HOW TO SAVE THE EURO AND THE EUROPEAN UNION? ---------------------------Версию на русском – см. здесь Translation into any language is possible here Answer to the question: “If member states leave the Economic and Monetary Union, what is the best way for the economic process to be managed to provide the soundest foundation for the future growth and prosperity of the current membership?” (from Russian) Authors: Evgeni DOVGEL, Analyst with operational experience in spheres of analysis, prognostication, improvement of production relations and management systems – leading author, Viktar TSIARESHCHANKA, Republic of Belarus. Presidential candidate at the elections of 2010 in the Republic of Belarus, Candidate of Economics, associate professor in special subject “Economics”, MBA, manager with operational experience in spheres of state and economic management, Victor SVETOV, B.Sc.C.K. MBPs. President. Select Trading Solutions Inc. Toronto, Canada Chairman & CEO. Royal Clark Enterprises Inc. Toronto, Canada. Consultant Mr. H.J. (Joe) Janthur, FICB, Ec.D. Certified Economist Developer. President. Chairman of the Federation of Export Clubs of Canada. Chairman of the Central Ontario Export Club. January 30, 2012 Summary of the work Answer to the question: “If member states leave the Economic and Monetary Union, what is the best way for the economic process to be managed to provide the soundest foundation for the future growth and prosperity of the current membership?”, nominated for Wolfson Economics Prize The authors give the survey of events which, in their opinion, justify the conclusion: there is an economic situation which threatens with a collapse of the Eurozone, which may have disastrous effects on the whole world financial system. That is why the question in the title is so urgent for the EU countries and the world It is seen that credit and monetary systems of EU states feature internal contradiction. The essence of the loan process of any money issuer is shown in the following scheme: Issue of credits into economy by issuing bank 100 EUROS (US Dollars, rubles…) Return of credits to the issuing bank with interests 100 EUROS (US dollars, rubles…) + interests at refinancing rate The contradiction of this scheme is obvious: each of the CENTERS OF MONEY ISSUING recalls more money from circulation than issues money with this credit act. It requires faster rates of issue of its credits from any National bank, otherwise there will be deficiency in money for return of credits with interests. The time when monetary systems were developing at the expense of the fact that the rate of issuing credits by them exceeded the rate of credit return has already played out. The growth rate of credit debts in the whole world economy increases faster than the increase of actual value of monetary aggregates in circulation. 2 The authors represent 2 mathematical models of processes in the economy. The analysis according to the models shows that such a situation is developing when existing debts, making the base of the world financial system and all its assets could not be returned and increase. If the system does not eliminate this contradiction, so the downturn of financial system will give active recession and rise to “boom” of hyperinflation, price increase and mass discontent. The analysis also shows that in monetary systems, the money of National banks does not have proper provision in the course of real-time. That is why inflation devalues currency money supply in different states and the world economy. That is why the European and world monetary systems need fundamental innovation. The analysis of the history of Euro showed that the way out of the crisis should be a simple return to the state of the European Union, which was convenient for everyone during the period from 01.01.1999 till 01.01.2002. It is reasonable for the EU to transform Euro from the status of a unified currency to the status of a common one without demolishing the institute of Euro and the Eurozone and to provide the Eurozone countries with the right to restore their monetary systems for simultaneous circulation of national currencies in their territories. Such monetary restructuring will be the most optimal for the EU members: remaining the member of the Eurozone, each country will receive at its disposal the instrument of state control and development of national economy – its monetary system. At the same time all the National banks should correct in their systems the contradiction which everyday still accumulates in them the reason of getting more aggravating credit crisis. National banks should pass on from creditissuing to investment-issuing financing of the economy. Instead of emitting money by means of credits, National banks must realize emission by means of purchasing highly liquid shares of highly effective and promising commercial business projects. Governments must develop such business-projects, give them to National banks and insure if necessary. (To some extent, this idea was taken from the analysis of the well-known "economic miracle" of Japan, and Israel's achievements in science and technology). Meanwhile EACH BANKNOTE will be introduced into circulation by 100% provided with highly liquid assets, which will increase in value relative to money and will bring bigger income to the issuer than in the process of credit 3 issuing. It will increase the assets of money issuers. Currencies of the EU countries will be able to free from such illness as inflation. The volume of stable, not subjected to inflation monetary aggregate will increase. Capitals of commercial banks will start increasing as well. The answers to all the questions of the Wolfson Economics Prize are also given in the work. It is showed, that the transition from credit-issuing to investment-issuing financing of economy will create conditions for stability in the European banking system. The optimality of the offered here reorganization of the European monetary system should be emphasized from the point of view of its technical maintenance. There will be no demand in any new banking organizations. There are also some other measures recommended to the European Union and its members: in the field of optimization of tax system, creation of conditions of high management motivations and to the employees to the development of means of production, increase of production output, improvement of pension system . The concept of complex associated solutions which solve economic problems, has been worked out in details by the authors, it was approved and may be prepared for interested states according to their initial data. The authors express confidence that all these measures in complex with other agreed means of the European Union and national governments of the EU member states will allow Europe to stabilize Euro in short time and make its common currency the main worldwide reserve currency. The situation for this in the whole world is favorable. The world is on the eve of a new crisis-free epoch of Homo sapiens. As a scientific basis for this final statement we also present an original scientific theory of socioeconomic systems of the leading author (annex-4). The authors are ready to present their development, which has fundamental scientific novelty, in the form of complex reports by the authors with visual demonstration of economical models. Evgeni Dovgel 30.01.2011 4 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Reasons and economic mechanisms of the world debt crisis About developed computer mathematical models The essence of reason behind inflation of modern money Mechanism of money inflation and price increase Conclusion 3. Answer to Mr. Wolfson’s question: “If member states leave the Economic and Monetary Union, what is the best way for the economic process to be managed to provide the soundest foundation for the future growth and prosperity of the current membership?” and proposed ways for the Eurozone states out of the debt crisis. 4. Answers to other questions posed in Wolfson Prize’s terms: 5. Source list 6. Attachments: 1) Computer mathematical model 1. Model of credit and monetary processes in economy – Excel file: model-1.xls. 2) Computer mathematical model 2. Optimization of variants of credit and investment business plan – Excel file: model-2.xls 3. Diagrams: Fig. 1.1. Dynamics national monetary mass of the country where the authors of the present paper live (as an example), files – r-1.jpg (pdf), Fig. 1.2. The same national monetary mass (see Fig. 1.1.) per capita in US Dollars at the official exchange rate, files – r-2.jpg (pdf), Fig. 1.3. The same national monetary mass (see Fig. 1.1.) per capita in US Dollars taking into account inflation of Dollar (in Dollars of 1990), files – r-3 (pdf).jpg, Fig. 2. Amount of grams of gold in 100 US Dollars at New-York Stock Exchange, files – r-4.jpg (pdf). 4) Theory of Socio-Economic Formations (fundamental principles, new view – theoretical substantiation of the current Submission) ), files – theory.docx (pdf). 5 1. Introduction The 489 billion euros in three-year loans allotted in 2011 by the European Central Bank (hereinafter referred to as – ECB) to the Eurozone banks as well as the financial and fiscal austerity measures adopted for restraining the growth of national debts in the member states have slightly diminished the problem of liquidity deficit in the financial system of the European Union for the time being. After another session of the Governing Council for the rates on 12.01.2012, the head of ECB Mario Draghi even declared about the first indications of economic stabilization in the Eurozone11. However maintaining the liquidity of banks with the help of loans is a method, which is no longer trusted among the analysts. Europe is facing mounting problems with providing pension payments to its aging population, problems of environment, migrants, social minority groups, etc. And just a day after M. Draghi’s moderately optimistic statement the rating agency Standard & Poor's announced the downgrading of the sovereign credit ratings of nine out of 17 countries of the Euro zone. The ratings of Italy, Spain, Portugal and Cyprus were lowered two notches; the ratings of France, Austria, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia -- lowered one notch. On Monday January 16, 2012 Standard & Poor's also cut one notch from the credit rating of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) – organization, which is financed by member states of the European Union, and was created by 27 member countries of the EU on 9 May 2010 with the purpose to fight the European debt crisis. On 18 January the World Bank downgraded the forecast of the global economic growth in the Eurozone countries and warned against the danger of collapse of the whole world economy. On 24 January the International Monetary Fund also warned that the Eurozone debt crisis is aggravating and may negatively impact the growth of the world economy. The IMF called Europe to immediate actions for restoration of confidence in markets. On 27 January the Fitch international rating agency decreased long-term credit ratings of five states of the Eurozone with further negative forecast and suggested that the Eurozone states could not support the status of Euro as a world reserve currency.2 Creditors actively transfer their deposits from accounts in different banks of the EU states and invest them into deposits of the ECB. All this shows that the economic situation in the Eurozone threatens with a collapse of the zone of Euro, which may have disastrous effects on the whole world financial system. Therefore, Mr. Wolfson’s question, given in the title of the present paper, is getting more and more urgent both for the European Union countries and for the whole planet. 6 To answer this question it is necessary to examine the reasons of the crisis. 2. Reasons and economic mechanisms of the world debt crisis The essence of a crisis in any system is the accumulation in this system of the results of a certain contradiction up to the level after which the system starts to collapse. Credit and monetary systems of modern states with market economy, including the EU, feature internal contradiction: National banks of these states, as well as the ECB, the Federal Reserve System of the USA (hereinafter referred to as – FRS) and to a certain extent the International Monetary Fund within the limits of its system (SDR - special drawing rights) issue CREDITS like ancient money lenders. After a certain period borrowers have to return THESE CREDITS with INTEREST. The essence of the credit process of any bank - money issuer is shown in the following scheme: Granting of loans by bank - the Return of loans to bank – the money issuer money issuer into the economy with interest 100 EUROS (US Dollars, 100 EUROS (US Dollars, rubles…) rubles…) + interest at refinancing rate The contradiction of this scheme is obvious: each MONEY ISSUING AUTHORITY as a result of each CREDIT act removes from circulation more money than what it issues with this credit act into circulation. Let us recall a school problem about a swimming pool, which is being filled with water through one pipe, and drained through two pipes. In this case one of the draining pipes (for return of the loan to the bank) passes exactly the same flow as the pipe which fills the swimming pool (issuing of loans into economy), and the second pipe (return of interest) passes a portion of the flow of the pipe which fills the swimming pool. And likely everyone at school knew that such a swimming pool would become empty in the end. In order for the world credit and monetary environment to work without the accumulation of problems which lead to crises it is necessary that fullweight money continue to somehow appear in the economy in greater quantity, than is issued into the economy by means of loans by the entire complex of issuing banks. 7 At time, when gold and silver were used as money, this condition was met although not without problems: the amount of real money (gold and silver as precious metals) in the world economy kept increasing all the time without inflation: Firstly, because gold and silver have inherent value, their extraction is associated with certain expenditures; Secondly, because gold and silver were constantly mined in nature and involved into sphere of exchange as money; Thirdly, because the increase in the amount of gold and silver (hereinafter referred to as precious metals) in circulation always objectively fell behind the growth rates of the world production, the increase in the volume of goods on markets and the demand of the world economy for money as a medium of exchange. Therefore, in the previous centuries, due to the constant inflow of fullvalue money (precious metals) into the economy from outside the boundaries of the credit and monetary sphere, the contradiction between the issuance of loans into the economy and the necessity to return these loans with interest was to a certain extent self-resolved by means of the market self-regulators. If there was not enough money in the economy for resolving the indicated contradiction, the market prices for money - precious metals increased relative to the goods, which thereby stimulated more active mining of precious metals with all possible means. But gold and other precious metals have left the sphere of money circulation a long time ago for objective reasons (which are commonly known for specialists and are not described here). Nowadays money is issued into economy only by the national banks of states, as well as ECB and FRS (all of them hereinafter referred to as National banks). And they issue symbolic money (electronic, paper), sometimes without the proper provision of their obligations before people and establishments who exchange their values, goods and labor for such money. The National bank of any country with market economy, by issuing its symbolic money into the economy through loans, as a result of each completed credit act withdraws from the economy more money, than what it has issued by means of the same credit act. The scheme of credit emissions always requires from any National bank faster rates of issuance of its loans, otherwise the economy it finances will in short time have an obvious deficiency in money due to the return of loans with interest. For a certain period of time, the credit and monetary systems which did not have proper provision of their liabilities, were growing and even flourishing due to the fact that the rate of the new loans they kept issuing significantly exceeded the rate of the loans return. But this opportunity has already exhausted itself everywhere. Therefore, the growth rate of loan debts in the entire world 8 economy is already increasing faster than the increase of the actual value of the monetary mass in circulation. This leads to the situation when the existing debts, which comprise the basis of the world financial system and the whole mass of its assets, cannot be objectively returned. This has already lead to partial write-offs of debts, toughening of the budget discipline, increase of taxes and retirement age for population, reduction of incomes and number of government employees, reduction of subsidies for banks, bonuses for bankers, etc. But this is not enough. To overcome the crisis it is necessary to ensure the growth in production volumes and number of working places. Otherwise the number of overdue debts will start to actively increase. When this becomes a morally habitual event, there will start a mass non-payment not just of loan interest, but also of the principal. And taking into consideration that this will cause the world economy to fall into an active recession, the downturn of financial system will give rise to a “boom” of hyperinflation, price growth and mass discontent as a ground for social-and- proletarian and military-and-police revolutions. About developed computer mathematical models In the course of preparation of the present work the authors developed, tested and applied the computer mathematical model of credit and monetary processes in the economy (attachment 1). Analysis of dynamics of the credit and monetary processes in the economy clearly shows that modern states with market economy, and correspondingly the entire planet, is experiencing an increase in the deficit of the volume of the monetary mass which makes it impossible to return all loans to the National banks in their full amount. It should be noted that borrowers from the National banks are, as a rule, commercial banks which build on this their own interest rate business. Meanwhile their activity provokes multiplication of deposits and interest liabilities on loans without the increase of the amount of real money in the economy. The multiplication increase of deposits and interest by commercial banks (see attachment 1, part III. “The multiplication increase of deposits and interests by commercial banks”) also requires the growth of monetary mass in the economy. At the same time, due to market competition of manufacturers in the economy, there manifests a well known law of constant decrease of specific profit on capital which is invested into the expansion of production. With each next cycle of loan issuance, the abilities of borrowers decrease. It is not coincidental that a fundamentally different scheme of financing of the development of public production was found a long time ago and is being used ever more actively in the world – without the use of loans, but by means of 9 creation of joint-stock companies which attract investments in exchange for their shares. Using this scheme of financing they have neither interest debt on loans nor the loan debt itself owed to the banks. The authors also developed a second mathematical model “Comparison of variants of credit and investment business plan” (see attachment 2). Comparison of the different variants of credit and investment business plans for the same business projects shows that financial expenditures per product unit of joint-stock companies, which attract significant financial resources into resource-demanding production, at times prove to be two or three times lower than those of the competitors, who resort to loans for their production development. And that is why banks receive fewer and fewer production business projects, which are able to earn profit on loan schemes of financing. On the other hand, the National banks’ use of non-credit channels for issuance into circulation of the nominal money, which get no proper provision of liabilities of the issuers, does not solve the problem, but only causes growth of unsecured monetary mass in the country, inflation and non-convertibility of money of such issuers into other currencies. Inflation of the national currency leads to price increases for goods in the country, demonetization of the national economy with national currency which has financial problems, the need for increased export of goods and national resources, ineffective for the country, with dollarization of such national economy. To some extent in certain cases the National bank can slightly increase the monetary mass in its state by purchasing gold, other precious metals and nonmonetary treasure assets into the reserves of National banks. But such actions of the National bank are, firstly, non rational as they deaden significant public values inside bank reserves, and secondly, they are obviously not enough in comparison with the mass of issued credits and the deficiency in full-weight money in the economy to make it possible to return these credits to the issuers. Moreover, as our modeling clearly shows, even the growth rate of the credit monetary mass in circulation, which is constantly insufficient for the ability to return all borrowed from banks loans, still significantly exceeds, and has been exceeding for a long time, the growth rates of commodity production in the modern world economy (1-2% per year). This leads to inflation, the depreciation of the whole mass of such money in circulation. As an example and actual illustration of the above-stated arguments we enclose a diagram which is based on the actual monetary statistics (as of 01.01.2012) for the country where the authors of the present paper reside. Growth of the volume of the national money in the Republic of Belarus over the last 20 years: Fig. 1.1. 10 The same amount of the national money in circulation but converted to the US Dollar gives, in principle, the same diagram but of a completely different type: Fig. 1.2. And if we take into consideration the inflation of the Dollar, relative to some other comparison, for example to gold, energy resources, food supply and so on, then the line representing the volume of the national money in the economy of the given country falls on the diagram completely to the axis, showing that the country has the fact of demonetization of national economy with national money. Fig..1.3. It should be emphasized that all the above-mentioned problems appear as worldwide tendencies for all countries with market economy. According to our estimation, for the period since 2000 the amount of Dollars and Euros in the world doubled. But the credit and monetary model in all countries with market economy eventually comes to deficiency of money in circulation making it impossible for the debtors to return all loans and pay interest. It is possible to receive visual evidence both for decrease of value of US Dollar, and for decrease of value of any other modern currency. 11 Fig. 1.4. Number of grams of gold in 100 US Dollars at New-York Stock Exchange. All together this makes up a natural complex mechanism for the modern world credit, financial and economical crisis, which started in the 90s of the last century in the USA and spread all over the world economy. An unthinkable sum of liabilities has been accumulated in the world finances, which, according to our estimation, already exceeds the annual volume of the gross domestic product of the world. Debts in economy of each country grow faster than the increase of monetary mass in circulation, thus economy of any of such countries is inevitably going, and consequently and inevitably reaches intermittently the deficiency of money in circulation for the possibility to return credits with payment of interests. The Government debt of the USA, for example, already exceeds the GDP of the whole nation and again approached the limit which is approved by the congress at the amount of 15.194 trillion Dollars3. It is physically impossible to return ALL THE CREDITS AND INTERESTS in such system of monetary-and-credit relations because of the deficiency of money for these purposes both in the economy of separate states and in the world economy. It is no coincidence that Ben Bernanke – the Chairman of the Federal Reserve System of the USA and the Director of the White House’s National Economic Council – got the nickname “Helicopter Ben” for the idea that sometimes, in conditions of crisis, “throwing money from a helicopter” may be a necessity. As soon as banks of any country start to feel danger of non-return of money to them, the rate of issuing loans slows down, and the requirements to the debtors become more active. And the deficiency of money in the economy of this country starts to be perceived sharply. “Reduction of money offering in economy is the reason for most economic crises”. (M. Friedman, an American economist, leader of monetarism, Nobel Memorial Prize in 1976). The deficiency of money in the economy of a country gives rise to problems with sales of goods. This in turn leads to decrease of production 12 volumes and decrease of tax payments. And at the same time the demands of the budget begin to grow (it is necessary to render support to manufacturers and needy population groups) which obliges the states to issue additional volumes of unsubstantiated money in the form of loans to the Government. The issue of empty irrevocable credit emissions leads to depreciation of money in the economy, as a measure of value, depreciates the national monetary mass in the country and results in price increases. The increase in prices causes a further decline in consumer demand and promotes consumers saving mode, which exacerbates the problem of sales and leads to a further reduction in production volume. Arising inflation distorts reports of enterprises and national statistics of the country in favour of governments. The essence of reasons behind inflation of modern money Below is a schematic diagram of dynamic balance of monetary system of any National bank Table 1. Schematic diagram of dynamic balance of monetary system of a National bank of any state (figures are conventional) Assets (for example) 1. Loans to commercial banks for 1 year at refinancing rate Liabilities (for example) 5000 Credit emission 5000 2. Loans to governments at refinancing rate for financing of budget deficit for 2-3 years 400 Credit emission 400 3. Preferential loans to certain enterprises and population groups (through authorized banks, for example for 3-5 years) 300 300 4. Preferential loans to certain population groups (for example for 10, 20, 30 and 40 years at the rate of 1%) 200 Credit emission 200 100 Emission by purchasing of currency 100 50 Emission by purchasing of assets 50 5. Foreign currency in the reserves of the National bank Credit emission 6. Gold and other valuable assets in the reserves of the National bank TOTAL-balance 6050 13 TOTAL-balance 6050 From the point of view of figures and mathematics the balance of this, as well as any other National bank, always looks fully balanced: as many loans are issued, so many liabilities arise for their return to the National bank plus interest. But none of the loans, as a rule, will be returned earlier than the established term: for position 1 – a year; for position 2 – 2-3 years, it is possible that the terms will have to be prolonged, and also possible that the debt will be completely written off; for position 3 – 3-5 years and the debt may not be returned by everyone; for position 4 – debts for a period of up to 40 years will be partially written off against benefits, the remaining balances may fully depreciate as a result of inflation. for position 5 – currency of the reserve is usually placed for certain periods into deposits of some reliable banks and not all the time can be used efficiently. If it is does get used, the National bank will be left without this reserve which will shake faith in its currency. for position 6 – аssets may be used (sold) but also not very fast, and in this case the National bank will also lose this reserve. As we can see the system of each National bank-money issuer is arranged in such a way that its liabilities – money does not have the proper provision in the course of real-time. The major factor, underlining the modern monetary and debt crisis, is imbalance (unsubstantiated in its material-and-energy essence, with regard for the time factor) of assets and liabilities in National banks - issuers of money, and correspondingly – in financed by them economy. That is why the value of any currency fluctuates as a sliver in ocean waves, and which is influenced by many factors: current and wind, waves and tides, shores and rocks, rubbish, slime, algae, passing ships and even birds or fish can peck, push it… Instead of controlling their balance and provision of their national currency, the issuers of money (states, FRS, ECB) try to control external circumstances, i.e. environment, currency market, up to requirements to other states (as for example, requirements of the USA to China), in order not to change the rate of their currency! To support confidence in their money National banks have to draw out of social circulation and accumulate in their reserves – in principle “deaden” – significant public values, those which have the highest liquidity in the society. But as the reserves of any National bank comprise just a small part from the total sum of nominal money issued by them into circulation, so all the National bank-issuers of such money will not be able to objectively bear full responsibility for their liabilities in relation to the value of their currencies. Thus 14 there occurs constant inflation of currencies. In crisis situations there always appear defaults and exchange devaluations. Inflation and exchange devaluation of all countries depreciate the value of the world mass of money in relation to goods, and the deficiency of money in the economy naturally becomes apparent everywhere from time to time. Because of the decrease of value of the money mass in the economy in relation to value of goods, accounts receivable and account payable of enterprises increases, commercial banks start to delay payments, some of them become bankrupt. Population, defending itself from inflation and concerned about devaluation of the national money, buys up foreign currency, and fearing the non-return of currency by banks, starts to keep it in household capital. All these aggravate the problems of world crisis… One of the important components of the world debt and monetary-financial crisis is the crisis in the Eurozone. Mechanism of money inflation and price increase Sociological research shows that in each country people are mostly annoyed because of price escalation. This is one of the most important reasons of social revolutions in countries and social instability in the world. That is why it is important here to express our attitude towards this problem. Nowadays the prices in the world and in each country increase mostly because the universally recognized standards of money depreciate and correspondingly all national money, compared with them at convertible rates, depreciate as well as a measure of prices for goods in the country. The necessary volume of money in the economy of each country as means of circulation and instrument of payment is determined according to the economic law of commodity-money balance in the market, the law can be expressed by Irving Fisher’s formula: GxP = MxV, where: G – amount of goods at the market of the country; P – price level of these goods in the country; M – stock of money in circulation (monetary aggregate); V – the velocity of circulation of money in the economy. Let’s evaluate from this equation the formula of price level: P= MxV G 15 It is seen from this simple formula that if the amount of nominal, not having own value money in circulation (M) grows faster than the increase of volume of goods in the market so the value of such money decreases, i.e. prices for goods increase. And this increase extremely upsets population which has already had experience of such past significant personal losses. Escaping from depreciation of the national money people and organizations recover money from storing places, withdraw from bank accounts and start to buy goods for future use. As a result, the rate of circulation of money in the economy (V) sharply increases, and the amount of goods in the market offered for this money (G) sharply decreases. I.e. in such situation all the three terms of the equation (P, V, G) work only for price increase. And that is why prices grow in grave (cubic) dependence from the excessive, issuance of money into circulation without providing them with goods in the country. Conclusion The world has reached a deadlock with such monetary system. It requires fundamental improvement. “The problems that exist in the world today cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them”. Albert Einstein, one of the authorities of contemporary physics To solve problems of the European Union member states, which largely suffer from the debt crisis (such as Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus) by means of new loans means to force the illness deeper and deeper into the organism of the European Union and thus to just complicate its perspectives for recovery. Crisis will aggravate and become sharper. “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Albert Einstein Having revealed the reasons and mechanisms of the crisis, it is possible to achieve a speedy correction of the crisis situation, activation of the national economy of any country, and at the level of organizations – the improvement of work of enterprises. 16 3. Answer to Mr. Wolfson’s question: “If member states leave the Economic and Monetary Union, what is the best way for the economic process to be managed to provide the soundest foundation for the future growth and prosperity of the current membership?” and proposed ways out of the debt crisis for the Eurozone states. “If we take into consideration all the mistakes and defects, so after the crisis Europe will emerge much stronger than it used to be”. Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of Germany, 15.01.20124 This question arises naturally. We propose the following answer to it: The European Union should provide to the EU member states such solutions, which would be more ECONOMICALLY, SOCIALLY and POLITICALLY advantageous to follow than any other independent solutions of these states. In our opinion such solutions, execution of which will be economically, socially and politically more advantageous than any other solution both for each of states of the Eurozone and for the whole European Union should consider the following: Approaches to transition. Nowadays Euro is a convenient and habitual currency for more than 320 million of Europeans. Euro was introduced to world financial markets as an accounting currency in 1999, and on 1 January 2002 banknotes and coins were introduced into cash circulation. Before transition to Euro during the period from 1979 till 1998, a common European currency successfully operated in the European economy (European currency unit – ECU), which was used only in cashless payments. ECU was: valid measure standard; accounting unit for the whole European monetary union (hereinafter referred to as – EMU) as well as for economic and financial activity and accounting in the Community; reserve cost asset; it was used for provision of currency reserves and was the object of interest payment; instrument of payment in operations among central banks of EMU member states. Meanwhile the states had the possibility to issue ECU in the form of coins, bonds and loans for private sector. A consideration of evidence from relevant historical examples 17 (e.g. the end of various currency pegs and previous monetary unions). It was rational to such extent that member states, which had established the EMU, decided even to reject their national credit and monetary systems and replace national currencies with common currency of the European Union. On 1 January 1999 the member states of the European Economic and the Monetary Union introduced a common currency – Euro, initially for cashless payments. Since that moment exchange rates of national currencies of member states were strictly fixed against Euro, and Euro became independent, competent monetary money. At that stage Euro and national currencies operated simultaneously and with equal rights. Since 01.01.2002 banknotes and coins of Euro have been introduced into circulation, which gradually replaced banknotes and coins in national monetary units. The period of simultaneous circulation of these currencies continued till the end of February. Everything was just perfect till 01.03.2002, when cash and cashless Euro completely replaced national currencies of twelve countries of the EU. Since that moment problems started to accumulate in the system of the EU. Two countries – Great Britain and Denmark – did not enter the “zone of Euro” as its first members. And they have not entered to this day. It is no coincidence that nowadays they have significantly less problems in their state finances than the majority of the Eurozone countries. But does it really mean that the European Union or any of the Eurozone countries now has to reject Euro in order to correct the previous mistake? We believe that this is not necessarily. Euro introduced so many positive moments into the European social relations that it would be an even more irrational mistake for any of the Eurozone states to reject all those good things, which are associated with the circulation of Euro on its territory – which turned out to be convenient and became habitual for its population. We believe that the way out of the crisis for the Eurozone, in its essence, should simply be a return to the state of the European Union, which was recently the most rational for all of its members. I.e. for the Eurozone countries it is reasonable to return to that state of social relations which during the period from 01.01.1999 till 01.01.2002 was convenient for everyone. In other words, it is reasonable for the European Union to transform Euro from the status of unified to the status of common currency of the European Union. And to provide the Eurozone countries with the right, if they wish, to restore their monetary systems for simultaneous circulation of national currencies on their territories. In order to introduce Euro into circulation on the territory of the countries, all member states of the monetary union had to meet strict requirements, fixed in Maastricht Treaty. Certain requirements should be presented also to the 18 countries which desire to use the right for restoration of their monetary systems, remaining at the same time member states of the Eurozone and the European Union. Euro replaced ECU in ration 1:1 and this replacement turned out to be absolutely smooth for accounting and analytical operations in the economy. This rational experience should be also considered in solutions of the European Union for overcoming the problem of debt crisis in the Eurozone. The essence of our suggestion is, without destroying the institute of Euro, to organize a simultaneous circulation of Euro with national currencies of the Eurozone countries with certain innovations. We believe that each member state of the European Union should be granted the right to restore its national monetary system, remaining at the same time a full member of the European economic and monetary union, when the following 4 simple conditions are satisfied: 1) the currency of the European Union is identified as a common currency of the European Union with the right of free circulation on the territory of the given member of the EU and the Eurozone as the second equal right currency; 2) a national currency is initially introduced only into cashless payments, but on the expiry of a certain period, which is determined by the European Union, it may be introduced also into cash payments; 3) the initial exchange rate of the national currency on the date of its introduction into circulation is legally determined to be 1:1 to the exchange rate of Euro; 4) national currency is freely convertible into Euro (and vice versa) by the National bank of this country. The optimum monetary reconfiguration. Such monetary restructuring will be the most optimal. As during this process, while remaining the member of the Eurozone, each country will again receive at its disposal a very important instrument of state control and development of national economy – its credit and monetary system. Terms and approaches to restoration of a national monetary system in states may be different. It will not disturb anyone. If some countries don’t want to use their national currency they may use just Euro. But at the same time each member state of the European Union and the whole European Union should understand and correct in their credit and monetary systems the system error which still every day, every hour and every minute accumulates the reason for an aggravating debt crisis. Notably: they should not allow imbalance (non-provision in resource-and-energy matter with account for the time factor) of assets and liabilities in the National banks money issuers, and correspondingly – in financed by them economy. 19 For this reason the ECB and National banks of member states of the European Union should transition from the credit-monetary to the investmentmonetary financing of the economy by means of the common European (for ECB) and the national money (for National banks). Let us explain this with the help of a schematic representation of the balance of monetary system using the data from the earlier presented in this work Table 1. Table 2. Schematic diagram of dynamic balance of the monetary system of conventional National bank taking into account suggested innovations: Assets (for example) 1. Loans to commercial banks for 1 year at refinancing rate 2. Loans to governments at refinancing rate for financing of budget deficit for 2-3 years Liabilities (for example) 5000 Credit emission 5000 400 Credit emission 400 3. Preferential loans to certain enterprises and preferential population groups (through authorized banks, for example for 3-5 years) 300 300 4. Preferential loans to certain population groups (for example for 10, 20, 30 and 40 years at the rate of 1%) 200 Credit emission 200 100 Emission by purchasing of currency 100 5. Foreign currency in reserves of the National bank 6. Gold and other valuable assets in reserves of the National bank 7. Highly liquid and insured shares of highly effective and promising commercial business projects TOTAL-balance Credit emission 50 Emission by purchasing of assets 50 500 Investment emissions of monetary funds into effective business projects in the sphere of energy sector, high technologies and other production sectors. 500 6550 TOTAL-balance 6550 We will explain this scheme and later will answer all questions of the contest for Wolfson prize. The fundamental essence of innovations lies in paragraph 7. Instead of the emission of money by means of loans, in this case the emission should be arranged by means of purchasing of highly liquid (in necessary cases also insured) shares of highly effective and promising commercial business projects. 20 Meanwhile EACH INVESTMENT-EMISSION MONETARY UNIT will be introduced into circulation as 100% provided with highly liquid assets. And with such assets (we will repeat: highly liquid and insured shares of highly effective and promising commercial business projects) which will increase in value relative to money and will bring to the issuer bigger income than in the process of loan issuance. It will increase the assets of money issuers. As a result of this, the volume of stable, not subjected to inflation monetary mass will increase (as in Japan). It will have positive potential influence upon international banking system. Capitals of commercial banks will start increasing as well. As a result of this the rates of credits in commercial banks will also start decreasing. 4. Answers to other questions according to the terms of Wolfson Economics Prize: Implications for international contracts denominated in Euro. Implications for sovereign debt, private savings, and domestic mortgages. 1. It would be possible to arrange calculations on earlier concluded international contracts in Euros, including state debts, in common currency of the EU, i.e. in Euros, unless otherwise specified in free agreement of parties of these contracts. 2. Investment emissions of the ECB and National banks of the Eurozone into highly liquid and insured shares of highly effective and promising commercial business projects will allow to create additional and new working places, will decrease the cost price of goods of the financed productions (in comparison with credit financing), will increase their competitiveness at external EU markets, will increase incomes of business owner and workers. Internal mortgages will receive additional sources and other positive preconditions for their return to banks. 3.It would be a free choice of enterprises and business owners whether to sell their shares to the ECB or the National bank of the state (via the system of authorized banks), or to get credits in commercial banks. But if we apply our program mathematical model 2 “Optimization of variants of credit and investment business plan” (Attachment 2 to the present work), it will become apparent that the credit way of development in any serious variant of business plan will be knowingly not competitive. As for investment scheme of financing they will not have to return credits to banks and pay interests. That is the fundamental difference! This measure will significantly decrease cost price of their products and correspondingly will increase their competitiveness in relation to price factors. Credit schemes of development will fall to share of small enterprises. Commercial banks will be able to receive in the ECB and in National banks not credits at refinancing rate, but emissive investments for development of their investment capital – by means of selling their shares to the ECB or 21 National bank. And also – not to credit but invest into the most significant production projects. 4. Under investment schemes of financing business projects will sharply increase their stability, competitiveness and profitability (in comparison with credit schemes of financing, see model 2). Meanwhile not only taxes, but also significant profit will go to states as investors of business projects. 5. Profit from investment emissions will become an importance source for reinforcement of budgets. It will give the possibility for the European Union and its member states to improve and reduce taxes without losses for the budget which will also positively influence the economy of the countries and of the EU. • The effects on the stability of the banking system. • The effects on the stability of the banking system. 6. By offering to the market highly liquid shares for that or other currency (depending on demand and reasonability) amount of goods at the market will increase, and simultaneously, by selling shares, certain sums of corresponding currency units will be withdrawn from circulation. Thereby, in case of demand, the exchange rate of this currency unit will be increased (controlled and within reasonable limits). Development of share market is a perfect solution for member states and the EU to increase commodity mass at the market, as well as to withdraw notprovided money from circulation by selling (privatization) of state assets. And not only shares of enterprises, but also a certain right to land, water bodies, forests and so on may become commodities with civilized responsibility of buyers for their further condition and with reasonable assessed tax. By means of sale of highly liquid shares to the ECB, each National bank will be always able in case of demand to withdraw certain sums of their money from foreign exchange market and by means of this to consolidate it by means of control and reasonability – to increase market exchange rate of its currency depending on demand. But not with the help of a mechanical sale of its shares, but with the development of IPO for each object (i.e. special projects for share placement at the market of the country and abroad), and also with interest in legality of consumer’s sources of income. • The link between exit from EMU and sovereign debt restructuring. Payments of national debt also may be paid off with the help of shares or national currencies in case of agreement of creditors. 7. The more actively INVESTMENT EMISSIONS in economically grounded and insured business project are arranged, and the fewer new CREDIT EMISSIONS, the faster financial system in states and in the European Union will be stabilized. • The effects on the stability of the banking system. 22 Transition from credit-issuing to investment-issuing financing of economy, when each currency unit will come into circulation with 100% provision with reliable liquid assets, will create conditions for stability in the European banking system. Exchange devaluations are excluded in this system, Euro and national currencies of the EU countries will be shortly able to free from such illness of currencies as inflation. It guarantees reliable protection of savings of population. • The institutional implications. The optimality of the offered here reorganization of the European monetary system should be specially emphasized from the point of view of its technical maintenance. Nowadays Euro is controlled and administrated by the European Central Bank (ECB) and by the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), which consists of central banks of the EU member states regardless of the fact whether they accepted Euro as a national currency. They have had recent experience of work in ECU and Euro as common currencies and experience of simultaneous circulation of Euro with national currencies. As we believe there will be no demand in any new banking organizations. Central banks of the EU member states are to receive just accentuated status of banks of double subordination. They should be in charge for the execution of rules of emission and circulation of Euro before the ECB; they should be responsible before the heads of national states for the execution of rules of emission, circulation, stability of exchange rate and free converting of national currencies. At the same time governments of states should be responsible for preparation and state insurance of investment business projects, which are introduced for investment at the expense of investment emissions of central banks (via their authorized banks). Meanwhile it would be reasonable to strengthen departments of economists-analysts for investments in authorized banks. We believe that this very solution is the most optimal for the fastest solution of the problem of debt crisis in the EU. Positive tendencies will appear just after the realization by the European Union of the stated here suggestions. Inaccurate actions or inaction of the EU, or not agreed with the EU actions of the national governments in conditions of aggravating world monetary and financial crisis may lead any state to significant deficit of state budget, collapse of prices in the country, sale of key facilities of the national economy, growth of unemployment and conflicts with the population, including for religious and ethical reasons. Besides innovational reorganization of the banking system we also recommend to the European Union and to the member states the following: To arrange purposeful optimization of tax systems at scientific level of solutions, with regard to criterion of minimization of cost price of products and assistance in increase of competitiveness of manufacturers. To use taxes as 23 method of activation of production and market redistribution of resources into the spheres with the highest economic effect, with active growth of proceeds into the state budget. To create by means of taxes everywhere in each country, at each enterprise and in all sectors of economy conditions of high self-supporting motivations of management and workers for work and development of means of production, increase of production output. It should be more profitable, convenient and reliable for the population to purchase shares of enterprises, achieve profit and further development, than to purchase and accumulate cash in households. To improve systems of pension security of workers in such a way, that state pension of the worker must be mostly “earned” by individual capital of the worker, which is accumulated in the system of stare insurance. The concept of complex associated solutions which solve these questions, has been worked out in details by the authors, it was approved in economical experiments and may be prepared for interested states according to their initial data. We express confidence that all these measures in complex with other agreed means of the European Union and national governments of the EU member states will allow Europe to stabilize Euro in short time and make its common currency the main worldwide reserve currency. The situation for this in the whole world is favorable! It will make Europe socially consolidated leader of technological and intellectual growth, an example, ideologist, investor and sponsor, who is able to consolidate other countries of the world for solution of burning worldwide problems. We believe that there are unique conditions for this in the European Union. The world is on the eve of a new crisis-free epoch of Homosapiens. As a scientific basis for this final statement and for all our work provided for Wolfson Economics Prize, we also present an original scientific work of the leading author – “The theory of social and economic formations: fundamentals and new view” which in order to present our proposals concisely is given in Attachment 4 to this paper. P.S. We are ready to present our development, which has fundamental scientific novelty, in the form of complex reports of authors with presentation of slides and visual demonstration of computer economical models. We need 2 hours for the report. 24 5. Source list In this work the result of long-term scientific research and experience of practical work of the authors in different spheres of economics, business, analysis, prognostication, and state management was used. Certain ideas were published earlier: 1) in Internet: http://dovgel.com/, Evgeniy Dovgel. About new paradigms. http://vikte.ru/, Viktar TSIARESHCHANKA, Problems of the country, their reasons and solutions. Program of the presidential candidate at the elections in 2010 in Republic of Belarus. 2) in the article “Crisis management? It is possible!” in Russian in newspaper “Narodnaya Volya” of 29.07.2011, published in the Republic of Belarus. Attachments: 1. Program mathematical model 1. Model of credit and monetary processes in economy, file in Excel: model-1.xls 2. Program mathematical model 2. Optimization of variants of credit and investment business plan, file in Excel: model-2.xls Diagrams: Fig. 1.1. Dynamics national monetary mass of the country where the authors of the present paper live (as an example), files – r-1.jpg (pdf), Fig. 1.2. The same national monetary mass (see Fig. 1.1.) per capita in US Dollars at the official exchange rate, files – r-2.jpg (pdf), Fig. 1.3. The same national monetary mass (see Fig. 1.1.) per capita in US Dollars taking into account inflation of Dollar (in Dollars of 1990), files – r-3 (pdf).jpg, Fig. 2. Amount of grams of gold in 100 US Dollars at New-York Stock Exchange, files – r-4.jpg (pdf). 4. Theory of social and economic formations (basics, new view) References 1 N.Bokareva. Euro zone got off the ground, 13.01.2012, http://www.bfm.ru/articles/2012/01/13/evrozona-sdvinulas-s-mertvoj-tochki.html 2 Davos lost immunity, 28.01.2012, http://www.gazeta.ru/financial/2012/01/28/3977417.shtml 3 National dent of the USA reaches its limit. 13.01.2012, http://vz.ru/news/2012/1/13/553133.html 4 Merkel: Economical power of Germany is not infinite. http://mignews.com/news/economics/world/250112_172934_21004.html 25
© Copyright 2024