REGULAR MEETING AGENDA OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL Thursday, May 7, 2015 Closed Session: 6:00 p.m. Regular Session: 7:00 p.m. City Council Chamber 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes. B. C. 1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION ● ● ● ● ● 2. Brad Hancock, Mayor Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, Council Member Frank Johnston, Council Member Verne Lauritzen, Council Member CLOSED SESSION A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to four matters of pending litigation:: (1) City of Jurupa Valley vs. City of Riverside, Riverside Public Utilities and, as Real Parties in Interest, Southern California Edison, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BS143085, Court of Appeal, Second District Case No. B257623; (2) Southern Page - 1 - California Edison Company v. City of Jurupa Valley et al., Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC1504590 (Vernola Market Place Project); (3) City of Riverside v. City of Jurupa Valley et al., Riverside Superior Court Case No. RIC1504611 (Vernola Market Place Project); and (4) Application of Southern California Edison Company (U238-E) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Construct the Riverside Transmission Reliability Project, California Public Utilities Commission Case No. A15404013. C. 3. 7:00 P.M. - RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION A. 4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to two matters of potential litigation and will discuss whether to initiate litigation against certain defendants. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS IN CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL ● ● ● ● ● Brad Hancock, Mayor Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, Council Member Frank Johnston, Council Member Verne Lauritzen, Council Member 5. INVOCATION 6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND POSTING OF THE COLORS – LED BY GIRL SCOUT TROOP 953 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 8. PRESENTATION 9. A. PRESENTATION TO CHLOE FERREIRA-COPAT - GIRL SCOUTS SILVER AWARD RECIPIENT B. PROCLAIMING MAY AS “MENTAL HEALTH MONTH” PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS Page - 2 - Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow-up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda. 10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE 12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 13. A. APRIL 16, 2015 REGULAR MEETING B. APRIL 21, 2015 SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL COMMENTS AND CONSENT CALENDAR (COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA TAKEN HERE) (All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved in one motion unless a Councilmember requests a separate action on a specific item on the Consent Calendar. If an item is removed from the Consent Calendar, it will be discussed individually and acted upon separately.) A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF $606,458.74 Requested Action: and 23, 2015. C. That the City Council ratify the check registers dated April 9, 16 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-07 Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2015-07, entitled: Page - 3 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONING MAP NO. 15 (JURUPA AREA PLAN) CHANGING THE ZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD (APNS: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) FROM GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000), REGULATED DEVELOPMENT AREAS (R-D) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P) ZONES TO COLLECTIVELY A RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE (R-6) D. NOTICE OF DECISION FOR MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 14112 (TTM36827 AND VAR1501) PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENT FOR NOTICING THE ADVISORY AGENCY’S (PLANNING COMMISSION) DECISION OF A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ON A VACANT LOT LOCATED NORTH OF 45TH ST., WEST OF GOLDEN WEST AVENUE AND EAST OF OPAL STREET (APN: 182-361-009-4) Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the Notice of Decision. 14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 15. PUBLIC HEARING A. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-C, TABULATION OF THE BALLOT, AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ORDER ING THE ANNEXATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT OF ZONE 182 1. Requested Action: That the City Council conduct the public hearing and after closing the public hearing, direct the City Clerk, or his/her designee, who the City Council finds to be an impartial person as that term is used in Section 53753(e) of the California Government Code, to tally all ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing. 2. That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2015-19, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 891-CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ZONE 182 OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL ASSESSABLE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 Page - 4 - 16. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. B. FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015/2016 FIVE-YEAR MEASURE “A” LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 FOR THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the City of Jurupa Valley’s Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Five-Year Measure “A” Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2015/16 through Fiscal Year 2019/20 for the RCTC Measure ‘A” Local Funds Program; and 2. Approve the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification required of the City of Jurupa Valley that establishes a Base Year amount and commitment to expending Measure A Local Street and Roads funds to projects identified in the City of Jurupa Valley’s Five-Year CIP; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer, or his designee, to submit an amended five-year plan to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the listed Measure “A” projects as part of any current fiscal year CIP budget approval process. CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER TO SUPERVISOR JOHN TAVAGLIONE CONCERNING SHERIFF SERVICE CONTRACT COST INCREASES Requested Action: That the City Council consider the letter to Supervisor John Tavaglione concerning Sheriff service contract cost increase, and authorize the Mayor to sign the letter for transmittal. C. REQUEST FROM JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SUBLEASING OFFICE SPACE AT CITY HALL Requested Action: That the City Council consider the Letter of Interest from the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce requesting sub-leasing of City Hall office space and provide direction to staff for development of a sub-lease policy. D. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG) ANNUAL MEETING Requested Action: That the City Council authorize reimbursable expenditures deemed appropriate for City Council members attending the WRCOG Annual Meeting. E. Page - 5 - INITIATION OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ADD A PROVISION AUTHORIZING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO REFER CERTAIN DISCRETIONARY ENTITLEMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Requested Action: That the City Council initiate an amendment to the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance that authorizes the Planning Director to refer certain discretionary entitlements to the Planning Commission. F. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - REMOVAL OF GENERAL MEMBER/DECLARATION OF VACANCY Requested Action: That the City Council remove Craig Maxwell from the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), declare the seat vacant and direct the Planning Department/City Clerk to advertise a notice of unscheduled vacancy and begin the process to fill the seat. G. DISCUSSION OF VETERAN’S BANNER PROGRAM (REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBER FRANK JOHNSTON) (ORAL REPORT) Requested Action: That the City Council discuss the item and provide appropriate direction to City staff. 17. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS A. B. Page - 6 - MAYOR PRO TEM LAURA ROUGHTON 1. UPDATE ON THE WRCOG HEALTH SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON APRIL 22, 2015 2. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE GOVERNMENTS MEETING HELD ON MAY 4, 2015 3. UPDATE ON THE HEALTHY JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY MEETING HELD ON MAY 5, 2015 COUNCIL OF COUNCIL MEMBER FRANK JOHNSTON 1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY – BOARD OF DIRECTOR’S MEETING HELD ON APRIL 23, 2015 2. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY – BOARD BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON MAY 6, 2015 3. UPDATE ON THE 2015 SCAG ANNUAL CONFERENCE & GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING HELD ON MAY 7, 2015 C. COUNCIL MEMBER VERNE LAURITZEN 1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING HELD ON MAY 4, 2015 18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT 19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS 20. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of May 21, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332-6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org. Page - 7 - AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.A RETURN TO AGENDA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL April 16, 2015 The meeting was held at the Jurupa Valley City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION ● ● ● ● ● Brad Hancock, Mayor Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, Council Member Frank Johnston, Council Member Verne Lauritzen, Council Member Mayor Hancock called the closed session meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. 2. CLOSED SESSION A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS There were no public comments regarding the closed session items. 3. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION. The City Council met in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to two matters of pending litigation: (1) City of Jurupa Valley v. Dutch House Collective et al. (Riverside Superior Court Case No. RIC 1405494); and (2) City of Jurupa Valley vs. City of Riverside, Riverside Public Utilities and as Real Parties in Interest, Southern California Edison, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BS143085. C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council met in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to three matters of potential litigation and will discuss whether to initiate litigation against certain defendants. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. 7:00 P.M. - RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS IN CLOSED SESSION -1- Mayor Hancock announced that there were no reportable actions taken. 4. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL ● ● ● ● ● Brad Hancock, Mayor Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, Council Member Frank Johnston, Council Member Verne Lauritzen, Council Member Mayor Hancock called the regular meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. 5. INVOCATION was given by Mr. Don Porter. 6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Boy Scout Daniel Alexandre who was at the meeting to earn a communication merit badge. 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, to approve the Agenda. Ayes: Noes: Absent: 8. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None PRESENTATION A. PRESENTATION BY JOLENE HANCOCK AND DAN RODRIGUEZ 2015 JURUPA VALLEY 5K COMMUNITY RUN Dan Rodriguez, General Manager of the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District and 5K Chairperson Jolene Hancock announced that the 4th Annual Jurupa Valley Community Run is scheduled for Saturday, May 30, 2015 with a start time of 7:00 am. Mrs. Hancock thanked the Council and Sheriff’s Department for their ongoing support which will help to ensure another successful event. 9. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS Ron Anderson conveyed an invitation to a special event on April 29, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. at the Sizzler Restaurant that will recognize the five deputies and one volunteer that were honored by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. The guest speaker will be Police Chief Jason Horton. RSVP’s would be appreciated. Carl Wisdom presented photographs of a vacant property at 8810 45th Street. He advised that the property has been vacant for six years and there is concern from residents that the -2- current condition of the property is unsafe and creates a neighborhood eyesore. Mr. Wisdom asked for Council’s assistance to address this matter. Mayor Hancock asked City staff to look into this matter. 10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Berkson acknowledged the Healthy Jurupa Valley Extravaganza, stating that it was an absolutely wonderful event. He expressed appreciation to all involved. Council Member Lauritzen expressed appreciation to Lieutenant Ken Ditton for his comprehensive and informative updates. He recognized Lieutenant Ditton for his 25 years of distinguished service. He reported on his attendance at the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department’s annual awards ceremony at the Morongo Casino and Resort where recipients were honored for their acts of heroism, lifesaving, and community service. He was overwhelmed by the number of Jurupa Valley residents who were recognized for their acts of heroism and lifesaving efforts. Council Member Johnston complimented all those involved in the Healthy Jurupa Valley Extravaganza, stating that the event gets bigger and better each year. He echoed Council Member Lauritzen’s comments, noting that a member of the community who was recognized by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department was a member of his church. He began the meeting with the following quote: “We can choose to throw stones, to stumble on them, to climb over them, or to build with them.” – William Arthur Ward. He announced that the City’s Planning Department received recognition for leadership in planning with the APA Inland Empire Award for the City’s new Environmental Justice Element. Council Member Roughton asked whether the Annual 5K Community Run would need to come back as an Agenda item. She announced that the Healthy Jurupa Valley Gardens and Markets Action Team has partnered with the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District to create an educational produce stand called “The patch.” The produce stand will open tomorrow and will feature organic produce and rare fruits. Residents are encouraged to visit the produce stand on Fridays from 9 am to 12 noon at the Community Center, 4810 Pedley Road at the Gazebo. She thanked everyone for participating in the Healthy Living Extravaganza, stating that it was a wonderful event with close to 3,000 attendees. She expressed appreciation to Mayor Hancock and his wife Jolene for constructing and organizing the human foosball court which was a big success. Mayor Hancock thanked all those responsible for the Healthy Jurupa Valley Extravaganza, stating that it was a wonderful event. 11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE City Manager Thompson introduced Steve Loriso, Deputy City Engineer. He announced that a Special Council Workshop will be held Tuesday, April 21, 2015 to discuss the -3- Compensation Study prepared by Koff & Associates. He announced that the next Town Hall will be on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at Patriot High School. He discussed the fire that occurred earlier today, stating that the multi-agency response was tremendous and contributed to the quick containment of the fire. Council Member Berkson asked for clarification regarding the City’s efforts toward the control of excess weeds and brush so that it doesn’t become a fire hazard. Mr. Thompson responded that the City is looking at working with CalFire to do some cleanup in the city. The City is also bringing on additional staff to focus on illegal dumping. 12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MARCH 31, 2015 SPECIAL MEETING A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council Member Johnston, to approve the Minutes of the March 31, 2015 special meeting. Ayes: Noes: Absent: B. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None APRIL 2, 2015 REGULAR MEETING A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, to approve the Minutes of the April 2, 2015 regular meeting. Ayes: Noes: Absent: 13. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None CONSENT CALENDAR A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,963,226.73 Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated March 26, 31 and April 6 and the Payroll Register dated April 3, 2015. -4- C. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-06 Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2015-06, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AMENDING CHAPTER 8.56, HAZARDOUS VEGETATION, OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES, AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY, TO ADD TUMBLEWEEDS TO THE DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION AND PROVIDE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF TUMBLEWEEDS AND OTHER HAZARDOUS VEGETATION IN THE CITY D. SUPPORT POSITION FOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AB 1455 REGARDING ONTARIO Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the City Manager’s authorization for the City of Ontario to utilize the City’s name and City seal on correspondence to the State Assembly for all agencies in support of AB 1455. A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Council Member Lauritzen, to approve the Consent Calendar. Ayes: Noes: Absent: Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None 14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 15. PUBLIC HEARING A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 1463 (GPA1403, CZ1404, TTM36720, & SDP31456) TO ALLOW 26 AFFORDABLE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 5.3 ACRES AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET & NORTHERLY OF MISSION 169-100-057 BOULEVARD (APN: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; (APPLICANT: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - RIVERSIDE) Annette Tam, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. At the request of Council Member Berkson, Mike Myers, Assistant City Engineer, provided additional information on the vehicular points of access and responded to Council’s questions. -5- Ernie Perea, the City’s environmental consultant provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions. Kathy Michalak, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity Riverside gave a brief PowerPoint presentation. She reported that this is a project that is in partnership with CalVet and is meant to support Veterans as they transition back to civilian life. She outlined the services and resources that will be provided. Council Member Johnston stated that he would like to find a way to help ensure the Veterans in this program receive military banners. Mayor Hancock opened the public hearing and called for any public comments. Ron Anderson voiced support of the project, stating that those who have served this nation as Veterans deserve to be recognized and supported. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council Member Johnston, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-18, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD, AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1403, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36720, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 31456 TO PERMIT THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD INTO 26 AFFORDABLE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR VETERANS LIVING IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ayes: Noes: Absent: Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None A motion was made by Council Member Lauritzen, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, to introduce Ordinance No. 2015-07, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONING MAP NO. 15 (JURUPA AREA PLAN) CHANGING THE ZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED -6- AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD (APNS: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) FROM GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000), REGULATED DEVELOPMENT AREAS (R-D) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P) ZONES TO COLLECTIVELY A RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE (R-6) Ayes: Noes: Absent: 16. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None COUNCIL BUSINESS A. APPROVE INITIATION OF AIR AND NOISE TECHNICAL STUDIES FOR THE CEQA REVIEW OF POSSIBLE TRUCK RESTRICTIONS ON ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN SR-60 AND HOPKINS STREET Jim Smith, City Engineer, presented the staff report. Penny Newman suggested that the City should incorporate what has already been analyzed and take advantage of the fact that a very thorough environmental analysis has already been done. The AQMD has also done an ongoing monitoring program on diesel impacts which could also be incorporated into the City’s analysis. A motion was made by Council Member Berkson, seconded by Council Member Lauritzen, to authorize the City Manager to amend the Iteris Agreement to provide for the air and noise technical study for possible truck restrictions on Etiwanda Avenue between SR 60 and Hopkins Street in an amount not to exceed $18,020 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Ayes: Noes: Absent: B. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None INITIATION OF A ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND SECTION 18.28(A), SECOND UNIT PERMITS Thomas Merrell, Planning Director, presented the staff report. Betty Anderson voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance stating that she is concerned about adding a blanket zoning to the entire city. She suggested that the Council could grant Lennar Homes a special variance that would allow them to offer second units in their new homes. -7- Stephen Anderson voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance, stating that the second unit permits should remain isolated for Lennar Homes. He voiced concern that second units invite renters and transients, change the aesthetics and frequently take over street parking which impacts the livability of the community. Geoff Smith representing Lennar Homes stated that multi-generational living is a big part of Lennar’s customer base. Lennar is meeting this demand by building what they call a “Next Gen” home. He noted that many cities have embraced this concept and Lennar is willing to work with city staff to assist in modifying the City’s zoning code. Ron Anderson voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance, stating that second units do not belong on 6,000 square foot lots. He added that the City’s Code Enforcement staff is already overburdened and would find it difficult to manage any potential violations. Kim Jarrell Johnson voiced concern that Lennar Homes did not do their due diligence prior to building their second unit homes in Jurupa Valley. She advised that this is a density issue not a zoning issue and it should be dealt with through the General Plan process. She suggested that the Council could set a percentage of allowable second units and other standards that would better regulate second unit permits. By consensus, the Council elected not to initiate a code amendment for second unit permits at this time. Staff was directed to bring back a revised list of standards that would apply to the construction of second dwelling units. Ayes: Noes: Absent: Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None Mayor Hancock called a short recess at 9:30 p.m. Mayor Hancock reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m. C. INITIATION OF A DRAFT ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ADD A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONE TO THE JURUPA VALLEY ZONING CODE Thomas Merrell, Planning Director, presented the staff report. A motion was made by Council Member Lauritzen, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, to initiate a code amendment to the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance for the creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zone. -8- Ayes: Noes: Absent: D. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR THE INTERIM GENERAL PLAN (GPA1405) Mary Wright, General Plan Program Manager, presented the staff report. A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Council Member Lauritzen, to approve the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Technical Services for the Interim General Plan; and authorize the Planning Department to distribute the RFP, pursuant to the Council-adopted Interim General Plan work program. Ayes: Noes: Absent: E. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None POLICY FOR USE OF CITY OWNED VEHICLES City Manager Gary Thompson presented the staff report. A motion was made by Council Member Johnston, seconded by Council Member Berkson, to adopt the Vehicle Use Policy that will be applicable to City owned vehicles. Ayes: Noes: Absent: F. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH GARY THOMPSON City Attorney Peter Thorson presented the staff report. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council Member Berkson, to approve the “City Manager Employment Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Gary Thompson,” dated as of April 16, 2015; and terminate the “Agreement for Consultant Services Between the City of Jurupa Valley and GST Consulting for Interim City Manager Services,” dated as of July 17, 2014, as of the time the City Manager Agreement becomes effective on May 1, 2015. -9- Ayes: Noes: Absent: G. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None DISCUSSION OF INCORPORATION CELEBRATION ACTIVITIES REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON (ORAL REPORT) Council Member Berkson outlined his reasons for bringing this item forward. He discussed his desire to organize a community parade on the July 4th weekend that would provide an opportunity for citizens to show their community pride. He read aloud a list of civic organizations that could be included in a community parade that could help celebrate the City’s incorporation. Ron Anderson advised that the Jurupa Area and Recreation and Park District has not yet confirmed an agreement with the School District for use of Patriot High School for the annual Independence Day/Fireworks Celebration. By consensus, the City Council decided to forgo organizing a parade this year due to time constraints and begin the process to form a 5th Birthday Celebration Committee to organize a larger-scale celebration and community parade in 2016. Ayes: Noes: Absent: 17. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS A. REGARDING MAYOR BRAD HANCOCK 1. B. REPORTS Mayor Hancock gave an update on the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District Meeting on April 16, 2015. MAYOR PRO TEM LAURA ROUGHTON 1. Mayor Pro Tem Roughton gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments Meeting on April 6, 2015. 2. Mayor Pro Tem Roughton gave an update on the Healthy Jurupa Valley Community Meeting April 7, 2015. 3. Mayor Pro Tem Roughton gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments Administrative and Finance Committee Meeting on April 8, 2015. -10- C. D. COUNCIL MEMBER FRANK JOHNSTON 1. Council Member Johnston gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting on April 9, 2015. 2. Council Member Johnston gave an update on the Northwest Transportation NOW Coalition Meeting on April 9, 2015. COUNCIL MEMBER VERNE LAURITZEN 1. 18. Council Member Verne Lauritzen gave an update on the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Meeting on April 6, 2015. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report. 19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS Mayor Pro Tem Roughton reported on her attendance at the ONT Airport Authority meeting on April 6, 2015. A report from that meeting indicated that the number of car trips from the Inland Empire to LAX has increased dramatically and will have significant impacts on SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan. She reported on her attendance at the League of California Cities, Riverside Division Executive Committee meeting on April 13, 2015, stating that the Legislative Committee discussed several new bills. The next Division meeting is May 11, 2015 which will include a tour of the former Annenberg Estate. Mayor Hancock asked for clarification regarding the Northwest Mosquito Vector Control District’s approval of the subordination request relating to proposed refunding bonds issued for Jurupa Valley’s Redevelopment Project Area of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside. Council Member Johnston announced that “School Bus Driver Appreciation Day” is Tuesday, April 21. He announced that the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce will host “Casino Night” at the Country Village Ballroom tomorrow night at 6:00 p.m. He provided the following closing quotes: “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.” - Thomas Jefferson. -11- 20. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Hancock adjourned the meeting at 11:18 p.m. The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held May 7, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509. Respectfully submitted, Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk -12- RETURN TO AGENDA AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.B MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL April 21, 2015 The meeting was held at the Jurupa Valley City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL - COUNCIL WORKSHOP ● ● ● ● ● Brad Hancock, Mayor Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, Council Member Frank Johnston, Council Member Verne Lauritzen, Council Member Mayor Hancock called the special meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Berkson. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Roughton, seconded by Council Member Johnston, to approve the Agenda. Ayes: Noes: Absent: 4. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None DISCUSSION REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF FUTURE CITY EMPLOYEE SALARY STRUCTURES, BENEFITS AND RETIREMENT PROGRAM, AND DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PERSONNEL MANUAL City Manager Gary Thompson presented the staff report. Mr. Thompson explained that the City Council is being asked to review the Compensation Study prepared by Koff & Associates. The overall benefits, salaries and City Personnel Manual will be brought back at a later date with all appropriate implementing ordinances and resolutions. Georg Krammer, CEO, Koff & Associates presented a brief PowerPoint presentation and outlined the results of the Total Compensation Study. 5. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS Kim Jarrell Johnson voiced concern that the salary survey was not based on the actual agencies that the city would be using as a possible employee pool and should have included school and/or special districts. She equated the Assistant to the City Manager -1- position with the City Clerk position and questioned why the City Clerk position has a lower salary range. She discussed the proposed salaries, voicing that a job description should reflect the job and not the person holding the job. She opposes contracting with CalPERS and supports the PTO option that would help attract new employees. 6. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS Following discussion, Council Member Berkson requested that staff bring back a comparison of what is currently being paid to the city’s consultants to better analyze the proposed salary ranges and benefits package. By consensus, the City Council provided direction to the City Manager to bring back a benchmark comparison for formalizing salary, benefits and retirement systems for future City employees which will be brought back at a later date. Ayes: Noes: Absent: 7. Berkson, Hancock, Johnston, Lauritzen, Roughton None None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Hancock adjourned the meeting at 7:49 p.m. The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held May 7, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509. Respectfully submitted, Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk -2- RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BY: GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER ALAN KREIMEIER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.B CHECK REGISTERS RECOMMENDATION That the City Council ratify the check registers dated April 9, 16 and 23, 2015. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2014-15 Budget was adopted on June 19, 2014. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year. The check register dated April 9, 2015 includes a $6,852.49 payment to Chase Card Services. The Statement, with purchase details, is attached. ANALYSIS All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code. OTHER INFORMATION None. FINANCIAL IMPACT Check registers: $ 592,582.28 4/9/15 4/16/15 $ 716,874.01 4/23/15 $1,217,914.89 TOTAL $ 606,458.74 Page | 1 RETURN TO AGENDA AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.C ORDINANCE NO. 2015-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONING MAP NO. 15 (JURUPA AREA PLAN) CHANGING THE ZONE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 5.3 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF AMARILLO STREET AND NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD (APNS: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) FROM GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000), REGULATED DEVELOPMENT AREAS (R-D) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P) ZONES TO COLLECTIVELY A RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE (R-6) ZONE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City of Jurupa Valley Land Use Regulatory Authority. Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that: (a) The City The City of Jurupa Valley incorporated on July 1, 2011. (b) On July 1, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2011-01. This Ordinance provides that pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 57376, all ordinances of the County of Riverside which have been applicable within the territory now incorporated as the City of Jurupa Valley, to the extent that they applied before incorporation, shall remain in full force and effect as ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley, including the Riverside County General Plan. Additionally, Ordinance No. 2011-01 provides that the resolutions, rules and regulations of the County of Riverside which have been applicable in the implementation of the aforesaid ordinances and State laws (including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act and regulations pertaining to traffic) to the extent that they applied before incorporation shall remain in full force and effect as resolutions, rules and regulations, respectively, of the City of Jurupa Valley. On September 15, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2011-10, effective October 15, 2011, continuing in effect all ordinances of the County of Riverside that have been applicable within the territory now incorporated as the City of Jurupa Valley, to the extent that they applied before incorporation. These ordinances and resolutions as well as the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code shall be known as “Jurupa Valley Ordinances.” (c) On September 15, 2011, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No. 2011-09, effective October 15, 2011, adopting Chapter 2.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code establishing the Planning Commission for the City of Jurupa Valley. Chapter 2.35 provides that the Planning Commission shall perform the planning agency functions described in Government Code Section 65100 et seq., and shall fulfill the functions delegated to the Planning Commission for the County of Riverside under the relevant ordinances and resolutions, which the City has adopted as required upon incorporation. Chapter 2.35 further provides that the Planning Commission shall perform the functions of any and all planning, zoning or code 1 enforcement appeals board created by the relevant County of Riverside ordinances and resolutions, which the City has adopted by reference as required by law. Section 2. Project Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that: (a) Habitat for Humanity - Riverside (the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 1403, Change of Zone No. 1404, Tentative Tract Map No. 36720, and Site Development Permit No. 31456 (collectively, Master Application No. 1463 or MA No. 1463) to allow the subdivision of approximately 5.3 acres into 26 affordable, single-family residential lots and 3 open space lots for veterans living in the County of Riverside on real property located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission Boulevard (APNs: 169100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) in the General Residential (R-3), Regulated Development Areas (R-D) and General Commercial (C-1/C-P) Zones and designated Community Development: Highest Density Residential (CD:HHDR), Community Development: High Density Residential (CD:HDR) and Community Development: Medium High Density Residential (CD:MHDR) (the “Project”). The Applicant filed Master Application No. 1463 with the City on June 30, 2014. (b) All of the components of Master Application No. 1463 shall collectively be known as the “Project.” Change of Zone Application No. 1404 is the subject of this Ordinance. (c) The Applicant is seeking approval of Change of Zone No. 1404 to rezone approximately 5.3 gross acres located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission Boulevard (APNs: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) from General Residential (R-3; R3-525; R-3-4,000), Regulated Development Areas (R-D) and General Commercial (C-1/C-P) Zones to collectively a Residential Incentive (R-6) Zone. (d) Section 20.3a d. (1) of Riverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, provides that upon receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval of an amendment to change property from one zone to another, the City Clerk shall set the matter of public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and shall give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission. (e) Section 20.3a e. of Riverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, provides that after closing the public hearing the City Council shall render its decision within a reasonable time and may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, however, that any proposed modification of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Planning Commission shall first be referred back to the Planning Commission for a report and recommendation. - -2- (f) The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (g) On March 25, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 1463, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. (h) At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2015-3-25-02 recommending that the City Council approve Master Application No. 1463 (General Plan Amendment No. 1403, Change of Zone No. 1404, Tentative Tract Map No. 36720, and Site Development Permit No. 31456), to allow the subdivision of approximately 5.3 acres into 26 affordable, single-family residential lots and 3 open space lots for veterans living in the County of Riverside on real property located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission Boulevard (APNs: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057), subject to the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit A. (i) On April 16, 2015, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held duly noticed public hearings on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the public hearing. (j) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project: (a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. §15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment (b) period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on January 1, 2015 and expired at 5:00 p.m. on January 20, 2015. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509. (c) The City Council, by separate Resolution No. 2015-18, adopted the Negative Declaration and findings pursuant to CEQA. (d) The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the - -3- City Council’s decision was based, including, without limitation, the staff reports for Master Application No. 1463, all of the materials that comprise and support the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all of the materials that support the staff reports for Master Application No. 1463, is the Planning Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8304 Limonite Avenue, Suite M, Jurupa Valley, California 92509. (e) The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA. Section 4. Project Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required by the Jurupa Valley Ordinances and applicable state law: (a) The proposed Change of Zone No. 1404 will be consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 1403, in that: 1) The proposed R-6 zone is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Community Development: Medium Density Residential; and 2) The Project, 26 single-family dwellings, is compatible with the character of the surrounding residential community. Section 5. Approval of Zone Change. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby rezones the 5.3 acre real property located at the terminus of Amarillo Street and north of Mission Boulevard (APNs: 169-100-055; 169-070-035; 169-100-057) from General Residential (R-3; R-3-525; R-3-4,000), Regulated Development Areas (R-D) and General Commercial (C-1/C-P) Zones to collectively a Residential Incentive (R-6) Zone, as depicted in Exhibit B and directs the City Manager to revise the official Riverside County Zoning Map No. 15 for the Jurupa Area to designate the Property as being in this new zone. Section 6. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of May, 2015. ______________________________ Brad Hancock Mayor - -4- ATTEST: ________________________ Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ) ) ss. ) I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2015-07 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of April, 2015 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of May, 2015, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of May, 2015. ________________________________ Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk - -5- RETURN TO AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: BY: GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.D NOTICE OF DECISION FOR MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 14112 (TTM36827 AND VAR1501) PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENT FOR NOTICING THE ADVISORY AGENCY’S (PLANNING COMMISSION) DECISION OF A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ON A VACANT LOT LOCATED NORTH OF 45TH ST., WEST OF GOLDEN WEST AVENUE AND EAST OF OPAL STREET (APN: 182-361-009-4) RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file the Notice of Decision. BACKGROUND Per Section 6.7 (A) of Ordinance No. 460 (Subdivision Regulations), a notice of the decision of the Planning Commission for the action on Tentative Tract Map No. 36827 shall be filed with the City Council. This notification will trigger the beginning of a 10day appeal period. On April 22, 2015, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution No. 2015-4-22-01 approving Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36827 and Variance No. 1501 subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration. TTM No. 36827 proposes to subdivide a 3.35-acre parcel into 13 single-family residential lots with a public street labeled “Lot A” and a water quality basin labeled “Lot B.” Individual parcels will contain a minimum 7,200 square feet with average lot widths of 60 feet and average lot depths of 100 feet. One parcel, Lot 13 is proposed with less than the required average lot depth requirement, thereby necessitating a variance. The Planning Commission reviewed a letter from an adjoining property owner expressing concern that the future construction of homes could have a negative impact Page | 1 ATTACHMENTS: 1) Planning Commission Staff Report (Dated April 22, 2015) 2) Adopted Resolution No. 2015-4-22-01 Page | 3 RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER JIM L. SMITH, P.E., CITY ENGINEER BRIGITTE HAHN, SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1C, TABULATION OF THE BALLOT, AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ANNEXATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT OF ZONE 182 RECOMMENDATION 1) That the City Council Conduct the public hearing and, after closing the public hearing, direct the City Clerk, or her designee, who the City Council finds to be an impartial person as that term is used in section 53753(e) of the government code, to tally all ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing. All ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing will be tallied after the conclusion of the public hearing on Thursday, May 7, 2015. 2) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2015-19, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ZONE 182 OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL ASSESSABLE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 Page | 1 ANALYSIS Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Resolution 2015-13 adopted March 5, 2015, the City Council noticed a public hearing for May 7, 2015, to receive testimony regarding the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C. Annexation of Zone 182 will fund the maintenance and servicing of a future traffic signal at Wineville/Mission, and the provision of electricity and pole rental charges for street lights along Wineville Ave. and along Mission Blvd. The Engineer’s Report attached to this report includes an assessment diagram for the parcels and a cost estimate. All property owners within Zone 182 have been noticed concerning the proposed annexation into L&LMD No. 89-1-C. Pursuant to the notice, all ballots must be returned prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Adoption of Resolution No. 2015-19 confirms the assessment levy as indicated in the Engineer’s Report for fiscal year 2015-16 for Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C and orders the placement of the annual assessment on the County’s Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2015-16. OTHER INFORMATION None. FINANCIAL IMPACT The proposed budget for fiscal year 2015-16 for Zone 182 is $7,079 that will result in an assessment for fiscal year 2015-16 within Zone 182 of $2,361 per assessed parcel. The annual assessment may be adjusted annually by the greater of 2% or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U for “electricity”, if any, as it stands as of March of each year over the base index of 2015. TALLY RESULTS: Possible Votes 1 Votes Cast 1 YES Votes 1 NO Votes % Pass 100 % Failed Fifty-one percent of votes cast, must be in favor of the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C and the levy and enrollment of the special assessment for the election to pass. Page | 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above tabulation results, staff recommends that the Council: Approve the requested actions. Not to do so would mean that the assessments could not be collected to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific right-of-ways. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Staff Recommendation; or 2. Elect not to adopt the resolutions. ****************************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE************************** Page | 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE 182 TO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR ZONE 182 OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1CONSOLIDATED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL ASSESSABLE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 WHEREAS, on March 5, 2015 the City Council (hereinafter the "City Council") of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2015-13, pursuant to Section 22608 and Section 22585 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, declaring the intention of the City Council to order the annexation of Zone 182 to Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (hereinafter “L&LMD No. 89-1-C”) of the City pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, and giving notice of and setting a public hearing for 7:00 p.m. on May 7, 2015 at the meeting room of the City Council and requiring that the notice of the public hearing and assessment ballots be mailed to all owners of property within Zone 182 as shown on the equalized tax roll; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly published and mailed as required by Resolution No. 2015-13, Section 22626 of the Streets and Highways Code and Sections 53753 and 54954.6 of the Government Code and the assessment ballots were timely mailed to all owners of property within said Zone 182 as shown on the equalized tax roll; and WHEREAS, at 7:00 p.m. on May 7, 2015, as set forth in Resolution No. 2015-13, the City Council held a public hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protest or communications made or filed by any interested persons, closed the public hearing and directed the City Clerk, as an impartial person having no vested interest in the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C as required by Section 53753(e) of the Government Code to tally the assessment ballots that had been received prior to the close of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, said Engineer has filed the Report with the City Clerk and the Report has been presented to and considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the tally of the assessment ballots show that assessment ballots were timely received from the owners and based on the financial weight of the assessment ballots received, the vote is in favor of annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C and the levy of an annual assessment in said Zone 182 beginning fiscal year 2015-16 may proceed; and; WHEREAS, the City Council may proceed, pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed, or as changed by the City Council, and the adoption of such a resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment on all assessable lots and parcels of land within Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C beginning fiscal year 2015-16. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, after reviewing the Report, does hereby find, determine and declare that: (a) The foregoing recitals are true and correct; Compliance has been had with all the requirements of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, and Sections 53753 and 54954.6 of the Government Code; (b) A majority protest to the annexation of, and annual assessment of, Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C has not been filed; (c) (d) The tally of the assessment ballots timely received was percent voted in favor of the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C and the levy of an annual assessment beginning fiscal year 2015-16, and percent voted no; The City Council may proceed to adopt a resolution ordering the annexation of Zone 182 to L&LMD No. 89-1-C; (e) (f) The City Council may proceed to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment for Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C either as originally proposed or as changed by it; and The assessments to be levied on the assessable lots and parcels of land within Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C for the maintenance and servicing of streetlights and a future traffic signal improvement in said Zone 182 during the fiscal year 2015-16 as contained in the Engineer’s Report which is on file with the City Clerk (hereinafter the “Report”) are based on benefits derived by such lots and parcels from the availability of such streetlights and a future traffic signal improvement, and are not based upon the ownership of such lots and parcels. (g) Section 2. Annexation: Zone 182, as proposed to be annexed to L&LMD No. 89-1-C, includes all the property subject to Plot Plan No. 31201 in the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, State of California as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and is annexed into L&LMD No. 89-1-C. Section 3. No. 89-1-C are: Improvements: The improvements authorized for Zone 182 of L&LMD (a) Providing electricity to and the maintenance and servicing of streetlights and traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses. -2- Section 4. Confirmation of Report: The Report and the assessment diagram and the assessment of estimated costs for the maintenance and servicing of streetlights and future traffic signal improvement in Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C for fiscal year 2015-16 as contained in the Report are confirmed. Section 5. Levy of Assessment: Pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance and servicing of streetlights and future traffic signals improvements in Zone 182 of L&LMD No. 89-1-C during fiscal year 2015-16, as contained in the Report, and such assessment is levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution, together with the diagram and assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor-Controller of the County of Riverside, who, pursuant to Section 22645 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall enter on the County Tax Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment. Section 6. Authorization. The City Council authorizes the County to act as the City’s agent to administer the revenue/expenditures and budget for L&LMD No. 89-1-C for fiscal year 2015-16. Section 7. Resolution. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Section 8. adoption. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of May, 2015. ______________________________ Brad Hancock Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk -3- CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ) ) ss. ) I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-19 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of May, 2015 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of May, 2015. ________________________________ Victoria Wasko, City Clerk City of Jurupa Valley -4- RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER STEVE R. LORISO, P.E., DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015/2016 FIVE-YEAR MEASURE “A” LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 FOR THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION 1) That the City Council approve the City of Jurupa Valley’s Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Five-Year Measure “A” Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2015/16 through Fiscal Year 2019/20 for the RCTC Measure ‘A” Local Funds Program; and 2) Approve the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification required of the City of Jurupa Valley that establishes a Base Year amount and commitment to expending Measure A Local Street and Roads funds to projects identified in the City of Jurupa Valley’s Five-Year CIP; and 3) Authorize the City Engineer, or his designee, to submit an amended five-year plan to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the listed Measure “A” projects as part of any current fiscal year CIP budget approval process. BACKGROUND The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Ordinance No. 02-001 (Transportation Expenditure Plan and Retail Transaction and Use Tax Ordinance), as enacted pursuant to Division 25 of the Public Utilities Code, specifies that local cities and the county must submit annually a 5-year Measure “A” CIP to receive Measure “A” funds. The program is subject to amendment by RCTC. The Deputy City Engineer has prepared the City of Jurupa Valley’s FY 2015/2016 Measure “A” Local Streets and Roads Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2015/2016 (FY 15/16) through FY 2019/2020 (FY 19/20). This 5-year plan is attached. U:\STAFF REPORTS\2015\050715\Staff Report - Meas A CIP (16.A).docx Page | 1 The RCTC Ordinance No. 02-001 requires annual certification that General Fund expenditures for transportation-related construction and activities for FY 2015/16 will meet or exceed the Maintenance of Effort Year amount and commitment to expending Measure A Local Street and to projects identified in the City of Jurupa Valley’s Five-Year CIP. discretionary maintenance (MOE) Base Roads funds Based upon the City’s incorporation on July 1, 2011, the annual MOE Certification is required to be submitted for the first time to the RCTC for review and approval. ANALYSIS Measure “A”, Riverside County’s half-cent sales tax for transportation, is a major funding source for transportation infrastructure improvements throughout the County. Shown below is RCTC’s estimated allocation to Jurupa Valley for each of the next 5 years. The estimated amount for each Fiscal Year is reduced by RCTC over earlier projections. YEAR FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 EST AMOUNT $1,802,000 $1,830,000 $1,867,000 $1,904,000 $1,961,000 $2,020,000 Measure “A” funds can only be used for transportation related purposes and may be used to provide required City matching funds for other federal and state transportation grants. Such funds may also be committed for debt service to secure Total Roads Improvement Program (TRIP) financing for transportation infrastructure. TRIP has previously been presented to the City Council and at Council’s direction staff continues discussions with RCTC and Riverside County regarding this program. The projects included in the City’s FY 15/16 Measure “A” Five-Year CIP satisfy the requirements of RCTC Ordinance No. 02-001 and meet all criteria for Measure “A” funding. The City Council may make any subsequent changes to the list of projects as part of the City’s annual budget approval or any budget amendment process. OTHER INFORMATION All of the projects identified on the Five-Year Measure “A” CIP list were previously reviewed by the City’s Planning Commission and were found to be in conformance with the City’s General Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT The approval of the Five-Year Measure “A” CIP along with the City’s participation in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation U:\STAFF REPORTS\2015\050715\Staff Report - Meas A CIP (16.A).docx Page | 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY MEASURE “A” LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FY 2015/2016 - 2019/2020 APRIL, 2015 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2015 - 2016 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: April 2015 Adopted: May 7, 2015 ITEM NO. 2015.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Limonite Pavement Rehabilitation and Shoulder Improvement (Ph. 2) PROJECT LIMITS Day Creek Blvd. to Bellegrave PROJECT COST $600,000 D,B & C 2015.2 2015.3 Pacific Ave Pavement Rehabilitation Golden West Sidewalk Infill Project MEASURE A FY 2015/16 $600,000 45th St to Mission Blvd $328,320 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$138,320 45th St to Rathke Ave D, B, C $190,000 $270,000 2015.4 Mission Blvd. Bridge SB 821=$70,000 Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (PA/ED) 2015.5 Camino Real Pavement Rehabilitation Linares Ave to 270' N/o Black Hills Dr (8300LF) 2015.6 Annual Miscellaneous Street Pavement Rehabilitation Program Various Locations Citywide D, B, C $200,000 $50,000 $187,500 $1,000,000 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000 Various Locations Citywide D,B & C 2015.7 Annual Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program 2015.8 Annual Miscellaneous Street Maintenance Program Various Locations Citywide 2015.9 8% Overhead/ Administration Inter-fund 8% Transfer per Measure A Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer $750,000 $175,000 $250,000 4/2015 Revised per RCTC 2/6/15 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction $147,000 TOT BUDGET = $2,549,500 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: April 2015 Adopted: May 7, 2015 ITEM NO. 2016.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sierra Ave Pavement Rehabilitation PROJECT LIMITS Armstrong Rd to S/o Karen Ln (2800 LF) PROJECT COST $500,000 D, B & C 2016.2 2016.3 Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab Jurupa Rd to Bellegrave Ph 2 D FY15/16, C FY16/17 Mission Blvd. Bridge Fund 2, Gas Tax=$1,014,000 Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (PA/ED) MEASURE A FY 2016/17 $500,000 $1,315,000 B, C $301,000 $50,000 2016.4 2016.5 Annual Miscellaneous Street Pavement Rehabilitation Program Annual Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Various Locations Citywide $1,000,000 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000 Various Locations Citywide D, B & C $750,000 $200,000 2016.6 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $130,926 2016.7 8% Overhead/ Administration 4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Inter-fund 8% Transfer per Measure A Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer $150,000 TOT BUDGET = $2,081,926 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: April 2015 Adopted: May 7, 2015 ITEM NO. 2017.1 2017.2 2017.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation Ph 3 PROJECT LIMITS PROJECT COST Bellegrave to SE/o Etiwanda Av $1,300,000 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$950,000 Rubidoux Blvd, 28th St and 30th Rubidoux Blvd, SR-60 to St Pavement Rehabilitation 28th and 28th & 30th St, Avalon St to Rubidoux Fund 2, Gas Tax=$200,000 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (PS&E) D, B, & C MEASURE A FY 2017/18 $350,000 $600,000 D, B & C $400,000 $50,000 2017.4 2017.5 Annual Miscellaneous Street Pavement Rehabilitation Program Annual Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Various Locations Citywide $1,000,000 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000 Various Locations Citywide D, B & C $750,000 $200,000 2017.6 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $123,148 2017.7 8% Overhead/ Administration 4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Inter-fund 8% Transfer per Measure A Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer $153,000 TOT BUDGET = $2,026,148 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: April 2015 Adopted: May 7, 2015 ITEM NO. 2018.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Valley Way Pavement Rehabilitation PROJECT LIMITS PROJECT COST MEASURE A FY 2018/19 Mission Blvd to Jurupa Rd $280,000 $280,000 2018.2 Wineville Ave Pavement Rehab Riverside Dr to Mission Blvd $390,000 $390,000 2018.3 General Drive Pavement Rehabilitation 200' East of Clay St to East End $250,000 $260,000 2018.4 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (PS&E) $50,000 2018.5 2018.6 Annual Miscellaneous Street Pavement Rehabilitation Program Annual Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Various Locations Citywide $1,000,000 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000 Various Locations Citywide $750,000 $110,000 2018.7 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $107,037 2018.8 8% Overhead/ Administration 4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Inter-fund 8% Transfer per Measure A Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer $157,000 TOT BUDGET = $2,104,037 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: April 2015 Adopted: May 7, 2015 ITEM NO. 2019.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Rubidoux Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation PROJECT LIMITS PROJECT COST MEASURE A FY 2019/20 Mission Blvd to SR60 $612,000 $300,000 2019.2 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (Construction) $709,000 $237,000 2019.3 2019.4 Annual Miscellaneous Street Pavement Rehabilitation Program Annual Roadway Safety and Traffic Improvement Program Various Locations Citywide $1,000,000 Fund 2, Gas Tax=$250,000 Various Locations Citywide $750,000 $200,000 2019.5 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $125,000 2019.6 8% Overhead/ Administration 4/2014 Revised per RCTC 2/10/14 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Inter-fund 8% Transfer per Measure A Administrative Inter-Fund Transfer $157,000 TOT BUDGET = $1,769,000 Brad Hancock, Mayor . Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem . Brian Berkson, Council Member . Frank Johnston, Council Member . Verne Lauritzen, Council Member FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015/16 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Jurupa Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $0, scheduled for approval by the Commission at its July 8, 2015 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 7, 2015 Gary S. Thompson City Manager ATTEST: Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk 8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.B CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER TO SUPERVISOR JOHN TAVAGLIONE CONCERNING SHERIFF SERVICE CONTRACT COST INCREASES ______________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION 1) That the City Council consider the letter to Supervisor John Tavaglione concerning Sheriff service contract cost increases, and authorize the Mayor to sign the letter for transmittal. BACKGROUND The City has been contracting with the Riverside County Sheriff Department for police services since incorporation. The services provided have been excellent and the expertise and responsiveness of the patrol and supervisory staff at the Jurupa Valley Station have been outstanding. However, the City, along with all other cities in the County that contract with the Sheriff, have been saddled with annual cost increases, with no increase in service level, that have become unsustainable. ANALYSIS Since the City incorporated in 2011, police services provided by the Sheriff’s Department have been subject to annual increases in deputy patrol hour rates, and other administrative support functions. For the current Fiscal Year, FY 14/15, the increase that will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors in the near future is approximately 7%, retroactive to the beginning of the Fiscal Year. Additionally, the contract cities have been advised to expect an additional 7% for FY 15/16. This equates to an overall cost increase of 14% over two years, with no increase in service levels. Over the last several months, the City Managers of the cities that contract with the Sheriff’s Department have been engaged in discussions concerning this unsustainable cost trend. The City Manager group, of which our City has been a participant, has had meetings with senior staff at the Sheriff’s Department and with senior County Human Page | 1 Resources Department personnel, concerning these increases. The two most significant drivers of these annual cost increases are related to labor agreements negotiated by the County and the various bargaining units, and more recently, the costs associated with the new countywide public safety communication system. The contract cities have no control over these decisions made at the County level, and to date have had little to no input into the process so the County can understand the impacts that these decisions have on their contract partners. As these increases occur, and are passed on to the cities to absorb, the cities are now all facing tough decisions regarding service levels in police services and other service areas in order to balance budgets since revenue growth is not keeping pace with these levels of cost increases. As a result of these meetings, the City Managers have proposed recommendations to the County which would allow greater collaboration, and a better forum for the contract cities to address these cost increases. At the most recent meeting of the City Managers, it was decided that it would be an appropriate time for the City Councils and Mayors of each of the contract cities to engage their respective Supervisors in these discussions, as it is up to the Supervisors to approve the final rate increases. To that end, the attached letter, similar to letters that the other contract cities are sending, outlines the concerns raised by the City Managers, and recommendations for consideration by the Board of Supervisors regarding greater collaboration between the County and the contract cities with regard to the rate process. Staff recommends that the City Council consider the letter to Supervisor John Tavaglione concerning Sheriff service contract cost increases, and authorize the Mayor to sign the letter for transmittal. OTHER INFORMATION None. FINANCIAL IMPACT As noted above, the City, and all other contract cities in the County, are absorbing 14% increases in Sheriff service contract costs over a two year period- FY 14/15 (retroactive to the beginning of the Fiscal Year), and FY 15/16 (current projected increase for next Fiscal Year). For the City, this amounts to over $1,000,000 in cost increase per year, with no increase in service levels. ALTERNATIVES 1. Elect not to send the letter at this time. Page | 2 Brad Hancock, Mayor . Laura Roughton, Mayor Pro Tem . Brian Berkson, Council Member . Frank Johnston, Council Member . Verne Lauritzen, Council Member May 7, 2015 Honorable John Tavaglione 2nd District Supervisor 4080 Lemon Street, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Unsustainable Increases in the Sheriff Services Contract Rate Dear Supervisor Tavaglione, The City of Jurupa Valley has been a customer of the County of Riverside for police services provided by the Sheriff’s Department since 2011. Contract cities are an important partner with the County, with contract partners paying $169 million for patrol costs versus the net county cost for patrol of $77 million per the FY 2014/15 County budget. The police service that the City has received as a partner for contracting of these services has been excellent. However, the costs for these services continue to increase at a rate which is, quite frankly, unsustainable. Since our City’s incorporation, the cost for police service has significantly outpaced the City’s available revenues. As we have seen in several California communities, when cost growth far exceeds revenue growth, a public agency is quickly heading toward insolvency. Since 2011, City revenue growth has been slow but steady. However, with the staggering loss of Vehicle License Fee Revenue diverted to the counties in the state by the state legislature and the Governor, the problem of sustainability of these service cost increases with limited revenue growth is exacerbated, in particular, for our city. Our city is experiencing revenue growth of approximately 3.75% per year in its primary tax revenues. In addition, the cost of living percent change remains near zero for 2015 and has been well under 2% for an extended period of time. Yet, the contract rate for FY 2014/15 increased 7.04% almost double the rate of our City’s revenue growth, and more than triple the increases in the region’s Consumer Price Index. And the projection for FY 15/16 has been identified by the Sheriff Department to be another approximate 7% increase. That is a staggering 14% increase over two years with no change in service levels. It is unconscionable to expect any contract city to be forced to absorb such significant increases when the revenue growth and CPI increases clearly reflect trends that does not support such increases. The City of Jurupa Valley implores the Board of Supervisors to consider your contract cities’ revenue trends and the very small CPI increases, when managing the factors affecting the contract rate. 8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org Honorable John Tavaglione May 7, 2015 Page Two All police service costs must be considered within these parameters, including labor. Since labor costs (salaries and benefits) of direct patrol staff account for more than 80% of the Contract Police Rate, we ask that cost control be considered during labor negotiations. City managers from contract cities have met several times with the Sheriff’s executive staff to discuss and cooperate on cost control. It’s now up to us, as elected policy makers to join forces in service to local residents. Our City, in conjunction with the other contract cities in the County, is also requesting a change in the process of developing the Police Contract Rate. The cities would like an opportunity to review the rate determination and make comments and provide input before it is published as a final rate. An area of particular concern is the amount of County support costs being allocated to the Contract Police Rate. County costs have been pushed to the Contract Police Rate in excess of revenue growth and inflation, while cities are struggling to recover from the recession. The following increases over the prior year are of great concern: Technical Services 36% Increase Administration 22% Increase Personnel Recruiting 18% Increase (increased 50% the previous year) Information Services 15% Increase Contract and Grants 15% Increase Considering our City’s 3.75% rate of revenue growth, increases in the range of 15- 36% are obviously untenable. The City requests that the contract cities be included in the determination of administrative and support costs allocated to the Patrol Service budget to ensure they are reasonable and appropriate. Recent actions indicate that costs are being allocated to Patrol Service where 70% of the cost is paid by contract customers (primarily cities) beyond reasonable cost growth rates. We are also very interested in reducing and controlling costs for the County’s Public Safety Enterprise Communication System (PSEC). The contract cities were given no choice and had no input to the design, construction and implementation of this radio system. Yet the contract cities are paying a large share of the annual operating cost of this system through the Contract Police Rate. As a contract city, we request to be involved in the determination of how the costs are allocated, since the cost far exceeds the previous 800 Mhz system that was very adequate for this function. The contract cities propose to work with the County through quarterly meetings with Finance Directors of the contract cities and separately with the City Managers. The Finance focus would provide a forum to review areas of the contract rate subject to fluctuation and provide insight as to how the County is managing these costs and early warning for increases that may occasionally exceed the norm. Exceeding a normal rate of cost growth should not be the norm, as it has been for the past five years. The City Managers meeting would provide a forum for 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org Honorable John Tavaglione May 7, 2015 Page Three partner city executives to share ideas and concerns with the Sheriff’s executive team. Providing a forum to discuss large changes, such as the PSEC radio system and how it will be managed would be appropriate. The City Managers would remain available to assist the Sheriff’s Department regarding legislation that may be helpful or damaging. Significant synergy can occur through regular meetings addressing substantive issues. Our community greatly values the Police Service provided by the County. We look forward to your positive reception of our very reasonable requests. We would like to meet with you in the near future to discuss the significant issue of Contract Police Rate costs control and how we can successfully achieve this goal together on behalf of our mutual constituents. Sincerely, Brad Hancock Mayor City of Jurupa Valley 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.C REQUEST FROM JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SUB-LEASING OFFICE SPACE AT CITY HALL ______________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION 1) That the City Council consider the Letter of Interest from the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce requesting sub-leasing of City Hall office space, and provide direction to staff for development of a sub-lease policy. BACKGROUND When the new City Hall facility was renovated, one additional vacant office space was established for potentially being made available for use by an undetermined outside organization that provides direct service benefits to the City residents and businesses as a whole. This office area is located down the very short hallway to the left of the main entrance to the building, outside of the inner security door office areas. The City has recently received an inquiry from the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce (JVCC) expressing an interest in sub-leasing this office space. ANALYSIS In order to enter into discussions with any organization desiring to sub-lease the available office space at City Hall, certain parameters and policies need to be discussed and established. Additionally, certain legal requirements and public benefit findings need to be met in order to offer the use of public property to any private organization, including non-profit organizations. Currently, the City has no policy regarding subleasing of office space within City Hall, therefore a discussion needs to be held concerning what considerations staff should utilize for development of a policy and future discussions with potential sub-lessees, in this case, the JVCC. Considerations should be given to the type of sub-lease agreement to be developed, what services such as utilities, internet or phone service should be included, if any, and what services, furniture and other equipment the potential lessee will provide at their Page | 1 RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.D WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG) ANNUAL MEETING ______________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION 1) That the City Council authorize reimbursable expenditures deemed appropriate for City Council members attending the WRCOG Annual Meeting BACKGROUND The 24th Annual WRCOG General Assembly & Leadership Address will be held on June 11, 2015 at the Morongo Casino Resort & Spa. The Keynote Speaker will be former Texas Governor Rick Perry. The following day, June 12, 2015, WRCOG will hold an Executive Committee meeting at the hotel. Additionally, as part of the General Assembly business meeting on June 11, 2015, the WRCOG membership will be voting on the FY 2015/16 budget, and electing the Chair, Vice Chair and 2 nd Vice Chair for the coming year. ANALYSIS The City has been granted a table for 10 attendees at no cost to the City for participation in the General Assembly Address and business meeting the night of June 11th. Additionally, the current City representative to the WRCOG Executive Committee is entitled to a one night stay at the hotel the night of June 11 th at no cost to the City, in order to attend the Executive Committee meeting the following morning. The City’s representative is Mayor Pro Tem Roughton. These costs are being paid by WRCOG. However, as the General Assembly meeting will probably run late into the evening, other City Council attendees may want to stay overnight at the hotel and potentially attend the Executive Committee meeting. In accordance with the City’s expenditure reimbursement policy, any travel related expenditures for attending this type of meeting requires prior approval by the City Council. This travel related expenditure is an authorized type of travel under the policy. Page | 1 RETURN TO AGENDA 120 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: BY: GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.E INITIATION OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ADD A PROVISION AUTHORIZING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO REFER CERTAIN DISCRETIONARY ENTITLEMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION That the City Council initiate an amendment to the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance that authorizes the Planning Director to refer certain discretionary entitlements to the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND Under the Zoning Ordinance, certain discretionary entitlements are delegated to the Planning Director. Projects requiring a Site Development Permit (SDP) are approved by the Planning Director or his designee. Site Development Permits that require environmental review require the Director to conduct a public hearing before taking action; those that are exempt under CEQA are approved by the Director or his designee without a hearing. Approval of Site Development Permits for large residential accessory structures and new wireless cellular antennas generally do not require a hearing, but require a twenty day notice to the surrounding property owners. The ordinance requires the Director to conduct a hearing for such SDPs if a hearing is requested by any resident. The Director also has jurisdiction to approve Tentative Parcel Maps for residential development. Such maps cannot create more than four lots. Most of these applications have been in the Mira Loma and Riverdale areas. In the case of an SDP or residential Parcel Map that must also include a concurrent entitlement requiring Planning Commission or City Council approval, the entire group of entitlements will go the Commission or Council. Only stand-alone SDPs or residential Parcel Maps are decided by the Planning Director. Page | 1 All other discretionary approvals are made by the Planning Commission or the City Council. The following is a general summary of discretionary entitlements and the approving body: Discretionary Entitlement Approving Body Detail Site Development Permit Planning Director Appealable to the PC Planning Commission Appealable to the CC City Council Requires hearing and recommendation from PC Residential Tentative Parcel Maps Site Development Permits for shopping centers of 30 acres or more Variance Conditional Use Permit Public Use Permit Interim Use Permit Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for sale of alcoholic beverages Commercial and industrial Tentative Parcel Maps Tentative Tract Maps Hazardous Waste Facility Siting Permit General Plan Amendment Rezone Zoning Ordinance Amendment PROPOSED AMENDMENT From time to time the Planning Director recognizes that an entitlement under his jurisdiction carries with it a policy implication or is the subject of concern for the public interest expressed by the City Council. Further, it may be evident that a controversy is inherent in an entitlement application that will undoubtedly result in an appeal. In such cases, it may be appropriate for the Director to refer the entitlement to the Planning Commission. However, the ordinance does not provide the authority to do so. An example is the affordable housing project by Palm Communities in Rubidoux approved by the Director in 2013. Although this project met or exceeded our standards for market rate housing, the policy implication suggested this project should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Under the present ordinance there was not a means to refer the project to the Commission. Page | 2 RETURN TO AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 7, 2015 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: BY: GARY S. THOMPSON, CITY MANAGER THOMAS G. MERRELL, AICP, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.F GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (GPAC): REMOVAL OF GENERAL MEMBER/DECLARATION OF VACANCY RECOMMENDATION That the City Council remove Craig Maxwell from the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), declare the seat vacant and direct the Planning Department/City Clerk to advertise a notice of unscheduled vacancy and begin the process to fill the seat. BACKGROUND As established by the City Council, the GPAC includes 23 general voting members and 9 ex officio members. On November 6, 2014, the Council appointed 13 of the general members to the GPAC, including Craig Maxwell, a resident of Jurupa Valley. Mr. Maxwell has not attended any of the GPAC meetings held to date and has indicated that he no longer intends to serve on the GPAC. The GPAC Roles, Responsibilities, Rules and Procedures Manual states: “GPAC members missing more than 2 consecutive meetings may be removed from the Committee at the Council’s discretion.” Staff recommends the City Council remove Mr. Maxwell from the GPAC, declare the seat vacant, and direct the Planning Department/City Clerk to publish a notice of unscheduled vacancy and begin the process to fill the seat. FINANCIAL IMPACT Staff time to support the GPAC, as outlined in the Interim General Plan Work Program, was approved by the City Council as part of the Interim General Plan budget. 1|Page
© Copyright 2024