Mars Sample Return Discussions February 23, 2010 1 Agenda !"#$% & & && & & & !"#$%&'()*+'*,&+$ & '()*)+,)( & && & & !$-)& -.$/) $ $ $$ 0123425155$ $ 6&+%7$ 8+'(9)'%:$'(%::+9;+< ?@<*$%<<+<<A+9*<$ $$ ".$=%>%*)$ 25123422155$ -.$/)$ 22155422123$ *Mars Sample Return is conceptual in nature and is subject to NASA approval. This approval would not be granted until NASA completes the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 2 Multi-element Mars Sample Return Architecture "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 3 Mars Sample Return Discussion - Overview Multi-element Mars Sample Return Campaign provides robust architecture •! Multi-element approach derived from numerous studies •! Provides technical robustness and programmatic resilience Technology challenges for mission elements are identified •! Past investments laid ground work for many key required engineering capabilities •! Technology tall-poles have been identified: discuss status and development plans that are mapped to mission needs •! Other technical challenges also identified Cost assessments •! Mission element concepts developed to “Team X” level: recent updates •! FY15 $/reserves per decadal survey guidelines •! Recent updates to Independent Cost Estimate performed for NASA HQ in May ‘08 "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 4 Functional Steps Required to Return a Scientifically Selected Sample to Earth /%,9'($N&@A$ J%&*(C/%9H$@9$ !%&<$ * "+:+'*$"%AE:+<$ L'O,)&+C?%'(+$ "%AE:+<$ &"'()*%=".3$,*#$%1.% * !"#$%&-#C";*% &"'()*%=";83.4%+>?*#%5!@AB=6% ** * #+*&)+B+CD%'7%;+$ "%AE:+<$@9$!%&<$ /%,9'($"%AE:+<$ *@$!%&<$F&G)*$ !"#$%&"'()*%+*,-#.%/".0*#% ** 1#23,3.4%&"'()*%51&6%3.%* !"#$%1#23,% * ?%E*,&+$%9H$I<@:%*+$ "%AE:+$?@9*%)9+&$ #+*,&9$*@$J%&*($ /%9H$@9$J%&*($ 1#23,3.4%&"'()*%51&6% 1.%7"#,8% !%&<$"%AE:+$#+*,&9$F&G)*+&$ * !"#$%%+*,-#.*0%%&"'()*% 9".0)3.4%5!+&96%%:";3)3,<% *Artist’s Rendering #+*&)+B+CK,%&%9*)9+$ %9H$D&+<+&B+$"%AE:+<$ @9$J%&*($ L<<+<<$=%M%&H<$ "%AE:+$"')+9'+$ **Note: Launch sequence of MSR-L/MSR-L can be switched: launching MSR-O first can provide telecom relay support for EDL/ surface operation/MAV launch "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" &"'()*%%&;3*.;*% 5 Multi-Element Architecture for Returning Samples from Mars Is a Resilient Approach * * MAX-C (Caching Rover) * * Mars Sample Return Orbiter Mars Sample Return Lander Mars Returned Sample Handling Science robustness •!Allows robust duration for collection of high quality samples Technical robustness •!Keeps landed mass requirements in family with MSL Entry/Descent/Landing (EDL) capability •!Spreads technical challenges across multiple elements Programmatic robustness •!Involves mission concepts with sizes similar to our implementation experience •!Incremental progress with samples in safe, scientifically intact states: improved program resiliency •!Spreads budget needs and reduces peak year program budget demand •!Leverages and retains EDL technical know-how "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" *Artist’s Rendering 6 Mars Astrobiological Explorer-Cacher (MAX-C) rover MAX-C rover will perform in situ exploration of Mars and acquire/cache dual sets of scientifically selected samples •! Team X conducted Decadal Survey Mars Panel study in Jan’10: added dual cache Major Rover Attributes Science Capability Remote and contact science: Color stereo imaging, macro/micro-scale mineralogy/composition, micro-scale organic detection/characterization, micro-scale imaging Key mission concept features •! Cruise/EDL system derived from MSL, launched on Atlas V 531 class vehicle. •! Land in ~10 km radius landing ellipse, up to -1 km altitude, within +25 to -15 degrees latitude. •! 43% mass margin carried on MAX-C rover (adopting many MSL parts), landing platform, and hardware where specific modifications would be made to the MSL EDL system. Coring and caching rock samples for future return Payload Mass ~15 kg instruments ~60 kg including corer/abrader, dual cache, mast, arm Traverse Capability 20 km (design capability) Surface Lifetime 500 Sols (design life) Instrument/Sensing Mast Quad UHF Helix High Gain Antenna Low Gain Antenna * SHEC “Sample Cache” Hazard Cameras * Artist’s Renderings 2.2m Ultraflex Solar Array Sampling/Science Arm "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 7 Current 2018 Mission Concept Implementation Approach Team X study concept included: Land MAX-C and ExoMars rovers together •! attached to a landing platform •! MAX-C and ExoMars rovers perform in situ science exploration: assessing potential joint experiments •! MAX-C will cache scientifically selected samples for future return •! * * •! MSL Cruise/EDL and Skycrane system lands Rovers on platform * "%AE:+$?%9)<*+&<$F9$ !%&<$",&N%'+$ Landing platform (pallet): ‘proof-of-concept’ by Team X; with further refinements by dedicated design team Scaling of MSL aeroshell diameter (from 4.5 m to 4.7 m) to accommodate 2 rovers •! Preserve MSL shape, L/D •! Same thermal protection system •! Same parachute Descent stage architecture/design based on MSL •! Same MSL engines, avionics, radar, algorithms, etc •! Mechanical structure updated to accommodate rovers/platform geometry/loads •! Incorporates terrain-relative descent navigation capability * * * MAX-C Rover * Artist’s Renderings * Artist’s Renderings "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" Rovers post-landing w/ example egress aids 8 Mars Sample Return Orbiter Concept MSR Orbiter will •! •! •! •! •! •! Rendezvous with Orbiting Sample (OS) container in 500km orbit. Capture, transfer and package OS into Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) Perform “break-the-chain” of contact with Mars Return to Earth Release EEV for entry Divert into a non-return trajectory If Before MSR Lander •! Monitor critical events of EDL and MAV launch •! Provide telecomm relay for lander and rover Key mission concept features •! Over twice the propellant needed by typical Mars orbiters. Uses bi-prop systems flown on previous Mars missions •! UHF Electra relay system for surface relay •! Orbiter mass quite dependent on specific launch and return years. Designed to envelop opportunities in early-mid 2020s. EEV 50 kg Orbiter Rendezvous systems 20 Systems Capture/Sample Transfer 40 Avionics 40 Power 130 Structures/Mechanisms 330 Cabling 40 Telecom 30 Propulsion 170 * * Thermal Team-X Design: Alternate Design: No “staging” required Separate prop stage that separates after Trans Earth Injection * Artist’s Renderings Misc. Contingency TOTAL Orbiter Systems Mass 40 100 940 kg Propellant 2280 kg TOTAL (43% margins) 3270 kg "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 9 MSR Orbiter: Sample Capture/Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) * * * Capture Basket concept testing on Orbiting Sample (OS) container NASA C-9 zero-g aircraft * Strawman EEV design Detection and rendezvous systems –! OS released into a 500km circular orbit by the MAV –! Optical detection from as far as 10,000km. –! Autonomous operation for last tens of meters Capture System –! Capture basket concept designed –! Prototype demonstrated on NASA zero-g aircraft campaign. –! 0.9m diameter, 60° sphere-cone blunt body –! Self-righting configuration –! No parachute required –! Hard landing on heatshield structure, with crushable material surrounding OS Capitalizes on design heritage –! Extensive aero-thermal testing and analysis –! Wind tunnel tests verified self-righting * Artist’s Renderings "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 10 Mars Sample Return Lander Concept MSR Lander will Key mission concept features •! Land a pallet with Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) and fetch rover •! MSR lander pallet delivered to the surface via the Skycrane EDL approach •! Upon safe landing, the fetch rover will egress and retrieve MAX-C sample cache •! Traverse distance up to ~14 km •! Supports and protects MAV in thermal igloo and minimizes thermal cycle depths •! Sample cache transferred by robotic arm on pallet from fetch rover to MAV •! MAV will launch sample container into stable Martian orbit Ultraflex Solar Array UHF •! 1 Earth year life Lander WEB MAV * Fetch Rover Lander arm Bio-Thermal Barrier *Artist’s concept * Egress Ramps Fetch Rover "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 11 MSL EDL Feed Forward To MSR •! MSL EDL system will deliver ~1000 kg rover to the surface for ‘11 launch L * –! Can be used for MAX-C in 2018 and the MSR Lander in 2020s •! Mass of three major sub-elements of MSR lander ~ 1000 kg •! EDL performance is relatively constant between 2011 and ‘22-’26 –! Can accommodate the MSR Lander –! 2018 is a more favorable opportunity than 2011 for EDL •! MSL EDL system capability may be improved to accommodate minor increase (~5–10%) to landed mass D V ! g * –! Options include increased entry body L/D and parachute deployment Mach number •! Three flight-element approach improves resilience for landed mass * Artist’s Renderings "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 12 Mars Returned Sample Handling Element Mars Returned Sample Handling element includes: ground recovery operations; Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) and sample curation facility The SRF will •! Contain samples as if potentially hazardous, equivalent to biosafety level-4 (BSL-4). Industry studies performed to scope facility and processes (2003) •! 3 architectural firms, with experience in biosafety, semi-conductor and food industries. •! Current costs estimates and scope based on studies and comparison to existing BSL-4 facilities. •! Keep samples isolated from Earthsourced contaminants •! Provide capability to conduct biohazard test protocol as a prerequisite to release of samples from containment. •! Could serve as a sample curation facility after hazard assessment. Artist’s concept of an SRF "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 13 Technical/Technological Challenges for Multi-element Mars Sample Return Campaign "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 14 Existing* Technical Capabilities •! Navigation: –! •! EDL: –! –! •! Reliable and precise navigation to entry corridor (~1.5km, knowledge) Skycrane providing landing capability of ~1000 kg payloads Guided entry providing ~10km (radius) landing accuracy Mobility: –! Rovers with long traverse capabilities using •! Autonomous hazard avoidance utilizing stereo cameras •! •! Instrument placement: –! •! Ability to satisfy forward planetary protection for landers and orbiters Phoenix's Bio-Barrier to keep manipulator arm in sterilized condition until after landing on Mars Sample Return: –! •! Direct to Earth and relay communication capability Planetary Protection: –! –! •! Lessons learned from Phoenix’s sample acquisition and sample transfer Development of a drill for MSL and its sample transfer subsystem Telecom: –! •! Ability to approach and place tools and science instruments on targets with a single command with less than ~1 cm error Sample Acquisition: –! –! •! Visual odometry providing accurate measurement of wheel slippage Genesis and Startdust missions Rendezvous and Capture: –! * Including flight and MSL design heritage DARPA Orbital Express "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 15 Multi-element MSR Campaign Technologies •! Tall pole technologies •! Defined as key technologies that require significant development •! Sample acquisition and encapsulation (MAX-C) •! Mars ascent vehicle (MSR lander) •! Back planetary protection (MSR orbiter) •! Other key challenges •! •! •! •! Round trip planetary protection (MAX-C) Mobility capability (MAX-C and MSR fetch rover) Terrain-relative descent navigation (MAX-C and MSR lander) Rendezvous and sample capture (MSR orbiter) "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 16 Sample Acquisition and Encapsulation 17 Target Requirements Consistent with MEPAG Next Decade Science Analysis Group (ND-SAG) Science –! Acquire~ 20 rock cores with dimension approximately 1 cm wide by 5 cm long –! Store and seal samples in individual tubes –! Provide capability to reject a sample after acquisition –! Measure the sample volume or mass with 50% accuracy Engineering –! System mass to be ~30kg •! Includes robotic arm –! Sample on slopes up to 25 degrees –! Sample from a ~300kg rover Examples of acceptable samples "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 18 Current Capabilities/State of the Art •! Ten years of technology development •! MTP, MIDP, SBIR, etc. •! Two flight-like corers developed by Honeybee Robotics: •! Mini Corer (for ’03/‘05 MSR) •! CAT (for MSL) in 2006. •! MSL flight drill developed and tested •! Drilling and coring testbed developed ."+)/0))&1$+$&2"()(& ."+)/0))&23!&42"()(&5+6&50(56)(7& 1:;&<($==& "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 89#)($-)+,*& 19 Strawman Development Plan •! •! •! •! Four end-to-end system concepts are being develop by industry and JPL in FY ‘10 MEP will select an approach that best fits MAX-C rover architecture and its constraints Develop sample acquisition and encapsulation capability to TRL 6 prior to MAX-C PDR Verify system performance via laboratory and rover field tests ATK Concept Honeybee Concept Alliance Space Systems Concept "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" JPL Concept 20 Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) 21 MAV Target Requirements •! Launches 5kg Orbiting Sample (OS) into 500 +/-100 km orbit, +/-0.2deg •! Ability to launch from +/- 30o latitudes •! Continuous telemetry for critical event coverage during ascent. •! Survive relevant environment for Earth-Mars Transit, EDL, and Mars surface environment for up to one Earth year on Mars •! 300kg (including OS) "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 22 Current Capabilities/State of the Art NASA has not launched a rocket from a planetary surface autonomously before. Three industry MAV studies performed in 2001-2002 •! Considered solid, liquid, and gel propulsion systems. •! Identified technology gaps, assessed risk, and provided estimates for mass, volume, and cost. •! Several follow-up reviews and RFIs have been conducted Summary study results •! Solid propulsion was judged to be more reliable, simpler, and most mature •! MAV components are available, but are not developed for long-term storage in relevant environments (including thermal cycling) or for EDL g-loads. –! Long term martian surface storage more demanding than typical storage in space •! Mass estimate assessment ~300 kg •! Preliminary cost assessment for TRL 6 development –! Design/development including environmental qualification, ground and high-altitude flight tests ~$250M (adjusted to $FY15 with 50% reserves) "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 23 Solid Two-Stage Mars Ascent Vehicle Concept* All figures are artist’s concepts Payload Fairing Orbiting Sample (OS) Avionics Compartment Stretched Star 17A SRM TVC Actuators 2.5 m Star 13A SRM •! Kept thermally stable in an RHU-augmented thermal igloo. •! Continuous telemetry for critical event coverage during ascent. •! Fully redundant C&DH •! Uses standard and stretched solid rocket motors (SRMs). Same fuel as MER and Pathfinder descent motors. •! Flight time to orbit ~700 sec •! 3-axis stabilized •! Stage-one uses a Thrust Vector Controlled nozzle •! Stage-two uses a fixed nozzle. Steering is accomplished by the use of four pairs of 20Ibf hydrazine engines (primary and backup) * LMA 2002 study "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 24 Strawman Development Plan •! Phase 1: Early investment (~$3M funded by In-Space Propulsion ROSES NRA, start date ~10/1/2010) –! System definition and development studies (~6 months) –! Propulsion subsystem development and tests for select MAV concepts (~3 years) •! Phase 2: Component technology development to TRL 6 and system architecture downselect (~2 years, ~$40M, may include ISP follow-on options) –! Develop component technologies to reach TRL6 –! Test components’ performance in realistic temperatures, storage, EDL g-loads as appropriate –! Culminates in the final downselect to a single concept, whose high-risk components have known performance and survivability characteristics •! Phase 3: Integrate and develop a MAV. Perform integrated testing and qualification. (~3 years, ~$210M, includes ISP Phase 3 options) –! Perform three high-altitude flight tests to assure at least two successful tests and measure performance prior to MSR lander PDR. –! At least one flight test must be performed on unit that has successfully completed environmental qualification/life testing •! Flight Project responsibilities, after completion of technology program: –! Update design based on test results, fabricate flight unit hardware, spare, and interface test articles (mechanical, electrical/testbed), complete flight acceptance test, and deliver to ATLO "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 25 JP%AE:+$!LQ$R+B+:@EA+9*$"'(+H,:+$ ROSES ISP MAV NRA (~3.5 yrs ISPduration) MAV Studies ISP follow-on "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 26 Back Planetary Protection 27 Planetary Protection Requirements & Mission Scenarios Forward PP Round Trip PP Outbound to Earth Outbound to Mars Avoid contamination of Mars with Earth life Introduction of viable Earth life into a favorable martian environment is considered harmful contamination by definition Back PP Avoid false positive life detection event Life detection event in this context is considered to mean detection of contamination that could be confused with extraterrestrial (ET) life "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" Protect Earth from potentially harmful effects (biohazards) 28 Target Requirements OS •! •! MSR is a Restricted Earth Return mission –! Goal of <10-6 chance of inadvertent release of an unsterilized >0.2 micron Mars particle. CV Top CV Bottom Sealed CV Subsystem requirements: –! Break-the-chain of contact with Mars •! Deliver a “Mars contained” OS to Containment Vessel (CV) •! Assure OS does not “leak” •! Mitigate ascent and orbiter dust –! Sample container protection Impact Sphere Orbiting Sample (OS) Containment Vessel (CV) Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) •! Reliable delivery to Earth entry corridor utilizing a robust Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) •! Assure containment at impact •! Maximize OS , CV, and EEV meteoroid protection –! Quarantine in specialized sample handling facility and application of a test protocol to assess safety prior to release "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 29 Current Capabilities/State of the Art •! Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) approach was developed to assess the overall probability of meeting the goal •! Preliminary design of the EEV was completed and a test article developed. Performed component and system tests: –! EEV drop test achieved terminal velocity and demonstrated shock tolerance. –! Wind tunnel tests verified aerodynamics, including self-righting. –! Arc jet tests verified TPS performance. •! A brazing technique was developed to TRL 3 for containment assurance and breaking the chain of contact with Mars •! Leak detection –! OS leak-detection technique using wireless transducer was demonstrated at TRL3 via an SBIR •! Sample container protection –! Preliminary materials for OS, CV, and EEV to assure meteoroid protection were selected (TRL 2-3 development). "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 30 Strawman Development Plan •! Update/improve models for Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) to measure capability to meet goal •! Breaking-the-chain –! Investigate various options of sealing the OS in a container. Will implement and evaluate prototypes •! Down select and develop technology to TRL 6. Test and verify sealing –! Develop OS leak detection technique by considering pressure drop or other techniques •! Down select and develop technology to TRL 6 •! Sample container protection –! Update EEV design considering the availability of TPS material •! Perform impact, heat, and aerodynamics tests –! Select materials for OS, CV, and EEV and satisfy meteoroid protection requirement •! Assure containment and sample integrity during ground processing –! Sample transfer from landing site to Sample Receiving Facility –! Ultra-clean sample manipulation, double-walled glove boxes "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 31 Example Back Planetary Protection Development Schedule "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 32 Other Key Challenges 33 Other Key Challenges$ •! Round trip planetary protection (MAX-C) –! Objective: Avoid false positive life detection –! Approach: Clean assembly, bio-barrier, analytical tool to compute overall probability of contamination Round Trip PP •! Mobility capability (MAX-C and MSR fetch rover) –! Objectives: Increase average rover speed and develop lighter/smaller motor controller –! Approach: Use FPGAs as co-processors and develop distributed motor control •! Terrain-relative descent navigation (MAX-C and MSR lander) –! Objective: Improved landing robustness –! Approach: Use terrain-relative navigation approach for avoiding landing hazards. Leverage NASA ALHAT project 50 cm rover move timeline Safe Landing •! Rendezvous and sample capture (MSR orbiter) –! Objective: Locate, track, rendezvous, and capture OS in Mars orbit –! Approach: Update system design, develop testbeds, and perform tests. Leverage Orbital Express capability Sample Capture "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 34 Estimated Technology Cost Including 50% Reserve ($M) MAX-C ($85M) MSR Orbiter ($160M) MSR Lander ($250M) "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 35 Cost Assessment for Multi-element Mars Sample Return Campaign "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 36 Cost assessment approaches •! Three sets of costs are provided, all in constant $FY’15 and include S! Mission and flight system development and ATLO (including technology) S! Launch vehicles S! Mission and ground operations •! First set of mission cost estimates are derived from JPL Team X studies S! Team X cost estimating process employs representatives of the potential doing organizations S! The flight system WBS for each mission composed of many separate cost elements (e.g., propulsion, thermal, mechanical, etc.) S! Several additional WBS elements estimated by wrap algorithms (e.g. mission design) and look-up catalogues, including the NASA instrument cost model S! Recent MSL experience is taken into account S! Team-X results have included S! Development (phase A-D) reserves of 50%, phase E reserve of 25% S! Technology/advanced engineering development, also with reserves of 50% •! Second set of mission cost estimates are derived from analogy (enabled by multi-element approach) with recently implemented missions in the program (completed by program office) S! MSL and MRO are used for analogy •! Third set of mission cost estimates are taken from a 2008 independent cost estimate by Aerospace Corp., conducted for NASA Headquarters, recently updated in Oct’09. "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 37 * ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ 6%<)<& !LT4?$U"%AE:+$?%'()9;$#@B+&V$ L9%:@;$C$ !+*&)'<$ W%9$X25$6%<+:)9+$ ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ UY-Z[23V$ 2.$$$8+%A4T$$ $$$$$$$"+<<)@9$ $\Y].]$6^^$ ].$$$$L9%:@;>$$ $$$$$$$b)*($!"/$UO,%9*)M+H$*@$Y5.36V$ !)H4<)M+$&@B+&$b)*($\c5$7;$ )9<*&,A+9*$E%>:@%H$%9H$'%'()9;$ <><*+A$U!"/1$]d3$7;Ve$'%E)*%:)M+$ @9$!"/$JR/C?&,)<+$?%E%G):)*>$ d.$$$$$I9H+E+9H+9*$ $$$$$$$$L+&@<E%'+$ $$$$$$$$?@&E.$ * Artist’s Renderings \Y].56$ Y].26$ **reflects estimated impact of inclusion of DSN/EPO/etc "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" ?@AA+9*<$ !%&<$R+'%H%:$D%9+:$:+H$&+'+9*$<*,H>$)9$ W%9[251$<')+9'+$E%>:@%H_$H,%:$<%AE:+$ '%9)<*+&<_$+*'.$R+*%):<$@N$:%9H+&$E%::+*$%9H$ H+<'+9*$<*%;+$A@H)N)+H$<)9'+$`@B[50$ !%&<$R+'%H%:$E%9+:$E&+<+9*%*)@9.$ UI9':,H+<$*+'(9@:@;>$H+B+:@EA+9*$Ya3!V$ ?%E)*%:)M+$@9$!"/$JR/C'&,)<+$<><*+A<e$ N@',<$@9$*+'(9)'%:$'%E%G):)*>$@N$<')+9*)N)'$ <%AE:+$<+:+'*)@9C<%AE:+$'%'()9;$ I9H+E+9H+9*$'@<*$+<*)A%*+$E+&N@&A+H$N@&$ A)<<)@9$H+<);9$N@&$`@B[50$!%&<$E%9+:$ E&+<+9*%*)@9e$8+%A$T$'@<*$&+<,:*$b%<$%*$ Y].26.$ 38 * ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ 6%<)<& !%&<$"%AE:+$#+*,&9$F&G)*+&$ L9%:@;$C$ !+*&)'<$ 2.$$$8+%A4T$$ $$$$$$$"+<<)@9$ $$$$$$$F'*.$]550$ ].$$$$L9%:@;>$$ $$$$$$$b)*($!#F$ UO,%9*)M+H$*@$ Y5.3$6V$ \$Y2.f$6^^$ F&G)*+&$b)::$G+$!#F4':%<<$ G,*$9++H<$*@$'%&&>$JJQ_$ '%E*,&+$<%AE:+$'%E<,:+$)9$ !%&<$@&G)*$%9H$E&@E,:<)B+:>$ )9g+'*$)9*@$J%&*($&+*,&9$ *&%g+'*@&>$ d.$$$$$I9H+E+9H+9*$ $$$$$$$$L+&@<E%'+$ $$$$$$$$?@&E.$ * Artist’s Renderings ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ UY-Z[23V$ \$Y2.3$6$ ?@AA+9*<$ 8+'(9@:@;>$ )9B+<*A+9*<$U\ Y2c5!$ )9':,H)9;$ &+<+&B+V$ )9':,H+H$ !%g@&$ E&@E,:<)@9$ <><*+A$N@&$!FI$ %9H$*&%9<4J%&*($ @&G)*$)9g+'*)@9$ \$Y2.26^^$ **reflects estimated impact of inclusion of DSN/EPO/etc "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 39 * ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ 6%<)<& !%&<$"%AE:+$#+*,&9$/%9H+&$ L9%:@;$C$ !+*&)'<$ 2.$$$8+%A4T$$ $$$$$$$"+<<)@9$ $$$$$$$F'*.$]550$ \$Y].f$6^^$ ].$$$$L9%:@;>$$ $$$$$$$b)*($!"/$UO,%9*)M+H$ *@$Y5.36V$ -+*'($&@B+&$U!J#4':%<<V$*@$ &+*&)+B+$'%'(+H$<%AE:+e$ !LQ$%9H$:%9H)9;$E:%*N@&A$ d.$$$$$I9H+E+9H+9*$ $$$$$$$$L+&@<E%'+$ $$$$$$$$?@&E.$ * Artist’s Renderings ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ UY-Z[23V$ \$d.5$6$ ?@AA+9*<$ 8+'(9@:@;>$)9B+<*A+9*<$\ Y]35!$U)9':,H)9;$&+<+&B+V$ )9':,H+H$ ?%E)*%:)M+$@9$!"/$JR/C'&,)<+$ <><*+A<e$$:%9H)9;$E:%*N@&A$ N++H$N@&b%&H$N&@A$!LT4?$ \Y].3$6^^$ **reflects estimated impact of inclusion of DSN/EPO/etc "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 40 * ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ 6%<)<& !%&<$#+*,&9+H$"%AE:+$=%9H:)9;$U!#"=V$ L9%:@;$C$ !+*&)'<$ 2.$$$$!"#=$'@<*$H+&)B+H$ N&@A$E&+B)@,<$ )9H,<*&>$)9E,*$ ].! L9%:@;>$$b)*($ 6)@<%N+*>$/%G<$ UO,%9*)M+H$*@$ Y5.36V$ d.$$$$$I9H+E+9H+9*$ $$$$$$$$L+&@<E%'+$ $$$$$$$$?@&E.$ ?@<*$J<*)A%*+$ U-Z[23V$ \Y5.3$6$ ?@AA+9*<$ 8+'(9@:@;>$ )9B+<*A+9*<$@N$\ Yd3!$U)9':,H)9;$ &+<+&B+V$)9':,H+H$ 6)@<%N+*>$:%G<C',&%*)@9$ N%'):)*)+<$ \$Y5.3$6$ \$Y5.d$6$ * Artist’s Renderings "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 41 Multi-element Sample Return Cost Estimates (All In $FY ’15) 1:>&8=)-)+,*& !)5-?@&&AB& CDE&3?<&F&GCE&8& >)*)(H)*& &3+5="I/&A$,J& #5*,&-$**$"+*& 4KL5+,$M)6&,"&DNCO7&$ P+6)#)+6)+,&43)("*#5%)& 2"(#"(5,$"+7$ \Y].]$6$ \Y].5$6$ \Y].2$6^^$ \Y2.f$6$ \$Y2.3$6$ \Y2.2$6$ * \Y].f$6$ \$Yd.5$6$ \Y].3$6$ * \Y5.3$6$ \Y5.3$6$ \Y5.d$6$ TUVNC&O& TUWND&O& TUVND&O& !LT4?$ * !"#4F&G)*+&$ * !"#4/%9H+&$ !#"=$ 1Q;!P?8;818R!&1:>& !S!3;:& **based * Artist’s Renderings "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" on Oct/Nov’09 Team X concept 42 Example Scenario for Multi-element Mars Sample Return Campaign •! ‘16 Joint NASA/ESA orbiter •! ‘18 MAX-C Joint NASA/ESA mission •! ’22 MSR-O (Assuming it is a NASA-only mission) •! ‘24 MSR-L (Assuming it is a NASA-only mission) 2f55$ 2]55$ !#"=$ 2555$ a55$ i]f$!"#4/$ c55$ i2a$!LT4?$ f55$ ]55$ i]]$!"#4F$ i2c$F&G)*+&$ F9;@)9;$ $!)<<)@9<$ 5$ -Z22$ -Z2d$ -Z23$ -Z2h$ -Z20$ "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" -Z]2$ -Z]d$ -Z]3$ 43 Examples of Scenarios for Mars Sample Return Campaign •! ‘16 Joint NASA/ESA orbiter •! ‘18 MAX-C Joint NASA/ESA mission •! ’22 MSR-O (Assuming it is a NASA-only mission) •! ‘24 MSR-L (Assuming it is a NASA-only mission) 2f55$ 2]55$ 2555$ a55$ c55$ f55$ ]55$ 5$ !#"=$ i]f$!"#4/$ F9;@)9;$ i2c$F&G)*+&$ i2a$!LT4?$ $!)<<)@9<$ -Z22$ -Z2d$ -Z23$ -Z2h$ •! ‘16 Joint NASA/ESA orbiter •! ‘18 MAX-C Joint NASA/ESA mission •! ’22 MSR-O (Assuming a joint mission; NASA contributes 25% of mission cost) •! ‘24 MSR-L (Assuming a joint mission; NASA contributes 80% of mission cost) i]]$!"#4F$ -Z20$ -Z]2$ 2f55$ 2]55$ 2]55$ 2555$ !#"=$ a55$ c55$ 5$ -Z22$ i]f$!"#4/$ i2a$!LT4?$ f55$ ]55$ -Z]3$ •! ‘16 Joint NASA/ESA orbiter •! ‘18 MAX-C Joint NASA/ESA mission •! ’22 MSR-O (Assuming a joint mission; NASA contributes 25% of mission cost) •! ‘26 MSR-L (Assuming a joint mission; NASA contributes 80% of mission cost) 2f55$ 2555$ -Z]d$ F9;@)9;$ i2c$F&G)*+&$ $!)<<)@9<$ -Z2d$ -Z23$ i]]$!"#4F$ a55$ f55$ ]55$ 5$ -Z2h$ -Z20$ !#"=$ c55$ F9;@)9;$ $!)<<)@9<$ []c$!"#4/$ i2a$!LT4?$ i2c$F&G)*+&$ -Z]2$ -Z]d$ -Z]3$ -Z22$ -Z2d$ "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" -Z23$ i]]$!"#4F$ -Z2h$ -Z20$ -Z]2$ -Z]d$ -Z]3$ 44 Summary •! Strong scientific impetus for sample return –! Next major step in understanding Mars and the Solar System •! Engineering readiness for sample return –! Past investments have developed key capabilities critical to sample return –! Key remaining technical challenges/development are identified •! Resilient multi-flight-element approach –! Science robustness •! Allows proper sample selection/acquisition –! Technical robustness •! •! Spreads technical challenges across multiple elements Keeps landed mass requirements in family with MSL EDL capability –! Programmatic robustness •! •! •! •! Involves concepts similar to our existing implementation experience Scientifically intact samples on/around Mars that provides program resiliency Spreads budget needs over ~1.5 decade Approach amenable to international partnership •! Multi-element MSR should not be viewed as an “isolated (flagship) mission” but as a cohesive campaign that builds on the past decade of Mars exploration "For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only" 45
© Copyright 2024