Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Vol. 73, October 2014, pp. 667-670 Production and characterization of hybrid aluminum matrix composites reinforced with boron carbide (B4C) and graphite T Thirumalai*, R Subramanian, S Kumaran, S Dharmalingam and S S Ramakrishnan Department of Metallurgical Engineering, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, India Received 25 February 2013; revised 20 December 2013; accepted 5 August 2014 Aluminum matrix composites have been reinforced with Boron carbide (B 4C) and Graphite (Gr) for increasing mechanical properties and wear resistance. Additions of Boron carbide (B4C) improves both strength and wear resistance of composites, but addition of B4C alone in higher amounts makes the composite brittle and machining difficult. Thus, B 4C can be advantageously used as a reinforcement to overcome the problem of strength reduction in Gr reinforced composites, resulting in hybrid composites. Aluminum matrix composites reinforced with up to 12 wt % B4C and 3 wt % Gr particulates are investigated in the present study. Hybrid composites exhibit better wear characteristics compared to aluminium alloy. Wear tests were carried out with loads varying from 10 to 40 N and sliding distances of 500 and 1000 m with a constant sliding speed of 1m per second. An interaction between load and sliding distance was observed in the composites which may be attributed to the presence of Gr particulates. Decrease in wear with an increase in speed and vice versa were observed with both load and sliding distance. Hardness of the composites measured using Vicker’s Hardness Tester indicated that hardness increased with increasing percent of B4C reinforcement while addition of Gr imparted the lubrication effect in the composites. Keyword: Aluminum metal matrix composites (AMC), boron carbide, graphite, wear, stir casting, adhesive wear. Introduction Use of metal matrix composites in the fields of aerospace, automotive and other engineering applications is gaining momentum now days due to their high strength to weight ratio, stiffness, hardness, wear resistance, as well as thermal conductivity. Combining low density metals with reinforcing particles result in enhanced performance components which can be used as substitutes for existing monolithic materials. Among the various factors that influence the hardness, wear, and other mechanical properties of the AMC’s size of abrasives and per cent weight of alumina play a significant role. Aluminium alloys reinforced with ceramic particles such as SiC, Al2O3, B4C, and graphite have been reported to posses better hardness, wear properties and strength. Many researchers have shown that, size of reinforcement was the major parameter influencing the hardness of composites followed by weight fraction of reinforcement compared to other control factors. Reinforcing hybrid composites with SiCp and graphite increased the wear resistance but, the wear rate decreased with increasing SiCp content1. Similar *Author for Correspondence Email: [email protected] increase in hardness with increasing percent of reinforcement have also been reported2,3. In addition, sliding speed and applied load influence the friction coefficient However, significant influence of sliding distance on friction coefficient was observed. However, holding temperature and time of alloy melt showed limited effect on hardness4,5. Boron carbide is a non-metallic reinforcement having a high hardness coupled with high wear resistance and high melting point thus possessing resistance to change due to the addition of chemicals. Hence reinforcing the aluminium composites with boron carbide particles confers high specific strength, elastic modulus, good wear resistance and thermal stability17. Wear studies on Al-B4C composites with varying wt % of B4C (5, 10 and 15 %) showed a linear increase in wear resistance with increasing B4C content and the highest wear resistance was observed at 15 per cent reinforcement of B4C7. Fabrication of Al composites with 40% SiC/5%Gr by squeeze casting revealed that the addition of graphite led to a decrease in the friction coefficient of composites but increased the wear resistance by 170 to 340 times8. However, increasing the Gr reinforcement beyond 5 % decreased the fracture toughness due to the formation of thick solid lubricant film which overrides the effect 668 J SCI IND RES VOL 73 OCTOBER 2014 of fracture toughness9. Hence the present study was taken up with the aim of fabricating Al–B4C–Gr composite having improved wear resistance and evaluate them for understanding the factors contributing to the enhanced to wear resistance. Materials and Methods Al–B4C–Gr and Al composites were fabricated usin0g LM25 as matrix alloy by stir casting method. The composition of LM25 alloy and that of al alloyB4C-Gr particulate composites are given in Table 1 and 2. Hybrid composites (Al–B4C–Gr) were prepared by adding 3, 6, 9 and 12% B4C by weight along with 3% Gr reinforcement. Fabrication of Composites Stir-casting process was used to fabricate the AMC’s by physically mixing matrix alloy Aluminium (LM25) with graphite and B4C. The stir-casting setup consisted of a motor to drive the steel stirrer. The matrix alloy was melted in a graphite crucible in an electric furnace under argon atmosphere. Weighed quantity of aluminium alloy was superheated to 750ºC and brought to a semi-solid state by lowering the temperature gradually below the liquidus temperature. Magnesium (3 wt.%) was added to the molten metal to improve wettability of reinforcements with aluminium. At this stage mixture of Boron carbide (B4C) and graphite (Gr) particulates, preheated to 200ºC, were introduced into the melt and the slurry was continuously stirred by rotating the impeller at a speed of 400 rpm for uniform dispersion of partculates in the melt. Stirring was continued for about 2-3 minutes to ensure good wetting and then the composite melt was degassed using hexachloroethane. The melt was then superheated above the liquidus temperature and finally poured into a cast iron permanent mould to obtain cylindrical samples of Table 1Chemical composition of the matrix alloy Aluminium(LM25) Chemical composition (weight %) Si 7.1 Mg 0.3 Fe 0.3 Cu Zn Ni < 0.012 0.004 0.002 Mn 0.28 Al Rest Table 2Details of reinforcements S. No 1. 2. 3. Type of Reinforcement level (%) reinforcement B4C Gr Total 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 9.0 9.0 3.0 12.0 12.0 3.0 15.0 Size 25–5 Micron 25–75 Micron 15 mm diameter and 75 mm length. Unreinforced matrix alloy specimens were also cast for comparison purpose. Characterization of Composites Wear test specimens of 15 mm length and 6 mm diameter were machined form the cast samples. Specimen’s surface was polished with abrasive paper (600 grade) and followed by fine polishing with grade 1000 paper. Dry sliding wear tests were carried out as per ASTM G99-95a standard using pin-on-disc equipment. The disc was made of EN31 steel with surface roughness, Ra 0.1 and a hardness of 65 Rc. Test pins were cleaned with acetone and weighed before and after testing (accuracy of 0.0001 g) to determine the weight loss of the specimens. The flatness of test sample is maintained so that entire surface of the Pin is in contact with disc. The wear test were carried out with loads varying between 10 to 40 N , for sliding distances of 500 and 1000 m at a constant sliding speed of 1m per second. The hardness of the composites is measured using varying Vicker’s Hardness Tester. Results and Discussions Hardness is an indicator of the resistance to plastic deformation and an important mechanical property often considered in the design of automotive components. Compsoite with 12 wt % B4C 3 wt% graphite reinforcement showed a significant increase in hardness. Higher strength of boron carbide (9.30 Mohs) might have contributed to the increased strength of hybrid composites. Similar results have been observed in 6061Al matrix reinforced with B4C particles by the researchers5,6. Measured hardness values correlate well with other properties like strength and wear resistance (Table 3). An increase in wear resistance was also observed in the present investigation which might be attributed to the instability developed at longer sliding distances in the tribolayer. Among the composites containing different Table 3Hardness of Al alloy and hybrid composites S. No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reinforcement Al Al/3B/3 Gr (C1) Al/6B/3Gr (C2) Al/9B/3Gr(C3) Al/12B/3 Gr(C4) Average VHN (load-100) % of Improvement 87 110 119 128 140 26.46% 36.78% 47.13% 60.92% THIRUMALAI et al: PRODUCTION AND CHARCTERIZATION OF HYBRID MATRIX COMPOSITES WITH B4C & GRAPHITE amounts of B4C (3, 6, 9 and 12%), composites with 12 wt 5 B4C showed optimal properties. A similar increase in wear resistance was also observed in nano composites11,12 and in fine grained boron carbide and B4C-TiB2 composites5. A drastic increase in wear rate of A356 Al–10SiC–4Gr hybrid composites with sliding distance was observed immediately after the removal of tribolayers3,4,9. The amount of wear was considerably lower for Al–B4C–Gr hybrid composites than unreinforced Al as seen from figure 1- 4. Similar observations indicating an increased wear loss with increasing load and sliding distance for both Al–B4C–Gr hybrid composites and Al have been reported by several researchers1,11,12. Fig. 1 and 2 depict the effect of per cent B4C reinforcement and load on the wear of Al–B4C-Gr hybrid composites and Al. The amounts of wear loss as well as its trend at a sliding speed of 1m/s for various load and reinforcement levels are similar for both the sliding distance of 500 m and 1000 m. It is also evident from the plot that the wear loss increases with increasing sliding distance and load irrespective of the amount of reinforcement in both Al and hybrid composites and are found to be the predominant factors affecting wear [Fig. 2, 3, 4]. Addition of increasing levels of B4C particles along with Gr (3%) in the Al matrix increases the strength by offering more resistance to stress and increased the hardness of the Al hybrid composites in the present investigation. Similar improvement for the addition of B4C and Gr individually was reported by many researchers2,4,5,6,7,8. Reinforcement, sliding speed, load and sliding distance significantly influences the wear and notable interactions exist among sliding speed, load and sliding distance in Al–B4C–Gr hybrid composites. The distribution of boron carbide and Fig. 3Sliding Distance 1000 m Fig. 1Sliding Distance 500 m Fig. 2Sliding Distance 500 m 669 Fig. 4Sliding Distance 1000 m 670 J SCI IND RES VOL 73 OCTOBER 2014 graphite particles in the hybrid Al composite was studied using optical microscopy and was found to be nearly uniform. Optical micrographs of Al alloy and Al-B4C-Gr hybrid composite revealed spherical B4C particles and slightly angular graphite particles along with dendritic aluminium particles in a eutectic matrix. The distributions of reinforced particles were observed to be randomly oriented. Conclusion The Al–B4C–Gr hybrid composites were prepared successfully by stir casting method and reinforcement of boron carbide increased the strength of composites. Optimal per cent reinforcement can be of 12% for any value of sliding distance, speed and load within the range considered in this investigation. Al–B4C–Gr hybrid composites are better substitutes the Al alloy owing to improved hardness and wear resistance as a result of the addition B4C–Gr particulates to Al. Analysis shows that, increase in per cent reinforcement reduces the wear up to 12%. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the Principal, Head of the Department and faculties of Dept. of Metallurgical Engineering, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, for helping in carrying out the work and allowing utilization of facilities available. Thanks are also due to the Dr.P.C.Angelo, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore and Dr.B.Ravishankar, NIT, Trichy for their help and constructive suggestions rendered during the study. References 1 Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Subramanian R & Chandrasekar A, Dry Sliding Wear Behavior of Al 2219/SiC Metal Matrix Composites, J. Mat. Sci.Poland, 2 (2006) 357-366. 2 Suresha S & Sridhara B K, Effect of silicon carbide particulates on wear resistance of graphitic aluminium matrix composites, J. Mat. Design, 31(2010) 4470-4477. 3 Suresha S, Sridhara & B K, Friction characteristics of aluminium silicon carbide graphite hybrid composites, J. Mat. Design, 34 (2012) 576-583. 4 Deshmanya I B & Purohit G K, Development of Mathematical Model to Predict Micro-Hardness of Al7075/Al2O3 Composites Produced by Stir-Casting, J. Eng.Sci. Tech. Review, 5 (2012) 44-50 5 Gopal K U B, Sreenivas R K V & Vasudeva B, Effect of Boron Carbide Reinforcement on Aluminium Matrix Composites, Int.J.Met.Mat.Sci.Eng., 3 (2013) 41-48 6 Yusof A, Mohd R, Yusof A M, Nadira K, Wilfred Sylvester Paulus, Roslinda Shamsudin, Nasrat Hannah Shudin & Nurazila Mat Zali, Al/B4C Composites with 5 and 10 wt% reinforcement content prepared by powder metallurgy, J. Nuc. related Tech., 9 (2012) 42-47 7 Mohammad S E, Karimzadeh F & Enayati M H, Fabrication and evaluation of mechanical and tribological properties of boron carbide reinforced aluminum matrix nano composites. J. Mat.Design, 32 (2011) 3263–3271. 8 Leng Jinfeng Jiang Longtao Wu Gaohui Tian Shoufu & Chen Guoqin, Effect of Graphite Particle Reinforcement on Dry Sliding Wear of SiC/Gr/Al Composites, J. Rare Metal Mat.Eng., 38 (2009), 1894−1898 9 Guo M LT & Tsao CYA, Tribological behavior of self-lubricating aluminium / SiC / graphite hybrid composites synthesized by the semi-solid powder-densification method, J. Composites Sci.Tech., 60 (2000), 65-74. 10 Krishnamurthy L, Sridhara B K & Abudl B D, Comparative study on the machinability aspects of aluminum silicon carbide and aluminum graphite composite, J. Mat. Manufacturing Process, 22 (2007) 903-908. 11 Chapman T R, Niesz D E, Fox RT & Fawcett R, Wearresistant aluminum–boron–carbide cermets for automotive brake applications, J.Wear (Elsevier) 236 (1999) 81–87. 12 Schwetz S K A, Greim J & Knoch H, Wear of boron carbide ceramics by abrasive water jets, J. Wear (Elsevier), 181 (1994) 148–155 13 Barbara Previtali & Dante Pocci Cataldo Taccardo, Application of traditional investment casting process to aluminium matrix composites, Composites: Part A (Elsevier), 39 (2008) 1606–1617 14 Suresh K R, Niranjan H B, Martin J P& Chowdiah M P, Tensile and wear properties of aluminum composites, J. Wear (Elsevier), 255 (2003) 638–642 15 Riahi A R& Alpas A T The role of tribo-layers on the sliding wear behavior of graphitic aluminium matrix composites, J. Wear (Elsevier), 251 (2001)1396-1407 16 Rohatgi P K, Guo R Q & Keshavaram B N Cast Aluminium Alloy-Fly Ash Composites, J. Key Eng. Mat., 104 (1995) 283-292. 17 Rohatgi P K ,Guo R Q ,Huang P &Ray S Friction and Abrasion Resistance of Cast Aluminum Alloy-Flyash Composites, J. Met.Mat.Transactions A, 28 (1997) 245-250.
© Copyright 2024