CARPC AGENDA COVER SHEET Executive Summary Re: November 12, 2009 Item 7 Consideration of Resolution CARPC No. 2009-13 amending the Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan and Dane County Water Quality Plan by revising the Central Urban Service Area boundary and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and Town of Verona Decision Items: 1. Consideration of Resolution CARPC No. 2009-13 Synopsis The proposed amendment will add 44.1 acres to the Central Urban Service Area south of Mid Town Road and west of Woods Road. Located on the southwestern edge of the City of Madison, 31.6 acres of the amendment area are in the City of Madison and 12.5 acres are in the Town of Verona. The amendment request proposes 22.5 acres of residential development with 135 housing units, accommodating approximately 357 persons including an estimated 61 schoolaged children. The development proposal also includes 15.4 acres of street right-of–way and 6.2 acres for stormwater management facilities, parks and open space. There are 2.9 acres of existing residential development and 3.6 acres of existing right-of-way. Background The proposed amendment provides the full range of urban services and is within the twentyyear service area land demand for the Central Urban Service Area. There are no significant natural resources in the amendment area that would require inclusion in environmental corridors. The City of Madison has proposed stormwater management performance standards that are more stringent than those in NR 151 and the Dane County Chapter 14 to help mitigate the adverse impacts of the proposed development. The amendment area is a small percentage (<1%) of the Lower Badger Mill Creek Watershed and an even smaller percentage of the Badger Mill Creek Watershed. However, the cumulative effects of increased peak flow rates and volumes of stormwater runoff warrant more stringent standards on a consistent, watershedwide basis. The peak flow rate control requirement in the City of Madison stormwater ordinance for this watershed covers a larger design storm (100-yr 24-hr) than required by NR 151 or Dane County Chapter 14. Increased peak flow rates from smaller storms can also result in erosive velocities and flashier stream flows. Therefore, CARPC staff recommends that the 1-yr 24-hr storm also be included in the range of design storms used for peak flow rate control. Some communities, such as the Cities of Middleton and Verona, have adopted more protective maximum predevelopment runoff curve numbers than those required by NR 151 or Dane County Chapter 14. The City of Madison should also consider adopting more protective maximum predevelopment runoff curve numbers, at least for sensitive watersheds. 1 The City of Madison proposes that developers in the amendment area be required to limit postdevelopment stormwater discharge volumes from the 1, 2, and 10-year storm events to no more than the pre-development volumes for these same events only if the development will discharge stormwater onto the adjacent farm field and not if the stormwater will discharge directly into Lower Badger Mill Creek via a stormsewer. It is difficult to reconcile the City’s inconsistency between acknowledging the need to mitigate stormwater volume impacts on an adjacent farm, but not on the water resource. Therefore staff recommends the performance standard of maintaining pre-development runoff volumes to protect the natural resources that are downstream of the proposed amendment areas. Rainfall series data provide more accurate modeling of actual rainfall intensity and antecedent moisture conditions than synthetic design storms, therefore CARPC staff recommend that the standard 1-year and 5-year annual rainfall series be used to demonstrate compliance with the volume control standard. If necessary, retrofit practices could be implemented in other areas of the subwatershed to meet a volume control and groundwater recharge standard on a subwatershed basis. It is important to note that the objective of protecting, improving, and restoring water quality and fisheries can only be realized through stringent standards that are applied to the entire watershed. One such protective standard is maintaining predevelopment runoff volumes for all storm events to maintain the hydrology of these streams. Staff has previously recommended that a standard of no increase in runoff volume be adopted for the Badger Mill Creek subwatershed and that a watershed level intergovernmental agreement be facilitated by the CARPC so that all new development in the watershed is required to uphold this standard. This may be the only practicable approach that would prevent further degradation of these sensitive cold fisheries. The Commission has referred this issue to its Environmental Resources Technical Advisory Committee for discussion and recommendation. Staff Recommendation If the Commission decides to take action on this amendment, staff recommends the following conditions based on the proposed land uses and services and on the City of Madison pursuing the following: Submit a detailed stormwater management plan for CARPC and DCL&WCD staff review and approval prior to any land disturbing activities in the amendment area. The stormwater management plan should include the following: a. Install stormwater practices prior to other land disturbing activities and protect these practices from compaction and sedimentation during land disturbing activities or restore them after land disturbing activities are completed b. Provide at least 80% sediment control for the amendment area in accordance with existing ordinances c. Control peak rates of runoff for the 1, 2, 10, and 100-year 24-hour design storms to “predevelopment” levels d. Control post development runoff volumes to be equal to or less than predevelopment runoff volumes for the one-year average annual rainfall period and five-year average rainfall period in addition to the 1, 2, and 10-year 24-hour design storms 2 e. Maintain WGNHS pre-development groundwater recharge rates (9 to 10 inches per year) with no caps on the extent of infiltration areas f. Provide deep tilling to restore all areas compacted during construction g. Control the thermal impacts of stormwater discharge to meet WDNR cold water standards in accordance with existing ordinances h. Stormwater practices should be publicly managed, or have a perpetual legal maintenance agreement finalized with the City Materials Presented with Item: 1. 2. Staff Analysis dated November 6, 2009 Draft Resolution CARPC No. 2009-13 Contact for Further Information: Kamran Mesbah, Deputy Director 266-9283 [email protected] 3 11/6/09 Staff Analysis of Proposed Amendment to the Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan and Water Quality Plan, Revising the Central Urban Service Area Boundary and Environmental Corridors in the Shady Wood Neighborhood in the City of Madison and Town of Verona 1. Applicant: City of Madison 2. Description of Proposal The proposed amendment will add 44.1 acres to the Central Urban Service Area south of Mid Town Road and west of Woods Road. Located on the southwestern edge of the City of Madison, 31.6 acres of the amendment area are in the City of Madison and 12.5 acres are in the Town of Verona. The amendment request proposes 22.5 acres of residential development with 135 housing units, accommodating approximately 357 persons including an estimated 61 school-aged children. The development proposal also includes 15.4 acres of street right-of–way and 6.2 acres for stormwater management facilities, parks and open space. There are 2.9 acres of existing residential development and 3.6 acres of existing right-of-way (see Table 1 and Maps 1, 2, and 3). Table 1: Central Urban Service Area, Shady Wood Neighborhood Requested by the City of Madison Proposed Land Use Density (units/acre) Proposal Housing Mix 1 6.9 Residential Total 6.9 CUSA 6.6 Total ( ac.) % of Total Housing Units 22.5 51% 135 135 No. of No. of Persons Students 357 357 61 Existing Develop. Environ. DevelopCorridor* able 2.9 22.5 51% Park, Open Space, Drainage 6.2 14% 61 0.0 Street R-O-W 15.4 35% 3.6 TOTAL 44.1 100% 6.5 19.6 2.9 19.6 4.9 1.3 11.8 4.9 32.7 31.6 acres in City of Madison (72%) & 12.5 acres (28%) in Town of Verona Source: City of Madison Planning Submittal and CARPC The plan for the amendment area calls for residential development classified in the Neighborhood Plan as Housing Mix 1. Housing Mix 1 is described as predominantly detached single-family housing on individual lots, but limited areas could be developed with duplexes, row houses, or townhomes. Individual developments are limited to less than 16 units per acre, and the average is less than 8 units per acre. The relatively higher density types of Housing Mix 1 housing are planned to be adjacent to the 1.2 acre neighborhood park proposed for the amendment area. The specific placement of stormwater facilities in the area will depend on how the development is carried out. If development of the three parcels is coordinated, stormwater detention may be able to be consolidated into one facility adjacent to the park. However, the applicant reports that only two of the three property owners in the area have expressed interest in near-term development. Additional open space is planned to buffer residential development from Mid Town Road and Woods Road, and to provide a pedestrian-bicycle 1 connection between development in the amendment area and an existing east-west street east of Woods Road. The 44.1 acre amendment area is Development Phasing Area A, one of three development phasing areas within the larger Shady Wood Neighborhood. The complete Shady Wood Neighborhood Planning Area, generally bounded by Mid Town Road on the north, Woods Road on the east, County Trunk Highway PD on the south and Shady Oak Lane on the west, is approximately 640 acres. The City of Madison Common Council has adopted the Development Phasing Area A portion of the Shady Wood Neighborhood Plan, but referred action on the balance of the Neighborhood Plan. The draft recommendations for the remaining phasing areas (B and C) call for large areas to be designated open space to protect and preserve unique natural features and provide for the Ice Age National Scenic Trail. Most of the balance of the Shady Wood neighborhood is recommended for residential use, including a number of existing single family residences. The Council referred this portion of the plan to allow additional time to consider the concerns expressed by some of the Area B and Area C property owners, primarily about the location and size of the recommended Ice Age Trail and Open Space Conservation Corridor and Area Park, located south and west of, but not adjacent to, the amendment area. The Council directed City staff to work with the property owners to try to address their concerns, and the Phasing Area B and C portions of the Neighborhood Plan are to be brought before the Council in midJanuary. (see Map 4) 3. Existing Environment Natural Resources. The proposed amendment area is located entirely within the Lower Badger Mill Creek sub-watershed of the Badger Mill Creek watershed. Lower Badger Mill Creek is an intermittent stream that drains west side neighborhoods in the cities of Madison and Verona, as well as areas within the towns of Middleton and Verona (see Map 5). Lower Badger Mill Creek The Lower Badger Mill Creek watershed is approximately 7,167 acres. The amendment area is less than 1 percent of the watershed. The stream channel is approximately 6 miles long, from its mouth at Badger Mill Creek, south of the City of Verona, upstream to Valley View Road. Lower Badger Mill Creek is classified as an intermittent stream, meaning it flows only after rainfall or snowmelt, and as a result it is dry most of the year. Therefore, water quality and biotic index data are not collected for Lower Badger Mill Creek because of these flow conditions. The Lower Badger Mill Creek subwatershed is designated as a thermally sensitive area since it is a tributary to Badger Mill Creek, which supports brown trout populations. Badger Mill Creek is designated as a Class II trout stream by the WDNR for fish management purposes, in accordance with NR 1.02(7). Badger Mill Creek is also classified as a Variance Stream for Uses and Designated Standards [NR 104.05(2)], which allows the WDNR to relax certain water quality standards for this stream to allow discharge of treated municipal wastewater. These stream use standards are state water quality standards established to guide water quality planning under NR 121. 2 Central USA ve Driv e P O an D ri ops ed M R Turnwood Circle Addition Area P O M Hawks Landing Golf Course e Hidden Hill Drive Shady Point Drive Town of Middleton Tree t D ri v Ki Re d T Mid Town Road le a il Shadow Wood Drive n gsw oo d C ir c D g re e rs Way Silverstone Lane City of MadisonS Central USA Map 1 Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona s t o ne Lane Ashworth Drive Woods Road Town of Verona ilver Service Area to be added (44.1 acres) Proposed Environmental Corridor (4.9 acres) Existing Environmental Corridor Incorporated Area Existing Urban Service Area Boundary Proposed Urban Service Area Boundary . 28 October 2009 0 600 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. ive Dr Hidden Hill Drive Turnwood Circle K in Mid Town Road v ir c le g s w oo d C Red Ta il D Shadow Wood Drive ri e Shady Poin t Drive an Red D g e rs Way re Silverstone Lane Woods Road Ashworth Drive Map 2 (Aerial 2008) Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona Existing Service Area Boundary Proposed Service Area Boundary Environmental Corridor to be Added Incorporated Area 0 . 5 Nov. 2009 600 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. ive Dr Hidden Hill Drive Shady Poin t Drive an Red Turnwood Circle ri e K in ir c le g s w oo d C Red Ta il D Shadow Wood Drive v Mid Town Road D g e rs Way re Silverstone Lane Ashworth Drive af tP la n Fu tu re D ev el op m en tP ha si ng Ar ea Woods Road Dr Map 3 Planned Land Use Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona Proposed Amendment Area Extractive Single Family Incorporated Area Industrial Transportation Agriculture Institutional or Governmental Two Family Cemetery Multi-Family Water Commercial Forest Open Land Woodland Commercial Sales or Services Outdoor Recreation Communications or Utilities Right of Way 0 . 6 Nov. 2009 600 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. CTH PD Meadow Rd. Shad y Oak Hill Ct. Rolling Meadow Rd. Nor-Del Hill Rd. Mid-Town Rd. Oak Ln . Shadow Wood Dr. Woods Rd. Nine Mound Rd. Hidden Hill Dr. Shady Point Dr. Country View Rd. Mound View Rd. F A DR T Woodland 500 1,000 Feet City of Madison Planning Division 0 View Opportunity from Terminal Moraine Richardson's Cave Lower Badger Mill Creek Conceptual Stormwater Detention Location Undrained Kettle or Depression Existing Dwelling Unit Conceptual Trail Access Connection Conceptual Ice Age Trail Existing Ice Age Trail Street Right-of-Way Future Planning Area Stormwater Management and Other Minor Open Space Potential Conservation Development Open Space Conservation Area Park Existing Housing Mix 1 Higher Densities within Housing Mix 1 Housing Mix 1 Recommended Land Use Planning Area Shady Wood Neighborhood Development Plan March 2009 Map 4: Land Use and Street Plan Lake Mendota Village of Shorewood Hills Town of Middleton City of Madison Town of Madison Town of Springdale City of Fitchburg City of Verona Town of Verona Map 5 Badger Mill Creek Subwatersheds Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona Existing Urban Service Area 4 Nov. 2009 SubWatershed Name Service Area to be Added Badger Mill Creek Natural Area (Floodplain or Wetland) Lower Badger Mill Creek Morse Pond 0 5,000 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. Threatened and Endangered Resources The WDNR Bureau of Endangered Resources maintains a map representing the known occurrences of rare species and natural communities that have been recorded in the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory (NHI). The map does not indicate the known presence of rare aquatic or terrestrial species within the section in which the amendment area is located. The City of Madison hired a certified arborist to conduct a tree survey of the woods within the amendment area. The arborist identified the tree species present as Bell’s Honeysuckle, Box Elder, and Buckthorn. All three of these species are classified as invasive by the WDNR. Soils and Geology The amendment area is located in the West Johnstown - Milton Moraines. The Land Type Associations of Wisconsin classifies the surficial geology of this area as a rolling hummocky moraine and outwash plain complex with scattered bedrock knolls. Surface elevations in the amendment area range from around 1056 feet to 1120 feet (see Map 6). The larger Shady Wood Neighborhood planning area contains some unique karst features. Karst topography is shaped by the dissolution of layer(s) of soluble bedrock, usually carbonate rock such as limestone or dolomite. Karst regions display distinctive surface features including sinkholes and caves. Approximately ¼ mile south of Mid Town Road, on the west side of Lower Badger Mill Creek, is a large karst feature know as Richardson’s Cave. Karst features often provide a direct conduit to groundwater, therefore the potential for the contamination of groundwater from polluted stormwater runoff is a concern in these areas. NR 151 and Dane County Chapter 14 prohibit the infiltration of stormwater in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or within 100 feet downgradient of karst features. The western edge of the amendment area is over 2,400 feet from Richardson’s Cave, well outside of the area where infiltration is prohibited. Due to subterranean drainage, there is often limited surface water and an absence of well-defined stream channels in areas with karst topography. This occurs in sections of Lower Badger Mill Creek. According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey of Dane County, the majority of soils in the amendment area are in the Dodge-St. Charles-McHenry association. These soils are well drained and moderately well drained, deep silt loams that are underlain by sandy loam glacial till. Table 2 shows detailed classification for soils in the amendment area. Table 3 shows important soil characteristics for the amendment area (also see Maps 7 and 8). No areas of hydric soils are located within the amendment area. The Troxel silt loam soils have hydric inclusions. These soils as well as the St. Charles silt loam soils can have a seasonal (April to June) zone of water saturation within 4.5 to 5 feet of the ground surface. These soils can have limited suitability for buildings with basements due to this seasonal high water table. Some of the areas with seasonally saturated soils have been placed within the proposed environmental corridors and some are planned for residential development. Depth to groundwater is over 25 feet in the rest of the amendment area. According to Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey mapping, the bedrock in the southwestern two-thirds of the amendment area is the Prairie du Chien Group, which is 8 dolomite with some sandstone and shale. The bedrock in the northeastern third of the amendment area is the Sinnipee Group, which is dolomite with some limestone and shale. Depth to bedrock is 10 to 50 feet in the amendment area. Map 9 shows areas with seasonal high water table within 5 feet of the land surface, based on NRCS soil survey data. NR 151 and Dane County Ordinance Chapter 14 limit infiltration to roof runoff only in areas with these conditions. Table 2 Soils Classification Soil % of Area General Characteristics Dodge Silt Loam; DnB, DnC2 29.5 Deep, well drained, gently sloping and sloping soils on glaciated uplands. Soils have high fertility, moderate permeability, and a moderate to severe hazard of erosion. Poses slight limitations for development due to low bearing capacity. St. Charles Silt Loam; ScB 26.6 Deep, well drained and moderately well drained, nearly level to moderately steep soils on glaciated uplands. Soils have high fertility, moderate permeability, and a moderate hazard of erosion. Poses moderate limitations for development due to low bearing capacity. Kidder Silt Loam; KdC2 25.3 Deep, well drained, gently sloping to very steep soils on glaciated uplands. Soils have medium fertility, moderate permeability, and a severe hazard of erosion. Poses moderate limitations for development due to slopes. Troxel Silt Loam; TrB 10.4 Deep, well drained and moderately well drained, gently sloping soils in draws, on fans, and in drainageways. Soils have high fertility, moderate permeability, a moderate hazard of erosion, but are subject to flooding. Poses severe limitations for development due to low bearing capacity and frequent flooding. McHenry Silt Loam; MdD2 8.2 Deep, well drained, gently sloping to moderately steep soils on glacial uplands. Soils have medium fertility, moderate permeability, and a very severe hazard of erosion. Poses severe limitations for development due to steep slopes. Source: Dane County Soil Survey 9 Table 3 Soils Characteristics Soil Map Symbols (see Map 7) Characteristic % of Area Prime Agricultural Soils DnB, ScB, TrB Hydric Soils (Indicates Potential / Restorable Wetlands) None Soils with Seasonal High Water Table ScB, TrB Soils Associated with Steep Slopes MdD2 8.2 Soils Associated with Shallow Bedrock None 0 Limitations for Buildings with Basements MdD2, ScB, TrB 45.2 Best Potential for Infiltration (0.5” / hr) KdC2 25.3 Source: Dane County Soil Survey 10 47.3 0 37.0 ive Dr 110 0 Hidden Hill Drive 0 110 Turnwood Circle K in Mid Town Road v ir c le g s w oo d C Red Ta il D Shadow Wood Drive ri e Shady Poin t Drive an Red D g e rs Way re Silverstone Lane Ashworth Drive 1100 1100 0 0 11 Woods Road 0 11 1100 Map 6 Elevation Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona 100 Foot Interval Proposed Service Area Boundary 20 Foot Interval Existing Service Area Boundary 4 Foot Inverval Incorporated Area 0 0 . 5 Nov. 2009 600 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. Driv e ed ops an D ri ve Tree t Hidden Hill Drive Turnwood Circle r iv e Shady Point Drive R il D Ki le R ed Ta Shadow Wood Drive n g s w o o d Ci r c Mid Town Road ScB DnC2 ScB DnB D g re e rs Way Silverstone Lane KdC2 ScB Ashworth Drive TrB ScB ScB DnC2 MdD2 ScB MdD2 Woods Road KdC2 Map 7 Soil Type Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona Existing Urban Service Area River/Stream City of Madison Boundary Lakes or Open Water 0 . 5 Nov. 2009 600 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. ive Dr Hidden Hill Drive Turnwood Circle K in Mid Town Road v ir c le g s w oo d C Red Ta il D Shadow Wood Drive ri e Shady Poin t Drive an Red D g e rs Way re Silverstone Lane Woods Road Ashworth Drive Map 8 Soil Limitations Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona Existing Service Area Boundary Proposed Service Area Boundary 0 . 5 Nov. 2009 600 Incorporated Area Prime Farmland (20.7 acres) Severe Limitations to Development (3.6 acres) Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. Map 9 Shallow Bedrock / Seasonal High Water Table Areas to 1 2 to 1 2 to 2 3 to 3 4 to 5 0 5 4. 5 2 2. 5 3. 5 3. 75 Min. Depth to Water Table (ft) Depth to Bedrock (ft) 0 Amendment to the Central Urban Service Area and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and the Town of Verona 4 Nov. 2009 0 600 Feet Prepared by staff of the CARPC. Groundwater Recharge In 2009, the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey published a report estimating the existing groundwater recharge rates in Dane County based on the soil water balance method. The study estimates the existing groundwater recharge rate in the amendment area to be 9 to 10 inches per year. Archaeology The amendment application includes a letter from the Wisconsin State Historical Society reporting that the amendment area was included in an earlier survey for cultural material and no archaeological sites were identified. (See attached letter) Land Use. The proposed amendment area is primarily in agricultural use or vacant. There are two farm residences and outbuildings on the properties. Land uses adjacent to the proposed amendment are as follows: North: South: East: West: Residential (City of Madison) Rural residential, woodland (Town of Verona) Residential, University Ridge Golf Course (City of Madison) Agriculture (Town of Madison) Existing Transportation System. The major roadways serving the proposed amendment area are Mid-Town, County Trunk Highway (CTH) PD, and CTH M. Mid-Town Road is a two-lane, east-west minor arterial. CTH PD is a two-lane, east-west principal arterial. CTH M is a two-lane, north-south principal arterial. Woods Road, which borders the amendment area to the east, is a local road, but is planned as a future collector. There is currently no bus service to the amendment area. Private taxicab service is available from three different operators. The Madison Area Transportation Planning Board’s Rideshare Etc. Program provides ride-matching services for individuals interested in car- or vanpooling. Dane County contracts with a private provider for limited group ride service for the elderly and persons with disabilities to nutrition sites, senior center activities, adult day care, and shopping. The Retired Senior Volunteer Driver Escort Program (RSVP) uses volunteer drivers to provide individual rides for the elderly, primarily to medical appointments. Mid-Town Road has paved shoulders to accommodate bicyclists and is suitable for bicycling. CTH PD and CTH M have paved shoulders, but are still rated as least suitable for bicycling due to traffic volumes and speeds. Mid-Town has a sidewalk on the developed north side of the roadway and portions of the south side east of Woods Road. CTH PD, CTH M, and Woods Road do not have sidewalks. 4. Consistency or Conflict With Adopted Plans and Policies The proposed amendment is consistent with the future land use shown in the City of Madison Comprehensive Plan, and with the plan for Development Phasing Area A, one of three development phasing areas of the draft Shady Wood Neighborhood Development Plan. The Development Phasing Area A portion of the plan, covering the northeast corner of the 15 neighborhood, was adopted by the City of Madison Common Council on July 21, 2009. While adopting the recommendations for Phasing Area A, the Council referred action on the balance of the Neighborhood Plan to allow more time to consider the concerns expressed by some of the Area B and Area C property owners, primarily about the location and size of the recommended Ice Age Trail and Open Space Conservation Corridor and Area Park. The areas of concern are located south and west of, but not adjacent to, the amendment area. The Council directed City staff to work with the property owners to try to address their concerns, and the Phasing Area B and C portions of the Neighborhood Plan are to be brought before the Council in mid-January. The City has included the draft recommendations for Phasing Areas B and C with the USAA application for Area A to provide context for review of the amendment application. The amendment is also consistent with the City of Madison and City of Verona Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement, adopted in 1996, under which an ultimate boundary between the two municipalities was established at County Trunk Highway PD, the southern boundary of the Shady Wood Neighborhood planning area. The proposed amendment has no conflict with the Dane County Park and Open Space Plan. The Park and Open Space Plan identifies the Ice Age Trail Corridor, and a proposed off-road bicycle-pedestrian trail through the corridor, crossing through the Shady Wood Neighborhood, southwest of the amendment area. The Shady Wood amendment proposal supports one CARPC goal and some CARPC neighborhood development objectives, and conflicts with one CARPC goal. The proposed residential density of 6.9 units per acre exceeds the existing CUSA residential density of 6.6 units per acre, supporting the goal of promoting compact urban development. The City of Madison proposes residential Housing Mix 1 for this amendment area and throughout the Shady Wood Neighborhood. This housing mix falls in a low density category for the City of Madison. The City provides the following reasons for planning only lower density residential development for the Shady Wood Neighborhood: x The City does not recommend mixed –use development because it considers the market potential for neighborhood-scale commercial to be limited at this edge location generally characterized by relatively low densities. There are limited areas of mixed-use development nearby, and the amendment is close to existing and planned employment, service and retail locations in the surrounding area. x The City does not recommend higher-density housing types partly due to the absence of supporting activity centers in the neighborhood, and the lack of transit service in the foreseeable future. x The City proposes lower density housing types to be more compatible with the existing rural/suburban residential development in the area, and with the recommended Ice Age Trail Open Space Conservation Corridor in the neighborhood. The amendment proposal supports CARPC objectives regarding neighborhood development by being part of, and consistent with, a detailed neighborhood development plan that recommends a walkable and bikeable neighborhood with an east-west pedestrian and bicycle route and sidewalks within the amendment area. 16 The proposed amendment conflicts with the CARPC goal to protect agricultural lands because approximately 47 percent (20.7 acres) of the amendment area is composed of prime agricultural soils. The recommendations included in the draft plan for the larger Shady Wood neighborhood support the CARPC goals of protecting environmental resources and promoting a countywide system of open space corridors by identifying over 160 acres for the Ice Age Trail and Open Space Conservation Corridor southwest of the amendment area. The proposed amendment is adjacent to the existing urban service area to the east and north, with access to urban services from these adjacent areas. Need The addition of 32.7 developable acres proposed in the current amendment is well within the CARPC forecast of 2030 land demand for the CUSA. The January 2009 land demand calculations for the CUSA forecasted a need for 2,624 additional developable acres by 2030. Since that time, the CARPC has approved two additions to the CUSA: 312.4 developable acres for the Pumpkin Hollow Neighborhood in the City of Madison, and 40 developable acres for a school site in the Blackhawk area of the City of Madison. With both CUSA amendments taken into account, the remaining 2030 land demand for the CUSA is 2,271.6 developable acres. The Commission will need to adopt 2035 population forecasts early in 2010 in order to maintain a minimum 20-year planning horizon required by NR 121. Extending the land demand forecast to 2035 increases the unsatisfied land demand forecast for the CUSA to 4,628.6 developable acres. Redevelopment and Infill The City has provided documentation of support for infill and redevelopment activities, particularly in the Downtown and Isthmus areas, increasing residential density. See Map 10 (Downtown Development) and Map 11 (New Dwelling Units) 17 Map 10 TWIN VALLEY RD 109.02 4 879 VALLEY VIEW RD 109.01 696 1323 BLACKHAWK RD Zero Units Added Greater than 500 100 - 500 Map 11 PIONEER RD 20 - 99 MCK EE RD MIDTOWN RD 4.03 MIN ER AL 108 609 1029 1975 883 N U 5.04 C M MC K P OIN T E 107.02 PD 525 627 5.03 C.T.H. PUTNAM 1808 30 RAYMOND RD 4.04 NE 1026 16 LI 1291 37 1 6 4.02 R 10 M O N D C ST R 1145 1 M O E C.T.H. M POST RD LACY RD 23.01 TROY DR ST JO H NS N O ST D OO EE U. S. E W B 1388 8 I N G R A CR 1363 2 13 W YW HA FIT LT L IN PO NIN E DR IN SH AV 3063 442 TO G N 21 2570 31 2237 50 22 24.02 E CREEK 1510 22 15.01 /T /H C 25 PACKERS AVE Lake Monona A W SP R IN GS E 112 RT 3060 65 102 19 15.02 E H WY 17.01 3333 943 18 TH TRA ILS WAY NO R 1526 8 HAVEY RD 1283 179 WH EEL ER RD N SHERMAN 879 4 1236 20 24.01 16.02PR 2385 O 359 UD UNIV 16.01 112 3355 473 346 100 23.02 14.01 2712 38 REGENT ST 1483 191 11 Lake Wingra 12 O NR SOO LIN E RR Lake Mendota 3298 245 WA L N U T & RW R E 894 4 RO D EE SP R 32 AY W 9 32 1245 0 14.02 ODANA RD 1472 3 MCKEE RD 1043 105 7 R 4.01 1426 47 P OIN T 8 101 LIMITS CITY 1848 7 UNIVERSITY AVE MIN ER AL 2946 162 CITY 1089 0 1910 5 3 RR MONTICELLO 5.01 HAMMERSLEY 3326 343 2.02 2.01 1491 9 OLD SAUK RD LIN 86 0 RR VE 110 A RD Y O R SO T 2037 148 MADISON MIDDLETON 2595 0 2790 1711 2.04 CE UNI VERSIT Y AV E OLD SAUK RD 2.05 GREENWAY U.S.H. 12 Less than 20 GAMMON RD BALZER RD CENSUS TRACT # ITALICIZED ALLEN BLVD Additional Dwelling Units Permitted NEW DWELLING UNITS 2000-2007 BOTTOM# MIDVALE BLVD HARPER RD TOTAL # OF DWELLING UNITS IN 2000 CENSUS WHITNEY WAY LAKE TOP# M C.T .H. DIVISION ST 2000 CENSUS TRACTS E LINE SEC 36 IG FRANKLIN W LINE 20 CV 1074 38 YAH A R A 15.02 26.02 US HIGHWAY 51 844 2 E NE LI BRO AD WAY 1004 0 PORTAGE RD 105 VOGES RD 41 687 U.S .H. 12 & 18 833 2911 FEMRITE DR SIG GEL KO W RD 114 BUCKEYE RD COMMERCIAL 114 NELSON RD 114 114 BRANDT RD THORSON RD City of Madison Department of Planning & Community & Economic Development, Planning Division, March 2008 Based on Building Permits Issued 31 E RD 30 2560 46 RD 2007 1 GR OVE 30.01 S TAT LIEN RD BURKE RD 114 HOEPKER RD MILWAUKEE ST 1576 586 E AV 1328 115 RR 30.02 ALL IS 1037 10 COT TAG E N TO G IN SH 26.03 O SO A W 2505 115 Lake Waubesa 29 DEAN 28 27 1605 18 COMMERCIAL NICHOLS RD LIB BY R D 2675 39 26.01 996 26 MESSERSCHM ID T 879 4 HAN SO N RD 112 RD CITY OF MADISON NEW DWELLING UNITS: 2000 - 2007 N NA KE MAPLE GROVE Y LIMITS D R A N O R NA . VE EN HW GLENWAY BREESE D LE O O H IN O EW ER RIV SEM AT C O G ED HH SO E AV PARK W D IS ST FIS I 90 YR IR HE R A K AV E AN RM SH E N SHERMAN AVE FORDEM AVE & BL W IN C RR L DR NW TA RD TR RT C& DO HTO N AH O RR EN OUG QU N N STOUGHTON HP NW M S ST NE -39 -94 MONONA DR 4-39 I 90 -9 MARSH RD T OR REINER RD -94 SPRECHER AVE 90 -39 I 90 I 90 S STOUGHTON RD 14 5. Proposed Urban Services Public Water System. The City of Madison proposes to provide public water service to the amendment area by the Madison Water Utility through the extension of water mains within Pressure Zone 8 with water from Wells 26, 16 and 28. Pressure Zone 8 is pressurized by a ground storage reservoir. Currently, water mains are located along Mid-Town Road and Woods Road. As development occurs, larger water mains will be extended along the primary roads, with smaller water distribution mains constructed along local streets developed within the amendment area. The City determined that the mains within Pressure Zone 8 have the ability to provide adequate water pressure to elevations between about 970 and 1,090 feet U.S.G.S. The City estimates water usage for the estimated 135 housing units within the amendment area is estimated to be 21,600 gallons per day (assuming 160 gallons per unit per day). The current capacity of the Water Utility’s system is 68 million gallons per day, with an average demand of 32 million gallons per day. Water services are capable of providing 2,000 gallons per minute for 2.5 hours for fire fighting purposes. The average water use per residential customer in the City Madison between 2004 and 2008 varied from 161 to 184 gpd per household based on the utility’s annual reports to the Wisconsin Public Service Commission. Thus, the projected water use for the development may be slightly underestimated. However, the current capacity of the City’s public water system is more than twice the average demand so the difference in the water use projections for the proposed development is not significant. Continued development on the far west side of Madison will increase the demand for water, and eventually new municipal wells will be required to ensure a reliable supply. The Madison Water Utility Master Plan includes a conceptual location for a future Well 32 near South Point Road between Mineral Point Road and Valley View Road. If constructed, this well would potentially serve the planning area. The Master Plan also identifies a conceptual location for a future Well 37 in the vicinity of the amendment area, which would likely be developed after Well 32. This future well location is also only conceptual, as the siting of a new well requires a considerable amount of detailed analysis and review. Wastewater. Near-Term Sanitary Sewer Service The City of Madison proposes to extend existing and planned nearby sanitary sewer infrastructure to serve development in the amendment area. Currently a lift station is located just north of the amendment area at the intersection of Hidden Hill Drive and Shady Point Drive. Effluent from the lift station is pumped eastward along Mid-Town Road where it eventually reaches gravity-flow interceptors. A larger, regional lift station will be constructed adjacent to Mid-Town Road near the Lower Badger Mill Creek corridor in 2009 with operation anticipated in 2010. The City of Madison anticipates that development in the amendment area will generate an average of 20,925 gallons of wastewater per day (assuming 135 dwelling units at 155 gallons per day). A peaking factor of 4 was used in sizing the lift station, so it is assumed that the amendment area will generate a peak flow of 83,700 gallons per day or 57.85 gallons per minute. After accounting for current flows and anticipated flows from the amendment area, the new lift station will have 356 gallons per minute of residual capacity. 20 The wastewater generation estimates are reasonable based on the historical rates for this pumping station service area (146 gpd per household in 2000). The City has identified two ways that the sanitary sewer effluent from the amendment area could be conveyed to the lift station adjacent to Mid-Town Road. One option is to construct a lift station and force main from the lower elevations of the amendment area to pump the effluent north to Mid-Town Road. The effluent could then be conveyed by gravity through existing sewers or a gravity sanitary sewer could be constructed along Mid- Town Road to connect to the gravity sewer draining to the planned regional lift station. An option utilizing gravity sanitary sewer service would be possible by constructing a sanitary sewer main across the adjacent farm property west of the amendment area between the lower elevations of the amendment area and the planned lift station adjacent to Mid-Town Road. A sewer main through the adjacent farm property could be located beneath the surface of the agricultural fields to permit continued cultivation. To the extent possible, the sewer would follow the alignment of planned future streets. To use this option, developers in the amendment area would need to obtain an easement from the adjacent property owners to accommodate the sanitary sewer main. Long-Term Sanitary Sewer Service The Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District’s planned Lower Badger Mill Creek Interceptor will eventually serve the amendment area. This Interceptor will be extended northward from the City of Verona along the Lower Badger Mill Creek corridor, and continue up the corridor within the Shady Wood planning area. Local sewers will connect to the Lower Badger Mill Creek Interceptor to serve new development areas. The timing of construction of the Lower Badger Mill Creek Interceptor is dependent on the available capacity of the planned lift station adjacent to Mid-Town Road. When the lift station nears its capacity, the Lower Badger Mill Creek Interceptor will be constructed to relieve the lift station and provide gravity sanitary sewer service for the Lower Badger Mill Creek watershed. The pace of development in the area served by the lift station will determine when the Interceptor is needed. Current estimates indicate that this may be around 2020. MMSD The Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) will provide wastewater treatment for the amendment area. The MMSD Pumping Station 12 currently serves this area. The MMSD Pumping Station 17 will serve this area when the Lower Badger Mill Creek Interceptor is completed. The MMSD is planning capacity improvements for its collection system. The Nine Springs Treatment Facility has a design capacity of 50 million gallons per day (mgd) and received an average of 47.2 mgd in 2008, including infiltration. It is expected to reach capacity by 2020 depending on growth rate assumptions. The MMSD has completed a long-range plan that evaluated various options for expanded treatment capacity to serve its current and future service area. For the 20-year planning period, service to this area is expected to remain through current interceptor routes with expanded capacity of the system as the need is foreseen. Stormwater Management System. The City of Madison is proposing one primary and two secondary stormwater detention facilities in the amendment area. The primary facility is planned at the lowest elevations at the western edge of the amendment area. If the development of two or all three parcels within the amendment area is coordinated, the City may shift the locations of the secondary facilities and eliminate one or both of them. The facilities will be designed to maximize infiltration to the extent possible. Infiltration will 21 occur within larger areas dedicated to the public. Smaller infiltration facilities may also be located on private properties. It is the City of Madison’s intention that development within the amendment area have minimal impact on the Dreger property located between the amendment area and Lower Badger Mill Creek. The Dreger’s farming operations are expected to continue for many years. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts from future development in the amendment area on the Dreger property, City Engineering is recommending that developers in the amendment area be required to limit post-development stormwater discharge volumes from the 1, 2, and 10-year storm events to no more than the pre-development volumes for these same events. They also recommended that for the 100-year storm event, developers be required to detain (match peak flow rates) the post-development peak to the predevelopment peak. This recommendation is similar to the requirements placed on the Pine Hill Farm development that is located along Valley View Road within the Lower Badger Mill Creek watershed. As an alternative, the City of Madison has proposed to allow developers in the amendment area to pursue conveyance of stormwater discharge via a stormwater pipe across the Dreger property if an easement can be obtained. A pipe could be located sufficiently beneath the ground surface to permit continued cultivation of the agricultural fields. The pipe could follow a similar route as the potential gravity sanitary sewer main and coincide with the alignment of planned future streets. In order to implement this option, developers in the amendment area would need to obtain an easement from the Dregers to accommodate the pipe. If a pipe was established, impacts on the Dreger’s farming operations would also be mitigated and then the City would require that the typical stormwater requirements for development in the Lower Badger Mill Creek would then apply (i.e. no post development volume control to predevelopment volumes). However, this would not mitigate the potential impacts of increased stormwater volumes on Lower Badger Mill Creek. The City also proposes smaller scale stormwater infiltration facilities such as rain gardens and bioswales in the amendment area in addition to larger infiltration basins. These facilities may be incorporated into many different areas within the amendment area. It is currently anticipated that features could be located on public property in the street terraces and within boulevard streets. They could also be located on private property in many different locations to serve individual lots or an entire block. These features are most effective in areas with permeable soils. The Dane County Soil Survey indicates that some of the amendment area has relatively permeable soils. Specific locations for infiltration facilities, as well as specific system designs is proposed to be determined as part of more detailed development planning when more precise soil information is available. Performance Standards The City has proposed that the stormwater management system meet the following performance standards required by the State of Wisconsin (NR 151), Dane County (Chapter 14), and City of Madison (Chapter 37) stormwater regulations: 1. Require post-construction sediment control (reduce total suspended solids leaving the site by at least 80%) for the average annual rainfall. This is the standard required by the State of Wisconsin, Dane County, and City of Madison. 22 2. Require post-construction peak runoff rate control for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year, 24hour design storms to pre-development peak runoff rates. The City of Madison Stormwater Ordinance requires a maximum runoff curve number of 68 for hydrologic soil group B (pre-development). This is a more stringent standard than NR 151, which only requires detention of the 2-yr 24-hr design storm and the Dane County Ordinance, which does not require detention of the 100-yr 24-hr design storm. 3. Require post-development infiltration of at least 90% of pre-development infiltration volumes in residential areas, up to a 1% site area cap and at least 60% of predevelopment infiltration volumes in commercial areas, up to a 2% site area cap. This is the standard required by State of Wisconsin, Dane County (which allows an alternate standard of meeting the estimated average annual recharge rate of 7.6 inches per year when site area caps are reached), and City of Madison stormwater regulations. 4. Require thermal control in accordance with local ordinances. 5. Require construction site erosion control (limit total off-site soil loss to a maximum of 7.5 tons per acre per year) with the installation of best management practices prior to land disturbing activities in accordance with state and local ordinances. In addition, if the development will discharge stormwater onto the adjacent farm field, then the City of Madison proposes that developers in the amendment area be required to limit post-development stormwater discharge volumes from the 1, 2, and 10-year storm events to no more than the pre-development volumes for these same events. Environmental Corridors. The amendment proposal includes 4.9 acres of Environmental Corridors for stormwater management, facilities, parks, and open space. There are no significant natural features within the amendment area that require inclusion in Environmental Corridors. The proposed environmental corridors meet CARPC criteria for corridor delineation. Public Safety Services. The City of Madison Police Department provides police protection services to the City of Madison and will provide services to the portion of the proposed amendment within the City and any additional lands as they are annexed to the City in the future as part of the Department’s West District. The West District operates from a station on McKenna Boulevard, near Raymond Road, approximately three miles from the amendment area. Lands in the Town of Verona will continue to receive services from the Dane County Sheriff’s Department. The City currently has 438 full time equivalent police officers, or about 1.93 officers per 1,000 residents. The number of officers and the ratio to population varies over time but the City plans to maintain average police staffing levels at about this level in the future. The City of Madison Fire Department provides fire protection and emergency medical services for the City of Madison. The City department will serve those areas within the amendment area within the City. The Madison fire station serving the amendment area is Fire Station No. 7, located at 1810 McKenna Boulevard. Response time to the amendment area is estimated to be approximately 4to 6 minutes. The City of Madison has an ISO fire rating of three (3), well within CARPC fire protection guidelines. A new Madison Fire 23 Station, being constructed at 400 South Point Road, approximately 2.5 miles north of the amendment area, will improve service to the area. Lands within the Town of Verona will continue to receive fire and EMS services through the Verona Fire District and Fitch-Rona EMS. Streets and Sanitation Services. The Madison Streets Division provides solid waste collection, street repair, street cleaning and snow and ice control to the amendment area. Street maintenance services are provided on City of Madison public streets. These services will be provided to the amendment area from the West Badger Public Works Facility. Lands within the amendment area that are not in the City of Madison will continue to receive services through the Town of Verona. School and Park Facilities. The part of the amendment area in the City of Madison is in the Madison Metropolitan School District and the remainder is in the Verona Area School District. The two school districts approved a Boundary agreement in 1999 that will result in all lands of the amendment area eventually being in the Madison Metropolitan School District. Currently, students residing in the Madison portion of the amendment area would attend Olson Elementary School at 801 Redan Drive, Toki Middle School, 5606 Russett Road, and Memorial High School, 201 South Gammon Road. Urban Transportation System. The amendment area is for the first phase of development of the Shady Wood Neighborhood. The development plan for the neighborhood proposes an interconnected local street system with relatively short blocks and multiple access points to both Mid-Town Road and Woods Road. The access points to Mid-Town Road align directly with the existing streets to the north, Hidden Hill Drive and Meadow Road. The plan recommends a 108-foot right-of-way for Mid-Town Road to accommodate a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes in the future. An 80- to 90-foot right-of-way is recommended for Woods Road to accommodate a planned future two-lane divided roadway with bike lanes. A multi-use path is proposed along the north side of the planned Ice Age Trail Open Space Corridor, which would extend north of Mid-Town Road connecting to a planned regional path that would extend to Old Sauk Road. If a proposed east-west street across the open space corridor south of Mid-Town Road is not constructed, the plan calls for a multi-use path instead in order to maintain an east-west pedestrian/bicycle route through the neighborhood. The plan also includes a short pedestrian/bicycle path connection east to Woods Road south of Mid-Town Road connecting to a street that, in combination with a planned path segment, will provide a pedestrian/bicycle route over to CTH M and the planned path in that corridor. Sidewalks will be provided on both sides of all streets. CTH M is programmed for reconstruction and expansion to a divided four-lane roadway over the next five years. The southernmost segment from north of Cross Country Road to north of CTH PD is programmed for construction in 2013 and will include improvements to the CTH M/CTH PD intersection. Raymond Road is planned to be cul-de-saced or realigned as part of the Meriter West campus development to eliminate the unsafe five-legged intersection with CTH M and CTH PD. A multi-use path is planned in the CTH M corridor 24 on the west side that would ultimately connect to the Ice Age Trail path east of CTH M. The segment of the Ice Age Trail path from CTH PD south to the Military Ridge Trail has federal funding and will be constructed in early 2010. 6. Impacts or Effects of Proposal Surface Water Impacts. Development typically creates impervious surfaces (i.e., streets, parking areas, and roofs) and alters the natural drainage system (i.e., natural swales are replaced by storm sewer) resulting in increased stormwater runoff rates and volumes, as well as reduced infiltration. Development can also cause substantial soil erosion and off-site siltation during construction activities. Scientific research has well documented that without effective mitigation measures, the potential impacts of development on receiving water bodies can include: · Flashier stream flows (sudden higher peaks) · Increased frequency and duration of bankfull flows · Reduced groundwater recharge and stream base flow · Greater fluctuations in wetland water levels · Increased frequency, level, and duration of flooding · Additional nutrients and contaminants entering the receiving water bodies · Geomorphic changes in receiving streams and wetlands Natural drainage systems attempt to adapt themselves to the dominant flow conditions. The frequency of bank-full events often increase with urbanization and the stream attempts to enlarge its cross section to reach a new equilibrium with the increased channel forming flows. Higher flow velocities and volumes increase the erosive force in a channel, which alters streambed and bank stability. This can result in channel incision, bank undercutting, increased bank erosion, and increased sediment transport. The results are often wider, straighter, sediment laden streams, greater water level fluctuations, as well as loss of riparian cover, shoreland, and aquatic habitat. These changes in hydrology, combined with increased pollutant loading, can have a dramatic effect on the aquatic ecosystem of streams. It is important to realize that flow is a major determinant of the physical habitat in a stream, which in turn determines the biotic composition of stream communities. A growing body of literature documents that channel geomorphology, habitat structure, and complexity are determined by prevailing flow conditions, which in turn determine the biota that can inhabit the area. This is true for both the fish as well as the aquatic insects upon which they feed. Studies of streams affected by urbanization have shown that fish populations either disappear or become dominated by rough fish that can tolerate the associated lower water quality levels. The City proposes to mitigate the urban non-point source impacts of the proposed development by implementing various stormwater best management practices that are designed and constructed in accordance with state and local performance standards. Although these measures and standards meet or exceed current minimum standards, and will reduce the likely impacts of the proposed development, they do not completely address the potential impacts on the receiving waters. Implications for Lower Badger Mill Creek and Badger Mill Creek The design storms in the City’s stormwater ordinance (2, 10, and 100-year storms) represent extreme events within the annual precipitation range for a watershed. These 25 extreme storms are unusual and represent only a small fraction of the annual precipitation falling on a site and, consequently, the annual runoff flowing off developed areas. The peak flow rate control standard offers little to no control of runoff from the smaller, more frequent storms that produce most of the runoff reaching streams. It is runoff from these small storms that largely determine how a stream will function and transform in response to more erosive velocities and flashier stream flows. Therefore, CARPC staff recommends that the 1-yr 24-hr storm also be included in the range of design storms used for peak flow rate control. The City of Madison proposes that developers in the amendment area be required to limit post-development stormwater discharge volumes from the 1, 2, and 10-year storm events to no more than the pre-development volumes for these same events if the development will discharge stormwater onto the adjacent farm field, but not if the stormwater will discharge directly into Lower Badger Mill Creek via a storm sewer. Increases in runoff volume from a site can lead to increases in flood peaks or durations at downstream locations, even if peak runoff rates from sites are controlled. In particular, there is the issue of greater frequency, durations, and sizes of smaller storms that can erode the channel and negatively affect fish and aquatic life downstream. CARPC staff recommends that a volume control standard be used to mitigate the impacts on the receiving stream. Information on the channel geometry, bank vegetation, bank and bed material, channel forming discharge, and bank stability of Lower Badger Mill Creek has not been evaluated as part of this development proposal and is not known to be available from other studies. This resource specific information would help determine the carrying capacity of Lower Badger Mill Creek for stormwater runoff volumes. Without this site-specific information and analysis it is prudent to control post-development runoff volumes to no greater than predevelopment volumes (100% pre-development stay on volume). This will promote the goal of maintaining existing hydrology in Lower Badger Mill Creek and Badger Mill Creek, which is critically important to maintaining the health of these water bodies, and the biological communities that they support. NR 151 and Dane County Chapter 14 prohibit the infiltration of stormwater in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or within 100 feet downgradient of karst features. The western edge of the amendment area is over 2,400 feet from Richardson’s cave, well outside of the area where infiltration is prohibited. This is an issue that will need to be addressed in the stormwater management planning for the larger Shady Wood Neighborhood planning area. Richardson’s cave has been protected from surface water intrusion by a berm. Maintaining the hydrology of the stream in this area would help prevent future flooding of the cave, which can have groundwater quality impacts. It is also necessary to acknowledge that the City of Madison occupies a small portion of the watershed and a volume control standard is necessary for the entire watershed if the trends towards improved fisheries in the Badger Mill Creek are to be continued, and if the fisheries in the Sugar River are to be maintained or improved. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct broader, comprehensive, stormwater management planning for these watersheds to effectively deal with increasing volumes of stormwater runoff to mimic pre-development (i.e., existing) hydrologic conditions and foster improvements where opportunities permit. The amendment area includes seasonal high groundwater tables as shown in Map 9. These areas have limited suitability for buildings with basements due to the seasonal high water 26 table, which can cause problems with groundwater induced flooding. On-site soils investigations should be conducted between April and June to determine the actual extent of seasonal high groundwater tables in the amendment area to prevent future problems. Staff recommends that these areas be zoned to restrict buildings with basements. If buildings with basements and sump pumps are allowed, the stormwater management plan must account for this additional water volume in the design of the stormwater management facilities. Groundwater Impacts. An important potential impact associated with urban development is declining groundwater levels resulting from groundwater pumping and wastewater diversion. Groundwater modeling conducted by CARPC staff indicates an eight-foot drawdown in water table levels in the vicinity of the amendment area as a result of anticipated 2030 well withdrawals. This is in addition to the existing 22 foot drawdown resulting from current well withdrawals. Simulated Streamflows Resulting from Current and Future Development Scenarios Pre-Development 2000 2030 Upper Sugar River 29.52 cfs 27.70 (-6%) 26.87 (-9%) Badger Mill Creek 5.37 cfs 3.50 (-34%) 2.79 (-48%) Lower Sugar River 34.89 cfs 31.20 (-11%) 29.66 (-15%) Note: Simulated discharge represent groundwater contributions to streamflow only and does not include the discharge of approximately 4 dvs from the MMSD effluent return line to Badger Mill Creek. In addition, as natural areas are converted to urban development the ground/surface water balance in streams and wetlands shifts from a groundwater-dominated system to one dominated by surface water runoff, with subsequent reductions in stream quality and transitions to more tolerant biological communities. Groundwater modeling conducted by CARPC staff indicates that water table levels will be reduced by approximately two feet as a result of planned development. This has significant implications for baseflow in streams and wetlands, particularly during critical dry-weather periods. Since the impacts are gradual and cumulative, it is important to minimize them for all development. One promising strategy is to try and mimic pre-development hydrology. Maintaining predevelopment infiltration also helps reduce the peak flow rate and volume of runoff, resulting in less streambank erosion, cutting and widening of channels and stream beds, and less pollutants being transported to the stream (surface water impacts). The applicant proposes to mitigate the groundwater impacts of the proposal by meeting existing state, county, and municipal standards. RPC staff recommends an average annual recharge rate of 9 to 10 inches per year, with no cap on the site infiltration area, based on current recharge estimates for this part of Dane County by WGNHS 2009. This will make up for the amount of recharge loss resulting from impervious development. It will not, however, make up for the amount of water lost due to well water withdrawals. Mitigating the impacts of high capacity well withdrawals is a regional issue. Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination is needed among local units of government to achieve goals of sustainability. This is being coordinated at the regional level and will take some time to accomplish. In the meantime, it is recommended the applicant exceed the natural recharge 27 rate, where possible, to mitigate its water use, as well as fostering water conservation and reuse practices. Karst features often provide a direct conduit to groundwater, therefore the potential for the contamination of groundwater from polluted stormwater runoff is a concern in these areas. The western edge of the amendment area is over 2,400 feet from Richardson’s cave, well outside of the area of concern. This is an issue that will need to be addressed in the stormwater management planning for the larger Shady Wood Neighborhood planning area. Transportation System Impacts. The amendment area includes the first phase of the Shady Wood Neighborhood Development Plan, which calls for 22.5 acres of residential development consisting of 135 housing units. The plan recommends a mix of single-family, duplex, and townhome units. When fully developed, the amendment area could be expected to generate around 1,100 one-way vehicle trips on an average weekday—a little more or less depending upon the mix of housing types. The entire Shady Wood neighborhood could be expected to generate approximately 6,000 one-way vehicle trips when fully developed. In 2008, the average weekday traffic (AWT) volume on Mid-Town Road was 1,650 west of Woods Road and 5,250 west of CTH M. The 2008 AWT volume on Woods Road south of Mid-Town Road was 1,950. The 2008 AWT volume on CTH M south of Mid-Town Road was 21,550. There is sufficient capacity on Mid-Town Road and Woods Road to handle the expected traffic from the amendment area. Minor intersection improvements may be needed on those roads at the access points to the neighborhood. Traffic volumes on CTH M indicate that it is experiencing a very high level of congestion during peak periods. However, the planned reconstruction and expansion of CTH M along with improvements to the intersecting streets will address both the capacity and safety issues in that corridor. School System Impacts. The amendment proposal adds an estimated 61 students to the Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD). The MMSD has experienced declining enrollment over the last several years. However, the southwest side of the district has been growing and Olson Elementary School, serving the area of the amendment, was opened in the 2008-09 school year. 7. Alternatives The City of Madison Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2006, defines nine Peripheral Planning Areas (PPAs) at the edges of the urban area. The PPAs are areas that the City determined as having some near or long-term potential for future urban development and City of Madison expansion. The Shady Wood planning area is within Peripheral Planning Area A, a “Group 1” district recommended as a potential location for relatively near-term City of Madison expansion and urban development. The plan anticipated development to begin in at least portions of all Group 1 Peripheral Planning Areas within one to five years. The projected population growth warrants expansion of the Central Urban Service Area, and the City has identified Development Phasing Area A of the Shady Wood Neighborhood as a potential growth area. Although a number of potential alternative locations for CUSA 28 expansion exist, the City has identified this location through the planning processes as having near term potential for beginning development. 8. Controversies, Comments Received, Unresolved Issues A public hearing before the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission is scheduled for November 12, 2009. No comments have been received and no controversies are noted. 9. Conclusions and Staff Recommendation The proposed amendment provides the full range of urban services and is within the twenty-year service area land demand for the Central Urban Service Area. There are no significant natural resources in the amendment area that would require inclusion in environmental corridors. The City of Madison has proposed stormwater management performance standards that are more stringent than those in NR 151 and the Dane County Chapter 14 to help mitigate the adverse impacts of the proposed development. The amendment area is a small percentage (<1%) of the Lower Badger Mill Creek Watershed and an even smaller percentage of the Badger Mill Creek Watershed. However, the cumulative effects of increased peak flow rates and volumes of stormwater runoff warrant more stringent standards on a consistent, watershed-wide basis. The peak flow rate control requirement in the City of Madison stormwater ordinance for this watershed covers a larger design storm (100-yr 24-hr) than required by NR 151 or Dane County Chapter 14. Increased peak flow rates from smaller storms can also result in erosive velocities and flashier stream flows. Therefore, CARPC staff recommends that the 1yr 24-hr storm also be included in the range of design storms used for peak flow rate control. Some communities, such as the Cities of Middleton and Verona, have adopted more protective maximum predevelopment runoff curve numbers than those required by NR 151 or Dane County Chapter 14. The City of Madison should also consider adopting more protective maximum predevelopment runoff curve numbers, at least for sensitive watersheds. The City of Madison proposes that developers in the amendment area be required to limit post-development stormwater discharge volumes from the 1, 2, and 10-year storm events to no more than the pre-development volumes for these same events only if the development will discharge stormwater onto the adjacent farm field and not if the stormwater will discharge directly into Lower Badger Mill Creek via a storm sewer. It is difficult to reconcile the City’s inconsistency between acknowledging the need to mitigate stormwater volume impacts on an adjacent farm, but not on the receiving streams. Therefore staff recommends the performance standard of maintaining pre-development runoff volumes to protect the natural resources that are downstream of the proposed amendment areas. Rainfall series data provide more accurate modeling of actual rainfall intensity and antecedent moisture conditions than synthetic design storms, therefore CARPC staff recommend that the standard 1-year and 5-year annual rainfall series be used to demonstrate compliance with the volume control standard. If necessary, retrofit practices could be implemented in other areas of the subwatershed to meet a volume control and groundwater recharge standard on a subwatershed basis. 29 It is important to note that the objective of protecting, improving, and restoring water quality and fisheries can only be realized through stringent standards that are applied to the entire watershed. One such protective standard is maintaining predevelopment runoff volumes for all storm events to maintain the hydrology of these streams. Staff has previously recommended that a standard of no increase in runoff volume be adopted for the Badger Mill Creek sub-watershed and that a watershed level intergovernmental agreement be facilitated by the CARPC so that all new development in the watershed is required to uphold this standard. This may be the only practicable approach that would prevent further degradation of these sensitive cold fisheries. The Commission has referred this issue to its Environmental Resources Technical Advisory Committee for discussion and recommendation. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions based on the proposed land uses and services. The conditions establish the more protective standards expected for stormwater management within the Badger Mill Creek Watershed. Submit a detailed stormwater management plan for CARPC and DCL&WCD staff review and approval prior to any land disturbing activities in the amendment area. The stormwater management plan should include the following: a. Install stormwater practices prior to other land disturbing activities and protect these practices from compaction and sedimentation during land disturbing activities or restore them after land disturbing activities are completed b. Provide at least 80% sediment control for the amendment area in accordance with existing ordinances c. Control peak rates of runoff for the 1, 2, 10, and 100-year 24-hour design storms to “predevelopment” levels d. Control post development runoff volumes to be equal to or less than predevelopment runoff volumes for the one-year average annual rainfall period and five-year average rainfall period in addition to the 1, 2, and 10-year 24-hour design storms e. Maintain WGNHS pre-development groundwater recharge rates (9 to 10 inches per year) with no caps on the extent of infiltration areas f. Provide deep tilling to restore all areas compacted during construction g. Control the thermal impacts of stormwater discharge to meet WDNR cold water standards in accordance with existing ordinances h. Stormwater practices should be publicly managed, or have a perpetual legal maintenance agreement finalized with the City i. Include stormwater management facilities in environmental corridors. 30 Resolution CARPC No. 2009-13 Amending the Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan and Dane County Water Quality Plan by Revising the Central Urban Service Area Boundary and Environmental Corridors in the City of Madison and Town of Verona WHEREAS, the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission has adopted, amended and reaffirmed the Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan and Water Quality Plan; and WHEREAS, said plans delineate urban service areas as amended through October 2009; and WHEREAS, the City of Madison has requested an addition to the Central Urban Service Area, and is consistent with the Shady Wood Neighborhood Development Plan, the City of Madison Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Madison and City of Verona Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement, adopted in 1996; and WHEREAS, a staff analysis of the proposed amendment has been prepared, which indicates that the amendment is generally consistent with adopted regional plans and policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in accordance with §66.0309, Wis. Stats., and Sec. 208 of Public Law 92–500, the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission amends the Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan and recommends the amendment of the Dane County Water Quality Plan by revising the Central Urban Service Area boundary and environmental corridors as shown on the attached map. Adoption of this amendment is based on the land use and urban service plans submitted in support of this amendment, and conditioned on the City of Madison pursuing the following: Date Adopted Jeff Miller, Chairperson
© Copyright 2024