1. No category

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL,
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
M.A. No. 564 of 2014, M.A. No. 606 of 2014, M.A. No. 622 of 2014
and M.A. No. 646 of 2014
In
Original Application No.165 of 2014
IN THE MATTER OF:
Rahul Nagar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR, CHAIRPERSON
HON’BLE DR. D.K. AGRAWAL, EXPERT MEMBER
Present:
Applicant :
Respondent No. 1&6:
Respondent No. 3 &4:
Date and
Remarks
Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Adv. along with Mr. Vikrant
and Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Kr. Tandon, Add. Standing Counsel
Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Adv. and Mr. Dinesh
Jindal, LO
Ms. Manisha, Adv. for Delhi Jal Board.
Orders of the Tribunal
Item No. 3
October
9, 2014
The Learned Counsel appearing for the Delhi Jal
Board prays for time to seek instruction and file a Report.
In the meanwhile, the Delhi Jal Board shall ensure
that no sand mining is permitted in the name of dredging
of river. We also direct the Delhi Pollution Control Board
and the Central Pollution Control Board to take sample of
the sand/dredged material that is being carried by the
persons upon whom the contract has been placed. It shall
be reported to the Tribunal whether the material in the
truck is sand or silt.
List on 13th November, 2014.
The newly added parties are also given liberty to file
Reply.
M.A. No. 646 of 2014
Issue Notice to the Respondents to this Application
also. The Delhi Jal Board is directed to be impleaded as a
Respondent to the Original Application No. 165 of 2014.
Reply on behalf of the Delhi Jal Board and NCT of Delhi
may be filed within three weeks from today with advance
copy to the Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant
who may file Rejoinder thereto within one week thereafter.
List on 13th November, 2014.
M.A. No. 622 of 2014
This is an Application filed by the Applicant praying
for impleadment in the Original Application No. 165 of
2014.
The Applicant prays to be a party interested and
effected by the Orders and proceedings in the present
Application. There is no objection to this prayer.
Consequently, M.A. No. 622 of 2014 is allowed
subject to just exception and without prejudice to the
rights of the parties. The Applicant would have the right to
address.
Thus, M.A. No. 622 of 2014 is accordingly disposed
of and no further prayers are allowed in this Application.
M.A. No. 606 of 2014
In view of the Orders passed on the Original
Application No. 165 of 2014 today, no further Orders are
called for on this Application.
Consequently, M.A. No. 606 of 2014 is accordingly
disposed of.
M.A. No. 564 of 2014
Reply to this Application may also be filed by the
parties within three weeks from today. Rejoinder thereto,
within one week thereafter.
List on 13th November, 2014.
………………………………….,CP
(Swatanter Kumar)
………………………………….,EM
(Dr. D.K. Agrawal)