Disclosures: Posterior Instability: Why is this important and How to Treat

Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Disclosures:
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat?
1.
2.
3.
4
4.
5.
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Professor, Departments of Orthopedics
Head, Section of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Team Physician, Chicago White Sox and Bulls
Chief Medical Editor, Orthopaedics Today
6.
Outline
1.
2.
3
3.
4.
5.
6.
Some definitions
Pathoanatomy
Diagnosis & Pertinent Physical Exam
Proper surgical patient selection
Arthroscopic posterior stabilization
Management of posterior glenoid bone loss
Royalties: Arthrex
Consultant: Arthrex
Miscellaneous Support: Arthrex
B i Science/Research
Basic
S i
/R
h Support:
S
t Arthrex,
A th
S ith andd
Smith
Nephew, Ossur, Miomed, DJOrtho, Conmed Linvatech,
Athletico
Editorial Board: Orthopedics Today (Chief Medical Editor),
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Techniques in
Shoulder and Elbow, Techniques in Sports Medicine, Sports
Health, Orthopedics
Publisher Support: Elsevier (Textbook)
Definitions
Laxity- excessive translation, asymptomatic
Instability- SYMPTOMATIC translation
Classification of Posterior Instability:
1. Traumatic
2. Atraumatic
3. Voluntary
a. Voluntary Muscular (habitual)
b. Voluntary Positional
Screen for Voluntary PI
Cause of Atraumatic PI
1. Collagen Disease
Or
Voluntary muscular- habitual, secondary gain
Voluntary positional- no secondary gain, patient
avoids provocative positions
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
2. Bony Deformity
1
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
Traumatic PI
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Who is at risk for traumatic
posterior instability?
Most common etiology
requiring surgical tx
Single Event
Vs.
Cumulative effect of
multiple smaller
traumatic episodes
Bradley AJSM 2006
Single event traumatic posterior instability
“Posterior-Inferior” Instability
A Spectrum of Instability
Posterior Stabilizers
1. Recurrent Subluxation- most common
presentation as a result of single traumatic
dislocation or repetitive
p
microtrauma
2. Recurrent dislocation- less common than
anterior instability, Reverse Hills Sachs
3. Fixed posterior dislocation
4. Posterior glenoid bone loss
a. Acquired (fracture or erosion)
b. Developmental
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Static:
1. Labrum- deepens socket by 50%
2 IGHLC2.
IGHLC attaches from 2-4
2 4 to 7
7-9
9 o’clock
o clock
a. posterior band present in 63%
3. Rotator interval- “circle” concept
a. CHL, SGHL, long head of bicep tendon
Dynamic:
1. Rotator cuff, periscapular muscles
2
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Pathomechanics: loss of static
stabilizer function
Loss of chondrolabral
containment
1.
Labral deficiency 51-58%
1. Tearing/Attentuation
2. Healing in a recessed position
p
g
laxity
y 43-67%
2. Capsuloligamentous
1. Anterior/Posterior/”Circle Concept”
3. Glenoid deficiency/malpositioning
1. Retroversion/Dysplasia
2. Bone loss
3. Scapular dyskinesis
Loss of chondrolabral containment is a consistent finding in shoulders with
symptomatic posterior instability.
Loss of chondrolabral containment:
The rim-loading mechanism
Savoie FH, Holt MS, Field LD, Ramsey JR. Arthroscopic management of posterior
instability: evolution of technique and results. Arthroscopy. May 2008;24(4):389396. Bradley JP. Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstruction for Posterior
Instability of the Shoulder: A Prospective Study of 100 Shoulders. Am J Sports
Med. Mar 21 2006;34(7):1061-1071.
pathoanatomy
Sites of failure of Posterior static stabilizers:
Kim SH et al. JBJS 2005.
Reverse Bankart
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
1 glenoid labral attachement1.
attachement
Reverse bankart- 4 types
POALPSA
Post GLAD lesion
2. Mid Capsule- capsular insufficiency
3. Humeral insertion of ligaments- RHAGL
Kim Lesion
3
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
POLPSA
Posterior GLAD lesion
Posterior Capsular laxity
RHAGL
Physical Exam
Generalized shoulder exam
1. Scapular Rhythm, ROM, strength
Exam for laxity
1. hyperlaxity- load and shift (supine)
2. MDI- Sulcus sign
Provocative maneuvers for symptomatic PI
a. Jerk Test (upright)
b. Kim Test (upright)
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Jerk Test: Posterior Labrum
Positive test: pain or discomfort
Sitting position, axial directed force with arm
flexed, adducted, IR. Bring arm into
extension to reduce subluxated head
4
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Provocative tests interpretation
Kim Test: Posteroinferior labrum
Sitting position, arm in 90 degrees abduction, examiner holds
elbow and lateral aspect of proximal arm, firm axial load is
applied. Simultaneous 45 degree upward diagonal elevation
is applied on the distal arm, while a downward and backward
force is applied to the proximal arm.
Jerk test more sensitive posterior labral lesion
Kim test more sensitive to inferior labral lesions
Combination of teststests 97% sensitive
Pain without clunk– labral lesion
Pain with clunk– labral lesion and instability
Provocative exam drives treatment:
Negative Jerk/Kim test– nonoperative treatment
often successful
Non-operative treatment
Key points to dx and pt selection
Postive test: pain or discomfort
Indications: asymptomatic laxity and negative
provocative exam findings (jerk/kim tests)
Physical therapy
therapy- rotator cuff strengthening,
strengthening
periscapular muscle strengthening
Results: 93% responded to physical therapy
alone in pts with negative jerk/kim tests
1. Activity related shoulder pain is most
common presenting symptom of PI
2 Loss of chondrolabral containment results in
2.
symptomatic posterior instability
3. A negative Jerk test/Kim test usually can be
successfully treated non-operatively
4. MRI findings of posterior labral lesions are
often less dramatic than anterior labral injury
Kim SH et al. Painful Jerk test: a predictor of success in nonoperative
treatment of posteroinferior instability of the shoulder: Am J Sports
Med 32(8):1849-1855, 2004.
Indications for Arthroscopic
Stabilization
1.
2.
3
3.
4.
Involuntary, symptomatic instability
Postitive Jerk test/Kim test
Failed non-operative
non operative treatment
Imaging consistent with loss of
chondrolabral containment
5. Absence of glenoid dysplasia or excessive
bone loss
Arthroscopic Management: Options
1.
2.
Capsulorrhaphy
Labral repair
-With suture anchors
g reconstruction
3. “Sling”
4. Rotator interval closure?
-Controversial, in our own
laboratory biomechanically
unhelpful
5. Osseous augmentation
-Where indicated
Mologne TS, Zhao K, Hongo M, Romeo AA, An KN, Provencher MT. The addition of rotator interval closure after arthroscopic repair
of either anterior or posterior shoulder instability: effect on glenohumeral translation and range of motion. Am J Sports Med. 2008
Jun;36(6):1123-31
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
5
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Portals
Lazy Lateral Position
•
Standard
Posterior
Anterosuperior
5 o’clock
•
Trans-subscapularis
•
Percutaneous only, no cannula
7 o’clock
•
Inferior to posterior cuff
•
2-3cm lateral to glenoid rim
•
8.25 cannula, dilators necessary
•
•
•
•
7- 0’Clock Portal
Diagnostic Arthroscopy
(Right shoulder)
1. Labrum
2. Capsule/ligaments
– Reverse HAGL
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Posterior bone loss
Chondral surfaces
Reverse Hill Sachs
Biceps
Rotator cuff
Rotator interval
Capsulolabral Pathology is variable…
(Harryman 1999)
•Labral detachment
•Chondral/labral erosion
•Capsular stripping
•Labral split (Kim)
Bradley et al AJSM 2006.
Intraoperative capsulolabral pathology of 100
shoulders with symptomatic PI
43% patulous capsule with no evidence of
labral detachment
27% incomplete labral tear
30% complete detachment of posterior labrum
•Laxity
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
6
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
Posterior Instability with Extensive Labral
and Cartilage Injury
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Probe labrum for Kim lesion
• 22 yyear old
• Offensive Lineman
• NFL Combine 2013
A concealed complete detachment of the
posterior labrum.
very benign appearing on imaging and initial
diagnostic arthroscopy.
Look for RHAGL
Chondrolabral junctional preparation
1. Elevators
2. Hooded/”SLAP”
burr
3. Shaver
4. Anteriorly continue
until it “floats”
5. Posteriorly
“autoreduction”
anecdotally less
reliable
Anchor placement
1. 3-4 anchors
2. 6 o’clock and
beyond
3 Superiorly
3.
S
i l
(above
equator)
• Knotless
anchors
Labral Tear
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Knotless suture anchor fixation
Biomechanical testing at our
institution showed:
Cyclic loading up to 25N
showed no difference to
failure compared with knotanchor configurations
All stitches- single,
horizontal, double loaded
performed similar to
knotless
Nho SJ et al. A biomechanical
analysis of anterior bankart repair
using suture anchors. Am J Sports
Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1405-12.
7
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Suture passage
Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair
Capsular Plication:
Can the labrum be used as an anchor?
Postoperative Protocol
•
•
•
•
•
Provencher MT, Verma N, Obopilwe E, Rincon LM, Tracy J, Romeo AA, Mazzocca A. A
biomechanical analysis of capsular plication versus anchor repair of the shoulder: can
the labrum be used as a suture anchor? Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):210-6.
Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair
Multiple recent studies have demonstrated excellent outcomes
Surgeon:
N
Recurrence
Abrams (2002)
34
4/34 (11%)
Romeo (2005)
45
4/45 (10%)
Bradley (2006)
100
11/100 (11%)
Snyder (2010)
29
1/29 (3.4%)
75 – 90% Good / Excellent Results
Bradley, J. P. Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstruction for Posterior Instability of the Shoulder: A Prospective Study of 100
Shoulders. American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, 1061–1071 (2006).Provencher, M. T. Arthroscopic Treatment of Posterior
Shoulder Instability: Results in 33 Patients. American Journal of Sports Medicine 33, 1463–1471 (2005).
Bahk, M. S., Karzel, R. P. & Snyder, S. J. Arthroscopic posterior stabilization and anterior capsular plication for recurrent posterior
glenohumeral instability. Arthroscopy 26, 1172–1180 (2010).
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
•
0-3 weeks: Splint in ER
3-6 wks: ER, FF to 90°,
isometrics
6 wks: ER, FF, IR,
strengthening
3 mon: ROM as tolerated
4 mon: return to noncontact sports
6-9 mon: return to all sports
Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstruction for
Posterior Instability of the Shoulder: A Prospective
Study of 100 Shoulders
Bradley, et al; AJSM
March 2006
•100 shoulders, 91 patients
•51 Contact Athletes
•> Chondrolabral changes
and retroversion
•ASES Scores: 50  86
•89% Return to Sport
(67% at same level)
Outcomes analysis now includes >200 Shoulder
8
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Recurrence (Failure)
James Bradley – Posterior Stabilization
Traumatic re-tear
Be are of:
Beware
• Occult
multidirectional
instability
• Bone loss
Glenoid bone loss
• Recurrent
Instability
• Epilepsy
• Collision
Sports
• Dysplasia
Glenoid Bone Loss
Not important
Important
Osseus Augmentation
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Bradley JP. Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstruction for Posterior
Instability of the Shoulder: A Prospective Study of 100 Shoulders. Am
J Sports Med. Mar 21 2006;34(7):1061-1071.
Krishnan SG, Hawkins RJ, Horan MP, Dean M, Kim Y-K. A soft tissue
attempt to stabilize the multiply operated glenohumeral joint with
multidirectional instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Dec 2004(429):256261.
• Biomechanical Study
•
•
HH translation with varying degrees of posterior
glenoid bone loss
5° posterior glenoid bone loss
•
Significant posterior HH translation during simulated FF
Osseous Augmentation
9
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Osseous Augmentation Results
Appropriate indications and
meticulous surgical technique
crucial, as results of traditional
“bone block” procedures at 18
years demonstrate
1. 100% radiographic DJD
2. 73% persistent subjective instability
Meuffels DE, Schuit H, van Biezen FC, Reijman M, Verhaar JAN. The posterior bone
block procedure in posterior shoulder instability: A long-term follow-up study. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. Jun 01 2010;92-B(5)
Osseous Augmentation Results
•
•
•
•
19 cases
Mean 20 mo f/u
Autologous ICBG
Recurrent posterior instability
•
Humeral or Glenoid bone loss
•
Dysplasia
•
Hyperlaxity
Improved Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores
100% radiographic healing rate
No cases of recurrent dislocation
•
•
•
Case
Case
• 29yo M, RHD
• Computer Technician
• Recurrent posterior
instability
•
•
Seizure disorder
Now controlled
• “Dislocated when I
flex my arm above
shoulder level”
Case
Case
•
•
•
•
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
2 years post-op
Full ROM
No apprehension
No instability
events
10
Posterior Instability:
Why is this important and How to Treat
Beware of “guide services” from
Matt Provencher…
AANA Fall Meeting
November 2013
Thank you!
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
Thank you!
Chicago
Anthony A. Romeo, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
11