REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Closed Session: 6:00 p.m.
Regular Session: 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
A.
As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent
mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the
public and City Council.
A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker
Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an
agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action.
Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public
Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.
As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to
speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
B.
C.
1.
6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION
●
●
●
●
●
2.
Brad Hancock, Mayor
Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Berkson, Council Member
Frank Johnston, Council Member
Verne Lauritzen, Council Member
CLOSED SESSION
A.
PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
B.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION. The City
Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to four matters of pending litigation:: (1) City
of Jurupa Valley vs. City of Riverside, Riverside Public Utilities and, as Real Parties in
Interest, Southern California Edison, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No.
BS143085, Court of Appeal, Second District Case No. B257623; (2) Southern
Page - 1 -
California Edison Company v. City of Jurupa Valley et al., Riverside County Superior
Court Case No. RIC1504590 (Vernola Market Place Project); (3) City of Riverside v.
City of Jurupa Valley et al., Riverside Superior Court Case No. RIC1504611 (Vernola
Market Place Project); and (4) Application of Southern California Edison Company (U238-E) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Construct the Riverside
Transmission Reliability Project, California Public Utilities Commission Case No.
A15404013.
C.
3.
7:00 P.M. - RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A.
4.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The
City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to two matters of potential litigation and will
discuss whether to initiate litigation against certain defendants. A point has been
reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and
circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS IN CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
●
●
●
●
●
Brad Hancock, Mayor
Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Berkson, Council Member
Frank Johnston, Council Member
Verne Lauritzen, Council Member
5.
INVOCATION
6.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND POSTING OF THE COLORS – LED BY GIRL
SCOUT TROOP 953
7.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
8.
PRESENTATION
9.
A.
PRESENTATION TO CHLOE FERREIRA-COPAT - GIRL SCOUTS SILVER
AWARD RECIPIENT
B.
PROCLAIMING MAY AS “MENTAL HEALTH MONTH”
PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Page - 2 -
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on
the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes
to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill
out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for
Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please
come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing
your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow-up information
to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your
comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City
Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.
10.
INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS,
ANNOUNCEMENTS
11.
CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
12.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
13.
A.
APRIL 16, 2015 REGULAR MEETING
B.
APRIL 21, 2015 SPECIAL MEETING
COUNCIL
COMMENTS
AND
CONSENT CALENDAR (COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA TAKEN HERE)
(All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved in one motion unless a Councilmember requests a
separate action on a specific item on the Consent Calendar. If an item is removed from the Consent Calendar, it
will be discussed individually and acted upon separately.)
A.
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE
TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN THE
AGENDA
Requested Action:
That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.
B.
CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF $606,458.74
Requested Action:
and 23, 2015.
C.
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated April 9, 16
ORDINANCE NO. 2015-07
Requested Action:
That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 2015-07, entitled:
Page - 3 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ZONING MAP NO. 15 (JURUPA AREA PLAN) CHANGING THE ZONE OF
AN APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF MISSION
BOULEVARD (APNS: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) FROM
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000), REGULATED
DEVELOPMENT AREAS (R-D) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P)
ZONES TO COLLECTIVELY A RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE (R-6)
D.
NOTICE OF DECISION FOR MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 14112
(TTM36827 AND VAR1501) PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENT FOR NOTICING
THE ADVISORY AGENCY’S (PLANNING COMMISSION) DECISION OF A
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ON A VACANT LOT LOCATED NORTH OF 45TH
ST., WEST OF GOLDEN WEST AVENUE AND EAST OF OPAL STREET (APN:
182-361-009-4)
Requested Action:
That the City Council receive and file the Notice of Decision.
14.
CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
15.
PUBLIC HEARING
A.
PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-C,
TABULATION OF THE BALLOT, AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION
ORDER ING THE ANNEXATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT OF ZONE 182
1.
Requested Action:
That the City Council conduct the public hearing and after
closing the public hearing, direct the City Clerk, or his/her designee, who the
City Council finds to be an impartial person as that term is used in Section
53753(e) of the California Government Code, to tally all ballots received prior
to the close of the public hearing.
2.
That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2015-19, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 891-CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ZONE 182
OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL
ASSESSABLE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN WITHIN
THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015-16
Page - 4 -
16.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
A.
B.
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015/2016 FIVE-YEAR MEASURE “A” LOCAL STREETS
AND ROADS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FOR FISCAL YEAR
2015/2016 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 FOR THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE “A” LOCAL
FUNDS PROGRAM
1.
Requested Action:
That the City Council approve the City of Jurupa Valley’s
Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Five-Year Measure “A” Local Streets and Roads Capital
Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2015/16 through Fiscal Year 2019/20 for the
RCTC Measure ‘A” Local Funds Program; and
2.
Approve the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification required of the City of
Jurupa Valley that establishes a Base Year amount and commitment to
expending Measure A Local Street and Roads funds to projects identified in the
City of Jurupa Valley’s Five-Year CIP; and
3.
Authorize the City Engineer, or his designee, to submit an amended five-year
plan to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the listed Measure “A”
projects as part of any current fiscal year CIP budget approval process.
CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER TO SUPERVISOR JOHN TAVAGLIONE
CONCERNING SHERIFF SERVICE CONTRACT COST INCREASES
Requested Action:
That the City Council consider the letter to Supervisor John
Tavaglione concerning Sheriff service contract cost increase, and authorize the Mayor
to sign the letter for transmittal.
C.
REQUEST FROM JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SUBLEASING OFFICE SPACE AT CITY HALL
Requested Action:
That the City Council consider the Letter of Interest from the
Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce requesting sub-leasing of City Hall office space
and provide direction to staff for development of a sub-lease policy.
D.
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG) ANNUAL
MEETING
Requested Action:
That the City Council authorize reimbursable expenditures
deemed appropriate for City Council members attending the WRCOG Annual Meeting.
E.
Page - 5 -
INITIATION OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ADD A
PROVISION AUTHORIZING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO REFER
CERTAIN DISCRETIONARY ENTITLEMENTS TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
Requested Action:
That the City Council initiate an amendment to the City of Jurupa
Valley Zoning Ordinance that authorizes the Planning Director to refer certain
discretionary entitlements to the Planning Commission.
F.
GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - REMOVAL OF GENERAL
MEMBER/DECLARATION OF VACANCY
Requested Action:
That the City Council remove Craig Maxwell from the General
Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), declare the seat vacant and direct the Planning
Department/City Clerk to advertise a notice of unscheduled vacancy and begin the
process to fill the seat.
G.
DISCUSSION OF VETERAN’S BANNER PROGRAM (REQUESTED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANK JOHNSTON) (ORAL REPORT)
Requested Action:
That the City Council discuss the item and provide appropriate
direction to City staff.
17.
CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING REGIONAL
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A.
B.
Page - 6 -
MAYOR PRO TEM LAURA ROUGHTON
1.
UPDATE ON THE WRCOG HEALTH SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING
HELD ON APRIL 22, 2015
2.
UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE
GOVERNMENTS MEETING HELD ON MAY 4, 2015
3.
UPDATE ON THE HEALTHY JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
MEETING HELD ON MAY 5, 2015
COUNCIL
OF
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANK JOHNSTON
1.
UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY – BOARD OF
DIRECTOR’S MEETING HELD ON APRIL 23, 2015
2.
UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY – BOARD BUDGET
AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON MAY 6, 2015
3.
UPDATE ON THE 2015 SCAG ANNUAL CONFERENCE & GENERAL
ASSEMBLY MEETING HELD ON MAY 7, 2015
C.
COUNCIL MEMBER VERNE LAURITZEN
1.
UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING HELD ON MAY 4, 2015
18.
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
19.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
20.
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of May 21, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930
Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need
special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact
Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332-6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when
services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide
accessibility to the meeting or service.
Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City
Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the
City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the
writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa
Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council
Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.
Page - 7 -
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.A
RETURN TO AGENDA
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
April 16, 2015
The meeting was held at the Jurupa Valley City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1.
6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION
●
●
●
●
●
Brad Hancock, Mayor
Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Berkson, Council Member
Frank Johnston, Council Member
Verne Lauritzen, Council Member
Mayor Hancock called the closed session meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.
2.
CLOSED SESSION
A.
PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
There were no public comments regarding the closed session items.
3.
B.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION.
The City Council met in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to two matters of pending
litigation: (1) City of Jurupa Valley v. Dutch House Collective et al. (Riverside
Superior Court Case No. RIC 1405494); and (2) City of Jurupa Valley vs. City of
Riverside, Riverside Public Utilities and as Real Parties in Interest, Southern
California Edison, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BS143085.
C.
CONFERENCE
WITH
LEGAL
COUNSEL
POTENTIAL
LITIGATION. The City Council met in closed session with the City Attorney
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to three matters
of potential litigation and will discuss whether to initiate litigation against certain
defendants. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney,
based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to
litigation involving the City.
7:00 P.M. - RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS IN CLOSED
SESSION
-1-
Mayor Hancock announced that there were no reportable actions taken.
4.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
●
●
●
●
●
Brad Hancock, Mayor
Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Berkson, Council Member
Frank Johnston, Council Member
Verne Lauritzen, Council Member
Mayor Hancock called the regular meeting to order at 7:12 p.m.
5.
INVOCATION was given by Mr. Don Porter.
6.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Boy Scout Daniel Alexandre who was at the
meeting to earn a communication merit badge.
7.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Roughton, to approve the Agenda.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
8.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
PRESENTATION
A.
PRESENTATION BY JOLENE HANCOCK AND DAN RODRIGUEZ 2015 JURUPA VALLEY 5K COMMUNITY RUN
Dan Rodriguez, General Manager of the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District
and 5K Chairperson Jolene Hancock announced that the 4th Annual Jurupa Valley
Community Run is scheduled for Saturday, May 30, 2015 with a start time of 7:00
am. Mrs. Hancock thanked the Council and Sheriff’s Department for their
ongoing support which will help to ensure another successful event.
9.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Ron Anderson conveyed an invitation to a special event on April 29, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. at
the Sizzler Restaurant that will recognize the five deputies and one volunteer that were
honored by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. The guest speaker will be Police
Chief Jason Horton. RSVP’s would be appreciated.
Carl Wisdom presented photographs of a vacant property at 8810 45th Street. He advised
that the property has been vacant for six years and there is concern from residents that the
-2-
current condition of the property is unsafe and creates a neighborhood eyesore. Mr.
Wisdom asked for Council’s assistance to address this matter.
Mayor Hancock asked City staff to look into this matter.
10.
INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Berkson acknowledged the Healthy Jurupa Valley Extravaganza, stating
that it was an absolutely wonderful event. He expressed appreciation to all involved.
Council Member Lauritzen expressed appreciation to Lieutenant Ken Ditton for his
comprehensive and informative updates. He recognized Lieutenant Ditton for his 25
years of distinguished service. He reported on his attendance at the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department’s annual awards ceremony at the Morongo Casino and Resort
where recipients were honored for their acts of heroism, lifesaving, and community
service. He was overwhelmed by the number of Jurupa Valley residents who were
recognized for their acts of heroism and lifesaving efforts.
Council Member Johnston complimented all those involved in the Healthy Jurupa Valley
Extravaganza, stating that the event gets bigger and better each year. He echoed Council
Member Lauritzen’s comments, noting that a member of the community who was
recognized by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department was a member of his church.
He began the meeting with the following quote: “We can choose to throw stones, to
stumble on them, to climb over them, or to build with them.” – William Arthur Ward. He
announced that the City’s Planning Department received recognition for leadership in
planning with the APA Inland Empire Award for the City’s new Environmental Justice
Element.
Council Member Roughton asked whether the Annual 5K Community Run would need to
come back as an Agenda item. She announced that the Healthy Jurupa Valley Gardens
and Markets Action Team has partnered with the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park
District to create an educational produce stand called “The patch.” The produce stand will
open tomorrow and will feature organic produce and rare fruits. Residents are
encouraged to visit the produce stand on Fridays from 9 am to 12 noon at the Community
Center, 4810 Pedley Road at the Gazebo. She thanked everyone for participating in the
Healthy Living Extravaganza, stating that it was a wonderful event with close to 3,000
attendees. She expressed appreciation to Mayor Hancock and his wife Jolene for
constructing and organizing the human foosball court which was a big success.
Mayor Hancock thanked all those responsible for the Healthy Jurupa Valley
Extravaganza, stating that it was a wonderful event.
11.
CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
City Manager Thompson introduced Steve Loriso, Deputy City Engineer. He announced
that a Special Council Workshop will be held Tuesday, April 21, 2015 to discuss the
-3-
Compensation Study prepared by Koff & Associates. He announced that the next Town
Hall will be on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at Patriot High School. He discussed the fire that
occurred earlier today, stating that the multi-agency response was tremendous and
contributed to the quick containment of the fire.
Council Member Berkson asked for clarification regarding the City’s efforts toward the
control of excess weeds and brush so that it doesn’t become a fire hazard. Mr. Thompson
responded that the City is looking at working with CalFire to do some cleanup in the city.
The City is also bringing on additional staff to focus on illegal dumping.
12.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A.
MARCH 31, 2015 SPECIAL MEETING
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council
Member Johnston, to approve the Minutes of the March 31, 2015 special
meeting.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
B.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
APRIL 2, 2015 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Roughton, to approve the Minutes of the April 2, 2015 regular meeting.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
13.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
A.
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN
THE AGENDA
Requested Action:
That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.
B.
CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,963,226.73
Requested Action:
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated
March 26, 31 and April 6 and the Payroll Register dated April 3, 2015.
-4-
C.
ORDINANCE NO. 2015-06
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 2015-06, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY AMENDING CHAPTER 8.56, HAZARDOUS VEGETATION,
OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES, AS ADOPTED
BY THE CITY, TO ADD TUMBLEWEEDS TO THE DEFINITION OF
HAZARDOUS VEGETATION AND PROVIDE FOR THE ABATEMENT
OF TUMBLEWEEDS AND OTHER HAZARDOUS VEGETATION IN
THE CITY
D.
SUPPORT POSITION FOR
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
AB
1455
REGARDING
ONTARIO
Requested Action:
That the City Council ratify the City Manager’s
authorization for the City of Ontario to utilize the City’s name and City seal on
correspondence to the State Assembly for all agencies in support of AB 1455.
A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Council
Member Lauritzen, to approve the Consent Calendar.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
14.
CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
15.
PUBLIC HEARING
A.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
1463 (GPA1403, CZ1404, TTM36720, & SDP31456) TO ALLOW 26
AFFORDABLE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 5.3 ACRES AT THE
TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET & NORTHERLY OF MISSION
169-100-057
BOULEVARD
(APN:
169-100-055;
169-070-035;
(APPLICANT: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - RIVERSIDE)
Annette Tam, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
At the request of Council Member Berkson, Mike Myers, Assistant City Engineer,
provided additional information on the vehicular points of access and responded
to Council’s questions.
-5-
Ernie Perea, the City’s environmental consultant provided additional information
and responded to Council’s questions.
Kathy Michalak, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity Riverside gave a brief
PowerPoint presentation. She reported that this is a project that is in partnership
with CalVet and is meant to support Veterans as they transition back to civilian
life. She outlined the services and resources that will be provided.
Council Member Johnston stated that he would like to find a way to help ensure
the Veterans in this program receive military banners.
Mayor Hancock opened the public hearing and called for any public comments.
Ron Anderson voiced support of the project, stating that those who have served
this nation as Veterans deserve to be recognized and supported.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council
Member Johnston, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-18, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR A
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS
ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND
NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD, AND APPROVING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1403, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36720,
AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 31456 TO PERMIT THE
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRES LOCATED
AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF
MISSION BOULEVARD INTO 26 AFFORDABLE, SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR VETERANS
LIVING IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
A motion was made by Council Member Lauritzen, seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Roughton, to introduce Ordinance No. 2015-07, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ZONING MAP NO. 15 (JURUPA AREA PLAN) CHANGING THE ZONE
OF AN APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED
-6-
AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF
MISSION BOULEVARD (APNS: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057)
FROM GENERAL
RESIDENTIAL (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000),
REGULATED DEVELOPMENT AREAS (R-D) AND GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
(C-1/C-P)
ZONES
TO
COLLECTIVELY
A
RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE (R-6)
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
16.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
A.
APPROVE INITIATION OF AIR AND NOISE TECHNICAL STUDIES
FOR THE CEQA REVIEW OF POSSIBLE TRUCK RESTRICTIONS ON
ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN SR-60 AND HOPKINS STREET
Jim Smith, City Engineer, presented the staff report.
Penny Newman suggested that the City should incorporate what has already been
analyzed and take advantage of the fact that a very thorough environmental
analysis has already been done. The AQMD has also done an ongoing monitoring
program on diesel impacts which could also be incorporated into the City’s
analysis.
A motion was made by Council Member Berkson, seconded by Council
Member Lauritzen, to authorize the City Manager to amend the Iteris
Agreement to provide for the air and noise technical study for possible truck
restrictions on Etiwanda Avenue between SR 60 and Hopkins Street in an
amount not to exceed $18,020 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
B.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
INITIATION OF A ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND
SECTION 18.28(A), SECOND UNIT PERMITS
Thomas Merrell, Planning Director, presented the staff report.
Betty Anderson voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance stating that she is
concerned about adding a blanket zoning to the entire city. She suggested that the
Council could grant Lennar Homes a special variance that would allow them to
offer second units in their new homes.
-7-
Stephen Anderson voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance, stating that the
second unit permits should remain isolated for Lennar Homes. He voiced concern
that second units invite renters and transients, change the aesthetics and frequently
take over street parking which impacts the livability of the community.
Geoff Smith representing Lennar Homes stated that multi-generational living is a
big part of Lennar’s customer base. Lennar is meeting this demand by building
what they call a “Next Gen” home. He noted that many cities have embraced this
concept and Lennar is willing to work with city staff to assist in modifying the
City’s zoning code.
Ron Anderson voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance, stating that second
units do not belong on 6,000 square foot lots. He added that the City’s Code
Enforcement staff is already overburdened and would find it difficult to manage
any potential violations.
Kim Jarrell Johnson voiced concern that Lennar Homes did not do their due
diligence prior to building their second unit homes in Jurupa Valley. She advised
that this is a density issue not a zoning issue and it should be dealt with through
the General Plan process. She suggested that the Council could set a percentage
of allowable second units and other standards that would better regulate second
unit permits.
By consensus, the Council elected not to initiate a code amendment for
second unit permits at this time. Staff was directed to bring back a revised
list of standards that would apply to the construction of second dwelling
units.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
Mayor Hancock called a short recess at 9:30 p.m.
Mayor Hancock reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
C.
INITIATION OF A DRAFT ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ADD A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONE TO THE JURUPA
VALLEY ZONING CODE
Thomas Merrell, Planning Director, presented the staff report.
A motion was made by Council Member Lauritzen, seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Roughton, to initiate a code amendment to the City of Jurupa Valley
Zoning Ordinance for the creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
zone.
-8-
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
D.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR THE
INTERIM GENERAL PLAN (GPA1405)
Mary Wright, General Plan Program Manager, presented the staff report.
A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Council
Member Lauritzen, to approve the Request for Proposals (RFP) for
Technical Services for the Interim General Plan; and authorize the Planning
Department to distribute the RFP, pursuant to the Council-adopted Interim
General Plan work program.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
E.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
POLICY FOR USE OF CITY OWNED VEHICLES
City Manager Gary Thompson presented the staff report.
A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Council
Member Berkson, to adopt the Vehicle Use Policy that will be applicable to
City owned vehicles.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
F.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH
GARY THOMPSON
City Attorney Peter Thorson presented the staff report.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council
Member Berkson, to approve the “City Manager Employment Agreement
between the City of Jurupa Valley and Gary Thompson,” dated as of April
16, 2015; and terminate the “Agreement for Consultant Services Between the
City of Jurupa Valley and GST Consulting for Interim City Manager
Services,” dated as of July 17, 2014, as of the time the City Manager
Agreement becomes effective on May 1, 2015.
-9-
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
G.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
DISCUSSION OF INCORPORATION CELEBRATION ACTIVITIES
REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON (ORAL
REPORT)
Council Member Berkson outlined his reasons for bringing this item forward. He
discussed his desire to organize a community parade on the July 4th weekend that
would provide an opportunity for citizens to show their community pride. He
read aloud a list of civic organizations that could be included in a community
parade that could help celebrate the City’s incorporation.
Ron Anderson advised that the Jurupa Area and Recreation and Park District has
not yet confirmed an agreement with the School District for use of Patriot High
School for the annual Independence Day/Fireworks Celebration.
By consensus, the City Council decided to forgo organizing a parade this
year due to time constraints and begin the process to form a 5th Birthday
Celebration Committee to organize a larger-scale celebration and community
parade in 2016.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
17.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A.
REGARDING
MAYOR BRAD HANCOCK
1.
B.
REPORTS
Mayor Hancock gave an update on the Northwest Mosquito and
Vector Control District Meeting on April 16, 2015.
MAYOR PRO TEM LAURA ROUGHTON
1.
Mayor Pro Tem Roughton gave an update on the Western Riverside
Council of Governments Meeting on April 6, 2015.
2.
Mayor Pro Tem Roughton gave an update on the Healthy Jurupa
Valley Community Meeting April 7, 2015.
3.
Mayor Pro Tem Roughton gave an update on the Western Riverside
Council of Governments Administrative and Finance Committee
Meeting on April 8, 2015.
-10-
C.
D.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANK JOHNSTON
1.
Council Member Johnston gave an update on the Riverside County
Transportation Commission Meeting on April 9, 2015.
2.
Council Member Johnston gave an update on the Northwest
Transportation NOW Coalition Meeting on April 9, 2015.
COUNCIL MEMBER VERNE LAURITZEN
1.
18.
Council Member Verne Lauritzen gave an update on the Western
Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Meeting on April
6, 2015.
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.
19.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Roughton reported on her attendance at the ONT Airport Authority
meeting on April 6, 2015. A report from that meeting indicated that the number of car
trips from the Inland Empire to LAX has increased dramatically and will have significant
impacts on SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan. She reported on her attendance at the
League of California Cities, Riverside Division Executive Committee meeting on April
13, 2015, stating that the Legislative Committee discussed several new bills. The next
Division meeting is May 11, 2015 which will include a tour of the former Annenberg
Estate.
Mayor Hancock asked for clarification regarding the Northwest Mosquito Vector Control
District’s approval of the subordination request relating to proposed refunding bonds
issued for Jurupa Valley’s Redevelopment Project Area of the Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside.
Council Member Johnston announced that “School Bus Driver Appreciation Day” is
Tuesday, April 21. He announced that the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce will
host “Casino Night” at the Country Village Ballroom tomorrow night at 6:00 p.m. He
provided the following closing quotes: “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers
of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to
exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of
constitutional power.” - Thomas Jefferson.
-11-
20.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Hancock adjourned the
meeting at 11:18 p.m.
The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held May 7, 2015 at 7:00
p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
Respectfully submitted,
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-12-
RETURN TO AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.B
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
April 21, 2015
The meeting was held at the Jurupa Valley City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1.
6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL - COUNCIL WORKSHOP
●
●
●
●
●
Brad Hancock, Mayor
Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Berkson, Council Member
Frank Johnston, Council Member
Verne Lauritzen, Council Member
Mayor Hancock called the special meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
2.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Berkson.
3.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council Member
Johnston, to approve the Agenda.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
4.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
DISCUSSION REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF FUTURE CITY
EMPLOYEE SALARY STRUCTURES, BENEFITS AND RETIREMENT
PROGRAM, AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PERSONNEL MANUAL
City Manager Gary Thompson presented the staff report. Mr. Thompson explained that
the City Council is being asked to review the Compensation Study prepared by Koff &
Associates. The overall benefits, salaries and City Personnel Manual will be brought
back at a later date with all appropriate implementing ordinances and resolutions.
Georg Krammer, CEO, Koff & Associates presented a brief PowerPoint presentation and
outlined the results of the Total Compensation Study.
5.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Kim Jarrell Johnson voiced concern that the salary survey was not based on the actual
agencies that the city would be using as a possible employee pool and should have
included school and/or special districts. She equated the Assistant to the City Manager
-1-
position with the City Clerk position and questioned why the City Clerk position has a
lower salary range. She discussed the proposed salaries, voicing that a job description
should reflect the job and not the person holding the job. She opposes contracting with
CalPERS and supports the PTO option that would help attract new employees.
6.
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS
Following discussion, Council Member Berkson requested that staff bring back a
comparison of what is currently being paid to the city’s consultants to better analyze the
proposed salary ranges and benefits package.
By consensus, the City Council provided direction to the City Manager to bring
back a benchmark comparison for formalizing salary, benefits and retirement
systems for future City employees which will be brought back at a later date.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
7.
Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton
None
None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Hancock adjourned the
meeting at 7:49 p.m.
The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held May 7, 2015 at 7:00
p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
Respectfully submitted,
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-2-
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
BY:
GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
ALAN KREIMEIER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.B
CHECK REGISTERS
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated April 9, 16 and 23, 2015.
The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the
annual budget process. The FY 2014-15 Budget was adopted on June 19, 2014.
Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution
throughout the fiscal year. The check register dated April 9, 2015 includes a $6,852.49
payment to Chase Card Services. The Statement, with purchase details, is attached.
ANALYSIS
All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City
Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the
Government Code.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Check registers:
$ 592,582.28
4/9/15
4/16/15
$ 716,874.01
4/23/15
$1,217,914.89
TOTAL
$ 606,458.74
Page | 1
RETURN TO AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.C
ORDINANCE NO. 2015-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ZONING MAP NO. 15 (JURUPA AREA PLAN) CHANGING THE ZONE
OF AN APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED
AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF
MISSION BOULEVARD (APNS: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057)
FROM GENERAL
RESIDENTIAL
(R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000),
REGULATED DEVELOPMENT AREAS (R-D) AND GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
(C-1/C-P)
ZONES
TO
COLLECTIVELY
A
RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE (R-6) ZONE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
City of Jurupa Valley Land Use Regulatory Authority.
Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a)
The City
The City of Jurupa Valley incorporated on July 1, 2011.
(b)
On July 1, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2011-01. This
Ordinance provides that pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 57376, all
ordinances of the County of Riverside which have been applicable within the territory now
incorporated as the City of Jurupa Valley, to the extent that they applied before incorporation,
shall remain in full force and effect as ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley, including the
Riverside County General Plan. Additionally, Ordinance No. 2011-01 provides that the
resolutions, rules and regulations of the County of Riverside which have been applicable in the
implementation of the aforesaid ordinances and State laws (including, but not limited to, the
California Environmental Quality Act and regulations pertaining to traffic) to the extent that they
applied before incorporation shall remain in full force and effect as resolutions, rules and
regulations, respectively, of the City of Jurupa Valley. On September 15, 2011, the City Council
adopted Ordinance No. 2011-10, effective October 15, 2011, continuing in effect all ordinances
of the County of Riverside that have been applicable within the territory now incorporated as the
City of Jurupa Valley, to the extent that they applied before incorporation. These ordinances and
resolutions as well as the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code shall be known as “Jurupa Valley
Ordinances.”
(c)
On September 15, 2011, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No.
2011-09, effective October 15, 2011, adopting Chapter 2.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code establishing the Planning Commission for the City of Jurupa Valley. Chapter 2.35
provides that the Planning Commission shall perform the planning agency functions described in
Government Code Section 65100 et seq., and shall fulfill the functions delegated to the Planning
Commission for the County of Riverside under the relevant ordinances and resolutions, which
the City has adopted as required upon incorporation. Chapter 2.35 further provides that the
Planning Commission shall perform the functions of any and all planning, zoning or code
1
enforcement appeals board created by the relevant County of Riverside ordinances and
resolutions, which the City has adopted by reference as required by law.
Section 2.
Project Procedural Findings. The City
Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
(a)
Habitat for Humanity - Riverside (the “Applicant”) has applied for
General Plan Amendment No. 1403, Change of Zone No. 1404, Tentative Tract Map No. 36720,
and Site Development Permit No. 31456 (collectively, Master Application No. 1463 or MA No.
1463) to allow the subdivision of approximately 5.3 acres into 26 affordable, single-family
residential lots and 3 open space lots for veterans living in the County of Riverside on real
property located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission Boulevard (APNs: 169100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) in the General Residential (R-3), Regulated Development
Areas (R-D) and General Commercial (C-1/C-P) Zones and designated Community
Development: Highest Density Residential (CD:HHDR), Community Development: High
Density Residential (CD:HDR) and Community Development: Medium High Density
Residential (CD:MHDR) (the “Project”). The Applicant filed Master Application No. 1463 with
the City on June 30, 2014.
(b)
All of the components of Master Application No. 1463 shall collectively
be known as the “Project.” Change of Zone Application No. 1404 is the subject of this
Ordinance.
(c)
The Applicant is seeking approval of Change of Zone No. 1404 to rezone
approximately 5.3 gross acres located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission
Boulevard (APNs: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) from General Residential (R-3; R3-525; R-3-4,000), Regulated Development Areas (R-D) and General Commercial (C-1/C-P)
Zones to collectively a Residential Incentive (R-6) Zone.
(d)
Section 20.3a d. (1) of Riverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as
adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code, provides that upon receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission for
approval of an amendment to change property from one zone to another, the City Clerk shall set
the matter of public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and shall give
notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing
before the Planning Commission.
(e)
Section 20.3a e. of Riverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as
adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code, provides that after closing the public hearing the City Council shall render its decision
within a reasonable time and may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the
Planning Commission; provided, however, that any proposed modification of the Planning
Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Planning Commission shall
first be referred back to the Planning Commission for a report and recommendation.
-
-2-
(f)
The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances.
(g)
On March 25, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa
Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 1463, at which time all persons interested in the Project
had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the
receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing.
(h)
At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearings and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2015-3-25-02
recommending that the City Council approve Master Application No. 1463 (General Plan
Amendment No. 1403, Change of Zone No. 1404, Tentative Tract Map No. 36720, and Site
Development Permit No. 31456), to allow the subdivision of approximately 5.3 acres into 26
affordable, single-family residential lots and 3 open space lots for veterans living in the County
of Riverside on real property located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission
Boulevard (APNs: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057), subject to the conditions of
approval attached hereto as Exhibit A.
(i)
On April 16, 2015, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held duly
noticed public hearings on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the
opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public
testimony the City Council closed the public hearing.
(j)
All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Section 3.
California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The City Council
hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the
approval of the Project:
(a)
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code §21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs.
§15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the
approval of the Project. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined
that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there was no substantial evidence that the
Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
was prepared.
Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment
(b)
period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The
public comment period commenced on January 1, 2015 and expired at 5:00 p.m. on January 20,
2015. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at City
Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
(c)
The City Council, by separate Resolution No. 2015-18, adopted the
Negative Declaration and findings pursuant to CEQA.
(d)
The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative
Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the
-
-3-
City Council’s decision was based, including, without limitation, the staff reports for Master
Application No. 1463, all of the materials that comprise and support the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and all of the materials that support the staff reports for Master Application No.
1463, is the Planning Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available
for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8304 Limonite
Avenue, Suite M, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.
(e)
The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination
in accordance with CEQA.
Section 4.
Project Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings
as required by the Jurupa Valley Ordinances and applicable state law:
(a)
The proposed Change of Zone No. 1404 will be consistent with the City of
Jurupa Valley General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 1403, in that:
1)
The proposed R-6 zone is consistent with the proposed General
Plan land use designation of Community Development: Medium Density Residential; and
2)
The Project, 26 single-family dwellings, is compatible with the
character of the surrounding residential community.
Section 5.
Approval of Zone Change. The City Council of the City of Jurupa
Valley hereby rezones the 5.3 acre real property located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and
north of Mission Boulevard (APNs: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) from General
Residential (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000), Regulated Development Areas (R-D) and General
Commercial (C-1/C-P) Zones to collectively a Residential Incentive (R-6) Zone, as depicted in
Exhibit B and directs the City Manager to revise the official Riverside County Zoning Map No.
15 for the Jurupa Area to designate the Property as being in this new zone.
Section 6.
Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to
the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in
the manner required by law.
Section 7.
Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in
Government Code Section 36937.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa
Valley on this 7th day of May, 2015.
______________________________
Brad Hancock
Mayor
-
-4-
ATTEST:
________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
)
) ss.
)
I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 2015-07 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 16th day of April, 2015 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 7th day
of May, 2015, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of
the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of May, 2015.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-
-5-
RETURN TO AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
BY:
GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.D
NOTICE OF DECISION FOR MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 14112
(TTM36827 AND VAR1501) PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENT FOR
NOTICING THE ADVISORY AGENCY’S (PLANNING COMMISSION)
DECISION OF A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ON A VACANT LOT
LOCATED NORTH OF 45TH ST., WEST OF GOLDEN WEST AVENUE AND
EAST OF OPAL STREET (APN: 182-361-009-4)
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive and file the Notice of Decision.
BACKGROUND
Per Section 6.7 (A) of Ordinance No. 460 (Subdivision Regulations), a notice of the
decision of the Planning Commission for the action on Tentative Tract Map No. 36827
shall be filed with the City Council. This notification will trigger the beginning of a 10day appeal period.
On April 22, 2015, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and, on a 5-0 vote,
adopted Resolution No. 2015-4-22-01 approving Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36827
and Variance No. 1501 subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopted the Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
TTM No. 36827 proposes to subdivide a 3.35-acre parcel into 13 single-family
residential lots with a public street labeled “Lot A” and a water quality basin labeled “Lot
B.” Individual parcels will contain a minimum 7,200 square feet with average lot widths
of 60 feet and average lot depths of 100 feet. One parcel, Lot 13 is proposed with less
than the required average lot depth requirement, thereby necessitating a variance.
The Planning Commission reviewed a letter from an adjoining property owner
expressing concern that the future construction of homes could have a negative impact
Page | 1
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Planning Commission Staff Report (Dated April 22, 2015)
2) Adopted Resolution No. 2015-4-22-01
Page | 3
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
JIM L. SMITH, P.E., CITY ENGINEER
BRIGITTE HAHN, SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A
PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1C, TABULATION OF THE BALLOT, AND CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ANNEXATION AND CONFIRMING THE
DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT OF ZONE 182
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council Conduct the public hearing and, after closing the public
hearing, direct the City Clerk, or her designee, who the City Council finds to be
an impartial person as that term is used in section 53753(e) of the government
code, to tally all ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing. All
ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing will be tallied after the
conclusion of the public hearing on Thursday, May 7, 2015.
2) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2015-19, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT FOR ZONE 182 OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED AND LEVYING
ASSESSMENTS ON ALL ASSESSABLE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND
THEREIN WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONE FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 2015-16
Page | 1
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Resolution 2015-13 adopted
March 5, 2015, the City Council noticed a public hearing for May 7, 2015, to receive
testimony regarding the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C. Annexation of
Zone 182 will fund the maintenance and servicing of a future traffic signal at
Wineville/Mission, and the provision of electricity and pole rental charges for street lights
along Wineville Ave. and along Mission Blvd. The Engineer’s Report attached to this
report includes an assessment diagram for the parcels and a cost estimate.
All property owners within Zone 182 have been noticed concerning the proposed
annexation into L&LMD No. 89-1-C. Pursuant to the notice, all ballots must be returned
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2015-19 confirms the assessment levy as indicated in the
Engineer’s Report for fiscal year 2015-16 for Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C and
orders the placement of the annual assessment on the County’s Assessment Roll for
fiscal year 2015-16.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The proposed budget for fiscal year 2015-16 for Zone 182 is $7,079 that will result in an
assessment for fiscal year 2015-16 within Zone 182 of $2,361 per assessed parcel.
The annual assessment may be adjusted annually by the greater of 2% or the
cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U for “electricity”, if any, as it stands as of
March of each year over the base index of 2015.
TALLY RESULTS:
Possible
Votes
1
Votes
Cast
1
YES
Votes
1
NO
Votes
%
Pass
100
%
Failed
Fifty-one percent of votes cast, must be in favor of the annexation of Zone 182 to
L&LMD No. 89-1-C and the levy and enrollment of the special assessment for the
election to pass.
Page | 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above tabulation results, staff recommends that the Council:
Approve the requested actions. Not to do so would mean that the assessments could
not be collected to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific right-of-ways.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve Staff Recommendation; or
2. Elect not to adopt the resolutions.
****************************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**************************
Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ZONE 182 OF
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1CONSOLIDATED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL
ASSESSABLE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015-16
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2015 the City Council (hereinafter the "City Council") of the
City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2015-13, pursuant to
Section 22608 and Section 22585 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, declaring the
intention of the City Council to order the annexation of Zone 182 to Landscaping and Lighting
Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (hereinafter “L&LMD No. 89-1-C”) of the City
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 (commencing with Section
22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, and giving notice of and setting a
public hearing for 7:00 p.m. on May 7, 2015 at the meeting room of the City Council and
requiring that the notice of the public hearing and assessment ballots be mailed to all owners of
property within Zone 182 as shown on the equalized tax roll; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly published and mailed as required by
Resolution No. 2015-13, Section 22626 of the Streets and Highways Code and Sections 53753
and 54954.6 of the Government Code and the assessment ballots were timely mailed to all
owners of property within said Zone 182 as shown on the equalized tax roll; and
WHEREAS, at 7:00 p.m. on May 7, 2015, as set forth in Resolution No. 2015-13, the
City Council held a public hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard,
and considered all oral statements and all written protest or communications made or filed by
any interested persons, closed the public hearing and directed the City Clerk, as an impartial
person having no vested interest in the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C as
required by Section 53753(e) of the Government Code to tally the assessment ballots that had
been received prior to the close of the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer has filed the Report with the City Clerk and the Report has
been presented to and considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the tally of the assessment ballots show that assessment ballots were timely
received from the owners and based on the financial weight of the assessment ballots received,
the vote is in favor of annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C and the levy of an annual
assessment in said Zone 182 beginning fiscal year 2015-16 may proceed; and;
WHEREAS, the City Council may proceed, pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and
Highways Code, to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as
originally proposed, or as changed by the City Council, and the adoption of such a resolution
shall constitute the levy of an assessment on all assessable lots and parcels of land within
Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C beginning fiscal year 2015-16.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, after reviewing
the Report, does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a)
The foregoing recitals are true and correct;
Compliance has been had with all the requirements of the Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the
Streets and Highways Code, and Sections 53753 and 54954.6 of the Government Code;
(b)
A majority protest to the annexation of, and annual assessment of,
Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C has not been filed;
(c)
(d)
The tally of the assessment ballots timely received was percent voted in
favor of the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C and the levy of an annual
assessment beginning fiscal year 2015-16, and percent voted no;
The City Council may proceed to adopt a resolution ordering the
annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C;
(e)
(f)
The City Council may proceed to adopt a resolution confirming the
diagram and assessment for Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C either as originally proposed or as
changed by it; and
The assessments to be levied on the assessable lots and parcels of land
within Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C for the maintenance and servicing of streetlights and a
future traffic signal improvement in said Zone 182 during the fiscal year 2015-16 as contained in
the Engineer’s Report which is on file with the City Clerk (hereinafter the “Report”) are based on
benefits derived by such lots and parcels from the availability of such streetlights and a future
traffic signal improvement, and are not based upon the ownership of such lots and parcels.
(g)
Section 2.
Annexation: Zone 182, as proposed to be annexed to L&LMD No.
89-1-C, includes all the property subject to Plot Plan No. 31201 in the City of Jurupa Valley,
County of Riverside, State of California as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and
is annexed into L&LMD No. 89-1-C.
Section 3.
No. 89-1-C are:
Improvements: The improvements authorized for Zone 182 of L&LMD
(a)
Providing electricity to and the maintenance and servicing of streetlights
and traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
-2-
Section 4.
Confirmation of Report: The Report and the assessment diagram and the
assessment of estimated costs for the maintenance and servicing of streetlights and future traffic
signal improvement in Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C for fiscal year 2015-16 as contained in
the Report are confirmed.
Section 5.
Levy of Assessment: Pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and
Highways Code the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the
maintenance and servicing of streetlights and future traffic signals improvements in Zone 182 of
L&LMD No. 89-1-C during fiscal year 2015-16, as contained in the Report, and such assessment
is levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution, together with the
diagram and assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor-Controller of the
County of Riverside, who, pursuant to Section 22645 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall
enter on the County Tax Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon,
as shown in said assessment.
Section 6.
Authorization. The City Council authorizes the County to act as the City’s
agent to administer the revenue/expenditures and budget for L&LMD No. 89-1-C for fiscal year
2015-16.
Section 7.
Resolution.
Certification.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Section 8.
adoption.
Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa
Valley on this 7th day of May, 2015.
______________________________
Brad Hancock
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-3-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
)
) ss.
)
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 2015-19 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council
of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of May, 2015 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of
the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of May, 2015.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
-4-
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
STEVE R. LORISO, P.E., DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015/2016 FIVE-YEAR MEASURE “A” LOCAL
STREETS AND ROADS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 FOR
THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION (RCTC)
MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the City of Jurupa Valley’s Fiscal Year 2015/2016
Five-Year Measure “A” Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan for
Fiscal Year 2015/16 through Fiscal Year 2019/20 for the RCTC Measure ‘A”
Local Funds Program; and
2) Approve the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification required of the City of
Jurupa Valley that establishes a Base Year amount and commitment to
expending Measure A Local Street and Roads funds to projects identified in the
City of Jurupa Valley’s Five-Year CIP; and
3) Authorize the City Engineer, or his designee, to submit an amended five-year
plan to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the listed Measure “A”
projects as part of any current fiscal year CIP budget approval process.
BACKGROUND
The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Ordinance No. 02-001
(Transportation Expenditure Plan and Retail Transaction and Use Tax Ordinance), as
enacted pursuant to Division 25 of the Public Utilities Code, specifies that local cities
and the county must submit annually a 5-year Measure “A” CIP to receive Measure “A”
funds. The program is subject to amendment by RCTC.
The Deputy City Engineer has prepared the City of Jurupa Valley’s FY 2015/2016
Measure “A” Local Streets and Roads Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY
2015/2016 (FY 15/16) through FY 2019/2020 (FY 19/20). This 5-year plan is attached.
U:\STAFF REPORTS\2015\050715\Staff Report - Meas A CIP (16.A).docx
Page | 1
The RCTC Ordinance No. 02-001 requires annual certification that
General Fund expenditures for transportation-related construction and
activities for FY 2015/16 will meet or exceed the Maintenance of Effort
Year amount and commitment to expending Measure A Local Street and
to projects identified in the City of Jurupa Valley’s Five-Year CIP.
discretionary
maintenance
(MOE) Base
Roads funds
Based upon the City’s incorporation on July 1, 2011, the annual MOE Certification is
required to be submitted for the first time to the RCTC for review and approval.
ANALYSIS
Measure “A”, Riverside County’s half-cent sales tax for transportation, is a major
funding source for transportation infrastructure improvements throughout the County.
Shown below is RCTC’s estimated allocation to Jurupa Valley for each of the next 5
years. The estimated amount for each Fiscal Year is reduced by RCTC over earlier
projections.
YEAR
FY 14/15
FY 15/16
FY 16/17
FY 17/18
FY 18/19
FY 19/20
EST AMOUNT
$1,802,000
$1,830,000
$1,867,000
$1,904,000
$1,961,000
$2,020,000
Measure “A” funds can only be used for transportation related purposes and may be
used to provide required City matching funds for other federal and state transportation
grants. Such funds may also be committed for debt service to secure Total Roads
Improvement Program (TRIP) financing for transportation infrastructure. TRIP has
previously been presented to the City Council and at Council’s direction staff continues
discussions with RCTC and Riverside County regarding this program.
The projects included in the City’s FY 15/16 Measure “A” Five-Year CIP satisfy the
requirements of RCTC Ordinance No. 02-001 and meet all criteria for Measure “A”
funding.
The City Council may make any subsequent changes to the list of projects as part of the
City’s annual budget approval or any budget amendment process.
OTHER INFORMATION
All of the projects identified on the Five-Year Measure “A” CIP list were previously
reviewed by the City’s Planning Commission and were found to be in conformance with
the City’s General Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The approval of the Five-Year Measure “A” CIP along with the City’s participation in the
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program and the Western Riverside
County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
U:\STAFF REPORTS\2015\050715\Staff Report - Meas A CIP (16.A).docx
Page | 2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
MEASURE “A” LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
FY 2015/2016 - 2019/2020
APRIL, 2015
ATTACHMENT 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2015 - 2016
Agency: City of Jurupa Valley
Date: April 2015
Adopted: May 7, 2015
ITEM NO.
2015.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Limonite Pavement
Rehabilitation and Shoulder
Improvement (Ph. 2)
PROJECT LIMITS
Day Creek Blvd. to
Bellegrave
PROJECT COST
$600,000
D,B & C
2015.2
2015.3
Pacific Ave Pavement
Rehabilitation
Golden West Sidewalk Infill
Project
MEASURE A
FY 2015/16
$600,000
45th St to Mission Blvd
$328,320
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$138,320
45th St to Rathke Ave
D, B, C
$190,000
$270,000
2015.4
Mission Blvd. Bridge
SB 821=$70,000
Co-op Agreement with
Riverside County (PA/ED)
2015.5
Camino Real Pavement
Rehabilitation
Linares Ave to 270' N/o
Black Hills Dr (8300LF)
2015.6
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Pavement Rehabilitation
Program
Various Locations Citywide
D, B, C
$200,000
$50,000
$187,500
$1,000,000
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000
Various Locations Citywide
D,B & C
2015.7
Annual Roadway Safety and
Traffic Improvement Program
2015.8
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Maintenance Program
Various Locations Citywide
2015.9
8% Overhead/ Administration
Inter-fund 8% Transfer per
Measure A
Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer
$750,000
$175,000
$250,000
4/2015 Revised per RCTC 2/6/15 Budget Projection
NOTE: D = Design
B = Bid/Award
C = Construction
$147,000
TOT BUDGET = $2,549,500
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2016 - 2017
Agency: City of Jurupa Valley
Date: April 2015
Adopted: May 7, 2015
ITEM NO.
2016.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Sierra Ave Pavement
Rehabilitation
PROJECT LIMITS
Armstrong Rd to S/o Karen
Ln (2800 LF)
PROJECT COST
$500,000
D, B & C
2016.2
2016.3
Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab Jurupa Rd to Bellegrave
Ph 2
D FY15/16, C FY16/17
Mission Blvd. Bridge
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$1,014,000
Co-op Agreement with
Riverside County (PA/ED)
MEASURE A
FY 2016/17
$500,000
$1,315,000
B, C
$301,000
$50,000
2016.4
2016.5
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Pavement Rehabilitation
Program
Annual Roadway Safety and
Traffic Improvement Program
Various Locations Citywide
$1,000,000
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000
Various Locations Citywide
D, B & C
$750,000
$200,000
2016.6
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Various Locations Citywide
Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal)
Program
$130,926
2016.7
8% Overhead/ Administration
4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection
NOTE: D = Design
B = Bid/Award
C = Construction
Inter-fund 8% Transfer per
Measure A
Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer
$150,000
TOT BUDGET = $2,081,926
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2017 - 2018
Agency: City of Jurupa Valley
Date: April 2015
Adopted: May 7, 2015
ITEM NO.
2017.1
2017.2
2017.3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Van Buren Blvd Pavement
Rehabilitation Ph 3
PROJECT LIMITS
PROJECT COST
Bellegrave to SE/o Etiwanda
Av
$1,300,000
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$950,000
Rubidoux Blvd, 28th St and 30th Rubidoux Blvd, SR-60 to
St Pavement Rehabilitation
28th and 28th & 30th St,
Avalon St to Rubidoux
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$200,000
Mission Blvd. Bridge
Co-op Agreement with
Riverside County (PS&E)
D, B, & C
MEASURE A
FY 2017/18
$350,000
$600,000
D, B & C
$400,000
$50,000
2017.4
2017.5
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Pavement Rehabilitation
Program
Annual Roadway Safety and
Traffic Improvement Program
Various Locations Citywide
$1,000,000
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000
Various Locations Citywide
D, B & C
$750,000
$200,000
2017.6
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Various Locations Citywide
Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal)
Program
$123,148
2017.7
8% Overhead/ Administration
4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection
NOTE: D = Design
B = Bid/Award
C = Construction
Inter-fund 8% Transfer per
Measure A
Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer
$153,000
TOT BUDGET = $2,026,148
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2018 - 2019
Agency: City of Jurupa Valley
Date: April 2015
Adopted: May 7, 2015
ITEM NO.
2018.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Valley Way Pavement
Rehabilitation
PROJECT LIMITS
PROJECT COST
MEASURE A
FY 2018/19
Mission Blvd to Jurupa Rd
$280,000
$280,000
2018.2
Wineville Ave Pavement Rehab
Riverside Dr to Mission Blvd
$390,000
$390,000
2018.3
General Drive Pavement
Rehabilitation
200' East of Clay St to East
End
$250,000
$260,000
2018.4
Mission Blvd. Bridge
Co-op Agreement with
Riverside County (PS&E)
$50,000
2018.5
2018.6
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Pavement Rehabilitation
Program
Annual Roadway Safety and
Traffic Improvement Program
Various Locations Citywide
$1,000,000
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000
Various Locations Citywide
$750,000
$110,000
2018.7
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Various Locations Citywide
Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal)
Program
$107,037
2018.8
8% Overhead/ Administration
4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection
NOTE: D = Design
B = Bid/Award
C = Construction
Inter-fund 8% Transfer per
Measure A
Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer
$157,000
TOT BUDGET = $2,104,037
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2019 - 2020
Agency: City of Jurupa Valley
Date: April 2015
Adopted: May 7, 2015
ITEM NO.
2019.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Rubidoux Blvd. Pavement
Rehabilitation
PROJECT LIMITS
PROJECT COST
MEASURE A
FY 2019/20
Mission Blvd to SR60
$612,000
$300,000
2019.2
Mission Blvd. Bridge
Co-op Agreement with
Riverside County
(Construction)
$709,000
$237,000
2019.3
2019.4
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Pavement Rehabilitation
Program
Annual Roadway Safety and
Traffic Improvement Program
Various Locations Citywide
$1,000,000
Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000
Various Locations Citywide
$750,000
$200,000
2019.5
Annual Miscellaneous Street
Various Locations Citywide
Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal)
Program
$125,000
2019.6
8% Overhead/ Administration
4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection
NOTE: D = Design
B = Bid/Award
C = Construction
Inter-fund 8% Transfer per
Measure A
Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer
$157,000
TOT BUDGET = $1,769,000
Brad Hancock, Mayor . Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem .
Brian Berkson, Council Member . Frank Johnston, Council Member . Verne Lauritzen, Council Member
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015/16 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION
STATEMENT
The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Jurupa Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax
transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County
Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's
Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $0, scheduled for approval by the
Commission at its July 8, 2015 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace
discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The
Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall
result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending
Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement
Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission.
Dated:
May 7, 2015
Gary S. Thompson
City Manager
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464
www.jurupavalley.org
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.B
CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER TO SUPERVISOR JOHN
TAVAGLIONE CONCERNING SHERIFF SERVICE CONTRACT COST
INCREASES
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council consider the letter to Supervisor John Tavaglione
concerning Sheriff service contract cost increases, and authorize the Mayor to
sign the letter for transmittal.
BACKGROUND
The City has been contracting with the Riverside County Sheriff Department for police
services since incorporation. The services provided have been excellent and the
expertise and responsiveness of the patrol and supervisory staff at the Jurupa Valley
Station have been outstanding. However, the City, along with all other cities in the
County that contract with the Sheriff, have been saddled with annual cost increases,
with no increase in service level, that have become unsustainable.
ANALYSIS
Since the City incorporated in 2011, police services provided by the Sheriff’s
Department have been subject to annual increases in deputy patrol hour rates, and
other administrative support functions. For the current Fiscal Year, FY 14/15, the
increase that will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors in the near future is
approximately 7%, retroactive to the beginning of the Fiscal Year. Additionally, the
contract cities have been advised to expect an additional 7% for FY 15/16. This equates
to an overall cost increase of 14% over two years, with no increase in service levels.
Over the last several months, the City Managers of the cities that contract with the
Sheriff’s Department have been engaged in discussions concerning this unsustainable
cost trend. The City Manager group, of which our City has been a participant, has had
meetings with senior staff at the Sheriff’s Department and with senior County Human
Page | 1
Resources Department personnel, concerning these increases. The two most significant
drivers of these annual cost increases are related to labor agreements negotiated by the
County and the various bargaining units, and more recently, the costs associated with
the new countywide public safety communication system.
The contract cities have no control over these decisions made at the County level, and
to date have had little to no input into the process so the County can understand the
impacts that these decisions have on their contract partners. As these increases occur,
and are passed on to the cities to absorb, the cities are now all facing tough decisions
regarding service levels in police services and other service areas in order to balance
budgets since revenue growth is not keeping pace with these levels of cost increases.
As a result of these meetings, the City Managers have proposed recommendations to
the County which would allow greater collaboration, and a better forum for the contract
cities to address these cost increases. At the most recent meeting of the City Managers,
it was decided that it would be an appropriate time for the City Councils and Mayors of
each of the contract cities to engage their respective Supervisors in these discussions,
as it is up to the Supervisors to approve the final rate increases. To that end, the
attached letter, similar to letters that the other contract cities are sending, outlines the
concerns raised by the City Managers, and recommendations for consideration by the
Board of Supervisors regarding greater collaboration between the County and the
contract cities with regard to the rate process.
Staff recommends that the City Council consider the letter to Supervisor John
Tavaglione concerning Sheriff service contract cost increases, and authorize the Mayor
to sign the letter for transmittal.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
As noted above, the City, and all other contract cities in the County, are absorbing 14%
increases in Sheriff service contract costs over a two year period- FY 14/15 (retroactive
to the beginning of the Fiscal Year), and FY 15/16 (current projected increase for next
Fiscal Year). For the City, this amounts to over $1,000,000 in cost increase per year,
with no increase in service levels.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Elect not to send the letter at this time.
Page | 2
Brad Hancock, Mayor . Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem .
Brian Berkson, Council Member . Frank Johnston, Council Member . Verne Lauritzen, Council
Member
May 7, 2015
Honorable John Tavaglione
2nd District Supervisor
4080 Lemon Street, 5th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Subject: Unsustainable Increases in the Sheriff Services Contract Rate
Dear Supervisor Tavaglione,
The City of Jurupa Valley has been a customer of the County of Riverside for police services
provided by the Sheriff’s Department since 2011. Contract cities are an important partner with
the County, with contract partners paying $169 million for patrol costs versus the net county cost
for patrol of $77 million per the FY 2014/15 County budget. The police service that the City has
received as a partner for contracting of these services has been excellent. However, the costs
for these services continue to increase at a rate which is, quite frankly, unsustainable.
Since our City’s incorporation, the cost for police service has significantly outpaced the City’s
available revenues. As we have seen in several California communities, when cost growth far
exceeds revenue growth, a public agency is quickly heading toward insolvency. Since 2011,
City revenue growth has been slow but steady. However, with the staggering loss of Vehicle
License Fee Revenue diverted to the counties in the state by the state legislature and the
Governor, the problem of sustainability of these service cost increases with limited revenue
growth is exacerbated, in particular, for our city. Our city is experiencing revenue growth of
approximately 3.75% per year in its primary tax revenues.
In addition, the cost of living percent change remains near zero for 2015 and has been well
under 2% for an extended period of time. Yet, the contract rate for FY 2014/15 increased 7.04%
almost double the rate of our City’s revenue growth, and more than triple the increases in the
region’s Consumer Price Index. And the projection for FY 15/16 has been identified by the
Sheriff Department to be another approximate 7% increase. That is a staggering 14% increase
over two years with no change in service levels. It is unconscionable to expect any contract city
to be forced to absorb such significant increases when the revenue growth and CPI increases
clearly reflect trends that does not support such increases.
The City of Jurupa Valley implores the Board of Supervisors to consider your contract cities’
revenue trends and the very small CPI increases, when managing the factors affecting the
contract rate.
8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464
www.jurupavalley.org
Honorable John Tavaglione
May 7, 2015
Page Two
All police service costs must be considered within these parameters, including labor. Since labor
costs (salaries and benefits) of direct patrol staff account for more than 80% of the Contract
Police Rate, we ask that cost control be considered during labor negotiations. City managers
from contract cities have met several times with the Sheriff’s executive staff to discuss and
cooperate on cost control. It’s now up to us, as elected policy makers to join forces in service to
local residents.
Our City, in conjunction with the other contract cities in the County, is also requesting a change
in the process of developing the Police Contract Rate. The cities would like an opportunity to
review the rate determination and make comments and provide input before it is published as a
final rate. An area of particular concern is the amount of County support costs being allocated to
the Contract Police Rate. County costs have been pushed to the Contract Police Rate in excess
of revenue growth and inflation, while cities are struggling to recover from the recession. The
following increases over the prior year are of great concern:
Technical Services
36% Increase
Administration
22% Increase
Personnel Recruiting 18% Increase (increased 50% the previous year)
Information Services 15% Increase
Contract and Grants 15% Increase
Considering our City’s 3.75% rate of revenue growth, increases in the range of 15- 36% are
obviously untenable. The City requests that the contract cities be included in the determination
of administrative and support costs allocated to the Patrol Service budget to ensure they are
reasonable and appropriate. Recent actions indicate that costs are being allocated to Patrol
Service where 70% of the cost is paid by contract customers (primarily cities) beyond
reasonable cost growth rates.
We are also very interested in reducing and controlling costs for the County’s Public Safety
Enterprise Communication System (PSEC). The contract cities were given no choice and had
no input to the design, construction and implementation of this radio system. Yet the contract
cities are paying a large share of the annual operating cost of this system through the Contract
Police Rate. As a contract city, we request to be involved in the determination of how the costs
are allocated, since the cost far exceeds the previous 800 Mhz system that was very adequate
for this function.
The contract cities propose to work with the County through quarterly meetings with Finance
Directors of the contract cities and separately with the City Managers. The Finance focus would
provide a forum to review areas of the contract rate subject to fluctuation and provide insight as
to how the County is managing these costs and early warning for increases that may
occasionally exceed the norm. Exceeding a normal rate of cost growth should not be the norm,
as it has been for the past five years. The City Managers meeting would provide a forum for
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464
www.jurupavalley.org
Honorable John Tavaglione
May 7, 2015
Page Three
partner city executives to share ideas and concerns with the Sheriff’s executive team. Providing
a forum to discuss large changes, such as the PSEC radio system and how it will be managed
would be appropriate. The City Managers would remain available to assist the Sheriff’s
Department regarding legislation that may be helpful or damaging. Significant synergy can
occur through regular meetings addressing substantive issues.
Our community greatly values the Police Service provided by the County. We look forward to
your positive reception of our very reasonable requests. We would like to meet with you in the
near future to discuss the significant issue of Contract Police Rate costs control and how we can
successfully achieve this goal together on behalf of our mutual constituents.
Sincerely,
Brad Hancock
Mayor
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464
www.jurupavalley.org
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.C
REQUEST FROM JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR
SUB-LEASING OFFICE SPACE AT CITY HALL
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
1)
That the City Council consider the Letter of Interest from the Jurupa Valley
Chamber of Commerce requesting sub-leasing of City Hall office space, and
provide direction to staff for development of a sub-lease policy.
BACKGROUND
When the new City Hall facility was renovated, one additional vacant office space was
established for potentially being made available for use by an undetermined outside
organization that provides direct service benefits to the City residents and businesses
as a whole. This office area is located down the very short hallway to the left of the main
entrance to the building, outside of the inner security door office areas. The City has
recently received an inquiry from the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce (JVCC)
expressing an interest in sub-leasing this office space.
ANALYSIS
In order to enter into discussions with any organization desiring to sub-lease the
available office space at City Hall, certain parameters and policies need to be discussed
and established. Additionally, certain legal requirements and public benefit findings
need to be met in order to offer the use of public property to any private organization,
including non-profit organizations. Currently, the City has no policy regarding subleasing of office space within City Hall, therefore a discussion needs to be held
concerning what considerations staff should utilize for development of a policy and
future discussions with potential sub-lessees, in this case, the JVCC.
Considerations should be given to the type of sub-lease agreement to be developed,
what services such as utilities, internet or phone service should be included, if any, and
what services, furniture and other equipment the potential lessee will provide at their
Page | 1
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.D
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG)
ANNUAL MEETING
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council authorize reimbursable expenditures deemed appropriate for
City Council members attending the WRCOG Annual Meeting
BACKGROUND
The 24th Annual WRCOG General Assembly & Leadership Address will be held on June
11, 2015 at the Morongo Casino Resort & Spa. The Keynote Speaker will be former
Texas Governor Rick Perry. The following day, June 12, 2015, WRCOG will hold an
Executive Committee meeting at the hotel. Additionally, as part of the General
Assembly business meeting on June 11, 2015, the WRCOG membership will be voting
on the FY 2015/16 budget, and electing the Chair, Vice Chair and 2 nd Vice Chair for the
coming year.
ANALYSIS
The City has been granted a table for 10 attendees at no cost to the City for
participation in the General Assembly Address and business meeting the night of June
11th. Additionally, the current City representative to the WRCOG Executive Committee
is entitled to a one night stay at the hotel the night of June 11 th at no cost to the City, in
order to attend the Executive Committee meeting the following morning. The City’s
representative is Mayor Pro Tem Roughton. These costs are being paid by WRCOG.
However, as the General Assembly meeting will probably run late into the evening,
other City Council attendees may want to stay overnight at the hotel and potentially
attend the Executive Committee meeting.
In accordance with the City’s expenditure reimbursement policy, any travel related
expenditures for attending this type of meeting requires prior approval by the City
Council. This travel related expenditure is an authorized type of travel under the policy.
Page | 1
RETURN TO AGENDA
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
BY:
GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.E
INITIATION OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ADD A
PROVISION AUTHORIZING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO REFER
CERTAIN DISCRETIONARY ENTITLEMENTS TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council initiate an amendment to the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning
Ordinance that authorizes the Planning Director to refer certain discretionary
entitlements to the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND
Under the Zoning Ordinance, certain discretionary entitlements are delegated to the
Planning Director. Projects requiring a Site Development Permit (SDP) are approved by
the Planning Director or his designee. Site Development Permits that require
environmental review require the Director to conduct a public hearing before taking
action; those that are exempt under CEQA are approved by the Director or his designee
without a hearing.
Approval of Site Development Permits for large residential accessory structures and
new wireless cellular antennas generally do not require a hearing, but require a twenty
day notice to the surrounding property owners. The ordinance requires the Director to
conduct a hearing for such SDPs if a hearing is requested by any resident.
The Director also has jurisdiction to approve Tentative Parcel Maps for residential
development. Such maps cannot create more than four lots. Most of these applications
have been in the Mira Loma and Riverdale areas.
In the case of an SDP or residential Parcel Map that must also include a concurrent
entitlement requiring Planning Commission or City Council approval, the entire group of
entitlements will go the Commission or Council. Only stand-alone SDPs or residential
Parcel Maps are decided by the Planning Director.
Page | 1
All other discretionary approvals are made by the Planning Commission or the City
Council. The following is a general summary of discretionary entitlements and the
approving body:
Discretionary Entitlement
Approving Body
Detail
Site Development Permit
Planning Director
Appealable to the PC
Planning Commission
Appealable to the CC
City Council
Requires hearing and
recommendation from PC
Residential Tentative Parcel Maps
Site Development Permits for
shopping centers of 30 acres or
more
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Public Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
Determination of Public
Convenience or Necessity for sale
of alcoholic beverages
Commercial and industrial
Tentative Parcel Maps
Tentative Tract Maps
Hazardous Waste Facility Siting
Permit
General Plan Amendment
Rezone
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
From time to time the Planning Director recognizes that an entitlement under his
jurisdiction carries with it a policy implication or is the subject of concern for the public
interest expressed by the City Council. Further, it may be evident that a controversy is
inherent in an entitlement application that will undoubtedly result in an appeal. In such
cases, it may be appropriate for the Director to refer the entitlement to the Planning
Commission. However, the ordinance does not provide the authority to do so.
An example is the affordable housing project by Palm Communities in Rubidoux
approved by the Director in 2013. Although this project met or exceeded our standards
for market rate housing, the policy implication suggested this project should be reviewed
by the Planning Commission. Under the present ordinance there was not a means to
refer the project to the Commission.
Page | 2
RETURN TO AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
MAY 7, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
BY:
GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER
THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.F
GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (GPAC): REMOVAL OF
GENERAL MEMBER/DECLARATION OF VACANCY
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council remove Craig Maxwell from the General Plan Advisory Committee
(GPAC), declare the seat vacant and direct the Planning Department/City Clerk to
advertise a notice of unscheduled vacancy and begin the process to fill the seat.
BACKGROUND
As established by the City Council, the GPAC includes 23 general voting members and
9 ex officio members. On November 6, 2014, the Council appointed 13 of the general
members to the GPAC, including Craig Maxwell, a resident of Jurupa Valley. Mr.
Maxwell has not attended any of the GPAC meetings held to date and has indicated
that he no longer intends to serve on the GPAC. The GPAC Roles, Responsibilities,
Rules and Procedures Manual states: “GPAC members missing more than 2
consecutive meetings may be removed from the Committee at the Council’s discretion.”
Staff recommends the City Council remove Mr. Maxwell from the GPAC, declare the
seat vacant, and direct the Planning Department/City Clerk to publish a notice of
unscheduled vacancy and begin the process to fill the seat.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Staff time to support the GPAC, as outlined in the Interim General Plan Work Program,
was approved by the City Council as part of the Interim General Plan budget.
1|Page