Genetic introgression as a potential to widen a species` niche

Genetic introgression as a potential to
widen a species’ niche: Insights from alpine
Carex curvula
Milica Nenadic
Study organism
Carex curvula
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
dominant sedge of most alpine grasslands
clonal
long-lived
protogynous
wind-pollinated & primarily out-crossing
2 taxa (subspecies)
C. curvula subsp. curvula ~> Cc
C. curvula subsp. rosae ~> Cr
base-rich substrates
acidic substrates
•  Spatial distribution does not overlap
•  Cc and Cr populations close => interbreeding
•  Morphologicaly intermediate individuals
obsereved and are fertile
Main objectives:
1.  Are morphological and ecological variation
correlated with genetic differentiation?
2.  Do ecologically marginal populations of each
tacon exhibit particular multilocus genotype
when compared to population of optimal
habitats?
Methods
Genetic analysis
Sampled:
18 populations on Alps
+ 1 Cc population on Pyrenees
8-10 individuals per population (total: 177)
AFLP markers
⇒  between population genetic distances (Nei)
⇒  F statistics
Niche investigation
•  Determine niche for each taxa
•  Discriminate between optimal and marginal habitats
•  1300 vegetation relevés (plots)
species list
six local-scale environmental variables
coinertia analasys
taken from:
Dray S., Chessel D., Thioulouse J. (2003). Co=inertia analysus and
the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology, 84(11), pp.
3078-3089
Results
Niche investigation results
Genetic analysis results
opt
marg
Cc
Cr
Pyrenees Cc
• Fst
• diagnostic markers
• Nei’s genetic distance
Genome integrity of each taxon is maintained even if populations are very close
(<1 km distance)
Conclusions
Single origin for Cc and Cr
•  Morphological and ecological variation in C. curvula
populations strongly correlated with genetic
differentiation
•  Genetic relatedness between Cc and Cr independent of
geographical distance
(Unknown initial reproduction barrier)
Cross-pollination between Cc and Cr is likely
widespread dominant sp.
wind pollen dispersal
sympatric over large areas
Maintenance of genetic differentiation:
1. 
2. 
Habitat specialization => change in phenology
Lower hybrid fitness in typical habitats
Marginal populations might result from genetic
introgression between Cc and Cr
morphologically intermediate hybrids
“non-typical” AFLP phenotypes
western and middle parts of the Alps
Hybridization and introgression are sources
of genetic variation and are shaping species
distribution along gradients!