Qualitative analysis: Identifying the components of a sample Quantitative analysis: Measuring the amounts or concentrations of analytes in a sample The three measurement terms of “analysis”, “determination”, and “characterization” have different meanings. Analysis = Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of chemical analytes Determination = Quantitative measurements of specific analytes Characterization = Experimental description of properties of materials ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Steps in an Analysis Define the Problem Perform the Measurement Data Processing and Report Select a Method Perform Any Necessary Chemical Separations Obtain a Representative Sample Prepare the Sample for Analysis 1. Define the Problem Factors: • What is the problem--what needs to be found? Qualitative and/or quantitative? • What will the information be used for? Who will use it? • When will it be needed? • How accurate and precise does it have to be? • What is the budget? • The analyst (the problem solver) should consult with the client to plan a useful and efficient analysis, including how to obtain a useful sample. 2. Select a Method Factors: • Sample type • Size of sample • Sample preparation needed • Concentration and range (sensitivity needed) • Selectivity needed (interferences) • Accuracy/precision needed • Tools/instruments available • Expertise/experience • Cost • Speed • Does it need to be automated? • Are methods available in the chemical literature? • Are standard methods available? 3. Obtain a Representative Sample Factors: • Sample type/homogeneity/size • • • Heterogeneity of sample composition increases from the fairly homogeneous gas and liquid samples to solid samples that must be ground up prior to dissolution. Analysis of grains from crops (rice, wheat, etc.) requires dehusking to yield meaningful data. Milling and blending are usually parts of the sample preparation procedures. • Sampling statistics/errors • • The quality of analytical data must support the measurement objectives and hence the sampling procedures have to satisfy statistical requirements of the analysis. The number of samples or sample size, the frequency and time of sampling, and the location of sampling have to be consistent with the analytical objectives. 4. Prepare the Sample for Analysis Factors: • Solid, liquid, or gas? • Dissolve? • Ash or digest? • Chemical separation or masking of interferences needed? • Need to concentrate the analyte? • Need to change (derivatize) the analyte for detection? • Need to adjust solution conditions (pH, add reagents)? 5. Perform Any Necessary Chemical Separations Factors: • Distillation • Precipitation • Solvent extraction • Solid phase extraction • Chromatography (may be done as part of the measurement step as in the hyphenated techniques of GC-MS or LC-MS) • Electrophoresis (may be done as part of the measurement step as in CE-MS and microfluidics) 6. Perform the Measurement Factors: • Calibration • Instruments must be properly calibrated according to analytical protocols; for instance, the wavelength scale of a spectrometer has to be verified with a standard; all sample preparation equipment from the balances to sample extraction devices must also be checked or calibarated • Validation/controls/blanks • Suitable matrix blanks, trip blanks, lab control standards must be analyzed to support the sample measurements. • Replicates • Appropriate number of replicates meeting the analytical statistical confidence is necessary. 7. Data Processing and Report • Conversion of raw instrumental signals into meaningful results of chemical identification and determination • • Interpretation of data by correlating chemical parameters of analytes (formula mass, functional groups, etc.) with observed signals (energies of spectral peaks , retention times of chromatographic peaks, etc.) Calibration plot of standards at various concentrations is used to determine quantitative results of sample constituents. • Statistical analysis of quantitative results (reliability) • • • Accuracy – Results for standard reference materials (SRMs) from National Institute Standards and Technology Precision – Relative standard of deviation or coefficient of variation Blanks, correlation coefficients of calibration plots, spike recovery, detection limits, and etc. • Relating qualitative and quantitative results to the objectives of analyses (i.e. how C-14 results are used to determine the age of an archaeological artifact or whether an art piece is authentic). The sample size dictates what measurement techniques can be used. ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Classification of Analytical Methods Classical methods • Gravimetry • Titrimetry Instrumental methods • Electroanalytical • Spectroscopy • Chromatography • Radioisotopic measurements Different methods provide a range of precision, sensitivity, selectivity, and speed capabilities. ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Types of Instrumental Methods Configuration of Instrumentation Instrument or Process Raw data Machine-level commands Control Diagnostics Processed data (Information) High-level commands Integrated Computers Data Processing Intelligent System User Interface User-level commands Explanation (Knowledge) Analyst Output Device Components of a Typical Instrument Signal generator Analytical signal Input transducer or detector Electrical or mechanical input signal Meter or Scale Signal processor Output signal Recorder 12.301 Digital unit Some Examples of Instrument Components Selecting an Analytical Method Defining the problem: 1. What accuracy and precision are required? 2. How much sample is available? 3. What is the concentration range of the analyte? 4. What components of the sample will cause interference? 5. What are the physical and chemical properties of the sample matrix? 6. How many samples are to be analyzed? Validation involves determining: •selectivity •linearity •accuracy •precision •sensitivity •range •limit of detection •limit of quantitation •ruggedness/robustness Standard reference materials (SRMs) best for determining accuracy. General process for evaluation/validation of methodology ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Other Characteristics to Be Considered in Choosing a Method 1. Speed of analysis 2. Ease of use and automation 3. Cost and availability of instrument 4. Per-sample cost (consumables and reagents) 5. Training and learning curve 6. Software features and compatibility with databases and data processing programs COMPONENTS OF A QUALITY CONTROL Well trained personnel GLP SOP Suitable and PROGRAM well maintained facilities Quality Control Evaluation Samples Maintained and well calibrated equipment GMP Complete Documentat ion IMPORTANT PROCEDURES IN QUALITY CONTROL Measured parameter Procedure Accuracy Analysis of reference materials or samples of know concentration Precision Analysis of replicate samples Extraction efficiency Analysis of matrix spikes Contamination Analysis of blanks POTENTIAL SOURCES OF SAMPLE CONTAMINATION Steps in the analytical process Contamination sources Sample collection Equipment, Sample handling steps such as compositing, or filtering, Sample preserving additives, Sample containers, Ambient contamination Sample transport and storage Sample containers, Cross contamination from ear reagents or other samples Sample preparation Sample handling, Dilutions, Glassware, Ambient contamination Sample analysis Instrument memory effects or carry-over, Reagents, Syringes, Glassware, Apparatus TYPES OF ANALYTICAL BLANKS FOR QUALITY CONTROL Blank type Purpose Process System or Instrument blank Establishes the baseline of an analytical instrument, in the absence of sample Determine the background signal with no sample present Solvent or Calibration blank To measure the amount of the analytical signal which arises from the dilution solvent. The zero solution in the calibration series. Analytical instrument is run with dilution solvent only Method blank To detect contamination from reagents, sample handling, and the entire analytical process A simulated sample containing no analyte is taken through entire analytical procedure Matched-matrix blank To detect contamination from field handling, transportation, or storage A synthetic sample which matches the basic matrix of the sample is carried to the field and is treated in the same fashion as the samples Sampling media or trip blank To detect contamination in sampling media such as filters and sample adsorbent traps Analyze samples of unused filters or traps to detect contaminated batches Equipment blank To determine contamination of equipment and assess the efficiency or equipment clean-up procedures Samples of final equipment cleaning rinses are analyzed for contaminants REGULATORY LEVELS OF TCLP CONTAMINANTS Metals Regulatory level (mg/l) Pesticides Regulatory level (mg/l) Other organics Regulatory level (mg/l) Arsenic 5 Chlordane 0.03 Benzene 0.07 Barium 100 2,4-D 1.4 Chloroform 0.07 Cadmium 1 Endrin 0.003 Cresol 10 Chromium 5 Lindane 0.06 1,4Dichlorobenzene 10.8 Mercury 0.2 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.14 Pentachlorophen ol 3.6 Lead 5 Heptachlor 0.001 Trichloroethylene 0.07 Silver 5 Methoxychlor 1.4 Toluene Vinyl chloride 14.4 0.05 REGULATORY LEVELS FOR AMBIENT AIR POLLUTANTS Compound Regulatory concentration Averaging period 0.12 ppm 1h Carbon monoxide 35 ppm 9 ppm 1h 8h Nitrogen dioxide 0.05 1 year Sulfur dioxide 0.14 ppm 0.03 ppm 24h 1 year Particulate matter 150 µg/m3 50 µg/m3 25 µg/m3 24h 1 year 24h Sulfates 25 µg/m3 24h Vinyl chloride 0.01 ppm 24h Lead 1.5 µg/m3 3 months Ozone You can’t have accuracy without good precision. But a precise result can have a determinate or systematic error. Accuracy and precision ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Figures of Merit for Precision of Analytical Methods The precision becomes poorer at low concentrations. (Also sometimes at high concentrations, as in spectrophotometric measurements –see spectrometric error, Fig. 16.27.) Dependence of relative standard deviation on concentration ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Random errors follow a Gaussian or normal distribution. We are 95% certain that the true value falls within 2σ (infinite population), IF there is no systematic error. ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Normal error curve (Gaussian Curve) Bias Bias = m - xi where m => population mean xi => measured concentration Sensitivity 2 factors limiting sensitivity: • slope of calibration curve – steeper slope, greater sensitivity • reproducibility of measurements – equal slope, better reproducibility, greater sensitivity Sensitivity IUPAC defined calibration sensitivity S = mc + Sbl where S => measured signal c => concentration of the analyte Sbl => instrumental signal for blank m => slope of calibration line ignores precision Sensitivity analytical sensitivity => g g = m/ss where ss =>standard deviation of the signals advantages: - relatively insensitive to amplification factors - independent of units disadvantage: - standard deviation of signal can vary with concentration Detection Limit & Quantitation Limit Instrumental detection limit refers to the minimum concentration or weight of analyte that can be detected at a known confidence level and is usually defined as being equivalent to 3 times the signal background noise or the 3s-level. Method or practical quantitation limit refers to the level at which reliable quantitative analysis can be performed and is commonly defined at 9s to 15s levels. Detection Limit minimum distinguishable analytical signal => Sm Sm = Sbl + ksbl where Sbl => mean blank signal k => some multiple (normally 3) sbl => absolute standard deviation of the blank measure 20-30 blanks over extended period of time to determine Sbl and sbl detection limit => cm = (Sm - Sbl)/m Raman spectra of Calcium ascorbate SNR=17 100 ms, 50 um slit SNR= 5 10 ms, 50 um SNR=2.8 10 ms, 20 um SNR < 2 10 ms, 10 um 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Raman shift, cm-1 1600 1800 2000 Signal averaging improves S/N 0.1 sec* 1.0 sec 30 sec 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Raman shift, cm-1 * spectra were accumulated for period indicated 1800 2000 Instrument response Linear Dynamic Range LOL LOQ => limit of quantitative measurement LOQ Useful range Concentration LOL => limit of linear response Selectivity degree to which a method is free from interference by other species contained in the matrix S = mAcA + mBcB + mCcC + Sbl where S => analytical signal cA, cB, cC=> concentrations of A, B, and C, mA, mB, cC => calibration sensitivities of A, B, and C, respectively, slope of calibration curve Sbl => instrumental signal of blank Selectivity kB,A = mB/mA and kC,A = mC/mA where kB,A => selectivity coefficient for B with respect to A kC,A => selectivity coefficient for C with respect to A yielding S = mA(cA + kB,AcB + kC,AcC) + Sbl The units ppm or ppb are used to express trace concentrations. These are weigh or volume based, rather than mole based. m m m ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) m m This is a time plot for analysis of the same sample, assumed to have only random distribution, to check for errors in a method. At 2s, there is a 1 in 20 chance a value will exceed this only by chance. At 2.5s, it is 1 in 100. Typical quality control chart ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Select a confidence level (95% is good) for the number of samples analyzed (N). Confidence limit = x ± ts/√N. It depends on the precision, s, and the confidence level you select. ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) F = s12/s22 You compare the variances of two different methods to see if there is a significant difference in the methods at a given confidence level. ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) QCalc = outlier difference/range. If QCalc > QTable, then reject the outlier as due to a systematic error. ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) The median may be a better indicator of the true value than the mean for small numbers of observations. And the range times a factor (K) may be a better measure of spread than the standard deviation (sr = RKR). ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) A least-squares plot gives the best straight line through experimental points. Exel will do this for you. Straight-line or Linear Regression Plot ©Gary Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed. (Wiley) Main Purposes of Solid Phase Extraction Purpose How Performed Usage Application Examples Removal of interferences Interferences are allowed to pass unretained through the cartridge with analytes remained sorbed, or analytes pass through the cartridge, with interferences remaining on the cartridge 50% Removal of proteins from biological fluids, fats and lipids from food, ionic compounds from aqueous samples and drugs of abuse from urine, and extractions of dioxans from waste water. Analyte Concentration Conditions are chose to achieve strong retention values (retentive stationary phase/ weak mobile phase); elution in a small volume of volatile organic solvent. 35 Trace enrichment of ppb of polynuclear aromatics from water, trace pesticides in urine, caffeine from beverages, and therapeutic drugs from plasma. Phase exchange Analyte present in emulsion, suspension, or undesirable solvent is sorbed on SPE cartridge, dried, and eluted with desired solvent 5 Exchange of aqueous solvent for nonaqueous one with intermediate dry nitrogen flush. Specifically coated SPE phases selectively derivatize analytes as they pass through the cartridge. 5 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine-coated cartridges that selectively derivatize carbonyl-containing compounds; amines and polyamines in air; organic acids in water. Vapor or liquid samples are collected at factory or in field on an SPE cartridge or disk and transported to laboratory. 5 Soil gas analysis; trace organics in water. Solid-phase derivatization Sample storage and transport Comparison of Extraction Methods for Sample Preparation of Solids Parameter Sonication Soxhlet (traditional) Soxhlet (modern) SFE ASE (ESE) MicrowaveAssisted (closed container) MicrowaveAssisted (open container) Sample size, g 20-50 10-20 10-20 5-10 5-15 2-5 2-10 Solvent volume, ml 100-300 200-500 50-100 10-20* 10-15 30 20-30 Temperature, °C Ambient-40 40-100 40-100 50-150 50-200 100-200 Ambient Pressure Atmospheric Atmospheric Atmospheric 2000-4000 psi 1500-2000 psi 1500-2000 psi Atmospheric Time, hr 0.5-1.0 12-24 1-4 0.5-1.0 0.2-0.3 0.2-0.3 0.1-0.2 Degree of Automation** 0 0 ++ +++ +++ ++ ++ Number of Samples*** High 1 6 44 24 12 12 Cost§ Low Very low Moderate High High Moderate Moderate * When organic modifier is used to effect polarity ** For the most complete commercial instrument;0= no automation, += some automation, ++= mostly automated, ++= fully automated *** Maximum number that can be handled in commercial instruments § Very low = < $1000, Low= $10,000, Moderate= $10,000-20,000, High= > $20,000 Modern Extraction Methods for Solid Samples Method of Sample Principles of Technique Comments Accelerated (enhanced) solvent extraction (ASE or ESE) Sample is placed in a sealed container and heated to above its boiling point, causing pressure in vessel to rise; extracted sample is automatically removed and transferred to vial for further treatment Greatly increased speed of liquid-solid extraction process and is automated. Vessel must withstand high pressure; extracted sample in diluted form requires further concentration; safety provisions are required. Automated Soxhlet extraction A combination of hot solvent leaching and Soxhlet extraction; sample in thimble is first immersed in boiling solvent then thimble is raised for Soxhlet extraction with solvent refluxing. Manual and automated versions are available; uses less solvent than traditional Soxhlet and solvent is recovered for possible reuse. Extraction time is decreased due to two-step process. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) Sample is placed in flow-through container and supercritical fluid (such as CO2) is passed through sample; after depressurization, extracted analyte is collected in solvent or trapped on adsorbent, followed by desorption by rinsing with solvent. Automated and manual versions are available; to affect "polarity" of supercritical fluid, density can be varied and solvent modifiers added. Collected sample is usually concentrated and pure because CO2 is removed after extraction; matrix has an effect on extraction process. Microwave-assisted extraction (MASE) Sample is placed in an open or closed container and heated by microwave energy, causing extraction of analyte. Extraction solvent can range from microwave-absorbing (MA) or non-microwave-absorbing (NMA); in MA case, sample is placed in high-pressure, non-microwave-absorbing container and heated well above its boiling point. Also in MA case, the sample and solvent can be refluxed at atmospheric pressure, analogous to solid-liquid extraction, in NMA case, container can be open, with no pressure rise, safety provisions are required. Modern Extraction Methods for Solid Samples Method of Sample Principles of Technique Comments Accelerated (enhanced) solvent extraction (ASE or ESE) Sample is placed in a sealed container and heated to above its boiling point, causing pressure in vessel to rise; extracted sample is automatically removed and transferred to vial for further treatment Greatly increased speed of liquid-solid extraction process and is automated. Vessel must withstand high pressure; extracted sample in diluted form requires further concentration; safety provisions are required. Automated Soxhlet extraction A combination of hot solvent leaching and Soxhlet extraction; sample in thimble is first immersed in boiling solvent then thimble is raised for Soxhlet extraction with solvent refluxing. Manual and automated versions are available; uses less solvent than traditional Soxhlet and solvent is recovered for possible reuse. Extraction time is decreased due to two-step process. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) Sample is placed in flow-through container and supercritical fluid (such as CO2) is passed through sample; after depressurization, extracted analyte is collected in solvent or trapped on adsorbent, followed by desorption by rinsing with solvent. Automated and manual versions are available; to affect "polarity" of supercritical fluid, density can be varied and solvent modifiers added. Collected sample is usually concentrated and pure because CO2 is removed after extraction; matrix has an effect on extraction process. Microwave-assisted extraction (MASE) Sample is placed in an open or closed container and heated by microwave energy, causing extraction of analyte. Extraction solvent can range from microwave-absorbing (MA) or non-microwave-absorbing (NMA); in MA case, sample is placed in high-pressure, non-microwave-absorbing container and heated well above its boiling point. Also in MA case, the sample and solvent can be refluxed at atmospheric pressure, analogous to solid-liquid extraction, in NMA case, container can be open, with no pressure rise, safety provisions are required. Comparison of Extraction Methods Parameter Sonication Soxhlet (traditional) Soxhlet (modern) SFE ASE (ESE) MicrowaveAssisted (closed container) MicrowaveAssisted (open container) Sample size, g 20-50 10-20 10-20 5-10 5-15 2-5 2-10 Solvent volume, ml 100-300 200-500 50-100 10-20* 10-15 30 20-30 Temperature, °C Ambient-40 40-100 40-100 50-150 50-200 100-200 Ambient Pressure Atmospheric Atmospheric Atmospheric 2000-4000 psi 1500-2000 psi 1500-2000 psi Atmospheric Time, hr 0.5-1.0 12-24 1-4 0.5-1.0 0.2-0.3 0.2-0.3 0.1-0.2 Degree of Automation** 0 0 ++ +++ +++ ++ ++ Number of Samples*** High 1 6 44 24 12 12 Cost§ Low Very low Moderate High High Moderate Moderate * When organic modifier is used to effect polarity ** For the most complete commercial instrument;0= no automation, += some automation, ++= mostly automated, ++= fully automated *** Maximum number that can be handled in commercial instruments § Very low = < $1000, Low= $10,000, Moderate= $10,000-20,000, High= > $20,000 Extraction Methods for Various Types of Samples and Analytes Sample Solid Liquid Organic Analytes Metals Organic Analytes Supercritical Fluid Extraction Accelerated Solvent Extraction Microwave Digestion Soxhlet Extraction Acid Digestion Ultrasonic Extraction Solid Phase Extraction Solid Phase Microextraction Dissolved Metals Chelation/Organic Extraction Ion Exchange Solid Phase Extraction Liquid/liquid Extraction METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTANTS BY IMPINGER METHODS Compound Ammonia Absorbing solution Dilute sulfuric acid Analytical method React with phenol to form blue indenophenol, Colorimetric measurement Range 20-700 micrometers/m3 Interferences Some metal ions (EDTA prevents some interference) LOD 0.2 micrometers/ml in solution Nitrogen dioxide Triethanol amine, omethyl-phenol, sodium metabisulfite React with sulfanilamide and 8anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid- colorimetric measurement 20-700 micrometers/m3 HNO2, N2O3 Sulfur dioxide Sodium tetrachloromercurate React with formaldehyde and pararosaniline, Colorimetric measurement 500 ml/m3 to 10 micrometers/m3 None (note high toxicity of abs. soln) Phosgene 4-(4’-nitro-benzyl) pyridine in diethylphthalate Colorimetric measurement Down to 40 microliters/m3 Acid chlorides, high humidity Chlorine Methyl orange at pH3 Bleaching of the methyl orange is measured colorimetrically Down to 1 ml/m3 in air. 5-100 micromoles/ 100 ml of soln Free bromine, SO2, NO2, (used for Cl spills, in emergences) Ozone and oxidizers Buffered KI soln I3 formed is measured colorimetrically 0.01-10 ml/ m3 in air NO2 Acrolein 4-hexyl-resorcinol in ethyl alcohol and trichloroacetic acid Colorimetric measurement Down to 0.01 ml/m3 in air Dienes (slight) EXAMPLES OF COLORIMETRIC AIR SAMPLING TUBES Compound Range Description Interference Mercury vapor 0.1-2 mg/m3 Hg reacts with CuI reagent to give a yellow-orange complex Cl2 gives low readings Carbon monoxide 5-150 ml/m3 CO reacts with iodine pentoxide giving I2, and a preconditioning layer removes halogenated hydrocarbons, benzene, etc. Acetylene will interfere Ozone 0.05-1.4 ml/m3 Blue indigo dye is cleaved and bleached to Cl2 and NO2 when white present above 5 ml/m3 will turn indigo gray Sulfur dioxide 0.5-5 ml/m3 SO2 react with blue complex of I2 and starch, changing to white Tetrachloroethylene 5-50 ml/m3 First layer contains MnO4- which cleaves the analyte forming Cl2, which reacts in second layer with N,N’-diphenylbenzidine to give a gray-blue product H2S will make indicator gray Free halogens, hydrogen halides and easily cleaved halocarbons SORBENT MATERIALS FOR AIR SAMPLING Sorbent Useful for Desorption method Tenax (polyphenylene oxide) Nonpolar VOC with BP from approx. 40-200 ̊C Thermal desorption Carbon molecular sieve C2-C5 hydrocarbons Thermal desorption Activated charcoal Low to medium boiling polar and nonpolar organics Solvent extraction Polyurethane foam Polar and nonpolar semivolatile compounds Solvent extraction Activated silica Amines and polar organics Solvent extraction Graphitized carbon C4 to C14 hydrocarbons, heavy organics such as PCBs Thermals desorption, Solvent desorption XAD-2 resin Semivolatiles, PAH Solvent desorption SOME COMMON COLORIMETRIC REAGENTS Analyte Color system Measurement wavelength (nm) Metals Cr (VI) 1,5-Diphenylcarbazide 540 Pb Dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6-dithizone 512 Fe(III) Thiocyanate 460 Fe(II) Pyrocatecol violet 570 Cd Iodide/Malachite green 685 Hg 2-Pyridylketone 2-quinolylhydrozone Organics Phenol 1-nitroso-2-napthol/Ce(IV) Inorganic Ions NO2- TiCl3/sulfanilamide 530 SO42- Fe(III)/HClO4 355 CN- Isonicotinic acid, 3-methyl-1-phenyl2-pyrazoline-5-one 548 O3 KI 352 NH3 Glutamate dehydrogenase 340 Gases Candidates for electrochemical detection: Biomedical Acetylcholine* Amino acids* Benzoic acids Cinnamic acids Coenzymes DNA adducts Enzymes Estrogenic hormones Glucose* Lactic acid* Mandelic acids Neutral phenols Nitrosothiols Oxalate Peptides* Phenylpropionic acids Phenylpyruvic acids Thiols and disulfides Tryptophan metabolites Tyrosine metabolites Vitamins * Require chemical or enzymatic derivatization before detection. Candidates for electrochemical detection: Ions Bromide Cyanide Nitrite Sulfite Candidates for electrochemical detection: Pharmaceutical Alkaloids Disulfides Analgesics Antibiotics L-DOPA and related compounds Nitrogen heterocycles Anticancer Phenothiazines Antimalarial Thiols β-mimetics and β-blockers Tricyclic antidepressants Candidates for electrochemical detection: Environmental and Industrial Analines Herbicides Antioxidants Aromatic amines Naphthols PCB metabolites Biphenyls Peroxides Chelating agents Pesticides Ethylenethiourea Phenols Explosives Typical Functional Groups Oxidizable Aromatic amines Ascorbic acids Hydroquinones Indoles Phenols Phenothiazenes Thiols Vanillyl Xanthines Reducible Aliphatic nitro Aromatic nitro Azo compounds Azomethine Nitrosamines N-oxides Organometallics Peroxides Quinones and Thioamides Standard Calomel Reference Electrodes of the Type // KCl/MCl(satd.)/M MCl/M KCl E˚’ at 25˚C 25 D(E˚’) dt (mV deg-1 at 25˚C) AgCl/Ag Hg2Cl2/Hg 3.5 M (at 25˚C) 0.205 -0.73 Saturated 0.199 -1.01 0.1 M (at 25˚C) 0.336 -0.08 1.0 M (at 25˚C) 0.283 -0.29 3.5 M (at 25˚C) 0.250 -0.39 Saturated 0.244 -0.67 EXAMPLES OF ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODES Electrode Type Concentration Range Interferences Ammonia Gas sensing 1-5 X 10-7 M Volatile Amines Chloride Solid state 1-5 X 10-5 M OH-, S-2, Br-, I-, CN- Fluoride Solid state Saturated to 0.02 ppm OH- Lead (Pb+2) Solid state 0.1-10-6 M Oxygen Gas sensing 0-14 ppm Silver or Sulfide Solid state 1-10-17 M (Ag+ or S-2) Hg+2 Water hardness (M+2) Liquid membrane 1-6 X 10-6 M Na+, Cu+2, Zn+2, Fe+2, Ni+2, Sr+2, Ba+2, K+ Calcium (Ca+2) Liquid membrane 1.0-5 X 10-7 M Pb+2, Na+, Hg+2, H+, Fe+2, NH4, Mg+2 Ag+, Hg+2, Cu+2, high Cd+2 or Fe+ Relative Sensitivity of Some Electrochemical Techniques Technique Ion selective electrode DC polarography at DME Differential pulse polargraphy at SMDE Differential pulse ASV at HMDE DC ASV at mercury film Square-wave ASV at mercury film Limit of Detection for Pb(II) 10-5 M 10-6 M 10-7 M 10-10 M* 10-11 M* 10-12 M* * Deposition for 360 seconds; LOD varies with deposition time;S(H)MDE = (hanging) mercury drop electrode
© Copyright 2024