Learning (PBL) for Malaysia Teacher Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Problem Based Education: Mohamad Termizi Borhan Department ofDevelopment and Planning Aalborg University, Denmark Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University, Denmark. Ph.D Thesis Submitted to SUMMARY This research involved developing, implementing Learning (PBL) designs new teaching and student-centered and evaluating Problem in the context of Malaysian teacher education. As learning approach such learning as in the to suit the as research norms the research more the PBL has posed challenges since the the approach was needs, i.e Malaysian teacher challenge, the proposed PBL designs have been adjusted issues, the researcher has adopted Design Based Research methodology contextually due to its relevant. In principles that strive to particular, in practical make learning the method addresses the needs and of a local context, which has led to research findings that are scientifically sense. emphasises synergistic relationship between researching, designing and engineering design in an effort to the PBL method concerns involve (1) collaborating PBL relatively Malaysian teacher education. trustworthy and useful DBR to this forward the above Putting (DBR) regards a Malaysian higher education landscape, too different from the demands and constraints of contextual education. With Based learning and learning improve the practice the research progresses a study, (2) of higher external implementing the design through impact of the PBL iteration and design implementation on Instead of strictly systematically adjust practical better informed designs, the research initial findings for the PBL setting and Implementing the aimed to shed and following issues in a set and iterate the PBL activities has led to core design This (1) having the PBL education, and (3) achievement validity. To achieve such PBL Compiling environment. Since the especially during the implementation phase. of embedded research within design itself as complex PBL learning environment. of ideas, the DBR allows the researcher to design as a its inherent activities of research and document the students' in practitioners, (2) developing refine and adjustment and (4) seeking to learning and cognition, with local design, (3) striving to students' understand PBL was divided into three design, Developing the design light on the impact ofPBL in Malaysia setting. on student learning, design phases: P BL designfor Malaysia The first and the design phase potentials and III constraints ofPBL Evidence Such information implementation. from gathered were theoretical. practical and contextual perspectives. Accordingly, research findings ofPBL impacts constraints on were students' are: curriculum elements for the PBL were analysed to ensure design implementation that course they were analysed was analysis. to ensure transformed into three PBL Constructivism, of these PBL PBL2: Alternative problems emphasise students. The PBL toolkit plan, PBL the PBL Implementing the PBL on also was both design in PBL design design Malaysian design implementation Different numbers of weeks problems. Likewise, the students to on was in knowledge developed brought findings lesson in the third The aim of this design phase (i.e., phase is to and students' implement impact of the required for the students to deal with the three PBL on learning has different number of PBL problem empirical learning and and data students' on the environment. learning cycles impact of the PBL for design learning environment, observation, questionnaire descriptive were statistics used. Data were use to analysis qualitative and respectively. the The PBL activities that variety were of skills linked to the learning activities-which IV as are and the locating practice of this research have indicated that the students learning process such learning knowledge course. problems students' approach such as inductive analysis data among the acquisition on students' written reflection, interview and quantitative problems (PBL 1: assessment. Malaysia setting). To obtain the students' learning Century Learning). Each and skills for all the PBL into that the teacher education context and to ascertain the each PBL complete. implementation The and PBL3: 2 r scenario, student written reflection and Subsequently, the PBL Conception A number of PBL the results from the second design phase, the was design while the intended aligned, design. Following content of the design phase (i.e., Developing outcomes were addressed in the PBL course as one Another two elements involve in this PBL PBL curriculum elements and the and key potentials have served findings in the second design development designfor Malaysia setting). development phase course favourable and the were identified. These collective initial three elements for PBL the PBL learning on included resources-have served they acquired, developed required were aware and the students to be knowledge and skills of the improved throughout actively involved they acquired. The in the group brainstorming, discussing, arguing, presenting as an opportunity and for them to validate arguments, and exchange and expand ideas-all of which have resulted in better resolutions of the tasks. The students also remarked their favour towards PBL: information and asking for help findings have and teaching and (3) the research out that their improved, thus, they have The above spoken directly learning learned about entrenched with traditional lot the multiple learning practice learning practice, research has demonstrated that DBR is between PBL and the present (1) a learning a such i.e as analyse methodology, (2) the PBL Application ofDBR as design the design for the Malaysian elements that influence PBL is means environment the activities. possible Malaysian teacher feasible sharing managing reach and during the relevance of the PBL teacher education since it value and consider new ability to find, activities and materials. methodology increases the Therefore, initiating the felt comfortable from the other group members. In information, the students pointed information has they in a learning. context that is education. The to reconciliate the distance adaopted in Malaysian teacher education. v SAMMENDRAG Denne forskningsrapport omhandler udvikling, implementering og evaluering af Problembaseret Leering (PBL) designs Den studenter-centrerede ltering heringstilgang pa videregaende udfordringer, i den da dens malaysiske som hensyn til metodologi, f.eks. PBL uddannelser i er en designs justeret til at passe til den forskningsresultater, hojde for behov og der bade er det gay og nogle seerlige hensyntagen til denne udfordring er er malaysiske leereruddannelse. valgt Design Based Research (DBR) streeber efter at gore princippeme bag DBR undervisnings- krav, begnensninger og behov der fra de ovennrevnte forhold har forfatteren da relativt ny Malaysia og tilgang var for forskellig kontekstrelevant. Metoden tager har fort til malaysisk lrereruddannelsessammenhreng. en leereruddannelse og kontekst. Under de foreslaede PBL Under som i normer i Ieering mere en lokal videnskabeligt palidelige kontekst, hvilket og praktisk anvendelige. DBR leegger veegt pa synergien mellem forseg pa at forsta leering i et forsknings- praktikere (2) udvikling og forbedre et gennem den og Da metoden vedrerer implementering af et systematisk at justere og ny gentagelse skrider frem. Praksissen med For at et seet af ideer, sig selv (2) bedre forstaelse uddannelsessystemet (3) opnaelse opna sadanne PBL designs, de ferste resultater til PBL blev designfase PBL har pa de forskningen opdelt samt som leering mulighed og for forskningen aktiviteter har fort til af grundlreggende forhold i tre designet, Udvikling af PBL design leering, forskeren praktiske i en designfaser: Indsamling af til en malaysisk malaysisk sammenhceng. streebte efter at :fa indblik i hvilken evidens der studerendes studerendes af hojere ekstem validitet. sammenhceng og Implementering af PBL designet ferste giver DBR inden for at forfine og soge efter at dokumentere af PBL-designet efterhanden indlejret forskning at PBL bliver til et studie i inden for felge med lokale PBL-design (3) forsog pa gentagelse ogjustering og (4) I stedet for stramt at et leering og kognition, designaktiviteter (1) samarbejde indflydelse implementeringen af et PBL-design har bade pa de Ieeringsmilje. (1) forske, designe og konstruere PBL design i komplekst milje. involverer dets iboende PBL-design at er for den Den indflydelse potentialer og begrrensninger i implementering af Vll PBL. Evidensen blev indsamlet ud fra Som heraf var folge og de samling af ferste resultater har vigtigste potentialer den anden curriculumfaktorer og at sikre, at var (PBL 1: begreensninger blev ligget til grund indgar i de nne alignet, mens den for et af de tre elementer i af PBL blev adresseret i for Iseringsresultater, laringsmateriale en Ireringscyklus) Efterfelgende PBL der blev der vrerktejskasse, som konstrueret og studerendes arbejde i den antal kering og deres empiriske data om, hvordan PBL-lreringscyklusser, leering fungerer i den resultateme problemer leering), af bade viden og som bade tredje design undervisnings- og deres som og analytisk tilgang leeringsmilje. har hvert og deskriptive forskelligt PBL-problem gennemfore. havde var PBL-designets De studerende har de studerende skal blev der (dvs. Formalet med denne fase implementeringen af PBL-designet Ieeringsmilja, fase lrereruddannelse og sikre problemer. Ligeledes refleksioner fra de studerende, interview og induktiv folge formodninger om leeringsprocessen (PBL malaysiske med de tre PBL forskelligt studerendes analyseret for studerende, blev udviklet, designet bragt i anvendelse implementere PBL-designet antal uger til at PBL fremlagt. blev PBL indflydelse pa de malaysisk ramme). og PBL 3: 21. drhundredes implementering afPBL-designet i malaysisk sammenhamg). at er: Ved at Ieegger veegt pa udvikling for savel facilitatorer gruppebedemmelser blev en PBL-designets PBL-designet blev analyseret for PBL-designet. Konstruktivisme, PBL2: Alternativ opfattelse fierdigheder, adresseret, design til PBL-designudviklingsfase planlagte retning Ieering identificeret. Denne blev kursuselementeme transformeret til tre PBL designfase, Derudover blev studerendes Et antal PBL curriculumfaktorer blev kursusanalyse. heringsresultaterne fra den anden som designfase (dvs. udvikling To andre elementer der at sikre at de savel indvirkning pa de PBLs forskningsresultater om nyttige, udvikling i teoretiske, praktiske og kontekstuelle perspektiver. et For at fa indflydelse pa de brugt observation, skriftlige spergeskema. Dataanalyseteknik, sa statistikker blev brugt til som savel kvalitative som kvantitative data. Resultateme af forskningen viser, at de studerende forskellige flerdigheder de aktiviteteme, som havde krrevede, at de studerende forbundet med den viden og de involverede viii opnaet, udviklet fserdigheder, var de var bevidste om den viden og de og forbedret gennem kurset. PBL aktivt involveret i Leringsprocessen, opnaede, Gruppeleeringsaktiviteter, brainstorming, diskussioner, argumentering, pnesentation og var som lokalisering af resurser, har givet dem en mulighed for at validere argumenter og for at udveksle og udvide deres ideer. Alt dette har resulteret i bedre ogsa udtryk bede om for hjrelp velvilje over fra andre for PBL: de var gruppemedlemmer. papegede de studerende, at deres forbedret, og at de dermed havde Isert evne og I deres en masse behandling afinformationen igennem analysere information relevansen var aktiviteteme. (1) metodologien (2) PBL-design leeringsaktiviteter og materialer. forskningsmetodologi eger saledes De studerende gay til passe med at dele deres information og til at finde, forsta og De ovenneevnte resultater har direkte neevnt undervisnings- opgavelosninger. Anvendelse afDBR og (3) som afPBL-designet for den malaysiske Ieereruddannelse. IX RUMUSAN Penyelidikan ini melibatkan pembangunan, perlaksanaan dan penilaian rekabentuk Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah (PBM) dalam konteks pendidikan guru Malaysia. Sebagai pendekatan pembelajaran dan pengajaran yang relatifnya barn dalam landskap pendidikan tinggi Malaysia, pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar seperti memberi cabaran kerana dalam pendekatan ini terlalu berbeza keperluan kontekstual (i.e., pendidikan rekabentuk PBM yang telah konteks guru dicadangkan adalah PBM telah daripada kehendak Malaysia). dan kekangan Rentetan dari cabaran diselaraskan untuk disesuaikan ini, dengan pendidikan guru Malaysia. Untuk mengetengahkan isu-isu di atas, penyelidik telah menerima Berasaskan Rekabentuk untuk membuat khususnya, membawa (PBR) sebagai metodologi kerana prinsipnya yang penyelidikan pembelajaran yang lebih relevan metod ini pakai Penyelidikan berusaha dalam konteks. Secara mengutarakan keperluan dan norma konteks tempatan, kepada dapatan penyelidikan yang boleh dipercayai secara yang telah saintifik dan berguna dari segi praktikal. PBR menekankan hubungan sinergi antara penyelidikan, rekabentuk PBM dalam usaha untuk memahami kompleks. Oleh kerana metod aktiviti yang sedia ada dalam mengambil mereka bentuk dan pembelajaran dalam berat tentang kejuruteraan suasana yang pembelajaran dan kognisi , penyelidikan dan reka bentuk melibatkan ( 1) bekerjasama dengan pengamal tempatan (2) membangun dan melaksanakan reka bentuk PBM (3 ) , , berusaha untuk memperbaiki dan menambah baik pembangunan PBM melalui penyesuaian dan (4) ingin mendokumentasikan kesan pelaksanaan pembelajaran dan persekitaran pembelajaran pelajar. idea secara Selain dari reka bentuk PBM penyelidikan ini dalam aktiviti rekabentuk PBM itu sendiri, (3) pencapaian kesahihan praktikal (2) semasa progres Amalan kepada (1 ) pengkajian memberi maklumat tentang isu akar umbi luaran yang lebih secara penyelidikan berlansung. telah membawa pada satu set idea mengikuti ketat, PBR membolehkan penyelidik untuk menyesuaikan PBM sistematik dan iterasi reka bentuk PBM iterasi dan pendidikan dan tinggi. Xl Untuk mencapai bentuk: reka bentuk PBM Mengumpul reka bentuk PBM dalam suasana mengenai dalam hasil , penyelidikan bagi tetapan ini telah kajian awal untuk reka bentuk PBM, Malaysia dan Melaksanakan dalam Fasa reka bentuk Malaysia. bukti kesan PBM pelaksanaan PBM kontekstual. Oleh itu, hasil penyelidikan terhadap impak Penemuan awal kolektif dijadikan utama dan salah satu sebagai rekabentuk PBM dalam fasa reka bentuk kedua bagi tetapan Malaysia). dari dikumpulkan pelajar adalah menggalakkan dan potensi Dua lagi Membangunkan reka bentuk PBL pertama bertujuan untuk memberi penerangan kepada pembelajaran pelajar, Bukti telah . dibahagikan kepada tiga fasa reka dan dan potensi kekangan perspektif teori praktikal , PBM kekangan dan kepada pembelajaran telah dikenal daripada tiga elemen melibatkan dalam fasa pembangunan unsur (i.e, membangunkan pasti. reka bentuk PBM pembangunan reka bentuk PBM ini adalah; elemen kurikulum PBM dan analisis kursus. Beberapa elemen kurikulum PBM dianalisis untuk memastikan keselarian, manakala kursus yang dicadangkan untuk pelaksanaan reka pembelajaran diutarakan dalam rekabentuk 21). Hasil pembelajaran telah memastikan hasil bagi reka bentuk PBM ini. Rentetan hasil kedua,kandungan kursus (PBM1: Konstruktivisme, bentuk PBM dianalisis PBM2: telah ditransformasikan Konsepsi yang menekankan menjadi tiga masalah Altematif dan PBM3: pengetahuan dan dibina dan andaian proses Selanjutnya, kemahiran ke- pembelajaran dan pembelajaran pelajar telah dibangunkan, pentaksiran kumpulan telah pembelajaran (kitaran pembelajaran reka bentuk PBM telah dipratikkan melaksanakan reka bentuk PBL dalam suasana pelaksanaan reka bentuk PBM ) telah dibuat. dalam fasa reka bentuk Malaysia). Tujuan melaksanakan reka bentuk PBM dalam konteks menentukan kesan PBM Pembelajaran Abad diutarakan, Kit PBM yang berfungsi sebagai bahan pengajaran untuk kedua-dua fasilitator dan daripada fasa pendidikan PBM guru ketiga (i.e, fasa ini adalah untuk Malaysia dan terhadap pembelajaran dan persekitaran pembelajaran pelajar. Beberapa minggu diperuntukkan kepada pelajar untuk menangani tiga masalah PBM. Dengan itu, setiap pembelajaran PBM yang berbeza masalah PBM juga kepada pelajar. mengenai kesan pelaksanaan reka bentuk pembelajaran pelajar, selidik telah statistik Xll kaedah digunakan. PBL pemerhatian, Untuk mendapatkan data empirikal pada pembelajaran dan persekitaran refleksi Teknik analisis data mempunyai bilangan kitaran pelajar bertulis, temuduga dan seperti pendekatan soal induktif dan analisis deskriptif telah digunakan untuk data kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil kajian ini telah menunjukkan kepelbagaian kemahiran sepanjang kursus. dalam proses mereka Aktiviti dikaitkan pembelajaran , peluang bagi idea yang telah peroleh membangun dan bertambah baik , Aktiviti PBM yang memerlukan perbineangan, berhujah penyampaian suatu pelajar-pelajar menyedari pengetahuan dan yang telah mereka pembelajaran telah perolehi. bahawa mereka untuk dengan pengetahuan seeara dan pelajar untuk terlibat aktif dan kemahiran yang berkumpulan melibatkan sumbang penearian sumber telah mengesahkan hujah, kesemuanya telah menjana resolusi yang menunjukkan keeenderungan terhadap PBM: maklumat dan meminta bantuan seeara digunakan sebagai dan bertukar dan mengembangkan lebih baik untuk tugasan. mereka merasa daripada ahli-ahli kumpulan yang saran, Pelajar juga selesa untuk berkongsi lain. Dalam menguruskan maklumat, pelajar menegaskan bahawa keupayaan mereka untuk meneari, meneapai telah dan menganalisa maklumat telah menjadi banyak belajar Dapatan kajian semasa di atas seeara reka bentuk PBM serta PBR aktiviti (3) bertambah baik, justeru itu, mereka dijalankan. langsung diperkaitkan dengan (1) metodologi kajian, (2) aktiviti dan bahan pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Penggunaan sebagai metodologi penyelidikan telah meningkatkan kesesuaian reka bentuk PBM dalam pendidikan element yang guru Malaysia kerana ianya menilai mempengaruhi pembelaajaran. Maka, pembelajaran yang baru seperti PBM adalah dan mempertimbangkan pelbagai memulakan satu amalan berpotensi walaupun konteks pendidikan guru Malaysia adalah berakar umbikan pembelajaran berpusatkan guru. Penyelidikan ini telah menunjukkan bahawa PBR adalah satu wadah yang berpotensi dalam usaha merapatkanjurang antara amalan pembelajaran semasa pendidikan guru Malaysia dan PBM. Xlll CONTENTS Summary iii Sammendrag vii Rumusan Xl Acknowledgement xv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Conception of Learning 1.3 Problem Based 1.4 PBL in 1.5 Research 1.6 Conclusions 18 1.7 Reader Guide 19 1 and Constructivism 5 9 Learning (PBL) Malaysian Higher Education and Questions and in Teacher Education 14 17 Objectives CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Methodologies 2.3 Design Based Research (DBR) 2.4 Data Collection and of Researching New Practices as Research Methodology 21 23 Analysis 2.4.1 Literature Review 29 XVll 2.4.2 Data Collection and Analysis for PBL Case at AAU 2.4.3 Data Collection and Analysis for Implementation of the 33 PBL 34 Designs 2.5 Research Trustworthiness 40 2.6 Conclusions 42 CHAPTER 3: PBL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION 43 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Overview of the 3.3 Phase 1: Compiling Initial Findings for PBL Design 3.3.1: Theoretical Element 47 3.3.2: Practical Element 50 3.3.3: Contextual Element 53 3.3.4: Initial 3.4 43 Design Phase Phase 2: Findings for PBL Developing the 3.4.1: Initial PBL Design Design for Malaysian Setting Findings for PBL Design 3.4.2: Elements ofPBL curriculum 3.4.3: Analysis Phase 3: XVlll 62 69 Implementing the PBL Design in Malaysian Setting 3.5.1: Pre-Implementation Phase 78 3.5.2: Implementation Phase 83 3.5.3: Reflection 3.6 61 66 of the Course 3.4.4: The PBL Toolkit 3.5 56 Conclusions on the Implementation 85 89 CHAPTER 4: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FINDINGS 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Empirical Research Findings 4.3 93 4.2.1 Qualitative Findings 93 4.2.2 Quantitative Findings 97 Conclusions 102 CHAPTER 5: REVISITING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND PERSPECTIVES 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Revisiting Research Question 5.3 Revisiting 105 1 (RQ 1) 106 Question 2 (RQ2) 108 5.4 Revisiting Research Question 3 (RQ3) 109 5.5 Revisiting Research Question 4 (RQ4) 112 5.6 Conclusions 113 Research REFERENCES 117 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Teacher education is influenced education and Figure 2 3 Figure 4 primary and Three elements involved in PBL Figure on by both policies secondary school compiling the initial on higher findings for the 3 46 designs Three elements involved in Elements ofPBL developing the alignment PBL in the curriculum 60 designs (Kolmos et al., 63 2009) Figure 5 Four components of the PBL toolkit 70 Figure 6 PBL student task in the form of instruction statement for PBL 1 72 Figure 7 Aligning learning outcome, teaching and the assessment (adapted from and learning activities (PBL) 74 Biggs, 1999) xix Figure 8 Sub-phases and main activities involve in the implementation 78 phase Figure 9 80 Learning process conjectures LIST OF TABLES of constructivism 7 learning environments Table I Principles Table 2 McMaster PBL model 10 Table 3 Seven steps of Maastricht PBL model 11 Table 4 The (2003, 13 Table 5 Methodological alignment of Design Based Research (DBR) 27 Table 6 Four criteria to select articles for review process 30 Table 7 Review framework for selected articles 31 Table 8 Data collection Table 9 Guide in Table 10 Questionnaire Table 11 Application of the project model proposed by 2007) according to de Graaff and Kolmos PBL problems 35 and weeks 38 designing a self-completed questionnaire on PBL Wolcott 39 environment learning (1994) strategies 40 to ensure trustworthiness of the research Table 12 Elements/sub-phases Table 13 Research Table 14 Research in the three 44 design phase findings on the student learning experience and implementation issues of PBL in Malaysian higher education findings on the impact of PBL on pre-service teachers 48 49 learning Table 15 Research findings on the PBL on the contextual elements learning experience of the first year 51 AAU students Table 16 Research Table 17 Initial Table 18 Contemplating on the initial findings for PBL design development Table 19 PBL xx findings findings for PBL design alignments of elements in the curriculum 54 57 61 65 Table 20 Comparison of the activity Table 21 Curriculum matrix to match the course Table 22 PBL content course outline before and after the learning redesign outcome to the 67 new 68 PBL 71 (PBL problems) trigger and P BL student task according to specific problem Table 23 Authentic assessment Table 24 Examples Table 25 The PBL Table 26 Activities involved according to the PBL problems of skills and competencies and ways to 75 76 assess thinking tool 81 during the implementation phase of the PBL 83 design Table 27 Number of weeks Table 28 Empirical on required to complete the PBL 85 problems research students' findings on the impact ofPBL implementation learning and students' learning environment 94 Table 29 Mean and SD for items in Table 30 Mean and SD for items in group Table 31 Mean and SD for items in the PBL task 99 Table 32 Mean and SD for items in the facilitator 100 Table 33 Mean and SD for items in PBL 97 general impression 98 learning process benefits and perspectives 102 APPENDICES for PBL A Interview guide AppendixB Interview transcript sample (PBL Appendix Appendix C AppendixD Group process case at case at 125 AAU) 132 analysis report sample Individual and group written reflection prompt for PBL design implementation 134 in Malaysia E Interview guide Appendix F Interview transcript sample (PBL design implementation Appendix 123 Aalborg University in 139 141 Malaysia) Appendix G SPSS-generated output for the Cronbach alpha value 147 XXI 149 Questionnaire Appendix I Article 1: Problem Based Learning (P BL) in Malaysian Higher Education Context: A Review ofResearch ofIssues of Implementation and Learners' Experience 153 Appendix J Article 2: A Review 163 (PBL) AppendixK on on PBL learning environment Appendix H ofthe Impact of Problem Based Learning Pre-Service Teachers' Learning Article 3: Problem Based Learning Collaborative (PBL): A Context for Learning Process at Aalborg University, 171 Denmark Appendix L Addressing the Contextual Elements and Developing Initial P BL Design: Lesson Learned from Three Asian Article 4: 183 Universities AppendixM The PBL toolkit for PBL 1: Constructivism 199 Appendix N The PBL toolkit for PBL2: Alternative Conception 206 Century Learning 216 Appendix 0 The PBL toolkit for PBL3: 21st Appendix P Student Guide to PBL 222 Appendix Q Field-note observations 232 AppendixR Impact of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Implementation on Student Learning 253 xxii Article 5: INTRODUCTION To meet the goal of educating pre-service and in-service school teachers for 21 schools, teacher educators in higher education are demanded to employ forms of pedagogy that suits adult learners. Conventional higher education is no frontline in preparing better ways to knowledge, strengthen their evaluate this a dispositions (pre-service foster active among students. PBL design learning in Accordingly, this on from many teaching learning develop, implement and practices in shifting to policy perspective. philosophy, the point of view. second section specific institutions The fourth section and gives The third section discusses learning principles that derived an overview ofPBL in teacher education. interplay between those aforementioned issues, research questions are and aspects of PBL, from basic assumption of learning formulated in the fifth part of this Analysis of and research chapter. Background Concerns towards education systems that do not and of the the motivation and drivers for the from constructivism variety ofPBL models. objectives 1.1 one research aims to implementation both in Malaysian higher education and the teachers) and inculcate skills and is entrenched from constructivism interpreting the practice across and in-service school learning experience higher education comprehensively discusses the PBL from models at the in the context of Malaysian teacher education. The first section of learning practice Since active Being in in order to be successful in diverse classrooms. chapter provides preliminary insights active to students' innovative teachers, teacher educators continually seek demand, Problem Based Learning (PBL) is approach designed to competencies school century pedagogy that entrenched sufficient to meet this current demand. Malaysian skills and To meet such longer an st working have prompted reviews adequately prepare students for in education worldwide. Students' learning living in higher 1 education is largely influenced regards education that disregards of teaching and approach students' attainment of skills and specialists suggest that education way their teachers/lecturers teach. A to this issue is the criticism with institutions should focus and (Murray-Harvey et al., 2004) than accuracy of the students' In the by the emphasize on past, extensive cognitive science studies on on student-centered a will facilitate the skills and of the quality to as approach to teaching well. Fostering centred. To education graduates. centered effectively address these are highlight the steered to For the example, learning, (Kolmos, 2010). and To a does not can 1993). on to learn it? active memorizing we in a more competencies we know that are and 2 outcome domain: student to achieve such aims has introduced the learning outcomes This on that focuses of the their equal emphasis on been learnt it? tackle many taught. development both we challenging tasks To realize this aim want our help student on other than across was on course Hence, the OBE emphasizes Malaysian established at the In line with its role quality in Malaysian higher education, the MQF emphasizes following learning university on learning activities (Pelan Strategik Pengajian Tinggi Negara, 2007). reference for higher on learn it? What is the best ways to expected to reproducing what has student are (Puteh, 2013). graduation. they have but higher education that Europe has emphasized public universities, the Malaysian Qualification Framework (MQF) end 0[2007 the well-rounded of knowledge, but also possession want them to where students and challenges only knowledge, prompted university teachers to enquire: What do Why do and how do learning develop education and upon higher education that higher education, policies do after class. In OBE, the qualities and skills has students to learn? in who possess not design and teaching students' of appropriate skills and knowledge learning on this in turn, would learning approaches in the late 1990's (OBE) actually only focus need to thinking process rather keep abreast, the Malaysia'S higher education method of curriculum what students issues in Bologna process outcome based outcome-based education aBE is and such outcome develop, implement and evaluate teaching skills the nature of learning have focused production of university graduates competencies higher inculcating generic having teaching moved towards learning (Barr and Tagg, 1995); encourage in learning competencies. Higher and Howson, (Casey answers the long-standing on the as the As 1. Knowledge ii. Practical skills 111. Social skills and responsibilities IV. Values, attitudes and v. Communications, leaderships VI. Problem V11. Information managements and viii. Managing entrepreneurial teacher educator who teaches in a researcher has to include those OBE aims. Regardless, education, but also ways pre-service Policies on on learning in and Figure 1, initiatives have are regards only on school being taught and course the implications in higher and how it affects the in teacher education institutions. and primary secondary school on and on secondary school how teachers changes policy change policy - in policy. Developments on to achieve the by both policies on higher education correspond to the policy changes school the Malaysia, Policies teacher education does not take need to stay abreast with the with is not education secondary in Teacher higher education should primary concern 1: Teacher education is influenced depicted university outcome domains in the and in-service teachers primary As skills development of Malaysian education Figure lifelong learning educational an the researcher's the and team skills and scientific skills solving and professionalism are place in a vacuum. higher education, and changes as Teacher well in national in policies and being prepared. Furthermore, in local and national standards. Recent as teachers development to school teachers and school children is the introduction of the School Based Assessments (SBA) by the Malaysia's Ministry of Education in Pengurusan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah, 2012). implementation 2011 (Panduan The rationale of the SBA is to: learners' physical, emotional, spiritual i. Develop ii. Reduce exam-oriented 111. Evaluate learners' learning progress learning and intellectual abilities among learners 3 Enhance teachers' IV. in integrity assessing, recording and reporting of learners' learning. SBA is a holistic, integrated and standard-referenced emphasizes student. There are and development of cognitive the on are two categories given the responsibility to In guidelines. Berasaskan Sekolah, 2012). in ways different from the in-service teachers or profession, that inculcates attitudes and and ones words, school teachers need are used to. This are teaching as a curriculum planner, as a to assess responsive team the equip and relevant to the particular, they also are leader, a the role of today's carrying multiple decision maker and teachers develop their and critical themselves with necessary skills, ever-changing complexity diversity of students' backgrounds, 1998 and skills and provide the competencies Edmundson implies that teachers Entailing issues of policy need to be relevant to their future change, both in schools. Hence, I 4 place in and teacher educator who prepares teachers for both Malaysian primary and secondary implement OBE to take Malaysia's higher education as a How to effects of the of change (p. 722). prepared for any change schools, have reflected on my role 1. help school teachers. He added: schools and may themselves become the obstacles schools. ongoing (1990) foundations to New teachers will be unable to resist the powerful conservative This statement of the school inclusive classrooms and Goodnough, 2006). does not their students such demand? to meet creativity, intellectuality, problem solving ability argued that a teacher education programme professions more and classroom matters; disposition to correspond with new rubrics however, raises the question; do the schools and school students. In development of technologies (Dean, future and be urged to For this reason, teachers need to classrooms, such by using instruments, learning process (Panduan Pengurusan Pentaksiran they teachers being a researcher, thinking skills. psychomotor of a school pre-service teachers have the ability teachers is not limited to one that in SBA: academic and non-academic. School teachers In other on-going changes regarding the approach fact, they should plan, prepare the instruments and administer the during the teaching roles like and affective conduct and administer SBA assessment Like any other assessment queried: in my teaching and learning? How to prepare teachers 11. (pre-service and in-service teachers) that correspond to current school demands? iii. How to continually prepare teachers according to the how to sustain the A new approach in teaching new and pedagogical practice learning practice giving teachers the responsiveness they need current demands, and in teacher education? seemed to be to meet with an essential element in developments new in school policies. 1.2 Conception of Learning and Constructivism Early understanding of what constitutes learning was contributed by the behaviourist school of thought, who postulated learning as external stimuli in the environment (Skinner, a change in observable behaviour caused 1974). Early behaviourist scientists such by as Thorndike and Pavlov claimed that observable behaviour indicates that the learner has learned, and not what is going on in his cognitive structure. The research learning on remained flourished within behavioural tradition of psychology until 1960s (Shuell, 1986). Between 1960s and behaviouristic to 1970s, the psychology of learning began to change from cognitive orientations (Shuell, 1986) since there environmental influences towards human factor to describe with the learning. shift from This shift development of cognitive psychology that placed great emphasis information processing as cognitive psychologists to was a as cause in behaviour. learning on the as processing capacity and the learner's Marton and Booth the world, and about more concerned with various perception, thinking knowledge representation and memory. during the learning process Learning, leamer's is observable and there is Cognitive psychology is Hence, the cognitive psychologists posit learning learning depends on began of learning. This is from the response of who claimed that not all learning than a change mental activities such the central a internal process, and the amount of of the leamer, the amount of effort existing (1997) defined, "meaning making". as structure (Ausubel, 1974). is how learners To describe expended perceive and understand meaning making, cognitive 5 psychologists have knowledge introduced "structure" such in memory schemata and heuristics to represent as (Palincsar, 1998). Therefore, knowledge outside but rather from inside the learners. The schemata the learners accommodation process as actions and information. Change are in schemata accommodation) reflects that learning has affective, interpersonal or exposed to new occurred. a produce knowledge in situations that differ from person to another These the basic assumption that gave Constructivism stemmed from the Jean Piaget's work (2002), an burgeoning epistemology cognitive, and knowledge (Biggs true to that person but not based (Cobb on their beliefs and and Bowers, 1999). rise to constructivism. field of cognitive science and the socio-historical work of Ley constructivism is in process of individual construct their experience were or understandings, experiences, Learning (whether involves people actively anyone else since learners from undergoes assimilation Moore, 1993). An individual's construction of knowledge is necessarily to imposed (either through assimilation or psychomotor domains) transformation and for this reason, is not or Vygotsky. According to Simpson philosophical explanation of learning. It shares characteristics with social particularly from cognitive theory that about the nature assumes persons, behaviours, and environment interact in reciprocal fashions (Bandura, 1997). However, constructivism differs from the learners; it also the locus conditioning theories contrasts with the oflearning within the mind, cognitive that stress environmental influence information on processing theory that places with little attention to the context in which it occurs (Schunk, 2009). Constructivism can be explained from three different perspectives endogenous and dialectical (Schunk, 2009). Exogenous notion that knowledge acquisition is represented by external world. This view implies a a constructivism developed through cognitive knowledge-not directly explain knowledge 6 the the highlights the In contrast, endogenous explain knowledge acquisition whereby abstraction from from environmental interactions Dialectical constructivism on on strong influence of external world in knowledge constructivism refers to the mental structure to is emphasizes reconstruction of structure construction, which may include experience and teaching. knowledge of exogenous, as previously acquired in exogenous constructivism. interaction between persons and environments to construction. Construction of knowledge is neither merely from external world, nor from the results of mental structure abstraction· rather it is the result , , of mental interaction with the environment. The basic and premise knowledge 2009). of constructivism is that into old understanding This underlies many and learning and principles, occurs as characterized by fitting new understanding and knowledge (Fry, Ketteridge learning principles that has development (Schunk, 2009). constructivism learning A Marshall, affected theories and research in learning environment that reflects by Brooks and Brooks (1999), is shown in Table 1: Table 1: of constructivism Principles Posing problems • Structuring learning • Seeking • Adapting • Assessing valuing around whereby a topic student learning (1999), pg35-96 participation, are taught to at ownership meaning al., 2004). As of what a they've and teaching perspectives, teaching own active role as an class discussion are designed meaningful inquiry by specifically described PBL In a and exploring interest higher retention, from a as the learners seek meaning constructed by their teachers (Hmelo and aligned with the constructivism active and understanding. evaluating progress, learned and encourages (mentally, physically, socially PBL is also learning process by result, constructivism learning environment gives students for themselves and not the tutoring and and Rather, the be self-directed and take active role in Evensen, 2000). A constructivism learning environment such peer integrated curriculum of instruction to learners. which allows them to construct their learning by setting goals, monitoring (Bruning delivery an From way that engages learners to the constructivism classroom, learners their emphasizes multiple perspectives. constructivism contradicts to the traditional active suppositions in the context of teaching constructivism is studied from a point of view and opinions curriculum to address students' perspectives, lesson is structured in primary concept students' Source: from Brooks and Brooks From curriculum environments of emerging relevance to students • and learning in a as and cooperative learning, way that allows students to play an emotionally) during the learning process. framework that views learners. Likewise, Savery learning and and teaching Duffy (1995) constructivism framework: 7 1. Learners construct their to think both critically own and problem, their peers, the knowledge creatively - Learners are encouraged and expected with multi-directional interactions with the resources, and the instructor. process of transmitting information from others to the learners it's a process of immersing themselves into them to monitor their 11. Problems as own related to the the 111. problem learning and identifying learning - All learnings issues based is socially negotiated Social - arise from on their team structure. Students' and tested constantly challenged negotiation of meaning is analysis and transform their knowledge among group members. The dialectical constructivism knowledge and and on explanations which communication serves as and supports activities like socially constructed, collaborative learning communication in PBL reflects for how individuals construct and transform Vygotskys theory of learning social interaction leads to the main tool that promotes reading and collaboration and as exchange the construction in thinking, develops reasoning Because knowledge is of ideas among group members lead to learning development of team-work professional practice (Maudsley & Strivens, 2000), an social process. In knowledge writing (Vygotsky, 1978). pragmatic value of supporting not content for how individuals construct the inculcation of social and communication skills. Collaborative learning is important conceptual understanding through dialectical activity. This dialectical particular, Vygotsky proposed that for the an understanding of the conceptual understanding through emphasis constructivism entrenched from but also in is valued, not skills needed in recognizing the view that isolated, individual activity. Accordingly, Malaysia's National Higher Education Action Plan (2011) recommended lecturers/university teachers in higher education institutions adopt student-centred learning approaches in their classrooms in order to achieve both the OBE aims and the quality of teaching and learning in higher education, in which the Problem Based 8 of by others. Learning through group work and collaboration explains that that allows class, generating hypotheses, identifying relevant facts in part of the problem-solving only one problem. Knowledge is themselves; rather, problem situation, a no more a understanding. stimulus and organizer for discussing the problem is Learning
© Copyright 2024