COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 04-23 NSF 04-550 FOR NSF USE ONLY NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER 10/29/04 FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S) (Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.) DGE - IGERT FULL PROPOSALS FILE LOCATION DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS# (Data Universal Numbering System) 796475382NULL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN) IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL AGENCY? YES NO IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S) SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS A RENEWAL AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL 056000522 NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE University of Rhode Island 70 Lower College Road Kingston, RI. 02881 University of Rhode Island AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) 0034140000 NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply) (See GPG II.C For Definitions) TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT MINORITY BUSINESS IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE IGERT: Assessing Change in Coastal Ecosystems: Integrating Natural and Social Sciences REQUESTED AMOUNT 3,188,179 $ SMALL BUSINESS FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS) 60 REQUESTED STARTING DATE SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO. IF APPLICABLE 07/01/05 months 0436431 CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.A) HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.D.6) DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C) Exemption Subsection PROPRIETARY & PRIVILEGED INFORMATION (GPG I.B, II.C.1.d) INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES: COUNTRY/COUNTRIES INVOLVED or IRB App. Date HISTORIC PLACES (GPG II.C.2.j) (GPG II.C.2.g.(iv).(c)) SMALL GRANT FOR EXPLOR. RESEARCH (SGER) (GPG II.D.1) VERTEBRATE ANIMALS (GPG II.D.5) IACUC App. Date PI/PD DEPARTMENT PI/PD POSTAL ADDRESS Narragansett Bay Campus University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 United States Coastal Institute PI/PD FAX NUMBER 401-874-6569 NAMES (TYPED) HIGH RESOLUTION GRAPHICS/OTHER GRAPHICS WHERE EXACT COLOR REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED FOR PROPER INTERPRETATION (GPG I.E.1) High Degree Yr of Degree Telephone Number Electronic Mail Address PhD 1981 401-874-6513 [email protected] PhD 1975 401-874-5138 [email protected] Ph.D 1981 401-874-4590 [email protected] Ph.D. 1967 401-874-6132 [email protected] MA 1971 401-792-1000 [email protected] PI/PD NAME Peter V August CO-PI/PD Richard Burroughs CO-PI/PD James J Opaluch CO-PI/PD Candace A Oviatt CO-PI/PD Judith M Swift Page 1 of 2 Assessing Change in Coastal Ecosystems: Integrating Natural and Social Sciences Peter V. August, Principal Investigator Coastal Institute, University of Rhode Island The Coastal Institute IGERT Project (CIIP) has developed an integrated, multi-disciplinary graduate curriculum to enrich the education of students who show potential for leadership in solving environmental problems in coastal ecosystems. Working closely with each other and with our non-academic partner institutions, students from the natural sciences (ecology, biology, fisheries, natural resources science) and the social sciences (economics, governance, planning, coastal policy) will acquire competence in developing, implementing, and monitoring programs and policies that promote the vitality of coastal regions. To accomplish this our students must be able to anticipate and negotiate points of conflict among environmental, social, and economic perspectives on issues of coastal science and management. The CIIP uses the expertise of Humanities Scholars to provide students with tools and perspectives that transcend disciplines and are fundamental to bridging science and public policy in practice. These tools draw from the spheres of ethics, cultural values, and social equity, thus requiring leadership and communication skills to effect genuine integration of method. Our IGERT program responds to the urgent need for practical integration with a pedagogy based upon these core principles: * Integration of science and policy is effectively accomplished in a bottom-up, student-driven setting. * Experiential learning in the natural sciences and social sciences is the most effective way to show students how each system works and expose them to actual and potential mechanisms of integration. * The humanities, especially philosophy and communication studies, train students to confront ethical and cultural issues which are omnipresent in coastal science and management. Moreover, the humanities address and identify our personal and disciplinary “lens of bias” which enables us to better filter information, form scientific questions, and develop policy that is sensitive to the wider range of human diversity. We have developed a richly integrated 2-year curriculum that expands doctoral student training by forging concrete linkages among and even beyond traditional disciplines. Under the auspices of our non-academic partner organizations first year CIIP students will spend their spring semester producing White Papers on issues of immediate relevance to coastal management and research. Our program then provides advanced leadership opportunities for second-year CIIP students by placing them in non-academic scientific research and policy-setting venues during the internship component of our curriculum. The collective cohort of 26 CIIP students, diverse in personal background as well as academic field, will significantly impact the integration of science and policy beyond the university setting. The Intellectual Merit of the CIIP – The University of Rhode Island has established depth and breadth in research in the natural science and social science dimensions coastal ecosystem management, especially in fisheries, and watershed and estuarine science. The primary goal of the CIIP is to integrate the traditionally disparate disciplines in the natural and social sciences to form a coherent, multidisciplinary framework for coastal research. This framework will sharpen the focus of basic research in the sciences by identifying the critical questions and information needs of resource managers. Similarly, research in the social sciences will be advanced by bringing scientific literacy to the assessment of economic and social dimensions of coastal environmental problems. The intellectual legacy of our program will result in better governance and policy through the research papers we produce, the new culture of Ph.D. students we create, and the pedagogical model our program will establish in integrated coastal management. Broader Impacts of the CIIP – The integrated research and training in the CIIP will produce practical solutions to environmental problems that are relevant to much of coastal America. Our curriculum will provide intellectual stimulation not merely for CIIP Fellows but also for the broader University of Rhode Island academic community and our non-academic partners (public agencies, political leadership, non-governmental organizations, private enterprise). Additionally, our commitment to progressive recruitment initiatives will result in a greater number of women and under-represented minorities attending the University of Rhode Island; the CIIP will function as a vector for a more diverse research and learning environment. We envision a culture of Ph.D. education at the University of Rhode Island that embraces a multidisciplinary framework for research and problem-solving in coastal management; one that achieves genuine integration of science and policy through a unique emphasis on the shared relations with ethics, diverse human values, social equity, leadership, and communication. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Summary Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS For font size and page formatting specifications, see GPG section II.C. Total No. of Pages Page No.* (Optional)* Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation Project Summary (not to exceed 1 page) 1 Table of Contents 1 Project Description (Including Results from Prior NSF Support) (not to exceed 15 pages) (Exceed only if allowed by a specific program announcement/solicitation or if approved in advance by the appropriate NSF Assistant Director or designee) 28 References Cited 3 Biographical Sketches (Not to exceed 2 pages each) Budget 24 10 (Plus up to 3 pages of budget justification) Current and Pending Support 0 Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources 1 Special Information/Supplementary Documentation 9 Appendix (List below. ) (Include only if allowed by a specific program announcement/ solicitation or if approved in advance by the appropriate NSF Assistant Director or designee) Appendix Items: *Proposers may select any numbering mechanism for the proposal. The entire proposal however, must be paginated. Complete both columns only if the proposal is numbered consecutively. Section (C) Project Description Section (C) a. List of URI Participants (Name, Discipline, Affiliation). Social Science Anderson, Christopher - Experimental Economics4 Anderson, James - Fisheries Economics4 Boulmetis, John - Program Evaluation12 Burroughs, Richard - Ecosystem Governance2 Dalton, Tracey - Marine Protected Areas2 Hennessey, Tim - Coastal Governance2 Juda, Larry - Ecosystem Governance2 Mederer, Helen - Social Dynamics in Communities8 Moakley, Maureen - State & Regional Politics11 Olsen, Stephen - International Coastal Management3 Opaluch, James - Decision Dynamics4 Sutinen, Jon - Fisheries Economics4 Swallow, Stephen - Ecosystem Economics4 Thompson, Robert - Environmental Planning2 Tyrrell, Timothy - Tourism Economics4 Roheim, Cathy - Fisheries Economics4 Humanities Derbyshire, Lynn - Cross-cultural Diversity and Gender Communication10 Foster, Cheryl - Environmental Ethics & Aesthetics6 Killilea, Alfred - Ethics and Public Service11 Knott, Gene - Leadership8 Mather, Roderick - Marine Archaeology9 Swift, Judith - Science & Policy Communication10 Natural Science August, Peter - Landscape Ecology & GIS1 Bengston, David - Fisheries7 Carrington, Emily - Marine Ecology5 Cobb, Stanley - Marine Ecology5 Collie, Jeremy - Fisheries Population Biology3 Costa-Pierce, Barry - Ecological Aquaculture3 Deacutis, Christopher - Marine Ecology3 Forrester, Graham - Fish Community Ecology1 Gold, Arthur - Watershed Hydrology1 Gomez-Chiarri, Marta - Fisheries Pathology7 Heikes, Brian - Atmospheric Science3 Killingbeck, Keith - Plant Ecology5 Kincaid, Chris - Estuarine Hydrodynamics3 King, John - Coastal Geology3 McWilliams, Scott - Wildlife Ecology1 Nixon, Scott - Estuarine Ecology3 Oviatt, Candace - Marine Ecology3 Paton, Peter - Conservation Biology1 Roman, Charles - Wetland Ecology3 Stolt, Mark - Soil Science1 Twombly, Saran - Aquatic Ecology5 Wang, Y.Q. - Land Use Change & Remote Sensing1 Yoder, James - Coastal Remote Sensing3 Departmental Affiliations: 1 Natural Resources, 2 Marine Affairs, 3 Oceanography, 4 Environmental Economics, 5 Biology, 6 Philosophy, 7 Fisheries, 8 Sociology, 9 History, 10 Communication Studies, 11 Political Science, 12 Education Section (C) b. Vision, Goals, and Thematic Basis. Environmental management is a complex integration of social science, natural science, planning, policy development, governance, politics, monitoring and assessment. Communication and partnering among natural scientists, social scientists, regulators, and political leaders are essential for effective environmental management (National Research Council 1993, Lubchenko 1998, Hennessey and Imperial 2000, Ludwig et al. 2001, Alpert and Keller 2003). In a perfect world, the flow of information and ideas progresses smoothly through the enterprise (Reichman and Pulliam 1996); however, this process frequently does not happen because the components of coastal science and management become isolated from one another (Heinz Center 2004). Grounded in this observation - that natural and social scientists are disconnected from governance processes in coastal (and other) ecosystems - the Coastal Institute IGERT Project (CIIP) will create a cohort of next-generation URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 1 leaders who are skilled in evaluating and communicating environmental problems in coastal ecosystems. Through study, research and field experience in coastal science and policy, the CIIP Fellows (selected Ph.D. students) will learn to be effective leaders in interdisciplinary teams formed to resolve complex environmental problems in coastal systems. In addition, by filtering coastal science and policy through questions raised within the humanities (issues of ethics, human values and communication), CIIP Fellows will develop an array of tools that will enable them to evaluate, explain, persuade and mediate. These diverse points of view will empower CIIP Fellows to lead others toward a common understanding of complex issues that arise from interactions between human and natural systems. Population growth is greatest in coastal landscapes (Cohen et al. 1997). Conflicts between human activities and ecosystem processes occur with greater frequency at the land/sea margin than in any other environmental setting (Costanza et al. 1997, Pew Oceans Commission 2003, U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 2004). Coastal regions provide an ideal landscape to bridge science and policy. Thus, the goals of the CIIP program are: 1) to create a generation of Ph.D.-level scholars who are sensitive to the policy implications of their research and are able to incorporate natural and social science into policy development, and 2) to establish a culture of interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among natural scientists, social scientists and policy-makers. The following objectives will assist us in achieving our goals. We will: Curriculum and Research Enrich both the theoretical and applied dimensions of the educational experience as CIIP Fellows develop their dissertation proposals. L Expand (not replace) the traditional mentoring that occurs between student and Major Professor by fostering interdisciplinary learning, dialogue, interaction and partnering. L Create an environment where students of diverse backgrounds engage in effective peer-learning. L Develop a graduate student curriculum that integrates policy, natural science and social sciences through research on coastal ecosystems and their management. L Intersection With Humanities Facilitate communication among disciplines, and between scientists and decision-makers. L Address the ethics of management scenarios in coastal regions where management options challenge the values, social practices and economic well-being of individuals, professions and communities. L Integrate issues of ethics, human values and communication (traditionally known as humanistic inquiry) into evolving areas of coastal research and management. L Skills Development Mentor CIIP Fellows in the development of leadership, mediation and communication skills, and create opportunities for them to exercise those skills in meaningful settings. L Foster imaginative thinking as a means to identify and address challenges encountered in the coastal zone. L Create opportunities for Ph.D. students to gain practical problem-solving experience during the CIIP program and expose them to postdoctoral opportunities in coastal science and policy offered by professional societies such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Ecological Society of America (ESA) and the Soil Science Society of America. L Outreach Applications L Provide CIIP Fellows with the opportunity to interact and network with the world’s best research scientists and leaders in coastal system inquiry, policy and management. L Recruit women and underrepresented racial and ethnic groups into our program to expand the multiplicity of perspectives, thereby creating a multicultural, cross-disciplinary cadre of CIIP Fellows URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 2 and thus of future leaders in coastal ecosystem research and management. The CIIP pedagogy is designed to create a generation of "T competent" coastal scholars (Reise 2001). T competency signifies depth of knowledge in a specific discipline (the vertical bar of the "T") and breadth of knowledge encompassing many disciplines (the horizontal bar above the "T"). The traditional academic Ph.D. curriculum provides disciplinary depth. The CIIP will provide the additional component of T competency through interdisciplinary breadth. Furthermore, we are careful to distinguish between multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary programming (Coughlin et al. 2002). Multidisciplinary activities engage participants from diverse fields of knowledge; however, individuals might not work out of their particular discipline. Its spirit is that of aggregation. Interdisciplinary programming, by contrast, extends beyond a multidisciplinary base and strives to create a unified process that draws on knowledge from a variety of disciplines, which in turn may influence the scope of a policy or the dimensions of a scientific hypothesis. Its spirit is integrative. Participants in the CIIP Program - The participants in the CIIP program, known collectively as the CIIP Community, are defined as follows: CIIP Fellows - Ph.D. students supported by IGERT funds for 2 years. CIIP Fellows will remain active in the program after the 2-year period but will be supported by extramural or University funds after their 2-year IGERT funding. Major Professors - faculty supervisors of CIIP Fellows who will also participate in the CIIP program through programmatic and instructional activities. Practitioner Scholars - partners outside of the University who will host CIIP Fellow interns and set parameters for the development of white papers on pressing coastal issues. Humanities Scholars - faculty who specialize in research and teaching of the humanistic components of this project including ethics, cultural values, social equity, leadership and communication. CIIP Council - the Director of the Coastal Institute; URI faculty representing natural science, social science and the humanities; the URI National Association of Fellowship Advisers (NAFA) representative; a student representative that is an active or past CIIP Fellow; the Dean of the College of the Environment and Life Science and the Dean of the Graduate School of Oceanography. URI is Uniquely Qualified to Develop This Program - Recognizing the opportunities presented by its unique geographic setting on Narragansett Bay and coastal Rhode Island, the University of Rhode Island has invested considerable resources in building capacity in coastal programs over the past 30 years. As a result URI has one of the nation's strongest academic programs in coastal science, policy, governance and resource management. Our ability to make significant strides in reshaping the education paradigm of coastal ecosystem management has never been stronger for many reasons. The number and diversity of URI faculty who have agreed to contribute to making the CIIP a success reflects the institution's commitment to interdisciplinary problem-solving in coastal systems. L URI programs have a consistent record of placing graduates with prestigious Institutes and Fellowships that advance coastal science nationally and internationally - these include Switzer Fellows, Knauss Fellows (URI has four this year) and Fulbright Fellows. L Strong coastal programs already exist within URI and will form the basis of the CIIP. These include: - The Coastal Resources Center - the world leader in developing integrated coastal zone management solutions for developing countries. - The Rhode Island Sea Grant (NOAA) and Land Grant (USDA) programs - institutions designed to integrate science with the needs of society. - Federal programs and partnerships within URI - organizations that fund research and outreach in coastal watershed management, fisheries, aquaculture and coastal communities; partnerships include the Agricultural Experiment Station (USDA), Cooperative Extension Service (USDA), L URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 3 - North Atlantic Coast Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (NPS, USGS, USDA NRCS), the National Park Service Coastal Inventory and Monitoring Program, and the NOAA Cooperative Marine Education and Research program. Research laboratories of federal agencies located adjacent to the URI campus - the NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service and Environmental Protection Agency enhance and expand the local community of coastal science practitioners. The EPA National Estuary Program and personnel with the NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System - located at URI or administered by URI faculty. The Nature Conservancy's global office for Marine Programs - located at URI. The URI Coastal Institute - an umbrella organization to create interdisciplinary coalitions of academic, public and private agencies, and NGOs to manage Narragansett Bay and its watershed. Section (C) c. Research Efforts. Two years of IGERT education will produce interdisciplinary doctoral research by CIIP Fellows in the core areas described below. These research themes have grown out of the identification of particular problems and topics that our faculty are uniquely poised to address. With this exceptional intellectual strength, URI has the capacity to tightly integrate the social and natural science dimensions of coastal ecosystem management. Of particular relevance to this proposal is the added capability of URI Humanities Scholars to address these dimensions in unique ways, thereby enriching the dialogue, perspectives and skill sets pertinent to the research agenda of CIIP Fellows and their Major Professors. Watershed and Estuarine Systems. Personnel: P. August, R. Burroughs, T. Dalton, C. Deacutis, G. Forrester, C. Foster, A. Gold, F. Golet, P. Hargraves, T. Hennessey, A. Killilea, K. Killingbeck, J. King, G. Knott, R. Mather, S. McWilliams, M. Moakley, S. Nixon, B. Nowicki, J. Opaluch, C. Oviatt, P. Paton, M. Stolt, B. Sullivan, S. Swallow, J. Swift, R. Thompson, T. Tyrrell, Y.Q. Wang, J. Yoder. Issues in Estuarine Research - Hypoxia (“dead zones”), fish kills, habitat degradation and shell-fishing bans have galvanized the management community to protect and restore estuaries at scales ranging from small lagoons less than 100 ha, to regional estuaries such as the Narragansett Bay. CIIP estuarine scientists will conduct research with CIIP Fellows to understand anthropogenic impacts associated with increased nutrient loading and climate changes that are documented for Narragansett Bay over the last century. Below we summarize major research endeavors in estuarine and watershed systems by CIIP scientists and scholars. L Within the estuary, what factors control the response of phytoplankton primary productivity, sea grasses and macroalgae, and hypoxia to nutrient loading? Managers need guidance to identify the sensitivity of different estuaries to nutrient loading and to evaluate the benefits of pollution abatement strategies for point and non-point sources. C. Oviatt, S. Nixon and B. Nowicki examine changes that result from local and regional drivers, such as eutrophication, pollution and climate (Nixon 1997, Nowicki et al. 1999). Their robust investigations are characterized by tight connections among modelers, experimentalists and process-level scientists. Nixon and co-workers develop models that build upon ongoing biogeochemical assessments of annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay (Nixon et al. 1995). Ecosystem models have been developed for the Narragansett Bay and smaller bays that estimate prehistoric and predict future nutrient inputs, productivity and the occurrence of hypoxic/anoxic events. These studies are integrated with whole system studies by MERL (Marine Ecosystem Research Laboratory) scientists on the relationships between levels and ratios of nutrients and primary production, limiting nutrients along a salinity gradient, and the relationships among nutrient levels, stratification and hypoxia. C. Foster has examined cultural attitudes toward the value of submerged sea grasses, clashes between legislative and NGOgenerated principles for estuarine restoration and social obstacles to efficacious restoration of degraded habitat (Foster 2000, 2005). The YSI sensors and SeaBird sensor system we request in the equipment URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 4 budget are critical instruments in data gathering for studies of hypoxia in Narragansett Bay. The sediment profile camera we request in the equipment budget is used to quantify benthic community composition. L How can research findings on anthropogenic and natural changes in ecosystem condition be assimilated into coastal policy? There is a need for scientific research on climate that pays attention to making results available in a form directly relevant to decisions faced by local decision makers. Furthermore, decision makers encounter obstacles to acquiring, understanding and using information about climate change, with the result that many decisions remain uninformed regarding the implications of ecosystem change. CIIP researchers at URI’s Policy Simulation Laboratory are utilizing advanced GIS technologies to create visualization systems that show how landscape changes will appear under various management scenarios (Opaluch et al. 2002). R. Mather examines submerged vessels that function as artificial reefs within established ecosystems in order to assess potential tension between their cultural and ecosystem status. R. Thompson, L. Philo and J. Opaluch are working with Cape Cod stakeholders to develop technology-based policy tools that help communities assess the values and risks of alternative policy actions in response to climate change. This is complemented by Burrough’s (1999) research on the role of stakeholder input in developing watershed-based management plans for coastal estuaries. Concurrently, T. Hennessey and M. Healey are examining the estuarine management structures that have used scientific information most effectively (Healey and Hennessey, 1994). J. Swift works on alternative methods to promote civic participation in the acquisition of knowledge about the relevant science and the development of persuasive techniques to involve decision makers in needed social and behavioral change as identified by science. L What are the key social and environmental indicators of estuarine ecosystems to management actions? CIIP scientists J. Yoder, M. Fox and Y.Q. Wang use satellite imagery and remote sensing to identify temporal and spatial patterns of algal blooms and to track historical and current changes in the extent and quality of sea grass beds (Siegel et al. 2002). CIIP scientists test and apply new technologies such as in situ sensors and telemetry systems that promote real-time detection of estuarine behavior (Fox et al. 2000). P. Hargraves, J. Collie and D. Smith monitor plankton, fish and bacteria to detect environmental change (Hargraves and Maranda 2002). J. Opaluch creates decision rules under uncertainty that prioritize actions to control potentially invasive species before they are established within coastal ecosystems. The URI Coastal Institute administers the Narragansett Bay and watershed monitoring consortium which is creating a data collection, synthesis and communication framework that is effective, responsive and affordable. J. Swift uses datasets derived from these initiatives as the basis for the creation of artistic works that explicate data in accessible forms. Issues in Watershed Research - In the face of prolonged and rapid population growth of coastal areas (Cohen et al. 1997), decision makers have embraced the “watershed approach” that recognizes the cumulative and multi-dimensional effects of local land management decisions. Land cover conversion in the past 40 years has reshaped much of Rhode Island’s rural landscape from large forested tracts to a mosaic of small parcels dominated by the built environment (August et al. 2002). CIIP research explores issues of land use and its effects on coastal biodiversity, freshwater quality and estuarine ecosystems, thus permitting insight into the efficacy of land use policies at the local and regional scale. We summarize below a few of the research questions asked by members of the CIIP research community. L What are the forces of change in coastal landscapes? J. Opaluch and R. Thompson are studying how incentives and government policies work together to influence locational choices by business and residents. This understanding is central to design of management strategies to control community growth, and therefore impacts to natural amenities in the coastal zone. A. Killilea and M. Moakley employ case studies based on the most recent and available data to prepare public administrators for URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 5 ethical decision making in environments where competing interests are at work. Y.Q Wang uses satellite imagery and remote sensing technology to measure and model landscape change (Wang et al. 2003, Wang and Zhang 2001). Using metrics developed by landscape ecologists, they assess changes in patch size, isolation and composition of matrix habitats in suburban and rural landscapes (Novak and Wang In Press). P. August use geographic information system technology to characterize the ecological geography of coastal landscapes (Rosenzweig et al. 2002) and to evaluate the suitability of various data for resource management analysis and modeling (Hollister et al. 2004). L How do nutrient sinks affect the risks of nutrient loading from sources within a watershed? Estuarine systems can be driven by land use/land cover changes that affect the inflow of fresh water and nutrients. A major question confronting watershed planners is where to target source control efforts. CIIP scientists A. Gold and B. Nowicki use reactive and nonreactive tracers, such as SF6, N2:Ar ratios and 15N, to examine nutrient retention and transformations within natural sinks, such as riparian wetlands, in-stream processing and coastal groundwater (Addy et al. 2002, Portnoy et al. 1998). M. Stolt and students study the occurrence and source of labile carbon deposits to provide insight into the long-term viability of these sinks. The Coastal Institute works with local and regional conservation and planning organizations (The Nature Conservancy, Land Trusts, communities) to integrate protection of riparian habitats into local land use plans, zoning and open space acquisition strategies (McCann et al. 2001). G. Knott applies leadership paradigms to sort through complex layers of possible choices and to encourage stakeholder commitment. LHow does habitat fragmentation affect biological communities, and what are the resulting changes in human well-being? Fragmentation impacts to ecological communities are used to assess the environmental, social and economic dimensions of suburban sprawl (August et al. 2002). Using econometric methods, CIIP scientist Swallow measures what local communities value most in conservation programs and what they are willing to pay to maintain rural and natural landscapes (Kline and Swallow 1998). In addition, S. Swallow and C. Foster develop mechanisms to account for the role of non-market values in relation to unexpected community preferences about conservation. P. Paton and F. Golet measure the effects of landscape composition on the diversity of amphibian communities in vernal pools and forest dwelling bird communities (Paton and Crouch 2002). S. McWilliams and his students evaluate how land use changes in coastal landscapes effect the ecological physiology of Neotropical migratory birds (McWilliams and Karasov 2001). L How can impacts to coastal landscapes be mitigated by conservation planning and habitat restoration? CIIP faculty S. Nixon, F. Golet and C. Roman conduct large-scale field experiments in coastal wetland restoration. By manipulating tidal flow to degraded salt marsh habitats, these researchers can replicate conditions suitable for the reestablishment of native marsh vegetation (Raposa et al. 1999). J. Opaluch and colleagues examine the viability of economic and ecological indicators for use in models that prioritize salt marsh restoration efforts (Johnston et al. 2002a). K. Killingbeck and his students have developed models to predict biodiversity hotspots based on geomorphology; these models can guide open space acquisition projects (Nichols et al. 1998). P. August, A. McCann and colleagues have developed a multivariate spatial model to identify critical lands for conservation (McCann et al. 2001). This tool is used to support the acquisition efforts of land trusts and local conservation organizations. S. Swallow, J. Opaluch and colleagues have developed methods to assess public response to complex policy alternatives including the economic value of and incentives for science-based policies to maintain rural and natural landscapes. They have also developed ecological-economic models to understand decision-making, and create decision processes that incorporate social and natural science knowledge (Johnston et al. 2002a, Johnston et al. 2002b, Johnston et al. 2003). These decision processes, simulative in character, are studied and tested in the Policy Simulation Laboratory using human subjects who help identify successes and failures in our understanding of science-based decision URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 6 and policy processes. The wireless networking system we request in the equipment budget will be an exciting new addition to the Simulation Lab’s capacity to assess subject responses to policy scenarios. J. Swift uses an artistic model to convey the implications of ecological economics to the broader public, including legislators, journalists and researchers from disparate fields. T. Hennessey and colleagues use adaptive management principles to examine the development and implementation of comprehensive watershed management efforts within Chesapeake Bay and the national estuary program of EPA (Imperial and Hennessey 1993). They have continued this line of inquiry in the National Academy of Public Administration study on the role of collaboration in the governance of watersheds. Their inquiry undertakes a comparative analysis of the estuaries of Narragansett Bay, Delaware Inland bays, Tampa Bay and Tillamook Bay in Oregon (Imperial and Hennessey 2000). Fisheries Management and Ecological Aquaculture. Personnel: C. Anderson, J. Anderson, D. Bengston, L. Buckley, J. Collie, B. Costa-Pierce, L. Derbyshire, E. Durbin, C. Foster, T. Hennessey, G. Klein-MacPhee, S. Macinko, H. Mederer, M. Moakley, S. Olsen, C. Oviatt, M. Rice, C. Roman, B. Sullivan, J. Sutinen, J. Swift, K. Wishner Globally, two-thirds of the major marine fisheries are fully exploited, overexploited, or depleted (FAO 2002). One-fifth of the world's fisheries catch is discarded as by-catch (Cook 2003). To maintain the industry, global fisheries are subsidized by an estimated $14-$20 billion per year - four times the value of US landings (Milazzo 1998). The growing trends include declines in wild fishery resources, price increases and the replacement of wild fish by cultured fish. CIIP fisheries scientists study the oceanographic processes that support fish and shellfish production, conduct quantitative analyses of resource species, and explore ways to implement ecosystem-based fisheries management. The social issues related to fisheries include the impacts of fishing and climate on recruitment, the impact of fishing on fish habitat, fisheries governance and management, the impact of changes in fisheries practice on economic and cultural dimensions of long-term fisheries communities, and the role of aquaculture in fisheries and in pollution of inshore waters. L How are commercial fish populations being impacted by multiple human stressors, including fishing, pollution and habitat loss/restoration? After decades of single-species focus, environmental managers have begun to recognize that resource species should be studied in an ecosystem context to quantify the impacts of protected areas/fishing closures and climate trends. Multi-species models that incorporate predator-prey interactions have been increasingly used as statistical tools for CIIP scientists. Ecosystem models of Narragansett Bay and subsystems, such as Greenwich Bay, have displayed the effects of pollution from excessive nutrients and have also revealed hypoxic/anoxic events in enclosed small systems. Researchers have restored tidal flow to salt marshes and then measured the ecological responses to restoration (Raposa et al. 1999). CIIP scientists also quantify the impacts of fishing gear on juvenile fish habitat and monitor the ecological response to large-scale fishery closures (Collie et al. 2000). Agar and Sutinen (forthcoming) have developed a multispecies bioeconomic model to study whether modifying the species selectivity properties of fishing gear could contribute to the rebuilding of overexploited stocks. Those prospects are quite limited and uncertain. For example, their analysis suggests that gear designs aimed at increasing the catch of under-exploited species can be counterproductive and may inadvertently exacerbate the decline of over-exploited species. B. CostaPierce and J. Anderson assess policies to reduce adverse impacts of aquaculture development (CostaPierce 2002). They are particularly interested in the social and ecological impacts of introducing nonnative aquaculture stock (Anderson, In Press). L Does aquaculture help to reduce pressure on the wild fisheries by contributing farmed seafood to meet consumer demand? Although aquaculture of marine fish species has been increasing dramatically around the world, its development in the U.S. has been hindered by insufficient knowledge of optimal techniques for culture, by user conflicts in the coastal zone and by the levels of financial risk in capital URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 7 investment. Globally, certain sectors of aquaculture are under considerable attack from environmentalists because of potential impacts on the environment. Aquaculture that occurs in the coastal zone itself is challenged to take an “ecological” approach to integrated aquaculture ecosystems, which should enhance natural ecosystems, ecosystem services and the social fabric of coastal societies (Costa-Pierce 2002). Another approach is to move aquaculture onto land in bio-secure, technologybased systems that could recycle seawater, use selectively bred or genetically modified organisms, and treat wastes and effluents to minimize environmental impacts. J. Anderson and his colleagues model the production economics for new species in land-based facilities (Zucker and Anderson 1999). Anderson is currently evaluating how the growth of aquaculture is changing the management of fisheries and international seafood trade (Anderson and King 2003, Anderson 2002), the competitiveness of aquacultures relative to traditional fisheries and how aquaculture can be used to enhance wild fisheries (Sylvia et al. 2000). CIIP scientists also address basic and applied questions about the biology and economics of cultured fish, e.g., development (Schreiber and Specker 2000), nutrition (Specker et al. In Press), disease (Gomez-Chiarri and Chiavenini 1999), physiology (Smith et al. 1999) and the development of new species for aquaculture (Bengtson 1999). M. Rice and his students investigate potentially beneficial roles of mollusks cultured in the ecosystem; for example, by filtering phytoplankton and thereby reducing eutrophication problems (Rice 2001). C. Foster has examined aesthetic objections made by the general populace to regional aquaculture development. J. Anderson, D. Bengtson and B. Costa-Pierce are especially interested in whether or not economic incentives can be developed to promote the more expensive but less polluting and more bio-secure land-based aquaculture for fish culture. J. Swift works with politicians on mediation techniques while M. Moakley puts state-level conflicts into a political context, both relevant since only an integrated approach with both natural and social sciences can provide guidance to politicians and managers in this area. L. Derbyshire focuses on communication strategies to engage marginalized or disenfranchised members of a given community as well as on training in skills of cultural diversity and gender communication. L How can we develop governance systems that succeed in managing fisheries resources in a biologically and economically sustainable manner? A large contingent of URI researchers, notably J. Sutinen, T. Hennessey, L. Juda and C. Anderson examine fisheries governance systems to identify the causes of management failure (Sutinen and Upton 2000, Juda 2002). Applying methods of experimental economics in the URI Policy Simulation Laboratory, they are developing a comprehensive model of fisheries policy and are subjecting its hypotheses to extensive testing. Their goal is to produce a new tool for political and economic application that will provide techniques for improving the design of fishery management institutions. URI’s team of social scientists investigate a wide range of fisheries management issues that integrate science into evaluations concerning the performance of social and economic regulations; examine the principles and economic implications of financing fisheries research, management and enforcement; and study the socioeconomics and governance of large marine ecosystems (Sutinen 1999, Sutinen and Andersen 2003). H. Mederer examines the economic and social impact of regulatory change on fishing fleets and fishing families. T. Dalton and G. Forrester study the viability of marine protected areas (MPAs) as a means to achieve sustainable fisheries management (Dalton 2004). Section (C) d. Education and Training. The objective of the CIIP curriculum is to provide CIIP Fellows: 1) advanced training in natural science, social science and policy integration; 2) directed training in communication and ethics in scientific research and coastal resource management; 3) insight into developing resource management-relevant scientific research; 4) practice in creating policy and planning proposals around credible science; and 5) experience working in multidisciplinary teams outside the bounds of their core discipline. While the capstone product for CIIP Fellows is a dissertation grounded in traditional scientific or social science, the ultimate impact of our program will be the creation of a cadre of leaders who can identify relevant problems, communicate them to diverse audiences (and to each URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 8 other) and produce published scientific research and relevant policy that integrates the natural and social sciences. Our educational model is based on the following premises: Integration of science and policy is accomplished most effectively in a bottom-up, student-driven setting wherein learning does not occur exclusively in a top-down classroom or lecture format. Thus, movement from passive to active learning will be integrated throughout as a tool that is transportable to a working life post-CIIP. L Application of experiential learning in both science and governance venues is an effective way to provide students with the opportunity to discover how each system works and expose them to the mechanisms of integration. Focus on leadership will delineate an essential awareness between individual responsibility and collaboration in these venues. L Enrichment and expansion of the mentoring relationship between a Major Professor and graduate student will occur through the education of faculty, as well as their graduate students, on the integration of science, policy and their respective disciplinary communities. L Inclusion of the humanities, especially philosophy and communication studies, will prepare and encourage students to confront ethical issues while still establishing channels and modes of communication within and among disciplines. Humanities Scholars participating in the CIIP will serve as mentors for the interface of issues in ethics, human values and communication. To be most effective, scientists and policy-makers must be able to communicate clearly with a diversity of audiences. We will train our students to understand the differences in communication needs among audiences and how to convey complex information in a manner that scientists, citizens, resource managers, and decision-makers can comprehend. L Application of technology such as WebCT, video conferencing, the CIIP web site and LISTSERV lists will contribute to maintaining ongoing dialogue around issues in science, policy, ethics, human values and communication throughout the CIIP curriculum. L Selection of CIIP Fellows - The CIIP will provide support for CIIP Fellows for 2 years early in their academic training (first or second year of studies) when they are completing their Ph.D. coursework and developing their dissertation research proposal. Over the 5-year IGERT project we will fund 26 different students with CIIP Fellowships. The disciplines of CIIP Fellows will be balanced among the core themes of natural science and social science dimensions of watershed and estuarine ecosystems, and fisheries management. Application for CIIP support will be submitted by prospective CIIP Fellows with endorsement of their Major Professor. The CIIP Council [see section (C) e] will evaluate applications using the following criteria: Research focus in watershed and estuarine systems, or fisheries management. Demonstrated commitment to embracing an interdisciplinary (natural and social science) perspective in their research. L High research promise as evidenced by publications, presentations, course performance and participation in programs or projects relevant to coastal ecosystem science and management. L Commitment by the Major Professor to contribute to the CIIP pedagogy. L Capacity to enhance the intellectual, gender and cultural diversity of the CIIP program. L L IGERT funds will be used by CIIP research faculty to leverage additional research funding. Within the URI system a number of grant-giving programs are presently available to fund research projects relevant to the CIIP mission. The NOAA Sea Grant Program, the USDA Agricultural Experiment Station, the North Atlantic Coast Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (National Park Service) and the NOAA Cooperative Marine Education and Research Program provide over $1,000,000 in competitive grants each year to support research in fisheries, ecosystems, water resource science and policy. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 9 CIIP Fellows will be drawn from the following participating academic departments at the University of Rhode Island. Academic Unit Academic Focus Department of Natural Resources Science, College of the Environment and Life Sciences (CELS) Department of Plant Sciences, CELS Department of Fisheries, Animal, and Veterinary Science, CELS Department of Geosciences, CELS Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences Department of Resource Economics, CELS Department of Marine Affairs, CELS Graduate School of Oceanography Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering Department of Ocean Engineering, College of Engineering Department of Political Science, College of Arts and Sciences Watershed management, wetland ecology, conservation biology, GIS, remote sensing, soil science, microbial ecology Agronomy, horticulture, entomology Fisheries management, shellfish pathology, aquaculture Groundwater pollution abatement, coastal geomorphology, glacial geology, coastal hazards Ecology, conservation, evolution, limnology Fisheries economics, biodiversity conservation economics, social values, tourism economics Coastal zone management, marine policy, environmental impact assessment Coastal and marine science, biological, physical and chemical oceanography Watershed modeling, fluid dynamics, groundwater dynamics Sensors, instrumentation, underwater acoustics, coastal and marine hydrologic modeling, oil spill tracking International, national, regional and local coastal policy, UNCLOS, NGO’s, public administration We will fund 26 different students over the course of the 5-year CIIP program. The table below shows the distribution of these students over the project. CIIP Fellow Cohort 1 1 2 3 4 Total Students in Program At Each Point of the 5-year Cycle Year of CIIP Program 3 4 5 2 6 Students 5 Students 5 Students 10 Students 6 11 10 15 10 Total Students in Cohort 6 5 5 10 26 Total Students Supported The CIIP Curriculum - The learning portfolio that CIIP Fellows will experience in the 2-year program consists of a mix of courses, seminars and experiential activities. The timetable for the curriculum is summarized below. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 10 September Y e a r Orientation Learning Goals 1 Y e a r Mentor first year CIIP Fellows Speakers 2 Fall Semester Course (3 cr): Winter Intersession Course (1 cr): Spring Semester Course (6 cr): Multidisciplinary Problem Solving in Coastal Ecosystems Leadership and Communication in Coastal Ecosystem Science and Management White Papers on Contemporary Policy Issues in Integrated Coastal Science May Summer Session Course (6 cr): Colloquium Field Practicum in Coastal Science Required courses Select speakers for course Problem Solving in Coastal Ecosystems Internship in Coastal Ecosystem Management Dissertation Research Proposal Development Y e a r s Report on work accomplished during internship - Conduct Research - Attend CIIP lectures and Colloquia - Compete for CIIP Grants-in-Aid 3-5 The CIIP curriculum is described below. Activities marked with an asterisk (*) will be open to the full URI graduate and undergraduate community, thus expanding the audience of CIIP programming. Student Year 1 Pre-Program Assessment In order to prepare a responsive learning agenda, we will conduct a pre-program assessment of new CIIP Fellows to measure their familiarity with coastal science and policy prior to orientation. Lead Personnel: CIIP Council, J. Boulmetis, P. Nelson Orientation September The CIIP Community will attend a daylong orientation workshop presented in the first week of the Fall semester. The purpose of the orientation is threefold: to introduce new Fellows to the different elements of the IGERT program, to meet existing and past CIIP Fellows, and to focus the community on the power of disciplines within the humanities to effect a continued exchange of information between scientists and policy makers. Fellows will be introduced to issues in ethics, human values and communication, familiarity with which may be considered atypical of a Ph.D. in their field but which often play a major if subtextual role in coastal ecosystem management. Lead Personnel: CIIP Council URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 11 Learning Goals, Annual Reflection, and Review Fall Semester CIIP Fellows will prepare a written proposal of their learning goals following the orientation workshop. The progress of CIIP Fellows will be reviewed against their learning goals on an ongoing basis by the CIIP Council and our external assessment program [section (C) f]. In reviewing student progress, the Council will pay special attention to Fellow participation in CIIP activities, leadership and integrative skills developed, contribution to the overall IGERT program and progress in meeting their individual learning goals. Lead Personnel: CIIP Council, J. Boulmetis, P. Nelson EVS6xx1 3 credits Multidisciplinary Problem Solving in Coastal Ecosystems * Fall Semester (NEW IGERT CLASS) Developed specifically for the CIIP program, this course will consist of two components: (1) weekly lectures (Thursdays) by URI faculty and visiting scholars on integrated research/policy in estuarine, watershed and fisheries research, and (2) weekly training and exercises (Tuesdays) in case studies of science and policy in coastal management. Members of the CIIP Council will coordinate the lecture component of the course in year one but during year two coordination of the outside lecture component will be handed over to second-year CIIP Fellows. In the Tuesday training and exercise component, URI faculty and CIIP Fellows will be assigned to project teams mixing natural science and social science members and will analyze (in class) a case study featuring a coastal resource management problem. Humanities Scholars will facilitate the discussion and introduce specific skills in framing issues, e.g., communication, integrating policy and science, and working in multidisciplinary teams. We will be attentive to using traditional sources of information (journals and books) as well as non-traditional environmental science and policy information sources, e.g., Green Wire, Land Letter, and Policy News Updates from the Ecological Society of America. Lead Personnel: P. August, J. Swift, J. Opaluch, R. Burroughs, A. Gold, C. Foster EVS6xx 1 credit Leadership and Communication in Coastal Ecosystem Science and Management Winter Intersession (NEW IGERT CLASS) 1 Each CIIP Fellow will participate in an intensive leadership and communication course during the academic intersession (January). Humanities Scholars, working with the URI John Hazen White Center for Ethics and Public Service and with the URI organization for Professional Development, Leadership and Organizational Training, will develop and implement the winter intersession Leadership course as an intense immersion in ethics, human values and communication - an immersion intended to prepare CIIP Fellows to take a leadership role in bridging science and policy in coastal stewardship. Our external program assessment leader (P. Nelson) is a professional consultant in communication and leadership training and will participate in the intersession leadership course. In the first year of the program, Humanities Scholars will facilitate discussion. In year two and subsequent years CIIP Fellows will facilitate learning along with Humanities Scholars. Topics for discussion will include: Communication - learning techniques of leadership, persuasion, negotiation, intercultural communication and the use of art and drama to convey complex issues among scientists, and between scientists and nonscientists; Ethics - examination of competing models for determining decision making and right action, presented in the context of case studies from scientific Course numbers will be assigned upon approval of our IGERT grant URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 12 research, policy development and coastal governance; Values - the role of culture, history, literature and aesthetics in understanding variation in values among stakeholder groups, especially in light of how these values drive policy, governance and the application of science in the coastal zone. Lead Personnel: J. Swift, C. Foster, L. Derbyshire, G. Knott EVS6xx 6 credits White Papers on Contemporary Policy Issues in Integrated Coastal Science The CIIP Practitioner Scholars - program partners external to the university - will identify questions or issues in coastal ecosystem policy. A pair of CIIP Fellows (one social scientist and one natural scientist) will be assigned to the Practitioner Scholar’s agency or organization and will research these questions over the semester and prepare a position paper on the issue or issues. We will strive to match student skills and research interests with the information needs of the Practitioner Scholars. The Practitioner Scholars will meet with the Fellows on a regular basis to monitor and direct their progress. The purpose of this assignment is to: Spring Semester L Expose (NEW IGERT CLASS) the Fellows to the workings of regulatory agencies and legislative government L Engage Fellows in science-based policy development and implementation related to issues of practical concern in coastal ecosystem management L Provide the Fellows opportunity to work in multidisciplinary teams L Encourage Fellows to view the questions through a humanistic as well as scientific lens White Papers will be of direct value and application for the CIIP Practitioner Scholars and will be both directed toward appropriate peer-reviewed journals and distributed via the CIIP website to relevant NGOs, government agencies, citizen groups and research forums. We will encourage Fellows to communicate their White Paper results to the public through Op-Ed articles and "Letters to the Editor" in print media. Lead Personnel: J. Opaluch, R. Burroughs CIIP Spring Colloquium * May The CIIP Community, including past CIIP Fellows, Major Advisors and Practitioner Scholars will meet for a full day at the end of the Spring Semester to hear the results of the White Paper studies. Recipients of CIIP Grants-in-Aid will provide short reports of the research they accomplished with IGERT funding. The Colloquium will be an annual celebration of the CIIP program and serve to keep past Fellows actively engaged in the initiative. It will also serve to integrate our Practitioner Scholars with the academic component of the CIIP community. Lead Personnel: CIIP Council EVS6xx 6 credits Field Practicum All CIIP Fellows will participate in an intensive summer science practicum specifically developed for the CIIP. The practicum will be administered during a summer session term (approximately one month) and consist of a series of field investigation units that emerge from our CIIP research themes. Students will learn the array of investigative methods used in each research area. They will gain URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 13 in Coastal Science insight into the nature and scale of data obtained, the analytical and interpretative approaches applied to the data, the approaches used to describe uncertainty, and finally, examples of how the research can inform policy makers. Summer (NEW IGERT CLASS) The summer practicum will include 6-8 different thematic units (e.g., fisheries science, water quality monitoring, submerged habitat mapping, etc.). Faculty and Practitioner Scholars will direct the first several units. The CIIP student Fellows will each take leadership for planning the remaining units, based on their personal area of research. Student Fellows will be mentored closely on this task by URI faculty, CIIP Practitioner Scholars and Major Professors throughout their first academic year and will have considerable time to prepare their summer science practicum unit. One component of each unit will include hands-on participation in a field or laboratory research exercise. We will also visit with a number of research scientists at their research sites and explore the research approaches used to address their hypothesis. Destinations will be selected from regional LTER sites such as Hubbard Brook, the Plum Island Ecosystem and the Baltimore Urban Ecosystem Study and from local venues of URI and Practitioner Scholar researchers. Because many of the research venues are run by our non-academic partner institutions (EPA, NOAA, National Park Service, US Fish & Wildlife Service) students will learn of research and postdoctoral opportunities as well as diverse applications of science and policy. During the latter portion of the course, teams of students or individual students will present their initial dissertation ideas, hypotheses and potential research methods to their peers as well as their Major Professors for review and discussion. Lead Personnel: C. Oviatt, A. Gold Student Year Two Having engaged in a year-long analysis, study and observation of leadership skills, second-year CIIP Fellows will now assume an active role in program delivery and shared mentoring of first-year Fellows, which inaugurates an iterative pedagogical cycle of learning and doing. In Year two CIIP Fellows will develop their research proposals, complete their CIIP multidisciplinary course requirement (see below), and perform an extended internship with a Practitioner Scholar. Required Courses Sometime during their Ph.D. studies, all CIIP Fellows are required to take one course in each of the following areas: 1) Social Dimensions of Coastal Management, and 2) Coastal Ecosystem Science. A list of acceptable courses will be prepared each year. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that CIIP Fellows have solid exposure to advanced topics in both the natural and social sciences. Problem Solving in Coastal Ecosystems * Second-year CIIP Fellows will be responsible for the selection and coordination of the speakers for the Fall class in Multidisciplinary Problem Solving in Coastal Ecosystems designed for first-year CIIP Fellows. This will give the second-year Fellows the opportunity to identify compelling issues in coastal science, policy and management based on their experiences during the year one White Paper policy course as well as during their summer science practicum. Second-year CIIP Fellows will develop a roster of speakers who reflect disparate points of view on these issues - speakers who might reflect opinions or research outside the academic norm. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 14 Lead Personnel: Year-2 CIIP Fellows in consultation with CIIP Council EVS6xx 12 credits Internship in Coastal Ecosystem Management Spring & Summer Second-year CIIP Fellows will complete an Internship by working in a laboratory, office or field research site of one of our non-academic partner institutions or our Congressional representatives in Washington D.C. during their second spring semester and summer. National-level interagency panels or programs in Washington D.C., such as the National Invasive Species Council or the NSF/AIBS NEON planning partnership, are other excellent venues for Fellow Internships. The purpose of this component of the CIIP program is to fully engage the Fellows in activities related to coastal science and management outside of the academic environment. At the close of this Internship and as they transition into their third year, CIIP Fellows will report on the work accomplished during their internship at the September Orientation. They will receive feedback from the full spectrum of the CIIP community - CIIP Council, Major Professors, Scholar Practitioners, new and continuing CIIP Fellows and Humanities Scholars. The multiple perspectives of this group will provide seasoned CIIP Fellows with a public critique of their progress in integrating science, policy, leadership and presentation skills and at the same time will provide first and second year CIIP Fellows with insight as they develop and continue to shape their learning goals. Lead Personnel: P. August, R. Burroughs, J. Opaluch Dissertation Research Proposal Development Spring & Summer CIIP Fellows will develop their dissertation research proposals during their second year in the CIIP program. Their research will embody the interdisciplinary principles of the CIIP program. CIIP Fellow alumni will present their dissertation proposals in the Spring Colloquium, thereby continuing the exchange of knowledge and discovery and to maintain a cohesive intellectual center for all Fellows across the years. Lead Personnel: Major Professors, CIIP Council CIIP Fellow Grants-in-Aid Ongoing A modest pool of funds will be made available on a competitive basis to CIIP Fellow and alumni of the CIIP curriculum to support activities that will advance their research in coastal systems. Fellows will be encouraged to seek funding for travel to conferences, travel to learn new techniques in labs away from URI, purchase small items of research supplies, cover page charges for journal publications, etc. The purpose of this Grants-in-Aid program is to keep CIIP Alumni Fellows engaged with the program and hone their skills in persuasive grant writing. Lead Personnel: CIIP Council Program Integration From the beginning the CIIP will seek Fellows and Major Professors who are committed to CIIP goals and value integration of science, policy and resource management. As a strategy to continue and cultivate that commitment, the CIIP Program has been designed so that the underlying philosophy of integration is URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 15 reinforced at deliberate and designated intervals, thereby providing CIIP Fellows a rich suite of integrated activities to educate them in research in coastal science and policy. The program also strives to keep past CIIP Fellows and their Major Professors fully engaged in the CIIP pedagogy. Alumni of the CIIP program will be invited to attend the Fall lectures in Coastal Science and interact with our visiting scholars. The Spring Colloquium will be an annual celebration of the CIIP community and serve to keep past Fellows engaged in the program. The Grants-in-Aid program will support research by past Fellows, and represents another dimension of the program to keep students engaged in the CIIP pedagogy. Graduate Educational Benefits CIIP Fellows will be exposed to a range of career options beyond the more standard academic track. Both the White Paper and Internship experiences will serve to create a strong relationship between Fellows and institutions external to URI. Fellows will have opportunities to exercise the full complement of communication, mediation, decision-making and leadership skills that they learn in the winter Leadership course. Fellows will be challenged to weave a multiplicity of points of view from humanities perspectives into the fabric of policy and scientific research, and to recognize ethical complexity as it arises in research and governance contexts. Because the academic culture at URI respects positions of coastal science and policy practice as desirable employment goals, there will be strong support for the exposure of CIIP Fellows to a variety of nonacademic career opportunities through the White Paper and Internship experiences. URI has a notable record of placing our advanced graduate students in positions of leadership in public and private agencies involved in coastal science and management. Examples of positions occupied by recent URI alumni include: Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Affairs, NOAA; Director of the NOAA Coastal Services Center; Policy Analyst for NOAA's Domestic Fisheries Division of the Office of Sustainable Fisheries; Division Chief for NOAA's Habitat Division; Director of Government Affairs at the Coastal States Organization; Switzer Foundation Research Fellow at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Executive Director of the Pew Oceans Commission; Chief of the US Coast Guard Environmental Standards Division; and Manager of the Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve in Mississippi. Almost every element of the CIIP program is designed to engage partner institutions in the CIIP pedagogy. We see this as an important component of the program because collaborative work by CIIP Fellows with Practitioner Scholars will expose our Ph.D. students to a diversity of career opportunities outside the academic setting. In turn, the CIIP program will provide significant value to our Partners through CIIP Fellow research in White Paper and Internship programs and, eventually, produce a cadre of highly employable professionals who bring a unique skill set to bear on issues surrounding coastal management and related public policy. Our current roster of partner institutions that will host CIIP interns and provide White Paper instruction includes: NOAA RI Sea Grant College Program, Dr. Barry Costa-Pierce Narragansett Bay Estuary Program, Mr. Richard Ribb and Dr. Christopher Deacutis Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Dr. David Gregg and Dr. Keith Killingbeck National Park Service, Dr. Mary Foley United States Geological Survey Biological Resources Division, Dr. Howard Ginsberg Atlantic Ecology Division Environmental Protection Agency, Dr. Jonathan Garber & Mr. Norman Rubinstein New England Region, Environmental Protection Agency, Ms. Margherita Pryor Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit, Dr. Charles Roman NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, Dr. Ken Sherman United States Senate, Senator Lincoln Chafee and Senator Jack Reed RI Senate Policy Office, Mr. Ken Payne URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 16 RI House of Representatives Policy Office, Dr. Sandra Whitehouse U.S. Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Ms. Denise Crimmins, Dr. Theresa Baus RI Department of Environmental Management, Mr. Fred Vincent RI Rivers, Bays and Watersheds Coordination Team, former Governor J. Joseph Garrahy Applied Science Associates, Dr. Deborah French-McKay Changing the Culture of Education in Coastal Science and Policy As a result of the new courses and experiential opportunities that will be created by the CIIP, the teaching of coastal science and policy at the University of Rhode Island will undergo profound change both within and beyond the 5 years of IGERT funding. As evidenced by past and current practice, as well the conscious engagement of URI faculty in CIIP programming, we are striving to create a permanent culture change that fosters cooperative learning partnerships in coastal science and policy that are informed and enriched by the perspectives of the humanities. Also, as evidenced by the number of activities in our curriculum that are designed to keep past CIIP Fellows engaged in the initiative and to celebrate current CIIP intellectual achievements, we want to create a long-lasting community of CIIP students and faculty. We are confident that we can be successful because: (1) prestigious NSF IGERT support and successfully surviving the peer approval process (competitive review of IGERT proposals) is an unambiguous demonstration of the intellectual legitimacy of our goals; and (2) the faculty we have engaged are regarded as the research leaders at the University of Rhode Island, and by their participation in the CIIP we are sending a clear message to the academic community and our non-academic partners that interdisciplinary integration of science and policy is important, legitimate and challenging. The CIIP program offers an exciting and unique pedagogy that takes root in URI’s multivalent strength as a research institution and will eventually grow into a practical resource for innovative scientific and social solutions to coastal zone problems. Between both ends of this spectrum we have developed a series of carefully-orchestrated, student-centered experiences that draw on the most cutting edge empirical findings about individual styles of academic mastery, collaborative learning exercises, alternative modes of assessment and curricular flexibility in relation to actual student progress. The CIIP Curriculum has been designed by a team of experts that includes several winners of the URI Foundation Awards for Teaching Excellence, Scholarly Excellence and Administrative Excellence, given once annually to individuals on campus. In addition, a number of CIIP Faculty participate in URI’s Instructional Development Program, where faculty examine the latest scholarship on teaching techniques before engaging in peer-instruction to raise the overall standard of teaching on campus. Associate Dean of the Graduate School L. Pasquerella, a philosopher, is one of these winners and is currently running a faculty workshop on research ethics. This is an example of pedagogical innovation that will be adapted for use with CIIP Fellows during the winter intersession, where scientists and social scientists consider humanistic approaches to problem solving. The CIIP draws on the research depth, pedagogical ingenuity and administrative acumen of URI faculty and staff while extending the reach of traditional doctoral studies beyond the walls of the university. The extension of the traditional mission is bolstered by URI’s extensive network of cooperative partners in Rhode Island and Washington D.C., from which we draw our CIIP Practitioner Scholars. In all the CIIP offers the most talented and committed young researchers in coastal science and management a truly unique program of study. Here are four of the most salient features of the CIIP educational program. Cross-pollination - URI is a Land, Sea and Urban Grant institution. The combination of these three commitments has positioned us to attract and evolve faculty who think in cross-, multi- and interdisciplinary ways. Thus in the Coastal Institute Building on campus it is not unusual to find a marine historian partnering with an expert in GIS in developing an underwater archaeology site plan, a philosopher working with resource economists on land use policy or a psychologist helping policy analysts to function more effectively as leaders. Moreover, what we assert to be particularly unusual URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 17 among the CIIP faculty is the extent to which cross-pollination has been internalized at an individual level as researchers think and work across disciplines. This mode of working will be modeled for students in the CIIP, while opportunities for students themselves to explore similarly original partnerships and projects will be provided through programming during the winter intersession Leadership course, summer science practicum and organization of the fall semester course Multidisciplinary Problem Solving in Coastal Ecosystems. The summer science practicum, in particular, will include conscious “stopovers,” i.e., times when the science CIIP Fellows and the policy CIIP Fellows pause to discuss how they have viewed what they have observed in each of the topical themes. A policy person may see a landscape with legal boundaries, a mix of socioeconomic classes, a people’s history or a tourism infusion, while a scientist may see a coastal zone, invasive species and eutrophication. Using directed, small group discussion as a vehicle for revealing different lenses of bias, CIIP faculty will design stopover sessions carefully to create a balance of perspectives as Fellows discover how to place their own points of view within a context beyond that of their academic disciplines. This will reinforce the model of T competent pedagogy with vertical disciplinary depth and horizontal multidisciplinary breadth. Pedagogical Inversion - The CIIP curriculum includes methodological inversion of the conventional pedagogy that students would normally encounter during their doctoral education. We upend the usual order of academic mastery that privileges theory and content over application and practice. In the second semester of their studies CIIP Fellows will engage in real-time case study - participating in the actual work of agencies and organizations wrestling with coastal problem solving - through placement in the course White Papers on Contemporary Policy Issues in Integrated Coastal Science. The CIIP program frontloads applied real world issues thereby exposing CIIP Fellows to the uncertainties at work in science or public policy. By frontloading their curriculum with observations, intersections and enforced rumination, we infiltrate their thinking with a multiplicity of points of view early in their studies as they prepare their dissertation research proposals. Extended Scientific and Policy Literacy - Foremost among those values that drive the CIIP is this: that Fellows avoid creating science to be left at the doorstep of others to do with as they will, others who possess neither the capacity nor the desire to understand, frame or apply scientific information efficaciously. The CIIP is designed to help scientists anticipate potential policy applications of their work and to provide social scientists with a working knowledge of the science relevant to realistic policy development. Towards this end CIIP Fellows take extensive field trips to scientific field sites and are placed in Internships with government agencies, NGOs and research facilities during their second year. However, the CIIP also takes direct steps to foster the acquisition of a vocabulary that reflects the realm of human value that is operative beneath and beyond science and policy. Broad social agendas often govern the use to which science is put in public life as well as the extent to which adoption of policy depends on factors outside good science. Disciplines in the humanities have developed tools to identify the influence of ethical, aesthetic, historical, multi- and cross-cultural considerations on decision-making. These considerations sometimes remain under the radar screen of academic awareness while nevertheless exerting real influence on the politics of science and policy. Through the winter intersession course and in public presentation of their individual case studies and research, CIIP Fellows will master the communication skills necessary to navigate the tangle of realworld considerations that often drive public decision-making and the leadership skills to bring science to bear on policy in an informed, responsible manner. Quality Placements - Internships are not particularly unique as a form of educating nascent researchers about the practical applications of their work. Even so, the manner by which CIIP places Fellows does indeed provide singular opportunities for in-depth exposure to ways of thinking and acting that may prove startling for students who are otherwise accustomed to undertaking work in a laboratory or URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 18 library. In fact, the CIIP Council intends to make placements that deliberately provide exposure to analytical and operational methods that contrast with the intellectual comfort zone of the individual CIIP Fellow. For example, we might send a CIIP Fellow from the Environmental Economics department out on the Narragansett Bay to work with a habitat restoration team while they test a new mechanical seeding device. A Fellow from the Department of Natural Resources Science could be sent to work in Senator Lincoln Chafee’s Washington, D.C. office to monitor the process by which coastal zone habitat restoration achieves federal funding. The restoration experience could turn out to be motivated as much by tourism as by science - i.e., the long-term demand for clean beaches - while the process of funding coastal zone habitat restoration might appear to seem more like horse-trading than rational policy based on science. In other words, the CIIP will challenge paradigms handed down through traditional academic disciplines by placing Fellows in positions that widen the aperture of their thinking through immersion in different approaches to problem solving. By the time CIIP Fellows are engaged in the Internship, they will also be bringing real value to the table while discovering ways in which to identify and address the challenges external - but complementary - to their Ph.D. discipline. Furthermore, the presence of CIIP Fellows in a wide array of agencies will introduce our CIIP partners to this new breed of integrative thinkers. Our Challenges Conscious of points made by reviewers of our previous proposals to IGERT, we acknowledge this as a full schedule for CIIP Fellows and an ambitious project overall. We are sensitive to striking a balance between a rich CIIP pedagogy and the traditional research agenda of the Ph.D. student. We have integrated, formalized and codified the various training elements of our curriculum as suggested by the 2003 IGERT review panel. To help us to gauge workload, the following will be relevant. CIIP program activities will be limited to a 20-hour per week commitment during the academic year, the standard allotment for graduate student assistantships at URI. Student commitment to the CIIP program will be greater during the summer and intersession when commitments to coursework are lighter. L Mentoring and managing the CIIP Fellows will be a significant endeavor. The proposal PIs will serve as the front-line management team: J. Swift and C. Foster will coordinate the intersession leadership course; A. Gold and C. Oviatt will manage the summer field practicum; R. Burroughs, J. Opaluch. J. Swift, P. August, and C. Foster will coordinate the Fall seminar. P. August will serve as liaison between the CIIP program and Practitioner Scholars. However, the entire team of CIIP participants is dedicated to engagement in ongoing CIIP activities. L Section (C) e. Organization, Management, and Institutional Commitment Administration: The CIIP will be administered by the Coastal Institute (CI) at the University of Rhode Island, a program under the Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs of the University. Peter August, the Director of the CI and PI of this proposal, will serve as the senior CIIP administrator and point of contact, manage the CIIP budget, carry out project reporting, and represent the CIIP at NSF functions. The Coastal Institute is already engaged in interdisciplinary, multi-institutional coastal science and policy in a number of ways. The CI administers the Rhode Island Environmental Monitoring Collaborative which reports annually on the monitoring needs and trends for Narragansett Bay and watershed to the Governor and General Assembly. The Coastal Institute also administers the Rhode Island Rivers, Bays, and Watersheds Coordination Team - a meta-institution of state agencies charged with developing a sustainable management plan for Narragansett Bay, coastal Rhode Island, and associated watersheds. The CIIP Council will oversee project content and implementation, resource allocation, admit new CIIP URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 19 Fellows, conduct CIIP Fellow annual reviews, perform internal assessment of the CIIP, develop internship opportunities for CIIP Fellows, work to enhance the gender and cultural diversity of CIIP Fellows, and leverage new funds to support the CIIP. The membership of the CIIP Council is given in section "(C) b." of the proposal. Institutional Commitment - We have received exceptional levels of support for the Coastal Institute IGERT Project from a variety of programs within and outside of URI. Within URI we will be working closely with the following organizations. L Federal/Academic Research Partnership Programs at URI - for example, the Sea Grant College Program (NOAA), the Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service (USDA), and the Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (CESU) - provide significant levels of funding for CIIP research themes. L The Graduate School of Oceanography currently provides 2-3 graduate assistantships to study environmental monitoring of the Narragansett Bay ecosystem. L The Policy Simulation Lab is the venue for CIIP research and training in stakeholder response to public policy. L The URI Marine Ecosystem Research Lab (MERL) - a system of large outdoor seawater enclosures that simulate coastal ecosystems - will host CIIP research and instruction. L The URI Environmental Data Center and the Laboratory for Remote Sensing - the University's Centers for GIS and remote sensing applications in environmental management and conservation - will be venues for instruction during the summer science practicum. L The John Hazen White Center for Ethics and Public Service will work with the CIIP to integrate the humanities with science and policy issues of coastal ecosystem management. L The URI Honors Program, through its membership in the National Association of Fellowship Advisors (NAFA), will assist the CIIP in recruitment to URI of outstanding and diverse students. Section (C) f. Performance Assessment The fundamental goals of the CIIP program are to: 1) to create a generation of Ph.D.-level scholars who are sensitive to the policy implications of their research and are able to incorporate natural and social science into policy development, and 2) to establish a culture of interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among natural scientists, social scientists and policy-makers. We have adopted a multitiered assessment strategy to determine if these goals are being realized. Student Assessment - All CIIP Fellows will participate in a process of goal setting during the Orientation Session at the beginning of the IGERT experience. They will be mentored by the CIIP Council and two professional assessment specialists in this process. J. Boulmetis, a URI education professor is the resident expert in program assessment. P. Nelson from Working InConcert Inc., our external review leader, will instruct the new CIIP fellows on setting short-term and long-term learning goals ("Outcome Journals"). New Fellows will also be given a pre-CIIP Program interview to assess their familiarity with interdisciplinary approaches to coastal ecosystem science and policy. CIIP Fellow learning goals will be treated as dynamic documents to be reconciled by an ongoing comparison of progress with learning goals at various points throughout the program, including targeted sessions during the winter Leadership course and the Spring Colloquium. Assessment of student progress will be made by our internal and external assessment programs. Internal Program Assessment - Internal assessment will be conducted by the CIIP Council. The CIIP Council will review annually the progress of CIIP Fellows being funded at that time to monitor their participation in program activities and to gauge the effect these activities have on the identification and achievement of learning goals. Past CIIP Fellows will be continually monitored by our external review URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 20 process to determine how their research was enhanced or expanded by the CIIP. Monitoring is also intended to determine if programmatic adjustments are needed to enhance the effectiveness of the CIIP pedagogy. The Council will report back to each active Fellow before the beginning of their second IGERT year. This assessment report will reinforce positive achievements students have made and provide suggestions on how to improve their leadership, communication and problem-solving skills. At the end of the two-year CIIP curriculum, each CIIP Fellow and his or her Major Professor will be asked to provide an overall assessment of the CIIP pedagogy. The assessment will include a critical review of all CIIP program activities and comment on the strengths and weaknesses of each. Once again, through modeling the framework of adaptive management CIIP Fellows and their advisors will be among the important architects of the program. We will conduct a post-project interview of each CIIP graduate to assess their familiarity with issues in coastal science and policy following the 2-year CIIP curriculum. All CIIP Practitioner Scholars who hosted students for White Paper or Internship activities will be asked to report on student performance and value to the practitioner. Reciprocally, students will be asked to evaluate the guidance they received from practitioner hosts. Feedback will direct future CIIP Fellows to Practitioners who have a record of effective mentoring. An important monitoring event will occur in August at the end of our second IGERT year. We will convene a daylong retreat consisting of the first cohort of CIIP Fellows, the CIIP Council, Directors of two other IGERT sites with similar programmatic themes (e.g., UCSD's marine biodiversity and conservation, or U. Idaho's program in ecosystem management), the external assessment coordinator P. Nelson (see below), internal assessment specialist J. Boulmetis and a representative from the URI NSFADVANCE program. The purpose of the retreat is to review the CIIP program with the first cohort of Fellows and to identify any programmatic changes that might be made for years three through five of the program. Included in this benchmark assessment will be evaluation of our ability to attract and retain students of diversity. The external IGERT Directors will be asked to provide recommendations on strengthening the CIIP and share with us aspects of their IGERT programs that have been especially successful and that we might incorporate into the CIIP. External Program Assessment - The nationally respected consulting firm of Working InConcert, represented by founding partner Mr. Page Nelson, will conduct our external program assessment. Working InConcert has extensive experience in evaluating and facilitating communication, collaboration and leadership practices within numerous organizations and networks, with a special interest and capability in coastal, ocean and watershed organizations and university partners. The firm specializes in helping to develop “learning organizations” that encourage individual and group growth and learning, open dialogue and team learning, systems thinking and awareness, and innovative thinking and problem solving. Working InConcert also has considerable experience in evaluating and implementing program effectiveness for coastal environmental institutions. Current or recent clients of Working InConcert include the California Sea Grant College Program, California Coastal Conservancy, Rhode Island Sea Grant College Program, National Aquarium in Baltimore and the Trust for Public Land. Working InConcert will use Outcome Mapping methodologies - developed by Canada’s International Development Research Centre (Earle et al. 2001) - to monitor CIIP effectiveness. Outcome Mapping measures qualitative and quantitative changes in both institutional and individual behaviors. Such behavior changes have been identified as what lead to long-term program impacts. Outcome Mapping is a planning and evaluation framework that was developed as a practical and rigorous method for setting goals for optimal impacts and adaptive learning, and then measuring progress in achieving those goals, particularly as it pertains to changes in behavior of program participants (“practice URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 21 change”). It tracks in both a qualitative and quantitative manner the abilities of program participants to access new resources, ideas, learning opportunities, or basic information over a certain period of time. Outcome Mapping methodologies include specific steps for setting goals and objectives (establishing “outcome challenges”), measuring progress towards those objectives at set intervals of time (identifying “progress markers” and measuring performance against these markers), monitoring interim outcomes and evaluating final outcomes. Working InConcert will play a significant role in mentoring students on establishing their individual CIIP learning goals. The first stage of Outcome Mapping sets forth intentional program design (goal setting). We plan to involve both external and internal evaluators from the very first, or “goal-setting stages” of the CIIP program. The next stages, which include monitoring and evaluating progress toward desired outcomes, then feed back to program design using an adaptive management approach that fosters organizational learning. For example, the progress markers in Outcome Mapping illuminate the depth and complexity of change being sought. The “expect to see” category is the early response to the program’s basic activities. This proceeds to what we would “like to see” happening, then to the ultimate “love to see” category if the program is having a profound influence. This is the way a program can track what has been accomplished while being reminded of what still needs to be achieved. Data will be collected through the participation of the external assessment team in CIIP’s annual Evaluation and Orientation Sessions (September), winter Leadership course (January), spring Colloquium (May), and special forums such as the daylong evaluation retreat at the end of the second year. Monitoring and assessment activities will include: L Assisting each CIIP Fellow to create and update the individual “dynamic documents” referred to at the beginning of this section (“Outcome Journals” which describe individual learning goals and benchmarks and then chart the student’s progress towards these goals). L Monitoring student progress at these points in the program by: Reviewing her or his written body of work and Outcome Journal. Meeting annually with each student, their Major Professor and the CIIP Council to discuss student goals and progress. Participating with the students in targeted activities (e.g., Leadership course) L As part of the September visit, Working InConcert will provide an annual program assessment review and make recommendations for program adjustment to the CIIP Council. This review will include an evaluation of CIIP progress in achieving “outcome challenges” (goals) that the program and its participants have set for themselves. Working InConcert’s evaluation will occur at three levels - CIIP student progress, changes induced by the CIIP within participating URI faculty, and CIIP-induced institutional changes within URI - using the Outcome Mapping methodology. Examples of traditional and outcome mapping-based assessment metrics that internal and external evaluators will use to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the CIIP program. Examples of CIIP Goals Integrate science and policy in student research and career Examples of Traditional Assessment Metrics Do CIIP Fellow dissertation proposals contain an interdisciplinary element that URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Examples of Outcome Mapping Progress Markers Are CIIP Faculty expanding the traditional mentoring that occurs between student and Major Professor with trans-disciplinary Page 22 goals embodies science and policy? learning, dialogue, interaction and partnering? Have Fellows altered their research and career goals because of insights learned from the CIIP? Foster student leadership and scholarship in coastal science and policy How many and what kinds of publications (journal, popular press, op-ed articles) and presentations have students made resulting from CIIP activities? Do CIIP Fellows integrate the multiple issues of humanistic inquiry–true interdisciplinary environmental scholarship–into the evolving areas of coastal research? Foster a collaborative, interdisciplinary network among URI faculty How many grant proposals or publications have been produced by faculty alliances developed in CIIP program? Are CIIP Faculty sharing lessons and experiences with the URI community and other communities nationally and internationally to become a coastal learning community and to encourage others? Demonstrate the intellectual credibility of interdisciplinary coastal sciences and policymaking How well attended are CIIP program activities that are open to the larger community of scholars at URI and nearby coastal science and policy practitioners? Do CIIP Fellows participate in regular marine and coastal resource meetings that bring together the users of the resource to discuss problems and solutions? Enhance the diversity of participants in coastal science and policy at URI How many students of diverse ethnic and cultural origins have been supported by and participate in CIIP programming? Have gender relationships, economic and social equity and other urgent social issues become incorporated into the CIIP Fellows analyses of coastal environmental problems? Section (C) g. Recruitment, Mentoring, and Retention Recruitment - We will implement two programs to increase diversity among CIIP Fellows. Our activities will: 1) proactively work to increase the number of students of diversity coming to URI for graduate education in coastal management and 2) aggressively target qualified students of diversity already at URI for CIIP support. We will partner in the administration of our recruitment program with the NSF-funded ADVANCE (advancing opportunities for women in STEM areas, i.e., science, technology, engineering and mathematics) program already in place at URI, as well as with the NSF IGERT INRP program, the National Association of Fellowship Advisers (NAFA) and CIIP faculty. We will immediately carry out the activities recommended in the IGERT program recruitment strategies document (on the IGERT INRP web site), with particular emphasis on fostering the working partnerships for IGERT recruitment that we have already established with area-related scholarship foundations and civic groups devoted to advancement for women and minorities. Dr. Cheryl Foster of the CIIP Council is a Director of the National Association of Fellowship Advisors (NAFA) and has the professional resources to target precisely the groups the CIIP intends to attract in URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 23 making diversity a genuine part of its program and pedagogy. In particular, we are able to draw on that organization’s considerable resources to make direct contact with academically talented minority students and women across the country as well as with the professionals who advise them at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Avenues of contact include leadership conferences of environmental scholarship winners, national meetings of minority student scholarship recipients and mailing lists of potential minority candidates as provided by related foundations such as the Goldwater Scholarship Foundation (natural science), the Morris K. Udall Foundation (environmental science and management; Native American tribal policy) and the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program (academically talented minority undergraduates). For example, Mary Williams at the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program, Melissa Millage at the Morris K. Udall Foundation and Louis Blair at the Harry S. Truman Foundation (public service leadership) have already committed to helping us target appropriate minority and female candidates for the CIIP program at their annual leadership meetings. Other programs such as the Soros Scholarship organization, the McNair Fellows in Undergraduate Research Program and the Woodrow Wilson Foundation offer concrete avenues for long-term recruitment. We will also publicize IGERT directly to talent development and academic opportunity programs for underrepresented or marginalized students at other institutions. URI has a well-established Talent Development Program of its own. Through URI-TD we are able to reach similar groups through professional associations of which URI is a member. In addition, through our campus NAACP Chapter we can run information sessions on IGERT programming and opportunities for interested graduate and undergraduate students in the New England region. Indeed, our campus chapter has expressed enthusiasm for assisting us in this student-driven recruitment strategy (including reaching out to potential candidates at HBCU and MSI institutions). In sum, to reach off-campus students we will utilize presentations at leadership and minority student academic fairs, targeted mailings of minority student fellowship winners in relevant areas, personal contact with potential candidates through executive staff at foundations serving minority students who are high academic achievers, contact at professional meetings of talent development associations, web resources related to coastal science and management and LISTSERV announcements to the hundreds of professionals nationwide who administer scholarship opportunity programs for academically talented graduate and undergraduate students. Finally, The Coastal Institute will dedicate non-NSF funds to support visits of promising candidates to campus. This will complement the concurrent URI representation at academic fairs targeting minority and female students which URI Vice Provost for Research, Graduate Education and Outreach Janett Trubatch and Graduate School Associate Dean Lynn Pasquerella already attend. Mentoring and Retention - While the URI Coastal Institute and the CIIP Council will provide program oversight and guidance for each Fellow, the Major Professor will retain a pivotal role in guiding Fellows through the CIIP program and supervising their dissertation research. Even so, the CIIP pedagogy includes opportunities for students to be mentored by myriad individuals (Practitioner Scholars, Humanities Scholars) including previous CIIP Fellows during the later years of the program. In addition, second year and advanced Fellows will mentor and guide novice CIIP Fellows during the Fall multidisciplinary problem solving course and the intersession leadership course. Current research has shown that solid mentoring leads to retention and success of students, a factor which is undeniably both a humanistic and an economic concern. However, given the CIIP’s commitment to diversity of perspective we must expand traditional mentoring activities to include specific focus on intercultural and gender considerations. URI is particularly well-poised to meet an expanded set of mentoring activities because of programs that are already in place. Firstly, URI maintains the only freestanding Multicultural Center at a New England institution of public education. Through this center the university sponsors a wide range of practical and academic programs, e.g., Diversity Week, which both celebrates and informs the community about multiple perspectives; Unity Weekend, which brings URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 24 together student campus leaders of all varieties to explore challenges of leadership in university settings; and the semi-annual convening of multicultural graduate students to introduce them to the range of support services affecting both their professional and personal lives. Second, URI’s Office of the Provost sponsors an ongoing series of “Women in Science” luncheons featuring a speaker who presents her research and provides an additional opportunity for the development of a support network (these events are also open to male faculty and administrators). Third, URI NSF ADVANCE engages in three crucial endeavors to mentor and support female faculty in the STEM areas: mentoring by an established female peer; financial support for research; and ongoing seminars on topics ranging from grant writing to family and professional integration. ADVANCE support of faculty filters down to students as these female ADVANCE Fellows function as role models for successful female students in science. All of these efforts contribute to a climate that is both welcoming and supportive of women and minorities on the URI campus. Beyond the cited proactive commitments, the CIIP Council is unanimously persuaded that a lack of diversity of perspective among the CIIP Fellows will lessen the impact and quality of the overall program. For this reason we are equally dedicated to raising issues of diversity within the CIIP Curriculum and sensitizing CIIP Fellows to the recognition of diverse perspectives. Such perspectives remain fundamental to leadership, communication and the development of credible public policy in response to issues of coastal management. Section (C) h. Recent Traineeship Experience The PIs have not received prior support from NSF specifically for graduate traineeship projects. URI, however, successfully hosts a large NSF-funded graduate education program in the marine and environmental sciences. The Rhode Island Marine and Environmental Sciences Graduate Teaching Fellows Program in GK-12 (Dr. Gail Scowcroft PI, URI Office of Marine Programs) has supported 56 different M.S. and Ph.D. students over the past five years. Dr. Scowcroft is on her second funding cycle ($1.5 M) for this program. The goals of the program are similar to those of the CIIP - to broaden the intellectual breadth of our graduate students on coastal environmental science. The specific goals of the GK-12 program are: Enrich the quality of students' lives by improving their science literacy and motivating them with knowledge of global concerns. L Create citizens who are able to make informed, responsible decisions about their lifestyles and the policies that will affect them. L Introduce GK-12 Fellows and Mentor Teachers to a wide range of innovative pedagogy. L Train the GK-12 Fellows, Mentor Teachers, and their Colleagues to translate their content knowledge into inquiry based activities for students. L Empower teachers to become confident in conducting inquiry activities and taking groups of students out into the field independently. L The CIIP shares many of the pedagogical instruments and values of the successful URI GK-12 program. The two programs differ in long-term goals; GK-12 will enhance the quality of science education in the GK-12 arena, whereas the CIIP will create a generation of researchers and coastal ecosystem management practitioners who are able to integrate science and policy. Section (C) i. International Collaboration We do not intend to have a dedicated International component to our IGERT program, although international research by CIIP participants will certainly inform the CIIP perspective. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 25 Section (C) j. Recruitment and Retention History The Coastal Institute IGERT Program is a University-wide curriculum. Participating students and faculty will be drawn primarily from the College of the Environment and Life Sciences (CELS), the Graduate School of Oceanography (GSO) and the College of Arts and Sciences (A&S). Policy and Governance students will be drawn from the Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics and the Department of Marine Affairs. Coastal science students will be drawn from GSO, the Department of Biology in A&S, and the Departments of Natural Resources Science, Plant Sciences, Geosciences and Fisheries and Aquaculture in CELS. Humanities Scholars will be faculty participating from the Departments of Communication Studies, History, Political Science and Philosophy in A&S. As evidenced in the statistics, URI has a rich diversity of academic programs that will comprise the CIIP Community. The following tables represent the best data URI currently has available on the composition of its graduate programs. We provide our statistics on a Department or Program basis when possible. For most metrics, College summaries are the best available. Number of Ph.D. Degrees Conferred by Academic Year and Average Time to Completion (in months) by College College Arts & Sciences Business Engineering Human Science & Services Oceanography Environment & Life Sciences 2001 2002 2003 Degrees Months Degrees Months Degrees Months 28 80.9 33 65.7 21 79.4 6 66.8 9 65.3 6 72.7 10 53.7 10 48.1 13 78.1 4 66.5 5 78.4 4 88.8 9 64.4 4 108.3 9 78.6 7 65.6 9 52.3 11 78.5 Notes: 1. Because our semesters span varying periods of time, we provide our time to completion statistics in months rather than semesters. Fall term is 4 months, Spring term as 5 month, and Summer as 3 months. 2. Time to degree is computed from the start of the first term to the end of the conferral term. Enrollment Headcount in Graduate Degree Programs Fall 2003 Semester Registered Students by College Masters Programs Doctoral Programs PartFull- PartCollege Full-time time Total time time Total 4 Arts & Sciences 174 284 458 155 65 220 Business 71 160 231 15 13 28 Engineering 61 44 105 31 27 58 Human Science & Services 181 138 319 1 39 40 Oceanography 24 5 29 43 16 59 Environment & Life Sciences 124 99 223 56 19 75 URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 26 Notes: 1. Headcounts as of October 13, 2003 2. Full-time students are registered for 9 or more credits. 3. Part-time students may have continuous registration status (0 credits) while doing research/thesis work. 4. Arts & Sciences includes 208 MLS students (50 full-time, 165 part-time) in Library & Information Studies. Ph.D. Enrollments (# of Students) in Departments or Programs Contributing to CIIP Department/Program Oceanography Environmental Science Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Biological Science Marine Affairs 2001 57 28 20 2002 56 17 21 2003 59 23 22 18 8 14 6 14 6 Admission Statistics by College GSO 102 57 55 101 57 55 80 50 59 1 College CELS2 167 136 81 170 142 84 195 165 85 A&S3 117 93 79 160 107 67 177 122 69 Number of Applicants 2001 Number Accepted 2001 Acceptance Rate 2001 (%) Number of Applicants 2002 Number Accepted 2002 Acceptance Rate 2002 (%) Number of Applicants 2003 Number Accepted 2003 Acceptance Rate 2003 (%) Notes: 1. GSO = Graduate School of Oceanography 2. CELS = College of the Environment and Life Sciences 3. A&S = College of Arts & Sciences Depts of Math, Stats, Applied Math, Chemistry, Physics, Bio, Computer Science Diversity Statistics for all URI Ph.D. Students # PhD Caucasian # PhD African American # PhD Hispanic # PhD Native American # PhD Asian/Pacific Islander # PhD International URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project 2001 321 18 17 3 7 150 2002 312 18 15 2 8 148 2003 294 13 8 2 15 138 Page 27 # PhD Unknown 30 32 26 # PhD Women # PhD Men 296 250 287 248 263 233 Diversity Statistics for Focal Departments in CIIP GSO* MAF ENRE NRS PLS BIO Total Ph.D.s Graduated in 2003-04 14 2 6 3 2 3 Number Male Number Female 10 4 1 1 2 4 2 1 2 2 1 Number Caucasian Number African American Number Native American Number Hispanic Number Asian 12 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 Number Going to Postdoc 5 1 1 1 Number Going to Academic 4 2 2 2 1 1 Employment Number Going to State, Federal or 3 3 1 International Agency Number Going to Private Sector 2 1 * GSO = Oceanography, MAF = Marine Affairs, ENRE = Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, NRS = Natural Resources Science, PLS = Plant Sciences, BIO = Biology URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Page 28 Section (D). References Cited. Papers published by members of the CIIP team are marked with an asterisk. *Addy, K, D.Q. Kellogg, A.J. Gold, P.M. Groffman, Gina Ferendo & C. Sawyer. 2002. In situ push-pull method to determine ground water denitrification in riparian zones. J. Environ. Qual. 31:1017-1024. *Agar, J. J. & J. G. Sutinen. Forthcoming. Rebuilding strategies for multispecies fisheries: A stylized bioeconomic model. Environmental and Resource Economics. Alpert, P. & A. Keller. 2003. The ecology-policy interface. Frontiers in Ecol. & Environ. 1:45-46. *Anderson, J. 2002. Aquaculture and the future: Why fisheries economist should care. Mar. R. Econ. 17:133-251. *Anderson, C. M. & J. R. King. 2003. Equilibrium behavior in the conservation easement game. Sub. to Land Econ. * Anderson, J.L. In Press. The International Fish and Seafood Trade, Woodhead Publ, Cambridge, UK. *August, P. V., L. Iverson, & J. Nugranad. 2002. Human Conversion of Terrestrial Habitats. Pages 198224. In K. J. Gutzwiller Editor, Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. SpringerVerlag, New York. *Bengston, D.A. 1999. Aquaculture of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus): Status of knowledge, current research, and future research priorities. Aquaculture 176: 39-49. *Burroughs, R. 1999. When stakeholders choose: Process, knowledge, and motivation in water quality decisions. Society and Natural Resources 12:797-809. Cohen, J. C. Small, A. Mellinger, J. Gallup, & J. Sachs. 1997. Estimates of coastal populations. Science 278:1211-1212. *Collie, J.S, S.J. Hall, M.J. Kaiser, & I.R. Poiner. 2000. A quantitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf-sea benthos, Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 785-798. Cook, R. 2003. The magnitude and impact of by-catch mortality by fishing gear. In M. Sinclair & G. Valdimarsson ed., Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem. Rome: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, S. Naeem, K. Limburg, J. Paruelo, R.V. O'Neill, R. Raskin, P. Sutton, & M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260. *Costa-Pierce, B.A. 2002. Ecological Aquaculture. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK Coughlin, B., L. Garwin, H. Blount, and L. Neistadt. 2002. Cross disciplinary science: Fostering, recruiting and reviewing multidisciplinary work. Science Editor 25:8. *Dalton, T. 2004. An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites. Journal of Environmental Management 70:333-350. Earl, S., F. Carden, & T. Smutylo. 2001. Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. International Development Research Centre. Ottawa, Canada FAO. 2002. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2002. Rome: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. * Foster, Cheryl. 2000. Restoring Nature in American Culture: An Environmental Aesthetic Perspective. In ( eds. Paul Gobster and Bruce Hull). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Pages 71-96. Island Press, Washington, D.C. * Foster, C. 2005 (forthcoming). Wherefore the Rhizome: Eelgrass Restoration in the Narragansett Bay. In (ed. Robert France) Healing Natures, Repairing Relationships: Landscape Architecture and the Restoration of Ecological Spaces and Consciousness. MIT Press. * Fox, M.F., D. Kester, J. Andrews, A. Magnuson, and C. Zoski. 2000. Seasonal warming of Narragansett Bay and Rhode Island Sound in 1997: AVHRR sea surface temperature and in situ measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(C9):22,071-22,082. *Gómez-Chiarri M, & Chiaverini L. 1999. Evaluation of promoters for the construction of DNA vaccines for aquaculture. Genet Anal 15:121-124 URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project References Page 1 *Hargraves, P.E. & L. Maranda. 2002. Potentially toxic or harmful microalgae from the northeast coast. Northeast Naturalist 81-120. *Healey M. & T. Hennessey.1994. The utilization of scientific information in the management of estuarine ecosystems. Ocean and Coastal Management 23:167-191. Heinz Center. 2004. Innovation by Design: Improving Learning Networks in Coastal Management. John H. Heinz Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment, Washington D.C. *Hennessey, T. & M. Imperial. 2000. Environmental governance in watersheds: The importance of collaboration. In Transforming Environmental Protection for the 21st Century 11: 7-180. Washington, DC., The National Academy of Public Administration. *Hollister, J., J. Paul, P. August, J. Copeland, & L. Gonzales. 2004. Assessing the accuracy of the National Land Cover dataset at multiple spatial extents. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70:405-414. *Imperial M. & T. Hennessey. 1993.The evolution of adaptive management for estuarine ecosystems, the National Estuary Program and its precursors. Ocean and Coastal Management 20:147-180. *Imperial M. & T. Hennessey. 2000. Environmental governance in watersheds: The importance of collaboration in transforming environmental protection for the 21st century. Washington D.C.. The National Academy of Public Administration. *Johnston, R. G.Magnusson, M. Mazzotta & J. Opaluch. 2002a. Combining economic and ecological indicators to prioritize salt marsh restoration actions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84. *Johnston R., S.K. Swallow, C.W. Allen, & L.A. Smith. 2002b. Designing multidimensional environmental programs: Assessing tradeoffs and substitution in watershed management plans. Water Resources Research 387: 1-13. *Johnston, R.J., S.K. Swallow, D.M. Bauer, & C.M. Anderson. 2003. Preferences for residential development attributes and support for the policy process: Implications for management and conservation of rural landscapes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 321 * Juda, L. 2002. Rio plus ten: The evolution of international marine fisheries governance. Ocean Development and International Law, 109-144. *Kline J. & S.K. Swallow. 1998. The demand for local access to coastal recreation in Southern New England. Coastal Management 263:177-190. Lubchenko, J. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279:491-497. Ludwig, D., M. Mangel, & B. Haddad. 2001. Ecology, conservation, and public policy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:481-517 *McCann, A., D. Chapman, & A. Mandeville. 2001. Using GIS to identify critical lands for conservation. Maritimes 43:10-12. *McWilliams, S.R. & W.H. Karasov. 2001. Phenotypic flexibility in digestive system structure and function in migratory birds and its ecological implications. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 128:579-593. Milazzo, M. 1998. Subsidies in World Fisheries: A Reexamination. World Bank Technical Paper, Number 406, Washington D.C. National Research Council. 1993. Research to Protect, Restore, and Manage the Environment. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. *Nichols, W., K. T. Killingbeck, & P. V. August. 1998. The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity: II. A landscape perspective. Conservation Biology 12:371-379. *Nixon, S. 1997. Prehistoric nutrient inputs and productivity in Narragansett Bay. Estuaries 202:253-261. *Nixon, S. W., S. L. Granger, & B. L. Nowicki. 1995. An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay. Biogeochemistry 31:15-61. *Novak, A. & Y. Wang. In Press. Effects of suburban sprawl on Rhode Island’s forests: a Landsat view from 1972 to 1999. Northeastern Naturalist. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project References Page 2 *Nowicki, B.L., E. Requintina, D. Van Keuren, & J. Portnoy. 1999. The role of sediment denitrification in reducing groundwater-derived nitrate inputs to Nauset Marsh Estuary, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Estuaries 222:245-259. *Opaluch, J., P. August, R. Thompson, R. Johnston, & V. Lee. 2002. Linking agent models and controlled laboratory experiments for managing community growth. In Agent-based Models of Landuse and Land-cover Change. Land Use and Cover Change Reports Series 6:98-100. *Paton, P.W.C. & W. Crouch. 2002. Using phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 18:194-204. Pew Oceans Commission Report. 2003. America’s Living Oceans, Charting a Course for Sea Change. Pew Commission, Arlington, VA *Portnoy, J. W., B.L. Nowicki, C.T. Roman & D.W. Urish. 1998. The discharge of nitrate contaminated groundwater from developed shoreline to marsh-fringed estuary. Water Resources Res. 34:3095-3104. *Raposa, K., C.T. Roman, & S. Adamowicz. 1999. Early ecological responses to restoration of a tidally restricted salt marsh Sachuest Point, RI. New England Estuarine Research Society. Reichman, O.J. & H. R. Pulliam. 1996. The scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 6:694-696. Reis, R. M. 2001. To compete or collaborate? Career questions in science. Chronicle for Higher Education, May 25, 2001 *Rice, M.A. 2001. Environmental impacts of shellfish aquaculture: filter feeding to control eutrophication. Pp.77-86 in Marine Aquaculture and the Environment: A Meeting for Stakeholders in the Northeast (M. Tlusty et al., eds.), Cape Cod Press, Falmouth, MA, 324 p. *Rosenzweig, L., R. Duhaime, A. Mandeville, & P. August. 2002. An ecological geography of Block Island, Rhode Island. In The Ecology of Block Island. P. Paton, L. Gould, P. August, & A. Frost, Eds., Rhode Island Natural History Survey Press, Kingston, RI *Schreiber, A.M. & J.L. Specker. 2000. Metamorphosis in the summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus: Thyroidal status influences gill mitochondria-rich cells. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 117: 238-250. * Siegel, D.A., S. C. Doney, and J. A. Yoder. 2002. The North Atlantic spring phytoplankton bloom and Sverdrup's critical depth hypothesis, Science, 296: 730-733. *Smith, T.R., G.C. Tremblay & T.M. Bradley. 1999. Characterization of the heat shock protein response of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 20: 279-292. *Specker, J.L., Schreiber, A.M., McArdle, M.E., Poholek, A.J., Henderson, J., Alves, D. Binette, E., & R. Lovett. 1998. Artificial diets during intensive culture. Dis. Aquat. Org. 38: 201-210. *Sutinen, J. G. 1999. What works well and why: Evidence from fishery management experiences in OECD countries. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56: 1051-1058. *Sutinen, J. G., & P. Andersen. 2003. Fisheries Management Costs: Findings and Challenges for Future Research, in W. Shrank, R. Arnason, R. Hannesson eds., The Cost of Fisheries Management: pp 279284. Hants, England: Ashgate Publishing. *Sutinen, J. G. & H. F. Upton. 2000. Economic perspectives on New England fisheries management. Northeast Naturalist 74: 361-72. *Sylvia, G., J.L. Anderson, & E. Hanson. 2000. The New Order in Global Salmon Markets and Aquaculture Development: Implications for Watershed-based Management in the Pacific Northwest. In: Sustainable Fisheries Management: Pacific Salmon. Ed. by Knudsen, E.E., et al. CRC Press LLC. United States Commission on Ocean Policy. 2004. An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. US Commission on Ocean Policy, Washington D.C. *Wang, Y. & X. Zhang, 2001. Dynamic modeling approach to simulating socioeconomic effects on landscape change. Ecological Modeling 1401-2: 141-162. *Wang, Y., A. Ngusaru, J. Tobey, V. Makota, G. Bonynge, J. Nugranad, M. Traber, L. Hale, & R. Bowen. 2003. Remote sensing of mangrove change along the Tanzania coast. Marine Geodesy 261-20. *Zucker, D.A. & J. Anderson. 1999. A dynamic, stochastic model of a land-based summer flounder aquaculture firm. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 30: 219-235. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project References Page 3 Peter V. August Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science & Director, The Coastal Institute Narragansett Bay Campus University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 Academic History University of San Diego, B.S. Biology, 1974 Texas Tech University, M.S. Biology, 1976 Boston University, Ph.D. Biology, 1981 Professional History 2000-Present: Director, The Coastal Institute, University of Rhode Island; duties include advancing knowledge and creating solutions to environmental problems in coastal ecosystems. 1995-Present: Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island; duties include leading the Environmental Data Center, teaching, research, and service. 1996-1998: Chairman, Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island; duties include administering the academic, research, and outreach programs for a department of 10 tenure-line faculty, 30 graduate students, and 270 undergraduate majors. 1985-1995: Assistant and Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island; duties include establishing a GIS program at URI, teaching, research, and service. 1981-1984: Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, University of Rhode Island; duties included teaching Vertebrate Biology, Human Physiology, Conservation Biology, and graduate seminars. Other Activities 2004-2006. Chair. United States Chapter of the International Association of Landscape Ecologists 2000-Present. Trustee. The Nature Conservancy, Rhode Island Field Office 1994-Present. Board Member. The Rhode Island Natural History Survey 1992-Present. Board Member. The Rhode Island Geographic Information System 2003-Present. Council Member. Richmond Rural Preservation Land Trust. Research, Outreach, and Educational Interests My research focuses on examining landscape-scale patterns of biodiversity and the ecological processes that cause and maintain these patterns. I teach senior and graduate courses in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology and Landscape Ecology. My outreach activities are primarily concerned with empowering local land managers, especially land trusts and municipalities, with GIS tools and the analytical methods to support natural resource management and conservation. My laboratory, the URI Environmental Data Center (EDC), conducts GIS analyses for the National Park Service, EPA, NOAA, and various state environmental agencies. The EDC is the electronic (world wide web) distribution center for the Rhode Island Geographic Information System database. As Director of the Coastal Institute (CI), I work to engage the intellectual assets of the University of Rhode Island in developing solutions to environmental problems in coastal ecosystems in Rhode Island, the region, the Nation, and world. Through the CI I currently administer the Rhode Island Environmental Monitoring Collaborative, the statewide institution to develop monitoring programs for our coast and watersheds, and report environmental status and trends to the Governor and General Assembly. As Chair Elect of the United States Chapter of the International Association of Landscape Ecologists I work to make US-IALE an effective institution to advance and promote the science and practice of landscape ecology. Dissertations Directed Nugranad, Jarunee. Completed 2002. Social and environmental correlates use change in Mae Tang watershed, Thailand. Rodriquez, Wilfrid. Completed 2003. Land use change and estuarine health in the northeastern US. Hollister, Jeffrey. In Progress. Multi-model assessment of estuarine ecosystem health in the midAtlantic U.S. Hines-Kuhn, Ann. In Progress. Watershed condition and mercury in loons in northern New England. Vigness-Raposa, Kathy. In Progress. Modeling acoustic disturbances to marine mammals. Brownlee, Julia. In Progress. Ecology of marine protected areas. Current Research Support 2003-2005. Office of the Governor of Rhode Island. Administration of Governor's Commission for Narragansett Bay and Watershed Planning. $50,000 2003-2005. RI Department of Environmental Management. Scientific Response Planning for Oil Spill Emergencies, $75,000 2001-2005. EPA. The Narragansett Bay Estuary Program (with C. Oviatt and R. Ribb), $330,000 2004-2005. National Park Service. The Field Technical Support Center for GIS (with C. LaBash, R. Duhaime), $75,000 2002-2004. USDA. The New England Water Quality Program (with A. Gold and others), $2,350,000 2004-2007. USDA Geospatial Extension Specialist (with C. LaBash, A. Gold, and A. McCann), $290,000 5 Representative Publications Hollister, J., J. Paul, P. August, J. Copeland, and L. Gonzales. 2004. Assessing the accuracy of the National Land Cover Dataset at multiple spatial extents. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 70:405-414 Paul, J., J. Copeland, M. Charpentier, P. August, and J. Hollister. 2003. Overview of GIS applications in estuarine monitoring and assessment research. Marine Geodesy, 26:63-72. August, P. V., L. Iverson, J. Nugranad. 2002. Human Conversion of Terrestrial Habitats. Pages 198224. In K. J. Gutzwiller (Editor), Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York. Nichols, W., K. T. Killingbeck, and P. V. August. 1998. The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity: II. A landscape perspective. Conservation Biology, 12:371-379. Comeleo, R., J. Paul, P. August, J. Copeland, C. Baker, S. Hale, and R. Latimer. 1996. Relationships between watershed stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries. Landscape Ecology, 11:307-319. Richard H. Burroughs Professor, Department of Marine Affairs University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Academic History A.B., Princeton University, Geosciences, 1969 Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, 1975 Professional History 1996-Present. Professor, Department of marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island 1997-Present. Adjunct Professor, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University 1983-1996. Assistant/Associate Professor, Department of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island Other Activities 2004-Present. Member of the Board and Co-Chair of the Education Committee of The Coastal Society 2002-Present. University Advisory Committee, Rhode Island Sea Grant 2000-Present. Mystic Seaport Watercraft Preservation Committee 1995-Present. Commissioner, Narragansett Bay Commission Current Research Support 2004-Present. Quonset Point Multi-Modal, Mixed-Use Ferry Terminal. (with R. Thompson) $78.632. U.S. Department of Transportation/URITC. Five Representative Publications Juda, L. and R. Burroughs. 2004. Navigational Dredging of Channels in a Changing Scientific and Regulatory Environment. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 34:171-218.. Burroughs, R. 2003. Goal and Trend Assessment to Define Coastal Ecosystem Management Initiatives. Local Environment 8:277-290. Boesch, D., Burroughs, R., Baker, J., Mason, R., Rowe, C. and R. Siefert. 2001. Marine Pollution in the United States: Significant Accomplishments, Future Challenges. Pew Oceans Commission, VA, 51 p. www.pewoceans.org/reports/022701report.pdf Burroughs, R. 1999. When Stakeholders Choose: Process, Knowledge, and Motivation in Water Quality Decisions. Society and Natural Resources 12:797-809. Burroughs, R. and T. Clark. 1995. Ecosystem Management: A Comparison of Greater Yellowstone and Georges Bank. Environmental Management 19:649-663. James J. Opaluch Professor, Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Director, Policy Simulation Laboratory 210 Kingston Coastal Institute University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02881 Academic History University of Rhode Island, B.A. Economics, 1975 UC Berkeley, M.A. Statistics, 1977 UC Berkeley, Ph.D. Ag & Natural Resource Economics, 1981 Professional History 1991-Present: Professor, Department of Environmental & Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island; duties include leading the Policy Simulation Laboratory, teaching, research, and service. 1979-1991: Assistant and Associate Professor, Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island; duties include teaching, research, and service. Other Activities US EPA Science Advisory Board, 2003 – present National Science Foundation, Decision Making Under Uncertainty Program, Site Review Panel Chairperson. National Science Foundation, Biocomplexity Program Review Panel, 2001. National Academy of Science, Panel on PCB Contaminated Sediments, 1999-2000 National Science Foundation, Biocomplexity Program Review Panel, 2000. National Academy of Science, Committee on Wetlands Functions and Values, 2000. Associate Editor, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997-2000. President, Northeast Assoc. of Agricultural and Resource Economists, 1992- 1995. Vice President, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1990 1992. US Minerals Management Service Social Science Research Panel, 1992. National Academy of Sciences, Panels to Evaluate Adequacy of Env. Info in Calif, Fla, Georges Banks & Alaska.. Associate Editor, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1987 1990. Editorial Board Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1988 1991. Board of Directors, Northeast Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, 1988 1991. National Academy of Sciences, Panel to Evaluate the U.S. Dept of Interior Env. Studies Program, 1988 1991. Current Research Support 2004-06 USDA, A Risk-Based Approach to Managing Intentional Introduction of Non-Native Species (with J. Anderon and K. Schneir). $220,000 2002-05. U.S. EPA, Information Tools for Informing Land Use Policy (with R. Thompson), $225,000. Dissertations Directed Kashmanian, R. Completed 1985. Controlling Hazardous Wastes in Narragansett Bay Zeitouni, N., Completed 1988. Economics of Groundwater Protection. Besidin, E., Completed 1994. Cost Effective Programs for Controlling Nitrate Contamination in Groundwater. Mazzotta, M., Completed 1996. Use of Stated Preference Models to Set Priorities for Preserving Natural Amenities. Johnston, R., Completed 1997. The Role of Time in Revealed Preference Models. Maharaj, V., Completed 1999. An Assessment of Salmon Aquaculture for Recreational Fishing. Managi, S. Completed 2002. Technological Progress and Resource Depletion Magnusson, G. In Progress. Linking Econ. & Natural Science for Setting Priorities for Wetlands Restoration Zhuang, H., in progress A Comparison of Agent Models for Forecasting Residential Development Barak, B.in progress Information Effects in Stated Preference Surveys 5 Representative Publications Managi, S., J. Opaluch, Di Jin and T. Grigalunas, 2005. “Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry” in press, Land Econ Managi, S., J. Opaluch, Di Jin and T. Grigalunas, 2004. “Technological Change and Depletion in Offshore Oil and Gas” J. of Env. Econ. and Man., Vol. No. 2 (Mar). Johnston, R., G. Magnusson, M Mazzotta and J. Opaluch, 2002. “Combining Economic and Ecological Indicators to Prioritize Salt Marsh Restoration Actions” Amer. J. of Ag. Econ., Vol. 84 No. 5 (Dec). Swallow, S., J. Opaluch and T. Weaver, 2001. “Strength of Preference Indicators and an OrderedResponse Model for Ordinarily Dichotomous, Discrete Choice Data” J. of Env. Econ and Man. Vol. 41 No. 1 (Jan). Mazzotta, M. and J. Opaluch, 1995. ”Decision Making When Choices Are Complex” Land Econ Vol. 71 No. 4. Candace A. Oviatt Professor, Graduate School Of Oceanography Director, Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 Academic History B.S. Biology, Bates College, 1961 Ph.D. Biological Oceanography, 1967, University of Rhode Island (Saul Saila, Major Professor). Professional History 2000-present Coastal Institute, Associate Director 1994-2000 Director, Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory, URI 1991-93 Interim Associate Dean, GSO, URI 1991 (fall) Acting Dean, GSO, URI 1990Professor Of Oceanography, GSO, URI 1984-94 Associate Director, Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory, URI 1982-90 Research Professor, GSO, URI 1980-82 Associate Research Professor, GSO, URI 1977-84 Manager, Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory, URI 1970-77 Research Associate and Lecturer, GSO, URI 1969-70 Research Associate, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island 1966-69 Research Associate, Harvard School of Public Health Professional Activities Chair, Estuarine Research Federation, Awards Committee, 2001, 2003. Head of Biological Faculty, 1994-present Search Committee for Ecologists, Swedish Universities, 1997, 2000, 2004 Past President, Estuarine Research Federation, 1997-1999 Advisor, Marine Science Committee, University of Maryland at Horn Point 1994-1997 President, Estuarine Research Federation, 1995-1997 President Elect, Estuarine Research Federation, 1994-1995 Research and Educational Interests My research has focused on whole systems and experimental marine ecosystems examining nutrient and carbon cycling and benthic-water column interactions. Recent interests are the impact of climate trends on estuarine ecosystems and changes in secondary production with changes in nutrient loadings. I teach the graduate core course in Biological Oceanography to primarily first year graduate students. I have advised 11 MS and 12 PhD candidates successfully and served on 65 graduate committees since 1990. Current Dissertations Under My Direction Melrose, Donald C. Expected 2005. Comparisons of fast repetition rate fluorescence estimated primary production and 14C uptake by phytoplankton. Whitman, Kimberly Expected 2006. Primary productivity patterns in Massachusett Bay using in situ C-14 to ground truth Sea Wifs satellite images. Longval, Brooke Expected 2007. A simulation model for ctenophore predation on zooplankton during a period of climate change. Calabratta, Christopher Expected 2007. Benthic community dynamics along the northsouth axis of the nutrient gradient in Narragansett Bay. Current Grant Support Battelle Laboratories. Monitoring Water Quality and Primary Production in Massachusetts Bay. ~$192,000 per year for four years through 2005. National Marine Fisheries Service. Bay Window. Benthic community response to winter-spring bloom intensity. $34,000 over 04-05. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. Measurement and analysis of marine water temperature. $29,325 over 04. EPA. Cooperative Agreement to assess and apply probabilistic approaches for evaluating estuarine sampling. 6/15/01-6/30/05. $640,000. PIs C. Oviatt, P. August. Representative Publications (Total to date: 73) Oviatt, C. A. In Press. The changing ecology of temperate coastal waters during a warming trend. Estuaries. Oviatt, C., and A. Gold. In Press. Nitrate in Coastal Waters Ch. 8 In: T. Addiscott (ed) Nitrate, Agriculture and the Environment. CAB International. UK. Oviatt, C. A., S. Olsen, M. Andrews, J. Collie, T. Lynch, and K. Raposa. (2003). A century of fishing and fish fluctuations in Narragansett bay. Reviews in Fisheries Science 11:1-22. Oviatt, C.A., A.A. Keller, and L. Reed. 2002. Annual primary production in Narragansett Bay with no bay-wide winter-spring phytoplankton bloom. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 54:1013-1026. Keller, A.A., C.A. Oviatt, and J.D. Hawk. 1999. Predicted impacts of elevated temperature on the magnitude of the winter-spring phytoplankton bloom in temperate coastal waters: A mesocosm study. Limnology and Oceanography. 44(2):344-356. Judith M. Swift Professor, Department of Communication Studies and Theatre Department Independence Hall University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Academic History: University of Rhode, M.A. English, 1971 University of Rhode, B.A. English, (Sociology/Criminology)1968 Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts, London, Acting, James Roose-Evans, 1976-77 Professional History: 2003-Present: Interim Vice-Provost for Academic Affairs, University of Rhode Island. 2000-present: Associate Director, The Coastal Institute, University of Rhode Island: duties include assisting Director with outreach, programming, long-term planning to address environmental problems in coastal ecosystems.. 1999- present: Resident Director, Rites and Reason Theatre, Research to Performance Laboratory, Africana Studies Department, Brown University. 2000: Unlimited joint appointment, Department of Communication Studies and Department of Theatre; duties include supervision of graduate students, teaching acting, directing, communication and media, communication in business enterprise; communicating business ethics, research and outreach. 1997- 2000: Special Faculty Assistant to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs; duties included assisting in oversight and preparation of directives, analyses and evaluations of all aspects of university’s academic mission. 1982-1997: Chair, Department of Theatre; duties included oversight of research/creative activity, teaching and outreach for academic program and production and laboratory season in a department of 6 tenureline faculty, 5 staff, 34 guest artists and 120 majors. Research, Outreach and Educational Interests: My research is primarily focused on the application of artistic and media communication to the creation of new artistic work which addresses questions of major concern to natural scientists as well as the communication of knowledge and challenges relative to public policy, sustainability and coastal ecosystems. Outreach activities include serving as part of a team to create a science exhibit, “Living on the Edge,” for the Boston Museum of Science, creation of sciencebased musicals to apply emotional learning in conveying difficult principles and theories to the lay public and scientists in other fields, and the creation of innovative programming to engage the public, elected officials, media and civic leaders in matters of concern to the scientific community. My work as an artist was recognized by the 2002 Research Excellence Award at URI and I have a lengthy series of credits from Off-Broadway to regional theatre. Current Research Support USDA CREES, ($95,000) Creation of a Minor Course of Study in Sustainability (with Deborah Grossman-Garber/chief PI, Dennis Nixon, Richard Rhodes) URI Research Grant, $3500, Creation of Musical on Monitoring and Projections for Coastal Ecosystems. 5 Representative Creative Research Projects 1992-2002, Buy the Bay: Coastal Life in the Gilded Age—director and co-author. Social history of Rhode Island coastal resorts in the Gilded Age sponsored by National Endowment for Humanities project What A Difference A Bay Makes. Toured to date to 22 sites including a Fall 2001 symposium on adaptive management at The Coastal Institute. 1995, A Cabaret on Death, theatrical piece commissioned as part of the John Hazen White Honors Colloquium, Mortal Questions, addressing issues of euthanasia, suicide, grieving and necrophobia. URI 1985, Compuhension: A Computerrific Cabaret— director and co-author; musical revue based on computer science, e.g. technology; impact on society (privacy, humanity vs. efficiency); artificial intelligence. Produced at URI and aired on Cable TV State Interconnect on the Higher Education Network. 1982, Clinicalleluia! - director and co-author; musical revue of the health sciences, e.g. medical ethics, physiology and social issues and attitudes regarding health and disease. Produced at URI. 1981, Oceantics - director and co-author; cabaret on oceanography, e.g. phenomenon of schooling, maritime law, mineral wealth, environmental protection, and aesthetics; funded by Sea Grant. Produced at URI. James Lavalette Anderson Professor, Environmental & Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island 1 Greenhouse Rd., Kingston, RI 02881 USA phone: 401-874-4568; email: [email protected] Academic History University of California, Davis, CA, Ph.D., Agricultural Economics, 1983 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, M.S., Agricultural Economics, 1978 College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, B.S., Biology/Economics, 1976 Professional History 1994-Present: Professor and Chair (2001- ), Dept. of Env. & Natural Resource Econ., University of Rhode Island 1989-1994: Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Env. & Natural Resource Econ., University of Rhode Island 1983-1989: Asst. Professor, Dept. of Env. & Natural Resource Econ., University of Rhode Island 1998-1999: Visiting Professor, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary Professional Service and Honors Co-chair, National Academy of Science, NRC, Committee on Non-native Oysters in the Chesapeake Bay (2002-03). Editor, Marine Resource Economics (1999- ); Associate Editor (1992-98). Director, International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade (2002-06). Article of the Year Award, Vukina, T. and J.L. Anderson, NAREA (1995). Research Scientist of the Year Award, College of Environ. & Life Sciences, Univ. of Rhode Island (1994). Editorial Council: Journal of Environmental Economics & Management (1989-91). Member, National Academy of Science, NRC Committee, Assessment of Technology and Opportunities for Marine Aquaculture (1988-91). Outstanding Ph.D. Thesis Award, American Agricultural Economics Association (1984). Current Research Support 2004-05 USDA: Imports of Shrimp and the US Shrimp Industry, $25,000 2003-04. USDC/NMFS: An Alternate Approach to Managing Atlantic Sea Scallops, $140,000. 2004-07. USDA/AES: The Economic Effect of Aquaculture on Fisheries, $60,000. Dissertations Directed Valderrama, D., In progress. The Economic Effect of Aquaculture on Fisheries. Baskaran, R., 2004. Fisheries Management with Heterogeneous Participants. Martinez, J. 2000. Hedging Effectiveness, Market Efficiency and Forecasting in the Shrimp Futures Market. Fong, Q.S.W. 1999. Assessment of Asian Shark Fin Trade and Implications for Shark Management. Zucker, D., 1998. Economic Analysis of Summer Flounder Aquaculture. Five Representative Publications Anderson, J.L., The International Seafood Trade, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL and Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, England (2003) 222 pp. Anderson, J.L., 2002. Aquaculture and the Future: Why Fisheries Economist Should Care, Marine Resource Economics, Vol. 17 No. 2:133-251. Martinez-Garmendia, J. and J.L. Anderson. 1999. Hedging Performance of Shrimp Futures Contracts with Multiple Deliverable Grades, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 19, No. 8:957-990. Zucker, D.A. and J.L. Anderson. 1999. A Dynamic, Stochastic Model of a Land-based Summer Flounder Aquaculture Firm, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, Vol. 30, No. 2:219-235. Sylvia, G. and J.L. Anderson. 1996. A Multilevel, Multiobjective Policy Model: The Case of Marine Aquaculture Development, American Journal of Agric. Econ., Vol. 78, No. 1:79-88. C:\IGERT\IGERTBio-JLA.doc Christopher M. Anderson Assistant Professor of Experimental Economics Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 205 Kingston Coastal Institute, One Greenhouse Road Kingston, RI 02881 Education California Institute of Technology, Ph.D., Social Science, 2001 Brown University, Sc.B. Applied Math-Economics (Honors), 1996 Appointment 2000-Present: Assistant Professor of Experimental Economics, Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island; duties include Assistant Director of the Policy Simulation Laboratory, research, teaching and service. Research and Educational Interests My research applies experimental economics, game theory and behavioral economics to understand the decisions agents make in different economic institutions. My current projects are analyzing properties of alternative market structures for tradable rights in fisheries; identifying the relative contributions of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion to overbidding in first-price auctions; and developing incentive compatible mechanisms for valuation of nonmarket environmental amenities through stated preference surveys. Grant Support RI-SeaGrant, $162,000 (3/03-2/04), Laboratory Testbedding Transferable Fishing Allowance Policies and Institutions: An Application to the Rhode Island Lobster Fishery (with J. Gates and J. Sutinen) Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station, $75,000+assistantship (3/03-2/06) Experimental Analysis of the Political Economics of Fishery Management (with J. Sutinen) Rhode Island MacIntyre-Stennis $75,000+assistantship (3/03-2/06) Valuation of Forested Land Conservation Alternatives: Tools to Evaluate Validity of Willingness-to-Pay (with S. Swallow) NOAA-NMFS/Cooperative Marine Education and Research, $38,800 (10/04-9/05), Economic Aspects of Transferable Days-At-Sea in the Northeast Multispecies Fishery: An Experimental Analysis (with J. Sutinen) NOAA-NMFS/Cooperative Agreement, $83,000 (10/04-9/05), Experimental Economics in the Design of Lease/Trade Rules USDA/NRI, $615,000 (1/05-12/07), Validating Best Forest Management Practices around Vernal Pools: Amphibian Metapopulations, Harvester Adoption Costs and Public Values (with S. Swallow, K. Schnier and P. Paton) 5 Selected Publications Anderson, C. M., C. R. Plott, K.-I. Shimomura and S. Granat. 2003. Global Instability in Experimental General Equilibrium: The Scarf Example. Journal of Economic Theory 115(2):209-249. Anderson, C. M. and J. R. King. 2004. Equilibrium Behavior in the Conservation Easement Game. Land Economics 80(3): 355-374. King, J. R. and C. M. Anderson. 2004. The Marginal Property Tax Rate Effects of Conservation Easements: A Vermont Case Study. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(4):919-932. Anderson, C.M. and L. Putterman. Do Non-strategic Sanctions Obey the Law of Demand? The Demand for Punishment in the Voluntary Contribution Mechanism. Games and Economic Behavior, forthcoming. Anderson, C.M. and J. G. Sutinen. A Laboratory Assessment of Tradable Fishing Allowances. Marine Resource Economics, forthcoming. Barry A. Costa-Pierce Professor & Director of the Rhode Island Sea Grant College Program Graduate School of Oceanography Narragansett Bay Campus University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 Academic History Drew University, Zoology, 1976 University of Vermont, Zoology, 1980 University of Hawaii, Oceanography, 1984 Professional History 2001—present: Director, Rhode Island Sea Grant College Program and Professor of Fisheries & Aquaculture, URI Department of Fisheries, Animal & Veterinary Science, with a Joint Appointment as Professor of Oceanography, Graduate School of Oceanography 1998—2001: Director, Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Ocean Springs, Miss. and Dauphin Island, Ala. 1995—1998: Staff Consultant in Post-Evaluation, Post-Evaluation Office, Asian Development Bank & Staff Consultant, Environment & Social Policy Division, The World Bank 1993—1995: Associate Professor of Aquatic Biology, Department of Biology, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, Minnesota & Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota 1985—1993: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM)—The World Fish Center, Manila, Philippines. ICLARM Positions: 1993: Consultant Scientist in Strategic Planning; 1989—1992: Director & Research Scientist, ICLARM Africa Project Office, Zomba, Malawi, Africa; 1985—1989: Team Leader & Associate Research Scientist , ICLARM-World Bank Project Office, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia Other Activities Associate Director, URI Coastal Institute (2003—) Board of Scientific Advisors, Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey, California (2003—) International Editorial Board, Aquatic Resources, Culture and Development (2003—) International Steering Committee, US-Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources (UJNR) (2003—) Chair of the Program Mission Committee, Sea Grant Association (2003—) Chair of the Sea Grant International Committee, Sea Grant Association (2003—) Editor, Husbandry & Mgt., Aquaculture, Elsevier Press, Amsterdam (2001—) Associate Editor, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society (1999—) Current Research Support 2004-2006. NOAA. Oceanic & Atmospheric Research. Office of Sea Grant. Rhode Island Sea Grant College Program. $3,177,693 2002-2005. NOAA. Oceanic & Atmospheric Research. Rhode Island Aquaculture Initiative. $1,418,000 2004-2006. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam. International Science Editor for the Husbandry and Management Section of Aquaculture. $70,100. 2002-2006. NOAA. Oceanic & Atmospheric Research International Affairs. Formulation of Sea Grant International (with S. Olsen). $53,030. 5 Representative Publications Costa-Pierce, B.A. et al., Editors. in press. Urban Aquaculture. CABI Publishing Co., Wallingford, U.K Costa-Pierce, B.A. 2003. Use of ecosystems science in ecological aquaculture. Bull. Aquacul. Assoc. Canada 103(2): 32-40. Costa-Pierce, B.A., R. Hardy, and J.M. Kapetsky. 2003. Review of the Status, Trends and Issues in Global Fisheries and Aquaculture, with Recommendations for USAID Investments. Strategic Partnerships for Agricultural Research and Education (SPARE), U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC. Bridger, C.J. and B.A. Costa-Pierce, Editors. 2003. Open Ocean Aquaculture: From Research to Commercial Reality. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA. Costa-Pierce, B.A., Editor/Author. 2002. Ecological Aquaculture. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. Tracey Morin Dalton Assistant Professor, Department of Marine Affairs 223 Washburn Hall University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Academic History Boston College, B.S. Chemistry, 1996 University of Massachusetts Boston, Ph.D. Environmental Science, 2002 Professional History 2002-Present: Assistant Professor, Department of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island; duties include teaching undergraduate and graduate courses, mentoring students, researching human dimensions of MPA management, and conducting service 2001: Research Assistant, New England Aquarium; duties included developing a public process for establishing, managing, and monitoring marine protected areas in the Gulf of Maine 1999-2000: Research Assistant, Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; duties included research using economic models and GIS to evaluate fisheries policies 1999-2002: Research Assistant, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston; duties included research and outreach related to the coastal and marine environment 1996-1998: Research Assistant, Geology and Geophysics Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; duties included operation of an automated vacuum line to extract carbon dioxide from seawater Other Activities 2004. Working Group Member. Stellwagen Bank Sanctuary Compatibility Working Group. 2003-Present. Disability Mentor. University of Rhode Island. 2003-Present. Teaching Fellow. University of Rhode Island. Current Research Support 2004. NSF ADVANCE Incentive Fund. $6,000. 5 Representative Publications Dalton, T. 2004. An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites. Journal of Environmental Management, 70(4):333-349. Jin, D., P. Hoagland, and T. Morin Dalton. 2003. Linking economic and ecological models for a marine ecosystem. Ecological Economics, 46:367-385. Morin, T. 2002. ‘Tis a peopled sea: incorporating human considerations into the design and management of marine protected areas. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Boston. Morin, T. 2001. Sanctuary advisory councils: involving the public in the national marine sanctuary program, Coastal Management. 29:327-340. Morin, T., M. Connor, J. Schubel, D. Shaw, and J. Pederson. 2001. Marine protected areas: a discussion with stakeholders in the Gulf of Maine. MIT Sea Grant Publication #01-19. Cheryl A. Foster Honors Professor of Philosophy Associate Director, Honors Program University of Rhode Island Honors Center - Lippitt Hall Kingston, RI 02881-0806 Education University of Edinburgh, Ph.D. Philosophy, 1992 University of Chicago, M.A. Humanities, 1986 Bowdoin College, B.A. Philosophy and English, Phi Beta Kappa, magna cum laude, Highest Honors Philosophy, 1983 Appointments 2002-present: Honors Professor of Philosophy, University of Rhode Island; duties include research and teaching in Honors Program and Philosophy Department. Focus in Environmental Philosophy, Aesthetics, Epistemology. 2000-present: Associate Director, Honors Program, University of Rhode Island; duties include administration of student advising and oversight of national fellowship selection panels. 1997-2002: Honors Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Rhode Island 1992-1997: Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Rhode Island Other Activities 2003-present: Board Member, National Association of Fellowship Advisers; Chair, Ethics Committee 1994-present: National Finalist Selection Panel, Harry S. Truman Scholarship; Boston Region Interview Panel 1996-2003: Selection Panel, Marshall Scholarship, Northeast Region 1997-2003: Board Member, North American Nature Photography Association; Treasurer, 2000-2002. Selected Awards, Appointments and Grants Grant, USDA/NRI, with Stephen Swallow and Robert Johnston, Do Amenity Values from Farm and Forest Increase With Decreasing Scarcity? Identifying Public Preference Surprises for Policy Assessment, 2002 ($160,000) Merit Award, American Society of Landscape Architects, for “Restoring Nature in American Culture,” as part of Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Scinces and Humanities, eds. Gobster and Hull, Island Press, 2001 Five Representative Publications Foster, Cheryl. 2005 (forthcoming). Wherefore the Rhizome: Eelgrass Restoration in the Narragnsett Bay. In (ed. RobertFrance) Healing Natures, Repairing Relationships: Landscape Architecture and the Restoration of Ecological Spaces and Consciousness. MIT Press. Foster, Cheryl. 2002. I’ve Looked at Clouds from Both Sides Now: Can There Be Aesthetic Qualities in Nature?. In (eds. Emily Brady and Jerrold Levinson). Aesthetic Concepts: Essays After Sibley. Pages 180-198. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Foster, Cheryl. 2000. Restoring Nature in American Culture: An Environmental Aesthetic Perspective. In ( eds. Paul Gobster and Bruce Hull). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Pages 71-96. Island Press, Washington, D.C.. Foster, Cheryl. 1999. Ideas and Imagination: Schopenhauer on the Proper Foundation of Art. In (ed. Christopher Janaway). The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Pages 213-251. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Foster, Cheryl. 1998. The Narrative and the Ambient in Environmental Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56(2): 127-137. Arthur J. Gold Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881. Phone: 401-874-2903); Fax: 401-874-4561 email: [email protected] Academic History Ph.D., 1983, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Michigan M.S., 1978, Water Resource Management, University of Michigan. B.S., 1973, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan. Professional History 1993-Present: Professor, Dept. Nat. Res. Sci., Univ. Rhode Island; duties include teaching, research and directing the Extension Water Quality Program 2000-Present: Associate Director, The Coastal Institute, Univ. of Rhode Island; duties include applying academic research to coastal management. 1998-Present. Natural Resources Program Leader, URI Landgrant; Duties include fostering a campus-wide research and extension program to address natural resources issues. Assistant and Associate Professor, 1988 - 1993, Dept. Nat. Res. Sci., Univ. Rhode Island. Research, Outreach and Educational Interests – My research focuses on characterizing the sources and sinks of nitrogen in coastal watersheds. I conduct process level studies on groundwater nitrate dynamics at the aquatic margin and use GIS techniques to scale up from the site level to the watershed scale. Current Research Support RHODE ISLAND SEA GRANT. Riparian Sinks for Mitigating Septic System Contamination in Urbanizing Coastal Watersheds. 2004 – 2006. A. Gold, P. Groffman and M. Stolt. $249,800. CSREES/NRICGP. $285,000. Subsurface Riparian N Removal: The Role of Landscape Setting. 1999-2004. A.J. Gold, P.M. Groffman, M. Stolt and K. Addy.. USDA/CSREES. $2,950,000. Watershed-based Water Quality Program for New England. 2000-2005. A.J. Gold, R. Jeffrey, A. McCann and P.V. August. U.S. EPA: $290,000. Quantifying the effects of ecosystem restoration on denitrification activity in riparian groundwater of a mid-Atlantic Piedmont stream. 2002-2005. P. Groffman and A. Gold. PhD. Students Mentored Dorothy Q. Kellog. In Progress. Groundwater denitrification in riparian zones Peg Pelletier. In Progress. Estuarine biogeochmeistry 5 Representative Publications Jacinthe, P.A., P.M. Groffman and A.J. Gold. 2003. Dissolved organic carbon dynamics in a riparian aquifer: Effects of hydrology and nitrate enrichment. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1365-1375 Addy, K, D.Q. Kellogg, A.J. Gold, P.M. Groffman, Gina Ferendo and C. Sawyer. 2002. In situ push-pull method to determine ground water denitrification in riparian zones. J. Environ. Qual. 31:1017-1024. Gold, A.J., P.M. Groffman, K. Addy, D.Q. Kellogg, M. Stolt, and A.E. Rosenblatt. 2001. Landscape attributes as controls on groundwater nitrate removal capacity of riparian zones. J. American Water Resources Association. 37:1457-1464. Rosenblatt, A.E., A.J. Gold, M.H. Stolt, P.M. Groffman and D.Q. Kellogg. 2001. Identification of riparian sinks for watershed nitrate using soil surveys. J. Environ. Quality. 30:1596-1604. Groffman, P.M., A.J. Gold and K. Addy. 2000. Nitrous oxide production in riparian zones and its importance to national emission inventories. Chemosphere. 2:291-299. Lawrence Juda Professor of Marine Affairs and Political Science Washburn Hall University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode Island 02881 telephone: (401) 874-4041; e-mail: [email protected] Education Ph.D., Columbia University, Political Science/International Relations, 1973 Appointments 1984-Present: Professor, Department of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island; duties include teaching graduate courses in ocean governance, policy, and law 1980-1998, 2002-: Chairman, Department of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island 1999 (spring semester) Visiting Professor, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Switzerland 1979-1984: Associate Professor of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island Research/Teaching Areas: • International and national ocean law, policy, institutions • Ocean governance systems and their evolution • International fisheries law and policy Grant Support: 2001-2003 Dredging in a Changing Scientific and Regulatory Environment, URI, Transportation Center, (with Richard Burroughs) 1999-2000 Large Marine Ecosystems, Resources Governance, NOAA 1998-2001 Sustaining Marine Ecosystems: The Human Dimension, Sea Grant, (with Jon Sutinen, et al.) 1998-1999 Large Marine Ecosystems Governance, NOAA 1997-1998 Socio-economics and governance of large marine ecosystems, NOAA, (with Jon Sutinen, et al.) Five Representative Publications “Changing National Approaches to Ocean Governance: the United States, Canada, and Australia,” 34 Ocean Development and International Law 161-187 (2003) “Rio Plus Ten: The Evolution of International Marine Fisheries Governance,” 33 Ocean Development and International Law 109-144 (2002) “Basic Trends in the Evolving Law of the Sea and Their Implications for Ocean Use Management,” 14 Oceanography 17-22 (2001) “Governance Profiles and the Management of the Uses of Large Marine Ecosystems,” 32 Ocean Development and International Law 41-67 (2001) (co-author: Timothy Hennessey) International Law and Ocean Use Management: The Evolution of Ocean Governance (London: Routledge, 1996) 345 pp. Scott R. McWilliams Associate Professor Department of Natural Resources Science University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Education Hiram College, B.A. Psychobiology, 1980 Iowa State University, M.S. Animal Ecology, 1986 University of California at Davis, Ph.D. Ecology, 1993 Appointments 2003-Present: Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island 1998-2003: Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island; duties include teaching, research on the physiological ecology of mostly birds and amphibians, and service. 1997: Faculty Associate, Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin at Madison; duties included advising of undergraduates, training of graduate students, curriculum development and enhancement, sabbaticaland research-leave replacement for professors. 1994-1997: Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin at Madison; duties included conducting original research on two projects: (a) digestive responses of passerine birds to increased demand for food, and (b) nutritional ecology and physiology of goslings. 1994: Postdoctoral Associate, Section of Evolution and Ecology and Center for Population Biology, University of California at Davis; duties included conducting original research on the effects of goose grazing on species composition and nutrient quality of wet meadow and pasture plants. Research and Educational Interests-- My research focuses on the nutrition, physiology, ecology, and behavior of threatened wild vertebrates, especially amphibians, waterfowl, and migratory songbirds. I teach senior and graduate courses in Principles of Wildlife Ecology, Wildlife Research Techniques, and Physiological Ecology of Wild Vertebrates. Current Grant Support NSF CAREER, $360,000, Phenotypic plasticity in physiological traits and environmental change. USDA CREES, $120,000, Land management and the population dynamics, ecology, and physiology of migratory songbirds in coastal southern New England. US NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, $75,000, Disturbance effects on nesting piping plovers. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, $150,000, Nutritional ecology and physiology of goslings. Ph.D. Students Mentored Barbara Pierce, 2003. Nutritional physiology of migratory birds Richard McKinney, In Progress. Avian ecology David Podlesak, In Progress. Avian nutritional ecology 5 Representative Publications McWilliams, S.R. and W.H. Karasov. 2001. Phenotypic flexibility in digestive system structure and function in migratory birds and its ecological implications. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 128A:579-593. Pierce, B.J. and S.R. McWilliams. 2003. Interactive effects of diet quality and food limitation on the dynamics of body composition and digestive organs in a migratory bird. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. McWilliams, S.R. and J.O. Leafloor. 2004. Effects of elevated CO2 on keystone herbivores in Arctic ecosystems. In: J. Ehleringer, T. Cerling, and D. Dearing (eds) A history of atmospheric CO2 and its effects on plants, animals, and ecosystems. Springer-Verlag. McWilliams, S.R. and W.H. Karasov. 2004. Migration takes guts: digestive physiology of migratory birds and its ecological significance. In: P. Marra and R. Greenberg (eds) Birds of Two Worlds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Karasov, W.H. and S. R. McWilliams. 2004. Digestive constraint in mammalian and avian ecology. In: J.M. Starck and T. Wang (eds). Consequences of feeding in vertebrates. Science Publishers Inc., India. Servello, F. E. C. Hellgren, and S. R. McWilliams. 2005. Techniques for wildlife nutrition research. In E. Braun, ed. Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitat. The Wildlife Society, Washington, D.C. Scott W. Nixon Professor of Oceanography Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI Education: B.A. (Biology) University of Delaware, 1965 Ph.D. (Botany-Ecology) University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 1970 (under Prof. H. T. Odum) Research Interests: The ecology of estuaries, bays, lagoons, marshes and other coastal ecosystems. My research is focused on the fundamental processes that determine the primary and secondary productivity of these environments, with particular emphasis on the importance of nutrient enrichment and other forms of anthropogenic impact. The study of this general problem has required the use of comparative and historical field data, autecological rate measurements, numerical simulation modeling, and manipulative ecosystem-level experiments. Recent Dissertations Under My Direction Joaquin E. Chaves. 2004. Potential Use of 15N to Assess Nitrogen Sources and Fate iNarragansett Bay. Joanne C. Bintz. 2002. The Ecology and Morphology of Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) and its Associated Macrophyte Community in Relation to Environmental Variables. Mark J. Brush. 2002. Development of a Numerical Model for Shallow Marine Ecosystems With Application to Greenwich Bay, R.I. Blaine S. Kopp. 1999. Effects of Nitrate Fertilization and Shading on Physiological and Biomechanical Properties of Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). Hsing-Juh Lin. 1995. Responses of Epiphytes on Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) to Nutrient Enrichment. Richard Chinman. 1991. Phosphorus Dynamics in the Parker River Estuary. Suzanne B. Bricker. 1990. The History of Metals Pollution in Narragansett Bay as Recorded by Salt Marsh Sediments. Veronica M. Berounsky. 1990. Rates of Nitrification and Their Importance to the Nitrogen Cycle of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Patrick F. Roques. 1985. Rate and Stoichiometry of Nutrient Remineralization in an Anoxic Estuary, the Pettaquamscutt River (Rhode Island, U.S.A.). 5 Representative Publications: Nixon, S. W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41:199-219. Nixon, S. W., S. L. Granger, and B. L. Nowicki. 1995. An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay. Biogeochemistry 31:15-61. Nixon, S. W. et al. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeochemistry 35:141-180. Nixon, S., B. Buckley, S. Granger, and J. Bintz. 2001. Responses of very shallow marine ecosystems to nutrient enrichment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 7(5):1457-1481. Nixon, S. W. and B. A. Buckley. 2002. A strikingly rich zone — nutrient enrichment and secondary production in coastal marine ecosystems. Estuaries. Peter W. C. Paton Associate Professor Department of Natural Resources University of Rhode Island, Kingston Academic History Lewis and Clark College, B.S. Biology, 1978 Colorado State University, M.S. Wildlife Biology, 1985 Utah State University, Ph.D. Wildlife Biology, 1994 Professional History 1995-Present: Assistant Professor, Associate Professor (since 2001), Chair (starting 2004) . University of Rhode Island, Kingston RI; duties include teaching Conservation Biology, Field Ornithology, Wetland Wildlife Management, and Management of Migratory Birds, directing research for up to 6 graduate students, and service. 1994-1995: Research Scientist, Alaska Bird Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska; duties include developing an inventory and monitoring program for birds in Denali National Park. 1990-1994: Graduate Student, Utah State University; dissertation research focused on breeding ecology of Snowy Plovers at Great Salt Lake. 1984-1990: Wildlife Biologist, Redwood Sciences Lab, Arcata, California; studied impact of logging on vertebrates, including spotted owls and marbled Murrelets Research, Outreach, and Educational Interests -- My research focuses the effects on human-altered landscapes on vertebrate populations, with an emphasis on birds and amphibians. I teach junior/senior and graduate courses in Field Ornithology, Wetland Wildlife Management, Conservation Biology, and Management of Migratory Birds. My outreach focuses on working with local landowners to assess biodiversity and develop management strategies to enhance biodiversity. Undergraduate and graduate students in my lab work on grants funded by NSF, National Park Service, EPA, USFWS, state agencies, and local non-government agencies. Current Research Support National Park Service: Inventory of avian community structure of 8 parks in the Northeast P. Paton $100,000 USDANRI. Ecosystem-Economics of Rural Landscapes and Land Use Change S. Swallow and P. Paton $165,000 U.S. EPA Star Grant Economics of Conserving Ecosystem Integrity with Residential Development around Vernal Pools. S. Swallow and P. Paton. $245,000 U.S. Golf Association. Upland habitat use patterns by pond-breeding amphibians. $60,000 5 Representative Recent Publications Paton, P.W.C. In press. A review of vertebrate community composition in seasonal forest pools of the northeastern United States.. Wetlands Ecology and Management Egan, R. S., and P.W. C. Paton. 2004. Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24:1-13. Paton, P.W.C., L. Gould, P. A. August, and A. Frost (editors). 2002. Ecology of Block Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston RI. 300pp. Crouch, W. and P.W.C. Paton. 2002. Assessing the use of call surveys to monitor breeding anurans in Rhode Island. Journal of Herpetology 36:185-192. Paton, P.W.C. and W. Crouch. 2002. Using phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 18:194-204. Jon G. Sutinen Professor, Environmental & Natural Resource Economics Kingston Coastal Institute University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Academic History San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, B.S., Actuarial Science, 1964 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, M.A., Economics, 1971 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, Ph.D., Economics, 1973 Professional History 1988-Present: Professor, Dept. of Environ. & Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island 1981-1988: Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Environ. & Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island 1976-1981: Asst. Professor, Dept. of Environ. & Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island Other Activities 2003-04, Chair, Committee on Defining Best Available Science, National Research Council 2003-05, President, North American Association of Fisheries Economists 2001-03, Member, Ocean Studies Board, National Research Council 2001-03, Member, Committee on Atlantic Salmon in Maine, National Research Council 1998 – present, Co-chair, Social Science Advisory Committee, New England Fishery Management Council 1999 – present, Member, Enforcement Committee, New England Fishery Management Council 1982 – 1995, Editor, Marine Resource Economics Current Research Support 2003-04. RI Sea Grant College Program. Laboratory Testbedding Transferable Fishing Allowance Policies and Institutions: An Application to the Rhode Island Lobster Fishery. $158,000. 2003-05. RI Agric. Exper. Station. Experimental Analysis of the Political Economics of Fishery Governance. $105,000. 2003-04. Saltonstall-Kennedy Grant Program. A Compliance Diagnostic for the Northeast Groundfish Fishery. $50,000 2001-04. RI Sea Grant College Program. Transboundary Impacts of Fishing Activities along the Northeast Continental Shelf. $122,300 Dissertations Directed Samuel Bwalya. In Progress. Political Economics of Common Pool Resource Governance. Reena Shaw. In Progress. A Compliance Diagnostic for the Northeast Groundfish Fishery. Mark Soboil. 2004. Transboundary Impacts of Fishing Activities along the Northeast Continental Shelf. Harold Upton. 2003. Economic Consequences of Protecting and Conserving Fish Habitat. Juan Agar. 2000. Bioeconomic implications of modifying the selectivity properties of fishing gears. 5 Representative Publications: Sutinen, J.G. and R.J. Johnston. 2003. Angling Management Organizations: Integrating the Recreational Sector into Fishery Management. Marine Policy 27: 471-487 (November). Holland, Daniel S., and Jon G. Sutinen. 2000. “Location Choice in New England Trawl Fisheries: Old Habits Die Hard,’ Land Economics, 76(1): 133-149. Sutinen, Jon G. 1999. ‘What Works Well and Why: Evidence from Fishery Management Experiences in OECD Countries,’ ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56: 1051-1058. Holland, D.S. and J.G. Sutinen. 1999. “An Empirical Model of Fleet Dynamics in New England Trawl Fisheries.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 56:253-264. Kuperan, K., and J. G. Sutinen. 1998. ‘Blue Water Crime: Legitimacy, Deterrence and Compliance in Fisheries,’ Law and Society Review 32(2):309-338. Stephen K. Swallow Professor, Environmental & Natural Resource Economics University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881 USA phone: 401-874-4589 email: [email protected] Appointments 1999-Present: Professor; 1994-1999: Assoc. Professor; 1988-1994: Asst. Professor Dept. of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island Education Duke University, Durham, NC, Ph.D., Resource Economics, 1988; M.S., Resource Economics, 1986 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, B.S., Wildlife Ecology and Natural Resources, 1982 Statement of Research and Educational Interests Professor Swallow conducts research on economics of ecosystem management and environmental resource uses, including valuation, dynamics of ecosystems in relation to human uses, decision-making integrating natural and economic science, and the role of land use in ecosystem health and human welfare. Professor Swallow’s primary interest is in integrating economics within conservation biology. Professional Service and Honors Editor (2004-2007), American Journal of Agricultural Economics Director (1997-99), Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Associate Editor (1994-96), Editorial Council (1992-93, 2001-02), Journal Environ. Econom. & Management Research Scientist of the Year (1999), College of the Environment & Life Sciences, Univ. Rhode Island Current Grant Support (selected from $3,000,000): NSF/EPA STAR Grant, “Economics of Conserving Ecosystem Integrity with Residential Development around Vernal Pools,” $200,000 (with P. Paton) 2002-2004 USDA/CSREES/National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program, “Ecosystem-Economics of Rural Landscapes and Land Use Change,” $160,000 (with P. Paton) 2002-2004 “Do Amenity Values from Farm and Forest Increase with Decreasing Scarcity? Identifying Public Preference Surprises for Policy Assessment,” $150,000 (with R. Johnston and C. Foster) 2003-2005 “Validating Best Forest Management Practices Around Vernal Pools: Amphibian Metapopulations and Public Values,” $615,000 (with C. Anderson, K. Schnier, P. Paton, K. McGarigal, J. Opaluch) 2005-2007. Dissertations Supervised Three Experiments on Providing and Valuing Threshold Public Goods with Alternative Rebate Rules. M.A. Spencer, 2002 Analyzing Public Preferences and Valuations for Forested Wetlands in Rhode Island. L.W. Newell, 2002. Economics of Sustainable Resource Management in a Dynamic Optimization Framework, P.Talukdar, 1996 Interactions Between Wage Employment and Subsistence Lifestyle: Oil Development on the North Slope, Alaska. U. Ganapathy, 1995. 5 Representative Publications: Swallow, S.K., P. Talukdar, and D.N. Wear. 1997. Spatial and Temporal Specialization in Forest Ecosystem Management under Sole Ownership. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(2):311-326. R.J. Johnston, S.K. Swallow, and T.F. Weaver. 1999. Estimating Willingness to Pay and Resource Trade-offs with Different Payment Mechanisms: An Evaluation of a Funding Guarantee for Watershed Management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38(July):97-120. Johnston, R.J., D.M. Bauer, S.K.Swallow. 2002. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. Land Economics 78(4):481-500. R.J. Johnston, S.K. Swallow, C.W. Allen, and L.A. Smith. 2002. Designing Multidimensional Environmental Programs: Assessing Tradeoffs and Substitution in Watershed Management Plans. Water Resources Research 38(7): IV1-13. Bauer, D.M., N.E. Cyr, S.K. Swallow. 2004. Public Preferences for Compensatory Mitigation of Salt Marsh Losses: A Contingent Choice of Alternatives. Conservation Biology 18(2):401-41 Timothy J. Tyrrell Professor, Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 208 Coastal Institute University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 Education University of South Florida, BS Mathematics, 1969 University of Tennessee, MA, Economics, 1977 Cornell University, Ph.D., Agricultural Economics, 1979 Appointments 1994-Present: Professor, Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 1978-1994: Assistant and Associate Professor, Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Recent Students Andrada Pacheco (Toma), Ph.D, 2002, Siripat Polwitoon, Ph.D. 2002 Gabriela Dobrot,, Ph.D., in progress Recent Publications Pacheco, Andrada and Timothy Tyrrell, “ Testing Spatial Patterns and Growth Spillover Effects in Clusters of Cities”, Journal of Geographical Systems 4, 2002: 1:11. Tyrrell, Timothy J. & Robert J. Johnston, “Estimating Regional Visitor Numbers,” Tourism Analysis 7 (1), 2002, pp. 33-41. Tyrrell, Timothy J. and Mark J. Okrant, “Importance-Performance Analysis: Some Recommendations from an Economic Planning Perspective”, Tourism Analysis, Volume 9, Number 2, November 2003. Johnston, Robert J., Stephen K. Swallow, Timothy J. Tyrrell, and Dana Marie Bauer, “Rural Amenity Values and Length of Residency,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, November 2003, pp. 1000-15. Tyrrell, Timothy J., Peter W. Williams, and Robert J. Johnston, "Estimating Sport Tourism Visitor Volumes: The Case of Vancouver’s 2010 Olympic Games", Tourism Recreation Research 29(1) 2004. YEQIAO WANG Associate Professor Dept. of Natural Resources Science University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881-0804 Academic History University of Connecticut, Ph.D., Natural Resources Management & Engineering, 1995 University of Connecticut, M.Sc., Natural Resources Management & Engineering, 1992 Chinese Academy of Science, M.Sc., Remote Sensing & Mapping, 1987 Northeast Normal University, Physics/Geography, 1982 Professional History 1999-present: Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island 1995-1999: Assistant Professor, Program in Geography, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Chicago 1997-2000: Adjunct Environmental Scientist, Center for Environmental Restoration Systems, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory (DOE) 1998-2003: Adjunct Research Associate, Environmental and Conservation Program, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago Other Activities 2004: Board of Directors: New England Region, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2003-present: Chair Education, Employment, and Outreach Sub-Committee, Remote Sensing and Applications Division, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Current Research Support 1999-2004: NASA (NAG5-8829), Multiple Innovative Models in Land Cover Change Study. $445,260 (PI). 2003-2005: NPS, Impacts of Land Cover Change on the National Parks of the Northeast Temperate Network. $230,319 (PI). 2003-2005: NPS, Remote Sensing of Terrestrial and Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Fire Island National Seashore: Towards Long-term Resource Management and Monitoring, $136,633 (PI). 2002-2004: Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, Investigation of Forest Fuel Load in the State of Rhode Island, $30,000 (PI). 2003-2005: NPS, Development of Salt Marsh Change Detection Protocol Using Remote Sensing and GIS, $50,000 (PI). Ph.D Students Directed Yang, Jiansheng 2003. Remote Sensing Modeling of Land Surface Temperature Wen, Yuming 2004. Spatial Diffusion Model for Simulation of Urban Land Cover Change 5 Representative Publications Wang, Y. and K. Zhang, 2004. A SPLIT Model for Extraction of Subpixel Impervious Surface Information, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(7): 821-828. Wang, Y., A. Ngusaru, J. Tobey, V. Makota, G. Bonynge, J. Nugranad, M. Traber, L. Hale, and R. Bowen, 2003. Remote Sensing of Mangrove Change along the Tanzania Coast, Marine Geodesy, 26(1-2): 3548. Wang, Y. and X. Zhang, 2001. Dynamic Modeling Approach to Simulating Socioeconomic Effects on Landscape Change, Ecological Modelling, 140: 141-162. Wang, Y. and D.K. Moskovits, 2001. Tracking Fragmentation of Natural Communities and Changes in Land Cover: Applications of Landsat Data for Conservation in Chicago Wilderness, Conservation Biology, 15(4): 1-9. Wang, Y. and D.L. Civco, 1996. Three Artificial Neural Network Paradigms in Multisource Spatial Data Land Cover Classification, Geographic Information Sciences, 1(2): 73-87. James A. Yoder Professor Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 Academic History 1970 B.A. Botany, DePauw University 1974/1979 M.S./Ph.D Oceanography, University of Rhode Island Professional History 1978-1989: Skidaway Institute of Oceanography 1986-1988: Visiting Senior Scientist, JPL, assigned to NASA HQ. 1989-: Graduate School of Oceanography, Univ. of Rhode Island, promoted to Professor in 1992. Associate Dean for Academic Affairs: 1993-1998. Interim Dean 2000-2001. 2001-2004: IPA to NSF, Director, Division of Ocean Sciences. Other Activities 2003-: Member, NASA’s Earth System Science and Applications Advisory Committee. 2000-2002 : President, The Oceanography Society (TOS). Current Research Support 2001-2004 “Satellite studies of coupled biological and physical variability in ocean margin waters of the Northwest Atlantic.”, $550K/3 years. NASA. 2001-2006 co-I with many others. “Partnership for Advancing Interdisciplinary Global Models”, $2M/year for 5 years, NOPP. Dissertations/Theses Directed (13 Ph.D and M.S.) P. Bontempi, Ph.D. 2001, Remote sensing of bio-optical water types, phytoplankton seasonality, and algal pigments in ocean margin waters. S. Freeman, M.S. 2002, Spectral Vertical Attenuation Coefficients (Kd(λ)) In Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. M. McFarland, M.S. 2002, Inherent optical properties of phytoplankton, colored dissolved organic matter and non-algal particles in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. C. Mouw, MS. 2004, Primary production calculations in the mid-Atlantic Bight, including effects of phytoplankton community size structure D. Keith, Ph.D. 2004, Determination of chlorophyll a concentrations and in New Enland estuarine waters using ocean color remote sensing from low-flying aircraft 5 Representative Publications Schollaert, S.E., T. Rossby and J.A. Yoder. 2003. Gulf Stream cross-frontal exchange: possible mechanisms to explain inter-annual variations in phytoplankton chlorophyll in the Slope Sea during the SeaWiFS years. Deep-Sea Res. II. 51: 173-188. Yoder, J.A. and M.A. Kennelly. 2003. Seasonal and ENSO Variability in Global Ocean Phytoplankton Chlorophyll Derived from Four Years of SeaWiFS Measurements. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17 (4), 1112. Yoder, J.A., S.E. Schollaert and J.E. O’Reilly. 2002. Climatological phytoplankton chlorophyll and sea-surface temperature patterns in continental shelf and slope waters off the Northeast U.S. coast. Limnology and Oceanography 47:672-682. Siegel, D.A., S. C. Doney, and J. A. Yoder. 2002. The North Atlantic spring phytoplankton bloom and Sverdrup's critical depth hypothesis, Science, 296: 730-733. Uz, M., J.A. Yoder and V. Osychny. 2001. Global remotely sensed data supports nutrient enhancement by eddies and planetary waves. Nature. 409: 597-600. Section G. Facilities and Equipment The facilities described below support rich and diverse portfolios of research projects in coastal ecosystem management and governance and will be active venues for CIIP research and training. The Policy Simulation Laboratory (SimLab) in the URI Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics is a set of networked rooms that are designed to use emerging technologies, such as digital imagery and virtual reality, to study decision processes and to help interested parties better visualize the consequences of policy choices. This process is analogous to how modern militaries use war game technology, but is applied to peaceful ends. The SimLab consists of a computer lab with 26 workstations, two small conference rooms, and a 125-seat auditorium. What makes this facility unique is the close integration of the system components. All the rooms are networked, have advanced audiovisual aids, and in-seat voting capabilities. Decision makers and members of the public in different rooms can interact (electronically) in developing policies and assessing the impacts of their decisions. The electronic equipment requested in the proposal will be used to enhance the computing architecture of this facility. The Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory (MERL) enclosures at the Graduate School of Oceanography provide marine researchers with a unique ability to experiment with individual organisms and whole marine ecosystems. The facilities consist of a laboratory building and an outdoor tank farm of 14 enclosures (mesocosms). Each enclosure may have a 37-cm layer of sediment in the bottom, and contain13 m3 of overlying water, a water column depth of 5 m, turbulence induced by means of a vertical plunger or horizontal mixers and a temperature held to within 1-2oC of the adjacent bay. When set up in a configuration to simulate lower Narragansett Bay, unmanipulated enclosures maintain healthy ecosystems for many months with properties which are similar to those of nearby lower Narragansett Bay. The enclosures allow for replication of treatments and untreated controls. After 25 years of experience, the evidence supports the assertion that the systems simulate the chemical and biological conditions in a coastal ecosystem. The YSI buoy and seabird sensors requested in the budget will be used to support MERL research and training in Narragansett Bay ecology and monitoring. The Laboratory for Terrestrial Remote Sensing (LTRS), directed by CIIP Faculty participant Dr. Y. Q. Wang, is a state-of-the-technology remote sensing lab with full computing power from server computers, SUN workstations, to high-end PCs. It also equipped with traditional photo interpretation facilities including a Digital Transfer Scope, Topcon Mirror Stereoscopes, light tables and the accessories. The lab has a Trimble ProXR 12 Channel GPS receiver and a Kodak 265 Field Imaging System that meet the requirements of ground-truthing and verification for remote sensing data processing. The LTRS has hosted several projects funded by NASA, USDA, USAID, and National Park Service. The Environmental Data Center (EDC) is a geographic information system (GIS) laboratory in the URI Department of Natural Resources Science, College of the Environment and Life Science (CELS). The mission of the EDC is to support the use of contemporary tools of spatial data processing and electronic dissemination in the analysis and distribution of environmental data. This is achieved through collaborative research with faculty in the Department of Natural Resources Science and projects with agencies external to URI. The EDC is the center of technical expertise in GIS for the state of Rhode Island. The Rhode Island Geographic Information Systems (RIGIS) database is stored and distributed through the EDC. Major areas of research at the EDC are spatial data modeling, ecological mapping, and data integration for environmental applications. The EDC infrastructure consists of approximately 200 Gigabytes of on-line storage, multiple data and web servers, and numerous high-end PC workstations. It is staffed by 12 research scientists and graduate students. Project PI August founded the EDC in 1985. Coastal Institute on Narragansett Bay and the Coastal Institute in Kingston will be the venues for CIIP meetings, symposia, lectures, and training. The facilities support two large auditoria (100 + capacity) and eight meeting rooms accommodating groups from 10-50. The PolyCom videoconferencing equipment we propose to purchase will electronically connect the CI meeting room venues to permit discussion and interaction between participants at the two URI campuses (Kingston and Narragansett) without having to physically travel to one location or another. This will open CIIP lectures to both campus communities. URI Coastal Institute IGERT Project Facilities Page 1 Section H. Letters of Support have been obtained from the following individuals: Governor Donald Carcieri, Governor of Rhode Island. CIIP Fellows will have the opportunity to work on many issues of science and policy relevance to the State. At the bequest of the Governor, the Coastal Institute administers a number of projects that integrate science and policy in the context of coastal watershed management. Lincoln Chafee, United States Senate. CIIP Fellows will have the opportunity to work with Senator Chafee's staff on pressing environmental issues in RI, the region, and nation. Senator Chafee has been an active champion of coastal and estuarine conservation programs. J. Joseph Garrahy, Former Governor and Chair of the RI Bays, Rivers, and Watersheds Coordination Team. CIIP Fellows will work on policy issues (e.g., Nutrients in Narragansett Bay, Bay Planning, Bay-based Economic Development, Fisheries) the Coordination Team is addressing. The Coordination Team reports to the Governor and General Assembly of RI Frederick Vincent, Chief, RI Department of Environmental Management. The RI DEM is a rich venue for CIIP internships and white paper topics. Jonathan Garber, Director of the EPA Atlantic Ecology Division Research Lab. The EPA lab adjacent the URI campus is a productive setting for research in applied coastal ecology. It will be an important venue for internships and the summer field course. Deborah French McKay, Senior Scientist, Applied Science Associates. ASA, a local coastal science consulting firm, specializes on a number of important issues that straddle science and policy. These include environmental emergency response, oil spill modeling, hydrological modeling, environmental emergency damage assessment. ASA has agreed to host CIIP Fellows for white paper and internship assignments. Peter Groffman, Senior Scientist, Institute for Ecosystem Studies (IES). Dr. Groffman is a PI on the NSF urban ecology (Baltimore) LTER project and a research scientist on the Hubbard Brook LTER. He is also an adjunct faculty member in the URI Department of Natural Resources Science. These two LTER sites will be destinations for the CIIP summer field course. Groffman will also serve as liaison for students wishing to pursue white paper, internship, or research opportunities at IES or the LTER programs. Janett Trubatch, Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Studies, University of Rhode Island. Dr. Trubatch is providing the letter of support by the host institution. Institute of Ecosystem Studies Box AB (65 Sharon Turnpike) Millbrook, New York 12545-0129 Telephone 845-677-5343 FAX 845-677-5976 E-mail: [email protected] Scientist Peter M. Groffman, Ph.D. October 13, 2004 Dr. Peter August Coastal Institute Bay Campus University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 Dear Pete, I am delighted to work with you and your team on the Coastal Institute IGERT Project (CIIP). My research projects here at IES and at the NSF funded long-term ecological research (LTER) sites in Baltimore and Hubbard Brook represent some potentially useful opportunities for the CIIP. My work has a strong focus on developing the scientific basis for rational decision-making and resource management; exactly the theme you have adopted in your IGERT proposal. I look forward to working with your team in the following ways: • I would be glad to participate in the proposed CIIP Fall Colloquium, and would welcome the opportunity to lead discussions on how science and society interact, based on the lessons we have learned in the Baltimore Urban LTER. • It would be great to bring students in the summer science practicum to visit IES and the Baltimore and Hubbard Brook LTER sites. The students would get to see a lot of watershed and ecosystembased science that has strong links to policy and environmental management. • My LTER and the IES work could be a useful setting for the extended internships that are an important and novel aspect of your CIIP curriculum. Many of our complex research and policy issues might be excellent topics for the student White Papers. I wish you every success with your proposal. As an adjunct faculty member of the University of Rhode Island (URI) for almost two decades, I have taken great pride in the unique strengths of URI graduate training in environmental science and management. The CIIP would set a new standard for graduate education in coastal ecosystems on a national level, and it would be great for URI. I look forward to being part of it. Sincerely, Peter M. Groffman Scientist
© Copyright 2024