Hospitalists with a Capital H How to Keep them and Your  Facility out of  HOT WATER

3/7/2012
Hospitalists with a Capital H
How to Keep them and Your Facility out of HOT WATER
Sheryl Spohn, RHIA, CHC AVP Compliance Kim Heibel CPC
Manager
WellStar Health System
Professional Services Coding Assurance
Objectives
• Improving ED Metrics with Compliant Admissions
• Utilizing Hospitalists on the Observation Unit
• Utilizing Midlevels Effectively—Risks & Benefits
• Educating on Clinical Documentation Improvement
• Informing on Post Discharge Reviews
• Communicating effectively
2012 Compliance Institute
1
3/7/2012
Appropriate Use of Observation
• Outpatient care, although rendered in a hospital bed
• Intended for short‐term monitoring & decision making • Documentation is critical. – Initial order, severity of illness/intensity of service 2012 Compliance Institute
Defining Observation Services
• Observation care begins at the time documented by the observation unit's admitting nurse. • Observation care ends at the time documented on the physician's discharge order or when the appropriate person signs off on the physician's discharge order. • Patients can be admitted to an inpatient unit from the observation unit. In such cases, payment for the observation services will fall under the DRG payment. • Patients cannot be placed in the observation unit following inpatient status.
2012 Compliance Institute
2
3/7/2012
Further Defining Observation Services
• Patients must be under the care of a physician while receiving observation care.
• Emergency department visits must be reported in conjunction with the bill for observation services.
• Patients directly admitted to the observation unit, a physician must be present to initiate observation services.
2012 Compliance Institute
CDU‐Benefits
• Clinical Decision Making Unit
– A bed in an area of the hospital where a patient may be evaluated or treated for up to 24 hours to determine the need for admission
• CDUs are one model of care designed to strengthen the gatekeeper role of Emergency Departments
• CDU Case Study
2012 Compliance Institute
3
3/7/2012
CDU‐Responsibility
• Who “owns” the CDU?
– ED versus Hospitalist?
• Fiscal Responsibility
– Understanding the differences in admission types
– Understanding the difference in reimbursement for top diagnoses in the unit
• Full Potential
• Improvements realized
– ED Door‐to‐Floor
– Decrease in Inpatient 1‐day stays
– Decreased Inpatient readmissions
2012 Compliance Institute
Differences in Documentation Requirements & Reimbursement
• Documentation requirements with associated visit codes
– Observation Admission
• H&P—Initial Outpatient Visit
• Progress Note‐‐Subsequent visit
• Observation Discharge
– Codes used for observation/outpatient physician visits dependant upon “attending” physician
– Inpatient Admission
• H&P—Initial Inpatient Visit
• Progress Note‐‐Subsequent visit
• Discharge Summary/Discharge visit
2012 Compliance Institute
4
3/7/2012
Advance Practitioners
Scope
• In states where NPs are supervised by physicians, hospital patients who require a diagnosis must be seen daily by a physician. If a hospitalist NP is the provider designated to see a patient, an MD often sees the patient briefly and writes a short note or adds a comment.
2012 Compliance Institute
Advance Practitioners
Scope
• The extent of involvement for the advance practitioner will depend on the degree of complexity and experience of the practitioner. Duties may include: – Admitting/Discharging patients; – Managing the care of patients with simple to complex acute health problems – Managing patients on an observation/CUD unit.
2012 Compliance Institute
5
3/7/2012
Reimbursement for Advance Practitioner Services
Risks vs. Benefits
• Individual services
– 85% of the physician fee schedule
• Shared services
– 100% of the physician fee schedule
• Documentation challenges
– Documentation of a face‐to‐face visit
– Pitfalls
2012 Compliance Institute
Looking at a Hosptialist
Mixed Model
• Employment
• Reporting
• Metrics
• Compliance responsibility
• Continued Opportunities for Improvement
2012 Compliance Institute
6
3/7/2012
Documentation / Coding / Billing Compliance
• Evaluation of current auditing/monitoring methodology
• Electronic Health Record (EHR) and coding nuances
• Accuracy rate (what is “good enough”)
• Sample Size/Selection Process
• Result: Point based model
• True Risk Potential
2012 Compliance Institute
The Case for Clinical Documentation Improvement
• Defining signs & symptoms into “probable” and “possible” diagnoses
• Consistent coverage – Consistent documentation
• Completion of Non‐leading Query
– i.e. Is this type of congestive heart failure acute or chronic, systolic or diastolic
• Linking the stay in the discharge summary
2012 Compliance Institute
7
3/7/2012
Coding and Reimbursement
• DRG 143 ‐ Chest pain – Inpatient Services
Place of service: Inpatient hospital
Reimbursement: Approximately $1,300
Length of stay: Open
• APC 0339 ‐ Observation services
Place of service: Observation unit
Reimbursement: About $425
Duration of service: Eight hours to 48 hours. CMS reimburses for the first 24 hours of service.
• Patient Out‐of‐Pocket Effects
2012 Compliance Institute
The Campaign for CDIP
• Obtain buy‐in! If not fully committed to CDIP may become low priority • Provide reports regarding areas of documentation needing improvement
• Present at hospitalist staff meetings. • Consider morning huddles
• Summarize improved reimbursement
• Should not be the sole focus in communicating with the physicians
2012 Compliance Institute
8
3/7/2012
Things to Remember
• Hospitalist time constraints
• Must balance different coding systems—
the ICD‐9‐CM/ICD‐10, as well as CPT and Evaluation and Management coding for their own billing
• Buy‐in occurs when metrics are built into Hospitalist metrics
2012 Compliance Institute
Measure the Success
Internal Medicine SOI Level Trends
50.00%
45.00%
SOI 1
40.00%
35.00%
SOI 2
30.00%
25.00%
SOI 3
20.00%
15.00%
SOI 4
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
2009 Q2
2009 Q3
2009 Q4
2010 Q1
2010 Q2
2010 Q3
2010 Q4
2011 Q1
2011 Q2
2011 Q3
2012 Compliance Institute
9
3/7/2012
Measure the Success
Internal Medicine ROM Level Trends
0.45
0.4
ROM 1
0.35
0.3
ROM 2
0.25
0.2
ROM 3
0.15
0.1
ROM 4
0.05
0
2009 Q2
2009 Q3
2009 Q4
2010 Q1
2010 Q2
2010 Q3
2010 Q4
2011 Q1
2011 Q2
2011 Q3
2012 Compliance Institute
Measure the Success
• Defining what to measure
– Case Mix Index
– CC/MCC Capture Rate
– Length of Stay
– Query rate
– Physician response rate
• Provide feedback and engage the physicians on improving the program effectiveness
2012 Compliance Institute
10
3/7/2012
External Regulatory Focus
• OIG Workplan Item
– Short stay inpatients
– Long observation stays
• RAC Reviews
– 1‐day stay inpatients—CP, Syncope, Back Pain, Esophagitis
• MAC Prepayment Reviews
– 1‐day stay inpatients—CP, Syncope
2012 Compliance Institute
External Regulatory Focus‐‐RACs
• The RACs are targeting:
– Incorrect coding excisional debridement;
– Confusion between septicemia/urosepsis;
– Respiratory failure claims with incorrect sequencing of principal diagnosis, e.g., respiratory failure vs. sepsis;
– Severity of patient's anemia failing to meet medical necessity for blood transfusion
– Inadequate intensivist documentation for level of care provided in the ICU.
2012 Compliance Institute
11
3/7/2012
The Hospitalist Role
• Hospitalist documentation is essential in appropriate coding, DRG assignment, supporting medical necessity and defining severity/quality indexes
• Defense from costly overpayments
• Documentation of patient diagnoses, not just symptoms (e.g., syncope suspected due to cardiac arrhythmia, chest pain suspected to be angina).
• Post‐discharge Planning—CMS requiring documentation certifying Home Health, DME, etc.
2012 Compliance Institute
The Hospitalist Types & External Drivers
NP Hospitalists
Observationalists
OB Hospitalists (OB triage area)
Neuro Hospitalists (Trauma Program)
Medicare priorities and financial incentives of hospitals and physicians
• Acute Care Episode (ACE) Demonstration Project (hospital‐physician bundled payments) • Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
•
•
•
•
•
2012 Compliance Institute
12
3/7/2012
Effective Communication
•
•
•
•
E&M Cards
Department Meetings
Lunch and Learns
Physician Portal
2012 Compliance Institute
E&M Template
Review
See Handout
2012 Compliance Institute
13
3/7/2012
2012 Compliance Institute
Recap
• Improving ED Metrics with Compliant Admissions
• Utilizing Hospitalists on the Observation Unit
• Utilizing Midlevels Effectively—Risks & Benefits
• Educating on Clinical Documentation Improvement
• Informing on Post Discharge Reviews
• Communicating effectively
2012 Compliance Institute
14
3/7/2012
Questions
Thank you
15