REPORT OF ASBESTOS SURVEY
KING-DANFORTH SCHOOL
MACON, GEORGIA
GEC JOB #130813.241
PREPARED FOR
MR. JASON DANIEL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CAPITAL PROGRAMS
BIBB COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
484 MULBERRY STREET
SUITE 330
MACON, GEORGIA 31201
PREPARED BY
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
514 HILLCREST INDUSTRIAL BOULVARD
MACON, GEORGIA 31204
ISSUE DATE:
May 23, 2014
May 23, 2014
Via-email: [email protected]
Mr. Jason Daniel
Executive Director of Capital Programs
Bibb County Board Of Education
484 Mulberry Street
Suite 330
Macon, Georgia 31201
SUBJECT:
Report of Asbestos Survey
Former King-Danforth School
1307 Shurling Drive
Macon, Georgia
GEC Project No. 130813.241
Dear Mr. Daniel:
Geotechnical & Environmental Consultants, Inc. (GEC) is pleased to present this report of an
asbestos survey for the above referenced site. The asbestos survey was conducted to be as near as
practical suitable to identify asbestos containing materials (ACM) in accordance with the National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations governing demolition
and renovations work where asbestos might be disturbed. This report outlines the analysis results
for the work that was performed by GEC over a two-day period May 9 and 10, 2014. The work
performed was in general accordance with GEC proposal No. ME-14-6404 and the methodologies
are described in detail therein.
Mr. Robert T. Hadden, an AHERA/ASHARA accredited Asbestos Inspector with GEC performed
the survey associated with the subject scope of work. The survey included the sampling of suspect
asbestos containing building materials. Additionally, GEC collected representative building
materials to form a sample for a Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure for Lead (TCLP-Pb)
Waste Stream Analysis for the above referenced site. The waste stream sample collected was
analyzed by TCLP to determine whether the expected demolition waste stream would be
hazardous for lead. Finally, GEC also conducted testing of observed surface coatings (paint) to
check for the presence of lead-based paint. No paint was detected that contained lead in
concentration high enough to be considered lead-based paint by regulation.
The survey covered the vacant building on the subject site that is nearest Shurling Drive and to the
northeast of the current operating school facility at the terminus of Boone Street. The complete
interior and exterior of the building was included in the survey. The specific suspect materials
514 Hillcrest Industrial Boulevard, Macon, GA 31204  Phone: (478) 757-1606  Fax: (478) 757-1608
5031 Milgen Court, Columbus, GA 31907  Phone: (706) 569-0008  Fax: (706) 569-0940
sampled in the survey are listed on the field chains of custody, and in the laboratory summary
report. All observed suspect materials were sampled. The samples were submitted under
appropriate Chain-of-Custody procedures to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES), in
Atlanta, Georgia. GEC received the results on May 20, 2014.
Estimated quantities of ACM are provided in the Detected Asbestos Sample Summary tables, but
Quantities of confirmed ACM that are to be abated/remediated should be corroborated by the
prospective abatement contractor. While the quantities provided by GEC may be suitable to compare
abatement rates in a bid setting, all abatement quantities should be verified prior to finalizing the
abatement contract. Much of the ACM is hidden under carpet or above suspended ceilings, and other
ACM such as piping may be hidden in walls. Complete as-built drawings should be used, but
otherwise, a careful inventory of all piping lines, etc. would be necessary to more accurately derive
quantities.
The roofing ACM was evidenced by several positive results indicating the presence of ACM, but
several samples of materials observed to be the same materials were found to not be ACM.
Additional sampling could reduce the size of areas, especially of roofing, that must be considered
ACM on the basis of the varied ACM results for roof decking and parapet areas, but additional
sampling may only confirm the inconsistent nature of the ACM rather than making it possible to
declare certain roof areas free of asbestos.
The Appendix to this report provides a Detected Asbestos Sample Summary Table and a copy of
the Analytical Reports with the field chains of custody for the survey. A copy of the TCLP
analytical report with the field chain of custody is also provided. Field sketches of the building
interiors are provided with the building and roof survey data. These have relevant notations on
field observations, materials, and area dimensions, and other notations pertinent to GEC’s field
observations. Selected portions of the original Bibb Board of Education survey for the Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) program at the school are also provided.
ASBESTOS SURVEY FINDINGS
A review of the asbestos results reveals the following:
The suspect materials sampled in this survey include but are not necessarily limited to the
following. Roofing materials including gray-black tar; multi-ply roof deck at several different
elevations; brick (and wood) wall flashing on various parapet walls on the roof; white flashing
seam caulk on the roof; white exterior door frame caulk; pipe gasket (exposed pipe outside
southwest of building where tank/pump removed); black mastic on exterior piping/wall (same
area southwest of building); white caulk on exterior piping metal jacket; vertical brick seam caulk
(exterior); vermiculite block fill; suspended ceiling tiles; brown baseboard mastic; black mastic
on pipe insulation (above ceiling); brown glue dots on ceiling; beige linoleum (black mastic
under); white under sink coat; wallboard mud (joint compound in school building intermittent
wall closures); bathroom sink caulk; Boiler Room – white insulation debris; wallboard in boiler
room; boiler room ceiling panels; sheetrock-like ceiling tile in boiler room; pink 12”x12” floor tile
in basement hallway; stair tread mastic; beige 12”x12” floor tile in basement stair; white 12”x12”
floor tile and black mastic at stairs; auditorium curtain fabric.
Sample Result Summary
Samples KD-1A, 1B, 1C, 1D – gray-black tar containing asbestos: The material was found
intermittently to be positive, but is applied to all vent penetrations across the roof.
Samples KD-2D, 2E – multi-ply roof decking: Only these two samples of five collected were
analyzed to contain asbestos. No discernible difference in the roof deck materials was observed.
Additional sampling could potentially delineate ACM decking from non-asbestos containing
decking material, but it might only confirm the inconsistent nature of the material.
Sample KD-3D – flashing material on the parapet wall: Only one of four such samples to be
analyzed to contain asbestos. It is located on the roof section over the north side office near the
entrance to the school.
Samples 5A, 5C, 5D, 5E – white exterior caulk: This material is found on all door frames, and
there is a 40-linear foot bead along the back of the school where an apparent awning/roof formerly
connected to the building.
Sample KD-6B – gasket on an exposed pipe flange: This is located exterior to the building at an
apparent former water handling or other tank storage equipment slab to the southwest of the
building. The remaining pipes are exposed and some go to the school building and some into the
brick retaining wall.
Sample KD-7A, 7A-DUP – black mastic: This material is on remnant foam glass pipe insulation
in the same area as the KD-6B sample above.
Samples KD-13A, 13B – black mastic: This material is found on all piping insulation joints and
elbow junctions that run above the suspended ceiling within the school building, and is found in
all classrooms and elsewhere in the school.
Sample KD-15B – black mastic under a beige linoleum: This material is located in Hall #4 (refer
to field sketch, but western most hall way). All floor coverings, except where specifically tested to
confirm otherwise, are considered ACM due to the tile or mastic.
Samples KD-17A, 17B – wallboard mud: This material (white joint compound) is found on
intermittent, infrequent wall closures where wallboard (sheetrock) is used to seal the closure.
Samples from the Boiler Room, FD-20A, 20B, 20C, 20D are all of debris from damaged
ACM in the Boiler Room. This area and the entrance room to it should be treated as a total room
abatement. On the basis of the original AHERA report (appended) and GEC’s findings, the room
is contaminated with asbestos from the damaged ACM.
Flooring materials, Samples KD-26A, 26B – floor tile and black mastic near the boiler room.
This flooring and the flooring as detailed in the original AHERA report are ACM. The
AHERA report indicated the 9”x9” floor tile is ACM. GEC did not re-sample the 9”x9”
floor tile, and saw no need to. Most of the floor tile is under carpet.
Appendix I contains a Detected Asbestos Sample Summary table provides estimated approximate
quantities for the discovered ACM, but quantities of confirmed ACM that are to be
abated/remediated should be corroborated by the prospective abatement contractor. While the
quantities provided by GEC may be suitable to compare abatement rates in a bid setting, all
abatement quantities should be verified prior to finalizing the abatement contract. Much of the ACM
is hidden under carpet or above suspended ceilings, and other ACM such as piping may be hidden in
walls. Complete as-built drawings should be used, but otherwise, a careful inventory of all piping
lines, etc. would be necessary to more accurately derive quantities.
WASTE STREAM BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS
At the time of the survey, GEC understood that the school facility building is to be demolished.
Therefore, a composite waste stream sample was collected from the building materials. Only
building materials that were judged to be representative of future building demolition were
collected. Small portions of observed building materials were collected to form one composite
sample. The waste stream sample was submitted to an accredited laboratory for analysis. Materials
that were sampled represented the majority of the building components.
The waste stream sample collected was analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate
Procedure (TCLP) method. EPA’s allowable limit, in its definition of Lead Hazardous Waste, is
less than 5mg/L. Based on the reported analytical results, the materials sampled were found to
contain less lead (BRL, below reporting limits of the Analytical method) than EPA’s allowable
limit in its definition of Hazardous Waste (less than 5 mg/L by TCLP analysis). The reported lead
content result of the waste stream was less than the EPA definition of a hazardous waste for lead.
Therefore, the debris is not hazardous with respect to lead and may be disposed of as general
construction debris at a permitted disposal facility, which accepts such waste. A copy of the
laboratory report and chain-of-custody can be found in the Appendix.
A licensed Lead Based Paint Abatement Contractor must be employed for removal, transport and
disposal of any identified lead paint that is disposed separately from the substrate material. GEC
conducted testing of the observed paints/coatings at the building. No paint or coating containing
lead at a level to be considered lead-based paint was discovered in the testing using an X-ray
Fluorescence (XRF) gauge.
ACM DEMOLITION CONSIDERATIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS
Removal/encapsulation/disturbance or demolition of regulated quantities or potentially friable
ACM must be conducted by a licensed and qualified asbestos abatement contractor, with
compliance air monitoring conducted during the removal.
Renovation and demolition activities disturbing ACM are regulated under OSHA Construction
Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101). If more than 10 square or linear feet of friable material is removed
or produced by the project, then in accordance with Georgia regulations, EPA’s NESHAP
regulation will apply. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Environmental
Protection Division (EPD) Land Protection Branch regulates asbestos abatement in this state.
Rules of Solid Waste Management (Charter 391-3-4) were revised on August 20, 1997 and
accepted on March 15, 1999. This rule, as well as the Rules for Air Quality Control (Chapter 391-
3-1) and Rules of Asbestos Removal and Encapsulation (Chapter 391-3-14), should be followed
during demolition activities.
Ten days prior to demolition or renovation activities, the EPD Lead-Based Paint and Asbestos
program should be notified under the Georgia Rule 391-3-14 and the Federal NESHAP Rule. The
project notification form should be completed by a Georgia licensed abatement contractor. The
abatement project requires a fee paid to the Division at the time notification is made. It is the
building owners’ and contractors’ responsibility to properly evaluate the ACM to be removed to
determine whether this material will be rendered friable due to the demolition or renovation
activity. If a material is non-friable, a courtesy notification to EPD is expected to explain removal
methods.
CLOSURE
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Jason Daniel and the Bibb County
Board of Education, and their representatives and assigns, who may use this report in its entirety
to provide information on the facility to those individuals that they deem suitable to receive such
information. This report and its findings shall not, in whole or in part, be disseminated to any other
party, nor used by any other party without prior written consent by Geotechnical & Environmental
Consultants, Inc.
Information contained in this report was obtained by means of interviews, document review, onsite observations, and analytical data. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report
are based on the data obtained and presented in this report. This report is representative of
conditions existing at the time the survey was conducted. Situations or activities which occur
subsequent to this report or to the times noted in this report are outside the scope of this ACM and
Waste Stream Survey, and GEC is not obligated to modify this report to include such information.
The scope of the Asbestos Survey and Waste Stream Sampling was, through sampling and
analysis, to provide information on the presence or absence of asbestos and to characterize the
waste from materials within the subject facility for disposal. Although GEC’s inspectors attempt to
locate and identify materials potentially containing asbestos, GEC does not warrant that all
materials containing asbestos were identified. The survey followed generally accepted industry
practices to minimize the possibility, but due to the nature of the limited survey and possible nonhomogeneity of the materials surveyed, it is possible that materials containing asbestos were not
found because they either were not visible (i.e. covered by other materials, totally enclosed,
elevated, or encapsulated), or not accessible to the inspectors, or for various other sufficient
reasons, were not sampled.
The Appendix to this report provides a Detected Asbestos Sample Summary Table and a copy of
the Analytical Reports with the field chains of custody for the survey. A copy of the TCLP
analytical report with the field chain of custody is also provided. Field sketches of the building
interiors are provided with the building and roof survey data. These have relevant notations on
field observations, materials, and area dimensions, and other notations pertinent to GEC’s field
observations. Selected portions of the original Bibb Board of Education survey for the Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) program at the school are also provided.
GEC appreciates the opportunity to work with you and the Bibb County Board of Education on
this project. We are available to work with you as needed in completing the planned
demolition/renovation of the subject building.
If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact us at (478) 757-1606.
Sincerely,
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Robert T. Hadden
Technical Service Manager
Asbestos Inspector/
Management Planner#14387
RTH/TED/hm
Thomas E. Driver, P.E.
President/Senior Engineer
GA Reg. # 17394
APPENDIX
DETECTED ASBESTOS SAMPLE SUMMARY
King-Danforth
GEC PROJECT NO. 130813.241
SAMPLE ID
HOMOGENEOUS
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE DATE:
5/9/2014
LAYER
KD-1A
KD-1B
KD-1C
LAYER 1
LAYER 1
LAYER 1
KD-2D
LAYER 2
KD-2E
KD-1D
LAYER 1
LAYER 1
KD-3D
LAYER 3
KD-5A
LAYER 1
KD-5C
LAYER 1
KD-6B
LAYER 1
KD-7A
LAYER 1
KD-5D
KD-5E
LAYER 1
LAYER 1
KD-7A-DUP
LAYER 1
KD-13A
LAYER 1
Black Mastic on Pipe
KD-13B
KD-15B
KD-17A
KD-17B
LAYER 1
LAYER 3
LAYER 1
LAYER 1
Black Mastic on Pipe
Beige Linoleum
Wallboard Mud (JC)
Wallboard Mud (JC)
Gray/Black Tar
Gray/Black Tar
Gray/Black Tar
Upper Multi-ply Roof
Decking
Upper Multi-ply Roof
Decking
Gray/Black Tar
ASBESTOS CONTENT
LOCATION
PHYSICAL
CONDITION % ASBESTOS
TYPE
COMMENTS
ESTIMATED
QUANTITIES
1 Roof *
3 Roof *
8 Roof *
Good
Good
Good
15
15
15
CH
CH
CH
8 Roof *
Good
15
CH
Good
Good
15
15
CH
CH
Good
15
CH
Good
2
CH
Good
5
CH
Good
20
CH
Good
15
CH
Black Mastic
20 LF per door and
40 LF strip at rear of
Building
Various- As observed, 1
gasket outside SW of
Bldg
As observed Approx.
12 SF
Good
Good
2
2
CH
CH
Paint included as binder
See KD-5A,C
Good
15
CH
Black Mastic
Hall #7
Good
20
CH
End
Hall #4
Rm 123
Rm 105 Hall #2
Good
Good
Good
Good
20
5
2
2
CH
CH
CH
CH
See KD-7A
4-6 applications per
room at 2 SF per
application on pipe in
ceiling intermittent
above suspended
ceiling throughout
building +/- 500 SF
See KD-26A
All wallboard- limited
areas - Approx. 300SF
7 Roof *
7 Roof *
North Office
Wall Flashing
Parapet Wall
Exterior Door
Caulk
Frame
White Exterior Door Frame SE Corner Door
Caulk
Window
Gray Smaller
Pipe (Lower
Gasket Material
Exposed)
Piping Wall on
Black Mastic
Foam Glass
White Exterior Door Frame
Door Next to
Caulk
Pipes-Southeast
White Exterior Caulk
Gym Near Door
Piping Wall on
Black Mastic
Foam Glass
Approx. 80 vent/
penetrations of Aprox. 4
SF each 320 SF
Entire Roof area
60,850 SF
See KD-1A,B,C
Approx. 750 SF of
parapet wall
Paint included as binder
Paint included as binder.
Talc included as binder
Black Mastic
Paint included as binder
Paint included as binder
SAMPLE ID
SAMPLE DATE:
5/9/2014
LAYER
HOMOGENEOUS
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
KD-20A
LAYER 1
White Insulation Debris
KD-20B
LAYER 1
KD-20C
KD-20D
LAYER 2
LAYER 1
White Insulation Debris
White Insulation Debris w/
Foam Glass and Wrap
White Insulation Debris
KD-26A
LAYER 1
White 12x12 FT w/ Black
Mastic
White 12x12
FT w/ Black
KD-26A
LAYER 2
KD-26B
LAYER 1
KD-26B
LAYER 2
Mastic
White 12x12
FT w/ Black
Mastic
White 12x12 FT w/ Black
Mastic
ASBESTOS CONTENT
LOCATION
PHYSICAL
CONDITION % ASBESTOS
Entrance
Damaged
Hot Water Heater
Boiler Room
Good
TYPE
10
CH
15
CH
COMMENTS
ESTIMATED
QUANTITIES
Entire boiler room and
Entry room w/ stair
needs abatementApprox. 310 LF various/
pipe. See original
AHERA report also
All flooring, most under
carpet 9"x9" and
12"x12"= 21,000 SF
Approx.
Boiler Room
top of Heater
Good
Good
15
5, 5
CH
CH, AM
Next to Stairs
Good
2
CH
Floor Tile
Next to Stairs
Good
5
CH
Black Mastic
Next to Stairs
Good
2
CH
Floor Tile
Next to Stairs
Good
5
CH
Black Mastic
NOTE: CH = Chrysotile Asbestos; AM = Amosite Asbestos; ND = Not Detected
CY = Cubic Yards; SF = Square Feet; CF = Cubic Feet; LF = Linear Feet
* Refer to Roof Field Sketch
See KD-26A
Page 1 of 12
Page 2 of 12
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
King Danford ACM
1405A87
Date:
19-May-14
Case Narrative
An extra sample with duplicate sample ID "KD-7A" was received but was not listed on the Chain of Custody. The sample was
analyzed as "KD-7A-DUP".
Page 3 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-1A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-001A
Gray / Black Tar - 1 Roof
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-002A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-003A
Lower Multiplied Roof
Decking (Paper) - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-003A
Lower Multiplied Roof
Decking (Paper) - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-003A
Lower Multiplied Roof
Decking (Paper) - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-004A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 1
KD-2A
Layer: 1
KD-2AA
Layer: 1
KD-2AA
Layer: 2
KD-2AA
Layer: 3
KD-2B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 4 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-2BB
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-005A
Lower Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-005A
Lower Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-005A
Lower Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-006A
Gray / Black Tar - 3
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-007A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-007A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 1
KD-2BB
Layer: 2
KD-2BB
Layer: 3
KD-1B
Layer: 1
KD-2C
Layer: 1
KD-2C
Layer: 2
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 5 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-2C
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-007A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-008A
Brick Wall Flashing on Side
(East Side) of Gym Wall
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-008A
Brick Wall Flashing on Side
(East Side) of Gym Wall
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-009A
Gray Black Tar - 8
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-010A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-010A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 8
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 3
KD-3A
Layer: 1
KD-3A
Layer: 2
KD-1C
Layer: 1
KD-2D
Layer: 1
KD-2D
Layer: 2
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 6 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-2D
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-010A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-010A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-011A
Wood Wall Flashing on
North Side of Gym Wall
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-012A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 7
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-012A
Upper Multiplied Roof
Decking - 7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-013A
Gray / Black Tar - 7
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 3
KD-2D
Layer: 4
KD-3B
Layer: 1
KD-2E
Layer: 1
KD-2E
Layer: 2
KD-1D
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 7 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-4A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-014A
White Flashing Seam Caulk
on Gym Wall (East End)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-015A
White Flashing Seam Caulk
on Gym Wall (Middle)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-016A
White Flashing Seam Caulk
West Side of Gym
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-017A
Brick Wall Flashing @
Media Center Wall North
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-017A
Brick Wall Flashing @
Media Center Wall North
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-018A
Wall Flashing North Office
Parapet Wall
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 1
KD-4B
Layer: 1
KD-4C
Layer: 1
KD-3C
Layer: 1
KD-3C
Layer: 2
KD-3D
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 8 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-3D
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-018A
Wall Flashing North Office
Parapet Wall
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-018A
Wall Flashing North Office
Parapet Wall
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-018A
Wall Flashing North Office
Parapet Wall
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-019A
Exterior Door Frame Caulk
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-020A
White Exterior Wall Vent
Caulk on East Wall South of
Entrance
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-021A
White Exterior Door Frame
Caulk @ SE Corn Door
Window
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 2
KD-3D
Layer: 3
KD-3D
Layer: 4
KD-5A
Paint included as binder
Layer: 1
KD-5B
Layer: 1
KD-5C
paint included as binder. Talc
included as binder.
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 9 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-6A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A87
-022A
Gray Smaller Pipe (Upper
Exposed) Gasket Material
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-023A
Gray Smaller Pipe (Lower
Exposed) Gasket Material
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-024A
Black Mastic on Piping Wall
on Foam Glass
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Black Mastic
1405A87
-024A
Black Mastic on Piping Wall
on Foam Glass
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Foam Glass
1405A87
-025A
White Caulk on Pipe
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-026A
White Caulk on Pipe
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Layer: 1
KD-6B
Layer: 1
KD-7A
Layer: 1
KD-7A
Layer: 2
KD-8A
Layer: 1
KD-8B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 10 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-5D
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A87
-027A
White Exterior Door Frame
Caulk Door Next to Pipes Southeast
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-028A
White Exterior Caulk at Gym
Near Door
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-029A
Vertical Brick Seam Caulk Souheast Rear Door
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-030A
Vertical Brick Seam Caulk w /
White Spackle
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A87
-031A
Square Lower Vent Seam
Caulk Southeast Rear
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Paint included as binder
Layer: 1
KD-5E
Layer: 1
KD-9A
Layer: 1
KD-9B
Layer: 1
KD-9C
Layer: 1
KD-7A-DUP
1405A87
-032A
Black Mastic
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 11 of 12
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A87
Project Name:
King Danford ACM
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-7A-DUP
AES ID
1405A87
-032A
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Foam Glass
Layer: 2
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 12 of 12
Page 1 of 2
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
19-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405B38
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.240
Client ID
KD-1A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405B38001A
Auto Stage Curtain
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405B38002A
Auto Stage Curtain
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 1
KD-1B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Yelena Khanina
James Wallace
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 11
Page 2 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-10A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A88
-001A
Bermioulite Block Fill
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-002A
Bermioulite Block Fill
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-003A
Ceiling Tile From Debris
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-004A
Brown Base Mastic - Hall #7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-005A
Black Mastic on Pipe - Hall
#7
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-006A
Brown Base Mastic - End of
Hall #7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Layer: 1
KD-10B
Layer: 1
KD-11A
Paint included as binder
Layer: 1
KD-12A
Layer: 1
KD-13A
Layer: 1
KD-12B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 3 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-13B
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A88
-007A
Black Mastic on Pipe - End
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-007A
Black Mastic on Pipe - End
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-008A
Glue Dot - Room 121 Hall #4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-009A
Beige Linoleum - Hall #4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Vinyl
1405A88
-009A
Beige Linoleum - Hall #4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Backing
1405A88
-010A
Beige Linoleum - Hall #4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Vinyl
Layer: 1
KD-13B
Layer: 2
KD-14A
Layer: 1
KD-15A
Layer: 1
KD-15A
Layer: 2
KD-15B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 4 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-15B
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A88
-010A
Beige Linoleum - Hall #4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Backing
1405A88
-010A
Beige Linoleum - Hall #4
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Black Mastic
1405A88
-011A
White Under Sink Coat Rm
123
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-012A
White Under Sink Coat Rm
123
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-013A
Wallboard Mud (JC) Rm 123
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-014A
Wallboard Sheetrock (JC)
Rm 123
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
Layer: 2
KD-15B
Layer: 3
KD-16A
Layer: 1
KD-16B
Layer: 1
KD-17A
Layer: 1
KD-18A
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 5 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-18A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A88
-014A
Wallboard Sheetrock (JC)
Rm 123
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-015A
Glue Dot Rm 105 Hall #2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-016A
Wallboard Mud (JC) Rm 105
Hall #2
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-017A
Wallboard Mud (Sheetrock)
Rm 105 Hall #2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-017A
Wallboard Mud (Sheetrock)
Rm 105 Hall #2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-018A
Brown Base Mastic - Rm 105
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Layer: 2
KD-14B
Layer: 1
KD-17B
Layer: 1
KD-18B
Layer: 1
KD-18B
Layer: 2
KD-12C
Covebase
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 6 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-12C
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A88
-018A
Brown Base Mastic - Rm 105
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Glue
1405A88
-019A
Ceiling Tile Debris Hall #2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-020A
Bathroom Sink Caulk Hall #2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-021A
Bathroom Sink Caulk - Hall
#1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-022A
White Insulation Debris
Entrance
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-023A
Wallboard Mud (JC) Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Layer: 2
KD-11B
Layer: 1
KD-19A
Layer: 1
KD-19B
Layer: 1
KD-20A
Layer: 1
KD-17C
Paint included as binder
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 7 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-18C
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
1405A88
-024A
Wallboard (Sheetrock) Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-024A
Wallboard (Sheetrock) Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-025A
White Insulation Debris by
Hot Water Heater Boiler Rm
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-026A
White Insulation Debris w /
Foam Glass and Wrap Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-026A
White Insulation Debris w /
Foam Glass and Wrap Boiler
Rm
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-026A
White Insulation Debris w /
Foam Glass and Wrap Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Comments
Paint included as binder
Layer: 1
KD-18C
Layer: 2
KD-20B
Layer: 1
KD-20C
Layer: 1
KD-20C
Layer: 2
KD-20C
Layer: 3
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 8 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-17D
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-027A
Wallboard Mud (JC) Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-028A
Wallboard (Sheetrock) Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-028A
Wallboard (Sheetrock) Boiler
Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-029A
White Insulation Debris on
top of Heater
5
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-030A
Boiler Rm Ceiling Panel
Coating
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-031A
Boiler Rm Ceiling Panel
Coating
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
Layer: 1
KD-18D
Layer: 1
KD-18D
Layer: 2
KD-20D
Layer: 1
KD-21A
Layer: 1
KD-21B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 9 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-22A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A88
-032A
Sheetrock CT - Room Next to
Boiler Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-033A
Sheetrock CT - Room Next to
Boiler Rm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Paint included as binder
1405A88
-034A
Pink 12x12 FT - Basement
Hallway
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Floor Tile with glue
1405A88
-035A
Pink 12x12 FT - Basement
Hallway
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Floor Tile with glue
1405A88
-036A
Stair Tred Mastic
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1405A88
-037A
Stair Tred Mastic
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Layer: 1
KD-22B
Layer: 1
KD-23A
Layer: 1
KD-23B
Layer: 1
KD-24A
Layer: 1
KD-24B
Layer: 1
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 10 of 11
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Bulk Sample Summary Report
Lab Code 102082-0
20-May-14
Client Name:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
AES Job Number:
1405A88
Project Name:
King Danforth
Project Number:
130813.241
Client ID
KD-25A
AES ID
Location
Asbestos Mineral Percentage
CH AM CR AN TR AC
Comments
1405A88
-038A
Beige 12x12 FT - Basement
Stairway
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Floor Tile with glue
1405A88
-039A
Beige 12x12 FT - Basement
Stairway
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Floor Tile with glue
1405A88
-040A
White 12x12 FT - Next to
Stairs w / Black Mastic
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Floor Tile
1405A88
-040A
White 12x12 FT - Next to
Stairs w / Black Mastic
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Black Mastic
1405A88
-041A
White 12x12 FT - Next to
Stairs w / Black Mastic
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Floor Tile
1405A88
-041A
White 12x12 FT - Next to
Stairs w / Black Mastic
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Black Mastic
Layer: 1
KD-25B
Layer: 1
KD-26A
Layer: 1
KD-26A
Layer: 2
KD-26B
Layer: 1
KD-26B
Layer: 2
Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite
For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.
ND = None Detected
AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab
Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA
600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building
Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.
These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.
PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently
the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.
This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .
Microanalyst:
QC Analyst:
Svetlana Arkhipov
Yelena Khanina
Page 11 of 11
May 19, 2014
Bob Hadden
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
514 Hillcrest Industrial Blvd
Macon
GA 31204
TEL: (478) 757-1606
FAX: (478) 757-1608
RE:
King--Danforth
Dear Bob Hadden:
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received
for the analyses presented in following report.
Order No: 1405D18
1
samples on 5/13/2014 12:20:00 PM
No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated
Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies
associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a
project Case Narrative.
AES’ certifications are as follows:
-NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water,
soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/13-06/30/14.
-AIHA-LAP, LLC Laboratory ID: 100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics,
Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental
Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01/15.
These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.
Chantelle Kanhai
Project Manager
Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4
Client:
GeoTechnical & Env. Consultants, Inc.
Project Name: King--Danforth
Lab ID:
1405D18-001
Analyses
Result
ICP METALS, TCLP
Qualifiers:
Reporting
Qual
Limit
Value exceeds maximum contaminant level
BRL Below reporting limit
Units
BatchID
WASTE STREAM
5/10/2014
Waste
Dilution
Factor
Date Analyzed Analyst
(SW3010A)
BRL
*
Client Sample ID:
Collection Date:
Matrix:
SW1311/6010C
Lead
19-May-14
Date:
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
mg/L
0.0500
191210
1
E
Estimated (value above quantitation range)
S
Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix
05/19/2014 14:16
H
Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
Narr
N
Analyte not NELAC certified
NC
Not confirmed
B
Analyte detected in the associated method blank
<
Less than Result value
>
Greater than Result value
J
Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit
Page 3 of 4
See case narrative
JL
Page 4 of 4
SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
The limited survey (limited in that the survey may not have penetrated beyond solid wood or other apparent
substrates to ceilings, walls, and more typically flooring) for the area focused primarily on identifying suspect
ACMs in the specified areas. Quantities of confirmed ACM that are to be abated/remediated should be
corroborated by the prospective abatement contractor. Samples were analyzed by a laboratory accredited in
accordance with Georgia law.
The intent of this survey was to identify suspect ACM and to collect and submit bulk samples of such
materials for laboratory analysis to identify the presence/absence and percent asbestos content in the
suspect materials.
During a walk-through of the survey area, the inspector visually checked for the presence of suspect ACM.
The inspection of the subject location included the following activities:

Suspect materials were examined for variations in color, texture, thickness and other visually
apparent characteristics useful in determining the uniformity of the material.

Each suspect material that appeared to be uniform was assumed to be a Homogeneous Material
(HM) and was assigned a number.

For each HM, descriptions and general locations of suspect ACM were noted, and are presented in
the Detected Asbestos Sample Summary Table, the chain of custody, and in the laboratory reports.

The physical condition of each HM and the presence of visible debris were also noted.

Since visual survey is inadequate to determine whether a material contains asbestos, each suspect
material is presumed to be ACM until a sufficient number of samples of each material are analyzed
for asbestos content. The minimum number of samples that must be collected and analyzed for
asbestos content in order to establish a suspect material as non-ACM is dependent upon material
type and quantity. For each miscellaneous suspect material that appeared to be homogeneous, a
minimum of two samples was collected.

The inspector performed bulk sampling in accordance with U.S. EPA guidelines to minimize
release of asbestos fibers during sample collection. Each bulk sample was thoroughly wetted with
amended water and collected by removing a small piece or core of the suspect material and placing
the sample in a clean, sealable container. An attempt was made to include each layer of suspect
material present.

Each sample was assigned a unique number, which was included on the sample container and on
the chain-of-custody.

Sampling locations were selected based on the goal of representing the area and homogeneity of
the materials surveyed. Samples were not located in any way so as to influence the analytical
results or findings of this report. Destructive sampling was performed. Sample location
descriptions are presented in the Detected Asbestos Sample Summary Table, and are also entered
on the Chain-of-Custody forms included with the Laboratory Report included in the Appendix.

Bulk samples were submitted under appropriate Chain-of-Custody procedures to Analytical
Environmental Services, Inc. (AES), in Atlanta, Georgia, a laboratory accredited for PLM analysis
of bulk samples for asbestos content.
LABORATORY PROCEDURES
All suspect ACM samples were analyzed for asbestos content by polarized light microscopy (PLM) using
dispersion staining (Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” EPA/600/R93/116). This analytical method, which the U.S. EPA currently recommends for the determination of
asbestos in bulk samples, is used for the qualitative identification of six morphologically different types of
asbestos fibers: chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite and actinolite. The fibrous
composition of the bulk sample is reported in visually estimated percentages of asbestos and non-asbestos
materials (i.e. cellulose, fibrous glass, synthetic).
The analytical results indicate the percent asbestos content in the sampled material. The amount of
asbestos identified in a sample of ACM may vary in a homogeneous material depending on the sample
location. Such variation in content may be due to incomplete mixing of material components during
manufacturing processes, or it may indicate that materials with a visually similar appearance are actually of
different composition.
Important Note To Our Clients
The PLM method for analysis of bulk samples for asbestos content requires that the microscopist make a
visual estimation of the percentage of asbestos in a given sample. By definition, any material with greater
than 1% asbestos is considered regulated asbestos-containing material. The extent of regulatory
requirements under EPA and OSHA asbestos regulations depends upon the category and condition of the
material.
If asbestos is identified in a sample of friable material by PLM analysis, with results between a trace and
10% asbestos, the owner must either assume that the content is greater than 1%, and treat the material as
regulated, or the owner may confirm the regulatory status by having samples of these materials reanalyzed by the point counting method. Some of these materials may be confirmed as less than or equal to
1% when the more quantitative point counting technique is used. Samples are not initially analyzed by
point counting because the regulations require analysis by PLM. Also, point counting is a more expensive
method. Point Counting results supersede the initial results obtained by PLM using the visual estimation of
area.
Some resinously bound materials such as mastics and roofing materials, and materials with very small
fibers such as floor tiles and joint compounds, may yield false negative PLM results. Resins, bitumen, and
similar sticky matrices may obscure the visual identification of asbestos minerals. Fiber sizes may be
beneath the visual limit of the light microscope. The presence or absence of asbestos in such samples may
be confirmed using the Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) with the Modified Chatfield
(quantitative), or Drop-Mount (qualitative) methods.
LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
Asbestos Laboratory Accreditation
AES of Atlanta, Georgia, has received accreditation for PLM and TEM analysis under the National
Voluntary Lab Accreditation Program (NVLAP) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. To
ensure quality, AES has developed an internal quality control program with the following features:









Sample collection, preservation, storage, analysis and disposal methods comply with approved
EPA and NIOSH methods;
Analysts participate quarterly in proficiency rounds administered by AES and conducted with two
other laboratories.
Chain-of-Custody Records (COCR) are maintained on all samples both during the collection phase
of the work and during the in-house analysis;
Statistical parameters or control charts are used to monitor accuracy of analysis and overall
laboratory effectiveness;
Laboratory personnel receive formal training in instrument operation and regular performance
evaluations;
A collection of reference samples is used to ensure analysts’ accuracy;
Each sample is analyzed by two separate analysts;
Sample certificates of analysis, reagent certificates, and sample container certificate files are
maintained; and
Hard copy QA/QC files are maintained for customer examination.