Download Report

Class Climate
Radford University Faculty and Course Evaluation_DRAFT
Radford University
Institutional Research
Mark as shown:
Please use a ball-point pen or a thin felt tip. This form will be processed automatically.
Correction:
Please follow the examples shown to help optimize the reading results.
1. QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR: Please provide fair and thoughtful information about your instructor and this course, being careful to separate the
two.
(4
)o
(5
g
y
ry
in
to
nd
c
fa
sta
ut
tis
sa
or
y
r
How would you evaluate your instructor's efforts to involve you with the course
material during class and/or through out-of-class assignments?
How professional was the instructor in working with students (e.g. was on time to
class, available during scheduled office hours, willing to help you learn, interacted
with students in a professional manner)?
1.3
How would you evaluate the instructor's effectiveness in communicating course
material (e.g. clarity of presentation, clearly responded to student questions, gave
relevant examples)?
1.4
How would you evaluate the instructor's effectiveness in organizing material (e.g.
came to class prepared, helped students analyze and apply material)?
How would you evaluate the instructor's effectiveness in communicating and
applying the standards and methods for evaluating students in the class?
1.5
t
ac
or
ct
oo
1.2
n
ha
isf
at
fa
)p
(1
tis
sa
)s
an
(3
th
et
ss
or
)le
)m
(2
1.1
(1
ng
tro
re
e
l
ee
tra
gr
ag
)a
ly
(4
eu
ee
(4
)m
(5
ha
)o
tis
sta
ut
sa
nd
g
y
y
in
or
r
to
ct
ac
fa
isf
r
y
oo
or
ct
)p
fa
(1
tis
at
sa
)s
an
(3
th
et
ss
or
)le
n
My overall rating of this instructor's effectiveness in this course is:
)n
gr
ee
1.7
(2
Based on the quality of instruction, I would recommend this instructor to others.
(3
isa
gr
sa
di
)d
ly
(2
ng
)s
tro
(5
)s
1.6
2. QUESTIONS ABOUT THE COURSE (DO NOT THINK ABOUT YOUR PARTICULAR INSTRUCTOR)
(4
(5
in
g
ry
ry
to
o
ct
nd
fa
sta
tis
ut
sa
)o
n
er
ul
c
ffi
t
t
ul
ic
e
y
as
g
ra
ve
iff
di
)d
y
(4
)a
sy
ea
)e
y
(2
er
)v
(3
(1
)v
(5
How would you evaluate the difficulty/work-load of this course?
ha
2.2
ac
isf
y
r
How would you evaluate the text and/or reading assignments used in this course (e.
g. relevance to course, stimulated intellectual curiosity, presented concepts clearly)?
at
or
oo
)p
ct
fa
(1
tis
sa
)s
an
(3
th
et
or
ss
)le
)m
(2
2.1
2008-10-15, Page 1/2
F54U0P1PL0V0
SAMPLE
Class Climate
Radford University Faculty and Course Evaluation_DRAFT
2. QUESTIONS ABOUT THE COURSE (DO NOT THINK ABOUT YOUR PARTICULAR INSTRUCTOR) [Continue]
)a
(3
m
t
ea
gr
am
nt
al
de
ou
Based on what I learned in the course, I would recommend this course to others.
)a
te
g
nt
in
th
ou
am
no
2.4
tro
ng
ly
e
re
ag
ee
gr
l
tra
ee
gr
eu
)a
)n
(4
(3
isa
ee
gr
sa
di
)d
ly
(2
ng
)s
tro
(5
)s
(1
How much did you learn in this course (i.e. increased your knowledge,
understanding, skills, or appreciation of the content area)?
(4
a
er
od
ir
or
fa
le
)a
itt
(2
)l
(1
2.3
3. QUESTIONS ABOUT THE STUDENT
3.1
3.2
3.3
Why did you take this course? To meet requirements for ....
General Education
My Major
My degree electives
What is your anticipated grade in this course?
F
D
B
A
Unknown
What is your current student classification?
Freshman
Sophomore
Senior
Graduate Student
My Minor
C
Pass (P/F option)
Junior
Other
4. COMMENT SECTION: Written examples are very helpful for course and insstructor development. Please provide fair and thoughtful information
about your instructor and this course, being careful to separate the two. Professors will view comments made on this sheet to help improve their teaching
ability and / or classroom procedures. No comments will be traceable to any student. No penalty will be assessed to a student who expresses an opinion
about a particular professor. We encourage your comments.
4.1
Provide comments or recommendations regarding the COURSE. These may include but are not limited to comments on assignments, workload, difficulty, reading
assignments, written assignments, projects, etc.
4.2
Provide comments or recommendations regarding your INSTRUCTOR. These may include but are not limited to effectiveness, clarity, effort, organization,
professionalism, availability, grading, etc.
2008-10-15, Page 2/2
F54U0P2PL0V0
SAMPLE
bbodo
Note
%HWKDQ\%RGR
At the top of each report the instructor's name will be
listed. Under the name the course and section number
are listed. In the parenthesis, the 2810 is the numerical
code for Fall 2008 and the four digits following indicate
the course index number. Finally, the last line contains
the number of surveys returned and scanned.
$607
1RRIUHVSRQVHV 2YHUDOOLQGLFDWRUV
48(67,216$%2877+(,16758&7253OHDVH
SURYLGHIDLUDQGWKRXJKWIXOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW\R
48(67,216$%2877+(&2856('21277+,1.
$%287<2853$57,&8/$5,16758&725
bbodo
Note
2/6/2009 10:01:08 AM
DY GHY DY GHY 2/6/2009 9:52:16 AM
6XUYH\5HVXOWV
The two scales under the heading "Overall indicators" represent the average score for the questions relating to
either the instructor or the course.
$EVROXWH)UHTXHQFLHVRIDQVZHUV
/HJHQG
6WG'HY
0HDQ
0HGLDQ
/HIWSROH
4XHVWLRQWH[W
bbodo
Note
5LJKWSROH
2/4/2009 2:12:036FDOH
PM
Q $PRXQW
DY 0HDQ
GHY 6WG'HY
DE $EVWHQWLRQ
+LVWRJUDP
The "poor" rating is the lowest value, represented on the
48(67,216$%2877+(,16758&7253OHDVHSURYLGHIDLUDQGWKRXJKWIXOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW\RXULQVWUXFWRUDQGWKLV
bottom as a 1; the "outstanding" rating is the highest
FRXUVHEHLQJFDUHIXOWRVHSDUDWHWKHWZR
value represented on the bottom by a 5.
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWH\RXULQVWUXFWRU
VHIIRUWVWR
LQYROYH\RXZLWKWKHFRXUVHPDWHULDOGXULQJFODVV
DQGRUWKURXJKRXWRIFODVVDVVLJQPHQWV"
bbodo
Note
+RZSURIHVVLRQDOZDVWKHLQVWUXFWRULQZRUNLQJZLWK
The item evaluated.
VWXGHQWVHJZDVRQWLPHWRFODVVDYDLODEOH
GXULQJVFKHGXOHGRIILFHKRXUVZLOOLQJWRKHOS\RX
OHDUQLQWHUDFWHGZLWKVWXGHQWVLQDSURIHVVLRQDO
PDQQHU"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHLQVWUXFWRU
V
HIIHFWLYHQHVVLQFRPPXQLFDWLQJFRXUVHPDWHULDOH
JFODULW\RISUHVHQWDWLRQFOHDUO\UHVSRQGHGWR
VWXGHQWTXHVWLRQVJDYHUHOHYDQWH[DPSOHV"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHLQVWUXFWRU
V
HIIHFWLYHQHVVLQRUJDQL]LQJPDWHULDOHJFDPHWR
FODVVSUHSDUHGKHOSHGVWXGHQWVDQDO\]HDQGDSSO\
PDWHULDO"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHLQVWUXFWRU
V
HIIHFWLYHQHVVLQFRPPXQLFDWLQJDQGDSSO\LQJWKH
VWDQGDUGVDQGPHWKRGVIRUHYDOXDWLQJVWXGHQWVLQ
WKHFODVV"
%DVHGRQWKHTXDOLW\RILQVWUXFWLRQ,ZRXOG
UHFRPPHQGWKLVLQVWUXFWRUWRRWKHUV
SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
Q DY GHY RXWVWDQGLQJ
Q DY GHY bbodo
RXWVWDQGLQJ
Note
SRRU
SRRU
Q DY the GHY The numbers at
top of the chart
represent the number
of responses in each
RXWVWDQGLQJ
numerical category. QDY
GHY SRRU
VWURQJO\GLVDJUHH
SRRU
&ODVV&OLPDWHHYDOXDWLRQ
RXWVWDQGLQJ
Q DY GHY VWURQJO\DJUHH
Q DY GHY 3DJH
%HWKDQ\%RGR$607
0\RYHUDOOUDWLQJRIWKLVLQVWUXFWRU
VHIIHFWLYHQHVVLQ
WKLVFRXUVHLV
SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
Q DY GHY bbodo
Note
The three numbers at the
48(67,216$%2877+(&2856('21277+,1.$%287<2853$57,&8/$5,16758&725
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHWH[WDQGRUUHDGLQJ
DVVLJQPHQWVXVHGLQWKLVFRXUVHHJUHOHYDQFHWR
FRXUVHVWLPXODWHGLQWHOOHFWXDOFXULRVLW\SUHVHQWHG
FRQFHSWVFOHDUO\"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHGLIILFXOW\ZRUNORDGRI
WKLVFRXUVH"
+RZPXFKGLG\RXOHDUQLQWKLVFRXUVHLH
LQFUHDVHG\RXUNQRZOHGJHXQGHUVWDQGLQJVNLOOVRU
DSSUHFLDWLRQRIWKHFRQWHQWDUHD"
%DVHGRQZKDW,OHDUQHGLQWKHFRXUVH,ZRXOG
UHFRPPHQGWKLVFRXUVHWRRWKHUV
YHU\HDV\
DJUHDWGHDO
Q DY GHY VWURQJO\DJUHH
Q DY GHY VWURQJO\GLVDJUHH
Q DY GHY YHU\GLIILFXOW
OLWWOHRUQRWKLQJ
SRRU
right of of each chart are:
the number of respondents
for each item (n), the mean
RXWVWDQGLQJ
(av.), and the standard QDY
GHY deviation (dev.).
48(67,216$%2877+(678'(17
:K\GLG\RXWDNHWKLVFRXUVH"7RPHHWUHTXLUHPHQWVIRU
Q *HQHUDO(GXFDWLRQ
0\0DMRU
0\0LQRU
0\GHJUHHHOHFWLYHV
bbodo
Note
:KDWLV\RXUDQWLFLSDWHGJUDGHLQWKLVFRXUVH"
)
'
&
2/6/2009 10:17:10 AM
Q For the non-scaled items, the number
of respondents is given. In the chart,
the number of respondents
in each
response category is presented at the
end of each bar.
%
$
3DVV3)RSWLRQ
8QNQRZQ
&ODVV&OLPDWHHYDOXDWLRQ
3DJH
%HWKDQ\%RGR$607
:KDWLV\RXUFXUUHQWVWXGHQWFODVVLILFDWLRQ"
Q )UHVKPDQ
6RSKRPRUH
-XQLRU
6HQLRU
*UDGXDWH6WXGHQW
2WKHU
&ODVV&OLPDWHHYDOXDWLRQ
3DJH
%HWKDQ\%RGR$607
3URILOH
6XEXQLW
1DPHRIWKHLQVWUXFWRU
1DPHRIWKHFRXUVH
1DPHRIWKHVXUYH\
bbodo
Note
,QVWLWXWLRQDO5HVHDUFK
%HWKDQ\%RGR
$607
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWH\RXULQVWUXFWRU
VHIIRUWVWRLQYROYH\RXZLWK
WKHFRXUVHPDWHULDOGXULQJFODVVDQGRUWKURXJKRXWRIFODVV
DVVLJQPHQWV"
+RZSURIHVVLRQDOZDVWKHLQVWUXFWRULQZRUNLQJZLWKVWXGHQWVHJ
ZDVRQWLPHWRFODVVDYDLODEOHGXULQJVFKHGXOHGRIILFHKRXUV
ZLOOLQJWRKHOS\RXOHDUQLQWHUDFWHGZLWKVWXGHQWVLQDSURIHVVLRQDO
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHLQVWUXFWRU
VHIIHFWLYHQHVVLQ
FRPPXQLFDWLQJFRXUVHPDWHULDOHJFODULW\RISUHVHQWDWLRQFOHDUO\
UHVSRQGHGWRVWXGHQWTXHVWLRQVJDYHUHOHYDQWH[DPSOHV"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHLQVWUXFWRU
VHIIHFWLYHQHVVLQRUJDQL]LQJ
PDWHULDOHJFDPHWRFODVVSUHSDUHGKHOSHGVWXGHQWVDQDO\]H
DQGDSSO\PDWHULDO"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHLQVWUXFWRU
VHIIHFWLYHQHVVLQ
FRPPXQLFDWLQJDQGDSSO\LQJWKHVWDQGDUGVDQGPHWKRGVIRU
HYDOXDWLQJVWXGHQWVLQWKHFODVV"
%DVHGRQWKHTXDOLW\RILQVWUXFWLRQ,ZRXOGUHFRPPHQGWKLV
LQVWUXFWRUWRRWKHUV
2/6/2009 10:28:24 AM
This graph is another way to represent the
mean for each of the items. The mean
(av.) is presented at the right and the red
line down the graph shows where the
mean score lies on the 5 or 4 point scale.
SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY VWURQJO\DJUHH
DY VWURQJO\
GLVDJUHH
0\RYHUDOOUDWLQJRIWKLVLQVWUXFWRU
VHIIHFWLYHQHVVLQWKLVFRXUVHLV
SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY +RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHWH[WDQGRUUHDGLQJDVVLJQPHQWVXVHG
LQWKLVFRXUVHHJUHOHYDQFHWRFRXUVHVWLPXODWHGLQWHOOHFWXDO
FXULRVLW\SUHVHQWHGFRQFHSWVFOHDUO\"
+RZZRXOG\RXHYDOXDWHWKHGLIILFXOW\ZRUNORDGRIWKLVFRXUVH"
SRRU
RXWVWDQGLQJ
DY YHU\HDV\
YHU\GLIILFXOW
DY OLWWOHRUQRWKLQJ
DJUHDWGHDO
DY VWURQJO\DJUHH
DY +RZPXFKGLG\RXOHDUQLQWKLVFRXUVHLHLQFUHDVHG\RXU
NQRZOHGJHXQGHUVWDQGLQJVNLOOVRUDSSUHFLDWLRQRIWKHFRQWHQW
DUHD"
%DVHGRQZKDW,OHDUQHGLQWKHFRXUVH,ZRXOGUHFRPPHQGWKLV
FRXUVHWRRWKHUV
VWURQJO\
GLVDJUHH
&ODVV&OLPDWHHYDOXDWLRQ
3DJH
%HWKDQ\%RGR$607
3URILOH
6XEXQLW
1DPHRIWKHLQVWUXFWRU
1DPHRIWKHFRXUVH
1DPHRIWKHVXUYH\
,QVWLWXWLRQDO5HVHDUFK
%HWKDQ\%RGR
$607
48(67,216$%2877+(,16758&7253OHDVHSURYLGHIDLUDQG
WKRXJKWIXOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW\RXULQVWUXFWRUDQGWKLVFRXUVHEHLQJ
FDUHIXOWRVHSDUDWHWKHWZR
48(67,216$%2877+(&2856('21277+,1.$%287<285
3$57,&8/$5,16758&725
bbodo
Note
2/6/2009 9:53:16 AM
The two scales below represent the average of the
questions relating to either the instructor or the course.
DY DY &ODVV&OLPDWHHYDOXDWLRQ
3DJH
%HWKDQ\%RGR$607
&RPPHQWV5HSRUW
&200(176(&7,21:ULWWHQH[DPSOHVDUHYHU\KHOSIXOIRUFRXUVHDQGLQVWUXFWRUGHYHORSPHQW3OHDVHSURYLGHIDLUDQG
WKRXJKWIXOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW\RXULQVWUXFWRUDQGWKLVFRXUVHEHLQJFDUHIXOWRVHSDUDWHWKHWZR3URIHVVRUVZLOOYLHZ
FRPPHQWVPDGHRQWKLVVKHHWWRKHOSLPSURYHWKHLUWHDFKLQJDELOLW\DQGRUFODVVURRPSURFHGXUHV1RFRPPHQWVZLOOEH
3URYLGHFRPPHQWVRUUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVUHJDUGLQJWKH&2856(7KHVHPD\LQFOXGHEXWDUHQRWOLPLWHGWRFRPPHQWV
RQDVVLJQPHQWVZRUNORDGGLIILFXOW\UHDGLQJDVVLJQPHQWVZULWWHQDVVLJQPHQWVSURMHFWVHWF
3URYLGHFRPPHQWVRUUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVUHJDUGLQJ\RXU,16758&7257KHVHPD\LQFOXGHEXWDUHQRWOLPLWHGWR
HIIHFWLYHQHVVFODULW\HIIRUWRUJDQL]DWLRQSURIHVVLRQDOLVPDYDLODELOLW\JUDGLQJHWF
3DJH
Discussion Draft Proposal from the Academic Program Review Committee
Assessment and Annual Reports
The proposal from the APR Committee is to re-institute an annual reporting process focused on
assessment for each degree program and concentration.
Context
1. Annual reporting will provide a needed emphasis on the discussion of assessment data and its
use to modify curriculum.
2. Annual reporting will ease the five-year reporting process. The five-year academic program
review should become an aggregation of annual reporting procedures and reflection of trends.
3. A pilot test of annual reporting should occur in 2008/2009 to refine the outline of expectations.
The annual reporting process for all units would occur during the 2009/2010 academic cycle.
Process
1. Each department will receive, annually, a template of information from the Office of
Institutional Research for the characteristics of the unit for [that year/a five-year period] for
each CIP code (degree program and concentration) contained in that department or unit.
2. Each degree program and concentration will then complete the annual report by submitting:
a. Name of the department/degree program/concentration (submit 1 for each CIP each
year)
b. Institutional Research descriptive and brief paragraph of response to the statistics
[e.g. our enrollments are up/down; our average class sizes are lovely/horrible…]
c. Assessment Information
[objectives, data collected – include tables, outcomes, actions proposed as a result]
[RU objectives to be addressed each year include providing evidence of progress or the
lack thereof for: student engagement, written and oral communication, and student
success upon graduation. College and department objectives should then extend
beyond these issues to those specific to the degree programs in that area]
d. Faculty and staff contributions: publications by type, performances, awards, honors
e. Other Points of Pride [economic development contributions, publications, national
honors ….]
3. The five-year program review would then consist of [the accreditation report for those with
external accreditation. For those without external accreditation, the unit would submit a
summary of the last five annual reports and should include (but may not be limited to):
a. Student enrollments, retention, number of degrees offered with comparisons to
national benchmarks
b. Assessment summary: major changes in curriculum, degree, and/or outreach activities
based upon assessment data
c. Faculty and staff contributions: publications, performances, awards, honors
d. Summary and conclusion: contributions of the program to RU 7-17 goals
4. Logistics
a. Data will be stored online [i.e. WeaveOnline]
b. Faculty data will be in a data warehouse
c. Annual reports will be public information