A SOCIAL AND MORAL CANCER IN ANY GOVERNANCE IS CORRUPTION 1. GENERAL VIEW This paper explains about the importance of human life, essence of humanity and the corruption which can be economic, social or political how it can oppose the essence of human life, its dignity and greatly how it is against the well being of civilization by destroying moral and ethical order of the individuals as well as social, in general. By starting the cutch attitude about this corrupted life, we will try to explain briefly the traditional factors still has root on the current political and social developments. Because the Church has the right to be a teacher for mankind, a teacher of the truth of faith: the truth not only of dogmas but also of the morals whose source lies in human nature itself and in the Gospel1. The word of the Gospel, in fact, is not only to be heard but is also to be observed and put into practice (cf. Mathew, 7:24; Luke, 6:46-47; John, 14:21,23-24). Consistency in behaviour shows what one truly believes and is not limited only to things strictly church-related or spiritual but involves men and women in the entirety of their life experience and in the context of all their responsibilities. However worldly these responsibilities may be, their subject remains man, that is, the human being whom God calls, by means of the Church, to participate in his gift of salvation. Men and women must respond to the gift of salvation not with a partial, abstract or merely verbal acceptance, but with the whole of their lives — in every relationship that defines life — so as not to neglect anything, leaving it in a profane and worldly realm where it is irrelevant or foreign to salvation. For this reason the Church's social doctrine is not a privilege for her, nor a digression, a convenience or interference: it is her right to proclaim the Gospel in the context of society, to 1 Cf. Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Declaration Dignitatis Humanae, 14: AAS 58 (1966), 940; John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor, 27, 64, 110: AAS 85 (1993), 1154-1155, 1183-1184, 1219-1220. 1 make the liberating word of the Gospel resound in the complex worlds of production, labour, business, finance, trade, politics, law, culture, social communications, where men and women live. The Church's set of guidelines concerning socio-economic questions does not constitute a final theory or a complete body of doctrine relative to the production of goods, ownership of the means of production, and distribution of finished products. Neither does it contain specific political programs. Both of these fall within the province of philosophers and politicians. But as a human activity, work must correspond to the dignity of man (RN 32; MM 18, 92). It comes immediately from a person, who places his stamp upon the raw material and makes it conform to his will (GS 67), thereby ennobling it (LE 9). Through his work, man not only transforms nature but perfects it (QA 135; MM 82, 149, 255). The worker realizes himself as a man and in a certain sense "becomes more human" (LE 9). All of this shows why it is necessary for the social order to permit the worker to perfect himself, not to degrade him and diminish his dignity (LE 9). Because shocking use and domination to each other can lead to corruption that feeds on itself. People involved in the petty corruption become increasingly involved in more and larger amounts. Corruption has many victims. Public corruption offenses affect all citizens directly and personally, particularly those at the lower end of the income level. Building inspectors paid small amounts of money to approve careless work results in dangerous construction, substandard electrical wiring, and inferior building materials, usually in the poorest areas of country. Judges and lawyers who line their pockets result in criminals set free to victimize citizens. Taxpayers pay for corruption. When officials are bribed to award construction contracts the cost of the bribe goes into the cost of the construction often with interest. In a corrupt system, good people avoid public service. Honest contractors refuse to bid on government contracts; honest lawyers refuse to become prosecutors or judges; honest citizens avoid participating in politics either as voters or candidates. Corruption has been highly detrimental for development. 2 Secretary-General, Ban Ki Moon said at the occasion of International Anti-Corruption Day on 9 December 2009 that it the world's vulnerable who suffer "first and worst" by corruption such as the theft of public money or foreign aid for private gain. The result, he says, is fewer resources to fund the building of infrastructure such as schools, hospitals and roads. Mr. Ban notes, however, that corruption "is not some vast impersonal force" but "the result of personal decisions, most often motivated by greed." Pointing out that "the UN Convention against Corruption is the world's strongest legal instrument to build integrity and fight corruption", he also called on businesses to adopt anti-corruption measures in line with the Convention.2 For Maritain, the best political order is one which recognizes the sovereignty of God. He rejects, therefore, not only fascism and communism, but all secular humanisms. He objects that such views — particularly fascism and communism — are not only secular religions, but dehumanizing and, while he was a defender of American-style democracy, he is clearly not interested in combining his attachment to Christianity with capitalism. A God Centered humanism, Maritain would argue, has its philosophical foundation in the recognition of the nature of the human person as a spiritual and material being — a being that has a relation to God — and morality and social and political institutions must therefore reflect this. Maritain envisages a political society under the rule of law — and he distinguishes four types of law: the eternal, the natural, the ‗common law of civilization’ and the positive. Maritain's moral and political philosophy lies within what may be called the Aristotelian-Thomistic natural law tradition. Maritain held, however, that Aristotelian ethics, by itself, was inadequate because it lacked knowledge of humanity's ultimate end. The Thomistic view — that there is a law in human nature that is derivative of (though knowable separately from) a divine or eternal law and that humanity's ‗end‘ goes beyond anything attainable in this life — was, Maritain thought, a significant advance on what Aristotle had provided. The Political Philosophy of Jacques Maritain3 in Man and the State asserts: 2 3 9 December : International Anti-Corruption Day. (World Wide) (2009). Jacques Maritain was a moral man living in a very immoral world, (1882-1973) in France Human nature never advances, only awareness in our mutual collective flaws can be considered as 3 ―It should be made rather in the name of ethical and spiritual values and of the primary social value of human personality holding fast to the principle that the rational life of man is ordered to the accomplishment of true freedom of autonomy.‖ 4 […] "If one day can build a society in world politics, this is due to media freedom. And with the means of freedom that the people of earth will be brought to a common will to live together "--Jacques Maritain, 19th century, industrial world educated French Modern political Philosopher was a person seeking morality and Common Good for corrupted Europe). But what does this freedom mean in terms of the politics within the social order? Also from Man and the State, political emancipation founded on the authentic notion of the common good, has for Maritain a communal and personalist component. It would be nonsense to talk of the common good of the temporal order that you separate it from the people who contribute thereto. Political emancipation founded on the authentic notion of authority has the role of the State as being one “especially concerned with the maintenance of law, the promotion of the common welfare and public order, and the administration of public affairs. Far from using its power and authority to absorb the body politic, it stands at the service of the whole political society.” If it is true that the purpose of public authority is to use its power to promote the essentially human purposes of the common good, who’s law is supreme? progress. Politics void of our spiritual nature denies our inherent autonomy. The only law that is valid comes from God, and not decided by men. When pluralism destroys that truth, our duty is to obey our Christian Father. He wasFrench philosopher and political thinker, was one of the principal exponents of Thomism in the twentieth century and an influential interpreter of the thought of St Thomas Aquinas. The Review of Politics. "Maritain Centenary." Vol. 44, No. 4, October, 1982. 4 J. Maritain Centenary." Vol. 44, No. 4, October, 1982. 4 The next aspect examines the political emancipation founded on the recognition of a religious principle. The basic truth of Christian faith is that man is made for God and eternal life. Maritain maintains that: “The Kingdom of God constitutes the ultimate end prepared for by the movement of all history and in which it concludes, toward which converge, on the other hand, the history of the Church and the spiritual world.” “Today if, we could access to the corrupted Ethiopian public money, by noble class used by the so-called world bank of Swiss (Swiss bank), we could cover many sectors of poverty in Ethiopia.” 5 . In this message, we would like to articulate our people , especially public curriers reading of our current situation not in our own words, but as discerned and articulated no less by citizens of our country, members of civil society as such. The biggest culprit and major cause of our nation‘s poverty and hunger is graft and corruption which has invaded all public and private institutions. This type of Corruption is abuse and misuse of public or private office to unlawfully enrich oneself and those close to him, or induce others to do the same. It is not only an economic and social problem but by and large a moral issue and a moral problem. 2. DEFINITION OF CORRUPTION? The term corruption can be used in a wide variety of contexts, each having different meanings. It is derived from the Latin term corruptio, meaning seduction from loyalty, diseased, corrupt condition and is generally associated with moral decadence. The concise Oxford Dictionary defines corruption as evil, morally depraved or willing to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain. In terms of social science, according to the Collins Dictionary of Sociology (1995), 5 Said One Ethiopian during conference time in Rome ( 2008), 5 corruption is, ―the abandonment of expected standards of behaviour by those in authority for the sake of unsanctioned personal advantage‖. (Siergiejew, 2003). The World Bank, an anti-corruption agency, define corruption in more simple terms as the abuse of public office for private gain. The World Bank proceeds to categories corruption into several categories; Bribery, Theft, Patronage and Influence Peddling. Considering the above categories, one would assume that corruption per se is easy to define and categorise. However, in reality, corruption can manifest itself in many different forms within the aforementioned categories. Depending on the observer‘s ethical and moral background, an action may or may not be labeled as corrupt. In China for instance, building relationships with business partners is extremely important and it would be customary for Chinese businessmen to exchange personal gifts or services. The Chinese place significant importance in the concept of (Guanxi) and would not associate such a gesture with corruption. This concept is central in Chinese society and describes the basic dynamic in the complex nature of personalised networks of influence and social relationships. It is possible that an observer from outside of China would mistake this gesture as corruption. In particular, if the gift is being given to a person in authority, the motives might be seen as dubious. A persons perception of corruption depends almost entirely on their cultural, ethical and moral values. In many cultures, Religion provides the underlying framework behind our ethical, moral and cultural beliefs. In fact, religion and morality have been closely intertwined since the beginning of western thought. The Greeks focused on the concept of homer, ―a body of texts transmitted first orally and then written down in the seventh century BCE‖ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Morality and religion are connected in the Hebrew Bible primarily by the category of God's command. God issues a series of commands. Firstly, ―Let there be light‖. Then, after the creation of animals, God gives a second kind of command, ―Be fruitful and multiply‖. In the second chapter there is a third kind of command. God tells Adam that he is free to eat from any tree in the garden, but 6 he must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. When Adam and Eve disobey God, they are expelled from the garden. ―God is setting up a kind of covenant by which humans will be blessed if they obey the commands God gives them‖. (Ibid,). As we can see, corruption is a highly subjective matter that depends on a person‘s ethical, moral, cultural and religious beliefs. Both the extent of corruption and people‘s perception of it varies greatly across the world. However, despite the many dentitions for corruption and it‘s subjective nature researchers agrees that corruption is damaging democracy and economic progress. 3. WHY IS CORRUPTION IMPACT IN AN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS CONTEXT? Corruption has a considerable effect on our lives because it is all around us. The emphasis on making money is so great , the emphasis on getting rich, no matter how, is so tremendous, that it influences virtually every aspect of our society. – (Lawrence Ritter). Corruption has received an enormous amount of attention in recent years. In particular, academics and researchers have analysed the topic in detail. Organisations such as the World Bank are very concerned about corruption and the effect it is having on countries throughout the world. Thankfully, the social science of corruption and it‘s effects are better known now than 200 years ago. During this period, the world has changed dramatically and as a result, corruption now poses a far more serious threat. The main reasons for the elevated importance of corruption are inequality and international trade. Over the past 200 years, the world has experienced a dramatic change. Around 1800, that the average life expectancy was less than 40 years for the vast majority of the world. As countries began to develop and prosper, their health systems improved accordingly. The present day reality can be seen in many fields of investments; developed and emerging economies have a life expectancy between 65 and 85, whereas the poorest countries in the world (largely African countries) have only improved marginally. In fact, the differences in between the rich and the poor 7 has only widened. It is this disparity that provides corruption with a solid foundation on which to thrive. With this in mind, It is important to consider both globalisation and international trade. Both have caused an increase in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in developing countries. This is a natural progression as developed markets become saturated, trade barriers decrease and risks associated with international trade decreases. As FDI is a critical driving factor behind the emergence of developing countries, it is seen as a positive force in development. However, the growth of international trade between countries of disproportionate wealth has presented a serious problem in relation to corruption. Due to the disparity between income levels, foreign investors are particularly susceptible to corruption. Developing countries often have administrative procedures for international companies entering the host market. The developing country establishes these procedures to ensure that the multinational companies meet a set of standards so that the host county is not negatively affected. However, this presents authorities in power with a moral hazard as they can demand additional payments to ensure a successful application. Given the discrepancies in income level, a large demand by the host country official is perceived as an relatively small amount by the multinational company. The company is likely to pay the bribe in the knowledge that market power is secured and that the cost of the bribe can be recouped through higher market prices. Ultimately, the public suffer through higher costs and less efficient systems. 4. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF CORRUPTION Considering corruption from an international business perspective, it can be viewed as a risk associated with gaining entry into a foreign market. Business investment decisions are based almost entirely on planning and risk. Companies use various models for assessing the risk associated with gaining entry into a foreign country. One of the basic models is Porter‘s Forces, as it describes the competitive forces within the host country. Corruption can be considered part of government and legal barriers that are included in ―threat of entry‖ (Grant, 1998). Deep rooted corruption goes further to affect every aspect of Porter‘s Forces; Threat of New 8 Entrants, Bargaining Power of Suppliers, Bargaining Power of Buyers, Threat of Substitutes and Industry Rivalry (Siergiejew, 2003). As Porter‘s Forces is an indicator of market competitiveness, corruption directly affects a country‘s ability to attract FDI (Mauro, 1995). Furthermore, for a single company that wants to expand internationally, corruption is a barrier that also affects entry mode in addition to investment decision. Smarzynska and Wei (2002) showed that a company‘s choice of entry mode is proportional to the level of corruption and the companies technological sophistication. When a specific threshold of corruption is reached, the company decides not to enter the market. The impact of corruption on FDI was first performed by Paolo Mauro in 1995. His research analysed a sample of 67 countries and found that corruption negatively affects the ratio of investment to GDP in both developed and developing countries. However, he found that corruption was less evident in wealthy countries. As the majority of developing countries are depending on FDI as a primary driver of future growth, significant efforts need to be made to reduce corruption in developing countries. Multinational companies often justify payoffs as a method of avoiding greater harm. Others argue that corruption helps overcome bureaucratic inefficiencies and helps maintain allocation efficiency. Although these companies believe they need to pay the bribe, they know that they would be better off if nobody paid bribes. It is possible to apply game theory to corruption in a similar manner to the ―prisoners dilemma‖. The multinational company has two options; to partake in corrupt activities or to report the corruption to local authorities (Siergiejew, 2003). Game theory would suggest that the multinational company will partake in corruption if they cannot determine whether or not competitors are also partaking in it. Furthermore, these companies know that they would be better off if no party participated in corruption. Everyone would benefit in the long run b y reduced transaction costs and increased transparency. However, such is the secretive nature of corruption that companies tend to be focused on the short term in corrupt markets. 9 5. POLITICAL CORRUPTION Whenever a person accepts a political appointment or wins election to an office, he or she must take an oath to uphold the public trust. While this may sound noble on paper, enforcement of this oath can prove problematic. Very few political candidates successfully reach office without making a few promises along the way. Many of these campaign promises are harmless, such as sponsoring a bill or lobbying for more funding for schools. Other promises, however, may come closer to crossing an ethical line, such as hiring relatives or awarding government contracts to influential contributors. Political corruption has been a fact of life for thousands of years, beginning with the first attempts at a democratic form of government in ancient Greece and Rome. Almost all of these countries' political representatives were from the wealthier class, which inevitably led to a division between the influential haves and the virtually powerless have-nots. The seeds of political corruption were planted as soon as the senators and other political leaders realized that power and wealth could be equals. Political corruption often begins with favoritism towards those with wealth and influence. In the modern sense of the term, political corruption is a cancer on the integrity of a governmental body. Very few public officials begin their careers with the intention of becoming corrupt, but some succumb to a sinister form of peer pressure over time. Being placed in a position of significant political power can be overwhelming, and the temptation to bend or break rules for a perceived 'greater good' is always present. 6. CONCLUSION Corruption is a complex social, political and economic phenomenon that affects all countries. Corruption undermines democratic institutions, slows economic development and contributes to governmental instability. Corruption attacks the foundation of democratic institutions by distorting electoral processes, perverting the rule of law and creating bureaucratic quagmires whose only reason for existing is the soliciting of bribes. Economic development is stunted because foreign direct investment is discouraged and small businesses within the country 10 often find it impossible to overcome the "start-up costs" required because of corruption. Morality is a term that spans many meanings. It is shaped by our cultural, moral, ethical and religious backgrounds. Despite religious diversity throughout the world, morality at its core is shared by all of human kind. Religious scriptures and ancient philosophy echo similar beliefs; that we should ―love our neighbor‖ and ―take care of others less fortunate‖. Corruption is also a subjective term, of which our perception is dependent on culture, religion and morals. The World Bank defines it as ―the abuse of public office for private gain”. Despite it‘s subjectiveness and varying dentitions, corruption ―of all kinds undermines trust: it inhibits social and economic development and undermines fair competition”. Given globalization and the increase in international trade between countries of disproportionate wealth, corruption is posing a far more serious threat than previously before. Developing countries are highly dependent on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) for economic growth. The increased income disparity between investor and host creates a solid platform for corruption to thrive. Ultimately, corruption adds inefficiency into a system and increases the risk for investors. Consequently, market prices are higher due to increased risk and increased transaction costs. Deep rooted corruption causes companies to rely on paying bribes as their main source of competitive advantage. This is opposed to innovating, taking risks and becoming more efficient. Being morally corrupt is the lowest form of existence as the they take advantage of the weak and most vulnerable in society through the pursuit of personal gain. By applying stake- holder theory, morally corrupt people have total disregard for the well being of people, and have no concern for the future well being of society. We have to learn from the past errors. To see from corruption-free Ethiopia where accountability and transparency are ensured in all sectors of the economy; public services are provided as per systems put in place; business transactions are undertaken based on regulations and standards governing the market; and corruption does not affect the equitable distribution of resources among society. A proposal of realization of fighting 11 corruption in all sectors, endorse good governance and integrity in public affairs. This is the only measurement which guarantees democracy and equal rights and opportunities of the development of Ethiopia. Endless wish for the Common good of all Ethiopians and from corruption free development for Ethiopia, without forgetting as it is the list corrupted and highly corruption fighting developing nation in current Africa! God Bless Ethiopia and Ethiopian! _____________________________________ Abba Hagos Woldu [email protected] Date,5.1.2003 12
© Copyright 2024