EDPS 614B 1 EDPS 62400 Advanced Counseling Practicum, Supervision Theory Spring 2015 – BRNG 3123 Instructor: Mary Carole Pistole, Ph.D. Office: BRNG 5176; [email protected] Monday, 5:30-8:20, BRNG 3123 COURSE DESCRIPTION Supervised use of personal and career counseling techniques applied to complex and difficult client situations in a non-program counseling setting, and critical analysis of major theories and strategies of counseling supervision, providing (a) exposure to the basic knowledge base for supervision practice, and (b) preparation for supervising counselors in internship or entry level positions. COURSE FORMAT This aspect of the course addresses supervision theory. Supervision theories provides exposure to the supervision knowledge base, which is the foundation for competent supervision. Note that many professional psychologists argue that supervision practice is effective only after the psychologist gains 3 + years of post-doctoral experience. This supervision theories aspect of EDPS 62400 is delivered as a doctoral seminar. It is important, therefore, for everyone to work responsibly in the group: contribute to discussion, provide feedback and comments, and process feelings and emotional reactions as they relate to professional relationships and the knowledge base. Please think in terms of developing a mature working group, with all members contributing in all roles that constitute effective membership and leadership (see the Forsyth reading). Your learning will be only as meaningful as the group’s contributions. I will do everything in my power to make the climate safe and our learning effective and useful. I expect professional behavior from you. Read ahead of class, and bring the readings to class, with material identified for discussion. Professional psychologist competence includes identifying “issues” and requesting “help” to improve competence. OBJECTIVES Supervision Theory 1. Develop knowledge of counseling supervision theories, methods, and problems 2. Begin to think like a supervisor, using the scientist-practitioner integration of theory, research, and practice. 3. Understand individual and cultural differences and diversity (ICD) in supervision. 4. Achieve a counseling supervision foundation that is consistent with the scientist-practitioner model, your counseling theoretical approach, and your identity as a counseling psychologist. 5. Gain knowledge, awareness, and understanding of ethical issues related to counseling supervision. TEXT See required weekly readings. NOTES 1. In the event of a major campus emergency, course requirements, deadlines, and grading percentages are subject to changes that may be necessitated by a revised semester calendar or other circumstances. For changes, email me, call my office, 765.494.9744, or my cell phone number. 2. I expect everyone to have comments or questions for class. 3. I expect that you genuinely aspire to learn and meet psychology's best practice standards, which includes professional behavior and requires use of APA policies (e.g., Ethical Code, Practice Guidelines). I further expect that you will read professional literature, participate as an effective group member/leader, and attend to the learning activities. Grades will be lowered when students do not meet these expectations, regardless of the effectiveness of current counseling skills. EDPS 614B 2 REQUIREMENTS 1. Attendance and Professional Behavior Weekly attendance is required; effective group functioning requires all to be present and on time. The group will monitor use of time and elicit (and value) comments from all members. Professional and ethical behavior is required, including demonstrating the professional skill of being self-directed in learning and of being ready to assume more advanced roles. In-class or in-session multitasking is a serious cause for concern, as is any non-professional behavior. I will lower grades for non-professional behavior, even if counseling seems to be effective at this level of training. Each student is expected to actively and assertively contribute to the group’s work, and to his/her own and others’ learning. You need to participate in class discussion, read assignments before class, think about the reading, and interact meaningfully with others. 2. Class Leadership You will lead the supervision theories portion of the course once or twice. I expect all of us to participate actively. 3. Supervision Theory Presentation During the latter weeks, students will present supervision theories. Select your topic, provide a presentation that allows time for questions and discussion. You may include a brief experiential component. Provide a handout and a pdf reading for the class. Topics: a. Process model – 7-eyed model (Hawkins & Sholet); b. Integrated Developmental Model (IDM; Stoltenberg et al.); c. Critical Events Model (Ladany, Friedlander, & Nelson); d. Competency Model (Falender & Shafranske); e. System Analysis Supervision (Holloway); f. Interpersonal Process Recall (Kagan) or Microcounseling: A training and supervision paradigm for the helping professions (Daniels, Rigazio-Digilio, & Ivey). 4. Reflection/Questions Bring 1-2 thoughtful questions over the readings. Be clear about the specific text you are thinking about or reacting to. At this level of professional development, I expect you to be invested in your learning and grappling with your learning edges. Therefore, you should focus on what was important to you; we will use the questions to think through or “try out” perspectives. For instance, you may have values that contradict the profession’s values, in which case you might want to stimulate a discussion that addresses the “positive and negatives” of your own, your peers, and the profession’s stances. Bring hard copy to class. TENTATIVE COURSE OUTLINE Week 1: Organization of the course and class, 1.12. Week 2: 1.26 Supervision – Professionalism Elman, N. S., Illfelder-Kaye, J., & Robiner, W. N. (2005). Professional development: Training for professionalism as a foundation for competent practice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36,367-375. Johnson, W. B., Elman, N. S., Forrest, L., Robiner, W. N., Rodolfa, E., & Schaffer, J. B. (2008). Addressing professional competence problems in trainees: Some ethical considerations. Professional Psychology, 39, 589-599. Falender, C., & Shafranske, E. (2005). Supervisee effectiveness. In M. B. Madson, L. K. Chapman, N. L. Wood-Barcalow, & C. Williams-Nickelson (Eds.), Succeeding in practicum: An APAGS resource guide (pp. 65-70). Washington, DC: APAGS. [pdf] [how to use as a supervisor] EDPS 614B 3 Williams-Nickelson, C. (2005). What to seek and expect from a supervisor and supervision. In M. B. Madson, L. K. Chapman, N. L. Wood-Barcalow, & C. Williams-Nickelson (Eds.), Succeeding in practicum: An APAGS resource guide (pp. 71-82). Washington, DC: APAGS. [pdf] [how to use as a supervisor] Week 3: 2.2 Supervision Competencies and Ethics Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology,38, 232-240. Falender, C., Cornish, J. A. E., Goodyear, R. K., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N.J., Leventhal, G., Shafranske, E., Sigmon, S. T., Stoltenberg, C., & Grus, C. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771-785. Arredondo, P., Shealy, C., Neale, M., & Winfrey, L. L. (2004). Consultation and inerprofessional collaboration: Modeling for the future. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 787-800. Johnson, W. B. (2007). Transformational supervision: When supervisors mentor. Professional Psychology,38, 259-267 Week 4: 2.9 Supervision Ethics Gottlieb, M. C., Robinson, K., & Younggren, J. N. (2007). Multiple relations in supervision: Guidance for administrators, supervisors, and students. Professional Psychology, 38, 241-247. Barnett, J. E., Erickson Cornish, J. A., Goodyear, R. K., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (2007). Commentaries on the ethical and effective practice of clinical supervision. Professional Psychology,38, 268-275. Gottlieb, M. C., & Younggren, J. N. (2009). Is there a slippery slope? Considerations regarding multiple relationships and risk management. Professional Psychology, 40, 564-571. Thomas, J. T. (2007). Informed consent through contracting for supervision: Minimizing risks, enhancing benefits. Professional Psychology, 38, 221-232. Week 5: 2.16 Negative Supervision Experience/Research Ladany, N. (2007). Psychotherapy supervision: How dressed is the emperor? Psychotherapy Bulletin, 37, 14-18. Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Ancis, J. R. (2001). Psychotherapy trainees’ experience of counterproductive events in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 371-384. Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 384-395. Veach, P. M. (2001). Conflict and counterproductivity in supervision – When relationships are less than ideal: Comment on Nelson and Friedlander (2001) and Gray et al. (2001). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 396-400. Ellis, M. V. (2001). Harmful supervision, a cause for alarm: Comment on Gray et al. (2001) and Nelson and Friedlander (2001). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 401-406. Nelson, M. L., Gray, L. A., Friedlander, M. L., Ladany, N., & Walker, J. A. (2001). Toward relationshipcentered supervision: Reply to Veach (2001) and Ellis (2001). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 407-409. Ramos-Sanchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., Ratanasiripong, R., & Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 197-202. [recommended] Week 6: 2.23 Supervision Overview & Supervising International Students EDPS 614B 4 Westefeld, J. S. (2009). Supervision of psychotherapy: Models, issues, and recommendations. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 296-316. Mori, Y., Inman, A. G., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2009). Supervising international students: Relationship between acculturation, supervisor multicultural competence, cultural discussions, and supervision satisfaction. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 10-18. Nilsson, J. E., & Anderson, M. Z. (2004). Supervising international students: The role of acculturation, role ambiguity, and multicultural discussions. Professional Psychology, 35, 306-312. Wedding, D., McCartney, J. L., & Currey, D. E. (2009). Lessons relevant to psychologists who serve as mentors for international students. Professional Psychology, 40, 189-193. Week 7: 3.2 Other Supervisory Issues McWilliams, N. (n.d.). Some observations about supervision/consultation groups. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from http://apadiv31.org/newsletter_coop.htm Haboush, K. L. (n.d.). Conducting group supervision within the context of graduate training programs. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from http://apadiv31.org/newsletter_coop.htm Enyedy, K. C., Arcinue, F., Puri, N. N., Carter, J. W., Goodyear, R. K., & Getzelman, M. A. (2003). Hindering phenomena in group supervision: Implications for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 312-317. Friedman, D., & Kaslow, N. J. (1986). The development of professional identity in psychotherapists: Six stages in the supervision process. The Clinical Supervisor, 4, 29-49. [old; worth the ideas] Week 8: 3.9 Other Supervisory Issues Alsonso, A., & Rutan, J. S. (1988). Shame and guilt in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 25, 576-581. [pdf] [old; worth thinking about] Rozsnafszky, J. (1979). Beyond schools of psychotherapy: Integrity and maturity in therapy and supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 190-198. [worth thinking about] Henderson, C. E., Cawyer, C. S., Watkins, C. E., Jr. (1999). A comparison of student and supervisor perceptions of effective practicum supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 47-74. Week 9: 3.23 Attachment Theory in Supervision & Counseling Fitch, J. C., Pistole, M. C., Y Gunn, J. E. (2010). The bonds of development: An attachment-caregiving model of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 20-34. Pistole, M. C., & Fitch, J. C. (2008). Attachment theory in supervision: A critical incident experience. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47, 193-205. Gunn, J. E., & Pistole, M. C. (2012). Trainee Supervisor-attachment: Explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6, 229-237. Bennett, S., & Saks, L. V. (2006). A conceptual application of attachment theory and research to the social work student-field instructor supervisory relationship. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 669-682. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2006.200500506 Newswald-McCalip, R. (2001). Development of the secure counselor: Case examples supporting Pistole & Watkins’s (1995) discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision. Counselor Education & Supervision, 41, 18-27. Week 10 – 3.30 Supervision Presentations: Sam – Holloway, Systems Aieyat – Ladany, Critical Events EDPS 614B 5 Week 11 – 4.6 Supervision Presentations: Chai – Process (Hawkins & Sholet) Matt – Competency (Falender & Shafranske) Week 12 – 4.13 Supervision Presentation: Dan – Integrated Development (Stoltenberg) Week 13 – 4.20 Supervision Presentation Yaping – Interpersonal Process Week 14 – 4.27 – Last Class Supervision Final Catch-up and Learning Processing EVALUATION You grade is based on effective completion of each and all campus requirements and activities, including Professional Behavior, Leading Class Discussion & Supervision Presentation, & Reflection Questions UNIVERSITY POLICIES http://www.purdue.edu/univregs/ Disability Accommodation: http://www.purdue.edu/ODOS/adpro/Welcome.html [Adaptive Programs] If you are eligible for academic accommodations because you have a documented disability that will impact your work in this class, please schedule an appointment with me as soon as possible to discuss your needs. Academic Dishonesty: http://www.purdue.edu/univregs/pages/stu_conduct/stu_regulations.html [Regulations Governing Student Conduct , Disciplinary Proceedings, and Appeals] From the Dean of Students Website: “Purdue University values intellectual integrity and the highest standards of academic conduct …. Purdue prohibits ‘dishonesty in connection with any University activity. Cheating, plagiarism, or knowingly furnishing false information to the University are examples of dishonesty.’ [University Regulations, Part 5, Section III, B, 2, a] Furthermore, the University Senate has stipulated that ‘the commitment of the acts of cheating, lying, and deceit in any of their diverse forms (such as the use of substitutes for taking examinations, the use of illegal cribs, plagiarism, and copying during examinations) is dishonest and must not be tolerated. Moreover, knowingly to aid and abet, directly or indirectly, other parties in committing dishonest acts is in itself dishonest.’ [University Senate Document 72-18, December 15, 1972]” Non-Discrimination: http://www.purdue.edu/univregs/pages/nondescrim/nondescrim.html Purdue University is committed to maintaining a community which recognizes and values the inherent worth and dignity of every person; fosters tolerance, sensitivity, understanding, and mutual respect among its members; and encourages each individual to strive to reach his or her own potential. In pursuit of its goal of academic excellence, the University seeks to develop and nurture diversity. The University believes that diversity among its many members strengthens the institution, stimulates creativity, promotes the exchange of new ideas, and enriches campus life. Purdue University views, evaluates, and treats all persons in any University related activity or circumstance in which they may be involved, solely as individuals on the basis of their own personal abilities, qualifications, and other relevant characteristics. Purdue University prohibits discrimination against any member of the University community on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability, or status as a disabled or Vietnam era veteran. Harassment http://www.purdue.edu/univregs/pages/state_equal/prc_harass.html Harassment in the workplace or the educational environment is unacceptable conduct and will not be tolerated. Harassment is conduct towards another person or identifiable group of persons that has the purpose or effect of: creating an intimidating or hostile educational environment, work environment, or environment for participation in a EDPS 614B 6 University activity; unreasonably interfering with a person’s educational environment, work environment, or environment for participation in a University activity; or unreasonably affecting a person’s educational or work opportunities or participation in a University activity. Racial harassment is conduct that demonstrates hostility toward another person (or identifiable group of persons) on the basis of race, color, national origin, or ancestry …. The University is strongly committed to providing a safe and harassment-free environment for members of those groups that historically have been, and still are likely to be, at greatest risk of harassment for reasons of prejudice. Sexual Harassment is any unwelcome sexual advance; requesting of sexual favors; or other written, verbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature when …. The disparity of power between persons involved in amorous relationships of a teacher and student, supervisor and subordinate, or senior and junior colleagues in the same department or unit makes them susceptible to exploitation. Emergency: In the event of a major campus emergency, course requirements, deadlines and grading percentages are subject to changes that may be necessitated by a revised semester calendar or other circumstances. To get information about changes in this course, email me, [email protected], or call my office, 765.494.9744. ALSO, students are required to visit http://www.education.purdue.edu/ODFD/resources.html and review the response procedures for emergencies in Beering Hall. It is necessary that you review these directions within the first week of your Beering classes. If you have any questions see your instructor. Amorous Relationships http://www.purdue.edu/policies/pages/human_resources/iv_7_1.html [excerpted]. Purdue University is committed to maintaining an environment in which learning and discovery take place in a professional atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. Amorous relationships can develop within the University community between faculty, students and staff. The disparity of power between persons involved in amorous relationships between a student and a faculty member, a graduate teaching or research assistant, or any other Purdue employee who has educational responsibility over the student, supervisor and subordinate, or senior and junior colleagues in the same department or unit makes them susceptible to exploitation. Amorous relationships that occur in the context of educational or employment supervision and evaluation between a student and a faculty member, a graduate teaching or research assistant, or any other Purdue employee who has educational responsibility over the student, or supervisor and subordinate undermine professionalism and hinder the fulfillment of the University’s educational mission. Relationships between faculty and students are particularly susceptible to exploitation. The respect and trust accorded a member of the faculty by a student, as well as the power exercised by faculty in giving grades, approvals, or recommendations for future study and employment, make voluntary consent by the student suspect. Those who abuse their power in the context of an amorous relationship where there is educational or employment supervision and evaluation violate their duty to the University community. Voluntary consent by the student or subordinate in a romantic or sexual relationship is difficult to determine given the asymmetric nature of the power structure in the relationship. Because of the complex and subtle effects of the power differential in the relationship, the individual with power may perceive the existence of consent that may not exist or not exist at the level perceived by the individual with power. The possibility exists that, if the relationship sours, these individuals may be subject to a claim of sexual harassment. Amorous relationships may have an effect on others in the course, department or unit. Others may perceive that the student or subordinate in the amorous relationship is favored and afforded undue access and advantage above others in the same course, department or unit. These individuals may perceive the environment created as a result of the amorous relationship to be hostile and/or perceive forward progress and benefits are obtained through engaging in a romantic or sexual relationship with the person in power. Therefore, Purdue University prohibits amorous relationships between a student and any Purdue employee who has educational responsibility over the student, and supervisors and subordinates where there is a supervisory or evaluative relationship between the parties. Individuals engaged in an amorous relationship in violation of this policy are subject to disciplinary action ranging from a written reprimand up to and including termination. Individuals engaged in an amorous relationship prior to the existence of a supervisory or evaluative relationship within the educational and/or employment context, or who find themselves entering into such a relationship, have a duty to report the existence of the amorous relationship to the department or unit head who must ensure that arrangements are made to sever the supervisory or evaluative relationship between the parties. The parties must abide by the University Policy Concerning Nepotism. Responsibility for the interpretation and enforcement of this policy rests with the Vice President for Ethics and Compliance. Purdue University is committed to maintaining an environment in which learning and discovery take place in a professional atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. Amorous relationships that occur in the context of educational or employment supervision and evaluation between a student and a faculty member, a graduate teaching or research assistant, or any other Purdue employee who has educational responsibility over the student, or supervisor and subordinate undermine professionalism and are disruptive to the educational and work environment. Ultimately, amorous relationships hinder the fulfillment of the University’s educational mission. (see also V. E. Kress & A. Dixon, 2007, in Counselor Education & Supervision). EDPS 614B 7 Emergency Preparedness. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES are based on a simple concept – if you hear a fire alarm inside, proceed outside. If you hear a siren outside, proceed inside. Indoor Fire Alarms mean to stop class or research and immediately evacuate the building. o Proceed to your Emergency Assembly Area away from building doors. Remain outside until police, fire, or other emergency response personnel provide additional guidance or tell you it is safe to leave. All Hazards Outdoor Emergency Warning Sirens mean to immediately seek shelter (Shelter in Place) in a safe location within the closest building. o “Shelter in place” means seeking immediate shelter inside a building or University residence. This course of action may need to be taken during a tornado, a civil disturbance including a shooting or release of hazardous materials in the outside air. Once safely inside, find out more details about the emergency*. Remain in place until police, fire, or other emergency response personnel provide additional guidance or tell you it is safe to leave. *In both cases, seek additional clarifying information by all means possible: Purdue Emergency Status page, text message, email alert, TV, radio, etc. Review the Purdue Emergency Warning Notification System multicommunication layers: http://www.purdue.edu/ehps/emergency_preparedness/warning-system.html EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES: Review the Emergency Procedures Guidelines https://www.purdue.edu/emergency_preparedness/flipchart/index.html Review the Building Emergency Plan (available on the Emergency Preparedness website or from the building deputy) for: o evacuation routes, exit points, and emergency assembly area o when and how to evacuate the building. o shelter in place procedures and locations o additional building specific procedures and requirements. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AWARENESS VIDEOS o "Shots Fired on Campus: When Lightning Strikes," is a 20-minute active shooter awareness video that illustrates what to look for and how to prepare and react to this type of incident. See: http://www.purdue.edu/securePurdue/news/2010/emergency-preparedness-shots-fired-oncampus-video.cfm (Link is also located on the EP website) MORE INFORMATION. Reference the Emergency Preparedness web site for additional information: https://www.purdue.edu/ehps/emergency_preparedness/ SUMMARY TENTATIVE SCHEDULE Week 1 – 1.12 2 – 1.26 3 – 2.2 4 – 2.9 5 – 2.16 6 – 2.23 7 – 3.2 8 – 3.9 9 – 3.23 10 – 3.30 11 – 4.6 12 – 4.13 13 – 4.20 14 – 4.27 . Leader Pistole Pistole Pistole Sam/Aieyat Chai/Matt Dan Yaping Pistole Assignment Due Introduction/Syllabus Revised syllabus, readings Readings Readings Readings Readings Readings Readings Readings Presentations Presentations Presentations Presentations Exit Meeting
© Copyright 2024