320 OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 18, No. 4 / February 15, 1993 Mode-locked fiber laser gyroscope M. Y. Jeon, H. J. Jeong, and B. Y. Kim Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 373-1, Kusong-Dong,Yusung-Ku, Taejon, Korea Received September 30, 1992 We describe a new form of an all-fiber-optic gyroscope that utilizes a fiber laser. The Sagnac interferometer is used as a loop reflector with a modulated reflectivity to produce actively mode-locked optical pulses. The rotation-induced phase shift is obtained from the timing shift of the pulses. Experimental results compare well with the theoretical predictions. We propose and demonstrate a novel fiber-optic gy- loop reflector. 9 roscope in the form of a mode-locked laser consisting of a laser cavity formed by a planar mirror at one reflector is a function of the rotation rate or any nonreciprocal phase shift introduced between the counterpropagating waves in the Sagnac interferometer. A fiber-optic phase modulator located near one end of the fiber coil, as shown in Fig. 1(a), can be used to modulate the optical loss in the cavity by modulating the phase difference between the counterpropagating waves. When the frequency of the loss modulation is the same as the frequency spacing of the longitudinal modes of the laser [i.e., Af = c/n(L. + 2Le), where n is the refractive index], mode locking takes place, and the output of the laser become a series of short pulses. The timing of the pulses is determined such that the oscillating pulses in the cavity pass through the loss modulator at the time of minimum loss. On the other hand, the depth of optical loss modulation for the system in Fig. 1(a) becomes maximum when the modulation frequency is fm = c/2Lcn. At this frequency, the modulation provided by the loop end, a gain medium, and a Sagnac interferometer at the other end. The Sagnac interferometer serves as a reflector as well as a rotation-sensing element. The output of the gyroscope is a series of short optical pulses. The separation of two sets of optical pulses in the time domain changes as a function of rotation rate, providing a much simplified signal processing compared with that in conventional fiberoptic gyroscopes. The Sagnac effect introduces differential phase shift between the countercirculating optical waves. In a ring-laser gyroscope,' the differential phase shift is translated into beat frequency of the laser lines oscillating in the opposite directions, which could be measured with high accuracy. For interferometric fiber-optic gyroscopes, however, the basic intensity output from the Sagnac interferometer has a sinusoidal dependence on the differential phase shift. Relatively complicated electronic/optical signal processing is required in order to recover the differential phase information that is linearly proportional to the rotation rate. A number of closed-loop2 - 4 and open-loop5 - 8 signal-processing techniques have been developed for this purpose. It is, however, still felt that a simpler signal processing than the existing ones is desirable for better performance and/or lower The reflection coefficient of the loop Le Output1 Amplifier Output2 (a) cost. The novel gyroscope configuration described in this Letter combines the characteristics of the ring-laser gyroscope and the interferometric fiberoptic gyroscope. The entire optical circuit operates as a laser without gain competition between the counterpropagating waves in the sensing loop. The rotation-induced Sagnac phase shift is translated into spacing of the mode-locked pulses instead of the beat frequency. A schematic of the simplified mode-locked fiber laser gyroscope (MLFLG) is shown in Fig. 1(a). It consists of a laser cavity formed by a planar mirror at one end and a Sagnac interferometer at the other end, with an optical amplifier in between. When the optical gain provided by the amplifier is greater than the round-trip loss, the system operates as a cw laser since the Sagnac interferometer acts as a 0146-9592/93/040320-03$5.00/0 Pulses R f tf Ar f Vill 1f ill-I W-W t i I AO/ . I' I -4 : OR (b) Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the MLFLG. Le, fiber length outside the sensing loop; L4, fiber length of the sensing loop; PM, phase modulator. (b) Response of the gyro output to the phase-difference modulation. © 1993 Optical Society of America February 15, 1993 / Vol. 18, No. 4 / OPTICS LETTERS Length-matchingfiber (provided by Polaroid) was used as the optical amplifier. I Oscilloscope I I Generator Fig. 2. Experimental setup of the MLFLG. PC's, polarization controllers; DC, directional coupler; PM, phase modulator; Pol, polarizer. The black dots indicate splice points. reflector is pure amplitude modulation without any phase modulation, which simplifies the mode-locking process. In order to operate the gyroscope at f m = Af, the optical length of the fiber cavity outside of the sensing loop should be half that of the sensing loop (Le = L4/2). Figure 1(b) shows the reflectivity of the Sagnac interferometer (R) with respect to the phase difference (AO k),demonstrating the timing of the optical pulses in the presence of a sinusoidal phase-difference modulation. Optical pulses will be produced at the time when the net phase difference between the counterpropagating waves in the sensing loop is zero and the reflectivity from the Sagnac interferometer is unity. Therefore, for every cycle of the phasedifference modulation, two optical pulses are produced if the rotation-induced nonreciprocal phase shift (AOR) is less than the amplitude of the phasedifference modulation (0im). Without any rotation input, the optical pulses are equally spaced. With rotation input, however, the two sets of optical pulses will be shifted in time by the same amount but in opposite directions. The amount of timing shift represents the rotation rate with the relationship At = T sin-'( AR) 321 A dichroic mirror (99% reflection at 1.06 /.tm and >80% transmission at 0.8 ,um)was glued to one polished end of the Nd-doped fiber. The other end of the Nd-doped fiber was spliced to one port of the directional coupler that forms the gyroscope sensing coil. A high-power laser-diode array (500 mW at 808.4 nm) was used as the pumping source. The fiber sensing coil consisted of a 600-m-long singlemode fiber with the cutoff wavelength of 790 nm wound around a spool with a radius of 8 cm. An extra length of fiber of 182 m was spliced between the Nd-doped fiber and the directional coupler to increase the amplitude modulation. Although it was not long enough to satisfy the condition described above (L4 = '/2L4), it was sufficient for demonstrating the operating principle of the gyroscope. With 150 mW of absorbed pump power, 3.6 mW of cw laser output power at 1.06 1tum was obtained. A phase modulator was placed at one end of the fiber coil, and polarization controllers were installed inside and outside of the sensing coil. The coupling ratio of the fused directional coupler was 85% at 1.06 p-m. A polarizer may be necessary outside the loop for a stable reciprocal operation of the MLFLG but was not used for our experiment. The polarization controller inside the sensing coil was used to provide reciprocity for the interfering optical waves. A sinusoidal modulation signal was applied to the phase modulator at fm = 195.4 kHz, which corresponded to the longitudinal mode spacing of the laser. The phase modulation (a) (1) where T = 1/fm . If the sense of the rotation is reversed, so is the direction of the timing shift that can be measured with reference to the electrical signal applied to the phase modulator. By measuring the time separation of the optical pulses, the rotation rate can easily be obtained. More than two optical pulses per phase modulation cycle can be produced depending on the amplitude of the phasedifference modulation and the rotation-induced phase shift. Note that enough phase modulation amplitude should be provided to cover the desired dynamic range of the gyroscope. Another possibility is to use a triangular phase-difference modulation waveform that produces a linear scale factor instead of Eq. (1). If the splitting ratio of the directional coupler is exactly 50%, no light output is expected from output 2. A light signal from output 1 with less than a 100% reflecting mirror could be used as the output of the gyroscope. The experimental setup of the MLFLG is shown in Fig. 2. A 29-m-long double-clad Nd-doped fiber (b) 2 ps/div Fig. 3. Signal output from the MLFLG: applied electric signal to the phase modulator (upper traces) and the mode-locked optical pulses from the MLFLG (lower traces) with (a) no rotation input, and (b) a rotation rate of 15 deg/s (2 As/division). OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 18, No. 4 / February 322 Sagnac Phase Shift A9,(rad) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 15, 1993 2.5 U, -2 a) Rotation Rate (deg/s) pure phase modulation is used for the mode locking by placing the phase modulator outside of the sensing coil, no timing shift for the pulses was observed. The polarization controller outside of the sensing coil did not influence a portion of the pulses. Although a fiber amplifier was used for our experiment, there are also possibilities with the use of semiconductor amplifiers. In conclusion, we have proposed and demonstrated a novel mode-locked fiber laser gyroscope whose output is the timing shift of mode-locked pulses. This research was supported by the Agency for Defense Development under contract number 90-1-1. References Fig. 4. Response of the timing shift of the pulses as a function of the rotation rate. 1. F. Aronowitz, in Laser Applications, M. Ross, ed. amplitude was 3.12 rad. Figure 3(a) gives the gyroscope signal without rotation input showing the equally spaced pulses with 50-ns pulse width. Figure 3(b) shows the output pulse train when the gyroscope was rotating at the rate of 15 deg/s. It can be clearly seen that the timing of the two sets of pulse trains is shifted in opposite directions as predicted. Figure 4 shows the shift of the timing of the pulse At as a function of rotation rate for three different values of phase modulation amplitudes (0kin= 2.8, 4.5, and 5.4 rad). The dotted curves correspond to theoretical curves obtained with Eq. (1) and agree well with experimental results. When a 3. B. Y. Kim and H. J. Shaw, Opt. Lett. 9, 375 (1984). 4. H. C. Lefevre, in Optical Fiber Sensors II, B. Culshaw and J. Dakin, eds. (Artech, Dedham, Mass., 1989), (Academic, New York, 1971), Vol. I, p. 133. 2. J. L. Davis and S. Ezekiel, Opt. Lett. 6, 505 (1981). Chap. 11. 5. K. Bohm, P. Martin, E. Weidel, and K. Petermann, Electron. Lett. 19, 997 (1983). 6. A. D. Kersey and R. P. Moeller, Electron. Lett. 26, 1251 (1990). 7. B. Y. Kim and H. J. Shaw, Opt. Lett. 9, 378 (1984). 8. K. Toyama, K. A. Fesler, B. Y. Kim, and H. J. Shaw, Opt. Lett. 16, 1207 (1991). 9. D. B. Mortimore, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 6, 1217 (1988).
© Copyright 2024