1. business and industrial
2. construction

RULE 15c2-12 FILING COVER SHEET
This cover sheet is sent with all submissions to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the
Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities Information Repository) and any applicable State
Information Depository pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c2-12 or any
analogous state statute.
Issuer Name: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority
Issue(s):
$
94,879,710 Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2010
$ 305,929,944 Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2011
$
70,000,000 Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2011
$
30,000,000 Senior Llien Revenue Refunding PUT Bonds, Series 2013B
$ 155,810,000 Senior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2013A
$ 103,960,000 Subordinate Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Sereis 2013
Filing Format X electronic ___ paper; If available on the Internet, give URL:_______________
CUSIP Numbers to which the information filed relates (optional):
X Nine-digit number(s) (see following page(s)):
___ Six-digit number if information filed relates to all securities of the issuer
* * *
Financial & Operating Data Disclosure Information
X Annual Financial Report or CAFR
X Financial Information & Operating Data
___ Other (describe)
X Fiscal Period Covered: FYE 2013
___ Monthly ___ Quarterly X Annual ___Other:
* * *
I hereby represent that I am authorized by the issuer or its agent to distribute this information publicly:
Signature:
Name:
Bill Chapman
Title:Chief Financial Officer
Employer: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority
Voice Telephone Number: (512) 996-9778
Email Address:
[email protected]
DESCRIPTION OF ISSUES COVERED BY THIS REPORT
Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2010
Date
01/01/15
01/01/17
01/01/18
01/01/19
01/01/20
01/01/25
01/01/25
01/01/26
01/01/27
01/01/28
01/01/29
01/01/30
01/01/31
01/01/32
01/01/33
01/01/34
01/01/35
01/01/36
01/01/37
01/01/38
01/01/39
01/01/40
$
$
Principal
140,000
1,620,000
3,475,000
5,310,000
7,240,000
42,095,000
3,158,010
3,516,021
3,264,321
3,171,378
2,932,886
2,702,666
2,254,553
2,103,883
1,980,266
1,860,556
1,745,752
1,418,625
1,337,508
1,258,994
1,183,406
1,110,879
CUSIP
155498BK3
155498BL1
155498BM9
155498BN7
155498BP2
155498BQ0
155498AT5
155498AU2
155498AV0
155498AW8
155498AX6
155498AY4
155498AZ1
155498BA5
155498BB3
155498BC1
155498BD9
155498BE7
155498BF4
155498BG2
155498BH0
155498BJ6
94,879,704
Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2011
Date
01/01/22
01/01/23
01/01/24
01/01/25
01/01/26
01/01/31
01/01/41
01/01/46
$
$
Principal
480,449
1,868,357
3,346,476
3,183,732
1,120,931
47,975,000
145,015,000
102,940,000
305,929,944
CUSIP
155498 BW7
155498 BX5
155498 BY3
155498 BZ0
155498 CA4
155498 BT4
155498 BU1
155498 BV9
Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2011
Date
01/01/41
$
Principal
70,000,000
$
70,000,000
CUSIP
155498 CB2
Senior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2013A
Date
01/01/14
01/01/15
01/01/16
01/01/17
01/01/18
01/01/19
01/01/20
01/01/21
01/01/22
01/01/23
01/01/33
01/01/43
$
$
Principal
1,100,000
2,155,000
4,675,000
4,195,000
3,800,000
3,480,000
3,210,000
3,760,000
3,605,000
3,475,000
47,240,000
75,115,000
CUSIP
155498CC0
155498CD8
155498CE6
155498CF3
155498CG1
155498CH9
155498CJ5
155498CK2
155498CL0
155498CM8
155498CN6
155498CP1
155,810,000
Senior Llien Revenue Refunding PUT Bonds, Series 2013B
Date
01/01/45
$
Principal
30,000,000
$
30,000,000
CUSIP
155498DC9
Subordinate Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Sereis 2013
Date
01/01/14
01/01/15
01/01/16
01/01/17
01/01/18
01/01/19
01/01/20
01/01/21
01/01/22
01/01/23
01/01/33
01/01/42
$
$
Principal
250,000
1,180,000
500,000
500,000
1,000,000
2,235,000
2,350,000
2,470,000
2,595,000
2,725,000
36,265,000
51,890,000
103,960,000
CUSIP
155498CQ9
155498CR7
155498CS5
155498CT3
155498CU0
155498CY2
155498CZ9
155498DA3
155498DB1
155498CV8
155498CW6
155498CX4
ONTINUING
ISCAL
ISCLOSURE EPORT
OR HE
EAR NDED UNE
TOLL REVENUE DEBT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The audited financial statements for the Authority for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 are being
separately filed directly with the Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities Information Repository
and any applicable State Information Depository, and are hereby incorporated by reference into this
Annual Continuing Disclosure Report.
SIGNATURE OF ISSUER
The information set forth herein has been obtained from the Authority and other sources believed to be
reliable, but such information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness and is not to be
construed as a promise or guarantee. This Annual Continuing Disclosure Report may contain, in part,
estimates and matters of opinion which are not intended as statements of fact, and no representation is
made as to the correctness of such estimates and opinions, or that they will be realized. The
information and expressions of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice, and the
delivery of this Annual Continuing Disclosure Report will not, under any circumstances, create any
implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Authority or other matters described.
CENTRAL TEXAS REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY
Bill Chapman
Chief Financial Officer
Approved for Submission:
Date
CERTIFICATE OF SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL REPORT
Subject to the continuing disclosure requirements of SEC Rule 15c2-12, this Annual Continuing
Disclosure Report for the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority with respect to the issues listed on
the report cover was submitted directly to the National Recognized Municipal Securities Information
Repository (“NRMSIR”) listed below as well as to any applicable State Information Depository
(“SID”).
NRMSIR
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB")
via the Electronic Municipal Market Access ("EMMA") system
First Southwest Company
Signed by:
/s/ Thiiri Kimathi
CENTRAL TEXAS REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY
2013 ANNUAL CONTINUING DISCLOSURE REPORT
THE SYSTEM
The Authority has designated the Manor Expressway Project and the 183A Turnpike Project as part of the CTRMA
Turnpike System (the”System”).
183A Turnpike Project
Please see the Quarterly Progress Report No. 16, July 2013, which has previously been filed with, and is publicly
available on the MSRB’s EMMA System, for the following:





Background of the Project
Description of the System and the Project
Construction of Project
Estimated Construction Costs and Opening Date of the Project
Toll Collection Facilities and Technology
Additionally a copy of the 2013 Annual Report of Conditions as provided by HNTB Corporation has been included
in this report.
Manor Expressway Project
Please see the Quarterly Construction Progress Report, November 2013, which has previously been filed with, and is
publicly available on the MSRB’s EMMA System, for the following:





Background of the Project
Description of the System and the Project
Construction of Project
Estimated Construction Costs and Opening Date of the Project
Toll Collection Facilities and Technology
Remainder of page intentionally left blank.
1
183A PHASE I AND II TOLL RATE SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
183A Phase I
TOLL
Park Street Main
Plaza
Toll Direction
Northbound/Southbound
Brushy Creek Ramps
To/From South
Lakeline TxTag Plaza
Northbound/Southbound
183A Phase II
TOLL
Toll Direction
Crystal Falls Parkway
Ramps
To/From North
Crystal Falls Mainline
Plaza
Northbound/Southbound
Scottsdale Drive
Ramp
From South
2-Axle Vehicles
3-Axle Vehicles
4-Axle Vehicles
5-Axle Vehicles
6-Axle Vehicles
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
$1.40
$1.86
$2.80
$3.72
$4.20
$5.58
$5.60
$7.44
$7.00
$9.30
$0.56
$0.74
$1.12
$1.48
$1.68
$2.22
$2.24
$2.96
$2.80
$3.70
$0.52
$0.69
$1.04
$1.38
$1.56
$2.07
$2.08
$2.76
$2.60
$3.45
2-Axle Vehicles
3-Axle Vehicles
4-Axle Vehicles
5-Axle Vehicles
6-Axle Vehicles
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
$0.38
$0.51
$0.76
$1.02
$1.14
$1.53
$1.52
$2.04
$1.90
$2.55
$0.99
$1.32
$1.98
$2.64
$2.97
$3.96
$3.96
$5.28
$4.95
$6.60
$0.56
$0.74
$1.12
$1.48
$1.68
$2.22
$2.24
$2.96
$2.80
$3.70
MANOR EXPRESSWAY PROJECT TOLL RATE SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
290E TOLL
U.S. 183 Ramps
(Direft Connectors)
Springdale Road
Ramps
Toll Direction
To/From North
Eastbound/Westbound
2-Axle Vehicles
3-Axle Vehicles
4-Axle Vehicles
5-Axle Vehicles
6-Axle Vehicles
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
TxTag
Rate
Pay By
Mail
$0.50
$0.67
$1.00
$1.34
$1.50
$2.01
$2.00
$2.68
$2.50
$3.35
$0.50
$0.67
$1.00
$1.34
$1.50
$2.01
$2.00
$2.68
$2.50
$3.35
183A Turnpike Project. The 183A Phase I Project opened in March 2007 utilizing a combination of toll collection
systems. At various payment locations in the System, tolls were collected either solely by electronic toll collection or
by a choice of cash payment or electronic toll collection. In December 2008, the Authority introduced a pay-by-mail
option at all payment locations and the cash payment option was discontinued and all cash lanes were closed. Tolls
are currently collected at all payment locations by either electronic toll collection or the pay-by-mail option.
In November 2009, the Board revised the Authority’s toll rate policy to provide for toll rate increases for the 183A
Turnpike Project in the year 2010, and in April 2011 the Board further revised the Authority’s toll rate policy to
provide for toll rate increases for the 183A Turnpike Project in the year 2012, and to provide for annual increases in
tolls for the System beginning in 2013, as more particularly described below.
Annual Toll Adjustment Policy. Subject in all respects to the provisions, requirements and restrictions of the
Indenture, the Authority modified its toll policy in April 2011 to include a process for implementing an annual
increase in the toll rates for the System based on the index of Consumer Prices for All Urban Consumers before
seasonal adjustment (“CPI”), as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor.
The current toll policy provides that beginning on October 1, 2012, and on each October 1 thereafter (each, a “Toll
Escalation Determination Date”), a percentage increase in the Toll rates for the System will be determined in an
amount equal to [(CPIt – CPIt-12)/CPIt-12], where CPIt is the most recently published CPI prior to the Toll Escalation
Date for which such calculation is being made and CPIt-12 is the CPI published in the month that is twelve months
prior to CPIt (the “Toll Rate Escalation Percentage”). If the Toll Rate Escalation Percentage is calculated to equal
less than 0%, then the Toll Rate Escalation Percentage shall be deemed to equal 0%. The Toll Rate Escalation
Percentage, as calculated on each Toll Escalation Determination Date, will be reported to the Board each year at its
2
October board meeting. The percentage increase in the Toll rates will be effective on the January 1 of the next
calendar year, unless at such board meeting the Board affirmatively votes to modify the Toll Rate Escalation
Percentage. If the Board votes to modify the Toll Rate Escalation Percentage, the Toll rate increase to be effective on
January 1 of the next calendar year shall be based on the modified Toll Rate Escalation Percentage. If the CPI is
discontinued or substantially altered, as determined in the sole discretion of the Authority, the Authority may
determine an appropriate substitute index or, if no such substitute index is able to be determined, the Authority may
choose to modify the toll policy. At its meeting on October 31, 2012, the Board approved a Toll Rate Escalation
Percentage of 1.99% for the 183A Turnpike Project, which became effective on January 1, 2013.
183A Turnpike Project 2013 Toll Rate Adjustment. After giving effect to the aforementioned Toll Rate Escalation
Percentage approved by the Board on October 31, 2012, the toll rates for the 183A Turnpike Project, which became
effective on January 1, 2013, are as follows:
Paypoint Location
Toll Direction
Payment Type*
Toll Rates (1)
CR272 Ramps
(Crystal Falls Ramps)
To/From North
ETC
PBM
$0.37
$0.49
New Hope Main Lanes
(Crystal Falls Main Lanes)
Northbound/Southbound
ETC
PBM
$0.97
$1.29
New Hope Ramp
(Scottsdale Drive Ramp)
From South
ETC
PBM
$0.55
$0.73
Park Street Main Lanes
Northbound/Southbound
ETC
PBM
$1.38
$1.84
Brushy Creek Ramps
To/From South
ETC
PBM
$0.55
$0.73
Lakeline Main Lines
Northbound/Southbound
ETC
PBM
$0.51
$0.68
_______________
*
ETC – Electronic Toll Collection
PBM – Pay-by-Mail
(1)
The toll rates shown are the toll rates for passenger cars. The Authority’s current toll policy provides that toll rates for multiaxle vehicles will be proportionately higher at all paypoint locations based on a toll rate structure under which multi-axle vehicles
pay the two-axle, passenger car, toll rate multiplied by a factor equal to the number of axles on the multi-axle vehicle minus one
3
Manor Expressway Phase I Project. At its meeting on October 31, 2012, the Board approved and adopted the toll
rates utilized in the Manor Expressway Traffic and Revenue Report as being the initial toll rates for the Manor
Expressway Phase I Project. The toll rates for the Manor Expressway Phase I Project for the period beginning on its
opening date (being January 5, 2013) and ending on the date the Manor Expressway Phase II Project is opened to
traffic (anticipated to occur in May 2014), are set forth below. Unless otherwise determined by the Board and subject
to the requirements and provisions of the Indenture, such toll rates will not be subject to an increase in January 2014
in accordance with the Authority’s toll rate policy described above.
Paypoint Location
Toll Direction
Payment Type*
Toll Rates
US 183 Direct Connectors
To/From North/South
ETC
PBM
$0.50
$0.67
On/Off Ramp east of Springdale Road
Eastbound/Westbound
ETC
PBM
$0.50
$0.67
(1)
_______________
* ETC – Electronic Toll Collection
PBM – Pay-by-Mail
(1)
The toll rates shown are the toll rates for passenger cars. The Authority’s current toll policy provides that toll rates for multiaxle vehicles will be proportionately higher at all paypoint locations based on a toll rate structure under which multi-axle vehicles
pay the two-axle, passenger car, toll rate multiplied by a factor equal to the number of axles on the multi-axle vehicle minus one.
Manor Expressway Phase II Project. At its meeting on October 31, 2012, the Board approved and adopted the toll
rates utilized in the Manor Expressway Traffic and Revenue Report as being the initial toll rates for the Manor
Expressway Phase II Project. Upon the opening of the Manor Expressway Phase II Project (anticipated to occur in
May 2014), the initial toll rates for the Manor Expressway Phase II Project will be as set forth below. Unless
otherwise determined by the Board and subject to the requirements and provisions of the Indenture, such toll rates will
not be subject to an increase in January 2014 in accordance with the Authority’s toll rate policy described above.
Paypoint Location
Toll Direction
Payment Type*
Toll Rates
US 183 Direct Connectors
To/From North/South
ETC
PBM
$0.53
$0.71
On/Off Ramp east of Springdale Road
Eastbound/Westbound
ETC
PBM
$0.53
$0.71
On/Off Ramp east of Arterial A
Eastbound/Westbound
ETC
PBM
$0.53
$0.71
Gantry Plaza at Giles Lane
Eastbound/Westbound
ETC
PBM
$1.06
$1.41
On/Off Ramp west of Harris Ranch Parkway
Eastbound/Westbound
ETC
PBM
$0.53
$0.71
Gantry Plaza at Parmer Lane
Eastbound/Westbound
ETC
PBM
$0.53
$0.71
(1)
_______________
*
ETC – Electronic Toll Collection
PBM – Pay-by-Mail
(1)
The toll rates shown are the toll rates for passenger cars. The Authority’s current toll policy provides that toll rates for
multi-axle vehicles will be proportionately higher at all paypoint locations based on a toll rate structure under which multiaxle vehicles pay the two-axle, passenger car, toll rate multiplied by a factor equal to the number of axles on the multi-axle
vehicle minus one.
4
AUTHORITY’S INVESTMENT EARNINGS AND YEAR END BALANCES – AS OF JUNE 30, 2013
Investment Vehicle
Year End Balances 6/30/2012
TexStar
Fidelity MMA
Regions SIB Loan MMA
Money Market Fund-Payroll
Certificates of Deposit
U.S. Treasuries and Agencies(1)
Bayerische GIC
Total Year End Balances in Fund
Year End Balances 6/30/2013
TexStar
Fidelity MMA
Regions SIB Loan MMA
Money Market Fund-Payroll
Certificates of Deposit
U.S. Treasuries and Agencies(1)
Bayerische GIC
Total Year End Balances in Fund
(1)
(2)
Operating
$
$
$
$
214,439
214,439
1,597,745
1,597,745
Debt Service(2)
Debt Service
Reserve
$ 30,749,683
12,064,603
15,736,946
$ 58,551,233
8,297,319
233,438
6,133,357
$ 14,664,114
$
$
$
$
8,032,423
6,953,494
29,061,061
5,000,000
$ 49,046,979
$
5,561,566
8,481,477
3,906,771
$ 17,949,814
Funds
TxDOT
Grant
Renewal and
Replacement
$
$
660,350
1
660,350
661,175
1
661,176
$
$
$
$
Revenue
$
5,418,690
3,034,561
1,000,000
9,453,250
1
1,164,934
$ 1,164,935
$
3,181,497
230,836
3,042,089
3,000,000
9,454,423
$
$
$
Value represented as the market value of the investment.
Includes amount in the Subordinate Lien Debt Service Fund.
5
1
516,713
516,714
Additional
Projects
General
$
1,068,136
5,819,399
6,887,535
54
14,726,994
$ 14,727,048
$
$
$
$
1,167,517
1,167,517
799,853
799,853
Other
Obligations
$
10
Construction
4,164,007
15,855,131
155,289,194
$ 175,308,331
$
$
$
$
4,169,214
51,645,265
41,223,309
97,037,788
$
1
5,764,258
5,764,259
1
31,315,224
$ 31,315,226
10
Cost of Issuance
$
$
$
$
10
Cap I
$
10
BAB Subsidy
-
3,676,349
264,696
33,763,173
$ 37,704,217
$
-
$
$
11,347,309
11,303,451
$ 22,650,760
$
$
897,199
897,199
-
SYSTEM HISTORICAL CASH FLOW AND DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given to such terms in the
Master Trust Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2005, as amended (the “Master Trust Indenture”), between the Central
Texas Regional Mobility Authority (the “Authority”) and Regions Bank, as successor in trust to JPMorgan Chase
Bank, National Association, as trustee and paying agent.
The table on the following page has been compiled to show the following information for the Fiscal Years ended
June 30, 2013, 2012, and 2011:

Debt Service Coverage for Rate Covenant and Additional Bonds Test – calculated based on total
Revenues, Operating Expenses for the System and debt service requirements for the Authority’s Senior
Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (the “Series 2005 Senior Lien Bonds”) and Subordinate Lien Revenue
Bonds, Taxable Series 2005 (the “2005 TIFIA Bond”). No debt service net of capitalized interest was due
on any other Outstanding Obligations for the periods presented, other than the Authority’s Revenue
Notes, Taxable Series 2010 (Build America Bonds – Direct Subsidy) (the “Series 2010 Notes”) (which is
included in “Debt Service Payments and Other Obligations” for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 in
the table on the following page). The Series 2010 Notes constituted Other Obligations under the Indenture
and were refunded and redeemed in whole in June 2011. Pursuant to the Master Trust Indenture,
Operating Expenses (actual or projected, as applicable) for the System are deducted from Revenues
(actual or Projected Revenues, as applicable) in calculating the coverage levels for purposes of the
Authority’s rate covenant and the conditions for issuing additional Obligations. No amounts were
required to be deposited into the Senior Lien Debt Service Reserve Fund or into the Renewal and
Replacement Fund for such periods. On the date of issuance of the Series 2005 Senior Lien Bonds, the
Authority received grant funds from TxDOT in the approximate amount of $11,498,000 which were
deposited into the 2005 TxDOT Grant Fund established by the First Supplemental Indenture and
confirmed and reestablished in the Tenth Supplemental Indenture. Separate transfers of approximately $1
million of such grant funds were transferred to the Operating Fund for payment of Operating Expenses for
the System and Maintanance Expenses for the System during fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, however
the amounts shown for Operating Expenses for the System and Maintenance Expenses for the System for
such periods do not reflect such transfers from the 2005 TxDOT Grant Fund.

Debt Service Coverage for Revenues Available for Debt Service – calculated based on total Revenues,
Operating Expenses for the System, Maintenance Expenses for the System and debt service requirements for
the Series 2005 Senior Lien Bonds and 2005 TIFIA Bond. Pursuant to the Master Trust Indenture, Revenues
are transferred to the Operating Fund for purposes of paying Operating Expenses for the System and
Maintenance Expenses for the System before being available to pay debt service on Obligations.

Annual Excess – All Revenues remaining after all payments and transfers required by the terms of the Master
Trust Indenture are required to be deposited into the General Fund. Moneys in the General Fund may be used
for any lawful purpose, including to pay Operating Expenses and Maintenance Expenses for the System.

Source of Information and Basis of Accounting – amounts shown for “Toll Revenues” and “Other Revenues”
were obtained from the audited financial statements of the Authority. Amounts shown for “Interest Income
Available to Pay Debt Service” represent interest income of the Authority, as contained in the Authority’s
audited financial statements, less interest income attributable to the Construction Fund. Amounts shown for
“Operating Expenses” and “Maintenance Expenses” represent the allocation of total operating expenses of the
Authority, as contained in the Authority’s audited financial statements, to Operating Expenses and
Maintenance Expenses (as each such term is defined in the Master Trust Indenture) for the System, after first
deducting certain noncash expenses for depreciation and amortization and all non-System expenses of the
Authority, all as determined by the Authority. Total non-System expenses of the Authority paid from
Revenues for the Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were $__________, $1,989,745, and
$3,256,678 respectively. All amounts were accounted for on an accrual basis of accounting; provided,
6
however, amounts shown for “Operating Expenses” and “Maintenance Expenses” exclude certain noncash
expenses for depreciation and amortization.
SYSTEM HISTORICAL CASH FLOW AND DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE
Fiscal Year Ending, June 30
2013
2012
2011
$32,159,157
$23,603,505
$21,458,000
1,513,535
1,676,164
2,383
Toll Revenues
Other Revenues
Interest Income Available to pay Debt Service
Total Revenues
(2)
230,171
$33,902,863
190,933
$25,470,602
239,771
$21,700,154
Less: Operating Expenses (3)
Revenues Available for Rate Covenant and
Additional Bonds Tests
(7,615,028)
$26,287,835
(6,499,939)
$18,970,663
(5,848,981)
$15,851,173
Net Senior Lien Debt Service (4)
13,207,242
8,897,125
7,439,500
Net Subordinate Lien Debt Service (4)
Total Net Debt Service
7,067,096
20,274,338
5,459,784
14,356,909
7,439,500
1.99x
2.13x
2.13x
1.30x
1.32x
2.13x
(1,134,753)
$25,153,082
(967,138)
$18,003,525
(984,494)
$14,866,679
1.90x
2.02x
2.00x
1.24x
(20,274,338)
1.25x
(14,356,909)
2.00x
(7,439,500)
Debt Service Coverage Ratio for Rate
Covenant Additional Bonds Tests
Senior Lien Obligations
Senior and Subordinate Lien
Obligations
(5)
Less: Maintenance Expenses
Revenues Available for Debt Service
Debt Service Coverage Ratio for
Revenues Available for Debt Service
Senior Lien Obligations
Senior and Subordinate Lien
Obligations
Less: Total Net Debt Service
Less: Deposits to Renewal and Replacement Fund (6)
Less: Debt Service Payments on Other Obligations
Annual Excess
-
(7)
$4,878,744
$3,646,616
(1)
(1,243,667)
$6,183,512
(1)
Grant revenues of approximately $27.6 million is excluded from “Other Revenues” as such grant revenues are restricted
for purposes other than debt service obligations.
(2)
Represents interest income of the Authority, less interest income attributable to the Construction Fund.
(3)
Represents Operating Expenses (as defined in the Master Trust Indenture) for the System and includes an $11,000
annual servicing fee paid to USDOT in connection with the 2005 TIFIA Bond.
(4)
The amount shown is net of any federal subsidy payments received and used to pay debt service on Other Obligations.
(5)
Represents Maintenance Expenses (as defined in the Master Trust Indenture) for the System.
(6)
The Authority was not required to make any payments to the Renewal and Replacement Fund for such periods.
(7)
The amount shown is net of any federal subsidy payments received and used to pay debt service on Other Obligations.
7
SENIOR LIEN DEBT SERVICE TABLE
Fiscal
Year
Ended
6/30
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
Outstanding Debt Service (1)
Principal
Interest
$
1,100,000
$ 26,740,656
$
2,295,000
29,950,263
4,675,000
29,856,013
5,815,000
29,890,013
7,275,000
29,589,363
8,790,000
29,199,550
10,450,000
28,720,225
12,290,000
28,143,425
13,450,449
27,869,501
15,558,357
28,607,856
17,796,476
29,863,625
12,601,742
35,292,795
13,931,952
33,962,760
15,744,322
32,150,916
15,671,378
32,216,922
16,012,886
31,884,139
16,387,667
31,510,521
17,759,554
30,130,834
18,253,884
29,643,766
18,835,266
29,057,634
19,485,557
28,411,244
20,195,753
27,704,948
22,313,625
25,582,825
23,192,508
24,700,142
24,148,995
23,749,155
25,313,406
22,725,244
26,425,879
21,619,271
37,765,000
10,278,205
26,515,000
8,116,115
26,785,000
6,592,430
28,315,000
5,141,798
29,850,000
3,604,525
31,620,000
1,976,250
$ 586,619,655
(1)
$ 814,482,924
Total
27,840,656
32,245,263
34,531,013
35,705,013
36,864,363
37,989,550
39,170,225
40,433,425
41,319,950
44,166,213
47,660,100
47,894,538
47,894,713
47,895,238
47,888,300
47,897,025
47,898,188
47,890,388
47,897,650
47,892,900
47,896,800
47,900,700
47,896,450
47,892,650
47,898,150
48,038,650
48,045,150
48,043,205
34,631,115
33,377,430
33,456,798
33,454,525
33,596,250
$ 1,401,102,579
Outstanding Debt Service includes Senior Lien Bonds Series 2013B Put Bonds, Series 2013A, Series 2011 and Series 2010.
8
SUBORDINATE LIEN DEBT SERVICE TABLE
Fiscal
Year
Ended
6/30
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
Outstanding Debt Service (1)
Principal
Interest
$
250,000
$
7,963,250
$
1,180,000
9,898,700
500,000
9,851,500
500,000
9,826,500
1,000,000
9,801,500
2,235,000
9,751,500
2,350,000
9,639,750
2,470,000
9,522,250
2,595,000
9,398,750
3,425,000
9,269,000
4,755,000
9,085,500
5,305,000
8,814,500
5,650,000
8,509,000
6,015,000
8,182,750
6,275,000
7,834,750
6,655,000
7,472,000
7,035,000
7,086,750
7,525,000
6,679,000
7,915,000
6,241,500
8,335,000
5,782,750
8,885,000
5,301,250
9,390,000
4,788,750
9,860,000
4,249,250
10,495,000
3,684,500
11,040,000
3,084,500
11,715,000
2,455,500
12,325,000
1,789,250
14,055,000
1,090,750
4,225,000
211,250
$ 173,960,000
(1)
$ 197,266,200
Total
8,213,250
11,078,700
10,351,500
10,326,500
10,801,500
11,986,500
11,989,750
11,992,250
11,993,750
12,694,000
13,840,500
14,119,500
14,159,000
14,197,750
14,109,750
14,127,000
14,121,750
14,204,000
14,156,500
14,117,750
14,186,250
14,178,750
14,109,250
14,179,500
14,124,500
14,170,500
14,114,250
15,145,750
4,436,250
$ 371,226,200
Outstanding Debt Service includes Subordinate Lien Bonds Series 2013 and Series 2011.
9
MANOR EXPRESSWAY PROJECT - PHASES I & II
Quarterly
Progress Report
No. 16 | July 2013
Independent Engineering Report
Board of Directors
Ray A. Wilkerson, Chairman
James H. Mills, Vice-Chairman
Robert L. Bennett, Jr., Treasurer
David B. Armbrust
Nikelle S. Meade
David Singleton
Charles Heimsath
Executive Director
Mike Heiligenstein
General Engineering Consultant (GEC)
Phase I Construction Contractor
Phase II Design-Build Developer
MANOR EXPRESSWAY PROJECT - PHASES I & II
Quarterly Progress Report
No. 16
July 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 1
PHASE I ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................................ 4
PHASE II DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................. 4
PHASE II PROGRESS PHOTOS ........................................................................................................................ 5
PHASE II PROGRESS PHOTOS ........................................................................................................................ 6
PHASE II PROGRESS PHOTOS ........................................................................................................................ 7
PHASE II PROGRESS ....................................................................................................................................... 8
MANOR EXPRESSWAY PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY ............................................................................. 10
PHASE II CONSTRUCTION FINANCIAL STATUS ............................................................................................ 11
DBE STATUS................................................................................................................................................. 12
EMPLOYMENT REPORTING STATUS ............................................................................................................ 13
SUSTAINABILITY .......................................................................................................................................... 14
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................................................ 16
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Phase II Development Progress ..................................................................................................... 8
Table 2 - Schedule of Project Milestones...................................................................................................... 9
Table 3 - Project Financial Status Summary ................................................................................................ 10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Project Location Map .................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2 - Project Cash Flow Curve (Phase I & Phase II Total Project Costs) .............................................. 10
Figure 3 - Phase II DBE Design & Construction Commitment for Period Ending May 2013 ....................... 12
Figure 4 - Phase II Employment History ...................................................................................................... 13
INTRODUCTION
This report documents and describes Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project during the
period from March 26, 2013 to June 25, 2013. This Project is being developed and constructed
by the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (“Mobility Authority”). The Project is funded
by a combination of funds including, a State Infrastructure Bank loan, Series 2011 Senior Lien
Bonds, Series 2011 Subordinate Lien Bonds, TxDOT grant funds, and Mobility Authority funds.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Manor Expressway Project is an approximately 6.2-mile toll project located in Travis County
along the existing U.S. Highway (US) 290 corridor between US 183 and just east of State
Highway (SH) 130. This project will upgrade the existing US 290 four-lane divided highway to a
controlled access highway facility with three tolled mainlanes and three non-tolled frontage
lanes in each direction. The tolled mainlanes will provide grade-separated access through
several local intersections that currently experience significant congestion throughout the day,
and will provide a more expeditious route to traverse the US 290 corridor. Local traffic will
continue to access adjacent properties by use of non-tolled frontage roads and signalized
intersections at cross streets. The Manor Expressway Project also includes four direct
connectors at the US 183 interchange that allow for continuous movement from the US 183
interchange to the Manor Expressway Project.
The Manor Expressway Project is being implemented in three phases as shown on Figure 1 and
described below.
Manor Expressway Project - Phase I
Phase I of the Manor Expressway Project includes completion of four tolled direct connectors
and associated pavement at the US 183 interchange that provide direct access to and from the
Manor Expressway Project mainlanes. Toll gantries were installed to toll each of the direct
connectors. Frontage roads between the US 183 interchange and Cross Park Drive were also
constructed in this phase. Access to the westbound direct connectors from the westbound
frontage road has been achieved by construction of an entrance ramp located just west of
Tuscany Way. Construction of Phase I of the Manor Expressway Project has been completed,
and is currently open to tolled traffic.
Manor Expressway Project - Phase II
Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project includes completion of the Manor Expressway Project
from Phase I at the US 183 interchange to the eastern limits east of SH 130. Three tolled
mainlanes and three lane non-tolled frontage roads will be constructed in each direction as well
as all associated ramps, auxiliary lanes, toll gantries, and ramp gantries. Phase II of the Manor
Expressway Project includes an interim milestone that provides grade-separated intersections
at Tuscany Way and Springdale Road so that users of the direct connectors constructed as part
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 1 of 25
of Phase I can bypass the existing signals at those intersections. These two grade-separated
intersections provide for a minimum of two tolled lanes and two-lane non-tolled frontage roads
in each direction. The work associated with the interim milestone, the Interim Development
Work, has been completed.
Manor Expressway Project - Phase III
Phase III of the Manor Expressway Project includes construction of the seven remaining direct
connectors at the SH 130 interchange. The Mobility Authority has no current plans to design or
construct these direct connectors at this time. Phase III of the Manor Expressway Project will
be developed as traffic conditions warrant and funding sources are identified.
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 2 of 25
Figure 1 - Project Location Map
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 3 of 25
PHASE I ACTIVITIES
Construction of Phase I of the Manor Expressway Project has been completed. The Phase I
Contractor, Webber, LLC (“Webber”) achieved Final Acceptance on April 12, 2013. The facility
is currently open to tolled traffic.
PHASE II DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
Since the Quarterly Report in April, 2013, CTMC has made substantial progress on the frontage
road construction throughout Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project. CTMC has completed
construction of several sections of the westbound frontage road. During the reporting period,
CTMC has completed the initial grading and commenced construction of the pavement section
of the westbound frontage road between Harris Branch and SH 130. CTMC has completed the
eastern portion of the westbound frontage road between Giles Road and Harris Branch
Parkway. Construction of the westbound frontage road between Arterial “A” and Giles Road
continues; the western portion of this section of roadway has been completed. Additionally,
CTMC has completed the westbound frontage road between Chimney Hill Boulevard and
Arterial “A”, and traffic has been switched to this new section of frontage road. CTMC
continues to progress the westbound frontage road between Tuscany Way and Springdale
Road. Furthermore, CTMC completed the Blue Goose Road intersection, and switched traffic
to this new section of frontage road in June.
CTMC has also made substantial progress on the eastbound frontage road construction. During
the reporting period, CTMC completed a large portion of the eastbound frontage road between
Harris Branch Parkway and Giles Road; the portion of the eastbound frontage road nearest to
Giles Road remains incomplete due to utility conflicts. Additionally, CTMC has completed most
of the eastbound frontage road between the SH 130 interchange and the eastern terminus of
the Project. Portions of the eastbound frontage road bridge at Tributary #1C to Gilleland Creek
have yet to be completed, and an ATMOS gas metering station must be relocated prior to
completion of the eastbound frontage road in the aforementioned area.
Although the construction focus has been on the frontage road construction, CTMC has
advanced construction of select areas of the mainlanes. For instance, CTMC has commenced
the initial grading and embankment operations of the eastbound and westbound mainlanes
between Decker Lane and Parmer Lane. Furthermore, CMTC has completed the concrete
paving on the eastbound mainlanes between Walnut Creek and Arterial “A”.
Since the last Quarterly Report in April 2013, CTMC has continued to relocate utilities
throughout the project; the Austin Energy overhead electric line has been relocated out of the
Johnny Morris intersection, which has allowed traffic to be switched to the completed
eastbound frontage road through this intersection. All utilities in conflict with the Project
construction have been relocated.
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 4 of 25
PHASE II PROGRESS PHOTOS
Westbound Frontage Road Work
Since the Quarterly Report in April 2013, CTMC
has continued to focus on frontage road
construction. Completion of the frontage
roads will allow CTMC to shift traffic so the
mainlane construction can be completed.
CTMC has advanced construction on the
westbound frontage roads in multiple
locations throughout the Phase II Project.
Construction of the eastbound frontage road
east of Chimney Hill Blvd (Looking West)
Westbound frontage road construction near the
Arterial “A” intersection (Looking East)
Westbound frontage road construction at
Springdale Road (Looking Northeast)
Westbound frontage road construction
between Arterial “A” and Giles Road
Northwest)
Westbound frontage road construction
between Arterial “A” and Giles Road
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 5 of 25
PHASE II PROGRESS PHOTOS
Eastbound Frontage Road Work
Since the Quarterly Report in April 2013, CTMC
has continued to focus on frontage road
construction. Completion of the frontage
roads will allow CTMC to shift traffic so the
mainlane work can be completed. CTMC has
advanced construction on the eastbound
frontage roads from Johnny Morris Road to the
eastern terminus of the Phase II Project.
Construction of Eastbound frontage road
bridge at Tributary #1C (Looking East)
Prime coat placement west of Parmer Lane
(Looking East)
ATMOS metering station at eastbound frontage
road near Parmer Lane (Looking East)
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Eastbound frontage road construction east
of Parmer Lane (Looking East)
Construction of eastbound frontage road
bridge at Gilleland Creek (Looking East)
Page 6 of 25
PHASE II PROGRESS PHOTOS
Mainlane Work
CMTC has been primarily focused on frontage
road work over the past three months.
However,
CTMC
has
advanced
the
construction of the mainlanes in select locations
throughout the Phase II Project. CTMC will
continue mainlane construction in certain areas
until traffic is completely shifted to the frontage
roads. At that point, CTMC will construct the
remaining mainlane components that cannot
currently be constructed due to the location of
the current eastbound and westbound traffic.
Concrete pavement on the eastbound
mainlanes near Walnut Creek (Looking East)
Crews continue to install concrete pavement on
the eastbound mainlanes (Looking West)
Tied steel for concrete pavement on the
eastbound mainlanes (Looking West)
Subgrade for the westbound mainlanes east of
Arterial “A” (Looking West)
Tied steel for concrete pavement between
Arterial “A” and Giles Road (Looking East)
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 7 of 25
PHASE II PROGRESS
CTMC has submitted their progressed schedule for the period ending June 25, 2013. Based on
an assessment of CTMC’s activities and progress, a summary of the construction progress
achieved on work tasks through this period is provided in Table 1.
CTMC’s latest schedule indicates Substantial Completion of all remaining Development Work on
February 7, 2014, on schedule with the current contract requirement. The General Engineering
Consultant, Atkins, has performed an independent schedule analysis of the remaining
Development Work; this independent schedule analysis indicates that CTMC may complete the
Development Work as late as May 2014 if additional resources are not committed to the
project. However, Atkins does not currently anticipate that delays to the Substantial
Completion of Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project will impact commencement of toll
revenue collection. As of June 25, 2013, there were 227 days remaining until contractual
Substantial Completion for the Project; CTMC has used 76.2% of the days allotted in the
contract for the Development Work.
Table 1 - Phase II Development Progress
Development Tasks
Development Design
Utility Coordination
Earthwork
Utility Relocation
Pavement
Structures (Bridges and Retaining Walls)
Drainage
Lighting, Signing, Striping, and Signals
Toll Facility Infrastructure
Toll System Integration
Incidental Construction (Barriers, Sidewalks, Landscaping)
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
% Complete
100%
97%
78%
90%
39%
73%
57%
32%
45%
20%
24%
Page 8 of 25
The Manor Expressway Project (Phases I & II) milestones are provided in Table 2.
Table 2 - Schedule of Project Milestones
Task
Selection of Phase I Contractor
Phase I NTP Issued
Phase I Substantial Completion
Phase I Final Acceptance
Phase II Selection of Developer
Phase II NTP Issued
Phase II Interim Completion (Open to Traffic)
Phase II Substantial Completion (Phase II Open to Traffic)
Phase II Final Acceptance
Date (*Projected)
January 12, 2010
April 27, 2010
November 30, 2012
April 12, 2013
February 23, 2011
June 29, 2011
December 22, 2012
February 7, 2014**
June 7, 2014**
**Based on CTMC’s schedule submitted with Draw Request #25 for June 2013 efforts
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 9 of 25
MANOR EXPRESSWAY PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Table 3 shows the overall financial status for the Manor Expressway Project through May 2013.
The original budget established for the Project and the expenditures to date are provided. An
estimated cost remaining and an estimate at completion is also provided. The Manor
Expressway Project is currently projected to be under budget.
Table 3 - Project Financial Status Summary
Note: These costs include Traffic & Revenue analyses costs, Final Engineering costs, Utility Adjustment costs, Construction
costs, Toll & ITS costs, GEC costs, Legal costs, and contingencies.
Project Cash Flow Curve - Baseline
Figure 2 - Project Cash Flow Curve (Phase I & Phase II Total Project Costs)
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 10 of 25
PHASE II CONSTRUCTION FINANCIAL STATUS
The following summary provides the financial status of design-build CDA contract for the Phase
II Project.
Original CTMC Contract Amount:
Authorized Changes (Change Order and/or Amendments):
Allowable Dispute Resolution Board Expenses (1)
Change Order #1
Change Order #2
$
207,297,859.00
$
$
$
24,268.16
1,480,445.71
9010.88
Current Authorized Contract Amount:
$
208,811,583.75
Previous Total of CTMC Payments:
$
115,844,523.21
Amount of CTMC Draw Request #22 for March 2013 efforts
Amount of CTMC Draw Request #23 for April 2013 efforts
Amount of CTMC Draw Request #24 for May 2013 efforts
$
$
$
7,120,219.68
7,607,117.53
7,255,302.93
Total Amount Paid To-Date: (2)
Retainage withheld: (3)
Liquidated Damages assessed
Approved Amount for work completed (through Draw #24):
$
$
$
$
137,827,163.35
0.00
0.00
137,827,163.35
Amount remaining for work to be completed:
Total Percent of Budget Expended through May 2013:
$
70,984,420.40
66.01%
Footnotes:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The Dispute Resolution Board (“DRB”) was convened to introduce the board to the project;
the CDA allows CTMC to invoice half of the expenses associated with the DRB to the
Mobility Authority.
Draw Request #25 for CTMC’s June 2013 efforts is currently being reviewed by the General
Engineering Consultant.
Retainage to be withheld only after 95% of the adjusted contract price has been paid.
Summary of Phase II Change Orders This Reporting Period
Change Order #2 was approved during the reporting period. This change order covered CTMC’s
costs to perform archival research on a cistern that CTMC discovered within the right-of-way
during earthwork activities. This discovery qualifies as a Force Majeure Event as defined in the
Design/Build Comprehensive Development Agreement. The amount approved in Change Order
#2 was $9,010.88.
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 11 of 25
DBE STATUS
Phase II DBE Status
CTMC is required to meet the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”) goal of 12.2% for
Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project. The total DBE amount subcontracted to date is
$26,367,356.74 which is 12.72% of the authorized contract total. This represents executed DBE
subcontracts with the following firms: Aviles Engineering Corporation [geotechnical design], RJ
Rivera Associates, Inc. [sign and pavement marking design], SE3, LLC [retaining wall design], PE
Structural Consultants [bridge design], Lina T. Ramey & Associates [design surveying], United
States R.O.W. [right-of-way acquisition], Solar Ray [utility design], Hayden Consultants [TDLR
Review], Breda Company [furnish and tie reinforcing steel], N-Line Traffic Maintenance, L.P.
[traffic barricades], Office Authority [furnishes office supplies], Panther Creek Transportation,
Inc. [trucking], Roadway Specialties [cable barrier & small signs], Texas Trucking [trucking], S&R
Investments [furnish fuel], and ID Guerra [wet utilities].
As of June 25, 2013, Webber has submitted costs associated with DBE development work in the
amount of $24,311,234.94 which equals 11.7% to date of the original contract value. CTMC’s
utilization of DBE subcontractors to date indicates that CTMC is on track to reach the
contractual DBE goal of 12.2%
Figure 3 - Phase II DBE Design & Construction Commitment for Period Ending June 2013
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 12 of 25
EMPLOYMENT REPORTING STATUS
The Phase II Developer began providing employment data in January 2012. Construction of
Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project supported 512 jobs during the reporting month of
June 2013. This number of jobs supported by the construction includes: the construction
personnel and their subcontractors; design staff; design and construction management staff,
including inspectors and subconsultants; and the general engineering consultant staff and their
subconsultants. The total payroll figures are not being provided by the Phase II Developer. The
employment history from January 2012 through June 2013 for Phase II of the Manor
Expressway Project is provided in Figure 4.
Figure 4 - Phase II Employment History
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 13 of 25
SUSTAINABILITY
Phase II Sustainability Initiatives
In accordance with the terms of the Comprehensive Development Agreement (“CDA”), CTMC is
required to incorporate sustainable practices into the Project. The Mobility Authority, through
provisions in the CDA, has implemented a “Green Credits” program that requires CTMC to
attain a minimum number of credits for implementing sustainable practices into the Project;
CTMC is required to attain 30 credits for the Project. CTMC is required to submit a quarterly
report identifying the sustainable practices being implemented on the Project. CTMC
submitted their Sustainability Initiatives Report for the first quarter of 2013 in June. The
following sustainable initiatives were reported:
 Sustainability Plans:
CTMC has prepared and implemented a series of required sustainability plans on the
Project. These plans include a Noise Mitigation Plan, a Dust/Emission and Odor Control
Plan, a Waste Management Plan, a Site Recycling Plan, and a Water Quality
Maintenance/Enhancement Plan.
 Solar-Powered Traffic Control Devices/Flashing Beacons:
During the first quarter of 2013, CTMC continued using three solar-powered flashing
beacons and six solar-powered traffic control devices on the Project.
 Pavement Reuse:
During the first quarter of 2013, a total of 11,530 cubic yards of asphalt millings were
used as detour subgrade, and 31,105 cubic yards of unbound base was used as
foundation improvements and pipe backfill.
 Reuse of Topsoil:
During the first quarter of 2013, CTMC reused 2,772 cubic yards of topsoil.
 Recycled Fill/Embankment Materials:
During the first quarter of 2013, CTMC reused approximately 220,634 cubic yards of
material for fill or embankment. All of this material was from the Project site or from
overburden from a local sand reserve quarry.
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 14 of 25
 Wood Recycling:
During the first quarter of 2013, 68.1 tons of wood waste was generated for recycling.
 Steel Recycling:
During the first quarter of 2013, 5.8 tons of steel were recycled from the Project.
 Utilization of Reclaimed or Non-Treated Water:
During the first quarter of 2013, CTMC continued using non-treated water from
Gilleland Creek for dust suppression on the Manor Expressway Project.
 Separating Waste for Landfills Recyclable Waste:
Recyclable materials are separated at the IESI waste recycling and disposal facility.
 Equipment Emission Reduction:
18% of CTMC’s equipment fleet is Tier 4 equipment.
CTMC is on track to earn thirty three (33) green credits for the sustainable practices currently
being implemented on the Project.
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 15 of 25
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The Mobility Authority’s Public Involvement Team manages the Manor Expressway hotline
(512-684-3252) and the Project website (manorexpressway.com). Lane closures and
construction alerts are regularly posted on the Project website as well as posted on the Project
twitter account (@ManorExpressway). Additionally, stakeholders can sign up on the Project
website for lane closure information to be sent directly to their cell phone via SMS text.
With Phase II of the Manor Expressway Project in active construction, public involvement
continues to play a crucial role in the Manor Expressway Project. Following are the outreach
activities for this quarter:
 Hotline:
64 calls were received over the project’s hotline (512-684-3252) and 16 emails/website
contacts were made regarding the Manor Expressway Project. The calls and messages
included project information requests, the congestion and signal timing at the
Giles/Johnny Morris intersection, congestion and signal timing at the Harris Branch
intersection, temporary relocation and traffic delays. These issues were addressed by
the team via phone, email and in person. Complaints about the closing of the Chimney
Hill turnaround resulted in the contractor constructing a new temporary turnaround just
west of the Johnny Morris/Giles intersection.
 Twitter:
248 updates have been posted to the Manor Expressway’s Twitter account
(@ManorExpressway) and email this quarter to inform followers of closures and
detours.
 Website:
All project updates have continued to be posted on the website in an effort to help keep
the public informed on lane closures and construction activities.
 Emails:
43 construction alerts were sent out by email to 290 stakeholders via Constant Contact
email.
 Outreach/Visits:
Group Solutions coordinated a meeting with Mr. Pete Dwyer of Dwyer Realty about the
temporary closure of Blue Goose, and meeting with DeCoty Coffee regarding the
repaving of their delivery driveway. Group Solutions also conducted door-to-door
outreach about the Blue Goose closure and the closure of the Decker Lane crossover on
May 17. Two neighborhood appreciation events were held; one for the Chimney Hills
subdivision in April, and one for the Harris Branch subdivision in June. In addition,
regular communication continued with the Chimney Hills North neighborhood
association, the Chimney Hills Townhomes HOA, the Harris Branch neighborhood
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 16 of 25
association, Walnut Place HOA, and the Rosemont at Hidden Creek Apartment
community.
Manor Expressway Project
Quarterly Progress Report, No. 16
Page 17 of 25
Attachment A
Manor Expressway Phase II Project
Aerial Photographs
June 2013
US 290 East looking west from Gilleland Creek
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East looking west from Parmer Lane
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at SH 130 Interchange looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Decker Lane Intersection looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Harris Branch Intersection looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Crofford Lane Intersection looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Giles Road Intersection looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East near Old Manor Road looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East looking west at Mokan Crossing
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Chimney Hill Blvd looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Springdale Road looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
US 290 East at Tuscany Way looking west
(Taken 6/24/2013)
Attachment B
Manor Expressway Project
Contingency Tracking
June 2013