, met, noise data
– telemetry and location
– operating status / faults
 data available in both raw and clean
formats
 site and equipment details available
at the click of a button
– site history
– equipment location history
 flightdeck.fulcrum3d.com
Page 34
benefits compared with lidar
 significantly lower cost to install and operate
– four separate sodars could be installed for the cost of one lidar
 real-world accuracy is just as good as lidar
– one study estimated Fulcrum3D sodar uncertainty at ~2.6% compared with
~2.3% for First Class cup anemometers
 lower energy yield uncertainty for the same monitoring budget
– more monitoring locations for longer periods means less uncertainty from
wind flow modelling
– on most sites this uncertainty significantly outweighs the wind speed
measurement uncertainty at a monitoring location
 better performance in complex terrain
– no need for “flow correction” modelling
Page 35
fleet-wide statistics in real-world trials
 review of ~25 internal validation
assessments based on 10-minute
correlations of met-mast
vs.
concrete
Sodar
footings
 excellent fleet-wide accuracy,
being generally within 1% of the
mast, in both simple and complex
terrain and over all heights
 excellent scatter (R2) for a sodar
with average of 0.974 on simple
sites and 0.969 on complex sites
 results are generally within cup
anemometer error bands
Note, these statistics are based on direct correlations of 10
minute samples and are not comparable to statistics for
binned data.
Page 36
and the value is…
Monitoring option
Cost
Locations
measured
Largest
distance to
turbine
Time
A
1 x 60m met mast
(base case)
€30k
1
1 – 1.5 years
10km
B
1 x 60m met mast
1 x 80m met mast
€70k
2
1 – 1.5 years
5km
C
1 x 60m met mast
1x sodar at 2 x locations
€70k
3
1 – 1.5 years
3km
D
3 x 80m met masts
€120k
3
1.5 years
3km
E
1 x 60m met mast
€70k
1x sodar
at 4 x locations
 €100k
development
F
translates
1
x 60m
met mast to increased development
€110k
5
1.25 years
2x sodars at 4 x locations
G
5 x 80m met masts
€200k
5
2.25 years
budget
saving
5
1.5 years
1,5km
profit
1,5km
1,5km
Comment
highest overall uncertainty
lowest cost
lowest monitoring coverage
high overall uncertainty
low-moderate cost
building permits required
medium overall uncertainty
low-moderate cost
sodars can be re-used at end
medium overall uncertainty
moderate cost
building permits required
lowest overall uncertainty
low-moderate cost
longer monitoring time
sodars can be re-used at end
lowest overall uncertainty
moderate cost
shortest monitoring time
sodars can be re-used at end
lowest overall uncertainty
very high cost Page 37