I i S C A W C O V E R SHEET This material may be protected by copyright and its use is limited to purposes assigned by Northwestern College faculty. ! ! CONTENTS 189 Stated Clerks and Social Policy: American Presbyterians and Transforming American Culture. Smylie lames +I. 199 A New Lool( at Presbyterian Origins in New York City Joyce D. Coodfricnd 209 "Above All Other3" Jonathan Edwards and the Gospel M~ntstry Hclcn t'etfer Westra 221 john Francis Cook, Antebellum Black presbyterian. Willard B. Catewood, Jr. 231 Presbyterians and the Golden Kule: TheChristian Socialism of I.E. Scott. Douglas Firth Anderson 244 Reviews Journal of Presbyterian istory VOLUME 67-NUMBER FALL 1989 3 Catcwood Beale, David 0.In Pursuit of the Purity: American rmdamentalim Since 1850. Wallace, Dewey D., lr. The Spirituality 01 the Later English Purita,,~. Hall, loseph H. Presbyterian Conflict and Resolution on the Missouri Frontier. EDITOR JAMES H. SMYLIE Lane Hardman, Kicth I., Charles Grandson Finney, 1 7 9 2 - 1 8 7 5 : Revivaliit and Reformer. Brown VanBuren, Ernestine. The Marquerite Mizell Story: An Ordinary Woman on Whom the Lord Laid Hi~sHand. Kerr Dillard, Annie. An American Childhood. Farrim Kellersiwger, E.R., M.D. Dr. Not Afraid. Neelv Heuser, Frederick I.,lr. A Guide To Foreign Missionary Manuscripts in the Pre~shyterian Historical Society. ASSOCIATE EDITORS R. DOUGLAS BRACKENRIDGE FLORENCE FLEMING CORLEY GFKALD W. CILLETTE Boren7alr. Timollw, Dwielrl. " To Live Arl~irril Liver: l'hc Primitivist Dimension i n Puritsniro?. Townsend, Lucy Forsyth. Thr Rest Helpers of One Another: Anna Peck Sill and the Struggle lor Women's Education. EDITORIAL ASSISTANT IOHN C. PETERS Bartlett McCoy, Marjorie Casebier with McCoy Charles 5. Frederick Ruechner: Novelist and Thrologim nf the Lait and Found. Anderson Warner K. Stephen. New Wine in Old Wineskinr: Evangelicals and Liberals in a S o d l Town Church. First Presbyterian Church Springfield, Illinois by Douglas Firth Anderson Known as the church of governors and judges, First Church occupied i t s present building in 1872. The building, erected by theThird Presbyterian Church in 1866, is noted for its chancel windows honoring Lincoln and others. The Reverend John M. Ellis of the United Domestic Missionary Society of New York organized the congregation in 1828. Mary Todd was a member, Lincoln kept a pew and their children were baptized in the 1843 church at Third and Washington. The Lincoln pew is on display in the present building. Entry No. 150 American PresbyterianIReformed Historical Sites Registry THE FIRST ISSUE OF THE SAN FRANCISCO WEEKLY SOCIALIST appeared 13 July 1895. Its purpose was "to present frankly, clearly, and squarely the character, interests, and aim of Socialism." The "fundamental ethics" of socialism, it was claimed, were summed up by the periodical's masthead motto, "Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbor a s ~ h ~ s e l f . E.J. " ' Dupuy was the paper's manager; he was also the pastor of the French Presbyterian Church, San Franci~co.~ Editor J.E. Scott, however, was the Socialist's founder and editorial voice. At the time, the fifty-eight year old Scott was serving as the stated clerk of the Presbytery of San Francisco. The previous fall, he had delivered a sermon on socialism to the presbytery at the close of his term as moderator. When Congregationalist George D. Herron (1862-1925), a professor at Iowa College, came to the San Francisco Bay Area i n the spring of I895 to lecture on the "organized social wrong" of "our economic system," Scott joined others in defending him from the accusations of heresy and anarchism raised by C.O. Brown, pastor of First Congregational Church, San ~ r a n c i s c o Scott .~ alluded to the recent Herron-Brown controversy as he playfully confided in the readers of the Socialist: "It possibly may be a mild shock to the minds and mis-understandings of some good friends . . . that we two, staid, orthodox, careful and conservative Presbyterian ministers, in our right minds, not J- cp k - ' wearing our hair long, nor parted in the middle, never having been accused of being cranks, crooks nor heretics, should embark i n the advocacy of what our Brother Brown is pleased to call a menace to 'our institutions'" The real menace, Scott averred, was from those supporting Brown's "stand as to the economic and industrial, and political remedy for the dangers that are gathering about us."4 -J.E. Scott (1836-1917) has been a neglected figure in the history of American social Christianity. Social Christianity, an impulse defined by historian Charles H. Lippy as "bringing the ethical principles of Christianity to bear on the social conditions of the day," did not originate in the latter nineteenth century, b u t i t did re-emerge then with a new breadth and insistency, particularly among AngloAmerican Protestant denomination^.^ Whether in conservative, progressive, or radical form, resurgent social Christianity was a major source of the "progressive" ethos in the early twentieth-century U.S.6 A few historians of aspects of the turn-ofthe-century reformist ferment have noted J.E. Scott's Christian socialism.' He has not been examined carefully, however, in light of his religious and regional contexts or the extent of his journalism. Thefollowing essay analyzes Scott's significance as a Presbyterian and Californian exponent of Christian socialism. The biographical details on Scott are, to Dr. Anderson is Assistant Professor of History at Northwestern College, Orange City, IA. A r n e k w W5bWr;an$, 67.1 Fall IPP9, 1 American Presbyterians / / date, meagre. Joseph Edwin Scott was born in Enosbury, Vermont, on 28 September 1836. After completing a B.A.. at 38' [ Y ~ ~ ' Hamilton College, New York, he married 1' Anna Higgins and taught at an academy in Delaware. In 1862 he was ordained a Presbyterian minister, subsequently serving in New Jersey. He completed work at Auburn Theological Seminary in 1867 and earned an M.A. from Hamilton College in 1869. Following a brief pastorate in lndiana, the Scotts spent from 1871 to 1881 serving in the Kurdistan region of Turkey under the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM). Returning home because of health and because of dissention on the mission field, Scott's first wife apparently died, for he remarried in 1884. His second wife, Catherine Victoria Cochrane, M.D., and their three children moved to the town of Menlo Park, California, not far south of San Francisco. Scott served as pastor of Menlo Park Presbyterian Church from 1884 through 1891. Then transfering to the Presbytery of San Francisco, Scott took charge of a fledgling congregation in San Francisco for a couple of years. The work, though, was dissolved in the spring of 1893. Catherine V.C. Scott's medical practice provided income, and J.E. Scott did not take up another charge. He served as moderator of the presbytery for six months in 1894 and as stated clerk from 1895 until 1897. From then until his death on 9 November 1917, age eighty-one, he remained on the presbytery rolls, a resident of San Francisco.' In the decades surrounding 1900, the corporatizing society of the U.S. increasingly forced itself on the attention of Anglo-Protestants.' J.E. Scott's Christian socialist journalism was part of a diverse response of Presbyterians to "the social problem." Although subject to challenge, historian Henry May has suggested a useful typology of conservative, progressive, and radical social Christianity for the era.'' r ~ e ~ r e s e n t a t i vofe Presbyterian conservative social Christianity were figures such )2( L The Christian Socialism of 1.F. Scott as J. Wilbur Chapman, A.T. Pierson, and Mark A. Matthews." Conservatives were not complacent about the social situation as seen in labor unrest and urban slums, but they were wary of relinquishing economic laissez-faire. Generally, they were concerned to support moral reform and moral community through voluntary social charity. Charles Stelzle, Woodrow Wilson, and William Jennings Bryan embodied more "progressive" social Christianity on the part of many Presbyterians." Progressive Presbyterians were open, to greater or lesser degrees, to modifying laissez-faire. They were social evangelists attempting to articulate and "convert" the churches and the general citizenry to applying biblically-derived themes such as service, "brotherhood," and the kingdom of God to the social order. In general, they supported not only the moralism and social charity of the conservatives, but also social settlements, labor unions, and the application of professional expertise to ameliorating the social environment. Finally, there were a few who went beyond the progressivestance to propose an alternative social order. J.E. Scott stands out as a Presbyterian representative of radical s? cia1 Christianity, particularly when compared to the younger and more ambiguous figure of Norman M. Thomas, who did n o t attempt t o maintain links t o the churches once he left the Presbyterian ministry for the Socialist party? Scott's intellectual journey to Christian socialism is not clear, due to the scanty evidence. Nevertheless, his religious background and eventual California context are suggestive. As a Presbyterian, Scott was an inheritor of the paradoxical social impulse at the heart of the Reformed theological tradition: all of creation is radically affected by alienation from God, yet the sovereign God revealed in Jesus Christ is to be glorified in all of life.14 In the context of the nineteenthcentury U.S., the Reformed tradition within most Presbyterian churches flowed in two distinct yet interrelated streams. I The Old School stream was characterized by a relative emphasis upon strict confessionalism and church order. The New School stream considered evangelical experience and transdenominational cooperation as important, or more so, than confessionalism and church order.15 In the Old School perspective, more static interpretations of the fallenness of creation and God's sovereign rule readily, although not necessarily, enhanced a social stance of preserving the current order as divinely-sanctioned and of deprecating most social engagement. The less doctrinaire and more experiential impulses within the New School perspective more readily supported a world-transformative understanding of creation's fallenness and God's sovereignty. The diffusion within Presbyterianism of such views as "the spirituality of the churchf'-a dualism of church-and-gospel-as-spiritual and society-as-material, and dispensational premillennialism-an eschatological perspective which entailed the inevitable degeneration of this age prior to the return of Christ, tended to compound the socially conservative potential of the Presbyterian tradition, whether Old or New School. Standard accounts of turn-of-the-century social Christianity in the nation have taken the conservative stream of Presbyterian social perspective, which was largely but not exclusively identified with the Old School tradition, and suggested it as representative of Presbyterianism as a whole.16 As the work of more recent historians has implied, however, the socially conservative reputation of Presbyterians is overdrawn." The theological paradox of creation's fallenness and God's rule is also potentially reformist and even radical in social perspective. In Presbyterianism, the New School tradition especially, although not exclusively, could be source of social transformation, particularly as such tendencies were given added impetus in the nineteenth century through conventional Anglo-American Protestant views that as- sumed human perfectibility and the rational and moral freedom to alter the social environment." J.E. Scott was clearly within the New School stream of Presbyterianism. Born in New England, he attended New School Auburn Theological Seminary prior to the 1869 reunion of New School and Old School. He later recalled with pride his college associations with Willis J. Beecher, Professor of Old Testament at Auburn (1871-1908), and a tolerant traditionalist in matters of biblical criticism. Scott carried on the New School interdenominational tradition with his mission service under the by then predominantly Congregationalist ABCFM. His letters to the ABCFM's Boston offices reflect the ethos of genteel e~an~elicalism.~~ The socialist vision of a cooperative , 1 commonwealth could appeal to someone of Scott's tradition and generation because of European and American modifio,,j,ications of socialism which madethe dominant U.S. version of it very compatible with Anglo-Protestant moral idealism. Socialism was a nineteenth-century import to the United States from Europe. Karl Marx was only one exponent, and not the 'A first, of an economic and political ideology that advocated a social order where the structures of public life were cooperatively owned and operated and the fruits of human labor equitably distributed. Q,, Many socialist proposals and movements (A. .u \ a VdV' and parties implicitly drew on Christian or 11 quasi-religious values, and groups surrounding figures such as Philippe Buchez and F.D. Maurice represented a stream of socialism based on avowedly Christian ass u m p t i o n ~In . ~nineteenth-century ~ America, where a native-born middle class imbued with democratic ideology and an evangelical religious ethos prevailed throughout so much of the nation's society and culture, the dominant socialist impulse was decidedly non-Marxian and Anglo-Protestant in character. The American socialism that emerged in the 1890s was indebted primarily to Henry George, lK::3" I (2,'' 5'' j'Z The Christian Socialism of I.E. Scott American Presbyterians whose Progress and Poverty (1879) gave a quasi-scientific and religious critique of private ownership of land and proposed redistribution of wealth through a single 2 taxon land, and to Edward Bellamy, whose utopian novel Looking Backward (1888) portrayed a future where a benign and efficient cooperative commonwealth had gradually emerged as Americans saw the social and cultural benefits of eliminating economic competition. Combined with j3i+, the socioreligious writings of Leo Tolstoy, $& ',;John Ruskin, and Giuseppe Mazzini, the influence of George and Bellamy fed a diffuse middle-class American socialism in the 1890s. These "knights of the Golden Rule," as historian Peter J. Frederick has aptly termed the more religious of them, were generally hostile to dialectical materialism and the class-struggle thesis, tended toward nonpartisan politics, and optimistically looked for the gradual and democratic evolution of national society into a socialist commonwealth.'' J.E. Scott's earliest public articulation of Christian socialism was his sermon as moderator of the Presbytery of San Frand cisco, delivered on 24 September 1894, 1(6i!if,and printed in pamphlet form the follow* ing year as Socialism: What is it?" His sermon text was a variant of the Golden Rule: "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" (Mt. 22:39). Socialism, Scott began, was a "much abused word." It did not mean anarchy, equal division of wealth, or all things in common. It meant "'applied /shristianity'" in the social realm. Citing, among others, Karl Marx, F.D. Maurice, the Fabian Society, and Edward Bellamy, Scott argued that the two essential elements of socialism were cooperation and "just apportionment of the fruits of toil and the common bounties of nature."23 Scott then launched into a criticism of American society Competition, he averred, was "the basal principle of society as it now exists." As such, "A more irrational, baneful, destructive, debasing and sinful system could never be concocted by all the powers of darkness com- Cr~''l fiJ Yl,.:g \ @' 1 bo bined." He argued that material good had come with competition despite its "wickedness"-"God causes even the wrath of men to praise him." Scott was of the same generation as Washington Gladden, Lyman Abbott, and Frances Willard-major leaders in late nineteenth-century social Christianity whose reformist critique of the developing industrial order of the U S . was grounded not only in religious conviction but also pre-industrial social experience. It seems significant that Scott turned for illustration of the rightness of cooperation and the iniquity of competition to the "old New England farm." A New Englander himself, he may have been drawing, at least in part, on personal memories. The New England farm family he argued, was in effect "a miniature cooperative state." The "varied industries of the home and farm" encompassed "what to-day constitutes a dozen distinct branches of labor." All worked together, for the welfare of all. What destroyed this "Socialistic community," Scott believed, was "the spirit of private enterprise." "One of the boys is stronger, shrewder, more unscrupulous than the rest," and thus takes "the lion's share of the profits," engenders "strife and bitterness," and forces "the old people" out of the home to become charity cases. Competition as a social principle was sinful because it admitted "no sense / of brotherhood or kinship." Scott argued that competition precluded obeying l Christ's command: "how can one love his neighbor as himself, when he must fight j w i t h t h a t n e i g h b o r f o r bread and b~tter?"'~ Turning to address the interests of the church, Scott urged Christians to consider not only the truth of socialism but also its efficacy for mission. The problem of "how to reach the masses" could be addressed in part by socialism. "Is it a wonder," he pointed out, "that men who work and men who can find no work, the ragged and wretched and hungry multitudes turn away from the church where members call Christ their Savior, but do not believe in the practicality of the Golden Rule in the world's business and social life?" Because of the economic depression of 1893-1896, Scott and his audience were vividly aware of unemployment and bitter labor strikes. Christianity was more than economics, Scott readily admitted, but it included economics; "if men see christianity a failure on the economic side, can they fail to lose confidence in it on all sides?" As a church member himself, Scott desired to win over his audience. His criticismsof the church were judiciously pointed. "There are multitudes of unselfish[,l faithful[,] loyal christian souls in the church," he believed. They longand pray for the coming of the kingdom of God's righteousness on earth; and they wonder why it comes so slowly. They want to see souls converted, but they forget that the ears are deaf to other sounds when the stomach is empty. They forget or perchance do not know that against the wheels of the chariot-car of Christ's kingdom the heavy brakes of antagonistic, social and economic environments are set. Scott alluded to the wider re-emergence of social Christianity when he pointed his audience to the new consciousness of "organic unity" and social injustice. He eloquently undercut "our brethren who tell us the business of the Church is to save souls and not to meddle with social questions" by noting that "they do not follow their own rule." "Do they not build church edifices and make them attractive? Do they not try to have good music and to make the social atmosphere of the church inviting? Do they not try to banish saloons and slums? Are not these 'social questions'? Are they not attempts to make the environment harmonize with and help on towards the end sought, as Christ did when he drove out the money changers?" Scott closed his address with a challenge "every christian to give Christian socialism "a sympathetic hearing" and "careful study.'' "Christianity has hitherto been applied to individuals," he said, "but it is adapted to a kingdom, and a kingdom means organized society and a state."" c0 ($ There is no direct evidence of the presbytery's response to Scott's address. However, the fact that several months later he was elected stated clerk suggests that his basing his socialism on the Golden Rule, his sidestepping of specifics for moving toward a cooperative commonwealth of "distributive justice," his appeal to the social situation of the times, and his loyalty to the church forestalled any controversy. Further, when heand E.J.Dupuy launched the Socialist in the summer of 1895, there was apparently no furor over the stated clerk's political journalism. The lack of Presbyterian controversy over Scott's socialism probably had something to do with the California context as well. California had become part of the nation by imperialist conquest, and its subsequent society and culture had been decisively shaped by the Gold Rush of 1848-1849: In the realms of collectiveexperience, mythic memory, and social aspirations, California was linked, as historian Kevin Starr has convincingly argued, "with an intensified pursuit of human happin e ~ s . " ' San ~ Francisco and the Bay Area became the metropolitan center for the state and the entire Pacific Coast virtually overnight, an "instant city" that from 1848 to 1856 grew from some 1,000 people to some 50,000. Culturally pluralist from its 1848 beginnings, San Francisco had a population in 1870 in which one out of every three people had been born in Ireland, Germany, China, or Italy, and between 1870 and 1930, over half of the city's population was of foreign parentage. This pluralism, fed by ongoing migration and immigration, added to the geographical and psychic remoteness of California, and compounded by the Gold Rush legacy of aspirations for easy money, made for a relatively fluid and rootless regional society. Few cultural traditions from areas to the East could serve as effective custodians of the community as a whole.z7 Prior to 1900, California was not a major manufacturing state, yet it underwent major adjustments in the direction of social American Presbyterians corporatization. California's geographic remoteness made sea and land transportation pivotal in its economy. The Southern Pacific Railroad came to epitomize in the popular experience monopolistic control of transportation and land and political influence contrary to the public's interests. Mining and agriculture also were significantly corporatized in California well before the turn of the century. Further, in the regionally dominant metropolitan center of San Francisco, the relative scarcity of labor made skilled workers in the building and transportation trades a poL t e n t i a l l y formidable political force.28 In such a social and cultural context, reformist ideas compatable with socialism gained increasing appeal among sectors of California's m i d d l i n g and upper / -classes. California was alluring with prom1 ise in the pursuitof happiness, butdreams dashed were as plentiful as dreams engenV dered, and in the experience of many, little seemed to stand between the autonomous individual and self-interested corporate structures. Henry George had developed his single tax ideas while struggling to make a living in San Francisco. Wealthy lawyer Burnette G. Haskell discovered the laboring classes of San Francisco and attempted to help them in the 1880s with an eclectic blend of Marxian and anarchist rhetoric, union organization, and utopian communalism. 'When Bellamy's Looking Backward spawned a movement of Nationalist Clubs in 18891890, the greatest number of clubs appeared in California. Bellamy's "Nationalism," though short-lived, was significant in Californiaas a link between middleclass reformism and socialist ideas. Nationalism took its name from its goal of national ownership of the means of production and distribution of goods. To reach the distant goal of a cooperative commonwealth, Nationalists favored immediate measures such as public ownership of utilities, woman's suffrage, the elimination of private banks, and an eight hour work day. Burnette Haskell was a 7 prominent leader in the San Francisco clubs, as was Job Harriman, another lawyer, who had at one time studied for the Disciples of Christ ministry. In southern California, which was beginning to boom with Anglo settlers from the greater Northeast and northern Midwest regions, Nationalists put forward wealthy H. Gaylord Wilshire in 1890 as a candidate for I Congress.2g - ra Nationalism rapidly declined after 1890, ,<)F?, in large part because many members turned to Populism and socialism. Bur-('/' nette Haskell, for example, joined the Populist movement. Antimonopolism gained in political potency in the 1890s, and Populists won some significant contests in California elections of 1892, 1894, and 1896. Socialism was also burgeoning. Job Harriman and his San Francisco Nationalist Club joined the Socialist Labor Party; later, Harriman would barely miss election as Mayor of Los Angeles as the Socialist party candidate in 1911 and 1913, and in 1914 he would found a socialist agricultural colony, Llano del Rio, in southern California. In the East Bay, the young Jack London of Oakland joined the Alameda County Socialist Labor Local in 1896, a year after its organization. Former Nationalist Gaylord Wilshire made real estate investments in Los Angeles with his brother that included the development of Wilshire Boulevard, but politically he turned to socialism. He founded Wilshire's Magazine as a journalistic platform, and he ran as a Socialist congressional candidate from the Los Angeles area in 1900.30 Given the growing public sentiment against the Southern Pacific Railroad, the comparatively weak traditional party system in California, and the emergent middle-class reformism and radicalism represented by Nationalism, Populism, and Socialism, i t is n o t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t reformist and radical sentiment should begin to gain a hearing within the AngloProtestant community of California in the 1890s. When and how J.E. Scott was converted to socialism is open to speculation. The Christian Socialism of I.E. Scott No. 34. COMMONWEALTH LIBRARY. Aug. 24. 1895. SOCIALISM: IS I T RIGHT, OR IS IT WRONG? Lecture delivered b y Rev. J. E. Scott before the American sect i o n of socialist labor party, a t Metropolitan Temple (the largest b a l l in San Francisco), June 30, 1895. It is certain, however, that he was in California during the years of Nationalist and Populist flowering, and hisviews were undoubtedly shaped by this ferment. The Bay Area speaking appearance of Christian socialist George D. Herron in 1895 was the occasion for Scott to begin the Socialist. He felt the times were right. "There is call for a paper of the kind this proposes to be, because of the large number of Socialists on this coast. The woods are full of them. Multitudes are Socialists without knowing it. Every man that really wants what is right for himself and his neighbor alike, is very near the kingdom of Socialism." Initially, his optimism seemed justified. In the third issue of his periodical, he exulted that "Presbyterian Elders and Congregational Deacons send in their half dollars," as well as "ministers of various denominations." The following week he claimed, "Few clergymen of standing in the city are unrepresented on o u r r o l l of names." His enthusiasm dampened a bit in the fall when financial stringency forced reducing the pages in each issue by half, but his basic optimism remained intacL3' Scott had defended G.D. Herron from the attacks of C.O. Brown in the Arena. In the Socialist, he welcomed Herron's paid subscription and sharply harried Brown as "the real subverter of social order and not Dr. H e r r ~ n . Scott, " ~ ~ however, was less a representative of Herron's brand of Christian socialism, which had an antichurch edge mingled with its revivalist passion, than he was of the Fabian Christian social- ism represented by W.D.P. Bliss (18561926). Bliss was a generation younger than Scott, but like the older Presbyterian, he had a New England background. Born of Congregationalist missionary parents in Turkey, Bliss attended Amherst College and Hartford Seminary. He converted to the Protestant Episcopal Church in 1885 in the conviction that it represented the original catholic unity of the church, and soon thereafter he began his lifelong efforts to unify social Christianity under broadly-defined Christian socialism. In 1887 and 1891 he helped found two Episcopalian groups, first the Church Association for the Advancement of the Interests of Labor, and then the Christian Social Union. He was a charter member of the Boston Nationalist Club in 1888. In 1889 he organized the Society of Christian Socialists and founded and edited its journal, the Dawn, and in 1895 he began the American Fabian League and its periodical, the American Fabian. In this indefatigable organizing and publicizing, Bliss' goal was to persuade Christians in particular that a gradualist, nonpartisan approach to a cooperative commonwealth was the truest way t o apply Jesus' social teachings.33 J.E. Scott clearly represented such a gradualist, ecumenical socialism that was open to all of social Christianity. In the first issue of the Socialist, Scott announced, "we shall try to recognize the value of every reform idea that makes for strict and impartial justice and right among men and women." The platform of 7 , @' American Presbyterians ering at Louisville PresbyterianTheological Seminary on 4 June 1988. From that occasion came the suggestion for this article. Socialist (13July1895j, 1, in the Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley (BAN). Presbytery of San Francisco, Minutes, 1890-1899, pp. 341, 343, in San Francisco Theological Seminary %chives, San Anselmo. Ibid., pp. 284, 297, 330, 397; "Prof. George D. Herron: the Man and His Work in California," Arena 14 (18951, 114ff.; Robert M. Crunden, "George D. Herron in the 1890s: a New Frame of Reference for the Study of the Progressive Era," Annals o f Iowa 3d ' E P ., A.-7 (1477\ .-.-,, Qdff .. ... ~ \ ' Socialist (13 July 1895), 1. 'Charles H. Lippy, "Social Christianity," in Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience: Studies of Traditions and Movements, eds. Charles H. L i o w and Peter W. Williams (New York: Charles SLAbner's, 1988), 2: 918. 'See, for example, Henry F. May, Protestant Churches and lndustrial America (New York: Harper & Row, 1967, original ed. 19491, and Robert M. Crunden, Ministers of Reform: the Progressive's Achievement in American Civilization, 1889-1920 (New York: Basic, 1982). C. Howard Hopkins, The Rise o f the Social Gosp e l in American p;otestantism, 1865-1915 (New Haven: Yale University, 1940), pp. 172f.; May, Protestant Churches and lndustrial America, p. 193; Howard H. Quint, The Forging of American Socialism: Origins of the Modern Movement (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964, original ed. 1953), pp. 241n. 248f., 250 f , 256f., 259. Auburn Theolo~icalSeminary, Auburn, New York, General~iogra~hical Catalogue ofAuburn TheologicalSeminary, 1818-1918, p. 156; American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions Papers, Unit 5, the Near East, Eastern Turkey Mission, 1872-1880, Letters R-W, letters nos. 41-78, microfilm reel 684 (ABCFM Papers); Menlo Park Presbyterian Church, Menlo Park, California, History o f the Menlo Park Presbyterian Church F h e Church of the Pioneersl: Centennial Year, 7873.1973, pp. 6f.; Presbyteyof San Francisco, Minutes, 1890-1899, pp. 103,178,239,284, 297. 330. 397: San Francisco Bulletin (9 November 191>), 19. On the social and cultural changes of the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century U.S., see Robert H. Wiebe, The Search for Order, 1877-1920 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1967) and Alan Trachtenberg, The Incorporation o f America: Culture and Society in the CildedAge (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982). 'O Mav. Protestant Churches and lndustrial America, pp. i k 3 , 170f, 235. Aaron lgnatius Abell, The Urban Impact on American Protestantism, 1865-1900 Hamden: Archon, 1962, original ed. 1943), pp. 1SSf.; Dale E. Soden, "In Quest of a 'City on a Hill': Seattle Minister Mark Matthews and the Moral Leadership of the Middle Class," in Religion andsociety in the American West: Historical Essays, eds. Carl Guarneri and David Alvarer (Lanham: University Press of America, 19871, pp. 355-73. "George H. Nash, Ill, "Charles Stelzle: Social Gospel Pioneer," Journal of Presbyterian History 50 " (1972). 206-28; John M. Mulder, Woodrow Wilson: the Years of Preparation (Princeton: Princeton University, 19781, pp. 229-77; Arthur S. Link, "Woodrow Wilson: Presbyterian in Government," in Calvinism and the Political Order, ed. George L. Hunt (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1965), pp. 157-74; Willard H. Smith, "William Jennings Bryan and the Social Gospel," Journal of American History 53 (19661, 41-60. "James C. Duram, "In Defense of Conscience: NormanThomas as an Exponent of Christian Pacifism During World War I," lournal o f Presbyterian History 52 (1974), 19-32. Ronald H. Stone, "Introduction to Reformed Faith and Politics," and Donald W. Shriver, lr., "A Political Lifestyle and Agenda for Presbyterians in the Nineteen-Eighties," in Reformed Faith and Politics, ed. Ronald H. Stone (Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 19831, pp. 5f., 16f., 182f. '"Lefferts A. Loetscher, The Broadening Church: a Study of Theological Issues in the Presbyterian Church Since 1869 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1954), pp. 1-8, 18, 27: George M. Masden, The Evangelical Mind and the New School Presbyterian Experience: a Case Study o f Thought and Theology in Nineteenth-Century America (New Haven: Yale University, 1970), pp. 230-49. Hopkins, The Rise o f the Social Gospel, p. 280; May, Protestant Churches and lndustrial America, pp. 192f. Louis Weeks, "Faith and Political Action in American Presbyterianism, 1776-1918," in Reformed Faith and Politics, pp. 101-19; Gary Scott Smith, The Seeds of Secularization: Calvinism, Culture, andPluralism in America, 1870-1915(Grand Rapids: Christian University, 19851, pp. 126-56; 1. Wayne Flynt, "Feeding the Hungry and Ministering to the Broken Hearted': the Presbyterian Church in the United States and the Social Gospel, 1900-1920," in Religion in the South, ed. Charles Reagan Wilson (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 19851, pp. 83-137. '"D.H. Meyer, The Instructed Conscience: the Shaping of the American National Ethic (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1972); Robert T. Handy, A Christian America: Protestant Hopes and HistoricalRealities2d ed. (New York: Oxford University, 1984). Loetscher, The Broadening Church, p. 75; Socialist (17 August 1895), 2; ABCFM Papers. 20 Andre Bieler, "Gradual Awareness of Social, Economic Problems (1750-1900)," in Separation Without Hope? Essays o n the Relation between the Church and the Poor During the lndustrial Revolution and the Western Colonial Expansion, ed. Julio De Santa Ana (Maryknoll: Orbis, 19781, pp. 23ff.; Peter &A. Jones, The Christian Socialist Revival, 18771914: Religion, Class, and Social Conscience in LateVictorian England (Princeton: Princeton University, 1968). Carl I.Guarneri, "The Associationists: Forging a Christian Socialism in Antebellum America," Church History 52 (19831, 36-49; James Dombrowski, The Early Days of Christian Socialism in America (New York: Columbia University, 1936); Quint, The ForgingofAmerican Socialism; Peter I.Frederick, Knights o f the Golden Rule: The InteNectual as Christian Social Reformer in the 1890s (Lexington: University " '' " '' '' The Christian Socialism o f I.E. Scott Press of Kentucky, 1976). 22 Presbytery of San Francisco, Minutes, 18901899, p. 297; J.E. Scott, Socialism: What is it? Is i t Christian? Should the Church take any interest in it? (San Francisco: n.p., 18951, 22 pp., in BAN. Scott, Socialism: What is it?, pp. 1-9. Ibid., pp. 12-14. Ibid., 15-20. Kevin Starr, Americans and the California Dream, 1850-1975(New Yark: Oxford Universitv. 19731. o. 68. Roger W. Lotchin, San Francisco, ld4i-1856: From Hamlet to City (New York: Oxford University, 19741, p. 30; William lssel and Robert W. Cherny, San Francisco, 1865-1932: Politics, Power, and Urban Development (Berkeley: University of California, 1986), pp. 14, 55f.; Moses Rischin, "Immigration, Migration, and Minorities in California: a Reassessment," Pacific Historical Review 41 (19721, 71-90. Gerald D. Nash, "Stages of California's Economic Growth, 1870-1970: and Interpretation," California Historical Quarterly 51 (1972), 317ff.; Michael Karin, "The Great Exception Revisited: Organized Labor and Politics in San Francisco and Los Angeles, 1870-1940," PacificHistoricalReview55 (1986), 375-87. 29 Ralph Edward Shaffer, "Radicalism in California, 1869-1929" (Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1962), pp. 74-112; Royce D. Delmatier, Clarence i. Mclntosh, and Earl G. Waters, The Rumble o f California Politics, 1848-1970 (New York: John Wiley, 1970), pp. 100ff.; Robert V. Hine, California's Utopian Colonies (New York: W.W. Norton, 1973, ori inal ed. 1953). pp. 78-100, 114. Delmatier et al., The Rumble o f California Politics, pp. 102-24; Shaffer, "Radicalism in California," pp. 101,105,113-50; Hine, California's Utopian Colonies. OD. 115-31: Kevin Starr. lnventine the Dream: '' '' '' '' " bp. 1, 1; (27 July 1895), 1; (3 1; (9 November 18%). 1. Ibid., (3 August 18951, 1; (20 July 18951, 2. Richard B. Dressner, "William Dwight Porter Bliss's Christian Socialism." Church Histow47 (19781. 84: 66-82; Frederick, Knights b f the Golden Rile, 98; Quint, The Forging of American Socialism, pp. 109-26. " " pp. w ' "Socialist (13 July 18951, 1; (20July18951, 6ff.; (15 Au ust 18961, 3ff. Ibid., (30 November 1895). 1; (25 luly 1896), 2; (28 December 18951, 2. 36 Ibid., (28December18951,2; (22 February 18961, 1; (20July1895),5; (27July1895),7; (11April1896),1; 1896), 1; (25 April 18961, 2. (4 Social Economist (17April18971,4, as quoted in Quint, the Forging of American Socialism, p. 251. Only two issues of the Social Economist are bound with the Bancroft Library's holdings of the Socialist. Socialist (18 January 18961, 1. Social Economist (21August 1897), 1,3; (11 September 18971, 1,4ff; Quint, The Forging ofAmerican Socialism, pp. 256-63. 40 P d ~ iandSocia1 t Problems 1 (March 18981.1. in the DO; Library, University of California, ~erkel&. Ibid., 5-20, and the issues of July 1898, December 1899, and January, February, March, June, August, October, and November 1900. Ibid., 2 (December 1899), 6; 1 (May 18981, 2,44; 1 (July 18981, 15; 2 (September 1900), 7; 2 (August 19001, 4ff. a Ibid., 2 (May 19001, 4; 1 (May 18981, 6. " Robert T. Handy, "Christianity and Socialism in America, 1900.1920,'' Church History21 (1952),39-54; Dressner, "Bliss's Christian Socialism," pp. 78-82; William McGuire King, "The Emergence of Social Gospel Radicalism: the Methodist Case," Church History 50 (19811, 436-49. On William Rader, I.Stitt Wilson, and other figures of Anglo-Protestant social Christianity in the Bay Area during the Progressive era, see Douglas Firth Anderson, "The Keverend J. Stitt Wilson and Christian Socialism in Berkeley," in Religion andSocietyin the American West, pp. 375-400 and idem, "Through Fire and Fair by the Golden Gate: Progressive Era Protestantism and Regional Culture" (Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Theological Union, 1988), Chapters IV, V, and VIII. 46 May, Protestant Churches and lndustrial America, pp. l3ff., 1 8 f , 44f., 136-ff., 230; Bruce Morgan, "Stephen Colwell (1800-1871): Social Prophet before the Social Gospel," in Sons o f the Prophets: Leaders in Protestantism from Princeton Seminary, ed. Hugh T. Kerr (Princeton: Princeton University, 19631, pp. " " '' " - " 177.47 INCIDENTAL ADDENDA OCCASIONALLY OFFERED FOR GENERAL INTELLIGENCE Item 55th. "Out of the mouth of babes . . ."Wesley Grove, filled with huge white oak and chestnut trees was the center of Orange County, NY, Methodism in the closing years of the 19th century. O n a warm Sunday evening i n August six t o eight thousand people would arrive by wagon and train t o set u p their tents. Famous preachers and evangelists preached from the wooden platform i n a natural amphitheater. Corinne Slaughter Ackerly almost ninety years later remembered going there with her Presbyterian parents. One of the preachers invited his listeners to come forward to profess faith. Little Corinne, only four years old, stood u p and shouted, "I'm a Presbyterian." 1150th Anniversary Book, Town of Harnptonburgh, New York, (1980), p. 40.1 Robert Blade
© Copyright 2024