Parthenon Metopes 1 and 26 By Tom • Woodford page 113. 26 26 detail • In this metope, the man is pictured trying to fight off the Centaur, using his hands to stop the Centaur from hitting him with his weapon (not that), whilst simultaneously attempting to kick the Centaur away. • The clothing that the man is “wearing” is quite poorly modelled, as it is just carved into the background. This doesn’t matter though, as if it had been fully modelled, it would have taken focus away from the main events. • The musculature on the Centaur seems relatively accurate (they are mythical after all) whereas the human seems slightly too perfect, with the muscles around the hips being impossible defined. 26 detail cont. • The human doesn’t seem to be expending a lot of effort keeping the Centaur away from him, as shown by his almost vertical right leg and vertical body which indicates that he isn't having too much trouble pushing back the Centaur's entire body weight. 1 • Woodford page 112/113 1 detail • In this metope, the man has been put in a headlock by the Centaur, who is about to hit him with something. • The man does not apparently register the threat of the situation, as he is showing no emotion at all in his face. This is a relatively serious fault in these metopes, although its impact would have been lessened by the fact that the metopes would have been too far away for people to be able to scrutinise these details. • The Centaur is impressively muscly, and the definition of his body is impressively realised. The position that the top half of his body (the human part) seems to be positioned in a fairly realistic pose, and the way that he is holding the man under his arm seems particularly strenuous. 1 detail cont. • It’s hard to see, but at the same time that the Centaur is preparing to hit the man, the man is thrusting a weapon (no!) into the Centaur’s flank. This would have been added as a metal weapon, which has not survived. • A different sculptor to the other metope. • The material on this metope is much better, as it is fully modelled, and it accurately flows with the connection to the Centaur’s leg. It also flows nicely around the mans neck. Both metopes • In both of these metopes, the centaurs are shown to be very angry. Their faces have been compared with theatrical masks, due to the intense features shown, making it easier for the viewer, who was at ground level, to see what was happening in the metope. • In metope 1, among others, the faces of the men seems to be very plain and expressionless. We can probably assume that the face of the man in metope 26 would also have been like this. • Both metopes, along with all those in this series depict a single man engaging in single combat with a single Centaur. • They are 120cm(h) X 125cm(w). • They are separated by triglyphs Story • The story that precedes the depicted battle is that the Centaurs were invited to a wedding dinner by the Lapiths, but were unused to the wine they were given, and that when the bride made her speech, a Centaur tried to rape her. This act caused other centaurs to try to rape the Lapith women. The battle is between these Centaurs and the Lapith men trying to defend their women. High Relief • The style of these metopes is high relief, which is when more than half of the mass of the objects are projected from the background. • Unlike in other types of relief, the depth of the objects remains true to life, meaning that the objects are basically little statues connected to the background. • Much of the objects, particularly the lower halves of the humans is left hanging in the air, with little or no support from the background. • The problem with high relief is that it leaves the figures quite vulnerable to damage, as seen in many of the Parthenon metopes. • Themetopes can project up to 25 cm, in a 35cm block of stone.
© Copyright 2024