Designing Efficient Reactors for Long-Lived Nuclear Waste Recycling Direct disposal or

Designing Efficient Reactors for
Long-Lived Nuclear Waste
Recycling
Division of Reactor Physics,
The Royal Institute of Technology
ABSTRACT
Accelerator-driven systems (ADS)
are being investigated and
designed for recycling long-lived
nuclear waste. Operation in
subcritical mode enhances safety of
fast reactor, and therefore allows
application of advanced nuclear
fuels with large fraction of minor
actinides, while the fraction in
conventional critical fast reactors is
limited to a few percent due to the
safety constraints. Additional costs,
imposed by the need of a strong
neutron source – linear proton
accelerator – to drive the fission
reaction, can be decreased by
improving the ADS efficiency,
particularly the external source
efficiency. This research shows that
the proton source efficiency of ADS
can be significantly increased by
utilization of advanced nitride fuels
permitting compact core design
and small target. On the other
hand, the source efficiency of a
large ADS core can be improved by
applying proton beam with annular
shape. High source efficiency of
ADS leads to more simple
accelerator design and higher
reliability.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Andrei Fokau
PhD student, Lic Eng
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Department of Physics
Reactor Physics
Roslagstullsbacken 21
SE-106 91 Stockholm
Office: 08-55 37 8204
Mobile: 073-571 03 56
[email protected]
http://neutron.kth.se
energy protons and the target nuclei.
Leaving apart oxygen and steel, typical
spent nuclear fuel consists of uranium
(94.6%), plutonium (1.1%), minor
actinides (0.1%) and fission products.
Direct disposal of such spent fuel
requires large underground storage
facilities and a very long isolation time
(105 years). The volume and time can be
significantly reduced (in 6 and 100 times
resp.) if the actinides are separated from
fission products and recycled in
dedicated reactors. While decisions in
Europe are made in favour of the direct
disposal, the recycling, or partitioning
and transmutation of high-level waste
(HLW), is considered as an alternative
solution, being the subject of numerous
research projects.
How to recycle HLW
efficiently?
Within the framework of the European
research program on partitioning and
transmutation of nuclear waste two
designs of an ADS are developed: experimental facility, XT-ADS (85 MWth, see
Fig. 2) and industrial-scale demonstrator,
EFIT (400 MWth). While construction of
XT-ADS starts in 2016, the design of
EFIT is still conceptual and is the subject
of this work.
Making ADS designs
more source efficient
The power of the proton beam required
to reach certain fission power depends
on how well the target is coupled to the
sub-critical core. This can be described
by the proton source efficiency:
ψ*=-ρ ν fp,
Fission probability of even neutron
number nuclides (e.g. 242Pu, 241Am, etc.)
is too low for thermal energy neutrons
(Fig.1), making transmutation of the minor actinides (MA) in convectional lightwater reactors (LWR) inefficient. Moreover, the presence of americium in LWR
fuel significantly deteriorates safety of
the reactor and is therefore limited to
1%, leading to a large part of the nuclear
reactor park dealing with Am contaminated fuel. In order to transmute MA
efficiently, fast neutron reactors must be
employed. Operation of such fast reactors in sufficiently sub-critical mode ensures core safety and allows much larger
fractions of MA in its fuel than in critical reactors. This permits lowering the
required number of dedicated transmuters involved in recycling of HLW.
Accelerator-driven
systems
Because sub-critical reactors do not have
self-sustained chain reactions, they need
an external continuous neutron source to
drive the fission reaction in their core.
Accelerator-driven systems (ADS)
employ a linear proton accelerator and a
heavy-metal target to create such
intensive neutron source via the
spallation reaction between the high-
where ρ is reactivity, ν is the total
number of neutrons per fission,
fp is the number of fissions per proton.
The source efficiency is higher when
each source proton produces more
source neutrons, and when each source
neutron induces more fission. By
selecting parameters of the proton beam,
spallation target and core, one can
optimize the source efficiency.
Advanced nitride fuel
In our work, we studied source efficiency
of the EFIT design with three fuel types
(see Fig. 3) – ceramic-ceramic
(AnO1.88+MgO), ceramic-metallic
(AnO1.88+Mo) and nitride (AnN+ ZrN)
fuels. We have shown that, thanks to the
good neutron economy of the nitride
fuel, EFIT core size can be more
compact. Because the core power of the
nitride fuelled version of EFIT is lower
(200 MWth) than those of the oxide
versions, it requires lower proton current,
which permits reducing the size of the
spallation target. The reduction of core
and target sizes resulted in 45% higher
proton source efficiency and therefore
lowers the demand for the proton
current even further. Additionally, an
ADS with nitride fuel features much
lower coolant void worth improving core
safety.
Annular proton beam
In the versions of the EFIT design with
oxide fuel, the target module has a large
diameter of 80 cm in order to provide
sufficient heat removal for the proton
beam power up to 20 MW. The large
target size decreases the energy of the
source neutrons and consequently lowers
source efficiency. We found that the
application of annular (tube-shape)
proton beam can compensate the
drawbacks of the large target diameter
and can provide high source efficiency.
Selecting the beam radius close to the
target border increases the energy of
source neutrons and therefore results in a
higher fission probability. The proton
source efficiency increases by 15% for
the nitride core and up to 50% for the
oxide ones (Fig. 4). In addition, the
annular shape of the proton beam
reduces the possibility of the target
material overheating, since the heat is
deposited on a larger area and more
easily removed.
CONTACT INFORMATION
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
Fig. 5. Optimized power distribution in the XT-ADS core with
three fuel zones. Power of each fuel pin was calculated by
high-energy neutron and proton transport code MCNPX. The
total power peaking factor is less than 1.3. The values along
the axes are in cm.
./"
$,0
./"
$%!
./"
$%(
./"
$%$
-+"
$%(
.12"
342"
-+"
$%,
*+"
$%%
*+"
$%)
!"
!#$"
!#%"
!#&"
!#'"
("
Fig. 1. Fission probabilities of some actinide
nuclides in thermal (PWR) and fast (SFR) neutron
spectrum.
Fig. 2. Primary system
of the experimental
facility XT-ADS
(MYRRHA).
Core power: 85 MW,
proton energy: 600 MeV,
beam power : 5 MW,
coolant material: PbBi,
fuel material: MOX
Conclusions
We have shown that the source efficiency
of ADS designs can be significantly
improved by optimizing parameters of
the sub-critical core and the proton
beam. We found that smaller ADS core
and smaller spallation target features
higher source efficiency. For ADS
designs with big target units, the source
efficiency can be improved by shaping
the proton beam and redesigning the
target cooling system. The higher source
efficiency reduces the proton current (or
proton energy) required to drive the
reactor and therefore leads to higher
energy gain and simpler accelerator
components with higher reliability.
Publications
Fokau, A., et. al., 2010. A source efficient ADS for minor actinides burning,
Annals of Nuclear Energy 37 (4), pp.
540-545
Zhang, Y., Wallenius, J., Fokau, A., 2010.
Transmutation of americium in a
medium size sodium cooled fast reactor
design, Annals of Nuclear Energy 37 (5),
pp. 629-638
Reactor core modelling and
optimization
./"
$,'
Designing a fast reactor core (critical or
subcritical) is a multi-stage iterative
process, which starts with specifying the
basic parameters such as the total core
power and the maximum linear power
rating, choosing suitable materials, and
selecting corresponding temperature
ranges. Then a number of simulations are
done for defining the geometry of fuel
elements and optimizing the composition
of the fuel material to meet the design
objectives.
Pin lattice parameters
The fission probability of minor actinides
is high for dense fuel pin packing due to
the high neutron energy. However, the
coolant volume fraction must be sufficient
for heat removal under accidental
conditions.
Fig. 3. Core loading schemes of EFIT reactor with
three fuel candidates: ceramic-ceramic
(AnO1.88+MgO, 180 FA), ceramic-metallic
(AnO1.88+Mo, 216 FA), and nitride (AnN+ZrN, 78 FA).
220
Number of fissions per proton
Andrei Fokau and
Janne Wallenius
Direct disposal or
recycling?
EFIT nitride
EFIT cermet
200
180
160
140
120
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Proton beam radius, cm
Fig. 4. Source efficiency of EFIT as a function of
the beam radius in case of annular proton beam.
Radial power profile
The external neutron source and
subcriticality result in a high power peaking
compared to critical reactors. One can
reduce it by dividing the core into several
fuel zones and tuning their fuel-to-matrix
ratios (see Fig. 5).
Fuel burn-up
During reactor operation, more-fissionable
nuclides are burning out and the core
reactivity drops. The reactivity swing can
be compensated by allowing fertile or lessfissionable nuclides to convert by neutron
capture, so that the reactivity is kept
constant during the fuel life-time.
Reactor safety
The main objective of the reactor design is
to ensure safety of the core in all possible
accident scenarios. In order to confirm
this, safety parameters are evaluated by
core simulation and then the reactor
behaviour is studied using transient
analysis codes. All operation limits and
requirements must be satisfied.
Target design
Depending on the power of proton beam
required to reach certain core power, the
target design is adjusted to make sure that
the heat deposited in the target material
can be removed.
Iterative process
Since all core parameters and
characteristics are interconnected,
correcting one of them requires
recalculation of all steps. It takes many
iterations before the reactor core design
satisfies all performance and safety
requirements.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support of SKB AB (the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management
Company), and the European Commission within the framework of the Integrated Project EUROTRANS.