sustainable science  for sustainability? A reflexive approach  for the present time for the present time.

How to devise a sustainable science for sustainability? A reflexive approach for the present time
for the present time.
Elena Camino, IRIS (www.iris.unito.it)
Centro Interuniversitario di Ricerche Interdisciplinari sulla Sostenibilità
A few p
preliminaryy q
questions…
In this Conference, where
,
there women p
panelists duringg morningg
sessions? Why no‐one mentions the involvement of science in military research, and the absence of research on the environmental i
impact of war
t f
?
? Why the great texture of evolution, which is continuously h h
f
l i
h h
l
acting at all organizational levels of life, is missing from the discourses?
If I ask you to 'look' towards the future, in If
I ask you to look towards the future, in
which direction you turn your gaze?
Why we are here?
•
•
•
•
•
For enchantment of life…
Out of affection for our loved ones …
Because we are angry …
For respect towards other peoples and cultures …
… •
•
•
•
•
•
From one science to many sciences
How to deal with complexity? The dependence on world views revealed by metaphors
Lookingg upstream
p
to identifyy the frames
Looking downstream to understand the approach to future
The PN science and the need of a multiplicity of legitimate
perspectives
A Manifesto signed by more than 520 scientists: g
y
scientists’ consensus on maintaining humanity’s life support systems in the 21st century
life support systems in the 21
Five global problems:
Five
global problems:
1. climate disruption, 2. extinctions, 3. loss of ecosystem y, p
,
p p
g
diversity, 4. pollution, 5. human population growth and resource consumption The most highly rated academic journals embrace and augment the view of a science that will continue to bring solutions and innovation to i
f
i
th t ill
ti
t bi
l ti
di
ti t
overcome the current crisis: “Scientists and engineers […] share a belief that increased fundamental knowledge about the natural
belief that increased fundamental knowledge about the natural world will lead to human progress…”. (Alberts 2008, p. 1435). Tartaglia, Mercalli & Ulgiati (2013), referring to the controversy about the high speed train in Valsusa, ask the President of Italy to assume the task of “promoting the public debate, qualified and independent, based on data, measurement and scientific method which will help everyone to put an end to social unrest
method, which will help everyone to put an end to social unrest and violence” Science is an open‐
,
,
,
minded, universalist, disinterested, and communal activity.
Quantitative approach to ht
natural systems
SCIENCE for
SCIENCE
for
sustainability?
I
Improve forecasting
f
ti
Emulating nature
Measures of processes, cycles, fluxes
Models and projections
New
New renaissance period
Improve earth
system
system governance
Responsible
stewardship
Dramatic cultural change
???????
But what about the natural systems
whose complexity transcends us, and whose
evolutionary dynamics includes us as internal
sub-systems?
How to deal with the unforeseen, the
unexpected? With uncertainty and ignorance?
???????
All scientific enterprises claim that they deal with facts, and they are based on the scientific method
and on experimental evidence
… but
b allll depend
d
d on the h
language!
g g
Metaphors are the mind
mind’ss eyes and society
society’ss
tools. They provide us with visions of the world
and
d instruments
i t
t to
t change
h
it (Nerlich, Jaspal 2012)
Citizens, public administrations and policy‐
makers are encouraged to trust science in order to make sound private and public decisions.
to make sound private and public decisions.
But… which science should
science should be trusted???
Obviously, interdisciplinary science, but…
Traditional, descriptive
SCIENCE?
Innovative, transformative
SCIENCE?
Quantitative, interpretative, p
SCIENCE?
Models and metaphors
and metaphors are the way to
are the way to
describe, give sense, and to communicate
SCIENCE SCIENCE
Zombie Endocrine Disruptors
Metaphors translate worldviews and and
mental frames into narratives
The study of science is ALSO the study of the h
d f
h
d f h
metaphors used by scientists. Science is not d
designed ONLY from the encounter between human d
f
h
b
h
reason and the natural world: it emerges from the prevailing ideas about the relationship between l
d
b
h
l
h b
humanity and nature.
GRAIN
Genomics, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence , Nanotechnology Big, industrial, goal‐
oriented technoscience
INNOVATION
INNOVATION SCIENCE
The nanoworld
ANALOGIES…
… if a nanoparticle were the size of a football, an actual football would be the size
of New Zealand
… are different from METAPHORS:
“Think of them [nanorods] like soldiers attacking an enemy base.
The gold nanorods are the Special Forces, who come in first to mark
the target. Then the Air Force flies in to deliver the laser‐guided
bomb. The devices are designed to minimize collateral damage to
th restt off the
the
th body.”
b d ” (M. Sailor, prof. of chemistry and biochemistry)
Smart bombs that could smash
could smash
cancer
nano‐weapon
hope for cancer stealth tactics to hit
to hit
cancer cells hard
Science is dependent on cultural imaginaries
Virginia Gewin, Nature 460, 2009
In the future, nanotechnology could be used to fight pathogens.
The Roots of Nanoscience
Nautilus, in the book Mistery Island (1874)
Issac Asimov's Fantastic Voyage (1966)
Science is inspired by imagination
Computer artwork of a medical nanorobot
p
holding a sperm cell. Microscopic robot g p
p
technology could be developed in the future to treat disorders, such as infertility, in new ways. VICTOR HABBICK VISIONS / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Where will synthetic biology take us?
The biological parts, genetic circuits, and fabrication techniques that have been developed and continue to
techniques that have been developed and continue to be improved offer exciting potential in diverse applications, from environmental engineering to
applications, from environmental engineering to regenerative medicine.
…synthetic biology is poised to transform our ability to
…synthetic biology is poised to transform our ability to probe, understand, and manipulate biology.
Chen et al. Genome
al Genome Biology 2012, 13:240 http://genomebiology.com/2012/13/2/240
2012 13:240 http://genomebiology com/2012/13/2/240
Engineering & Synthetic Biology
Living parts
gp
as p
pieces of LEGO
Cells as ‘micro‐chips’
The key enzyme in photosynthesis, Rubisco, is a relic of a bygone age. The ability to assemble Rubisco in the a bygone age. The ability to assemble Rubisco
in the
test tube offers the prospect of genetically manipulating the enzyme to make it fit for the modern manipulating the enzyme to make it
fit for the modern
world. (J. Ellis, 2010)
The power of metaphors resides in their ability to serve as translational devices between different articulations of science
translational devices between different articulations of science But describing genetic But
describing genetic
systems as though they are electrical ones (whereby genes are switched on and off) works to a degree. k t d
Pawels, Nature, 2013
Language reveals frames and imaginaries
and imaginaries
… is applying sunblock to the planet… is repairing the planet.
repairing
the planet.
The planet is a machine
… is manipulating the planet’s thermostat
The planet is a body
… is applying medical treatment to the i
l i
di l t t
t t th
planet
Th l t i
The planet is a patient ti t
Different imaginaries, different metaphors
Towards a physiology of the Earth
Is the biosphere hyperventilating?
Shifting biomes, monsoons, currents
…
By 2100 some 40 percent of ´major ecological community types´ – that is biomes like forest, grassland, tundra –
will have switched to a different state.
Tropical cyclones are not passive players in Earth’ climate systems, p
y
p
p y
y
,
rather they actively contribute to the dynamics of ocean and atmosphere (Sriver, 2013)
We are pushed by all scientific experts to rely on We
are pushed by all scientific experts to rely on
SCIENCE to tackle the global, challenging issues of our time
issues of our time
But… on which of the sciences that are present on the market,
which run in a highly competitive race to get more and more
private and public funds and promise to give practical answers
to the planet’s turmoil?
•Shall
Shall we turn to the reassuring image of techno
techno‐science,
science, that
offers short term, innovative and powerful answers to urgent
problems?
•Or shall we prefer to collect data ever more numerous,
accurate and reliable of the ongoing global transformations in
order
d to govern the
h planet
l
i a sustainable
in
i bl way ?
Each scientific knowledge about natural systems
expresses a world view and the related narratives
UPSTREAM, research questions are formulated according to the y g
underlying view:
 what kind of relation we conceive between humans and nature?
Whi h
Which are most meaningful variables to be investigated?
t
i f l i bl t b i
ti t d?
Who is entitled to participate in the research?
DOWNSTREAM, different concepts of risk, uncertainty and ignorance provide different answers to the question “what if”:
How will natural systems react?
How shall we cope with unforeseen outcomes? Who will benefit and who will suffer damage?
Post normal science
Post normal
(S. Funtowiz, J.Ravetz 1999)
The modern programme
h
d
of scientists teaching truth to f
h
h
power, deducing correct policies from uncontrovertible
f
facts, is, in the environmental field, in tatters. h
l f ld
Post‐Normal Science (PNS) is a new conception of the management of complex science‐related issues. It focuses on aspects of problem solving that tend to be neglected in traditional accounts
problem solving that tend to be neglected in traditional accounts of scientific practice:
•uncertainty
uncertainty
• value loading
•aa plurality of legitimate perspectives
plurality of legitimate perspectives
F
From
experiments
i
t to
t experience
i
S. Funtowiz, J.Ravetz 1999
Decision stakes
high
Post normal science
Professional consultancy
Applied science
L
Low
Low
Systems
y
uncertaintyy
High
From isolated, bounded subsystems to global inter‐related socio‐ecosystemns
to experience
Excess of objectivity
(Sarewitz 2004)
For a given value‐based position in an environmental controversy it is often possible to compile a supporting
controversy, it is often possible to compile a supporting set of scientifically legitimated facts.
R di l uncertainty
Radical
t i t
(J.P. Dupuy, 2004)
Our uncertainty regarding the behavior of complex systems
Our
uncertainty regarding the behavior of complex systems
has nothing to do with a temporary insufficiency of our g ,
y
g
j
,
knowledge, it has everything to do with objective, structural properties of complex systems. Post normal model
The ideal of rigorous scientific demonstration is replaced by an Th
id l f i
i ifi d
i i
l db
ideal of open public dialogue. Inside the knowledge production process citizens become both critics and creators
process, citizens become both critics and creators. .
Their contribution has not to be defined as ‘local’, ‘practical’, ‘ethical’ or ‘spiritual’ knowledge, but it has to be considered and accepted as a plurality of rightful and coordinated perspectives with their own meaning and value structures (Liberatore and F t i 2003).
Funtowicz
2003)
democratizing
d
i i science i
expertizing citizens
Letture Letture
AA.VV. Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation . EEA Report No 1/2013.
Benessia, A., Funtowicz, S., Bradshaw, G., Ferri, F., Raez‐Luna, Benessia
A F nto ic S Bradsha G Ferri F Rae L na
E.F., and Medina. Hybridizing sustainability: toward a new praxis for the present human predicament. Sustainability
praxis for the present human predicament. Sustainability Science 7(Supplement 1): 75‐89 (2012) .
Funtowicz S. and Ravetz J. Science for the Post‐Normal Age”, Futures, 25:735‐755 (1993).
Cini M. Il supermarket di Prometeo. Codice, Torino (2006).