ADOPTION OF THE 2015 EDITION OF THE CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE FOR USE IN BC Consultation Feedback Summary Report BC Safety Authority held a public consultation on the proposed BC amendments and changes to the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code. This report summarizes the feedback received from stakeholders during the consultation period of April 7 to May 15, 2015. PARTICIPATION A Working Group was struck to propose BC amendments to the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code. The recommendation from this Working Group was accepted by BCSA’s Electrical Technology Advisory Committee. Number of meetings 4 Number of Working Group members 9 Number of Electrical Technology Advisory Committee members 13 Consultation Number of consultation meetings 1 Meeting attendees 16 Written responses received 21 Total number of participants 38 Invitations sent 8200 Letters were sent to targeted stakeholders, with follow -up emails and phone calls to six stakeholder associations. Direct emails w ere sent to electrical contractors, FSRs and ow ners. Website notific ations were sent to those who had registered to receive “electrical” updates. RESPONSE RATE < 0.0 % Adoption of the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code: Consultation Feedback Summary Report BC Safety Authority May 2015 p.1 of 5 Respondent demographics The following table provides a breakdown of participants in the consultation, including both the written feedback received and the April 29, 2015 consultation meeting attendees. Businesses (electrical contractors) 18 Micro (1-9 employees)* 8 Small (10-49 employees) 1 Medium (50-249 employees) 0 Large (250-999 employees) 0 Associations 7 Electrical industry associations 1 Owner/end user associations 5 Construction industry associations 1 Owners 1 Manufacturers/distributors/suppliers 1 Engineers 1 Utilities 1 Governments/Regulatory agencies 6 Educators 1 Renewable energy systems designers/engineers 2 TOTAL 38** *These only include contractors who identified number of employees through the feedback form **The total number counts partic ipants who both submitted w ritten feedback and attended the consultation meeting as a single participant, and organizations who co-authored written feedback in a single submission as multiple participants. RESPONSES Agreement with the adoption of the 2015 edition of the code Response Yes No Chart Percentage Count 73.3% 26.7% 11 4 Adoption of the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code: Consultation Feedback Summary Report BC Safety Authority May 2015 p.2 of 5 Agreement with the proposed BC amendments Response Chart Yes No Percentage Count 46.7% 53.3% 7 8 Section 0 Proposed BC amendment to definitions of “electrical contractor” and “National Building Code of Canada” Top comments Response Chart Disagree with referring to National Building Code Percentages Count 100.0% 2 Section 10 Proposed BC amendment to allow for aluminum as a grounding conductor in dry locations Top comments Response Chart Want only copper as grounding service Percentages Count 100.0% 1 Section 26 Expanded use of arc fault circuit interrupters in residential buildings Agreement Response Chart Negative Positive Percentages Count 84.6% 15.4% 12 2 Percentages Count 64.3% 28.6% 21.4% 21.4% 9 4 3 3 Top comments Response Cost is too high Nuisance tripping Is not a high risk Safety is worth the cost Chart Adoption of the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code: Consultation Feedback Summary Report BC Safety Authority May 2015 p.3 of 5 Section 64 Changes to requirements for photovoltaic systems Agreement Response Chart Negative Positive Percentages Count 50.0% 50.0% 2 2 Percentages Count 25.0% 1 25.0% 25.0% 1 1 25.0% 25.0% 1 1 Top comments Response Chart Disagree with arc fault circuit protection Standards cannot be achieved Disagree with disconnecting procedure Disagree with rapid shutdown Sets a good standard Section 66 Changes to requirements for motion picture, TV industry, carnivals and similar settings Agreement Response Chart Negative Neutral Positive Percentages Count 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 1 1 1 Percentages Count 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 Top comments Response Disagree with grounding conductor cable size Disagree with requiring single splitters Chart Section 76 No BC amendment to Rule 76-016 for Assured Grounding Program (AGP), unlike previous editions Adoption of the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code: Consultation Feedback Summary Report BC Safety Authority May 2015 p.4 of 5 Agreement Response Chart Negative (amendment necessary) Positive (no amendment necessary) Percentages Count 0% 100.0% 0 3 Percentages Count 33.3% 33.3% 1 1 Top comments Response Chart AGP needs to include bonding AGP doesn’t address double insulated tools Other comments Response Consultation process (negative) Count 2 Adoption of the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code: Consultation Feedback Summary Report BC Safety Authority May 2015 p.5 of 5
© Copyright 2024