Isolated systolic hypertension 3:2 Raminder Singh, Mumbai Until the 1980’s the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was assumed to be the most relevant hemodynamic parameter for prognosis of hypertensive patients. Elevated systolic pressure was considered as an inevitable consequence of aging and many physicians were reluctant to pay credence to the need for therapy of elevated systolic blood pressure. There was a radical change in thinking based on epidemiological studies and reports by insurance companies which led to recognition of elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP). The term isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) has been introduced particularly in elderly subjects, since SBP is known to rise with advancing age; where as diastolic blood pressure (DBP) usually levels off and tends to decrease in elderly.1 According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III, ISH is the most prevalent type of untreated hypertension over 60 years of age. ISH represents a substantial health care problem as the target BP is very difficult to attain by drug therapy. According to JNC-VI and WHO/ISH guidelines, ISH is now defined as BP >140/<90 mmHg, this criteria is more stringent than older definition of ISH >160/<90.2 Etiology of ISH Apart from ISH seen with advancing age, ISH can also be seen in young patients 3 (obese, smokers, low education and socioeconomic status), hyperthyroidism, hyperaldosteronism, renal insufficiency and failure, renal artery stenosis, drug induced (NSAIDS, COX-2 inhibitors, corticosteroids, cyclosporine), herbal remedies, excess alcohol use, obstructive sleep apnoea, anaemia, beriberi, Paget’s disease and cancer (due to release of humoral pressor substances or hypercalcemia). Pathophysiology of ISH ISH largely reflects progressive structural and functional deterioration of arterial wall involving endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, aortic stiffness and increased wall stress and pulse pressure. According to the hypothesis, atherosclerosis, triggered by vascular endothelial damage and mechanical strain from each stroke volume, plays a central pathophysiological role. Atherosclerosis progressively leads to the replacement of elastin by collagen and other structural proteins and the build of calcium in the arterial wall, and this in turn leads to hypertrophy and fibrosis of arterial smooth muscle. All these factors lead to increased vascular stiffness which results in reduction in arterial compliance and decreased of ‘Windkessel function’ of large arteries. Renin angiotensin system plays an important role in pathogenesis of arterial stiffness by decreasing elastin content and increasing collagen of arterial wall. Proliferating small muscle cells in the arterial wall results in increased thickness, stiffening, and partial loss of contractility. 4 Classification of ISH ISH is classified as shown in Table 1. Symptoms and Signs In most elderly, ISH is asymptomatic. Epistaxis may be a presenting feature. Cardiac dysfunction is indicated by symptoms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias. Stroke, intermittent 111 Medicine Update 2012 Vol. 22 and death (J–curve phenomenon).7 Several intervention studies in ISH have demonstrated beneficial effects of treatment of ISH. Table 1 : Classification of ISH Category Blood Pressure (mmHg) Diastolic Systolic Optimal <120 And <80 Benefits of treatment of ISH Normal <130 And < 85 130-139 Or 80-89 Several interventional trials such as STOP-1, STOP-2 and MRC Elderly have clearly demonstrated that treatment of hypertension in elderly is beneficial and protective against stroke8 and coronary artery disease. In most of these trials, no clear distinction was made between ISH and ordinary hypertension. However a major percentage of elderly hypertensives recruited for such studies showed hemodynamic characteristics of ISH. A few clinical trials have enrolled patients with well defined ISH. High-normal ISH Stage 1 140-159 And <90 Stage 2 160-179 And <90 Stage 3 ≥180 And <90 claudication due to peripheral arterial disease, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, features of hypertensive retinopathy, renal insufficiency or failure may be present. Severe hypertension or an abrupt rise of BP may cause headache, blurred vision or dizziness. Evaluation of ISH An initial evaluation of ISH should include assessment for other cardiovascular risk factors, end organ damage, identifiable secondary causes of hypertension and potentially contributing lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, alcohol, smoking, body weight, drugs). Physical examination should include assessment of peripheral pulses, optic fundi, thyroid, heart, lungs, kidney and neurological system. Abdominal and carotid bruit should be carefully looked. Interventions Trials concerning ISH Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly (SHEP)9 Elderly patients with defined ISH were treated with low dose chlorthalidone (with the option to add atenolol or reserpine), in comparison with placebo. Active treatment brought about the following significant beneficial changes / reductions: • non- fatal stroke – 37% • nonfatal MI – 33% • left ventricular failure – 54% There were obvious trends (although not significant) towards decrease in Ambulatory BP Monitoring (ABPM) is of value in elderly patients to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension if clinic BP is more than 140/90 mm Hg (White coat effect), to identify non dippers and to assess response to drugs. • TIAs (-25%) • Total mortality (-13%) • Cardiovascular mortality (-20%) Home BP measurement (HBPM) can be suitable alternative to monitor the response to treatment. The devices are easily available and user friendly. • Cerebrovascular mortality (-29%) • Coronary mortality (-15%) Investigations for end organ damage should include hematocrit, urine analysis for proteinuria, BUN, serum creatinine, uric acid, electrolytes (sodium, potassium, calcium), blood glucose, lipid profile, thyroid function test, ECG, X-ray chest. Echocardiography, carotid doppler, renal doppler, CT abdomen/ chest, USG abdomen and polysomnography (in obese subjects) may also be required. ISH as a risk factor In addition, this study has confirmed and emphasised the beneficial effects and safety of low dose diuretics in elderly hypertensives. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR)10 Trial In large number of ISH patients active treatment with the calcium antagonist nitrendipine (with optional add on enalapril and /or hydrochlorothiazide) was compared with placebo, in a double blind randomized design. The Framingham study5 and The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial6 (MRFIT) showed that SBP levels are stronger predictors of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events than diastolic BP (DBP). A significant reduction (by 42%) in the incidence of stroke and vascular dementia (by -50%) by nitrendipine treatment was found. It should be realized that a too low DBP is also dangerous in those with coronary artery disease. DBP below 60 mm Hg may be associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction The design of this trial, performed with Chinese ISH patients, was very similar to that of the SYST-EUR study. In the Chinese Systolic Hypertension in China (SYST-China)11 Trial 112 Isolated Systolic Hypertension patients active treatment with nitrendipine significantly reduced the following endpoint phenomenon: • total stroke – 38% • stroke mortality -58% • all cause mortality -39% • cardiovascular mortality -39% • fatal and non-fatal cerebrovascular events -37% 1.Life style changes: The lifestyle changes recommended for patients with isolated systolic hypertension are the same as those for patients with other forms of hypertension. a. Weight reduction: Decrease in body weight decreases the incidence of hypertension and the viceversa is also true, reduction in 1.0kg body weight decreases blood pressure by 1.6/1.3 mmHg. It improves insulin sensitivity, sleep apnoea and the sensitivity to sodium decreases. It is advisable to maintain ideal body weight (BMI 18.5 – 24.9 kg/ m2). b. Dietary sodium restriction: Moderate degrees of sodium restriction to 2.4 gm/day results in SBP reduction by 2 - 8 mm Hg. Indian patients with ISH are more responsive to sodium restriction, because of their lower renin responsiveness. In Indians there is hidden salt in many food items and common practise to consume items (pickle, papad, sausages) which are loaded with sodium. c. Diet Changes: Role of diet has been proven in DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension), TONE16 (Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions in the Elderly), and many more trials. The diet should be rich in fruits, vegetables, low in saturated and total fat and high in fibre content. It causes SBP reduction by 8 -14 mm Hg. d. Moderation of alcohol: Alcohol abuse is the commonest cause of reversible hypertension. Limit consumption to not more than 2 drinks per day in men and one drink per day in women. It causes SBP reduction by 2 - 4 mm Hg. These are associated with fewer coronary events and strokes in comparison to teetotallers. f. Avoidance of tobacco: Smoking is prevalent in urban and rural population. It is a significant contributory factor for ISH, along with other detrimental effects on other body systems. g. Physical exercise: Regular aerobic physical activity such as brisk walking at least 30 minutes daily for most of the days of the week results in SBP reduction by 4 - 9 mm Hg. h. Stress management: Relaxation techniques, yoga, massage can reduce blood pressure and this can be a part of their treatment. i. Low caffeine: Discourage excessive consumption of coffee and other caffeine rich products. These lifestyle changes reduce the blood pressure and Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)12 Study The INSIGHT study was performed in hypertensive patients with at least one additional risk factors such as hyperlipidemia or diabetes mellitus. The study was not deliberately designed to investigate ISH treatment, but it contained a subgroup of patients with defined ISH which were analysed separately. Treatment consisted of nifedipine (in the GITS form: Adalat-OROS), versus hydrochlorothiazide. This subgroup of patients appeared to be more responsive than those with ‘ordinary’ hypertension to treatment with nifedipine – GITS. Interestingly, in these study patients with ISH whose DBP significantly decreased with increasing therapy were smokers with evidence of atherosclerosis. Both types of treatment (calcium antagonist vs diuretic) caused a significant and sustained reduction in blood pressure (in particular SBP) and a significant reduction of the relevant endpoint parameters, such as stroke and MI. Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) 13 study The ISH substudy of LIFE compared Losartan with atenolol and demonstrated that losartan reduced the risk of stroke and CV death to greater degree than atenolol. Angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan in isolated systolic hypertension (ARAMIS)14 studies: Telmisartan (20 – 80 mg) produce significant reduction in SBP Valsartan in Isolated systolic hypertension (VALISH)15 This study showed a significant effect on ISH. Smaller studies on ISH ACE inhibitors like lisinopril, Enalpril, Periondopril are also suitable for blood pressure control in ISH patients and favourably influence cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, it appears mandatory and possible to treat ISH and there is sufficient evidence that has demonstrated beneficial effects of this treatment. Management of Isolated systolic hypertension The management of ISH should start with lifestyle changes followed by drug therapy. 113 Medicine Update 2012 Vol. 22 favourably affect other risk factors like obesity, lipid disorders and diabetes. 2. Drug Treatment regimen as more than one drug is required to control blood pressure. Diuretics can be combined with most of the other class of antihypertensives.17 General principles of drug therapy: a. The therapy in ISH should begin with life style changes which may decrease the need of medications. b. The initial dose of drugs should be as low as possible to achieve the pharmacological effect and gradually increase the dose to attain the target BP. c. The minimum goal for BP control in ISH is < 140 mm Hg and in patients with diabetes and renal disorder, the goal is <130 mm of Hg. d. Care should be taken to avoid DBP < 55 mm Hg in older patients with ISH. e. Avoid orthostatic hypotension in diabetics and in immobile patients. f. g. Carefully consider all the pre-morbid conditions like diabetes, kidney disease, lung disease, coronary artery disease, prostatomegaly before selecting the agent h. Select a drug which can give multiple benefits, add on therapy can be given, if target BP in ISH is not controlled B. CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Most of the patients will require more than one drug to achieve target BP control in ISH Six major classes of antihypertensives which are most useful in ISH: B Calcium channel blockers C Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors D Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB’s) E Beta adrenoreceptor blockers Hypertensives with high renin are more prone to cardiovascular events and show maximum benefit with ACE inhibitor therapy. The ACE inhibitor should be started in low dose and to be increased gradually to prevent first dose hypotension. ACEI are considered standard therapy in hypertension with renal disorders, diabetes, diabetic nephropathy and LV dysfunction. ACE inhibitors are preferred in elderly because of end organ protection in cardiac and renal patients. The ACE inhibitors often induce a persistent dry cough and in rare instances, angioedema.19 D. ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) A.DIURETICS This group of drugs is effective in hypertensive diabetics, a combination very commonly seen in clinical practice. A unique character of CCBs is that its antihypertensive efficacy is not blunted by non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents (NSAIDs) which can elevate BP by 3-6 mmHg. The commonly seen side effects of CCBs are leg edema & constipation. Lercanidipine, a newer long-acting dihydropyridine is promising to have lesser incidence of leg oedema and has associated antiatherogenic properties. Its antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability has been established in recent ELYPSE trial.18 C.ANGIOTENSIVE CONVERTING ENZYME (ACE) INHIBITORS A Diuretics F Alpha adrenoreceptor blockers The New 2011 British hypertension guidelines commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and developed in conjunction with the British Hypertension Society (BHS) highlights the use of thiazide like diuretic, such as chlorthalidone (12.5-25 mg once daily) or indapamide (1.5-2.5 mg once daily) in preference to a conventional thiazide diuretic such as bendroflumethiazide or hydrochlorothiazide, if there is high risk of heart failure. In presence of elevated serum creatinine levels(S Cr > 2) the diuretic of choice would be Furosemide, Toresemide or Metolazone. The current Joint National Committee guidelines recommend thiazide diuretics as initial drug therapy for most patients with isolated systolic hypertension on basis of their efficacy of reducing blood pressure, cardiovascular complications and their low cost.Thiazide diuretics induce glucose intolerance and hypokalemia resulting in muscle fatigue, weakness, lethargy. The clinical importance of these adverse effects is uncertain. Most of the patients will end up receiving diuretic as a part of their ARBs may be especially useful in treating ISH. All the ARBs are potent in reducing SBP levels as shown by various clinical trials, and have a class effect. This group of drugs was initially introduced as an alternative to ACEI, for those who are intolerant to them due to severe dry cough. The ISH substudy of LIFE demonstrated for the first time in patients with ISH that losartan confers more CV benefits over atenolol at the same level of BP control. The ARBs are used in the renal 114 Isolated Systolic Hypertension diseases, proteinuria, and heart failure. The compelling contraindication is renovascular disease. 3. Eplerenone, a newer aldosterone antagonist results in very low incidence of gynaecomastia. A remarkable feature of ARBs is safety and tolerability profile. 20 The combinations of ARBs and ACEI have additive effect in lowering BP and proteinuria. 4. Bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist demonstrated BP-lowering effects. Drug toxicity (i.e., teratogenicity, testicular atrophy, and hepatotoxicity) has largely limited the use of this drug, but new agents are in the pipeline. E. BETA ADRENORECEPTOR BLOCKERS Beta- blockers are effective in reducing blood pressure in ISH. The use of beta-blockers as first line therapy for elderly patients has been controversial; a meta analysis of trials for hypertension showed a 16% higher incidence of stroke among patients treated with atenolol as compared to other antihypertensives. 21 It may be due to small reductions in blood pressure. A recent study showed that ISH is less responsive to beta blockers as compared to patients with essential hypertension. The rate lowering effects of beta blockers may result in increase in systolic and pulse pressure. 22 The use should limit to those with compelling indications such as coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, congestive failure or certain arrhythmias, young patients, women with child bearing potential. Beta blockers are associated with a number of chronic adverse effects like lethargy, fatigue, muscle weakness, cold extremities and impotence in men. F. ALPHA ADRENORECEPTOR BLOCKERS Selective alpha blockers like Doxazocin, Prazosin have been shown to be effective agents as monotherapy. Men with ISH and prostatic hyperplasia may obtain dual benefit from these drugs. Postural hypotension and heart failure are known side effects with them. The centrally acting agents such as clonidine and methyldopa result in dry mouth, sedation and rebound hypertension. Selective Imidazoline (Type I) agonists, such as moxonidine and rilmenidinen are reasonably effective and well tolerated. Newer attempts to treat ISH: It would be desirable to find new antihypertensive agents which selectively decrease SBP without reducing DBP. Some of these drugs are: 1. Nitrates as NO generator may be considered as a potential new agent to treat ISH. Isosorbide dinitrate took eight weeks of treatment to show this effect on SBP. Transdermal nitroglycerine and molsidomine demonstrated similar effect. 23 2. Spironolactone, an aldosterone antagonist is weak potassium sparing diuretic which also inhibit the enhanced formation of collagen and vascular fibrosis provoked by aldosterone. Spironolactone can control the arterial stiffness which is the basis of ISH.24 5. Aliskiren, recently released renin inhibitor, demonstrated antihypertensive efficacy similar to that of currently available ACE inhibitors and ARBs. The advantage of aliskiren is that it suppresses renin activity, unlike ACE inhibitors and ARBs, which can lead to a reactive rise in plasma renin activity. All these agents require larger studies and investigations for their widespread use in ISH. ISH in the young Little is known about isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in younger adults. ISH among young adults is increasing in prevalence, and is more common than systolic/diastolic hypertension. Obesity, smoking, and low socioeconomic status appear to be important determinants of ISH among young adults and have all increased over the last decade. The onset of hypertension during early adulthood warrants particular concern as even slight elevations in SBP during early adulthood increase one’s risk for further cardiovascular disease morbidity in later life. Increased blood viscosity is associated with obesity and might, by increasing the rheological component of peripheral resistance, contribute to obesity-associated changes in arterial blood pressure. Body fat has been shown to be a strong predictor of aortic stiffness in both young and older adults, which may account for the isolated elevation in SBP among obese young adults.3 ISH in Hyperthyroidism The secondary causes of isolated systolic hypertension include anaemia, aortic insufficiency, Paget’s disease, beriberi, and hyperthyroidism. They all share a common mechanism of an increase in cardiac output. The prevalence of ISH in thyrotoxicosis is 20–30%. Triiodothyronine (T3) is the active form of thyroid hormone. In hyperthyroidism, T3 dilates resistance arterioles, reducing systemic vascular resistance, which stimulates renin release and sodium reabsorption, resulting in an expansion of blood volume by 5.5% and an increase in venous return to the heart. Erythropoietin stimulation also contributes to blood volume. Heart rate and cardiac contractility are also changed with hyperthyroidism. Cardiac output is increased by >1 L/min. The net effect of these hemodynamic changes is a rise in 115 Medicine Update 2012 Vol. 22 SBP and a widening of pulse pressure. Arterial stiffness is increased. 25 Treatment with antithyroid drugs narrows the pulse pressure, decreases heart rate, reduces cardiac output and improves the ISH. References 1. Amery A, Fagard R, Guo C, Isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: an epidemiological review. Am J Med 1999;90:64S – 70S 2. The sixth report of Joint National committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2413–2446. 3. Regina C Grebla, Prevalence of determinants of ISH among Young Adults, J Hypertens. 2010;28:15–23. 4. Izzo Jr JL, Arterial stiffness: clinical relevance, measurement and treatment. Rev cardio-vas Med 2001;2:29-40 5. Kennel WB, Gordon T, Systolic verses diastolic blood pressure and the risk of coronary artery disease. The Framingham Study. AM J of Cardiol 1971;27:335-46. 6. 7. Neaton J D, Wentworth D. Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking and death from coronary artery disease. Overall findings and differences by age for 316099 white men. Multiple Risk Factor Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:5664. Zanchetti A, Hansson L, Clement D et al. Benefits and risks of more intensive blood pressure lowering on hypertensive patients of the HOT study with different risks profile: does a J-shaped curve exist in smokers? J Hypertension 2003;21:797-804. 8. Hedner Th. The problem of hypertension in the elderly. Blood Press 2000;9[suppl.2]:4-6 9. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA 1991;265:3255-3264. 10. Stassen JA, Fagard R et al. Randomised double blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997;350:757-764 11. Liu J,Wang GJ et al. Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertension 1998;16:1823-29. 12. Brown NJ, Palmer CR et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients randomised to double blind treatment with a long acting calcium channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine-GITS study. Intervention as a goal in hypertension treatment. Lancet 2000;356:366-372. 13. Kjeldsen SE et al. Effect of losartan on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: a Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) sub study. JAMA 2002;288:1491-1498. 14. Manolis AJ et al Angiotensin II receptor antagonist in isolated systolic hypertension(ARAMIS study): efficacy and safety of Telmisartan 20,40 or 80 mg Vs hydrochlorthiazide 12.5 mg or placebo. J Hypertens 2004;22:1033-1037. 15. Ogihara T, Saruta T, Rakugi H et al. Valsartan in Elderly Isolated Systolic Hypertension (VALISH) Study. Hypertension 2010;56:196-202. 16. Apple LJ, Espeland MA, Easter L, Wilson AC et al. Effect of reduce sodium intake on hypertension control in older individuals: results from the Trial of Nonpharmacological Intervention in the Elderly(TONE) Arch Int Med 2001;161:685-93. 17. ALLHAT Officers and coordinators for the ALLHAT collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs. diuretic: the hypertensive and Lipid-Lower Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002;288:2981-97. 18. Barrios V, Navarro et al. Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine in daily clinical practice. Investigators of ELYPSE study. Blood pressure 2002;11:95-100. 19. Wing LM, Reid CM,et al. A comparison of outcome with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. NEJM 2003;348:583-92. 20. M Volpe, Treatment of systolic hypertension: Recent studies with angiotensin II antagonists. Journal of Human hypertension 2005;19:93-102. 21. Lindholm LH, Carlberg B. Should Beta blockers remain first choice in treatment of hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet 2005;366:1545-53. 22. Goldberger J J, Jacobson J T. Relationship of blood pressure to heart rate in isolated systolic hypertension. J Investig Med. 2011;Sep 27 [Epub ahead of print] 23. Safar ME. Antihypertensive effects of nitrates in chronic human hypertension. J Appl Cardiol 1990;5:69-81. 24. Lim P O, Jung R T. Raised aldosterone to renin ratio predicts antihypertensive efficacy of spironolactone. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;48:756-760. 25. Klein L, Ojaama K. Thyroid hormone and cardiovascular system. NEJM 2001;344:501-509. 116
© Copyright 2024