UHSM Policy on latex allergy Version: Ratifying Committee: Date ratified: Name of originator/author/job title: Name of responsible committee/individual: 2.0 Infection Control Committee September 2012 Deborah Hughes, Allergy Specialist Nurse Susana Marinho, Consultant Allergist Judith Allen (Occupational Health Advisor) Jay Gardner-Turner ( Head of Nursing –Infection Prevention & Control ) Date published on intranet: Review date: Target audience: September 2015 Trust wide, Including all PFI partners EQUALITY IMPACT University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (‘UHSM’) strives to ensure equality of opportunity for all service users, local people and the workforce. As an employer and a provider of health care UHSM aims to ensure that none are placed at a disadvantage as a result of its policies and procedures. This document has therefore been equality impact assessed by the (Safety Committee) to ensure fairness and consistency for all those covered by it regardless of their individuality. The results are shown in the Equality Impact Tool at Appendix E. Don’t rely on paper copies, review the latest version on intranet. Date of this review Sept 2012 Date of this review Sept 2015 University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust VERSION CONTROL SCHEDULE Version number Issue Date 2 1 Revisions from previous issue Full Review Date of Ratification by Committee September 2012 May 2008 DOCUMENT CONTROL Summary of consultation process Control arrangements Safety Committee, Occupational Health ,Infection Control UHSM policy site Minimum requirement to be monitored Process for monitoring Annual audit carried out by Latex Allergy specialist Allergy Service to monitor Policy. 3 yearly review of the policy Allergy Service /Safety committee for review of results Deborah Hughes will be responsible individual for development of action plan Deborah Hughes / Dr Susana Marinho will be responsible for monitoring of action plan Associated documentation and references Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 Disability Discrimination Act 1995 Latex Sensitisation in the Health Care Setting, MDA DB 9601 1996 Policy for the prevention and Management of Natural Rubber Latex Allergy, Health & Safety Executive, 2003 NHS Plus, Royal College of Physicians, Faculty of Occupational Medicine. Latex allergy: occupational aspects of management. A national guideline. London, 2008 CONTENTS 1 Policy .................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Aims .................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Purpose............................................................................................................................... 3 4 Responsibilities and duties .............................................................................................. 4-5 5 Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 6 6 Natural rubber latex (NRL) and associated products ......................................................... 6 7 Latex allergy .................................................................................................................. 7-10 8 Patient Screening ............................................................................................................. 10 9 The provision of a latex-safe environment ................................................................ 10-15 10 Latex allergic members of staff ................................................................................... 15-16 11 References ................................................................................................................... 16-17 15 Appendix A -Screening questionnaire ......................................................................... 18-19 16 Appendix B - List of common medical and household products that contain latex ........ 20 17 Appendix C – UHSM Allergy Centre Referral Forms for Allergic Reactions during General Anaesthesia ......................................................................................................................... 21-31 18 Appendix D- Dissemination ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 32 19 Appendix E-Equality Impact............................................................................................. 33 UHSM Policy on latex allergy The Management of Latex Allergy Minimising the Risk of Latex Exposure and Allergy for Patients and Staff 1 Policy University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust recognises its duty under the Health and Safety at Work Act, the Controls of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations to provide a safe environment for both its employees and patients, and to protect them from hazards that may arise in the course of health care activities against latex sensitisation and allergic reactions due to latex allergy. 2 Aims The Trust recognises that Natural rubber latex (NRL) is a hazard to patients and staff in hospital and that it is a potent sensitiser that may give rise to serious allergic reactions in those that have Type I latex allergy. The aim of this policy is to provide guidance and raise awareness of the latest issues which affect patients and staff. The Trust recognises the general duties imposed by the Health and Safety at Work Act, and the COSHH regulations apply. The Trust has an obligation to minimise latex exposure so far as reasonable practicable. The Trust encourages the adoption of a proactive approach to prevent and minimise latex allergy amongst patients and staff. 3 Purpose 3.1 To develop procedures for diagnosis, prevention and management of Type I latex allergy (immediate type, IgE-mediated reactions) within the Trust. 3.2 To provide guidelines for all Trust employees on minimising and managing Type I latex allergy and disseminate information. 3.3 To provide guidelines for the safe management of patients in the outpatient clinics, wards, departments and in peri-operative and procedure period. 3.4 To initiate screening of high risk patients for signs and symptoms of Type I latex allergy at the earliest opportunity. Thereafter, treat them in a safe, latex-free environment. 3.5 To ensure prompt recognition and diagnosis of employees with Type I latex allergy. An appropriate referral will be sent to the relevant Department (Allergy/Dermatology or Occupational Health) to distinguish immediate-type responses (Type I) and delayed type hypersensitivity or irritant responses (Type IV) as per Appendix A. 3.6 To provide a safe workplace for staff sensitised to latex, in collaboration with the Occupational Health Department. 3.7 To ensure that the latex content of equipment and disposables is reviewed in each directorate and alternative products used where possible without causing another risk. 3.8 When purchasing new products, the latex content will be reviewed and latex-free products purchased where possible without causing another risk. 3.9 To ensure all staff have access to the reporting, legislation and guidance on latex issues and polices within the Trust. 3.10 To use the universal assessment format to allow tasks or conditions presenting a significant hazard to be entered on the Risk Register for Review. 3.11 The provision of a primary preventative programme as further aetiology is known. 4 Responsibilities and duties 4.1 Chief Executive and Trust Board bear ultimate responsibility and will give their authority to the introduction of this procedure into the working arrangements of the Trust and monitor via the Risk Register. 4.2 Executive and Directorate Directors will ensure that the Trust’s safety policy, strategy and this procedure are implemented throughout the areas they control so that latex sensitisation and allergic reactions are minimised. 4.3 Medical Director shall ensure that appropriate practices are in place for maintaining a latex-free environment and ensuring that this complies with safety regulations. 4.4 Clinical Directors and Head of Services will oversee the application of this procedure into their services and shall ensure its implementation is undertaken within their management structure and necessary controls are put into place to achieve the Trust’s policy and aim. 4.5 General Managers will ensure their local managers provide for incident investigations and regular safety inspections to identify tasks and situations where patients may be exposed to latex. They will review risks forwarded from wards and departments for the risk register and verify that significant risks are controlled so far as reasonably practicable. They shall also liaise with Estates and Facilities to ensure, whenever services are established or significantly amended, that consideration is given to the work process for each task to ensure that factors contributing to latex contact are controlled within reasonable. 4.6 Heads of Nursing and Modern Matrons will liaise closely with their General Managers, Wards and Department Managers and Risk Advisors to ensure the identification, assessment, and control of latex allergy risks. They will also review controls following incidents and ensure day to day adherence to safe working practices. 4.7 Medical staff will ensure that all patients clearly identified as latex-allergic or suspected latex-allergic have an appropriately filled patient red alert record in the front of their notes. This information must be communicated to all parties caring for the latex-allergic patient. Using the screening questionnaire, ensure an appropriate referral is sent to the Allergy Department. 4.8 Ward and Departmental Managers will ensure that this policy is implemented within their area of control. They are responsible for staff to ensure that latex-free environments are maintained when a latex-sensitive/allergic patient attends their area. They will ensure that Patient Alert Records are completed within the notes, once an entry has been on the Patient Alert Record. The ALERT box on the front cover of the case note folder must be ticked to indicate that an alert exists. The manager will ensure that staffs communicates with colleagues in their own department and others when a latex-sensitive/allergic patient is to be treated .They are responsible for ensuring that latex-free products and drugs are available within the clinical area. Ward and Departmental mangers are responsible for referral of staff to Occupational Health when they suspected that an employee may have latex allergy or when the employee reports their suspicion to their manager that they have a latex-related health issue. Managers should ensure that suitable alternative equipment is available for staff with latex allergies to use within their area of practice. 4.9 All staff will report to their manager situations where latex exposure arises and is likely to require control. It is all staff responsibility to ensure they are aware of this policy and content and procedures of reporting mechanisms for patients with latex allergies. They are responsible to ensure that a latex-free environment is maintained when caring for a patient with a latex allergy and, where reasonably practical, suitable alternative equipment is used that will not cause another risk. 4.10 Occupational Health Department shall assist managers in the management of staff with latex related health problems. The Occupational Health Team will fully assess the nature of the employee’s health problem, ensuring that all necessary steps are taken to obtain an accurate diagnosis and advise both the employee and the manger on the steps to be taken to manage the employee’s health problem at the work place. Under RIDDOR, latex allergy is reportable to the Health and safety Executive (HSE) .These reports will be made on the Trust’s behalf by the Occupational Health Department, who will ensure that the Trust’s risk manager is informed when such a report is made. 4.11 Supplies department will assist departments in ensuring that latex-free disposables and equipment are available. 4.12 The Medicines Information Centre in the pharmacy will advise on the possible latex content of medicines that will /may be used during the hospital stay on an individual basis as lists of latex-free medicines are difficult to maintain and update. 4.13 Infection Prevention Control Department will ensure that there is an appropriate glove policy within the infection prevention control policy manual that allows for Glove choices other then latex. 4.14 Resuscitation Officer shall be responsible in ensuring that there is latex-free resuscitation equipment available where reasonably practical. They should also ensure that resuscitation training is available to latex-allergic staff and equipment available for them to participate in training. 4.15 Allergy Service will provide advice and guidance regarding diagnosis and management of suspected latex-allergic patients and staff. 4.16 Patients will be seen in the Allergy Clinic, held in the outpatient setting. A diagnosis and a detailed management plan will be given to the patient. A letter with the relevant information will be sent to the referring practitioner, the patient, and the General Practitioner (GP). This letter must be communicated to all parties. 4.17 The Allergy service will review and update the latex policy and ensure the policy is implemented within the Trust. 4.18 Authors, Debbie Hughes (Clinical Allergy Nurse Specialist)/Dr Susana Marinho (Consultant Allergist), will disseminate and implement this policy and support the promotion of continuing educational programs on latex allergy. 5 Definitions 5.1 Natural rubber latex (NRL) is a milky fluid obtained from the Hevea brasiliensis tree, which is widely grown in South East Asia and in other countries. NRL is an integral part of thousands of everyday consumer and healthcare items. 5.2 Type I hypersensitivity (immediate type) reactions are immediate reactions mediated by specific IgE antibodies to latex, characterised by urticaria, conjunctivitis, rhinitis, asthma and occasionally anaphylaxis, which can be life-threatening. 5.3 Type IV hypersensitivity (delayed type) reactions are characterised by an eczematous rash – allergic contact dermatitis, often developing hours after exposure; they may be due to latex proteins or, much more commonly, other chemical additives used in NRL processing. 5.4 Latex sensitisation is the presence of specific IgE to latex, documented by either skin prick test or serum specific IgE. 5.5 Latex allergy is the term used to describe the elicitation of an immediate-type (type I) allergic symptoms by contact with latex in a sensitised individual. 5.6 While the majority of sensitised individuals will develop allergic reactions when exposed to latex, a proportion will not – these are considered to have asymptomatic sensitisation and are a target for secondary prevention (to prevent development of latex allergy). 5.7 ‘Latex –free’ is the term used to describe products that are not manufactured from NRL. 5.8 ‘Latex –safe’ is the term used to describe an environment that minimises the risk of a reaction occurring in sensitised or allergic individuals. This is achieved by removing the NRL products that are most likely to cause a reaction. 6 Natural rubber latex (NRL) and associated products 6.1 Natural rubber latex (NRL) is produced by the Hevea brasiliensis tree. The cloudy liquid latex is collected by ‘tapping’ the tree. It then goes through a complex manufacturing process, involving the addition several chemicals. It can be used to produce dry rubber products (e.g. tyres, shoes) or latex concentrate products (e.g. dipped latex products such as gloves, and adhesives, latex foam) that have different manufacturing processes, characteristics and allergenicity. 6.2 Allergy to natural rubber latex products emerged as an important clinical condition following an increase in the use of latex gloves for barrier protection in the early 1980’s. 6.3 Latex gloves are currently preferred to synthetic alternatives on the grounds of their impermeability to small viruses, excellent elasticity and low cost [1, 2]. 6.4 Routes of exposure 6.4.1 A list (non exhaustive) of latex-containing products is detailed in Appendix B 6.4.2 The possible routes for exposure are: Cutaneous – via gloves, tapes, masks, urine drainage bags; Mucous membranes- via products in dentistry, anaesthesia, intubation, rectal, urological and gynaecological examinations (including intra-uterine devices), eye and ear droppers Inhalation – via aerosolisation of latex glove powder; Internal tissue/organs - via latex products used in surgery; Intravascular- via latex products used in intravascular devices (e.g IV cannulae), devices used to deliver IV fluids and injectables (syringes and IV administration sets) or products stored or drawn up through rubber bungs or devices containing latex. 6.4.3 In the hospital setting, latex gloves are the most important source of latex. Cornstarch-powdered gloves represent the highest risk as the starch powder concentrates the allergenic latex protein and allows it to become airborne and dispersed into the environment. Respirable particles can also be shed from powderfree latex gloves[3] but to a much lesser extent. 7 Latex allergy 7.1 Risk factors for latex allergy and high risk populations 7.1.1 Latex exposure, particularly if significant and frequent, is one of the major risk factors for sensitisation and development of allergy. 7.1.2 Atopy. NRL allergy is more common among patients with allergic diseases. There is an association between allergy to certain fruits and vegetables and latex allergy (latexfood syndrome), particularly avocado, banana, kiwi, chestnut, tomato, potato; this is a co-phenomenon due to cross-reactivity rather than a true risk factor but patients reporting allergy to these foods need to be enquired about problems with NRL. 7.1.3 Dermatitis, especially hand dermatitis. Risk factors for natural rubber latex allergy Risk Factor Latex exposure Atopy Dermatitis Detail Occupational groups Healthcare workers, laboratory workers, food handlers, rubber industry workers, security personnel, greenhouse workers, construction workers, electronics manufacture workers, hairdressers and domestic workers[1, 4-6] Increased exposure due to repeated surgical procedures, chronic intravenous and urinary catheterisations[7, 8], repeated placement of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Spina bifida; congenital nephro-urological or neurological malformations; multiple surgical procedures Asthma, eczema, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (‘hay fever’)[1] Hand eczema (possibly through absorption of allergens through broken skin)[1] 7.2 Prevalence of latex sensitisation 7.2.1 General population: the prevalence of latex sensitisation in the general population is not very well documented but ranges between 5% and 10 %[9]. 7.2.2 Healthcare workers: healthcare workers, particularly those who are atopic, show an increased prevalence of sensitisation to NRL (0.5 to 17%), up to 3.5 times higher than in the general population[9]. 7.2.3 Patients with Spina Bifida: these patients are at increased risk of latex sensitisation due to repeated surgical procedures or early repeated contact with latex through catheters and gloves. The prevalence of NRL sensitisation in this group varies from 18% to 64%[9]. 7.3 Clinical manifestations of latex allergy 7.3.1 NRL exposure can elicit three different types of reactions (due to its proteins, rubber accelerators and other chemicals used during its manufacture): 7.3.2 Type I (immediate hypersensitivity) – also known as latex allergy Associated with the production of specific IgE antibodies to NRL. These reactions occur usually within a few minutes, or occasionally up to two hours, after exposure to NRL. Typical symptoms include urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, rhinitis/conjunctivitis and, in severe cases, anaphylaxis. Contact urticaria is the most common early manifestation of latex allergy, particularly in healthcare workers, of whom 60-80% report contact urticaria involving the hands. Symptoms appear 10-15 minutes after the gloves are donned are often mistakenly attributed to glove powder or hand washing[10]. Patients may also have more widespread urticarial rashes (hives). Angioedema (swelling of the deep skin/subcutaneous/submucosal tissue, particularly lips, tongue, and face); laryngeal oedema may lead to difficulty swallowing, speaking and breathing. Respiratory symptoms including rhinitis/conjunctivitis (runny-itchy nose, redwatery-itchy eyes and sneezing) and asthma (with shortness of breath, wheeze, cough and chest tightness) particularly after the inhalation of latex allergencoated cornstarch particles from powdered gloves. The most serious problem is anaphylaxis, e.g. generalised and potentially fatal allergic reaction, requiring speedy and skilful resuscitation. Latex-sensitive persons can experience anaphylaxis during a variety of medical care situations including bladder catheterisation, surgery, or childbirth. Latex-induced intraoperative anaphylaxis is particularly common in spina bifida patients. 7.3.3 Type IV (delayed hypersensitivity) – also known as latex allergic contact dermatitis Occurs within 24- 48 hours of exposure to natural rubber products, such as gloves, shoes, sports equipment and medical devices due to cell-mediated hypersensitivity to the additives (accelerators, antioxidants and other chemicals) used in the manufacture of natural rubber products, and rarely due to latex proteins. It classically presents as contact dermatitis with dry skin, redness, itching, scaling, cracking, chapping, excoriation and blister formation on areas where the natural rubber product is in contact with the skin/mucosa. These patients need advice as to appropriate synthetic rubber or plastic alternatives. 7.3.4 Irritant contact dermatitis The most common reaction to NRL products is the development of dry, irritated, scaling areas on the skin, especially on the hands of glove wearers. This is not a true allergic reaction but is easily confused as one, particularly as the skin lesions are similar to those of allergic contact dermatitis (it s is distinguished by patch testing). Irritant reactions are caused by the effects of repeated hand washing, use of detergents or sanitisers, or the alkaline pH of cornstarch-powdered gloves; this affects the skin barrier causing loss of its integrity and lipids (when natural oils are stripped from the skin it can become dry and more susceptible to external agents). The Occupational Health Department offer private and confidential advice and support to members of staff with dermal irritation; a skin questionnaire is available on request. 7.4 Diagnosis of latex allergy (type I) 7.4.1 This is carried out by the UHSM Allergy Centre. 7.4.2 History Diagnosis of Type I latex allergy should only be made in the presence of a clear and characteristic history (with attention to type and timing of reactions) together with evidence of specific IgE to latex (from either skin prick testing, bloods or latex glove challenge). 7.4.3 Skin testing Skin prick testing (SPT) with natural rubber latex is done with commercial extracts and sometimes by pricking through latex gloves (if there are doubts with former results). NRL SPT solutions has a sensitivity close to 100 % and a specificity of 92 % (which means that not all individuals with positive SPT will be allergic to latex – asymptomatic sensitisation)[11]. 7.4.4 Measurement of latex-specific IgE antibodies Latex-specific IgE antibodies may also be demonstrated by immunoassay with serum from patients. The performance of these assays vary and their sensitivity is not 100%, so a negative latex-specific IgE test does not rule out latex allergy. 7.4.5 Component Resolved Diagnosis (CRD) in latex allergy Latex allergy can be a severe problem and there are various sources of NRL exposure, so there has been pressure to develop reliable diagnostic methods and to define the clinically important allergenic components of latex precisely[2]. To date, 13 latex proteins (designated Hev b 1 to Hev b 13) have been identified as latex allergens. These can be detected by immunoassays and are useful in clarifying latex allergy 7.4.5.1 Several latex allergens show sequence homology with fruit and vegetables with clinical cross-reactivity, which explains the latex–food syndrome[2]. In patients with latex allergy there is a ~35% risk of reaction to at least one of banana, avocado, and kiwi; conversely, there is an ~11% chance of latex allergy in patients allergic to the above fruits[12]. 7.4.6 Latex glove challenge – use test Latex allergy may be confirmed by the use test, in which a latex glove (or fingers only) is applied to a wet hand. The usefulness of this test is limited by the widely varying allergen content of gloves from different manufacturers. 7.5 Primary prevention of latex sensitisation and allergy 7.5.1 Primary prevention should be directed to the risk groups detailed in section 7.1, particularly those with spina bifida or congenital nefro-urological or neurological malformations and hand dermatitis. 7.5.2 Efforts should be made to avoid latex exposure from birth in all children with spina bifida or other medical conditions requiring early and repeated surgical interventions or instrumentation. 7.5.3 Patients and staff with hand dermatitis should avoid exposure to latex products, particularly gloves. 8 Patient Screening 8.1 Latex-allergic and high risk patients (as per section 7.1 and including those with unexplained allergic/anaphylactic reactions or peri-operative events) must be identified upon admission or attendance to hospital for any procedure/treatment. 8.2 The screening questions listed in Appendix A and detailed in the back of the RED ALERT CARD must be asked to all patients attending for elective surgery, endoscopy or maternity or any other interventional procedure. In addition, it would be desirable for these questions to be asked for all patients admitted to hospital and outpatient clinics where latex gloves are commonly used, e.g. gynaecology. 8.3 Patient assessment must be undertaken in the outpatient or pre-assessment unit prior to any elective surgery or interventional procedures using the screening tool in Appendix A (RED ALERT CARD) to identify allergic/at risk individuals. 8.4 For patients with known latex allergy, ideally, the GP will have informed the hospital doctor in the referral letter. This should be clearly marked in the RED ALERT CARD. These patients should also carry a MedicAlert bracelet or necklace with this information. 8.5 Use of the screening questions on the back of the RED ALERT CARD on patients and/or carers on admission should identify the allergic/high risk patients. 9 The provision of a latex-safe environment 9.1 Preparation of a latex-free environment 9.1.1 All equipment and disposable items used for the cleaning procedure, including gloves worn by the domestic staff, must be latex-free. 9.1.2 Remove all unnecessary equipment and materials from the room. 9.1.3 A terminal clean must be undertaken following discharge of the previous patient, before the latex-allergic patient uses the room. Where barrier cleaning is required, high-level cleaning must be undertaken prior to routine cleaning tasks. 9.1.4 The ward manager must: 9.1.4.1 Inform the estates departments to arrange the high-level clean; 9.1.4.2 Inform the domestic supervisors of estimated completion time; 9.1.4.3 Ensure nursing staff carries out their cleaning tasks before domestic assistants’ duties. 9.1.5 Nursing staff must use latex-free gloves and an apron to: 9.1.5.1 Strip and clean the bed and mattress; 9.1.5.2 Clean all medical equipment that is to be located in the room, e.g. drip-stands; 9.1.5.3 Clean any other equipment, which is likely to come into contact with the patient (refer to the Infection Control Policy). 9.1.6 The role of the domestic staff is to: 9.1.6.1 Empty waste bins; 9.1.6.2 High dust blinds, walls and fittings; 9.1.6.3 Damp-dust all furniture and fittings with a solution of neutral detergent and water using the correct colour-coded cleaning equipment (when Terminal -cleaning Chlorclean 1000ppm solution should be used instead of neutral detergent and water solution; for suspected or confirmed Chlorhexidine-allergic patients, cleaning can be done with .Chlor-Clean as it contains Chlorine and detergent(no Chlorhexidine involved). 9.1.6.4 Suction clean the floor; 9.1.6.5 Scrub the floor, using standard speed scrubber-polisher machine with a solution of warm water and neutral detergent; 9.1.6.6 Burnish the floor using a standard speed scrubber-polisher machine; 9.1.6.7 Static mop the floor; Mop heads that are used for every specialised Terminal clean must be laundered following completion of the task; All reusable equipment that has been used to clean the room should be cleaned in accordance with the Infection Prevention Policy. 9.1.7 Disposable cleaning items are disposed of in a clear Domestic waste bag. 9.2 This involves a team approach to: 9.2.1 provide a latex-safe environment for latex-allergic patients and staff (containing only non-latex materials, e.g. gloves, catheters, IV equipment, surgical tape, tourniquets, ventilation and airway equipment and medication containers without latex stoppers). 9.2.2 It should be recognised that hospitals can be made latex-safe (through the guidance detailed below) but not totally latex-free; there is still a risk of reaction that can be minimised by increased awareness and vigilance among health care workers and use of latex-safe substitutes; 9.2.3 develop a database of all latex products and latex substitutes, which needs to be regularly updated; 9.2.4 select and introduce use of latex-free alternative products where possible; these should be readily available to health care workers. Resus trolleys with latex-free medical products should be available on the wards and A+E; 9.2.5 centralise the purchasing system for NRL-containing devices and supplies and identify high-use areas; 9.2.6 As latex gloves are the most common medical product implicated in latex allergy in hospital, a facility-wide review of glove usage should be undertaken to determine the appropriateness of use (degree of risk, level of protection, compliance with universal precautions) and thereby prevent the unnecessary use of latex gloves. Purchase and use of powdered latex gloves should be stopped and non-powdered low-protein latex gloves should be used instead, preferably limited to health care workers involved with direct contact with potentially infectious fluids; non-latex gloves can be used in all other instances (this needs to be assessed as latex is still superior to its synthetic alternatives in respect to barrier characteristics against transmissible diseases); 9.2.7 Catering staff should use non-latex gloves when preparing food for latex-allergic patients; 9.2.8 promote continuing educational programs on latex allergy with support provided by the UHSM Allergy Centre; 9.2.9 All Trust members to adhere to the Latex policy. 9.3 Ward management of the latex-allergic patient 9.3.1 Patient notes should be marked with an ALERT and details of the Latex Allergy CLEARLY described inside on the RED ALERT CARD filed the front of the notes. 9.3.2 It is expected that most latex allergic patients will have been diagnosed prior to admission to a ward or department and their management carefully planned. 9.3.3 Latex-allergic patients require their investigation and treatment to be planned and managed by senior staff. 9.3.4 It is the duty of the admitting team to inform the appropriate ward manager, theatre team manager and anaesthetic or department of anaesthesia as early as possible about the potential admission of a latex-allergic patient, to enable planning of theatre or other procedures, if required. 9.3.5 Although these patients are not generally suitable for day case admission, it is important that they remain in hospital for as short a time as possible, to minimise the risk of latex exposure. 9.3.6 For advice on latex content of drugs contact Medicines Information on extension 3331. As active ingredients change over time, this must be checked on each admission. 9.3.7 A latex-safe sideward must be prepared for the patient (preferably with bathroom and entrance lobby without a carpet). This is achieved by following the procedure for preparation of latex-safe environment. Standard cleaning products may be used, but no rubber or latex gloves should be worn. The room should then be clearly labelled “Latex-safe area” 9.3.8 Personnel entering the room should be kept to a minimum. They should wash their hands, wear a plastic apron and, when it is necessary to examine or treat the patient, use latex-free gloves. 9.3.9 A Latex-free trolley (trolley that contains latex free items) should be available for urgent or emergency use; this should be checked regularly by a latex link nurse/theatre practitioner. 9.3.10 A designated Registered Nurse must be responsible for the patient’s care on each shift. The Registered Nurse must liaise with any other departments, e.g. X-ray, MRI and Theatre, to allow these areas to prepare latex-free conditions for the patient’s investigations or treatment. 9.3.11 All forward planning and documentation should inform future carers of the patient's sensitisation by effective recording in notes although patient confidentiality must be taken into account. 9.4 Emergency and newly diagnosed latex-allergic patients 9.4.1 When a patient is admitted with a high suspicion of latex allergy during normal working hours, the Consultant is responsible for the management of the patient and co-coordination of care between departments. 9.4.2 Out-of-hours, if, in the opinion of the admitting Consultant, a patient requires EMERGENCY SURGERY, the On Call Consultant Anaesthetist for that section should be contacted and the latex policy implemented – Latex Theatre protocol (see section 9.5). If the emergency surgery, treatment, or investigation is not required, the patient should be admitted to a latex-safe side ward, prepared according to section Error! Reference source not found. and admitted as per protocol. 9.5 Operating Theatre management of latex-allergic patients 9.5.1 Latex-allergic patients are not generally suitable for Day Case Surgery or Endoscopy or other procedures, but where a reasonable case of need for such a procedure can be demonstrated, it may be possible, after consultation with the Lead Clinician for the Day Case Unit, to organise a day case procedure. 9.5.2 The surgical team responsible for the patient must inform theatre staff, the anaesthetist and ward staff of a patient with known or suspected latex-allergy or sensitivity before admission to hospital, whenever possible, and always with sufficient time in advance of surgery to make effective preparation. All members of the healthcare team involved in care delivery, must be made aware of this so that the necessary precautions may be taken. 9.5.3 Any suspected latex-allergic patient should be treated as “NRL allergy; at risk of anaphylaxis” within a completely latex-safe environment. 9.5.4 Risk-assessments should be undertaken for specific department/theatres dependent upon the number of air changes within the room. As each department/theatre may have a unique environment, ideally, a local protocol should describe the management of latex allergy within the specific department/theatre. Recommended exposure limits for latex exposure[13] Relative Risk Low Moderate High Airborne Exposure < 10ng/m3 10-50ng/m3 >50 ng/m3 Dust contaminated < 10ug/g 10-100 ug/g >100ug/g 9.5.5 Pre-operative theatre planning 9.5.5.1 The patient should be first on the operating list (if elective) and the theatre prepared (as per guidance below) at least an hour in advance or the night before, if practical (to minimise exposure to airborne latex proteins). Depending on the number of air changes within the room, sufficient time should be allowed to reduce any aerosolised latex proteins. 9.5.5.2 When this is not possible, all latex-containing products must be removed and all equipment and the theatre should be cleaned by staff with latex-free gloves, the doors must be closed and the ventilation allowed to work undisturbed for one hour 9.5.5.3 9.5.5.4 9.5.5.5 9.5.5.6 to remove airborne latex particles. The complete processes will likely take approximately 2 hours. Induction of anaesthesia and recovery should both take place in the operating room to minimize risk. Working with the information from the local database of latex- and latex-free products and substitutes, all items containing latex should be removed from theatre and recovery bay (if recovery in operating theatre is not possible) and any area where the patient may be treated. When removal of such items is not possible, they should be covered and sealed with latex-free tape and a notice attached: “DO NOT REMOVE- CONTAINS LATEX”. Sterile Services Departments will need to be involved to ensure that there is no latex on or used for the preparation of instrument sets or accessories. All equipment used while caring for the patient in peri-operative areas should be free from latex, to reduce time in checking and cross-contamination from items containing latex. Items/equipment containing latex must be removed and replaced with latex-free items/equipment from the ‘latex-free box’. This is kept covered in a designated area in the department; a latex-free box specific to paediatric patients should be shared between appropriate areas. An identified individual must be designated responsibility for maintaining the contents of this box. In case of emergency situations, the patient can be questioned pre-operatively if conscious and a risk-assessment made given the responses to the screening tool (Appendix A). If the patient is unconscious, then best practice would suggest that latex exposure should be minimized and as far as is reasonably practicable, latexcontaining products should be removed or covered. 9.5.6 Other sources of peri-operative latex exposure 9.5.6.1 The antigen content of various latex products can vary significantly. Latex products manufactured with a dipping process (e.g. gloves) have the highest amount of latex allergens, whereas those made from dry, moulded, or extruded rubber (e.g. tyres, rubber seals, vial stoppers and syringe plungers) are thought to be less allergenic[14]. 9.5.6.2 The risk of exposure to latex from multi-dose vials with rubber stoppers, syringes with rubber plungers, and intravenous tubing is unclear. Small quantities of latex allergens can be present in the drugs/products and therefore the recommendation is to eliminate natural rubber from pharmaceutical vial enclosures[15]. 9.5.6.3 Drugs in vials with rubber bungs/stoppers should have the bung removed and the drug prepared in the vial. BUNGS-STOPPERS MUST NOT BE PIERCED. Some Pre-filled syringes should not be used, as there is the possibility of leach out of latex into the solution from the rubber bung. Suitable alternatives should be sought. Ensure all IV equipment is latex-free. 9.5.6.4 Some medical equipment that once contained latex has been replaced with suitable latex-free alternatives (e.g. anaesthesia bags). 9.5.7 Transferring patient to theatre 9.5.7.1 Portering staff should wash trolley with latex-free gloves and cover with a linen sheet. The trolley should be then be labelled ‘Latex –free’ and used only for the named patient. Portering staff should be educated to avoid latex protein transfer to the patient. 9.5.7.2 Minimum numbers of staff should be present in the Operating Theatre. 9.5.7.3 All staff must wash their hands following contact with latex-containing products. If it is necessary for gloves to be worn, they should be non-latex – synthetic rubber (either ‘Nitrile sterile’ or Examination‘) for body fluid interaction. 9.5.7.4 The patient should remain on the anaesthetic trolley throughout the theatre journey. 9.5.7.5 The latex-free box must contain latex-free alternative products. 9.5.7.6 Visible notices that the patient has latex-allergy should be placed in close proximity of the patient at all times whilst in the theatre department. 9.5.7.7 Prior to transfer to the ward/ITU, communication must have taken place well in advance to inform of the patient status if latex allergy recognised within the peri-operative area in order to allow time for ward preparation. 9.5.8 T.S.S.U/C.S.S.D 9.5.8.1 Notes on ventilation and airway management 9.5.8.2 A new latex-free anaesthetic breathing circuit and re-breathing bag should be used (the old having been removed the night before surgery, if possible). Anaesthetic filters should be used at the patient end of the circuit. 9.5.8.3 A clear facemask should be used. 9.5.8.4 The anaesthetic machine should be investigated and assured as being latex-free. All other equipment should be checked for their NRL content and replaced or covered as appropriate. 9.5.8.5 Remove any latex Bougies from the anaesthetic machine: alternatives from the ‘latex-free box’ should be used. 9.5.8.6 If gloves need to be worn for intubation, ensure that these are latex-free. Some stethoscopes and sphygmomanometers have latex tubing; these should be covered with stockinette and sealed with latex-free tape. 9.5.8.7 Monitoring. Sufficient non-latex monitoring equipment is available to use for monitoring in the clinical setting. The same equipment should be used throughout the patient journey through theatres 9.5.9 Recovery 9.5.10 If the patient cannot be recovered in theatre, a designated area should be prepared in recovery with all latex equipment removed. A screen should be placed around the patient displaying ‘Latex-allergic patient’ signs .Drugs for the treatment of anaphylaxis must be immediately accessible. 9.5.11 If the patient with known latex allergy has a suspected anaphylactic reaction during anaesthesia, the guidelines of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, ‘Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia’ (2009) must be followed[16]. A copy of this document should be kept in every theatre. Any such patient must be referred to the UHSM Allergy Centre for investigation and management using the form in Appendix C. 9.6 Discharge of the latex-allergic patient 9.6.1 When a latex-allergic patient is discharged to the care of the GP or other hospital, copies of the notes and management, including details of any adverse reactions, which occurred during the in-patient stay, must be sent promptly. It is important to include such details in any communication with District Nurses, Health Visitors, and Physiotherapists. 9.6.2 In the same way, if latex-allergy is diagnosed or occurs in an outpatient or clinic setting, full details must be sent to the patients GP and any other hospital where the patient is being investigated/treated. These patients must be referred to the Allergy Service prior to discharge (as per Appendices A and C). 10 Latex allergic members of staff 10.1 If staff are identified as sensitised or allergic to latex, the Occupational Health Department must work with the individual responsible for health and safety/latex in the ward or department to undertake a risk-assessment and ensure that the working environment is safe for the employment of the prospective or continuing member of staff. 10.2 When the risk-assessment has determined that the level of sensitivity makes it safe to do so, in many clinical areas, staff with latex allergy can successfully work with the following precautions: latex-allergic members of staff should use only non-latex gloves and other products and avoid all latex-containing products. Other individuals in the same work environment should use non-powdered low-protein latex gloves or, preferably, non-latex gloves. 10.3 However, if the risk-assessment determined that the allergy is particularly severe, other arrangements must be made as appropriate; e.g., the working area must be made latex-safe. 10.4 Additional precautions if latex allergy is confirmed and symptoms are present: 10.4.1 Avoid contact with latex gloves and other latex-containing products in the work place and at home; 10.4.2 Avoid areas where the powder from latex gloves worn by other workers might be inhaled – though powdered-glove use should be stopped; 10.4.3 Inform employers and healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, dentists, etc) about the latex allergy and consider wearing a MedicAlert bracelet; 10.4.4 Change protective clothing after any latex contact. Carefully follow physicians' instructions for dealing with allergic reactions to latex; 10.4.5 Inform the Occupational Health Department. 11 References and Bibliography 1. Cullinan, P., et al., Latex allergy. A position paper of the British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Clin Exp Allergy, 2003. 33(11): p. 1484-99. 2. Rolland , J.M. and R.E. O'hehir Latex allergy : a model for therapy Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2008. 38 p. 898-912. 3. Phillips, M.L., C.C. Meagher, and D.L. Johnson, What is "powder free"? Characterisation of powder aerosol produced during simulated use of powdered and powder free latex gloves. Occup Environ Med, 2001. 58(7): p. 479-81. 4. Hnizdo E, E.T., Rees D,Lalloo UG, Occupational asthma as identified by the surveillance of work-related and occuaptional respiratory disesases programme in South Africa Clin Exp Allegry 2001. 31: p. 32-39. 5. McDonald JC , K.H., Meredith SK, Reported incidence of occupational asthma in the United Kingdom. Environ Med, 2000. 57: p. 823-9. 6. Fett Ahmed, D., Sobczak ,S C, Yunginger ,J W. , Occupational allergies caused by latex. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am, 2003. 23: p. 205- 219. 7. Porri F, P.M., Lemiere C et al Association between latex sensitization and repeated latex exposure in children. Anesthesiology 1997. 86: p. 599-602. 8. Faust K, S.C., Zaglaniczny, K, Jarrett ,M. , Comparative analysis of latex allergy in the healthy versus high-risk pediatric population. AANA J. , 1999. 67(5): p. 461-6. 9. Yunginger, J.W., Chapter 58 - Natural Rubber Latex Allergy, in Middleton's Allergy Principles & Practice, B.S.B. N F Adkinson , W W Busse ,S T Holgate , R F Lemanske , F E Simons Editor. 2009, Elsevier Inc.: Philadelphia. 10. Heese A, v.H.J., Peters KP,Koch HU ,Hornstein OP., Allergic and irritant reactions to rubber gloves in medical health services.Spectrum,diagnostic approach, and therapy. J Am AQcad Dermatol, 1991(25): p. 831-9. 11. van Kampen V, R.-H.M., Sander I, Merget R; Stad 1-Gruppe., Diagnostics of occupational type I allergies--comparison of skin prick test solutions from different manufacturers for selected occupational allergens. May;64(5), 2010: p. 271-7. 12. Sicherer, S.H., Clinical implications of cross reactive food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol., 2001. 108(6): p. 881-890. 13. Reiter, J., Latex sensitivity : An industerial hygeine perspective. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002(110): p. s121-8. 14. Yunginger , J.W., Allergy to natural rubber latex Minn Med, 1998. 81: p. 27-30. 15. Primeau, M.N., Adkinson ,N.F Jr, Hamilton, R.G., Natural rubber pharmaceutical vial closures release latex allergens that produce skin reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2001. 107(6): p. 958-62. 16. Harper, N.J., et al., Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 2009. 64(2): p. 199-211. Appendix A SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE FOR IDENTIFICATION OF LATEX / CHLORHEXIDINE ALLERGIC OR HIGH RISK PATIENTS Name ________________________________ RM Number_____________________________ Date of Birth _____/_____/_____ Referring Consultant____________________ 1. History of typical allergic problems (type I) after contact with latex/natural rubber- or chlorhexidine-containing products? Yes No 1.1 Latex-containing products/exposures/high risk groups; list not exhaustive (tick all that apply): Latex or rubber gloves, balloons, condoms, adhesives, rubber bands Patient with spina bifida, other nephro-urological or neurological congenital problems, or other conditions requiring multiple surgeries or interventional procedures, particularly if from early childhood (high risk patient – REFER TO THE UHSM ALLERGY CENTRE) Allergic reaction during medical/dental procedure (e.g. urological, dental, cardiological procedures, surgeries, dental, rectal or pelvic examinations, other) Occupation involving frequent use of latex gloves or contact with rubber products Food allergy to any of the following foods: avocado, banana, kiwi, chestnut, tomato 1.2 Chlorhexidine-containing products/exposures; list not exhaustive (tick all that apply): Sterile wipes, hand scrub, skin disinfectants (e.g. Savlon ), lubricant gels (e.g. Instillagel ), mouthwashes (e.g. Corsodyl ) Allergic reaction during medical/dental procedure (e.g. urological, dental, cardiological procedures, surgeries, dental, rectal or pelvic examinations, other) 1.3 Allergic reactions (type I) experienced (tick all that apply): urticaria (hives) or swelling itchy-runny nose and sneezing; red-itchy-watery eyes shortness of breath, cough, wheeze abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea mouth/tongue/throat tingligling, itching, swelling anaphylaxis (severe life-threatening generalized or systemic hypersensitivity reaction with rapidly developing airway and/or breathing and /or circulation problems, usually associated with skin or mucosal changes) 2. History of typical delayed hypersensitivity problems (type IV) after contact with latex/natural rubber- or chlorhexidine-containing products? Yes No 2.1. Latex-containing products/exposures/high risk groups (see 1.1) 2.2. Chlorhexidine-containing products/exposures (see 1.2) 2.3. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions (type IV) experienced (tick all that apply): Dry skin, redness, itching, rash, cracking, chapping, scaling, excoriation, weeping and blister formation in skin areas exposed to: latex/natural rubber-containing products chlorhexidine-containing products ACTIONS If answered NO TO ALL QUESTIONS: Patient unlikely to have latex or chlorhexidine allergy No further action required If answered YES to any question in SECTION 1. or SECTION 2.3 for chlorhexidine products Patient may have latex or chlorhexidine allergy Refer to the UHSM Allergy Centre (Dr S Marinho) including the following: Copy of this screening questionnaire Send a blood sample for total + specific IgE to chlorhexidine and latex, add any foods causing symptoms (Immunology, 10ml in yellow or red capped tube; please request serum save). If patient presenting with allergic reaction, also send ideally 3 timed samples for mast cell tryptase (as per Anaphylaxis Policy) and include the completed Allergy referral proforma (in Appendix C of the Latex and Chlorhexidine Policies) If answered YES to any question in SECTION 2 Patient may have delayed hypersensitivity to latex or chlorhexidine Refer to the UHSM Dermatology Service (Dr J.E Ferguson) with a copy of this questionnaire FOR UHSM STAFF, if answered YES to any question, refer to the Occupational Health Department in addition to the above. 12 Appendix B - List of common medical and household products that contain latex 13 Medical products 15 Gloves 16 Blood pressure cuffs 17 Catheters Wound drains Adhesive tape Elastic bandages Electrode pads Endotracheal tubes and airways Bulb syringes Enema syringes Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts Finger cots IV access injection ports and IV tubing Manual resuscitators Penrose surgical drains Pulse oximeters Stethoscope tubing Stretcher mattresses Surgical masks Tourniquets Vascular stockings Rubber tops of multi-dose vials Bite blocks Dental coffer dams List is not exhaustive 14 Household products Adhesives Balloons Carpet backing Condoms Contraceptive diaphragms Elasticated fabrics Feeding nipples Household gloves Diapers and incontinence pads Infant pacifiers Rubber bands Erasers Shoes Bicycle helmets 18 Appendix C – UHSM Allergy Centre Referral Forms for Allergic Reactions during General Anaesthesia INVESTIGATION OF ALLERGIC REACTIONS DURING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA PATIENT REFERRAL FORM PATIENT DETAILS Name DoB Age Hospital/NHS No. Sex Date Ethnic group Address Telephone REFERRING CLINICIAN (ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE) Name Address Email Telephone Fax ANAESTHETIST (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE) Name Address Email Telephone Fax SURGEON Name Address Email Telephone Fax PATIENT’S GP Name Address Email Telephone Fax 1. Clinical history – reaction during general anaesthesia Source of referral: _______________ Anaesthetist Surgeon GP Other Referring Institution: ________________________________________________________________________ Contact number or email: ___________________________________________________________________ 1.1. Reaction details Proposed surgical procedure: ______________________________________________________________ Was surgery completed? Yes No If not, has another surgery been scheduled? Yes No Urgency of future surgery: ___________________________________________________________________ Date of reaction ____/___/______ Timing of reaction: Time of onset of reaction: _____/______h (24h clock) Occurring within 1h of the procedure Occurring more than 1h after the procedure Suspected cause (if any): 1)___________________; 2)___________________; 3)___________________ Details of the reaction Symptom/Sign Hypotension Onset Time (00:00h) Time resolved (00:00h) Severity (Mild/Moderate/Severe) Lowest BP: ____/_____mmHg Tachycardia Bronchospasm Cyanosis/desaturation Angioedema Lowest SpO2: ___% Area(s) affected: (specify distribution) Urticaria (specify distribution) Arrhythmia Flushing (specify distribution) Other (specify) Generalised / Localised, where? 1.2. Drugs / IV fluids / Procedures administered BEFORE the onset of the reaction (please include time of tracheal intubation, LMA insertion, and any other relevant event) Drugs / Procedures before onset of reaction Drug/Procedure Dose Route Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Time (00:00h, 24h clock) IV Fluids given before onset of reaction IV Fluid Approximate time started (00:00h, 24h clock) Volume 1.3. Drugs / IV fluids administered AFTER the onset of the reaction Drugs / IV Fluids after onset of reaction Drug/Procedure Dose Route Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Time (00:00h, 24h clock) Comments on response to treatment: Complications and sequelae Event Duration Outcome – survived? Transferred to: ICU Yes No HDU Ward Other ______________ 1.4. Anaesthetic techniques and procedures 1.4.1. LATEX-free environment: 1.4.2. Central venous access: Yes No Time: ____:_____h Skin Prep: _______________________________ Type of CVC: ________________________________________ Was a coated catheter used (chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine)? 1.4.3. Neuraxial blockade: Yes No Spinal Epidural Epi-spinal Skin Prep: ____________________________________________________ Neuroaxial blockade Drug 1.4.4. Dose Peripheral nerve blockade: Route Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Time (00:00h, 24h clock) Type of block(s): ______________ Skin Prep: ________________ Peripheral nerve blockade Drug Dose Route Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Time (00:00h, 24h clock) 1.4.5. Urethral catheterisation: Time ____:____h Antiseptic solution: ________________________ Urethral lubrication/local anaesthetic: _________________________ Type of catheter (eg latex, silastic etc): ________________________ 1.4.6. Skin preparation for surgery and start of surgery: Time surgery commenced: ____:____h Time surgery completed: ____:____h Skin Preparation Antiseptic Time (00:00h, 24h clock) 1.5. Investigations performed prior to referral (please give results if known) Were blood samples taken for Mast Cell Tryptase measurement? Yes First sample Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Result_____________________ Second sample Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Third sample Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Other blood tests: Test: _________________ Test: _________________ No Result_____________________ Result_____________________ Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Result_____________________ Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Result_____________________ N.B. It is the anaesthetist’s responsibility to obtain the results from the laboratory Case discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting? Yes No Reported to the MCA (Medicines Control Agency)? Date___/___/____ Reported to the AAGBI National Anaphylaxis database? Date___/___/____ Please send the completed form together with the following: Photocopy of the anaesthetic record and any other previous anaesthetic records Photocopy of the prescription record Photocopy of the recovery room documentation Photocopy of any relevant ward documentation For the attention of: Dr Susana Marinho Allergy Department Wythenshawe Hospital M23 9LT INVESTIGATION OF ALLERGIC REACTIONS DURING CARDIAC/RADIOLOGICAL/UROLOGICAL PROCEDURES REFERRAL FORM PATIENT DETAILS Name DoB Age Hospital/NHS No. Sex Date Ethnic group Address Telephone REFERRING CLINICIAN (ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE) Name Address Email Telephone Fax PATIENT’S GP Name Address Email Telephone Fax 2. Clinical history – reaction during or related to cardiac/radiological/urological procedure Source of referral: _______________ Cardiologist Radiologist GP Other Referring Institution: ________________________________________________________________________ Contact number or email: ___________________________________________________________________ 2.1. Reaction details Proposed procedure: ______________________________________________________________ Was the procedure completed? Yes No If not, has another been scheduled? Yes No Urgency of future procedure: _______________________________________________________________ Date of reaction ____/___/______ Time of onset of reaction: _____/______h (24h clock) Timing of reaction: Occurring within 1h of the procedure Occurring more than 1h after the procedure Suspected cause (if any): 1)___________________; 2)___________________; 3)___________________ Details of the reaction Symptom/Sign Onset Time (00:00h) Time resolved (00:00h) Hypotension Severity (Mild/Moderate/Severe) Lowest BP: ____/_____mmHg Tachycardia Bronchospasm Cyanosis/desaturation Lowest SpO2: ___% Area(s) affected: Angioedema (specify distribution) Generalised / Localised, where? Urticaria (specify distribution) Arrhythmia Flushing (specify distribution) Other (specify) 2.2. Drugs / IV fluids / Procedures administered BEFORE the onset of the reaction Drugs / Procedures before onset of reaction Drug/Procedure Dose Route Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Time (00:00h, 24h clock) IV Fluids given before onset of reaction IV Fluid Volume Approximate time started (00:00h, 24h clock) 2.3. Drugs / IV fluids administered AFTER the onset of the reaction Drugs / IV Fluids after onset of reaction Drug/Procedure Dose Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Route Time (00:00h, 24h clock) Comments on response to treatment: Complications and sequelae Event Duration Yes Outcome – survived? Transferred to: ICU HDU No Ward Other _______________ 2.4. Techniques and procedures 2.4.1. CONTRAST MEDIUM used: Yes No 2.4.2. LATEX-free environment: Yes No 2.4.3. Central venous access: Yes No Which? _________________________________ Time: ____:_____h Skin Prep: ____________________________ Type of CVC: __________________________________________ Coated catheter used? No 2.4.4. Neuroaxial blockade: Yes Spinal Yes Which? ____________ No Epidural Epi-spinal Skin Prep: ____________________________________________________ Neuroaxial blockade Drug Dose Route Time over which Time administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) 2.4.5. Peripheral nerve blockade: (00:00h, 24h clock) Type of block(s): ______________ Skin Prep: ________________ Peripheral nerve blockade Drug 2.4.6. Dose Urethral catheterisation: Route Time ____:____h Time over which administered (‘STAT’ or min:sec) Time (00:00h, 24h clock) Antiseptic solution: ________________________ Urethral lubrication/local anaesthetic: _________________________ Type of catheter (e.g. latex, silastic etc): _______________________ 2.4.7. Skin preparation for procedure: Time procedure commenced: ____:____h Time procedure completed: ____:____h Skin Preparation Antiseptic Time (00:00h, 24h clock) 2.5. Investigations performed prior to referral (please give results if known) 2.5.1. Were blood samples taken for Mast Cell Tryptase measurement? 1st sample Time___:___ (taken as soon as possible after the reaction) 2nd sample Time___:___ (taken 1-2h after the reaction) 3rd sample Time___:___ (taken ≥24h after the reaction) 2.5.2. Yes Date___/___/____ Result______ Date___/___/____ Result______ Date___/___/____ Result______ Other blood tests: Test: _________________ Test: _________________ Test: _________________ 2.5.3. No Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Result_____________________ Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Result_____________________ Time___:___ Date___/___/____ Result_____________________ If patient had a cutaneous reaction, were pictures taken? No 2.6. Other medication Yes (please enclose) Please list all drugs the patient is currently taking or was taking at the time of the procedure and when started. Patient’s regular medication Drug Date started Please send the completed form and copies of any relevant supporting documentation to: Dr Susana Marinho Allergy Department Baguley Outpatients Building University Hospital of South Manchester NHS FT M23 9LT APPENDIX D (UHSM policy on latex allergy) PLAN FOR DISSEMINATION Title of document: UHSM policy on latex allergy Date finalised: Jan 2012 Previous document already being used? If yes, in what format and where? Dissemination lead: Print name and contact details Dr Susanna Marinho Electronic on Trust Policy Website Proposed action to retrieve out-of-date copies of the document: Remove from Trust Policy website and upload new document Describe the plans for dissemination of the document to specific people / groups in specified formats and if appropriate with relevant training Through induction lectures and Trust training sessions. Dissemination Record - to be used once document is ratified. Date put on register / library of policy or procedural documents Notes HIRS/ANNUAL REPORT/SAFETY COMMITEE Date due to be reviewed March 2015 APPENDIX E (UHSM policy on latex allergy) EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT of UHSM policy on latex allergy Yes/No 1. Does the policy/guidance affect one group less or more favourably than another on the basis of: Race Ethnic origins (including gypsies and travellers) No No Nationality No Gender No Culture No Religion or belief No Sexual orientation including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people No Age No Disability No 2. Is there any evidence that some groups are affected differently? No 3. If you have identified potential discrimination, are any exceptions valid, legal and/or justifiable? No 4. Is the impact of the policy/guidance likely to be negative? No 5. If so can the impact be avoided? No 6. What alternatives are there to achieving the policy/guidance without the impact? No 7. Can we reduce the impact by taking different action? No Comments
© Copyright 2024