Enclosure F Report to: Council of Governors Date of meeting: 15 November 2012 Title of paper: Quarterly Quality Report Executive Summary: Complaints performance has deteriorated during this quarter due to low staffing levels and the replacement of this workforce with new members who are developing the skills to support the service. Training has been instigated, but this will be supported by an external source. A renewed focus will be given via the divisions in terms of timeliness and quality of responses. A large number of contacts are being logged via the PAL’s service in relation to patient’s inability to reach the trust via telephone. This is particular evident within the partial booking centre where a diagnostic review identified that ‘Only 49% of calls into the Partial Booking office were classed as answered with a high number of unanswered phone calls between 7.00 am to 8.30 am and 5.00 pm to 7.00 pm during weekdays and on weekends when no staff are scheduled to work ‘ . An action plan has been developed and is currently being reviewed and signed off by Operations. The most recent report from the National Learning Reporting System at the NPSA dated October 2011 to March 2012, shows that we have improved our level of reporting from an average of 6 per 100 admissions to 7.8 per 100 admissions, which places us in the top quarter percentile of 4 medium acute trusts. In comparing us with our peer group we appear to have fewer severe incidents and deaths as outcomes of the incidents reported. It has been over 960 days since we experienced a Trust acquired MRSA bacteraemia. Hospital Acquired C Difficile performance has seen a significant improvement with 9 reported cases against a trajectory of 18 year to date. All CQUIN’s apart from ‘Think Glucose’ and ‘Improving the experience of patients with Learning Disabilities (LD)’ have been delivered for Quarter 2 (confirmation is still required from the PCT) ‘Think Glucose’ CQUIN, has been reported previously as requiring radical improvements across the Trust. Actions to improve are in progress, being led by senior clinicians, but changes to reducing length of stay will take time to develop and embed due to large education programme and cultural change required in treating these patients. A steering group and the division are giving this CQUIN attention The learning disabilities CQUIN will be escalated to the PCT within the next week, as the Trust through regular audits are unable to demonstrate these patients have an extended length of stay. They are not medically fit to be discharged, i.e. their learning disabilities needs are being addressed but are not the cause of their stay Recommendation: The Council of Governors are asked to note the contents of this report. Enclosure F COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS MEETING : 15th November 2012 Quarterly Quality Report – 2nd Quarter (2012/13) Quality Dashboard Patient Experience Patient experience personal needs Improving Patient Experience PALS Themes Staff Experience Food Quality Cleanliness Patient Safety Serious Untoward Incidents Implementation of NICE Guidance for acutely ill patients Midwife to birth ratio Slip, Trips and Falls Infection, Prevention and Control Nutrition Pressure Ulcer Prevention Clinical Effectiveness Summary Hospital Mortality Index (SHMI) (see separate report) Heart attack secondary prevention PROMs Stroke sentinel audit CQUIN Improving Dementia Care & Training Failure to Rescue Improving the experience of patients with Learning Disabilities NET Promoter Score & Patient Experience Improving Choice of End of Life VTE Emergency Department Streaming Think Glucose (Length of Stay & Medication) Safety Thermometer 1 Q2 2012/13 Q1 2012/13 This report provides 2nd quarter information regarding patient experience, patient safety, clinical effectiveness and CQUIN performance. Enclosure F Recommendations Directors are asked to consider each section of the Quality Report and the highlights and issues raised by individual Directors. Susan Bowler Executive Director of Nursing & Quality Nabeel Ali Executive Medical Director Green Yellow Amber Red Achieved On plan to achieve target Further work required to achieve target Significantly behind target – urgent action required Key 2 Enclosure F Q2 RAG Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Patient Experience Personal Needs Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: For the composite score for all indicators to achieve 80% per quarter. Questions asked at discharge are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Were you as involved as you wanted to be in decisions about your care and treatment? Did you find someone to talk to about worries and fears? Were you given enough privacy when discussing your condition or treatment? Were you told about medication side effects to watch for went you went home? Were you told who to contact if you were worried about your condition after you left hospital? Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Quarter 1 results = 97% Quarter 2 results= 95% The key aims are to maintain above the 80% target. Individual questions are assessed to ensure they consistently achieve 80% All questions for quarter 2 have been consistently achieving above 80%. Question 4 and 5 results are starting to tail off. The results have been shared and pharmacy has introduced a card for every patient in relation to question 4. They are going to ensure all pharmacists and ward staff continue to distribute it to patients. In relation to question 5 a discharge leaflet is being produced which explains what to do when you leave hospital. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Key Aims for Q3 To maintain 80% or above for the quarter. To monitor monthly results and act on any questions that seem to be tailing off. To share the monthly results with ward staff broken down by question and to ask staff for ideas to improve the scores if they are tailing off. To analyses question 4 and 5. To roll out the discharge leaflet. Risks There are no risks to the CQUIN target. Results are consistently high Controls and Mitigation Lead: Sally Dore, Director of Customer Experience and Engagement 3 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Improving Patient Experience (Complaints) Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To maintain a high quality IPE department Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Complainants should receive acknowledgement within 3 days of the complaint being received by the department. During quarter 2 this performance dropped from 98% in quarter 1 to 87% in quarter 2. This was due to low staffing levels and the commencement of a replacement workforce who have never worked in complaints before. Month April May June July Aug Sept Complaints 48 45 53 46 46 44 3 days acknowledge 100% 93% 100% 89% 88% 83% Performance 77% 60% 100% 91% 91% 80% Quarter Training has been put in place for the new IPE staff and the importance of acknowledgements re-iterated. The department is still 1 staff member down due to sickness. Performance is monitored weekly and reports sent to divisions every week. Systems have improved in the IPE department ensuring chasing of responses is clearer and more timely. YTD 79% 79% Re-opened complaints have increased during quarter 2 and this seems to be due to the complaint not being fully answered by the investigator. 87% 83% Free training has been sourced from a solicitors firm and is planned for early January. The IPE team have begun calling patients to ascertain the questions they want answering from the outset. Divisional performance dropped off in September partly due to new staff in the department and their lack of capacity to chase responses with divisions. The main themes for quarter 2 were clinical treatment, attitude of the doctor, clinical diagnosis, communication-admin, nursing care and treatment. It is to be noted that if all communication was linked together it would be the highest followed by all attitude. Reopened complaints have increased in quarter 2 to 37. In quarter 1 there were 29. Key Aims for Q3 Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims To aim for 100% acknowledgement and to increase response performance to above 90% To reduce the amount of reopened complaints Lessons learnt have been collated over the past 2 quarters and will be presented in the CLIP report due in November. Risks The long term sickness is a risk to IPE performance The actions above will continue Controls and Mitigation The Director of Customer Experience is taking on more operational work at present to cover any urgent issues. Lead: Sally Dore, Director of Customer Experience and Engagement 4 Enclosure F Customer Experience – Patient Advice & Liaison Service (PALS) Quarterly Progress Report - Status July to September 2012, Quarter 2 Risks and Issues 1. Telephone Communication a. Poor customer service resulting in loss of business and poor reputation. b. The Customer Services team are failing to deliver their key service areas – PALS concerns, Charitable Funds, Voluntary Sector and Patient Experience whilst handling excessive volume of calls not managed in other services. c. Increase in DNA rate as patients are unable to advise us of their availability and problems. d. Increase in Complaints. e. Increase in demand for compensation. During this quarter the PALS team have logged 1975 contacts onto Datix, some contacts raise more than one subject. The themes and trends identified below continue to add pressure to the service and whilst we respond to the enquiries we are not always able to log all of these contacts due to the volume, particularly with regards to the Partial Booking Call Centre (please see below). Monthly reports are despatched to service line and divisional management teams collating the concerns, comments and compliments received. Possible service improvements are highlighted and feedback requested. Breakdown of primary subjects: Comments – 926, Compliments – 144, Concerns – 858, Complaints (first stage) - 47 Themes 1. Telephone Communication – 89 Contacts logged, calls not logged (logged on tick sheet = 493) Continuing from the previous 3 quarters patients are experiencing severe difficulties in contacting the hospital with regards to appointment bookings and general enquiries, patients report that they have been trying to contact services at KMH and Newark for a number of days or weeks. Contact has also been received from GPs. 2. Out Patient Capacity – 23 Contacts Cardiology Patient Experience Patient was informed there were no available appointments for cardiology at Newark Hospital but could be seen at King’s Mill Hospital. The patient received an appointment letter, then received a telephone call bringing forward the appointment, no confirmation letter was sent. The patient arrived for the appointment she was informed the appointment was actually for Newark Hospital. The patient travelled to Newark, paid for more parking, and was informed that the consultant had left for the day. Dermatology Patient Experience Patient saw GP who advised needed a referral to Dermatology, the Choose and Book system offered an appointment at Chesterfield Hospital. The patient (who works for SFHT) advised that they wanted an appointment at KMH. The GP advised this was unlikely as there were ‘never any appointments’. The patient advised that as she worked at King’s Mill and she wanted to take as little time off work as possible & wanted to support our services, to please try and get her at appointment at her chosen hospital. The GP tried to secure an appointment during her visit but was unable to do so. He advised that he would contact her once he had secured an appointment, she was informed of her appointment date the following week. The patient was very concerned that GPs are not considering KMH as an option as they can not obtain choose and book appointments. This patient booked her appointment on 29 August, a letter from ‘The Appointments Line’ at Milton Keynes dated 30 August arrived at her house on 27 September asking her to call and make an appointment. 3. CQC have raised individual concerns regarding patients inability to speak to the partial booking office and the constant ringing 4C’s breakdown PC&S Division EC&M Division D&R Division Corporate Development Other Total Comments 225 182 376 33 110 926 Concerns 148 150 443 24 93 858 Compliments 92 34 14 1 3 144 Complaints 6 13 16 0 12 47 Lead : 2. Out Patient Capacity a. Loss of business b. Loss of reputation Added value The Customer Services teams are managing the following projects to enhance the customer environment and experience. Main activities for next quarter – Newark 1. Support improvements in the delivery of patient administration services. Main activities for next quarter – King’s Mill 1. Review the main reception services and patient flow in preparation for the introduction of the new main entrance doors. 2. Refurbishment of A&E, EAU relative’s rooms and review of further provision for care of visitors. 3. Continue to monitor ‘The Friends and Family Test’ national agenda. 4. Support the introduction of SFH patient experience agenda at Mansfield Community Hospital. Recruitment of volunteers has commenced to conduct out patient surveys and team member receiving training to undertake in patient surveys. 4. Develop a protocol for implementing a PALS helpline with the support of the Communication Director. (The PALS team have provided the Breast Service Helpline which requires evaluation) 5. Provide patient experience evidence to Support Service Line Managers to make the required changes to the patient administration services to retain and develop business. A diagnostic report related to the partial booking centre has been written by the ABC team. This report has been reviewed with Director of Operations, with an action plan being developed. Tracey Brassington – Customer Services Manager 5 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report : Staff Experience Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2, July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: Review and improve recruitment and selection process developing key quality indicators. Work with divisions and corporate services to ensure that the appraisal process is integrated and aligned to strategic objectives and priorities and performance improves to 79%. o Implement the health and wellbeing action plan and stress and mental health strategy to support; managers and staff to achieve a reduction in sickness absence. o Incorporate the principles and delivery of effective change management in leadership and management development programmes. Ensure all management involved in implementing change management have received appropriate development and support. o Embed the Trust’s Equality objectives. o Improve Staff Survey results and staff engagement. o Continue the implementation of the leadership and management development programme which seeks to embed core behaviours into management practice. Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Continue to increase the number of staff who have received an appraisal to 79%. Continue to roll out the Stress Education Programme to managers and extend by delivering to teams within work areas. The Staff Survey Action Plan and Communication Plan to be implemented. Implement the Staff Health & Well-being Action Plan and the Stress & Mental Health Strategy in order to support the work to reduce sickness absence to 3.4%. Training, Education & Development will deliver training to support managers in managing change. The Leadership and Management Development Programme will be delivered to a second cohort and work will start on identifying individuals for the third and fourth cohort. Ensure efficient management of the junior doctors’ rotation in August and induction to the Trust. A PING sub group has been established to drive forward a programme of work designed to increase appraisal rates. The Stress Education Programme has been delivered to a number of work areas. The evaluation has been very positive. Committees and working groups continue to work on the achievement of the 2011 Staff Survey Action Plan. Progress reports have been given to JSPF, the Workforce Committee and September’s Board. Training, Education & Development continue to deliver training to support managers in managing change in partnership with staff side colleagues. The Leadership and Management Development Programme is being delivered to a second cohort and individuals for the third and fourth cohort have been identified and are fully subscribed. The junior doctors’ rotation and induction to the Trust went smoothly receiving positive feedback from junior doctors. For the first time the F1s were inducted separately and given the opportunity to shadow thereby improving their induction experience and increasing their knowledge and confidence. Key Aims for Q3 Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Continue to increase the number of staff who have received an appraisal and secure improved levels of performance and productivity. Review the new appraisal documentation following the pilot in 4 work areas and if appropriate agree and commence roll out plan. 6 Divisional directors confirm 30 November completion date to increase appraisal rates. Regional appraisal framework assessed for adoption. Managers to focus on meeting with staff who have attendance issues and Enclosure F Continue to roll out the Stress Education Programme to managers and extend by delivering to teams within work areas. Implement the Staff Survey Action Plan and Communication Plan and facilitate delivery of the 2012 Staff Survey questionnaires. Implement the Sickness Absence Action Plan. Training, Education & Development will deliver training to support managers in managing change. The Leadership and Management Development Programme will be delivered to further cohorts. resolving matters. Improved resilience confidence and skills for those managing workforce change. Improved staff resilience to health related issues, particularly with regard to stress and mental health and steps to reduce the impact. Continue to deliver and promote the Stress and Mental Health Strategy to increase manager awareness and confidence in recognising and supporting staff in their work area. Effective promotion of the 2012 seasonal flu vaccination programme to ensure maximum take up of vaccination particularly by frontline staff. Promote the 2012 staff survey and make progress in addressing the key findings from the 2011 Staff Survey to increase response rates and engage staff. Promote the Trust’s Equality workshop fostering staff engagement. Risks Controls and Mitigation • • • • Low staff morale and disengagement. Increased stress and/or sickness absence due to workforce change, winter pressures and broader economic climate issues. • Sickness Absence Action Plan. Increased training and support for HR Advisors and managers to enable improved management of workforce change and sickness absence. Flu immunisation Programme. Lead: Anne Burton, Staff Support & Benefits Co-ordinator and Nicola Awni, Deputy Director of Human Resources 7 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Food Quality Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To deliver a High Quality catering service that meets the Nutritional needs of all patients as well as offering sufficient variety to suit different tastes and preferences. This is measured during annual PEAT and MiniPEAT audits as well as an on going programme of ward catering audits. Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Introduce Steamplicity individual plated meal system to Mansfield Community Hospital Wards. This system is now live at Mansfield. MiniPEAT audits have demonstrated an on going high level of patient satisfaction with the quality of the catering service at all 3 sites. Key Aims for Q3 Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Implement Ward Hostess Role and Steamplicity individual plated meal system to Newark Wards .Undertake MiniPEAT audits at all 3 sites to demonstrate on going high level of satisfaction with food service standard. Rollout date scheduled for 0ctober 8th at Newark 2012 to coincide with New Steamplicity Menu launch for all sites. Additional Medirest management support at Newark to support ensure a smooth transition to the new system. Mini PEAT audits scheduled for October & November. On going programme of catering audits. Risks No risks for this quarter identified Controls and Mitigation Lead: Liz Nicholas FM services Manager 8 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Cleanliness Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2, July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: Standards of Cleanliness are measured against the National Specifications for Cleanliness; the current benchmarks are Significant Risk areas at 75% and above, High Risk and Very High Risk areas at 85% and above. This benchmark is viewed as a performance parameter for the cleaning services as provided by Medirest and this is validated through monitoring of the service by Trust and jointly with Project co. Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Mini PEAT audits to be undertaken at King’s Mill Hospital, Newark Hospital and Mansfield Community Hospital. Ongoing schedule for monitoring cleanliness standards across all areas. Mini PEATS were undertaken, with the scores achieved following a consistent trend from the main PEAT in February 2012. Cleanliness audits undertaken by Medirest under the frequencies required under National Standards of cleanliness provided consistent high scores. Cleanliness audits undertaken by the Trust solely and as part of a joint team, which includes Infection Control, provides validation. Patient satisfaction surveys for cleanliness undertaken by Medirest for all three sites has shown that patients are reporting the cleanliness of all three hospitals to be a high standard. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Key Aims for Q3 The integration of the ’15 steps’ into the auditing methodology by Medirest. The audit tool is being developed for use by Domestic Supervisors and will form part of their ongoing monitoring Review of the hydrogen peroxide fogging protocol. Ongoing schedule for monitoring cleanliness standards across all areas. Medirest staff have attended CQC awareness training, and have been provided with additional ongoing support by the Trust Risks No risks identified in this quarter Controls and Mitigation Lead: Julie Horrobin FM Performance and Quality Manager 9 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Serious Untoward Incidents / Never Events / Incidents Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To reduce serious incidents resulting in harm (including never events) Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Support ‘Handlers/Investigators’ in their efforts to reduce the numbers of overdue incidents. Reinforce the importance of reporting all types of incidents and how this is proven to improve overall patient safety. Quarterly Progress Report: Zero Never Events reported for this quarter. Serious Incidents reported on STEIS this quarter Q2 12/13 was 20 compared to 15 for Q2 11/12 and 12 reported on STEIS for Q1 12/13. Continue to upload patient safety incidents to the NPSA in a timely manner. To complete investigations and conclude the reporting mechanism on outstanding SI reports To complete investigations and close outstanding incidents that are currently open on the reporting database. To share lessons learn and ensure robust action plans are implemented and monitored within the Trust and divisional governance structures. Quarter 2 produced 2044 incidents compared to 2063 the previous quarter with Falls, Pressure Ulcers and Medication, continuing to be the top 3 sub-categories. There are 21 open Serious Incidents past the reporting deadline (7 of which have been requested to be closed by the PCT) compared with 27 still open past the deadline in qtr 1. The numbers of long dated open incidents has shown a continued improvement over this quarter, reducing from 603 in Q1/12/13 down to 565 at time of writing this report. Falls: • Patient falls continue a downward trend in both absolute numbers and relative to Trust’s increased activity: 486 patient falls Q1/12/13, 442 Q2/12/13. Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcers: • 71 Hospital acquired pressure ulcers in Q2 12/13 compared to 76 in Q1 12/13 (72 HAPU in Q2 11/12) • 11 grade 3 and Zero grade 4 Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcers (HAPU) reported for Q2/12/13. Medication: • 250 Medication related incidents this quarter compared to 279 for Q1. • The top ‘Adverse event’ was ‘Medication not administered, with Emergency Admissions Unit (EAU) having the highest incidence. Key Aims for Q3 Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims • • • • To continue to be a high reporting trust To continue to investigate and close the SI reports within the target response time. To continue to work on investigating and closing open lower level incidents within the • • To complete the review of the incident reporting policy with the update Serious Incident policy from NHS Midlands and East. To drive the closure of long dated open incidents further To arrange investigation and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) training to key individuals who are requested to undertake RCA investigations. The ward leaders will be a specific target group. 10 Enclosure F timescales. • To undertake the Manchester Safety Framework audit to measure where we are as a trust on the safety culture matrix Risks Controls and Mitigation Level of knowledge and skill in investigation and report writing in order to close incidents within the allotted timescale. The most recent report from the National Learning Reporting System at the NPSA dated Oct 2011 to March 2012, shows that we have improved our level of reporting from an average of 6 per 100 admissions to 7.8 per 100 admissions, which places us in the top quarter percentile of 4 medium acute trusts. In comparing us with our peer group we appear to have fewer severe incidents and deaths as outcomes of the incidents reported. Lead: Lesley White, Patient Safety Manager 11 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Care of the Acutely Ill Adult Patient Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To improve compliance with physiological track and trigger scoring in order to identify patients early in the course of their deterioration, obtain help and appropriate treatment sooner and help to prevent further decline Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims Overall compliance with all elements of the Observation and ACAT audit was 93%. This To improve overall compliance with documentation of : represents an improvement. Five of the six mandatory signs were recorded in 100% of cases. All 6 mandatory vital signs every 12 hours as a minimum There was an improvement in recording AVPU (89% compliance) and ACAT was recorded Monitoring plans Carry out a ‘deep dive’ audit of the Observations and the correctly in 86% of cases. 93% had 12 hourly observations as a minimum, and where abnormalities were present, this was Augmented Care assessment Tool (ACAT) which complements increased in 83% of cases. 96% of patients had monitoring plans, 82% of which were ongoing audit via the metrics audit in ‘Test Your Care’. contemporaneous. To improve care of the hypoxic and/or hypovolaemic / hypo AIMS national training for all members of the multi-disciplinary team continues (and now includes perfusional patient. Healthcare Support Workers). All nursing staff have been informed of their responsibilities regarding oxygen administration in acute situations (with no requirement for a PGD) and supplementary oxygen training has commenced at Newark with a view to sharing this Trust wide, starting with Emergency Admission Unit (EAU). A Patient Group Directive has been ratified to facilitate rapid administration of fluid resuscitation to hypovolaemic or hypo-perfusional patients and implementation will commence in Q4. Key Aims for Q3 To raise the profile of physiological track and trigger scoring and continue to increase compliance with the Rapid Response Systems currently in operation at Trust. The outcome of this will be to increase vigilance around the deteriorating, acutely ill patient potentially enhancing patient safety. Implementation of the PGD for intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride. Continue Acute Illness Management (AIMS) training for all members of the multi-disciplinary team. Risks Members of the multi-disciplinary team do not comply with the observation and ACAT policy Lead: Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims • Commence implementation of the National Early Warning Scoring System on an incremental basis across the Trust. This will help to re-engage staff with the rapid response system and the training required will re-energise teams in this very vital area of practice. • Existing data already collected on calls to Critical Care Outreach Team, unexpected admissions to Intensive Care Unit and cardiac arrest calls will be used to monitor the organisational effects of the new score and subsequently review potential resources required to maintain our Rapid Response System • Review metrics data for compliance with observations and the track and trigger tool in Q3 and repeat the ‘deep dive’ audit in Q4. Controls and Mitigation A number of audits are currently in place to identify when this does not happen, e.g. Global Trigger Tool audits across the Trust and in Intensive Care through which ‘missed opportunities’ are fed back to the teams concerned for further investigation and training. Michele Platt, Critical Care Nurse Consultant 12 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Maternity Care including Midwife to Birth Ratio Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: • • • Work with regional colleagues on a maternity workforce tool and monitoring. Work with regional colleagues to establish a maternity network. Maintain midwife to birth ratios and proactively monitor local outcomes. Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims All emergency caesareans are reviewed by a senior midwife and consultant to identify learning and feedback to staff involved current rate averaging 19-21%. A prospective audit undertaken with the current rate averaging 28-30% • Review Caesarean Section rates • Review Induction of Labour rates • Midwife to birth Ratio at 1:28 Current ratio 1:32 working with regional colleagues on a work force tool to reflect local variations. Visit from SHA maternity lead to review service. • Reduce Smoking during pregnancy rates Smoking at time of delivery audit completed, well received by staff and results are expected in Nov. • Monitor women’s experience of the service and their perception of 1:1 care in labour • Participate in the BirthRate plus tool data collection to ascertain current staffing levels against national recommendations 100% of women who responded to the survey highlighted that they felt they had received 1:1 care in labour. Of the 68 women surveyed, there was a low return rate of 28. Results are based on how attentive the women feel their midwife has been during labour. This is carried out solely within the labour suite and does not extend to other areas of the service. Key Aims for Q3 • • • Reduce Caesarean Section rates Reduce Induction of labour rates Improve Midwife to Birth Ratio The unit has closed to admissions on two occasions during this quarter. On one occasion we had to admit women as the neighbouring trusts could not offer respite due to their own pressure. We have also supported other Trusts through their closures. This is notified by the local supervising authority database and it is evident that especially during September many units have experienced significant capacity problems. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Continue the work described above. Also, awaiting formal feedback from the service review and explore staffing options to meet the gaps. A paper will be produced outlining the findings and recommendations of BirthRate Plus. Risks Controls and Mitigation A concern has been identified with the administration of midwifery led referrals, following the reconfiguration of PPC. There is also a storage issue and insufficient preparation of notes prior to admission. Andrew May is leading to identify a notes accommodation solution. The concerns regarding referrals have been escalated through Business Strategy Units who now manage PPC, who are identifying corrective actions. This is being discussed at clinical Governance Committee and Divisional meetings. Lead: Alison Whitham 13 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Incidents/Trends Slips, Trips and Falls Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012: 1. To reduce the number of falls resulting in harm to patients 2. To integrate the Trust falls service into community falls service 3. To improve the knowledge and skills of staff to prevent falls and manage patients at risk of falls Key Aims for Q2 A. To ensure Trust wide protocols and guidelines are updated and in line with national guidelines. • Review and update falls policy and bed rail policy • Review and update nursing documentation (falls risk assessment, falls care plan, post fall management plan) B. To ensure appropriate process and allocation of resources (i.e. one to one observation, equipment) is available and accurately allocated for the management of patients with temporary and permanent cognitive impairment. • One to one/Zone observation assessment process • Night time elderly and frail people safe transfer policy • Footwear project • Improving equipment availability: walking aids, alarm system C. To identify areas for improvement by Datix data analysis and review of serious incidents related to in-patient falls Key Aims for Q3 • • To complete the Quarter 2 project related actions To review training and ensure it is appropriate for all categories of staff Risks • • • Failure to identify patients at risk and appropriately manage various individual risk factors Inadequate resource availability and location Inconsistent management of patients at risk of falling Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims • • • • • • The falls policy and bed rail policy have been reviewed and circulated for consultation. To be submitted for approval in November 2012 Work is in progress to change falls risk assessment and care plan. The nursing th documentation group is to agree and approve the new documentation by 15 of November 2012 A working group has been established to review the escalation and usage of ‘specialing’ across the Trust. A paper is being written outlining the potential cost and care benefits of initiating an outreach falls team who could work flexibly across areas of greatest need. This would potentially reduce agency use and ensure the appropriate patients have the required special input. A Trust action plan for falls is under development and will be discussed at the Falls Steering Group meeting in November 2012. The system for feeding back falls data is currently being reviewed to ensure it is accessible to ward leaders and Heads of Nursing, alongside other data sets which indicate care standards across clinical areas. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims • • To review and update training sessions Undertake a training needs analysis Controls and Mitigation • Work is underway to update the falls risk assessment and care plan to give clearer • • signposts to staff and improve the quality of assessment and documentation. A scoping exercise is in progress to assess resource availability. The work to increase and improve the training will reduce inconsistencies. Leads: Dr Anne-Louise Schokker, Consultant Geriatrician & Elena Caraman, Advanced Nurse Practitioner 14 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Infection Prevention & Control (IPC) Q2 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q3 RAG Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: • To maintain surveillance and infection control and prevention targets: MRSA bacteraemia: Trajectory 0, C. difficile infection: Trajectory 36, MSSA bacteraemia: No national set trajectory, E. coil bacteraemia: No national set trajectory • Review of all IPC policies and guidelines before the end of Q4 in line with the Infection Prevention & Control Team (IPCT) programme. Key Aims for Q2 • To remain within the MRSA bacteraemia trajectory for Q2 • To remain within the C. difficile infection trajectory for Q2 • To achieve < 5 MSSA bacteraemia for Q2 • To achieve < 1 E. coil bacteraemia for Q2 • To develop the Norovirus toolkit • To review the Norovirus policy • To proactively manage outbreaks • To ensure that damaged flooring on WD 33 is replaced • To ensure capacity and flow is maintained • To ensure policies and reviewed and updated within the timescales required • To establish the Care Quality Commission (CQC) Outcome Guardian role for Outcome 8 (Infection Prevention and Control) Key Aims for Q3 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims • The IPCT has identified that further clarity is required on how surveillance is reported across the Trust. It was agreed at the September Infection, prevention and Control Committee (IPCC) that all surveillance reporting will be standardised and report ‘year to end surveillance’. • During quarter 2 there were no hospital acquired cases of MRSA bacteraemia. • To date there has been 9 cases of hospital acquired C. difficile infection (trajectory 18). • To date there has been 4 cases of MSSA bacteraemia. • To date there has been 24 cases of E. coil bacteraemia; of which 1 was a urine catheter related which was in Q1. • To date there has been 5 separate norovirus outbreaks, affecting a total of 33 patients and 20 members of staff with 77 bed days lost. • A Norovirus Toolkit has been designed and issued to all clinical areas throughout the Trust. • A Norovirus policy developed, consultation period complete and was ratified at the clinical th policy group on 17 September 2012. Now available on the Trust Infection and prevention (IP) web page. • The damaged flooring on Ward 33 has been replaced, along with the bed head buffers and the area received Hydrogen Peroxide Vapour decontamination prior to reopening. • IPCN attendance at the Capacity and Flow meeting during winter pressure was discussed at the September IPCC meeting. It has been agreed that an IPCN will attend the 10am Capacity st th and Flow meeting from the 1 October until 30 April. During outbreaks if required the IPN’s will attend this meeting more frequently. • During this quarter several policies have been reviewed including: Hand Hygiene, Infectious outbreak/incident policy including major outbreak, Policy regarding safe linen disposal, Policy for the management of scabies in a healthcare setting and Management for the deceased with a suspected known infection – these policies will be forwarded to the Clinical Policy and Guideline Group for ratification. • The Nurse Consultant has set up 4 (red, green, blue, yellow) teams with a lead infection control nurse within each team to do outcome guardian visits. 10 of these have been undertaken. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims 15 Enclosure F To remain within trajectory for surveillance To develop assessment tools, patient’s information letter and set up database To develop audit tools to be ‘form’ based – electronically completed, database To review policies and review risk assessment frameworks for IPC Review the RCA’s for bacteraemia Include Group A strep surveillance for maternity unit Development of SSI surveillance tool Development of SSI database To undertake a Clinell trial Perform the risk assessment/risk plans for IPCT To continue the Outcome Guardian visits and put actions in place to address the 2 key themes that have already been identified Clinell wipe trials: Two products are being trialled (commenced end of September), which will run into Q3. If successful there is a significant cost saving by implementing both wipes, which would require a cost comparison: a) Clorox Wipes for the cleaning of commodes and C.difficile positive bed spaces b) Continence Care Wipes for the cleaning of patients skin following incontinence Risks ICNet Version 5 Was installed in 2008, it is the IT software used by the IPCT to monitor active infections and target surveillance. The system has never been updated, and it has now reached a critical point. The system is limited and in the event that the system should fail it will not be possible for it to be repaired. ICNet NG: is the latest version of ICNet, it has the capability to receive data from various hospital systems already in place, in real time. By having an up to date system with additional availability will reduce the administration time for the IPCT, allowing more time for them to focus on delivering IPC at the point of care, thereby improving infection prevention practices. Lead: Controls and Mitigation • • This was discussed briefly at the September IPCC and a demonstration has been arranged for November 2012 to assess the benefits. A recommendation will be made to the IPCC following the demonstration and next steps identified. Suzanne Morris, Nurse Consultant, Infection Prevention and Control 16 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Nutrition Q2 RAG Date period : Quarter 2, July – September 2012 Q3 RAG Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To provide a high standard of nutritional care to patients within the Trust: All adult in patients to be screened for the risk of malnutrition within 24 hours of admission to the ward, re-assessed appropriately and action taken. Raise staff awareness on the importance of embedding protected mealtimes and effective nutritional care planning into the ward culture. Reduction of central line infections in relation to parenteral nutrition Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims To ensure correct completion and calculation of Malnutrition Universal Screen Tool (MUST) scores Implementation of MUST e-learning programme. Geriatric wards to drive protected mealtimes. Meet with nutrition board and parenteral and enteral sub group to review all aspects of nutritional care. Commence the drill down visits to wards as part of the Trusts Care Quality Commission (CQC) implementation strategy (outcome 5, meeting nutritional needs) Central line audit commenced on all patients receiving Parenteral Nutrition Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Key Aims for Q3 The MUST screening tool has been revised to ensure correct completion. This is being incorporated into the new nursing risk assessment booklet. On going analysis of MUST datix incidents and development and review of actions. Liaising with training and development and British Association Parenteral Enteral Nutrition with regards to implementation of MUST e-learning programme Initial meeting with geriatric ward leaders regarding protected mealtimes. Mealtime service audited. Awaiting results. Relevant updates in nutritional care fed into nutrition board and sub groups (e.g National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) alerts). Drill down visits undertaken in 3 areas and feedback given to ward leaders. Ward metrics scores for nutrition during August reduced significantly To ensure protected mealtimes is embedded throughout the Trust. Continue to meet with nutrition board and sub groups. Central line audit on going Continue to monitor correct completion of MUST screens Review results of initial protected mealtime audit. Identify examples of good practice to share and disseminate with wards. Identify areas where improvement needed. Continue to audit central lines in relation to Parenteral Nutrition Continual audit of MUST through the Trust wide quality metrics project. Analysis of datix incidents that identify issues relating to MUST th Plans are underway for promoting Nutritional Day on 8 November Risks Controls and Mitigation Patients at risk of malnutrition may not be identified Completing and calculating of MUST scores may be sub- optimal Non-adherence to protected mealtimes may compromise patient recovery. Lead: Angela Hill, Nutrition Nurse Specialist 17 The nursing metrics are undertaken monthly and identify any areas of concern. These are discussed with the ward leader to put actions in place. Training on MUST tool will take place via registered nurse time outs and nursing induction. Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report – Pressure Ulcer Prevention Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Aims / Objectives for 2012: Pressure ulcers are no longer a specific CQUIN target this year but are part of the Quality Schedule. The contractual requirement is to reach Zero Tolerance of Avoidable Pressure Ulcers by the end of March 2013, with incremental reduction targets through each quarter. Key Aims for Q2 Performance against Quarter 2 Key Aims Continue the “No Pressure” communication campaign across the Trust th Raise awareness during national Pressure Ulcer week commencing 17 September Training the Link Nurses to roll out the S.K.I.N.S. tool in their areas Continued targeting of all pressure damage within the Trust by the TV team Development of a culture of Zero Tolerance to avoidable pressure damage To attend the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Collaborative Programme, which is a national venture where teams gain leadership development and training tools. Audit pressure relieving equipment and provide a gap analysis of any deficit requirements for all hospitals within the Trust. Complete all Route Cause Analysis presentations on grade 3 pressure ulcers so that lessons and themes can be shared amongst nurse leaders and clinical staff to prevent repetition of similar issues. Key Aims for Q3 Review all Trust Guidance and documents relating to Pressure Ulcer care to reflect strategy and best practice. Develop an education programme for patient’s carers and staff to promote prevention of pressure ulcer development. Continue the implementation of the S.K.I.N.S tool to embed the new documentation Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Promotion of the “No Pressure” Campaign and the S.K.I.N.S Tool Auditing compliance of the S.K.I.N.S Tool Continued targeting of all pressure damage within the Trust by the TV team Development of a culture of Zero Tolerance to avoidable pressure damage Engaging patients/carers in pressure ulcer prevention 18 Monthly communications delivered on I care 2 site to. Pressure ulcer TH week 17 September celebrated in “the street” supported by a focused key pressure ulcer prevention messages and PU logo badges distributed to staff. Stand was manned by staff raising awareness to both staff and public. TV team continue to review all reported grade 2,3,4 pressure ulcers delivering patient and staff education at the bedside driving a no tolerance approach. Training for all Link Staff has been delivered to support the Introduction of the S.K.I.N.S tool. A rolling programme of ad hoc training has been delivered across all hospitals sites and clinical areas by the TV team. S.K.I.N.S tool has been implemented in all areas throughout the trust. A tool has been developed and used by the TV team to test S.K.I.N.S compliance formal and written feedback is given to Ward leaders HON. A Multidisciplinary Pressure Ulcer Collaborative team has been established to attend regional collaborative work streams. This team feeds into the Pressure Ulcer steering group and has helped to inform the PU work programme for 2012/13 Full trust wide mattress audit undertaken in September Grade 3 Pressure Ulcers presented at monthly PU Steering group and lessons learnt are shared. Enclosure F Risks Controls and Mitigation Unable to recruit to Nurse Consultant Tissue Viability which is leaving a gap around clinical expertise. nd Community Specialist TV Nurse employed by CHP was withdrawn on 2 July, with no prior notice. Leads: Sandra Hopkinson, Head of Nursing 19 This post is being re-submitted via the vacancy approval process so it can be re-advertised Discussions have taken place over the past few months between CHP and commissioners who have agreed to fund 6 months of Band 7. Enclosure F Clinical Effectiveness Heart attack secondary prevention. July 2012 to Sept 2012. Quarter 2. Percentage of heart attack patients prescribed an anti-platelet, statin or beta blocker. National standard identified in the NSF for CHD. Quarterly progress highlights Risks & Issues • Taken from MINAP (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project) data. Period of July, 2012 – Sept, 2012. Data includes all patients discharged alive with a discharge diagnosis of MI. Aspirin B Blocker Ace Clopidogrel Statin (all admissions) Number of patients KMH 100.0% 98% 98% 100.0% 100% • None. Added value • National 99.4% 97.0% 95.7% Main activities for next quarter 98.5% • 81 • To note: contractually the trust is required to have 90% of patients discharged on secondary prevention medication • King’s Mill has maintained a strong performance across all categories. • Single audit clerk now collecting data enables more consistency in data collection. Continue to collect data on all ACS patients admitted rather than only NSTEMI patients. Validation of audit is due over the next quarter. Author: Joanne Davies, Clinical Audit Assistant in Cardiac and Stroke Services 20 Enclosure F Clinical Effectiveness Status PROMS – QUARTERLY PARTICIPATION RATE REPORT Quarterly Progress Report Risks and Issues The PROMs pre-operative questionnaire participation and linkage rates for Sherwood Forest Hospitals Trust for the period April 2011 to March 2012 are shown below. PROMs pre-operative questionnaire participation and linkage rates All Procedures Groin Hernia Hip Replacement Knee Replacement Varicose Vein Total eligible episodes 1,390 436 355 Q1s completed 1,172 352 290 Participatio n rate 84.3% 80.7% 81.7% Q1s linked 831 271 193 Linkage rate 70.9% 77.0% 66.6% 433 166 429 101 99.1% 60.8% 278 89 64.8% 88.1% All procedures Groin Hernia Hip replacement Knee replacement Varicose Vein • • • • Q1s completed 827 314 180 251 82 Participatio n rate 70.6% 89.2% 62.1% 58.5% 81.2% Q1s linked 529 191 136 168 34 Linkage rate 64.0% 60.8% 75.6% 66.9% 41.5% Provisional PROMs data for 12/13 for the period April 2012 to May 2012 has been published but this is currently not available at a provider level. Author: Julie Jan – Deputy Divisional Director – Planned Care & Surgery 21 None identified this quarter Main activities for next quarter • The PROMs post-operative questionnaire participation and linkage rates for Sherwood Forest Hospitals Trust for the period April 2011 to March 2012 are shown below. Total eligible episodes 1,172 352 290 429 101 • Continue to encourage and collate PROM related data for submissions to HES Need to investigate why the participation rate for Varicose vein procedures are much lower than the other procedures. Pre and post op pathway to be reviewed. Continue to interrogate National database at provider and consultant level to determine variance in participation rates New questionnaire forms received and will be in use from 17th Oct 2012 at both King’s Mill and Newark hospitals Review the questionnaire process for all procedures post operatively to ensure patients are getting the forms. Enclosure F Clinical effectiveness To improve outcomes for stroke patients using the 9 SENTINEL indicators as a measure. NICE, NSF, National Stroke Strategy: July to September- Quarter 2, 2012. Quarterly progress highlights Risks & Issues • • Thrombolysis rates improving- 8% of stroke cases this quarter vs National target of 10%. Increasing recruitment to stroke research trials- 9th out of 23 in East Mids league tables Indicator Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 11/12 11/12 12/13 12/13 95% 96% 85% 95% • • • • • • Dr Foster reporting rising stroke mortality Lack of weekend therapy staff on Acute Stroke Unit. Bed capacity pressures. Lack of Community Stroke Team may lead to capacity issues if inpatient bed base decreases Still dependent on locum consultant staff (2 out of 4) Decrease in Trust’s SALT contract may adversely impact on stroke service Patients spend at least 90% of their stay on a stroke unit Screening for swallowing 100% 99% 97% 99% Added value disorders <24hrs after admission • Role out of RCP SSNAP real time stroke audit will allow closer Brain scan within 24hrs of 100% 100% 100% 96% scrutiny of service. stroke Anti-platelet medication by 100% 100% 99% 100% Main activities for next quarter 48hrs after stroke Physiotherapist assessment 95% 98% 99% 100% • Develop cross-site working with NCH to allow progress towards within 72hrs of admission 24/7 thrombolysis service. OT assessment within 4 91% 94% 99% 99% • Enhance nursing expertise to support telemedicine projectworking days of admission establish 24/7 Band 6 cover in line with peer stroke services Patient weight during admission 100% 100% 98% 100% throughout Region Rehabilitation goals by the multi 100% 100% 96% 99% • Relocation of Rehabilitation from ACH to KMH. disciplinary team within 5 days • Establish 6/52, 6/12 and annual stroke F/U in accordance with Patients mood assessed by 100% 99% 95% 100% National Stroke Improvement Programme discharge % patients who achieve all 9 83% 87% 96% 99% indicators The results from Quarter 2 from the ongoing measurement against the 9 Sentinel Audit KPIs are shown in the table above and show maintained/continuing improvement. Author: Martin Cooper, Stroke Physician & Joanne Davies, Clinical Audit Assistant in Cardiac & Stroke Services 22 Enclosure F QUARTERLY UPDATE ON PROGRESS AGAINST THE COMMISSIONING FOR QUALITY AND INNOVATION (CQUIN) TARGETS QUARTER 2 1 JULY TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2012 The highlight reports that follow give an indication to the Board of progress to date, against the Nottinghamshire County CQUIN schemes with a total value of circa £4.5m.. 23 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report – CQUIN A) Improving Dementia Care B) Dementia Training CQUIN Annual Value: £720k Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q1 Rating Q2 Forecast CQUIN Target: 1. 95% of all emergency patients aged >75 years have been screened using dementia screening tool 2. 95% patients aged > 75 years who have been positively screened have had a dementia risk assessment undertaken 3. 100% patients aged > 75 years who are identified at risk have been referred for specialist diagnosis 4. 90% of all relevant staff are trained in dementia care & mental capacity act every 2 years Key Aims for Q2 • Production of a risk assessment tool • Education of clinicians and nursing staff across Trust • Safeguarding nurses and lead medic will focus upon Assessment Units to increase awareness and compliance to documentation • Agreement of structure to ensure successful implementation within these areas • Produce and consolidate action plan in Quarter 2 • Prepare for Q3/4 requirements • Programme of Clinician education • Continuation of Dementia & MCA training at Induction and Mandatory sessions • Possible fixed term recruitment of a fixed term data clerk to support the CQUIN delivery Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims • Dementia Screening Assessment & Diagnosis (DSAD) tool finalised and in place • Education programmes rolled out across trust. • Safeguarding nurse making daily visits to admission areas and wards • Dementia and Mental Capacity Act (MCA) training continued • A system has been implemented for data collection and national submission of data • Recruitment of nurse (fixed term) to lead dementia strategy and CQUIN Key Aims for Q3 • Aim for percentage targets for DSAD completion (as above) • Raise awareness trust-wide • Continue programme of education and training • Re-invigorate dementia as a key agenda for clinicians and wards. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims • Clarify DSAD placement and filing for ward receptionists • Investigate possibilities of IT for referral data (Orion question) • Raise awareness – - F1 teaching and grand rounds, nursing bulletin/posters - Raise public profile of dementia screening • Push trust dementia strategy forward • Restructuring and reinstatement of Trust Dementia Working Group • Support data collection/ maintain vigilance Controls and Mitigation • Re-engagement of clinicians and ward staff • Dedicated nurse lead for dementia CQUIN • Support data clerks and ensure regular feedback of current processes (weekly meetings) th th Summary 13 August – 30 September • Criteria 1 – 26% (Q2 no target, Q3 Target 95%) • Criteria 2 – 30% (Q2 no target, Q3 Target 100%) • Criteria 3 – 97% (Q2 no target, Q4 Target 100%) • Dementia training compliance - 83% (Q2 target 70%) Risks • Reliant on engagement of clinicians trust-wide • Current low percentage rate of completed assessments • Level of change involved • Labour intensiveness of data collection Lead: Dr Steve Rutter, Consultant Geriatrician & Adam Hayward, Service Improvement Nurse - Dementia 24 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report – Failure to Rescue CQUIN Annual CQUIN Value: £511k Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q1 Rating Q2 Forecast CQUIN Target: To reduce avoidable cardiac arrests by 50% by Quarter 4 Key Aims for Q2 1. Collection of data for “avoidable” cardiac arrests – feedback to wards & Consultants 2. Review all “avoidable” cardiac arrests and provide feedback to parent teams 3. Communications drive to highlight avoidable cardiac arrests and plans to reduce them 4. Education – targeted ward-based Augmented Care Assessment Tool (ACAT) training, AIM courses, junior doctor induction 5. Observation charts (re-design) 6. Acute Response Team: further publicity (especially for August hand-over) & audit 7. Develop Patient Group Directive (PGD) for Oxygen and Fluids 8. Engage senior medical staff: Consultant review of deteriorating patients, plus Allow Natural Death (AND) and Ceiling of Therapy decisions Key Aims for Q3 1. Continue to collect data for “avoidable” cardiac arrests & feedback to wards & Consultants 2. Continue to review “avoidable” cardiac arrests, feedback to parent teams – ensure response and chase up action plans. 3. Implementation of NEWS (National Early Warning Score) and development of NEWS observation charts 4. Education – publicity & training on NEWS and escalation policy, training on Fluids PGD 5. Re-write observations policy incorporating NEWS and NEWS escalation policy 6. VitalPAC – consider introduction of electronic monitoring of observations 7. Introduction of ceiling of therapy/treatment escalation plan document 8. Link into other key groups in Trust – Sepsis, Acute Kidney Injury Risks 1. Staffing levels – ability of CCOT and NTLs to respond to increased volume of calls generated by adoption of NEWS Lead: Dr Lisa Milligan, Consultant in Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims 1. Data for Q2 will be sent to wards and consultants within the next 2 weeks. By the end of quarter 2 a 52% reduction in avoidable cardiac arrests has been achieved. This meets the Q2 CQUIN. 2. All “avoidable” cardiac arrests during Q2 have been reviewed by CQUIN team and feedback sent to parent team Consultants. 3. Junior doctor induction training completed. On-going ward-based targeted ACAT training, and monthly AIM courses, including courses for HCA’s. 4. Observation chart redesign – on going. Decision to change to National Early Warning Score (NEWS). 5. Further publicity re Acute Response Team (ART) in early August, including pop-ups. ART audit on-going. 6. PGD fluids approved by DTC – roll out and training to commence. 7. Medical Grand Round presentation on resuscitation decision making in early August. Patient info leaflets redesigned. Formation of Consultant group to discuss AND & ceiling of therapy decisions (due to meet 27 November) Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims 1. Agree the new version of the observation chart, based on NEWS 2. Agree the rollout and training plan for the NEWS chart across the Trust 3. Scope the impact on the Critical Care Outreach Team (CCOT) team in terms of additional calls 4. The 12/13 action plan will be reviewed at the Failure to Rescue project group meeting and specific actions allocated. Controls and Mitigation 1. On-going discussions about staffing levels with Trust management, on-going CCOT audit of calls 25 Enclosure F Title : Improving the experience of patients with Learning Disabilities (LD) Annual CQUIN Value £340k Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q1 Rating Q2 Forecast CQUIN Targets for 2012/13: Flagging system in place for identification of patients with Learning Disabilities Patients with Learning Disabilities to have a mean length of stay (LOS) of no longer than patients without Learning Disabilities Demonstrate involvement of users with learning disabilities and their carers in surveys Report to the Learning Disabilities Partnership Board 6 monthly Key Aims for Q2 • Ongoing audit to find out whether patients with learning disabilities have a longer length of stay at SFHFT and the reasons for this. • Review LOS data for Q2 with an associated audit to be undertaken on any patients with longer LOS. • To continue to meet at the Learning Disabilities Steering Group quarterly. • To continue to raise awareness to staff of the flagging system to prevent any patients not being recognised with a LD Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims • Flagging system – Ongoing flags added as patients are seen by the learning disability nurse specialist. The number of patients flagged so far is 258 • During Quarter 1, the data supplied did not show a longer mean Length of Stay for learning disabilities patients. The audit enabled patients with a higher than average LoS to be identified and any Audit results showed that patients were receiving active treatment and therefore were not a medically fit for discharge. This has remained the case in the monthly audits undertaken. • Patient & Carers involvement – The August learning disability steering group was cancelled due to low attendance, next meeting in November 2012. Patient feedback has continued to be collated from inpatients on a monthly basis • The trust went to the Learning Disabilities Partnership Board on 6 September to report on the CQUIN and inform interested parties of ongoing work. th Key Aims for Q3 • To ensure Learning Disabilities patients are flagged up immediately on admission to the Trust so that reasonable adjustments/care needs can be met. • To engage LD patients and carers to ensure improvements are introduced within the system. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims th • Learning disability steering group scheduled for Wednesday 28 November 2012. • Continue to audit LOS for LD patients. • Attend learning disability Partnership board meetings • Continue to collect patient experience feedback • Continue to Flag new patients to the electronic system Risks • Data for Q2 Length of Stay for Learning Disabilities against Trust average is currently being collated Controls and Mitigation • Learning Disabilities nurse is proactively auditing the notes of patients who have previously been admitted so any themes or issues of concern relating to extended LOS can be addressed. Lead: Claire Henley – Learning Disability Nurse Specialist 26 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report - Net Promoter Score (NPS) ANNUAL CQUIN VALUE £340K Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q2 RAG Q3 RAG Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To maintain a NPS of 71 or above per month Key Aims for Q2 Results: July:88 Aug:75 Sept:83 The aims are: To increase awareness with the ward teams about their individual ward scores. To ask ward leaders to produce action plans if their results are less than 75 To ensure the reasons for not recommending us are captured on datix to enable feedback to the wards To increase wards staffs general awareness of care, dignity and compassion To ensure other teams visiting wards take action if they identify any areas of concern Key Aims for Q3 Ensure monthly scores remain above 71 Risks The risk is that if one person chooses not to recommend us the overall score can become very low. Lead: Sally Dore, Director of Customer Experience and Engagement 27 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims The raw results are fed back to the ward leaders and Heads of Nursing and they have taken a great interest in them. They are: discussing the results and implications at ward meetings asking patients the question themselves and digging deeper to fully understand the reasons for the scores explaining to all staff the importance of enabling the patients to be able to say they are highly likely to recommend our service Customer services now collate the feedback from patients when asking these questions and will log on datix, identifying if the patient was a promoter, passive or detractor. This will enable a greater understanding of the reasons for the scores. This is also being compared to the inpatient survey results All registered nurses have been invited to a Care, Dignity and Compassion all day training event. Many have already attended The guardians of care are surveying wards every week and will identify any areas of concern and feed it back to the ward leaders on the same day. The nursing metrics are carried out on the wards every month and will identify any issues. There are thoughts that the Doctors handover in August may have adversely affected the results. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims Director of Customer Experience to ensure the above actions are maintained. SHA conference calls are participated in every month to enable learning from other organisations Controls and Mitigation The above actions are in place to ensure patients do get a good experience and would recommend our service. Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report + Improving choice at End of Life Annual CQUIN Value: £340k Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q1 Rating Q2 Forecast CQUIN Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: • • Improve identification of patients in the last year of life, communication with primary care and expedition of patients preferred place of care. Primary care notification for at least 80% of patients on the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), within 24 hours Key Aims for Q2 • • • • • Continue to raise awareness of ward staff/ medics in identifying patients approaching End of Life. Raise awareness of the multi professional team in identifying patients’ needs and planning care through the process of Advanced Care Planning. Continue to work collaboratively with primary care 24 RE: notifying primary care of patients approaching End of Life and the End of Life Care Register. Continue to support ward staff to inform GP, within 24 hours of commencement of the Liverpool Care Pathway. On-going monthly audit to assess the compliance with the implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway and Preferred Place of Death. Key Aims for Q3 • • Continue to work collaboratively with primary care 24 RE: notifying primary care of patients approaching End of Life, in order to maintain the End of Life register. Continue to support ward staff to inform primary care, within 24 hours of commencement of the Liverpool Care Pathway. Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims 1a: Identification of patients in the last year of life. • Data shows 31 patients were placed on the End of Life register during July to September 2012. This met the CQUIN requirements. • End of Life Care covered in a Grand round presentation, to inform all medical staff of the importance of early identification of patients approaching End of Life. • Continue to use established referral process to primary care, for patients identified as approaching their last year of life. • A process has been developed for the discharge team to refer all identified fast track patients to the End of Life register. • Mandatory questions have been developed, as part of the discharge process to become a mechanism for identifying patients approaching End of Life. 1b: Primary Care notified of patients being placed on the Liverpool Care Pathway within 24 hours. • 75 patients were coded as commenced on the Liverpool Care Pathway between 01.07.201230.09.2012, Primary Care were informed of 81% of these patients. • End of Life Care Coordinator continue to notify Primary Care within 24 hours of patients commencing on the Liverpool Care Pathway. • Improvement in ward staff informing Primary care and End of Life Care Coordinator Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims • • • • On-going monthly audit to assess compliance with the implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway and PPD. Continue to work with primary care 24 RE: notifying primary care of patients approaching End of Life.] Continue to work collaboratively with the Discharge Team with referrals to the End of Life Care register. Continue to support ward staff to refer all patient on the Liverpool Care Pathway to Primary Care 28 Enclosure F • • • Risks • • • On- going monthly audit to assess the compliance with the implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway and Preferred Place of Death (PPD). Continue to deliver education on Induction programmes, Registered Nurse Development Days, Workshops, Medical Grand Rounds & Face to Face teaching on the Wards Continue to monitor progress being made on actions within Trust Action Plans produced as a result of participating in the National Cancer Network, local audits and CQUINS • • and End of Life Care Coordinator. Establish discharge process to include questions surrounding identifying patients approaching end of life. Deliver on a number of education programmes Update Trust Action Plans to reflect progress being made in improving EOLC Controls and Mitigation Failure to notify primary care of all patients implemented on the Liverpool Care Pathway. Process and mechanism for effective communication with primary care, and implementing the End of Life register. • • Promote Primary Care 24 contact number (24 hour day/ 7 day week) Limit number of professionals involved in referral process, i.e. Discharge Team and End of Life Care Coordinator. Lead: Dr Mark Roberts, Consultant & Lead for End of Life Care 29 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report Venous Thrombo-prophylaxis (VTE) Annual CQUIN Value: £340k Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q1 Rating Q2 Forecast Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: To improve the assessment and treatment of patients with VTE. Key Aims for Q2 • To achieve 93% Compliance for VTE risk assessment. This is based on the monthly compliance below • To achieve 93% compliance in re-assessing patients their condition changes significantly i.e. taken to theatre/ITU/CCU – currently 91.90% ( still collecting data ) • To achieve 100% -patients requiring prophylaxis receive it in an appropriate and timely manner. Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims • July 93.04%, August 93.05%, September 93.15% • To achieve 93% compliance in re-assessing patients their condition changes significantly i.e. taken to theatre/ITU/CCU – currently 91.90% ( still collecting data ) • To achieve 100% -patients requiring prophylaxis receive it in an appropriate and timely manner. 100% achieved. Key Aims for Q3 • Increase in level of compliance needed to achieve is 95% for VTE Risk Assessment. • Undertake case reviews of hospital acquired thrombus to learn lessons Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims • Continue to maximise data collection methods for VTE. • Continue to influence electronic solution • Influence the paper prescription chart to enable easier completion of the risk assessment until electronic solution is available • Encourage the checks on post take wards rounds by consultants to ensure increase in compliance • Weekly meetings with service leads Risks • CQUIN requirements not met resulting in a loss of payment • Patient safety issues if not Risk Assessed for VTE • Data collection clerk has tendered her resignation and this will be a risk to collecting the data if the vacancy is frozen Controls and Mitigation • Monitoring system in place to identify any specific issues within areas • Alternative ways for working in place to cover data collection process while considering the need to re-appoint to the post. Lead: Dr Samuel Kemp, Consultant & Clinical Lead for VTE 30 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report + Emergency Department (ED)Streaming Q1 Rating Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q2 Forecast Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: • • Achievement of quarterly percentages of patients streamed (as highlighted in in-year milestones) and/or all patients who could be streamed were streamed. Suitability agreed via clinical audit with PCT lead. Fully functioning Clinical Decision Unit (CDU) by 1 October 2012. Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims • A minimum of 8% of ED attendances and/or all patients who could be streamed were streamed. Suitability agreed via clinical audit with PCT Clinical Lead with 1% leeway either side of “all patients who could be streamed were streamed” for cases where the clinical audit does not reach agreement on the appropriateness of said cases for primary care. 7% of all presentations were streamed to primary care, however 11% of patients who could be streamed were streamed, which reflects the current rise in activity through majors and resus. This meets the CQUIN requirements. • Q2 CDU partly operational by 1 July 2012 Appropriate patient pathways and operational policy all developed within quarter. Key Aims for Q3 Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims For Q3 – a minimum of 8 % and/or all patients who could be streamed were streamed. Suitability agreed via clinical audit with PCT Clinical Lead with 1% leeway either side of “all patients who could be streamed were streamed” for cases where the clinical audit does not reach agreement on the appropriateness of said cases for primary care. Sustain current performance in streaming all appropriate patients to primary care, review clinical criteria post audit. Q3&4 – Fully functioning CDU by 1 October The CDU is now in operation and a review of clinical pathways has commenced Risks Controls and Mitigation Primary Care Streaming – opening of PC24 “front door” may reduce the number of patients attending the ED with minor illness. Discussion during ED/PC management meeting regarding review of percentage required to meet target and increase focus on audit. This is being monitored via the Trust contract meetings. CDU – Trust overall capacity could impact on the ability to utilise beds on EAU for CDU patients CDU – Mitigation, highlight and identify patients suitable for CDU tariff. Lead: Julie Dixon, Head of Nursing 31 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report – Think Glucose CQUIN Annual Value: £511k Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q1 Rating Q2 Forecast Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: 1. Mean length of Stay for patients with diabetes admitted for any reason to be no more than 1 day longer than patients without diabetes (admitted for any reason) 2. 80% reduction of insulin medication errors by Quarter 4. Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims 1. Develop and prepare for a trust wide pilot of new blood sugar monitoring form 2. Meet with IT representative to implement ‘flagging’ system for diabetes patients 3. Work with Pharmacy to reduce insulin errors. 4. Identify clinical leads for each element of the CQUIN to drive delivery. Key Aims for Q3 1. Standardised referral process for specialist diabetes intervention to be discussed at Steering Group Meeting 2. Think Glucose information will be available at point of use 3. Work towards reducing insulin errors 1. Form has been developed and approved by nursing documentation group and rolled out 2. A Think Glucose training session has been introduced to the Registered nurse time out days, which features a patient story to reinforce key messages. 3. Training of ward based nurses and doctors is underway using Think Glucose criteria. 4. Training in use of Think Glucose criteria will follow the Admission to Discharge, incorporating the Diabetes Inpatient Care Teaching Framework. 5. Work is in progress to develop a separate insulin prescription sheet and sliding scale sheet and promote insulin safety on e-learning. 6. Insulin safety on line training is now mandatory and is assessed at junior doctor induction. 7. The clinical team have identified areas within the Trust where length of stay for diabetic patients (outside of diabetes wards) is higher than average and education and training is being targeted to these areas. 8. An in-patient diabetes service has been introduced. Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims 1. Diabetes team to work with divisional management team to review implications of service redesign to orientate the diabetes and endocrinology service towards delivering a specialist in patient service. 2. The clinical team have undertaken the National In patient diabetes audit questionnaire. The use of this structure is a part of the inpatient proposal. This measures the number of incident errors. 3. The National in patient diabetes audit data for October 2012 will be published on line in February 2012 were we are benchmarked against other trusts and I suggest we use that for the next quarterly report in addition to January data. 4. Training will be conducted by a dedicated Diabetes support nurse with supervision by the Diabetes Specialist nurses. Risks Controls and Mitigation 1. At present, there is no standardised referral process. 1. Plans for the review and redesign of the referral process is being discussed at the next steering group This is being reviewed by the diabetes team. meeting 2. Potential lack of clinical buy-in and awareness to 2. Opportunities to target senior medical staff are currently being scoped and awareness is being raised achieve the LOS reduction across nursing teams via the time out days and ward leader meetings. 3. Loss of income resulting in failure to deliver CQUIN (£116) LEAD: Dr Devaka Fernando, Consultant in Endocrinology and Diabetes 32 Enclosure F Title : Quarterly Quality Report – Safety Thermometer Annual CQUIN value £340K Q2 RAG Date period : Quarter 2 July – September 2012 Q3 RAG Aims / Objectives for 2012/13: 1) To ensure Safety Thermometer data is collected on ALL WARDS monthly and submitted to NHS information centre (NHSIC) by required deadline (mandatory)- Target -3 consecutive quarterly submissions of monthly survey data- Q1 and Q2 submitted to date. 2) To have 95% “harms free” care by December 2012 (stretch/ aspirational target) Key Aims for Q2 Progress against Quarter 2 Key Aims 1) To ensure data is collected monthly 2) To report on the data to the NHS Information Centre 3) ST information to be reviewed at Professional Advisory Group to ensure it is being acted upon effectively 4) Reports to be made available to Pressure Ulcer and Falls Steering Groups 5) To continue to communicate to the ward staff the designated day for data collection to prevent any none collection of data. 1) Achieved: All Wards submitted data for July, August & Sept 2012. Key Aims for Q3 1) To ensure data is collected monthly on ALL wards 2) To report on the data to the NHS Information Centre 3) ST information to be reviewed at PAG to ensure it is being acted upon effectively 4) To continue to communicate to the ward staff the designated day for data collection and to ensure accurate data reporting. Risks Non-submission of data from 1 or more wards Non-submission of data to NHSIC Inaccurate data collected. Lead: Harms Free Care old (pre admission)+ new harms Harm Free Care new harms(on or during admission) Q1 90% (1625/1810), Q1 96% (1735/1810), Q2 91% (1647/1808) Q2 97% (1743/1808) 2) Achieved: Data cleansed and then submitted to NHSIC within required deadline. During Q2, the NHSIC commenced a data quality check process and SFH is one of the few Trusts that was reported as having no data quality issues for Aug and Sept 2012. th 3) Pending: PAG to review information on Wednesday 24 October. However in addition to a PAG review the Divisional Governance Advisors have been introduced to the Safety Thermometer tool and Divisional Safety Thermometers are now being created monthly and forwarded to the Division for review and appropriate action (as of Oct 2012). 4) Achieved: Safety Thermometer PU data used by the Pressure Ulcer Collaborative group and falls data has been included within the Monthly report to the Trust Falls and Safety group. 5) Achieved: Reminder send via Nursing Bulletin in August (Alison Clarke). Actions to Deliver Quarter 3 Key Aims 1) Email reminders send for Safety Thermometer Co-ordinator to HoN and wards leaders 5 days before, 2 days before and on the data collection day. This allows HoN, Ward leaders to nominate alternative staff to collect data in the event of illness/ leave etc. 2) An additional member of Staff within E.A.R has been trained in data validation and procedures to upload data to NHSIC ensure continuity of data submission in case of sickness. th 3) Awaiting response from PAG review which is scheduled for 24 Oct 2012. Any required actions will be implemented 4) To work with Divisional Clinical Governance Advisors to produce support information to be distributed via Nursing Bulletin to ensure all safety Thermometer data collectors understand and collect accurate data. Controls and Mitigation 1) Reminder system as described above, more than 2 staff per ward trained to collect data, support from Ward Leaders / Safety Thermometer Leads on other wards in the event of no-availability of all trained staff. 2) Additional member of Staff trained in EAR to submit data 3) Additional and on-going training in use of Safety thermometer plus production of support information and continuation of data validation by Trust’s Safety Thermometer Co-ordinator before submission to NHSIC Sonia Gill, Clinical Audit Support Officer / Safety Thermometer Co-ordinator 33
© Copyright 2024