B L U E C O L L A R P O K E R HOW TO BUILD A THREE-LEGGED STOOL Why Poker Is Not a Game of Cards ...And How to Take Advantage of That Fact The true art of memory is the art of attention. Samuel Johnson (English Poet 1709-1784) There is a young fellow, let’s call him ‘Daniel’, in his twenties, who is a regular at the cash tables of my local casino, Club Regent in Winnipeg. A little too loose and a little too aggressive, he is not afraid to ask questions of the more seasoned players, but somewhat hesitant to accept the answers. I believe that the esoteric nature of my replies to his queries confuses him somewhat. The problem I believe is that he cannot accept that I play the game on a level that far exceeds his. He lacks sufficient life experience to understand. No Limit Texas Hold’em is a game of pressure, not hand value. It is a game of people, where accumulative knowledge of your opponents can both add to and protect your stack. Information that is seemingly trivial can be of the utmost importance. 38 You do need the best hand at showdown to scoop the pot. However, winning with less than the best, or folding when you know you can’t win, no matter what you do is key to survival. Many times I have heard from others, “I only remember my winning hands.” or “I only remember the bad beats” or “I never remember anything for too long.” Me? I remember everything! I am both blessed and cursed with a memory that will not let me forget. Events from days ago and decades long passed race through my mind without relief. Only sleep allows escape from my thoughts. And even then, the ghosts of life occasionally haunt me. A three-legged stool may be out of level but it never wobbles. And if you understand the importance of the three points I am about to make, you game will be as steady as that stool. First. Using the inner demons of your enemy. There is another regular at Club Regent; lets call him ‘Jake’. In his thirties, a father of two, and recently separated, I’ve logged many hours at the table with him over the last several years. He’s a good guy, but a rascal who probably should not have gotten married when he did and to whom he did. Even he acknowledges that fact. But the children keep him close to his foil, and he is honourable. The simple question I ask him when we are about to do battle is, “How’s the wife?” If he goes off about whatever the current issue is I know that he will be über aggressive. If the answer is one of calm, he will be more passive and less prone to radical play. I pattern my play and strategy against him accordingly. The spots I must pick to win are diametrically opposed to each other, depending on his mood. Nice to know whether to zig or zag when faced with the choice. Am I concerned about revealing this nugget to him? No! He cannot help himself, even when armed with the knowledge that would save him from himself. Like the fox who eats the rabbit on the swim across the river, after promising without exception not to; it is his nature! That is the first leg of the stool. Second. A paired board then and now. Another rounder, lets call him ‘Doyle’. Good player. Recently retired and an empty nester. Has the money to wager but not foolishly. Capable of a bluff, but more likely to hold the nuts on a push. The challenge is recognizing having the ‘second nuts’ on a paired board. A couple of years ago, I flopped quad 5’s while he held Hellmuth’s hand, 9♠9♣. The play was mid aggressive, as I slow played my hand, check calling ever increasing but reasonable bets from Doyle. I wasn’t sure how or even if I could get all the money in at some point. I actually put him on a pocket pair greater than the board showed at any time. When a 9 hit the river, I insta shoved my stack, a little less than $300. It took less than a second for him to call. And less than a second after that for me to declare, “I have quads!” He was crushed. Instantly. I knew that he had been ‘running bad’ to a degree, for a few months. Not playing badly. Just not benefiting from hands that were winners until the river hit the board. I knew it was wearing on him, as it does all of us when it happens. To my credit I rarely let it affect my ability to fold a hand when its value is in doubt. There are two more cards coming in a few seconds, representing the next opportunity to play correctly. Doyle did not even take time to consider that he was beat. He took no time whatsoever to study the board. And more ‘No Limit Texas Hold’em is a game of pressure, not hand value. It is a game of people, where accumulative knowledge of your opponents can both add to and protect your stack. Information that is seemingly trivial can be of the utmost importance.’ importantly, he did not use what he knew of me to analyze the hand. If he has paid any attention to my play over the years, he could have come to the conclusion that I had him beat. Even if there were only one hand out there that would do it. It still existed no matter what the odds. And I am not risking everything on bluff or less than the mortal nuts! I do love my money a little and I am not giving it away. You can take that to the bank, so to speak! That is one side of the coin that made me money. Now consider the other side that saved me money. More recently at Club Regent, Doyle sat in seat 1, player ‘X’ in seat 4 and I filled seat 8, on the button holding 8/10, one gap suited connectors. A small pre-flop raise and my button call saw a 4/6/7 rainbow flop. Doyle checked as did ‘X’. I made a ½ pot sized bet with a double gutter, hoping to pick up the pot right there, and both called. Up went the red flag. A check call is perhaps the most unnerving event of a poker hand, especially when two players are interested. There was less than $100 in the pot. Another 7 hit the turn and a check around was the result. The river was a blank. Doyle checked. ‘X’ checked. And having completely missed making my hand, I also checked. I smelled something fishy after the check call of my post flop bet, and I knew that I could not win, even had I bet big. I am ALWAYS wary of a paired board, regardless of what I hold unless it is the mortal nuts. The question, “Don’t tell me you have a full house” is one we have all heard many times. Fortunately for me I have had it asked of me more often that I have had the need to ask. Even the ‘Baby Boat’ is vulnerable, and should be played with caution. #&%!&%# flowed like lava out of ‘Doyle’s’ mouth as he flipped over two black 4’s. As happens often, the table entered into a discussion of the hand. “I thought you would bet”, Doyle stated, looking directly at me. “You weren’t getting another nickel out of me”, I returned. Joining in, Daniel asked me, “If you make the str8, you’re not calling a bet?” “No way”, I answered. “Even $30” he asked, and tagged “I don’t believe you” “Even $2” I returned belaying the point with an extreme. Of course I’d call $2 just to see the cards Doyle held. But I would not call much more than that and certainly not $30. The cards were already flowing for the next hand. Being called a liar is something that I take great offence to. We all twist reality at times at the table, but when I claim the truth as my ally, I mean it. In defense, I attempted to explain to Daniel why I would not call. The most salient point was the paired board. There is an old saying, “If you have to ask the question, you won’t understand the answer”. Translated. If something is so obvious, yet you don’t get it, no measure is likely to enlighten you. It quickly became the ‘trying to teach a goat to fly scenario’. It is a complete waste of your time and does nothing but piss off the goat! After a very short minute I gave up on the flying lesson, as Daniel would have none of it. A new advantage for me the next time I had him by the short hairs. Because I remember virtually everything that goes on at the table, the quad 5’s hand led me to see the trap being set by Doyle. I know that he remembers the hand and that it sticks in his craw like a chicken bone. Nothing personal, just poker, and friendly revenge for the former victim against the perpetrator. But you have to get up pretty early to get one by me. And even then good luck to ya! I can fold a hand. That is the second leg of the stool! Internet poker has seen the flood of kids playing the game. Not learning the game, just playing it. Lacking any substantial life experience at their tender age, it is difficult for them to understand the more esoteric aspects that would serve to educate them. But not me! Two of a group of these youngsters, let’s call them Itchy and Scratchy, sat at the table that afternoon as well. Itchy in seat 2, Scratchy in seat 9, and me sandwiched between, in seat 3. I had tangled with them several times over a couple of years, and can’t remember one time that it cost me money. Like most kids in the game today, their 39 B L U E C O L L A R P O K E R understanding of poker is relatively unsophisticated. They are overly aggressive, easy to read and eventually trap. It always seemed that Scratchy took great pleasure in crushing Itchy. I had asked Scratchy why? Apparently their group had caught Itchy in some form of cheat at their home game. Although there was forgiveness to some degree there would never be any solace for Itchy. The punishment from his peer group would be a virtual perpetual motion machine. They would do anything to see him lose every hand he played. If Itchy opened a pot, and there were a caller or two, a huge raise from Scratchy nearly always followed. After it happened a couple of times that afternoon, I took advantage of a seat change. For my plan to work I had to be on Scratchy’s immediate right. The hand with Doyle and the 4’ full took place shortly after I moved to seat 8. An opinion of position that I do not understand states that you want the tight players on your left and vice versa. I have put a lot of thought into this and completely disagree. I want the tightest player on my immediate right and the most aggressive on my immediate left. Why? There are a few regulars at the casino who short buy and are so tight, that if they either enter a pot (even with a smooth call), or call or raise an already opened pot, you know exactly where you are in the hand even before the flop hits the felt. Even with KK in position, they are so afraid of seeing an Ace on the flop that they will put in the minimum as the fourth or fifth in. Even when a 4-bet or all-in shove is called for, they fail to act. To that end, folding a small pair knowing that you are drawing to 2 outs or AK/Q/J or10, because hitting one on the flop is no guarantee that you are ahead to their probable AA or KK is an easy play. Pushing them off a hand is virtually impossible pre flop if they are known to hold big cards or big pairs when they choose to invest in the game. They rarely have enough chips in front of them to pose much of a threat but you need to be willing to answer their predictable all-in with what you hold if you choose to tangle with them. It severely shortens your range of playable hands. Having that player 40 on my right saves me $$$. When they enter a pot with a bet or raise, I exit and it costs me nothing. Conversely, there are a few super aggressive players who go ‘upstairs’ to open nearly every pot and virtually every button. They do have a hand now and then, but they play the position and pressure game to the extreme. Limping in with AA or other big hand that sees them raise and several callers in the mix builds a nice sized pot pre flop. When the action returns, you can hit it hard with confidence and many times take it down right there. Or if you are lucky get it all in with your AA or KK to their AK, KK or QQ having them drawing very thin for the win. But the really smart ones will eventually key in on this strategy and slow down a little when you limp to them a few times and then show the nuts or near nuts to a fold around to your coup-de-gras. This is not a bad thing. What it does is put you in control of the game. You can see many more flops for cheap when the ‘Badger’ et al, slow down for fear of being trapped when you consistently limp in. They never know if you have Aces, Ducks or suited connectors. You may have to limp fold here and there to set it up but it only costs you a few big blinds and will pay big rewards down the road. I want the ‘Badger’ on my left. He’ll build a pot for me! So-called professional poker players may argue against this strategy, but what makes more sense and whom are you going to believe? When a professional ‘liar’ gives advice isn’t the reverse of what they say a better course to follow? Think about it. With Scratchy on my left in seat 9 and Itchy in seat 2, I am perfectly poised to profit from their personal war. After paying close attention to what the both of them were doing and a couple of limp folds, I woke up with AK on the small blind. Doyle folded and Itchy opened for $12 into the $3 of the BB/SB. I knew he had nothing by the way he casually tossed the chips in. It was a pot builder. I knew, by paying close attention, that when he had a real hand he took much more time to craft a bet before committing chips. Two others called the opening raise, as did I. Scratchy did exactly what I wanted him to do. Sixty-four he chirped, letting the chips slide off one another creating a pathway to the pot. Itchy folded in disgust mumbling something under his breath about being targeted by his buddy. The others folded to me. There was over $100 in the pot and I still had the $300 behind when I checked to end the 4’s full hand. Looking the dealer in the eyes as I always do when I bet, “I’m all in” I declared. Now Scratchy was put to the test. He hummed and hawed and squirmed in his seat. So, he did have something I thought. But not much I quickly concluded when he did not insta-call. A small pair or suited AQ/ AJ seemed obvious. Itchy was his target as always and his tunnel-vision mentality in that regard leaves him open for attack from those who are wise enough to recognize the opportunity to do so. We had about the same size stack, but I had been working like a circus mule for several weeks and what I risked was only the equivalent of a day’s pay and a very small portion of my poker stake. One thing for sure is that I am not afraid to get it all in if I think I’m ahead. Losing a few hundred would not change my life whatsoever. For a twenty-something like Scratchy it could have represented a large percentage of what he possessed. Losing this hand could put a hurt on him that would leave a nasty scar and take some time to heal. A reload or two with the same result could see him bruised and bloodied. He lifted his cards and whether or not he meant to, exposed A♠Q ♠ in my full view. “I think I’m ahead,” he said while flashing his hand. I started laughing so hard I had to get up to catch my breath. The house rule at Club Regent is that an exposed hand is immediately dead. So I had no fear of losing but said nothing at the time. I was relatively certain he wasn’t calling, but would call for the floor if he were foolish enough to try. I don’t like angling and don’t think it should be permitted under any circumstance. I wasn’t laughing because the hand would be declared dead. I was laughing because I was probably playing poker before his parents were born. And if he thought he was getting one over on me he was only fooling himself into eventually losing his stack to me, if I got the chance to take it. What did he think I was moving in with? That is how narrow a scope of thought he and many other of the kiddies have if they think I do not have AQ crushed when I make that move. It was a planned play when I changed seats, and took an hour to set up. That is the level at which I play the game. Get it Daniel? After a Hollywood Minute he folded, calling my hand as an exercise. I confirmed his belief showing for effect. When I make that move I want the respect it takes to force a fold, so showing a big hand serves an important purpose. I welcome a race from ahead, but those 2 and 3 outers do come so I am happy to take the pot right there. And as importantly, I took control of the game for a period of time. That is why the limp call is such an important aspect of winning poker strategy. And that is why I am so wary of it when I am on the receiving end of one. Just a couple of hands later the roles and hands were reversed. As he has trained himself to do Scratchy again raised into Itchy, who was short stacked. Itchy moved all-in for a few dollars more than Scratchy’s raise. I now had AQ off suit and contemplated moving all-in again. But! I am smart enough to realize that Scratchy is not a complete idiot. If he is doing it again such a short time after the last, then I have to give him credit for a better hand than mine. I didn’t want to get involved with their personal battle this time so I folded. Scratchy turned over A♦K♦ and Itchy had two black 8’s. As it turned out I would have won when a Queen hit the river. But a ‘sweat’ to win is not what I am looking for. Racing from behind is a tough way to make money at the poker table. There are two quotes that I hold dear when my hard earned money is at risk. One from a pre-eminent Las Vegas gambler who avowed, “As a professional gambler, I don’t care how much money I win. I care how much money I lose!” And the other is from T. J. Cloutier, one of the best poker players in the history of the game. “Poker is not about winning pots. It is about making correct decisions. If you consistently make correct decisions, you will be a winning poker player!” The third leg of the stool that does not wobble! Slow playing the quad 5’s was the correct decision. If you flop the mortal nuts why not let your opponent(s) catch up? If you bet and they fold what do you win? By betting you may completely eliminate any chance of building a decent pot for a very rare hand. If you check one or two streets you still have a chance to build a small pot on the turn or river. Even though the result is the same, at least you gave them a chance to succumb to their nature and build a pot. The best example that I can think of is the following true story. Holding 77 UTG, ‘Roy’ raised to $7 pre flop in the 1 / 2 game at the casino. There were 8 callers. Flopping quads, he bet $7 on every street to the river and every player at the table called every bet to showdown. Brilliant! How would it be possible to win that amount against one or two players without forcing one or both to fold with a bet somewhere down the line? $200+ profit flopping quads, bleeding a little from each player, betting a number that no one keyed in on as a hint to his hand. He did it for giggles. I can tell you that I would have lost $7 at the very most, wary of the paired board and would not call for the flop if I didn’t like my hand. Checking down in the 4’s full hand instead of betting, after the check call and checked turn/river, on the paired board and because Doyle was involved was the correct decision. Stealing with a bet in position was not an option. If they check called the post flop bet, there was something up and at least one of them was going to call a bet or put in a raise on the river. If they have nothing and I bet, the winning amount is the same when they fold. If they have a hand and I bet, they raise and I fold, losing more than I needed to, against the same amount that I would win if they had nada. Risk management meters the amount you may lose unnecessarily, against what you will win, if you are unsure of your hand value, and where you stand in a hand. Moving into seat 8 with a plan that was hatched with information that had nothing to do with the cards was the correct decision. Executing that plan at that time was the correct decision. Folding the AQ off suit for the reason I stated was the correct decision. The fact that a Queen hit the river and would have given me the win is irrelevant to the fact that I knew that I had the inferior hand and knowing so chose to fold it. This is why poker is not a game of cards. It is without a doubt a game of pressure, information and correct decision-making. If you do not play poker at this level you are at the mercy of those of us who do. We are not perfect beings and we cannot expect to play perfect poker every single hand through every single session. What we can do is try to play perfect poker to the best of our abilities. To resist our inherent nature to bet when everyone checks. The check call, check raise and check lead out on the next street have become the norm. Just because someone checks, it does not mean that they don’t have a hand. That is why folding a hand when unsure of its value is so important. There are two more cards coming your way in a few seconds. But you cannot take advantage of them if you just lost your stack and have to make that walk of shame. The victim of your own foolishness, flawed nature and inability to fold a friggin’ hand! I close with the following; the first two lines of Memories are Made of This. Written in 1955 by Terry Gilkyson, Richard Dehr, and Frank Miller and made popular by Dean Martin, one of the true Pioneers of Vegas and Rat Pack stalwart. Sweet, sweet memories you gave-a me You can’t beat the memories you gave-a me……… Good luck at the tables. And remember. I’m watching! ♠ Doug Antoine is an avid amateur poker player who has been working professionally as a technician in the Canadian Entertainment Industry since 1976. You can read all of his 41
© Copyright 2024