Capacitive Deionization for RO brine recovery in NEWater production L.Y. Lee1, H.Y. Ng1, S.L. Ong2, J.Y. Hu1, G. Tao3, K. Kekre3, B. Viswanath3, W. Lay4 and H. Seah4 1 Division of Environmental Science & Engineering; 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260 3 Centre for Advanced Water Technology, Singapore Utilities International, Singapore 4 Public Utilities Board, Singapore Abstract: Reverse osmosis (RO) brine from water reclamation facility is a potential untapped water source, provided a feasible and economical treatment process is available to recover this waste stream. Organic and inorganic compounds are two major groups of pollutants in the RO brine. In this study, an integrated treatment scheme consisting of a biological activated carbon (BAC) column and a low pressure Capacitive Deionization (CDI) process was investigated. BAC was used as a pretreatment to remove the organic compounds prior to the inorganic removal using the CDI process. Two empty bed contact times, namely 20 min and 40 min tested in the BAC columns provided similar TOC removal efficiency within the range of 15–21%. High ions removals of more than 85% from the RO brine were achieved in the CDI process when operated with water recovery up to 89%. This study has successfully demonstrated that the integrated BAC with CDI process has high potential to increase water recovery of a water reclamation plant while gaining the advantage of a reduced volume of RO brine for disposal. This system could further contribute to enhancement of sustainable water reclamation practice. Keywords: Biological activated carbon, capacitive deionization, inorganic removal, organic removal, pre-treatment, RO brine, water recovery. Introduction Water reclamation and reuse have been increasingly practised especially in the fast developing urban cities. Table 1 shows a few of the cities that uses reclaimed domestic wastewater to augment the water supply for various applications. In 1998, the NEWater initiative was carried out as a joint study by the Singapore Public Utilities Board (PUB), the Ministry of the Environment (ENV) and the National University of Singapore (NUS) to determine the feasibility and viability of using reclaimed water (known as NEWater) as a source of raw water for augmenting Singapore’s freshwater supply. Two full-scale NEWater plants were commissioned in February 2003 following the favorable results obtained from the study (MOE and PUB, 2002; PUB, 2003). NEWater produced is used to augment Singapore’s water resource by indirect potable reuse which a suitable amount of NEWater is being introducted into the reservoirs. The current reclamation capacity in Singapore has increased to meet 15% of its water demand (MEWR, 2007) which will increased to 30% in 2011 following a planned addition of the 5th NEWater Factory by 2011. Currently, the RO brine generated from the NEWater production is disposed to the sea through direct discharge. However, with the increase in NEWater production, RO brine generation will also increase correspondingly. This waste stream could be a potential valuable source of water if an efficient and cost-effective solution can be formulated. Hence, this could reduce the volume of concentrated RO brine for disposal, increase overall water recovery while having the potential to provide a long term solution to sustainable water reclamation and reuse practices. Table 1. Reuse application for reclaimed domestic wastewater reuse in some of the major cities (extracted from Hu et al., submitted). City Reuse application 1 North Barcelona Singapore2 Tokyo, Japan 1 Windhoek, Namibia (Goreangab WRP)1 1 2 non-potable reuse non-potable reuse and in-direct potable reuse non-potable urban reuse makes up of 35% of the city drinking water Asano et al. (2007) Stedman (2007) Water Practice & Technology Vol 3 No 4 © IWA Publishing 2008 doi: 10.2166/WPT.2008081 The contaminants in RO brine from domestic wastewater reclamation mainly consist of organic and inorganic compounds. The RO brine characteristics from a NEWater plant in Singapore is summarized in Table 2. As noted from Table 2, total dissolved solids (TDS) in the RO brine are in the range of 569 – 996 ppm while having a conductivity ranging from 1500 – 2700 µS/cm (depending on the stage where the RO brine is obtained). Organic matters are mainly consists of slow- and hard-to-degrade compounds. A cost-effective technology to treat the RO brine would need to be able to remove the inorganic and organic compounds to an acceptable level for reuse applications or as RO feed water. In view of this, a novel treatment process consisting of a biological activated carbon (BAC) as a pretreatment step prior to the capacitive deionization (CDI) process is proposed for the RO brine treatment and recovery in this study. Table 2. Characteristics of RO brine from a NEWater plant in Singapore. Parameter pH Conductivity TDS TOC COD Unit µS/cm mg/L mg/L mg/L Concentrations 7.31 - 7.4 1523 - 2700 569 - 996 15 - 30 19 - 47 Cations Na+ NH4+ K+ Mg2+ Ca2+ mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 230 - 416 ND - 7 29 - 53 11 - 21 39 - 75 Anions ClNO3PO43SO42- mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 257 - 1010 38 - 62 7 - 16 131 - 254 Removal of organic matters had shown to reduce the fouling potential in RO membranes in water reclamation process (Hu et al., 2005). Hence, the biological activated carbon (BAC) process is used as a pretreatment process which aimed to remove a substantial amount of organic matter prior to CDI process. BAC has the advantage of combined adsorption and biodegradation effect which the activated carbon can be partially regenerated by biochemical activities while the carbon bed is in operation (Rodman et al., 1978; Rice and Robson, 1982). This will reduce the need for regeneration process and prolonged the useful life-span of the BAC column. Inorganic matters in the RO brine can be further removed using the CDI process. The CDI process have been tested for removal of inorganic compounds from different types of water, namely, seawater, groundwater, industrial process water and wastewater (Weldemoed and Schutte, 2005, Garrido et al., 2006, ENPAR Technologies Inc., 2007). The main advantage of CDI process over membrane technology for removal of inorganic compounds mainly lies in its low pressure requirement during purification process. Materials and Methods RO brine Brine from the 2nd stage of RO process was collected once a week from the Bedok NEWater Plant, Singapore. They were stored at 4oC in the laboratory’s cold room until use. Experimental set-up Figure 1 illustrates the schematic diagram of the experimental set-up used in this study for the treatment of RO brine. 2 CDI unit Product water Concentrate BAC column RO brine from NEWater plant BAC effluent holding tank Pretreatment Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up to treat RO brine. The RO brine was cooled to room temperature (30±3oC) before feeding into the BAC columns. RO brine was supplied continuously at a flow rate of 49 ml/min and 25 ml/min to the bench-scale BAC columns, BAC 1 and BAC 2, respectively using peristaltic pumps (Mflex economy digital drive, 10 – 600 rpm). The BAC columns used in this study were constructed using perspex tubes having a diameter of 50 mm and an effective packing height of 500 mm. Packing material used was granular activated carbon (Filtrasorb ® F400D, Calgon Carbon Co.). The activated carbon had an effective size and density of 0.65 mm and 0.47 g/cm3, respectively. BAC 1 and BAC 2 were maintained at an empty bed contact times (EBCTs) of 20 mins and 40 mins, respectively. An intermediate holding tank was used to collect the effluent from BAC 2 for further treatment with CDI process. The bench-scale CDI process (Model: DesEL 400, ENPAR Technologies Inc., Canada) with a flow rate of up to 250 mL/min and an electrode surface area of 0.7 m2 was operated in batch mode. Each batch was operated for 6 h at varying water recovery. Water quality analysis The water quality of samples from each stage of treatment, namely RO brine, BAC effluent, and CDI product and concentrate was characterized for pH, conductivity, TDS, total organic carbon (TOC), anion and cation concentrations. The pH was measured using the Horiba pH meter F-54 BW (Horiba Ltd, Japan) while conductivity and TDS were quantified using WTW Conductivity meter LF 538 (WTW, Germany). Color was measured using the UV-Vis Spectrophotometer DR 4000U (Program 1660, Hach Company, USA), and TOC was analyzed using the Total Organic Carbon analyzer (TOCVCSH, Shidmadzu, Japan). The anion and cation concentrations were determined using the Dionex LC 20 Chromatography (Dionex Corporation, USA). The anions analyzed were Cl-, NO2-, NO3-, PO4- and SO4- and cations were Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg+ and Ca2+. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) was quantified only for RO brine and BAC effluent. All water quality analyses were carried out in accordance with the Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater Analysis (APHA, 1998). 3 Results and Discussion Pretreatment using BAC at different EBCTs The TOC performances of the two BAC columns are illustrated in Figure 2. The TOC removal performances between the two different EBCTs at the initial volume treated did not differ significantly. BAC 1 achieved its stabilized stage after treating more than 1,440 bed volume while BAC 2 was noted to stabilize after treating 3,000 bed volume. The stabilized performance and the respective periods are summarized in Table 2. The results indicated breakthrough was achieved faster at shorter EBCT and exhaustion of the BAC adsorption capacity took approximately 1,440 and 3,000 bed volume for BAC 1 and BAC 2, respectively. The organic matters in the RO brine were also demonstrated to be highly resistant to biodegradation and BAC was only able to remove 15 – 21% of the TOC concentration in the RO brine. 1.00 0.90 Normalized concentration (C/Co) 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 BAC 1 - EBCT 20 mins 0.10 BAC 2 - EBCT 40 mins 0.00 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Bed Volume Treated Figure 2. Normalized TOC concentrations for BAC 1 and BAC 2. Table 2. Stabilized performance and the respective periods in BAC 1 and BAC 2. BAC columns Bed volume treated (-) Effluent concentration (mg/L) Removal efficiency (%) TOC COD TOC COD 1 1440 – 4825 24.0 ± 2.6 52.4 ± 9.4 21.5 ± 6.5 24.2 ± 9.0 2 3000 – 5021 22.2 ± 2.6 49.1 ± 14.0 25.4 ± 5.1 37.2 ± 9.3 CDI process for recovery of RO brine Effluent from BAC 2 was used a feed to the CDI process. The CDI process was able to achieve stable operating performance with no significant pressure build up during the 6 h continuous operation. Process characteristics and product quality of water recovery at 85 and 89% are presented in Table 3. The results indicated that at higher water recovery, the process rate and the production rate were reduced by about 22 and 19%, respectively. Lower removal efficiencies in terms of conductivity, TDS, TOC and TDS were also experienced when operated at higher water recovery. The anion and cation removal efficiencies at both water recoveries were similar except for approximately 8% lower chloride ion removal at 89% water recovery compared with water recovery at 85%. Hence, the results indicated relatively stable performance at the two water recovery conditions tested especially for anions and cations removal. 4 Table 3. Results of CDI operating at 85% and 89% water recovery. Operating conditions: Process rate (L/d) Production rate (L/d) Water recovery (%) Removal (%) Conductivity TDS TOC TN Cation Na NH4 K Mg Ca Anion Cl NO3 PO4 SO4 Run 1 265.6 226.8 85 Run 2 207.1 184.7 89 91.5 91.6 67.4 91.0 88.2 88.3 66.3 87.7 92.2 94.7 92.7 91.1 92.4 92.9 94.7 96.5 96.6 96.8 93.3 93.8 82.2 95.1 85.7 91.1 85.3 92.7 Summary The combined pre-treatment with BAC with CDI process has demonstrated high potential of increased water recovery while giving the advantage of reduced volume for disposal to further enhance sustainable water reclamation practices. Research is currently on-going to optimize this process for brine treatment and recovery. Acknowledgments This project is co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (20022006) (Contract-No. 018309), Public Utilities Board, Singapore and National University of Singapore (Ministry of Education’s AcRF Tier 1, Grant no.: R-288-000-044-731). The authors would like to thank Calgon Carbon Co., Singapore for providing the complimentary Filtrasorb ® F400D and ENPAR Technologies Inc., Canada for the technical advice on CDI process in this study. References American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation (1998) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Ed., Washington, D.C. Asano, T., Burton, F.L., Leverenz, H.L., Tsuchihashi, R. and Tchobanoglous, G. (2007) Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies and Applications. McGraw-Hill Inc., N.Y. ENPAR Technologies Inc. (2007) ENPAR’s DesEl System: Case Histories. http://www.enpar-tech.com/pdf/DesEl%20Case%20Histories-4-5.pdf Garrido, S., Aviles, M., Ramirez, A., Calderon, C., Ramirez-Orozco, A., Nieto, A, Shelp, G., Seed, L., Cebrian, M. and Vera, E. (2006) Arsenic removal from water of Huautla, Morelos, Mexico using capacitive deionization. WEFTEC 2006. Hu, J.Y., Song, L.F., Ong, S.L., Phua, E.T. and Ng, W.J. (2005) Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system. Chemosphere, 59 (1), 127-133. Hu, J.Y., Lee, L.Y., Shan, J.H., Ong, S.L. and Ng, H.Y. (submitted) Nanomembrane. In: Nanotechnologies for water environment applications. ASCE Publications, U.S.A. MEWR (Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources) (2007) NEWS RELEASE NO: 12/2007, DATE OF ISSUE: 15/03/2007, Speech by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the Official Opening of Keppel Seghers Ulu Pandan Newater Plant on 15 March 2007. http://app.mewr.gov.sg/press.asp?id=CDS4956. 5 MOE (Ministry of the Environment) and PUB (Public Utilities Board, Singapore) (2002). Newater for reservoirs from February 03 onwards. Media release 25 September 2002. http://www.pub.gov.sg/info_center/press_20020925.aspx (accessed on August 10, 2007) PUB (2003) Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the official launch of Newater. Media release. 21 February 2003. http://www.pub.gov.sg/info_center/press_20030221.aspx (accessed on August 10, 2007) Welgemoed, T.J. and Schutte, C.F. (2005) Capacitive denionization technologyTM: an alternative desalination solution. Desalination, 183, 237 – 340. 6
© Copyright 2024