Update on ISO Cleanroom Standards – 14644 & 14698 Conor Murray Bio

www.cleanrooms-ireland.ie
Update on ISO Cleanroom
Standards – 14644 & 14698
Conor Murray
Chairman - Irish Cleanroom Society
Head of Delegation for Ireland at ISO TC 209
2
Conor Murray Bio
‰ Conor Murray, an Engineer by profession is an independent
Technical Expert on GMP Cleanrooms and Biosafety Labs
‰ Conor is a founder member and Chairman of the Irish
Cleanroom Society, (ICS). Conor is a past Chairman of the
ICCCS, (International Confederation of Contamination
Control Societies) and currently Chairman of the ICEB,
(International Cleanroom Education Board)
‰ Conor is Head of Delegation for Ireland representing the
NSAI at ISO TC 209 and is on WG 01 & WG 02
‰ Conor is Convener of Sub Group 13, (Cleanrooms) on the
Health Care Standards Consultative (HCSC) committee
‰ Conor's particular areas of expertise include Green and
Energy Efficient Modular Design, Lifecycle Sustainability,
Process Integration, RABS and Fast Track Clean
Build Construction
3
Presentation Content
‰ Irish Cleanroom Society
‰ ISO 14644 & 14698 Overview
‰ ISO DIS 14644 -1 & -2:2011 – WG 01
‰ 14698 -1 & -2:2003 – WG 02
4
Irish Cleanroom Society
www.cleanrooms-ireland.ie
5
Irish Cleanroom Society
‰ The Irish Cleanroom Society (ICS) is a not for profit
membership subscription based organisation formed in
1998 to represent cleanroom professionals in Ireland
‰ The ICS is affiliated to the International Confederation of
Contamination Control Societies (ICCCS)
‰ The primary focus is to promote best practice knowledge
and skills, understanding and harmonisation of
cleanroom and contamination control technology and
standards among users and professionals in Life
Sciences, Healthcare, Food, Microelectronics and
Micromanufacturing
6
ICS Objectives
‰ Promote the development of cleanroom and
contamination control technologies throughout Ireland
‰ Heighten the awareness of cleanroom and contamination
control technology among all users inc industry, educational,
institutional establishments, government bodies & the public
‰ Assist in the standardisation and harmonisation of
cleanroom and contamination control
‰ Organise seminars, exhibitions and peer to peer forum
workshops for the dissemination of knowledge & experience
gained in cleanroom and contamination control technology
‰ Represent Ireland on the international stage
7
ICS & Education
‰ Education and Training are at the core of ICS activities
‰ The ICS has been a major contributor to the CTCB-I
(Cleanroom Testing and Certification Board International) since its inauguration in 2002 and
has provided nearly 20 Cleanroom Technology and
Testing courses with over 200 candidates from Ireland
and around the world
‰ Since 2005 the ICS has helped lead the ICEB initiative of
the ICCCS to accredit, harmonise & licence cleanroom
training courses across national cleanroom societies with
the emphasis on certification through examination
8
ICS on the International Stage
‰ The ICS represents Ireland at international level on ISO
TC 209 for cleanroom standarisation where Ireland is a
voting member
‰ Conor Murray is Head of Delegation for Ireland & a
subject matter expert on the TC & a number of WGs
‰ The ICS is an active member of the ICCCS, International
Confederation of Contamination Control Societies
‰ ICS an active member of the International Cleanroom
Education Board (ICEB)
‰ Ireland hosted the 21st biennial symposium in 2008
9
ICS Linkages in Ireland
‰ The National Standards Authority of Ireland are the
Irish representative body in CEN and ISO Standards
organisations
‰ Their Health Care Standards Consultative (HCSC)
committee has established a subcommittee, SC 13
concerning cleanrooms
‰ The Irish Cleanroom Society play a leading part in
this. Conor Murray is Convener of SC 13 and
represents Ireland at ISO TC 209 concerning
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments
‰ The ICS works closely with FAS on cleanroom training
and up skilling
10
ICS Initiatives - Education
‰ International Cleanroom Education Board (ICEB)
‰ Part of International Confederation of Contamination
Control Societies (ICCCS)
‰ Set up in 2007
‰ ICS playing a significant leadership role internationally
‰ CTCB-I initiative set up with S2C2 in 2001
‰ CTCB-I now includes Scandinavian Countries (R3) of
Norway, Sweden and Denmark & The Netherlands
(VCCN)
‰ Capturing interest from the US, Baltic, Far East, South
Africa, Egypt
11
ICS Initiatives - Education
‰ 5 ICEB accredited courses
‰ Cleanroom Testing – CTCB-I (‘03 250)
‰ Advanced Cleanroom Technology - CTCBi
(‘05 100)
‰ Airborne Particle Counting – CTCB-I (‘08 20)
‰ Introduction to Cleanrooms - SSE (‘09 50)
‰ Cleanroom Cleaning - FLO (‘09 40)
12
ICS & International Associations
13
ICS Initiatives - ISO TC 209
‰ Participation in Working Groups in TC 209 on
cleanroom standards
‰ WG 01 - revision of ISO 14644 - 1 & 2 Classification by
total airborne particles
‰ WG 02 - revision of ISO 14698 – Biocontamination
(Irish Biocontamination Mirror Group)
‰ WG 03 - revision on ISO 1464 - 3 Metrology
14
ICS & ISO TC 209
15
ISO 14644 & 14698
- Overview
16
ISO 14644 & 14698 Standards
ISO Document
Title
Status
ISO-14644-1
Classification of Air Cleanliness - 1999
WG01
ISO-14644-2
Testing for Continued Compliance to -1 - 1999
WG01
ISO-14644-3
Test Methods & Metrology - 2005
WG03
ISO-14644-4
Design, Construction & Start Up
2001
ISO-14644-5
Cleanroom Operations
2004
ISO-14644-6
Terminology - 2007
SG06
ISO-14644-7
Separative Enclosures
2004
ISO-14644-8
Classification of Airborne Molecular Contamination - 2007
WG08
ISO-14698-1
Biocontamination: General Principles - 2003
WG02
ISO-14698-2
Biocontamination: Eval’n & Interpretation of Data - 2003
WG02
17
ISO 14644 & 14698 Standards
ISO Document
Title
Status
ISO-14644-1
Classification of Air Cleanliness - 1999
WG01
ISO-14644-2
Testing for Continued Compliance to -1 - 1999
WG01
ISO-14644-3
Test Methods & Metrology - 2005
WG03
ISO-14644-4
Design, Construction & Start Up
2001
ISO-14644-5
Cleanroom Operations
2004
ISO-14644-6
Terminology - 2007
SG06
ISO-14644-7
Separative Enclosures
2004
ISO-14644-8
Classification of Airborne Molecular Contamination - 2007
WG08
ISO-14698-1
Biocontamination: General Principles - 2003
WG02
ISO-14698-2
Biocontamination:
& Interpretation
of Data
- 2003
2
new standardsEval’n
under
development
to cover
SCP via WG9 & -9 and SCC via WG8 & -10
WG02
18
ISO 14644 TD Proposal
Deals with the role of an ISO 14644 Technical
Document as an Overview, Introduction,
Explanation and Context in dealing with
updates and changes to ISO 14644 & ISO
14698 re airborne and surface cleanliness
classification by total particles, viable, chemical
and nano particles
Approved in Milan 2011- to be presented to ISO
TC 209 in Zurich, September 2012
19
ISO 14644 Issues
‰ Historical development and focus on Airborne
Particles
‰ New standards deal with surfaces, chemicals
and nanoparticles
‰ Need backward compatibility
‰ Where to put the history, context, perspective,
objectives, usage & application notes
20
ISO 14644 Issues
‰ Existing definition of cleanroom relates to
airborne particles ie total particle
concentration in air
‰ New definition needs to address the
concept of a controlled environment where
the control could be total particles, viables or
chemicals in air and/or on a surface
21
ISO 14664/ 14698 Structure
Total
Particles
Viable
Biocontamination
Chemical
Nanoparticles
Airborne
ACP
ACV
ACC
ACN ?
Surface
SCP
SCV
SCC
SCN ?
Total
Particles
Viable
Biocontamination
14698-1
14698-2
14698-1
14698-2
Chemical
Nanoparticles
14644-8
14644-?
14644-10
14644-?
Airborne
14644-1
Surface
14644-9
22
ISO Support Standards
Standard
Existing
Testing for Ongoing Compliance to
14644-1
New
Testing for Ongoing
Compliance to 14644-1
14644-3
Test Methods
Supporting Test Methods
14644-4
Design, Construction & Startup
Design, Construction &
Startup
14644-5
Operations
Operations
14644-6
Terminology
Terminology
14644-7
Separative Devices
Separative Devices
14644-2
14698-?
Supporting ?
23
ISO DIS 14644 -1 & - 2
24
ISO DIS 14644 -1 & -2
‰ Apply good science and statistics
‰ Remove confusion and inconsistencies
‰ Simplify terms
‰ Use more precision
‰ Use a Table for Classification instead of the
universal formula
25
ISO DIS 14644 -1
Copenhagen
‰ DIS Vote May ‘11 – unanimous but > 200
comments
‰ Differences over no of samples for confidence level
and maximum area to determine classification
‰ Differences over method of selection of sample
locations, application of statistics – random selection
‰ Differences over treatment of 5 micron particles
‰ Differences over normative use of ISO 21501-4
26
ISO DIS 14644 -2
Copenhagen
‰ DIS Vote May ‘11 – unanimous
‰ Decided to remove classification and keep to
Periodic Testing & Monitoring
‰ Agreed that Classification and Periodic Testing are
NOT the same – amount of testing
‰ Differences over inclusion of Differential Pressure
27
ISO 14698 -1 & -2:2003
- Biocontamination WG 02
28
ISO 14698 -1 & -2: 2003
29
ISO 14698 Issues
‰ ISO 14698 not in line with ISO 14644
‰ No Tables of Classification
‰ Not up to date with Risk Assessment & Risk
Management techniques (eg ICH Q9 QRM)
‰ No Check Lists of “Things to Consider”
‰ Not up to date with technology advances in
Rapid Microbiological Methods (RMM) &
Instantaneous Microbiological Detection (IMD)
(eg ATP, Bioluminescence)
30
ISO 14698 Issues
‰ Cannot “Monitor a process into Control”
‰ Not enough clarity on differences, issues and
guidance on Aseptic vs Non Sterile applications
‰ Not enough guidance on Airborne vs Surface
biocontamination risks and control
‰ Overall seen as not easy to read & use
31
ISO TC 209
Preliminary Work Items WG02
IS O/T C 2 09 N 187
Re so lution s from ISO/ TC 20 9 M ee ting 9-10 No v em be r 2007
Ré sol utio ns de l' IS O / T C 20 9 (1 9 èm e réu nion, 9 et 1 0 Nov e mbr e 2 00 7)
Re so lution 1
IS O/T C 209 reso lv es th at W G 2 co m m ence s w ork on thes e tw o doc um ents :
a. C lassi fication of airb orne bi oc onta m inatio n in c leanroo m s, inc luding m etho ds of
m eas ure m ent a nd their v alida tion.
b. C lassi fication of s urf ace bioc ontam inatio n in c le anroo m s, including m ethod s of
m eas ure m ent a nd their v alida tion.
At t he appropriat e time during the de velopm ent of these docu m ents, t he position of IS O 14 698
Parts 1 a nd 2 sh ould b e cons idered, as w ell as a Risk M anage m ent St andard.
(All in fa vor)
32
ISO Standard Principles
‰ ISO Standards are NOT industry specific Bird’s Eye view from 25,000 feet
‰ Normative (Must do) & Informative (Should do)
‰ Based on good science with clear and
independent guidance
‰ Short & concise, easy to read & use
‰ Check Lists, flow charts, suggested methods,
options on best practice methods, choices,
examples.
33
ISO Working Group Principles
‰ Working Group is a team of international experts
nominated by each member country
‰ Terms of reference set by TC 209
‰ Duration varies but typically 2 - 5 years
‰ Act as Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in their
field
34
ISO Working Group Principles
‰
‰
‰
‰
‰
Capture best science and international expertise
“Get all the toys on the table” and play with them
Everything on the table
Open dialogue encouraged until the end
Let “good science” prevail
35
ISO 14698 Challenges
- Limitations of Quantitation
‰ Current measurement ‘technologies’ limited to
orders of magnitude resolution, especially in low
density populations
‰ Species recovered using these technologies
limited due to incubation methodology (inc
media, temperature, pH, aerobic/anerobic, etc.)
‰ “Environmental microbiologists recent research
indicate that some species are inter-dependant
& one species will not culture successfully
without the presence of the other”
36
ISO 14698 Challenges
- Diversity of People
‰ People are the greatest source of
biocontamination
‰ Unpredictability and uncertainty of Human
behaviour
‰ “80% of the species found in the human upper
respiratory tract cannot be recovered”
37
ISO 14698 Challenges
- Issues in clean spaces
‰ Below limit of resolution for current
technologies
ƒ i.e. 1 cfu recovered may be indicative of 1cfu
or perhaps >10cfu, impossible to accurately
and repeatably determine
‰ Risk of false positives high due to likelihood of
accidental contamination during collection and
incubation
38
ISO 14698 Challenges
- Process/ Application Specific
‰ In some cases, all species are considered
harmful
‰ In some cases there is ‘background counts’ of
cfu of species considered ‘normal and nonharmful’
‰ In some cases, some species are considered
‘objectionable’ and are not tolerated at all
39
Aseptic Processing
- 5μm Particles & EU GMPs
‰ “In Grade A and B zones, the monitoring of the
≥5.0 μm particle concentration count takes on
a particular significance as it is an important
diagnostic tool for early detection of failure.”
‰ “... consecutive or regular counting of low
levels (of ≥5.0 μm) is an indicator of a possible
contamination event and should be
investigated.”
‰ Particles ≥5.0 μm could be skin particles
carrying biocontamination
40
ISO 14698
- Proposed New Structure
41
New ISO 14698 Flowchart
42
New ISO 14698 Flowchart
43
New ISO 14698 Flowchart
44
Proposed New ISO 14698 -1
- Establishing Control
‰ Risk Analysis/ Assessment
‰ Risk Management
‰ Establishing (Risk) Control
45
ISO 14698
- Establishing Control Step 1
‰ Identify ‘typical, non-harmful’ species
ƒ - typical in cleanroom
ƒ - not harmful to product or
application/customer
‰ Identify ‘objectionable’ species
ƒ - atypical in cleanroom
ƒ - harmful to product and/or harmful to
customer
46
ISO 14698
-Establishing Control Step 2
‰For “normal, non-harmful”:
ƒ - establish typical ‘background counts’, e.g.
<10cfu
ƒ - establish acceptable incidence of higher
than normal counts, where maximum limit is
defined
ƒ - anything above incidence rate or maximum
triggers investigation
47
ISO 14698
- Establishing Control Step 3
‰ For “Objectionable”:
ƒ - establish acceptable incidence, including
maximum number process will tolerate
ƒ - anything above incidence rate or maximum
triggers investigation
48
ISO 14698
- Establishing Control Step 4
„
Classify your process/cleanroom:
ƒ “Normal, non-harmful”
- species
- by ‘background counts’
- by acceptable incidence of ‘higher than
normal’ (maximum limit is defined)
ƒ “Objectionable”
- establish acceptable incidence, including
maximum number process will tolerate per
incidence
49
ISO 14698
- Airborne Classification
Class
*Airborne limit In
Operation
cfu/m3
ACVx 1
ACVx 2
ACVx 3
ACVx 4
<10#
< 100
< 1000
< 10000
1. *Combined with an appropriate incidence rate
2. ‘x’ is the species of interest
3. # still under discussion (added error by air collection
method)
4. Intermediate classes are permitted, eg SVCx 3,5
50
ISO 14698
- Surface Classification
Surface
Contamination
Class (SCV)
*Surface Count
Limit (CFU)
Sampled Area
SVCx 1
<4
1 m2
SVCx 2
<40
1 m2
SVC x3
<40
1 cm2
SVCx 4
<300
1 cm2
SVC x5
>300
1 cm2
1. Numbers are open for further discussion
2. *Combined with an appropriate incidence rate
3. ‘x’ is the species of interest
4. Intermediate classes are permitted, eg SVCx 3,5
51
ISO 14698
- WG 02
‰ Next meeting – Zurich Sept 2012
‰ New Work Item Proposal (NWIP)
‰ Formal Vote required for approval
‰ ISO timetable of CD, DIS FDIS, & IS
over 3 years
52
Thank You for Your Attention