Document o f The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: 38504-VN PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 32.8 MILLION (USS50 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM FOR A H O CHI MINH CITY INVESTMENT FUND FOR URBAN (HIFU) DEVELOPMENT PROJECT May 24,2007 Urban Development Sector Unit Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region This document has a restricted distribution and maybe used by recipients only in the performance o f their official duties. I t contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective May 3 1,2006) Currency Unit = Vietnamese Dong (VND) 16,025VDN = US$1 1.51US$ = SDR1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAA AFD BOT BW CFAA CPRGS CPS DA DAF DNIF DONRE DPI DPL EIA EMP EMPF ES EVN FI FIL FS FSPP GDP GOV HANIF HCMC HDP HIFU ICB IDA IEE Analytical and Advisory Activities Agence Franqaise de D6veloppment (France Agency for Development) Build Operate Transfer Borrowing Window Country Financial Accountability Assessment Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy Country Partnership Strategy Designated Account Development Assistance Fund Dong N a i Investment Fund Department o f Natural Resources and Environment Department o f Planning and Investment Development Policy Lending Environmental Impact Assessment Environment Management Plan Ethnic Minority PlanningFramework Environmental Safeguards Electricity o f Vietnam Financial Intermediary Financial Intermediary Loan Feasibility Study Framework for Selecting Private Partners Gross Domestic Product Government o f Vietnam Hanoi Investment Fund Ho Chi Minh City HIFU Development Project Ho Chi Minh City Investment Fund for Urban Development InternationalCompetitive Bidding InternationalDevelopment Association Initial Environment Assessment LDF LOC MIC MOF MPI NCB NPL ODA OED OLA PC PER PER-FA PMO PMU PPA PPC PPI PPP PRSC PSP RAP ROE SIL SOCB SOE SPV TA TAF TOR USTDA VDB VDIC VND WBTC Local Development Investment Fund Line o f Credit Middle Income Country FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Ministry o f Finance Ministry o f Planning and Investment National Competitive Bidding Non-Performing Loans Official Development Assistance Operations Evaluation Department On-lending Loan Agreement People’s Committee Public Expenditure Review Public Expenditure Review and Integrated Fiduciary Assessment Project Management Office Project Management Unit Project Preparation and Appraisal Provincial People’s Committee Private Participation in Infrastructure Public Private Partnership Poverty Reduction Support Credit Private Sector Partner Resettlement Action Plan Return on Equity Specific Investment Loan State Owned Commercial Bank State-Owned Enterprise Special Purpose Vehicle Technical Assistance Technical Assistance Facility Terms o f Reference Unites States Trade and Development Agency Vietnam Development Bank Vietnam Development Information Center Vietnam Dong West Bus Terminal Co. Vice President: Acting Country Director: Sector Director: Task Team Leader: James W. Adams Martin Rama Keshav Varma KamranKhan This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance o f their official duties. I t s contents may not be otherwise disclosed without World Bank authorization. VIETNAM HIFU Development Project CONTENTS Page A . STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE ....................................................................... 1 1. Country and Sector Issues ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Rationale for Bank involvement .............................................................................................. 3 3. Higher level objectives to which the project contributes ......................................................... 6 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION B . 2. 1 ...................................................................................................... 6 Lending instrument .................................................................................................................. 6 Project development objective and key indicators ................................................................... 6 .................................................................................................................. 7 4 . Lessons learned and reflected in the project design ................................................................ - 8 9 5 . Alternatives considered and reasons for rejection.................................................................... 3. C . Project components IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................. 10 1. Partnership arrangements ....................................................................................................... 10 2. Institutional and implementation arrangements ..................................................................... 11 3. Monitoring and evaluation o f outcomes/results ..................................................................... 11 4. Sustainability .......................................................................................................................... 12 5. Critical risks and possible controversial aspects .................................................................... 12 6. Loadcredit conditions and covenants .................................................................................... 14 . D APPRAISAL SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 15 1. Economic and financial analyses .......................................................................................... -15 2. Technical ................................................................................................................................ 16 . . 3 . Fiduciary ................................................................................................................................. 16 4. Social ...................................................................................................................................... 17 5. Environment .......................................................................................................................... -18 6 . Safeguard policies .................................................................................................................... 19 20 7 . Policy Exceptions and Readiness ............................................................................................. .............................................................. Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the Bank and/or other Agencies ........... Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring.............................................................................. Annex 4: Detailed Project Description........................................................................................... Annex 5: Project Costs..................................................................................................................... Annex 6: ImplementationArrangements ...................................................................................... Annex 7: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements .......................................... Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements ........................................................................................... Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis................................................................................... Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues ................................................................................................. Annex 11: Project Preparation and Supervision........................................................................... Annex 12: Documents in the Project File ....................................................................................... Annex 13: Statement of Loans and Credits ................................................................................... Annex 14: Country at a Glance....................................................................................................... Annex 1: Country and Sector or Program Background MAP Clearead by IBRD 21 30 31 35 49 50 52 63 70 85 90 91 92 95 VIETNAM HO CHI MINH CITY INVESTMENT FUND FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HIFU) DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC EASUR Date: M a y 24,2007 Country Director: Martin Rama (Acting) Sector Director: Keshav Varma Project ID: P104848 Team Leader: Kamran M. Khan Sectors: Urban Development, Finance Themes: Municipal Finance Category: F I Safeguard Screening Category: Limited Impact For Loans Credits and Others: Total Bank Financing: (US$): 50 million Governmentlsub borrowers Contribution: U S $ 3 0 million BorrowerDXecipient 0.5 International 50.0 Development Association Private Sector 30.0 Contribution Total 80.5 Borrower: SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM 0.5 50,O 30.0 0.0 80.5 Responsible Agency: H o Chi Minh City Investment Fund for Urban Development (HIFU) Address: 33-39 Pasteur, District 1, Ho C h i Minh City, Vietnam Contact Person: Ms. N g o Kim Lien, General Director, HIFU Estimated disbursements (FY/US$m) FY FYO8 FYO9 FYlO Annual 5 7 15 Cumulative 5 12 27 Project implementation period: FY’08 - FY’12 Expected closing date: December 31,2012 Does the project depart from the CAS in content or other significant respects? Does the project require any exceptions from Bank policies? Have these been approved by Bank management? I s approval for any policy exception sought from the Board? FYll 15 42 [ ]Yes []Yes []Yes []Yes [X ] N o [XINO [ IN0 [XINO FY12 8 50 Does the project include any critical risks rated “substantial” or “high”? Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation? Project development objective: Refer PAD B.3 [XIYes [XIYes [ ] No [ ] No The project aims to develop HIFU as a model Local Development Investment Fund LDIF (in terms o f internal policy and procedures for financial policy, sub-project appraisal, social and environmental safeguards, and partnership with the private sector) and increase private sector participation in financing municipal infrastructure in H C M C Project description Refer PAD B.4 The project design envisages providing lending support as well as monitoring and implementation support. Both project components will be managed by HIFU Component 1: Investment Capital (US$ 80 million; IDA US$ 50 million) Component 2: Technical Assistance (US$ 0.5 million; IDA US$ 0 million) Which safeguard policies are triggered, if any? The project will not have any large scale or irreversible adverse environmental impacts. The project triggers the W o r l d Bank Safeguards Policies on Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) and Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12). The project i s classified as environment Category “FI”. Significant, non-standard conditions, if any?: None A. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE 1. Country and Sector Issues 1. The demand for municipal infrastructure in Vietnam i s increasing rapidly as the country copes with rapid urbanization, decentralization and high rates o f economic growth. There i s wide agreement that a significant investment gap exists vis-&vis municipal infrastructure demand. Domestic and international commentary on the investment climate in Vietnam i s beginning to increasingly cite the lack o f infrastructure in general and municipal infrastructure in particular as a key bottleneck to investment and economic growth. The heavy reliance on public budget i s an important reason for the slow pace o f infrastructure development. W h i l e Vietnam has utilized Official Development Assistance (ODA) very effectively over the last decade, the magnitude o f the infrastructure challenge in the fast growing Vietnamese economy makes i t unlikely that the traditional approach involving one ODA-funded infrastructure investment at a time will be sufficient. Vietnam has to consider alternative models for financing infrastructure. Specifically, establishment o f infrastructure finance models which involve local institutions and leverage private capital must be an important element o f Vietnam’s strategy to become a middle-income country. 2. The mismatch between the long-term financing needs o f infrastructure investment and the short-term deposits held by banks means that banks are not the ideal financing institutions for infrastructure. Vietnam’s financial sector i s currently dominated by five major state-owned commercial banks (SOCBs), accounting for about 80% o f the capital, lending and assets o f the banking system. Over the past decade the SOCBs have evolved from specialized policy-lending vehicles to more commercially oriented financial intermediaries. However, much more needs to be done to reform the banking sector before it can be appropriately utilized to finance urban infrastructure development. Infrastructure enterprises have to date not borrowed large amounts from the SOCBs, with the exception o f f i r m s in the transport sector. 3. Overall the market for bonds i s poised for significant development but important institutional reforms, addressing governance and transparency in particular, are required to permit this potential to be realized. The national Government has been working to develop the government bond market. I t plans to raise U S $ 4 billion by 2010 to be used mainly to finance infrastructure projects. At the provincial level, the first municipal bonds were issued by the H o Chi Minh City (HCMC) government in 2003, in the form o f a general obligation bond, raising U S $ 127 million. The rules for issuance o f municipal bonds are not yet clear, and they do not always provide the right incentives to the issuers. In particular, there i s a need to further strengthen disclosure rules for the public offerings. The stock o f sub-national government debt in Vietnam i s not currently a threat to fiscal stability, but plans for increased investment are likely to see sub-national debt increase significantly, requiring national oversight. 4. The challenges facing Vietnam vis-a-vis financing o f municipal infrastructure are further complicated by the following two important developments: The 0 Vietnam i s fast transitioning towards a decentralized governance model. responsibility for municipal infrastructure i s being devolved to the provincial governments which have limited budgetary resources, and suffer from a combination 0 o f weak institutional capacity and policy uncertainties which will affect the flow o f private CapitaVexpertise into municipal infrastructure development. In the near to medium term the private financial markets in Vietnam are unlikely to become adequately deep or broad to meet the fast growing municipal infrastructure financing demand. W h i l e the acute demand for financing calls for immediate public sector action, measures must be taken to ensure that actions taken in the interim period take into account the risk o f private sector crowding-out in the medium to long-term. 5. The Government o f Vietnam (GOV) has actively encouraged the provincial governments to take responsibility for financing municipal infrastructure. The 2001 Public Administration Reform Master Program (for 2001-2010) lays the groundwork for putting in place the regulations on decentralization o f administrative management and fiscal functions. The two most significant components o f the emerging municipal finance framework include permission to the provincial governments to: (i) establish Local Development Investment Funds (LDIFs), and (ii) borrow up to 30% o f their annual state budget for development investments - H o Chi Minh City (HCMC) and Hanoi are allowed to borrow up to 100% o f annual budget - through revenue or general obligation bonds. LDIFs allow the provincial governments to mobilize capital and enter into contracts with the private sector for the development o f municipal infrastructure. The reliance o f provincial governments o n LDIFs i s increasing very substantially as the decentralization process continues in Vietnam. HIFU was the first LDIF established in June 1996. Since then, twelve other provincial governments have established LDIFs with the approval and support o f the GOV. HIFU remains by far the most financially viable and operationally successfbl LDIF in Vietnam. 6. The LDIFs are expected to operate as commercial-oriented entities, raising private capital and investing in municipal infrastructure projects which offer cost recovery. In 2004 the total charter capital o f LDIFs in Vietnam was approximately US$ 300 million; in 2006 it i s estimated to be approximately $400 million, with the top-seven LDIFs investing approximately U S $ 100 million per year which accounts for an investment increase o f 118% for these funds over the 2002 level. The LDIFs currently also engage in short-term borrowing on a roll-over basis from SOCBs and other SOEs. Hence, possible mismanagement o f LDIFs carries the risk o f decreasing investment efficiency in municipal infrastructure, increasing the contingent liabilities o f the GOV, and undermining financial market development. There i s acceptance at the highest levels in the GOV that i t i s critical that HIFU- the most advanced and leading LDIF - adopts an operational model which can be replicated in the other LDIFs. 7. HIFU has a strong financial position, including a very l o w Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio and excellent profitability and balance sheet strength (see Annex 9 for details). HIFU i s in the initial stages o f corporatization, and significant progress made to date vis-a-vis corporate governance includes: 0 HIFU operates under a legally binding Credit Statute o f the H C M C government that mandates investment analysis to ensure cost recovery, and provides guidelines for investment monitoring and workouts when necessary. 0 HIFU has a well developed internal appraisal and investment monitoring system, and the decision making authority rests with HIFU staff. 2 HIFU prices i t s loans at market rates, and has an excellent track record o f investing in cost recovery oriented infrastructure projects in partnership with the private sector. 0 HIFU maintains annual audited financial statements which are based on the accepted accounting standards used by corporations in Vietnam. The financial statements provide reasonably reliable data on the financial performance and portfolio quality. 0 HIFU is financially self sufficient and does not require any operational budget support from the provincial government. 0 Majority o f HIFU staff are hired on private contracts, i.e., they are not provincial government employees. HIFU has a proven track record o f building major infrastructure projects - including toll roads and a major B O T project in the water sector - in H C M C which are currently operating on a financially viable basis and providing infrastructure services to H C M C residents. Finally, HIFU has been selected based on a comprehensive qualification criteria developed to establish a model for the participation o f other LDIFs in anticipated future World Bank programs. 8. The successful performance o f HIFU in financing municipal infrastructure is also a critical national priority because H C M C is the largest city in Vietnam and a major industrial and commercial center with a population o f 6 million. It i s a Category 1 city reporting directly to the Central Government. The city has been in the forefront o f the transition initiated by the economic reform “Open door” and “Renovation” policies which have led to unprecedented growth for the country, particularly in the industrial sector. The growth has been most pronounced in HCMC, which accounts for 35-40 percent o f the national GDP. The annual growth rate o f the H C M C urban population is between 5-7 percent with the population in 2020 expected to equal approximately 10 million residents. The increase in urban population and continued economic growth i s putting increased pressure on the urban services o f the city. For example, i t was recently reported (Vietnam News, 15 January 2007) that there has been an annual increase in the use o f public transport in H C M C o f around 20 percent. The urban areas face similar problems in other sectors such as water, education and health. It i s estimated that H C M C needs to invest approximately $3 billion annually to meet the current infrastructure demand. 2. Rationale for Bank involvement 9. The Bank’s infrastructure strategy involves engagements which focus on improvement o f sector policies, provision o f public/ODA funds for critically needed municipal infrastructure, and establishment o f models which can support the increase o f private sector participation in infrastructure delivery. 10. The Bank’s response to the GOV request for assistance to LDIFs included AAA and an operational program. The AAA completed in 2005 produced a detailed Briefing Paper which highlighted the relevant policy and operational issues involved in the development o f LDIFs. The AAA established the Bank as the primary advisor to the government and confirmed the commitment o f the G O V and key provincial governments to the reform and development o f LDIFs. 3 The planned sequence o f World Bank Group (WBG) engagement with LDIFs will 11. follow the below described proposed outline for the long-term development o f LDIFs. Stage I Stage II Stage 111 12. The Bank's operational engagement regarding the LDIFs involves helping the G O V establish national policy and regulatory framework to support the development o f LDIFs, develop a model LDIF vis-&vis operational standards and investment efficiency, and provide credit to "Qualified" LDIFs. IDA financing will be used in the initial stage o f the engagement because i t can contribute to make municipal infrastructure more available and affordable to beneficiaries, Le., IDA financing i s expected to address the failure o f the financial market to provide long-term financing for infrastructure investment. With its financing IDA also brings technical expertise to support the operational reforms in HIFU. Finally, the Bank's operational engagement with HIFU at this stage will provide a platform for other donors interested in scaling-up their financial support to LDIFs based on the lessons learned from the project. 13. The HIFU Development Project (HDP) i s a split operation o f the national project called Local Development Investment Funds Project (LDIFP). The LDIFP which focuses on national policy and targets all LDIFs is currently under preparation for an expected delivery in late FY08. The Bank has agreed to support the G O V request to proceed in FY07 with a project (HDP) focused exclusively on HIFU because HIFU is ready to start executing a pipeline o f projects in 2007, and HIFU Management and the H C M C Peoples' Committee (HCMC PC) have committed to adopt the LDIF internal policy and operational reform measures which have been prepared under the LDIFP. Proceeding more rapidly with a targeted support to HIFU i s in line with the incentive framework envisaged under the LDIFP. The LDIFP remains a high priority for the Bank and the GOV because i t will provide the policy and institutional framework and the necessary technical assistance which is critical to the long-term development o f HIFU and other LDIFs. 14. WBG strategic aim o f operational engagement in the particular case o f HDP i s to establish a road map for the LDIFs to become independent, competent and professional infrastructure financing agencies which can leverage private capital in infrastructure without distorting the market or creating contingent liabilities for the provincial and central 4 government. This will require a long-term operational engagement and utilization o f multiple instruments available to the WBG in three stages. 15. Stage One. The provision o f a relatively small IDA credit to HIFU i s the first, modest step. The strategic approach via the IDA credit to HIFU i s to: (a) alleviate the need for HIFU to rely upon short-term borrowing to finance long-term infrastructure investments; (b) increase the affordability o f municipal infrastructure to the citizens by providing long-term financing which i s currently not available in Vietnam; and (c) help HIFU establish the appropriate systems and procedures to build a track record, including the rules o f the game for partnering with the private sector, which can form the basis for HLFU’s future borrowing from the market via bank loans or bonds. The identified and agreed role o f I F C in this engagement i s to work with HIFU to co-finance some o f the investments which are identified in the H D P subproject pipeline. The strengthening o f the internal systems and institutional capacity o f HIFUwill also solidify and further expand the corporatization o f HIFU from the municipal government structure. Indeed, the H C M C PC has repeatedly confirmed that improvement o f HIFU’s institutional capacity will be the strongest impetus for instituting additional corporate governance reforms, i.e., the level of independence which HIFU can obtain depends upon continued improvement in HIFU’s professional competence. The operational association with and provision o f technical assistance from the WBG will further improve HIFU’s institutional capacity. 16. Stage Two. The issuance o f an international standard, credit-based HIFU Bond will be the most positive demonstration o f HIFU’s professional competence. The success o f the H D P and continued progress o f LDLFP and national policy framework will be critical to prepare HIFU (and the M O F as the regulator) for a “HIFU Bond” in the near future. The next phase o f direct operational engagement o f the WBG with HIFU will therefore likely involve credit enhancement o f a HIFU Bond or a credit based borrowing via the Subnational Finance Program o f WB/IFC. It has been discussed with HIFU that during the implementation o f the HDP the task team will initiate discussions with a global credit rating agency to help prepare HIFU for a credit rating. Stage Three. The third stage o f WBG engagement with HIFU will probably be 17. through I F C and MEGA. It is anticipated that in State Three more private players will be active in the infrastructure finance market and HIFU will be transitioning towards it stated long-term role involving secondary market functions, such as securitization. 18. The Bank’s technical and operational approach to HIFU and LDIFs is based o n substantial international experience in developing municipalhfrastructure finance systems around the world. The task team has conducted a detailed review o f all the relevant and comparable models pursued in the developed and developing countries. These experiences are described in detail in the AAA report o f LDIFs. The task team has worked closely with staff in FSPSD, PREM and the I F C to explore the avenues for the Bank’s operational engagement with LDIFs before finalizing the approach which i s outlined in this PAD. The task team has also employed the Bank’s knowledge tools to safeguard against possible adverse cross-sector policy impacts, particularly on financial market development (please see page 36 for details). Finally, the task team includes global experts in municipalhfrastructure finance as well as senior staff who fully understand the technical issues and have an excellent understanding o f the Vietnamese context. 5 3. Higher level objectives to which the project contributes 19. A financially viable and sustainable HIFU will contribute significantly to reducing the municipal infrastructure financing gap in the most economically important province in Vietnam. Establishment o f HIFU as a successful model o f a financially sound, competent and professionally independent institution will also contribute towards the development o f other LDIFs in the country. Once HIFU has gained legitimacy vis-a-vis i t s role o f efficiently and effectively mobilizing and managing infrastructure financing hnds - both public and O D A - i t can at a later stage begin to leverage such competence towards mobilizing significant private funds, both at the project level (the existing model) and also at the funds’ equity capital and on-balance sheet debt level. This in turn i s expected to bring about a significant increase in the current level o f private sector capital leverage, and hence, will contribute significantly to reducing the municipal infrastructure financing gap. 20. The Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) for Vietnam for the period 2007-2011 recognizes the development o f a vibrant capital market to support the financing o f infrastructure in particular as an essential element in the reform o f the financial system under i t s first pillar focused on improving the business environment. Under this pillar, i t also emphasizes that making further progress in infrastructure development requires diversijjing funding sources and improving transparency in resource mobilization, notably at the local level. In this context, the increase in private share o f total financing o f infrastructure i s one o f the selected outcomes to which the CPS is expected to contribute, notably through the development o f municipal financial markets and non-subsidized lending facilities in selected jurisdictions and H C M C in particular. The HIFU Development Project is instrumental for such results to be achieved. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Lending instrument 21. The proposed instrument is a Financial Intermediary Loan (FIL) because i t i s the most appropriate instrument for addressing the systemic issues associated with the channeling o f funds for municipal infrastructure. The wholesale approach supported under the project makes the Specific Investment Loan (SIL) instrument less relevant. Similarly, a Development Policy Lending (DPL) would not have provided the appropriate platform for a long term engagement which i s capable of: (a) strengthening the institutional capacity o f HIFU and (b) providing the necessary detailed operational advice to HIFU. 2. Project development objective and key indicators 22. The Project Development Objective is to develop HIFU as a model LDIF (in terms o f internal policy and procedures for financial policy, sub-project appraisal, social and environmental safeguards, and partnership with the private sector) and increase private sector participation in financing municipal infrastructure in HCMC. 0 Evidence that private sector participation in financing municipal infrastructure in H C M C i s improving will be measured by the increase in total number and amount o f HIFU investment (debt and equity) per year in municipal infrastructure projects with private sector involvement, as well as by the improvement in the leverage ratio (new 6 0 private capital / HIFU direct investment) in municipal infrastructure projects per year. Evidence that HIFU performs as a model LDIF will be measured by i t s continued compliance with the Financial Covenants, as well as by i t s adherence to the Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) and Private Sector Partners (PSP) selection manuals. The satisfactory adherence o f projects funded by the line o f credit to these manuals will be a major institutional development; the Bank and HIFU will also assess the extent to which they are progressively used for other HIFU investments, and regularly review lessons to be drawn from implementation, so as to help streamline them in HIFUportfolio. 3. Project components Component 1: Investment Capital (US$80 million; IDA US$50 million) 23. A line o f credit will be provided to HIFU to invest in cost recovery oriented municipal infrastructure investments in partnership with the private sector. A Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) Manual governs how the HIFUinvestments under the line o f credit will be identified, developed and appraised. A Private Sector Partner (PSP) selection Manual describes the way private sector participants will be selected in Project Enterprises financed under the line o f credit. 24. HIFU will work with the Department o f Planning and Investment (DPI) and other departments within the provincial government to identify investment needs in HCMC, as described in H C M C master plan, which can be financed via public private partnerships. HIFU will then work with the city departments to put in place effective project structures and then invite private investors to participate in the projects. A pipeline o f projects has been identified and confirms that HIFU can absorb the 25. investment capital which i s being made available via the project. Two sub-projects to be financed in year one o f project implementation have been appraised. Component 2: Technical Assistance (US$0.5 million; IDA US$ 0 million) 26. HIFU will finance the technical assistance to support the implementation o f support to implement the PPA manual with on-the-job operational reforms, including: (i) chief advisor and technical specialist, as well as a social specialist and an environment specialist; (ii)support to implement the PSP manual with on-the-job chief advisor and private sector specialist; (iii)independent monitoring consultants for social and environmental safeguards policies; and (iv) Financial Audits o f HIFU to International Auditing Standards. 27. Detailed set o f Terms o f Reference (TOR) for technical assistance consultants have been prepared. The package o f TORs and the associated procurement plan has been reviewed and approved by the H C M C PC as part o f the final H D P project approval. The H C M C PC approval makes the implementation o f the procurement plan, including the utilization o f an estimated $0.5 million HIFU capital for the assigned objective o f recruiting international and local consultants in accordance with the TORs, a firm and official mandate for HIFU. In order to ensure timely mobilization o f key consultants, the mobilization o f consultants under three (3) o f the most critical TORs - including the TOR 7 for independent auditors to ensure compliance with safeguards policies - has been established as a Condition o f Loan Effectiveness. 28. The technical assistance will contribute to the institutional development o f HIFU. Specifically, it will build upon the current practices o f HIFU and develop capacity in HIFU to implement the PPA and the PSP manuals. The long-term institutional development plans have been prepared in consultation with the Bank and are documented in the two manuals. The capacity building o f HIFU is a part o f a broader initiative which involves AFD, USTDA, the World Bank and other donors. The Bank team has worked very closely with U S T D A to scope, prepare and provide capacity building technical assistance to HIFU. The phase one (approximately $300,000) o f the U S T D A technical assistance was concluded in 2006. The planned phase I1to focus on internal operations i s currently being reviewed by USTDA management. Similarly, AFD has approved a technical assistance package o f approximately Euros 1.5 million which will provide significant technical assistance and training to HIFU and its borrowers in financial management and other operational functions. The technical assistance provided by AFD and U S T D A complements the IDA credit and the associated HIFU-financed technical assistance. Further details o f the Bank’s partnership strategy vis-&vis the development o f LDIFs is described on section C. 1. 4. Lessons learned and reflected in the project design 29. Slow Disbursement in infrastructure portfolio. The disbursement level o f ODAfinanced investment portfolio in Vietnam, notably vis-&vis infrastructure projects, has remained slow for many years. In reviewing the problems associated with slow disbursements, the Government and the Bank agreed, inter alia, on the need to explore new models o f doing business which are in line with the current decentralization process, and involve select local institutions-“islands o f competence” - which are performing in an efficient and professional manner. HIFU has so far been relatively successful in leveraging private investment in infrastructure in H C M C and building operational infrastructure projects (e.g., toll roads and water BOTS). Moreover, HIFU involvement has helped to improve the efficiency o f projects implemented through the H C M C line departments. HIFU also has an excellent funds disbursement record, completing projects in significantly shorter time frames than traditional investment projects. The decision o f the H C M C P C to use HIFU as the lead implementing agency i s therefore fully supported by the Bank. 30. Financial Intermediary Lending. The Independent Evaluations Group (IEG) review o f Bank Line o f Credit (LOC) operations under OP 8.30 rules for Financial Intermediary lending identified the need for a sound analysis o f the financial intermediaries by the Bank. The Bank has conducted a detailed due diligence o f the financial operations o f HIFU, first in the context o f a detailed AAA which was completed in FY05, and more recently through a consulting assignment with an international accounting firm. The analysis confirms that HIFU has a strong financial position. The Bank has appraised HIFU’s financial viability vis-a-vis i t s investment practices: for example, it prices loans at market rates and invests in cost recovery oriented infrastructure in partnership with the private sector. Specific financial covenants governing its financial policy have also been put in place to further strengthen HIFU’s financial position. Other elements o f project design which address the risks identified by the IEG report include: 8 HIFU maintains annual audited financial statements, which provide reasonably reliable data on financial performance and portfolio quality. HIFU Management has agreed to switch to International Audit Standards. Strict and comprehensive qualification criteria have been applied to select HIFU, with a view to establish a model for the participation o f other LDIFs in Bank programs under the LDIFP. A review has been conducted to analyze HIFU projects pipeline and i t s implementation track-record to confirm that HIFU has the capacity to invest and manage the IDA credit. The MOF will on-lend the funds to HIFU in Vietnam Dong (VND), which will protect HIFU against any fluctuation in the VND foreign exchange rate. The foreign exchange hedging cost as well as the IDA commitment fee i s fully priced in the on-lending rate charged by the M O F to HIFU as required under current Vietnamese regulations governing ODA. In addition, the MOF on-lending terms do not present a disadvantageous maturity mismatch for the MOF. HIFU charges market (positive real) interest rates on its loans, and i t s target ROE on equity investments are based on a risk free treasury rate plus a margin. Comprehensive operational frameworks have been established in the form o f Project Preparation and Appraisal Manual and the Private Sector Participant Selection Manual. The framework has been developed in close collaboration with HIFU, Department o f Planning and Investment, Department o f Finance, and other city departments. The manuals have been reviewed and approved by the H C M C PC. HIFU will implement the framework with the help o f international on-the-job consultant advisors and specialists, which will develop HIFU’s operational capacity and further reduce project risk. 31. Link to National Policy. The Bank experience in Vietnam and around the world indicates that the results o f projects can be maximized if they are linked to andor are supported by a broader national policy framework. The H D P i s linked to a national program and a Bank strategy for engaging with LDIFs in Vietnam which has been established over a period o f 2-3 years. 32. Government Ownership. Previous Bank-financed infrastructure funds point to the importance o f a strong and consistent government ownership. The H D P i s well anchored because o f the LDIFP and the deep history o f government ownership o f the Bankrecommended LDIF reform agenda dating back to 2004. The project has been endorsed by the MOF, M P I and other relevant GOV agencies. The commitment o f the H C M C PC i s also strong and it has been confirmed with the issuance o f the official H C M C PC Decision approving the project and the conditions relating to the internal policy o f HIFU. 5. Alternatives considered and reasons for rejection Establishing a National Municipal Development Fund. Creating one fund at the 33. national level was initially considered as it was deemed to reinforce the Bank’s focus on the wholesale model. However, there were concerns that a national fund: (i) might not adequately support the decentralization objectives o f the G O V which has devolved the responsibility o f financing and managing municipal infrastructure to the provincial governments; (ii) would reduce the buy-in from Provincial People’s Committee; (iii) would fail to leverage the operational track record already established by successful LDIFs such as HIFU; (iv) would result in more cumbersome decision making processes involving 9 many central government entities; and (v) i s less effective than decentralized institutions to identify high quality cost-recovery projects. 34. Providing a Wholesale Guarantee Facility. Providing a wholesale guarantee facility aimed at decreasing the cost and extending the maturity o f loans provided for infrastructure projects in Vietnam was considered as an alternative to directly supporting the LDIFs. However, given that the problem in Vietnam i s both one o f access to long-term financing as well as that o f identification and preparation o f financially viable projects, i t was decided that providing long-term financing and detailed technical assistance on operational reforms to qualified LDIFs would help achieve such objective more effectively. Moreover, direct support to the LDIFs would also allow the Bank to pursue other developmental objectives such as corporate governance and social and environmental sustainability, which would be much harder to accomplish under the wholesale guarantee facility model. Accordingly, i t was agreed that the wholesale guarantee facility model may be pursued at a future stage as an appropriate extension o f the current operational approach. 35. Relying on the WB-IFC Sub-national Finance Program. This option was initially considered in coordination with IFC and was eventually disregarded because: (i) being exclusively transaction oriented, i t would not provide the right entry point to provide the required long-term policy advice and technical assistance to HIFU; and (ii) being more expensive, i t would most likely have affected the affordability o f the municipal infrastructures financed by the project. C. IMPLEMENTATION 1. Partnership arrangements 36. W h i l e the project does not involve any formal co-financing, it i s very central to the engagement o f other donors. Since the LDIFs present a promising model for financing municipal infrastructure in Vietnam, the donors are all very keen to work with LDIFs. The Bank’s AAA on LDIFs i s widely regarded as the most in-depth analytical analysis o f the policy and operational issues associated with the development o f LDIFs, and i t has been shared very broadly with all interested donors. The donors are very interested in replicating the frameworks (e.g., manuals, financial covenants, safeguards standards) which are being prepared under the H D P in their engagements with the LDIFs. The coordination on capacity building technical assistance for HIFU has also been very strong. The HDP and the associated technical assistance very closely complements the technical assistance programs financed by United States Trade and Development Agency (USTDA) and Agence Franqaise de DCveloppement (AFD) in particular. AFD Technical Assistance Project aims to improve HIFU’s internal management capacities and to improve the operating and financial management skills o f managers engaged on projects financed under AFD Credit Facility - a Euro 30 million line o f credit for HIFU targeted at health, education, housing and environment projects. USTDA has conducted a review o f the performance o f HIFU’s activities, which has been useful for the identification and preparation o f HDP. A follow-on capacity building program i s planned by USTDA. Other donors have also expressed interest in engaging with HIFU and possibly other LDIFs through the platform provided by H D P and LDIFP, building on lessons learned from these projects. Finally, IFC has expressed a very strong interest in financing investments (subprojects) in partnership with HIFU, and plans to review the HIFU subproject pipeline 10 to possibly announce a formal commitment to finance 3-4 projects in year 2-3 o f H D P implementation. 2. Institutional and implementation arrangements 37. The implementing agency for the H D P will be HIFU as it institutes key operational reforms and undertakes investments in municipal infrastructure with private sector involvement. The implementation structure mirrors the current system and role o f HIFU, with the HDP further enhancing and developing the function o f HIFU. HIFU operates as a specialized agency within the municipal government, working with the Department o f Planning and Investment (DPI) and other line departments in the municipal government. The DPI as the planning agency for the province identifies the investment needs as well as project ideas, including those which can be financed with private sector participation. The DPI in collaboration with the H C M C PC then assigns the investment targets and project ideas to the concerned line departments. The line departments prepare the technical details o f the projects and consult with HIFU on the financial structuring with a view to involve private sector. The Department o f Finance - o n behalf o f the H C M C P C - will work with HIFU to ensure that an appropriate process i s used to select private sector partners and provide oversight on the financial operations o f HIFU. 38. The IDA credit will be on-lent by the MOF to HIFU in VND on terms which are stipulated in Decree 134 and detailed in MOF decision No. 3936 dated March 22, 2007. The equity or paid-in capital o f HIFU (referred to in Vietnam as charter capital) i s provided by the HCMC-PC. HIFU will invest the investment capital provided under the project according to the loan conditions which restrict the investment to cost-recovery municipal infrastructure and define the sectors o f focus. The key financial covenants cover the whole financial operation o f HIFU (not restricted to IDA credit) to ensure the financial and operational viability o f HIFU as an institution. The project conditions will help to further support HIFU’s qualification under Bank OP 8.30. The disbursements to HIFU will be based on a 6-months report based system, which will require HIFU to document how the funds received based on the previous report were utilized, and describe how the h n d s requested for the next period will be used. 3. Monitoring and evaluation o f outcomes/results 39. A comprehensive monitoring system has been established in close collaboration with HIFU to monitor and evaluate the project activities and operations leading to the project objectives. The monitoring system has four components: 1. HIFU internal system will provide the baseline data and report on results as follows: HIFU Department o f Planning and Promotion will collect information on the indicators for private sector involvement and o n private sector partner selection; and HIFU Department o f Appraisal will collect information about the progress made in implementing the Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) manual. 2. Quarterly unaudited financial statements will be provided by HIFU to the Bank; Yearly audit report o f the financial statements-prepared by an independent auditor to conduct international standard financial audits-will be provided to the Bank within six months after the end o f HIFU fiscal year. 3. Independent consultants will monitor the compliance o f each sub-project with the social and environmental safeguards requirements. 11 4. Bank Supervision Team (with support from a contract with an international accounting firm in conducting financial assessment o f HIFU) will conduct periodic reviews of un-audited quarterly as well as review o f the annual audited financial statements to ensure compliance with the financial covenants and the achievement o f operational reform milestones (subproject appraisal system and framework for the selection o f private sector partners). Project Review. All project information will be compiled by HIFU management 40. and discussed with the HCMC-PC and the Bank in a workshop to be held every six months. The workshop will provide an opportunity to discuss project progress and any outstanding issues, including the need to refine or adjust any project components. The operational and institutional framework (PPA and PSP manuals) will be reviewed at least once every year by HIFU and the PC and discussed with the Bank during the six monthly reviews. The manuals may be amended by a resolution o f the PC, provided the written agreement o f the Bank is obtained before the amendment is approved by the PC. 4. Sustainability 41. The development o f LDIFs in general and HIFU in particular i s an important priority for the GOV, for which it has consistently sought Bank assistance. HDP and the upcoming LDIFP should therefore be seen as a coherent and phased support to the LDIF framework for which there i s strong commitment at the central and provincial government. This series o f projects i s also closely linked to the Bank’s policy dialogue with the GOV in the context o f the Poverty Reduction Support Credit (PRSC) process, and specific central government actions aimed at improving the legal and administrative structure for LDIF operations were included in the conditions o f PRSCS. Furthermore, the project activities will be closely coordinated with the work o f the Bank’s Financial and Private Sector Development team in Vietnam with regard to the development o f regulatory framework for the domestic debt market and the GOV contingent liability management. 42. The project i s expected to have negligible fiscal impact on all parties involved, including HIFU, H C M C government, and the GOV. The GOV is undertaking this project under an on-lending arrangement with terms that cover the foreign exchange hedging cost as well as the cost o f processing the loan. The loan will be repaid by HIFU. The H C M C PC does not need to provide any additional capital to HIFU, which i s fully able to cover all i t s operating expenses with i t s own income. HIFU has been operating very successfblly over the last ten years. The financial analysis demonstrates that HIFU can recover all i t s operating costs (including staff salaries) and make a profit from i t s investments. The cost recovery orientation o f the project also provides an opportunity to HIFU to take advantage o f the project reflows as loans are repaid and HIFU exits out o f equity investments. I t i s anticipated that HIFU will continue to use the operational framework which i s being established under HDP to invest the reflow proceeds. The capital investment risk will be addressed through the covenants o f this project. LDIFP will also help establish a national policy framework to fbrther reduce finance risk. 5. Critical risks and possible controversial aspects 43. Because o f the innovative nature o f the wholesale approach supported by the project, the new features introduced in the management o f LDIF and the lack o f operational experience in Vietnam in this regard, the project inevitably carries substantial risks. By 12 focusing o n the best performing LDF (HIFU) the associated risk i s somewhat mitigated. Furthermore, a clear delineation o f Bank responsibility in this Financial Intermediary (FI) operation has been agreed upon, which mitigates the main reputational risks for the Bank. Risks Inadequate Financial Performance of HIFU HIFU i s reluctant to mainstream the manual Poor compliance with Env. and Social Safeguards HIFU operations crowding out the private sector Mismanagement o f HIFU as a result o f overcapitalization Slow preparation and implementation o f projects L o w capacity o f HIFU t o implement the n e w manuals Delays in the mobilization o f the TA Overall Risk Rating Risk Mitigation Measures Due diligence o f HIFU’s financial operations for eligibility under OP8.30 concludes that current financial position o f HIFU i s sound. Agreement o n clear and achievable financial covenants and associated TA will help enhance HIFU’s financial viability 0 Quarterly un-audited financial statements will b e provided by HIFU to the Bank; Yearly audit report o f the financial statements-prepared by an independent auditor t o conduct international standard financial audits-will be provided to the Bank after the end o f HIFU fiscal year 0 Reports-based disbursement program which w i l l allow the Bank t o monitor the use o f funds over the previous six months as w e l l as assess the anticipated need for capital over the coming six months TA is provided under component 2 t o help implement the manuals 0 Progress in implementing the PPA and PSP manuals will b e reviewed twice a year by HIFU and the P C in conjunction with the B a n k 0 The manuals prepared with participation o f HIFU, Line Departments and P C 0 TA is provided under component 2 to help implement the provisions o f Annexes of the P P A manual o n Environment and Social safeguards. 0 Independent monitors will be recruited to monitor each subproject 0 Prior review o f category A projects crowding out private funds is negligible in the short-run, specific l i m i t s o n HIFU participation have been set. 0 PSP manual implemented t o make the private sector participant selection transparent and efficient 0 The investment eligibility criteria i s provided in the internal investment policy, which i s part o f the operational reform package 0 Independent audits and evaluations will monitor HIFU performance 0 Clear financial covenants monitored under Bank supervision via an international accounting firm o n contract to the Bank 0 Identification o f a robust project pipeline with detailed description o f projects 0 The wholesale approach, combined with HIFU’s excellent disbursement record, in the project design mitigates the risk o f slow disbursements Private sector involvement i s expected further to enhance HIFU performance The TA component i s specifically targeted at strengthening the relevant capacity. This is recognized an area o f substantial risk requiring a sound monitoring system 0 International and technical consultants t o provide on-the-job advice and training t o HIFU staff over the first 3-years o f project implementation 0 Six month review to review and discuss implementation progress with HIFU and the HCMC P C The six TORSpackage for Technical Assistance prepared and approved along with the Procurement Plan by the HIFU Board o f Management. Mobilization o f three k e y consultant a condition for effectiveness; RFPs expected t o be issued by Board approval Risk Rating & Mitigation M S S N S M S M S Risk Rating - H (Hi h Risk), S (Substantial Risk), M (Modest Risk), N (Negligible or Low Risk) 13 6. Loadcredit conditions and covenants 44. 0 0 45. 0 0 46. Credit Conditions The G O V through MOF will make the IDA credit available to HIFU under subsidiary agreement which will (i) protect the interests o f IDA, (ii) meet the project objectives, and (iii) include provisions for the repayment o f the principal, interest, and applicable commitment fee associated with the IDA credit. HIFU and H C M C PC through HIFU will ensure the compliance o f the credit conditions by HIFU which include but are not limited to (i) investment o f credit proceeds in the form o f loans or equity in cost recovery oriented municipal infrastructure projects in partnership with the private sector; (ii) compliance with the provisions o f the manuals for project preparation and appraisal and private sector partner selection (iii) recruitment o f consultants to implement the project according to the five Terms o f Reference (TORs) which have been agreed with the Bank; (iv) compliance with requirements regarding environmental protection and social safeguards and ensuring the sub-project enterprises comply and implement the same; (v) maintenance o f a financial management system and records and accounts adequate to reflect expenditures in respect to the sub-projects, and provision o f reports o f the same to the Bank; (vi) provision o f financial statements which have been audited by independent auditors and are in line with international audit standards; (vii) organization o f semi-annual reviews with Bank and H C M C PC to evaluate the progress o f the project with respect to implementation. Project Effectiveness Conditions Execution o f the Subsidiary Agreement between the G O V and HIFU - copy o f the signed Subsidiary Agreement; and Engagement of: (i) an independent monitoring consultant for social safeguards; (ii) an independent monitoring consultant for environmental safeguards; and (iii) a consulting firm in respect o f the implementation o f the Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) Manual - copies o f the contract between HIFU and such consultants and consulting firms, together with their respective TORs. Financial Covenants HIFU has a sound financial position, and maintaining i t s financial viability i s a critical priority o f HDP. The financial covenants o f the HDP are critical for the future development o f HIFU, as the record o f financial discipline will allow HIFU to raise capital from the market and substantially increase i t s investment scale. The following financial covenants have been agreed: 14 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 FINANCIAL COVENANTS’ Aggregate equity investments shall not exceed 50 percent o f the total amount o f the Fund’s paid in equity capital. The Fund’s debt-to-equity capitalization ratio (Le. Leverage) shall not exceed 3:1, where debt means all debt liabilities plus contingent liabilities and equity means paid in equity capital plus retained earnings and reserves not allocated to cover specific liabilities. Liquid Assets shall be sufficient to cover projected Fund operating expenses over the subsequent 18 months. Total investment (debt and/or equity) in a single obligor shall not exceed 15 percent o f total find capital (including debt and equity). In all HIFU investments involving H D P proceeds, HIFU will not take greater than 30% ownership (equityldirect investment) in a Project Enterprise In all HIFU investments involving H D P proceeds, the debt to equity ratio will not exceed 3: 1. Specifically, debt will not be greater than % o f the total financing o f the subproject APPLICABILITY Applies to all HIFU operations Applies to all HIFU operations Applies to all HIFU operations Ann1i-a tn 011 U T C U Applies to the use o f IDA proceeds only Applies to the use o f IDA proceeds only D. APPRAISAL SUMMARY 1. Economic and financial analyses 47. The detailed due diligence o f HIFU financial accounts was conducted to determine the financial viability o f HIFU as a potential Bank partner vis-&-vis a Financial Intermediary Loan. The analysis reviewed the quality o f HIFU loan portfolio, including the level o f non-performing loans and a detailed review o f randomly selected loans to determine loan rates and repayment quality. The equity investments o f HIFU were also analyzed to determine HIFU’s exposure vis-Bvis industry and investment instrument. The key equity investments were identified and reviewed to determine asset quality. The Income Statement was analyzed v i s - h i s profitability and operational efficiency. Finally, the investments in portfolio companies (non-infrastructure investments) account for a significantly minor proportion o f total fund assets and therefore present limit exposure to market fluctuations. The analysis confirmed that HIFU i s in a strong financial position (details are in Annex 9). 48. The project will significantly improve the financial sustainability o f HIFU and reduce the risk i t may present to financial market development due to inappropriate borrowing practices involving short-term roll-over debt. Also, the project will not add any additional cost to H C M C fiscal position but will help H C M C government to protect i t s ’ The GOV has issued a draft decree o n Institution and Operation o f LDIFs, which specifically addresses covenants 2 and 4. These two covenants, as stipulated above, are consistent with the Bank’s technical advice to the GOV. The task team has agreed with HIFU and HCMC PC that during implementation, covenants 2 and 4 can be adjusted in line with the final, approved stipulation o f the GOV Decree as part o f the six monthly review o f a l l H D P conditions which i s described in t h i s PAD. 15 investments in HIFU (in the form o f charter capital or equity) by improving the financial sustainability o f HIFU operations, and attracting private capital in the development of municipal infrastructure. 2. Technical 49. HIFU will use the IDA credit to invest in cost recovery oriented municipal infrastructure investments in partnership with the private sector. A pipeline o f projects has been identified, and it confirms that HIFU can absorb the investment capital which i s being made available via the project. Two sub-projects to be financed in year one o f project implementation have been appraised successfully. Details o f the appraisal are in the project files, and a summary i s provided in Annex 4. 3. Fiduciary Financial Management 50. The inherent risk to the project from the financial environment i s assessed as moderate and the project control risk i s assessed as l o w with the mitigation measures. The overall financial management risk i s assessed as Low. 51. The financial management function o f HIFU i s well established, and it i s adequately staffed with personnel with satisfactory competence and qualifications. The accountants have educational background in accounting (at least bachelor degree) and experience in managing the operations o f the Fund, The internal control procedures are in place and effectively maintained. However, improvement on Risk Management and I T systems is required which will be supported by the Technical Assistance under the project and/or in collaboration with the Technical Assistance provided by AFD and other donors. The current Accounting and Reporting system is assessed as adequate for accounting and reporting on the receipt and use o f funds from IDA, but needs further enhancement to better serve the management o f Fund’s operations in the future. These enhancements will be implementedwith the support o f the Technical Assistance provided under the LDIFP. 52. The financial management personnel do not have experience with IDA funded projects, in particular, disbursement procedures and IDA reporting requirements. Training on these therefore was delivered to those involved in the project financial management by the Bank Financial Management Specialist. Procurement Procurement capacity. Procurement under the proposed project would be carried 53. out by HIFU (consultant services under component 2 self-financed by HIFU) and the private sector/public sector autonomous commercial f i r m s who would receive financing from HIFU (in the form o f loans and / or equity investment). The Bank team has done an assessment o f the procurement capacity o f HIFU and the first two potential borrowers of HIFU loans, namely West Bus Terminal Co. and Hoa Binh Waste Treatment Co. Ltd. The summary o f this assessment i s provided in Annex 8. The procurement risk o f the proposed project i s rated ‘medium’. To mitigate the risk and strengthen the implementing agency’s procurement capacity, specific actions summarized in Annex 8 are proposed. These actions have been discussed and agreed with the Borrower. 16 54. Procurement Arrangements. Procurement for the proposed project would be carried out in accordance with the World Bank’s “Guidelines: Procurement Under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits ” dated M a y 2004, revised October 1, 2006; and “Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers ” dated M a y 2004, revised October 1, 2006, and the provisions stipulated in the Credit Agreement. General arrangements o f the project procurement, Procurement Plan and Bank review are discussed in Annex 8. Anti-corruption 55. The main corruption risk under the project stems from the selection by HIFU o f i t s private sector partners. As one o f the key reforms supported by the project, a Private Sector Partner (PSP) selection manual has been prepared to introduce in a phased manner competitive selection o f private partners, with specific processes to deal with unsolicited proposals. Independent advisors will be appointed to conduct the required evaluation (see Annex 4). The project will also allow HIFU to take important steps towards increased disclosure as the HIFU website will be used to disclose the summary o f HIFU’s audited financial accounts and the l i s t o f subprojects which are being pursued by HIFU. The financial management structure provides for improved credit management policies, including requirement that all project enterprises involved in HIFU’s equity investments provide audited financials o f their operations to HIFU. Finally, the disbursement will be report based, which will: (a) directly link periodic disbursements with reports verifying the appropriate use o f IDA proceeds; and (b) allow supervision flexibility to monitor and manage the disbursement for specific investments (loans or equity investments) o f HIFU. 56. HIFU i s a Local Development Investment Fund which has been audited every year. The Project introduces international standards for such audits. Furthermore, quarterly unaudited financial statements will be received and reviewed by the Bank. Strict Financial Covenants have been put in place to ensure that HIFU financial performance i s further strengthened, and to provide a long-term engagement point for Bank dialogue on the importance o f financial viability and increased disclosure o f financial operations. As part o f the supervision activities, the Bank will recruit and retain an international accounting firm on a long-term contract to help evaluate HIFU financial statements/operations. 4. Social 57. HDP will mostly have positive impact on the society through improving infrastructure and living environment for the City and i t s citizens. However, the project will also have some adverse impacts related to the need for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. A Resettlement Policy Framework for the project has been adopted by the H C M C PC and approved by the Prime Minister. Guidelines have been included in the PPA Manual to guide HIFU and its borrowers/investment partners on how to minimize and mitigate the impacts to the people and how to prepare and implement the safeguards documents to meet the Bank’s requirements. Supervision framework has also been established to ensure compliance. These guidelines have been put in practice in the preparation o f the two proposed subprojects for the first year o f implementation. Among these two subprojects only one required land acquisition (Septic tank waste treatment plan). The compensation and resettlement activities have been implemented since 2005. The background o f the remaining complaints which have not yet been resolved i s discussed in 17 the Annex 10. Satisfactory resolution o f these i s a condition for the subproject to be financed by the Line o f Credit provided under the HDP. 58. Taking into account the fact that there are two ethnic minority groups living in H C M C (Cham with about 5,200 persons and K h M e r with about 4,800 persons in accordance with the data o f 1999 general population census), an Ethnic Minority Planning Framework (EMPF) has been prepared. Ethnic Minority Plans will have to be developed in accordance with the project EMPF for the subprojects having any ethnic minority group in the subproject areas. There are no ethnic minorities in the proposed two subprojects for the first year o f implementation. 5. Environment 59. The HDP i s expected to have mostly positive environmental and public health impacts contributing to improvement o f the city’s infrastructure; solid waste management, efficient and safer transport systems, and on-site sanitation services. Adverse impacts could arise through: (a) temporary pollution (air, noise, vibration, surface mn-off), excavation work, and disturbances to local transport, waterways or drainage systems, that could occur during construction; (b) wastewater discharge and disposal o f sludge from the waste treatment plants; (c) disposal o f dredged material; and (d) transportation and disposal o f solid waste in the landfill sites. 60. Detailed guidelines on Environmental safeguards, acceptable to the Bank has been included in the PPA manual and approved by the H C M C People Committee. The Manual will be used by HIFU staff in carrying out environmental safeguard (ES) work to meet the requirements o f GOV and the Bank for the projects that would be financed by the line o f credit provided to HIFUthrough the project. 6 1. The environmental guidelines (an annex o f the PPA Manual) include a process with the following features: (a) screening that could possibly exclude areas and subprojects due to environmental siting and other potential negative impacts by using an exclusion l i s t acceptable to the Bank; (b) EIA preparation per the GoV regulations and Bank environmental safeguard policies including an internal due diligence assessment o f EL4 reports (when already available) o f subprojects that pass the screenings and Government environmental approval; and (c) institutional arrangements for HIFU and Bank supervision as needed under the H D P o f the implementation o f environmental management plan (EMP). 62. The PPA and guideline processes were used by HIFU in preparing and appraising two subprojects for Year One as a pilot program o f the HDP in a manner acceptable to the Bank. The PPA i s being applied for the preparation o f all other subprojects HIFU expects to finance through the line o f credit provided under the project. HIFU will implement and continuously improve the PPA Manual with assistance from on-the-job consultants to be hired as part o f component 2 o f the project. 63. Due diligence assessment processes and outcomes have been implemented as an approach to ensure subproject safeguard compliance. This includes: (a) scoping new EA works in accordance with the PPA Manual; (b) assessing the adequacy o f the EA work approved by DONRE; (c) developing risk management plans to remediate the mitigation work defined in the EIA if implementation i s found insufficient; (d) obtaining borrower’s 18 written commitments to HIFU to implement the risk management plan; (e) assessing borrowers institutional mechanism to carry out EIA work for A-category subprojects; and ( f ) testing the PPA Manual with HIFU using Year One Pilot Projects. 64. Specifically for the Year one pilot program, due diligence assessments were carried out for the Initial Environmental Evaluation (IEE) o f the West Bus Terminal and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) o f the Septic Tank Waste Treatment subprojects. As a result o f the due diligence assessment, a risk management plan has been developed for each o f the subprojects. The plans were signed between HIFU and the borrowers. Annex 10 provides the details regarding processes to ensure compliance o f these two sub-projects. 65. The potential negative impacts o f all subproject activities will be mitigated through environmental management plans (EMPs) prepared for each subproject in accordance with the environmental guideline and in compliance with OP 4.01 on EA. The EMPs will include mitigation measures, monitoring plans and institutional responsibilities connected with their implementation. Mitigation measures will be included in construction contracts. For the subprojects which have obtained from D O N R E an approval to the EIA report, or environmental certificate, due diligence assessment o f the EA work will be conducted and supplemental environmental information or study will be required as necessary. 66. HIFU will arrange for the monitoring o f E M P implementation in each subproject, and will prepare semi-annual environmental compliance progress reports submitted to PC and IDA. An independent environmental safeguard monitoring consultant will be hired to assist HIFU in this task, and also to provide guidance to the borrowers in internal supervision and reporting on the implementation o f mitigation measures as specified in the EMP. 6. Safeguard policies Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project Environmental Assessment [OP/BP/GP 4.0 1) Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) Pest Management (OP 4.09) Cultural Resources (OP 4.11) Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) Indigenous Peoples [OD 4.20, being revised as OP 4.10) Forests (OP/BP 4.36) Safety o f Dams (OP/BP 4.37) Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP/GP 7.60) Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP/GP 7.50) Yes [ XI [I [I [I [ XI [I [I 11 [I [I No [I [XI [XI [XI [I [[XI [XI [XI [XI [XI 67. The yedno responses in the above table refer to the safeguards expected to be triggered for most o f the sub-projects to be financed under the line o f credit. Screening mechanisms as specified in the PPA Manual will be applied to investment pipeline subprojects in determining safeguard triggers for OP 4.04,4.09,4.10, and 4.1 1. 68. The safeguards screening category is S2, which means one or more safeguard policies are triggered but impacts are limited and technically/institutionally manageable. 19 The project i s determined to be an environmental screening category FI. Subprojects environmental screening categories will vary. 69. Public consultation. The PPA manual specifies when and how public consultation has to take place for each sub-project. Consultation for the EIA report for the Subproject Septic tank waste treatment (A category) has been completed with the local authority (Ward People Committee D a Phuoc) and local NGO (the Father Front o f the District Binh Chanh) in accordance with the new national law on environmental protection. N o public consultation on environmental issues was required for the West Bus Terminal. 70. Public disclosure. The PPA manual specifies when and how the various safeguards documents need to be disclosed. HIFU has confirmed the public disclosure o f the EL4 report for the Septic tank waste treatment and the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for the West Bus Terminal subproject in the ward PC offices since Mar 05, 2007 as per the Bank’s disclosure requirements. A copy o f the drafi Environment Guidelines and Social Safeguards Manual as a part o f the PPA Manual have been disclosed locally and sent to InfoShop in Washington D C and made available in English and Vietnamese in Hanoi’s Development Information Center (VDIC) on March 20,2007. 7. Policy Exceptions and Readiness Policy Exceptions: NA Readiness: The following project elements outline the readiness o f the project: HIFU project pipeline i s ready with 13 projects identified with detailed project descriptions. Two (2) year 1 projects have been appraised, including fill safeguards documentation, and financial analysis. Projects ready for financial close. 5 TORs package for technical assistance and the procurement plan ready and approved by HIFU Management; mobilization o f the three key consultants under the approved TORs to take place before loan effectiveness. Project team operational - includes designated procurement and FM staff. Manuals for Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) and Private Sector Participant (PSP) selection prepared with broad participation o f city departments, and formally approved by the H C M C PC for implementation by HIFU. Results framework in place; base line available. FM arrangements setup; FM capacity analyzed. Audit arrangements agreed with client. Counterpart fbnding confirmed with client. Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) approved by the Prime Minister. . 20 Annex 1: Country and Sector or Program Background VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Municipal Infrastructure in Vietnam. Municipal infrastructure demand i s increasing rapidly in Vietnam as the country copes with rapid urbanization, decentralization and high rates o f economic growth. There i s wide agreement that a significant investment gap exists vis-a-vis municipal infrastructure demand. Commentary on the investment climate in Vietnam i s beginning to increasingly cite the lack o f infrastructure in general and municipal infrastructure in particular as a key bottleneck to investment and economic growth. I t i s unlikely that Vietnam can significantly increase public investment in infrastructure from the recent level o f 8.7-10.0% o f GDP; in order to meet the increasing demand for municipal infrastructure Vietnam will therefore have to attract private capital and increase the efficiency o f investment, which will require policy reforms and improvement in planning and management o f infrastructure assets. To date, Vietnam has neither established the appropriate investment channels for attracting private financing, nor the institutional and regulatory frameworks to involve private sector in the provision o f infrastructure. The public sector agencies have also been slow in undertaking the necessary sector policy reforms-including tariff increases and cost recovery-to improve the quality and increase the coverage o f infrastructure delivery. The challenges facing Vietnam vis-avis financing o f municipal infrastructure are further complicated by the following two developments : At present, there i s a severe shortage o f long-term capital in the market in general, and for municipal infrastructure in particular, as the risks associated with municipal infrastructure investment remain prohibitively high for the private sector. In the near to medium term the private financial markets in Vietnam-which are unlikely to become currently at the very initial stage o f development-are adequately deep or broad to meet Vietnam’s infrastructure financing needs. W h i l e the critical and immediate infrastructure financing needs o f the country call for immediate public sector action, measures must be taken to ensure that actions taken in the interim period take into account the risk o f private sector crowding-out in the medium to long-term 0 Vietnam i s fast transitioning towards a decentralized governance model through a political process that has very strong political support. The responsibility for municipal infrastructure has already been devolved to the provincial governments. The provincial governments have limited budgetary resources for municipal infrastructure, and suffer from a combination o f weak institutional capacity and policy uncertainties which will affect the flow o f private capital/expertise into municipal infrastructure development The Decentralization Challenge. Decentralization has increased the spending obligations at sub-national levels. According to the developing decentralization regime in Vietnam, municipal infrastructure is primarily the responsibility o f the local governments. As decentralization has progressed, the share o f sub-national governments in total government expenditures has risen from 26% in 1992 to 48% in 2002. The estimated annual financing requirement to achieve the government’s targets between 2010 and 2020 will be of the order o f U S $ 377.5 million for urban water supply, U S $ 280 million for wastewater collection and treatment, U S $ 239.3 million for drainage (including canal rehabilitation), 21 and US$ 835.4 niitliori for loxv income h o u s ~ nin~urban areas, a t ~ u n ~ c i pres~?o~zsibi~ity.~ al This gives a total o f US5 1.7 to 1.8 b i l ~ ~ oann~I~Ily, n or between 3.0% and 4.0% o f CDP annually. This cstimare excludes required ~nvesrn~ents in urban t r a n s ~ ~which r t ~ are I X U G ~ harder to ~ u a n ~but ~ f are y expected to be s ~ ~ ~ ~ c a n t . EiCMC i s the largest city in Vietnam and a major ind~~strial and cona~ercialcenter with a population o f 6 ~ ~ ~ l I~t ios na ,~ a t e ~ o rIy city r e p o directly ~ ~ ~ ~to ~the Central ~ o ~ ~The~ city ~ has ~ been ~ in e the~ forefroIit z t o~f the t r ~ z s ~ in~tiated ~ ~ o ~ bi y the economic reform ""Open door" and ' ~ R e n o ~ a t i opolicies ~" which have led to ~npreccdc~~tcd growth for the c ~ ~ ~ n pt r ~~ 'r , ~ ~ cn ~the~ i t~~ ad ~r sl t r~sector. ~ a l This growth has been most ~ r o n o ~ t ~ c e d i n MCMC, xvhich accounts for 35-40 percent o f the n ~ t ~ o nCDP. a ~ The annual growth rate o f the HCMC urban ~ o ~ ~ ~i s~between t i o n 5-7 percent with thc ~ o ~ u in~ 2020 ~ ~ ~ o r ~ expected to he approx~matel~ 10 ~ ~ i l ~rcsidcnts. ion The increase ixa urban p o p ~ ~ a t i oand n the cconornic g r o ~ t hi s putting increased pressure on. the urban set+es o f thc city. For example, it was recently reported ~~~~e~~~~~ News, 15 January 2007) rhat there has been an annual increase i n the ttsc o f public t r a n ~ in ~ oHChiIC ~ o f around 20 percent. The r~rban arcas face simifar problems in other sectors such as wder, e d ~ ~ a t i Q and n hcatth. I t i s estim~~ed that HCMC needs to invest ~ p ~ r o ~ ~ $3 ~ ~biIlion zate an inu~ all^^ to meet the c t t ~ ~ c n t i17f r ~ s t r u c ~den1 ~ ~ rand. c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ t ~jModel. u ~ As ~t Vicfnam u r ~~ preparcs to ~ meet the ~demand for i iticreascd ~ in~re~rnient, i f needs to also undertake me~suresto start p r e ~ a for ~ ~the n ~~ r ~ s i t i oaway n from c o n ~ e ~ s ~donor o ~ ~ a~ ~n a ~ z c ifor n ~urbm ~nfrastn~crure sewiccs. The ~iccessar~ nene bot:dS 13% ~ Key reforms related to the planning and management o f infrastructure services can also improve the financing possibilities. In particular, ensuring cost-covering tariffs for infrastructure services, where feasible, can provide infrastructure enterprises with the possibility o f self-financing using retained earnings, and open the possibility for alternative financing sources that rely on future revenue streams. Important reforms to improve the efficiency o f infrastructure procurement and services can also help to defer the need for new investment and reduce the overall financing needs. Financial Sector Development Vietnam continues to move forward with the reform of the banking. Since the Government started accelerating the reform in 2001, the five state-owned commercial banks (SOCBs) have evolved from specialized policy lending vehicles towards increasingly commercial orientation; by improve their credit policies and procedures, accounting practices, information systems, products and services. In June 2003, the Government announced i t s intention to equitize the SOCBs as a step to fully commercialize them. Joint-stock Banks (JSBs) have also been consolidated to form stronger banks. Serving mostly for private businesses, some o f them have posted strong growth and are gradually gaining market share. The environment in which banks operate has also been improving with the removal o f interest rate ceilings and the implementation o f a national payment system and modem core banking systems at the largest banks. The SOCBs and leading JSBs are also competing to expand their ATM networks. The State Bank o f Vietnam (SBV) has promulgated numerous regulations, gradually leveling the playing field for foreign banks, setting prudential standards and reclassifying NPLs to support their resolution. A credit information center was officially set up in 1999, and a registry for secured credit transactions in 2002, both o f which are expected to improve the access to finance. As a result, both bank deposits and credits have been registering rapid growth (over 25% annually since 2002), and the banking sector assets now amount to 66% o f GDP. The improved confidence in the banking system and the local currency has been leading to gradual ded~llarization~ and use o f non-cash payment instruments. The stock market and the non-bank financial institutions have also shown phenomenal growth. During 2006, the number o f companies listed has increased by nearly fivefold4 while the market capitalization increasing by more than tenfold to surpass 22% of GDP, already well surpassing the Government’s original target o f 15% by 2010. The largest enterprises including the SOCBs are only yet to come to the market. The number of securities companies has also been doubling while many are increasing their capital to undertake new business such as underwriting o f public offers. The insurance sector also has registered healthy growth till recently while increasingly faced with tough competition with banks’ savings products. Development o f the capital markets and the planned liberalization o f foreign participation in the statutory casualty insurance sector are expected to bring a renewed impetus to the sector’s growth. Despite the impressive development, there are important issues left unresolved. In particular, meaningful measures are yet to be taken to develop the debt capital market. The Other factors include: higher interest rate on VND savings than foreign currency and the lack o f deposit insurance in foreign currency. 192 including 106 at H C M C STC and 86 at Hanoi STC as o f January 16,2007. 23 rapid growth of the financial industry and market is also creating dangerous gaps and imbalances in the regulatory and supervisory capacity and financial infrastructures. In addition, the financial sector i s already faced with the second generation issues as Vietnam moves swiftly toward a middle income country status. Concerns are growing with the slow progress o f the restructuring and equitization o f the state-owned commercial banks (SOCBs) and enterprises (SOEs). Uncertainty surrounding hTLs, the practice o f rolling over short-term credits to generate long-term funds, the difficulty in valuation, etc. are delaying the process. The equitization i s considered as essential to enhancing their efficiency and competitiveness amid the growing competition due to the WTO accession and integration into the regional and global economy. The SOCBs are responsible for nearly 70% o f all credits to the economy and are primary creditors to SOEs. Therefore, SOCBs’ restructuring and equitization are linked with those o f SOEs. W h i l e a half o f the over 6,000 SOEs have been equitized, largest ones are left untouched, leaving the large share (85%) o f the original state enterprise assets s t i l l in the state hands. The equitization o f Vietcombank and Mekong Housing Bank has also been delayed. The capacity building of the financial sector regulatory and supervisory authorities is also lagging behind the development of their respective sectors. The State Bank o f Vietnam (SBV) is only in the initial preparatory stage o f fundamental reform to become a fullfledged central bank o f a market economy. Reform and upgrading o f i t s bank supervision capacity can be done only as part o f the process. The Deposit Insurance o f Vietnam (DIV) has been in operation but i s lacks capacity and i t s responsibilities overlap with those o f the bank supervisor. The State Securities Commission (SSC) needs to urgently upgrade i t s capacity to guide the civilized development o f the rapidly growing securities market including the OTC market as well as the Stock Trading Centers. To do so, i t needs to become able to effectively discharge the much expanded responsibilities under the new Securities Law. An investor protection fund i s yet to be established. The Insurance Department o f the MOF has only 25 staff with only very basic information and communication technology capacity to supervise the growing and diversifying indu~try.~ Vietnam continues to receive growing amount of foreign investment. In addition to a record level o f foreign direct investment, the country i s now receiving the third wave of foreign portfolio investment (FPI, amounting to $3 billion in accumulated total). Remittances are even greater than FPI while exports and tourism are booming. There i s now an appreciation pressure on VND which the SBV i s struggling to manage while at the same time trying to contain the inflationary pressures. Cross border capital flows and exchange rate are expected to be increasingly liberalized to implement Vietnam’s WTO commitments. The authorities must strengthen the prudential regulation and supervision o f banks and NBFIs and strongly promote their sound risk management to mitigate risks associated with foreign exchange, interest rate, maturity mismatches, liquidity, etc. Financial market must also offer instruments to manage such risks (e.g., bond market, derivatives). I t i s also necessary to build a capacity to closely monitor the sector- or economy-wide risks. 24 insurance companies (eight lifes and 16 non-lifes), seven insurance brokers, one reinsurer and 144 agents offering over 900 products which are growing rapidly. 24 Vietnam is faced with a need to invest aggressively in infrastructures which require a huge amount of long-term resources estimated to be in excess of 10% of GDP through 2010 and beyond. Enhancement o f the access to finance by the poor i s also a key policy objective to continue to reduce poverty. The former requires development o f the domestic bond market and mobilization o f private resources to release the pressure o n the currency and maturity mismatches. Yet, one common factor cutting across the two issues i s a need to strengthen policy-based financial institutions. The Vietnam Development Bank (VDB) has been established by transforming the former Development Assistance Fund. However, it i s yet to build the capacity to take on these challenges. Similarly, the Vietnam Bank for Social Policy (VBSP), Vietnam Postal Savings Corporation (VPSC) and People’s Credit Funds (PCFs) all need technical assistance and training and the appropriate policy framework to carry out their functions. The reform o f the policy lending institutions will have important l i n k s with the equitization o f the SOCBs. Private Investment in Infrastructure. There is great potential in Vietnam for increased private investment in infrastructure. Private investment, including foreign investment, offers a virtually limitless source o f financing, and could go far to meeting the infrastructure investment agenda. As Table 1.2 below indicates, over the period 1997-2003 private participation in infrastructure (PPI) commitments amounted to about 15% o f the total infrastructure investment-or 8.5% if we exclude one U S $ 1.3 billion gas field and pipeline project. Private sector participation in urban infrastructure (water, solid waste, and other development infrastructure sectors) financing has been particularly weak. Table 1.2: Private Investment in Infrastructure (Contractual Commitments in U S $ million) Ports Airports Toll-roads Telecoms Water Electricity Gas 1994 10 1995 128 15 205 1996 110 1997 70 1998 38.8 120.5 1999 16.3 20 2000 16.2 154 2001 10 16.2 480 1,300 2002 20 246.3 412 2003 2004 Total 100 15 10 423 212.8 1,540.3 1,300 Source: PPI database. These figures record investments promised at the time o f contracting. In some instances o f projects with multiplephases where subsequencphases did not occur actual disbursements may differ f r o m commitments. But involving the private sector in undertaking significant investments in infrastructure i s a complex and difficult task. To attract private finance, investors must expect to earn a return on the capital invested commensurate with the risks undertaken, but these needs must be balanced with the protection o f consumers from the market power o f privatized infrastructure. This balancing act must be implemented in transaction documents (legal contracts, licenses, and laws established to induce the initial investments) and in the ongoing regulatory environment established to govern the infrastructure f i r m ’ s operations. To get all o f this right i s a highly complex affair, requiring skilled economists, accountants, 25 and lawyers, as well as carefil political guidance, The best way o f establishing these skills would be through experience, which suggests that Vietnam should, in addition to the IPP program envisaged for electricity, seek to establish pilot projects with private participation, including management control rights, in a range o f infrastructure sectors. Policy Framework for FIL Emerging Framework for Municipal Finance. The Government o f Vietnam (GOV) has actively encouraged the provincial governments to take greater responsibility for financing municipal infrastructure. The 2001 Pubic Administration Reform Master Program (for 20012010) lays the groundwork for putting in place the regulations on decentralization o f administrative management and fiscal functions. The two most significant components o f the emerging municipal finance framework include permission to the provincial governments to (i) establish Local Development Investment Funds (LDIFs), and (ii) borrow up to 30% o f their annual budget for development investments-HCMC and Hanoi are allowed to borrow up to 100% o f annual state budget through revenue or general obligation bonds. The LDIFs offer an operational and legal structure for the provincial governments to focus on infrastructure, including the ability to mobilize capital and enter into contracts with the private sector. The H o Chi Minh City Investment Fund for Urban Development (HIFU) was the first LDIF established in June 1996. Since then, twelve other provincial governments have established LDIFs with the approval and support o f the GOV. The increase in the number o f LDIFs is matched by the increase in the intensity with which provincial governments have pursued the LDIF model, as evidenced by the increase in the charter capital o f the LDIFs which increased by approximately 45% per year from 1997 to 2004 and was estimated to be approximately $400 million by the end o f 2006. The most active LDIFs are making progress in bringing the new forms o f public-private partnerships, including the more sophisticated contracting mechanisms (BOO and BOT, etc.) to Vietnam. The LDIFs can also become a valuable instrument for instituting provincial policy reforms that support decentralization and increase the efficiency o f public sector management. The LDIFs can be segmented into three distinct tiers based on their operational performance. HIFU leads the field, followed by the three middle tier LDIFs. The remaining nine LDIFs are far behind the top-4, and will likely not be able to make significant progress in the near fiture without a significant effort. The critical capacity building and institutional development needs o f LDIFs are described in the table below. 26 Relative Performance and Institutional Development Priorities Top Performance Tier Top 3 Development Needs Dong Nai IF Binh Duong IF HANIF HIFU LDlFs - investment PolicyIRisk Mgmt. Cwporate Governance * Investment PoiicyIRisk Mgmt. Financial Structuring Bottom Middle * Investment Appraisal * Cwpwate Governance - Investment Appraisal *Investment PolicyIRisk Mgmt. *Staffing & Operational Resources The most urgent priority for the G O V at this stage i s to ensure that the top-4 LDIFs, particularly HIFU, develop appropriate operational models. HIFU i s in a position to set the standards for other LDIFs, and encourage other provincial governments to use the LDIFs in an appropriate fashion. The success o f HIFU has in particular encouraged many provincial governments to establish LDIFs, and its focus on cost recovery and partnership with the private sector provides an excellent initial roadmap for other LDIFs. The capital structure o f LDIFs requires critical attention. Specifically, the LDIFs are currently engaged in short-term borrowing on a roll-over basis. The LDIF borrowing should be directly tied to their assets, particularly their Charter Capital. I t may be prudent for LDIFs to not increase their commercial borrowing until they have undertaken the necessary reforms. The long-term business model o f LDIFs should involve the use o f equity (Charter Capital) to raise debt for investment purposes. Short-term borrowings particularly if they are not tied to LDIF credit - can lead to short-term oriented investments which can channel LDIF capital away from long-term infrastructure development projects. Preliminary estimates indicate that approximately 80% o f all LDIFs mobilized capital i s short-term (< 12 month tenor) with roll-over features, and approximately 20% i s medium term (>12 <60 month tenor). There i s almost no long-term debt. Inappropriate borrowing by the LDIFs can have a negative affect on the developing banking sector. I t i s essential that in the immediate future the qualified LDIFs utilize technical assistance and long-term debt from ODA program to establish a good investment and financial management record, before they start raising senior debt from the market. The development o f LDIFs will require a sustained, long-term effort. In particular, the LDIFs should first establish a performance record vis-a-vis financial management and execution o f projects in partnership with the private sector, and raise debt from the market. In the later phases o f development the goal can be expanded to include raising private equity into the fbnds. As discussed above, i t is important for the LDIFs to take advantage o f IDA technical assistance and long-term financing to establish sounds systems and processes before they engage in raising debt from the market. The discussions with various private sector parties in Vietnam indicate that while the private investors are willing to engage LDIFs at the project level (as partners in project entities), they will be very 27 reluctant to invest directly in the LDIFs in the near-term. The involvement o f the private sector in the financing and management o f LDIFs should be an important long-term objective o f the government. The following diagram provides a possible long-term development model for the LDIFs. Stage I Stage II Stage 111 LDIFs and Financial Market. There are four categories o f risk associated with government owned FIs which apply to the LDIFs. The Bank team has worked closely with the GOV and provincial governments to develop a practical risk mitigation approach which can be implemented in Vietnam. 1. Policy Capture: Provide appropriate incentives to the LDIFs and the Provincial Governments to highlight the value o f LDIFs as important tools for addressing the growth-oriented infrastructure needs o f the cities, rather than a convenient channel for providing subsidies for politically important projects. 2. Private Sector Crowding-Out / Market Distortion: Incentivise and help develop the LDIFs to work in partnership with the private sector. It is also very important to ensure that LDIFs do not price their investments below market. This will also require establishment o f the necessary institutional framework within the provincial government to ensure identification o f appropriate projects, and development o f LDIF capacity to prepare good, bankable projects which allow for market pricing. 3. Mismanagement: Establish clear frameworks for financial management and operations, and ensure that capital provided to the LDIFs i s in line with their project pipeline. 4. Contingent Liabilitymarket Risk: Develop models for monitoring the debt service capacity o f LDIFs because the LDIF borrowings do carry implied government guarantees. Specifically, at a time when the market infrastructure (e.g. rating agencies) is not in place and banking sector and capital market development is at an initial stage, inappropriate borrowing practices o f LDIFs can severely impact the financial market. 28 Strategic Framework for World Bank FILs in MunicipaUInfrastructure Finance. The task team has utilized a framework prepared by the EAl? Sustainable Development Department to conduct strategic review o f the appropriateness o f pursuing FILs for municipal/infrastructure finance in Bank operations. The framework i s specifically designed to allow infrastructure task teams to review the cross-sector impact of the projects, particularly on financial market development. I t also facilitates the identification o f the long-term role o f the FI, and the provision o f measures to help manage the transition o f the project entity (FI) towards an appropriate long-term role. The following tables summarize the results o f the application o f the framework to HDP. -0cus FI approach with HlFU is justified based on the following considerations: - Traditional engagements (SILs) have had limited success in financing infrastructure -There is a lack of long-term capital in the market - Private market is not ready to directly finance program objectives - Public sector co-financing is necessary to attract private capital - Credit enhancement is necessary to finance infrastructure projects - Lack of capacity to prepare financially viable projects - Need for a specialized public institution to negotiate with private sector (PPI contracting, etc.) and attracting private capital Is the FI approach necessary to achieve program objectives? Financial Market Will the FI support market development? The risk of private sector crowding-out is limited in the short-term, but may become significant in the long-term unless HlFU transitions towards a private market support role National policy l incentive structure defining the long-term role of HIFUlother LDlFs Financial covenants in place to ensure co-financing with the private sector Project puts HlFU on track to develop new market instruments (HIFU Bonds), and improve standards for infrastructurefinancing - appraisal, risk management, Framework :ocus Sector Policies HlFU can continue to support sector policy reforms -Separation of investmentswhich offer cost recovery and can be financed by HlFU from those which require budget support -As an investor in infrastructure projects, HlFU supports tariff rate increase to ensure sustainabilityof infrastructure assets - HIFU’s disclosure practices will set higher standards for SOEs and city departments - ImDroved standards for safeguards practices Can the FI structure contribute to sector policy reform? * institutional structure in place to minimize the “policy capture” risk Partnership Conditions Is the engagement Partnership Strategy - Int’l Audit Standards: Financial Covenants; and implementation of Are the appropriate conditions in place to ensure strategic clarity? supporting a transition towards an appropriate long-term business models? - Project Preparation and Appraisal Manual Appropriate financial risk management structure is in place -market pricing, cost-recovery, portfolio monitoringlmanagement Institutional capacity to manage social/environmentalsafeguards Co-financinglsyndicationwith private sector ensure loan conditions Financial risk management identified as key prerequisite for growth Capitalization of HlFU tied to portfolio risk and absorption capacity Technical assistance provided to HlFU (and MOF) to facilitate transition towards commercializationl corporate independence Manuals and conditions designed to help HlFU set safeguards standards 29 Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the Bank and/or other Agencies VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Bank financed Public-private partnership in infrastructure projects (on-going) Rural finance; promotion o f private sector investment Financial sector modernization (ongoing) Financial sector modernization; broaden access to finance Rural finance; promotion o f private sector investment Deterioration of sanitation systems and institutional weakness (ongoing) Lack o f access to infrastructure and tenure insecurity in urban poor areas (ongoing) Lack o f access to water supplies, deterioration o f water supply systems and institutional weakness (ongoing) Other Development Agencies Public/Private Partnership Generation Project (P086509) (Board proposed 7/08/08) Implementati on Progress (IP) Power N/A Vietnam Second Rural Finance S Project (P072601) (Board approval 5/30/02) Financial Sector Modernization and N/A Information Management (P088759) (Board proposed 9/27/07) Second Payment System and Bank Modernization Project (P082627) (3/10/05) Vietnam Guarantee Project Vietnam Rural Finance Project S (P004847) (Board approval 5/07/96) Ho Chi Minh City Environmental U Sanitation Project (Cr. 3475) Urban Upgrading Project (Cr. 3887) S Urban Water Supply Development MS Project (Cr. 4028) 30 Development Objective (DO) N/A S N/A S MS S S Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project PDO To develop HIFU as a model LDIF (in terms o f internal policy and procedures for financial policy, sub-project appraisal, social and environmental safeguards, and partnership with the private sector) and increase private sector participation in financing municipal infrastructure in HCMC. Intermediate Results ComDonent 1: HIFU uses the line o f crddit to finance quality municipal investments Component 2: HIFU capacity to appraise and monitor projects is strengthened . Increase in total number o f HIFU investment (debt and direct) per year in municipal infrastructure with private sector projects involvement Increase in total amount o f HIFU investment (debt and direct) per year in municipal infrastructure with private sector projects involvement Improvement in the leverage ratio (new private capital / HIFU direct investment) in municipal infrastructure projects per year Evidence that HIFU performs as a model LDIF : 1- Compliance o f HIFU with the Financial Covenants 2- Percentage o f HIFU projects processed in accordance with the P P A manual guidelines 3- Percentage o f Private Sector Partners o f HIFU selected using the PSP manual guidelines . Information will be used every six months t o assess the extent to which HIFU i s able to leverage private capital through i t s investments. While the information will be used to ensure that projects funded by the LOC are processed according t o the agreed guidelines, it will also help assess the extent to which such good practices are adopted by HIFU for projects financed with non-IDA sources ter dic Number and amounts o f n e w To establish benchmarks and investments undertaken by HIFU standards for F I operations o f similar nature in Vietnam with the Line o f Credit 0 Portfolio quality indicators maintained 0 Projects feasibility studies by Information will be used t o assess HIFU and Line Departments meet the effectiveness o f the technical assistance provided under the adequate quality standards project Level o f compliance o f projects review of the with Environment and Social Annual implementation o f the manuals will Safeguards PSP manual i s implemented in be an opportunity to improve them a phased manner (see Annex 4 for specifics) 31 Arranpements for results monitoring A comprehensive monitoring system has been established in close collaboration with HIFU to monitor and evaluate the project activities and operations leading to the project objectives. The monitoring system has four components: 1. HIFU internal system will provide the baseline data and report on results as follows: HIFU Department o f Planning and Promotion will collect information on the indicators for private sector involvement and on private sector partner selection; and HIFU Department o f Appraisal will collect information about the progress made in implementing the PPA manual. Quarterly un-audited financial statements will be provided by HIFU to the Bank; Yearly 2. audit report o f the financial statements-prepared by an independent auditor to conduct international standard financial audits-will be provided to the Bank after the end o f HIFU fiscal year. Independent consultants will monitor the compliance o f each sub-project with the social 3. and environmental safeguards requirements. 4. Bank Supervision Team (and an on-going contract with an international accounting firm which worked with the Bank in conducting the initial financial assessment o f HIFU) will conduct periodic reviews o f un-audited quarterly as well as annual audited financial statements to ensure compliance with the financial covenants and the achievement o f operational reform milestones (subproject appraisal system and framework for the selection o f private sector partners). Project Review. All project information will be compiled by HIFU management and discussed with the HCMC-PC and the Bank in a workshop to be held every six months. The workshop will provide an opportunity to discuss project progress and any outstanding issues, including the need to refine or adjust any project components. More specifically, the operational and institutional framework (PPA and PSP manuals) will be reviewed at least once every year by HIFU and the PC and may be amended by resolution o f the PC, provided the written agreement o f the Bank i s obtained before the amendment i s approved by the PC. 32 ? e N a -Y E! 0 > 9 e, 2 9 9 $ Z I- $ Z 3 .-E 3 E 2 s \Do 3 E gz Annex 4: Detailed Project Description VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Project Components Component 1: Investment Capital (US$80 million; IDA U S $ 5 0 million) A line o f credit will be provided to HIFU for it to invest in cost recovery oriented municipal infrastructure investments in partnership with the private sector. A Project Preparation and Appraisal Manual governs the way HIFU investments under the line o f credit will be identified, developed and appraised. A Private Sector Partner Manual describes the way private sector participants in Project Enterprises financed under the line o f credit will be selected. (See component 2 for a description o f the institutional changes supported by these manuals). HIFU will work with DPI and other departments within the provincial government to identify investment needs in HCMC, as described in HCMC master plan, which can be financed via public private partnerships. HIFU will then work with the city departments to put in place effective project structures and then invite private investors to participate in the projects. The pipeline of projects identified in the table below confirms that HIFU can absorb the investment capital which i s being made available via the project. 7 8 9 10 Daphuoc North Cemetery and Crematoria in either Cuchi or Hocmon Hazardous waste treatment in Phuoc Hiep Cornpostingplant in Phuoc Hiep High Technology Medical Treatment 11 I Nguyen Du Underground Parking and 12 13 Services General Port Catlai Area 1 New Port General Port Catlai Area 2 New Port Sub-Total Ditto 4.5 2009-2010 Ditto Ditto Ditto 25 7 6 2009-2011 2009-2011 2009-2010 I Ditto 16 Ditto Ditto 30 85 177 35 I 2009-2011 20 10-2012 2010-2013 These sub-projects have been reviewed by city Depts, and are consistent with the development master plan o f HCMC. A detailed appraisal o f the two year one pilot projects i s provided below as attachment to Annex 4. The IDA credit will be made available to HIFU according to the proposed on-lending structure agreed between HIFU and M o F according to the Decree # 134 o f the central government on O D A management. The Bank team has reviewed the structure and confirmed that i t will support the project objectives and conforms to the stipulations o f the Decree 134. The structure involves the Ministry o f Finance borrowing IDA credit from the Bank and then on-lending the hnds to HIFU under reasonable terms which take into account the cost o f foreign exchange risk and other administrative costs. (Annexes 6 and 7 provide the details o f these implementation and disbursement arrangements respectively). The Bank has conducted a detailed financial due diligence o f the financial accounts o f HIFU through an international accounting firm and confirmed that HIFU i s in strong financial position. HIFU issues audited annual financial statements, and it engages in market-based investment practices. Specifically, HIFU loans are priced at market rate. The Bank can confirm that HIFU i s ready to carry out the hnctions o f a financial intermediary as required under Bank OP 8.30. The financial covenants o f the credit agreement will hrther reinforce the financial soundness o f HIFU operations and contribute to i t s institutional development as a financial intermediary. (Annex 9 provides the details o f the financial analysis o f the project). Component 2: Technical Assistance (US$0.5 million; IDA US$ 0.0 million) 7 1. HIFU will finance the technical assistance to support the implementation o f operational reforms, including: (i) support to implement the PPA manual with on-the-job chief advisor and technical specialist, as well as a social specialist and an environment specialist; (ii)support to implement the PSP manual with on-the-job chief advisor and private sector specialist; (iii) independent monitoring consultants for social and environmental safeguards policies; and (iv) Financial Audits o f HIFU to International Auditing Standards. 72. Detailed set o f Terms o f Reference (TOR) for technical assistance consultants have been prepared. The package o f TORs and the associated procurement plan has been reviewed and approved by the H C M C PC as part o f the final HDP project approval. The H C M C PC approval makes the implementation o f the procurement plan, including the utilization o f an estimated $0.5 million HIFU capital for the assigned objective o f recruiting international and local consultants in accordance with the TORs, a firm and official mandate for HIFU. In order to ensure timely mobilization o f key consultants, the mobilization o f consultants under three (3) o f the most critical TORs - including the TOR for independent auditors to ensure compliance with safeguards policies - has been established as a Condition o f Loan Effectiveness. The technical assistance will contribute to the institutional development o f HIFU. 73. Specifically, i t will build upon the current practices o f HLFU and develop capacity in HIFU to implement the PPA and the PSP manuals. The long-term institutional development plans have been prepared in consultation with the Bank and are documented in the two main manuals. The capacity building o f HIFU i s a part o f a broader initiative which involves AFD, USTDA, the World Bank and other donors. The Bank team has worked very closely with USTDA to scope, prepare and provide capacity building technical assistance to HIFU. The phase one (approximately $300,000) o f the U S T D A technical assistance was concluded in 2006. The 36 planned phase I1 to focus on internal operations i s currently being reviewed by USTDA management. Similarly, AFD has approved a technical assistance package o f approximately Euros 1.5 million which will provide significant technical assistance and training to HIFU and its borrowers in financial management and other operational functions. The technical assistance provided by AFD and USTDA complements the IDA credit and the associated HIFU-financed technical assistance. Further details o f the partnership strategy vis-a-vis the development o f LDIFs i s described on section C. 1. 74. The H D P i s focused on helping HIFU implement those important operational reforms which are under the authority o f HIFU Management and the H C M C PC. Broader national level policy reforms are being addressed under the LDIFP planned to be submitted for Board approval in FY08 . I t should be noted that some o f the operational reforms demonstrated under the H D P may be adopted as national policy/MOF guidance under the LDIFP at a later stage. 75. The Bank, HIFU and the H C M C P C will work in close co-operation in the application, review and amendment o f the two manuals. The implementation o f the manuals will be reviewed at least once every year by HIFU and the H C M C PC, and discussed with the Bank during the six monthly reviews. The manuals may be amended by resolution o f the H C M C PC, provided the written agreement o f the Bank i s obtained before the amendment i s approved by the PC. The Bank may also request or suggest amendments to the manuals to HIFU and the H C M C PC during the implementation o f the project. Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) Manual. HIFU has to date successfully identified and invested in several projects. I t s current project appraisal process appears to have worked reasonably well. However, HIFU has recognized that with the anticipated increase in the volume o f its business, i t will require a more comprehensive and consistent process for appraising investments. In order to facilitate this, a new project preparation and appraisal system has been developed and agreed with HIFU and the H C M C PC. The Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) Manual is a comprehensive integration o f technical, financial, environmental and social safeguard assessment and it includes the following: 0 Initial identification and exclusionary screening o f projects 0 A sensible, simple appraisal matrix that describes the appraisal outcomes so that projects can be prioritized 0 A process by which projects are appraised by Line Departments in H C M C PC in terms o f both financial and non-financial mandates combining project and social safeguards appraisal methodologies 0 A risk appraisal methodology 0 A necessary due diligence process 0 L i n k s with the HIFU Private Sector Participant Selection Framework. 0 Monitoring, evaluation and reporting requirements The manual is prepared for practical implementation; i t uses flow charts and step by step explanation o f various processes, It will apply to all new projects funded under the H D P but i s also available to HIFU for use on other projects. A regime for its annual review and amendments o f the Manual i s established. I t covers both the appraisal o f loan funding requests where HIFU does not have a project preparation role as well as project preparation for new projects in which HIFU will invest 37 equity. It also sets out a consistent standard for project appraisal regardless o f whether or not they are unsolicited proposals. The Manual on Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) will become applicable from date o f effectiveness for all projects that are not in development (that i s have not proceeded beyond project identification and screening). Since infrastructure projects have long lead times it i s not necessary to set out a phased application other than for requirements for the development o f unsolicited proposals. Two external consultants (a consultant with international experience on project preparation and appraisal, a consultant able to provide accessible support from Vietnam on project preparation and appraisal) will establish with HIFU and utilize a screening process for projects to ensure that projects meet HIFU criteria. They will also coordinate the range o f appraisal and preparation activities throughout the project preparation life-cycle and will assist HIFU to proactively plan activities in the preparation and appraisal o f specific projects. They will also review the application o f the manual on specific projects so as to accurately report on activities and on areas where the application can be improved or amended and provide six monthly reports to the WB on the projects in preparation and appraisal and the application o f the manual. An on-the-job environmental consultant will also be hired by HIFU under HDP funds to assist HIFU in implementing the environment guideline (Annex F). This task will include the following: 1. Environmental due diligence review o f projects in municipal infrastructure. 2. Implementation o f safeguard policies including review o f environmental safeguards documents and monitoring o f the implementation o f environmental management plans, 3. Technical input to the HIFU team on project environmental planning and management, 4. On-the-job training for HIFU staff on environmental planning and management 5. On-the-job training for HlFU staff on the environment aspects o f project technology evaluation, 6. Implement an improved project appraisal system over a period o f 3-years to include environmental safeguards A local consultant will be hired to provide on-the-job training and technical assistance to HIFU on a part-time basis for implementation o f social safeguard policies including socio-economic screening o f the proposed projects, preparation o f TORS, evaluation o f socio-economic assessments, guiding the investorshorrowers to prepare and implement social safeguards documents, review and appraisal social safeguard documents, monitoring its implementation and reporting the results to the HCMC’PC and WB. The consultant will also help HIFU in determining the relevance and effectiveness o f project social programs including Resettlement Plans and Land Acquisition as well as in implementing the social aspects o f the Project Preparation and Appraisal Manual. Private Sector Partner (PSP) Selection M a n u a l A framework for the selection o f SPS in the Project Enterprises i s necessary to: 0 establish transparent processes that provide information and certainty to potential investors; 0 ensure the consistent application o f selection processes; and 38 meet international good practice requirements as part o f the development o f HIFU governance and operations systems. This manual has been drafted to achieve these objectives in the selection o f private sector investors who participate in the ownership o f the Project Enterprise formed to implement the project. I t does not cover the procurement o f any goods or services by the Project Enterprise, which shall be done in accordance with applicable Vietnamese law. A formal Legal Opinion has been obtained from a top tier law firm in Vietnam to confirm the compliance o f the manual with current Vietnamese laws and regulations. Given the current absence o f a coherent selection process and the current reliance on unsolicited proposals, the full development o f a Private Sector Participant (PSP) selection process for HIFU will be phased over three years. The process will be streamlined for maximum efficiency while meeting international good practice requirements for competitive selection by the end o f the third year after adoption o f this framework. The framework will not apply retrospectively to projects already implemented. Key components are: 0 establishing HIFU as project financier available to all bidders 0 the use o f Special Purpose Vehicle Enterprises 0 how HIFUdeals with cases where there i s no bidder response to RFP 0 an exit strategy for HIFU from Project Enterprises clear guidance on how Enterprises with State Owned Shares and enterprises in which HIFU already has an investment stake may participate as PSPs 0 a process by which unsolicited proposals are managed 0 evaluation criteria and processes that i s fair, transparent and cost-effective. The PSP Manual i s closely aligned with the Project Preparation and Appraisal Manual in that both set out a means by which HIFU can rely less on unsolicited proposals and more on projects brought to a competitive market. I t allows a maximum o f one year to establish the unsolicited proposal framework and communicate this to the market. The PSP manual requires more complex reforms within HIFU and i s also related to parties not in the control o f HIFU. Thus, a phased application is established as set out below. Application o f Manual Evaluation system proposals Unsolicited Proposals for solicited 1 Prequalification o f Bidders I Participation o f Enterprises with State Owned Shares in Project Enterprise Exit Strategy for HIFU The manual applies to Enterprises with HIFU participation in equip( ownership. Operational Develop detailed evaluation process and Commence with pilot bidding rules Unsolicited proposals accepted before manual Operational Operational adopted without competitive selection process. Manual adopted and hade known to market I Not applicable Commence Operational I with pilot All Enterprises with State Owned Shares eligible (including Only private sector Enterprises. SoEs) No restriction Enterprises with State Owned Shares to make available their services to all PSP bidders. Subject to Charter and covenants Commence Operational I with Pilot I Operational I Operational I Not required I I I No restriction Participation o f Enterprises with State Owned Shares as Sub Contractors to the Project Enterprises Maximum equity stake Use of SPVs End of Year 3 End o f Year 2 End o f Year 1 In development 39 I I t must be noted that the pipeline for the first year includes only loan type projects. HIFU will thus be able to apply the PSP Selection manual to projects that it has prepared in terms o f the PPA manual from year 2. A PSP consultant will provide HIFU with expert assistance in applying the PSP selection processes established in the Manual to projects in the HIFU portfolio and will review every six months the manner in which the manual has been applied, will identify beneficial amendments to the manual and to provide comprehensive reports on these to HIFU, the H C M C P C and the World Bank. This consultant will ensure that the Manual i s applied for projects under the HDP and will coordinate the selection activities throughout the selection process to assist HIFU, who has to manage a complex range o f stakeholders including line departments and bidders in order to manage the selection process as efficiently as possible. This consultant will also develop standard bidding documents as well as standard evaluation process documents with a view to effectively evaluate bidders, and to assist HIFU to carry out a satisfactory due diligence on all aspects o f bidders’ technical and financial capacity as well as history and proven capability to meet the stringent environmental and social safeguard requirements for each project. Independent Environmental and Social Safeguard Monitoring. Independent consultants to will be hired under HDP to monitor the compliance with environmental and social safeguards policies. The consultants will provide the following services: Independent Monitoring (Environment) Consultant: Independent consultant will be 1. hired to monitor the performance o f the HIFU Joint Ventures /project enterprises and borrowers with respect to compliance with the environment requirements. The consultant will also highlight need for additional mitigation measures, need for capacity development within HIFU and Project Enterprises, and to adapt HIFU and Project Enterprise systems for each future development project environmental planning process. Independent Monitoring (Social) Consultant: Independent consultant will be hired 2. to monitor the performance o f the HIFU Joint Ventures /project enterprises and borrowers with respect to compliance with the social requirements. The consultant will also highlight need for additional mitigation measures, need for capacity development within HIFU and Project Enterprises, and to adapt HIFU and Project Enterprise systems for each future development project environmental planning process 40 Attachment 1 to Annex 4 - Detailed appraisal of the two Sample Sub-Proiects {Total Estimated Investment - $5 million) identified for vear 1. Subproject 1 -West Bus Terminal Upgrade 1. Rationale The West Bus Terminal presently receives around 1,200 buses per day and approximately 18,000 passengers. The number o f daily passengers received during peak time (Vietnam New Year) amounts to approximately 50,000. With a wide frontage along Kinh Duong Vuong Street, the site offers high-valued commercial potential. There is an urgent need to improve the existing service facilities and in providing the general public with higher standards o f service, especially in respect to safety and health standards. 2. Existing West Bus Terminal Facilities With large passenger and bus numbers the existing facilities are unable to efficiently handle the traffic volumes and are greatly in need o f refurbishment and redevelopment. The facilities are outdated and in their present form are unable to maximize their full commercial potential. One o f the present problems o f the site i s the regular flooding that occurs during monsoon season, with regular flooding o f the bus parking area and passenger waiting areas as the internal drainage system i s unable to drain to the existing drainage facilities along Kinh Duong Vuong Street. The duration o f flooding i s usually around 2 hours but during this time considerable inconvenience is caused to passengers and commercial operations alike. This situation is further exacerbated in that the existing drainage system i s a combined system and used for both rain water and waste water. 3. West Bus Terminal Management The West Bus Terminal i s managed and operated by the West Bus Terminal Joint Stock Company, with 51 percent o f i t s shares owned by the State and 49 percent by West Bus Terminal Company staff. The Company comprises a Board o f Directors represented by the State (3 members), and representatives from the founding shareholders and consisting o f the Dong A Bank Securities Company Limited, the Thai Binh Shoes Joint Stock Company, and a staff representative, making a total o f six board members. The chartered capital o f the Company i s VND25 billion. The general Company Charter allows it to operate the two interprovincial bus terminals including West Bus Terminal along with other associated activities such as provision o f services within the terminal sites, tourism transportation, leasing and management o f commercial areas, freight cargo handling, car spare parts trading, and maintenance and repair services. 4. Proposed Subproject Works The proposed West Bus Terminal Upgrading building works will consist o f upgrading and expansion o f both the two storey departure and arrival hall buildings, along with the ticketing office areas; upgrading and provision o f new departure area bus shelters; provision o f new arrival area bus shelters; construction o f a new staff parking building; construction of a RepairMaintenance Bus Workshop; provision o f a new fuel service station; construction o f a dining hall and lodging facilities for drivers; provision o f new public toilet facilities; and construction o f a Security/Guard House, All structures will be constructed from reinforced concrete with color bonded aluminum roofing and ceramic floor tiles. 41 Due to the existing drainage/flooding problems, there will be a need to reshape the ground level o f the bus terminal site, and to replace and upgrade existing drainage facilities. For waste water sources from toilets and commercial areas, septic tanks will be constructed. For vehiclebus washing areas, and where lubricating oils are being used, sand tanks shall be provided to allow treatment o f washing water and lubricants and to ensure that these materials do not enter the drainage system. Water supply facilities are readily available and the present system will be rehabilitated with new pipes. The construction o f a 135 cubic meter watedstorage tank will be provided in order to enhance fire protection capabilities. Within the site there i s presently an underground water source that i s utilized for vehiclebus washing, and this source will continued to be used for such purposes. Further deepening o f the well will be required. In respect to electricity and power supply, the existing 63 KVA power station will be replaced with a 250 KVA power station. In addition, the installation o f underground cables for servicing the site will be required along with an outdoor lighting system within the bus parking areas and along the boundary fence for security. For fire prevention and safety, i t i s proposed to provide 7 water hydrant points and two underground water tanks with 150 cubic meters capacity and associated pumps. Equipment, including computers, printers, and associated I T equipment, will be procured to support the operation and management o f the West Bus Terminal. 5. Technical Justification All the subproject components have been based on appropriate technologies that are both cost effective and technically feasible. They have been developed with consideration o f the operating company’s capacity to operate and maintain the various physical works components, while minimizing the associated operating and maintenance costs. The proposed standards for drainage improvements are compatible with existing facilities. The proposed improvements will greatly enhance the site and provide a much improved public facility. 6. Cost Estimate The total cost o f the subproject i s estimated at VND 53,106,710,268 (approximately US$3.32 million). The following table provides a breakdown o f the costs. No. 1 2 3 4 7. I t e m Description Construction Works Machinery and Equipment Project Development and Implementation Costs - Project Design and Bidding Documents - Implementation Supervision - Project Completion Activities Contingency Fund T o t a l Subproject Investment Cost T o t a l Cost (VND) 41,647,380,245 2,990,175.345 3,658,111,088 329,230,000 3,145,975,535 182,905,553 4,811,043,590 53,106,710,268 Financing Plan I t i s proposed that the subproject will be financed through an equity investment by the West Bus Terminal Joint Stock Company o f 30 percent o f the total investment cost, or an amount o f VND 17,029,446,407 (US$ l.O6million), with a loan from HIFU for the remaining 70 percent o f the funds o f VND36,077,263,861 (US$2.26million). The HIFU loan funds will carry an interest 42 rate o f about 10 percent over a period o f 10-12 years, including a 2 year grace period during construction. 8. Implementation Arrangements The implementation o f the subproject will be undertaken over a two year period in two phases, with the first phase consisting o f all civil works including site grading, drainage, water supply, power supply, sanitation facilities, and fire protection works, while the second phase will consist o f the construction and upgrade o f the service facilities, including departure and arrival areas, waiting halls, office facilities, ticketing facilities, and other support facilities. 9. Operation and Maintenance Responsibility for the operation and maintenance o f the subproject facilities will be assumed by the West Bus Terminal Joint Stock Company. W h i l e the present facilities are generally well maintained, i t i s expected that routine maintenance will be regularly undertaken to minimize large scale maintenance works on the upgraded facilities. Adequate annual budget allocations should be made to cover required routine maintenance costs. 10. Social Safeguard Issues a. Resettlement There are no land acquisition or resettlement requirements within the subproject site. The subproject site land area was allocated to the West Bus Terminal Joint Stock Company on 18 August 2005 through a decision by the H C M C People’s Committee. In respect to commercial areas, the West Bus Terminal Joint Stock Company i s presently renting a number o f kiosk areas to various bus operators/enterprises on a 6 month renewable contract basis. The Bus Company advises that they have informed the kiosk renters about the proposed upgrading works and advised them that they will be given priority in respect to renewing their respective contracts once the upgrading works have been completed. b. Environmental Aspects A summary initial environmental assessment (SIEE) has been undertaken for the subproject which showed that no significant adverse effects are anticipated and that a detailed environmental impact assessment (EIA) i s not required. The proposed upgrading works will generally enhance the existing bus terminal conditions. Flooding will be eliminated due to site grading and improved drainage facilities resulting in a reduction in the present disruption to the traveling public as well as to commercial and business activities. Improved traffic flow and parking arrangements within the terminal site will result in greater safety and convenience to the traveling public. 11. Financial and Economic Analyses a. Financial Analysis The analysis has been undertaken to work out Financial Internal Rate o f Return (FIRR) for the sub-project while analyzing its sensitivity to an increase in the investment cost, increase in operating costs, and reduction in business revenues. The analysis assesses the financial viability by comparing (i) the FIRR based on incremental revenue generation with the updated average cost o f capital for each component; and (ii) the average incremental financial revenue with the 43 average incremental financial cost. The HIFU loan funds will carry an interest rate o f about 10 percent over a period o f 10-12 years, including a 2 year grace period during construction. The sensitivity analysis conducted on the West Bus Terminal Upgrading Sub-project indicates that its current FIRR o f 12.36% will only decrease to 11.47% if the investment cost was increased by 10 percent. In fact, the FIRR o f the subproject remains positive until the investment cost increases by more than 40 percent. Additionally, there exists considerable opportunity for increases in user fees and tariffs which are currently at l o w base levels. An increase o f tariffs, if and when enacted, will have minimal affordability impact on the transport users. b. Economic Analysis For the economic analysis and calculation o f the sub-project Economic Internal Rate o f Return (EIRR), the methodology and assumptions utilized follow standard methodology for development sub-projects. The calculation o f the EIRR also used economic opportunity cost o f capital o f 12 percent as standard for the feasibility study o f development project. The subproject has economic efficiency with an EIRR o f 13.53 percent and an ENPV o f 12 percent equivalent o f VND 7,112 million. c. Debt Service Capability The capability for debt repayment o f West Bus Company depends on annual income of the company, loan size, repayment period, and annual interest rate. The annual income bases on the financial performance and approximated in financial analysis. The intended loan borrowing represents 70 percent o f the total sub-proj ect investment and equals approximately VND 37,106.7 million. Three annual interest rate scenarios have been used ranging from 7 to 10 percent. Repayment period o f 10 years, with a 2 year grace period and an 8 year repayment period has been adopted. The calculations o f Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) at this lending terms has confirmed the company’s capability to repay the proposed loan even with the current level o f user fees and tariffs. Subproject 2 - Septic Tank Waste Treatment Plant in Da Phuoc, Binh Chanh District 1. Rationale The Hoa Binh Waste Treatment Disposal Company Limited i s jointly owned by two partners each owning 50 percent o f the total operations with initial financial contributions o f VND6,OOO million each. Employing a total o f 46 staff, the Hoa Binh Waste Disposal Company i s the only licensed company in H C M C that undertakes the de-sludging and treatment o f septic tank waste. Since its establishment, the Company has maintained i t s business operations entirely on septic tank waste disposal and over time has expanded i t s operations into the production o f biproducts such as organic fertilizer used in agriculture production and micro-biological slurry used in wastewater treatment processes. Prior to the closing o f its original operations site, the operational capacity o f the operations was around 250 cubic meters per day. The Hoa Binh Waste Disposal Company Limited disposal and treatment site was previously located near the H C M C Tan Son International Airport. Due to urbanization and environmental requirements, the Company was requested to relocate i t s operations to the outskirts o f the City. 44 2. Proposed Subproject Description The proposed site o f the Septic Tank Waste Treatment Plant i s a 9.4 hectare site located in the D a Phuoc Solid Waste Treatment Complex in Binh Chanh District, HCMC. The site i s adjacent to a 40 hectare site proposed by the H C M C Urban Sewerage Company as a sludge waste treatment plant and next to the solid waste landfill development site o f Vietnam Waste Solution Company which i s presently under development. An existing cemetery i s located near the entrance to the site. The D a Phuoc area has been designated as one o f the city’s major locations for waste disposal in general, be i t solid waste, drainage sludge, or septic tank waste. The area i s well clear o f any residential areas and i s separated from surrounding urban development by a series o f canals and a major water course. The proposed location o f the Hoa Binh Septic Tank Waste Treatment Plant within this development area i s therefore consistent with proposed planning guidelines. The proposed Septic Tank Waste Treatment development follows a separated treatment technology process where the sludge and waste water are separated and independently treated. The total fully developed capacity o f the operation i s based on a daily septic tank sludge volume o f up to 500 cubic meters per day and i s calculated on an average o f 1.5 cubic meters per household and septic tank de-sludging once every 3-5 years (depending on the size o f the household septic tank). With relatively high density urban living standards within H C M C it is likely that the majority o f septic tanks would require de-sludging once every 3 years. The Hoa Binh Waste Disposal Company will provide the full service from household septic tank sludge collection, transportation to the disposal site, and treatment o f the septic sludge. Processing o f the septic sludge will be undertaken through proven and tested Japanese technological processes in producing organic fertilizers for agricultural uses as well as in the production o f micro biological slurry for waste water treatment systems where biological treatment processes are utilized. The treatment o f septic sludge into organic manure will be processed through a reinforced concrete receiving tank (20 meters long x 10 meters wide x3 meters deep) where the sludge is exposed to the sun, then into tanks o f 500 cubic meters capacity where the sludge and waste water are separated, and after a period o f around 5 months the sludge will be further dried in large drying beds and then composted into fertilizer. The whole process will take around 12 months with a production output o f around an equivalent o f 7 tons per day o f organic fertilizer. For the waste water, this shall be treated in reinforced concrete tanks where the sludge shall be self-destroyed with the waste water passing through regulating tanks where the water content i s regulated, then into an organic compound tank for chemical treatment, then into a tank for biological processing o f bacteria, and lastly to a sterilization tank where the waste water i s further chemically treated before discharge o f the sterilized water into the surrounding water courses. Odors will be minimized through chemical treatment at various stages o f the processing chain. The Hoa Binh Waste Disposal Company proposes to develop the treatment site in two phases, the first phase developing a capacity o f around 300 cubic meters per day, which would meet the projected demands o f septic waste disposal in the city over the next 5 years, or to 2012, and the second stage through expanding the overall capacity to around 500 cubic meters per day beyond 2012. The expansion o f the treatment plant would be a relatively straight forward 45 No. 1 2 3 4 No. 1 2 3 4 5 5. Item Description Total Cost (VND) Construction Works Machinery and Equipment Project Development and Implementation Costs Project Design and Bidding Documents Implementation Supervision Contingency Fund Total Overall Subproject Investment Cost Item Description Construction Works Machinery and Equipment Project Development and Implementation Costs - Project Design and Bidding Documents - Implementation Supervision Interest During Grace Period Contingency Fund Total Overall Subproject Investment Cost (Phase 1) 19,324,997,978 5,499,609,675 1,844,033.375 1,590,720,224 253,3 13,15 1 2,686,189,101 29,548,080,108 Total Cost (VND) 8,369,138,500 5,242,448,500 1,844,033,375 1,590,720,224 253,3 13,15 1 265,212,716 2,686,189,101 18,407,022,192 Financing Plan As only Phase 1 o f the subproject will be initially financed and developed, it i s proposed that the subproject will be financed through an equity investment by the Hoa Binh Waste Disposal Company Limited o f 46.6 percent o f the total Phase 1 investment cost, or an amount o f VND8,584,328,992, or approximately US$536,520 equivalent, with a loan from HIFU for the remaining 53.4 percent o f the subproject cost o f VND9,822,693,200, or approximately US$613,919. 46 6. Implementation Arrangements I t is estimated that the implementation o f the first phase o f the subproject will be undertaken within a one (1) year period. 7. Operation and Maintenance Responsibility for the operation and maintenance o f the subproject facilities will be assumed by the Hoa Binh Waste Disposal Company Limited. Adequate annual budget allocations should be made to cover required operational costs as well as routine maintenance costs. 8. Social Safeguard Issues a. Resettlement The compensation and resettlement activities have been implemented since 2005. According to the due diligence report, there are s t i l l 1.9 out o f 9.4 ha having not yet been cleared with about 10 households waiting for their complaints to be resolved and land plots in a resettlement site to be provided. On March 1, 2007 HCMC-PC has instructed Binh Chanh district PC to resolve the issue as soon as possible, including allocation o f land plots in a neighbor commune for the displaced people to be relocated. The interviewed displaced people were satisfied with the applied compensation and resettlement policies. Resolution o f this issue in a manner satisfactory to the Bank i s a condition for the subproject to get financing from the Line o f Credit. b. Environmental Aspects An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report o f the proposed Septic Tank Waste Treatment Subproject was prepared by the Environmental Management and Engineering Center and submitted to the Department o f Natural Resource and Environment (DONRE) for approval. After receiving commentdfeedback from the Appraisal Committee under DONRE, the Report (version January 2007) was finalized and approved by DONRE on March 20,2007. Assessment o f the institutional mechanism o f the Hoa Binh Ltd. to carry out EA work for the Septic tank waste treatment was submitted to the Bank on March 27,2007. The Bank has found this satisfactory, provided that the Hoa Binh Ltd. will hire consultants for internal monitoring and HIFU will get consulting service for independent environmental monitoring as part o f the TA to HIFU. 9. Financial and Economic Analyses a. Financial Analysis The analysis has been undertaken to work out Financial Internal Rate o f Return (FIRR) for the sub-project while analyzing i t s sensitivity to an increase in the investment cost, increase in operating costs, and reduction in business revenues. The analysis assesses the financial viability by comparing (i) the FIRR based o n incremental revenue generation with the updated average cost o f capital for each component; and (ii) the average incremental financial revenue with the average incremental financial cost. After year 10 i t i s projected that the volume o f collected sludge and produced fertilizer will attain the maximum capacity o f the first phase investment which would amount to 300 cubic 47 meters per day or 104,025 tons per year. O n reaching the maximum capacity, and after 10 years, the Hoa Binh Waste Company will invest i t s own funds to expand the plant capacity to 500 cubic meters per day at which time the volume o f collected sludge will amount to 182,500 tons per year and fertilizer 1,916 tons per year. The H C M C People’s Committee presently pays a fee equivalent to US$6/ton for disposal o f collected sludge, while the average price o f fertilizer sold in the market i s around VND400,000/ton. Based on the projected volume o f sludge and collection fees and the price o f fertilizer, the septic tank waste treatment plant i s expected to generate revenue over a ten year timeframe as shown in the following table. The results show that Septic Tank Waste Treatment Plant Sub-project has FIRR o f 11.5% and s t i l l has financial efficiency with minimal negative impact from an increase in investment costs o f 10 percent with an FIRR o f 10.47 percent. Nevertheless, there exists considerable opportunity for increases in user charges due to there present very low base levels, and these increases would significantly improve the financial prospect o f the sub-proj ect. b. Economic Analysis For the economic analysis and calculation o f the sub-project Economic Internal Rate o f Return (EIRR), the methodology and assumptions utilized follow standard methodology for development sub-proj ects. The calculation o f the EIRR also used economic opportunity cost o f capital o f 12 percent as standard for the feasibility study o f development project. The subproject has economic efficiency, with an Economic Internal Rate o f Return (EIRR) o f 26.14 percent and an Economic N e t Present Value (ENPV) o f 12 percent equivalent o f VND 23,869 million. c. Debt Service Capability The capability for debt repayment o f the Hoa Binh Waste Treatment Company Limited depends on annual income o f the company, loan size, repayment period, and annual interest rate. The annual income i s based on the financial performance and approximated in the subproject financial analysis. As the Investor i s prepared to invest 43 percent o f the total subproject cost, the loan amount represents 57 percent o f total sub-project investment or an amount o f VND 9,882,693 million. Three annual interest rate scenarios have been used ranging from 7 percent to 10 percent. Repayment period o f 10 years, with a 2 year grace period and an 8 year repayment period has been adopted. All scenarios generate high capabilities o f the Hoa Binh Waste Treatment Company Ltd. in i t s ability to repay the proposed loan. 48 Annex 5: Project Costs VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Local Total Project Cost By Component andor Activity us Foreign Investment in municipal infrastructure Technical Assistance for Project Monitoring $million 60.0 0.3 $million 10.0 0.2 $million 70.0 0.5 60.3 6.0 2.7 69.0 NA NA 69.0 10.2 1.o 0.3 11.5 NA NA 11.5 70.5 7.0 3.0 80.5 NA NA 80.5 Total Baseline Cost Physical Contingencies Price Contingencies Total Project Costs' Interest during construction Front-end Fee Total Financing Required us us 'Identifiable taxes and duties are U S $ 8 million, and the total project cost, net o f taxes, i s U S $ 72 million. Therefore, the share o f project cost net o f taxes i s 69%. 49 Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Implementation Structure The implementing agency for the H D P will be HIFU as it institutes key operational reforms and undertakes investments in municipal infrastructure in participation with the private sector. The implementation structure mirrors the current system and role o f HIFU, with the HDP (involving operational reform and increased investment capital) h r t h e r enhancing and developing the h c t i o n and o f HIFU. HIFU operate as a specialized agency within the municipal government with the charge o f working with the Department o f Planning and Investment (DPI) and other line departments in the municipal government to finance costrecovery oriented municipal infrastructure projects in partnership with the private sector. The DPI in i t s role as the planning agency for the province identifies the investment needs as well as project ideas, including those which can be financed with private sector participation. The D P I in collaboration with the H C M C PC then assigns the investment targets and project ideas to the concerned line departments. The line departments prepare the technical details o f the projects (detailed engineering designs, etc.) and consult with HIFU vis-&vis financial structuring to involve with private sector participation. The Department o f Finance - on behalf o f the H C M C PC - will work with HIFU to ensure that an appropriate process i s used to select private sector partners and provide oversight o n the financial operations o f HIFU. HDP Project Implementation Structure MoF ($) IDAto F\ On-lending VND at 4% + WB Commitment Fee 25 yr term, 10 yr grace period Investment Capital (booked as debt on BS) I I Repayment to IDA ($) niru I Repayment of the VND Loan to McIF HIFU 4 Financed Projects 4 CaDital Private Sector HCMC PC Pvt. Investors The flow o f IDA credit i s described in the illustration above. The IDA credit will be on-lent by the MOF to HIFU in VND on terms which have already been negotiated between HIFU and 50 M O F in consultation with the Bank Task Team. The capital on-lent from MOF will be booked on the HIFU balance sheet as debt. The equity or paid-in capital o f HIFU (referred to in Vietnam as charter capital) i s provided by the H C M C PC. HIFU will invest the investment capital provided under the project according to the loan conditions which restrict the investment to cost-recovery oriented municipal infrastructure and define the sectors o f focus. The key financial covenants cover the financial operations o f HIFU (they are not restricted to IDA credits only) to ensure the financial and operational viability o f HIFU as an institution. The project conditions will help to further support HIFU’s long-term qualification under Bank OP 8.30. The disbursements to HIFU will be made via a 6-months Report Based system, which will require HIFU to document how the h d s received based on the previous periodic “Report” were utilized, and describe how the funds requested for the next period will be used in line with the loan conditions - please see annex 7 for details. p Role MOF I HIFU Depts. WB Task Auditors Roles and ResDonsibilities HDP Impact/Notes Provide IDA Credit t o GOV On-lend VND to HIFU I Invest in cost recovery oriented municipal infrastructure projects; leverage private capital in projects; repay the MOF loan; maintain a sound financial position Approve a l l H D P documentation; ensure compliance with loan conditions; oversee project progress Plan infrastructure investments in HCMC and identify project ideas for private sector investment Prepare project details, e.g., engineering designs and FS; consult with HIFU o n relevant projects Supervise project implementation; provide strategic advice to HIFU Management and HCMC PC; review project progress, including monitoringhesults indicators Monitor project progress; provide reports o n project indicators 51 I I I I I $50 m i l l i o n 25 yr, 10 yr grace, 4%+WB Commitment fee, denominated in VND H D P will strengthen the financial operations and provide capital for increased activity, including the ability to proactive prepare projects and then invite private investors H D P will reduce the risk o f contingent liability associated with HIFU; strategic clarity o n investment planning and increasing private sector investment in municipal infrastructure H D P will allow D P I to better utilize HIFU for strategic investments involving private sector participation Increased investment capital will make it easier and faster for HIFU to structure and finance projects for the departments Demonstrate that Vietnamese institutions can implement projects; improve disbursement; establish development models which can help Vietnam become a MIC Establish a model for transparency in municipal government operations I I I Annex 7: Financial Management and DisbursementArrangements VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Country Issues The 2001 C F A A for Vietnam concluded that the public financial management system represented some level o f fiduciary risk. The 2005 PER-IFA recognized improvements in transparency and accountability arising from (i) a new audit law (May 2005) which will enhance oversight by the National Assembly and Provincial People’s Councils over public finances and increase public access to information on government finances; (ii) the new decree on independent audit (March 2004) which regulates the status o f auditors and audit f i r m s and define the value o f audit results; (iii) the accounting law (2003) which establishes the legal framework for Vietnamese Accounting Standards for public and private sectors on the basis of international standards. However, the PER-FA identifies a large agenda for improvement in public financial management. The key challenges include: (i) implementation o f the legislative frameworks which are largely in place; (ii) strengthening the effectiveness o f the State Audit o f Vietnam; (iii)streamlining the internal control framework; (iv) building the financial management capacity, particularly at the sub-national level; and (v) adopting international public sector accounting standards. Recently, corruption and collusion has been highlighted as a significant risk in some donor funded projects in Vietnam. The risks particularly relate to procurement, however the weaknesses in internal control and financial monitoring and oversight combined with capacity weaknesses increase the inherent risk in relation to mis-use o f finds for approved purposes which are accounted for through government systems and processes to substantial. Risk Assessment and Mitigation The inherent risk to the project from the financial environment i s assessed as Moderate. The project specific control risk taking into account the risk mitigation measures that are to be implemented for the project i s assessed as low. The overall financial management risk of the project is assessed as Low. Risk Inherent Risk Country level: Overall Fiscal Environment Entity and Project level: Funds may not be used efficiently and Risk Rating Risk Mitigation Measures Incorporated into Project Design Risk After Mitigation Condition of Negotiation, Board or Effectiveness Moderate Capacity building in MTEF and budgeting, implementation and monitoring, commitment control and debt management; Performance expenditure reviews at least annually (i) Annual financial audit by independent auditor for Financial Statements o f HIFU including the notes o n Fund and Uses o f Fund Moderate Moderate 52 Moderate Risk Risk Rating economically and for purposes intended Entity and Project level: the P P M U may not have necessary capacity to implement the project Overall Inherent Risk Control Risk 1. Budgeting Low 2. Funds F l o w Low 3. Staffing Low 4. Accounting Policy & Procedures 5. Internal Audit Moderate 6. External Audit Low 7. Reporting & Monitoring Moderate 8. Information Systems Moderate Overall Control Risk Moderate Risk Mitigation .Measures Incorporated into Project Design under HDP, (iiGuidance ) o n Financial Management o f HDP, (iii) independent consultant t o monitor ,the compliance o f safeguard performance, fiduciary requirement and (iv) technical assistance o n accounting and reporting system financed by LDIFP Training on the bank procedures and project management be provided t o the project staffs Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Risk After Mitigation Condition o f Negotiation, Board o r Effectiveness (i) Budgets are prepared o n a quarterly basis (ii) L o w Technical assistance provided (partially) a n d o r in cooperation with TA f r o m AFD t o enhance the m e d i u d l o n g term planning and budgeting Low Funds will flows directly f r o m the IDA t o the designated accounts maintained at a commercial bank acceptable to IDA whose signatories are management HIFU. Low Finance staff to b e trained o n IDA procedures and project management. Low Accounting system for HFU’s operations will be improved under the LDIFP Moderate The Supervision Board function i s t o be enhanced to cover aspects o f internal controls under the TA o f LDIFP/ AFD. Internal Audit function (as function o f Supervision Board) to be set UD if determined necessarv bv the TA Low Annual Financial Statements o f HIFU (including the Financial Statements o f the Project as a note/part) will be audited by independent auditors with TOR acceptable t o IDA Moderate (i) Upgrade o f I T system partly self-financed and under the TA o f AFD, (iiimprovement ) of the accounting and reporting system under the TA o f LDIFP Upgrade o f I T system partly self-financed and under TA o f AFD. Low Low Implementation arrangement H C M C People’s Committee will have overall responsibility for overseeing implementation o f the project, reporting to the Government o f Vietnam and fulfilling the requirements o f the World Bank. H C M C Investment Fund for Urban Development (HIFU), which was established 53 in 1996 as a national financial institution, will be the implementing agency for the project responsible for financial management relevant to the project components. HIFU will report to H C M C PC for necessary approval. The proceeds from the Credit can be used for both lending and equity investments which meet the criteria agreed with the Bank. Staffing of financial management function at HIFU HIFU already has an established financial fbnction that i s adequately staffed and the staff has satisfactory competence and qualifications. The accountants in HIFU have accounting educational backgrounds (at least bachelor degree) and experiences managing the activities of the fund. However, the accounting staffs do not have experiences with IDA funded projects, in particular, disbursement and financial management requirements o f IDA. Training on these was delivered to those involved in Financial Management. Budgeting Budgeting procedures have been established at the HIFU. Financial Plans and budgets are prepared and finalized with the cooperation o f different departments (e.g., Finance and Accounting, Investment, Credit Appraisal, Planning Department) within the Fund. The HIFU’s planning department i s responsible for preparing the consolidated budget and plan, obtaining approval from the Management o f the Fund and sending to the H C M C PC for final approval. At HIFU, the planning and budgeting which i s done on a quarterly and annual basis for the short-term period (ie., under one year) was assessed as adequate though the plans and budgets for the longer term (medium and long term) are not comprehensively prepared. The analysis o f actual against budgets i s performed on a monthly basis and the overall assessment i s done at the year end, which i s considered as adequate. I t is concluded from the financial management assessment that the current level o f budgeting and planning, short-term budget and plan is reliable, thus can be used as basis in the report based disbursement method. The longer t e r m planning and budgetingwill be enhanced with the technical assistance component provided under the AFD Credit Agreement and LDIFP. Accounting In accordance with the permission o f the MOF, HIFU has adopted the same accounting regime employed by the Development Assistance Fund under the Decision 78/2003/QD-BTC. Decision 78 introduces (a) the accounting principles, (b) system o f accounting papers/vouchers/ receipts, (c) chart o f accounts, (d) system o f accounting books and (e) format for financial reports. The adoption o f the DAF’s accounting policies to LDIFs in general and to HLFU in particular i s not entirely suitable. This i s mainly due to the fact that there are significant differences in the nature and scope o f operations o f DAF and LDIFs. DAF’s business i s mostly l i k e a not-forprofit organization while the LDIFs are playing a role o f more financially viable and commercial-oriented entities. LDIFs’ activities are more diversified including syndicated investment and lending in co-operation with other commercial banks. Due to those differences, there i s lack o f some significant regulation o f accounting policies such as equity investment, syndicated lending and taxation. HIFU therefore has designed such accounting policies for i t s 54 operations which are (i) generally similar to those o f commercial banks and (ii) not “legalized” (Le. regulated) in the accounting regime issued by the MOF. The project will use HIFU’s current accounting system which i s assessed as adequate for accounting and reporting the receipt and use o f funds received from the IDA as well as other donors, The accounting regime for LDIFs will be changedimproved in the h t u r e upon the issuance o f the new Decree on the management o f the LDIFs. Technical Assistance under the LDIFP will be provided to the M O F to achieve those. Internal Controls The management o f HIFU i s responsible for ensuring that an adequate internal control framework and internal controls are in place and operating. Overall, the current internal control system i s assessed as adequate as HIFU has: (i)established clear defined Financial Management responsibilities, supervision, monitoring and reporting structures; (ii) observed the segregation o f duties; (iii) defined and documented financial processes and procedures; (iv) set up adequate management reporting including analysis o f variances and findings with monthly and quarterly reporting to the Board o f Management; and (v) set up proper procedures and documentation retention. However, there are certain areas o f the risk management processes where improvements are required: (i) development o f procedures for identification o f risks o f concentration liquidity and market and; (ii)use o f tools and modules for risk assessment processes such as maturity analysis, re-pricing analysis, interest sensitivity model, etc. In addition, the information technology system should also be upgraded to hrther facilitate the efficient management o f the hnd’s operations. Technical assistance for the development o f investment policies (which includes the risk management) i s being provided by a Bank executed assignment o f which the output will be recommendations to HIFU (and other LDIFs) for improvement o f the risk management. The upgrade o f the information technology o f HIFU will also be partially self- financed and partially by the technical assistance component o f this project andor with the AFD’s project. Amount o f Credit Allocated (million US%) YOof Expenditures to be Category 1- Equity Investments by HIFU 20 100% Category 2- Loan Investments by HIFU 30 100% 50 100% Expenditure Category TOTAL Financed Eligible expenditure Eligible expenditure means equity investments and loan investment for the reasonable costs o f goods, works and services o f sub-projects which meet the criteria agreed with IDA. The subprojects must meet the criteria, as set out in the D C A and the PPA Manual vis-a-vis: (i) cost recovery; (ii) municipal infrastructure investment and (iii) being implemented in partnership o f private sector. 55 Disbursement Methods The project will use the following disbursement methods: 0 0 0 Reimbursement - The Bank may reimburse the borrower for expenditures eligible for financing pursuant to the Loan Agreement (“eligible expenditures”) that the borrower has pre-financed from i t s own resources. Advance - The Bank may advance loan proceeds into a designated account o f the borrower to finance eligible expenditures as they are incurred and for which supporting documents will be provided at a later date Direct Payment - The Bank may make payments, at the borrower’s request, directly to a third party (e.g., supplier, contractor, and consultant) for eligible expenditures. The Disbursement Deadline Date will be four months after the Closing Date o f the project. Supporting documentation to evidence that funds have been used for eligible expenditures under the reimbursement and advance methods are the Interim Financial Reports (IFRs). The un-audited IFRs will be required to be submitted to the Bank at least quarterly and will be reviewed by the Financial Management Specialist prior to recording o f the expenditures against the project expenditures categories by the Loans Department. Under the Direct payment method the supporting documentation i s the records o f eligible expenditures; or any other supporting documentation that the Bank may request by notice to the borrower. The format of the IFRs needs to be agreed between the representatives o f GOV and IDA at the negotiation. Designated Accounts and Ceiling A Designated Account (DA) in USD is maintained at a commercial bank with the terms and conditions acceptable to IDA. The Ceiling o f the DA i s the 6 month forecast o f the cash flow requirements. Application for Advances HIFU may apply for an advance in an amount up to the Ceiling less the aggregate amount of those advances previously received for which HIFU has not yet provided supporting documentation (IFRs). The advance requested will be based on the forecast estimate o f equity investments and loan investments which HIFU expects to disburse in the next 6 months period. HIFU will provide information on the expected disbursements for approved sub-projects in the quarterly IFRs required to be submitted to the Bank. Forecasts will be reviewed by the financial management specialist and task team for reasonableness. Frequency of Reporting Eligible expenditures paid from the DA HIFU will report on the use o f loan proceeds advanced to the DA on a quarterly basis through unaudited interim financial reports. Retroactive financing Retroactive financing in the aggregate amount o f US$1.5 million will be provided for expenditures made prior to the date o f the Credit Agreement but after appraisal date, for urgently required disbursement for Equity and Loan Investments. The procurement procedures shall be in accordance with IDA Procurement Guidelines. 56 Fund flow diagram The IDA Credit will be on-lent by the Government o f Vietnam to HIFU on terms and conditions acceptable to IDA. The IDA funds will be directly deposited to a designated account in USD at a commercial bank, acceptable to IDA, maintained and operated by HIFU. Withdrawal applications will be prepared by HIFU and processed through the MOF - External Financing Department. HIFU will be responsible for the flow o f funds to equity and loan investment beneficiaries and suppliers. Fund flow from IDA to HIFU and Beneficiaries (sub-projects) MOF/ External A I t Commercial Bank I I Beneficiaries 1. HIFU prepares the withdrawing application and sends to M O F - External Finance Department (EFD) for verification 2. EFD verifies and notifies HIFU 3. HIFU submitted the withdrawing application to IDA 4. IDA transfers fund to the DA o f HIFU at commercial bank 5. Beneficiaries send the requests for payment to HIFU 6. HIFU instructs the Commercial Bank to make the payments 7. Commercial Bank makes payments to Beneficiaries 57 Details o f Fund Flow from HIFU to Beneficiaries (Sub-projects) Beneficiaries (subproject holders) (1) Beneficiaries (sub-project holders) apply for loanshnvestments from the HDP; (2) HIFU approves the loanshnvestment proposals; (3) Beneficiaries s i g n contracts with contractors to carrying out work; (4) Contractors claims for reimbursement based on work completed, submitting supporting documentation to Beneficiaries; (5) Beneficiaries review and forward reimbursement claims to HIFU (together with copies o f supporting documentation). Beneficiaries to retain the original copies o f supporting documentation; (6) HIFU makes payment from H D P designated accounts, retaining the copies o f supporting documentation. 58 Monitoring of Sub-project Financial Performance and Use of Funds Monitoring procedures by HIFU Diagram o f the credit monitoring process (for loan investment) i s as follow: Appraisal Department (1) Appraisal Credit Department to ’ council (1) ’ process the loan (2) (3) I I I I I I I (------------------------------------------J I I I I I + I Accounting and Finance Department ’ Claims for payments from suppliers/contractors In summary, there are 3 types o f monitoring supervision implemented by HIFU for loans: 1. The appraisal procedures taken before the loan i s processed by Appraisal Department and Appraisal Council; 2. Check documentation o f each and every claims for payments to suppliers and contractors (of the borrowers) to ensure the loan proceeds are used for agreed purposes. This check is done by credit officer and technical expert; 3. Post disbursement inspection where credit department performs inspection to ensure: (i) the proceeds from loans have been used for the agreed purposes; and (ii) that the borrower can repay the loans. This inspection also includes review o f periodical financial statements and analysis o f financial indicatodratios. Note: The documentation required may comprise o f contract, invoices, certificate o f construction volume, etc. Based on the result o f due diligence review by Emst and Young, and the result o f Financial Management Assessment, i t i s concluded that the procedures discussed in (2) and (3) are adequately provided while the procedures o f (1) should be improved. For equity investment, the same monitoring procedures o f (1) and (3) are in place. However the procedures o f (2) cannot be performed due to the nature o f the disbursement process for investment whereas checking procedures cannot be performed against each and every payment. Furthermore, it i s not clearly regulated in HIFU that the investees should submit the audited financial statements to ensure that: (i)the proceeds from equity investment are used for intended purpose and (ii) to reflect truly and fairly the financial position and performance o f investees. 59 The constraints o f the current monitoring procedures o f HIFU can be enhanced by the followings which are the key elements o f the oversight and monitoring arrangements to ensure that funds are used for eligible purposes and properly accounted and reported: HIFU adopts the Manual o f Preparation and Appraisal o f the Projects (PPA Manual) and the Manual for the Selection o f Private Sector Participants (PSP Manual) where projects are appraised, selected and monitored following guidelines and procedures and criteria agreed with the Bank; HIFU will require through the sub-project agreements the beneficiaries to maintain adequate records and to provide such financial information as HIFU requests, to carry out the sub-project with due diligence and with efficiency. HIFU will also require the right to inspect by i t s e l f or jointly with representatives o f the Bank, the plans, operations, works, goods, services, activities and any relevant records and documents o f the sub-project; HIFU will require the sub equity investment projects to submit to HIFU the annual audited financial statements and auditor report prepared by acceptable Auditor to HIFU; An international auditing firm (as a part o f Bank supervision team) will conduct on a quarterly basis, a review o f the un-audited and audited financial statements and the progress manual implementation, including the confirmation o f whether the loans and equity investments are meeting the agreed sub-project criteria, specifically, are they being prepared according to PPA Manual and PSP Manual; Independent Consultant monitors the compliance o f each sub-project with the social and environmental safeguards requirements; All project information will be compiled by HIFU Management and discussed with the H C M C PC and the Bank in a workshop to be held every six months. The workshop will discuss project progress and any outstanding issues, including the need to refine or adjust any project component; Annual External Financial Audit whereby HIFU’s Financial Statements which include the notedparts o f Financial Statements o f the Project will be audited in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing. Financial Reporting HIFU’s current financial and management reporting i s assessed as adequate and accurate in accordance with the requirements o f Decision 78. Quarterly Interim Financial Reports (IFRs) will be prepared by HIFU for monitoring of financial performance o f the project in a format to be agreed between the representatives o f the GOV and the IDA during loan negotiations. HIFU will submit IFRs to the Bank within 45 days o f the end each quarter to the Bank. The IFRs will cover all project activities and will include: Financial reports (analyzing expenditures against budgets) IFR 1.1 Sources and Uses o f Funds by expenditure category (including forecast o f funds requirement for the next 6 months); IFR 1.2 Detailed Six Month Financial Plan 60 0 IFR2.0 IFR3.0 IFR4.0 0 IFR5.0 0 Uses o f Funds by Components; Statement o f Designated Account Reconciliation; Report o n Contract Progress (applied for Component 2: Technical Assistance only) Report on Procurement Monitoring (applied for Component 2: Technical Assistance only) The IFRs are not requiredto be audited. Annual Project Financial Statements: HIFU will prepare annual project financial statements which will be included in the notes o f HIFU’s financial statements consisting o f A Statement o f Sources and Uses o f Funds / Cash Receipts and Payments which recognizes all cash receipts, cash payments and cash balances controlled by the entity; and separately identify payments by third parties on behalf o f the entity. The Accounting Policies Adopted and Explanatory Notes. The explanatory notes should be presented in a systematic manner with items on the Statement o f Cash Receipts and Payments being cross referenced to any related information in the notes. Examples o f this information include a summary o f fixed assets by category o f assets, and a schedule o f credit withdrawals, listing individual withdrawal applications; and 0 A Management Assertion that Bank funds have been expended in accordance with the intended purposes as specified in the relevant World Bank legal agreement. The annual financial statements are required to be audited and submitted to the Bank within 6 months o f the end o f each financial year. The key accounting policies are included in the HIFUproject financial management guidelines. Key accounting policies include: 0 Vietnamese Accounting Standards are applied for the accounting for the Income and Expenses o f the Project which required the accrual basis to be applied; 0 Interest income from IDA funds i s recorded as income o f the project thus i s reflected in the closing fund balance. Audit Arrangements The current financial statements o f HIFU are audited by D T L Auditing Company (a local company, which i s a member o f Howarth International) in accordance with Vietnamese Standards on Auditing. The audit opinion on the recent financial statements i s unqualified. However, performance o f DTL Auditing Company has not been assessed by IDA. External Audit. HLFU’s financial statements which include the notedparts o f Financial Statements o f the Proiect will be audited in accordance with international auditing standards by independent auditors and TORS acceptable to IDA. The audited financial statements and audit reports will be submitted to the Bank within six months o f the end o f each financial year, and the date o f closing o f the project. 61 Supervision Plan The FM risk i s assessed as low. On this basis, the FM supervision will consist o f review o f the quarterly IFRs and annual financial statements and accompanying audit reports, and the results o f the supervision auditors’ reviews o f the project’s operations (including eligibility of expenditures) and financial reports. An annual on-site supervision mission to review all aspects o f the project financial management will be undertaken. The on-site supervision will review the project’s financial management system, including but not limited to operation o f the Designated Account, Statement o f Expenditures, internal controls, reporting and follow up of audit findings and mission’s findings. The financial management supervision will be conducted by IDA’Sfinancial management specialist staff. 62 Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project A. General Bank-fundedprocurement for the proposed project would be carried out in accordance with the World Bank’s “Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits” dated M a y 2004, revised October 1, 2006 (the Procurement Guidelines); and “Guidelines: Selection and Employment o f Consultants by World Bank Borrowers” dated M a y 2004, revised October 1, 2006 (the Consultant Guidelines) and the provisions stipulated in the Financing Agreement. The general description o f various items under different expenditure categories i s described below. For each contract to be financed by the IDA Credit, the different procurement methods or consultant selection methods, the need for prequalification, estimated costs, prior review requirements, and time frame are agreed between the Borrower and the Bank project team in the Procurement Plan. The Procurement Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. HIFU i s expected to invest in selected infrastructure projects under two possible forms (i) loans to private sector f i r m s and/or autonomous commercial f i r m s in public sector and (ii)equity investment in partnership with private sector firms. In addition, consultant services are expected to be procured by HIFU under component 2 o f the project. These consultant services are to be wholly financed by HIFU own funds and would be procured in accordance with the national Procurement Law. Al- Procurement under HIFU loans to private sector firms and/or autonomous commercial firms in public sector Procurement o f Works. C i v i l works to be procured under HIFU loans to private sector f i r m s and/or autonomous commercial f i r m s in public sector include urbdtransport facilities such as bus/truck terminal, river port, inland depot, waste treatment facilities, workshops, etc. Procurement o f works would mainly be undertaken by respective borrowersheneficiaries o f HIFU loans using the established private sector and/or commercial practices in accordance with paragraph 3.12 o f the Bank’s Procurement Guidelines. The following private sector and commercial practices are intended to be used for the project. For small works (no specific threshold i s established but normally about less than VND1 billion or US$70,000), entities may negotiate a contract directly with a Contractor with due attention to qualifications and reputation o f contractor would be used. Alternatively, the entity may invite quotations from a minimum o f three Contractors to assure competitive prices. Such small works may also be directly constructed by the f i r m s if they have adequate construction experience, personnel and equipment capabilities (force account). For larger works, open competitive bidding (similar to the national competitive bidding o f the national Procurement Law) would be used. These practices are basically found acceptable to the Bank considering the incentive o f HIFU borrowing f i r m s in ensuring economy and efficiency o f their borrowed funds due to commercial interest rate they have to pay to HIFU. However, i t i s recommended that for large and complex works which are estimated to cost more than US$5 million per contract, I C B method as provided in Section 11, the Bank’s Procurement Guidelines may be the most appropriate procurement method and should be used. 63 Procurement o f Goods. Goods under loans from HIFU to i t s borrowers (Component 1) include equipment associated with the facilities they invest such as bus terminal equipment, driers, air compressors, generators, etc. These goods would be procured by respective subborrowersibeneficiaries using the established private sector and/or commercial practices in accordance with paragraph 3.12 o f the Bank’s Procurement Guidelines. The following commercial practices are intended to be used for the project. For small goods items (no specific threshold i s established but normally about less than V N D l O O million or US$7,000), direct contracting would be used. Direct contracting may also be used for equipment o f proprietary nature or when need i s urgent. For goods items o f about less than V N D 2 billion or US$125,000 per contract, shopping would normally be used. Larger goods contracts may be procured using suitable open competitive bidding procedures. These practices are basically found acceptable. The Bank team recommends that where possible, I C B method as provided in Section 11, the Bank’s Procurement Guidelines should be used for purchase o f large single items o f goods or large quantities o f l i k e goods which can be grouped together for bulk purchasing under contracts estimated to cost more than US$1 million each. Selection o f Consultants. Consulting services under loans from HIFU to i t s borrowers include preparation and appraisal o f engineering design, procurement support, construction supervision, technical transfer, etc. These consulting services would be procured by respective HIFU loan borrowersheneficiaries using established commercial private sector and commercial practices in accordance with paragraph 3.14 o f the Bank’s Consultant Guidelines. The following commercial practices are intended to be used for the project. For small contracts (no specific threshold i s established but normally less than VND500 million or US$30,000), single source selection (but usually based on a comparison o f qualifications o f several candidates or previous experience with the firm) would be used (to some extent, this procedure i s more or less similar to the Bank’s CQS method). For larger contracts, consultants would be selected through a competitive process similar to the Bank’s QCBS or LCS methods. It i s recommended that large assignments estimated to cost more than US$1 million per contract should be procured through the QCBS method described in Section 11, the Bank’s Consultant Guidelines. A-2 Procurement under HIFU Equity Investment Apart loans to private sector f i r m s and/or autonomous commercial f i r m s in public sector, HIFU would invest in selected infrastructure projects under the form o f equity investment in partnership with private sector firms. This i s an innovative operation. The selection o f such partnering f i r m s would be conducted following a competitive procedure established based on the global experience and best practice, under the Private Sector Participation (PSP) Manual prepared for the project. This procedure has been agreed with the Bank and i s described in Annex 4 o f the PAD. Procurement o f goods, works and consulting services for such projects would be done by respective newly established joint venture companies (of which HIFU is a partner) following their own procedures or commercial practices. A-3 Procurement under component 2 o f the project Consulting services under Component 2 procured by HIFU for i t s technical assistance needs include social/environmental monitoring, preparation o f PPA manual, on-the-job advisory, training, financial auditing, etc. These consultant services are to be wholly financed by HIFU own h d s and would be procured in accordance with the national Procurement Law. 64 B. Assessment o f the apency’s capacitv to implement procurement An assessment o f the procurement capacity o f HIFU and the first two f i r m s which would borrow HIFU loans (West Bus Terminal Co. and Hoa Binh Waste Treatment Co. Ltd) was carried out during the project preparation. This assessment provided the following key findings: (i) all agencies have institutional capacity in place but they have not yet arranged specific organization and staffing for project/procurement implementation; (ii)although the agencies do not appear to have prior knowledge and experience o n Bank procurement, because this is a Financial Intermediary Loan and given the Project’s specific financing arrangement, the implementing agencies are not expected to implement their procurement using the Bank’s traditional competitive methods, but mostly through commercial practices. The commercial practices intended to be used for the project are found generally acceptable; (iii) the agencies have different levels o f experience in procurement using commercial practices. HIFU has successfully participated in a multi-million U S D BOO water supply plant project and gained good experience on competitive bidding. However, -both W B T C and H B D C - lack knowledge and experience on competitive bidding, and the procurement practices they were familiar with are mainly direct contractinglsingle source selection, shopping and force account; (iv) HIFU staff generally have good qualifications and capabilities, some o f them were trained on basic Bank procurement and the national Procurement Law; and (v) To address procurement capacity deficiencies, the agencies already planned to hire consultants to assist their procurement implementation. Based on the above findings and the specific nature o f procurement work required for the project, the procurement risk for the proposed project is rated as ”medium”. To mitigate the procurement risk and to strengthen the project procurement implementation capacities, the following key actions have been discussed and agreed with the Borrower. 0 Organization o f the implementation unit within HIFU/WBTC/HB WTC, including designation and j o b descriptions for procurement staff should be prepared. Other prospective borrowers should designate procurement staff for the HIFU loan before implementation o f their subprojects. 0 An internationally experienced consultant should be hired to prepare detailed guidancekidding documents and assist/train HIFU and relevant city departments in implementing competitive selection o f private sector partners for i t s equity investment operation. 0 A procurement operational manual for guidance to HIFU borrowers should be prepared based on the experiences o f the first two subprojects. 0 A procurement session should be organized during the project launching workshop to introduce the project’s specific procurement requirements with a focus on commercial practices to be used for HIFU loans. An in-depth training should be conducted for HIFU and relevant city departments on detailed procedures for competitive selection o f private sector partners during project implementation. 0 Prospective HIFU borrowers should hire consultant(s) to help implement their procurement as needed. C. Procurement Plan The Borrower developed a detailed Procurement Plan for implementation o f Component 2 and the first two subprojects under Component 1. This plan (Attachment 2) has been discussed and agreed between the Borrower and IDA during negotiations. The Procurement Plan will be 65 made available in the Project’s database and in the Bank’s external website. I t will be updated in agreement with the Bank team at least annually or sooner if required to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. D. Bank Prior-Review and Frequency o f Procurement Supervision The following requirements for Bank procurement prior-review are recommended: 0 The first two contracts for procurement o f goods and works procured through open competitive bidding under the commercial practices by HIFU loan borrowers. 0 All contracts for procurement o f goods and works to be procured under International Competitive Bidding (ICB) and all contracts for procurement o f consultants’ services to be procured under Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) Other contracts than those mentioned above shall be subject to the Bank’s post review procedures. I t i s recommended to carry out supervision missions to conduct post review o f contracts o n a frequency o f every twelve (12) months. Attachment 1 Details o f the procurement arrangements involving international competition Goods and Works and non-consultingservices. L i s t o f contract Packages which will be procured following I C B method: No ICB contracts are expected at the time ofproject preparation. Consulting Services. L i s t o f Consulting Assignments with short-list o f international firms: No consulting contracts with shortlist of international firms are expected at the time of project preparation. 66 Attachment 2: Indicative Procurement Plan for the First 18 Months I. GENERAL Project information: Country: Vietnam Borrower: Socialist Republic o f Vietnam Project Name: HIFU Development Project Loadcredit No.: NA. Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs): HIFU, West Bus Terminal Co. (WBTC), Hoa Binh Waste Treatment Co. Ltd (HBTC) and other private sector f i r m s / autonomous commercial f i r m s in the public sector Period covered by this procurement plan: 18 months 11. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: Refer to Section D, Annex 8 o f the PAD. 2. Special Procurement Arrangements: Selection o f private sector partners for HIFU equity investment operation shall be done following the competitive procedures described in Annex 4 o f the PAD. Works and goods contracts under H o a Binh Waste Treatment Co.3 Subprojects are expected to be procured in advance o f the Financing Agreement signing. The expenditures under these contracts incurred after the cut-off date specified in the Financing Agreement and prior to signing o f the FA with IDA, would be eligible for retroactive financing, subject to meeting all the specified conditions o f eligibility that would apply to expenditures incurred after the signing. 1 2 Ref. No. Contract Descriptions 3 Est. cost (US%) 4 5 6 7 Procurement Method P Q Domestic Preference Review by Bank 8 Expected Bid-Opening Date No No Prior Apr. 2008 No No Post Jul. 2008 No No Post Jul. 2008 No No Post Apr. 2008 No No Post Jul. 2008 West Bus Terminal Co.’s Subprojects BX-13 Yard road & 130,000 Commercial Practice technical (Open Competitive infrastructure Bidding) BX-14 Terminal & 80,000 Commercial Practice platform (Open Competitive Bidding) BX-15 Other supporting 40,000 Commercial Practice works (Open Competitive Bidding) BX- 18 Equipment for 90,000 Commercial Practice road and yard (Shopping) BX-19 Equipment for 95,000 Commercial Practice terminal (Shopping) 9 Comments HB-1 Intake tanks, septic tanks, treatment works, pump station, weighing station and access road Site leveling and preparation 270,000 Commercial Practice (Open Competitive Bidding) 30,000 HB-3 Passive aeriation area 150,000 HB-4 Workshop and stor age 40,000 HB-5 Water drainage and lighting system 28,000 HB-6 Lightning protection system 5,000 Commercial Practice (Direct Contracting) Commercial Practice (Open Competitive Bidding) Commercial Practice (Direct Contracting) Commercial Practice (Direct Contracting) Commercial Practice (Direct HB-7 I Dredging 60,000 HB-2 I pumping/gradin I I gequipment I I I Commercial Practice (Shopping) No No Post Jun. 2007 No No Post May 2007 No No. Post Jul. 2007 No No Post Jul. 2007 No No Post Jul. 2007 No No Post Jul. 2007 No No Post Jul. 2007 111. Selection of Consultants 1. Prior Review Threshold: Selection decisions subject to Prior Review by Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines Selection and Employment o f Consultants: Refer to Section D, Annex 8 o f the PAD. 2. Short list comprising entirely of national consultants: Because the nature and value o f consultant services required, almost consultants are expected to be national. However, there would be some international individual consultants required for Component 2. 3. Special Procurement Arrangements: Consultant contracts under H o a Binh Waste Treatment Co.’s Subprojects are expected to be procured in advance o f the 68 Financing Agreement signing. The expenditures under these contracts incurred after the cut-off date specified in the Financing Agreement and prior to signing o f the FA with IDA, would be eligible for retroactive financing, subject t o meeting a l l the specified conditions o f eligibility that would apply to expenditures incurred after the signing. 1 Ref. No. I 2 I Description of Assignment I 7 Est. 4 I HB-14 I Technical transfer, commissioning and testing Procurement support I h 7 Review by Bank (Prior I Post) Expected Proposals Submissi on Date Comments 60,000 Gov’t proc. procedures NA Oct. 2007 50,000 Gov’t proc. procedures NA Oct.2007 Bank prior review TOR I qualifications only Ditto 70,000 Gov’t proc. procedures NA Feb.2008 Ditto 100,000 Gov’t proc. procedures NA Nov.2007 Ditto 100,000 Gov’t proc. procedures NA Oct. 2007 Ditto 120,000 Gov’t proc. procedures NA Oct.2007 Ditto Post I Aug. 2007 I Post May 2007 cost HB-13 1 Selection Method (us9 HIFU’s Component 2 Independent resettlement TA- 1 monitoring consultant (firm) Independent TA-2 environmental monitoring consultant (firm) On the job safeguard TA-3. advice and training for HIFU (firm or individual) On the job advice and TA-4. training for implementing PSP framework (firm or individual) On the job advice and TA-5 training for implementing project preparatiodappraisal manual (firm) Independent financial TA-6 audit West Bus Terminal Co.’s Sub s 3,000 I 3,000 69 Commercial Practice (SSS) Commercial Practice (SSS) I Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF HIFU Financial Intermediary Analysis The detailed due diligence o f HIFU’s financial accounts was conducted to determine the financial viability o f HIFU as a potential Bank partner in a financial intermediary loan. T h e analysis reviewed the quality o f HIFU’s loan portfolio, including the level o f nonperforming loans and a detailed review o f randomly selected loans to determine loan rates and repayment quality. The equity investments o f HIFU were also analyzed to determine HIFU’s exposure vis-a-vis industry and investment instrument. Again, the key equity investments were identified and reviewed to determine asset quality. Finally, the Income Statement was analyzed vis-a-vis profitability and operational efficiency. The team conducted C A M E L Analysis, key financial ratios analysis. The analysis confirmed that HIFU i s in a strong financial position with total paid-in capital (charter capital) o f VND 1,288,224 billion and a very healthy capital adequacy ratio. Total assets have increased from VND 2,203,529 billion in 2003 to 3,323,603 billion in 2005, N e t income has increased from VND 55,433 billion in 2004 to VND 85,369 billion in 2005. The quality o f the loan portfolio i s good, with non-performing loans accounting for 0.04%. T h e interest rate in the random sample o f 10 loans reviewed was around lo%, which i s above the standard market rate as indicated by the SOCBs. The quality o f the investment portfolio was also very strong, with the high possibility that the current (marked to market) value o f the investments will be far higher than the values reported in the financial statements. Finally, the investment portfolio (loans and investments) i s heavily concentrated in infrastructure related investments. The interest income from lending accounts for approximately 70% o f total sources o f income. Operating and administration expenses o f the Fund are very l o w considering the size o f the current operations o f the Fund. Finally, the investments in portfolio companies (noninfrastructure investments) account for a significantly minor proportion o f total fund assets and therefore present limit exposure to market fluctuations. The detailed analysis o f HIFU’s financial position i s provided below. The detailed analysis o f HIFU’s financial position i s provided below. 70 Financial Analysis o f HIFU 2005 MVDm 2004 VNDm 2003 VNDm ASSETS Cash and current accounts with banks Loans and advances to customers(**) Long-term investments Fixed assets (net) Construction in progress Other assets 110,979 2,916,085 256,292 38,290 917 1,040 208,596 2,608,246 155,675 38,673 917 43 1 3 70,443 1,695,751 127,693 3,117 917 5,608 Total assets 3,323,603 3,012,538 2,203,529 TOTAL LIABILITIES Customer deposits and other amounts due to customers Borrowed funds (***) Other liabilities 35,198 1,828,205 66,250 32,309 2,153,780 43,775 49,625 1,482,383 44,661 Total liabilities 1,929,653 2,229,864 1,576,669 OWNER’S E Q U I T Y Chartered capital Foreign exchange difference Retained earnings Reserves 1,288,224 515 85,371 19,840 687,209 927 82,266 12,272 452,617 777 55,433 118,033 Total owner’s equity 1,393,950 782,674 626,860 Total Liabilities and Owner’s Equity 3,323,603 3,012,538 2,203,529 LIABILITIES AND OWNER’S EQUITY (*):Figures are extractedfrom the auditedjnancial statements of the Fund. I**) Including loans from trusted funds to customers amountinp to VND 676,298m 12004: VND 673.422mL 2003: 579.752m) which HIFU does not bear credit r i s k . I***) Including funds for trusted finds amounting to VND 777,789m (2004: 1.483,522m. 2003: 1.114.677m) as discussed in 1**I 71 3.1.1 Loans to customers Loans to customers include long-term and medium-term loans from the source o f (i) the chartered and mobilized capital, (ii) other banks in syndicated lending and (iii) entrusted fund. As discussed above, loans to customers which are from the participation o f other banks in syndicated loans and entrusted fund should not be recognized as assets in the balance sheet o f the Fund according to the prevailing regulation o f the SBV. Loans to customers hold a high percentage in the total assets though this high proportion seemed to experience an up trend over the years. Overall loan portfolio review Medium and long-term loans to customers Loans from trusted funds to customers'" Other loans to customers Transportation infrastructure Water/ Electricity Supply Industrial/ Residential Zone Infrastructure Public Health Education Others 1,761,217 676,208 478,660 1,272,824 673,422 662,000 1,115,999 579,752 2,916,085 2,608,246 1,695,751 749,764 33% 576,232 30% 324,919 29% 199,360 9% 210,487 11% 53,442 5% 837,775 222,248 126,792 103,937 37% 10% 6% 5% 710,259 202,162 116,737 118,947 37% 10% 6% 6% 394,131 153,988 90,742 98,777 35% 14% 8% 9% 2,239,877 (*) 100% 1,934,824 100% 1,115,999 100% - (*) This amount excluded loans from trusted funds to customers but included the portion of loans from the participations of other banks in syndicated lending, which can not be separated by the Fund. Loan portfolio o f HIFU i s much concentrated on the infrastructure o f transportation, industrial, residential zone, and public health. T h i s structure o f funding i s consistent with strategic development policy o f the H C M C People's Committee. lo Trust fund investments are fully at the risk o f the beneficiary o f the Trust (HCMC PC), subject to standard fiduciary responsibilities 72 State Owned Enterprise Limited Liability Company Joint Stock Company Private 1,914,486 12,614 308,281 4,496 2,239,877 85% 1,773,627 1% 5,908 14% 155,289 0% - 92% 0% 8% 0% 978,227 20,329 117,443 - 88% 2% 11% 0% 100% 1,934,824 100% 1,115,999 100% - The major borrowers o f HIFU are s t i l l SOEs accounted for over 85% o f total portfolio. I t i s a common practice that SOEs s t i l l play an important role in infrastructure development projects. Non-performing loans and write-offs Loans to customers from sources o f chartered capital, mobilized capital and other banks in syndicated loans (net) . Overdue loans % 2,238,913 1,933,586 1,114,651 964 1,238 1,348 0.04% 0.06% 0.12% Provision for loan losses As reported by HIFU, their non-performing loans only account for a minimal portion in the loan portfolio. And those non-performing loans are being collected and recovered over the 3 years. I t i s noted that, HIFU has not implemented any loan classification and provision system. As a consequence, we could not have any information to assess the overall quality of the loan portfolio. Currently, banks in Vietnam i s to follow Decision 493/2005/QD-NHNN issued by the State Bank o f Vietnam regarding the loan classification and loan loss provision in lending activities. In the following part, we will present the result and our comments o n the review o f the sample o f 10 customers as at 3 1 December 2005 according to Decision 493. Loan review sample We have randomly reviewed 10 customers who operate in different industries and borrowed money from HIFU for different purposes with different contractual conditions and have significant loan balances with the Fund. It was noticed that source o f repayment o f the state directed lending was mostly from the budget o f the H C M C People’s Committee which i s reliable but might be delayed due to bureaucratic procedures o f using the state budget. 73 The reviewed 10 items covered about 70% o f total portfolio o f which we do not note down any impairment or downgrade o f the reviewed item that requires the Fund has to create additional specific provision against them. General provision Decision 493 requires credit institution to maintain a general provision at the rate o f 0.75% o n the current loans (group 1). Should the Fund wish to apply that approach, the Fund i s required to additional book a general provision o f VNDm 16,792 in the income statement for the year ended 31 December 2005. 74 I I i i I I i Investment portfolio Other long t e r m investment Investment in securities 1,208 126,484 786 154,889 389 255,903 127,692 155,675 256,292 9% 12% 18% % o f total assets Investment portfolio accounts for a significant part in total assets o f HIFU and increases quickly over the years. The investment portfolio is rather diversified in terms o f the types o f investment, industry and size. Investment I n vestme nt value (MvNDI type Development Commercial Joint Stock Bank Viet A Joint Stock Commercial Bank City Infrastructure & Technology JV Company 2 3 4 5 I I I 6 I I 7 8 9 I I Binh Chanh construction and investment JV Company REE Refrigerator ~vcompaiy Cu Chi Industrial zoneconstruction and investment JV Phu Nhuan Gold & Jewelry JV Company K e n h Dong Water JVCompaiy Thu Duc B O O Water JV Company Joint stock Joint stock Banking Banking Joint stock I I Joint stock Joint stock I Joint I I I I stock I I I Joint I stock I Joint stock Thu Duc Housing Development JV 10 Company Joint stock Song Than JV 11 Company Joint stock %of sg;s ( ) %of %of shares shares (2004) (2005) N/A (*> N/A Share urchase Share urchase Infrastructure construction Develop and invest infrastructure and technical deployment o f main Project Real estate trading Industrial zone infrastructure trading Gold and precious stone trading Clean water business Water business Houses and accommodation management and trading Industrial zone infrastructure trading and Founding shareholder 28,973 Transfer o f State hnd 6,000 Founding 76 N/A (*> * . 12 Bach Tuyet Cotton Joint Stock Company 14 SACOM HSC Securities Joint Stock Company 15 Vinamilk 13 16 M E C O Joint stock Joint stock Joint stock Joint stock Joint stock Joint stock Cotton manufacturing Telecommunic ation Cable Manufacturer Share purchase NIA (**) NIA 530 Share purchase NIA (**) NIA 2,047 Securities trading Milk products manufacturer Founding shareholder Share purchase Found shareholder 30 NIA (**) NIA (*) 30 NIA Hospital 10,000 1,833 85 ** ** ** NIA 1 1 30 0.1 NIA (*I * Investments are recorded at original costs, normally at par value being the amounts that the Fund invested on the establishment ofjoint stock companies, or acquiring o f shares injoint stock companies or managing the stakes o f SOE being equitized which are delegated by local People’s Committee. The investee companies operate mostly in the infkastructure development, such as water supply, construction, housing development.. . Overall, HIFU is holding shares o f companies having high market value. Please refer to the following table to compare the market value o f the portfolio o f the Fund. (*) (**) Unlisted firms, price i s obtained from OTC market and provided by HIFU as o f February 12,2007 Listed firm, price i s obtained from Hochiminh City Securities Market as of February 12,2007. 77 After the acquiring date, the Fund has not reflected subsequently these investments at the market price and consequently, the value o f the investment portfolio i s understated as at 31 December 2005 at least by due to information on the value o f share o f certain unlisted companies i s not available, Chartered capital and reserves The chartered capital o f HIFU significant increased from VND 687,209m in 2004 to VND 1,288,244m, (the initial registered capital was only VND 500,000m). The increase in chartered capital i s mainly attributed by the actual cash contribution from the H o Chi Minh City’s State Budget in the year to strengthen the financial capacity o f the Fund in order to provide financial supports to new projects in the coming period and the recapitalization o f earnings of previous years. Capital adequacy ratio The capital adequacy ratios o f the Bank over the years are as follows: Chartered Capital Reserves (non-distributable) 1,288,224 99,939 687,209 91,395 452,617 171,567 Total capital 1,388,163 778,604 624,184 Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) 1,249,727 1,085,777 1,063,520 111% 72% 59% % total capital funds/ RWA (Capital Adequacy Ratio) The ratio indicates that the Fund i s well capitalized and i s potential for hrther expansion o f total assets by providing new loans or investing in new projects. Analysis o f the income statement (extracted from the audited financial statements)2004 TOTAL INCOME Interest and similar income Interest and similar expenses 103,018 (3 7,129) 103,460 (3 0,6 14) 79,456 (25,528) N e t interest margin Fees and commission income Fees and commission expenses Dividend income received Other operating income 65,889 1,387 (572) 26,799 1,597 72,846 1,017 (832) 16,154 1,798 53,928 912 (621) 8,304 365 TOTAL O P E R A T I N G INCOME 95,100 90,983 62,888 Employees expenses (6,330) (5,977) (4,484) 78 Depreciation, amortization and maintenance Other operating expenses 9594) (2,807) (503) (2,239) (1,198) (1,773) 85,369 82,264 55,433 TOTAL PROFIT BEFORE TAX In the total income o f HIFU, interest income from lending accounts for approximately 70% of total sources o f income. The next significant contribution to the income i s dividend income. There has been a steady growth in those sources o f income over years as a direct result of the growth and the good quality o f the lending and investment portfolio. N e t interest income i s relatively high at 64% in 2005 (in 2003-2004: about 68% to 70%). This shows a very high margin o f the Fund which i s attributed by the fact that a significant h n d resources are from owner's equity which i s free o f cost. Operating and administration expenses o f the Fund are also very l o w provided that the current size and operations o f the Fund. This i s because the Fund i s s t i l l operating under the umbrella of the People's Committee so certain operating expenses are not at the normal market condition yet. Also the staff cost o f the Fund i s still in line with the overall salary scale applicable to public servants rather than o f commercial entities. The current salary scale o f the Fund is also far below the salary structure o f commercial banks having similar size. Hereafter i s the summary o f key performance ratio o f the Fund as follows: 6.85% 7.12% 6.17% INTEREST INCOMEITA 5.32% 6.02% 5.50% INTEREST EXPENSEITA 1.76% 1.53% 1.77% 3.6% 4.2% 3.7% NIA NIA NIA NET INCOME/TA" = ROA" PROFIT NET INTEREST MARGIN/TA13 PROVISION EXPENSEl4ITA Interest Rates I t should be noted that the traditional financing method for municipal infrastructure in Vietnam involves GOV borrowing ODA for projects and providing the proceeds to the municipal government as grants. Indeed, to date all o f the W B ' s municipal infrastructure projects in H C M C have been financed with GOV grants. In the HDP, the H C M C government, WB and the GOV are taking the first step towards rationalizing the use o f GOV subsidies for municipal infrastructure. Specifically, the project underscores the need to distinguish the infrastructure investments which require budget support from those which can offer cost recovery and can be financed with market capital under public-private partnership arrangements. As a government- '' TA = Total average assets l2ROA = Return on Average Assets l3NIMiTA = (INTERST INCOME -INTEREST EXF'ENSE)/TA bad debt l4Total provisions for 79 owned FI, the on-lending rate which HIFU receives from the GOV must be determined by the MOF strictly according to Decree 134, which provides legislated rules for determining the onlending rates for ODA projects according to sector o f focus and other variables that are important to the government. The on-lending i s in VND. The focus o f the project design has been o n the interest rate charged by HIFU in the subprojects to ensure against market distortions. HIFU will continue to price i t s loans at market rates for infrastructure in Vietnam. Specifically, HIFU will price the loans at the l o w end o f the State-Owned Commercial Banks SOCB rates, which i s currently at 10.4%. The rate will be reviewed every six months by HIFU and the WB team. The current interest rate regime in Vietnam i s described in the graph and table below for reference. However, it should be noted that for infrastructure projects the benchmark is increasingly being set by the Vietnam Development Bank. IO-year Interest Rate Benchmarks (2006) 2.00% 0.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% 10-year 10-year City HTPT- DAF SOCBs 10Government Bond (VDB) 10year Bond year HIFU 10year Source: HIFU Note: Represents the SOCB and HIFU low range. 2005 Low Benchmark (annual rates) 5-year Government bond interest rate 10-year Government bond interest rate 5-year City bond interest rate 10-year City bond interest rate HTPT- DAF (VDB) interest rate for 5 year loans HTPT- DAF (VDB) interest rate for 10 year loans SOCBs interest rate for 5 year loans SOCBs interest rate for 10 year loans HIFU interest rate for 5 year loans ~HIFUinterest rate for 10 year loans Source: HIFU 80 6.60% 6.60% 9.56% 9.56% 9.56% 9.56% High 11.56% 12.06% 12.56% 11.06% I I 2006 Low 8.20% 8.60% 8.80% 9.00% 7.80% 7.80% 10.40% 10.40% 10.40% 10.40% High 12.40% 12.90% 11.40% 11.90% Directed Credit . . . . The IDA credit i s being provided to HIFU as a FIL to achieve the following objectives: Finance municipal infrastructure - which i s a key bottleneck to economic growth - and provide affordable infrastructure services to the public Develop alternative model for financing municipal infrastructure which do not require 100% G O V grants Reduce the risk to financial market development posed by inappropriate borrowing practices o f LDIFs, such as HIFU Implement operational reforms in HIFU geared towards improvement in project appraisal standards, financial management including international standard auditing, and appropriate due diligence for environmental and social safeguards. Ensure the financial sustainability o f HIFU by establishing clear Financial Covenants which can be implemented and monitored I t i s understood and anticipated that the HDP will allow HIFU to establish a track record - vis-avis clear and consistent investments appraisal standards, good operational practices, and sound financial management. After successfully implementing HDP, HIFU will be in a position to raise capital from the market via bank borrowing or bonds. Subsidies There are no subsidies involved in the HDP structure. Fiscal Sustainability The H D P i s designed to ensure the financial sustainability o f HIFU by putting in place a framework for HIFU to start operating like a “hnd” which can utilize i t s equity (charter capital) to raise investment capital (debt) from the local market. The H D P will help establish appropriate project appraisal and financial management practices which will allow HIFU in the future to safely raise investment capital from the local market. The owner o f HIFU - the H C M C Peoples’ Committee - has been investing substantial equity in HIFU over the years. The H C M C PC therefore has a very strong incentive to ensure the financial feasibility o f HIFU. The H C M C PC has very publicly announced that development o f HIFU as a professional and competent institution capable o f financing municipal infrastructure in H C M C i s an important pillar o f the city’s long-term development strategy. The lack o f long-term capital in the Vietnamese market has resulted in the current inappropriate HIFU practice o f borrowing o f short-term capital on a roll-over basis. The HDP allows the H C M C PC and HIFU Management a chance to take advantage o f long-term IDA credit and Bank technical assistance to substantially improve the capacity o f HIFU. Specifically, the HDP provides an opportunity for the H C M C PC and HIFU Management to establish, test and perfect the internal HIFU systems for project appraisal and financial management. In short, the H C M C PC and HIFU Management are well aware o f the value o f the long-term IDA credit and the associated technical assistance associated with the project. The clients also realize that success o f H D P will allow HIFU to raise substantial capital from the local market in the h t u r e and finance badly needed municipal infrastructure in HCMC. HDP w i l l have noJisca1 impact on the HCMC government. The HDP will create no additional fiscal burden on the H C M C financial position. The H C M C PC provides no operating budget to 81 HIFU, and the project requires no additional equity investment in HIFU from H C M C PC. In particular, the HDP will have no affect on the H C M C financial position vis-a-vis the following: There will be no impact on H C M C PC financial position vis-a-vis incremental taxes; and the project does not provide any additional subsidies. There will be no increase in recurrent costs for H C M C P C or HIFU. HDP will have no impact on the H C M C PC current fiscal situation, as the project will not require any additional capital or operating budget from H C M C PC. There will also be no impact on the G O V fiscal position because the project is structured as an on-lending arrangement in which the MOF i s able to fully cover not only the cost o f foreign exchange risk, but also the IDA commitment fee and any transaction costs incurred by the MOF. H D P will have no negative impact on the overall level o f recurrent costs required to operate the municipal infrastructure sectors adequately and the volume o f financing provided by the Government in the recent past. Indeed, the participation o f private sector and focus on cost recovery projects will likely reduce the relative provincial government outlay in the target sectors. The availability and certainty and formal commitment o f the HFU Board o f Management to contribute an estimated $0.5 million in counterpart funds from HIFU for technical assistance has been confirmed during project appraisal. Summary o f the eligibility criteria for FIs The selection o f HIFU as an F I i s based on the following- assessment: a. HIFU has demonstrated adequate profitability, capital, and portfolio quality and local collections. The financial due diligence o f HIFU was carried out by an international accounting firm, under contract to the Bank. The detailed financial analysis o f HIFU i s provided in the PAD. HIFU already provides audited financial statements, and HIFU Management has agreed to switch to international auditing standards, which can be carried out by approximately 4-5 Vietnam based international accounting firms. b. HIFUhas acceptable levels o f loan collections. C. HIFU has the appropriate capacity, including staffing, for carrying out subproject appraisal and supervising subproject. Currently HIFU has 83 professional staff, which includes 20 staff with M B A s andor graduate degrees. At least 10 HIFU staff are fluent in English, and an additional 10 have basic conversational skills and can read and write in English. The majority o f HIFU staff i s on private employment contracts, with only about 5 senior staff maintaining city employee status. Implementation o f comprehensive manuals for project preparation and appraisal and private sector partner selection will ensure that all relevant Bank policy requirements will be carried out by HIFU. The HIFU Board o f Management has also officially approved the decision to use an estimated $0.5 million o f HIFU capital as client contribution to hire international consultants to provide on the job advice and training to HIFU staff for a 3-year period. d. The current borrowing practice o f HIFU requires improvement. The project will help HIFU establish the investment track record and appropriate financial management standard to mobilize capital via bank loans or bonds in the future. e. As an LDIF, HIFU i s a government-owned FI. The project i s initiating the process o f developing adequate managerial autonomy and commercially oriented governance in HIFU. This will require 1) provision o f incentives to the Peoples’ Committee to utilize LDIFs in the appropriate fashion and 2) development o f prerequisite capacity in the 82 LDIFs to carry out their h c t i o n s and raise capital without undermining financial viability, and without government support. f. The project i s further improving the prudential policies, administrative structure, and business procedures in HIFU. This includes the implementation o f a comprehensive manual for project preparation and appraisal, and the manual for the selection o f private sector participants o f HIFU. HIFU already provides audited annual financials. HIFU Management has agreed to switch to international standard financial audits. Finally, the following Financial Covenants have been agreed to monitor and manage the financial 4 5 6 FINANCIAL COVENANTS” Aggregate equity investments shall not exceed 50 percent o f the total amount o f the Fund’s paid in equity capital. The Fund’s debt-to-equity capitalization ratio (i.e. Leverage) shall not exceed 3: 1,where debt means all debt liabilities plus contingent liabilities and equity means paid-in capital plus retained earnings and reserves not allocated to cover specific liabilities. Liquid Assets shall be sufficient to cover projected Fund operating expenses over the subsequent 18 months. Total investment (debt and/or equity) in a single obligor shall not exceed 15 percent o f total fund capital (including debt and equity). In all HIFU investments involving HDP proceeds, HIFU will not take greater than 30% ownership (equity/direct investment) in a Project Enterprise In all HIFU investments involving HDP proceeds, the debt to equity ratio will not exceed 3: 1. Specifically, debt will not be greater than % o f the total financing o f the subproject APPLICABILITY Applies to all HIFU operations Applies to all HIFU operations Applies to all HIFU operations Applies to all HIFU nnnrot; UpLadns Applies to the use of IDA proceeds only Applies to the use o f IDA proceeds only Coordination with IFC IDA and IFC have been coordinating very closely on the engagement with HIFU. The I F C had attempted to execute transactions with HIFU (senior loan) as well as one o f its portfolio companies (equity investment in CII). However, the transactions did not materialize for various reasons, which have lead IFC to the conclusion that HIFU requires substantial institutional development before IFC can do a direct transaction with it, IDA and IFC have therefore decided that the Bank i s better suited to undertake the initial task o f building institutional capacity o f HIFU, establishing a supportive national policy and H C M C municipal government framework, and providing long-term capital for investment in partnership with private sector. The I F C will play an important role in co-financing HIFU transactions in partnership with the private sector. The GOV has issued a draft decree o n Institution and Operation o f LDIFs, which specifically addresses covenants 2 and 4. These two covenants, as stipulated above, are consistent with the Bank’s technical advice to the GOV. The task team has agreed with HIFU and H C M C P C that during implementation, covenants 2 and 4 can be adjusted in line with the final, approved stipulation o f the GOV Decree as part o f the six monthly review o f a l l H D P conditions which i s described in this P A D . 83 As discussed and agreed with IFC, the advantages o f getting I F C involved at the project level (as oppose to the HIFU level) are as follows: IFC’s risk appetite i s better suited to the subprojects financed by HIFU rather than the financing o f HIFU itself. The financing o f HIFU involves policy risk, which i s better suited for IDA finded operations. IFC’s involvement in the HIFUjoint ventures will allow HIFU to establish good models for corporate governance and other operational functions o f a joint venture. IFC’s involvement in HIFU joint ventures will allow HIFU to learn the principles o f good project structuring, including development o f legal contracts and negotiations with the private sector. The Bank i s better positioned to invest in HIFU which will require substantial technical assistance and very close coordination with the GOV and H C M C municipal government. I F C can be relatively more competitive in Vietnam with i t s equity products than i t s debt products. This i s because Vietnam i s an IDA country with access to very cheap financing, particularly for infrastructure projects. 84 Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project Environmentalassessment (OP 4.01) The HDP project i s classified as Category FI. The complexity o f subprojects evaluated for investment i s varied. All subprojects will pass initial review and screening against the G o V and WB/IFC exclusion lists. Based on the size and the nature o f the potential impact on the environment from the subproject activities financed under the HDP project, categorization will be determined for each o f the subproject in the investment pipeline, which has passed the review against the Government and IFC exclusion lists. A manual on Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA Manual), including a detailed guideline o n Environmental safeguards acceptable to IDA, has been developed and approved by the H C M C People Committee. The manual and annexes: 0 clearly lay out the steps where environmental assessment and supervision are undertaken during the project cycle; review Environmental Safeguard (ES) requirements o f GOV and the Bank; identify the discrepancies ES between G O V and Bank requirements, and when there are discrepancies, identifies proper approaches to best comply with the Bank ES requirements; clarify ES activities, including due diligence assessment for the subprojects with EA government approval prior to the lending from HIFU, 0 describe when and who has to do what to meet the ES requirements; and 0 guide the assessment o f the borrower’s institutional mechanism to carry out EA work for category A subprojects. The PPA Manual clearly defines the procedure and responsibility o f the EA work as integrated in the sub-project preparation and supervision process, The Environmental guideline included in annexes o f the PPA Manual specify how to carry out environmental assessment (EA) work at each stage during the project cycle. The approach described in the manual follows a due diligence assessment which includes: carrying out new EA works in accordance with the Manual which provides guidance to meet the requirements o f Government regulations and the Bank safeguard policies; assessing the adequacy o f the EA work which have been approved by DONRE and developing a risk management plan if the EA work i s not sufficient; borrower’s written commitments to HIFU to implement the risk management plan; and assessing the borrower’s institutional mechanism to carry out EA work for A-category subprojects. The PPA Manual will be used by HIFU staff in carrying out environmental safeguard (ES) work to meet the requirements o f G O V and IDA. The Environmental Guideline o f the Manual was used by HIFU in appraising two subprojects for Year One as a pilot program o f the HDP, in a manner acceptable to IDA. It will also be applied for the preparation o f the other subprojects in the investment pipeline for the following years. HIFU will implement the Manual with assistance from on-the-job consultants who will be hired as part o f component 2 o f the project. Environmental appraisal o f the two year 1 pilot subprojects: For the two year 1 pilot subprojects, a due diligence assessment has been carried out for the Initial environmental assessment (IEE) o f the West Bus Terminal (B-category sub-proj ect)and 85 the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Septic Tank Waste Treatment (A-category subproject). Summary of major environmental impacts of the two pilot subprojects in Year One: K e y environmental issues during construction work under the two subprojects are noise and dust pollution, traffic congestion, transportation and disposal o f waste construction materials, transportation o f filling soils. Major environmental impacts during the operation phase are related to the operations o f the waste treatment plant include odor and pathogenic bacteria, insects and bugs vermin, collection truck leakage, vehicle exhaust fimes, ground water pollution from pipe and tank leaks during the treatment process and surface water pollution from runoff, effluent discharge from treatment facilities. Other impacts could be related to the management of waste generated at the bus terminal. The two sub-projects will help address current environmental sanitation problems and i s expected to have a positive impact on existing environmental and social conditions. The design standards will ensure that effluents from wastewater at the bus terminal be connected to the city’s sewer. Discharge from the septic tank waste treatment plant i s expected to comply with the requirements for water quality o f the receiving bodies. Better solid waste management would also contribute to improved environmental conditions o f the cities. Nevertheless, improper transportation and disposal o f the construction materials and the wastes would impose noise and dust pollution. Inadequate design o f the disposal site would have longterm soil pollution and lead to hygiene consequences. Poor O & M o f the septic tank waste treatment plant would cause serious environmental problems in the surrounding areas, especially the residential areas and the canals supplying water for agriculture and aquaculture activities. Environmental Management Plan (EMP): For the Septic tank waste treatment subproject, categorized as a category I1 (Vietnamese categorization) project, an Environmental Management Plan was developed in the EIA. However the due diligence assessment has found it inadequate. As a result, HIFU has requested an Environmental Management Program be provided in adequate detail to indicate how the mitigation plans described in the EIA will be implemented for each project phase. For the West Bus Terminal, no EMP was required although commitments to environmental compliance were made before DONRE environmental certificate was issued. The application for the environmental certificate, however, did not specify the resources for the implementation. At a request from IDA, a risk management plan has been developed for each o f the subprojects. Those plans will be signed between HIFU and the borrowers as a M O U prior to the disbursement o f HIFU funds to the borrower. The MOU clarifies that by receiving the HIFU funds the borrower is signing on a commitment to implement the Plan, In addition, as guided by the PPA Manual HIFU will arrange monitoring o f the implementation o f the EMP and risk management plan in each o f the two subprojects and will prepare semiannual environmental compliance progress reports to be submitted to PC and IDA. An independent environmental safeguard monitoring consultant will be hired to assist HIFU in this task, and also to provide guidance to the borrowers in internal supervision and reporting on the implementation o f mitigation measures as specified in the E M P and risk management plan. Assessment of the institutional mechanism o f the Hoa Binh Ltd. to carry out EA work for the Septic tank waste treatment was submitted to the Bank on March 27, 2007. The Bank has found 86 this satisfactory, provided that the Hoa Binh Ltd. hire consultants for internal monitoring and HIFU hire consulting services for independent environmental monitoring as part o f the TA to HIFU. Ensuring GoV environmental certzfzcation: An approval for the EIA report for the Septic tank waste treatment facility were received from the H C M C DONRE on March 20, 2007. According to the Decree 80/2006/ND-CP dated August 09, 2006 “Guideline on the implementation of the National Law on Environmental protection ”, an Environmental certificate for the West Bus Terminal subproject, which i s classified as a type I11 i s a condition for the HIFU loan disbursement to the borrower. Cultural Resources (OP 4.11) For the subprojects to be financed by the line o f credit, careful design to avoid possible vista or damage to historic and cultural sites, and proper construction supervision will be needed during project implementation, particularly excavation and dredging works, to check for possible buried artifacts. As far as the two year 1 sub-projects are concerned, cultural property does not exist in their respective locations. Natural habitat (OP 4.04) For the subprojects to be financed by the line o f credit, exclusion l i s t will be used in environmental screening to make sure that the project will not finance adverse impacts or conversion o f critical natural habitats. N o natural habitat i s involved in the two year 1 subprojects. Pest management (OP 4.09) The use o f any chemicals listed in the Government restriction will be subjected to the exclusion from H D P finance. OP 4.09 i s not triggered for the two year 1 subprojects. Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) A Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for HDP has been prepared to ensure that affected people can restore the losses and living standards as pre-project level. This framework has been adopted by HCMC-PC and was [approved] by the Prime Minister. All compensation and resettlement activities, occurred under the project, will need to follow the approved RPF. The Social Safeguards Manual (Annex G o f the Project Preparation and Appraisal Manual) includes provisions for HIFU and its borrowers, investment partners to minimize and mitigate the impacts to the people and to prepare and implement the safeguards documents to meet the Bank’s requirements. In particular, the respective responsibilities o f the HIFU and investorshorrowers are spelled-out in the manual. HCMC-PC will have to approve prepared Resettlement Plans (RPs) in accordance with the approved RPF for all subprojects requiring land acquisition except for the ones where the investors can negotiate and agree with the affected people on the buying-selling basis without involvement o f the local authorities. For subproject where the land was cleared before, a confirmation report i s required. If there are still some remaining issues, a due diligence report should be provided to identify the problems and clarify how they will be resolved. Satisfactory resolution o f outstanding issues i s a condition for the borrower to receive HIFU funds from HDP. 87 Supervision framework has also been established to ensure the compliance. Under component 2 o f the project, HIFUwill hire independent consultants to monitor compensation and resettlement activities to help HIFU in ensuring the project objectives are met. For the two year 1 subprojects, only one relates to land acquisition (Septic tank waste treatment plan), where the compensation and resettlement activities have been implemented since 2005. According to the due diligence report, there are s t i l l 1.9 out o f 9.4 ha having not yet been cleared with about 10 households waiting for their complaints to be resolved and land plots in a resettlement site to be provided. Most o f the complaints relate to the issue o f identification of land use right to define the land category to be compensated. The interviewed displaced people were satisfied with the applied compensation and resettlement policies. O n March 1, 2007 HCMC-PC has instructed Binh Chanh district PC to resolve the issues as soon as possible, including allocation o f land plots in a neighbor commune for the displaced people to be relocated.. Resolution o f this issue in a manner satisfactory to the Bank i s a condition for the subproject to get financing by HIFUunder the HDP. Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) There are no ethnic minorities in the proposed two subprojects for the first year o f implementation. However, taking into account the fact that there are two ethnic minority groups living in H C M C (Cham with about 5,200 persons and K h M e r with about 4,800 persons in accordance with the data o f 1999 general population census), an Ethnic Minority Planning Framework (EMPF) has been prepared. The EMPF was approved by HCMC-PC. Ethnic Minority Plans will have to be developed in accordance with the project EMPF for the subprojects having any ethnic minority group in the subproject areas. All monitoring and reporting arrangements for resettlement activities will be applied to Ethnic Minority Plan implementation. PPA manual implementation advisors with international experience and local social consultants will be hired by HIFU to help deal with social safeguard policies compliance and i t s management for the first three years o f the project implementation. Public consultation. The PPA manual specifies when and how public consultations have to take place for each sub-project. EIA report for the Subproject Septic tank waste treatment (A category) has been consulted with the local authority (Ward People Committee D a Phuoc) and local NGO (the Father Front o f the District Binh Chanh) in accordance with the new national law on environmental protection. N o objections to the project or environmental concerns other than those about emission and odor from the operation o f the Septic tank waste treatment and that has been incorporated in the final EIA report. Public consultation on environmental issues was not required for the West Bus Terminal. HIFU and local resettlement related agencies have been consulted intensively during preparation o f RPF and social safeguards manual. A consultation mechanism has been developed to be applied during resettlement plan (RP) preparation and implementation to ensure the needs and wishes o f all related stakeholders, especially potentially affected people be reflected. The R P s will detail the plan for consultation including the procedures, methodologies and subjects o f consultation. The RPs will also describe grievance redress mechanism with the steps and procedures for grievance filing as well as the responsible institutions and timeframe for receiving and addressing the grievances. 88 Public disclosure. The PPA manual specifies when and how the various safeguards documents need to be disclosed. HIFU has confirmed the public disclosure o f the EIA report for the Septic tank waste treatment and the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for the West Bus Terminal subproject in the ward People committee offices since March 05, 2007 as per the Bank’s disclosure requirements. A copy o f the draft Environment guidelines and Social safeguards manual (Annexes F and G o f the PPA Manual), as well as the RPF and the EMPF have been disclosed locally and sent to InfoShop in Washington D C and made available in English and Vietnamese in Hanoi’s Development Information Center (VDIC) on March 20, 2007. Institutional capacity assessment and strengthening: HIFU has the institutional arrangement to manage investments, and i t s departments have clear understanding o f the requirements for implementing the Government and the Bank safeguard policies during a subproject appraisal, investment and monitoring phases, though World Bank policies on involuntary resettlement are quite new for them. HIFU has staff that has training in environmental management and work experience on land acquisition and resettlement policies. They have gained familiarity with environmental assessment and compensation, resettlement tasks through other HIFUprojects. To assist HIFU in improving its staff skills on environmental and social safeguard management, on-the-job training consultants will be hired during the first three years under component 2 o f the project to help HIFU implement safeguard policies including review o f environmental assessment and social safeguards documents, preparation of TORS, and monitoring o f the implementation o f environmental management and resettlement plans. In addition, independent monitors will be recruited to monitor the performance of safeguard compliance within the specific subprojects. These monitoring reports will assist HIFU in focusing efforts to improve project due diligence procedures. 89 Annex 11: Project Preparation and Supervision VIETNAM: VN - HIFU Development Project P C N Date Initial PID to PIC Initial ISDS to PIC Appraisal Negotiations Board/RVP approval Planned date o f effectiveness Planned date o f mid-term review Planned closing date Planned January 2007 April 2007 March 2007 April 2007 M a y 2007 June 2007 September 2007 Actual January 2007 April 2007 April 2007 April 2007 M a y 2007 December 2012 K e y institutions responsible for preparation o f the project: H o Chi Minh City People’s Committee H o Chi Minh City Investment Fund for Urban Development (HIFU) Bank staff and consultants who worked on the project included: Name Title Kamran Khan Sr. Infrastructure Finance Specialist, TTL Cuong Duc Dang Senior Operations Officer Isabel D. Mutambe Program Assistant Giang Thi Huong Nguyen Program Assistant William Dachs Senior Infrastructure Specialist Cung Van Pham Financial Management Specialist K i e n Trung Tran Senior Procurement Specialist Hoa Thi Mong Pham Senior Operations Officer Phuong Thi Thanh Tran Senior Environmental Specialist Luc Lecuit Senior Operations Officer Joseph F. Wells Safeguards Due Diligence Specialist Hoi-Chan Nguyen Senior Counsel Tri Pham Senior Auditor Alan Carroll Peer Reviewer Ellis Juan Peer Reviewer Anthony Pellegrini Peer Reviewer Bank funds expended to date on project preparation: 1. Bank resources:$243,778 2. Trust fimds: $0.0 3. Total: $243,778 Estimated Approval and Supervision costs: 1. Remaining costs to approval: $0.0 2. Estimated annual supervision cost: $65,000 90 Unit EASOP EASUR EASUR EACVF FEU EAPCO EAPCO EASSD EASEN EAPCO Consultant LEGEA IADDR LCSQE IEF External Advisor Annex 12: Documents in the Project File VIETNAM: HIFU Development Project 1. Social Safeguard Manual 2. Resettlement Policy Framework 3, Ethnic Minority Planning Framework 4. Environmental Safeguard Manual 5. Project Paper - LDIF-Splitting Operations Memo 6. Project Concept Note (HDP) 7. QER Minutes (HDP) 8. Project Concept Note (LDIFP) 9. Project Preparation and Appraisal (PPA) Manual 10. Private Sector Partner (PSP) Selection Manual 11. Financial Analysis o f HIFU Conducted by E&Y 12. Detailed Appraisal o f the 2 year-1 Pilot Projects 13. Detailed Description o f the Subprojects in the HIFU Project Pipeline 14. Approved TOR o f the U S T D A Phase I1Technical Assistance to HIFU 15. Approved AFD Technical Assistance Plan for HIFU 16. Credit Statute o f HIFU 91 Annex 13: Statement o f Loans and Credits VIETNAM: VN- HIFU Development Project Difference between expected and actual disbursements Original Amount in US$Millions Proiect I D FY P101608 2007 VN-Avian & Human Influenza Control &Prep 0.00 20.00 0.00 PO82295 2007 VN-COASTAL CITIES ENVMT SANIT. 0.00 124.70 PO85071 2006 Customs Modernization 0.00 65.90 VN-TRANS & DISTRIB 2 0.00 200.00 PO84871 2006 Pumose IBRD IDA SF GEF Cancel. Undisb. 0.00 0.00 20.30 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Orin. Frm. Rev’d 0.00 0.00 126.01 0.00 0.00 66.58 -0.25 0.00 199.90 12.56 0.00 70.29 -1.83 0.00 PO79663 2006 VN-Mekong Regional Health Support Proj 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PO79344 2006 VN -1CT Development 0.00 93.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.20 1.27 0.00 PO77287 2006 VN-RRD RWSS 0.00 45.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.75 2.72 0.00 PO75407 2006 VN-RT3 0.00 106.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 108.92 5.00 0.00 PO73361 2006 VN -Natural Disaster Risk Mngt Project 0.00 86.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.20 -6.57 0.00 2005 VN-Avian Influenza Emergency Recovery Pr 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.10 1.88 0.00 PO85260 2005 VN-EFA Support Program 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.13 0.00 0.00 PO85080 2005 VN-ROAD SAFETY 0.00 31.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.26 5.3 1 0.00 PO82627 2005 Payment System and Bank Modernization 2 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.57 39.50 25.67 PO82604 2005 VN-HIV/AIDS Prevention Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.96 -1.56 0.00 PO80074 2005 VN-GEF-RURAL ENERGY 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.00 4.95 0.20 0.00 PO74688 2005 VN-RURAL ENERGY 2 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 217.36 52.53 0.00 PO74414 2005 VN GEF Forest Sector Development Proj 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 8.50 2.37 0.50 PO73763 2005 VN-WATER SUPPLY DEV. 0.00 112.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 109.56 6.98 0.00 2005 VN - Forest Sector Development Project 0.00 39.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.69 6.02 0.73 225.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 210.82 102.26 0.00 149.25 28.20 0.00 PO88362 PO66051 PO59663 2004 - VN-ROAD NETWORK IMPROVT 0.00 PO65898 2004 VIETNAM WATER RESOURCES ASSISTANCE 0.00 157.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 PO70197 2004 VN-URBAN UPGRADING 0.00 222.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.93 5.20 0.00 PO44803 2003 VN-PRIMARY EDUC FOR DISADVANTAGED CHILRE 0.00 138.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 156.52 43.19 -1.24 PO75399 2003 Public Financial Management Reform Proj. 0.00 54.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.54 36.49 -0.63 PO71019 2003 VN-GEF DEMAND SIDE MGMT & ENERGY 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 2.80 1.47 0.00 PO73305 2002 VN-Regional Blood Transfusion Centers 0.00 38.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.57 26.32 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.25 -3.48 0.00 PO59936 2002 VN -Northem Mountains Poverty Reduction - PO72601 2002 VN Rural Finance I1 Project 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.46 -67.40 0.00 PO66396 2002 VN-SYSTEM ENERGY, EQUITIZATION & RENEWAB 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 187.02 145.63 62.58 PO73778 2002 VN-GEF-System Energy EquitizationRenewal 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 3.52 3.52 0.00 PO51838 2002 VN-PRIMARY TEACHER DEVELOPMENT 0.00 19.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.94 6.75 4.96 PO42927 2001 VN-MEKONG TRANSPORTELOOD PROT. 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.67 35.65 0.53 P052037 2001 VN-HCMC ENVMTL SANIT. 0.00 166.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 148.92 94.44 85.86 92 PO62748 2001 VN - COMMUNITY BASED RURAL INFRA. 0.00 102.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.53 25.51 0.00 PO42568 2000 VN - COASTAL WetlProt Dev 0.00 31.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.73 1.81 1.81 - PO04845 1999 VN MEKONG DELTA WATER 0.00 101.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.51 23.55 -9.01 PO51553 1999 VN-3 CITIES SANITATION 0.00 80.50 0.00 0.00 7.40 26.26 27.58 22.23 PO04828 1999 VN-HIGHER EDUC. 0.00 83.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.41 9.83 10.45 PO45628 1998 VN-TRANSMISSION & DISTR 0.00 199.00 0.00 0.00 39.69 36.60 67.92 3.24 0.00 3,643.49 0.00 29.25 47.09 2,800.48 740.57 207.68 Total: 93 VIETNAM STATEMENT OF IFC’s Held and DisbursedPortfolio In Millions o f U S Dollars Committed Disbursed IFC FY Auoroval Comuanv Loan 2003 ACB-Vietnam 2002 CyberSoft 2002 2002 IFC Equity Quasi Partic. 0.00 5.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 Dragon Capital 0.00 0.00 1.05 F-V Hospital 5.00 0.00 3.00 Loan Equity Quasi Partic. 0.00 5.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2005 Khai Vy 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998 MFL Vinh Phat 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 1997 Nghi Son Cement 10.09 0.00 0.00 1.88 10.09 0.00 0.00 1.88 2004 Olam 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2005 Paul Maitland 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2001 RMIT Vietnam 7.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 0.00 0.00 2.3 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.05 0.00 0.00 Sacombank 0.00 3.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.05 0.00 0.00 VEIL 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2003 VEIL 0.00 7.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.41 0.00 0.00 2007 VEIL 6.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.15 0.00 0.00 28.82 6.05 1.88 45.92 28.82 6.05 1.88 2006 SABCO 20.00 0.00 2003 Sacombank 0.00 2004 Sacombank 0.00 2005 Sacombank 2006 2002 0.00 Total portfolio: 75.67 Approvals Pending Commitment FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic. 2000 MFL-AA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2006 CCS-Asia 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000 Interflour 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 2006 CII-Vietnam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000 MFL Mondial 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2002 F-V Hospital 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999 MFL Minh Minh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1999 MFL Chau Giang 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Total pending commitment: 0.03 94 Annex 14: Country at a Glance VIETNAM: VN- HIFU Development Project Vietnam East A8ia a Paclflc Lowincome 83.0 820 514 1885 1627 3,067 2,353 580 1364 11 2.1 0.9 13 19 2.3 41 70 29 15 79 91 115 18 30 59 80 39 75 62 D4 in 99 POVERTY and SOCIAL 2005 Population, mid-year (millions) GNiparcapita (Atlasmathod, US$) GNI(At1asrnathod. US$ billions) ) e v e l o p m e n t diamond' Life expectancy A v e r a g e annual growth, 1999.05 Population (%, Lab0r force (%) GNI par capita M o s t r e c e n t e s t i m a t e ( l a t e s t year available, 1909-05) Poverty (% of population balownationalpo varty line) Woan population (%of fotaipopuiatlon) Lifa axpectancyat birth (pars) Infant mortality(per /000iiva births) Childmainutrition (%ofchildrenundar5) Access to animprovadwatarsourca(%ofpopulation) Literacy(%ofpopuiation age S+ Gross primaryanrollmant oof school-agepopulation) Mala Famala 29 26 70 n 28 85 90 98 01 94 Gross primafi anrollmant Access to improvadwatarsourca -Vietnam ID -Lo wincoma group KEY E C O N O M I C R A T I O S a n d L O N G - T E R M T R E N D S 1985 GDP (US$ blilions) Gross capital formation/GDP Exports of goods and sarvicasiGDP Gross domestic savingdGDP Gross national savingslGDP 14.1 Current account balancaiGDP lntarast pa)rments/GDP Total dabtiGDP Total debt sarvicaiaxports Present valueof dabt1GDP Present value of dabtlagorts -3.8 0.0 0.4 ., .. .. .. .. 1985-95 1995-05 (average annual gro Mh) GDP GDP percapita Exports of goods and sewices 8.5 4.3 25.2 6.9 5.8 15.8 2004 2005 20.7 27.1 32.8 8.0 s.2 45.2 35.8 86.4 28.3 322 52.4 -B.5 0.4 P2.8 4.7 -3.8 07 39.4 2.6 34.1 50.4 1995 2004 I 2005 2 0 0 5 - 0 9 8.4 7.4 '6.0 7.7 8.6 27.9 E c o n o m l c ratios' 7.5 8.4 15.0 Trade I 1 I Indebtedness -Vietnam Lowincoma group STRUCTURE o f the E C O N O M Y 1985 (%of GDP) Agriculture Industry Manufacturing Services Household final consumption axpanditura General gov't final consumption aganditura imports of goods andsarvicas 1995 40.2 27.4 20.5 32.5 27.2 28.8 '6.0 44.1 218 40.1 20.3 38.2 .. 73.8 8.2 419 65.3 8.4 73.6 .. .. 1985-95 1995.05 (avarageannualgronth) Agriculture Industry Manufactunng Services Household final consumption axpenditura Ganaral gov't final consumption axpanditura Gross capital formation Imports of goods and services 2004 2004 3.5 7.3 4.3 8.4 4.1 D.0 110 5.7 3.5 0.2 0.1 7.5 .. 5.2 3.8 9.8 8.5 7.1 7.8 0.5 25.2 .. 25.8 24.2 2005 G r o w t h o f c a p l t a l a n d G D P ('A) W 01 02 -GCF 2005 03 W 05 -GDP j G r o w t h o f e x p o r t 8 a n d I m p o r t s ('A) w 01 02 03 M 05 Nota: 2005data are praliminaryastimatas. This tabla was producadfrom the Davalopmant Economics LDB database. 'The diamonds showfour kayindicators in the country(in bold) compared with its incomagroupavaraga. If data are missing, thadiamondwili be incomDlata. 95 ............. .............................................................................. " tnliarioo (a) v- 185 %7 .;Export ______-. .................................... and import t w o 1 8 (US$ milt.) ~ 1.M coo I 990 *- - -- I --- iCurrsnt account btilancs to G D P ('At Currunt accoirrif balancn -933 265 269 c MAP SECTION
© Copyright 2024