( )

Questions Before One Sample Proportion Inference Answers
1. Suppose you take a SRS of size n from a population and calculate the proportion
of the sample to be pˆ .
a. Write a general form for a 96% confidence interval.
" pˆ (1 ! pˆ ) %
pˆ ± 2.054 $
'
n
#
&
b. What conclusion about the population can you draw from the confidence
interval? Why?
-
We are 96% confident that an interval created as shown above
will capture he population proportion
-
96% of all intervals like the one shown above will capture the
population proportion
-
The reason why these two description are valid is because 96%
of all the sample proportions are within 2.054 standard
deviations from the population proportion therefore if we go
2.054 standard deviations from a given sample proportion we can
use one of the above conclusions.
c. What would happen to the margin of error and therefore the confidence
interval if we were to change size of the sample? Why?
We know that as the sample size increases the standard deviation
of the proportions decreases. Therefore as the sample size
increases the margin of error decreases so the width of the
confidence interval gets smaller. If the sample size decreases the
margin of error increases so the width of the confidence interval
gets larger.
d. What would happen to the margin of error and therefore the confidence
interval if we were to change the C-level? Why?
If we increase the confidence level we increase the size of the
critical value and therefore increase the margin of error and
increase the width of the confidence interval. If we decrease the
confidence level we decrease the size of the critical value and
therefore decrease the margin of error and decrease the width of
the confidence interval.
2. What is the value of z* when you are creating a 92% confidence interval?
z* = 1.751
3. What is the value of z* when you are creating a 85% confidence interval?
z* = 1.44
4. What is the value of z* when you are performing a one-tail test and α = 0.03?
z* = 1.88
5. What is the value of z* when you are performing a one-tail test and α = 0.02?
z* = 2.054
6. What is the value of z* when you are performing a two-tail test and α = 0.07?
z* = 1.812
7. What is the value of z* when you are performing a two-tail test and α = 0.12?
z* = 1.555
8. If ! = 0.05 then what confidence level would give same result as a:
a. One-Tail Test
90%
b. Two-Tailed Test
95%
9. If the confidence level is 94%, what ! value would give same result as a:
a. One-Tail Test
! = 0.03
b. Two-Tailed Test
! = 0.06
10. Your local newspaper polls a random sample of voters. How big of a sample size
is required to have a margin of error within 1%.
! (0.5) ( 0.5 ) $
! (0.25 $
0.25
0.25
2
0.01 = 1.96 #
' ( 0.0051) =
' n=
= 9611.687
& ' 0.0051 = #
&
n
n %
n
"
( 0.0051)2
"
%
The required sample size to guarantee a margin of error within 1% is 9612
11. A recent study examined a random sample of 384 children and found that 46 of
them showed signs of autism
a. Determine the 95% confidence interval and clearly express what you have
calculated.
(0.08731, 0.15227). I am 95% confident that the proportion of children
with autism is within the given interval
b. In the 1980s it was accepted that autism affected about 5% of the nation’s
children. What does this confidence interval suggest?
Since all the values in the interval (0.08731, 0.15227) are larger than 0.05
I would conclude that the proportion of children diagnosed with autism
has increased.
12. A recent study surveyed a random sample of 881 and found that 42% had
smoked.
Complete a Hypothesis Test using ! = 0.05 with H a : p < po
Ho: P = 0.44(44% of adults today have smoked)
Ha: P < 0.44 (less than 44% of adults today have smoked)
I will perform a one-sample proportion z-test
− We are given that data is a SRS
− (0.44)•881 = 387.64 > 10
(0.56)•881 = 493.36 > 10
− Assume more than 8810 adults
We are justified in concluding the sample proportions fit a normal
distribution.
pˆ = 0.42
z = !1.197
p-value = 0.1156
Fail to Reject Ho because p > 0.05 and z < 1.645. Data is not statistically
significant.
We do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the percent of adults
who have smoked in today’s population is less than the percent of adults
who have smoked in 1960s
13. Mars Inc., makers of M&M candies, claims that they produce M&M’s with the
certain distribution shown below to the left. A bag of M&M’s was randomly
selected from a grocery store shelf and the color counts were recorded as follows
below to the right. Our goal is to check the company’s claim for the proportion of
yellow M&M’s
Brown
Orange
Red
30% Green
10% Yellow
20% Blue
10%
20%
10%
Brown
Orange
Red
16
5
11
Green
Yellow
Blue
Ho: P = 0.20(20% of the M&M’S are yellow)
Ha: P ≠ 0.20(the percent of yellow M&M’s is not equal to 20%)
I will perform a one-sample proportion z-test
− The bag was selected randomly from the grocery store
− (0.2)•61 = 12.2 > 10 (0.8)•61 = 48.8 > 10
− Assume more than 610 M&M’s
We are justified in concluding the sample proportions fit a normal
distribution.
p-value = 0.0295
z = 2.177
pˆ = 0.3115
Reject Ho because p < 0.1 and z > 1.645. Data is statistically significant.
There is strong evidence to conclude that percent of yellow M&M’s is
not equal to 20%
7
19
3
14. A 95% confidnece interval for the proportion of college age students between the
are resgistered to vote random sample is (0.573, 0.827)
a. Compute the value of the sample proportion, pˆ .
pˆ = 0.7
b. Compute the value of the Margin of Error.
M.E. = 0.127
c. Compute the value of the Standard Error.
S.E. = 0.0648
d. Compute the Sample Size.
0.0648 =
(0.7)(0.3)
n
n = 50
e. A claim is made that 73% of college age students are registered to vote.
Does this 73% seem reasonable based on the above confidence interval?
Since 0.73 lies within the interval we can not rule it out as a
possible proportion of college age students registered to vote
Therefore we must condier 73% as a reasonable percentage of
college age studenst that are registered to vote.
AP Statistics Quiz B – Chapter 19 – Key
The countries of Europe report that 46% of the labor force is female. The United Nations wonders
if the percentage of females in the labor force is the same in the United States. Representatives
from the United States Department of Labor plan to check a random sample of over 10,000
employment records on file to estimate a percentage of females in the United States labor force.
15.
a.
1. The representatives from the Department of Labor want to estimate a percentage of females in
the United States labor force to within ±5%, with 90% confidence. How many employment
records should they sample?
pˆ qˆ
ˆˆ
ME = z* pq
ME z *
n
n
They should sample at least 269 employment records.
(0.5) (0.5)
(0.46)(0.54)
0.05 1.645
= 1.645
0.05
n n
They should sample at least 271 employment records
1.645
(0.46)(0.54)
1.645(0.5)
nn =
0.05
0.05
268.87
n
|
n = 270.06 269
b.2. They actually select a random sample of 525 employment records, and find that 229 of the
people are females. Create the confidence interval.
We have a random sample of less than 10% of the employment records, with 229 successes (females) and
296 failures (males), so a Normal model applies.
n = 525, pˆ
0.436 and qˆ
margin of error: ME
0.564 , so SE ( pˆ )
z * u SE ( pˆ )
Confidence interval: pˆ r ME
ˆˆ
pq
n
1.6450.022
0.4360.564
525
0.022
0.0362
0.436 r 0.0362 or (0.3998, 0.4722)
c.3. Interpret the confidence interval in this context.
We are 90% confident that between 40.0% and 47.2% of the employment records from the United States
labor force are female.
d.4. Explain what 90% confidence means in this context.
If many random samples were taken, 90% of the confidence intervals produced would contain the actual
percentage of all female employment records in the United States labor force.
e.5. Should the representatives from the Department of Labor conclude that the percentage of
females in their labor force is lower than Europe’s rate of 46%? Explain.
No. Since 46% lies in the confidence interval, (0.3998, 0.4722), it is possible that the percentage of females in
the labor force matches Europe’s rate of 46% female in the labor force.
19-10
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.