the most salient workplace and human resource issues that are becoming important in the world of work. The analysis is relevant to management professionals as well as to academics. One of the book’s key strengths lies in its comprehensiveness of scope and balancing the interests of various stakeholders. The conclusions are largely relevant in different degrees for many other countries in the developed world as well. With the growing importance of convergence thesis in social science and management, many formulations will be of immediate relevance to developing countries like India as also to others. The book has painted a wide canvas of the contemporary world of work in the US and the implications it would have for public policy. The treatment of issues is authoritative. This book is a significant contribution to literature on American worker and human resource management. Debi S Saini Professor, Human Resource Management Area Management Development Institute Gurgaon e-mail:[email protected] Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant W Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005, pp. 240, US$ 27.95 W hy should companies waste time ‘breaking the competition’ when they can ‘break away’ from the competition? In other words, why should companies deplete their attention span in an endless analysis and tracking of the ‘competition’ when they can choose the path of ‘innovation’ instead? W Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne argue that it is time to move away from the red waters of saturated markets in order to ‘create uncontested market space’ in the blue oceans of innovation since only innovation can actually ‘make the competition irrelevant.’ While the red oceans of competition will not go away, the primary objective of this book is to set out a systematic strategy to make blue oceans possible since innovation is not just creativity or so-called ‘value innovation,’ but the ability to ‘align innovation, with utility, price, and cost positions.’ The creation of blue oceans through the process of innovation, however, is extremely demanding. The authors, therefore, set out a framework comprising the different aspects of innovation so that practising managers can go about the task of value innovation in as systematic a way as possible. Kim and Mauborgne begin with an elementary differentiation between the ‘red ocean’ and the ‘blue ocean.’ The former comprises ‘all the industries in existence today,’ while the latter represents ‘all the industries not in existence today.’ The intensity of competition turns the market space of the former into red, bloody oceans. An understanding of these industries depends on the conventional analytic frameworks used to study ‘competitive dynamics’ in business schools; these frameworks and forms of analyses dominate the strategy curriculum. Little guidance, however, is available for those who wish to swim in the blue ocean. This is partly because of the origins of business strategy in the history of military strategy. In military strategy, the fight is always over a piece of limited territory which has to be occupied and defended; this territory is ‘limited and constant.’ This is, however, not a valid constraint in the context of industry: business history reveals that blue oceans have appeared from time to time. Most of the leading industries in place today did not even exist a few decades ago since the emergence of a new technology can reshape industrial configurations beyond recognition. Examples of such blue oceans include ‘many industries as basic as automobiles, music recording, aviation, petrochemicals, healthcare, and management consulting.’ The crucial questions that companies must ask themselves today are these: Can the discovery of blue oceans be pursued in a systematic way? Or should it be left to the accidental emergence of innovations in the economy? Furthermore, why should companies actually bother with value innovations given the risks involved in pursuing anything new? According to Kim and Mauborgne, the economic reasons that will compel com- 151 VIKALPA • VOLUME 31 • NO 3 • JULY - SEPTEMBER 2006 151 panies to innovate are the following: the excess of supply over demand in most industries, the reduction in tariff barriers as a result of globalization, the loss of niche markets, the dismantling of monopolies, and the changes in the demography of the ‘developed markets.’ As a result of these economic factors, both products and brands are being increasingly commoditized. Furthermore, the authors argue that the performance of most companies has been historically inconsistent. Hence, it has become necessary, according to the authors, to move away from using the company and/or the industry as the fundamental unit(s) of analysis. The new unit of analysis that Kim and Mauborgne propose is the ‘strategic move.’ A strategic move is defined as a ‘set of managerial actions and decisions involved in making a major market-creating business offering.’ The empirical base for this book is drawn from ‘more than one hundred fifty strategic moves made from 1880 to 2000 in more than thirty industries.’ The study included analyses of both the winners and the losers in their attempts to create ‘blue oceans.’ The differences between the two cannot be explained in terms of industrial and/or organizational characteristics. The crucial difference lay in their ‘approach to strategy.’ The winners were able to negotiate the ‘value-cost trade-off’ better than the losers: they did not have to exercise the customary ‘choice between differentiation and low cost.’ They were able to pursue both through ‘value innovation,’ which, as pointed out earlier, must be ‘aligned with utility, price, and cost positions.’ Only then can value innovation serve as ‘the cornerstone of blue ocean strategy’ and take in the activities of the company as a whole. The default assumptions in the competitive notion of strategy are then identified under the rubric of ‘environmental determinism.’ In this model, the players work in the belief that they cannot ask questions; they can, at best, manoeuvre within the given, historical frame of competitive dynamics. While firms put in a heroic attempt to differentiate in this space, they do so at a high cost since they either use the competitor as a benchmark or survey the industry mechanically for the available set of ‘best practices.’ The blue ocean, however, renders the possibility of innovating within a ‘reconstructionist’ frame (as opposed to a ‘structuralist’ frame of ‘environmental determinism’) provided that a given company or firm can continue to handle ‘opportunity and risk’ since ‘there is no such thing as a riskless strategy.’ As the authors point out in Appendix B of this 152 volume, the reconstructionist view of strategy is inspired by Joseph Schumpeter’s notion of endogenous growth. However, the modalities of endogenous growth that emerge from innovations that arise from ‘within’ are not clear in Schumpeter’s model—especially since it is based on the activities of the ‘lone entrepreneur.’ The challenge is to make such innovations widespread, a challenge that was initially taken up by the ‘new growth theory’ and, subsequently, by the ‘reconstructionist view of strategy.’ The reconstructionist model ‘requires a shift of attention from supply to demand, from a focus on competing to a focus on value innovation—that is, the creation of innovative value to unlock new demand.’ Only by shifting to the demand side of the equation and by working out the modalities of value innovation is it possible to ‘achieve a leap in value’ that is not reducible to competitive dynamics in the traditional sense of a zero-sum game. The framework required to do this is referred to as the ‘strategy canvas.’ The focus on the demand side of the equation means that companies should concentrate on ‘alternatives’ rather than on competitors and on ‘non-customers’ rather than customers. The strategic hope here is that it is possible to pursue both cost and value by redefining the very nature of the industry that a company finds itself in. In order to do this and generate ‘a new value curve,’ the strategic framework must comprise the following four actions in order to redefine the factors which constitute the structure of a given industry. The strategic framework should eliminate, reduce, raise, and create the factors responsible for the generation of a new value curve given the industry standards at any point in time through the application of the ‘strategy canvas.’ The role of the four actions given above (in generating a new value curve) has been illustrated through three case studies. These cases include Casella Wines, Southwest Airlines, and Cirque du Soleil, a Canadian circus. Southwest, for example, is not interested in the competitive dynamics of the airline industry per se. It is, instead, focused on providing an alternative to car travel by reducing the cost of flying since it is a lowcost carrier. Southwest is also proactive in strategy formulation—avoiding thereby the me-too attitude of most key players in the airline industry. And, it works with an effective tagline: ‘the speed of a plane at the price of a car—whenever you need it.’ It is alternatives to air travel and non-customers in the airline industry that matter to Southwest Airlines in the formulation of a new BOOK REVIEWS 152 strategy canvas. The four principles of strategy formulation and the two principles of implementation set out in this book to generate a new strategy canvas (i.e., a blue ocean), however, do not have to be left to the vagaries of business history—they can be formulated and implemented systematically. Blue oceans are industries that emerge when companies learn to reconstruct markets, ‘focus on the big picture,’ go beyond the given demand for a product or service, and work out the right sequence in the formulation of a strategic goal. The principles of execution involve learning to take the organization down the path of innovation along with an inbuilt understanding of the role of execution in the framing of strategy. The following paragraphs set out the four principles of strategy formulation in some detail along with a brief discussion of the relevant cases included in the book. The first principle is reconstructing markets or rather market boundaries. But, what does it actually mean to ‘reconstruct’ a market? What are the paths that companies must traverse to reconstruct rather than merely penetrate markets? Kim and Mauborgne argue that there are six paths of relevance here. They comprise the following: thinking of product/service alternatives (as opposed to mere substitutes); looking across strategic groups within an industry; redefining the traditional chain of buyers in an industry (comprising influencers, purchases, and users); generating a total solution for a product or service by examining the temporal sequence in which it will be used through the notion of complementary offerings; defamiliarizing the conventional link between the emotional and functional aspects of a product/service; and tracking the emergence of trends across time. The case studies used to illustrate the six paths of relevance in reconstructing market boundaries comprise Net Jets and NTT DoCoMo; Curves (a fitness company for women); Novo Nordisk and Bloomberg; NABI (a bus company based in Hungary); The Body Shop, Cemex, and Direct Line Group; Apple Computers and Cisco Systems respectively. The reconstruction of market boundaries, however, presupposes the ability to change the strategy planning process. Since this process is inevitably enmeshed in the logic of the red ocean, it is extremely tempting for a strategic planner to get drawn into the emotionally comforting routine of number work and operational details. In order to draw up a ‘strategy canvas,’ however, it is necessary to focus on the ‘big picture.’ Hence, the importance of working out the modalities of ‘visualization’ in strategic planning. The authors illustrate the importance of visualization with a case study of the role of value innovation programmes at Samsung Electronics. Some of the concrete outcomes of these programs include LCD TVs and mobile phones which are leaders in their respective categories. A concrete tool that the authors advocate the use of in this context is the PioneerMigrator-Settler (PMS) Map. Such a map can help a company to situate its portfolio. ‘For the purpose of the exercise, settlers are defined as me-too businesses, migrators are business offerings better than most in the marketplace, and pioneers are the only ones with a mass following of customers.’ Most items in the portfolio are likely to be in the locus of the settler—the challenge is to push it towards the locus of the pioneers as represented in a hypothetical scatter plot diagram. The red ocean, given the conventional dynamics, is bound to be preoccupied not only with the current portfolio of product/service offerings but also with the customers already in place. The blue ocean must, therefore, aim at what is in excess of the current demand by targeting ‘the three tiers of non-customers’ for a given company. The first tier comprises those who are willing to try a new product or service; the second tier comprises those who are not willing to try; and the third tier comprises those who have not yet been targeted as potential customers. Case studies used to illustrate the dynamics of these three segments include Prêt A Manger, JC Decaux, and Lockheed Martin’s Jet Strike Fighter (JSF) programme respectively. Converting these noncustomers into customers, however, demands a business model which must ‘get the strategic sequence right.’ The strategic sequence demands that the company must pay attention to identifying a product/service that offers the buyer exceptional utility. It should be at a price affordable to the customer; however, demand should not be just a function of the price. Utility and price will help the company to structure the revenue section of its business model. In order to generate a profit, however, the company must be able to target cost effectively without letting ‘costs drive prices’—otherwise, the company’s offerings will not generate ‘a leap in value.’ This is especially the case in ‘bottom of the (economic) pyramid’ initiatives as the Cemex case study (based in Mexico) illustrates. In other words, to summarize, ‘it is the combination of exceptional utility, strategic pricing, and 153 VIKALPA • VOLUME 31 • NO 3 • JULY - SEPTEMBER 2006 153 target costing that allows companies to achieve value innovation.’ Value innovation, however, is not the same as technology innovation; technology does not automatically translate into ‘exceptional utility’ for the customer as illustrated by the failure of Motorola’s Iridium project. The authors advocate the use of a ‘buyer utility map’ comprising six utility levers across ‘the six stages of the buyer experience cycle’ as a reality check instead of conflating technology innovation with value innovation. This utility map can help to identify the ‘blocks to buyer utility.’ Value innovation (as opposed to technology innovation) involves the identification and elimination of such utility blocks. A relevant example in this context is Ford’s pioneering entry level automobile, the Model T (1908), which exploited the fact that most automakers in the pre-Ford era concentrated on luxury automobiles (in an attempt to make money) without realizing that the real hurdle in selling automobiles had to do with inadequate roads and routine maintenance. Since the cars were customized with multiple options and mechanics were scarce, the utility of these luxurious vehicles were severely limited by road and weather conditions. The Model T did away with these problems by building a durable car of standardized design making automobiles available to the ‘multitudes.’ Ford was able to pioneer successfully at the level of the product, the price, and the manufacturing process (the assembly line). In order to get into place the dynamic combination of exceptional utility and strategic pricing, a company must identify the target cost as early as possible. To generate a blue ocean, ‘a company should start with the strategic price and then deduct its desired profit margin from the price to arrive at the target cost.’ The assembly line helped Ford to reduce the costs and time involved in the manufacture of the Model T. Cost innovations then are absolutely crucial: strategies to attain such innovations include streamlining operations, partnering, and changing the model of pricing in place. As the authors explain in Appendix C on ‘the market dynamics of value innovation,’ blue ocean strategy aims to avoid the practice of ‘price skimming’ which is endemic in monopoly markets. The strategic intent should be ‘on creating new aggregate demand through a leap in buyer value at an accessible price.’ Keeping costs at low levels over a sustained period of time can, in addition to benefiting the customer, make it very difficult for the competition to emulate an instan- 154 tiation of value innovation. In addition to utility, price, and cost, a company should be aware of the resistance that may emerge to the adoption of a blue ocean strategy. For example, SAP experienced a lot of resistance in the development of Accelerated SAP (ASAP) from consultants who feared the possibility of a loss in revenue from ‘the development of best-practice templates’ for small and mid-sized companies in the market for business application software. SAP had to convince the consultants that the loss of revenue from the reduction in time to implement ASAP could be compensated for by an increase in the client base for affordable business application software. The modalities of formulating blue ocean strategy culminate in the tool that the authors term ‘the Blue Ocean Index (BOI).’ The index embodies the strategic ‘sequence of utility, price, cost, and adoption.’ The different claimants to value innovation can then check the attributes of their product against this index. The authors contrast the failure of Motorola’s Iridium project vis-à-vis the launch of the ‘i-mode’ by NTT DoCoMo in Japan in 1999 as a way of illustrating the usefulness of the BOI. The failure of the former and the success of the latter are mapped onto the structure of the BOI. The imode was a project to offer Net access on cell phones. It was so resoundingly successful that DoCoMo was not only able to address the problems of utility, price, cost, and adoption that structure the BOI, but, have also become, in the assessment of the authors, ‘the only company that has been able to make money out of the mobile Internet.’ Interestingly, ‘DoCoMo now exceeds its parent company, NTT, in terms of market capitalization as well as potential for profitable growth.’ Finally, the two principles of strategy implementation: overcoming the inevitable hurdles in the organization and learning to build execution into strategy. The first principle is illustrated by a detailed case study of police commissioner Bill Bratton’s attempt to reduce the levels of crime in New York City and turn around the demoralized New York City Police Department (NYPD) in the 1990s. Bratton used a model of leadership known as ‘tipping point theory.’ This theory is based on the simple principle ‘that in every organization, there are people, acts, and activities that exercise a disproportionate influence on performance.’ Hence, the focus should be on working with these disproportionate influencers rather than seeking a massive response to a massive challenge. Disproportionate influencers can help to break through BOOK REVIEWS 154 the cognitive, the political, and the motivational hurdles in the organization and overcome the resource constraints inherent in the implementation of blue ocean strategy. And, finally, the process of implementation must include execution from the very beginning through the notion of ‘fair process’ comprising ‘engagement, explanation, and expectation clarity’ to garner the cooperation of employees. While a blue ocean strategy can offer companies some protection against imitation, it is important to know when to value-innovate again. The right time is when a company’s ‘value curve begins to converge with those of the competition.’ The pursuit of blue oceans, however, does not mean that companies can do away with red oceans forever since these two models of competition and strategy are often found to co-exist in many industries. Nevertheless, Kim and Mauborgne seek to “balance the scales so that formulating and executing blue ocean strategy can become as systematic and actionable as competing in the red oceans of known market space.” Shiva Kumar Srinivasan Assistant Professor, Communications Area Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad e-mail: [email protected] The books that help you most are those which make you think the most. The hardest way of learning is that of easy reading; but a great book that comes from a great thinker is a ship of thought, deep freighted with truth and beauty. —Theodore Parker 155 VIKALPA • VOLUME 31 • NO 3 • JULY - SEPTEMBER 2006 155
© Copyright 2024