PREECLAMPSIA: UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA MATERNAL QUALITY CARE COLLABORATIVE TOOLKIT A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Stanislaus In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Nursing By Jennifer Serratos May 2015 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL PREECLAMPSIA: UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA MATERNAL QUALITY CARE COLLABORATIVE TOOLKIT by Jennifer Serratos Signed Certification of Approval Page is on file with the University Library Marla J. Seacrist, RN, PhD Associate Professor of Nursing Date Beth Stephens-Hennessy, RNC, OB-EFM, MSN Clinical Nurse Specialist Date Vicki Henry, RN, MSN/Ed Clinical Nurse Educator Date © 2015 Jennifer Serratos ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this project to all the women and children that will be helped through the use of the evidence based best practice regarding preeclampsia. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge my family and their sacrifices that assisted me to reaching my goal of my master degree; Nicholas, Andrew, Allison, Kamarin, Ken, Colleen, and Melissa. Also I would like to recognize my committee members and chair for their countless hours to assist me with the multiple revisions to this project. Each one of you brought a different expertise that help to refine this project. Marla Seacrist as my chair, good friend, and mentor your guidance and many talks to help me off the “ledge” and redirect me were invaluable. Vicki Henry you are one of the smartest women I know and your input as an educator and non-obstetrics nurse made sure that the information was relevant to a new learner. Beth Stephen-Hennessy you were my content expert and your participation assisted me to insure the information I was reading and interpreting for the end project was valid. Finally, I would like to thank Wendy Matthew for all you have done in supporting me through this process of getting our master’s degree; the endless texting, proofreading my papers and being the exact opposite of me. Again thank you all, as it truly takes a village to raise a child… or in this case complete an evidence based project that has the potential to help many women and children. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Dedication ............................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. v Abstract ................................................................................................................... viii Understanding and Implementing Elements of a Toolkit ....................................... 1 Theoretical Frameworks ............................................................................. Preeclampsia ............................................................................................. Implementation of the Toolkit and Evaluation ........................................... Summary of Culminating Experience Project ............................................ 1 2 2 3 Background, Significance, and Theoretical Frameworks ....................................... 4 Knowles Andragogical Model .................................................................... Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory ......................................................... Learning Styles ........................................................................................... The Power of a Checklist ............................................................................ Change Theory ............................................................................................ 6 7 8 14 16 Preeclampsia Literature Review ............................................................................. 19 Definition of Hypertensive Disorder .......................................................... Risk Factors for Preeclampsia .................................................................... Historical Perspective of Preeclampsia ....................................................... Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia ..................................................................... Current Standard of Practice Prior to CMQCC Toolkit.............................. 20 21 23 25 28 CMQCC Toolkit Implementation ........................................................................... 32 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .............................. California Pregnancy Associated Mortality Review................................... California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative......................................... Implementation ........................................................................................... 33 34 35 37 Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 41 Board of Registered Nursing ...................................................................... Evaluation Tools ......................................................................................... 42 43 vi Overall Conclusion of Project ..................................................................... 44 References ............................................................................................................... 48 Appendices A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Summary of Articles from the CMQCC Toolkit ........................................ History and Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia ........................................... California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative: Preeclampsia Education Preeclampsia Early Recognition Tool ........................................................ Evaluation and Treatment of Antepartum & Postpartum Preeclampsia ..... Treatment for Severe Preeclampsia ............................................................ Eclampsia Checklist .................................................................................... Online Module Evaluation Tool ................................................................. Simulation Evaluation................................................................................. vii 61 64 70 77 78 79 80 81 82 ABSTRACT The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) created a toolkit that defined the best practices for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Knowledge gaps exist in the understanding of pathophysiology, history, and treatment of preeclampsia. According to the CMQCC, hypertensive disorders occur in 12-22% of pregnancies, resulting in the leading cause of maternal mortality. The purpose of this culminating project is to implement an adult learning program that includes both a didactic portion and an experiential component focusing on preeclampsia. Various theoretical frameworks, teaching strategies, and learning theories will be discussed to build the background foundation. These theories include: Knowles Adult Learning theory, Kolb’s Experiential Learning theory, Kotter’s Change theory, Online and Computer based learning, and the power of the checklist in the field of healthcare. The aim of this project is to assist staff nurses and providers who work in maternal health departments. Key words include: Preeclampsia, adult learning theory, andragogical, online and computer based learning, checklist in nursing, evaluation, and simulation. The outcome of this project will be a computer based learning module, a team based simulation scenario, and finally a best practice checklist and algorithms regarding the history, pathophysiology and current treatment for preeclampsia, supported by the elements from the CQMCC toolkit. The rewards of an evidence based learning program for nurses, implications for future research and implications for nursing practice regarding preeclampsia will be explored. viii UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING ELEMENTS OF A TOOLKIT Preeclampsia and its associated syndromes are one of the leading causes of fetal and maternal morbidity (Druzin, Shields, Peterson, & Cape, 2013; Martin, 2013; Silasi, Cohen, Karumanchi, & Rana, 2010). The syndrome of preeclampsia is diagnosed when a previously normotensive preganat female develops a new onset of hypertension and has symptoms of either proteinuria or end organ dysfunction (August, 2014; Sibai, 2012). Staff nurses at this author’s hospital were surveyed, and readily admit to a knowledge gap in understanding hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, specifically related to preeclampsia, the history of preeclampsia, and the current treatment of preeclampsia. Two separate expert task forces [California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) and The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG)] convened to investigate the management of hypertension in pregnancy and published their evidence based recommendations (ACOG, 2013; Druzin, Shields et al., 2013). The purpose of this culminating experience project is to develop an electronic learning (e-learning) module, a simulation scenario, and a preeclampsia checklist using the CMQCC toolkit. The title of the reference toolkit is Improving Health Care Response to Preeclampsia: A California Quality Improvement Toolkit. Theoretical Frameworks Theoretical frameworks will be used to guide the development of this project. Knowles’ (1989) andragogical models will be discussed in reltation to adult learning and strategies. Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory will be used to guide the implementation of the simulation scenario. Kotter’s (1996) change theory will be used to guide the implementation of the CQMCC toolkit and evidence based practice changes. 1 2 Additionally three different learning styles will be explored to determine the best practice for implantation of the e-learning, simulation, and checklist portions of this project. Preeclampsia In order to effectively use the CMQCC toolkit an extensive literature review was conducted to gain knowledge about preeclampsia, its history, risk factors, prognosis, and treatment. Preeclampsia affects 3% to 5% of all pregnancies, and has a perinatal and neonatal mortality rate of 10% worldwide (Silasi et al., 2010). In California, preeclampsia is responsible for 17% of all maternal deaths, in which all of were judged to be preventable to some degree (Druzin, Walsh et al., 2013). The United States of America allocated between 18 to 22 billion dollars of direct healthcare cost to treat women with preeclampsia and their neonates in 1992 (Shmueli, Meiri, & Gonen, 2012). It is important to look at the past treatment and history of preeclampsia, to gain insight that will produce best practices and tools, for future patients suffering from preeclampsia. Implementation of the Toolkit and Evaluation Many reasons can be attributed to errors occurring in healthcare. According to Ennen and Satin (2014), patient safety is at risk due to human fallibility errors, complexity in the medical field, and defensive barriers. Many strategies can be implemented to reduce errors; such as individual education, simulation and drills, the development of evidence based protocols, guidelines and checklists (Kohn, Corrigan, & Donaldson, 2000). The end product for this culmination experience project will include an e-learning module, a checklist, and a simulation scenario. The module content will include the history, risk factors, and current treatment of preeclampsia. The checklist is to be used when a preeclampsia patient arrives to a maternal child unit to direct the treatment and interventions of care the patient will receive. Finally a simulation scenario for a preeclamptic patient experiencing an eclamptic seizure 3 will be drilled, on a maternal child unit, to educate the staff on the care that is expected to be delivered. The creation and/or implementation of these items will be guided by the CMQCC toolkit (Druzin, Shields et al., 2013). Summary of Culminating Experience Project The final section of this culminating experience project will be to identify the gaps that still exist after the implementation of the e-learning, simulation, and checklist related to the care of the preeclampsia patient. Despite the fulfillment of several areas of needed education and implementation this project will complete, new areas of future research or education will become evident after completion. Furthermore implications for future nursing practice will be acknowledged and discussed, along with an overall evaluation of the application of this culminating experience project. Preeclampsia is one of the most common complications of pregnancy affecting both the mother and fetus (Druzin, Shields et al., 2013). The treatment of preeclampsia is currently a rescue perspective, as opposed to a preventable approach. Until the definitive cause of preeclampsia is found, prevention remains elusive. However, with the development of the CMQCC toolkit, a standard of interventions for best practice is now available for providers, clinical staff, hospitals, and healthcare organizations (Druzin, Shields et al., 2013). One would hope that with the implementation of evidence based practice interventions regarding preeclampsia, there will be a decrease morbidity and mortality for mothers and babies. BACKGROUND, SIGNIFICANCE, AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS Nursing professionals are lifelong learners. The current emphasis for treatment and care for their patient population is to apply evidence based best practices. Learning opportunities should have a theory based foundation. Knowledge regarding the various learning styles, theories, models, and frameworks ensure that the education being delivered is appropriate to meet the learning goals. The reliable models and theories, created by Knowles (1989) and Kolb (1984), are appropriate for the implementation of adult active learning strategies. Some adult active learning strategies include simulation, computer based learning, and standardization of care through the use of a checklist. Changing the standard for practice to reflect evidence based best practices within the field of nursing is a slow process. With the emphasis in the medical field to create a culture of safety by applying evidence-based best practice for better patient outcomes and safety, nurses must continue to learn best practices. Nurses must have research-based knowledge and apply it appropriately when caring for patients (Gawande, 2010). Nurses are lifelong learners requiring continuing education for the renewal of their professional licenses (Curran, 2014). It is imperative for nurses to be professionally accountable with current education, skills, knowledge, and delivery of care that has been supported by the best evidence (Bromley, 2010). Learning opportunities should be accessible and convenient. 4 5 Challenges for nurses to keep up to date with their knowledge include staffing problems that make it difficult for acute care facilities to allow staff to attend conferences. Cost for extended education is expensive with the travel, course fees, time off from work, and time away from their families (Bromley, 2010). The goal is to make education obtainable for the staff nurse so that he/ she will continue to apply critical thinking and clinical reasoning with evidence based best practices. Adult learners are classified as being between the ages of 25 to 64 and somehow involved in a learning experience for work or non-work purpose’s (Promoting Adult Learning, 2005). Many adult learning theories can be referenced to guide nursing education. Malcolm Knowles (1989) and his adult learning framework along with David Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory will be the theatrical frameworks applied in the development and implementation of this project. As with adult theorists, many teaching strategies can be used to educate the adult learner. The active teaching strategy that will be applied is computer based or electronic learning (e-learning), along with simulation, and checklist development and usage. Change is difficult for some people especially those in the nursing field that have been doing the same thing the same way for years. Lastly, the application of a change theorist will guide and assist with the concept and implementation of change for practicing nurses. Currently there are two types of learning; passive and active. Passive learning is when the learner is not required to be an active participant in the learning (Phillips, 2005). An example of passive learning is the traditional reading from the textbook, watching videos, and attending lecture. The educator gives the information and the 6 learner recalls the ideas. According to Phillips (2005), fewer high level cognitive skills are applied, and the learning is often at a lower level. Active learning strategies engage the learner and demand an advanced level of thinking. The learner is required to integrate, relate, and retain the knowledge. Educators’ roles change from a teacher to facilitator; it is now the students’ responsibility to learn when using active learning (Phillips, 2005). Knowles Andragogical Model Many different theories are embedded in nursing research that would serve to provide a foundation for this project. Malcom Knowles (1989) is the adult learning framework that will guide this cumulating project. According to Curran (2014), Knowles coined the word andragogy to build his assumptions on adult learning theory. Andragogy refers to scholarship that uses learner focused teaching, where the student and educator use a collaborative approach (Bromley, 2010; Curran, 2014; Phillips, 2005; Reeves & Reeves, 2008). Some examples of andragogical educational strategies that promote active learning are: learners collaborating with their peers, online discussion forums, web based tele conferencing, and instructive feedback from instructors (Bromley, 2010). According to Knowles, (1989) his andragogical model (adult learning framework) is comprised of six assumptions: Adults need to know why they need to learn something before undertaking to learn it. Adult have a self-concept of being responsible for their own lives. Adults come into an educational activity with both a greater volume and a different quality of experience from youths. Adults become ready to learn 7 those things they need to know or to be able to do in order to cope effectively with their real-life situations. In contrast to children’s and youths’ subjectcentered orientation to learning (at least in school), adults are life centered (or task centered or problem centered) in their orientation to learning. While adults are responsive to some extrinsic motivators (better jobs promotions, salary increases, and the like), the more potent motivators are intrinsic motivators. (Knowles, 1989, pp. 83-84). The application of Knowles andragogical model will be threaded into this project, as all the learners are adults, self-directed, prefer active learning strategies, and create their environment for the knowledge to meet their needs. Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory After the learner gains the cognitive information presented in the learning modules, they will have the ability to apply the knowledge in a simulated environment. Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory is a learner-center approach that focuses on the learner actively problem solving and contributing to the physical experience (Curran, 2014; Lisko & O’Dell, 2010). Experiential learning is a continuous process that changes the way a person reasons and performs by transforming the experience into cognitive concepts (Lisko & O’Dell, 2010) The four stages of an experiential learning cycle are concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and finally active experimentation (Stutsky & Laschinger, 1995). According to Kolb (1984) experiential learning theory stages are: 8 An orientation toward concrete experience focuses on being involved in experiences and dealing with immediate human situations in a personal way. An orientation toward reflective observation focuses on understanding the meaning of ideas and situations by carefully observing and impartially describing them. An orientation toward abstract conceptualization focuses on using logic, ideas, and concepts. An orientation toward active experimentation focuses on actively influencing people and changing situations (Kolb, 1984, pp. 68-69). The application of Kolb’s experiential learning theory will be threaded into this project, as all the learners will be asked to apply didactic cognitive skills into a simulation scenario. Learning Styles According to Overview of Learning Styles (2013), there are seven different ways that individuals can learn; visual, logical, verbal, physical, aural, social, and solitary. The visual learning or spatial learner tend to prefer pictures, images, and can use spatial references for understanding and tend to be fast-paced learners. The logical learning style or mathematical learner prefers to use logic or reasoning for understanding. The verbal learning or linguistic learner tends to use words, either in writing or speech to gain an understanding. A physical learning style or kinesthetic learner will use their body, hands and the sense of touch to gain knowledge. The aural learning style or auditory-musical learner will use sound, song, or music to increase knowledge. The social style or interpersonal learner prefers to learn in a 9 group setting with other people, whereas the solitary learning style or intrapersonal learner tends to want to work alone. Most people tend to have a style that they prefer to use and may use a combination of one or more styles (Overview of Learning Styles, 2013). With the implementation of the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) preeclampsia toolkit and simulation scenarios, it will be imperative to build various learning styles into the curriculum that will meet the learning style of the students. Active learning strategies will be engaged in the project. Along with knowing how different people learn, evaluate the assumptions the various generations of learners hold in regards to their learning. According to Phillips, (2005), baby boomers (aged 44-64 years) may have barriers against using an e-learning module as they lack computer skills and are accustomed to passive learning. Generation X (aged 24-44 years) are not as technological astute as generation Y, and might not know where to find information (Phillips, 2005).This generation is highly independent with problem solving, multitasking, and frequently challenge authority (Clark, 2008). Generation Y (aged 24 years and younger) are easily assimilated into e-learning as they are knowledgeable about current technology (Phillips, 2005). This generation has the greatest cultural diversity, is self-reliant, question frequently, expects respect from others, is the most technologically advanced, and is often addicted to visual media (Clark, 2008). 10 Computer Based Learning As technology improves, so does the way in which people are taught. No longer are classroom lectures (passive learning) the only way instruction is administered. Computer based learning (CBL) is becoming more conventional in nursing as a quality way to promote higher order cognitive skills where the learner is self-directed and independent (Blake, 2010; Bromley, 2010, Phillips, 2005). Using only CBL compared to lecture has shown to have lower satisfaction and higher dropout rates over the long term from students if the learning is only computer based (Adams, 2004; Blake, 2010; Hahne, Benndorf, Frey, & Herzig, 2005; Smith & Reed, 2008). There are many studies that illustrate online courses are as effective of a learning strategy as traditional lecture in a classroom settings (Blake, 2010; Bromley, 2010; Phillips, 2005; Reeves & Reeves, 2008; Smith & Reed, 2008). Technology allows new ways to obtain continuing education. Learning segments for nurses’ development can be in the form of short modules or mandatory competencies (Phillips, 2005). The learning segments are placed on institutions computer learning systems that are available to the staff at any time and any day (Phillips, 2005). Disadvantages occur with only using CBL education. It is important to review what is currently published to understand why students do not like e-learning prior to building a comprehensive learning module. Social isolation without human contact or lack of immediate feedback (the ability to ask questions, or have knowledge tested) have all contributed to CBL failures (Blake, 2010; Bromley, 2010). Lack of computer literacy or competency in basic computer skills, along with 11 accessibility due to lack of connectivity of the internet, have been shown to be frequent situations that create a non-optimal learning environment (Bromley, 2010). Finally from the educators point of view, concerns are that computer based learning can be labor- intensive, is costly since it requires the purchase of a learning system, and the educator has the lack of human contact to provide immediate feedback or knowledge testing (Blake, 2010; Bromley, 2010; Phillips, 2005). The advantages of CBL are flexibility of learning, increased opportunities for professional development, individually paced learning, and enhanced quality of education (Blake, 2010; Reeve & Reeves, 2008). Online learning is a way to engage learners into active learning strategies (Phillips, 2005). Online learning puts the learner in charge of their own learning, by having them choose when to do the learning. It allows them to repeat lessons to improve knowledge acquisition and, finally, there is less cost as a result of less need to travel to seminars and learning courses (Blake, 2010; Bromley, 2010; Smith & Reed, 2008). According to Reeves and Reeves (2008), there are five rewards with online learning. Online course are more affordable, with increased higher- order cognitive skills such as problem solving and clinical reasoning. Secondly, learners have multiple venues to obtain knowledge, instead of just a lecture and information from an outdated text book. Thirdly, academic staff can reform the curriculum to align with professional agencies and accreditation standards. The fourth reward is that educators can become renewed professionally by using the new opportunities to teach. Lastly, the learner is prepared for learning in the 21st century with the newest technologies (Reeves & Reeves, 12 2008). It is important to ensure that the educators are developing quality courses with constructive feedback incorporated as a way of formative assessment of the students (Adams, 2004). Breaking lessons into small achievable steps, with short quizzes or test to assess the knowledge from the learner, should be incorporated in CBL (Adams, 2004). The context of the learning modules should incorporate text, images, videos with sound, and interactive learning (Adams, 2004). The CBL modules will give didactic skills in conjunction to simulation which gives experiential skills through role-play. As discussed previously, computer based learning should be paired with hands on learning opportunities to gain the largest benefits for the learner. Simulation Simulation is used more often in nursing schools as a way to allow students to have experience they may not be exposed to while in the clinical arena (Cant & Cooper, 2010). Different kinds of high risk, low frequency procedures often happen in the hospital setting. Simulation is one of best practice tools for developing a culture of safety (Cant & Cooper, 2010). Simulation is discovery learning with a group approach, in which role playing involves a case study that unfolds as the learners perform tasks and processes in real time with well-defined constraints and responsibilities (Adams, 2004; Clark, 2008; Kohn, Corrigan, & Donalson, 2000; Rourke, Schmidt, & Garga, 2010). The goal for the simulation experience is to offer learners an opportunity to apply contextual learning (Lisko & O’Dell, 2010). This is achieved by problem solving, while using simulation models or confederates (actors), 13 in a safe and secure environment, where students receive feedback from simulation champions, other team members, or through video recording (Cant & Cooper, 2010; Kohn et al., 2000; Rourke et al., 2010). Research shows that cooperative learning, as with simulation, leads to improved learning, and superior outcomes are produced as the participants are motivated to actively engage in the learning process (Imel, 1999). It is imperative to recognize that not all learners will see the significant aspects of the simulation scenario, and the educator will need to draw out the missed learning opportunities during a debrief (Adams, 2004). According to Cant and Cooper (2010), there are four key elements that are accomplished with simulation, 1) the development of psychomotor skills through repetition where technical proficiency is achieved, 2) experts or champions of simulation, assist the learner and tailor the scenario to meet the needs of the learner, 3) the learner is given a specific learning objective to achieve, and 4) clinical reasoning is developed by the learner through the application of the knowledge and skills (Cant & Cooper, 2010). The effectiveness of simulation learning has been discussed in many articles. In the systematic review of 12 studies, by Cant and Cooper (2010), statistical improvement was gained in three areas during simulation. Knowledge and skills are improved. Secondly, the learner reported having confidence in critical thinking skills after participating in a simulated scenario increased. Finally, the results showed that simulation is an effective strategy for learning, where participants expressed satisfaction with the experience. Cant and Cooper (2010) discussed one of the important implications for nursing practice was to pair practice guidelines to 14 simulation with manikins as an effective teaching and learning method. Current literature shows that simulation has a significant advantage over other teaching strategies, by empowering nurses to cultivate, synthesize, and then relate that knowledge in a safe, real life experience (Cant & Cooper, 2010). The Power of a Checklist The aviation industry cannot afford to have planes fall from the sky due to human error, just as nurses cannot afford to compromise patient care. According to the Kohn et al. (2000), healthcare like the aviation industry should develop and use tools whenever appropriate to reduce the reliance on memory. In healthcare, the goal is to improve outcomes in complex activities, where to rely solely on memory from even the most experienced staff sets up errors to occur (Gawande, 2010; Kohn et al., 2000; McDowell & McComb, 2014; Tweedale & Reiss, 2010). A checklist guides the user to select the next appropriate action or decision by giving structure to critical tasks, thus it assists with the reduction of making an error (Gawande, 2010; Kohn et al., 2000). The process of developing a checklist to include all situations or critical paths can be difficult. Checklists must be developed using evidence based practice to provide a foundation. A well-developed checklist that is regularly used in high risk, low frequency procedures addresses the human failure issue and allows the professional to use their critical reasoning (Tweedale & Reiss, 2010). Standardizing a process of a high risk, low frequency situation can reduce the reliance of memory and improve outcomes (McDowell & McComb, 2014; Kohn et al., 2000). 15 Standardization gives individuals a simplified process to assist with problem solving when dealing with unfamiliar complex processes. (Kohn et al., 2000). The best constructed checklists are brief, clear, only include the critical steps that promote communication and team work, and finally require all users to take action (Gawande, 2010; Tweedale, Reiss 2010). If the checklist includes every step it will be too detailed and difficult for the user to apply, thus it will not be viewed as useful and not used. The only steps that should be included are the critical steps that have been shown to produce bad outcomes, or are commonly missed steps. It is important to debrief (a thorough careful analysis) the checklist after adverse outcomes occur to identify weakness and make improvements (Gawande, 2010). According to Kohn et al. (2000), crew resource management (team work and communication) leads to fewer errors, as each member of the team is “looking out” for each another and they know that individually they are responsible for all the members on the team as well as the outcome of the situation. Effective communication is one of the most powerful tools a clinician has to reduce errors (Tamura-Lis, 2013). Having a checklist to guide the actions of the team gives members a sense of trust in the each other’s judgment and directs the care being given (Kohn et al., 2000). According to Gawande (2010), implementing a new checklist is a cultural change that can potentially shift responsibility; expectations of the staff, and authority in applying evidence based patient care. It is important that the leadership team support the staff during the implementation of a checklist (Gawande, 2010). 16 Change Theory With the implementation of change, such as creating a culture of safety, it is important to look at a framework that will guide the transformation of change. Although change frameworks will not guarantee success, it can simplify or direct the process to help those that are affected by the change (Mitchell, 2013). John Kotter (1996) recognized eight critical factors that help successfully implement change. Kotter’s (1996) model is as follows: there must be (a) a sense of urgency for the change; (b) an alliance must be formed with individuals who have power and can work together to lead the change; (c) a vision to direct the change, and a strategy to achieve the vision; (d) the change vision must be communicated constantly to the employees; (e) obstacles must be identified and replaced with nontraditional ideas, or activities; (f) short term wins need to be rewarded and celebrated; (g) continue to assess the process of change that has occurred and implement additional visions for change as needed; (h) and finally insure that the new behaviors that have occurred with the change have created better performances (Kotter, 1996). Applying Kotter’s (1996) model to the implementation of the CMQCC preeclampsia toolkit could resemble the following: Staff need to understand preeclampsia is one of the leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality (Druzin, Shields, Peterson, & Cape, 2013). Key staff must be identified to guide the change (formal and informal leaders, such as nurse managers, charge nurses, providers, and staff 17 nurses) with the implementation of the CMQCC toolkit, simulation, and checklist, which are evidence based and best practice. The CMQCC has developed an evidence based approach, which is methodical, and will standardize care for preeclampsia patients (Druzin, Walsh, Shields, Morton, & Peterson, 2013). The toolkit will be the foundation for the development of the online learning, scenario in the simulation, and the checklist. Online learning and simulation will be mandatory for all staff and discussed at all staff meetings and supported by the leadership team. Computer based learning and simulation are learning strategies that can be employed for adult learners as an alternative of class lectures and testing. As staff complete the computer modules, simulation exercise, and are appreciative of the knowledge; they will become early adopters and can assist with promoting the education to other staff. It will be important to make sure current evidence is always being implemented in the care for the preeclampsia patient, research, and checklist adaptation must be ongoing. To insure the change is permanent it will be important to audit the patient’s charts, with a diagnosis of preeclampsia, to insure the checklist and toolkit were followed. 18 A theory based foundation will help provide learning opportunities for nursing professionals. Being informed about the various learning styles, theories, models, and frameworks ensure that the education being delivered is appropriate to meet the learning goals. Knowles (1989) and Kolb (1984) have created reliable models and theories for implementation of adult active learning strategies. Some of those strategies include computer based learning, simulation, and standardization of care through the use of a checklist. Change in current knowledge based evidence and standards for practice within the field of nursing is frequently a slow process from inception to adoption. The ultimate goal is to educate the staff nurses caring for their patient population by creating a culture of safety through the use of best practices. PREECLAMPSIA LITERATURE REVIEW Hypertensive disorders, which includes preeclampsia, are some of the leading medical complications that effect pregnant women (Druzin, Walsh, Shields, Morton, & Peterson, 2013; Lowdermilk, Perry, Cashion, & Alden, 2012; Martin, 2013). The discovery of preeclampsia occurred in the fourth century BC, yet there is still no definitive cause or prevention for the disease (August, 2014; Bell, 2010). In the United States, hypertensive disorders are responsible for 17% of all maternal deaths, and tragically many of these deaths could have been avoided (Druzin, Shields, Peterson, & Cape, 2013). In a review of the pregnancy related deaths in California, 50% of the deaths from preeclampsia had a strong to good chance and the other 50% has some chance to alter the outcome (California Department of Public Health, 2012). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy comprise a significant number of complications that affect both the mother, with end-organ dysfunction, and fetus with preterm delivery related to hostile uterine environment (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). Preeclampsia affects 3 to 5% of all pregnancies and has a neonatal mortality rate of 10% worldwide (Silasi, Cohen, Karumanchi, & Rana, 2010) and a maternal death rate of 10% to 15% worldwide (August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). This paper will explore the definitions of hypertensive disorders associated with pregnancy, historical perspectives, risk factors and pathogenesis of preeclampsia, and the current standard of care for preeclampsia patients. Insight to produce best 19 20 practices and standardized tools, for the future of patients suffering from preeclampsia will be gained. Definition of Hypertensive Disorders Currently the American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist (ACOG) use a four category classification system for hypertension during pregnancy (2013). The different categories include gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension (from any origin), chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, and preeclampsiaeclampsia (ACOG, 2013; August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are defined as having a systolic blood pressure (BP) greater than 140 mm Hg, a diastolic BP greater than 90 mm Hg or both on two occasions at least six hours apart (Druzin, 2013). Severe hypertension is defined as having a systolic BP greater than 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than 110 mm Hg. Gestational hypertension is described as a new onset of elevated BP that develops after 20 weeks of pregnancy with the absence of proteinuria. Chronic hypertension is diagnosed when elevated BP is present prior to conception or noted before 20 weeks of gestation and persist longer than 12 weeks postpartum. Chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia is defined as elevated BP prior to 20 weeks with proteinuria or end-organ dysfunction after 20 weeks gestation (ACOG, 2013; August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). According to Lowdermilk et al., this form of hypertension is difficult to diagnose and is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes (2012). 21 Preeclampsia is a progressive multisystem disorder, unique to humans during pregnancy (ACOG, 2013; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). Preeclampsia is classified, in pregnant women, by hypertension occurring only after 20 weeks of pregnancy and accompanied with proteinuria or end-organ dysfunction. (August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). According to ACOG the observation of proteinuria removed as an essential criteria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia (ACOG, 2013). Additional signs and symptoms that have been noted to occur including: (a) headaches, (b) visual disturbances, (c) epigastric pain, (d) thrombocytopenia, (e) abnormal liver functions, (f) pulmonary edema, and (g) renal insufficiency (ACOG, 2013; August & Sibai, 2014; Druzin, 2013; Karumanchi, Lim, & August, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013a). Preeclampsia without severe features or preeclampsia severe features can develop into eclampsia when the patient starts to have grand mal seizures (ACOG, 2013; August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). The placenta is thought to be the root cause of preeclampsia, as the symptoms begin to resolve once the fetus and placenta are expelled (Druzin, Walsh, et al., 2013; Lowdermilk et al., 2012). The risk factors for developing preeclampsia and the co-morbidities related to this disorder are important to recognize. Risk Factors for Preeclampsia Current literature shows that the following are risk factors of developing preeclampsia prim parity of the pregnancy; 22 carrying multiple fetuses; extreme in maternal ages, less than 20 years old, and greater than 40 years old; new paternity; prolonged interval between pregnancies (greater than 10 years); previous history of preeclampsia; family history of preeclampsia (August et al., 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013a; Silasi et al., 2010). Many co-morbidities linked to an increase chance of developing preeclampsia include chronic hypertension; renal disease; obesity; rheumatoid arthritis or lupus; diabetes mellitus, or gestational diabetes; migraines, hypercoagulable states (August, 2014; August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al. 2012). Preeclampsia also increases the patients risk for developing life threatening events such as acute renal failure; cerebral hemorrhage; placental abruption; pulmonary edema; 23 disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); hepatic failure or rupture; progression to eclampsia or seizures; (August & Sibai, 2014). All of the risk factors and complications listed above (August, 2014; August & Sibai, 2014; August & Sibai, 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013a; Silasi et al., 2010) can have significant negative consequences for both the mother and the baby. The fetus is especially vulnerable and has an increase in morbidity and mortality due to a greater risk of restricted fetal growth and preterm birth (August & Sibai, 2014). Historical Perspective of Preeclampsia During ancient Grecian times, from the fifth to fourth century BC, preeclampsia or eclampsia was not classified as a formal disorder of pregnancy (Bell, 2010; Lindheimer, 2013). In the face of the limited knowledge and technology the concept of eclampsia was noted as a headache accompanied by heaviness and convulsions during pregnancy (Bell, 2010; Lindheimer, 2013). From 400 to 1200 AD, medical and scientific progress came to a standstill due to the influence of Christianity (Bell, 2010). In the Renaissance period (1400-1600), the female reproduction tract was accurately described (Bell, 2010). By the 17th century Francois Mauricea scientifically described eclampsia and distinguished that primigravida was a risk factor for convulsions (Bell, 2010; Lindheimer, 2013). Mauricea posited that convulsions were caused by inflammation due to a dead fetus or abnormal lochial 24 flow (Bell, 2010). The suppressed vaginal flow resulted in pains in the head, which cause convulsions, suffocation, or death. Treatment during this time period was blood-letting, purging, or altering diets, as a way to decrease cerebral congestion thus reduce the chance of convulsions (Bell, 2010; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013a). The 18th century differentiated eclampsia from epilepsy (Bell, 2010; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013a). Epilepsy was considered to be chronic as the convulsions recurred over time. Eclampsia was classified a disease that was acute in nature and resolved with the removal of the precipitating event (Bell, 2010; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013a). It was believed, at this time, that pregnancy was not the only precipitating event. Hemorrhage, pain, and infection could also cause eclampsia (Bell, 2010). In the 19th century Dr. Thomas Denman recognized that more people in large cities and towns had convulsions (Bell, 2010). Denman’s theory for convulsions during pregnancy was linked to the uterus. When the uterus got larger, more pressure was placed on the descending blood vessels. This caused an increase in pressure with the regurgitation of blood backing up into the head and overloading the vessels of the brain causing convulsions. The treatment included: bloodletting, opiate usage, warm baths, inducing delivery, and splashing the face with cold water. Toward the end of the 19th century, a connection was made between premonitory symptoms and convulsions (Bell, 2010). The development of the mercury manometer in 1896, gave the ability to measure BP which is what transformed preeclampsia into a hypertensive disorder, as elevated blood pressures were linked with eclampsia (Druzin, Walsh et 25 al., 2013; Lindheimer, 2013; Preeclampsia Foundation, 2013b). During this time period the term preeclampsia was introduced and defined as the time period to deliver women to prevent the progression to eclampsia (Druzin, Walsh, et al., 2013). With the defining of symptoms of hypertension, edema, proteinuria, and headaches, physicians had tangible symptoms for the diagnosis for preeclampsia (Bell, 2010). Physicians at the beginning of the 20th century continued to identify some of the patho-physiological changes, but failed to uncover the cause and prevention of preeclampsia (Bell, 2010). Research during the 1960’s focused on the placenta as the cause of preeclampsia. The findings from examining the placenta beds revealed that placental trophoblast cells did not adequately enter into the maternal arteries in the uterus (Bell, 2010; Roberts & Escudero, 2012). The placental trophoblast cells are responsible for converting maternal arteries from small, high resistant vessels, to large low resistant vessels. The lack of conversion of the maternal arteries caused restriction in blood flow to the placenta and fetus (Bell, 2010; Roberts & Escudero, 2012). An additional hypothesis posited a reduction in placental perfusion which causes ischemia to the placenta, resulting in toxins being produced (Bell, 2010). The toxins then damage the endothelial cells in the blood vessels and activate the coagulation cascade. Considerable research related to preeclampsia has been conducted, with the results reflecting an unclear etiology (Martin, 2013). Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia The cause of preeclampsia is unknown, however many studies have begun looking at placenta tissues to develop hypothesis about the pathophysiological 26 mechanisms involved in preeclampsia (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). According to Karumanchi et al., placental tissue is required in the development of preeclampsia, not fetal tissue, and the cure always occurs after the delivery of the placenta (2014). The maternal adaptation that occur in preeclampic women, where the placental invasion to the uterine muscle occurs, does not correctly remodel the uterine spiral arteries (August, 2014; Karumanchi et al., 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). This occurs at conception. The placentation appears to be incomplete in preeclampic women. The uterine spiral arteries do not remodel, which is necessary to increased blood and oxygen flow from the mother to the placenta. Remodeling occurs when cytotrophoblast cells enter the endothelium and musculature of the maternal uterine spiral arteries. This creates vessels that are larger in capacity and have lower resistance. If the arteries fail to remodel they become narrow vessels and cause hypoperfusion of the placenta. Placental infarctions along with a decreased oxygen flow to the placenta causes placental hypoxia (Karumanchi et al., 2014; Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). The symptoms from the lack of remodeling can be described as a leaking hose. Nancy Donoho (personal communication, March, 28, 2009) once used the leaking hose analogy to describe the effects to preeclampsia on the cellular level. When a hose is kinked the water behind the kink may build up, or shoot out of the faucet connection, and eventually the hose will break down. In front of the kinked area is a reduced volume of water coming out, but it is under a higher pressure. 27 Blood vessels are the hose and blood the water. When remodeling fails to occur, the hose (or blood vessels) kinks and the red blood cells (RBC) collide with the vessel walls. This collision damages the RBC’s and the endothelial tissue of the vessel wall. Some RBC’s are destroyed (hemolyzed) as they strike the walls; some are hemolyzed as they pass by the kink. The RBC’s and fluid that do not get the kink will start backing up into the vascular and cellular beds. Around 20 weeks the effects of the poor placentation process subsequently causes clinical manifestations. Placental ischemia is believed to stimulate the release of substances that are toxic to endothelial cells, thus causing endothelial cell dysfunction (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). The cellular dysfunction then causes vasospasm and decreased organ perfusion, intravascular coagulation, and increased permeability and capillary leakage (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Sibai, 2011; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). An in-depths look at each of these three consequences and the manifestation will follow. Vasospasms result in poor tissue perfusion to all the organ systems (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). Vasospasms in turn cause hypertension; uteroplacental spams that cause intrauterine growth restriction; glomerular damage that causes increased plasma uric acid and creatinine; and oliguria; cortical brain spams that causes headaches, hyperreflexia, and seizure activity; retinal arteriolar spams that cause blurred vision and scotoma; 28 hyperlipidemia; liver ischemia that causes elevated liver enzymes, nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, and right upper quadrant pain. Intravascular coagulation causes hemolysis of red blood cells; platelet adhesion as evidenced by low platelet counts due to platelet consumption; disseminated vascular coagulation (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). Finally, increased permeability and capillary leakage occur and cause proteinuria; generalized edema; pulmonary edema that cause dyspnea; hemoconcentration that results in intravascular dehydration as proteins and fluid loss occur resulting in less plasma volume as evidenced by increased hematocrit (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Sibai, 2011; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). Until the definitive cause of preeclampsia is found treatment will include treating the symptoms of PE and keeping women pregnant as long as possible. Current Standard of Practice Prior to CMQCC Toolkit Once a diagnosis of preeclampsia occurs, the management of care is hospitalization, frequent BP measurements, laboratory studies, 24 hour urine collection, daily weights, and fetal monitoring (Bell, 2010). Laboratory studies reviewed for the severity of preeclampsia are platelet counts, liver function, and the evidence of hemolysis (Roberts & Escudero, 2012). The patient is confined to bed rest and has frequent assessments for blurred vision, epigastric pain, persistent headaches, and fetal surveillance for wellbeing (Bell, 2010; Hoedjes et al., 2011; 29 Lowdermilk et al., 2012). The only cure for preeclampsia is delivery (Bell, 2010). The decision for the type and timing of delivery is dependent on the gestational age, the conditions of the mother and child, and the severity of preeclampsia (Bell, 2010). The current medical model for preeclampsia is to manage the symptoms with intravenous magnesium sulfate and antihypertensive medication (hydralazine or labetalol) for the mother (Bell, 2010; Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). Magnesium sulfate is given to prevent seizures. The medication interferes with the release of acetylcholine at the synapses, thus decreasing the neuromuscular irritability (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). Cardiac conduction is decreased and magnesium sulfate decreases the central nervous system irritability (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). The dose of magnesium sulfate differs in the literature. Magnesium sulfate is given intravenously with a loading dose between four to six grams followed by one to three grams an hour (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Nguyen, Crowther, Wilkinson, & Bain, 2013; Norwitz & Repke, 2014). Calcium gluconate is the antidote for magnesium toxicity and must be available to be given, should an magnesium sulfate overdose occur (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Norwitz & Repke, 2014) Antihypertensive medications are used when the BP is greater than 160/110 mm Hg (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Norwitz & Repke, 2014). The goals of antihypertensive medications, such as labetalol or hydralazine, are to reduce the chance of maternal stroke and maintain uteroplacental perfusion (Lowdermilk et al., 2012; Norwitz & Repke, 2014; Townsend & Drummond, 2011). If the gestation is less than 34 weeks, antenatal corticoid steroids (betamethasone or dexamethasone) need to be given to 30 help with fetal lung maturity (Norwitz & Repke, 2014; Sibai, 2011). Magnesium sulfate has also been shown to assist with neuroprotection of the preterm fetus if the mother is on at least two grams for 24 hours (Nguyen et al., 2013). The medical interventions are designed to keep the mother and fetus safe and continue the pregnancy to allow the fetus to grow and allow time for the fetal lungs to mature (Townsend & Drummond, 2011). Currently, the role for the nurse in the management of preeclampsia is to protect the maternal/fetal wellbeing and optimize a healthy outcome for both (Bell, 2010). The nurse is responsible for keeping a quiet environment, maintaining seizure precautions, having emergency medications available, and an emergency birth pack ready (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). As observed in the clinical setting by the author of this paper, routine assessments of (a) blood pressure, (b) urine output, (c) proteinuria, (d) edema, (e) fetal wellbeing, (f) visual disturbance, and (g) epigastric pain are used to evaluate the severity of preeclampsia for patients not receiving magnesium sulfate. Again as observed in the clinical setting by the author of this paper, once the patient is on magnesium sulfate, the hourly assessments include (a) medication infusing on a pump, (b) lung sounds, (c) deep tendon reflexes, (d) assessment of level of consciousness, (e) urine output, (f) proteinuria, (g) BP, (h) assessment for visual disturbances, (i) epigastric pain, and (j) fetal wellbeing. The severity of a patient’s preeclampsia can change rapidly. An operative delivery must be readily available with a resuscitation team available to support a preterm baby. 31 Eclampsia occurs in less than one out of 100 women with preeclampsia (Stoppler, 2014). During an eclamptic event, the fetus and the mother are both compromised. While the mother is seizing the uterus becomes hypertonic (Lowdermilk et al., 2012). The contracted uterus can cause rapid cervical dilation, rupture of amniotic membranes, and placental abruption. Additionally, the mother experiences a decrease in cerebral perfusion. Placenta perfusion is decreased causing fetal hypoxia and fetal compromise. The fetal heart tracing may show bradycardia, late decelerations, minimal variability, and fetal stress. Eclampsia alone is not a reason for an immediate cesarean delivery (Lowdermilk et al., 2012) Understanding and defining hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, historical perceptions of preeclampsia, risk factors for developing preeclampsia, pathogenesis of preeclampsia, and the current standard of care for the preeclamptic patient allow for foundation of knowledge regarding the treatment of preeclampsia. Examining current practice, is the best way to make recommendations for best evidence based practice changes. As stated in the beginning of this paper, the 17% death rate of American women suffering from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy can be reduced (Druzin, Shields, et al., 2013). Gaining the knowledge and then implementing the research and best evidence based practice could decrease maternal, perinatal, and neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with preeclampsia. CMQCC TOOLKIT IMPLEMENTATION When an emergency occurs, whether in ordinary life or professionally, most people function on auto pilot, doing the things they have been trained to do, and resolve the conditions that created the emergency. According to Roth, Parfitt, Hering, and Dent (2014), when dealing with an emergency, many people believe the correct actions will be taken by the team and all the issues to resolve the emergency will be considered. This practice uses the assumption that at least one person will identify the critical steps if another person does not. That way of thinking leads to many potentially critical steps being missed, even when there is a team of people educated and trained to resolve such emergencies. Omitting key elements or actions can significantly change the outcome (Roth et al., 2014). Implementing the use of effective, evidence based practices help ensure safe patient care. The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) has developed a toolkit to direct the care for a patient suffering from a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (Druzin, Shields, Peterson, & Cape, 2013) The strategies from the CMQCC toolkit will be discussed in order to develop an educational online study module, a simulation experience, and a checklist, to provide nurses evidence based knowledge and best practices to care for patients with preeclampsia at the author’shospital. The materials that will be presented are a bundle of items that will assist the staff nurse to understand the history and pathophysiology of preeclampsia, the current 32 33 recommendations from the CMQCC and tools to use when a preeclamptic event occurs in simulation or clinically. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists On the national level, 17 experts in the field of obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, hypertension, internal medicine, nephrology, anesthesiology, physiology, and patient advocacy met three times over nine months during 2011 and 2012 (Martin, 2013). In order to come to a consensus for practice recommendation, additional hours of writing and deliberating were done, to address the issues of hypertension in pregnancy. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), task force undertook three tasks (2013): 1) Summarize the current state of knowledge about preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders in pregnancy by reviewing and grading the quality of the extant world literature; 2) translate this information into practice guidelines for health care providers who; treat obstetric patients affected by these disorders; and 3) identify and prioritize the compelling areas of laboratory and clinical research to bridge gaps in our current knowledge. (Martin, 2013, p. x) On a regional level, a taskforce from both large and small Obstetric (OB) units within California, convened multidisciplinary experts to develop a toolkit to “Improve Health Care Response to Preeclampsia: A California Quality Improvement Toolkit” (Druzin et al. 2103). Fund were provided by Federal Title V Maternal Child Health (MCH) block grant from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health division and Stanford University, to develop this toolkit and then disseminate it to the obstetrical providers, hospitals and health care organizations (Druzin et al., 2013). 34 California Pregnancy Associated Mortality Review The California Pregnancy Associated Mortality Review (CA-PAMR) evaluated the overall mortality rate for women suffering from preeclampsia and associated syndromes from 2002-2004 (Druzin et al., 2013). The results showed a mortality rate of 1.6 per 100,000 deaths from preeclampsia and associated syndromes. Those numbers did not include the mortality and morbidity rates of fetus related to premature birth (Druzin et al., 2013). During CA-PAMR review and analysis, healthcare providers, failure to recognize and respond to the preeclampsia triggers and the serious deterioration of the patient’s condition was a significant factor (Peterson, Shields, & Morton, 2013). Missing key signs or triggers lead to 60% of the deaths from preeclampsia. The triggers that were missed included proteinuria, headaches, epigastric pain, deterioration of fetal status, and altered mental status, in addition to elevated blood pressures. A lack in critical thinking and clinical reasoning among the healthcare team contributed to the negative outcomes (Peterson et al., 2013). The emphasis of the preeclampsia task force was related to education of healthcare providers (Druzin et al., 2013). The three components were; understanding the importance and accuracy of measuring blood pressures, initiating antihypertensive medications, and preventing the progression of the disease (Druzin et al., 2013). Treatment of preeclampsia focuses on rescuing from an acute event, rather than prevention of the initiating factor. This rescue is the only strategy until the definitive cause of preeclampsia is found. With the development of the CMQCC 35 toolkit, a standard of interventions for best practice is now available for both providers, clinical staff, hospitals, and healthcare organizations (Druzin et al., 2013). California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative The goal of the toolkit was to provide tools and guidelines that would assist others in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality (Druzin et al., 2013). The CMQCC goal was to develop the methods that would be used by hospital, providers, and healthcare organizations to facilitate a timely, organized tool that would improve the response to preeclampsia. Another goal was to implement a quality improvement program at the hospital and healthcare organization level to decrease short term and long term morbidity in women related to preeclampsia (Druzin et al., 2013). Once the goals were identified, building the toolkit was the next step. The toolkit consists of three major components; the research articles, tools for implementation of the toolkit, and a slide set for education (Druzin et al., 2013). The first section consist of 18 articles which are a compendium of best practices on multiple topics about hypertensive disorders (see Appendix A). This section of the toolkit informs the readers of the background, preparation, and management. This section consists of best practice articles, with of evidence found in the literature to support the recommendations (Druzin et al., 2013). Each article discussed a different topic using a literature review for the background section; a table, diagram, or picture to summarize the information; a recommendation of quality improvement; the level of evidence including the type of study and level of recommendation; and finally a 36 reference section (Druzin et al., 2013). Secondly there is a collection of checklists, flowcharts, and table chart formats of care guidelines that were developed using best practice evidence. This section also includes samples for policy and procedures. Finally, there was a slide set for education purposes. The slides have been developed to be shared. Instructions that accompanied the slide set allow users to use the slides and the CMQCC logo as long as the information has not been changed. Feedback and recommendations will be shared with the CMQCC regarding the slide sets. The slides are geared to summarize preeclampsia best practices and assist with the training and education for preeclampsia. The CMQCC toolkit will be implemented by applying Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory. The learner-centered approach focuses on the learner actively problem solving and contributing to the physical experience as with a simulation experience (Curran, 2014; Lisko & O’Dell, 2010). Experiential learning is a continuous process that changes the way a person reasons and performs by transforming the experience into cognitive concepts (Lisko & O’Dell, 2010), where practicing in-situ simulation allows the learner to use all four stages of the experiential learning cycle; concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation (Stutsky & Laschinger, 1995). Applying the information from the CMQCC toolkit into a computer based learning module will allow an affordable opportunity for staff nurses to increase their cognitive skills, problem solving, and clinical reasoning through a self-directed learning module about preeclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. 37 Finally using the checklist, algorithms, tables and charts distributed by the CMQCC, will provide the staff with a systematic approach in their delivery of care for patient suffering of preeclampsia. The use of checklist guides the user to select the next appropriate action or decision by giving structure to critical tasks, reducing the chance of making an error (Gawande, 2010; Kohn, Corrigan, & Donaldson, 2000). Implementation The goal of the culminating project will be to have two online courses accessible to nurses within the Sutter Healthcare System’s learning management system. One of the courses will discuss the history and pathophysiology of preeclampsia (see Appendix B) and was produced from the literature review. The second course will be the slide set that was created by CMQCC (see Appendix C). The checklist and algorithms will also be accessible to the staff in a portable document format (PDF) within the learning module. The Preeclampsia Early Recognition Tool (Appendix D) is a CMQCC tool, giving staff the criteria to recognize that the patient condition is getting worrisome and interventions need to occur (Druzin et al., 2013). The Evaluation and Treatment of Antepartum and Postpartum Preeclampsia and Eclampsia guideline (Appendix E) is a CMQCC tool that displays the medications that should be used in the management and treatment of preeclampsia and eclampsia. The Treatment for Severe Preeclampsia algorithm (Appendix F) guides the healthcare providers in the treatment for patients that are experiencing severe preeclampsia. Finally, the Eclampsia Checklist (Appendix G) is from the CMQCC with a modification, to lead the healthcare providers to perform the 38 important task that should be done during the treatment of eclampsia (Druzin et al., 2013). The modifications included antihypertensive medications and spaces for the providers to document the time the interventions were carried out. All of these tools were created and included to give the healthcare providers evidence based best practices to care for the preeclamptic and eclamptic patient. Healthstream® Learning Center (HLC) is a learning management system for healthcare (2015). The vision of Healthstream® is to assess healthcare workers in online courses through compliance requirements by streamlining competency and performance management to improve the quality of healthcare (Healthcare Learning Center, 2015). Online courses and classes can be built and imported into the HLC. The courses can be a self-driven power point that staff can self-assign, or be assigned by their management team. The courses can have knowledge checking questions embedded in the learning module, or an exam at the end. At the completion of the course the staff will be given an evaluation tool to evaluate the course and provide feedback. When all of the components of the learning and evaluation have been completed the student will be awarded continuing education units. In-situ simulation will be scheduled for the staff within the author’s facility following the rollout of the online learning courses. This will be a multidisciplinary approach to include, Obstetricians and midwives, Anesthesiologist, respiratory therapist, staff nurses in all areas of the family birthing center and emergency department. An eclampsia simulation will be schedule and the staff and obstetrical providers will have the opportunity to manage a patient that will demonstrate signs 39 and symptoms of preeclampsia. During the progression of the in-situ simulation the patient’s condition will worsen and she will develop eclampsia. The simulation experience will start with a pre-brief. Expected outcomes will be explained to the learners along with general knowledge regarding preeclampsia and the medical management of the disorder. The learners of the simulation will be oriented to the physical environment, equipment, simulators, participant roles, and they will have the opportunity to ask questions of the simulation champions. The simulation experience will last between 15-20 minutes giving the learners the opportunity to manage the preeclamptic/ eclamptic patient. Immediately following the in-situ simulation, the learners will debrief the experience with the champions to guide the discussion. Debriefing is where the actual learning occurs and will last twice as long as the simulation experience was. During the debriefing, three reflective questions will be ask of the learner: (a) what did they do well, (b) what could or should they improve, and (c) what system issues could be improved. The learner will then have an additional opportunity to immediately experience the eclampsia simulation again, and apply the knowledge they gain from the first experience and the debriefing. The goal will be to hardwire the learning and use of the tools, to make a difference in the quality and safe care of preeclampsia patients. Although we do not yet understand the full pathophysiology of what causes preeclampsia, we do know that delivery is the only method of halting the disease. However, the widely accepted aphorism of “delivery is the cure” does not take into account that patients with preeclampsia are at a serious risk for days and weeks into 40 their postpartum period (Druzin et al., 2013). It is the hope that one day the morbidity and mortality for mothers and newborns will be decreased through the implementation of evidence based practice interventions, such as this CMQCC preeclampsia toolkit. Having the right information, with the evidence to support healthcare treatments decisions, healthcare providers will feel confident in the care they provide, knowing it represents best practice. This educational plan, including online modules and in-situ simulation will bridge the gap between practice and research, providing the most current best practice evidence. EVALUATION As a nurse educator, the author’s main responsibility is to provide staff with efficient, up to date, evidence based best practice educational opportunities that are both cost effective and attainable. When implementing learning modules for the first time, evaluating the course from the learner perspective is important. Comments from the participants should be reviewed to guide future alterations or additions to meet the objectives of the course. One of the goals of this online learning module is to reward the registered nurse with continuing education units (CEU). To award CEU, the Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) has regulations that must be met. Implementing a new clinical practice guideline can have challenges with the adoption of the information into clinical practice (Dobbins, Davies, Danseco, Edwards, & Virani, 2005). Listening to the learner and creating educational opportunities that have value and emphasizes patient safety is the number one priority. The learning modules, checklist, algorithms, and simulation experience that this culminating project provides, must be evaluated by the learner who was exposed to it. An evaluation tool will be used with the online learning module and simulation experiences to gain information to improve this project. The online learning module will have questions imbedded in the power points to test the understanding of the content presented. These questions represent formative evaluation strategies. After the learner has completed the learning module an evaluation of the course will automatically launch (see Appendix H), which represents the summative evaluation. 41 42 Once the learning module and evaluation have been completed, the CEU’s will be awarded. The ability of the learner in the simulation setting to transfer the learning to the clinical setting is one of the primary outcomes of simulation (Fisher & King, 2013). The goal of simulation is to enhance confidence, competency, knowledge, and transfer skills learned in simulation to clinical practice (Fisher & King, 2013). After the final debrief, following the simulation experience, the learners will be provided the evaluation tool to complete (see Appendix I). The simulation evaluation tool will evaluate the checklist, algorithms, and the simulation experience. One of the stipulations that the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) required was that if their tools were used, users must provide them with feedback (Druzin, Shields, Peterson, & Cape, 2013). The open-ended comment sections will be reviewed and sent to CMQCC as feedback. Board of Registered Nursing In order to award CEU a review of the requirements established by the governing body of registered nurses is needed. According to the Department of Consumer Affairs Board of Registered Nursing (BRN), registered nurses (RN) in California are required to complete 30 hours of continuing education every two years to maintain an active license (2015a). There are many regulations required to award CEU’s. Each hour that is awarded a CEU must be a minimum of 50 minutes engaged in the learning experiences (Department of Consumer Affairs Board of Registered Nursing, 2015b). The continuing education can be a variety of forms of learning 43 experiences, with the purpose to increase the knowledge of the RN in direct or indirect nursing activities and/or patient care. There must be a systematic learning experience that will increase the knowledge, skills, and information of direct and indirect patient care. The content must be relevant to the development and preservation of up-to-date competency while delivering nursing care. The providers of CEU must have a course outline, a record of the time and place, the instructor’s vitae, and the names and licensed number of the RN taking the course (Department of Consumer Affairs Board of Registered Nursing, 2015b). The course outline must include; clearly stated course description, objectives, and an evaluation (Department of Consumer Affairs Board of Registered Nursing, 2015c). The BRN allows the instructors to decide how to evaluate the understanding of the content from a seminar or attended course. In the case of home study, some method of evaluation needs to occur that verifies the course was read. The BRN recommends all courses should be evaluated; related to meeting the objectives pertinent or usable information, the instructor’s mastery of the subject matter the use of appropriate teaching methods, the efficient delivery of the course (audiovisuals, handouts, acoustics, etc.), and provision of an area for additional comments (Department of Consumer Affairs Board of Registered Nursing, 2015c). Evaluation Tools Learner evaluations have the purpose of providing the overall picture of the effectiveness of the teaching (Emerson & Records, 2007). Evaluation tools should have a combination of five point Likert scales and open-ended questions to obtain 44 rich data (Emerson & Records, 2007). The Likert data can be quickly reviewed to see over all trends. Additionally a mean score can be calculated to see trends from the learners, to evaluate if change is needed. The open-ended responses allow the learner to expand on his or her opinion of the educational offering. Both evaluation tools will be used to improve the online modules, as well as the simulation experience and include the following checklist, algorithms, and evidence of meeting the regulation that the BRN requires for awarding CEU’s. As a nurse, providing care that is grounded in the best evidence based practice is a priority. Patients are consumers and they deserve to have nurses caring for them with the highest level of knowledge and competence. According to Tarnow, Gambino, and Ford (2013), educators are challenged with delivering tools and educational programs which align the public expectations for safe, effective, patient centered, efficient, timely, and equitable care, that also award CEU’s. Building cost efficient, relevant educational modules and experiences is a responsibility of any clinical nurse educator. Evaluating all learning modules to find where the gaps in learning occur is important. Identifying the gaps can lead to future nursing education, revisions, or modifications to current learning modules. Overall Conclusion of Project Applying original research in the clinical setting can take as much as two decades to occur (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001). The standard for routine care of patients in any healthcare setting is to provide evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice exists where clinical experience, patient preference 45 and current research are combined to produce the best outcomes for patients (Spruce, 2015). This culminating project was developed to bring the current collaboration of evidence-based best practice to staff nurses managing patients with preeclampsia. A literature review was completed regarding the various learning styles, theories, models, and frameworks to education adult learners. Knowles (1989) and Kolb (1984) was the model and theory used to implement the adult active learning strategies of computer based learning, simulation, and standardization of care via the use of a checklist, algorhythm or charts. A second literature review was completed to look at the history, pathophysiology, and current state of treatment including risk factors and comorbidities for patient suffering from preeclampsia. The next section of this project included presenting the findings of the CMQCC (Druzin et al., 2013) the evidence-based best practice. Providing rational and experiential learning is more likely to result in compliance when asking nurses to change practice. The educational module included a computer based learning module and simulation experience with checklist, algorithms, and charts. The last section of this project was the development of an evaluation tool for both the online module and simulation experience. Providing a feedback tool for the participants will allow for recommendations in order to make future alterations or additions to meet the objectives of the course. Evidence-based practices must be employed to improve patient outcomes. According to Rycroft-Malone, drawing from a wide range of practical and organized approaches will assist with the success of evidence based practice efforts, thus improving nursing practice and the patient’s experiences (2012). The CMQCC 46 compiled the evidence and this culminating project is a tool to get the information into the clinical setting. The treatment of preeclampsia is reactive instead of proactive, on the part of the healthcare team. The overall goal of the CMQCC is to decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (Druzin et al., 2013). REFERENCES 48 REFERENCES Adams, A. (2004). Pedagogical underpinnings of computer-based learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(1), 5-12. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02960.x Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2001). Translating Research Into Clinical Practice (TRIP)-II Fact Sheet. Retrieved from http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/translating/tripfac/trip2fac .pdf American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (AGOG). (2013). Hypertension in pregnancy. Washington, DC: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Archer, T. (2013). Airway management in pregnant or postpartum women having seizures. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 75-77). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Archer, T., Druzin, M., Shields, L. E., & Peterson, N. (2013). Antihypertensive agents in preeclampsia. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 46-50). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. August, P. (2014). Preeclampsia: Prevention. UpToDate. Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/preeclampsia-prevention 49 August, P. & Sibai, B. (2014). Preeclampsia: Clinical features and diagnosis. UpToDate. Retrieved from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/preeclampsiaclinical-features-and- diagnosis Bell, M. (2010). A historical overview of preeclampsia-eclampsia. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 39(5), 510-518. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01172.x Berg, O., Lee, R. H., & Chagolla, B. (2013). Magnesium sulfate. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 51-59). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Blake, H. (2010). Computer-based learning objects in healthcare: The student experience. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7(1),15. doi:10.2202/1548-923X.1939 Bromley, P. (2010). Online learning: Anywhere anytime education for specialist nursing. Neonatal, Paediatric & Child Health Nursing, 13(3), 2-6. Retrieved from http://www.nzno.org.nz California Department of Public Health (CDPH). (2012). The California pregnancyassociated mortality review: CA-PAMR pregnancy-related death, chance to alter outcomes by grouped cause of death; 2002-2004. Retrieved from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Documents/MO-CAPAMRPublicUseSlideSet-2002-2004.pdf 50 Cant, R., & Cooper, S. (2010). Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(1), 3-15. doi:10.1111/j.13652648.2009.05240.x Chagolla, B., Berg, O., & Gabel, K. (2013). Ante, intra, postpartum nursing management and assessment of preeclampsia: Maternal/fetal assessment and monitoring recommendations. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 36-40). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Champagne, H. (2013). Proteinuria. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 32-25). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health.Clark, C. C. (2008). Classroom skills for nurse educator. Minneapolis, MN: Jones and Bartlett. Curran, M. K. (2014). Examination of the teaching styles of nursing professional development specialists, part I: Best practices in adult learning theory, curriculum development, and knowledge transfer. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(5), 233-240. doi:10.3928/00220124-20140417-04 Department of Consumer Affairs: Board of Registered Nursing. (2015a). California Board of Registered Nursing Continuing Education for License Renewal. Retrieved from http://www.rn.ca.gov/licensees/ce-renewal.shtml Department of Consumer Affairs: Board of Registered Nursing. (2015b). California 51 Code of Regulations Title 16, Division 14, Article 5. Continuing Education. Retrieved from http://www.rn.ca.gov/pdfs/applicants/ceptitle16.pdf\ Department of Consumer Affairs: Board of Registered Nursing. (2015c). California Board of Registered Nursing Continuing Education Program: Instructions for Providers. Retrieved from http://www.rn.ca.gov/pdfs/applicants/cepinstruct.pdf Dobbins, M., Davies, B., Danseco, E., Edwards, N., & Virani, T. (2005). Changing nursing practice: evaluating the usefulness of a best-practice guideline implementation toolkit. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership, 18(1), 3448. Drews, M., & Tsigas, E. (2013). Education and patient information: Prenatal and postpartum patient counseling or education*. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 98-103). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Druzin, M. (2013). Classification and diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 19-24). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Druzin, M. L., Shields, L. E., Peterson, N. L., & Cape, V. (Eds.). (2013) Preeclampsia toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. 52 Druzin, M. L., Walsh L., Shields, L. E., Morton, C. H., & Peterson, N. L. (2013). Introduction and historical perspective. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 12-18). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Edwards-Silva, R. (2013). Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 89-93). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Emerson, R., & Records, K. (2007). Design and testing of classroom and clinical teaching evaluation tools for nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 4(1), 1-15. Ennen, C., & Satin, A. (2014). Reducing adverse obstetrical outcomes through safety science. UpToDate. Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/reducing-adverse-obstetrical-outcomesthrough-safety-science Fisher, D., & King, L. (2013). An integrative literature review on preparing nursing students through simulation to recognize and respond to the deteriorating patient. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), 2375-2388. doi:10.1111/jan.12174 Gabel, K. (2013). Patient care and treatment recommendations: Accurate blood pressure measurement. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape 53 (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 26-28). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Gawande, A. (2010). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books. Hahne, A., Benndorf, R., Frey, P., & Herzig, S. (2005). Attitude towards computerbased learning: Determinants as revealed by a controlled interventional study. Medical Education, 39(9), 935-943. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Healthstream Learning Center. (2015). About us. Retrieved from http://healthstream.com/about-us Hoedjes, M., Berks, D., Vogel, I., Franx, A., Duvekot, J. J., Steegers, E. P., & Raat, H. (2011). Poor health-related quality of life after severe preeclampsia. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 38(3), 246-255. doi:10.1111/j.1523536X.2011.00477.x Imel, S. (1999). Using groups in adult learning: Theory and practice. Journal of Continuing Education In The Health Professions, 19(1), 54-61. Karumanchi, S. A., Lim, K., & August, P. (2014). UpToDate. Preeclampsia: Pathogenesis. Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/preeclampsia-pathogenesis Kilpatrick, S. (2013). Outpatient management of preeclampsia. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving 54 health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 40-41). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning; Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Knowles, M. (1989). The making of an adult educator. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass Inc Lindheimer, M. (2013). Historical perspective: The history of preeclampsia and eclampsia as seen by a nephrologists. Paper presented at the 2012 Benson and Pamela Harer Seminar on History Lecture, Chicago, IL. Lisko, S., & O'Dell, V. (2010). Integration of theory and practice: Experiential learning theory and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 106-108. Retrieved from http://www.nlnjournal.org Lowdermilk, D., Perry, S., Cashion, K., & Alden, K. (2012). Maternity & women’s healthcare (10th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/ Elsevier. Lyndon, A., Walsh, L., & Edwards-Silva, R. (2013). Teamwork and communication. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 60-69). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. 55 Martin, J. (2013). Forward. In American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (AGOG), Hypertension in pregnancy. (pp. ix-x). Washington, DC: American College and Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Meyers, M. (2013a). The role of medical simulation. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 70-74). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Meyers, M. (2013b). Emergency department recognition and treatment: Focus on delayed postpartum preeclampsia and eclampsia. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. (pp. 94-97). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Mitchell, G. (2013). Selecting the best theory to implement planned change. Nursing Management - UK, 20(1), 32-37. Retrieved from http://www.nursingmanagement-journal.co.uk McDowell, D., & McComb, S. A. (2014). Safety checklist briefings: A systematic review of the literature. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses Journal, 99(1), 125-137. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2013.11.015 Nguyen, T., Crowther, C., Wilkinson, D., & Bain, E. (2013). Magnesium sulphate for women at term for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD009395. 56 Norwitz, E. R., & Repke, J. T. (2014). Preeclampsia: Management and prognosis. UpToDate. Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/preeclampsiamanagement-and-prognosis Overview of Learning Styles. (2013). Learning-styles-online.com. Retrieved from http://www.learning-styles-online.com/overview/ Peterson, N. L., Shields, L. E., & Morton, C. H. (2013). Early recognition. In M. Druzin, L.Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 29-32). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Phillips, J. (2005). Strategies for active learning in online continuing education. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 77-83. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Preeclampsia Foundation. (2013a). Preeclampsia: Know the symptoms. Trust yourself. Retrieved from: http://www.preeclampsia.org Preeclampsia Foundation. (2013b). 2,400 Years of preeclampsia history. Retrieved from: http://www.preeclampsia.org/component/content/article/53-healthinformation/257-history-of-preeclampsia Promoting Adult Learning. (2005). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Reeves, P., & Reeves, T. (2008). Design considerations for online learning in health and social work education. Learning In Health & Social Care, 7(1), 46-58. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com 57 Roberts, J., & Escudero, C. (2012). The placenta in preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertension, 2(2), 72-83. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2012.01.001 Roth, C. K., Parfitt, S. E., Hering, S. L., & Dent, S. A. (2014). Developing protocols for obstetric emergencies. Nursing for Women’s Health. 18(5), 379-390. doi: 10.1111/1751- 486X.12146 Rourke, L., Schmidt, M., & Garga, N. (2010). Theory-based research of high fidelity simulation use in nursing education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7(1),14. doi:10.2202/1548923X.1965 Rycroft-Malone, J. (2012). Implementing evidence-based practice in the reality of clinical practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 9(1), 1. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00240.x Shmueli, A., Meiri, H., & Gonen, R. (2012). Economic assessment of screening for preeclampsia. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32, 29-38. doi:10.1002/pd.2871 Shields, L. E. (2013a). Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 42-45). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. Shields, L. E. (2013b). Special circumstances: Severe preeclampsia at < 34 weeks. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 78-86). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. 58 Sibai, B. (2011). Evaluation and management of severe preeclampsia before 34 weeks' gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 205(3), 191198. Retrieved from http://www.ajog.org/ Silasi, M., Cohen, B., Karumanchi, S. A., & Rana, S. (2010). Abnormal placentation, angiogenic factor, and the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Obstetrics & Gynecology Clinics of North America, 37(2), 239-253. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2010.02.013 Smith, B., & Reed, P. (2008). Greater flexibility for learning. Nursing Standard, 23(1), 64. Spruce, L. (2015). Back to basics: Implementing evidence-based practice. AORN Journal, 101(1), 106-112. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2014.08.009 Stoppler, M. (2014). Eclampsia. Emedicinehealth: Experts for everyday emergencies. Retrieved from http://www.emedicinehealth.com/eclampsia/article_em.htm Stutsky, B., & Laschinger, H. (1995). Changes in student learning styles and adaptive learning competencies following a senior preceptorship experience. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(1), 143-153. doi:10.1046/j.13652648.1995.21010143.x Tamura-Lis, W. (2013). Teach-back for quality education and patient safety. Urologic Nursing,33(6), 267-271. doi:10.7257/1053-816X.2013.33.6.267 Tarnow, K., Gambino, M. L., & Ford, D. J. (2013). Effect of continuing education: Do attendees implement the tools that are taught?. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(9), 391-396. doi:10.3928/00220124-20130823-17 59 Townsend, N., & Drummond, S. (2011). Preeclampsia; pathophysiology and implications for care. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 25(3), 245-252. doi: 10.1097/JPN.Ob013e318223ad14. Tweedale, D., & Reiss, C. (2010). How checklists improve outcomes [Peer commentary on the book “The Checklist Manifesto: How to get things right” by A. Gawande]. Retrieved from http://www.nlc.org Zakowski, M. (2013). Consultation triggers in severe preeclampsia for all obstetric. Shields, L. E. (2013a). Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. In M. Druzin, L. Shields, N. Peterson, & V. Cape (Eds.), Preeclampsia Toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia (pp. 87-88). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. APPENDICES 61 APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF ARTICLES FROM THE CMQCC TOOLKIT The article by Druzin (2013) used level II-2 and II-3 evidence to classify and diagnose the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and included tables and an algorithm to display the different hypertensive disorders. The article by Gabel (2013) used level II and III evidence to discuss accurately measuring blood pressures with using the correct size of blood pressure cuff and preparing the patient. The article by Peterson, Shields, and Mortonhahne (2013), used level III-C evidence to discuss the early recognition of preeclampsia, discussed criteria, warning signs, treatments and appropriate responses of the healthcare team. The article by Champagne (2013), used level III-C to discuss values of proteinuria in preeclampsia as a screening tool (dipstick) or 24-hour urine collection (the gold standard) to evaluate for severe preeclampsia symptoms. The article by Chagolla, Berg, and Gabel (2013), used level III-C evidence in the discussion of ante, intra, postpartum nursing management and assessment of preeclampsia. It included a table with the recommendations of maternal and fetal assessment. The article by Kilpatrick (2013), used level C evidence to discuss outpatient management including recommendations for maternal and fetal assessments and under which conditions the patient should be admitted to the hospital. The article by Shields (2013a), used level I-A and III-C to discuss chronic hypertension in pregnancy and that this patient population is at risk for developing superimposed preeclampsia. These women should receive more frequent prenatal assessments and should be on antihypertensive treatment. The article by Archer, Druzin, Shields, and Peterson (2013), used level III-C evidence to discuss the uses of antihypertensive agents, labetalol and hydralazine in preeclampsia women with systolic blood pressure (BP) greater than 160mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than 105-110 mm Hg. The article by Berg, Lee, and Chagolla (2013), used level I-A, I-B, II-B, III, and IV evidence to discuss the use of magnesium sulfate for the prevention and 62 management of eclamptic seizures. The information included the preparation, administration, and side effects and toxicity including nursing interventions for the use of magnesium sulfate in the women with severe preeclampsia. The article by Lyndon, Walsh, and Edwards (2013), used level II-3 and III evidence to discuss the importance of effective communication and teamwork as an essential strategy to ensure safe quality care for all patients. Some of the components include; mutual respect, shared decision making, resolving clinical disagreements, SBAR techniques. The article by Meyer (2013a), discussed how the used of medical simulation has a growing body of literature to assist teams to identify knowledge gaps through practice. In situ simulations allows multi-disciplinary teams to train and tests; new policies and procedures, demonstrate skills, identify system issues and test new systems, and finally education for the coordination of team in regards to improving communication. The article by Archer (2013), used level III-C evidence to discuss airway management and recommendations for improvements, in regard to the women having seizures either while pregnant or during the postpartum period. The article by Shields (2013b), used level II-1A and III-1A evidence to discuss the special circumstances that can occur with women that have severe preeclampsia at greater than 34 weeks gestation. The severity of the disease and the weeks of gestation need to look at to determine the treatment plan or when delivery should occur. The article by Zakowski (2013), used level C evidence to discuss when the delivery team should consult other specialties when conditions related to pulmonary/fluid, cardiac, neurologic or hematologic medical situations occur as a result of preeclampsia. The article by Edwards-Silva (2013), used level III evidence to discuss symptoms and treatment for women that suffer from posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). The article by Meyer (2013b), used level C evidence to make recommendations for emergency rooms to have protocols that identify women that are in the period of postpartum up to six weeks and at risk for delayed postpartum preeclampsia and /or eclampsia. 63 The article by Drews and Tsigas (2013), discussed the importance of educating women during their pregnancy and in the postpartum period about risk factors and symptoms related to preeclampsia. 64 APPENDIX B HISTORY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PREECLAMPSIA 65 66 67 68 69 70 APPENDIX C CALIFORNIA MATERNAL QUALITY CARE COLLABORATIVE: PREECLAMPSIA EDUCATION 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 APPENDIX D PREECLAMPSIA EARLY RECOGNITION TOOL ASSESS NORMAL None WORRISOME Agitated/Confused Drowsy Difficulty speaking Mild Headache Nausea, vomiting Blurred or impaired Awareness Alert/Oriented Headache None Vision SEVERE Temporary blindness Unresponsive Unrelieved headache Systolic BP (mm Hg) 100 to139 140 to 159 ≥ 160 Diastolic BP (mm Hg) Heart Rate 50 to 89 61 to 110 90 to 105 111 to 129 ≥ 105 ≥ 130 Respirations SOB O2Sat 11 to 24 Absent ≥ 95 25 to 30 Present 91 to 94 < 10 or > 30 Present ≤ 90 Pain: Abdomen or chest None Nausea, vomiting Chest pain Abdominal pain Fetal Sign Category I Reactive NST Nausea, vomiting Chest pain Abdominal pain Category II IUGR Non-reactive NST Urine Output (mm/hr) ≥ 50 Proteinuria Trace Platelets AST/ALT Creatinine Magnesium Sulfate Toxicity > 100 <70 ≤ 0.8 DTR + 1 Respiration 16 to 20 Category III ≤ 30 (in 2hr) 30 to 49 ≥ +1 ** ≥ 300 mg/24 hours 50 to 100 > 70 0.9 to 1.1 < 50 > 70 ≥ 1.2 Depression of patellar reflexes Respirations <12 YELLOW = WORRISOME GREEN = NORMAL Proceed with protocol Increase assessment frequency Triggers 1 ≥2 TO DO Notify Provider Notify charge RN In-Person evaluation Order Labs.Test Anesthesia consult Consider magnesium sulfate Supplemental oxygen Triggers 1 of any type Awareness Headache Visual BP Chest Pain Respiration SOB O2 SAT RED = SEVERE TO DO Immediate evaluation T ransfer to higher acuity level 1:1 Staff ratio Consider Neurology consult CT Scan R/O SAH/Intracranial hemorrhage Labetalol/hydralazine in 30 min. In-person evaluation Magnesium sulfate loading or maintenance infusion Consider CT angiogram O2 at 10 L per Rebreather mask R/O pulmonary edema Chest x-ray ** Physician shoulde be made aware of worsening or new-onset proteinuria Druzin, M. L., Shields, L. E., Peterson, N. L., & Cape, V. (Eds.). (2013). Preeclampsia toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health p. 107 78 APPENDIX E EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF ANTEPARTUM & POSTPARTUM PREECLAMPSIA 1st Line Anti-Hypertensive Treatment: Labetalol & Hydralazine* Target BP: 140-160/90-100 (BP< 140/90 = decreased fetal perfusion TREATMENT LABETALOL as Primary Anti-Hypertensive Magnesium HYDRALAZINE as Primary Anti-Hypertensive Initial Treatment 1. Administer Labetolol 20 mg IV 1. Administer Hydralazine 5 to 10 mg IV 1. Loading Dose: 4-6 gm over 15-20 min 2. Repeat BP in 10 min 2. Repeat BP in 20 min 2. Maintenance 1-2 gm/hr · If BP threshold is still exceeded, · If BP threshold is still exceeded, 3. Close observation for signs of toxicity administer labetalol administer hydralazine 10 mg IV Disappearance of deep tendon reflexes ·If SBP <160 and DBP < 100, continue ·If SBP <160 and DBP < 100, continue Decreased RR, shallow respirations to monitor BP closely to monitor BP closely shortness of breath 3. Repeat BP in 10 min 3. Repeat BP in 20 min Heart block , chest pain · If BP threshold is still exceeded, · If BP threshold is still exceeded, Pulmonary edema administer labetalol 80 mg IV administer labetalol 20 mg IV ·If SBP <160 and DBP < 100, continue ·If SBP <160 and DBP < 100, continue to monitor BP closely to monitor BP closely 1. Secure airway and maintain oxygenation 4. Repeat BP in 10 min 4. Repeat BP in 10 min 2. Give 2nd loading dose of 2 gm · If BP threshold is still exceeded, · If BP threshold is still exceeded, Magnesium over 5 min administer hydralazine 10 mg IV administer labetalol 40 mg IV and 3. If patient seizes after 2nd magnesium ·If SBP <160 and DBP < 100, continue obtain emergent consultation from bolus, consider the following to monitor BP closely internal medicine, anesthesiology 5. Repeat BP in 20 min ·If SBP <160 and DBP < 100, continue Midazolam 1-2 mg IV; may repeat in 5-10 min OR · If BP threshold is still exceeded, to monitor BP closely Lorazepam 2 mg IV- May repeat OR obtain emergent consultation from 5. Once target BP achieved, monitor BP Diazepam 5-10 mg IV, may repeat q15 min internal medicine, anesthesiology q10min for 1 hour, q 15 min for 2nd hour to max of 30 mg 6. Once target BP achieved, monitor BP If Patient Seizes while on Magnesium: Phenytoin 1 gm IV over 20 min q10min for 1 hour, q 15 min for 2nd hour Seizures Resolve 1. Maintain airway and oxygenation 2. Monitor VS, cardia rhythm/ ECG for signs Druzin, M. L., Shields, L. E., Peterson, N. L., & Cape, V. (Eds.). (2013). Preeclampsia toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health p. 110 of medication toxicity 3. Consider brain imaging for: Head Trauma Focal Seizures Focal Neurologic findings Other neurologic diagnosis is suspected 79 APPENDIX F TREATMENT FOR SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA Systolic BP≥ 160 mmHg and/or Diastolic BP ≥ 110 mmHg If preeclampsia proceed below Inform OB Team IV access IV Antihypertensive Medications Monitor FHT Send Labs Seizure Prophylaxis Labetalol 20 mg Hydralazine 5-10 mg Magnesium sulfate bolus dose 4-6 g (over 20 minutes) Repeat BP in 10 mins if elevated administer labetalol 40 mg Repeat BP in 20 min if elevated administer hydralazine 10 mg Magnesium sulfate maintenance dose 1-2 g/hr Repeat BP in 10 min if elevated administer labetalol 80 mg Repeat BP in 20 mins if elevated administer labetalol 20 mg Check serum magnesium levels (if indicated) Repeat BP in 10 mins if elevated administer hydralazine 10 mg Repeat BP in 20 mins if remains elevated obtain anesthesia consult Repeat BP in 10 min if elevated administer labetalol 40 mg AND obtain anesthesia consult 80 APPENDIX G ECLAMPSIA CHECKLIST Call for help _______ Establish open airway and maintain breathing (call for RT) ______ Oxygen (non-rebreather mask) ______ Check BP & Pulse ______ Start IV 18 gauge, if not already placed _______ Left Lateral Position ______ Seizure Control If not on Magnesium sulfate administer 4-6 grams IV bolus (over 20 minutes)______ If already on magnesium sulfate administer 2nd bolus dose of 2 grams (over 3-5 mins )______ Magnesium maintenance dose 1-2 g/h for 24 hour after last seizure or after delivery If seizure not terminating administer: Midazolam (Versed) 2mg IV- can repeat in 5-10 minutes OR ______ Lorazepam (Ativan) 4 mg IV over 2-5 minutes OR ______ Diazepam (Valium) 5-10 mg IV slowly (can repeat every 15 minutes up to 30 mg) OR ______ Phenytoin (Dilantin) 1000mg IV over 20 minutes- May cause QRS or QT prolongation _______ Monitor respirations, BP, ECG, and signs of magnesium toxicity (VS)_____________________ Anti-Hypertensive Medications Labetalol (as Primary) 20 mg IV over 3-5 minutes Repeat BP in 10 minutes, if exceeds 160 and 100 Administer Labetalol 40 mg IV ____________ Repeat BP in 10 minutes, if exceeds 160 and 100 Administer Labetalol 80 mg IV ____________ Repeat BP in 10 minutes, if exceeds 160 and 100 Administer Hydralazine 10 mg IV __________ Hydralazine (as Primary) 5-10 mg IV over 3-5 minutes Repeat BP in 10 minutes, if exceeds 160 and 100 Administer Hydralazine 10 mg IV __________ Repeat BP in 10 minutes, if exceeds 160 and 100 Administer Labetalol 20 mg IV ____________ Repeat BP in 10 minutes, if exceeds 160 and 100 Administer Labetalol 40 mg IV ____________ Once target BP achieved monitor BP q10 minutes for 1 hour, then q15 minutes for 2nd hour Monitor Fetal Heart Tracing Ob and Anesthesia to discuss if/when delivery is required Try to avoid immediate delivery, Allow time for FHT to return to baseline (FHT)___________________________________ Delivery only for prolonged bradycardia after termination of seizure Druzin, M. L., Shields, L. E., Peterson, N. L., & Cape, V. (Eds.). (2013) Preeclampsia toolkit: Improving health care response to preeclampsia, Sacramento, CA. California Department of Public Health P. 108 Labetalol and Hydralazine recommendations based on 2011 ACOG Committee Opinion #514 and Practice Bulletin #33 81 APPENDIX H ONLINE MODULE EVALUATION TOOL Course Developed by: Jennifer Serratos RN, BSN Course Date: (AUTOMATIC FILLED IN COMPUTER ) Course Location:(AUTOMATIC FILLED IN COMPUTER) 1. Did the presentation and supplemental materials meet the objectives?YES/NO 2. List 3 concepts you learned in this program that you will use in your clinical setting. 3. What could have happened that would have improved this learning opportunity? 4. What did you like best about this course? 5. What did you like the least about this course? 6. Did the online module present the material clearly? 7. What other topics would you like to have presented? 8. Any additional constructive comments? 82 APPENDIX I SIMULATION EVALUATION Simulation Evaluation In order to facilitate improvements to Simulation your feedback is greatly needed. Please complete the following course evaluation. Please rate the following: Course Content Not at all Minimally Average Very Extremely helpful Helpful Helpful Helpful Preeclampsia Early Recognition Tool 1 2 3 4 5 Evaluation & Treatment of 1 2 3 4 5 Antepartum Postpartum Preeclampsia & Eclampsia Treatment for Severe Preeclampsia 1 2 3 4 5 Eclampsia Checklist 1 2 3 4 5 OB Preeclampsia Order Set 1 2 3 4 5 Policy and Procedures 1 2 3 4 5 Comments: Please comment on any area you rated 3 or less Please rate the quality and amount of content presented on the following topics: List of specific course topics Not at all Minimally Average Very helpful Helpful Helpful Magnesium Sulfate 1 2 3 4 Hydralazine 1 2 3 4 Labetalol 1 2 3 4 Sign & Symptoms of Preeclampsia 1 2 3 4 Ob Order Sets & access 1 2 3 4 Comments: Please comment on any area you rated 3 or less Please rate the following: Simulation Not at all Minimally helpful Helpful Pre-Brief 1 2 Simulation Experience 1 2 Debrief 1 2 Simulation Champions 1 2 Equipment 1 2 Room 1 2 Overall Experience 1 2 Comments: Please comment on any area you rated with 3 or less Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Very Helpful 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Extremely Helpful 5 5 5 5 5 Extremely Helpful 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Overall Comments: Please feel free to add any additional comments relevant to this course. Positive comments as well as suggestions for improvement are welcome.
© Copyright 2024