1. education

 *1. Are you submitting a Fully Formed Panel for Discussion or a Response to a Track
Question?
j Fully Formed Panel for Discussion
k
l
m
n
j Response to a Track Question
k
l
m
n
*2. For which track are you submitting?
j Innovation in Education for an Evolving Public Service Sector
k
l
m
n
j Strategic Program Management and the Global Face of Higher Education
k
l
m
n
j Data­Driven Decision Making and Equipping Students with an Informed Perspective
k
l
m
n
Page 1
Submitting a Fully Formed Panel for Discussion
*3. Proposal Title
*4. Proposal summary: 2600 characters maximum (about 400 words). Please copy/paste
into this box, note that formatting will not be retained.
*5. Convener
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
*6. Have you communicated with the people below that you are submitting their names
as part of your panel?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
j Only vaguely
k
l
m
n
If you have not notified them, please email them now with the summary you submitted above. 7. Presenter (1st)
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
8. Presenter (2nd)
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
9. Presenter (3rd)
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
Page 2
10. Presenter (4th)
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
11. Respondent
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
12. If you are submitting this on behalf of someone else, please identify yourself
Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
*13. Which one of the following topics does your proposal speak most towards? Only
one choice is allowed
j Accreditation
k
l
m
n
j Assessment
k
l
m
n
j Budget and Financial Management
k
l
m
n
j Comprehensive Schools
k
l
m
n
j Diversity and Social Equity
k
l
m
n
j Doctoral Education
k
l
m
n
j Executive Education
k
l
m
n
j Global Issues
k
l
m
n
j Local Government Management Education
k
l
m
n
j New Directors
k
l
m
n
j Nonprofit Management Education
k
l
m
n
j Research
k
l
m
n
j Small Programs
k
l
m
n
j Undergraduate Education
k
l
m
n
j Not Applicable
k
l
m
n
14. If you are submitting on behalf of a Section or Committee? Please identify which one:
Page 3
Submitting a Response to a Track Question
*15. For which question would you like to propose an answer?
j Innovation 1: Can generalist programs survive in a future in which student interest and faculty research point towards specialization?
k
l
m
n
j Innovation 2: What skills are vital for students who will become multi­sectoral leaders, and how do we best teach those skills?
k
l
m
n
j Innovation 3: How are the best global practices being applied and integrated into curriculum?
k
l
m
n
j Strategic 1: How can you leverage the NASPAA accreditation process to achieve the strategic goals of the program, department, college, k
l
m
n
and university? j Strategic 2: How can programs best infuse diverse experiences and viewpoints into the student experience and program operations?
k
l
m
n
j Strategic 3: How can programs integrate stakeholder viewpoints, especially from those who hire our students, to promote the preparation k
l
m
n
of effective stewards of the public interest j Data 1: What can public service education programs do to build capacity in data analysis so that students can compete with graduates k
l
m
n
from other sectors and address public problems? j Data 2: How do you connect policy problems with data analysis and use evidence­based approaches to improve the education of students k
l
m
n
and the impact of our research? j Data 3: Could a failure to advance the cutting edge of data analysis and evidence­based approaches prove a disservice to students, k
l
m
n
governments, and society? *16. Please share a 1300 character (about 200 words) summary of the 1­3 main points
you would cover in your discussion. Please copy/paste into this box, note that formatting
will not be retained.
*17. Presenter
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Affiliation/University:
*18. Would you be willing to serve as panel convener?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
The panel convener will facilitate conversation among the selected presenters and prepare a cohesive thesis for discussion at the conference. The convener is the main point of contact for the panel and required to communicate all relevant information to panelists. Page 4
Scheduling and Logistics
19. Are you UNAVAILABLE (due to travel or teaching schedule) to give your session
during any of the following time blocks? Note: limits on scheduling flexibility might reduce
the chances for the proposal’s acceptance.
c Thursday Morning 10/15
d
e
f
g
c Thursday Afternoon 10/15
d
e
f
g
c Friday Morning 10/16
d
e
f
g
c Friday Afternoon 10/16
d
e
f
g
20. Is there anything that you want to share with NASPAA and the Conference Selection
Committee?
5
6 21. It is NASPAA's policy that all sessions all considered open press. If you have concerns
about your session being open, please indicate what they are below so a member of the
conference committee can contact you to discuss further.
5
6 Please keep a copy of this submission for your records. Once you click 'Submit' below, your submission will be sent to NASPAA for review. NASPAA will review all submissions and notify the convener of the status in May 2015. If you have any questions, please contact Emily Reineke, Conference Manager at [email protected] or by phone at 202.628.8965 x112. Page 5