Chapter-III SETTING AND SAMPLE This Chapter presents a brief profile of both Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in general and the districts under study in particular. It also includes the socio-economic profile of the respondents. 3.1 State Profile: Assam Assam, the easternmost part of the India, is bordered in the north by Bhutan and in east by Arunachal Pradesh. Along the south lie Nagaland, Manipur and Mizoram. Meghalaya lies to the southwest, Bengal and Bangladesh lie to the west. The State is known as the gateway to the entire Northeast India. With the British annexation, Assam has undergone series of changes in its physical and cultural boundaries to attain the present status, which makes it a centre of mosaic culture. Till 1947, Assam comprised most of Northeast India, except the tiny erstwhile kingdom of Tripura to the south, and the British administered territory of Manipur to the east. However, modern Assam is a minuscule form of its old structure. The Government of India, which has the unilateral powers to change the borders of a state, divided Assam into several states in the 1970’s with a view to satisfy national aspirations of the tribal populations living within the then borders of Assam. At present, the geographical entity of Assam actually consists of three distinct natural regions: 128 a) The Brahmaputra Valley, lies in north has overwhelmingly Assamese speaking people and also having existence of different tribes and ethnic groups. The Valley comprises 22 plain districts with a total area of 56,194 sq. km. However, four districts such as Kokrajhar, Cirrang, Bagsha and Udalguri now fall under Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC). b) The Hills areas comprising Karbi Anglong district and North Cachar Hills (presently known as Dima Hasio Raji) district with a total area of 15,322 sq. km. c) The Barak Valley lies in the southern part of the state having Bengali speaking people with some immigrant labourers in the tea plantations and some sprinkled tribal population mainly in the foothills. The Valley covers three districts with total area of 6922 sq. km. Thus, the State of Assam comprises 27 districts (23 as per 2001 census) which are further subdivided into 56 subdivisions and 145 revenue circles for the convenience of administration and revenue collection. It covers an area of 78,438 sq. km. with population density of 340 per sq. km. Assam has total of 26,247 revenue villages. As per the Census of 2001, the total population of Assam was 26,655,528 of which Hindus share 17,296,455 (Male-8,951,108 and Female-8,345,347), Muslim 8,240,611 (Male-4,252,691 and Female-3,987,920), Christian 9,86,589 (Male-5,02,756 and Female-4,83,833), Sikh 22,519 (Male-13,508 and Female-9,011), Buddhist 51,029 (Male-26,322 and Female-24,707), Jain 23,957 (Male-12,840 and Female-11,117), Other Religious Communities 22,999 (Male-11,795 and Female-11,204). Out of the total population 87.10 percent are rural population and remaining 12.90 percent are urban population. The 129 percentage shares of area and population of the State to that of the country are 2.4 and 2.6 respectively. Besides, the sex ratio per thousand of male in 2001 was 932 females (as compared to 933 for the country) and the literacy rate in the State is 63.25 percent (male 71.28% and female 54.61%). Assam has 1.83 million Schedule Castes and 3.31 Schedule Tribe populations. The panchayati raj administration is well entrenched with 20 Zilla Parishads at the district level, 188 Intermediaries (Anchalik Panchayats) and 2223 Gaon Panchayats at the village level. In the backdrop of state profile an extensive profile of each selected districts, viz., Cachar, Hailakandi and Karimganj are stated below. Cachar The district of Cachar, situated in the southern most part of Assam (Longitude 92 Degree 24’E and 93 Degree 15’ E, Latitude 24 Degree 22’N and 25 Degree 8’ N), is one of the oldest district of Assam. The district is bounded on the East by two districts Hailakandi and Karimganj, North by Barail and Jayantia Hill ranges and on the South by the State of Mizoram. 130 The district was first created in 1830 when the British annexed the Kachari kngdom. In 1854, North Cachar was annexed and tagged to the district. Subsequently, in 1874, Cachar was included in the Chief Commissionership of Assam and the post of Superintendent was redesignated as the Deputy Commissioner. In the post-independence period, North Cachar Subdivision was made a separate district and taken out of Cachar in 1951. Again, in 1983 and 1989 erstwhile Karimganj and Hailakandi Sub-division were separated and upgraded as two districts. A brief profile of Cachar district is presented below in a tabular form: C1: Profile of Cachar District Total Population 14,44,921 Population Male Female SC ST Rural Urban 7,43,042 7,01,879 2,08,235 18,631 12,43,534 2,01,387 Area in sq. km 3786 Sex ratio (female) 945 (per 1000 males) Percentage of literacy (M/F) Religious Compositions 67.82 Hindus Muslims Christians Sikhs Buddhists Jains Others Religion not stated 8,86, 761 5,22, 051 31,306 628 742 1385 1175 873 No. of Villages No. of ZP, AP and GP Inhabited 1020 1047 ZP AP GP 01 15 163 Uninhabited 27 Source: Census of India, 2001 (www.censusindia.com) & www.cachar.nic.in 131 Karimganj The district of Karimganj is located in the Southern tip of Assam (longitude 92 and degree 15’ and 92 and degree 35’ east, latitude 24 and degree 15’ and 25 and degree 55’ north). The district is bounded on the North by Cachar district, on the South by Mizoram and Tripura States, on the East by Hailakandi district and on the West by Bangladesh and Tripura. The district is strategically very important as it shares 92 kms (51 kms is land border and the rest 41 kms is demarcated by the river Kushiara) of International Border with Bangladesh. Karimganj, earlier a part of Sylhet district, was under the control of British. However, up to 1786, the British could not establish its authority over the entire region. During that period a local Zamindar known as Radharam brought the region under his administrative control and he strongly opposed the Colonial rule. Later on, British succeeded to defeat him and thus it was with his downfall that in 1786 the British could establish their complete authority in the region. Karimganj also occupies an important place in the first war of Indian independence when three companies of the 132 34th Native Infantry stationed at Chittagong revolted (November 1857) and subsequently emerged in the South-east of the then Sylhet district. These rebel soldiers encountered a Contingent of the Sylhet Light Infantry under the command of Major Byng at Latu Village (presently under Karimganj district). Ultimately, the soldiers were defeated. Nevertheless, they are still adored by the people of the region. Subsequently, Karimganj was upgraded as Sub-division of the then Sylhet district in 1878. At the time of independence, the district of Sylhet was transferred to East Pakistan except three-and-half thana areas such as Ratabari, Patherkandi, Badarpur and half of Karimganj thana. These thanas were put together under Karimganj Sub-division and incorporated in the Cachar district of Assam as a full-fledged Sub-division. Finally, this Subdivision was upgraded on 1st July 1983 as a full-fledged district. A brief profile of the present Karimganj district is highlighted below in a tabular form: C2: Profile of Karimganj District Total Population 10,07976 Population Male Female SC ST Rural Urban 5,17,680 4,90,296 1,30,957 2,901 9,34,126 73,850 Area in sq. km Sex ratio (female) Percentage of literacy (M/F) Religious Compositions 1809 947 (per 1000 males) 67.21 Hindus Muslims Christians Sikhs Buddhists Jains Others Religion not stated 4,70,708 5,27,214 8,746 128 346 503 37 294 ZP AP Inhabited 915 GP 01 07 96 No. of Villages No. of ZP, AP and GP 940 Uninhabited 25 Source: Census of India, 2001 (www.censusindia.com) & www.karimganj.nic.in 133 Hailakandi The district of Hailakandi is located in plain and an apparently mountainous region. The district is situated at the southernmost corner of Assam (latitude 24.68’ North and latitude 92.57’ East). It is bounded by the river Barak on the North, on the East by Cachar district, on the South by Mizoram and on the West by Karimganj. The district has got interstate border having a length of 76 km. with Mizoram. It has a total geographical area of 1327 sq. km. Consisting approximately 48% as forest area typically located mostly on the southwest, south and southeastern side bordering Mizoram. Till the invasion of the British rule, Hailakandi was connected only by water ways. It was during the early period of British rule that changes in the means of communication had developed. The district had also a 134 splendid account of playing a role during the freedom struggle. It had participated in the first war of Indian independence also when leaders from this region (in 1857) had a gallant fight with the British rulers at a place called ‘Ron Tila’ at Mohanpur in Hailakandi and some of the leaders laid down their lives for the cause of the country. This region has also been credited for taking part in the Civil Disobedience Movement and Quit India Movement. Hailakandi was one of the oldest Sub-Divisions in the State of Assam. It was declared as Civil Sub-Division on 1st June, 1869. Prior to its emergence as a full-fledged district, Hailakandi was a Civil Sub-Division under Cachar district. It was upgraded as a district only on 29 September, 1989. A brief profile of the present Hailakandi district is given below in a tabular form: C3: Profile of Hailakandi District Total Population 5,42,872 Population Male Female SC ST Rural Urban 2,80,513 2,62,359 59,251 821 4,98,787 44,085 Area in sq. km 1327 Sex ratio (female) Percentage of literacy (M/F) Religious Compositions 935 (per 1000 males) 59.64 Hindus Muslims Christians Sikhs Buddhists Jains Others Religion not stated 2,23,191 3,12,849 5,424 09 589 82 579 149 No. of Villages No. of ZP, AP and GP 331 Inhabited Uninhabited 327 04 ZP AP GP 01 05 62 Source: Census of India, 2001 (www.censusindia.com) & www.hailakandi.nic.in 135 3.2 State Profile: Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh, land of rising sun, is situated at the eastern end of the Himalayas. It is located in the extreme North-eastern corner of India. The state is bordered by Myanmar on the East and South-East, Bhutan on the West, China (Tibet) on the North and Northeast and the States of Assam and Nagaland to its South. This speaks of the geo-strategic importance of the State for the nation. Arunachal Pradesh, once a part of Assam, has undergone a unique process of political development. The state has acquired its identity for the first time in 1914 when some tribal areas were separated from the then Darrang and Lakhimpur district of Assam to form North East Frontier Tract (NEFT). The NEFT was further subdivided into Balipara Frontier Tract, the Sadiya Frontier Tract and Tirap Frontier Tract between 1914 and 1943. At the time of independence the whole territory was under Part B of the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution as the tribal areas of Assam. Part B includes NEFT including Balipara Frontier Tract, the Tirap Frontier Tract, the Abor Hills district, the Mishmi Hills district and the Naga tribal areas. All these districts were renamed as NEFA in 1951. The NEFA was scheduled as part of Assam during 1950-65 and its administration was carried out by the Governor of Assam as an agent of the President of India under the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Later on, the responsibility of the NEFA Administration was transferred to the Ministry of Home Affairs in 1965. It is pertinent to note here that the whole developmental process actually started after the Sino-Indian war. It was this war that compelled the Government of India to change its policies towards the region and undertook a number of measures for its speedy politico economic developments in order to bring the heterogeneous tribes into national 136 mainstream.1 As such the region has acquired the status of Union Territory on 20th January, 1972 and renamed as Arunachal Pradesh with the provision of thirty member legislative assembly. Later on, it was declared as the 25th State of India on 20th February, 1987 with the provision of sixty member legislative assembly and the first general election to constitute the state government was held in February 1987. However, the democratic political process mostly at the grassroots level actually started in the state when Panchayati Raj was introduced on the basis of the recommendations of the Dying Ering Committee. It is worthwhile to note that the PRIs in the state have got ethno-political origin due to the diversified and isolated traditions of the various tribes.2 The State of Arunachal Pradesh at present comprises 16 districts having a population of 10,97,978 (Males-5, 79,941 and Females-5, 18,027) of which Hindus share 3,79,935 (Male-2,17,195 and Female-1,62,740), Muslim 20,675 (Male-12,756 and Female-7,949), Christian 2,05,548 (Male-1,02,606 and Female-1,02,942), Sikh 1,865 (Male-1475 and Female-390), Buddhist 1,43,028 (Male-72,618 and Female-70,410), Jain 216 (Male-130 and Female-86), Other Religious Communities 3,37,399 (Male-1,68,613 and Female-1,68,786). The State has a territory of 83,743 sq. km., which is about 2.55 per cent of India’s land area and a third of the area of North-East India. The largest state in North-East India, Arunachal’s area is slightly more than that of Assam, but its population is 0.11 per cent of India’s population and only 2.85 per cent of the population of North-East India. The density of population in the state is 13 people per sq. km. This stands in sharp contrast to the population density of 324 per sq. km. in the country.3 The State has all together 4065 villages, out of which 3863 are inhabited and the rest are uninhabited. 137 In the backdrop of state profile the extensive features of the three selected districts, viz., Papum Pare, Lower Subansiri and West Kameng are stated below. Papum Pare district The district of Papum Pare is located in the North Eastern part of the country (lies between longitude 93 13’ to 94 and latitude 270 15’ and 2 in the south, 7 in the west and 12 in the east). The district is divided into two administrative sub-divisions (Sagalee and Itanagar) and nine administrative circles. The district is bounded by Kurung Valley district on the north, Lower Subansiri district on the east, East Kameng district on the west and Assam on the south. The district is inhabited mainly by the Nishis who are known in history for their valour. Besides, the Mikir also form a major part of the population. The district was once an important part of the Ahom kingdom. The entire region was brought under the Ahom administration during sixteenth century. However, due to the revolt of the Nishis the Ahom expedition in this region came to an end. With the fall of Ahom rule and the signing of 138 Yandabo Treaty (1826) British rule over Assam was established. The British followed the policy of non-interference in the matter of the tribes. In 1914 the area became a part of the administrative unit called Western Section of NEFT. By 1919, the area was renamed as Balipara Frontier Tract, which was again divided in 1946 into – Se LA Sub-Agency and Subansiri Area. Further, in 1954, this Tract was bifurcated into two administrative units – Kameng Frontier Division and Subansiri Frontier Division. In postindependence period (1965) the latter was renamed as Subansiri district and in 1987 it was further bifurcated into – Lower Subansiri and Upper Subansiri districts. The Papumpare district was emerged out of the Lower Subansiri district only in 1993. A brief profile of the present Papmpare district is highlighted below in a tabular form: C4: Profile of Papumpare District Total Population 1,22,003 Population Male Female SC ST Rural Urban 64,104 57,819 1,397 69,007 59,961 62,042 Area in sq. km Sex ratio (female) Percentage of literacy (M/F) Religious Compositions 2875 901 (per 1000 males) 69 Hindus Muslims Christians Sikhs Buddhists Jains Others Religion not stated 51,026 5,318 36,574 263 3,330 65 25,395 32 No. of Villages No. of ZP, AP and GP Inhabited 267 283 ZP AP GP 01 10 76 Uninhabited 16 Source: Census of India, 2001 (www.censusindia.com) & www.papumpare.nic.in 139 Lower Subansiri district The Lower Subansiri district is mostly mountainous terrain and a greater part of it falls within the higher mountain zone consisting of tangled peaks and villages. The name of the district is actually derived from the Subansiri River that flows through Raga Circles of this district. The district is bounded on the north by China and Upper Subansiri district, on the south by Assam and Papumpare district, on the east by West Siang and some part of Upper Subansiri, on the west by East Kameng district. During the British period the district was a part of Lakhimpur Frontier Tract which was renamed as Balipara Frontier Tract in 1919. But in 1946, the district was carved out of the Balipara Frontier Tract and named as ‘Subansiri Area’ with it’s headquarter at North Lakhimpur. Later on, Subansiri Area was again renamed as ‘Subansiri Frontier Division’ (1954) and the head quarter was transferred to Ziro. It was at a time when the Ministry of Home Affairs took over the administrative charge of NEFA in September 1965; the area was further renamed as ‘Subansiri’ district. The 140 district was bifurcated in May 1980 into Upper Subansiri and Lower Subansiri districts. Again, in September 1992, the Lower Subansiri district was bifurcated and a separate Papumpare district carved out of it. At present Lower Subansiri district has six administrative circles and Ziro is the head quarter. The district is mainly composed of three major tribes such as Apatani, Nishis and Hill Miri. A brief profile of the present Papmpare district is highlighted below in a tabular form: C5: Profile of Lower Subansiri District Total Population 98,244 Population Male Female SC ST Rural Urban 49,542 48,702 197 88,512 85,860 12,384 Area in sq. km 10,135 Sex ratio (female) 957 (per 1000 males) Percentage of literacy (M/F) Religious Compositions 45 Hindus Muslims Christians Sikhs Buddhists Jains Others Religio n not stated 10,493 830 24,078 52 284 06 62,481 20 No. of Villages No. of ZP, AP and GP Inhabited 652 704 ZP AP GP 01 14 195 Uninhabited 52 Source: Census of India, 2001 (www.censusindia.com) & www.lowersubansiri.nic.in West Kameng district The district of West Kameng is also mostly mountainous and a greater part of it falls within the higher mountain zone, consisting of tangled peaks and valleys. The district is named after the Kameng River, a tributary of Brahmaputra, which flows through this district. The district shares an international border with Tibet region in the north, Bhutan in the west, 141 Tawang district in the northwest and East Kameng district in the east. The southern boundary adjoins Sonitpur and Darrang districts of Assam. Historically, the area around Kameng River has come under the control of the Mon Kingdom, Tibet and the Ahom Kingdom. During the British period this area became a part of the ‘Western Section’ of the North East Frontier Tract’. It was renamed as the ‘Balipara Frontier Tract’ in 1919, with its headquarter at Charduar in Assam. Just before independence of the country this area was curved out of the Balipara (1946) with the name of ‘Sela Sub-Agency’ but its headquarter remained the same. Following the independence of the country, Sela Sub-Agency was renamed as the ‘Kameng Frontier Division’ in 1954 with Bomdila as its headquarter. Subsequently, this Division again was renamed as the Kameng district, which was further bifurcated into East Kameng and West Kameng in June 1980. At present, West Kameng district is divided into three administrative 142 Sub-divisions such as Bomdila, Thrizino and Rupa. The district is now mainly inhabited by the tribes like Monpa, Miji, Sherdukpen, Aka and Bugun. The Monpas (Tibeto-Mongoloid stock) are the largest tribe of the district. A brief profile of the present West Kameng district is as under: C6: Profile of West Kameng District Total Population 74,599 Population Male Female SC ST Rural Urban 42,542 32,057 372 36,951 67,906 6,693 Area in sq. km Sex ratio (female) Percentage of literacy (M/F) Religious Compositions 7,422 954 (per 1000 males) 61 Hindus Muslims Christians Sikhs Buddhists Jains Others Religion not stated 32,125 1,159 2,462 426 33,104 16 4,750 557 No. of Villages No. of ZP, AP and GP Inhabited 213 220 ZP AP GP 01 09 97 Uninhabited 07 Source: Census of India, 2001 (www.censusindia.com) & www.westkameng.nic.in 3.3 Socio-Economic Profile of the respondents In pursuance of the Seventy-third Constitutional Amendment Act both the Government of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh passed their respective Panchayat Acts i.e. the Assam Panchayati Raj Act 1994 and the Arunachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act 1997. Under these Acts two Panchayat elections have so far been held. In Assam, the first election was held in 2001 and the second in 2007, while in Arunachal Pradesh it was held in 2003 and 2008. This ushered in a social change focusing on the basic issues and problems relating to communities at the grassroots level. The compulsory reservation of SC (except Arunachal Pradesh), ST and Women candidates is expected to 143 change the socio-economic dynamics at the grassroots level. It is in this setting an understanding of socio-economic status of the Panchayat representatives would enable us to determine the effectiveness of PRIs in realizing as well as executing the scheme of democratic decentralization at the grassroots level. In the following table we present an analysis of the socio economic profiles of the elected leaders (respondents) of the panchayats. Table C 7: Distribution of the respondents by Sex Assam Position Arunachal Praadesh Sex Total M F President 14 (58.3) 10 (41.7) 24 (100.0) VicePresident 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0) Members 39 (54.2) Total representative 71 (59.2) Position Sex Total M F Chairperson 13 (68.4) 6 (31.6) 19.0 (100.0) 24 (100.0) ViceChairperson -- -- No Provision 33 (45.8) 72 (100.0) Members 34 (58.6) 24 (41.4) 58 .0 (100.0) 49 (40.8) 120 (100.0) Total representative 47 (61.0) 30 (38.9) 77 (100.0) Source: Field Data. The figures in parentheses indicate percentage to total. The table indicates that 59.2 per cent of the GP representative in Assam is male and 40.8 per cent is female. Among the GP President Male constitutes 58.3 per cent and female 41.7 per cent. Interestingly, only 25 per cent of the female representative in Assam holds the office of the Vice-President of GP and male holds 75 per cent. The difference as regard to male and female GP member in Assam is not significant. On the other hand, in Arunachal Pradesh, 61 per cent of the Panchayat representatives (GP) are male and 38.9 per cent are female. But as regard female Chairperson is concerned only 31.6 per cent holds the Office, which is less than that of Assam. The table reveals that in Arunachal Pradesh there is no provision for the office of the Vice-Chairperson and hence the question of male and female 144 representation does not arise. Compared to Assam, the gap between male and female representation as GP member is more in Arunachal Pradesh. Table C 8: Distribution of the respondents by Age Assam Age Group Arunachal Pradesh M F Total M F Total 21-30 14 (19.7) 13 (26.5) 27 (22.5) 05 (10.6) 04 (13.3) 09 (11.7) 31-40 31 (43.7) 23 (46.9) 54 (45.0) 19 (40.4) 13 (43.3) 32 (41.6) 41-50 16 (22.5) 10 (20.4) 26 (21.7) 14 (29.8) 08 (26.7) 22 (28.6) 51 & above 10 (14.1) 3 (6.1) 13 (10.8) 09 (19.1) 05 (16.7) 14 (18.2) Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Source: Field Data Age is a significant component as it represents maturity as well as experience, which affects the activities of various bodies. The Seventy-third Amendment Act has made a uniform age structure round the country by fixing the lower age limit to 21 year so that youths could take active part at grassroots politics. In Assam 22.5 per cent and in Arunachal Pradesh 11.7 per cent belong to the age group of 21-30 years, which shows less interest of the youths at grassroots politics. This reveals that representation of youths at grassroots politics in both the states is minimal. Reasons for such low level of participation of the youths lie in their careerist attitude. That is to say, in the longing for settlement in life youths are attracted towards income and jobs and thereby having less attraction towards grassroots politics. While being settled their attitude gets change. It is observed that relatively higher per cent of GP representatives (45 per cent in Assam and 41.6 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) is in the age group of 31-40 years. Another significant number of the respondents constituting 21.7 per cent in Assam and 28.6 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh belonged to the age group of 145 41-50 years followed by 10.8 per cent (Assam) and 18.2 (Arunachal Pradesh) belonging to the age group of 51 and above. This shows that a majority of members at grassroots politics belong to middle age group. From the analysis of age data of male and female members it is observed that most of them belong to 31-40 age groups. At this age both male and female are generally settled and they become active in the political sphere. However, in case of women it is the reservation facility which prompts them more to participate at the grassroots politics. Table C 9: Distribution of the respondents by Marital Status Assam Marital Status Arunachal Pradesh M F Total M F Total Married 48 (67.6) 32 (65.3) 80 (66.7) 35 (74.5) 22 (73.3) 57 (74.0) Unmarried 20 (28.2) 12 (24.5) 32 (26.7) 10 (21.3) 7 (23.3) 17 (22.1) Divorced / Widow/ Widower 3 (4.2) 5 (10.2) 8 (6.6) 2 (4.2) 1 (1.3) 3 (3.9) Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Source: Field Data The table reveals that married group occupies the highest percentage in both the state. In Assam 66.7 per cent and in Arunachal Pradesh 74 per cent of the respondents belonged to the married group, while only 26.7 and 22.1 per cent belonged to the unmarried group. The respondents belonging to the third group (divorced/widow/widower) is negligible. Comparing to male and female representatives in both the states it is found that male representatives are mostly married. The analysis of the table indicates that unmarried people have less interest in participating grassroots politics. 146 Table C 10: Distribution of the respondents by caste category Assam Category Arunachal Pradesh M F Total M F Total General 34 (47.9) 29 (59.2) 63 (52.5) 0 0 -- SC 14 (19.7) 8 (16.3) 22 (18.3) 0 0 -- ST 2 (2.8) 1 (2.0) 3 (2.5) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) OBC 13 (18.3) 7 (14.3) 20 (16.7) 0 0 -- MOBC 8 (11.3) 4 (8.2) 12 (10.0) 0 0 -- Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Source: Field Data Caste is an age old concept, which depicts the social status of the people and it is on the basis of this caste that categories are also determined. The caste facet in Assam occupies an important position not only at the grassroots level but also at the upper level of state politics. On the other hand, in Arunachal Pradesh typical caste system does not exist. The state has a very negligible SC population because of which it has been exempted from making SC reservation. However, differences exist among the various ST groups in Arunachal Pradesh. As a result of this social composition, we observe variation in terms of the representation of various caste categories in the PRIs of both the states. In Assam, General Category constitutes the highest percentage (52.5 per cent), followed by SC (18.3 per cent), OBC (16.7 per cent), MOBC (10 per cent) and ST (2.5 per cent). In case of male and female respondents, male occupies significant position in all the categories. It is also to be noted that both male and female representatives from general category constitutes the majority of the GP representatives. Conversely, in Arunachal Pradesh, the position is totally different. Here, all the 147 respondents (100 per cent) belong to the ST category. However, like Assam, male also has the dominant position in Arunachal Pradesh. Table C 11: Distribution of the respondents by Religion Assam Religion Arunachal Pradesh M F Total M F Total Hindu 40 (56.3) 26 (53.1) 66 (55.0) 27 (57.4) 17 (56.7) 44 (57.1) Muslim 29 (40.8) 22 (44.9) 51 (42.5) -- -- -- Christian 2 (2.8) 1 (2.0) 3 (2.5) 17 (36.2) 12 (40.0) 29 (37.7) Buddhist -- -- -- 3 (6.4) 1 (3.3) 4 (5.2) Any Other -- -- -- -- -- -- 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Total Source: Field Data The table depicts that in Assam, Hindu occupies the highest percentage in GP as they constitute 55 per cent, followed by Muslims (42.5 per cent) and Christians (2.5 per cent). The result indicates that both Hindus and Muslims are taking equal part in the development process at the grassroots level in proportion to their population. As Christian population is less in the sampled districts, their representation is also very minimal. Likewise, in Arunachal Pradesh also, Hindu representatives constituting 57.1 per cent exclusively control the GP activities, followed by Christians (37.7 per cent) and Buddhist (5.2 per cent). There is no Muslim GP representative in Arunachal Pradesh. 148 Table C 12: Distribution of the respondents by Family Pattern Assam Arunachal Pradesh Size of the Family M F Total M F Total 1-5 members 34 (47.9) 27 (55.1) 61 (50.8) 23 (48.9) 13 (43.3) 36 (46.8) Above 5 37 (52.1) 22 (44.9) 59 (49.2) 02 (51.1) 17 (56.7) 41 (53.2) Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) M F Total M F Total Nuclear 41 (57.7) 30 (61.2) 71 (59.2) 27 (57.4) 09 (30.0) 36 (45.5) Joint 30 (42.3) 19 (38.8) 49 (40.8) 20 (42.6) 21 (70.0) 41 (55.8) Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Family Type Source: Field Data Family pattern represents two important components – size of the family and type of the family. The former refers to the number of members present in the family. Commonly, if a family consists of five or less than five members it is considered as small and above five is large. Depending on the nature of composition the families have been categorised as joint or nuclear for the purpose of present study. Here joint family refers to that family which is composed of parents, children and the children’s spouses and offspring in one household and nuclear family refers to a family composed of parents and their children only. Table C12 reveals that majority of the Panchayat representatives (50.8 per cent) in Assam belong to small family group (1-5 members) and both male and female representatives are more or less equally spread. As regard the type of the family, 59.2 per cent of the representatives in Assam belong to the nuclear family. This shows a decline in joint family system, which has been a major feature of Indian rural society since time immemorial. There is 149 an escalation of individualistic attitudes which is bringing a change in the life-style of the rural masses also. Unlike Assam, in Arunachal Pradesh, majority of the representative (53.2 per cent) belong to the large family group (Above 5 members). Here, the joint family system is still in existence as 55.8 per cent of the respondents belong to this category and this put them in advantageous position at the time of Panchayat election. Table C 13: Distribution of the respondents by Education Assam Education Arunachal Pradesh M F Total M F Total Illiterate 02 (2.8) 05 (10.2) 7 (5.9) 06 (12.8) 07 (23.3) 13 (16.9) Primary 19 (26.8) 27 (55.1) 46 (38.3) 19 (40.4) 13 (43.3) 32 (41.6) Below HSLC 29 (40.8) 11 (22.4) 40 (33.3) 14 (29.8) 06 (20.0) 20 (26.0) HSLC/HS passed 13 (18.3) 06 (12.2) 19 (15.8) 06 (12.8) 02 (6.7) 08 (10.4) Graduation & above 08 (11.3) 00 (0.0) 8 (6.7) 02 (4.2) 02 (6.7) 04 (5.2) Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Source: Field Data Education and democracy is highly correlated. Democracy needs the ability of taking right decision and it is education which helps to realize the needs of democracy. Education broadens the rational outlook of a person and there by enables him to take correct and quick decision. There is a common notion that people with average merit take part at grassroots politics and educated section of the people keep themselves away from village politics. However, situation has changed considerably with the passing of Seventythird Amendment Act as it has expanded the activities of local bodies. PRIs are now entrusted with multifarious functions including development projects which can bring a sea-change in the life of the rural masses. 150 Though the Act has not prescribed for any educational qualification yet the pattern of working of the PRIs demands educational qualification of the representatives. Table C 13 shows that PRIs in both the states are controlled by the representatives having education up to primary level (38.3 per cent in Assam and 41.6 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh). This is followed by the representatives having below HSLC qualification (33.3 per cent in Assam and 26 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh. It is also observed from the table that representative having HSLC/HS qualification in Assam constitutes 15.8 per cent, which is slightly higher than that of Arunachal Pradesh (10.4 per cent). As regard the respondents from the last category (Graduation and above) it is observed that the difference is marginal as 6.7 per cent representing Assam and 5.2 per cent representing Arunachal Pradesh. A minute analysis of the table further reveals that female representatives both in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh are comparatively less qualified than male representatives as they constitute only 5 per cent in Assam (adding together fourth and fifth category) and 12.2 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh (adding together fourth and fifth category), which indicates the reality of women empowerment in the states. It deserves mention here that the percentage of female respondents under the first and second category (illiterate and primary) in both the states is more than that of male respondents. From the analysis of the table it can be inferred that though the education profile of members of PRIs have steadily undergone change it is yet to attract highly educated people as Panchayat members. 151 Table C 14 (a): Distribution of the respondents (President/Chairpersons) by Income Assam Chairperson Annual Income Total M F Below 20000 0 (0.0) 6 (60.0) 6 20001-40000 2 (14.3) 1 (10.0) 3 40001-60000 4 (28.5) 1 (10.0) 5 60001-80000 6 (42.9) 2 (20.0) 8 80001 & above 2 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 2 Total 14 (100) 10 (100) 24 Arunachal Pradesh Chairperson Annual Income Total M F Below 20000 0 (0.0) 4 (66.6) 4 20001-40000 3 (23.0) 0 (0.0) 3 40001-60000 4 (30.8) 1 (16.7) 5 60001-80000 5 (38.5) 1 (16.7) 6 80001 & above 1 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 1 13 (100) 6 (100) 19 Total Source: Field Data. Table C 14 (b): Distribution of the respondents (Members) by Income Assam M F Below 20000 17 (29.8) 32 (82.1) 49 Total No. (Presidents/ Chairpersons + Members) 6+49=55 (45.8) 20001-40000 23 (40.4) 4 (10.3) 27 3 + 27=30 (25.0) 40001-60000 12 (12.1) 2 (5.1) 14 5 + 14 = 19 (15.8) 60001-80000 3 (5.2) 1 (2.5) 4 8 + 4 = 12 (10.0) 80001 & above 2 (3.5) 0 (0.0) 2 2 + 2 = 4 (3.3) 57 (100) 39 (100) 96 24 + 96 = 120 (100) Annual Income Total Member Total 152 Contd... Table C 14(b) Arunachal Pradesh Annual Income Member Total Total No. 17 (70.8) 30 4 + 30 = 34 (44.1) 11 (32.4) 4 (16.7) 15 3 + 12 = 18 (23.3) 40001-60000 6 (17.6) 2 (8.3) 8 5 + 8 = 13 (17.0) 60001-80000 3 (8.8) 1 (4.2) 4 4 + 6 = 10 (13) 80001 & above 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0) 1 1 + 1 = 2 (2.6) 34 (100) 24 (100) 58 19 + 58 = 77 (100) M F Below 20000 13 (38.2) 20001-40000 Total Source: Field Data. The distribution of sampled respondents on the basis of income in Table C 14 (a) and C 14 (b) shows that not a single male President/Chairperson in both the states has annual income of less than Rs. 20000, while in case of female President/Chairperson a significant percentage – 66.6 per cent in Assam and 70.8 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh – has an annual income of below Rs. 20000. It is also observed from the table that in case of male President/Chairperson in both the states, income category Rs. 60001 – 80000 comprises the highest percentage, followed by Rs. 40001 – 60000 and Rs. 20000 – 40000 category. However, a nominal percentage – 7.7 per cent in Assam and 2.9 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh – of male President/Chairperson have annual income of above Rs. 80001. Thus, it is evident from the table that male Presidents/Chairpersons in both the states are more affluent comparing to female Presidents/Chairpersons. Ironically, not even a single female President/Chairperson is found to have annual income of above Rs. 80001. Majority of them (70 per cent in Assam and 66.6 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) have annual income of below Rs. 40000. As regard the economic status of male and female GP members are concerned, it is observed from the table that in both the states the 153 percentage of female members in the category of below Rs. 20000 is much higher (82.1 per cent in Assam and 70.8 in Arunachal Pradesh) than that of male members (29.8 per cent in Assam and 38.2 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) and this clearly indicate about the dependence syndrome of the female representative upon their family members. Further, it is found that the male representatives are also well heeled than that of female members in both the states. From these observations it can be mentioned here that the Panchayat Acts of both the states have opened up new vistas for the rural masses having different socio-economic background to join PRIs. Table C 15 (a): Distribution of the respondents (President / Chairpersons) by Land Holding Assam Land Chairperson Total M F 0-1 acre 2 (14.3) 8 (80.0) 10 2-4 acre 5 (35.7) 2 (20.0) 7 5 acre & above 7 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 7 Total 14 (100) 10 (100) 24 Arunachal Pradesh Land Chairperson Total M F 0-1 acre 1 (7.7) 5 (83.3) 6 2-4 acre 7 (53.8) 1 (16.7) 8 5 acre & above 5 (38.5) 0 (0.0) 5 Total 13 (100) 6 (100) 19 Source: Field Data. 154 Table C 15 (b): Distribution of the respondents (Members) by Land Holding Assam Member Land Total Total No. (Presidents/Chairperson s + Members) M F 0-1 acre 25 (43.9) 35 (89.7) 60 10 + 60=70 (58.3) 2-4 acre 21 (36.8) 4 (10.3) 25 7 + 25 = 32 (26.7) 5 acre & above 11 (19.3) 0 (0.0) 11 7 + 11=18 (15.0) Total 57 (100) 39 (100) 96 24 + 96=120 (100) Arunachal Pradesh 0-1 acre 16 (47.1) 19 (79.2) 35 6 + 35=41 (53.2) 2-4 acre 10 (29.4) 5 (20.8) 15 8 + 25=23 (29.9) 5 acre & above 8 (23.5) 0 (0.0) 8 5 + 8=13 (16.9) Total 34 (100) 24 (100) 58 19 + 58=77 (100) Source: Field Data. In rural India, land occupies an important position as it associated with the socio-economic status of the people. Hence, questions are asked to the respondents about their land possession. Table C 15 (a) and C 15 (b) reveal that in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, male Presidents/Chairpersons have relatively occupy larger size of land than the female Presidents/Chairpersons as well as members. In Assam 50 per cent and in Arunachal Pradesh 38.5 per cent of the male Presidents/Chairpersons possess more than 5 acre of land, while not a single female Presidents/Chairpersons fall in this category. Again, 35.7 per cent (Assam) and 53.8 per cent (Arunachal Pradesh) of the male Presidents/Chairpersons possess 2-4 acre of land. Surprisingly, majority of the female Presidents/Chairpersons (80 per cent in Assam and 83.3 in Arunachal 155 Pradesh) in both the states occupy less than 1 acre of land. The main reason for such differences between male and female respondents is the pattern of property ownership as men possess land in their name rather than women. This indicates a form of discrimination against women so far as land relation is concerned. Analysing the land holding of the male and female members it is noticed that male members in both the states are also in a better position than female members. The highest concentration of male members (43.9 per cent in Assam and 47.1 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) is in the category of 0-1 acre, followed by the second category [2-4 acre (36.8 in Assam and 29.4 in Arunachal Pradesh)] and third category [5 and above (19.3 in Assam and 23.5 in Arunachal Pradesh]. In case of female members it is found that majority of them (89.7 per cent in Assam and 79.2 in Arunachal Pradesh) are having 0-1 acre of land. Even not a single female member belong to the third category (5 acre and above). Hence, it can be concluded that women representatives are comparatively less affluent than male representatives. It is only by virtue of reservation facilities that they are able to participate in the decision making process at the grassroots level. It is thus evident from the analysis that the sampled GPs are composed of representatives from various socio-economic backgrounds. Further, it is required to mention that in course of interaction with the respondents their material possessions have also been taken into account. It is observed that in terms of material possession Presidents/Chairpersons in both Assam and Arunachal Pradesh are in a quite better position. They possess household appliances (TV, refrigerator etc), means of communication (two/three wheeler) as well as agricultural tools. They also live in pucca houses, while it is observed that majority of the members in 156 both the states live in semi-pucca houses, possess limited household goods. Interestingly, female Presidents/Chairpersons having low level of annual income and land holding also possess better household materials. The reason is that they belong to a comparatively better off family (better financial position of husband) as against other female members. Thus the analyses of the above table indicate that there is a trend to choose the rural elites to the posts of President/Chairperson in both the states. Table C 16: Distribution of the respondents by Political Parties’ affiliation Assam Arunachal Pradesh Political Party M F Total M F Total INC 31 25 56 (46.7) 34 17 51 (66.2) BJP 15 09 24 (20.0) -- -- -- AUDF 05 05 10 (8.3) 02 03 05 (6.5) IND 19 10 29 (24.2) 11 10 21 (27.3) AGP 01 00 01 (0.8) -- -- -- Total 71 39 120 (100) 47 30 77 (100) Source: Field Data. Political factors play a prominent role in the functioning as well as implementation of the plan schemes under the PRIs. It is often observed that the political rivalries between the various factions and groups influence the smooth working of the decision-making process at the grassroots level. Thus, to understand the political influence at the local level it is necessary to highlight the political majority of members in both the states (46.7 per cent in Assam and 66.2 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) belong to the Indian National Congress (I), followed by Independent candidates (24.2 per cent in Assam and 27.3 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh). The strength of the GP representatives from BJP is only 20 per cent in Assam, while in Arunachal Pradesh none of the respondents belong to this party. The regional parties 157 like AUDF and AGP has also nominal presence in the sampled areas of Assam. In Arunachal Pradesh, NCP has only 6.5 per cent of members at the GP. In course of interaction with the respondents it is observed that particularly in Assam many of the respondents contested elections as independent candidates, while after winning election they joined the political parties (mainly ruling party) and started working for them. The reason for such kind of attitude lies in enjoying power by remaining close to the political personnel. However, the existence of members from various political parties creates differences of opinion in the functioning of the GPs across the states. In case of Arunachal Pradesh it is quite interesting to note that some of the GPs are composed of three/four members and among them half of the members are from one party and the rest from other party. This kind of division in such small body creates differences of opinion resulting in the difficulty of selecting the beneficiaries as well as undertaking rural development programmes. Thus, the party factions generate problems in realizing the spirit of democracy at the grassroots level. Besides, it is also pertinent to know the motive of the representatives for joining grassroots politics since the performance of the PRIs largely depends on the commitment of the participants in bringing socio-economic and political developments. Keeping this in view respondents have been asked to share their opinion and in response the selected representatives have pointed out a multiplicity of factors, which are grouped below in a tabular form. 158 Table C 17: Factors motivated representatives to contest Panchayat election Factors Assam M F Total Arunachal Pradesh M F Total Self-motivation 16 (22.5) 05 (10.2) 21 (17.5) 12 (25.5) 03 (10.0) 15 (19.5) Family members / Friends 06 (8.5) 31 (63.3) 37 (30.8) 05 (10.6) 16 (53.3) 21 (27.2) Party involvement 34 (47.9) 04 (8.2) 38 (31.7) 23 (48.9) 05 (16.7) 28 (36.4) Welfare of the locality 11 (15.5) 03 (6.1) 14 (11.7) 05 (10.6) 02 (6.7) 07 (9.1) Serving women 04 (5.6) 06 (12.2) 10 (8.3) 02 (4.3) 04 (13.3) 06 (7.8) Total 71 (100) 49 (100) 120 (100) 47 (100) 30 (100) 77 (100) Source: Field Data. Table C 17 reveals that a significant number of the representatives in both Assam (31.7 per cent) and Arunachal Pradesh (36.4 per cent) have joined the PRIs largely because of party involvement, followed by family members/friends (30.8 per cent in Assam and 27.2 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh), self motivation (17.5 per cent in Assam and 19.5 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh), welfare of the locality (11.7 per cent in Assam and 9.1 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) and serving women (8.3 per cent in Assam and 7.8 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh). Interestingly, vast majority of female representatives in both the states (63.3 per cent in Assam and 53.3 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh) stated that they joined PRIs as they are motivated/influenced by their family members/friends, which is not a healthy sign for the better performance of the PRIs. 3.4 Summing up: This Chapter presents the brief profile of both the states along with the selected districts. It also presented the socio-economic and political profile of the respondents of both the states. The analysis of the data reveals that there are variations in the composition of the GPs across 159 the districts mainly in the Arunachal Pradesh, while in Assam the GPs have similar composition. But GPs in both the states are represented by the people having different socio-economic background. The analyses of the tables specify that Presidents/Chairpersons in both the states are better off in comparison to the other members. Sex-wise distribution of respondents shows that male elected representatives constitute the largest number in GPs in comparison to female representatives and it is because of their numerical strength as well as the social structure that male representatives are dominating the functioning of the PRIs in both the States of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. However, gap between male and female representation has been found more in Arunachal Pradesh as compared to Assam mainly because of the existence of rigid social norms particularly the patriarchal norms. Age data of the respondents reveal the minimal representation of youths at the grassroots politics in both the states. Reasons for such less participation of the youths lie in their careerist attitude. It is also observed that a higher per cent of GP representatives (both male and female) is in the age group of 31-40 years, which shows the domination of the middle age group at the grassroots level. Again, marital status of the respondents reveals that married group occupies the highest percentage in both the states and this indicates the low level of interest of the unmarried people in participating at the grassroots politics. As regard the social background it is observed that in Assam, general category constitutes the highest percentage followed by SC, OBC, MOBC and ST. However, in comparison to female representatives male occupies significant position in all the categories. It is observed that most of the SC and women representatives have been contested and elected in the PRIs not because of their passion but because of the reservation of seats for them. Conversely, in Arunachal Pradesh, the situation is totally different. Here, 160 reservation of seats is not available for SC and all the representatives belong to the ST category. But, differences exist among the members of various ST groups. However, one common fact has been noticed in respect of both the states is that male representatives have occupied the dominant position in the PRIs activities. Religion-wise distribution of the respondents of both the states also show the active involvement of the people irrespective of their religion in the decision making process at the grassroots politics. Analyzing the educational data it is observed that representatives from Assam are more educated than that of Arunachal Pradesh. It is noticed that the problem of literacy in both the states is grimmer among female representatives in comparison to their male counterpart. Female representatives both in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh are found comparatively less qualified than male representatives, which indicate the reality of women empowerment in the states. However, it is important to note here that the level of participation of the representatives from illiterate category is not significant and this proves that educated sections of the rural people are now gradually coming forward to participate in the PRIs. The study of Family pattern of the respondents shows that a significant portion of the representatives in Assam are found to be a part of the nuclear family system. This shows a decline in joint family system, which has been a major feature of the rural society since time immemorial. There is an escalation of individualistic attitudes which is actually bringing a change in the life-style of the rural masses also. Unlike Assam, in Arunachal Pradesh, it is observed that majority of the representatives belong to the large family group (Above 5 members). Further, it is found that the joint family system is still in existence in Arunachal Pradesh as majority of the respondents belong to this category. The distribution of respondents on the basis of their income reveals that male Presidents/Chairpersons in both the states are 161 more affluent comparing to female Presidents/Chairpersons. As regard to the economic status of male and female GP members, it is observed that in both the states a great number of female members have a nominal income comparing to male members, which clearly indicate the dependence syndrome of the female representatives. An overall analysis of the economic status of the elected representatives of both the states shows that individuals from various income levels have got an opportunity to participate in the activities of the PRIs. Analysing the land holding of the elected representatives of both Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, it is further observed that male Presidents/Chairpersons are relatively in a better position as they occupy larger size of land comparing to female Presidents/Chairpersons and other members. It is thus clear that size of landholding is particularly relevant in relation to the holding of the post of President/Chairman. Again, in terms of material possession also, Presidents/Chairpersons (both male and female) in both the states are found in a quite better position than that of the members. Finally, the distribution of the respondents on the basis of their political affiliation shows that the largest number of elected representatives including Presidents/Chairpersons, Vice-Presidents (posts of vice- presidents is not available under APPRA) and members in both the states belong to the Indian National Congress (I) followed by Independent candidates. It is worth mentioning here that the presence of Independent candidates in a large number reflects the enthusiasm of the people to participate in the PRIs activities. However, in course of interaction it is found that in Assam there is a tendency on the part of the independent candidates to join in the ruling political party in the post-election phase with a view to get advantages. This in turn provides stability in the decision 162 making process at the GP level. But where the numbers of members from various political parties exist, political factions also prevail. It is in this background it has become imperative to understand the working of the PRIs in both Assam and Arunachal Pradesh and to do so a set of questions have been prepared for the respondents and their responses are tabulated and analysed in the next chapter. References: 1. Pratap Chandra Swain (2008), Panchayati Raj, APH Publishing Corporation, New Delhi. 2. Ibid. 3. Government of India (2005), Arunachal Pradesh Human Development Report, Department of Planning. ------------- 163
© Copyright 2024