THE SURGICAL J. D. From TREATMENT GREIG, J. Hairmyres H. OF ANDERSON, Hospital, A. East Kilbride INGROWING J. IRELAND, and J. the Royal R. TOENAILS ANDERSON Infirmary, Glasgow Two prospective studies of ingrowing toenail management were conducted. In the first, 163 patients (204 ingrowing nail edges) who had not had previous surgery were randomised and treated by total nail avulsion, nail edge excision, or nail edge excision with phenolisation of the germinal matrix; recurrence rates one year postoperatively were 73%, 73% and 9% respectively. In the second study, 63 ingrowing nail edges nail edge excision and phenolisation. nail one year after operation. The results of ingrowing toenail variable. The review by Sykes studies quoted recurrence rates 86%. Most independent tions studied There which was a 5% treatment are extremely in 1986 of 32 published which ranged from 0% to of the management of recurrent We have assessed three forms in patients who had not previously reviewed the effectiveness germinal matrix after a previous of phenolisation operation. PATIENTS for AND edge digital We included all patients conservative to Hairmyres Hospital and between August 1986 and July or onychogryphotic toenails Patients treatments were randomised : group 1) total of the ingrowing nail edge ; group and germinal matrix phenolisation. J. D. Greig, University Laurieston J. H. Anderson, FRCS, Registrar A. J. Ireland, FRCS, Registrar J. R. Anderson, FRCS, Consultant University Department ofSurgery, Glasgow G3l 2ER, Scotland. Correspondence should be sent Royal to Mr © 1991 British Editorial Society ofBone 0301-620X/91/1051 $2.00 JBoneJointSurg[Br] 1991; 73-B:l3l-3. VOL. 73-B, No. I, JANUARY 1991 Joint of 0.5% 0.5 cm of the nail trainees. whole nail was toenails who in were then was Alexandra Surgery Parade, compressed and by were introthe matrix. by cutting a tourniquet performed as for . the venous ooze. Paraffinjelly was the nail to protect it. Liquified removed gutter applied phenol dried to to the skin (80%) was Study 2 Consecutive patients who presented with a recurrent ingrowing toenail excision of Edinburgh, toe was Marcaine. applied in drops from a pipette onto the nail bed and along the gutter. It was left for four minutes and then removed with swabs. Any remaining phenol was neutralised with methylated spirit. Glasgow Royal 1987. Recurrent were excluded. edge 2. The control around checked by a pre-operatively from granulation tissue was were carried out by removed and J. R. Anderson. and 10 ml At least recurred surgical treated Infirmary, to were taken and excess operations forceps it from group 3) nail FRCS, Registrar Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, Scotland. 5 . and to receive one of three avulsion ; group 2) excision nail with of the distal circulation was The toe was anaesthetised down its longitudinal axis. Group 3) Nailedge excision andphenolisation was applied and nail edge excision was failed, referred Infirmary ingrowing The underwent of dystrophy avulsion with a pair of artery forceps. Group 2) Nail edge excision artery duced deep to the nail edge, separating which ingrowing had block operations incidence treatment and also METHODS with treatment techniques. postoperatively. Bacteriological swabs discharging nail beds curetted. The following Study! whom previous and a 5% one or other of three surgical Group 1) Total avulsion : the excision those rate ingrowing of surgical had surgery nail after recurred Operative pre- and of these studies were retrospective, without assessment of the results, and the populawere inadequately defined. There have been few reports toenail. had recurrence 1 operation by nail were edge described above. In both studies, days and subsequent entered excision dressings postoperative the general practitioner. surgeon two weeks later were taken if appropriate. growth antibiotic Patients hygiene. of over the same period after one previous in this and were study. They phenolisation changed care was advised after three provided by Patients were assessed by the when bacteriological cultures Infection was defined as a pathogenic organism from treatment was guided by reported were were as on wound care, the wound; sensitivities. footwear and 131 J. D. GREIG, I 32 The independent patients were reviewed one assessor who did not know J. H. ANDERSON, A. J. IRELAND, Table groups year later by an which procedure had been performed. of ingrowth of the Recurrence nail edge presence or absence The statistical and the Bonferroni of symptoms was noted. methods used were the comparison tests. J. R. ANDERSON was defined as evidence or spicu!e formation; the I. Clinical data of the three in first study (163 patients) chi-squared (group) Male Female Total avulsion(1) 41 18 26.3 (12to69) 33 14 28.1 (13 to 77) 39 18 28.3 (12 to 70) Nailedge RESULTS (2) Nail edge and phenolisation excision 1 There were 168 patients follow-up, leaving 163 surgery were assessed. ages shown in Table II. In developed a postoperative toenail pre-operatively. group 2, the one infection had Patients undergoing patient who an infected nail edge results were nail incidence for the not edges were of recurrence three groups surgeon-dependent. HI. Total avulsion(l) Nailedge excision Infection treated was (Table. rates after three 22 0 0 18 38 1 2 15 26 7 12 (2) N % N 81 59 73 46 (3) toenails (204 Time % Patient satisfaction (%) to mean and range 57 46 4.4 (2to 11) recurrence 41 73 36 64 49 5.4 (2 to 12) 67 6 9 6 9 84 4.2 (2 to 10) (months) (3) between 1 and 3 (p < 0.01) and in groups treatment, (Table III). Study 2 study, edge excision and total nail 27 of 59 (46%) patients in group 1 said that they were satisfied, 23 of 47 (49%) in group 2 and 48 of 57 (84%) in group 3 in this female, with an average age of 22 years They had 64 recurrent ingrowing toenail treatments included : total nail avulsion 29 male and with germinal avulsion with tion (2). At the time (27%) were infected. 0.01). their procedures) 56 different: patients for ingrowing Sym ptomatic in about and phenolisation n = 57 Rec urrences groups 1 and 2. However, the results were significantly groups Nailedge Number of ingrowing nail edges rates between two comparisons 42 13 excision operations recurrence the other were Post-operative (1) Nailedge 73%, III). in asked Pre-operative in in group 3 were symptomatic but not all recurrences groups 1 and 2 produced symptoms. Using the Bonferroni comparison test, there was no significant difference When Total avulsion n = 59 (2) Nailedge excision and phenolisation < toe Procedure (group) All recurrences Recurrence Procedure (group) 2and3(p and postoperative for ingrowing of group n =47 ingrowing Table There II. Incidence of preinfection in 163 patients treated nails by number and percentage is excision the 1 63 patients. The 73% and 9% respectively The Table I). infection and phenolisation had more wound infections postoperatively in whom only two had preinfection) than did those in the other two All infections settled rapidly on appropriate antibiotic therapy. A total of 204 (2) in this study. Five were lost to patients in whom the results of The sex distribution and mean of the three groups were similar (Table The incidence of pre- and postoperative excision (seven operative groups. Mean age in years (range) Sex Procedure excision Study treatment 13 bed Two weeks infections. postoperatively, Three were but one required nail Two of the infected operatively. One year of the later THE avulsion nails 63 edges JOURNAL (range edges. alone 1 1 to 63). Previous (51); nail matrix germinal phenolisation (1 1); matrix phenolisa- revision operation cured four patients with oral to eradicate had been were 17 edges assessed OF BONE AND had nail antibiotics the infection. infected pre(one JOINT patient SURGERY THE was lost ingrowing to follow-up). nail edges; recurred three to all four There were SURGICAL TREATMENT OF INGROWING three and recurrent they had Murray toenail avulsion postoperatively. Two (86%). Radical were painful months patients (three edges) developed nail at the site of phenolisation, painful eight dystrophy of the and 12 months postoperatively. Of the 42 patients, 37 were satisfied with their treatment. The five patients who developed ingrowing or dystrophic nails were dissatisfied. Out of 63 nail edges, 57 (90%) were asymptomatic one year after surgery. Sykes’ 1986 survey and and found that more than half advocated did not ablate the nail bed. The recurrence (73%) for simple avulsion general surgeons procedures which high incidence of in the present study (1975) demonstrated there was ablative undergone previous from consideration an even edge state indicated. The reported recurrence rates following surgical ablation of the nail bed have varied widely : for Zadik’s operation, 1% to 50% (Fowler 1958 ; Townsend and Scott 1966 ; Andrew and Wallace 1979); for segmental excision 16% to 30%(Wal!ace, Milne and Andrew 1979 ; Morkane, Robertson compared and and Inglis 1984). These to the recurrence rates after phenolisation (studies shown in the present 1 and 2). Other reports low failure rates (3% study eight six months Robb and Hamer-Hodges report of 9% and 5% method have also (Cameron 1981; Murray 1982; Varma, Kinninmonth 1983). However, in wider practise and the results may be worse, as was suggested by a three-year retrospective audit of the treatment of ingrowing toenails in a general hospital where the responsibility for treatment of patients was often delegated to inexperienced junior staff (Greig 1989). Their recurrence rate after total avulsion and phenolisation was 53%, although only half the recurrences were symptomatic. Issa and Tanner (1988) showed that combined wedge resection and segmental ablation alone. The reasons have included phenol ablation for recurrence : failure to remove was better after all than phenol nail phenol 2, symptomatic and 12 months. should We therefore suggest fragments, particularly in the angular fold ; the use of insufficient phenol, or for too short a time ; inadequate control venous ooze ; inappropriate postoperative footwear. meticulous attention is paid to technique and good advice is given to the patient, recurrences can be minimised. Postoperative infection did not predispose to recurrence. The management of recurrent ingrowing toenails has received little attention though it is so common. VOL. 73-B, No. 1, JANUARY 1991 of If pheno!isation patients had , after the operation, dystrophic Follow-up and nails developed in this type of be for at least one year. that nail edge excision with in after study phenolisa- treatment for ingrowing treatment has failed and has followed a previous the medical and nursing staff of Hairmyres Royal Infirmary for their co-operation in to Miss E. Anderson for statistical analysis. form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of REFERENCES Anderson JH, Greig JD, prospective study of toenails. J R Coil Surg Andrew T, Wallace controlled study. Ireland AJ, Anderson nail bed ablation for Edinb l990:in press. WA. Nail Br MedJ : an evaluation Fowler AW. Excision of the germinal matrix embedded toe-nail and onychogryphosis. 45:382-7. Greig JD. [Br] Issa MM, Tanner WA. Approach resection/segmental phenolization Surg 1988; 75:181-3. Results of surgery 1989; 71-B :859. Morkane AJ, ingrowing 71 :526-7. Robertson toenails Bedi BS. The surgical 1975; 62:409-12. JE, Murray WR. ingrowing toenails. Sykes PA. Ingrowing toenails Edinb 1986; 31 :300-4. Townsend Bone Varma AC, Joint Scott PJ. Surg [Br] to Ingrowing 1966; 48-B of two toenails. ingrowing combination cauterise? A treatments. Br treatment for Surg 1957-58; J Bone Joint toenails : the treatment. management in the 27:236-9. for critical toenail :354-8. of ingrowing appraisal? and of 1984; toenail. management of J R Coil Surg onychogryphosis. JS, Kinninmonth AWG, Hamer-Hodges DW. Surgical excision versus phenol wedge cauterisation for ingrowing a controlled study. J R CoilSurg Edinb 1983 ; 28:331-2. Wallace WA, Milne DD, Andrew T. Gutter toenails. Br MedJ 1979; ii:168-171. Surg wedge Br J GS. Segmental phenolization controlled study. Br J Surg Phenol cauterization Scott Med J 1982; : time or : a unified Br J for ingrowing RW, Inglis : a randomized Robb JR. A randomised, recurrent ingrowing bed ablation-excise 1979 ; i :1539. Cameron PF. Ingrowing toenails MedJ 1981 ; 283 :821-2. Murray WR, BrJSurg ablation rate disfiguring. (Anderson et a! 1990). 1 34% of the recurrences or more figures should be nail edge excision of the to 25%) recurrence excision and how many for multiple recurrences In group 2 of our study The authors wish to thank Hospital and Glasgow supporting this study and No benefits in any from a commercial party this article. alone contra- a second or failed to exclude them 1981 ; Robb and Murray that neither should be excision is after are often operations (Cameron tion is a logical and effective toenails in which conservative for those in which recurrence surgical procedure. avulsion nor nail edge unless phenolisation higher procedures is similar to that reported by him. Nail edge excision alone has been advocated because it can be performed without local anaesthesia and was said by Cameron (1981) to have a lower recurrence rate (39%). However, we found it no better than nail avulsion. We recommend simple practised that 1982 ; Varma et a! 1983). The importance of adequate primary treatment is emphasised by the high failure rate (47%) reported after total nail bed excision and phenol- happened of orthopaedic Bedi 133 Previous studies of nail have either failed to isation DISCUSSION TOENAILS treatment for J wedge toenail: ingrowing
© Copyright 2024