Microscopic Colitis: diagnosis, epidemiology and management Paul L Beck MD PHD University of Calgary, Division of Gastroenterology, Foothills Hospital Nilesh Chande MD University of Western Ontario, Division of Gastroenterology, London Health Sciences Centre Disclosures • Dr. Beck has no disclosures • Dr. Chande: – Speaker’s honoraria – Abbott, Schering – Advisory board – Ferring, Abbott, Axcan – Travel support - Schering CDDW/CASL Meeting Session: (Faculty Template Slide)________ CanMEDS Roles Covered in this Session: 9 Medical Expert (as Medical Experts, physicians integrate all of the CanMEDS Roles, applying medical knowledge, clinical skills, and professional attitudes in their provision of patient-centered care. Medical Expert is the central physician Role in the CanMEDS framework.) 9 Communicator (as Communicators, physicians effectively facilitate the doctor-patient relationship and the dynamic exchanges that occur before, during, and after the medical encounter.) Collaborator (as Collaborators, physicians effectively work within a healthcare team to achieve optimal patient care.) Manager (as Managers, physicians are integral participants in healthcare organizations, organizing sustainable practices, making decisions about allocating resources, and contributing to the effectiveness of the healthcare system.) 9 Health Advocate (as Health Advocates, physicians responsibly use their expertise and influence to advance the health and well-being of individual patients, communities, and populations.) 9 Scholar (as Scholars, physicians demonstrate a lifelong commitment to reflective learning, as well as the creation, dissemination, application and translation of medical knowledge.) Professional (as Professionals, physicians are committed to the health and well-being of individuals and society through ethical practice, profession-led regulation, and high personal standards of behaviour.) Objectives Understand microscopic colitis with respect to: 1. Histological features 2. Epidemiology and risk factors 3. Pathogenesis 4. Management 72 yo woman with non-bloody diarrhea x 8 months • HPI; – 6 liquid BMs per day, – Normal colonoscopy 3 months ago (no Bx done) – No; fevers, weight loss or extraintestinal features of IBD • PMHx; – Reflux; Rx; lansoprazole X 1 year. – Hypothyroidism on Synthroid, normal TSH. – Osteoarthritis-Rx; diclofenac and ibuprofen – smokes 1 ppd x 53 y. 72 yo woman with non-bloody diarrhea x 8 months • Investigations to date; – Normal; • CBC, lytes, alb, ESR, CRP • TTG, IgA • Stool C+S, O+P, C diff toxin assay • Colonoscopy; normal Question • How many of you use terms – Microscopic Colitis – Collagenous Colitis – Lymphocytic Colitis • Is differentiating these diagnoses of clinical significance? The History of Microscopic Colitis • 1976 – Freeman and Lindstrom independently reported the features of collagenous colitis (CC) • 1980 – Read applied the term “microscopic colitis” to a group of patients with chronic diarrhea and endoscopically normal appearing mucosa • 1989 - Lazenby et al first described lymphocytic colitis (LC) Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 1976;9(45), Pathol Eur 1976;11:87-9, Gastroenterology 1980;78:264-71, Hum Pathol 1989;20:18-28. Collagenous Colitis Histological Criteria 1) thickening of a subepithelial collagen layer of more than 10 μm* 2) inflammation** in the lamina propria consisting of mainly lymphocytes and plasma cells; and 3) epithelial damage, such as flattening and detachment. *Some studies suggest a cut-off limit of 15 μm to 30 μm **increased IELs may be present but is not necessary for the diagnosis Lymphocytic Colitis Histological Criteria 1) intraepithelial lymphocytosis (≥ 20 IEL per 100 surface epithelial cells) 2) inflammation in the lamina propria consisting of mainly lymphocytes and plasma cells 3) epithelial damage, such as flattening and detachment 4) subepithelial collagen layer not present or if present it must be less than 10 μm. Incidence of Microscopic Colitis • Olesen et al Orebro, Sweden. Gut 2004;53:346–350 • incidence of MC has increased from 1993-5 to 1996-8; collagenous colitis 3.7/105 Ö 6.5/105 lymphocytic colitis 2.4/105 Ö 5.1/105 • 10% of all patients with non-bloody diarrhea had MC • 20% of those >70 years had MC! • Incidences of CC and LC=Crohn’s disease in Sweden • Incidence of MC is close to ulcerative colitis. Incidence of Microscopic Colitis Point Prevalence MC; 10 - 103 per 100,000 CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2008;6:35–40 Canadian Data Calgary Health Region CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2008;6:35–40 Genetic Pathophysiology of MC •Differential HLA expression (HLA DQ2) •Family clusters •Associated with diseases with strong genetic component Altered immune response •K T cells, mast cells, plasma cells, fibroblasts, eosinophils •Th1 profile; •K K INFγ, IL-15, TNFα •KPGE2, TGFβ Infectious •Reports of enteric infection preceding MC •Fecal stream diversion can decrease MC •Some response to antibiotic therapy Factors implicated in the pathogenesis of diarrhea in MC •Inflammatory mediators •Bile salt injury •Decreased net Na+, Cl– absorption •Collagen band may act as a diffusion barrier •L tight junctional protein expression (E-cadherin and ZO-1) The Terminal Ileum Can Be Affected in MC. • Terminal ileal IEL counts (per 100); – – – – – 11.8 ± 1.8 in LC 10.3 ± 1.9 in CC 2.8 ± 0.4 in Crohn’s colitis 3.1 ± 0.4 in Ulcerative colitis 2.2 ± 0.2 in normal controls • The presence of >5 IELs/100 EC in terminal ileum biopsies was highly specific for LC and CC (specificity 98%, sensitivity 73% (LC) and 56% (CC). Am J Surg Pathol 26(11): 1484–1492, 2002. Is there is an overlap between MC, Celiac Disease and IBD? • The histology of LC and IBD can be similar Anat Pathol 2005;12(4):203 • K IELs in the ileum of both MC and celiac disease Dig Liver Dis 2006;38(11):815-9, Am J Surg Pathol 26(11): 1484–1492, 2002. • HLA types permissive for celiac are common in MC (HLADQ2) Am J Gastro.2000;95(8):1974-82, CLIN GASTRO. HEP. 2008;6:35–40. • Progression from MC to UC or CD has been described J Clin Gastro. 2001;32(5):435-8 63-66, Can. J Gastro.2007;21(5):315-8, Inflam. bowel diseases 2007;13(10):1321. • 10 fold increase in IBD in celiac patients Scand J Gastroenterol 2007;42(10):1214-20. • Celiac patients; K 1st degree relatives with IBD Inflam. bowel diseases 2003;9(5):321-3 • 12% of LC patients had a family history of UC, CD or celiac disease. Gut 2004;53:536–541 • Celiac disease shares two linkage regions with IBD: 5q31 (CELIAC2 and IBD5) and 19p13 (CELIAC4 and IBD6) Curley et al Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14(11):1215-22 . Why did she get MC? Microscopic Colitis Risk Factors and Disease Associations • Increasing age • Female gender • Autoimmune Disease – Thyroid Disease – Celiac Disease – Diabetes – Sjogren’s Syndrome • Past or Current history of Malignancy • Solid Organ Transplantation • Smoking • Medications Autoimmune Diseases are More Common in MC Gut 2004;53:536–541 Likelihood that a drug causes Microscopic Colitis High Likelihood Intermediate Likelihood • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Aspirin Acarbose Lansoprazole Cyclo3 Fort*, Cirkan* NSAIDs Ranitidine Sertraline Ticlopidine *extract from Ruscus aculeatus, hesperidine methylchalcone and ascorbic acid) Carbamazepine Flutamide Lisinopril Modopar (levodopa and benserazide). Oxetorone Paroxetine Simvastatin Tardyferon (iron and ascorbic acid) Vinburnine Beaugerie & Pardi Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 277–284. 5 Past or present malignancy in a group of 164 MC patients 4 3 2 1 Th yr oi d ul ar Te st ic vi ca l er C ag ea l ria l Es op h et m En do Lu ng B re as t Pr os ta te 0 C ol on /R ec ta l Number of Patients With Microscopic Colitis and Cancer Patients with MC may have an increased risk of malignancy Cancer Type/Location CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2008;6:35–40 The Risk of Microscopic Colitis in Solid-Organ Transplantation Patients is 50x Greater than the General Population • In the Calgary Health Region 0.9% of MC were kidney, kidney/pancreas, and liver transplantation recipients. • Point prevalence; 8.8/1000 transplantation recipients. • Annual incidence rate; 5.0 cases/1000 person-years. • SIR of developing MC after transplantation; 50.5 • Average age of diagnosis of MC: 49 years. • Average time of onset from txpl; 67 months. • Average time from onset of diarrhea to diagnosis of MC; 30 months. • All patients responded to MC-specific therapy. Transplantation 2008;85: 48–54 72 yo woman with non-bloody diarrhea x 8 months • How to investigate? – Do you screen all for celiac, thyroid problems? – Since TTG is not very sensitive in March 1-2 celiac disease… do you do an upper scope? – Sig vs full colonoscopy? Sigmoidoscopy can miss up to 35% of MC. • MC was restricted to the right colon in 3/13 (23%). Thijs et al; • 27% false-negative rate in a group of patients with collagenous colitis if only biopsies were taken within the distal 60 cm (sigmoidoscope). Tanaka et al; • Only 66% of rectosigmoid specimens were diagnostic. Offner et al; • 97% of cases of chronic diarrhea could be diagnosed with sigmoidoscopy (122 of 809 had diagnostic bx, 80/122 were MC). Fine et al Neth. J Medicine;2005:63;137-40, Gut 1992;33:65-70, Hum Pathol 19998:30;451-7, Gastrointest Endosc 2000:51;318-26. The only agents that have been well studied Meta-analyses by Chande et al 2008, 2011 Cochrane Database Syst Rev.; •Budesonide is effective for the treatment of CC and LC (clinical and histological improvement). •The evidence for benefit with bismuth subsalicylate, mesalamine, cholestyramine is weaker. •No data to support probiotics •Budesonide also maintains remission and improves quality of life. Can J Gastroenterol Vol 17 No 7 July 2003 Stop any high or intermediate risk drugs associated with MC Often not effective alone if severe diarrhea and/or abdominal pain Budesonide has the highest success rate and better tolerated. (9 mg/d x 8 weeks vs 9, 6, 3 mg/d taper) Of 47 patients we have treated all but one responded to budesonide, the other patient responded to loperimide and cholestyramine Rule out other disease states! Those that relapse with taper of budesonide consider Aza/6MP. Only a few case reports of this. Would only consider after exhausting all other avenues of therapy and a few second opinions! Disease Course of MC • Lymphocytic colitis: a retrospective clinical study of 199 Swedish patients Olesen et al Gut 2004;53:536–541 – chronic intermittent in 30% – chronic continuous in 7% – a single attack in 63% (duration was 6 (4–11) months • More than 80% of treated patients improved on corticosteroids (prednisone or budesonide) Long term management • Incidence of continued problems? – Most respond (>80% in most studies). • Following budesonide (9mg/d x 6-8 wk) the relapse rate can be as high as 60%. – median time to relapse 2 wk • Relapse is more common in patients <60 y. • Follow-up? – Follow symptomatically • Maintenance therapy? – Budesonide 6 mg/day effective • Cancer risk? – Nil noted to date Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005:22; 1115-9
© Copyright 2024