Educational Leadership Professional Leadership Appraisal Assignment EDUC 8813 Karene Biggs, Michael Hart, Ian Morrison, Michael Shiu & Murray Smith Introduction • Definition of professional leadership • Present a model • Elaborate on the concepts and components of the model • A reflective self-appraisal tool has been produced Professional Leadership Professional leaders create and articulate a shared vision which promotes quality teaching and learning for all within a focused, safe and supportive environment. They manage and allocate resources and lead curriculum development to achieve strategic goals. Professional leaders have a keen situational awareness and implement quality review processes to achieve continuous improvement. Starratt (2003), Robinson (2007), Weber (1987), Marzano, Waters & McNulty (2005) … to promote … Quality Teaching and Learning …demonstrates curriculum leadership … promotes staff development … creates a focused, safe and supportive environment …manages strategic resources Adapt to maintain course Funding Initiatives Guidelines A professional leader… Progress of students Monitoring/ Evaluation …has shared values, and beliefs …possesses situational awareness Governance Policy Delegation Resourcing Local Expectations within a wider educational context (Ministry of Education, 2003; Razik & Swanson, 2001; Duke, 1987; Weber, 1987) Citizenship National Expectations Diverse communities Regulations Choice A MODEL OF PROFESSIONAL LEADERSHIP Shared Vision This is the direction in which we are heading. It is: – Collaborative – Context specific – Clearly articulated – Embedded in all we do (‘the way we do things here’) Bush (2003), Starratt (2003), Robinson (2006) Strategic Resourcing Professional leadership effectively allocates the available resources to achieve teaching and learning goals. • Allocates resources to support improved student learning outcomes. • Manages financial and physical resources efficiently. • Recruitment of high quality staff. • Ensures a review of resourcing takes place. (Ministry of Education, 1999; Robinson, 2007) Staff development and growth Professional leaders: • Establish procedures and practices to maintain • and improve staff effectiveness through provision of professional development and encouragement of self-development. Motivate and support staff to improve the quality of teaching and learning. (Blase & Blase, 2000; Druker, 1955; Fitzgerald, Gunter & Eaton, 2006; Southworth, 2004) Curriculum Leadership Professional leaders demonstrate effective planning, monitoring and review of the curriculum to enhance the learning and teaching in a school. Curriculum leadership is the primary task of a professional leader (Cardno & Collett, 2003) Equivalently: “pedagogical leadership” (Robinson, 2006). (Lashway, 1996) Teaching and Learning Environment Professional leaders act as gatekeepers and ensure that time for the core activity of teaching and learning is protected by reducing external pressures and interruptions. They also establish a focused, safe and supportive environment both inside and outside the classrooms. ( Weber, 1987 ; Sallis, 2002 ; Lashway, 1995; Robinson, 2007 ; Ministry of Education, 1999 ) Situational Awareness The professional leader: • “is aware of the details and undercurrents in the running of the school and uses this information to address current and potential problems” • “is an advocate and spokesperson for the school to all stakeholders” and “establishes strong lines of communication with and among teachers and students” (Marzano, Waters & McNulty, 2005, p. 43; Duke, 1987; Harris, 1985; Razik, 2001). Self-Appraisal Tool Components of model Six reflective questions Questions Aspects Indicators Reflective Questions 1. Is the shared vision clearly articulated and 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. embedded in all aspects of school life? Do I allocate and manage resources and assets to support improved student learning outcomes? Do I promote professional growth and selfreflection? Do I demonstrate curriculum leadership? Do I create a focused, safe, and supportive teaching and learning environment? Am I aware of the potential opportunities and threats, through effective communication and outreach? Self-Appraisal Tool (example) Am I aware of the potential opportunities and threats, through effective communication and outreach? Situational Awareness Aspects Indicators Awareness prediction of what could go wrong from day to day awareness of issues that may cause discord; and addressing concerns proactively meeting with informal and formal groups of teachers meeting with informal and formal groups of students aware of the tone of the school (Formal and informal awareness of trends) 1 (weak) 2 3 4 (strong) Self-Appraisal Tool Areas of strength: Areas of weakness: Threats to success: Opportunities for growth: REFLECTION … to promote … Quality Teaching and Learning …demonstrates curriculum leadership … promotes staff development … creates a focused, safe and supportive environment …manages strategic resources Adapt to maintain course Funding Initiatives Guidelines A professional leader… Progress of students Monitoring/ Evaluation …has shared values, and beliefs …possesses situational awareness Governance Policy Delegation Resourcing Local Expectations within a wider educational context (Ministry of Education, 2003; Razik & Swanson, 2001; Duke, 1987; Weber, 1987) Citizenship National Expectations Diverse communities Regulations Choice A MODEL OF PROFESSIONAL LEADERSHIP References Blase, J. & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141. Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications. Cardno, C. & Collett, D. (2003). Curriculum leadership: Secondary school principals’ perspectives on this challenging role in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Educational Leadership, 19(2), 15-29. Drucker, P. (1955). The Practice of Management. London: Heinemann. Duke D. L. (1987). School Leadership and instructional improvement. New York: Random House. Fitzgerald, T. & Gunter, H. with Eaton, J. (2006). The missing link?: Middle leadership in schools in New Zealand and England. New Zealand Journal of Educational Leadership, 21(1), 29-43. Harris, B. (1985). Supervisory behaviour in education. San Francisco: Prentice-Hall. Lashway, L. (1995). Can instructional leaders be facilitative leaders? ERIC Digest Number 98. University of Oregon: Clearninghouse on Educational Management. Marzano, R. J., Waters, T. & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School Leadership That Works. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Ministry of Education (1999). Principal performance management. Wellington: School Labour Market Development. Ministry of Education (2003). Planning for better student outcomes. April. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Razik, T. A. & Swanson, A. D. (2001). Fundamental concepts of educational leadership. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Robinson, V.M.J. (2006). Putting education back into educational leadership. Leading & Managing, 12(1), 6275. Robinson, V.M.J. (2007). How School Leaders Make a Difference to their Students. Paper presented at the International Confederation of Principals, Auckand. Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education. (3rd ed.). London; Sterling, VA: Kogan Page; Sylus Pub. Southworth, G. (2004). Primary school leadership in context: leading small, medium and large sized schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Starratt, R. J. (2003). Centering educational administration: Cultivating meaning, community, responsibility. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Weber, J. R. (1987). Instructional leadership: A composite working model. University of Oregon: ERIC Clearninghouse on Educational Management.
© Copyright 2024